•  Sign into My Research
  •  Create My Research Account
  • Company Website
  • Our Products
  • About Dissertations
  • Español (España)
  • Support Center

Select language

  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Português (Portugal)

Welcome to My Research!

You may have access to the free features available through My Research. You can save searches, save documents, create alerts and more. Please log in through your library or institution to check if you have access.

Welcome to My Research!

Translate this article into 20 different languages!

If you log in through your library or institution you might have access to this article in multiple languages.

Translate this article into 20 different languages!

Get access to 20+ different citations styles

Styles include MLA, APA, Chicago and many more. This feature may be available for free if you log in through your library or institution.

Get access to 20+ different citations styles

Looking for a PDF of this document?

You may have access to it for free by logging in through your library or institution.

Looking for a PDF of this document?

Want to save this document?

You may have access to different export options including Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive and citation management tools like RefWorks and EasyBib. Try logging in through your library or institution to get access to these tools.

Want to save this document?

  • More like this
  • Scholarly Journal

Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

Publisher logo. Links to publisher website, opened in a new window.

No items selected

Please select one or more items.

Select results items first to use the cite, email, save, and export options

This is a limited preview of the full PDF

Try and log in through your library or institution to see if they have access.

It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader

Suggested sources

  • About ProQuest
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Innovation contests: attracting new solvers and new high‐quality solutions

  • August 2022
  • R& D Management 53(1)

Feng Hu at Beijing University of Technology

  • Beijing University of Technology

Eelko K. R. E. Huizingh at University of Groningen

  • University of Groningen

Tammo H. A. Bijmolt at University of Groningen

Discover the world's research

  • 25+ million members
  • 160+ million publication pages
  • 2.3+ billion citations

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Mikael Johnsson

  • Pingle Yang
  • Sanghyun Park

Henning Piezunka

  • Alexandra Gatzweiler

Vera Blazevic

  • PROD OPER MANAG
  • Jesse Bockstedt

Cheryl Druehl

  • J ECON MANAGE STRAT

John Morgan

  • Henrik Orzen
  • Martin Sefton

Dana Sisak

  • HARVARD BUS REV

Kevin J. Boudreau

  • Sam T. Manoogian
  • J. Steven Reznick

Avraham N Kluger

  • Organ Behav Hum Perform

Nicola Lacetera

  • Luke Boosey

Philip Brookins

  • EUR J OPER RES

Ella Segev

  • Giovanni Perrone
  • Reto Hofstetter

Z. John Zhang

  • Andreas Herrmann
  • Daniel P. Gross

Judy. Cameron

  • CONTEMP EDUC PSYCHOL

Richard M Ryan

  • Barry Bayus

Marian Garcia

  • Am Soc Inform Sci Annu Meet Proc

Tracy Liu

  • Lada A. Adamic

Yan Chen

  • Enver Yücesan
  • Christoph Hienerth
  • Eric von Hippel

Morten Berg Jensen

  • Toby E. Stuart
  • ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL

Sanjiv Erat

  • Param Vir Singh

Kannan Srinivasan

  • J PROD INNOVAT MANAG

Marion Poetz

  • Martin Schreier
  • Kai A. Konrad
  • Haim Mendelson
  • William J. Abernathy
  • Richard S. Rosenbloom

Florian Ederer

  • Daniel S. Putler
  • Masaki Aoyagi

Christophe Van den Bulte

  • Raghuram Iyengar
  • Pablo Casas-Arce

Francisco de Asis Martinez-Jerez

  • Recruit researchers
  • Join for free
  • Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Incentives in Contests with Heterogeneous Solvers

Management Science (2016)

18 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2015 Last revised: 1 Jun 2018

Ersin Körpeoğlu

UCL School of Management, University College London

Soo-Haeng Cho

Carnegie Mellon University

Date Written: December 23, 2016

In a contest in which solvers with heterogeneous expertise exert effort to develop solutions, a recent paper (Terwiesch, C., Y. Xu. 2008. Innovation contests, open innovation and multiagent problem solving. Management Science. 54(9) 1529--1543) argues that as more solvers enter the contest, every solver will reduce effort due to a lower probability of winning the contest. This paper corrects mistakes in this theory, and shows that there exist high-expertise solvers who may raise their effort in response to increased competition. This is because more entrants raise the expected best performance among other solvers, creating positive incentives for solvers to exert higher effort to win the contest. Due to this positive effect, we find that a free-entry open contest is more likely to be optimal to a contest organizer than what Terwiesch and Xu (2008) and other prior literature asserted.

Keywords: Contract; Crowdsourcing; Incentive; Tournament

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

UCL School of Management, University College London ( email )

Level 38 One Canada Square London, E14 5AB United Kingdom

Soo-Haeng Cho (Contact Author)

Carnegie mellon university ( email ).

Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics, related ejournals, organizations & markets: motivation & incentives ejournal.

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Technology, Operations Management & Production eJournal

Labor: personnel economics ejournal.

Browse Econ Literature

  • Working papers
  • Software components
  • Book chapters
  • JEL classification

More features

  • Subscribe to new research

RePEc Biblio

Author registration.

  • Economics Virtual Seminar Calendar NEW!

IDEAS home

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

  • Author & abstract
  • 19 References
  • 181 Citations
  • Most related
  • Related works & more

Corrections

(The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

(Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742)

Suggested Citation

Download full text from publisher, references listed on ideas.

Follow serials, authors, keywords & more

Public profiles for Economics researchers

Various research rankings in Economics

RePEc Genealogy

Who was a student of whom, using RePEc

Curated articles & papers on economics topics

Upload your paper to be listed on RePEc and IDEAS

New papers by email

Subscribe to new additions to RePEc

EconAcademics

Blog aggregator for economics research

Cases of plagiarism in Economics

About RePEc

Initiative for open bibliographies in Economics

News about RePEc

Questions about IDEAS and RePEc

RePEc volunteers

Participating archives

Publishers indexing in RePEc

Privacy statement

Found an error or omission?

Opportunities to help RePEc

Get papers listed

Have your research listed on RePEc

Open a RePEc archive

Have your institution's/publisher's output listed on RePEc

Get RePEc data

Use data assembled by RePEc

Incentives in Contests with Heterogeneous Solvers

New citation alert added.

This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:

You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.

To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.

New Citation Alert!

Please log in to your account

Information & Contributors

Bibliometrics & citations, view options.

  • Fayard A (2024) Making Time for Social Innovation Organization Science 10.1287/orsc.2020.0832 35 :3 (1131-1156) Online publication date: 1-May-2024 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2020.0832
  • Khorasani S Körpeoğlu E Krishnan V (2024) Dynamic Development Contests Operations Research 10.1287/opre.2021.0420 72 :1 (43-59) Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/opre.2021.0420
  • Körpeoğlu E Korpeoglu C Hafalır İ (2022) Parallel Innovation Contests Operations Research 10.1287/opre.2021.2250 70 :3 (1506-1530) Online publication date: 1-May-2022 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/opre.2021.2250
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Parallel innovation contests.

Crowdsourcing using innovation contests has become a popular tool to source innovative solutions to various problems organizations face. With several innovation contests that run in parallel, two key questions are how the number of contests affects ...

We study multiple parallel contests in which contest organizers elicit solutions to innovation-related problems from a set of solvers. Each solver may participate in multiple contests and exert effort to improve the solution for each contest the solver ...

Efficient crowdsourcing contests

A principal seeks production of a good within a limited timeframe with a hard deadline, after which any good procured has no value. There is inherent uncertainty in the production process, which in light of the deadline may warrant simultaneous ...

The Price of Anarchy of Self-Selection in Tullock Contests

Crowdsourcing platforms operate by offering their clients the ability to obtain cost-effective solutions for their problems through contests. The top contestants with the best solutions are rewarded, and the submitted solutions are provided to the ...

Information

Published in.

Linthicum, MD, United States

Publication History

Author tags.

  • crowdsourcing

Contributors

Other metrics, bibliometrics, article metrics.

  • 9 Total Citations View Citations
  • 0 Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months) 0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks) 0
  • Chen Z Mihm J Schlapp J (2022) Sourcing Innovation Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 10.1287/msom.2021.0983 24 :2 (1056-1073) Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/msom.2021.0983
  • Gao P Fan X Huang Y Chen Y (2022) Resource Allocation Among Competing Innovators Management Science 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4167 68 :8 (6059-6074) Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4167
  • Tian X Bi G (2022) Multiplicative output form and its applications to problems in the homogenous innovation contest model OR Spectrum 10.1007/s00291-022-00667-y 44 :3 (709-732) Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00291-022-00667-y
  • Korpeoglu C Körpeoğlu E Tunç S (2021) Optimal Duration of Innovation Contests Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 10.1287/msom.2020.0935 23 :3 (657-675) Online publication date: 1-May-2021 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/msom.2020.0935
  • Menon N Mishra A Ye S (2020) Beyond Related Experience Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 10.1287/msom.2019.0794 22 :5 (1045-1065) Online publication date: 1-Sep-2020 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/msom.2019.0794
  • Mihm J Schlapp J (2019) Sourcing Innovation Management Science 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2955 65 :2 (559-576) Online publication date: 1-Feb-2019 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2955

View options

Login options.

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Share this publication link.

Copying failed.

Share on social media

Affiliations, export citations.

  • Please download or close your previous search result export first before starting a new bulk export. Preview is not available. By clicking download, a status dialog will open to start the export process. The process may take a few minutes but once it finishes a file will be downloadable from your browser. You may continue to browse the DL while the export process is in progress. Download
  • Download citation
  • Copy citation

We are preparing your search results for download ...

We will inform you here when the file is ready.

Your file of search results citations is now ready.

Your search export query has expired. Please try again.

  • DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3607769
  • Corpus ID: 229067444

Team Collaboration in Innovation Contests

  • Sıdıka Tunç Candoğan , C. G. Korpeoglu , Christopher S. Tang
  • Published 22 May 2020
  • Business, Engineering

8 Citations

Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors, designing internal innovation contests, dynamic development contests, innovation contests with risk-averse participants, innovation contests with risk‐averse participants, when does data sharing promote innovation, should gig platforms decentralize dispute resolution, collaboration in development of new drugs, 37 references, innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving, innovation and crowdsourcing contests, designing internal innovation contests, the role of participation in innovation contests, optimal duration of innovation contests.

  • Highly Influential
  • 18 Excerpts

Should Managers Use Team-Based Contests?

Sourcing innovation: on feedback in contests, contest among contest organizers, how does team composition affect effort in contests a theoretical and experimental analysis, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

COMMENTS

  1. Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

    Terwiesch and Xu: Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving Management Science 54(9), pp. 1529-1543, @ 2008 INFORMS 1531 we believe, are of interest to firms executing inno-vation contests as well as those participating or con-sidering to participate as either seeker or solver.

  2. Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

    Abstract. In an innovation contest, a firm (the seeker) facing an innovation-related problem (e.g., a technical R&D problem) posts this problem to a population of independent agents (the solvers) and then provides an award to the agent that generated the best solution. In this paper, we analyze the interaction between a seeker and a set of solvers.

  3. PDF Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

    This expres-sion can be thought of as the expected value of the highest expertise among the n solvers. The more solvers, the higher the best solver's expertise is likely to be. For a Gumbel-distributed noise variable with mean. o and scale parameter , the expected high-est expertise among n solvers is o + ln n.

  4. Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

    Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving. The interaction between a seeker and a set of solvers is analyzed and it is established that the seeker can benefit from a larger solver population because he obtains a more diverse set of solutions, which mitigates and sometimes outweighs the effect of the solvers ...

  5. Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

    Abstract and Figures. In an innovation contest, a firm (the seeker) facing an innovation-related problem (e.g., a technical R& D problem) posts this problem to a population of independent agents ...

  6. nt Insights

    Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving Christian Terwiesch, Yi Xu Innovation contests have become increasingly pop-ular and provide a means for companies to solicit innovation from the outside world. Well-known con-tests include InnoCentive's innovation challenges and various X prizes for breakthrough innovations in

  7. Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and

    Explore millions of resources from scholarly journals, books, newspapers, videos and more, on the ProQuest Platform.

  8. Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

    In an innovation contest, a firm (the seeker) facing an innovation-related problem (e.g., a technical R& D problem) posts this problem to a population of independent agents (the solvers) and then provides an award to the agent that generated the best solution. In this paper, we analyze the interaction between a seeker and a set of solvers.

  9. Incentives in Contests with Heterogeneous Solvers

    In a contest in which solvers with heterogeneous expertise exert effort to develop solutions, a recent paper [Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54 (9):1529-1543] argues that as more solvers enter the contest, every solver will reduce effort due to a lower probability ...

  10. Innovation Tournaments with Multiple Contributors

    This study examines innovation tournaments in which an organizer seeks solutions to an innovation-related problem from a number of agents. Agents exert effort to improve their solutions but face uncertainty about their solution performance. ... Our analysis shows that whether an open tournament is optimal is tied to: (1) the variance of ...

  11. Designing Dynamic Contests

    Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving In an innovation contest, a firm (the seeker) facing an innovation-related problem (e.g., a technical R&D problem) posts this problem to a population of independent agents (the solvers) and then provides an award to the agent that generated the best ...

  12. Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

    In an innovation contest, a firm (the seeker) facing an innovation-related problem (e.g., a technical R&D problem) posts this problem to a population of independent agents (the solvers) and then provides an award to the agent that generated the best solution. In this paper, we analyze the interaction between a seeker and a set of solvers. Prior research in economics suggests that having many ...

  13. Submission quality in open innovation contests ‐ an analysis of

    However, not every self-selected member is in the position to solve the contest task appropriately. Hence, innovation contests often result in large numbers of submissions, covering a wide range of quality levels, causing decision biases and significant workloads for innovation managers to select ideas. This problem is referred to as ...

  14. PDF Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

    Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving Abstract In an innovation contest, a firm (the seeker) facing an innovation-related problem (e.g., a technical R&D problem) posts this problem to a population of independent agents (the solvers) and then provides an award to the agent that generated the best solution.

  15. The Role of Participation in Innovation Contests

    Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529-1543. Digital Library. Google Scholar [25] von Hippel E (2016) Free Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). Crossref. Google Scholar. Cited By View all.

  16. Innovation contests: attracting new solvers and new high‐quality

    Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving. Article. Full-text available. Sep 2008; ... These findings suggest that in successive open innovation contests, multiple ...

  17. Incentives in Contests with Heterogeneous Solvers

    Abstract. In a contest in which solvers with heterogeneous expertise exert effort to develop solutions, a recent paper (Terwiesch, C., Y. Xu. 2008. Innovation contests, open innovation and multiagent problem solving. Management Science. 54 (9) 1529--1543) argues that as more solvers enter the contest, every solver will reduce effort due to a ...

  18. Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

    Downloadable! In an innovation contest, a firm (the seeker) facing an innovation-related problem (e.g., a technical R& D problem) posts this problem to a population of independent agents (the solvers) and then provides an award to the agent that generated the best solution. In this paper, we analyze the interaction between a seeker and a set of solvers.

  19. [PDF] Problem-Solving Effort and Success in Innovation Contests: The

    DOI: 10.1016/J.JOM.2014.12.002 Corpus ID: 154825766; Problem-Solving Effort and Success in Innovation Contests: The Role of National Wealth and National Culture @article{Bockstedt2014ProblemSolvingEA, title={Problem-Solving Effort and Success in Innovation Contests: The Role of National Wealth and National Culture}, author={Jesse C. Bockstedt and Cheryl T. Druehl and Anant Mishra}, journal ...

  20. Incentives in Contests with Heterogeneous Solvers

    Abstract. In a contest in which solvers with heterogeneous expertise exert effort to develop solutions, a recent paper [Terwiesch C, Xu Y 2008 Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 549:1529-1543] argues that as more solvers enter the contest, every solver will reduce effort due to a lower ...

  21. Team Collaboration in Innovation Contests

    In an innovation contest, an organizer elicits solutions to an innovation-related problem from a group of internal solvers (e.g., in-house employees) or from a group of external solvers (e.g., crowdsourcing-platform members). These solvers may develop individual solutions and make individual submissions, or if the organizer encourages it, they may collaborate as teams and make team submissions ...

  22. Innovation Contests: A Review, Classification and Outlook

    Innovation contests as a means to realize innovative product or service solutions are growing in popularity among practitioners and researchers. An increasing number of organizations worldwide have adopted innovation contests, not only for innovation purposes, but also for other reasons such as promoting sustainability. ...

  23. Incentives and Stars: Competition in Innovation Contests with

    Online innovation contests in which all current and potential contestants can view the identities of participating contestants and their submissions have become a popular format. Contestants who enter such a contest earlier than other contestants must weigh the potential costs of revealing their identities and submissions against the potential ...