case study advanced practice nurses

We have a new app!

Take the Access library with you wherever you go—easy access to books, videos, images, podcasts, personalized features, and more.

Download the Access App here: iOS and Android . Learn more here!

• Remote Access
• Save figures into PowerPoint
• Download tables as PDFs

Introduction

• Download Chapter PDF

Disclaimer: These citations have been automatically generated based on the information we have and it may not be 100% accurate. Please consult the latest official manual style if you have any questions regarding the format accuracy.

Download citation file:

• Search Book

Jump to a Section

Important information about this book, the framework and how to use it, ana code of ethics, terminology.

• Full Chapter
• Supplementary Content

“Let us never consider ourselves finished nurses …

we must be learning all of our lives.”

–Florence Nightingale

Provide an educational tool to increase APRN students’ abilities to identify ethical concerns and work through them to find a solution.

Inform and expand current ethical pedagogy for APRN students. Faculty teaching in doctor of nursing practice, master of science in nursing, and certified nurse anesthetist programs; their students; and practicing APRNs will benefit from working through the case studies to identify and solve ethical dilemmas.

Provide classroom and clinical teaching in the form of case studies to foster critical thinking, judgment, and the skills needed to resolve ethical dilemmas. As healthcare increases in complexity, APRNs will continue to experience ethical conflicts and dilemmas. Providing guidance to APRNs in identifying and resolving ethical dilemmas can increase effective patient outcomes, and we can continue to be the most honest and ethical profession now and into the future.

Identify the problem.

Assess the factual information.

Identify the involved parties.

What is at stake?

What options are available, what process is needed to make a decision, identify the problem and associated components, assess the factual information, identify the involved stakeholders.

Autonomy: “Rational self-legislation and self-determination that is grounded in informedness, voluntariness, consent, and rationality.”

Beneficence: “Benefiting others by preventing harm, removing harmful conditions, or affirmatively acting to benefit another or others, often going beyond what is required by law.”

Justice: “A bioethical principle with various types or domains of justice, including distributive, retributive, restorative, transitional, intergenerational, and procedural. Bioethics is chiefly concerned with distributive justice. Distributive justice deals with the equitable distribution of social burdens and benefits society. When this allocation occurs under conditions of scarcity, it raises questions of rationing. The formal principle of justice states that equals shall be treated equally, and un-equals unequally, in proportion to their relevant differences.”

Nonmaleficence: This principle “specifies that a duty not to inflict harm and balances unavoidable harm with benefits of good achieved.”

Source: American Nurses Association, 2015 .

Nurse practitioners

Certified nurse-midwives

Clinical nurse specialists

Certified registered nurse anesthetists

Pop-up div Successfully Displayed

This div only appears when the trigger link is hovered over. Otherwise it is hidden from view.

Please Wait

CNU Library Blog

Ethical case studies for advanced practice nurses: solving dilemmas in everyday practice.

Title:   Ethical Case Studies for Advanced Practice Nurses: Solving Dilemmas in Everyday Practice

Authors: Amber L. Vermeesch, Patricia H. Cox, Inga M. Giske, Katherine M. Roberts.

Publication Information: Indianapolis, IN : Sigma. 2023.

Location:  Academic eBook Collection .

Description: Healthcare delivery can present ethical conflicts and dilemmas for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs)—nurses who already have a myriad of responsibilities in caring for patients. Ethical Case Studies for Advanced Practice Nurses improves APRNs'agility to resolve ethical quandaries encountered in primary care, hospital-based, higher education, and administration beyond community settings. Through case studies examining various types of ethical conflicts, the authors empower APRNs and students with the critical knowledge and skills they need to handle even the most complex dilemmas in their practice. By applying a set of criteria and framework, this book guides APRNs to use critical thinking to make ethically sound decisions.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

• Case Study #1: Defensive Medicine
• Case Study #2: STI Confidentiality
• Case Study #3: Substance Use in Pregnancy
• Case Study #4: HPV Vaccine Refusal
• Case Study #5: Abortion
• Case Study #6: Prostate Cancer Screening with Prostate-Specific Antigen
• Case Study #7: Administration of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics
• Case Study #8: Depression Screening in Adolescents
• Case Study #9: Treatment of Resistant Anxiety
• Case Study #10: COVID-19 Vaccine in Adolescence
• Case Study #11: Medical Emancipation Versus Confidentiality in Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming People
• Case Study #12: Childhood Obesity
• Case Study #13: Dementia and Stopping Driving
• Case Study #14: When to Transition to Palliative Care
• Case Study #15: Prescription Refill Dilemma for Patient and Spouse in Financial Straits
• Case Study #16: CRNA Labor and Delivery Epidural Pain Management With a Language Barrier
• Case Study #17: Violence, Suicide, and Family Dynamics With Medical Complexity
• Case Study #18: Psychiatric Acute Concerns and Fall Risks
• Case Study #19: Telehealth
• Case Study #20: Guiding a School of Nursing Through COVID-19 Focusing on Clinical Placements
• Case Study #21: Emergency Department Closure Decision-Making: Health System and Community Impact
• Case Study #22: Ethical Dilemmas in School of Nursing Leadership Pre-COVID-19

0 Comments.

  search this blog,   recent posts,   subscribe,   archive,   subjects,   follow us, this post is closed for further discussion..

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Ann Glob Health
• v.88(1); 2022

Advanced Practice Nursing Roles, Regulation, Education, and Practice: A Global Study

Kathy j. wheeler.

1 University of Kentucky College of Nursing, US

Minna Miller

2 British Columbia Children’s Hospital, CA

Joyce Pulcini

3 George Washington University School of Nursing, US

Deborah Gray

4 Old Dominion University School of Nursing, US

Elissa Ladd

5 MGH Institute of Health Professions, US

Mary Kay Rayens

Associated data, background and objectives:.

Several subgroups of the International Council of Nurses Nurse Practitioner/Advanced Practice Nurse Network (ICN NP/APNN) have periodically analyzed APN (nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist) development around the world. The primary objective of this study was to describe the global status of APN practice regarding scope of practice, education, regulation, and practice climate. An additional objective was to look for gaps in these same areas of role development in order to recommend future initiatives.

An online survey was developed by the research team, and included questions on APN practice roles, education, regulation/credentialing, and practice climate. The study was launched in August 2018 at the 10 th Annual ICN NP/APNN Conference in Rotterdam, Netherlands. Links to the survey were provided there and via multiple platforms over the next year.

Survey results from 325 respondents, representing 26 countries, were analyzed through descriptive techniques. Although progress was reported, particularly in education, results indicated the APN profession around the world continues to struggle over titling, title protection, regulation development, credentialing, and barriers to practice.

Conclusions and Practice/Policy Relevance:

APNs have the potential to help the world reach the Sustainable Development Goal of universal health coverage. Several recommendations are provided to help ensure APNs achieve these goals.

The advanced practice nurse (APN) is an established healthcare provider delivering care throughout much of the world. In 2020, the International Council of Nurses defined the APN as:

a generalist or specialized nurse who has acquired, through additional graduate education (minimum of a master’s degree), the expert knowledge base, complex decision-making skills and clinical competencies for Advanced Nursing Practice, the characteristics of which are shaped by the context in which they are credentialed to practice (adapted from ICN, 2008). The two most commonly identified APN roles are Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) and Nurse Practitioner (NP) [ 1 (p6) ].

Broadly speaking, NPs assess, diagnose, order and interpret laboratory tests, and prescribe medications for individual patients within a framework of collaboration with other medical providers and systems [ 2 ]. Though still involved in the direct provision of care to patients, CNSs tend to work more in healthcare administration and provide consultation and guidance to nursing staff and systems who manage complex patient care [ 3 ]. It is estimated about 40 countries currently have well-established APN roles [ 4 ]. Some of these countries have hundreds of thousands of APNs and others have more modest numbers.

Looking to the future, APNs may help counter the shortage and maldistribution of healthcare providers around the world. The World Health Organization predicts there will be a global deficit of 12.9 million physicians, nurses, and midwives by 2035 [ 5 ]. Physician roles and functions are fairly consistent throughout the world [ 6 , 7 ]. However, for APNs there are variations in the roles, titles, tasks, and regulatory, education and practice structures under which APNs provide care, country to country, and even jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Since 1999 several studies have attempted to document the evolution, expansion, and variation of the APN around the world (see Tables 1 and ​ and2) 2 ) [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. These studies serve as snapshots in time of global role development and denote steady growth around the world and improving clarity of education, certification, and regulatory underpinnings.

APN Role and Regulation Studies.

Country Responses Compared to Previous APN Studies.

* Unclear if participation in survey demonstrated presence of APN role.

** Role present in all countries, though significant variation in regulation and education.

*** Level of task shifting as follows: 1 = significant task shifting, 2 = limited task shifting, 3 = no task shifting.

Although titles, roles, and duties vary around the world, advanced practice nurse is a commonly accepted umbrella term representing four generally established advanced roles—the two described above, NP and CNS, as well as nurse anesthetist and nurse midwife. And while APN is a broadly accepted representative term, most countries and jurisdictions use other terms to refer to nurses who practice in an advanced role. For instance, the title adopted in the United States (US) is Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN), specifically developed by the Consensus Model for APRN Regulation in 2008 [ 13 ]. Aside from codifying the titles of the four disciplines representing APRNs--Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP), Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS), Certified Nurse Midwife (CNM), and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA)—the Consensus Model sought to ensure consistency in licensure, accreditation, certification, and education, facilitating regulation of APRNs throughout the US. The Consensus Model, which was adopted in the US in 2008, is a rather recent development relative to the observation that varied APN roles have existed in some form for over a hundred years [ 14 , 15 ]. The first global definition occurred in 2002, when the ICN defined an NP and APN, and the master’s degree was only a recommendation [ 16 ]. The more recent ICN definition of the APN, provided above, set the master’s degree as the minimal education requirement and emphasized an advanced level of decision-making and responsibility. However, it did not include definitions for APNs who deliver anesthesia or who participate in childbirth.

To describe the global status of APN practice regarding scope of practice, education, regulation, and practice, the Health Policy Subgroup of the International Council of Nurses Nurse Practitioner/Advanced Practice Nurse Network (ICN NP/APNN) recently completed this global study. An additional objective was to look for gaps in these same areas of role development in order to recommend future initiatives.

Survey Development

An online survey was developed by the research team, drawn largely from the 2010 Pulcini, Jelic, Gul, and Loke survey [ 10 ] as well as regulatory questions from the 2015 Heale and Buckley survey [ 11 ], once adaptation permission was granted. Questions were refined, with several areas added or developed, most notably the modification of questions on education, professional issues, clinical skills, credentialing, and certification. The survey categorized questions according to practice roles, education, regulation/certification, and practice climate. Because of the complexity of APN titling and practice issues, respondents were given the opportunity to answer multiple questions with open-ended responses in addition to multiple choice options. To clarify distinctions of education and credentialing, definitions for title protection, certificate, certification , and recertification were provided (see Table 3 ).

Education and Credentialing Definitions Provided in Survey for Items Needing Clarification.

Once the research team obtained institutional review board (IRB) approval from the Office of Research Integrity of the University of Kentucky and the survey was approved by the Core Steering Group of the ICN NP/APNN, the study was launched in August 2018 at the 10 th Annual ICN NP/APNN Conference in Rotterdam, Netherlands. Links to the survey were provided there and via ICN social media platforms. When initial data analysis showed response gaps from several continents due to institutional firewalls, the IRB approval was amended to allow document surveys to be anonymously submitted with deadline extended to September 2019.

Design and Sample

A convenience sample approach was used because of the difficulty accessing all eligible participants or countries worldwide. Participants completed the survey once in this cross-sectional assessment. Study participants were required to be APNs, APN educators, APN administrators, and/or APN researchers; be fluent in reading/writing English; and have access to a computer with an Internet connection. Completion of the survey established participant consent. Survey responses from 325 respondents, representing 26 countries, were analyzed. However, the study data were summarized as being from 23 countries, with data from England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, combined as a single location category (i.e., United Kingdom [UK]).

Each survey was analyzed for sufficiency of response. Participants from all represented countries answered both multiple choice and open-ended questions. We received 482 surveys in total, but 157 of them were not able to be retained due to widespread missing values; the effective sample size was 325, reflecting 67% of the total surveys received. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, were used to analyze and describe the sample data. SAS, v. 9.4 was used for the quantitative analysis.

Demographics

Responses came from countries in all the major regions of the world, specifically Africa ( n = 4), Asia ( n = 2), Europe ( n = 10), North America ( n = 3), South America ( n = 2) and Oceania ( n = 2), as presented in Table 4 .

Country Respondents.

Demographic totals and percentages are presented in Table 5 .

Demographics of Survey Respondents.

* Percentages do not add to 100% because respondents could select more than one answer.

Eligible participants could identify themselves as practicing nurses, educators, administrators, and/or researchers. Because nurses (and those associated with nurses) function in many roles, respondents were asked to check all that applied in each category or provide additional roles if an option was not listed. For this reason, the cumulative percentage across all roles exceeds 100%.

Of respondents who reported practicing as nurses, 37% ( n = 121) identified as a Family NP/APN, 22% ( n = 71) as a registered/generalist nurse, 15% ( n = 50) as a NP/APN specialist devoted to a specific disease, 15% ( n = 48) as a Hospitalist/Acute Care NP/APN, 14% ( n = 45) as an Adult NP, 10% ( n = 32) as a NP/APN specialist devoted to a specific age or population, 7% ( n = 22) as a Clinical Nurse Specialist, 6% ( n = 18) as a Geriatric/Gerontologic NP/APN, 6% ( n = 21) as a Community Health NP/APN, 5% ( n = 17) as a Mental Health NP/APN, 5% ( n = 17) as a Paediatric NP/APN, 4% ( n = 12) as a Women’s Health NP/APN, 2% ( n = 7) as an Adult/Gerontologic NP/APN, and 1% ( n = 2) as a Midwife. The 14% ( n = 47) of practicing nurses who reported roles outside those offered in the survey listed roles such as neonatal nurse practitioner or nurse anesthetist.

Of respondents who identified as educators, 12% ( n = 18) reported they educated registered/generalist nurses only, 42% ( n = 65) educated APNs only, and 38% ( n = 59) reported they educated both. An additional 8% ( n = 12) reported educating students other than registered/generalist nurses or APNs. Those who identified as administrators were almost equally split, with 49% ( n = 22) reporting oversight of nursing personnel and 51% ( n = 23) reporting oversight of both nursing and non-nursing personnel. Over half of the researchers reported they were involved exclusively in nursing research (53% ( n = 56), 6% ( n = 6) in non-nursing research, and 42% ( n = 44) in both.

Practice Role

Practice questions centered on titling and types of APN roles, presence/absence of title protection, professional issues, and clinical skills (see Appendix A). Most countries with some sort of APN practice reported more than one advanced role. Though most used the titles NP, CNS, or midwife, other titles were listed, such as APN, nurse in advanced practice, expert nurse, nurse specialist, and others. In some countries the term CNS (or a similar title) referred to nurses who function more as NPs, or vice versa (i.e., providers titled NPs but who functioned more as CNSs). Some countries reported midwives were commonly educated at the registered/generalist level or as a non-nurse, while other countries reported educating midwives at a post registered/generalist nurse level. Title protection was reported in Australia, Botswana, Canada, France, Hungary, Israel, Jamaica, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Republic of Ireland, Singapore, and the US. Title protection was not reported in Chile, Finland, Germany, Ghana, Italy, Kenya, Spain, Tanzania, or the UK.

Respondents chose from 15 APN work-place position options, such as doctor’s office, hospital-based clinic, hospital, faculty, and the like. Respondents could report all that applied as well and were able to list any unnamed workplace settings in an open-ended question. Australia, Botswana, Canada, Finland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, the UK, and the US responded affirmatively to all site options. Portugal reported all site options except occupational/workplace health, while the Republic of Ireland reported all site options except school health and occupational or workplace health. Singapore reported a little over half the work site options, while the remaining countries reported fewer than half of the work site options. Israel reported only specialty practice sites and Hungary reported that the role was too recently instituted to provide any details. Ecuador reported the role did not exist outside US government agencies, so will only be reported in the tables but not included in discussions or subsequent calculations. Other questions pertained to 21 clinical skills (from skin lesion removal to suturing to X-ray interpretation) and 12 professional issues (from carrying their own caseload of clients/patients to ability to prescribe to reimbursement (see Appendix A).

Education questions pertained to presence/absence of programs, number of programs, level of education, types of specialties or APNs, program details, and student requirement details (see Table 6 ).

Low response countries in shaded gray.

* a = Hospitalist/acute care NP/APN, b = specialty care specific to disease or illness NP/APN, c = specialty care specific to an age group or population NP/APN, d = family NP/APN, e = geriatric/gerontologic NP/APN, f = paediatric NP/APN, g = adult NP/APN, h = adult gerontologic NP/APN, i = women’s health NP/APN, j = midwife, k = community health NP/APN, l = mental health NP/APN, m = clinical nurse specialist, n = other.

All the countries reported having formal education programs for APNs. Only Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, the UK, and the US reported more than ten such programs in their country, with the remainder reporting fewer than this. Most of the countries offered multiple education paths for those wanting to practice as APNs. All the countries except Ghana and Israel listed the master’s degree as the education credential available to APN graduates, with Ghana offering the baccalaureate and advanced diploma, and Israel offering a certificate. Canada, New Zealand, and the US reported all five levels of education (doctorate, master’s, baccalaureate, certificate, advanced diploma), but Canada and the US specified those who earned the lower credentials had done so before the master’s had been required and had been grandfathered into practice. The UK reported all five levels of education but also reported some programs educated APNs but granted no credential. Germany reported offering doctorate, master’s, and baccalaureate degrees as well as programs of APN education where no credential was granted.

Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, the UK, and the US reported education for all advanced roles, though New Zealand participants specified midwifery was not considered an advanced role. Other than Israel, the remaining countries reported a variety of roles for which there were APN programs, including some listing disease-specific programs (e.g., an oncology APN track).

Reports of program length varied from 18 months to five years according to program type and degree, with most reporting programs that require two to three years of full-time schooling. Several programs reported a minimum of 500 clinical hours, though some required considerably more (e.g., 800; 1000; 1200; or 1490), additional internships (e.g., one year long; another as long as 5000 hours), and one specified clinical hours specifically devoted to pharmacology (in addition to other hours required).

All the countries with APN programs reported requiring students to be registered/generalist nurses with academic degrees before entering the program. With the exception of the US, nearly all the programs required registered/generalist nurses to have a minimum of two years of experience as a nurse, with some requiring as many as seven years.

Regulation and Credentialing

Regulation and credentialing questions pertained to presence/absence of recognition, regulation level, requirements to practice, requirements to renew, and certification (see Table 7 ).

Regulation, Credentialing, and Certification.

Low response in shaded gray.

*Some NPs were grandfathered to role without master’s degree but met other education/exam requirements. They tend to practice in remote areas.

**The APN, entitled Nurse Specialist, is issued a credential of qualification upon graduation from a professional program. Over the next five years the APN must demonstrate a specified level of practice, continuing education and a number of other professional activities. If the APN cannot provide proof of these activities the APN is struck from the Registry, losing the Nurse Specialist title. The title can be reestablished by entering an individual educational program with a licensed MANP program. At the conclusion of the program the credential is re-earned and the individual can register as Nurse Specialist with the Registration Commission.

***Government starting to place requirements on advanced nursing practice but in infancy. RCN offers a credentialing process, but it is not compulsory. Some groups campaigning for formal entry on the NHS. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine and the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine both offer a credentialing process and associate membership.

****Some NPs were grandfathered to role before master’s was required. Now rare since most are retired or close to retirement.

Nearly half (45%, n = 10) reported formal recognition by the government, hospital/health care agency, and/or professional organizations in their countries and some (14%, n = 3) reported formal recognition by the government and professional organizations only. The remaining (40%, n = 9) reported the role was recognized though there were no formal regulations at any governmental level. We assumed that the APNs working in these countries were credentialed by the local agencies employing them.

For those who reported regulation by a governmental agency, most regulation was reported at the federal level. However, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the Republic of Ireland, and the US reported jurisdictional level regulation as well. Only Ghana reported regulation solely at the jurisdictional level.

All the countries reported requiring an academic degree and/or approved education program in order to enter practice as an APN, though some reported grandfathering had occurred in the past for experienced APNs who would not be able to meet current education standards. Over half the countries (64%, n = 14) required registration, licensure, or endorsement at some governmental level to practice. Of the remaining countries (36%, n = 8), registration, licensure or endorsement to practice was listed at agency level authorization. Canada, Israel, and the US required passage of a certification exam in order to practice. Requirements to continue to practice mostly involved maintenance of practice, earning continuing education credits, or meeting portfolio requirements on some interval basis.

Practice Climate

Practice climate questions pertained to factors that facilitated or hindered APN role development and level of policy making and professional group organization (see Appendix B).

Nearly all respondents (73%, n = 16) reported the basis for development of the APN role was due to a need for providers in rural or underserved areas, with several (23%, n = 5) reporting very specific physician shortage issues in neonatal care or psychiatry, or policy changes that limited work hours of residents or junior doctors. Nearly all (77%, n = 17) reported consumer demand led to APN role development. One respondent reported that extensive dialogue had gone on about providing the right (high quality) care in the most (cost) efficient way, as well as patient needs moving from “illness and cure” to “health and behavior”.

Responses about who specifically advocated for or opposed the role were mixed. Advocacy options included the following: government; international organizations; individual nurses; individual physicians; consumers; insurance companies; universities; media; and/or in-country nursing, physician, nongovernmental/nonprofit institutions or private institutions. Two countries reporting affirmatively for all, but the remaining cited a mixture of responses. Over half of the countries (68%, n = 15) reported that government and nursing organizations within country were the prime advocates for the APN role. Over a third (37%, n = 8) reported physician organizations within country advocated for the role as well. However, regarding role opposition, physician organizations were reported the most (73%, n = 16), followed by individual physicians (68%, n = 15), individual nurses (55%, n = 12), and governments (45%, n = 10).

The majority of the countries (73%, n = 16) reported that policy making for APNs occurred at both a national and local level, though the respondent from Jamaica reported it occurred at the local level and the respondent from Italy reported it occurred at the national level. The development of APN organizations was reported mostly (73%, n = 16) at both the national and local level but the respondent from Chile reported it only at the national level, while France and Ghana reported it only at the local level. Hungary reported no evidence of either.

Larson states characteristics of a profession include a “professional association, cognitive base, institutionalized training, licensing, work autonomy, colleague control” [ 17 (p208)]. This research found significant evidence APNs possess the characteristics of a profession in many places around the world. But ongoing variations and gaps continue, and these gaps certainly have the potential to impact the profession as well as the care APNs provide and the ability to expand health care to those in need.

Distribution of APNs

Understanding the number, distribution, and types of providers present in the world is extremely complicated. It is even more complex for APNs, not only because of inherent problems of workforce data collection but also due to issues of categorization unique to nursing and APNs. The World Health Organization collects data on healthcare professionals throughout the world but admits the quality and completeness of the data is a concern [ 18 ]. Categories of collection include medical doctors, nursing and midwifery personnel, dentistry, and a few others. There is no separate category for APNs, their presence being counted among the nurses and midwives. This same limitation of data collection on APNs persists throughout many of the countries and jurisdictions of the world. Nonetheless, it is known NPs and CNSs are established in the Americas (US [ 19 ], Canada [ 19 ], Jamaica [ 20 ], Belize [ 20 ], Brazil [ 20 ], Chile [ 20 ], and Columbia [ 20 ], among others), much of Europe (Austria [ 21 ], Belgium [ 22 ], Czech Republic [ 22 ], Finland [ 22 ], France [ 22 ], Germany [ 23 ], Republic of Ireland [ 22 ], the Netherlands [ 19 ], Poland [ 22 ], Switzerland [ 23 ], the UK [ 22 ], among others), Australia [ 22 ], New Zealand [ 19 ], a few countries in Africa (Botswana [ 19 ], Ghana [ 24 ], Eswatini [ 25 ], Kenya [ 19 ], Namibia [ 19 ], and Zimbabwe [ 19 ], among others), and a few countries in Asia (Israel [ 23 ], Japan [ 22 ], Oman [ 19 ], Singapore [ 19 ], and Taiwan [ 26 ], among others). This aligns well with the responses obtained not only from this study but also those cited in Table 2 , and may point to areas of the world that could potentially benefit from NP and CNS role introduction.

Titling, Role, and Practice

Inconsistencies in titling, role, and practice continue to affect the profession. If individuals do not need to work outside the country or jurisdiction, the variations are not inherently limiting. However, healthcare needs are not always geographically bound, nor are the needs of professionals who sometimes must move for personal or professional reasons. Numerous authorities indicate this lack of standardization limits the ability of APNs to meet unmet healthcare needs, collaborate across borders, partake in scholarly exchanges with a common language, or participate in dependable and consistent research on the profession or the outcomes of care [ 27 , 28 , 29 ].

Title protection is also a critical professional issue, regardless of geographic mobility. Since title protection is the limited use of a title unless the title holder meets regulatory requirements [ 30 ] the finding that nearly half of the countries reported no title protection causes concern. The American Nurses Association states title protection protects the public from “unethical, unscrupulous, and incompetent practitioners” [ 31 (para 1)]. It also protects the practitioner from unfair competition from someone who does not meet education or regulatory standards. Additionally, having a defined and protected title provides regulators and the public with a common and understood frame of reference from which to create sound regulations and measure, monitor, and discipline the profession.

That nearly all the countries reported the master’s degree as the primary form of education for APNs is evidence the 2002 ICN recommendation of a master’s degree for advanced practice has had an impact. It is noteworthy these programs also required similar entry criteria, as well as similar clinical requirements and program length. The greatest variation was found in program and role offerings available by schools or within countries, a likely variation dictated by local need or knowledge of available roles. However, while this local determination might meet current local needs it could also limit geographic flexibility or the ability to attend to future, evolving needs. And local determination could be very restrictive to the nurse who wants to do something outside of what is locally available but has limited resources to seek education elsewhere. Unfortunately, this study did not look at educational curricula or program accreditation.

The most difficult professional area to understand and describe for the status of APNs around the world is regulation and credentialing. In 1997, as a concept fundamental to regulation, the ICN defined credentialing as:

processes used to designate that an individual, programme, institution or product have met established standards set by an agent (governmental or non-governmental) recognised as qualified to carry out this task. The standards may be minimal and mandatory or above the minimum and voluntary. Licensure, registration, accreditation, approval, certification, recognition or endorsement may be used to describe different credentialing processes…Credentials may be periodically renewed as a means of assuring continued quality and they may be withdrawn when standards of competence or behavior are no longer met [ 32 (p44)].

Because this terminology is complicated, with terms used interchangeably, APNs may not be able to fully describe the level of credentialing involved in the ability to practice or teach, which was reflected in this study. Considerable cross referencing had to be done to understand the regulatory models of the countries represented. Clearly, many APNs work and practice without the benefit of regulation at any governmental level. What remains for these APNs is agency recognition, a level of credentialing that may cause concern and confusion for the public.

Certification is another term used in a variety of ways as a credential descriptor. For the purposes of this study, professional certification was defined as:

the voluntary process by which a(n)…entity grants a time-limited recognition and use of a credential to an individual after verifying that he or she has met predetermined and standardized criteria. It is the vehicle that a profession or occupation uses to differentiate among its members, using standards sometimes developed through a consensus-driven process, based on existing legal and psychometric requirements [ 33 (p5)].

While certification can refer to a level of recognition based on curriculum, this study looked specifically for competency-based certification (exam-based) as well as portfolio- based competency. Though considered the best measure of competency, few countries relied on this level of certification for credentialing.

Table 8 provides a comparison of positive and negative factors related to level of regulation and certification.

Regulatory Models: Advantages and Disadvantages.

Clearly, regulatory models matter significantly to the practice of APNs and the potential for expansion of care they could provide. At the same time, recognition must be given to the effort that has already gone into developing the role and which will be required for future regulatory model expansion.

Despite nearly universal reporting of a need for providers in rural or underserved areas, as well as consumer demand, practice climate continues to negatively impact the profession, even where the APN role has functioned for decades. A 2009 study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) looked at 12 countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Ireland, Japan, Poland, the UK, and the US) and the factors that helped or hindered APN role development [ 35 ]. Similar to this study, the OECD found the following were affecting APN development: support and opposition from the medical and nursing community, issues related to regulation, and limitations of educational opportunities. It is noteworthy that the same practice climate issues still surround advanced practice a decade later.

Limitations

This study had several limitations, primarily the ability to reach and receive results from as wide a range of countries as hoped. For the most part the study relied on convenience sampling of ICN or ICN NP/APNN affiliated countries. The country-specific firewall challenges resulted in changing the study from an online survey to a word document submission as well as extending the deadline. Of the countries responding, several had very low response rates (fewer than three respondents), especially for a study relying on evidence of occurrence for reporting purposes. Another limitation was that the survey was only available in English, thereby limiting respondents not fluent in English or limiting understanding of some nursing terms. Similarly, the language surrounding credentialing and certification caused confusion, which made analysis cumbersome and required extensive cross referencing. Finally, one country included (Ecuador) did not have credentialed APNs outside of those credentialed by US agencies, which limited the applicability of the survey for nurses from that country.

Implications for Practice and Policy

While considerable progress has been made for advanced practice nursing, significant challenges persist. The global community seems to be awakening to the strong possibility that APNs may be part of the solution for access to healthcare services, especially in the context of universal health coverage (UHC) [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. UHC means all individuals receive needed health services without suffering economic hardship and is one of the primary goals the United Nations agreed on when they created and adopted 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), aimed at solving many environmental, economic, and political problems around the world [ 39 ]. Indeed, because good health is fundamental to education and economic security, many of the SDGs would be impacted by UHC. For this reason, policy makers, educators, and clinicians need to consider how and to what degree the APN can mitigate some of the challenges around UHC. Suggested strategies might include the following:

• Educate stakeholders on the importance of titling, title protection, and role consistency. Seek out opportunities to crosswalk titles and role wherever feasible and in a progressive stepwise fashion. Create a consistency of process and language so that APN research about the profession is productive, meaningful, and transferrable.
• Perform similar work as recommendation #1 for consistencies and efficiencies of education. Agreement on a core advanced practice curriculum would be helpful and would lead to accreditation models that might function on a broader scale, allowing flexibility and mobility.
• Explore and educate stakeholders about regulatory models and their critical importance in shaping the foundations of sound regulations that protect the public and the provider community.
• Educate APNs about all aspects of health policy and why they need to influence or become policy makers. Every APN needs to understand they are an ambassador to their own future—by providing high-quality health care, effectively and efficiently, they win lifelong support from patients and communities and that communicates well to administrators and regulators.
• Promote the importance of APN data keeping and data analysis to the profession, administrators, and regulators. This includes personal data keeping by practicing APNs, as well as data keeping by organizations, jurisdictions, and countries who employ APNs. One data set that would be particularly useful to initiate and obtain at intervals would be a consistent data set of APN role development around the world. Only through the keeping of a consistent data set will advances and gaps in progress be documented.
• Examine funding mechanisms that support the education, regulatory, and practice systems that equip APNs for the level of care they can provide when supported. This includes funding for systems of accreditation, credentialing, curriculum and program development, reimbursement systems, and others.
• Raise public awareness of APN care. This includes everything from communication via media campaigns to more personal communications aimed at colleagues, medical staff, administrative bodies, insurance companies, reimbursement platforms, and ministries of health.

The recommended strategies are ambitious but fundamental to the process of creating systems where APNs can develop and thrive. APNs can serve their patients and communities in complex and patient-centered ways when systems of education and healthcare delivery are thoughtfully designed. While country- and culture-specific issues continue to exist, this study identified common policy and practice issues critical to the APN role which need consideration to optimize the care and leadership these nurses offer patients, healthcare systems, and countries. Indeed, if the world is sincerely working toward universal healthcare coverage, APNs should be a meaningful part of the solution.

Additonal File

The additonal file for this article can be found as follows:

Appendices.

Appendix A and B.

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

• Latest hearings

Advanced practice case studies

This section gives some examples of the types of care that advanced practitioners can provide:

• Our proposals
• Our research
• Stakeholder engagement
• Get involved
• Advanced practice conversations

Nursing case studies

Hilary, a public representative from our Advanced Practice Public Advisory group (APPAG) shares her experience of receiving care from an Advanced nurse practitioner. Hilary also has experience of working with universities in the education of nurses as part of a public involvement programme.

Following is a snippet of a discussion between Hilary and the chair of our APPAG:

Hilary:   This was treatment by an advanced nurse practitioner in my last GP Practice. I saw the same nurse in three different settings - in the drop in centre, which was like A&E. Then she came to my home and I saw her in the GP surgery. I was aware of her role and thought it was marvellous because she was taking some of the strain off the GPs. Her knowledge was amazing. She took more time with me than a GP would as she explained her role. She was extremely competent and picked something up that actually was challenged later on, but in fact it was found to be correct. She was a person that I felt very safe with and respected. It was absolutely amazing that she was so well used within that practice and was able to work in all those different settings and able to prescribe. So I thought it was a fantastic role.

Chair:  Did the confidence you have in this nurse from the time you met her first and then after you’d finished the treatment?

Hilary:   No, I felt very secure with her. My own family has nurses within it and with my involvement with nurse training at Swansea, I am well aware of the training and competencies required of nurses and here was this really qualified practitioner sitting above other nurses, somewhat like sitting between a nurse and a doctor; and she was a respectful, a very active listener and I just felt very safe in her hands. I don't know whether that was a particular personality trait of hers, or whether that was to do with her advanced training.

Chair: And my final question, did you ever worry about the regulated level of nurse that this person that you're working with or did it did it ever cross your mind?

Hilary :  I felt very privileged! Privileged to meet this person and be treated by her, because I knew that her level of training was high, I knew that her competencies were high. So, I felt very secure with her.

This scenario shows an example of the sort of work that Advanced Nurse Practitioners do:

Mrs J, a 65-year-old lady, attends her GP surgery having developed a persistent cough following a walking holiday in Pembrokeshire. Mrs J is seen by Anna, who introduces herself as an Advanced Nurse Practitioner.

Anna explains that she’s had additional training and experience and is working at a higher level, meaning she has the skills to manage Mrs J’s presenting complaint, prescribe treatment, refer and follow up as required.

Anna undertakes assessment, orders further lung function tests, reviews the results and explains to Mrs J that she has a condition called chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Anna reassures Mrs J that the symptoms can be managed but that she will require ongoing care on a fairly regular basis to ensure that the condition is stable, and that Mrs J knows what to do should her symptoms worsen.

Anna prescribes medication for Mrs J and arranges follow up. Over the coming weeks, Mrs J is seen regularly by Anna and she adjusts her medications according to her needs.

Anna arranges for the respiratory team to undertake an exercise programme with Mrs J and for the home COPD team to visit to ensure that Mrs J’s home environment is conducive to managing her condition.

It becomes clear to Anna that Mrs J’s condition is not responding as she would expect, so she liaises directly with the respiratory clinician at the local hospital who advises on next steps in management that should be tried.

Mrs J’s condition responds to this treatment, and she continues to see Anna every six months as part of routine care. Mrs J finds she rarely needs to book an appointment with the GP about her condition and feels well cared for and listened to and values the relationship she has developed with Anna

Midwifery case studies

These scenarios show examples of the sort of care that Advanced Midwifery Practitioners provide:

Ms O had sadly experienced multiple pregnancy losses before she thankfully went on to have her baby daughter. During this pregnancy, because of her previous pregnancy history and complications, her maternity care was picked up early on by midwifery specialists who assessed her initially at a maternity assessment unit. 

Ms O considered the midwifery role titles and names of those who treated her as being 'very important' to help her understand the parameters of the care and support they could provide to her.

This included a knowledge and fundamental understanding of what medications they could safely prescribe to her during her pregnancy.

Ms O felt reassured and supported with the quality of care provided by her Advanced Midwifery Practitioner (AMP), whom she felt properly understood her healthcare needs.

She specifically highlighted how her AMP was able to advocate for her on some different things during her pregnancy. In concluding her story, she powerfully stated "she believes this is one of the reasons her baby is here today".

Ms M recalls being cared for by an Advanced Midwifery Practitioner (AMP) during her pregnancy. She suffered with severe ‘Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG)’ during her latest pregnancy.

She welcomed her AMP's sound knowledge of medication and competence in prescribing to support her care.

She felt particularly reassured by her Consultant Midwife, who is an AMP, when she discussed concerns with her, and “felt they understood the drawbacks, benefits of and alternatives to different medication”, to be able to effectively ensure she had the best treatment for her HG, to help support her through her pregnancy as smoothly as possible.

Ms B described what a vitally important role her Advanced Midwifery Practitioner (AMP) played during her recent pregnancy, with her third baby.

She had an ‘incompetent cervix’ identified at 12 weeks in her previous pregnancy, resulting in an immediate cervical cerclage.

In this pregnancy she was informed by her midwife that her cervix would again be assessed at 12 weeks. This gave her cause for concern as she was aware that her cervix was likely to have been further compromised from another pregnancy and delivery and that she would therefore potentially require the procedure earlier in this pregnancy. 

She therefore contacted her Consultant Midwife, who is an AMP, she was seen for assessment promptly within two days, and the AMP subsequently arranged for surgery to happen soon after at 10 weeks.

Ms B appreciated that their AMP had the "autonomy in use their professional judgment to do things differently”, to provide her with the best care possible.

• Last updated: 27/03/2024