(GCE coursework, GCE and GCSE non-examination assessments, Project qualifications)
(published August 2023)
to Friday . If you need to contact us during this period, please directly email the relevant team. |
OCR homepage
Jcq publishes detailed guidance on appeals.
The Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) has today published detailed guidance on the appeals process in place for summer 2021 results which are based on teacher assessment. This summer's appeals process provides an important safety net in the event that a student, including a private candidate, thinks something has gone wrong with the result they receive in August.
The JCQ guide covers appeals for GCSEs, AS and A Levels, FSMQ, Core Maths, Entry Level, EPQ and OCR's Cambridge Nationals and Cambridge Technicals. Endorsements (for GCSE English Language, and A Level Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Geology) are also subject to the same appeals guidance.
The document provides detailed guidance on administering the two-stage process in place for summer 21 appeals, on who can appeal and the reasons for allowing students to appeal their grade where they believe there has been an error. It also confirms the deadlines. Alongside detailed guidance on the process, the JCQ also provides some helpful checklists for schools and colleges on the procedures and the documentation they can check to spot errors and ensure students get the right grades on results day, as well as an infographic summarising steps to help minimise the need for appeals.
Stage 1: a centre review.
A centre review is the first stage of a summer 21 appeal. Students can ask schools and colleges if an administrative or procedural error has occurred. These error checks can also take place before results have been issued where prompted by a school's or college's own quality assurance processes. Requests for a Centre Review post results must be made directly by students to the school or college which submitted the grade. If a school or college finds an error in the grade they submitted, they need to send exam boards a correction request. If we agree with the revised grade, and the reason for it, we'll issue a changed grade for sharing with the student.
Before students can request stage two of the appeals process, students must first have asked their school or college to review whether an administrative or procedural error has been made i.e. completed Stage One of the appeals process. If the school or college does not agree about the error, but the student still thinks there has been an administrative or procedural error, or thinks a teacher has exercised an ' unreasonable academic judgement ' in deciding a grade, a student can ask them to submit an appeal to us. All the evidence on which the judgement was made must be submitted with the appeal. We will ask independent reviewers to consider if the original teacher assessed grade was a reasonable exercise of academic judgement. Our independent reviewers would only decide if there had been an unreasonable exercise of judgement if the teacher assessed grade was clearly wrong, i.e. if there was no basis upon which the grade could properly have been given.
16 August 2021 (for priority appeals - for students applying to higher education who did not attain their firm choice, i.e. the offer they accepted as first choice, and wish to appeal an A Level or other Level 3 qualification result)
3 September 2021 (for non-priority appeals)
23 August 2021 (priority appeals - as above)
17 September 2021 (for non-priority appeals)
The JCQ guide sets out appeals in the context of grades determined by teacher assessment this summer due to exceptional circumstances. It provides a reminder of what information to share with students and their parents to minimise the likelihood of appeals on results days, such as the evidence used to determine grades, as well as centre policies. The appeals process is a further safety net, alongside other measures such as quality assurance by schools and colleges and by awarding organisations, to command confidence in grades this year and support student progression.
Today's JCQ guide follows the policy set out by Ofqual and the DfE for this summer and is designed to implement Ofqual's regulations and guidance. The consultation decisions relating to Ofqual's guidance on appeals were also published today by Ofqual.
Standard post results services that are normally in place after exams do not apply to results based on teacher assessment this summer.
How to appeal a GCSE or A-level exam grade
The exam results period is a tense time for students and school staff. A lot hinges on the outcomes of GCSEs and A levels and for some young people these results will decide whether they go on to study at university.
For that reason, if a student, school or college has doubts about the marking of an exam, they have options through which to review that process.
Not exactly. Your paper will not be re-marked but you can request to see the paper or for the existing marking to be reviewed.
Once students receive the results of their GCSE or A-level exams, there is a time window in which they (or the school or college) can request a review of marking. Following this review process, if a student or centre is still unhappy, it is then possible to appeal against the mark given.
The first step in questioning an exam grade is to request the exam paper. This will enable the student and/or teacher to read the paper to check if an error or mistake has occurred in the calculation of the grade.
To request the exam paper, the school or college’s exams officer will need to contact the exam board. Some papers are immediately available online, whereas others require a request to be submitted.
However, if the student is waiting to confirm a place on a further education or university course that is dependent on the exam result, it is recommended that instead of requesting the paper, a submission is made for a priority review of marking.
A review of marking is when the exam paper is checked by another examiner. This request should come via the school’s exams officer. However, the student must give their consent for the review to take place.
Under a review of marking, the mark can go up, down or stay the same. Exam boards may charge a fee for this service.
If a student or centre believe a mistake has been in the marking of an exam there are three options available:
After exam results are released, students have a short window within which they can request a marking review. The key dates for marking reviews are as follows:
A priority review of marking can take around 15 days, whereas a normal review can take around 20 days.
Each exam board uses a different pricing structure for their re-marking services:
Specific exam grades are often prerequisites for further study, and students who have not obtained those grades may be prevented from continuing their studies at their chosen education provider.
In this situation, the student should submit a priority service 2 request, and always keep in contact with the centre where they wish to study to keep them informed of the progress of their appeal. It may be the case that their place can be taken up while they await the results of their appeal or review of marking.
After the above review process, if the student or centre is still unhappy, it is possible to appeal against the mark given.
Following the review process, there is an option to appeal the GCSE or A-level grade.
There are three different grounds for appeals:
All exam boards will follow the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) guidance on appeals .
For appeals that occur following a review of marking, there is a 30-day window to appeal from the point the school receives the reviewed grade. Once an appeal has been submitted, the school or college will receive a preliminary outcome letter within 42 days.
After the preliminary stage, the school or college will be told if the case will either be: not upheld, upheld in whole or upheld in part.
At this point, the school or college has 14 days to request an appeal hearing. To do this, a letter must be sent to the relevant exam board using the JCQ form JCQ/APP1 (see page 18).
If a student, school or college requires more details on how to appeal an exam grade, they should speak to their exams officer and consult the appeals page on the relevant exam board website.
If the grade has not improved after the review of marking has been conducted, students may decide they wish to resit the examination.
For students taking GCSEs, only maths and English language can be taken in the autumn. For A levels and all other GCSE subjects, resits will have to be taken in the next summer exam series.
Find out more about GCSE resits in 2024
For the latest education news and analysis delivered directly to your inbox every weekday morning, sign up to the Tes Daily newsletter
topics in this article
A subreddit for those who enjoy learning about flags, their place in society past and present, and their design characteristics
By continuing, you agree to our User Agreement and acknowledge that you understand the Privacy Policy .
You’ve set up two-factor authentication for this account.
Create your username and password.
Reddit is anonymous, so your username is what you’ll go by here. Choose wisely—because once you get a name, you can’t change it.
Enter your email address or username and we’ll send you a link to reset your password
An email with a link to reset your password was sent to the email address associated with your account
Art museums in elektrostal.
Zhukovsky International Airport, formerly known as Ramenskoye Airport or Zhukovsky Airfield - international airport, located in Moscow Oblast, Russia 36 km southeast of central Moscow, in the town of Zhukovsky, a few kilometers southeast of the old Bykovo Airport. After its reconstruction in 2014–2016, Zhukovsky International Airport was officially opened on 30 May 2016. The declared capacity of the new airport was 4 million passengers per year.
Phone 8 (915) 269-29-39 8 (915) 269-29-39
Home » Exams Office » Non-Examination Assessments
Downloads and further information.
Spreadsheet
Microsoft Word
Reasonable adjustments for gce a-level sciences – endorsement of practical skills.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.
Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Home » Exams Office » Appeals. The FAQs below are designed to support the JCQ guide to awarding bodies' appeals processes, June 2024, which can be found at the bottom of this page. Exam officers, the head of centre, teaching staff and other senior leaders within a centre should familiarise themselves with this document.
Microsoft Word. PDF. Related Documents. Instructions for conducting coursework 2023-2024 (Amended on 12 December 2023 - see page 9) Reviews of marking (centre assessed marks) suggested template for centres. Form 15 Notification of lost centre assessed work. Contact Us. Registered Address: 124 Finchley Road, London, NW3 5JS.
25 An appeal hearing is designed to ensure that the appellant has a formal opportunity to present their case to an impartial body. A member of centre staff must represent the centre at the appeal hearing for internal candidate appeals. The procedure followed at the appeal hearing is set out in paragraphs 55-77.
Instructions for conducting coursework (Last published 14 August 2023; Revision one: 12 December 2023) ... JCQ Appeals booklet (A guide to the awarding bodies' appeals processes) Effective from June 2024 examination series (published June 2024) Appeals FAQs: Summer 2024 ...
Appeals against decisions made in cases of malpractice 5 Appeals relating to access arrangements and special consideration 7 The procedure for Appeal hearings 9 Further avenues of appeal 13 Timescales 13 Review of other administrative decisions 13 Application for an appeal (Form JCQ/App1) 14 Appendix A - Awarding body contact details 17
The Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) has today published detailed guidance on the appeals process in place for summer 2021 results which are based on teacher assessment. This summer's appeals process provides an important safety net in the event that a student, including a private candidate, thinks something has gone wrong with the result ...
All exam boards will follow the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) guidance on appeals. For appeals that occur following a review of marking, there is a 30-day window to appeal from the point the school receives the reviewed grade. Once an appeal has been submitted, the school or college will receive a preliminary outcome letter within 42 days.
For artists, writers, gamemasters, musicians, programmers, philosophers and scientists alike! The creation of new worlds and new universes has long been a key element of speculative fiction, from the fantasy works of Tolkien and Le Guin, to the science-fiction universes of Delany and Asimov, to the tabletop realm of Gygax and Barker, and beyond.
JCQ Student Guide Summer 2021 DATE PUBLISHED: 06/08/21 VERSION DATE: 26/08/21. 2 ... This guide provides an overview of the appeal process for students, but if you want more information about the guidance for schools and colleges please see the Additional information section in the final section of this ... course at the same time.
Top Elektrostal Art Museums: See reviews and photos of Art Museums in Elektrostal, Russia on Tripadvisor.
Zhukovsky International Airport, formerly known as Ramenskoye Airport or Zhukovsky Airfield - international airport, located in Moscow Oblast, Russia 36 km southeast of central Moscow, in the town of Zhukovsky, a few kilometers southeast of the old Bykovo Airport. After its reconstruction in 2014-2016, Zhukovsky International Airport was officially opened on 30 May 2016.
How to appeal. 14. The head of centre or a private candidate (the appellant) should submit a written request for an appeal to the relevant awarding body. A list of the awarding bodies' contact details is provided in Appendix A, page 17. There is also a form (JCQ/App1) that may be used (see page 14). 15.
• The purpose of the appeal hearing is explained in paragraph 69 of the JCQ A guide to the awarding bodies' appeals processes. • An awarding body will aim to hold an appeal hearing within 70 calendar days of the receipt of a valid request for an appeal hearing. • The hearing by the appeals panel will complete the awarding body's
Black Raptor Pro Elektrostal postal code 144006. See 3 social pages including Youtube and Instagram, Hours, Phone, Website and more for this business. 2.5 Cybo Score. Review on Cybo.
JCQ Student Guide Summer 2021 DATE PUBLISHED: 06/08/21 VERSION DATE: 06/08/21. 2 ... This guide provides an overview of the appeal process for students, but if you want more information about the guidance for schools and colleges please see the Additional information section in the inal section of this ... course at the same time.
for the appeals process in exceptional cases where the awarding organisation deems the selection of evidence to have been unreasonable. Where such evidence still exists at the time this guidance was published, it should not be destroyed/deleted or returned to the student. If a student appeals because they believe their centre made an unreasonable
2 4 This booklet devotes a separate section to each of these types of appeal. As there is similarity in the way all appeals are handled, this will lead to some repetition of information. 5 Where a centre wishes to query or discuss any aspect of an awarding body's interpretation or application of the procedures detailed in this document, the
The Australian Government has appointed 14 new Members to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). The 14 Members will commence their terms at the AAT on 19 August 2024 to ensure it maintains capacity to hear matters in the period prior to commencement of the new Administrative Review Tribunal (ART).
Here are some examples of the unacceptable grounds for appeal that are often put forward in appeal applications. If your appeal application is based on one or more of these grounds and does not also contain any valid grounds, it will not be accepted as an appeal by the awarding body. Examples of applications for appeal
Downloads. Instructions for conducting non-examination assessments 2023-2024 (Amended on 12 December 2023 - see page 11) Notice to Centres - Informing candidates of their centre assessed marks. Review of marking (centre assessed marks) suggested template for centres. Form 15 - Notification of Lost Centre Assessed Work.