christian religious education paper one

Educationnewshub.co.ke

Free Christian Religious Education (CRE) notes, revision questions, KCSE past Papers, Exams, Marking Schemes, Topical revision materials, Syllabus and Many more

Get More Resources Free.

Christian Religious Education, CRE, is a subject that is examined by the Kenya National Examinations Council (Knec). It is an elective/ optional subject at high school and candidates sit two papers at the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education, KCSE, examinations. The subject code assigned for CRE by Knec is 313.

A number of soft copy resources that can be of great help to teachers and students can be available for download; more so to those candidates preparing to sit the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education, KCSE, examinations. In this post be sure to find a good number of such resources as: CRE Notes, KCSE Past Papers, Schemes of Work, Assignments, Termly examination papers, Marking schemes, lesson plans, charts, topical revision resources and many more. Download the resources at no charge by clicking each of the links below. Please note that you can also print and even share this article to benefit someone.

Join Telegram Group by using this link for a wide range of educational materials, at zero cost; TEACHERS’ SOFT COPY HUB- TELEGRAM

You can at the same time get unlimited resources for all subjects by clicking on this link; Teachers’ Resources Hub.

Here are links to the most important news portals:

KUCCPS News Portal
TSC News Portal
Universities and Colleges News Portal
Helb News Portal
KNEC News Portal
KSSSA News Portal
Schools News Portal
Free Teaching Resources and Revision Materials

CRE RESOURCES- FREE DOWNLOADS

The links below contain unlimited C.R.E resources. Click on each link to access the resources:

C.R.E PP1 MS KCSE PAST PAPERS
C.R.E PP1 KCSE PAST PAPERS
C.R.E PP2 MS KCSE PAST PAPERS
C.R.E PP2 KCSE PAST PAPERS
CRE TOPICAL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
CRE F1 NOTES
CRE F1-4 NOTES
CRE F2 NOTES
CRE F3 NOTES
CRE-FORM-3-NOTES
CRE FORM 1 NOTES
CRE NOTES FORM 1-4 BOOKLET
CRE Scheme Form 1
CRE Scheme Form 2
CRE Scheme Form 3
CRE Scheme Form 4
CRE SCHEMES Form I – IV
C.R.E P1 – MS
C.R.E P2 – MS
CRE P1 MS KCSE 2019
CRE PAPER 1 QP
CRE PAPER 2 QP
cre paper 2
CRE Pp 2 MS
CRE-FORM-1-EXAM
CRE-FORM-3 EXAM
CRE SCHEMES F1
CRE SCHEMES F2
CRE SCHEMES F3
CRE F2 SCHEMES
F3 CRE MOCKS 2020
F4 CRE TOPICS
FORM 1 CRE NOTES TYPE 2
FORM 1 CRE NOTES(1)
FORM 1-4 CRE NOTES
FORM ONE CRE NOTES TYPE 1
FORM ONE CRE NOTES-1
FORM ONE CRE NOTES
FORM THREE CRE NOTES
FORM TWO CRE NOTES
FORM_2_CRE NOTES NEW
FORM_3_CRE NOTES NEW
KCSE 2014 CRE MS
KCSE 2014 CRE PP1
KCSE 2014 CRE PP2
KCSE 2015 CRE PP1
KCSE 2015 CRE PP2
KCSE 2016 CRE PP1 MS
KCSE 2016 CRE PP1
KCSE 2016 CRE PP2 MS
KCSE 2016 CRE PP2
KCSE 2017 CRE PP1 MS
KCSE 2017 CRE PP1
KCSE 2017 CRE PP2 MS
KCSE 2017 CRE PP2
KCSE 2018 CRE PP1 MS
KCSE 2018 CRE PP1
KCSE 2018 CRE PP2 MS
KCSE 2018 CRE PP2
KCSE 2019 CRE PP1
KCSE 2019 CRE PP2 MS
KCSE 2019 CRE PP2
KCSE CRE PP1 REVISION
KCSE CRE PP2 REVISION
KCSE-CRE-TOPICALS
TOP SCHOOL CRE TRIALS KCSE

You did not find what you wanted? Worry not. Just search for more notes and other learning/teaching materials, below. Simply type in the box below and click on the search button.

Download free unlimited cre resources below; educationnewshub.co.ke:.

CRE FORM 1 EXAMS WITH MARKING SCHEMES

CRE free lesson plans for all topics (Form one to four)

CRE NOTES FOR FORM ONE TO FOUR BOOKLET

KNEC CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION, CRE, SYLLABUS

CRE FORM ONE NOTES FREE

CRE Form 1-4 Notes and Exams (Free downloads)

CRE NOTES CLASS 7 FREE

CRE NOTES FORM ONE

CRE Topic By Topic Questions And Answers

CRE SCHEMES OF WORK FOR FORM ONE

CRE Notes and Exams for Form one to Four; Free Downloads

Free CRE notes and exams form all forms. Download today.

Keep on reading….

SPONSORED LINKS; YOUR GUIDE TO HIGHER EDUCATION

For a complete guide to all universities and Colleges in the country (including their courses, requirements, contacts, portals, fees, admission lists and letters) visit the following, sponsored link:

UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES PORTAL; YOUR ULTIMATE GUIDE TO HIGHER EDUCATION

KCSE 2019 CRE Paper 1 Questions With Marking Scheme

« Previous Topic KCSE 2019 History Paper 2 Questions With Marking Scheme

Next Topic » KCSE 2019 CRE Paper 2 Questions With Marking Scheme

INSTRUCTIONS

Answer all questions

Explain how the learning of Christian Religious Education in secondary schools promotes the goal of national development. (6 marks)
State the meaning of the Biblical accounts of creation in Genesis chapters 1 and 2.(7 marks)
Identify the consequences of sin from the story of the fall of human beings in Genesis chapter 3 (7 marks)
State six commandments which guide on the relationships among human beings. (6 marks)
Identify eight lessons Christians learn from the incident when the Israelites worshipped a golden calf while at Mount Sinai. (8 marks)
List six forms of worship that were practised by the Israelites in the wilderness which are found in Christian worship today. (6 marks)
Identify six factors which led to widespread idolatry in Israel during the time of Prophet Elijah (6 marks)
Describe the incident in which Prophet Elijah challenged the prophets of Baal at Mount Carmel (1 Kings 18:19-41). (8 marks)
State six reasons that may influence some Christians to turn away from God today (6 marks)
Explain four visions of Prophet Amos concerning the judgement that would befall Israel. (8 marks)
Outline seven ways in which the rich oppressed the poor in Israel during the time of Prophet Amos. (7 marks)
Give five ways through which the Christians in Kenya can avoid God's punishment today. (5 marks)
Outline the content of Prophet Jeremiah's letter to the exiles in Babylon. (6 marks)
Give seven reasons why Prophet Jeremiah condemned the practice of human sacrifice in Judah. (7 marks)
Identify seven ways in which Christians can help to reduce human suffering in Kenya today. (7 marks)
Identify six regulations that an expectant mother is required to observe in traditional African communities. (6 marks)
Explain the rituals performed during the birth of a baby in traditional African communities. (7 marks)
State seven factors that undermine the role of medicine men in Kenya today. (7 marks)

Marking Scheme

Christian Religious Education encourages the learner to have a positive attitude towards work hard work is encouraged/laziness is discouraged
Learning Christian Religious Education helps the learner to acquire virtues/moral values which promotes economic development
Christian Religious Education discourages vices which hinder national development
Learners are equipped with knowledge/skills which lead to career development/employment
Learners are taught their duties/responsibilities as human beings/the need to develop the environment/nation
Learners are taught the need to use their talents for the development of self/others/nation
Christian religious education stresses the importance of peace/love/unity which contributes to a favourable working environment
God existed before the creation
God is the sole creator of all that exits
Creation is by the will/power of God not an accident
God is concerned about the wellbeing of all creation
Everything that God created is good
Marriage isordained by God
Work/rest is ordained/willed by God
Human beings were separated/alienated from God/Chased out of the graden
Childbirth became a painful experience/woman to experience pain during labour delivery
The life span human beings was reduced
Death came into the world/human beings started dying
It led to a distorted relationship among human beings/ mistrust/misunderstanding
The ground was cursed Produced
The woman became subject to man/inferior
Enmity between human beings and serpent developed
Human beings were to struggle/toil to meet their needs
Honour your father and mother
You shall not kill
You shall not commit adultery
You shall not steal
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor
You shall not covet your neighbor's property
Christians learn that God the only one to be worshipped/He is jealous
God hates sin/punishes sin
Christians should not represent God in any kind of image/avoid any of idolatry
Christians should intercede for others
Christians should be firm in decision making not to be swayed/misled easily/avoid peer pressure
Christians should have faith trust God (vii) Christians should repent their sins/ask for forgiveness the egg
Christians should respect those in authority/appointed by God (ix) Christians should be patientrowerowe-solontrol
Christians should obey God's instructions/teachings.
Christians should exercise self control/avoid anger
Obeying the ten commandments
Singing/dancing in church
Praying to God
Celebration of festivals/feasts
The observing the Sabbath
Giving offerings/tithes
Building places of Worship
Buning incense
The foreign princesses married to Israelite kings brought with them idol worship/false prophets were brought to Israel
Israelites changed their lifestyle from pastoralism to agriculture when they settled in Canaan and this forced them to worship the god of fertility
Israelites worshipped God/Yahweh and Baal gods on different occasions / syncretism.
The Kings built temples for Baal worship in the northern kingdom of Israel
Israelites broke the covenant through inter marriages with foreigners thus adopted Canaanite way of life/temple prostitution.
Israelites felt that Yahweh had forsaken them after they were defeated in wars by neighbouring nations/turned to other gods.
The true prophets of Yahweh who were in Israel were being persecuted
The kings made festivals for the Canaanite gods to be on the same dates as those of the Jewish calendar hence Israelites were influenced to worship idols
King Ahab made Baalism the official state religion
The Rampant presence of visible idols compared to unseen God(Yahweh)
Prophet Elijah requested king Ahab to send the prophets of Baal/all the Israelites to Mount Carmel
Elijah asked the people for how long would they limp on two different opinions/told the people to choose the lord God or Baal
Prophet Elijah asked for two bulls, one for those who worship Baal and the other for him
Each oroup was to offer a sacrifice to their god/the God that would send fire to consume the sacrifice is the true God
Elijah gave the prophets of Baal the first chance to prepare their sacrifice
The prophets of Baal called on their god to send fire but there was no response
Elijah mocked them to shout louder for their god to answer
The prophets of Baal cried louder/cut themselves with swords but the was no answer
Elijah repaired the altar with twelve stones/made a trench around it
He prepared the sacrifice/asked for water to be poured on it
Elijah prayed to God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel to reveal himself
Fire fell from heaven and burned up the sacrifice
The people acknowledged the God of Elijah as the true God
Elijah commanded the people to seize/kill the prophets of Baal
Elijah told Ahab to go and eat/prophesied the coming rain
Lack of faith / trust in God
Influence from non-believers/ridicule/discouragement
Peer pressure/critic influence/fear of other people
Quest for better economic power/pride/education/greed/materialism
Lack of role models in the society
Unemployment/poverty
Negative influence from the mass media
Emergence of different beliefs/cults/religious pluralism
Lack of time/family responsibilities/work pressure
Unanswered prayers/frustrations of life
Permisiveness in the society/moral decay
Amos saw God sending a great swam of locusts which was about to destroy all plants/food in the land. Amos pleaded with God to forgive the people. God forgave them.
Amos saw a supernatural fire that had already burned up the water/was about to consume the earth. God was going to destroy Israel by sending a supernatural fire. Amos pleaded with God and He withheld the punishment
Amos saw God standing with a plumb line in his hands by a wall. The wall was crooked and God was going to punish the people of Israel. Prophet Amos did not plead for the people hence God was not going to forgive the Israelites. This time he would destroy the places of worship/ dynasty of Jeroboam.
Amos saw a basket of ripe fruits at the end of the fruit harvest. It showed that the time for the Israelites to be punished was ripe. Amos did not plead with God thus punishment was inevitable.
In this last vision prophet Amos saw God standing by the altar/Hle ordered the destruction of the pillars of the temple all the worshippers were being struck. This showed that the wicked people would be killed/destroyed/none would escape death.
The poor were sold for apiece of silver/pair of sandals
The rich grabbed land/grains/food belonging to the poor
The merchants used false/faulty weighing scales
The rich sold goods that were unfit for human consumption to the poor /refuse
Poor people were paid unfair wage/underpaid for the labour provided to the rich
The poor were sold to slavery for being unable to pay the debts
They were charged high interest rates for the banked money
The poor were denied justice in law courts due to bribing of judges by the rich/the cases for poor was thrown out of courts
The poor were persecuted/oppressed when they challenged the injustices done
The rich failed to return the garments taken as pledge/they used the garments as bedding in the temple
Wives of the rich pressured their husbands to exploit the poor to meet their luxurious lifestyles
Christians can avoid Gods punishment by obeying his commands/instructions
By reading/putting to practice the word of God/having faith in God.
By leading exemplary lives/being role models
Taking care of the less fortunate/carrying out charitable activities
By taking care of God's creation
By praying and fasting
seeking spiritual guidance and counselling
Preaching the word of God
Prophet Jeremiah encouraged the exiles to build houses/settle down
He told them to plant gardens/eat their produce
He told them to marry/have children so as to increase in number
Prophet Jeremiah advised them to live in peace in Babylon/pray for the welfare of others
He warned them not to listen to false prophets who lied to them/gave false hope
He told them that God would restore them to the land after seventy years.
He encouraged them to trust in God/God would answer their prayers
He told them that God had good plans for them
The shedding of blood defiled the land given to the Israelites by God
Human sacrifice was an act of idolatry/continuation of what they had adopted from other nations
It demonstrated Israel's disrespect for the sacredness of human life
Human sacrifice showed lack of knowledge of the true nature of Yahweh/ignorance about Yahweh
It was an act of disobedience /going against the covenant way of life/against God's commandments
Human sacrifice provoked God's anger
It was an act of oppressing the weak /innocent
It would lead to severe judgement/punishment of the Israelites
It shows lack of faith in God
Christians can help to reduce human suffering in Kenya today by establishing medical facilities/providing medical care
By educating the public on their rights
By voting out corrupt leaders/exercise their democratic rights
Creating job opportunities for people
By condemning social injustices/any act that can lead to suffering
By providing basic needs to the needy/relief aid
By advocating for just laws/fair disbursement/distribution of resources
Respecting the laws/reporting to relevant authorities
Praying for those suffering
Offering guidance and counselling/advice to those suffering.
By preaching peace and love for one another
An expectant mother is supposed to eat special food/avoid cges/fatty meat/alcohol
She is not expected to perform heavy duties /farm work/splitting of firewood
She is to avoid sexual intercourse
An expectant mother is not supposed to handle iron sharp objects to avoid injury
She is not supposed to speak face to face with her husband
She is expected to wear protective charms against evil eye to protect her unborn child
An expectant woman is required to return to her mother parents' home for delivery
She is supposed to be checked frequently/counselled by traditional midwives
An expectant mother is to be given special herbs to keep the health of the baby/unborn
Make sacrifices/appease the spirits/ancestors
Cutting of umbilical cord symbolizes the separation of the child from the mother
Burying of the placenta/umbilical cord in a special place/banana plantation family shrine for continuity of life
Shaving of the mother/baby's hair signifies new beginning/casts of pregnancy stage
Treatment of the baby/mother with herbs/wearing of charms is done for protection
Ululations are made according to the sex of the baby to announce the sex of the child
Mother/ baby are secluded for a period of time to give the mother time to heal
There is celebration/singing and dancing/feasting to welcome the new member of the community
There is presentation of gifts to the mother new born baby to celebrate I them (holding the baby to signify shared responsibility
Sacrifices/offerings are made to God as a sign of thanksgiving/prayers to bless the baby and mother
Rituals for purification are carried out to clean the mother from the process of child birth
The baby is given a name for identity
The baby is given sweet and bitter substances symbolising the good and bad experiences in life
Introduction of western medicine/hospitals/new inventions/science and technology
Emergence of new religions which do not support medicine men
There is destruction of forests/herbs/deforestation
Lack of proper education by herbalists/professionalism /lack of proper dosage
Herbal medicine is cumbersome to look for
low hygiene standards associated with herbal medicine
Certain chronic diseases cannot be treated by some herbs
Emergence of conmen/quacks who give wrong medicine
Urbanization/migration from rural to urban centre
Lack of awareness/education on herbal medicine by the public
Strict government policies/rules/regulationsthat control both herbal and modern medicine
Moden/Formal education

Download KCSE 2019 CRE Paper 1 Questions With Marking Scheme .

Why download.

✔ To read offline at any time.
✔ To Print at your convenience
✔ Share Easily with Friends / Students

What does our community say about us?

Join our community on:.

KCSE Revision Questions
Privacy Policy
Mobile App Privacy Policy
High Schools in Kenya
Teacher Resources
Questions and Answers
Online Tuition and Classes in Kenya

KCSE Past Papers 2020 CRE Paper 1 (313/1)

Click here - free kcse past papers » knec past exams » free downloads » kcse papers & marking schemes.

NGOs Grants
Current Scholarships
Jobs in Africa
Link to Us!
Site Search
What is New?
Volunteer in Africa
Volunteer in Kenya
Medical Electives
Submit Article
Internships
Scholarships Grants
Undergraduate Scholarships
Call for Proposals
Study Abroad
KCSE Past Papers
Research Grants
Entrepreneur Grants
Journalist Grants

Free Scholarship Newsletter --- E-mail Address

First Name

to send you Advance Africa Newsletter.

Scholarship 2024/25

CPA NEW SYLLABUS 2021
KCSE MARKING SCHEMES
ACTS OF PARLIAMENT
UNIVERSITY RESOURCES PDF
CPA Study Notes
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS IN AUDITING (ISA)
Teach Yourself Computers

KNEC / TVET CDACC STUDY MATERIALS, REVISION KITS AND PAST PAPERS

Quality and Updated

CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION (CRE) FORM 1 NOTES PDF

TOPIC 1 : INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION – Click to view

TOPIC 2 : THE BIBLE – Click to view

TOPIC 3 : CREATION AND THE FALL OF HUMAN KIND – Click to view

TOPIC 4 : THE ORIGIN OF SIN AND ITS CONSEQUENCES – Click to view

TOPIC 5 : FAITH AND GOD’S PROMISES : ABRAHAM – Click to view

TOPIC 6 : THE EXODUS – Click to view

TOPIC 7 : THE SINAI COVENANT : MOSES – Click to view

TOPIC 8 : ISRAELITES NEW UNDERSTANDING OF THE NATURE OF GOD – Click to view

TOPIC 9 : KING SOLOMON’S ACHIEVEMENTS AND FAILURES – Click to view

TOPIC 10: THE EFFECTS OF IDOLATRY IN ISRAEL – Click to view

TOPIC 11 : SELECTED ASPECTS IN AFRICAN RELIGIOUS HERITAGE – Click to view

TOPIC 12 : FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO HARMONY AND MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE AFRICAN COMMUNITY – Click to view

SCHOOLS |
CAREERS |
CONTACT |
DONATE |

Association of Classical Christian Schools (ACCS)

Classical Christian schools have been called a “pearl of great price” in education: greatly valued by those who understand its potential, but largely unrecognized by those who do not. Our schools are different because they start with different goals.

What is classical Christian education?

Education that inspires depth and wisdom.

Classical Christian education (CCE) is a time-tested educational system which establishes a biblical worldview (called Paideia ), incorporates methods based on natural phases of child development, cultivates the seven Christian virtues, trains students in reasoning through the Trivium (Grammar, Logic, and Rhetoric), and engages children in “the great conversation” through the historical Great Books .

For Christ and His Kingdom

Upholding Excellence

Preserving the Classical Tradition

“The scholar has lived in many times and is therefore in some degree immune from the great cataract of nonsense that pours from the press and the microphone of his own age.”

-c.s. lewis, we consider great books, art, and stories..

Students engage great books and art containing rich stories that shape both the soul, literary understanding, and moral imagination . A rich and nuanced command of language plays an unsung role in understanding God’s word, and in understanding our fellow man.

We Use a Biblical Framework to Understand Everything.

This is more than adding a bible verse to the curriculum. When history, science, math, philosophy, art, and other subjects are integrated around the truth that God is the Creator of all that exists, and therefore all knowledge is interrelated and points back to Him. Theology is the queen of the sciences, with all subjects understood through the revealed word of God and natural/human history and philosophy.

Make connections with an integrated humanities core based in great books, philosophy, history and classic literature, and theology.

Great art that has stood the test of time emphasized in the fine and performing arts : music, visual art, etc.

Means we understand the importance of culture and learning everything from a Christian worldview. We teach people, not machines.

Great Books

Means we read the classics, interact with questions and ideas throughout history, study history and art, and do it all with a Biblical framework.

Liberal Arts

Means we study the Trivium – the historical way people were taught to think and learn on their own, and the Quadrivium – reasoning with numbers.

Education that Trains to Think and Speak

We train students to lead with eloquence. .

Our unique method is based in the tradition of the Trivium , part of the Liberal Arts tradition. It works with the age of the child through grammar (k–6), logic (grades 7–8), and rhetoric (grades 9–12) to develop clear thinking and a masterful command of spoken and written language.

“If education is beaten by [vocational] training, civilization dies.”

We encourage hard work.

We’re not so much about teaching as we are about forming the soul ., we’re not so much about subjects as we are about virtue ., we’re not so much about making a living as we are about living for a higher purpose ., education that cultivates character, we understand that all education is paideia ..

Paideia is a Greek word for the education that shapes a person and a culture. Paideia is powerful because it influences who we are in a deep way that is almost imperceptible to us– it’s woven into us from childhood. We’re intentional about the kind of people and the culture encouraged in school. If you spend a day in a conventional high school talking to students, and then spend a day with classical Christian high-schoolers, we think you’ll see the difference.

Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger,

But bring them up in the paideia, and instruction of the lord.”, -ephesians 6:4, “education is not a subject, and it does not deal in subjects., it is instead the transfer of a way of life.”, – g.k. chesterton, we cultivate rightly ordered affections (the ancient concept of virtue). , we promote a christian community. .

A classical Christian school is a community of parents and teachers who share a commitment for teaching children to love learning and grow in godliness. Smaller class sizes ensure that teachers know their students and are better able to serve them individually. Students know they are loved and not just another face in the crowd.

The schools acknowledge that God has given parents the responsibility for the education of their children and that the schools instruct those students under the parents’ delegated authority.

Blog, News, and Stories, from the CCE world.

“Smooth runs the water

Where the brook is deep.”, – shakespeare.

Ad Fontes means “to the sources” in Latin. Rather than reading textbooks…

The four arts of mathematics or number: arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, …

Great Ideas

Recurring themes that appear throughout writing and literature…

More About Paideia

Tens of thousands of parents are embracing classical Christian K-12 schools because they can see the difference — parents who want their children to flourish in life, not just get by. And they want this for their children’s whole life, not just for college. This is a gift you can give your child in the Christian paideia .

Classical Christian schools were uniquely designed to help parents obey Paul’s instruction in Ephesians, “And you, fathers, do not provoke your children to wrath, but bring them up in the paideia of the Lord.” In the first century to the 19th, classical Christian education was the way Christian parents cultivated a Christian Paideia in their children.

Paideia is powerful because it influences who we are in a deep way that is almost imperceptible to us– it’s woven into us from childhood. If you spend a day in a conventional high school talking to students, and then spend a day with classical Christian high-schoolers, we think you’ll see the difference.

If you listen to educators today, you’ll typically hear one common goal: “College and Career Readiness.” But what if students were asked to rise to a greater purpose? Parents at classical Christian schools are realizing that their kids can rise to something greater, something deeper, if we dare to imagine it. We disciple students to love great art, great books, and to appreciate the Greatness of God. And when they come near graduation after a decade or more in classical Christian schools, people notice something.

No form of education can compare to the success seen within classical Christian schools.

If education is beaten by [vocational] training, civilization dies. — C.S. Lewis

More about the Trivium

Classical christian education takes advantage of natural inclinations of children at different stages of their development to maximize learning..

When young children find it easy and fun to memorize and enjoy choral recitations and chants, they are given opportunities to memorize all types of facts in math, geography, English, bible and Latin. These facts are the “grammar” or building blocks inherent in every subject. Once they become teenagers, students like to contradict their elders, they sometimes are guilty of back talk, they enjoy pointing out other’s mistakes, and they like to propose and discuss difficult problems that have no easy solution. These students are ripe for instruction and training in formal logic.

If all goes well, in their later high school years students begin to show signs of creativity. The students, anxious to achieve independence and longing to express themselves, are taught to communicate eloquently and persuasively through instruction in rhetoric. It was Dorothy Sayers who proposed this marriage of the three stages of the Trivium (grammar, logic, and rhetoric) to the three stages of children development (roughly elementary, junior high, and high school). Through careful and thoughtful planning with a specific focus on curriculum and instruction, classical educators “cut with the grain” and help students develop skills that, once mastered, equip the children to learn for themselves.

In short, education is primarily about what we are trained to love, not just what we are taught to know.

More about Our Curriculum

Socratic Discussion in a Classical Christian Classroom

Socratic discussion, common placing (journaling great ideas & support), and a variety of engaging methods based in classical tradition create a very different classroom experience.
Structure and beauty characterize the environment with great art, uniforms, and organized, structured learning.
The quadrivium provides a philosophical approach to learning about our world including number, geometry (shape), astronomy (motion), and music (ratio’s and proportions).
Theology is the queen of the sciences, with all subjects understood through the revealed word of God and natural/human history and philosophy.
Great art is emphasized in the fine and performing arts.
Christian community extends beyond the classroom with intentional focus on the cultivation of virtue, as a practice.
The traditions of the church provide and inform the pursuit of the 7 Christian virtues, etc.

From the Trivium and Quadrivium, to Latin and Greek, to the cardinal virtues, to the great books; classical Christian methods sound foreign. But they have served the church for centuries. And, they are excelling today in ACCS member schools.

It’s time to rethink education.

Skip to primary navigation
Skip to main content
110 Baker St. Moscow, ID 83843
208.882.1226

A Classical & Christ-Centered Education

Classical Christian Education

Christ-centered.

In all its levels, programs, and teaching, Logos School seeks to: Teach all subjects as parts of an integrated whole with the Scriptures at the center (II Timothy 3:16-17); Provide a clear model of the biblical Christian life through our staff and board (Matthew 22:37-40); Encourage every student to begin and develop his relationship with God the Father through Jesus Christ (Matthew 28:18-20, Matthew 19:13-15).

In all its levels, programs, and teaching, Logos School seeks to: Emphasize grammar, logic, and rhetoric in all subjects (see definitions below); Encourage every student to develop a love for learning and live up to his academic potential; Provide an orderly atmosphere conducive to the attainment of the above goals.

Grammar : The fundamental rules of each subject. Logic : The ordered relationship of particulars in each subject. Rhetoric : How the grammar and logic of each subject may be clearly expressed.

What Do We Mean by Classical?

In the 1940’s the British author, Dorothy Sayers, wrote an essay titled The Lost Tools of Learning . In it she not only calls for a return to the application of the seven liberal arts of ancient education, the first three being the “Trivium” – grammar, logic, rhetoric, she also combines three stages of children’s development to the Trivium. Specifically, she matches what she calls the “Poll-parrot” stage with grammar, “Pert” with logic, and “Poetic” with rhetoric (see The Lost Tools Chart ). At Logos, the founding board members were intrigued with this idea of applying a classical education in a Christian context. Doug Wilson, a founding board member explained the classical method further in his book, Recovering the Lost Tools of Learning. Logos School has been committed to implementing this form of education since the school’s inception.

The Russian Orthodox Leader at the Core of Putin’s Ambitions

Patriarch Kirill I has provided spiritual cover for the invasion of Ukraine, reaping vast resources for his church in return. Now, in an extraordinary step, the E.U. is threatening him with sanctions.

Credit... Alexander Zemlianichenko/Associated Press

Supported by

Share full article

By Jason Horowitz

Published May 21, 2022 Updated May 22, 2022

As Russia’s invasion of Ukraine unfolded, Patriarch Kirill I, the leader of the Moscow-based Russian Orthodox Church, had an awkward Zoom meeting with Pope Francis.

The two religious leaders had previously worked together to bridge a 1,000-year-old schism between the Christian churches of the East and West. But the meeting, in March, found them on opposing sides of a chasm. Kirill spent 20 minutes reading prepared remarks, echoing the arguments of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia that the war in Ukraine was necessary to purge Nazis and oppose NATO expansion.

Francis was evidently flummoxed. “Brother, we are not clerics of the state,” the pontiff told Kirill, he later recounted to the Corriere della Sera newspaper, adding that “the patriarch cannot transform himself into Putin’s altar boy.”

Today, Kirill stands apart not merely from Francis, but from much of the world. The leader of about 100 million faithful, Kirill, 75, has staked the fortunes of his branch of Orthodox Christianity on a close and mutually beneficial alliance with Mr. Putin, offering him spiritual cover while his church — and possibly he himself — receives vast resources in return from the Kremlin, allowing him to extend his influence in the Orthodox world.

To his critics, the arrangement has made Kirill far more than another apparatchik, oligarch or enabler of Mr. Putin, but an essential part of the nationalist ideology at the heart of the Kremlin’s expansionist designs.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Clash of the Patriarchs

A hard-line Russian bishop backed by the political might of the Kremlin could split the Orthodox Church in two.

Two patriarchs sitting opposite each other at base of Orthodox-cross-shaped photo of Vladimir Putin, all on red background

Listen to more stories on curio

Updated at 2:00 p.m. ET on May 9, 2024

In late August of 2018, Patriarch Kirill, the leader of the Russian Orthodox Church, flew from Moscow to Istanbul on an urgent mission. He brought with him an entourage—a dozen clerics, diplomats, and bodyguards—that made its way in a convoy to the Phanar, the Orthodox world’s equivalent of the Vatican, housed in a complex of buildings just off the Golden Horn waterway, on Istanbul’s European side.

Explore the May 2024 Issue

Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.

Kirill was on his way to meet Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, the archbishop of Constantinople and the most senior figure in the Orthodox Christian world. Kirill had heard that Bartholomew was preparing to cut Moscow’s ancient religious ties to Ukraine by recognizing a new and independent Orthodox Church in Kyiv. For Kirill and his de facto boss, Russian President Vladimir Putin, this posed an almost existential threat. Ukraine and its monasteries are the birthplace of the Russian Orthodox Church; both nations trace their spiritual and national origins to the Kyiv-based kingdom that was converted from paganism to Christianity about 1,000 years ago. If the Church in Ukraine succeeded in breaking away from the Russian Church, it would seriously weaken efforts to maintain what Putin has called a “Russian world” of influence in the old Soviet sphere. And the decision was in the hands of Bartholomew, the sole figure with the canonical authority to issue a “tomos of autocephaly” and thereby bless Ukraine’s declaration of religious independence.

When Kirill arrived outside the Phanar, a crowd of Ukrainian protesters had already gathered around the compound’s beige stone walls. Kirill’s support for Russia’s brutal behavior—the 2014 annexation of Crimea and the bloody proxy war in eastern Ukraine—had made him a hated figure, and had helped boost support in Kyiv for an independent Church.

Kirill and his men cleared a path and ascended the marble steps. Black-clad priests led them to Bartholomew, who was waiting in a wood-paneled throne room. The two white-bearded patriarchs both wore formal robes and headdresses, but they cut strikingly different figures. Bartholomew, then 78, was all in black, a round-shouldered man with a ruddy face and a humble demeanor; Kirill, 71, looked austere and reserved, his head draped regally in an embroidered white koukoulion with a small golden cross at the top.

The tone of the meeting was set just after the two sides sat down at a table laden with sweets and beverages. Kirill reached for a glass of mineral water, but before he could take a drink, one of his bodyguards snatched the glass from his hand, put it aside, and brought out a plastic bottle of water from his bag. “As if we would try to poison the patriarch of Moscow,” I was told by Archbishop Elpidophoros, one of the Phanar’s senior clerics. The two sides disagreed on a wide range of issues , but when they reached the meeting’s real subject—Ukraine—the mood shifted from chilly politeness to open hostility. Bartholomew recited a list of grievances, all but accusing Kirill of trying to displace him and become the new arbiter of the Orthodox faith.

Kirill deflected the accusations and drove home his central demand: Ukraine must not be allowed to separate its Church from Moscow’s. The issue was “a ticking time bomb,” he said, according to a leaked transcript of the meeting. “We have never abandoned the notion that we are one country and one people. It is impossible for us to separate Kyiv from our country, because this is where our history began.”

Bartholomew explained that “the Ukrainians don’t feel comfortable under the control of Russia and desire full ecclesiastical independence just as they have political independence.” He added that he had been receiving petitions and pleas for years from Ukrainians at all levels, including members of Parliament and the country’s then–president and prime minister. Kirill replied that those pleas were meaningless because Ukraine’s political class was illegitimate. The people, he said with a disquieting certainty, “will overthrow them and expel them.” Bartholomew, shocked by the implied violence in Kirill’s words, called on the Russians “not to issue such threats, neither for schism nor for bloodshed in Ukraine.” When the meeting concluded, Kirill and his men were so angry that they skipped lunch and headed straight back to their private plane, I was told by an adviser to Bartholomew.

In the end, the threats proved unavailing: Bartholomew approved the new Orthodox Church of Ukraine, and Kirill issued an order to cut the Russian Church’s ties with the Phanar. (Confusingly, the Moscow-linked Church is called the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.) The clash of the patriarchs—they have not spoken since—now looks a lot like a prelude to the Russian war in Ukraine. Just after Bartholomew announced his decision, Putin convened a meeting of his security council to discuss it . Putin later cited the Church schism as part of his justification for the 2022 invasion, and he and Kirill continue to speak of the breakaway Church as an assault on Russia’s national identity.

But the struggle between Bartholomew and Kirill is bigger than Ukraine. It is a battle for the soul of Orthodox Christianity, a faith with 300 million believers around the world. The divide has drawn comparisons to the Great Schism, which a millennium ago separated the Orthodox East and the Catholic West.

On one side, Bartholomew has spent three decades trying to make Orthodoxy more compatible with the modern liberal world. He openly urges the faithful to accept evolution and other scientific tenets. He has been a passionate advocate for environmental protection. And, like Pope Francis, he has quietly promoted a more accepting attitude toward homosexuality. But Bartholomew’s power is more limited than the pope’s. There are eight other Orthodox patriarchs, each of whom presides over a national or regional Church, and Bartholomew’s role is that of “first among equals.”

Kirill, who heads by far the largest national Church, has made it into a bastion of militancy. He has given the war against Ukraine his full-throated support, and some of his priests go further , preaching about the glory of firing Grad rockets and dying in battle for Russia. Kirill’s tediously Manichaean tirades—about saintly Russia defending “traditional values” against the gay-pride parades of the decadent West—are much more than a justification for Putin’s autocracy. His anti-modern ideology has become an instrument of soft power that is eagerly consumed by conservatives across the Orthodox world as well as by right-wing figures in Europe (such as Hungary’s Viktor Orbán). It has even won adherents in the United States , where some evangelicals and right-wing Catholics seek a stronger hand in the culture wars.

Peacefield: Putin’s unholy war

Kirill has also launched an aggressive effort to capture Orthodox parishes allied with Bartholomew , allegedly with the help of the FSB, Russia’s intelligence apparatus, and of the Wagner Group, Russia’s mercenary arm. The Russian Orthodox Church has used bribery and blackmail, threatening to undermine churches that do not adopt its policies and requiring newly converted (and well-paid) clerics to sign documents renouncing all ties with Bartholomew’s Church. The goal of this campaign is a very old one. Five centuries ago, after Constantinople had fallen to the Ottomans, a Russian monk famously wrote that Moscow was now the world’s great Christian capital: “Two Romes have fallen, but the third stands, and there shall not be a fourth.” Kirill and Putin seem determined to make this declaration of a “third Rome”—Moscow—come true.

The spiritual heart of Orthodox Christianity is on Mount Athos, a densely forested peninsula in northern Greece. It is a community of 20 ancient monasteries, and pilgrims must receive written permission to visit. No women are allowed, and the peninsula—sealed from the mainland by fences—can be reached only by boat, as if it were an island. I got my entry paper stamped just after dawn at a waterside kiosk in Ouranoupoli, a Greek beach town full of restaurants and bars that is the main gateway to Athos. The waitress who had brought my coffee would be the last woman I saw for three days. At the pier, I climbed onto a battered old ferry that gradually filled with bearded monks, construction workers, and a smattering of pilgrims. A heavy funk of unwashed male bodies mingled with the sea breeze. As I looked out at the gorgeous blue-green water, I pitied the monks, who must also renounce swimming here.

Not much has changed on Athos since the monks first arrived, more than 1,000 years ago. They have followed the same candle-lit rituals of prayer and chanting even as the Christian world around them—once contained in a single empire—split and transformed over the centuries like a slow detonation. The Great Schism occurred in 1054. Around that same time, Mount Athos saw the arrival of Slavic monks, recently converted from paganism, who became an important presence on the peninsula and remain so today.

The ferry trawled alongside the western coast of Athos. After half an hour, we saw a cluster of buildings topped by the distinctive onion domes of the Russian Orthodox Church: the St. Panteleimon Monastery. It is the most Russia-friendly monastery on Athos, and its monks have posted a video of one of their priests chanting a prayer for “President Vladimir Vladimirovich, the government, and army of our God-protected fatherland.” After the Ukraine invasion in 2022, the monastery’s abbot sent Putin a birthday letter expressing the belief that “Russia under your wise guidance will overcome all difficulties and become a world power.” The monastery had not responded to my request for a visit. Still, my translator—a Macedonian named Goran who speaks fluent Russian as well as Greek—and I were hoping to persuade the monks to chat.

As we walked uphill from the pier, it became apparent that some of the monastery’s buildings were brand-new. Others were still under construction or being renovated, tall cranes hovering above them. Starting in the late 1990s, wealthy Russians, including a coterie of oligarchs close to Putin, began investing huge amounts of money in St. Panteleimon . It is now the largest and most opulent compound in all of Athos. The finances of the monasteries are opaque, and little supervision was introduced even after an abbot with ties to Russian oligarchs was jailed in Greece for embezzlement and fraud in 2011 over a lucrative land deal. (He was acquitted six years later.)

For all the new buildings, I found St. Panteleimon almost empty. Near the main sanctuary, we tried to have a word with a monk who was hurrying past. The man grimaced and brushed us off. We spotted a second monk, and he, too, refused to speak. Goran, who has been to Athos many times, seemed amazed by this rudeness. There is an ancient tradition on Athos of hospitality for pilgrims, and Goran told me he had been warmly received at St. Panteleimon before the war in Ukraine. Not anymore.

Our next stop was the Monastery of Simonopetra, a little farther down the coast. The reception could not have been more different. In the main building, a young monk from Syria named Seraphim escorted us into an anteroom with a magnificent view over the sea. He vanished, reappearing a minute later with a silver tray bearing coffee, water, and tiny glasses of cherry liqueur made by the monks. When we described our experience at St. Panteleimon, Seraphim nodded sadly. He then began telling us about a Russian plot to capture and annex Athos. It took me a moment to realize that he was talking about something that had occurred in the 19th century.

The past is very close on Athos. Clocks there still run on Byzantine time, with the day starting at sunset rather than midnight. The monks live surrounded by frescoes depicting events that happened centuries or even a millennium ago. Most of the clerics have little contact with the outside world, and must seek approval from their superiors to use the internet. Some current events do penetrate. The Ukraine war has had a profound impact, and not just for the Russian monks who gave me the silent treatment; it has begun to erode what the monks call a shared “Athonite consciousness.”

“It’s like a huge scar, this war between two Orthodox nations,” I was told by Elder Elissaios, the abbot of Simonopetra, who met with me the morning after our arrival. “Even if the war ends, the scars will still be painful … We cannot protect against this kind of thing.” I asked him what he meant. He paused for a moment, sipping his coffee and looking out at the blue expanse of the Aegean. “We don’t know how to separate the Church from the nation,” he said. “This is a problem of the Orthodox tradition.”

That problem has its origins in the fourth century C.E., when Roman Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity and began a process that would lead to its adoption as the religion of the empire. For more than 1,000 years afterward, Church and state in Constantinople “were seen as parts of a single organism,” according to the historian Timothy Ware, under a doctrine called sinfonia , or “harmony.” The echoes of this fusion can be seen today in many of the symbols of Orthodox authority, including the crown worn by Bartholomew on formal occasions and the throne on which he sits.

One of the paradoxes of modern Orthodoxy is that its rigidity has become a selling point in the West. Many conservatives complain that mainstream churches—Catholic and Protestant alike—have grown soft and spineless. Some in Europe and the United States openly yearn for a more explicitly Christian political sphere. Conversions to Orthodoxy are on the rise, and most of the converts are not looking for a tolerant message like Patriarch Bartholomew’s. According to Sarah Riccardi-Swartz, a scholar of Orthodoxy who teaches at Northeastern University, in Boston, the new converts tend to be right-wing and Russophile, and some speak freely of their admiration for Putin’s “kingly” role. In the U.S., converts are concentrated in the South and Midwest, and some have become ardent online evangelists for the idea that “Dixie,” with its beleaguered patriarchal traditions, is a natural home for Russian Orthodoxy. Some of them adorn their websites with a mash-up of Confederate nostalgia and icons of Russian saints .

Patriarch Kirill is keenly aware of his rising status among American religious conservatives , and he and his deputies have been welcomed warmly during visits to the U.S. (These visits took place before the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.) During a visit to Moscow in 2015, Franklin Graham—the son of the late Southern Baptist leader Billy Graham— told Kirill that many Americans wished that someone like Putin could be their president .

Read: Steve Bannon’s would-be coalition of Christian traditionalists

Russian Orthodoxy looks very different to many who grew up inside it. On my last day on Mount Athos, I had a conversation with a young man named Mykola Kosytskyy, a Ukrainian linguistics student and a frequent visitor to Athos. He had brought with him this time a group of 40 Ukrainian pilgrims. Kosytskyy talked about the war—the friends he’d lost, the shattered lives, the role of Russian propaganda. I asked him about the Moscow-linked Church that he’d known all his life, and he said something that surprised me: “The Ukrainian Orthodox Church”—meaning the Church of Kirill and Putin—“is the weapon in this war.”

All through his childhood, he explained, he had heard priests speaking of Russia in language that mixed the sacred and the secular—“this concept of saint Russia, the saviors of this world.” He went on: “You hear this every Sunday from your priest—that this nation fights against evil, that it’s the third Rome, yes, the new Rome. They truly believe this.” That is why, Kosytskyy said, many Ukrainians have such difficulty detaching themselves from the message, even when they see Kirill speaking of their own national leaders as the anti-Christ. Kosytskyy told me it had taken years for him to separate the truth from the lies. His entire family joined the new Ukrainian Church right after Bartholomew recognized it, in 2018. So have millions of other Ukrainians.

But religious ideas die hard, Kosytskyy said. The Russian message lives on in the minds of many Ukrainians, especially older ones. Among the hardest messages to unlearn is that the West represents a threat to Christian values, and that the vehicle for this threat is the humble-looking patriarch in Istanbul.

I first glimpsed Bartholomew on a rainy evening in late November. From where I stood, in the dim and damp recesses of St. George’s cathedral, in Istanbul, the patriarch appeared as a distant figure in a red-and-gold cape, framed by a high wall inset with a dense golden filigree of angels and dragons and foliage. Bartholomew walked forward, clutching a staff, and ascended his patriarchal throne. To anyone who was raised, as I was, on threadbare Protestant rituals, Orthodox services are a bit like dropping acid at the opera. The cathedral was as deep and shadowed as a canyon, full of drifting incense and the thrilling sound of low choral chanting. Sparkling eyes gazed down from icons on the sanctuary walls.

That evening, the church was packed with people who had come from all corners of the Orthodox world for the annual Feast of Saint Andrew, the Phanar’s patron saint. I heard shreds of multiple languages in the crowd—Greek, Serbian, French—and saw three East African priests in brown robes that were cinched with a rope at the waist. As the service came to an end, Bartholomew delivered the traditional blessing for a new archon, a layperson being honored for service to the Church. “ Axios! ” he called out three times (“He is worthy”), and each time the faithful repeated after him in unison: “ Axios! ”

When the service ended, we filed out into a small flagstone courtyard that underscores the peculiar status of the Phanar. It is revered as the ecclesiastical capital of the Orthodox world, but it is crammed into a space no bigger than a midsize hotel, and surrounded by a Muslim society that has treated it with undisguised hostility. The compound is overshadowed by the minaret of a neighboring mosque, whose PA system loudly proclaims the Islamic call to prayer five times a day. The clergy must change out of their clerical garb every time they leave the compound, lest they offend Muslim sensibilities.

I had a chance to speak with Bartholomew at an evening reception after an electric-violin concert in his honor at a Greek school in Istanbul. It was surprisingly easy to thread my way through a thicket of fawning diplomats, visiting Catholic bishops, and waiters balancing trays of wine and hors d’oeuvres—and there he was, seated in an armchair. He beckoned to me, and as I sat down he gave my forearm a paternal squeeze. Up close, Bartholomew has a rosy, patchy complexion, and his white beard looks almost like a rectangle of smoke spreading south from his chin. He spoke excellent English; when we were interrupted a few times by well-wishers, he conversed with them in French, Greek, and Turkish. He seemed very much at ease, answering my questions about the Church and its traditions as well as about his two highest priorities as patriarch—fostering greater openness to other sects and religions, and protecting the environment. As for the Ukraine war, he said bluntly that “Kirill is allowing himself to be a tool, to be an instrument of Putin.”

I asked him about the political inconvenience of being based in Istanbul. Bartholomew conceded that the Turks were difficult hosts, but added: “It’s better for us to be in a non-Orthodox country. If we were in Greece, we would be a Greek Church. If we were in Bulgaria, we would be a Bulgarian Church. Being here, we can be a supranational Church.” This larger role is the reason the Istanbul Church is known as the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

Broadening the Church’s mission has been a hallmark of Bartholomew’s career. He was born Demetrios Archondonis on the Aegean island of Imvros in 1940, just two decades after Turkey’s Greek Christian population had been decimated by violence and forced exile in the aftermath of the First World War. A local bishop saw his potential and paid for him to go to secondary school. He continued on to seminary and then to study in Rome, where he arrived in 1963 amid the theological ferment of the Second Vatican Council. Bartholomew had a front-row seat, meeting with council delegates, theologians, and other prominent Catholic figures. The Orthodox Church was, if anything, more rigidly traditional than the Roman Church, and Bartholomew seems to have been inspired by the Vatican reformers’ efforts to clear away the cobwebs.

He was no firebrand. But he spoke consistently in favor of modernizing the Church and fostering greater openness. Despite the Church’s overall conservatism, he had a few role models in this, including his godfather, Archbishop Iakovos, who was the Phanar’s representative in North and South America from 1959 to 1996—and one of the only non-Black clerics to accompany Martin Luther King Jr. on his march from Selma, Alabama, to Montgomery in 1965.

Bartholomew’s most distinctive effort to “update” the Church is his commitment to environmentalism . In the press, he is sometimes called the Green Patriarch. When, in 1997, he declared that abusing the natural environment was a sin against God, he became the first major religious leader to articulate such a position. Perhaps more controversial—at least to some Orthodox Christians—is Bartholomew’s emphatic call for believers to accept unreservedly the findings of modern science and medicine. He believes in evolution, and regularly reminds his followers that the first life forms emerged on the planet some 4 billion years ago.

Bartholomew and Kirill have at least one thing in common: Both grew up as Christians in the shadow of rigidly secular rulers. But the Turkish republic was mild compared with the Bolshevik regime, whose Marxist faith decreed that religion was illusory and backward—the “opium of the people.” The Bolsheviks were especially keen on destroying the Orthodox Church, because of its deep ties to czarist tradition. In the decade following the Russian Revolution of 1917, the new rulers imprisoned and executed thousands of Orthodox priests and bishops.

By the time Kirill was born, in 1946, Joseph Stalin had changed tack, feeling that he needed religion to shore up popular support. He revived the Church in zombified form, an instrument of the state that was massively surveilled and controlled by the security services. When some of the KGB’s archives were exposed in 2014 —thanks in part to the brave efforts of the late Gleb Yakunin, a dissident Russian priest who spent years in prison—the collusion of the Church’s leaders was revealed. One of the collaborating clerics, whose code name in the files is Drozdov (“The Thrush”), is alleged to be Patriarch Alexy II , Kirill’s immediate predecessor. Kirill’s name did not come up in the files, but he was the product of a system in which advancement was impossible without the approval of the regime.

As the Soviet Union collapsed, the Church faced a crisis of identity. Kirill was one of its most visible and charismatic leaders, and for a brief moment, he seemed to urge a new and more democratic direction for the Church. But as Russian society descended into chaos and gangsterism, Kirill staked out much more conservative and autocratic views.

By the time Putin came to power, in 1999, some of his old KGB friends had already started getting religion. It made a certain kind of sense that the most devout and pitiless Communists were those who most needed a new faith, and many of them had already spent years collaborating with Church figures. Putin made his first visit to Mount Athos in 2005, attending services at St. Panteleimon and climbing the monastery’s bell tower. A year later, one of his old confidants from the KGB helped found the Russian Athos Society to organize donations to the monasteries there. Putin’s own religious feelings are hard to discern, though he is rumored to have been brought into the Orthodox faith in the ’90s by a priest named Tikhon Shevkunov , who ran a monastery not far from the FSB’s Moscow headquarters.

In 2008, a documentary called The Fall of an Empire: The Lesson of Byzantium was broadcast on Russian state television, not once but three times. The director and star was the same Tikhon Shevkunov. The movie’s thesis was that Byzantium had been irrevocably undermined even before Ottoman armies conquered it in 1453, its religious culture and resolve eroded by the individualism of the encroaching West. Russia was held up as Byzantium’s heir, the natural vehicle of its holy mission. Historians pilloried the show as historically illiterate, but they were missing the point. It wasn’t really about the past. It was a blueprint for the future.

Kirill became patriarch in 2009. Soon afterward, Putin began invoking Orthodoxy when talking about Russia and its role in the world. Thousands of churches have since been built throughout the country, and Putin has made very public visits to Church elders. Kirill “inspired Putin to a great extent, to make him think in civilizational terms,” I was told by Cyril Hovorun, a Ukrainian-born theologian who spent 10 years as a personal assistant and speechwriter to Kirill before resigning in 2012, unhappy with the Church’s direction. Putin’s loyalists quickly began aping their president’s talk of “Holy Russia” and her “satanic” enemies .

Read: Are Ukraine’s leaders in league with Satanists? On Russian TV, yes

Putin’s decision to restore Orthodoxy to its old public role was a shrewd one, whatever his personal religious feelings. The Russian empire had collapsed, but its outlines could still be seen in the Russian Orthodox religious sphere, which extended beyond Russia’s borders and as far afield as Mount Athos and even Jerusalem. For a ruler seeking to revive his country’s lost status, the Church was a superb way to spread propaganda and influence.

If Kirill had any illusions about who stood higher in the new sinfonia between Church and state, they were quickly snuffed out. In 2011, he endorsed criticism of corrupt parliamentary elections in Russia . Reports soon appeared in the state-controlled media about luxury apartments belonging to Kirill and his relatives. Other stories began to circulate about billions of dollars in secret bank accounts. One website published a photograph from 2009 in which Kirill could be seen wearing a Breguet watch worth about $30,000. Kirill denied ever wearing it, but after a bungled effort to airbrush it out of the photo, the Church had to admit that the watch was his and make a humiliating apology. Kirill has shown abject loyalty ever since. At a celebration in honor of his first decade as head of the Russian Church, in 2019, he appeared alongside Putin and thanked God and “especially you, Vladimir Vladimirovich.” (My request for comment from Kirill and the Moscow Patriarchate went unanswered.)

For Kirill and Putin, it was not enough to restore the Church’s status in Russia. To reclaim the “Russian world,” they had to wage a much wider battle for influence and prestige, one that would include tarring Bartholomew.

The Russian campaign started in Greece, where there is a natural well of sympathy formed by ancient religious ties and shared enemies. In the mid-2000s, Russian oligarchs began building churches and doling out cash for favors. Bishops who lent holy relics for tours in Russia could make a tidy profit for themselves or their parishes. The Russian investments were followed by a systematic effort to denigrate Patriarch Bartholomew on hundreds of new Greek-language websites, blogs, and Facebook groups, an online offensive documented by Alexandros Massavetas, a Greek journalist, in his 2019 book, The Third Rome . “The message was that Bartholomew is being manipulated by the Turks or the U.S. or the Vatican,” Massavetas told me, “and that only Russia represents the true Orthodox spirit, with Putin as its protector.”

The Phanar overlooked these attacks for years. Bartholomew was working hard to maintain unity at all costs, because he was planning to convene a historic pan-Orthodox gathering that he saw as the crowning achievement of his tenure. The Church had not held a Holy and Great Council for more than 1,000 years, and the planning for this one had begun in 1961. Bartholomew was so keen on making the synod succeed that he accommodated the Russians at every turn. During a preparatory meeting, the Russians objected to proposed language about the Church’s opposition to discrimination and insisted that all references to racial and sexual minorities be deleted. (Kirill seems to see the language of human rights as a tacit endorsement of homosexuality and other supposed sins.) They also demanded that Ukraine’s calls for religious independence be kept off the agenda. Bartholomew caved on it all, even the seating plan.

Then, just a week before the synod’s start date, in 2016—with all the villas booked and ready at a Cretan resort town— the Russians pulled out . They defended their decision by pointing to three much smaller Orthodox bodies (Bulgaria, Georgia, and Antioch) that had withdrawn just beforehand. Although there appear to have been some genuine disagreements about the documents prepared for the meeting, the three smaller Churches have close ties with Moscow, and the Russian move came off as yet another effort to humiliate Bartholomew.

Kirill, though, appears to have miscalculated. His public snub laid bare the divisions in the Church and removed Bartholomew’s incentive to compromise. Archbishop Elpidophoros, who is now the Phanar’s senior bishop in the United States, spoke with me about this episode during a conversation in his Manhattan office, on the Upper East Side. Perhaps the most important consequence of Kirill’s move, he explained, was that it opened the door to giving the Ukrainians what they wanted. “That was the green light,” he said.

The movement for religious independence in Ukraine had been stirring for decades, and it had grown in tandem with the country’s political confrontations with Moscow. As early as 2008, the head of Ukraine’s Moscow-linked Church at the time, Metropolitan Volodymyr, was declaring that the Church and state should be separate—a position that would be unthinkable in Russia. When Viktor Yanukovych, an instrument of the Kremlin, became president of Ukraine in 2010, he made clear that he wanted the Orthodox Church—the faith of 72 percent of Ukraine’s people—back in its cage. A Ukrainian bishop, Oleksandr Drabynko, told me he was called into the ministry of internal affairs one morning in 2013 for a meeting. One of Yanukovych’s officials delivered a blunt message, Drabynko said: “We must push out Volodymyr because we need someone loyal to us.” The official added that with the next Ukrainian election approaching in 2015, “the Church must support our candidate.”

The landmark events of 2014, known in Ukraine as the Revolution of Dignity, were more than just a civilian movement to overthrow a corrupt autocrat. The uprising bred a new sense of independence among Ukrainians, thanks in part to the role played by the Orthodox Church. Though some priests supported Yanukovych and his government, many others openly backed the revolt. When police attacked protesters in Kyiv’s central square, one bishop allowed them to shelter from the police in his nearby cathedral .

Russia’s brazenly neocolonial response to the 2014 revolution—the seizure of Crimea—infuriated Ukrainians and supercharged the movement for a religious divorce from Moscow. In October 2018, just weeks after his tense meeting with Kirill in Istanbul, Bartholomew dissolved the 1686 edict that had given Moscow religious control over Ukraine . He also set in motion the process that would lead to recognition of a new Ukrainian Church, one that would be under Bartholomew’s—not Moscow’s—jurisdiction.

The Russians were furious, and Kirill severed ties with the Phanar . Worldwide, Moscow began behaving as if it had already become the third Rome. A vivid illustration was provided by events in Africa, where one of the most ancient Orthodox patriarchates is based (in Alexandria, Egypt). Kirill founded a new branch of the Russian Orthodox Church and began targeting the existing Orthodox parishes there, whose leader had aligned himself with Bartholomew. “Through Facebook and Instagram they approach our followers,” Metropolitan Gregorios, a Greek bishop who has been based in Cameroon since 2004, told me. “They begin by sending money. They attach everyone to them, show that Russia is rich, show that they can get more money.”

Gregorios, who is 62, spent two hours with me in the lobby of an Athens hotel as he described Russia’s religious efforts across Africa, which he said are funded by the Wagner mercenary force. Orthodox priests are more vulnerable to bribery than their Roman Catholic peers, Gregorios explained, because they are allowed to marry, and many have large families to provide for. “So the Russians say, ‘We’ll give education for your kids.’ They bring a motorcycle, a car. They say, ‘The Greeks just give bicycles.’ And they double the salaries we pay.” Last year, he said, he lost six priests in his jurisdiction: “They got approached by the Russians and offered 300 euros a month.” Gregorios later shared with me some of the documents that priests under Russia’s thumb must sign, swearing loyalty to the patriarch of Moscow “to my dying day.”

The Russian Church has made similarly aggressive moves in Turkey, the Balkans, and elsewhere. Russia’s secret services appear to be involved in some of these operations. In September, the North Macedonian government expelled a high-ranking Russian priest and three Russian diplomats , accusing them of spying. A week later, the same priest, Vassian Zmeev, was expelled from Bulgaria. According to Nikolay Krastev, a journalist in Sofia, Zmeev appears to have been organizing efforts to divide the Balkan Orthodox Churches and shore up opposition to the new Ukrainian Church. All of this bullying has had its effect: Only four Orthodox branches (out of about 17, depending on how you count) have recognized the new Ukrainian Church approved by Bartholomew.

In late 2021, weary of the conflict and worried that it was damaging all of Orthodoxy, Bartholomew reached out to the Russians—and was rebuffed. The Moscow Patriarchate “sent us a message saying that there is no way we will engage in any dialogue,” Archbishop Elpidophoros recalled. The Russians, he went on, declared that “the wound is so deep that we will need at least two generations to overcome.” The message may not have been entirely sincere. Russia was already planning what it believed would be a much quicker resolution to its Ukraine problems, one that did not include dialogue.

The Monastery of the Caves, in Kyiv, may be the most important Christian site in the Slavic world. Founded around 1050 C.E. by a monk from Mount Athos, it is a large complex of golden-domed churches, bell towers, and underground tunnels, ringed by stone walls and set on a hill overlooking the Dnieper River, in the center of the city. In the early days of the Russian invasion, in February 2022, there were rumors of a plan to parachute Russian special forces into the monastery grounds. Welcomed by friendly Orthodox priests, the invaders would quickly move on to the government buildings nearby and gain control of the capital.

The rumors were false, but they sounded plausible to many Ukrainian ears. The Russian military and its proxies had begun using Orthodox monasteries and churches as bases as soon as they arrived in eastern Ukraine in 2014, and have continued to do so over the past two years in occupied areas. They have even publicized the fact, in an apparent effort to show that the Church is on their side. Many priests, including prominent figures, did support Russia. The senior cleric at the Monastery of the Caves, Metropolitan Pavel, was well known for his pro-Moscow sympathies .

But the violence of the 2022 invasion united Ukrainians, and Kirill’s efforts to sprinkle it with holy water—describing those who opposed the Russians as “evil forces” and praising the “metaphysical significance” of the Russian advance—made him a widely hated figure. Many Ukrainians now view the Moscow-linked branch, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, with deep suspicion. The Ukrainian security services have carried out regular raids on its churches and monasteries over the past two years, including the Monastery of the Caves. Dozens of priests have been arrested and charged with espionage and other crimes. This past October, Ukraine’s Parliament approved a measure that could ban the Russia-backed Church altogether . That Church still has more parishes in Ukraine than its newer, independent rival, but its long-term prospects appear grim.

The loss of all of Ukrainian Orthodoxy would be a serious blow for Kirill. At its peak, Ukraine accounted for about a third of the parishes claimed by the Russian Orthodox Church. Ukraine also has a much higher rate of churchgoing than Russia, where actual piety seems to be rare—a fact that sits awkwardly with Kirill’s broadsides against the moral depravity of the West. Barely two months after the invasion, a well-known Russian priest and blogger named Pavel Ostrovsky—who was not ordinarily a regime critic—unleashed a tirade on Telegram: “Some argue that Russia is a stronghold of everything noble and good, which is fighting against world evil, satanism, and paganism,” he wrote. “What is all this nonsense? How can one be a noble stronghold with a 73 percent rate of divorce in families, where drunkenness and drug addiction are rampant, while theft and outright godlessness flourish?”

It is tempting to conclude that Russia’s efforts to capture world Orthodoxy will prove to be a losing bet. Religious leaders of all kinds have denounced Kirill’s embrace of the war, including Pope Francis, who famously told him not to be “Putin’s altar boy.” It may even be, as Archbishop Elpidophoros told me, that “the Patriarchate of Moscow is not a Church” so much as a convenient vehicle for nationalist ideology. The Russian people, he assured me, are the foremost victims of this religious tyranny.

The archbishop may be right about the Moscow Patriarchate: that it’s not a Church, not in the sense that we have long accepted in the West. That said, it’s not just an arm of the Kremlin. It is something more dangerous, a two-headed beast that can summon ancient religious loyalty even as it draws on all the resources of a 21st-century police state: internet trolls, abundant cash, the tacit threat of violence. Perhaps the most troubling possibility is that Kirill’s Church, with its canny blend of politics and faith, turns out to be better adapted to survival in our century than mainstream Churches are.

There are certainly dissenters from Kirill’s jingoistic line among the 40,000 Orthodox priests in Russia. But most clerics are pliant, and a vocal minority are even more extreme than their patriarch. Andrei Tkachev, an archpriest who was born in Ukraine and now lives in Moscow, has become notorious for sermons in which he asserts that “a warrior’s death is best of all.” He has millions of followers on social media. Other priests have reinterpreted Christian doctrine in ways that recall the Crusades. Online, you can easily find videos of Igor Cheremnykh, another well-known priest, asserting that the commandment “Thou shalt not kill” is meant to apply to the behavior only of civilians, not of soldiers. Cyril Hovorun, Kirill’s former assistant, knows many of these priests personally. He calls them “turbo‑Z Orthodox.” ( Z is used as a symbol of Russia’s war.) Some of them were aligned with or even personally close to Yevgeny Prigozhin, the late oligarch and leader of the Wagner Group. “This monster has outgrown its creators,” Hovorun told me. “It’s a Frankenstein.”

The day after I met Patriarch Bartholomew in Istanbul, I went for a walk near the Phanar. The Feast of Saint Andrew was over, and the ancient streets were no longer full of pilgrims. A cold drizzle fell. As I walked past the relics of dead civilizations—Roman, Byzantine, Ottoman—I found myself wondering if Orthodoxy would ultimately split into two religions, or just weaken itself through bickering, like the Christians who once ruled Constantinople.

It may be that Kirill and his angry zealots represent the last sparks of a dying flame. This is what Bartholomew has been assuring his flock: that he is bringing the Church into the future, while Kirill is holding on to the past. But as a patriarch in Istanbul, he must also know that the arc of history doesn’t always bend the way we want it to.

This article originally mischaracterized Roman Emperor Constantine's policy toward Christianity. It appears in the May 2024 print edition with the headline “Clash of the Patriarchs.”

About the Author

IMAGES

KNEC KCSE 2019 Christian Religious Education Paper 1 Past Paper
AQA A Religious Studies GCSE
Christianity: Beliefs & Teachings (Paper 1: AQA A GCSE Religious
The Light Christian Religious Education Volume One: Paper 1
GCSE RELIGIOUS STUDIES
AQA GCSE RELIGIOUS STUDIES A Paper 1: Christianity MAY 2023

VIDEO

KCSE CRE markers down tools, demand for pay
Bible Topics Why is Christian Education necessary?
Paper Presentation in Religious Education by Grace Mtonga
"13 Основ веры" Урок 1. Введение "13 Основ и их источник в Торе выход из Египта"
CXC Religious Education 2016 || Paper 1 with answers
AQA Inside Assessment: Religious Studies

COMMENTS

Free Christian Religious Education (CRE) notes, revision questions
Christian Religious Education, CRE, is a subject that is examined by the Kenya National Examinations Council (Knec). It is an elective/ optional subject at high school and candidates sit two papers at the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education, KCSE, examinations. The subject code assigned for CRE by Knec is 313.
KCSE Past Papers 2021 CRE Paper 1 (313/1)
2021 Christian religious Education (CRE) Paper 1. 1.State seven reasons why Christian Religious Education is taught in secondary schools in Kenya. (7 marks) (b) Outline the translation of the Bible from the original languages to local languages in Kenya. (6 marks)
CRE Notes
The study of Christian religious Education highlights to man about the nature of God. God is Holy trinity (Father, Son and Holy Spirit) (Genesis 1:26). Christian religious education enables us to understand that all men are equal before God, irrespective of colour, race, sex, age, ethnicity, etc.
KCSE 2019 CRE Paper 1 Questions With Marking Scheme
INSTRUCTIONS. Answer all questions. Explain how the learning of Christian Religious Education in secondary schools promotes the goal of national development. (6 marks) State the meaning of the Biblical accounts of creation in Genesis chapters 1 and 2. (7 marks) Identify the consequences of sin from the story of the fall of human beings in ...
KCSE Past Papers 2021 CRE Paper 1
2021 Christian religious Education (CRE) Paper 1. 1.State seven reasons why Christian Religious Education is taught in secondary schools in Kenya. (7 marks) (b) Outline the translation of the Bible from the original languages to local languages in Kenya. (6 marks)
CRE Notes Form 1
1.0.0 Meaning of Christian Religious Education. 2.0.0 The Bible. 3.0.0 Creation and The Fall Of Man. 4.0.0 Faith and God's promises: Abraham. ... Then write a paper arguing either for polygamy or monogamy. Lesson Six: Importance of the Temple in Israel. Learning outcomes. By the end of this lesson, you should.
PDF CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION PAPER 1 1996
CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION PAPER 1 1996. Give five reasons why reading the Bible is important to Christians. (5mks) Identify five teachings on the relationship between human beings and the environment from the Genesis stories to creation. (5mks) State five ways in which the Israelites worshiped god in the wilderness during the exodus. (5mks)
Christian Religious Education Paper 1
Christian Religious Education Paper 1. 1. (a) Provisions given by God to man in creation stories. (7 mks - Man was provided with the Garden of Eden. - God provided man with a company/helper, wife. - God provided man with the gift of life/breath. - He provided man with love /perfect happiness.
PDF Christian Religious Education Paper 1 1996
CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION PAPER 1 NOV. 1997. 1. Identify five responsibilities given to human beings by God in the Genesis stories of creation. 2. 3. (5mks) List the qualities of Moses shown during his call at Mount Sinai (5mks) Give any five qualities of the servant of Yahweh according to prophet Isaiah. 4.
Christian Religious Education Paper 1 Form 4 End of Term 1 Examination
PAPER 1 313/1. TIME: 2HRS. END-TERM 1 FORM 4. Answer FIVE questions in the answer booklet provided. 1. a) STATE Six Similarities in the Biblical stories of creation in Genesis chapter1and 2 (6 marks) b). Give REASONS why human beings are considered special to the rest of the creation. (7marks)
Christian Religious Education (CRE) Paper 1 notes: Questions and
Christian Religious Education paper one notes is the most simplified and comprehensive. It covers all paper one notes in form of questions well arranged in order as indicated in the syllabus. The author is a seasoned CRE teacher who is also an examiner. Students and teachers who will use this book will find it invaluable.
PDF Form One Work Chapter One Introduction to Christian Religious Education
1 FORM ONE WORK CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION PAPER 1 PAST KCSE QUESTIONS ON THE TOPIC 1. Explain the different ways in which Christians in Kenya use the bible to spread the Good news. 2. Give the consequences of sin according to genesis 3:11 3. What are teachings of the Genesis stories of creation? 4.
PDF Christian Religious Education Paper 1 2½ hours
2. With reference to Genesis 12 : 1 - 9, outline seven promises given to Abraham by God at the time of his call. (7 marks) Identify seven events that took place during the Passover night. (7 marks) Mention six lessons that Christians can learn from the incident when Abraham was willing to sacrifice his son Isaac. (6 marks) 3.
KCSE Past Papers 2020 CRE Paper 1 (313/1)
KCSE Past Papers 2020 CRE Paper 1 (313/1) 2020 Christian religious Education (CRE) Paper 1. 1. (a) List books of the Bible in the Old Testament referred to as books of minor prophets. (6 marks) (b) Outline the effects of the translation of the Bible into .African languages. (8 marks) (c) Give six ways in which Christians in Kenya use the Bible ...
PDF 4.10.1 Christian Religious Education Paper 1 (313/1) 1. (a) Why the
4.10 CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION (313) 4.10.1 Christian Religious Education Paper 1 (313/1) 1. (a) Why the Bible is considered as the word of God (i) The people/authors who wrote the Bible were under the influence of the Holy Spirit / inspired (ii) Through it, God's character / attributes / nature is revealed
PDF Christian Religious Education Paper 1 Time: 2 ½ Hrs Form Three
3. (a) State six promises of God to king David. (6 marks) (b) Explain how King Solomon turned away from the covenant way of life. (7 marks) ortance of the temple of Jerusalem to the Israelites. (7 marks)4. www.freekcsepastpapers.com (8 marks) (a) M. ntion different forms of injustice that prophet Amos condemned.(b.
Christian Religious Education (Cre) Form 1 Notes Pdf
TOPIC 1 : INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS EDUCATION - Click to view. TOPIC 2 : THE BIBLE - Click to view. TOPIC 3 : CREATION AND THE FALL OF HUMAN KIND - Click to view. TOPIC 4 : THE ORIGIN OF SIN AND ITS CONSEQUENCES - Click to view. TOPIC 5 : FAITH AND GOD'S PROMISES : ABRAHAM - Click to view. TOPIC 6 : THE EXODUS - Click to ...
What is Classical Christian Education?
Education that Inspires Depth and Wisdom. Classical Christian education (CCE) is a time-tested educational system which establishes a biblical worldview (called Paideia), incorporates methods based on natural phases of child development, cultivates the seven Christian virtues, trains students in reasoning through the Trivium (Grammar, Logic ...
Classical Christian Education
CHRIST-CENTERED. In all its levels, programs, and teaching, Logos School seeks to: Teach all subjects as parts of an integrated whole with the Scriptures at the center (II Timothy 3:16-17); Provide a clear model of the biblical Christian life through our staff and board (Matthew 22:37-40); Encourage every student to begin and develop his relationship with God the Father through Jesus Christ ...
The Russian Orthodox Leader at the Core of Putin's Ambitions
Published May 21, 2022 Updated May 22, 2022. As Russia's invasion of Ukraine unfolded, Patriarch Kirill I, the leader of the Moscow-based Russian Orthodox Church, had an awkward Zoom meeting ...
Russia, Ukraine, and the Coming Schism in Orthodox Christianity
In early 2019, Patriarch Bartholomew signed a "tomos of autocephaly" blessing the religious independence of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine. (Onur Coban / Anadolu Agency / Getty) By the time ...