You can find some useful tips in our how-to guide.
The maximum length of your abstract should be 250 words in total, including keywords and article classification (see the sections below).
Your submission should include up to 12 appropriate and short keywords that capture the principal topics of the paper. Our how to guide contains some practical guidance on choosing search-engine friendly keywords.
Please note, while we will always try to use the keywords you’ve suggested, the in-house editorial team may replace some of them with matching terms to ensure consistency across publications and improve your article’s visibility.
During the submission process, you will be asked to select a type for your paper; the options are listed below. If you don’t see an exact match, please choose the best fit:
You will also be asked to select a category for your paper. The options for this are listed below. If you don’t see an exact match, please choose the best fit:
Reports on any type of research undertaken by the author(s), including:
Covers any paper where content is dependent on the author's opinion and interpretation. This includes journalistic and magazine-style pieces.
Describes and evaluates technical products, processes or services.
Focuses on developing hypotheses and is usually discursive. Covers philosophical discussions and comparative studies of other authors’ work and thinking.
Describes actual interventions or experiences within organizations. It can be subjective and doesn’t generally report on research. Also covers a description of a legal case or a hypothetical case study used as a teaching exercise.
This category should only be used if the main purpose of the paper is to annotate and/or critique the literature in a particular field. It could be a selective bibliography providing advice on information sources, or the paper may aim to cover the main contributors to the development of a topic and explore their different views.
Provides an overview or historical examination of some concept, technique or phenomenon. Papers are likely to be more descriptive or instructional (‘how to’ papers) than discursive.
Headings must be concise, with a clear indication of the required hierarchy.
The preferred format is for first level headings to be in bold, and subsequent sub-headings to be in medium italics.
Notes or endnotes should only be used if absolutely necessary. They should be identified in the text by consecutive numbers enclosed in square brackets. These numbers should then be listed, and explained, at the end of the article.
All figures (charts, diagrams, line drawings, webpages/screenshots, and photographic images) should be submitted electronically. Both colour and black and white files are accepted.
There are a few other important points to note:
In addition, where Figures, Tables or Appendices are not needed within the article for the reader to follow and understand the article, authors are welcome to place these within a personal repository, should they wish to. Please note that this is not compulsory but optional. If authors wish to use a personal repository link, they should insert the link(s) within their manuscript, and they should not include the physical tables, figures or appendices within their manuscript, or any separate files uploaded to ScholarOne. If tables, figures, or appendices are provided these will be typeset. Please note it is the authors responsibility to ensure that the personal repository links remain live after publication.
Tables should be typed and submitted in a separate file to the main body of the article. The position of each table should be clearly labelled in the main body of the article with corresponding labels clearly shown in the table file. Tables should be numbered consecutively in Roman numerals (e.g. I, II, etc.).
Give each table a brief title. Ensure that any superscripts or asterisks are shown next to the relevant items and have explanations displayed as footnotes to the table, figure, or plate.
The same information applies as above regarding using a personal repository.
Where tables, figures, appendices, and other additional content are supplementary to the article but not critical to the reader’s understanding of it, you can choose to host these supplementary files alongside your article on Insight, Emerald’s content-hosting platform (this is Emerald's recommended option as we are able to ensure the data remain accessible), or on an alternative trusted online repository.
Emerald recommends authors that they use the following two trusted lists of repositories: and to identify the most suitable repository. Any and all supplementary material must be present/provided with the initial submission.
, you must submit these as separate files alongside your article. Files should be clearly labelled in such a way that makes it clear they are supplementary; Emerald recommends that the file name is descriptive and that it follows the format 'Supplementary_material_appendix_1' or 'Supplementary tables'. All supplementary material must be mentioned at the appropriate moment in the main text of the article; there is no need to include the content of the file only the file name. A link to the supplementary material will be added to the article during production, and the material will be made available alongside the main text of the article at the point of EarlyCite publication.
Please note that Emerald will not make any changes to the material; it will not be copy-edited or typeset, and authors will not receive proofs of this content. Emerald therefore strongly recommends that you style all supplementary material ahead of acceptance of the article.
Emerald Insight can host the following file types and extensions:
, you should ensure that the supplementary material is hosted on the repository ahead of submission, and then include a link only to the repository within the article. It is the responsibility of the submitting author to ensure that the material is free to access and that it remains permanently available. Where an alternative trusted online repository is used, the files hosted should always be presented as read-only; please be aware that such usage risks compromising your anonymity during the review process if the repository contains any information that may enable the reviewer to identify you; as such, we recommend that all links to alternative repositories are reviewed carefully prior to submission.
Please note that extensive supplementary material may be subject to peer review; this is at the discretion of the journal Editor and dependent on the content of the material (for example, whether including it would support the reviewer making a decision on the article during the peer review process).
All references in your manuscript must be formatted using one of the recognised Harvard styles. You are welcome to use the Harvard style Emerald has adopted – we’ve provided a detailed guide below. Want to use a different Harvard style? That’s fine, our typesetters will make any necessary changes to your manuscript if it is accepted. Please ensure you check all your citations for completeness, accuracy and consistency.
References to other publications in your text should be written as follows:
, 2006) Please note, ‘ ' should always be written in italics.A few other style points. These apply to both the main body of text and your final list of references.
At the end of your paper, please supply a reference list in alphabetical order using the style guidelines below. Where a DOI is available, this should be included at the end of the reference.
Surname, initials (year), , publisher, place of publication.
e.g. Harrow, R. (2005), , Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
Surname, initials (year), "chapter title", editor's surname, initials (Ed.), , publisher, place of publication, page numbers.
e.g. Calabrese, F.A. (2005), "The early pathways: theory to practice – a continuum", Stankosky, M. (Ed.), , Elsevier, New York, NY, pp.15-20.
Surname, initials (year), "title of article", , volume issue, page numbers.
e.g. Capizzi, M.T. and Ferguson, R. (2005), "Loyalty trends for the twenty-first century", , Vol. 22 No. 2, pp.72-80.
Surname, initials (year of publication), "title of paper", in editor’s surname, initials (Ed.), , publisher, place of publication, page numbers.
e.g. Wilde, S. and Cox, C. (2008), “Principal factors contributing to the competitiveness of tourism destinations at varying stages of development”, in Richardson, S., Fredline, L., Patiar A., & Ternel, M. (Ed.s), , Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, pp.115-118.
Surname, initials (year), "title of paper", paper presented at [name of conference], [date of conference], [place of conference], available at: URL if freely available on the internet (accessed date).
e.g. Aumueller, D. (2005), "Semantic authoring and retrieval within a wiki", paper presented at the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), 29 May-1 June, Heraklion, Crete, available at: ;(accessed 20 February 2007).
Surname, initials (year), "title of article", working paper [number if available], institution or organization, place of organization, date.
e.g. Moizer, P. (2003), "How published academic research can inform policy decisions: the case of mandatory rotation of audit appointments", working paper, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, 28 March.
(year), "title of entry", volume, edition, title of encyclopaedia, publisher, place of publication, page numbers.
e.g. (1926), "Psychology of culture contact", Vol. 1, 13th ed., Encyclopaedia Britannica, London and New York, NY, pp.765-771.
(for authored entries, please refer to book chapter guidelines above)
Surname, initials (year), "article title", , date, page numbers.
e.g. Smith, A. (2008), "Money for old rope", , 21 January, pp.1, 3-4.
(year), "article title", date, page numbers.
e.g. (2008), "Small change", 2 February, p.7.
Surname, initials (year), "title of document", unpublished manuscript, collection name, inventory record, name of archive, location of archive.
e.g. Litman, S. (1902), "Mechanism & Technique of Commerce", unpublished manuscript, Simon Litman Papers, Record series 9/5/29 Box 3, University of Illinois Archives, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
If available online, the full URL should be supplied at the end of the reference, as well as the date that the resource was accessed.
Surname, initials (year), “title of electronic source”, available at: persistent URL (accessed date month year).
e.g. Weida, S. and Stolley, K. (2013), “Developing strong thesis statements”, available at: (accessed 20 June 2018)
Standalone URLs, i.e. those without an author or date, should be included either inside parentheses within the main text, or preferably set as a note (Roman numeral within square brackets within text followed by the full URL address at the end of the paper).
Surname, initials (year), , name of data repository, available at: persistent URL, (accessed date month year).
e.g. Campbell, A. and Kahn, R.L. (2015), , ICPSR07218-v4, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor), Ann Arbor, MI, available at: (accessed 20 June 2018)
There are a number of key steps you should follow to ensure a smooth and trouble-free submission.
Before submitting your work, it is your responsibility to check that the manuscript is complete, grammatically correct, and without spelling or typographical errors. A few other important points:
You will find a helpful submission checklist on the website Think.Check.Submit .
All manuscripts should be submitted through our editorial system by the corresponding author.
A separate author account is required for each journal you submit to. If this is your first time submitting to this journal, please choose the Create an account or Register now option in the editorial system. If you already have an Emerald login, you are welcome to reuse the existing username and password here.
Please note, the next time you log into the system, you will be asked for your username. This will be the email address you entered when you set up your account.
Don't forget to add your ORCiD ID during the submission process. It will be embedded in your published article, along with a link to the ORCiD registry allowing others to easily match you with your work.
Don’t have one yet? It only takes a few moments to register for a free ORCiD identifier .
Visit the ScholarOne support centre for further help and guidance.
You will receive an automated email from the journal editor, confirming your successful submission. It will provide you with a manuscript number, which will be used in all future correspondence about your submission. If you have any reason to suspect the confirmation email you receive might be fraudulent, please contact our Rights team .
Review and decision process.
Each submission is checked by the editor. At this stage, they may choose to decline or unsubmit your manuscript if it doesn’t fit the journal aims and scope, or they feel the language/manuscript quality is too low.
If they think it might be suitable for the publication, they will send it to at least two independent referees for double-anonymous peer review. Once these reviewers have provided their feedback, the editor may decide to accept your manuscript, request minor or major revisions, or decline your work.
While all journals work to different timescales, the goal is that the editor will inform you of their first decision within 60 days.
During this period, we will send you automated updates on the progress of your manuscript via our submission system, or you can log in to check on the current status of your paper. Each time we contact you, we will quote the manuscript number you were given at the point of submission. If you receive an email that does not match these criteria, it could be fraudulent and we recommend you email [email protected] .
All accepted authors are sent an email with a link to a licence form. This should be checked for accuracy, for example whether contact and affiliation details are up to date and your name is spelled correctly, and then returned to us electronically. If there is a reason why you can’t assign copyright to us, you should discuss this with your journal content editor. You will find their contact details on the editorial team section above.
Once we have received your completed licence form, the article will pass directly into the production process. We will carry out editorial checks, copyediting, and typesetting and then return proofs to you (if you are the corresponding author) for your review. This is your opportunity to correct any typographical errors, grammatical errors or incorrect author details. We can’t accept requests to rewrite texts at this stage.
When the page proofs are finalised, the fully typeset and proofed version of record is published online. This is referred to as the EarlyCite version. While an EarlyCite article has yet to be assigned to a volume or issue, it does have a digital object identifier (DOI) and is fully citable. It will be compiled into an issue according to the journal’s issue schedule, with papers being added by chronological date of publication.
Visit our author rights page to find out how you can reuse and share your work.
To find tips on increasing the visibility of your published paper, read about how to promote your work .
Sometimes errors are made during the research, writing and publishing processes. When these issues arise, we have the option of withdrawing the paper or introducing a correction notice. Find out more about our article withdrawal and correction policies .
Need to make a change to the author list? See our frequently asked questions (FAQs) below.
| The only time we will ever ask you for money to publish in an Emerald journal is if you have chosen to publish via the gold open access route. You will be asked to pay an APC (article processing charge) once your paper has been accepted (unless it is a sponsored open access journal).
At no other time will you be asked to contribute financially towards your article’s publication. If you haven’t chosen gold open access and you receive an email which appears to be from Emerald, asking you for payment to publish, please . |
| Please contact the editor for the journal, with a copy of your CV. You will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. |
| Typically, papers are added to an issue according to their date of publication. If you would like to know in advance which issue your paper will appear in, please contact the content editor of the journal. You will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. Once your paper has been published in an issue, you will be notified by email. |
| Please email the journal editor – you will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. If you ever suspect an email you’ve received from Emerald might not be genuine, you are welcome to verify it with the content editor for the journal, whose contact details can be found on the editorial team tab on this page. Alternatively, you can . |
| If you’ve read the aims and scope on the journal landing page and are still unsure whether your paper is suitable for the journal, please email the editor and include your paper's title and structured abstract. They will be able to advise on your manuscript’s suitability. You will find their contact details on the Editorial team tab on this page. |
| Authorship and the order in which the authors are listed on the paper should be agreed prior to submission. We have a right first time policy on this and no changes can be made to the list once submitted. If you have made an error in the submission process, please email the Journal Editorial Office who will look into your request – you will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. |
CiteScore 2023
CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals.
Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same four years.
For more information and methodology visit the Scopus definition
CiteScore Tracker 2024
(updated monthly)
CiteScore Tracker is calculated in the same way as CiteScore, but for the current year rather than previous, complete years.
The CiteScore Tracker calculation is updated every month, as a current indication of a title's performance.
Time to first decision
Time to first decision , expressed in days, the "first decision" occurs when the journal’s editorial team reviews the peer reviewers’ comments and recommendations. Based on this feedback, they decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript.
Data is taken from submissions between 1st June 2023 and 31st May 2024
Acceptance to publication
Acceptance to publication , expressed in days, is the average time between when the journal’s editorial team decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript and the date of publication in the journal.
Data is taken from the previous 12 months (Last updated July 2024)
Acceptance rate
The acceptance rate is a measurement of how many manuscripts a journal accepts for publication compared to the total number of manuscripts submitted expressed as a percentage %
Data is taken from submissions between 1st June 2023 and 31st May 2024 .
This figure is the total amount of downloads for all articles published early cite in the last 12 months
(Last updated: July 2024)
Peer review process.
This journal engages in a double-anonymous peer review process, which strives to match the expertise of a reviewer with the submitted manuscript. Reviews are completed with evidence of thoughtful engagement with the manuscript, provide constructive feedback, and add value to the overall knowledge and information presented in the manuscript.
The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research.
Our vision is to give voice to professionals in the subject area who contribute unique and diverse scholarly perspectives to the field.
The journal values diverse perspectives from the field and reviewers who provide critical, constructive, and respectful feedback to authors. Reviewers come from a variety of organizations, careers, and backgrounds from around the world.
All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. Reviewers must not share their review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and authors involved, even after publication. This also applies to other reviewers’ “comments to author” which are shared with you on decision.
Discover practical tips and guidance on all aspects of peer review in our reviewers' section. See how being a reviewer could benefit your career, and discover what's involved in shaping a review.
More reviewer information
Call for papers – sustainability: a journey for better future in developing countries.
Call for Papers Sustainability : A Journey for Better Future in Developing Countries INTRODUCTION Sustainability has become a par...
Keynote Speaker: Professor Khaled Hussainey, University of Ports...
The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following for their invaluable service as 2021 reviewers for this journal. We are very grateful for all the contributions made. It is with t...
We are pleased to announce our 2023 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper The effect of credit risk ...
We are pleased to announce our 2022 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper Strategic management accounti...
We are to pleased to announce our 2020 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper The value relevance of R&am...
The Asian Journal of Accounting Research (AJAR) is a double-anonymous peer-reviewed journal on accounting and finance in developing countries. Published three times a year in association with the Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
Journal Owners
When submitting a manuscript, authors will be taken to a service called Paperpal Preflight , an AI-driven tool that checks manuscripts against the journal's author guidelines. Authors are free to use or bypass this step and submit directly to ScholarOne .
The Asian Journal of Accounting Research (AJAR) provides a forum for international researchers to publish original articles of high-quality research findings which contribute to academic literature and practice. AJAR welcomes a wide range of methodologies in all aspects of accounting and finance in developing countries, with a majority in Asia.
The scope of AJAR includes, yet not limited to:
The journal is administered by the Department of Accountancy, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia. This journal is associated with the Airlangga Accounting International Conference (AAIC).
All articles published in Asian Journal of Accounting Research are published Open Access under a CC BY 4.0 license.
Asian Journal of Accounting Research (AJAR) is published by Emerald Publishing on behalf of the Universitas Airlangga . AJAR is owned by the Universitas Airlangga. AJAR is published under a platinum OA arrangement, in that all charges for publishing an OA article in the journal are funded by the Universitas Airlangga. There is no charge to the author.
These are the latest articles published in this journal (Last updated: July 2024 )
How does budget participation affect managerial performance in the higher education sector a mediated-moderated model, the impact of climate transition risk on firms’ value – evidence from select indian-listed companies, top downloaded articles.
These are the most downloaded articles over the last 12 months for this journal (Last updated: July 2024 )
Do audit attributes impact earnings quality - evidence from india, risk management practices and potential fraudulent financial reporting: evidence from malaysia.
These are the top cited articles for this journal, from the last 12 months according to Crossref (Last updated: July 2024 )
Does ceo power moderate the link between labor productivity and financial performance: agency theory or stewardship theory, transparency statement, transparency statement for asian journal of accounting research.
Journal Ownership: Asian Journal of Accounting Research is published by Emerald Publishing on behalf of the Universitas Airlangga Indonesia.
Governing Body: The editorial team is appointed and managed by the Universitas Airlangga Indonesia. The journal is governed by the editorial team in collaboration with Emerald Publishing.
Peer Review Process: The journal operates a double-anonymous peer review model. All articles undergo an initial assessment by the journal editor. If they are considered suitable for consideration, articles will then be a reviewed by a minimum of two external reviewers to assess suitability for publication. Final responsibility for editorial decisions rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.
Editorial team/contact information: Contact details for the editorial team can be found on the journal homepage. Queries may also be directed to the Emerald team as follows: Judy Yeh – [email protected]
Copyright: All articles in the journal are published Open Access under a Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-4.0). This allows authors to retain copyright of their work whilst others can share, use and build upon this work created as long as appropriate attribution is given.
Author Fees: The journal is published under a Platinum Open Access arrangement, in that all costs associated with publishing an Open Access article in the journal are funded by the Universitas Airlangga Indonesia. There are currently no Article Processing Charges to the author(s).
Allegations of Misconduct: All journals published by Emerald are members of and subscribe to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics . In the event of any allegation of research or publication misconduct the publisher and editor will adhere to COPE guidelines in dealing with such allegations.
Conflicts of interest: Authors are asked to declare any financial or ethical conflicts of interest upon submitting their work to the journal. Difficult cases will be referred to the Committee on Publishing Ethics (COPE) for advice.
Frequency: The journal publishes four issues per annum (from 2023).
Access: All journal articles are published Open Access on EmeraldInsight.com - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/ajar under a CCBY 4.0 licence (please see section 5).
Revenue sources: The journal is published under a platinum Open Access arrangement, in that all costs associated with publishing an Open Access article in the journal are funded by the Universitas Airlangga Indonesia.
Advertising: The journal does not accept direct advertising
Archiving: Emerald provides perpetual access for all e-journal content by working with digital preservation schemes Portico, LOCKSS and CLOCKSS.
Direct marketing: On occasion the journal will use direct marketing activities (primarily email campaigns) to raise awareness of the journal and to invite authors to submit articles. Marketing activities are conducted by the Universitas Airlangga Indonesia unless otherwise agreed with Emerald.
This statement was updated by Judy Yeh (Emerald Publishing) on 16th Feb 2020.
This journal is part of our Accounting, finance & economics collection. Explore our Accounting, finance & economics subject area to find out more.
See all related journals
Islamic Economic Studies is a peer-reviewed publication on Islamic economics and finance, targeted at professional and...
Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy is an academic, peer-reviewed, open access journal which publishes theoretical...
EconomiA is an academic, peer-reviewed journal publishing research on all aspects of economics. Published open access by...
Discontinued in Scopus as of 2018
Science Alert Journals
19921454, 20772076
The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.
Category | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|
Multidisciplinary | 2010 | Q3 |
Multidisciplinary | 2011 | Q2 |
Multidisciplinary | 2012 | Q1 |
Multidisciplinary | 2013 | Q3 |
Multidisciplinary | 2014 | Q1 |
Multidisciplinary | 2015 | Q3 |
Multidisciplinary | 2016 | Q2 |
Multidisciplinary | 2017 | Q3 |
Multidisciplinary | 2018 | Q4 |
Multidisciplinary | 2019 | Q3 |
The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.
Year | SJR |
---|---|
2010 | 0.136 |
2011 | 0.218 |
2012 | 0.305 |
2013 | 0.172 |
2014 | 0.381 |
2015 | 0.160 |
2016 | 0.221 |
2017 | 0.146 |
2018 | 0.127 |
2019 | 0.135 |
Evolution of the number of published documents. All types of documents are considered, including citable and non citable documents.
Year | Documents |
---|---|
2008 | 1 |
2009 | 14 |
2010 | 11 |
2011 | 67 |
2012 | 30 |
2013 | 85 |
2014 | 52 |
2015 | 50 |
2016 | 33 |
2017 | 47 |
2018 | 65 |
2019 | 0 |
This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.
Cites per document | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2008 | 0.000 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2009 | 0.000 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2010 | 0.533 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2011 | 1.038 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2012 | 0.753 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2013 | 0.623 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2014 | 0.611 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2015 | 0.402 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2016 | 0.659 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2017 | 0.577 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2018 | 0.610 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2019 | 0.733 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2008 | 0.000 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2009 | 0.000 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2010 | 0.533 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2011 | 1.038 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2012 | 0.750 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2013 | 0.491 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2014 | 0.593 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2015 | 0.389 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2016 | 0.690 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2017 | 0.474 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2018 | 0.792 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2019 | 0.683 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2008 | 0.000 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2009 | 0.000 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2010 | 0.533 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2011 | 1.080 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2012 | 0.628 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2013 | 0.454 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2014 | 0.774 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2015 | 0.423 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2016 | 0.706 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2017 | 0.566 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2018 | 0.550 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2019 | 0.696 |
Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Self Cites | 2008 | 0 |
Self Cites | 2009 | 0 |
Self Cites | 2010 | 1 |
Self Cites | 2011 | 1 |
Self Cites | 2012 | 1 |
Self Cites | 2013 | 6 |
Self Cites | 2014 | 5 |
Self Cites | 2015 | 5 |
Self Cites | 2016 | 11 |
Self Cites | 2017 | 3 |
Self Cites | 2018 | 0 |
Self Cites | 2019 | 0 |
Total Cites | 2008 | 0 |
Total Cites | 2009 | 0 |
Total Cites | 2010 | 8 |
Total Cites | 2011 | 27 |
Total Cites | 2012 | 69 |
Total Cites | 2013 | 53 |
Total Cites | 2014 | 108 |
Total Cites | 2015 | 65 |
Total Cites | 2016 | 129 |
Total Cites | 2017 | 64 |
Total Cites | 2018 | 103 |
Total Cites | 2019 | 99 |
Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
External Cites per document | 2008 | 0 |
External Cites per document | 2009 | 0.000 |
External Cites per document | 2010 | 0.467 |
External Cites per document | 2011 | 1.000 |
External Cites per document | 2012 | 0.739 |
External Cites per document | 2013 | 0.435 |
External Cites per document | 2014 | 0.566 |
External Cites per document | 2015 | 0.359 |
External Cites per document | 2016 | 0.631 |
External Cites per document | 2017 | 0.452 |
External Cites per document | 2018 | 0.792 |
External Cites per document | 2019 | 0.683 |
Cites per document | 2008 | 0.000 |
Cites per document | 2009 | 0.000 |
Cites per document | 2010 | 0.533 |
Cites per document | 2011 | 1.038 |
Cites per document | 2012 | 0.750 |
Cites per document | 2013 | 0.491 |
Cites per document | 2014 | 0.593 |
Cites per document | 2015 | 0.389 |
Cites per document | 2016 | 0.690 |
Cites per document | 2017 | 0.474 |
Cites per document | 2018 | 0.792 |
Cites per document | 2019 | 0.683 |
International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.
Year | International Collaboration |
---|---|
2008 | 0.00 |
2009 | 14.29 |
2010 | 9.09 |
2011 | 4.48 |
2012 | 0.00 |
2013 | 8.24 |
2014 | 1.92 |
2015 | 10.00 |
2016 | 18.18 |
2017 | 29.79 |
2018 | 18.46 |
2019 | 0 |
Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Non-citable documents | 2008 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2009 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2010 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2011 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2012 | 36 |
Non-citable documents | 2013 | 36 |
Non-citable documents | 2014 | 36 |
Non-citable documents | 2015 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2016 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2017 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2018 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2019 | 0 |
Citable documents | 2008 | 0 |
Citable documents | 2009 | 1 |
Citable documents | 2010 | 15 |
Citable documents | 2011 | 26 |
Citable documents | 2012 | 56 |
Citable documents | 2013 | 72 |
Citable documents | 2014 | 146 |
Citable documents | 2015 | 167 |
Citable documents | 2016 | 187 |
Citable documents | 2017 | 135 |
Citable documents | 2018 | 130 |
Citable documents | 2019 | 145 |
Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Uncited documents | 2008 | 0 |
Uncited documents | 2009 | 1 |
Uncited documents | 2010 | 9 |
Uncited documents | 2011 | 12 |
Uncited documents | 2012 | 53 |
Uncited documents | 2013 | 78 |
Uncited documents | 2014 | 135 |
Uncited documents | 2015 | 125 |
Uncited documents | 2016 | 129 |
Uncited documents | 2017 | 93 |
Uncited documents | 2018 | 86 |
Uncited documents | 2019 | 85 |
Cited documents | 2008 | 0 |
Cited documents | 2009 | 0 |
Cited documents | 2010 | 6 |
Cited documents | 2011 | 14 |
Cited documents | 2012 | 39 |
Cited documents | 2013 | 30 |
Cited documents | 2014 | 47 |
Cited documents | 2015 | 42 |
Cited documents | 2016 | 58 |
Cited documents | 2017 | 42 |
Cited documents | 2018 | 44 |
Cited documents | 2019 | 60 |
Evolution of the percentage of female authors.
Year | Female Percent |
---|---|
2008 | 40.00 |
2009 | 37.84 |
2010 | 13.04 |
2011 | 22.95 |
2012 | 20.93 |
2013 | 13.38 |
2014 | 35.71 |
2015 | 28.57 |
2016 | 21.88 |
2017 | 36.29 |
2018 | 37.04 |
2019 | 0.00 |
Evolution of the number of documents cited by public policy documents according to Overton database.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Overton | 2008 | 0 |
Overton | 2009 | 1 |
Overton | 2010 | 1 |
Overton | 2011 | 0 |
Overton | 2012 | 0 |
Overton | 2013 | 0 |
Overton | 2014 | 1 |
Overton | 2015 | 1 |
Overton | 2016 | 0 |
Overton | 2017 | 3 |
Overton | 2018 | 1 |
Overton | 2019 | 0 |
Evoution of the number of documents related to Sustainable Development Goals defined by United Nations. Available from 2018 onwards.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
SDG | 2018 | 26 |
SDG | 2019 | 0 |
Name * Required
Email (will not be published) * Required
* Required Cancel
The users of Scimago Journal & Country Rank have the possibility to dialogue through comments linked to a specific journal. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved. For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor.
Follow us on @ScimagoJR Scimago Lab , Copyright 2007-2024. Data Source: Scopus®
Cookie settings
Cookie Policy
Legal Notice
Privacy Policy
The Asian American Journal of Psychology is the official publication of the Asian American Psychological Association and is dedicated to research, practice, advocacy, education, and policy within Asian American psychology. The Journal publishes empirical, theoretical, methodological, and practice oriented articles and book reviews covering topics relevant to Asian American individuals and communities, including prevention, intervention, training, and social justice. Particular consideration is given to empirical articles using quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodology.
The purpose of the Mission Statement is to clarify mission and objectives for the Journal (AAJP) as defined by the Association (AAPA). The AAJP's Mission Statement reflects the mission of the Association, which is to advance the psychological well-being of Asian American communities through affecting professional practice, research, and teaching. Thus, the Journal aims to promote a better understanding of Asian American individuals and communities through research, practice, advocacy, education, and policy pertinent to all areas of psychology and related disciplines. For the journal, Asian Americans are broadly defined as Americans of Asian and Pacific Islander ancestry in the United States and Canada.
We encourage articles that:
The Association seeks interdisciplinary work from scholars with expertise in Asian American issues and mental health practitioners from different fields. In that vein, the Journal is interested in content that reflects collaboration between research and practice. The Association also values student development and encourages students to submit publication of their research and scholarship to the Journal.
The Association would like the Journal to be methodologically inclusive, valuing the respective strengths of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method approaches. Despite the fact that the field of psychology has historically favored quantitative methods, the journal recognizes the in-depth and theory-building contributions of qualitative methods. The Journal, therefore, aims to include articles utilizing traditionally underrepresented qualitative and mixed methodologies. The Journal will take into consideration that qualitative research manuscripts take more space than quantitative and will therefore have a larger page allowance for a qualitative manuscript than for a quantitative manuscript.
In addition to publishing empirical research, AAJP will address clinical practice, advocacy, education, and policy. In particular, the Association has recognized that the Journal needs to attend to ongoing discussion on practice. Published articles on Asian American psychology may address practice in one of three ways:
The editorial board will actively solicit article submissions from various content areas (e.g., practice-oriented), disciplines (e.g., Asian American studies), and methodology (e.g., qualitative).
The editorial board will reserve special issues (once per year) that are thematic and relate to topics that are underrepresented in the journal, of interest to the membership, and relevant to current trends in Asian American psychology. Special issue topics can be proposed by the publications committee in conjunction with the EC, the editorial board, and the membership at large.
Asian American Journal of Psychology supports equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in its practices. More information on these initiatives is available under EDI Efforts .
One article from each issue of Asian American Journal of Psychology will be highlighted as an “ Editor’s Choice ” article. Selection is based on the recommendations of the associate editors, the paper’s potential impact to the field, the distinction of expanding the contributors to, or the focus of, the science, or its discussion of an important future direction for science. Editor’s Choice articles are featured alongside articles from other APA published journals in a bi-weekly newsletter and are temporarily made freely available to newsletter subscribers.
Explore journal highlights : free article summaries, editor interviews and editorials, journal awards, mentorship opportunities, and more.
Prior to submission, please carefully read and follow the submission guidelines detailed below. Manuscripts that do not conform to the submission guidelines may be returned without review.
Submit manuscripts electronically (.rtf or .doc) through the Manuscript Submission Portal.
Prepare manuscripts according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association using the 7 th edition. Manuscripts may be copyedited for bias-free language (see Chapter 5 of the Publication Manual ). APA Style and Grammar Guidelines for the 7 th edition are available.
Submit Manuscript
June Kim, PhD, editor The College of New Jersey Ewing, NJ
General correspondence may be directed to the editor's office .
In addition to addresses and phone numbers, please supply electronic mail addresses and fax numbers, if available, for potential use by the editorial office and later by the production office.
Asian American Journal of Psychology is now using a software system to screen submitted content for similarity with other published content. The system compares the initial version of each submitted manuscript against a database of 40+ million scholarly documents, as well as content appearing on the open web. This allows APA to check submissions for potential overlap with material previously published in scholarly journals (e.g., lifted or republished material).
Manuscripts for the Asian American Journal of Psychology can vary in length. Typical manuscripts will range from 10–35 pages with a maximum of 30 pages. Comprehensive review articles may be on the high end. Manuscripts using qualitative methodology or with multiple studies may be up to 40 pages in length, with prior permission of the Editor.
Authors should contact the editor first for permission if they intend to submit a manuscript longer than 30 pages, with a rationale for the extra length.
The journal publishes empirical, theoretical, methodological, and practice-oriented articles covering topics relevant to Asian American individuals and communities, including prevention, intervention, training, and social justice.
Whereas particular consideration is given to empirical articles using quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodology, the journal will publish the full range of articles including but not limited to empirical studies, book reviews, methodological reviews, and critical reviews.
The journal will also consider proposals for special issues that address specific themes within the field of Asian American psychology. Individuals interested in proposing a special issue of the journal should also contact the editor to check about its acceptability and feasibility before submitting a full proposal.
For the journal, Asian Americans are broadly defined as Americans of Asian and Pacific Islander ancestry in the United States and Canada.
Review APA's Journal Manuscript Preparation Guidelines before submitting your article.
Double-space all copy. Other formatting instructions, as well as instructions on preparing tables, figures, references, metrics, and abstracts, appear in the Manual . Additional guidance on APA Style is available on the APA Style website .
If your manuscript was mask reviewed, please ensure that the final version for production includes a byline and full author note for typesetting.
Below are additional instructions regarding the preparation of display equations, computer code, and tables.
We strongly encourage you to use MathType (third-party software) or Equation Editor 3.0 (built into pre-2007 versions of Word) to construct your equations, rather than the equation support that is built into Word 2007 and Word 2010. Equations composed with the built-in Word 2007/Word 2010 equation support are converted to low-resolution graphics when they enter the production process and must be rekeyed by the typesetter, which may introduce errors.
To construct your equations with MathType or Equation Editor 3.0:
If you have an equation that has already been produced using Microsoft Word 2007 or 2010 and you have access to the full version of MathType 6.5 or later, you can convert this equation to MathType by clicking on MathType Insert Equation. Copy the equation from Microsoft Word and paste it into the MathType box. Verify that your equation is correct, click File, and then click Update. Your equation has now been inserted into your Word file as a MathType Equation.
Use Equation Editor 3.0 or MathType only for equations or for formulas that cannot be produced as Word text using the Times or Symbol font.
Because altering computer code in any way (e.g., indents, line spacing, line breaks, page breaks) during the typesetting process could alter its meaning, we treat computer code differently from the rest of your article in our production process. To that end, we request separate files for computer code.
We request that runnable source code be included as supplemental material to the article. For more information, visit Supplementing Your Article With Online Material .
If you would like to include code in the text of your published manuscript, please submit a separate file with your code exactly as you want it to appear, using Courier New font with a type size of 8 points. We will make an image of each segment of code in your article that exceeds 40 characters in length. (Shorter snippets of code that appear in text will be typeset in Courier New and run in with the rest of the text.) If an appendix contains a mix of code and explanatory text, please submit a file that contains the entire appendix, with the code keyed in 8-point Courier New.
Use Word's insert table function when you create tables. Using spaces or tabs in your table will create problems when the table is typeset and may result in errors.
Authors who feel that their manuscript may benefit from additional academic writing or language editing support prior to submission are encouraged to seek out such services at their host institutions, engage with colleagues and subject matter experts, and/or consider several vendors that offer discounts to APA authors .
Please note that APA does not endorse or take responsibility for the service providers listed. It is strictly a referral service.
Use of such service is not mandatory for publication in an APA journal. Use of one or more of these services does not guarantee selection for peer review, manuscript acceptance, or preference for publication in any APA journal.
APA can place supplemental materials online, available via the published article in the PsycArticles ® database. Please see Supplementing Your Article With Online Material for more details.
All manuscripts must include an abstract containing a maximum of 250 words typed on a separate page. After the abstract, please supply up to five keywords or brief phrases.
Please submit a short statement titled, "What is the public significance of this article?" of one to two sentences written in plain English for the educated public. The statement should be below the abstract in the manuscript. This text should summarize the article's findings and why they are important to Asian American psychology in terms of meeting the mission of Asian American Journal of Psychology (i.e., advance the psychological well-being of Asian American communities through affecting professional practice, research, and teaching).
This new article feature allows authors greater control over how their work will be interpreted by key audiences (e.g., practitioners, researchers, policy makers, news media, other members of the public).
Please refer to Guidance for Translational Abstracts and Public Significance Statements to help you write this text.
List references in alphabetical order. Each listed reference should be cited in text, and each text citation should be listed in the references section.
Examples of basic reference formats:
McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Language learning as language use: A cross-linguistic model of child language development. Psychological Review , 126 (1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000126
Brown, L. S. (2018). Feminist therapy (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000092-000
Balsam, K. F., Martell, C. R., Jones. K. P., & Safren, S. A. (2019). Affirmative cognitive behavior therapy with sexual and gender minority people. In G. Y. Iwamasa & P. A. Hays (Eds.), Culturally responsive cognitive behavior therapy: Practice and supervision (2nd ed., pp. 287–314). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000119-012
Graphics files are welcome if supplied as Tiff or EPS files. Multipanel figures (i.e., figures with parts labeled a, b, c, d, etc.) should be assembled into one file.
The minimum line weight for line art is 0.5 point for optimal printing.
For more information about acceptable resolutions, fonts, sizing, and other figure issues, please see the general guidelines .
When possible, please place symbol legends below the figure instead of to the side.
APA offers authors the option to publish their figures online in color without the costs associated with print publication of color figures.
The same caption will appear on both the online (color) and print (black and white) versions. To ensure that the figure can be understood in both formats, authors should add alternative wording (e.g., "the red (dark gray) bars represent") as needed.
For authors who prefer their figures to be published in color both in print and online, original color figures can be printed in color at the editor's and publisher's discretion provided the author agrees to pay:
Authors of accepted papers must obtain and provide to the editor on final acceptance all necessary permissions to reproduce in print and electronic form any copyrighted work, including test materials (or portions thereof), photographs, and other graphic images (including those used as stimuli in experiments).
On advice of counsel, APA may decline to publish any image whose copyright status is unknown.
Starting in August 2017, articles are eligible for open science badges recognizing publicly available data, materials, and/or preregistration plans and analyses. These badges are awarded on a self-disclosure basis.
At submission, authors must confirm that criteria have been fulfilled in a signed badge disclosure form (PDF, 33KB) that must be submitted as supplemental material. If all criteria are met as confirmed by the editor, the form will then be published with the article as supplemental material.
Authors should also note their eligibility for the badge(s) in the cover letter.
For all badges, items must be made available on an open-access repository with a persistent identifier in a format that is time-stamped, immutable, and permanent. For the preregistered badge, this is an institutional registration system.
Data and materials must be made available under an open license allowing others to copy, share, and use the data, with attribution and copyright as applicable.
Available badges are:
Note that it may not be possible to preregister a study or to share data and materials. Applying for open science badges is optional.
For full details on publication policies, including use of Artificial Intelligence tools, please see APA Publishing Policies .
APA policy prohibits an author from submitting the same manuscript for concurrent consideration by two or more publications.
Authors may post the final accepted, preformatted version of their article—the accepted manuscript—on their personal websites, university and preprint repositories, and author networking sites. If your article is accepted for publication, the posted manuscript must include a note linking to the final published article. If your manuscript has been posted to a preprint archive, include a link to the preprint in the author note. Note that any press coverage of prepublication manuscripts may preclude press releases by APA’s Public Affairs Office.
See also APA Journals ® Internet Posting Guidelines .
APA requires authors to reveal any possible conflict of interest in the conduct and reporting of research (e.g., financial interests in a test or procedure, funding by pharmaceutical companies for drug research).
Authors of accepted manuscripts are required to transfer the copyright to APA.
It is a violation of APA Ethical Principles to publish "as original data, data that have been previously published" (Standard 8.13).
In addition, APA Ethical Principles specify that "after research results are published, psychologists do not withhold the data on which their conclusions are based from other competent professionals who seek to verify the substantive claims through reanalysis and who intend to use such data only for that purpose, provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and unless legal rights concerning proprietary data preclude their release" (Standard 8.14).
APA expects authors to adhere to these standards. Specifically, APA expects authors to have their data available throughout the editorial review process and for at least 5 years after the date of publication.
Authors are required to state in writing that they have complied with APA ethical standards in the treatment of their sample, human or animal, or to describe the details of treatment.
The APA Ethics Office provides the full Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct electronically on its website in HTML, PDF, and Word format. You may also request a copy by emailing or calling the APA Ethics Office (202-336-5930). You may also read "Ethical Principles," December 1992, American Psychologist , Vol. 47, pp. 1597–1611.
See APA’s Publishing Policies page for more information on publication policies, including information on author contributorship and responsibilities of authors, author name changes after publication, the use of generative artificial intelligence, funder information and conflict-of-interest disclosures, duplicate publication, data publication and reuse, and preprints.
Visit the Journals Publishing Resource Center for more resources for writing, reviewing, and editing articles for publishing in APA journals.
Incoming editor.
Michelle R. Madore, PhD VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States
Outgoing editor.
June Kim, PhD The College of New Jersey, United States
E. J. R. David, PhD University of Alaska Anchorage, United States
Pratyusha Tummala-Narra, PhD Boston University, United States
Gayle Y. Iwamasa, PhD, HSPP Department of Veterans Affairs, Central Office, United States
Frederick T. L. Leong, PhD Michigan State University, United States
Edward C. Chang, PhD University of Michigan, United States
Jean Lau Chin, EdD Adelphi University, United States
Christine Iijima Hall, PhD Retired Higher Education Administrator, United States
Gordon C. Nagayama Hall, PhD University of Oregon, United States
Arpana G. Inman, PhD Lehigh University, United States
Derald Wing Sue, PhD Teachers College, Columbia University, United States
Stanley Sue, PhD Palo Alto University, United States
Richard M. Suinn, PhD Colorado State University, United States
Barbara (Bobbie) Yee, PhD University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, United States
Nolan Zane, PhD University of California, Davis, United States
Soyeon Ahn, PhD University of Miami, United States
Phillip D. Akutsu, PhD California State University, Sacramento, United States
G. E. Kawika Allen, PhD Brigham Young University, United States
Prerna Arora, PhD Columbia University, Teachers College, United States
Janet Chang, PhD West Chester University of Pennsylvania, United States
Eva Chian-Hui Chen, PhD Benedictine College, United States
Roy K. Chen, PhD The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, United States
Stephen H. Chen, PhD Wellesley College, United States
Hsiu-Lan Cheng, PhD University of San Francisco, United States
Yuen Mi Cheon, PhD Myongji University, Republic of Korea
Alicia M. del Prado, PhD Wright Institute, United States
Donna Lynne L. Demanarig, PhD Wheaton College, United States
Khanh T. Dinh, PhD University of Massachusetts Lowell, United States
Qijuan Fang, PhD University of North Alabama, United States
Lou Collette Felipe, PhD University of Colorado Denver, United States
Michi Fu, PhD California School of Professional Psychology and Pacific Clinics, United States
Arpana Gupta, PhD University of California, Los Angeles, United States
Sehee Hong, PhD Korea University, South Korea
Joyce R. Javier, MD, MPH, MS Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, United States
Gagan "Mia" Khera, PhD Curry College, United States
Lisa Kiang, PhD Wake Forest University, United States
Adam Yoon Jae Kim, PhD Elon University, United States
Giyeon Kim, PhD Chung-Ang University, South Korea
Jacqueline H. J. Kim, PhD University of California, Irvine, United States
Paul Youngbin Kim, PhD Seattle Pacific University, United States
Soyeong Kim, PhD Massachusetts General Hospital, United States
Su Yeong Kim, PhD University of Texas at Austin, United States
Greg Kim-Ju, PhD California State University, Sacramento, United States
Kimberly J. Langrehr, PhD Roosevelt University, United States
Thao N. Le, PhD University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, United States
Debbiesiu L. Lee, PhD University of Miami, United States
Matt Lee, PhD Northeastern University, United States
Zhushan Li, PhD Boston College, United States
Hsin-Ya Liao, PhD Washington State University, United States
Noriel E. Lim, PhD Emory University School of Medicine, United States
Cindy H. Liu, PhD Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, United States
Qian Lu, MD, PhD University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
P. Priscilla Lui, PhD Southern Methodist University, United States
Linh P. Luu, PhD University of Memphis, United States
Cara S. Maffini, PhD San José State University, United States
David Matsumoto, PhD San Francisco State University, United States
Laurie (Lali) D. McCubbin, PhD Washington State University, United States
Keiko McCullough, PhD University of Denver, United States
Tara G. Mehta, PhD Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States
Jeffery Scott Mio, PhD California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, United States
Nadine Nakamura, PhD University of La Verne, United States
Sumie Okazaki, PhD New York University, United States
Yuki Okubo, PhD Salisbury University, United States
Anthony D. Ong, PhD Cornell University, United States
Soyeon Park, PhD San Francisco State University, United States
Yong Sue Park, PhD University of Southern California, United States
Desiree Baolian Qin, EdD Michigan State University, United States
Vaishali V. Raval, PhD Miami University, United States
Munyi Shea, PhD Seattle Pacific University, United States
Frances Shen, PhD University of Illinois Springfield, United States
Yishan Shen, PhD Texas State University, United States
Margaret J. Shih, PhD University of California, Los Angeles, United States
Anna V. Song, PhD University of California, Merced, United States
Nhi-Ha Trinh, MD, MPH Harvard Medical School, United States
William Tsai, PhD California State University, San Marcos, United States
Yuying Tsong, PhD California State University, Fullerton, United States
Anna Cristina Tuazon, PsyD University of the Philippines Diliman, Philippines
Cixin Wang, PhD University of Maryland, United States
Sherry C. Wang, PhD Santa Clara University, United States
Yijie Wang, PhD Michigan State University, United States
Gloria Wong, PhD University of Nevada Las Vegas, United States
Hui Xu, PhD Loyola University Chicago, United States
Amy Yamada, PhD University of South Carolina, United States
Minji Yang, PhD San José State University, United States
Eunju Yoon, PhD Loyola University Chicago, United States
Yiling Zhang, PhD Case Western Reserve University, United States
Lin Zhu, PhD Temple University, United States
Abstracting and indexing services providing coverage of Asian American Journal of Psychology
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 4, December 2022. This special issue brings together a collection of articles that focus on the experiences of Asian Americans during the pandemic.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 3, September 2022. The articles in this collection provide a close look at the experiences of Asian Americans and examine the protective variables that moderate and/or mediate the link between the experiences of discrimination and well-being.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 1, March 2022. This special issue traces the history of Filipina/x/o American psychology and proposes a framework that can guide future work in this area.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 4, December 2021. The special issue aims to create a space for focused dialog on social justice, by centering marginalized voices and amplifying counter-narratives that defy the stereotyped narratives about Asian American and Pacific Islanders (AAPI) people.
Special issue of APA’s Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 3, September 2021. This special issue aims to provide a better understanding of the factors impacting the health and well-being of the more than 9 million Asians currently forcibly displaced.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 2019. The articles reflect the state of the science in Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander health-related research in behavioral health and chronic medical disease disparities.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 4, December 2018. The articles advance the current state of knowledge about suicide in Asian American communities and highlight innovative approaches to suicide prevention and management.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 1, March 2018. Articles highlight a diverse array of qualitative perspectives and approaches that underscore the importance of context, reflexivity and trustworthiness, methodological rigor, transparency, and a commitment to giving voice to members of the Asian American community.
Special issue of the APA journal Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 4, December 2017. The articles showcase the ways in which qualitative research provides important insights into the lived experiences of Asian Americans across a variety of contexts.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 1, March 2017. Articles showcase research on economic contexts of development, Asian Americans' participation in leadership and politics, and understudied issues of discrimination.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2014. The issue highlights basic and applied research in prevention science, specifically addressing the cultural needs and preferences of Asian Americans as they relate to physical and mental health.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 1, March 2014. Includes articles about psychotropic medication adherence; quality of life; occupational health; inpatient psychiatric care; and sociocultural factors that may influence disparities, such as cultural competency, face concerns, and the model minority myth.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 4, No. 1, March 2013. The articles offer a nuanced and accurate perspective on Asian-heritage parenting by taking readers beyond the myth of the tiger mother and dispelling some of the stereotypical, monolithic notions of parenting within Asian-heritage families.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 3, September 2012. Includes articles about family assistance attitudes and family cultural conflict; telephone-delivered intervention for disordered gamblers; gender-based comparison of substance use; cultural competence in mental health service delivery; and US. mental health policy in an Asian American context.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, June 2012. Articles discuss education, psychosocial adjustment, discrimination, and distress among Asian Americans.
Special issue of APA's Asian American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2012. Articles discuss mental health issues among Asian Americans, including depression, suicidal behavior, and service use.
Definitions and further details on inclusive study designs are available on the Journals EDI homepage .
More information on this journal’s reporting standards is listed under the submission guidelines tab .
Orcid reviewer recognition.
Open Research and Contributor ID (ORCID) Reviewer Recognition provides a visible and verifiable way for journals to publicly credit reviewers without compromising the confidentiality of the peer-review process. This journal has implemented the ORCID Reviewer Recognition feature in Editorial Manager, meaning that reviewers can be recognized for their contributions to the peer-review process.
This journal offers masked peer review (where both the authors’ and reviewers’ identities are not known to the other). Research has shown that masked peer review can help reduce implicit bias against traditionally female names or early-career scientists with smaller publication records (Budden et al., 2008; Darling, 2015).
Sign up to receive email alerts on the latest content published.
Welcome! Thank you for subscribing.
Calls for Papers
Access options
APA Publishing Insider is a free monthly newsletter with tips on APA Style, open science initiatives, active calls for papers, research summaries, and more.
Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research
[E] ISSN: 2409-2622 - [P] ISSN: 2518-010X
The Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (AJEER) is a distinguished platform overseen by a globally renowned Editorial Board. It offers a valuable opportunity for academics and researchers worldwide to exchange knowledge on current issues in the field of economics. The scope of the journal includes the following:
|
|
|
Paper Selection and Publishing Process
2014 Journal was founded 2yr mean citedness: Impact Factor (RePEc): | Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research Online ISSN: 2409-2622 | Print ISSN: 2518-010X E-mail: [email protected] |
In the trend of digitalization reshaping the global value chain system, optimizing export technological structure is crucial for coping with complex international environments and enhancing core competitiveness. Based on panel data from 30 provinces and cities in China from 2002 to 2019, this study explores the impact of digitalization on the technological structure of exports. Our findings reveal that (1) digitalization development significantly optimizes the technological structure of exports, and this conclusion holds after a series of robustness tests. (2) The structural optimization effect of digitalization development is constrained by its own level of development, exhibiting nonlinear characteristics in its influence on export technological structure. (3) Enhancing the development level of technology markets, improving technology absorption capacity, and consolidating traditional infrastructure can strengthen the structural optimization effect of digitalization development on exports. Our study enhances understanding of the effectiveness and limitations of digitalization development and provides valuable insights for formulating complementary measures to foster digitalization advancement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Price excludes VAT (USA) Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
The datasets are available on reasonable request.
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review, 108 (6), 1488–1542.
Article Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128 (6), 2188–2244.
Akram, V., & Rath, B. N. (2020). Optimum government size and economic growth in case of Indian states: Evidence from panel threshold model. Economic Modelling, 88 , 151–162.
Alguacil, M., Turco, A. L., & Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2022). Robot adoption and export performance: Firm-level evidence from Spain. Economic Modelling, 114 , 105912.
Arthur, W. B. (2007). The structure of invention. Research Policy, 36 (2), 274–287.
Ben Slimane, S., Coeurderoy, R., & Mhenni, H. (2022). Digital transformation of small and medium enterprises: A systematic literature review and an integrative framework. International Studies of Management & Organization, 52 (2), 96–120.
Bertschek, I., Cerquera, D., & Klein, G. J. (2013). More bits–more bucks? Measuring the impact of broadband internet on firm performance. Information Economics and Policy, 25 (3), 190–203.
Bloom, N., Schankerman, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica, 81 (4), 1347–1393.
Chen, X., Huang, X., & Liu, H. (2011). Mechanisms and empirical studies on the evolution of China’s export technology structure. Journal of Management World, 210 (03), 44–57. (In Chinese).
Google Scholar
Chen, X., Zhang, X. E., Cai, Z., & Chen, J. (2024). The non-linear impact of digitalization on the performance of SMEs: A hypothesis test based on the digitalization paradox. Systems, 12 (4), 139.
Coe, D. T., & Helpman, E. (1995). International r&d spillovers. European Economic Review, 39 (5), 859–887.
Debbarma, J., Choi, Y., Yang, F., & Lee, H. (2022). Exports as a new paradigm to connect business and information technology for sustainable development. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7 (4), 100233.
DeStefano, T., & Timmis, J. (2024). Robots and export quality. Journal of Development Economics, 168 , 103248.
Dong, Z., & Chen, R. (2011). The technical content of export goods, the technical level of China’s export trade and the evaluation of its international competitiveness. Quantitative Economic Research, 2 (02), 58–75.
Du, X., & Wang, W. (2007). The technological structure of China’s export trade and its changes:1980–2003. Economic Research Journal, 471 (07), 137–151.
Fan, G., Wang, X., Zhang, L., & Zhu, H. (2003). Report on the relative process of marketization in China by region. Economic Research Journal, 3 , 9–18+89.
Gebauer, H., Arzt, A., Kohtamäki, M., Lamprecht, C., Parida, V., Witell, L., & Wortmann, F. (2020). How to convert digital offerings into revenue enhancement–Conceptualizing business model dynamics through explorative case studies. Industrial Marketing Management, 91 , 429–441.
Gniniguè, M., Wonyra, K. O., Tchagnao, A. F., & Bayale, N. (2023). Participation of developing countries in global value chains: What role for information and communication technologies? Telecommunications Policy, 47 (3), 102508.
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57 (1), 3–43.
Gong, Y., Yao, Y., & Zan, A. (2023). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect of digitalization capability on radical innovation: The role of knowledge accumulation and knowledge integration capability. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27 (6), 1680–1701.
Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93 (2), 345–368.
Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12 , 1–25.
Huang, Q., Yu, Y., & Zhang, S. (2019). Internet development and manufacturing productivity improvement: Intrinsic mechanisms and China’s experience. China Industrial Economics, 377 (08), 5–23.
Jiang, M., & Jia, P. (2022). Does the level of digitalized service drive the global export of digital service trade? Evidence from global perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 72 , 101853.
Jiang, L., Liu, S., & Zhang, G. (2022). Digital trade barriers and export performance: Evidence from China. Southern Economic Journal, 88 (4), 1401–1430.
Johnson, R. C. (2014). Five facts about value-added exports and implications for macroeconomics and trade research. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28 (2), 119–142.
Kočenda, E., & Poghosyan, K. (2018). Export sophistication: A dynamic panel data approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54 (12), 2799–2814.
Lee, Y. Y., & Falahat, M. (2019). The impact of digitalization and resources on gaining competitive advantage in international markets: Mediating role of marketing, innovation and learning capabilities. Technology Innovation Management Review , 9 (11), 26–39.
Liang, S., & Tan, Q. (2024). Can the digital economy accelerates China’s export technology upgrading? Based on the perspective of export technology complexity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199 , 123052.
Liu, J., Yang, Y., & Zhang, S. (2020). Study on the measurement and drivers of China’s digital economy. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 381 (06), 81–96.
Liu, Y., Hu, W., Luo, K., Guo, Y., & Wang, Z. (2023). How does digital trade promote and reallocate the export technology complexity of the manufacturing industry? Evidence from 30 Chinese provinces, 2011–2020. PLoS ONE, 18 (9), e0291464.
Liu, Y., Tang, T., Ah, R., & Luo, L. (2024). Has digital technology promoted the restructuring of global value chains? Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81 , 269–280.
Ma, S., Guo, J., & Zhang, H. (2019). Policy analysis and development evaluation of digital trade: An international comparison. China & World Economy, 27 (3), 49–75.
Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017). Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 70 , 1–16.
Montobbio, F., & Rampa, F. (2005). The impact of technology and structural change on export performance in nine developing countries. World Development, 33 (4), 527–547.
Paunov, C., & Rollo, V. (2016). Has the internet fostered inclusive innovation in the developing world? World Development, 78 , 587–609.
Qian, J., & She, Q. (2023). The impact of corporate digital transformation on the export product quality: Evidence from Chinese enterprises. PLoS ONE, 18 (11), e0293461.
Shahrokhi, M. (2008). E-finance: Status, innovations, resources and future challenges. Managerial Finance, 34 (6), 365–398.
Shehzad, A., Qureshi, S. F., Saeed, M. Z., & Ali, S. (2023). The impact of financial risk attitude on objective-oriented investment behavior. International Journal of Financial Engineering, 10 (01), 2250022.
Wan, X., Kazmi, S. A. A., & Wong, C. Y. (2022). Manufacturing, exports, and sustainable growth: Evidence from developing countries. Sustainability, 14 (3), 1646.
Wang, D., & Li, G. (2022). Will the use of industrial robots promote transformation of export trade modes? Empirical Evidence from China. Plos One, 17 (6), e0267135.
Wang, Q., Sun, J., Pata, U. K., Li, R., & Kartal, M. T. (2023). Digital economy and carbon dioxide emissions: Examining the role of threshold variables. Geoscience Frontiers, 15 (3), 101644.
Wang, Y., Wang, T., & Wang, Q. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on enterprise performance: An empirical analysis based on China’s manufacturing export enterprises. PLoS ONE, 19 (3), e0299723.
Xu, H., & Nakajima, K. (2017). Highways and industrial development in the peripheral regions of China. Papers in Regional Science, 96 (2), 325–357.
Yadav, N. (2014). The role of internet use on international trade: Evidence from Asian and Sub-Saharan African enterprises. Global Economy Journal, 14 (2), 189–214.
Zhang, Q., & Duan, Y. (2023). How digitalization shapes export product quality: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 15 (8), 6376.
Zhang, H., Liu, Q., & Wei, Y. (2023). Digital product imports and export product quality: Firm-level evidence from China. China Economic Review, 79 , 101981.
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
Foreign Language College, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, 130117, China
China Center for Energy Economics Research, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
School of Economics, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, China
Jincheng Li
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
All authors listed have contributed equally to the development and the writing of this article.
Correspondence to Jincheng Li .
Conflict of interest.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Sun, J., Yang, S. & Li, J. The Impact of Digitalization on Technological Structure of China’s Exports: An Empirical Test Based on the Panel Threshold Effect Model. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02223-1
Download citation
Received : 18 May 2023
Accepted : 16 July 2024
Published : 24 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02223-1
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Submission Guidelines Please go to the Aims & Scope section to obtain an overview before assessing the suitability of your manuscript for this journal. It is crucial to make sure that issues related to publication ethics , copyright, authorship, figure formats, data, and references format have been properly considered in into account. Obtain approval from all authors for the content of the manuscript before submission. To access the content, readers don’t need to pay anything. Upon article acceptance, authors or their institutions have to pay the Article Processing Charge (APC).
1. Submission Manuscripts must be written in good English and should be submitted through (i) online submission system or (ii) e-mail: [email protected]. Manuscripts should be submitted as a single MS-Word file including all materials. The recommended word count for articles is within the range of 5000 to 12000 words. This includes all written content, such as the abstract, references, all text within tables, figures, and appendices.
2. Title Page The first page of the manuscript must contain: the full title; the affiliation and full address of all authors and the corresponding author; the second page must contain an abstract of 250 words or less.
3. Abstract The acceptable range for the length of the abstract is between 200 and 250 words. The abstract should to be one paragraph and follow to the style of structured abstracts, but without headings. 1) Introduction: Provide a comprehensive overview of the topic and emphasize the objective of the research. 2) Methods: Please provide a brief description of the primary methods or approaches employed. 3) Findings: Provide a summary of the primary results presented in the article; and 4) Conclusion: Outline the key conclusions or interpretations drawn from the study.
If relevant to your paper, it is suggested that you include the research limitations/implications, practical implications, and social implications in the abstract.
4. Keywords It is recommended to include between 3 and 6 relevant keywords following the abstract. It is advisable to use keywords that are both relevant to the article and commonly used within the respective subject area.
5. Abbreviations Any word or words to be abbreviated should be written in full when first mentioned followed by the abbreviation in parenthesis.
6. Preparing Tables and Figures Tables: It is advised that all columns in a table include by a descriptive heading. In order to simplify the process of copy-editing larger tables, it may be suitable to utilize smaller font sizes, provided that they do not fall below 8 points in size. It is recommended that authors utilize the table feature in Microsoft Word for the purpose of creating tables.
Figures: It is essential that the figures be inserted into the main body of the text and have a resolution of at least 1000 pixels width/height or a resolution of 300 dpi or higher. The text within the figures is readable and clearly understandable.
7. References and Citation Policy References : A list of references should be included at the end of the papers and should be organized in alphabetical order. The sources are cited in the manuscript by the authors’ last names and are individually listed at the end of the paper. It is advisable to utilize a bibliography software package, such as EndNote to prevent errors in typing and duplication of references when preparing citations. The document formatting guidelines require the text to be single-spaced and set at a font size of 10 points. It is recommended to utilize the APA format for both references and citations. All references listed in the Reference List will be appropriately cited within the text, and conversely, all citations within the text will be included in the Reference List.
One author Castle, E. B. (1970). The teacher . London: Oxford University Press.
Two authors: McCandless, B. R., & Evans, E. D. (1973). Children and youth: Psychosocial development. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
Three or more authors: (list each author) : Smith, V., Barr, R., & Burke, D. (1976). Alternatives in education: Freedom to choose. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa, Educational Foundation.
Society, association, or institution as author and publisher: American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
Editor or compiler as author: Rich, J. M. (Ed.). (1972). Readings in the philosophy of education (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Chapter, essay, or article by one author in a book or encyclopedia edited by another: Medley, D. M. (1983). Teacher effectiveness. In H. E. Mitzel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (Vol. 4, pp. 1894-1903). New York: The Free Press.
Journal Articles:
One author: Herrington, A. J. (1985). Classrooms as forums for reasoning and writing. College Composition and Communication, 36 (4) , 404-413.
Two authors Horowitz, L. M., & Post, D. L. (1981). The prototype as a construct in abnormal psychology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90 (6) , 575-585.
Society, association, or institution as author: Institute on Rehabilitation Issues. (1975). Critical issues in rehabilitating the severely handicapped. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 18 (4), 205-213.
Newspaper Articles:
No author: More jobs waiting for college grads. (1986, June 17). Detroit Free Press , pp. 1A, 3A.
One author: Powledge, T. M. (1983, July). The importance of being twins. Psychology Today, 19 , 20-27.
No author: CBS invades Cuba, returns with Irakere: Havana jam. (1979, May 3). Down Beat , 10.
Microforms:
ERIC report: Plantes, Mary Kay. (1979). The effect of work experience on young men’s earnings . (Report No. IRP-DP-567-79). Madison: Wisconsin University. Madison Institute for Research on Poverty. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED183687).
ERIC paper presented at a meeting: Whipple, W. S. (1977, January). Changing attitude through behavior modification . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED146500).
Internet article based on a print source (exact duplicate) with DOI assigned: Stultz, J. (2006). Integrating exposure therapy and analytic therapy in trauma treatment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76 (4), 482-488. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.76.4.482
Article in an Internet only journal with no DOI assigned: Sillick, T. J., & Schutte, N. S. (2006). Emotional intelligence and self-esteem mediate between perceived early parental love and adult happiness. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 2 (2), 38-48. Retrieved from http://ojs.lib.swin.edu.au/index.php/ejap/article/view/71/100
Daily newspaper article, electronic version available by search: Botha, T. (1999, February 21). The Statue of Liberty, Central Park and me. The New York Times . Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
Webpage: Raymon H. Mulford Library, The University of Toledo Health Science Campus. (2008). Instructions to authors in the health sciences . Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://mulford.mco.edu/instr/
Annual report: Pearson PLC. (2005). Reading allowed: Annual review and summary financial statements 2004. Retrieved from http://www.pearson.com/investor/ar2004/pdfs/summary_report_2004.pdf
Citation Policy: It is crucial for authors to ensure that any material sourced from external sources, including their own published works, is appropriately cited and that permission is obtained from the relevant authors, where necessary.
It is recommended that authors avoid from doing an excessive amount of self-citation and avoid including references from other publications without having read the cited material.
It is recommended that authors avoid from exhibiting bias towards their own or their acquaintances’, colleagues’, or institution’s publications when citing sources. It is not recommended for authors to include advertisements or advertorial content in their work.
As per the guidelines set forth by COPE, it is expected that any exact text extracted from the works of other researchers be enclosed within quotation marks and accompanied by the relevant citations. This rule also applies to the written work of the author himself or herself. The organization known as COPE published a discussion document regarding citation manipulation , which includes suggestions for best practice.
8. Footnotes These should be numbered consecutively in the text.
9. Funding, Acknowledgements, Conflicts of Interest and Data Availability Statement Funding: It is crucial to provide full disclosure of all funding sources for the study, including grants received to support the research work and any funds allocated for publication expense. It is important to note that certain funding sources may not reimburse article processing charges (APC) unless the funder and grant number are accurately and explicitly stated in the publication.
Please include the statement "This research received no external funding," or "This research was funded by [name of funder] grant number [xxx]" and "The APC was funded by [XXX]" in this section. Kindly ensure that the information provided is accurate and uses the standard spelling of funding agency names.
Acknowledgements : In this section, it is possible to express gratitude for any assistance provided that is not included by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).
Conflicts of Interest: It is necessary for authors to share any personal circumstances or interests that could potentially impact the representation or interpretation of reported research findings. In the event that there are no conflicts of interest, kindly indicate "The authors declare no conflict of interest" in this section. However, if the funding sponsors participated a role in the study’s design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript writing, or decision to publish the results, it must be disclosed in this section. In the event that no role was played by the funding sponsors, kindly indicate the following statement: "The funding sponsors did not participate in the study’s design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript writing, and decision to publish the results."
Data Availability Statement: Please provide information in this section regarding where to find of data that supports the reported results. This includes links to publicly archived datasets that were either analyzed or generated during the study. Kindly refer to the recommended Data Availability Statements provided in the specified section. It is advisable to omit this statement in case the study has not presented any data.
10. Ethical Guidelines for the Use of Human Participants in Research
AJER requires all authors to evaluate whether there is any physical or psychological hazard during the conduct of a research which involves human participants, whether patients, volunteers, or healthy individuals. Such research studies may be classified as basic (experimental), clinical, and epidemiological research, prepared as a cohort study, case-control, or cross-sectional. Investigators are required to make a full disclosure about any such risk or hazard that the human participants may be exposed to. It will be mandatory to obtain informed consent from all such human participants in order to safeguard the welfare and dignity of the participants. Failure to make full disclosure prior to obtaining informed consent might lead to a delay or rejection of the manuscript.
We do not make any distinction regarding the nature of participation nor categorize participants based on the type of research. The research may be low risk or high risk, but “every” human participant, irrespective of his or her nature of participation, must give the consent of participations prior to the commencement of research. Hence, informed consent shall be required from all human participants and not with any specific type of research or category of participant.
The demographics should also include number, sex, age range and state of health of the human participants. By state of health, we mean that all participants must be in good physical and mental health, capable to take decisions throughout the tenure of the research. This information about participants’ health is required for all studies with human subjects Though payments to healthy volunteers participating in research are allowable, provided that such payment is to reimburse expenses or compensate for time and inconvenience, and is not at a level that would constitute an inducement for people to take part in studies. Such human research should be conducted only with the approval of the institutional ethical committee. The approval of the institutional ethical committee shall be required for every research submission, irrespective of the participants’ role in the research or whether the participant is paid or not.
References United States. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical, & Behavioral Research. (1978). The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (Vol. 2). Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. ( Download )
National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007 (Updated 2018). The National Health and Medical Research Council, the Australian Research Council and Universities Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. ( Download )
Gostin, L. (1991). Ethical principles for the conduct of human subject research: population-based research and ethics. Law, Medicine and Health Care, 19(3-4), 191-201.
Artal, R., & Rubenfeld, S. (2017). Ethical issues in research. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 43, 107-114.
Rice, T. W. (2008). The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research. Respiratory care , 53 (10), 1325-1329.
Childress, J. F., Meslin, E. M., & Shapiro, H. T. (Eds.). (2005). Belmont revisited: Ethical principles for research with human subjects . Georgetown University Press.
https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_515060_smxx.pdf ( Download )
11. Appendix: At the end of paper
12. Reviewer Suggestions Kindly provide three potential reviewers who have the relevant expertise to review the manuscript during the submission process. The referees may not be approached by the editors. Kindly furnish comprehensive contact details including physical address, website, telephone number, and email address. Kindly provide recommendations for potential reviewers in the cover letter when submitting your manuscript. The suggested referees must not have any ongoing collaborations with the co-authors and should not have co-published any works with them in the past three years. It is recommended that the suggested reviewers are affiliated with institutions other than those of the authors. It is recommended that potential reviewers for the journal be selected from the pool of appropriate Editorial Board members. It is recommended that reviewers be selected from among the authors frequently cited in the paper.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Asian Journal of Empirical Research provides a platform for scholars to discuss critical empirical tool for more accurate scientific findings in humanities and social sciences. The journal publishes papers on qualitative methodology, discussions on the general logic of empirical research, analysis of the validity, verification of social laws ...
Manuscripts are invited from academicians, researchers and practitioners for publication consideration in all areas related to applied sciences. Each manuscript must include 200 to 400 words abstract. Articles are accepted only in MS-Word format. E-ISSN: 2224-4425 Editor-in-Chief: Muhammad Shahbaz E-mail: ajer.editor-AT-gmail.com.
Asian Journal of Empirical Research is an academic journal published by Conscientia Beam. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Stock exchange & Cointegration. It has an ISSN identifier of 2224-4425. It is also open access. Over the lifetime, 330 publications have been published receiving 1437 citations. The journal is also known as: AJER.
Asian Journal of Empirical Research E-ISSN: 2224-4425 Print ISSN: 2306-983X. View Journal. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development E-ISSN: 2224-4433 Print ISSN: 2304-1455. View Journal. Journal of Asian Business Strategy E-ISSN: 2225-4226 Print ISSN: 2309-8295. View Journal ...
Impact Factor is the most common scientometric index, which is defined by the number of citations of papers in two preceding years divided by the number of papers published in those years. This graph shows how the impact factor of Asian Journal of Empirical Research is computed. The left axis depicts the number of papers published in years X-1 ...
Asian Journal of Empirical Research / Asian Economic and Social Society Citation analysis ; hindex ; h-index ; citation rakings ; bibliometrics ; citation metrics ; impact factor ; citation rankings. ... Impact Factor (IF) 0.06. 5 Years IF. 0.06. Data available in this report
2017, Volume 7, Issue 10. 251-259 The Effect of CSR On Brand Loyalty: The Moderating Role of Corporate Reputation and Mediates the Brand Image. by Saba Qasim & Mohammad R.A Siam & Mohd Nizam bin M Sarkawi. 260-268 The Impact of Monetary Strategies on Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis for Pakistan.
Asian Journal of Empirical Research; Information Menu. Aim and Scope; Editorial Board; Instructions To Authors; Indexed/Abstracted In; ... Login; Quick Submission; Subject Area; Qualitative Methodology; Discussions on the General Logic of Empirical Research; Analysis of the Validity; Verification of Social Laws; Replication of Empirical Results ...
Asian Journal of Empirical Research / Asian Economic and Social Society. null. Impact Factor. 0.06. 5-Years IF. 4. 5-Years H index [50 most cited papers] [50 most relevant papers] [cites used to compute IF] [Recent citations ][Frequent citing series ] [more data in EconPapers] [trace new citations] [Missing citations?
Publishes theoretical and empirical research on all aspects of terrorism, including counterterrorism, state terror, political violence and human rights. Browse; Search. Close search ... Critical Studies on Terrorism is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal. The journal seeks to publish quality research on all aspects of ...
Inferentially, Consumer-Relationship Factor (CRF) shows a medium, positive correlation, indicating that Malaysians highly value customer relationships and past experiences within the app, which have significantly impacted their purchase decisions. ... An Industry Perspective on Graduates' Employability in Higher Education. Asian Journal of ...
Shariah compliance is a crucial factor that influences Muslim travelers' hotel selection during their travels. ... F., & Arun Kumar Tarofder. (2018). Factors Impacting Purchase Intention toward Shariah Compliant Hotels An Empirical Investigation on Muslim Consumers' Hotel Patronizing Behaviour. 15th International Conference on Business ...
Published on behalf of the Department of Sociology, National University of SingaporeThe Asian Journal of Social Science (AJSS) is a principal outlet for scholarly articles on Asian societies published by the Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore. AJSS provides a unique forum for theoretical debates and empirical analyses ...
The Asian Journal of Accounting Research (AJAR) is a double-anonymous peer-reviewed journal on accounting and finance in developing countries. Published three times a year in association with the Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia. ISSN: 2459-9700.
Asian Journal of Empirical Research 3(2): 118-134 ... surroundings that is situational factor on consumer buying behavior. ... "Buy-One-Get-One-Free" has a positive impact on consumer buying ...
The Asian Economic Journal provides detailed coverage of a wide range of topics in economics relating to East Asia, including investigation of current research, international comparisons and country studies. It is a forum for debate amongst theorists, practitioners and researchers and publishes high-quality theoretical, empirical and policy ...
Asian Journal of Empirical Research (AJER) depends heavily on our referees, and we are greatly indebted for maintaining the quality and timeliness of our journal. Thank you for your help in assessing manuscripts. Review Process: The manuscript submission and peer review process is broken down into the following steps:
The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals ...
T Vinayagathasan. Asian Journal of Empirical Research 4 (1), 41-64. , 2014. 91. 2014. Exploring the impact of infrastructure, pay incentives and workplace environment on employees' performance (a case study of Sargodha university) SH Khan, Z Azhar, S Parveen, F Naeem, MM Sohail. Asian Journal of Empirical Research 2 (4), 118-140.
The Asian American Journal of Psychology is the official publication of the Asian American Psychological Association and is dedicated to research, practice, advocacy, education, and policy within Asian American psychology. The Journal publishes empirical, theoretical, methodological, and practice oriented articles and book reviews covering topics relevant to Asian American individuals and ...
The Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (AJEER) is a distinguished platform overseen by a globally renowned Editorial Board. It offers a valuable opportunity for academics and researchers worldwide to exchange knowledge on current issues in the field of economics. The scope of the journal includes the following: Paper Selection ...
1. Introduction. Asian Journal of Empirical Research ( AJER) (E-ISSN: 2224-4425) exerts a special attention to ethical integrity of its academic content and publishing process. For this purpose, AJER follows the editorial guidelines, publication ethics and malpractices statement as stated in Code of Conduct and Best-Practice Guidelines for ...
The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JERHRE) is the only journal in the field of human research ethics dedicated exclusively to empirical research.Empirical knowledge translates ethical principles into procedures appropriate to specific cultures, contexts, and research topics. The journal's distinguished editorial and advisory board brings a range of expertise and ...
The climate issue is now one of the serious challenges facing the global community. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global CO 2 emissions fell by about 2 billion tons in 2020 as a result of the impact of COVID-19, making the largest absolute drop in history. But China was the only major economy to achieve an increase in carbon emissions, i.e., China's annual carbon ...
In the trend of digitalization reshaping the global value chain system, optimizing export technological structure is crucial for coping with complex international environments and enhancing core competitiveness. Based on panel data from 30 provinces and cities in China from 2002 to 2019, this study explores the impact of digitalization on the technological structure of exports. Our findings ...
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. Volume 18, December 2024, 101356. Impact of village savings and loans associations participation on cocoa farmers' livelihood in the Western North Region, Ghana ... The empirical results demonstrated a positive and statistically significant relationship between VSLA participation and the following ...
1. Submission. Manuscripts must be written in good English and should be submitted through (i) online submission system or (ii) e-mail: [email protected]. Manuscripts should be submitted as a single MS-Word file including all materials. The recommended word count for articles is within the range of 5000 to 12000 words.