Mendeley
EndNote Web
saves your citation library to your local computer, but syncs with multiple computers so you can work from home, work, or school.
is a program that lives on your local computer, but syncs with a web account.
is web based. Your citation library is accessible from any computer that is connected to the web.
Zotero
Mendeley
EndNote Web
allows you to share your citations through shared folders -- you can give individuals or groups permissions to add and edit the citations in the shared folder.
allows you to share citations and documents with a group of up to 10 other users, or create a public reading list that is open to all.
allows you to share groups with anyone who is registered with the service. You can allow others to view or edit your citations.
Adapted with permission from “ Choosing a Citation Manager ,” copyright © 2011 The Pennsylvania State University.
Zotero | Mendeley | EndNote | EndNote Web | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Access | Zotero software with browser add-on (Firefox and Chrome). | Desktop software, but can sync with an online account which is editable | Desktop software with an online version (EndNote Web) | Web-based |
Where is my database stored? | Local computer with web based syncing between computers. | Local computer with web based syncing between computers | Local Computer with cloud storage and syncing via EndNote Web | Web-based |
How does it work? | Detect citations that can be captured from databases or web pages. Search and import records using PMID, DOI, or ISBN. Extract citation information from PDFs. | Import from many popular databases. Extract citation information from PDFs. | Export from databases into EndNote. Can search catalogs from within EndNote. | Browser bookmarklet can import from many databases. Can also import using text files |
Ability to work offline | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Cost | Free to anyone | Free. UChicago faculty, students, and staff can register through Web of Science fro more features |
| Free to UChicago faculty, students, and staff |
Word-processor compatibility | MS Word, Google Docs, Open Office | MS Word, Open Office, LaTex | Microsoft Word, OpenOffice (EndNote X3+), Pages (X4+) | MS Word |
Import from Library databases | Yes | Yes | Direct export from specific databases | Yes |
Import from Library Catalog | As of summer 2022, no, but expected. | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Integration | Yes, via Library Lookup feature | No | Yes, but must be configured | Yes |
Import citation info from web pages | Yes, also archives the page and you can add annotations | Yes, with a bookmark for a limited number of sites (mostly publishers or databases) | No | Yes, with bookmarklet |
Manage large libraries | Easy | Moderate to difficult | Easy | Moderate to difficult |
Storage capacity | Unlimited local storage. Unlimited data syncing if you use your UChicago email address. | Unlimited local storage and data syncing; 2GB personal and 100MB group free Mendeley file syncing ( ; must sign in to view prices) | Unlimited local storage. Software purchase provides term access to unlimited storage via EndNote Web | Limited to 10,000 citations |
Attach associated files (PDFs, etc.) | Yes, with option to attach automatically | Yes, and can highlight and annotate PDFs | Yes | Yes |
Search full text of PDFs | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
PDF Annotation and Notes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Create group or shared libraries | Yes | Yes, but limit of 3 members in a private group | No, but can share through EndNote Web | Yes |
Create bibliography w/ different styles | Yes, limited number included by default; hundreds can be downloaded from | Yes | Yes, hundreds of styles available. | Yes |
Edit output styles | Extremely difficult | No | Easy | No |
Strengths | - Easy to learn -Quick for collecting citations and organizing PDFs - Free unlimited storage and syncing with UChicago address. - User friendly features such as tagging, attachments, and notes.
| - Automatic citation extraction from PDFs - Sync library over multiple computers - Sync with Zotero library automatically | - Best for organizing large collections of citations and managing PDFs - Wide variety of citation styles - Easily customized | - Easy to work in multiple locations - Easy to share access with colleagues |
Open sourcetools
Zotero is a free, easy-to-use tool to help you collect, organize, annotate, cite, and share research.
Available for Mac, Windows, Linux, and iOS
Just need to create a quick bibliography? Try ZoteroBib .
Collect with a click..
Zotero automatically senses research as you browse the web. Need an article from JSTOR or a preprint from arXiv.org? A news story from the New York Times or a book from a library? Zotero has you covered, everywhere.
Zotero helps you organize your research any way you want. You can sort items into collections and tag them with keywords. Or create saved searches that automatically fill with relevant materials as you work.
Zotero instantly creates references and bibliographies for any text editor, and directly inside Word, LibreOffice, and Google Docs. With support for over 9,000 citation styles, you can format your work to match any style guide or publication.
Zotero can optionally synchronize your data across devices, keeping your files, notes, and bibliographic records seamlessly up to date. If you decide to sync, you can also always access your research from any web browser.
Zotero lets you co-write a paper with a colleague, distribute course materials to students, or build a collaborative bibliography. You can share a Zotero library with as many people you like, at no cost.
Zotero is open source and developed by an independent, nonprofit organization that has no financial interest in your private information. With Zotero, you always stay in control of your own data.
Still not sure which program to use for your research? See why we think you should choose Zotero .
Reference management. Clean and simple.
There are several good reference managers out there, each with its own strengths. Paperpile, Zotero, EndNote, and Mendeley are popular choices. Finding the best reference manager for your research process and personal preferences can be challenging. This guide is here to help you with your decision.
The table below compares the most important features of these four popular reference managers.
Paperpile | EndNote | Mendeley | Zotero | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Web | ||||
iOS | ||||
Android | ||||
Windows | ||||
MacOS | ||||
Linux | ||||
ChromeOS | ||||
Word on Windows | ||||
Word on Mac | ||||
Google Docs | ||||
Overleaf | ||||
Manual import with auto-completion | ||||
Bulk data import | ||||
In-app literature search | ||||
Bulk import from web databases | ||||
Metadata extract from PDFs | ||||
Create references from identifiers | ||||
Custom PDF file naming | ||||
Sticky notes | ||||
Highlight annotation | ||||
Freehand drawing | ||||
Custom highlight colors | ||||
Free text annotations | ||||
Free version (e.g., short-one time project) | ||||
Academic user subscription price |
If you’re looking for the best reference manager for your research process, try Paperpile :
“One place to organize all the PDF documents, including scientific papers and books. Being able to access them through Google Drive is a game changer.”
-Research Scientist, Boston Dynamics AI Institute
Other interesting topics:.
All your papers in one place. Nice and tidy.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
EndNote. Clarivate Analytics, 1500 Spring Garden Street, Fourth Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19130; http://endnote.com ; standard edition, $249.95. ; student pricing available; cost includes unlimited cloud storage; EndNote web included with some library subscriptions to other Clarivate products.
Mendeley. Elsevier, Suite 800, 230 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10169; http://www.mendeley.com ; basic account free; includes 2GB online storage; premium and institutional accounts and additional storage plans available for purchase.
RefWorks. ProQuest, 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, Ann Arbor, MI 48108; http://refworks.proquest.com ; institutional subscriptions only; contact vendor for pricing.
Zotero. Roy Rozenzweig Center for History and New Media, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MSN 1E7, Fairfax, VA 22030; https://www.zotero.org ; free; includes 300 MB online storage; storage plans available for purchase.
Citation management has not always been as easy as it is today. Years ago, references were manually organized on index cards, an awkward and time-consuming process. Citation management software was introduced in the 1980s and used primarily to organize references, search databases for articles on a particular topic, and generate bibliographies [ 1 ]. Over the years, users’ needs have changed, technology has advanced, and many new features have been added, including options for social networking and portable document format file (PDF) management.
There are now many bibliographic management packages available and many factors to consider when choosing the product that best meets the needs of the individual user or institution. Popular tools include RefWorks, EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley, and F1000 Workspace. This review will cover the first four; F1000 Workspace was reviewed in the Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) in 2017 [ 2 ].
First released in 1988 [ 3 ], EndNote is a commercial product that is primarily marketed via sales of its desktop application (currently version X8). A basic online version is free, but it has limited features and functionality. RefWorks, first released in 2001 [ 4 ], is an entirely web-based application marketed to libraries as an institution-wide tool, though a vendor representative indicated that individual accounts used to be available and will be offered again [ 5 ]. The product is currently transitioning to a new interface, referred to by the vendor as “new RefWorks.” Zotero’s free, open source citation manager was initially introduced in 2006 as an extension for the Firefox web browser. It is now available as a standalone application [ 6 ]. First released in 2008 [ 7 ], Mendeley is a free cloud-based citation manager with desktop and online versions. It also serves as an academic research network, offering a variety of social networking features.
All four products share a core set of features that allow users to import, organize, and manage citations and associated full text. Users can import references from a variety of databases, create in-text citations and bibliographies, and import bibliographic information from web pages. All offer an extensive list of citation styles and the ability to edit existing styles and create new ones.
The remainder of this review focuses on how these products differ with respect to the most commonly used features of citation managers and the advantages and disadvantages of each product. Table 1 summarizes key differences between the products. This review is based primarily on current desktop versions (if applicable) of the products as of February 2018, though online versions are discussed as needed to provide a complete picture of a tool’s functionality. For Mendeley, this review covers the free version only. For RefWorks, this review covers the new RefWorks only; it does not address the older version, known as Legacy RefWorks.
Citation management tools at a glance
EndNote | Mendeley | RefWorks | Zotero | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Platforms | Mac, Windows | Mac, Windows, Linux | Not applicable (web-based only) | Mac, Windows, Linux |
Browsers | Internet Explorer (IE), Firefox, Chrome, Safari | IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari | IE, Microsoft Edge, Firefox, Safari, Chrome | Firefox, Chrome, Safari |
Browser plug-ins | IE (Windows only) and Firefox (Windows and Mac) | IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari | IE (Windows only), Safari (Mac only), Firefox, Chrome, and Microsoft Edge | Firefox, Chrome, and Safari |
Mobile apps | iOS (iPad only) | Android, iOS | None; mobile-friendly site available | None; mobile-friendly site available |
Word processing integration | Microsoft Word (Windows and Mac) | Microsoft Word (Windows and Mac), LibreOffice (Linux, Mac, and Windows) | Microsoft Word (Windows and Mac), Google Docs | Microsoft Word (Windows and Mac), Libre Office (Linux, Mac, and Windows) |
Importing references | Refer/BibIX, tab delimited, RIS, ISI-CE, filters for hundreds of databases | BibTeX, EndNote, XML, RIS, Zotero library, txt, Ovid (Medlars reprint), PubMed/MEDLINE (nbib), Mendeley web catalog | Mendeley, RIS, filters for hundreds of databases | Bibliontology RDF, BibTeX browser bookmarks, Citavi 5 XML, CSL JSON, EndNote XML, MAB2, MARC, MARCXML, PubMed/MEDLINE (nbib), MODS, Ovid tagged, Primo normalized XML, PubMed XML, RDF, Refer/BibIX, RefWorks tagged, RIS, Web of Science tagged, XML ContextObject |
Add reference by identifier | Available by searching external databases in application | ArXiv ID, DOI, PMID | Not available | ISBN, DOI, PMID |
Offline availability | Yes, references and files stored locally | Yes, references and files stored locally | Only with link to Dropbox account | Yes, references and files stored locally |
All four products offer plug-ins for Microsoft Word. EndNote, Mendeley, and Zotero offer desktop clients, while RefWorks is entirely web-based. Table 1 shows platforms and browser compatibility. All four products offer a web-based version that works with recent versions of popular browsers. Some tools offer plug-ins for other browsers as well, and all offer browser add-ons (bookmarklets, extensions, etc.) for importing bibliographic information from web pages. The Mendeley browser add-on functions only with the online version of Mendeley; the Zotero add-on requires the desktop version for full functionality; and the EndNote add-on can be used in the desktop and online versions.
Of the four products, only EndNote and Mendeley offer mobile apps. While RefWorks and Zotero do not have mobile apps, they do have mobile-friendly sites.
All four tools allow users to import files of references from databases or other citation management tools. Users can search within databases, mark references to save or export, and select from a variety of options to add references to their preferred citation manager tools. Choosing a direct export option opens any of these tools that are installed on users’ computers, and references can be added with one mouse-click. Each of the products has direct export options for at least one of the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, EBSCO (CINAHL), and ProQuest (PsycINFO). All four systems allow direct export of records from EBSCO (CINAHL), while EndNote is the only tool that has a direct export option for PubMed.
Users can also use the browser add-ons to automatically import references into their reference collections. The add-ons for Mendeley, RefWorks, and Zotero allow users to import references to their reference collections from multiple databases. Depending on the database, users can select individual references or batches, and the references and associated PDFs are imported. Mendeley and Zotero users can use the browser add-ons to import references from PubMed, Web of Science, and Science Direct. Using Zotero, the reviewers were able to import references from ProQuest (PsycINFO), but the Mendeley browser add-on was not able to recognize the bibliographic metadata in ProQuest (PsycINFO) references. Errors were experienced with both Mendeley and Zotero when we imported references from EBSCO (CINAHL).
EndNote’s Capture Reference bookmarklet has more limited functionality than the browser add-ons for the other three products. When displaying a list of PubMed search results, Capture Reference only imported all references on the page; it did not allow us to select specific references to import. Capture Reference did not work at all for us with a list of results from Google Scholar. The only way to import these results was to open each one and then capture it. It also did not directly capture bibliographic information about web pages as easily as the other add-ons did. When we attempted to import information about a web page using Capture Reference, it created an RIS file that we then had to import into EndNote, whereas the other three add-ons added information about web pages directly.
The tools also offer several other ways to add references. Mendeley users can add references by entering a PubMed ID (PMID), digital object (DOI), or ArXivID. Similarly, Zotero users can add references using the international standard book number (ISBN), DOI, or PMID. In the online version of Mendeley, users can search and import references from Mendeley’s web catalog, a collection of all the references that have been added to the personal libraries of Mendeley users [ 8 ]. EndNote and RefWorks also allow users to search databases and library catalogs from within the application and import selected search results. EndNote offers an extensive list of free and commercial databases for searching. As of this writing, the new RefWorks only offers PubMed and the Library of Congress as search options, and, when tested, neither search option was functional. According to the RefWorks lead product manager, institutional account administrators can allow users to search any database that is accessible via the Z39.50 search standard. He also indicated that ProQuest is building application programming interfaces (APIs) to integrate RefWorks with other ProQuest tools such as Summon and Primo, which should increase in-app search options [ 5 ].
All four applications allow users to create standalone bibliographies in virtually any word processor, including Google Docs. With EndNote, users can create a standalone bibliography by selecting citations and an output style, and copying and pasting into a word processor document. EndNote also allows users to create a subject bibliography that is based on one or more keywords in users’ citations. Both Mendeley and Zotero allow users to drag references from the desktop client into a word processor, where they will be formatted according to the style that users have selected, the quickest and most user-friendly method of bibliography creation. RefWorks includes a feature that allows users to generate a bibliography from a batch of references in a folder, but that feature did not work when we tested it, leaving no way to generate standalone bibliographies from citations.
More commonly, users create bibliographies from in-text citations in a manuscript. All four tools offer Microsoft Word plug-ins to support this functionality. Table 1 provides details about which tools work with other word processors. In EndNote, the bibliography is automatically generated as the citations are inserted into the document. In Mendeley, RefWorks, and Zotero, inserting a citation and creating a bibliography are separate steps, and at least one citation must be added to the document in order to create a bibliography. All four products made occasional small errors in citations, especially when we cited web pages, but Mendeley performed especially poorly, omitting key information from web page citations, such as date accessed.
Each tool offers different options for adding PDF documents. All four systems allow users to add PDF documents by dragging and dropping them into their reference collections and by attaching them to existing citations. EndNote and Mendeley users can drag and drop PDFs both individually and in folders. RefWorks users can only add PDFs one at a time, while Zotero users can add multiple PDFs at once. Mendeley users can also add PDFs by putting them in a designated folder called a Watch Folder. Mendeley monitors the contents of these folders and automatically adds any PDFs to reference collections.
All four products can generate metadata from PDFs to create a citation record, but they use somewhat different methods to do so. When we tested articles from three different journals, all four products extracted metadata inconsistently and occasionally inaccurately. For example, one product extracted metadata completely for a given article, while another failed to extract key information (e.g. author name, page numbers) from the same PDF, and a third failed to import any metadata from the PDF. All products exhibited these failures, though RefWorks appeared to be the least accurate, with at least one significant error with each of the three PDFs that we tested.
All of the products, other than Zotero, support PDF annotation in the application. Zotero users can open PDFs in the application of their choice, annotate them, and save them back to the Zotero database. An add-on called Zotfile [ 9 ] allows users to extract annotations and perform other PDF management tasks.
EndNote and Zotero can use an openURL link resolver to help users retrieve full text from a library’s electronic collections. Users can specify the baseURL of their libraries’ link resolver in the product settings, and the products will use metadata from a citation in their libraries to attempt to locate full text for that item. In Zotero, this feature is called Library Lookup. Users click on a reference in their collections, and if full text is found, the PDF file can be easily dragged and dropped into their reference collections. EndNote users can access full-text through their institutions by using the Find Full Text feature. Mendeley used to allow integration with a library’s link resolver but no longer offers this feature [ 8 ]. For RefWorks, institutional administrators can configure a link resolver for all users at that institution.
According to RefWorks documentation, RefWorks users can only share collections with users at their own institutions [ 10 ]. The RefWorks senior product manager indicated, however, that as of fall 2017, RefWorks users can share folders with other RefWorks users across institutions [ 5 ]. EndNote X7 and X8 users can share with each other in groups of up to 100 members [ 11 ]. Mendeley and Zotero users can create both public and private groups [ 12 , 13 ], though Mendeley users with a free account can create and own only one private group, and private groups created by free accounts are limited to three members [ 14 ]. Mendeley offers additional social networking features in the online version that the other products do not provide. Mendeley users can search for and follow other researchers with similar interests and receive updates on actions and events of researchers they are following via the Mendeley Newsfeed [ 12 ].
EndNote, Mendeley, and Zotero collections and documents are stored locally and, therefore, available offline. RefWorks is a purely cloud-based system, so access to the application itself is not available offline. Users can, however, link a DropBox account to RefWorks to provide offline access to full-text documents in RefWorks [ 10 ].
Of the four products, EndNote is the only one that offers a journal matching feature, known as Manuscript Matcher, to help users find the right journal for their manuscripts. Users of the online version can provide their article titles, abstracts, and references, and EndNote will provide a list of journal recommendations based on its analysis of Web of Science citation data [ 15 ]. RefWorks is the only product to offer a plug-in for Google Docs, an especially useful feature at universities where Google tools are used heavily by students. It is also the only fully cloud-based product. While both Mendeley and Zotero are free, Zotero is the only open-source product among the four. Its source code is hosted on GitHub and freely available under an AGPLv3 license [ 16 ].
All four of the tools reviewed here are usable for standard reference manager functions, and each has strengths and weaknesses. For example, in our testing, Zotero’s browser add-on was the easiest to use and captured data more accurately than the other add-ons did. EndNote offered the most choices for searching databases within the tool, and Zotero generated the most accurate bibliographies. Each also offers unique features that may be especially valuable to certain populations (e.g., RefWorks’ integration with Google Docs, Mendeley’s social networking functions). Often, though, the best choice for a given purpose may be determined by factors other than the functionality of the applications themselves. These factors include cost, support provided by institutions, research needs, familiarity with a product from previous experience, and accessibility for the research team members. For example, if users are working on a systematic review with authors at several institutions, they will need to choose a tool that is accessible to everyone on the team. Since users are not limited to the citation managers supported by their institutions, information professionals need to be familiar with all popular choices in order to guide and support their users effectively.
A reference management tool is a software for storing and managing information resources. Generally, a reference management tool can help you:
EndNote, Mendeley and Zotero are the most popular reference management tools used by many researchers and students.
Find more details about these three tools in the following comparison table and detailed instructions in our online guides for each tool.
The following comparison table of EndNote, Mendeley and Zotero may help you choose a right tool to meet your research needs.
Check the for more details and latest updates. | Check the for more details and latest updates. | Check the for more details and latest updates.
| |
Drag and drop PDFs | |||
Table of Contents
That’s where reference management software comes in. It can help you gather, organize, and cite your sources more effectively- saving you time and energy in the long run.
But with so many different types of software to choose from, how do you know which one is right for you?
2. It makes collaboration much easier. Have a group project? Reference management software will help you share resources with ease. No more passing around notes or spending hours trying to compile everything together by hand!
Mendeley-most popular reference management tool.
Mendeley is a software that helps researchers manage their references. It can be used to create bibliographies and citations, and it also allows users to collaborate with other researchers. Mendeley can be accessed online or offline, and it is available for both Windows and Mac users.
Pricing/Free Version
Zotero helps you stay organized by allowing you to collect and save information about your sources in one place.
But perhaps the best thing about RefWorks is its collaborative features. With RefWorks, you can share your references with colleagues or classmates and work together on projects. You can also create groups to collaborate on research topics.
Ultimate guide to best reference management softwares for academic research, what is a reference management software.
Citation managers help you find sources more quickly and easily. Most programs have built-in search engines that allow you to quickly find articles and other resources related to your topic. They also allow you to save search parameters and customize your results. The more sources you find, the better equipped you will be to make an informed decision about how to word your paper’s thesis statement and plan out the rest of the writing process.
Final thoughts.
In scholarly articles and research documents, citations play an important role for both researchers and readers. It is also very time-consuming to integrate these citations accurately into research documents without the aid of reference management software.
10 thoughts on “10 best reference management software for research”.
Thank you so much for all this information. It was a great read and gave me some good cites to look into. However, I would recommend that you also look into Opendemia. Opendemia allows students to manage their references, take notes, and create bibliographies. This tool has really helped me with my research papers and I think other students reading this article can benefit from this as well.
Thanks for the comment. We will look into it.
Thank you! Here is the website: https://www.opendemia.com
Thank you for a good overview, very helpful. I just want to mention that as a researcher it is very important for me to have a product that can last me throughout my career. In my mind, this requires, for a good and bad, a bigger company behind the product. I believe this is something you should also consider here.
Interesting point Peter. Love to hear more elaboration from you!
I agree. A single, reliable software package that works for your entire career sounds wonderful. Having to learn new packages, or even new versions of your old package is a waste of time. It may tickle the fancy of computer nerds and business folks who want a steady stream of income. However, adapting to the newest and latest software every few years sounds like self-abuse to me.
Thanks for the overview. You say that EndNote one-time cost is $99. I’m quoted almost four times that amount. Is that possible a regional issue? (I am in Iceland)
I ran a quick check and saw that upgrading from the trial will cost from USD $99.95 to USD $109.95. I’m not sure how they could quote you 4X as much.
Some of the reference managers mentioned in the article are no longer available. However, it’s worth noting that there are newer options like CiteDrive, which is considered one of the most modern reference managers available. Overall, it’s a great article!
Choosing a citation management tool can be overwhelming, particularly when deciding between Mendeley and Zotero. Each offers unique features tailored to enhance academic research and organisation.
This article delves into the core differences between Mendeley and Zotero, examining aspects from storage and file management to user interface and collaboration features.
Our goal is to help you determine which tool best aligns with your research needs and collaborative style, making your citation management more efficient and tailored.
Feature | Mendeley | Zotero |
---|---|---|
2GB free cloud storage. | 300MB free, expandable with any WebDAV server. | |
Integrated PDF reader for annotations. | Organizes PDFs, needs extra software for deep editing. | |
Supports many styles but with limited customization. | Supports many styles with easy customization. | |
Sleek and user-friendly. | Utilitarian with flexible organization options. | |
Private groups up to 25 members. | Unlimited public or private groups. |
Mendeley is a standout reference and citation management system that helps you to:
Using Mendeley, you can import PDF files from your desktop or directly from the web. This is complemented by plugins for web browsers that enable a single-click capture of research papers and their metadata into your personal library.
One feature you will appreciate is the ability to cite directly from Mendeley into your word processor. It also automatically adapting to the citation style you choose—whether APA, MLA, or any of the thousands available.
For collaborative projects, Mendeley allows you to share citations and documents within a private group or invite-only public group, supporting up to 25 members for free. This makes it incredibly easy to manage joint research efforts.
Zotero stands out as a free, open-source reference manager that simplifies the lives of researchers like you by managing bibliographies and citations in research papers.
One of Zotero’s most lauded features is its ability to seamlessly capture citations from the web with its browser extension.
You will also find Zotero incredibly helpful for organizing research material thanks to its powerful tagging and searching capabilities.
These allow you to easily find any piece of work, whether it’s a PDF file or a web link. Zotero syncs all your data across devices, making your database accessible wherever you are.
Zotero also supports group libraries, enabling you to collaborate and share research materials and citations with peers.
While both Mendeley and Zotero offer robust solutions in organising your research, they come in slightly different flavors. Here are some ways they are different from each other.
Mendeley offers you 2GB of free cloud storage. This might sound generous until you see Zotero’s approach: it starts you off with 300MB of free cloud storage but doesn’t limit you to its own cloud.
Zotero allows you to sync your data with any WebDAV server, providing flexibility if you need more space.
This can be particularly useful if your research involves a lot of large files and you are comfortable managing your own data backups.
Mendeley stands out with its integrated PDF reader. This allows you to annotate and highlight PDFs directly within the app.
If you spend a lot of time reviewing journal articles, this feature turns Mendeley into not just a citation tool but a comprehensive review platform.
Zotero’s PDF handling is more about organization than annotation. It does allow PDF indexing for easy searchability within the app, but for in-depth PDF editing, you would need to use another program.
Both tools support thousands of citation styles, from APA to lesser-known types tailored to specific academic journals.
However, Zotero takes the lead in how easily you can switch between styles and even customize them.
Thanks to its active community forums and open-source nature, it may be easier to work on your citations in Mendeley, be it to:
This openness can be a significant advantage if your field requires a highly specific citation format that isn’t mainstream.
Mendeley’s interface is often praised for its sleekness and ease of use, particularly in how it integrates document management directly into the citation process.
There’s also support for many devices, such as Mendeley Desktop.
The newly designed Mendeley Reference Manager simplifies how you interact with your library and annotations. Zotero’s interface, while highly functional, can feel a bit more utilitarian.
The trade-off is that Zotero offers more flexibility in organizing your research materials through its tagging and folder systems.
Both platforms allow you to share your research with others, which is essential for collaborative projects.
Mendeley limits you to creating private groups with up to 25 members, which might be sufficient for most projects but could be restrictive for larger collaborative efforts.
Zotero, in contrast, lets you create unlimited public or private groups, which is a boon if you’re working in large teams or need to manage multiple projects with different groups of colleagues.
Deciding between Zotero and Mendeley for managing your research can feel daunting.
Both tools come highly recommended, but each has distinct features that may suit different research needs. Here’s how you can choose the right one for you.
If you frequently work with PDFs, you might lean towards Mendeley. It has an integrated PDF viewer that lets you annotate and highlight documents directly within the application.
This is immensely helpful if you’re someone who likes to add notes and insights directly onto your research materials.
Plus, Mendeley’s 2GB of free cloud storage means you can sync your annotated files across all your devices without fuss.
On the other hand, if your work involves a broad array of source types or you require more flexible storage options, consider to use Zotero instead.
Zotero is open source and supports a wide variety of reference types and metadata from webpages, which is perfect if your research pulls from diverse resources.
Additionally, Zotero’s capability to sync with any WebDAV server gives you more control over where and how your data is stored.
Collaboration features also differ significantly between the two.
\Mendeley allows you to create private groups with up to 25 members—sufficient for most projects but limiting for larger teams.
Zotero, meanwhile, offers the ability to create unlimited public and private groups, which is invaluable for large-scale research projects involving many collaborators.
For those who value community support and the flexibility to customize tools, Zotero’s strong community platform and forums are a treasure trove of tips, tricks, and custom citation styles.
In many cases, you may find Zotero easier to be adjusted to your specific needs, compared to Mendeley.
Mendeley and Zotero are not the only citation management systems out there, which means you can find alternatives if you want to use something else.
EndNote is particularly well-suited for those deep in complex research. It’s more than a citation manager; it integrates with Microsoft Word to create bibliographies and manage references as you write.
EndNote stands out with its ability to handle a large number of citation styles and its robust database syncing capabilities. This ensures your library is always up-to-date across all your devices.
ReadCube Papers is a newer player that has quickly gained traction due to its modern interface and powerful features. It excels in manuscript matching, helping you find the best journal for your research.
Like Mendeley, it allows PDF annotations directly in the app and offers excellent support for importing PDF metadata, streamlining how you organize your articles.
Citavi is unique because it not only manages citations but also aids in knowledge organization. You can annotate PDFs, save quotations, and create task lists directly in the app.
Citavi’s project management features are a boon if you’re juggling multiple research projects, allowing you to track progress in one place.
Choosing between Mendeley and Zotero for citation management boils down to your specific needs. Mendeley is ideal if you value a sleek interface and integrated PDF annotations, suitable for solo projects or small teams.
Zotero excels in flexible storage options, extensive customization, and is better suited for large-scale collaborations due to its capability to handle unlimited groups.
Evaluate your primary requirements in research management to make the best choice between these two robust tools.
Dr Andrew Stapleton has a Masters and PhD in Chemistry from the UK and Australia. He has many years of research experience and has worked as a Postdoctoral Fellow and Associate at a number of Universities. Although having secured funding for his own research, he left academia to help others with his YouTube channel all about the inner workings of academia and how to make it work for you.
We are here to help you navigate Academia as painlessly as possible. We are supported by our readers and by visiting you are helping us earn a small amount through ads and affiliate revenue - Thank you!
2024 © Academia Insider
#scribendiinc
Written by Scribendi
Students, academics, authors, and researchers generally have to do a lot of online research. With so many different databases, online journals, and websites, it can be overwhelming to manage and organize so many references—especially if you're doing it manually.
Did you know that there are programs that can actually manage and keep track of your references for you? If not, then you are in for a treat!
Many reference management software programs make the process of managing your references nearly effortless. Here are the top 6, as determined by Scribendi's research.
Managing your references online doesn't have to be hard, e specially when citation programs exist that let you easily organize and cite your references.
Reference managers take the effort out of storing references, categorizing them, and including the right ones in your work.
Without reference managers, it's too easy to lose an important source, or worse, cite it incorrectly.
Below, we're expanding on the top reference management software programs out there, including:
1. Mendeley
If you're in a technical or scientific field, Mendeley is an excellent option for you. This reference management software allows users to generate citations and bibliographies in Microsoft Word, LibreOffice, and LaTeX.
Mendeley is great for collaborative work because it allows you to connect with colleagues and share your papers, notes, and annotations. It can be used on your computer via the web or through your iPhone or iPad, which makes it easy to do your work wherever you go.
Mendeley is especially useful for gathering data from PDFs you find in your research process. It automatically extracts metadata and adds it to your library entry. The software also has a built-in PDF viewer for easy reading.
With both free and paid options, Mendeley is one of the best reference managers and is easily accessible across all devices. For easy organization, it gives you the option of categorizing sources as recently read or recently added.
As an additional way to keep all of your notes from sources on a single platform, Mendeley has its own proprietary system for annotating PDFs . This means you don't need to leave the platform to take notes as you go!
If you're like most researchers and authors, you might be considering Endnote versus Mendeley. If so, here are a few things that might sway your decision.
Mendeley offers the bulk of its platform features for free. It gives you the option to sync your references on all of your devices, and it makes reference categorization simple.
EndNote, on the other hand, is a pricier Mendeley alternative. The majority of its features can only be accessed with a paid subscription. However, EndNote is more of a complete tool, with a heavy focus on academic journals. You can search databases, such as PubMed, right inside the tool, and it makes citation formatting a breeze with its Cite While You Write integration.
Both platforms have great features; the choice just depends on how much you're able to spend per month and your specific discipline.
Flowcite helps researchers manage every aspect of academic writing, including research, reference management, collaborative writing, annotating, editing, and publishing. It brings together all of the most requested services for creating a research paper from start to finish.
Besides free core features, such as a knowledge library of almost 25 million sources, a reference manager, LaTeX and rich text editors, and a collaborative PDF viewer, Flowcite offers a number of top-notch services for editing and proofreading (by Scribendi !), similarity checking, and publishing from leading service providers.
Flowcite review.
Like other reference management tools, Flowcite has free and paid options. Their free option gives you 3 GB of storage and collaboration features for up to three people. However, at $9 a month, Flowcite's paid subscription isn't too steep.
With their paid option, you can enjoy the following features:
A PDF viewer in which you can collaborate with colleagues on annotations
The ability to access free journal articles within the platform
Up to 30 GB of storage for important references
Collaboration features for up to 10 people
The ability to purchase or rent e-books from Flowcite's online bookstore
A browser extension for saving references on the go
If you're searching for an all-in-one platform to help you not only research your paper but also write, format, and spell-check it, Flowcite is your best bet.
3. refworks.
RefWorks is an exceptional reference management software program. Although it is not free, many colleges and universities have subscriptions to RefWorks, which means that you may already have it available to you through your school. Score!
RefWorks is great because it allows users to generate and format bibliographies and manuscripts in hundreds of output styles, including some of the most common (e.g., APA , MLA , or Chicago ). It also allows users to manage more than just bibliographical data, which is why it's great for academics and researchers alike.
RefWorks is an ideal reference manager for students and undergraduates, given that most universities subscribe to it.
With RefWorks, you can create bibliographies in multiple formats, and it has a simple user interface, which can be either a benefit or a disadvantage, depending on the complexity of your research needs.
It also has helpful features, such as reference organization, a built-in PDF reader, and the ability to sync your data to Dropbox so you can access it offline.
Both RefWorks and Mendeley have great options for saving and organizing your references, but choosing between them will depend on your specific needs and situation.
Mendeley is a more user-friendly and stable platform. Many enjoy the tool's robust collaboration features and the ability to view full-text PDFs from within it, making it a top contender in the reference and bibliography software space.
If your university uses RefWorks, they most likely have a subscription that allows you to cite sources, record data from articles or books, and share your database with multiple people at no cost.
Zotero is both free and open source, which means that you don't have to pay for it and that its design is publicly accessible. Zotero is a great choice for a reference manager, especially for students, because it runs as both a web service and an offline service on your personal device (laptop, iPad, cell phone, etc.).
Zotero not only stores and formats your bibliographic information but also allows you to organize, tag, and search this information. It automatically and seamlessly extracts information from books, journal articles, and other online sources, making the process of creating a reference list effortless.
Zotero is an open-source reference manager with free and paid options that allow you to save web-based sources. With its browser extension (Connector), you can easily save and organize the sources you find while researching.
As one of the more popular reference managers, Zotero offers up to 300 MB of free file storage and has a clean and minimal interface for reference organization. Its Microsoft Word plug-in allows for easy citation formatting, and its annotation feature gives you the option to add notes to your research from within the platform.
When considering Zotero versus Mendeley, it's easy to see that both reference managers give you the ability to organize your references effectively.
One benefit of Mendeley is that it offers more free cloud storage than other platforms—up to 2 GB. This gives you space for about 700–800 articles. If you plan to collect a lot of references, this might be the better option.
However, Zotero is known to be better for non-journal articles and for having a dedicated user community for support, given that it is an open-source project.
Both platforms allow you to save citations while you browse and have free plug-ins for Word and LibreOffice for creating in-text citations, footnotes, and bibliographies.
EndNote is great if you're collaborating on a research paper. It lets you share sources with up to 14 colleagues anywhere in the world, so it's definitely the top choice for collaborations.
One of the highlights of this reference manager is that it includes reference types such as interviews, podcasts, conference papers, and press releases. It also lets you add citations to Microsoft PowerPoint slides, which is especially helpful if you're creating a presentation with a group.
EndNote has a huge catalog of format options with over 6,000 reference styles, so regardless of your discipline, you're bound to find one that fits your needs. Although EndNote isn't free, it is certainly high quality.
EndNote has a reputation for being one of the most complete reference manager software packages in the industry. It's been around a lot longer than most other similar tools and contains robust features for researchers and students in its paid version ($299, one-time purchase).
Within EndNote, you can create rules that let you organize your references and effectively format citations in multiple areas within your text using its Cite While You Write integration.
The latest version of EndNote also makes collaboration easier, offering support for up to 200 users to share references. Additionally, EndNote has a search function that makes it easy to search databases, such as PubMed, without leaving the platform.
Depending on the kind of citation manager software you need, both EndNote and Zotero offer helpful features for researchers and students.
While Zotero offers more features for free and has one of the best support communities, EndNote is a pricier but more robust option. However, both tools are effective at helping you to organize and categorize your references.
Both tools allow you to download references easily from a PubMed search, find and remove duplicate citations, and insert citations that are automatically formatted to your style preference into your text.
Additionally, Zotero seems to be a better fit for non-journal articles, while EndNote is often the best choice for STEM disciplines.
Citationsy is a great choice because it's so adaptable. You can access it as a page within your browser or download it as a Chrome extension or mobile app, which means that you can access your library from any device with an internet connection.
Like the other reference managers, it automatically extracts citation details so that you don't have to type them in yourself. You can even use its mobile app to cite your books by scanning their barcodes.
With its intuitive and easy-to-use user interface, Citationsy is a welcoming reference manager for students and professionals alike.
It boasts 300,000+ users and has features that help you add bibliographic references from your phone and scan physical books to save as future references. Currently, Citationsy supports over 8,000 citation formats, and references can be exported in BibTeX/LaTeX format.
In terms of price, Citationsy has a free 3-day trial with a $4.99/month subscription for students and a $9.99/month subscription for non-students.
The one thing to keep in mind with Citationsy is that some of its features are more limited in comparison with EndNote and Mendeley, so be sure it has exactly what you're looking for!
Do you see the common trend with these reference management software programs? They make creating a bibliography easy! Be sure to take advantage of the features offered by these programs to make your research just a little bit easier.
If you would rather have an expert editor format your references correctly according to any style guide, check out Scribendi's fast, affordable, and professional academic proofreading services .
Download now, what is a reference manager.
A reference manager, also called a citation manager, is a tool that makes it easy to collect and organize references during the research process. It allows you to store references from your browser so you do not overlook any references you've used. Many reference managers have plug-ins that make it easy to cite sources within your paper, usually with a single click.
The best citation manager will depend on your needs as a student, researcher, or author. You'll need to ask: Do I want a paid or a free option? How much storage do I need?
If you're looking for free options with the flexibility to be used from anywhere, try experimenting with EndNote Basic, Zotero, or Mendeley. However, if your university pays for your citation manager, RefWorks might be a better fit.
In terms of storage, Mendeley wins the race for large free storage options, but you may want to experiment with a few different tools to see what works for you.
Each shared dataset in Mendeley Data can take 1–2 business days to approve from the time of submission to be sure it complies with Mendeley's dataset requirements. You should receive an email informing you whether your dataset has been accepted.
To ensure dataset acceptance, double-check that your datasets are scientific in nature, have not already been published, and do not contain sensitive or copyrighted content.
Scribendi's in-house editors work with writers from all over the globe to perfect their writing. They know that no piece of writing is complete without a professional edit, and they love to see a good piece of writing turn into a great one after the editing process. Scribendi's in-house editors are unrivaled in both experience and education, having collectively edited millions of words and obtained nearly 20 degrees collectively. They love consuming caffeinated beverages, reading books of various genres, and relaxing in quiet, dimly lit spaces.
Have You Read?
"The Complete Beginner's Guide to Academic Writing"
Upload your file(s) so we can calculate your word count, or enter your word count manually.
We will also recommend a service based on the file(s) you upload.
File | Word Count | Include in Price? |
---|
English is not my first language. I need English editing and proofreading so that I sound like a native speaker.
I need to have my journal article, dissertation, or term paper edited and proofread, or I need help with an admissions essay or proposal.
I have a novel, manuscript, play, or ebook. I need editing, copy editing, proofreading, a critique of my work, or a query package.
I need editing and proofreading for my white papers, reports, manuals, press releases, marketing materials, and other business documents.
I need to have my essay, project, assignment, or term paper edited and proofread.
I want to sound professional and to get hired. I have a resume, letter, email, or personal document that I need to have edited and proofread.
Prices include your personal % discount.
Prices include % sales tax ( ).
Citation management software helps you:
This guide only covers citation software supported by the library: Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote. When deciding which one to use consider your research habits, word processing, and collaboration/sharing needs. These programs can work with each other and some people may need to use more than one throughout their academic career.
EndNote
Here are some other sites that compare citation manager features:
Citation Management Options (University of Michigan)
PIM Citation Tool Comparison Chart (University of Minnesota)
Comparison of reference management software (Wikipedia, very detailed and many programs)
You may also get personal assistance in choosing a new citation manager from ScholarSpace staff, either via email or by an in-person consultation .
Where to acquire software:
If you want information about where to find and how to install these programs: For Zotero, go to the Zotero guide linked to on the sidebar under the Zotero link For Mendeley, you can download and install it by following the link here To create a free EndNote Basic account, go here The full version of EndNote that you would install on your computer is not free software. You can purchase it from the Computer Showcase in either Shapiro or the Duderstadt Center; more info here , or see these pages for purchase info:
EndNote Mac Student
EndNote Mac Faculty/Staff
EndNote Windows Student
EndNote Windows Faculty/Staff
You may also wish to check to see if your school or department will provide you with an EndNote license. Some units on campus provide software for their affiliates. For example, LS&A provides EndNote licenses for LS&A faculty and students; move information on that is here .
How to choose: endnote, mendeley, or zotero.
This guide will assist you in choosing the citation manager that best fits your needs. You cannot go wrong with choosing any of the tools, but it helps if you take a few things into consideration before starting. Remember that switching between the tools is possible, but it does become less convenient the longer you use a tool and the more file attachments you collect.
All three programs can:
Reasons to Choose EndNote
Zotero and Mendeley are relatively young tools when compared to EndNote. EndNote X9 offers some advanced features that might be necessary for your discipline and work flow, including hundreds of built-in citation styles. For Northwestern students, faculty, and staff, EndNote 20 can be downloaded through NUIT with a valid NetID.
Reasons to Choose Mendeley
If your research content is primarily contained in PDF files, Mendeley has an integrated PDF viewer and can create citation records by using the browser extension. Mendeley has the strongest website and community platform.
Reasons to Choose Zotero
If your research content is diverse, Zotero is the easiest method to gather citation records for non-PDF content. Zotero's single-click capture works with more databases, catalogs, and websites than Mendeley's browser extension. You can also enable the retrieval of PDF metadata, which allows you to create citation records just from dragging a PDF into Zotero. Zotero is open source and cannot be acquired by a company.
Questions? Contact the library's citation management support .
This guide is based on a similar guide by Daria Carson-Dussan, Melissa Vetter, and Cheryl Holland at WUSTL.
Upcoming citation management workshops.
We offer workshops on EndNote and Zotero every quarter.
We offer Zotero workshops every quarter. Here's what's coming up for Spring 2024:
Zotero In person : Tuesday, April 16, 2024 1:00-1:45pm, Mudd Library, 2124 Register for the in person Zotero workshop
Zotero Online : Tuesday, April 30, 2024 2:00-2:45 pm, Zoom Register for the online Zotero workshop
EndNote In person : Thursday, April 11, 2024 1:00-1:45pm, Mudd 2124 Register for the in person EndNote workshop
EndNote Online : Wednesday, April 24, 2024 3:00-3:45 pm, Zoom Register for the online EndNote workshop
Drop-in assistance for EndNote and Zotero:
Thursday, May 16, 2024 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM, University Library Main Corridor No registration needed, stop by anytime during the hour.
For 1:1 assistance with EndNote or Zotero, contact the Libraries' EndNote and Zotero Support team.
To see other events at the library, visit libraries.nu/events
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Illustration by The Project Twins
For such utilitarian tools, reference management software can inspire strong reactions. Physician Ben Goldacre, for instance, has tweeted at least five times about Paperpile, a subscription-based reference manager that integrates tightly with Google Docs, calling it “amazing”, “fantastic, best ever”, and “unbeLIEVably good”. Goldacre, who is also director of the DataLab at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, UK, explains: “Paperpile is the first time I’ve used a reference manager where it didn’t make me want to punch myself in the face on a regular basis out of sheer rage. It’s just glorious and perfect.”
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
24,99 € / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
185,98 € per year
only 3,65 € per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Nature 585 , 149-150 (2020)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02491-2
Partners in drug discovery: how to collaborate with non-governmental organizations
Career Feature 23 AUG 24
Time to refocus for South Korean science
Nature Index 21 AUG 24
South Korean science on the global stage
How South Korea can build better gender diversity into research
The citation black market: schemes selling fake references alarm scientists
News 20 AUG 24
Chatbots in science: What can ChatGPT do for you?
Career Column 14 AUG 24
Memphis, Tennessee
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (St. Jude)
The Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics in the Wayne State University School of Medicine (http://genetics.wayne.edu/) is expanding its high-...
Detroit, Michigan
Wayne State University
Tampa, Florida
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute
Houston, Texas (US)
Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
Find the best product instantly, what is the best reference manager, 10 options considered.
Best reference manager | Price | Platforms | License |
---|---|---|---|
Free/Paid | Windows, Mac, Linux, Android (not official), iOS (not official), Web | AGPL (FOSS) | |
Freemium | Windows | - | |
$2.99/mo | - | - | |
Free | Windows, Mac, Linux | MIT | |
$3-5/month | - | - |
My recommendation for zotero.
Microsoft word integration, collaboration tools, snapshot of web page for offline view, integrates with word, libreoffice, lyx, and google docs, tag suggestios from existing list; tag pane to find related items, cloud sync allows web access and sync across devices, collect references effortlessly from the web, libre office integration, google-docs integration, multiple libraries for better management, my rec ommendation for citavi, my recommendation for citavi.
My rec ommendation for paperpile, my recommendation for paperpile.
Papers can be added directly from the browser, makes collaborative writing easy as it's built around google docs, my rec ommendation for jabref, my recommendation for jabref, requires java, organize articles based on keywords, tags, search terms or manual assignments, browser extension, hierarchical collections, regular expressions, find unlinked files, native bibtex and biblatex support, cross platform, keep track of what you read: ranking, priority, printed, quality-assured, word and libreoffice/openoffice upport, create entry from xmp metadata, readcube papers, my rec ommendation for readcube papers, my recommendation for readcube papers, best ui & workflow.
My rec ommendation for qiqqa, my recommendation for qiqqa, open source, brainstorm option, ocr support, f1000workspace, my rec ommendation for f1000workspace, my recommendation for f1000workspace, annotations on pdf and web pages, has been transformed under a new bossiness model with a new name which requires registration to use the product, import from identifiers (doi, pmid, pmcid, isbn, url), google docs add-on, ios/android mobile apps, chrome extension, import from pdf, mendeley, zotero, endnote, papers, readcube, reference manager, refworks, word plugin, my rec ommendation for endnote, my recommendation for endnote, industry leader, no mobile app, poor web interface, my rec ommendation for mendeley, my recommendation for mendeley, proprietary software, acquired by elsevier, web interface, native applications and mobile apps are available.
Very good pdf management capability.
Citation plugin for word and libreoffice.
Papers can be added directly from the browser (via extension), doesn't work on all platforms, moderately high cloud space.
Ability to edit, import, and export references in multiple formats, pdf viewer performs poorly on macos, good video tutorials, annotations from external pdf viewers can't be imported anymore (macos), great web interface, good sharing and community support, my rec ommendation for citato, my recommendation for citato.
Don't see your favorite option add it., my rec ommendation for citationsy, my recommendation for citationsy.
Built By the Slant team
Are you sure that you want to abandon your hard work?
All scientists know that to get published, they must have novel data. Therefore, when a researcher designs experiments and writes manuscripts, information and use of previous studies are fundamental. Indeed, a scientist must know what is known before designing an experiment. To help manage all of the research articles and studies that scientists sift through daily, there are citation managers that help organize papers . Among the various citation management tools such as Mendeley, Zotero, EndNote, and RefWorks, which citation tool is best suited for you?
Originally, reference managers helped researchers correctly format their citations . These tools have come a long way since then. However, with all the new options and features, deciding which citation tool works best requires background work and awareness. Among the various options available to the scientist, few common citation managers are RefWorks, Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote.
EndNote : A tool for managing and publishing bibliographies, citations, and references.
Mendeley : A tool for reference management and for collaborating and sharing your work.
Zotero : A tool for managing and organize different resources and for sharing research.
RefWorks : A tool for managing and organizing bibliographies.
The basic features of the citation management tools are often similar; however, they offer distinct services.
Free (basic) Desktop ($116) | Free (Institution-Dependent) | Free | Free (basic edition) | |
Desktop software & web based version | Web-based | Plug-in for browser or stand-alone version for desktop available | Desktop Version | |
Reference Library | Reference Library | Reference and PDF library are shareable | Reference Library (Limited PDF sharing) | |
Yes (must save website data manually) | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
Yes (Desktop Version Only) | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
Yes, in accordance with 12 professional society requirements | No | Yes, any journal in MEDLINE | Yes, by citation style | |
Yes(Desktop Version Only) | Yes | No | No | |
No | No | Yes | No | |
No | Yes | Yes | No | |
No | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
No | Yes | No | Yes | |
5GB | 5GB | 300MB | 2GB |
With all of these features and options, a scientist needs to consider which features are most important to him/her as a researcher. A good first step is to know what is already in use in your lab. While a tool may not be your favorite, using a shared citation manager will facilitate collaboration with your colleagues.
Do you like to work on multiple computer systems or without the internet? Consider using Zotero, Mendeley, or Endnote. Do you want to archive web pages? Consider using Zotero. Do you want to work on a group project and network or share? Consider using Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote. Each citation manager comes with its advantages. EndNote can not only house a large number of citations but also can be customized to a great extent. Zotero is effective in housing a variety of formats and downloading resources from different databases. Mendeley, on the other hand, has the capability to manage PDFs effectively and helps in sharing documents or citations within your network.
As a scientist, you may have typed in your research topic into PubMed. A search for “cardiac stem cell” yielded 18,522 results in May 2017. While many of those articles can be filtered out, there are likely dozens, if not hundreds, of articles that you want to read as part of your research. Using a citation management tool, such as RefWorks, Mendeley, Zotero, or EndNote, will help you organize your citations. It will facilitate your collaborative projects by sharing findings. It can help focus your research based upon trends spotted through organized citation data. You can also choose multiple citation platforms based on your requirements. Ultimately, you can conduct your research more efficiently and effectively by choosing the reference management tool that saves time, organizes your resources, helps in collaboration and builds and formats your citations.
Thanks for nice comparison. I use Mendeley for reference management and MS Word for making document.
Good to know that you found this comparison to be useful. Please feel free to share our posts with your network. Make sure you subscribe to our weekly newsletter ( https://www.enago.com/academy/subscribe-now/ ). Do you need instant tips on academic writing and publishing? Visit https://www.enago.com/learn today. Have a great day!
Rate this article Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published.
AI Assistance in Academia for Searching Credible Scholarly Sources
The journey of academia is a grand quest for knowledge, more specifically an adventure to…
Amy Anderson, a brilliant young researcher, had a burning passion for her work in quantum…
I pulled my collar up, my hat down, and secured my glasses when I realized…
Researcher 1: “It’s flooding articles every time I switch on my laptop!” Researcher 2: “Why…
Research is undoubtedly one of the most painstaking and thorough processes. Irrespective of your discipline,…
Are Reference Managers Enough to Organize and Curate Different Scholarly Knowledge…
How to Scan Through Millions of Articles and Still Cut Down on Your Reading Time —…
CiteSeerX: The Next Generation of Open Access Library Archiving
Sign-up to read more
Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:
We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.
I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:
In your opinion, what is the most effective way to improve integrity in the peer review process?
Citation manager tips & tricks, 10 tips for avoiding accidental plagiarism, endnote basics and resources, full text configuration, refworks basics and resources, mendeley basics and resources, zotero basics and resources.
Bibliographic management software makes it easy to collect and organize references to any type of information, from journal articles to multimedia files. The software also allows students and researchers to insert their citations into papers and format them for publication painlessly.
These suggestions can be applied to most citation management programs.
Example of Custom Fields for quotes and paraphrasing in EndNote
Highlighting and annotating a PDF.
EndNote is available from the D. Samuel Gottesman Library.
The EndNote Guide will help you
EndNote Resources
OpenURL/Link Resolver: https://zc6sj2ch8l.search.serialssolutions.com/
Authentication: https://elibrary.einsteinmed.edu/login?url=
RefWorks allows students and researchers to insert their citations into papers and format them for publication painlessly. Access to RefWorks is provided by the D. Samuel Gottesman Library.
The RefWorks Guide will help you
If you experience problems with your RefWorks account, contact
Mendeley is a free reference manager and academic social network that can help you organize your research, collaborate with others online, and discover the latest research in your field. Mendeley is a great organization tool for those who have accumulated a large number of PDF files during the research process.
The Mendeley guide will help you
Zotero is a free bibliographic management tool that allows you to store and organize your references. You can add references from library databases, add books with websites like Amazon.com and WorldCat.org, and manually add any references, such as websites.
The Zotero guide will help you
D. Samuel Gottesman Library Albert Einstein College of Medicine Jack and Pearl Resnick Campus Forchheimer Building, 1st Floor 1300 Morris Park Avenue Bronx, NY 10461-1924 Phone: 718.430.3108 - Fax: 718.430.8795 © Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Today's Hours:
General Inquiries
Image: https://admissionblog.usc.edu
Bibliographic citation managers (e.g. EndNote Web, Zotero, etc.) help researchers keep track of their references for research papers, theses, dissertations, journal articles, publication lists, course reserve lists, or any other writing needs. The software also facilitates the downloading of citations directly from the Web, online databases, and online library catalogs. Using bibliographic citation managers helps researchers create bibliographies or lists of references and easily format them in a wide variety of styles.
As you write academic papers, you will need to use citations in order to give credit to other works you have used to support your argument, show background research, and provide a context to your studies. Higher-level academic papers require you to use a lot of citations, and you can use citation management tools to make keeping track of your sources easier.
A citation management tool is an online tool that allows you to store, organize, and export citations according to whatever style you need. The University of Maryland subscribes to many tools that can make organizing your sources easier.
Comparing Citation Managers
The following videos provide some tips on how to investigate and decide on the best bibliographic software for your needs. The speakers touch on criteria such as collaboration, system compatibility, free vs. cost and functionality.
|
This Citation Manager Comparison guide provides a quick reference to the following most used citation managers and can help you pick the tool that is most suited to your needs. Review the handout on the left for more features to compare!
|
|
| |
Where do I sign up? | Through the database or |
|
|
Cost | Free for everyone, some features only available for UMD students, faculty, and staff. | Free for everyone. | Free for everyone. |
Available after I leave UMD? | Yes, but with reduced features. | Yes | Yes |
Accessibility | Only available online. Paid version includes desktop application. | Accessible online and on your workstation. | Accessible online and on your workstation. |
Can I share citations? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Ability to directly export from the catalog and many databases | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Attach associated files (PDFs, etc.) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Link to documents (articles, reports, etc.) with UMDs "Find It" | Yes | Yes | Yes, but it must be manually configured. |
Word processor compatibility (requires downloading a plug-in) | MS Word and LaTeX | MS Word, Open Office, and LaTeX | MS Word, Open Office, LaTeX, and Google Docs |
Link to Help / Support pages | EndNote Online and | Mendeley | Zotero and |
This sub is for discussions amongst college & university faculty. Whether you are an adjunct, a lecturer, a grad TA or tenured stream if you teach students at the college level, this space is for you! While we welcome students and non-academics lurking and learning, posts and comments are not allowed. If you're new here, please familiarize yourself with the sub rules and follow them. If you're ever unsure, feel free to reach out to the moderators for clarification.
I'm old school and don't use a citation manager. Some have told me to try Zotero. What do y'all like? Why do you like it?
By continuing, you agree to our User Agreement and acknowledge that you understand the Privacy Policy .
You’ve set up two-factor authentication for this account.
Create your username and password.
Reddit is anonymous, so your username is what you’ll go by here. Choose wisely—because once you get a name, you can’t change it.
Enter your email address or username and we’ll send you a link to reset your password
An email with a link to reset your password was sent to the email address associated with your account
COMMENTS
Use: Why: Work from multiple computers or locations. Zotero. Mendeley. EndNote Web. Zotero saves your citation library to your local computer, but syncs with multiple computers so you can work from home, work, or school. Mendeley is a program that lives on your local computer, but syncs with a web account. EndNote Web is web based.
11. FlowCite: All-in-one Reference and Citation Manager. FlowCite is an all-in-one reference management software in research that helps you seamlessly search for, save, and organize your references and deliver your best work. It lets you import and export your work to other applications.
With support for over 9,000 citation styles, you can format your work to match any style guide or publication. Stay in sync. Zotero can optionally synchronize your data across devices, keeping your files, notes, and bibliographic records seamlessly up to date. If you decide to sync, you can also always access your research from any web browser. ...
Paperpile, Zotero, EndNote, and Mendeley are popular choices. Finding the best reference manager for your research process and personal preferences can be challenging. This guide is here to help you with your decision. The table below compares the most important features of these four popular reference managers. Users can upload RIS, BibTeX ...
Zotero's free, open source citation manager was initially introduced in 2006 as an extension for the Firefox web browser. It is now available as a standalone application [ 6 ]. First released in 2008 [ 7 ], Mendeley is a free cloud-based citation manager with desktop and online versions.
Just finished my dissertation using mendeley. The new desktop app they recently rolled out no longer let's you export formatted bibliographies as text you can paste into a word doc -which is a huge loss of functionality for me because I don't directly insert citations into my manuscripts using the plug in (it's too much to teach my older co-authors to do, makes version control harder, and is ...
EndNote cite while you write (CWYW) is a comprehensive tool for citing references and editing citations; CWYW for both desktop and online libraries; A better tool for managing long documents and a large reference collection; MS Word, OpenOffice; Cite while you write with desktop library; MS Word, LibreOffice, Google Docs
Reference management software, or citation manager, is a program or online service that helps you collect, organize, cite, and share your research sources. Most of these programs also allow you to create bibliographies and footnotes in your papers. Citation managers help you find sources more quickly and easily.
EndNote Basic stands tall among free citation management tools like Zotero and Mendeley. Zotero is a free, open-source personal research assistant, while Mendeley is a free citation manager with social networking capabilities, EndNote Basic has its unique offerings. One of EndNote Basic's main draws is its integration with Microsoft Word.
Choosing between Mendeley and Zotero for citation management boils down to your specific needs. Mendeley is ideal if you value a sleek interface and integrated PDF annotations, suitable for solo projects or small teams. Zotero excels in flexible storage options, extensive customization, and is better suited for large-scale collaborations due to ...
Download our 1-page guide to reference management software solutions now. 1. Mendeley. If you're in a technical or scientific field, Mendeley is an excellent option for you. This reference management software allows users to generate citations and bibliographies in Microsoft Word, LibreOffice, and LaTeX. Mendeley is great for collaborative work ...
9. Chegg. Price: free trial/$10 per month. Uses: managing citations and grammar checks. Chegg is also a grammar checker, and it offers a similar service called Easy Bib, which features a similar citation manager. Chegg is a grammar checker and citation manager built for students.
The most powerful and full-featured citation manager; also the most complex to learn and use; Well supported; The most powerful and flexible integration with MS Word; Has the most features for working with very long documents (e.g., books, dissertations, etc) Ability to directly import PDF files and annotate them
Reasons to Choose EndNote. Zotero and Mendeley are relatively young tools when compared to EndNote. EndNote X9 offers some advanced features that might be necessary for your discipline and work flow, including hundreds of built-in citation styles. For Northwestern students, faculty, and staff, EndNote 20 can be downloaded through NUIT with a ...
Streamline your writing — and collaborations — with these reference managers. A suite of tools can help researchers to manage citations for grants and papers, and share those references with ...
Zotero, citavi, and Paperpile are probably your best bets out of the 10 options considered. "Cross-platform" is the primary reason people pick Zotero over the competition. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision.
Among the various options available to the scientist, few common citation managers are RefWorks, Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote. EndNote: A tool for managing and publishing bibliographies, citations, and references. Mendeley: A tool for reference management and for collaborating and sharing your work. Zotero: A tool for managing and organize ...
The new Mendeley Reference Manager has been built using researchers' feedback to give you what you need to manage your references even more quickly and effectively. Store all your references in one place. Build your personal Mendeley library to organize, search and read all your references.
Every citation manager has a Notes field, Research Notes field or several User Defined fields. Copy text from sources you plan to use into these fields. This will be a good reminder of what you are quoting. As you write, use your citation manager's "insert citation" tool (e.g. Cite-While-You-Write or Write-N-Cite). Keep the citations ...
Bibliographic citation managers (e.g. EndNote Web, Zotero, etc.) help researchers keep track of their references for research papers, theses, dissertations, journal articles, publication lists, course reserve lists, or any other writing needs. The software also facilitates the downloading of citations directly from the Web, online databases, and online library catalogs.
I tried Mendeley and Zotero, and worked better with Zotero. I guess it is a matter of taste and usability for you. For example, I need my papers to sync with my iPad, and zotero works better. Reply reply. JulyJohnson. •. Used Mendeley on my Masters thesis and Zotero for my PhD Thesis. Both are solid. Mendeley felt aesthetically nicer, but ...
Make sure you've synced your existing Mendeley Desktop library. Download and install Mendeley Reference Manager. Sign in using your Mendeley credentials and your existing library will sync. We'll be regularly adding new features to Mendeley Reference Manager. Visit the Release Notes to get updates.
I ended up doing more work fixing the errors from the citation managing than just taking the time to enter them in myself. I recently wrote a dissertation, my first published journal article, and book chapter without the software. I wish there was something that worked for me, but I just haven't found anything more reliable than manual citation.