difference discussion dissertation

Writing the Dissertation - Guides for Success: Results and Discussion

• Writing the Dissertation Homepage
• Overview and Planning
• Research Question
• Literature Review
• Methodology
• Results and Discussion
• The Difference
• What to Avoid

Overview of writing the results and discussion

The results and discussion follow on from the methods or methodology chapter of the dissertation. This creates a natural transition from how you designed your study, to what your study reveals, highlighting your own contribution to the research area.

Disciplinary differences

Please note: this guide is not specific to any one discipline. The results and discussion can vary depending on the nature of the research and the expectations of the school or department, so please adapt the following advice to meet the demands of your project and department. Consult your supervisor for further guidance; you can also peruse our  Writing Across Subjects guide .

Guide contents

As part of the Writing the Dissertation series, this guide covers the most common conventions of the results and discussion chapters, giving you the necessary knowledge, tips and guidance needed to impress your markers! The sections are organised as follows:

• The Difference  - Breaks down the distinctions between the results and discussion chapters.
• Results  - Provides a walk-through of common characteristics of the results chapter.
• Discussion - Provides a walk-through of how to approach writing your discussion chapter, including structure.
• What to Avoid  - Covers a few frequent mistakes you'll want to...avoid!
• FAQs  - Guidance on first- vs. third-person, limitations and more.
• Checklist  - Includes a summary of key points and a self-evaluation checklist.

Training and tools

• The Academic Skills team has recorded a Writing the Dissertation workshop series to help you with each section of a standard dissertation, including a video on writing the results and discussion   (embedded below).
• The dissertation planner tool can help you think through the timeline for planning, research, drafting and editing.
• iSolutions offers training and a Word template to help you digitally format and structure your dissertation.

Introduction

The results of your study are often followed by a separate chapter of discussion. This is certainly the case with scientific writing. Some dissertations, however, might incorporate both the results and discussion in one chapter. This depends on the nature of your dissertation and the conventions within your school or department. Always follow the guidelines given to you and ask your supervisor for further guidance.

As part of the Writing the Dissertation series, this guide covers the essentials of writing your results and discussion, giving you the necesary knowledge, tips and guidance needed to leave a positive impression on your markers! This guide covers the results and discussion as separate – although interrelated – chapters, as you'll see in the next two tabs. However, you can easily adapt the guidance to suit one single chapter – keep an eye out for some hints on how to do this throughout the guide.

Results or discussion - what's the difference?

To understand what the results and discussion sections are about, we need to clearly define the difference between the two.

The results should provide a clear account of the findings . This is written in a dry and direct manner, simply highlighting the findings as they appear once processed. It’s expected to have tables and graphics, where relevant, to contextualise and illustrate the data.

Rather than simply stating the findings of the study, the discussion interprets the findings  to offer a more nuanced understanding of the research. The discussion is similar to the second half of the conclusion because it’s where you consider and formulate a response to the question, ‘what do we now know that we didn’t before?’ (see our Writing the Conclusion   guide for more). The discussion achieves this by answering the research questions and responding to any hypotheses proposed. With this in mind, the discussion should be the most insightful chapter or section of your dissertation because it provides the most original insight.

Across the next two tabs of this guide, we will look at the results and discussion chapters separately in more detail.

Writing the results

The results chapter should provide a direct and factual account of the data collected without any interpretation or interrogation of the findings. As this might suggest, the results chapter can be slightly monotonous, particularly for quantitative data. Nevertheless, it’s crucial that you present your results in a clear and direct manner as it provides the necessary detail for your subsequent discussion.

Note: If you’re writing your results and discussion as one chapter, then you can either:

1) write them as distinctly separate sections in the same chapter, with the discussion following on from the results, or...

2) integrate the two throughout by presenting a subset of the results and then discussing that subset in further detail.

Next, we'll explore some of the most important factors to consider when writing your results chapter.

How you structure your results chapter depends on the design and purpose of your study. Here are some possible options for structuring your results chapter (adapted from Glatthorn and Joyner, 2005):

• Chronological – depending on the nature of the study, it might be important to present your results in order of how you collected the data, such as a pretest-posttest design.
• Research method – if you’ve used a mixed-methods approach, you could isolate each research method and instrument employed in the study.
• Research question and/or hypotheses – you could structure your results around your research questions and/or hypotheses, providing you have more than one. However, keep in mind that the results on their own don’t necessarily answer the questions or respond to the hypotheses in a definitive manner. You need to interpret the findings in the discussion chapter to gain a more rounded understanding.
• Variable – you could isolate each variable in your study (where relevant) and specify how and whether the results changed.

Tables and figures

For your results, you are expected to convert your data into tables and figures, particularly when dealing with quantitative data. Making use of tables and figures is a way of contextualising your results within the study. It also helps to visually reinforce your written account of the data. However, make sure you’re only using tables and figures to supplement , rather than replace, your written account of the results (see the 'What to avoid' tab for more on this).

Figures and tables need to be numbered in order of when they appear in the dissertation, and they should be capitalised. You also need to make direct reference to them in the text, which you can do (with some variation) in one of the following ways:

Figure 1 shows…

The results of the test (see Figure 1) demonstrate…

The actual figures and tables themselves also need to be accompanied by a caption that briefly outlines what is displayed. For example:

Table 1. Variables of the regression model

Table captions normally appear above the table, whilst figures or other such graphical forms appear below, although it’s worth confirming this with your supervisor as the formatting can change depending on the school or discipline. The style guide used for writing in your subject area (e.g., Harvard, MLA, APA, OSCOLA) often dictates correct formatting of tables, graphs and figures, so have a look at your style guide for additional support.

Using quotations

If your qualitative data comes from interviews and focus groups, your data will largely consist of quotations from participants. When presenting this data, you should identify and group the most common and interesting responses and then quote two or three relevant examples to illustrate this point. Here’s a brief example from a qualitative study on the habits of online food shoppers:

Regardless of whether or not participants regularly engage in online food shopping, all but two respondents commented, in some form, on the convenience of online food shopping:

"It’s about convenience for me. I’m at work all week and the weekend doesn’t allow much time for food shopping, so knowing it can be ordered and then delivered in 24 hours is great for me” (Participant A).

"It fits around my schedule, which is important for me and my family” (Participant D).

"In the past, I’ve always gone food shopping after work, which has always been a hassle. Online food shopping, however, frees up some of my time” (Participant E).

As shown in this example, each quotation is attributed to a particular participant, although their anonymity is protected. The details used to identify participants can depend on the relevance of certain factors to the research. For instance, age or gender could be included.

Writing the discussion

The discussion chapter is where “you critically examine your own results in the light of the previous state of the subject as outlined in the background, and make judgments as to what has been learnt in your work” (Evans et al., 2014: 12). Whilst the results chapter is strictly factual, reporting on the data on a surface level, the discussion is rooted in analysis and interpretation , allowing you and your reader to delve beneath the surface.

Next, we will review some of the most important factors to consider when writing your discussion chapter.

Like the results, there is no single way to structure your discussion chapter. As always, it depends on the nature of your dissertation and whether you’re dealing with qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods research. It’s good to be consistent with the results chapter, so you could structure your discussion chapter, where possible, in the same way as your results.

When it comes to structure, it’s particularly important that you guide your reader through the various points, subtopics or themes of your discussion. You should do this by structuring sections of your discussion, which might incorporate three or four paragraphs around the same theme or issue, in a three-part way that mirrors the typical three-part essay structure of introduction, main body and conclusion.

Figure 1: The three-part cycle that embodies a typical essay structure and reflects how you structure themes or subtopics in your discussion.

This is your topic sentence where you clearly state the focus of this paragraph/section. It’s often a fairly short, declarative statement in order to grab the reader’s attention, and it should be clearly related to your research purpose, such as responding to a research question.

This constitutes your analysis where you explore the theme or focus, outlined in the topic sentence, in further detail by interrogating why this particular theme or finding emerged and the significance of this data. This is also where you bring in the relevant secondary literature.

This is the evaluative stage of the cycle where you explicitly return back to the topic sentence and tell the reader what this means in terms of answering the relevant research question and establishing new knowledge. It could be a single sentence, or a short paragraph, and it doesn’t strictly need to appear at the end of every section or theme. Instead, some prefer to bring the main themes together towards the end of the discussion in a single paragraph or two. Either way, it’s imperative that you evaluate the significance of your discussion and tell the reader what this means.

A note on the three-part structure

This is often how you’re taught to construct a paragraph, but the themes and ideas you engage with at dissertation level are going to extend beyond the confines of a short paragraph. Therefore, this is a structure to guide how you write about particular themes or patterns in your discussion. Think of this structure like a cycle that you can engage in its smallest form to shape a paragraph; in a slightly larger form to shape a subsection of a chapter; and in its largest form to shape the entire chapter. You can 'level up' the same basic structure to accommodate a deeper breadth of thinking and critical engagement.

Using secondary literature

Your discussion chapter should return to the relevant literature (previously identified in your literature review ) in order to contextualise and deepen your reader’s understanding of the findings. This might help to strengthen your findings, or you might find contradictory evidence that serves to counter your results. In the case of the latter, it’s important that you consider why this might be and the implications for this. It’s through your incorporation of secondary literature that you can consider the question, ‘What do we now know that we didn’t before?’

Limitations

You may have included a limitations section in your methodology chapter (see our Writing the Methodology guide ), but it’s also common to have one in your discussion chapter. The difference here is that your limitations are directly associated with your results and the capacity to interpret and analyse those results.

Think of it this way: the limitations in your methodology refer to the issues identified before conducting the research, whilst the limitations in your discussion refer to the issues that emerged after conducting the research. For example, you might only be able to identify a limitation about the external validity or generalisability of your research once you have processed and analysed the data. Try not to overstress the limitations of your work – doing so can undermine the work you’ve done – and try to contextualise them, perhaps by relating them to certain limitations of other studies.

Recommendations

It’s often good to follow your limitations with some recommendations for future research. This creates a neat linearity from what didn’t work, or what could be improved, to how other researchers could address these issues in the future. This helps to reposition your limitations in a positive way by offering an action-oriented response. Try to limit the amount of recommendations you discuss – too many can bring the end of your discussion to a rather negative end as you’re ultimately focusing on what should be done, rather than what you have done. You also don’t need to repeat the recommendations in your conclusion if you’ve included them here.

What to avoid

This portion of the guide will cover some common missteps you should try to avoid in writing your results and discussion.

Over-reliance on tables and figures

It’s very common to produce visual representations of data, such as graphs and tables, and to use these representations in your results chapter. However, the use of these figures should not entirely replace your written account of the data. You don’t need to specify every detail in the data set, but you should provide some written account of what the data shows, drawing your reader’s attention to the most important elements of the data. The figures should support your account and help to contextualise your results. Simply stating, ‘look at Table 1’, without any further detail is not sufficient. Writers often try to do this as a way of saving words, but your markers will know!

Ignoring unexpected or contradictory data

Research can be a complex process with ups and downs, surprises and anomalies. Don’t be tempted to ignore any data that doesn’t meet your expectations, or that perhaps you’re struggling to explain. Failing to report on data for these, and other such reasons, is a problem because it undermines your credibility as a researcher, which inevitably undermines your research in the process. You have to do your best to provide some reason to such data. For instance, there might be some methodological reason behind a particular trend in the data.

Including raw data

You don’t need to include any raw data in your results chapter – raw data meaning unprocessed data that hasn’t undergone any calculations or other such refinement. This can overwhelm your reader and obscure the clarity of the research. You can include raw data in an appendix, providing you feel it’s necessary.

Presenting new results in the discussion

You shouldn’t be stating original findings for the first time in the discussion chapter. The findings of your study should first appear in your results before elaborating on them in the discussion.

Overstressing the significance of your research

It’s important that you clarify what your research demonstrates so you can highlight your own contribution to the research field. However, don’t overstress or inflate the significance of your results. It’s always difficult to provide definitive answers in academic research, especially with qualitative data. You should be confident and authoritative where possible, but don’t claim to reach the absolute truth when perhaps other conclusions could be reached. Where necessary, you should use hedging (see definition) to slightly soften the tone and register of your language.

Definition: Hedging refers to 'the act of expressing your attitude or ideas in tentative or cautious ways' (Singh and Lukkarila, 2017: 101). It’s mostly achieved through a number of verbs or adverbs, such as ‘suggest’ or ‘seemingly.’

Q: What’s the difference between the results and discussion?

A: The results chapter is a factual account of the data collected, whilst the discussion considers the implications of these findings by relating them to relevant literature and answering your research question(s). See the tab 'The Differences' in this guide for more detail.

Q: Should the discussion include recommendations for future research?

A: Your dissertation should include some recommendations for future research, but it can vary where it appears. Recommendations are often featured towards the end of the discussion chapter, but they also regularly appear in the conclusion chapter (see our Writing the Conclusion guide   for more). It simply depends on your dissertation and the conventions of your school or department. It’s worth consulting any specific guidance that you’ve been given, or asking your supervisor directly.

Q: Should the discussion include the limitations of the study?

A: Like the answer above, you should engage with the limitations of your study, but it might appear in the discussion of some dissertations, or the conclusion of others. Consider the narrative flow and whether it makes sense to include the limitations in your discussion chapter, or your conclusion. You should also consult any discipline-specific guidance you’ve been given, or ask your supervisor for more. Be mindful that this is slightly different to the limitations outlined in the methodology or methods chapter (see our Writing the Methodology guide vs. the 'Discussion' tab of this guide).

Q: Should the results and discussion be in the first-person or third?

A: It’s important to be consistent , so you should use whatever you’ve been using throughout your dissertation. Third-person is more commonly accepted, but certain disciplines are happy with the use of first-person. Just remember that the first-person pronoun can be a distracting, but powerful device, so use it sparingly. Consult your lecturer for discipline-specific guidance.

Q: Is there a difference between the discussion and the conclusion of a dissertation?

A: Yes, there is a difference. The discussion chapter is a detailed consideration of how your findings answer your research questions. This includes the use of secondary literature to help contextualise your discussion. Rather than considering the findings in detail, the conclusion briefly summarises and synthesises the main findings of your study before bringing the dissertation to a close. Both are similar, particularly in the way they ‘broaden out’ to consider the wider implications of the research. They are, however, their own distinct chapters, unless otherwise stated by your supervisor.

The results and discussion chapters (or chapter) constitute a large part of your dissertation as it’s here where your original contribution is foregrounded and discussed in detail. Remember, the results chapter simply reports on the data collected, whilst the discussion is where you consider your research questions and/or hypothesis in more detail by interpreting and interrogating the data. You can integrate both into a single chapter and weave the interpretation of your findings throughout the chapter, although it’s common for both the results and discussion to appear as separate chapters. Consult your supervisor for further guidance.

Here’s a final checklist for writing your results and discussion. Remember that not all of these points will be relevant for you, so make sure you cover whatever’s appropriate for your dissertation. The asterisk (*) indicates any content that might not be relevant for your dissertation. To download a copy of the checklist to save and edit, please use the Word document, below.

• Results and discussion self-evaluation checklist

• << Previous: Methodology
• Next: Conclusion >>
• Last Updated: Nov 21, 2024 4:14 PM
• URL: https://library.soton.ac.uk/writing_the_dissertation

• + 1 321 - 251 - 6977
• Book Editing Services
• Fiction Editing
• nonfiction editing
• Authors Here
• Dissertation
• Universities & Institutions
• Academics Here
• Journals and Scientific PUBLICATIONS
• Academic Editing
• Scientific Manuscript
• Subject Matter Experts
• Researchers Here
• Business Editing
• Compare Editing Services
• Executives Here
• Consultation
• Editorial Critique Services
• Publishing Here
• Instant Price Quotes
• Coupons and Discounts
• Free Editing Sample & Critique
• Your Editing Team
• CERTIFIED Story Editors
• PhD & Subject Matter Experts
• About First Editing
• March 31, 2023

Discussion vs Conclusion: Everything You Need to Know

• By Max Dade

The discussion and conclusion sections are both essential parts of any academic thesis. In this short guide, I’ll define the content to include in each, as well as discuss the differences between the two sections, along with a few tips on what to include to ensure your thesis fulfills all the necessary criteria.

Discussion vs conclusion: what’s the difference?

When it comes to writing an academic thesis , the discussion and conclusion are two important sections to focus on. They serve different purposes and should be approached in their own ways to ensure a comprehensive and complete thesis.

The discussion section is where you’ll analyze and interpret your research findings in detail, providing a thorough explanation of your results. It’s not just a summary, but an opportunity to evaluate your work critically and answer any questions raised in the introduction. You should also mention any potential limitations and suggest any routes to explore in future research.

In contrast, the conclusion section summarizes your thesis, bringing together the key points from the introduction, literature review, methodology, and discussion. It’s your chance to restate your thesis statement and briefly summarize your findings in a concise and impactful way. Avoid introducing new information, as this section should focus solely on reinforcing the main points of your research and emphasizing its significance. The conclusion should leave the reader with a clear understanding of your research and its contribution to the field.

Here’s a simple table highlighting the major differences.

What should the discussion section include?

The discussion section can often prove to be one of the most challenging. Here, the author must condense their findings into a summary, along with a critical analysis and interpretation of the findings in relation to the existing literature. Essentially, it involves connecting the dots between one’s own work and the broader academic landscape.

In addition to writing a summary, a critical analysis, and an interpretation, the author must also consider the practical and theoretical implications of the research while clearly stating any potential limitations. Due to the high level of critical thinking researchers apply to the discussion section, it’s worth spending ample time on it.

The following are some common elements in a typical discussion section:

• Summary of findings: A brief summary of the main findings of the research.
• Interpretation of results: An explanation of what the findings mean, how they contribute to the existing literature, and how they relate to the research questions or hypotheses.
• Comparison with previous studies: A discussion of how the current study compares with previous research in the field.
• Limitations of the study: Here, the author describes any limitations of the research, such as sample size, methodology, or other factors that may have influenced the results.
• Implications of the findings: A discussion of the practical and theoretical implications of the research, and how it may impact future research or practice in the field.
• Recommendations for future research: Suggestions for future research that could build on the current study or address the limitations of the research.
• Conclusion: A summary of the main points discussed in the discussion section, and how they relate to the overall research aims and objectives.

Overall, the discussion section is an opportunity for the author to reflect on the significance and implications of their research, and to demonstrate their understanding of the field and its broader context.

As important components of the discussion section, the interpretations, limitations, and limitations help to demonstrate the author’s critical thinking and understanding of the research and are typically integrated into the discussion section, rather than included as independent sub-sections. Let’s take a look at the importance of each:

• Interpretations involve analyzing and interpreting the results of the research and explaining what they mean in the context of the existing literature. This includes addressing how the findings contribute to the field and what new insights they offer.
• Implications involve discussing the practical and theoretical implications of the research, such as how the findings could be applied in real-world situations, as well as any ethical or social implications of the research.
• Limitations involve acknowledging the limitations of the research, including any constraints on the research design or methodology, and suggesting ways that future research could address these limitations.

What makes an effective conclusion?

The conclusion of a thesis or dissertation should provide a summary of the key findings of the research and their implications, as well as offer suggestions for future research. Here are some specific elements to include:

• Restate the research questions or hypotheses and summarize the main findings of the study.
• Discuss the significance of the findings and their implications for the field, as well as any practical or theoretical implications.
• Provide a critical evaluation of the research and its limitations, and offer suggestions for future research that could build on the current study.
• Consider the broader implications of the research, including any ethical or social implications.
• End with a strong concluding statement that summarizes the main points of the conclusion and leaves a lasting impression on the reader.

Now, let’s summarize this information by comparing what should be included against what not to include:

Overall, as the table above shows, it is clear that the conclusion should leave the reader with a clear understanding of the key contributions and limitations of the research, as well as the potential for future research in the field.

In conclusion, the discussion and conclusion sections are two essential components of a thesis that serve different purposes. Whereas the discussion section is where the author critically analyzes and interprets research findings in the context of existing literature, assesses the practical and theoretical implications of the research, and suggests directions for future research, in the conclusion section, they reinforce the thesis statement, summarize the key points, and highlight the significance of the research. To create an effective conclusion, the author should restate the research questions, summarize the main findings, discuss the significance and limitations of the findings, and provide suggestions for future research, without including new data or personal opinions.

• Frequently Asked Questions

Share With :

Get more updates, latest tips & tricks in editing and insightful articles right in your inbox.

Author Services

• Nonfiction Editing
• Copy Editing
• Content Editing
• Line Editing Services
• Proofreading Services
• Additional Editing Services
• Editing Consultation
• Business Copy Editing Services

Academic & Scientific Researchers

• Academic English Editing
• Scientific Research Editing
• Technical Copy Editing
• Universities & Institutions
• Thesis Editing
• Dissertation Editing
• How to Cite White Papers

Editing Help

• Editing Service Price Quote
• Client Login
• Satisfaction Guarantee
• Terms of Service
• Return Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Cookies Policy

Writer Resources

• Samples of Editing Levels
• PODCAST – Publishing Power!
• BLOG for Writers
• Writing Tools
• Coupons & Special Offers

About FirstEditing

• CERTIFIED Structural Editors
• Published Authors
• Customer Reviews
• Professional Editors
• Affiliate Program
• Partner with First Editing
• Refer a Friend
• Editing Jobs
• Guest Blogging

Publications

COUPON QUIZ Why is Veterans Day Celebrated the 11th of Nov?

Get 16% Off Now Expires November 23

Add Your Heading Text Here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.