regarding
thanks to
following
pertaining to
in place of
other than
Join the parts on the left using the conjunctions on the right | ||
as long as unless hence so whereas yet | ||
Use one of the conjuncts on the right to introduce the second sentence | ||
Accordingly Nevertheless Nonetheless Primarily In view of that On the other hand | ||
It should be emphasised that teaching this kind of idea linking should precede the demand for learners to produce fully finished essays.
Here we are on simpler ground.
The following sorts of verbal processes are common to many differently focused FADEs.
Tense use is also predictably simple.
Almost all the verbs in the examples given above are in the present simple because the discussion involves a current situation. Occasionally, the present perfect may be used to refer to a previous event that has significant present consequences, as in, for example: It has been shown in numerous well-conducted studies that Otherwise, the simple present is conventionally used throughout.
Passive-voice clauses serve to distance the writer from the topic by implying that it is the action that is important, not who did it and that is conventionally how the tone of FADEs is achieved. For example, from above: public spaces are defined as not: I am defining ... voluntary activity should be controlled not: The state should control etc. There are many more examples and if you use a model text as a teaching tool, it is worth taking the time to notice the frequency and effect of the structures.
Modal auxiliary verbs are used sparingly and generally confined to their function as hedging tactics or to express degrees of certainty. For example: Banning smoking, it is argued, will reduce a predictive use. whose illnesses may have been caused a hedging use. Occasionally, usually hedged, modal auxiliary verbs of obligation are used but almost never ones which express absolute obligation (deontic modality, in the trade). For example in
Whether smoking should be banned in all public spaces is by no means an easy issue to determine. Firstly, there is a tension between the public and private spheres regarding the extent to which the rights of smokers may be subordinated to the rights of others to breath clean air. Secondly, there is the issue of social costs and how far only one type of potentially dangerous voluntary activity should be controlled because of the costs that may be involved to society as a whole. Thirdly, there is the ethical issue of how far the law should be involved in the private decisions and choices of individuals.
all the uses are putative rather than expressing obligation per se . Modality in FADE writing is usually focused on the likelihood of a proposition being true. That is epistemic modality and there is a link below which will take you to a guide.
Circumstances refer to concepts such as location in time or space, contingency, cause, matter, means and angle. Many of these, including contingency, matter, angle and cause have been considered above under conjunction and prepositional links. However, the discussion would not be complete without some consideration of how adverbials and prepositional phrases in particular are used in a FADE. Here are some key examples:
There is a guide, linked below, to how theme-rheme structures are achieved in writing. Here it will be enough to consider two aspects only and we'll take this paragraph as the example:
On balance, it seems that the costs to society and to the health of its members are more important than the respect we owe to allowing individuals to make informed choices concerning their own lives. Smoking is not an activity which only affects the smoker. Others are affected by the degradation of their surroundings, damage to their own health and costs to society as a whole to which all taxpayers contribute.:
Simple approaches to teaching in this area involve:
Short-term, the goal of learners' writing is probably for some kind of assessment purpose, either of their language skills or their subject knowledge and ability to construct rational arguments. The target audience is often, therefore, a single teacher or tutor rather than the audience one imagines for most essays in non-educational settings which may be somewhat wider. However, a long-term objective is to apply the skills learned in real-world settings for true communicative purposes. Possible audiences include, therefore:
The nature of the audience will determine a number of issues and can affect the choice of lexis as well as the choice of grammatical structures. For example:
Writing well in this genre is not achievable overnight or in a lesson or two. Teaching demands consistency in planning and delivery over a series of lessons with sensible and achievable tasks to be accomplished along the way. You may decide, based on your reading, the nature of the learners and your own propensities, to adopt a product, process or genre approach to teaching writing skills but whichever approach you take, you will almost certainly have to find or compose model texts which can be drawn on for examples of the language that needs to be used. There are examples which you are welcome to use above. An outline syllabus might appear something like:
Lesson series | Language foci |
This is by no means a simple syllabus to design because, although the general structure of FADE writing can be explained and exemplified quickly and will lead naturally to some level of coherence, achieving cohesion involves weaving together the seven issues identified on the right into a series of lesson focusing on the elements on the left.
Related guides | |
which contains links to associated areas such as reporting verbs, modality and hedging in academic writing | |
use this guide if terms such as product vs. process vs. genre approaches to teaching writing are important to you. It is the essentials-only guide to the area. | |
for a similar guide to another popular genre concerning relating experiences | |
for more about cohesion is maintained using connections of ideas | |
this guide briefly considers the main types of modification and has links to other, more detailed areas | |
for a functional way of seeing adverbials and prepositional phrases | |
for more consideration of how these connected concepts are developed in writing | |
for a guide to the six main clause structures in English | |
a guide to this type of modality which is particular important in FADE writing | |
the in-service skills index for links to more areas |
References: Butt, D, Fahey, R, Feez, S, Spinks, S and Yallop, C, 2001, Using Functional Grammar: an explorer's guide. Sydney: NCELTR Burns, A, 2001, Genre-based Approaches to Writing , in Candlin, C and Mercer, N (Eds.), English Language Teaching in its Social Context . Abingdon, UK: Routledge Halliday, M, 1994, An introduction to functional grammar: 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold Tribble C, 1997, Writing . Oxford: Oxford University Press
Contact | FAQs | Copyright notice | ELT Concourse charter | Disclaimer and Privacy statement | Search ELT Concourse
Creative Resources for ESL/EFL Teachers
25 for and against essay topics that can be also used for class debates.
• The first paragraph should be the introduction. Include a thesis statement, which summarises the main issue.
In the past, most people lived with their parents until they got married. But in the modern world, it is more common to leave home and share accommodation with friends. This choice has both positive and negative aspects.
• The second paragraph should focus on the advantages. Include at least two arguments, if possible. Give examples where appropriate, introduced by phrases like For example or For instanc e.
There are several advantages to sharing with friends. Firstly, it gives you the opportunity to spend time with your friends and to build strong relationships with them. Secondly, it allows you to develop some of the practical skills that you will need as an independent adult. For instance, you will learn how to manage household bills, how to shop and cook, and so on. And thirdly, it makes living in your own home more affordable, and the more people who share, the more cost-effective it is. For instance , a shared house for six people is far cheaper than two houses for three people.
• The third paragraph should focus on the disadvantages. Include at least two arguments, if possible. Begin the third paragraph with a phrase like On the other hand or Howeve r,.. to express contrast with statements in the previous paragraph.
On the other hand , sharing a home has its disadvantages. Sharing a house can often cause disagreements. For instance, housemates often argue about household chores. What is more, it can be difficult to have time alone when you need it. And finally, the houses which young people share are sometimes in poor condition and landlords are not always good at repairing appliances when they break down.
• The fourth paragraph should be the conclusion. State your own opinion and decide whether the arguments for outweigh the arguments against the thesis statement or the other way around.
Although sharing a house with other young people is not always easy, the advantages definitely outweigh the problems. It is certainly something I would like to do in a few years’ time.
Source: Solutions Upper-Intermediate
Download the worksheet.
Other resources:
Picture Prompts for Speaking and Writing: An ESL Activity
Storytelling Cards: Imaginative Speaking and Writing Activity
Questions for ESL Conversation: 60 Questions Based on Vogue Interviews
Related posts.
This ESL simulation activity is for a group of four students, B1-B2 level, 15+ age. I find it’s best to use this activity after teaching crime vocabulary, and after teaching some basic concepts of peer pressure, argumentation, and manipulation. What I like about this activity is that the character cards…
I do a lot of speaking activities with my older students. We do a lot of simulations, discussions, role plays, games, etc. and this ESL debate is one of them. One of the activities I do is an argumentative debate where they can utilize everything they’ve learned, and another great…
I sometimes watch, or more accurately, watched (because Covid) Netflix with friends. We always use English subtitles, as my friends want to improve their English. Sometimes they ask me to translate a word or a phrase, sometimes I don’t mind and sometimes it bothers me. But my lack of patience…
I like the idea of essay topics that focus on the student’s own experiences. This can be a great way to show that the student has been thinking about the material and is not just reading about it.
Thank you 🙂
Thank you for this!! (emil du suger rövhål)
Excellent topics Helped me giving topics to students ……..
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .
Learn English Vocabulary Through Pictures with 150 Topics
English Vocabulary Exercises for A1 with Answers.
English Vocabulary Exercises for A2 with Answers.
English Vocabulary Exercises for B1 with Answers.
English Vocabulary Exercises for B2 with Answers.
FULL English Grammar Exercises with Answers
English Verbs and Tenses Exercises with Answers and Explanations
English Grammar Exercises for A1 with Answers
English Grammar Exercises for A2 with Answers
English Grammar Exercises for B1 with Answers
English Grammar Exercises for B2 with Answers
English Listening Exercises for Beginner with Answers
English Listening Exercises for A1 with Answers
English Listening Exercises for A2 with Answers
English Listening Exercises for B1 with Answers
English Listening Exercises for B2 with Answers
Practice Listening Tests for A1 with Answers & Transcripts
Practice Listening Tests for A2 with Answers & Transcripts
Practice Listening Tests for B1 with Answers & Transcripts
Practice Listening Tests for B2 with Answers & Transcripts
English Word Skills Exercises for A1 with Answers
English Word Skills Exercises for A2 with Answers
English Word Skills Exercises for B1 with Answers
English Word Skills Exercises for B2 with Answers
English Reading Exercises for Beginner with Answers
English Reading Exercises for A1 with Answers
English Reading Exercises for A2 with Answers
English Reading Exercises for B1 with Answers
English Reading Exercises for B2 with Answers
English Speaking Exercises for A1 with Answers
English Speaking Exercises for A2 with Answers
English Speaking Exercises for B1 with Answers
English Speaking Exercises for B2 with Answers
English Writing Exercises for A1 with Answers
English Writing Exercises for A2 with Answers
English Writing Exercises for B1 with Answers
English Writing Exercises for B2 with Answers
Business English Listening Exercises for A1 with Answers
Business English Listening Exercises for A2 with Answers
Business English Listening Exercises for B1 with Answers
Improve your ability to speak English
Article level 3, article level 4, conversations.
Listening Practice Through Dictation with Transcripts
English Writing Exercises for B1
More university students should stay in education after their first degree in order to get another qualification. Do you agree?
Agrees ◻ Disagrees ◻
Nowadays, the number of students who do a second degree is increasing. In order to decide if this is a good thing, we must examine the advantages and disadvantages of taking a postgraduate course.
It is certainly true that there is fierce competition for employment, and candidates need something extra in order to get a good job. We should also remember that people with a second qualification can expect to earn more when they start work. Moreover, postgraduate courses offer the chance to focus on a topic which you find particularly interesting. What could be better than spending an extra two or three years studying something you find fascinating?
However, there are disadvantages too. Firstly, it is an expensive option. You often need to pay for your place at university and also support yourself financially during the course. What is more, many young people are understandably impatient to leave education by the time they finish their first degree.
On balance, I believe it is a good idea to continue your studies beyond a first degree, if possible. Although it may be expensive, an extra qualification allows you to find a better job and earn more money.
In which paragraph (1-4) does the writer …
1 describe the arguments for?
How many does she / he describe?
2 describe the arguments against?
3 give his / her opinion?
1 2, 3 2 3, 2 3 4
Writing Strategy
Rhetorical questions can make an opinion essay more persuasive, provided you only include one or two. You do not have to answer the questions, but always make sure that the expected answer is clear, e.g.
Some people work long hours for very low pay. How can this is be right? (Expected answer: It can’t be right. )
a everything ◻
b most things ◻
c nothing ◻
What could be better than spending an extra two or three years studying something you find fascinating?, c
More students should do their degree at a university abroad rather than in their own country. Do you agree?
Paragraph 1: Rephrase the statement in the task.
………………………………………………………………………….
Paragraph 2: What are the arguments for doing a degree abroad? Think of two or three.
Paragraph 3: What are the arguments against doing a degree abroad? Think of two or three.
Paragraph 4: Give your opinion
your own answers
Use signposting phrases ( Firstly, …, Furthermore, …, etc.) to introduce opinions for the statement and against it, and to introduce your opinion in the conclusion ( On balance, … ).
addition also another furthermore other overall
One issue with social media is that it can distract people from work or study. In 1 …………………….., it can create unhappiness and anxiety when people compare their lives to other people’s. 2 …………………….. problem is that some people use it to spread unkind ideas about others.
On the 3 …………………….. hand, thanks to social media, people can build friendships quickly and easily by sharing photos, links, ideas and opinions. Social media 4 …………………….. allows people to ask for help and advice. 5 …………………….., it can educate people about things like health.
6 …………………….., I think social media has more positive than negative effects on everyday life.
1 addition 2 Another 3 other 4 also
5 Furthermore 5 overall
Teenage students should spend more time at school studying I.C.T. (Information and Communication Technology). Discuss.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
----------------------------------------
ChatPDF – Chat with any PDF
Quizgecko – Make a Test
Get an insight into the minds of our academics and team of educational creatives here at Oxbridge Essays. From expert guidance and practical advice on essay and dissertation writing, to commentary on current academic affairs, our blog covers all things student-related, with the goal of helping you do better during your time at university.
Next in our custom essays blog series is a type of essay question that crops up again and again in exams at all academic levels: ‘for and against’. This type of essay question typically asks the writer to provide arguments, reasons and evidence both for and against a certain opinion or statement , and sometimes also to conclude which is the stronger side of the argument. This is exactly the kind of essay that can cause students to panic under exam pressure, as a clear, structured essay format is required to tackle it correctly. Luckily, armed with our custom essay format for this particular type of question, you will be well on your way to top marks!
In a ‘for and against’ essay, the most common trap students fall into is breaking the essay into two large chunks , with the first dealing with all the reasons ‘for’ in one big chunk, before launching into all the ‘against’ reasons in a second long paragraph. The key to gaining top marks in this type of exam question is to create a sharply structured, clear essay format that separates your points into different ideas rather than allowing them to converge into two enormous arguments.
Cryptocurrency payments.
(kicsit magadon is) - önálló tanuláshoz *** Don't be a couch potato, be your coach!
For and against essays - useful expressions and linking words/phrases.
For and against essays, points to consider, 2. main body, 3. conclusion.
- read the conclusions below and say whether they express a balanced consideration, or the writer's opinion directly/indirectly., - read the main body of the for and against essay below on the topic: "discuss the view that advertising promotes excessive consumerism.", nincsenek megjegyzések:, megjegyzés küldése.
Megjegyzés: Megjegyzéseket csak a blog tagjai írhatnak a blogba.
How not to write your college essay.
If you are looking for the “secret formula” for writing a “winning” college essay, you have come to the wrong place. The reality is there is no silver bullet or strategy to write your way to an acceptance. There is not one topic or approach that will guarantee a favorable outcome.
At the end of the day, every admission office just wants to know more about you, what you value, and what excites you. They want to hear about your experiences through your own words and in your own voice. As you set out to write your essay, you will no doubt get input (both sought-after and unsolicited) on what to write. But how about what NOT Notcoin to write? There are avoidable blunders that applicants frequently make in drafting their essays. I asked college admission leaders, who have read thousands of submissions, to share their thoughts.
Don’t Go In There
There is wide consensus on this first one, so before you call on your Jedi mind tricks or predictive analytics, listen to the voices of a diverse range of admission deans. Peter Hagan, executive director of admissions at Syracuse University, sums it up best, saying, “I would recommend that students try not to get inside of our heads. He adds, “Too often the focus is on what they think we want.”
Andy Strickler, dean of admission and financial aid at Connecticut College agrees, warning, “Do NOT get caught in the trap of trying to figure out what is going to impress the admission committee. You have NO idea who is going to read your essay and what is going to connect with them. So, don't try to guess that.” Victoria Romero, vice president for enrollment, at Scripps College adds, “Do not write about something you don’t care about.” She says, “I think students try to figure out what an admission officer wants to read, and the reality is the reader begins every next essay with no expectations about the content THEY want to read.” Chrystal Russell, dean of admission at Hampden-Sydney College, agrees, saying, “If you're not interested in writing it, we will not be interested when reading it.” Jay Jacobs, vice provost for enrollment management at the University of Vermont elaborates, advising. “Don’t try to make yourself sound any different than you are.” He says, “The number one goal for admission officers is to better understand the applicant, what they like to do, what they want to do, where they spend the majority of their time, and what makes them tick. If a student stays genuine to that, it will shine through and make an engaging and successful essay.”
Dana white is ‘not thrilled’ with long-time ufc contender, after bangkok stopover julian assange will be heading to a little-known pacific island next—what to know about saipan.
Don’t Be Artificial
The headlines about college admission are dominated by stories about artificial intelligence and the college essay. Let’s set some ground rules–to allow ChatGPT or some other tool to do your work is not only unethical, it is also unintelligent. The only worse mistake you could make is to let another human write your essay for you. Instead of preoccupying yourself with whether or not colleges are using AI detection software (most are not), spend your time focused on how best to express yourself authentically. Rick Clark is the executive director of strategic student success at Georgia Institute of Technology, one of the first institutions to clearly outline their AI policy for applicants. He says, “Much of a college application is devoted to lines, boxes, and numbers. Essays and supplements are the one place to establish connection, personality, and distinction. AI, in its current state, is terrible at all three.” He adds, “My hope is that students will use ChatGPT or other tools for brainstorming and to get started, but then move quickly into crafting an essay that will provide insight and value.”
Don’t Overdo It
Michael Stefanowicz, vice president for enrollment management at Landmark College says, “You can only cover so much detail about yourself in an admission essay, and a lot of students feel pressure to tell their life story or choose their most defining experience to date as an essay topic. Admission professionals know that you’re sharing just one part of your lived experience in the essay.” He adds, “Some of the favorite essays I’ve read have been episodic, reflecting on the way you’ve found meaning in a seemingly ordinary experience, advice you’ve lived out, a mistake you’ve learned from, or a special tradition in your life.” Gary Ross, vice president for admission and financial aid at Colgate University adds, “More than a few applicants each year craft essays that talk about the frustration and struggles they have experienced in identifying a topic for their college application essay. Presenting your college application essay as a smorgasbord of topics that ultimately landed on the cutting room floor does not give us much insight into an applicant.”
Don’t Believe In Magic
Jason Nevinger, senior director of admission at the University of Rochester warns, “Be skeptical of anyone or any company telling you, ‘This is the essay that got me into _____.’ There is no magic topic, approach, sentence structure, or prose that got any student into any institution ever.” Social media is littered with advertisements promising strategic essay help. Don’t waste your time, energy, or money trying to emulate a certain style, topic, or tone. Liz Cheron is chief executive officer for the Coalition for College and former assistant vice president of enrollment & dean of admissions at Northeastern University. She agrees with Nevinger, saying “Don't put pressure on yourself to find the perfect, slam dunk topic. The vast majority of college essays do exactly what they're supposed to do–they are well-written and tell the admission officer more about the student in that student's voice–and that can take many different forms.”
Don’t Over Recycle
Beatrice Atkinson-Myers, associate director of global recruitment at the University of California at Santa Cruz tells students, “Do not use the same response for each university; research and craft your essay to match the program at the university you are interested in studying. Don't waste time telling me things I can read elsewhere in your application. Use your essay to give the admissions officer insights into your motivations, interests, and thinking. Don't make your essay the kitchen sink, focus on one or two examples which demonstrate your depth and creativity.” Her UC colleague, Jim Rawlins, associate vice chancellor of enrollment management at the University of California at San Diego agrees, saying “Answer the question. Not doing so is the surest way we can tell you are simply giving us a snippet of something you actually wrote for a different purpose.”
Don’t Overedit
Emily Roper-Doten, vice president for undergraduate admissions and financial assistance at Clark University warns against “Too many editors!” She says, “Pick a couple of trusted folks to be your sounding board when considering topics and as readers once you have drafts. You don’t want too many voices in your essay to drown you out!” Scripps’ Romero agrees, suggesting, “Ask a good friend, someone you trust and knows you well, to read your essays.” She adds, “The goal is for the admission committee to get to know a little about you and who better to help you create that framework, than a good friend. This may not work for all students because of content but helps them understand it’s important to be themselves.” Whitney Soule, vice provost and dean of admissions at The University of Pennsylvania adds, “Avoid well-meaning editorial interference that might seem to polish your writing but actually takes your own personal ‘shine’ right out of the message.” She says, “As readers, we connect to applicants through their genuine tone and style. Considering editorial advice for flow and message is OK but hold on to the 'you' for what you want to say and how you want to say it.”
Don’t Get Showy
Palmer Muntz, senior regional admissions counselor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks cautions applicants, “Don’t be fancier than you are. You don’t need to put on airs.” He adds, “Yes, proofread your work for grammar and spelling, but be natural. Craft something you’d want to read yourself, which probably means keeping your paragraphs short, using familiar words, and writing in an active voice.” Connecticut College’s Strickler agrees, warning, “Don't try to be someone you are not. If you are not funny, don't try to write a funny essay. If you are not an intellectual, trying to write an intellectual essay is a bad idea.”
Anthony Jones, the vice president of enrollment management at Loyola University New Orleans offers a unique metaphor for thinking about the essay. He says, “In the new world of the hyper-fast college admission process, it's become easy to overlook the essential meaning of the college application. It's meant to reveal Y...O...U, the real you, not some phony digital avatar. Think of the essay as the essence of that voice but in analog. Like the completeness and authenticity captured in a vinyl record, the few lines you're given to explain your view should be a slow walk through unrestrained expression chock full of unapologetic nuances, crevices of emotion, and exactness about how you feel in the moment. Then, and only then, can you give the admissions officer an experience that makes them want to tune in and listen for more.”
Don’t Be A Downer
James Nondorf, vice president and dean of admissions and financial aid at The University of Chicago says, “Don’t be negative about other people, be appreciative of those who have supported you, and be excited about who you are and what you will bring to our campus!” He adds, “While admissions offices want smart students for our classrooms, we also want kind-hearted, caring, and joyous students who will add to our campus communities too.”
Don’t Pattern Match
Alan Ramirez is the dean of admission and financial aid at Sewanee, The University of the South. He explains, “A big concern I have is when students find themselves comparing their writing to other students or past applicants and transform their writing to be more like those individuals as a way to better their chances of offering a more-compelling essay.” He emphasizes that the result is that the “essay is no longer authentic nor the best representation of themselves and the whole point of the essay is lost. Their distinctive voice and viewpoint contribute to the range of voices in the incoming class, enhancing the diversity of perspectives we aim to achieve.” Ramirez simple tells students, “Be yourself, that’s what we want to see, plus there's no one else who can do it better than you!”
Don’t Feel Tied To A Topic
Jessica Ricker is the vice president for enrollment and dean of admissions and financial aid at Skidmore College. She says, “Sometimes students feel they must tell a story of grief or hardship, and then end up reliving that during the essay-writing process in ways that are emotionally detrimental. I encourage students to choose a topic they can reflect upon positively but recommend that if they choose a more challenging experience to write about, they avoid belaboring the details and instead focus on the outcome of that journey.” She adds, "They simply need to name it, frame its impact, and then help us as the reader understand how it has shaped their lens on life and their approach moving forward.”
Landmark College’s Stefanowicz adds, “A lot of students worry about how personal to get in sharing a part of their identity like your race or heritage (recalling last year’s Supreme Court case about race-conscious admissions), a learning difference or other disability, your religious values, LGBTQ identity…the list goes on.” He emphasizes, “This is always your choice, and your essay doesn’t have to be about a defining identity. But I encourage you to be fully yourself as you present yourself to colleges—because the college admission process is about finding a school where your whole self is welcome and you find a setting to flourish!”
Don’t Be Redundant
Hillen Grason Jr., dean of admission at Franklin & Marshall College, advises, “Don't repeat academic or co-curricular information that is easily identifiable within other parts of your application unless the topic is a core tenant of you as an individual.” He adds, “Use your essay, and other parts of your application, wisely. Your essay is the best way to convey who your authentic self is to the schools you apply. If you navigated a situation that led to a dip in your grades or co-curricular involvement, leverage the ‘additional information’ section of the application.
Thomas Marr is a regional manager of admissions for the Americas at The University of St Andrews in Scotland and points out that “Not all international schools use the main college essay as part of their assessment when reviewing student applications.” He says, “At the University of St Andrews, we focus on the supplemental essay and students should avoid the mistake of making the supplemental a repeat of their other essay. The supplemental (called the Personal Statement if using the UCAS application process) is to show the extent of their passion and enthusiasm for the subject/s to which they are applying and we expect about 75% of the content to cover this. They can use the remaining space to mention their interests outside of the classroom. Some students confuse passion for the school with passion for their subject; do not fall into that trap.”
A Few Final Don’ts
Don’t delay. Every college applicant I have ever worked with has wished they had started earlier. You can best avoid the pitfalls above if you give yourself the time and space to write a thoughtful essay and welcome feedback openly but cautiously. Don’t put too much pressure on yourself to be perfect . Do your best, share your voice, and stay true to who you are.
One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts.
Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.
In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service. We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.
Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:
User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:
So, how can you be a power user?
Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.
‘It’s not a machine for cheating; it’s a machine for producing crap,’ says one professor infuriated by the rise of bland essays.
By Jack Grove for Times Higher Education
You have / 5 articles left. Sign up for a free account or log in.
The increased prevalence of students using ChatGPT to write essays should prompt a rethink about whether current policies encouraging “ethical” use of artificial intelligence (AI) are working, scholars have argued.
With marking season in full flow, lecturers have taken to social media in large numbers to complain about AI-generated content found in submitted work.
Telltale signs of ChatGPT use, according to academics, include little-used words such as “delve” and “multifaceted,” summarizing key themes using bullet points and a jarring conversational style using terms such as, “Let’s explore this theme.”
In a more obvious giveaway, one professor said an advertisement for an AI essay company was buried in a paper’s introduction ; another academic noted how a student had forgotten to remove a chatbot statement that the content was AI-generated.
“I had no idea how many would resort to it,” admitted one U.K. law professor .
Des Fitzgerald, professor of medical humanities and social sciences at University College Cork , told Times Higher Education that student use of AI had “gone totally mainstream” this year.
“Across a batch of essays, you do start to notice the tics of ChatGPT essays, which is partly about repetition of certain words or phrases, but is also just a kind of aura of machinic blandness that’s hard to describe to someone who hasn’t encountered it—an essay with no edges, that does nothing technically wrong or bad, but not much right or good, either,” said Professor Fitzgerald.
Since ChatGPT’s emergence in late 2022 , some universities have adopted policies to allow the use of AI as long as it is acknowledged, while others have begun using AI content detectors, although opinion is divided on their effectiveness .
According to the latest Student Academic Experience Survey , for which Advance HE and the Higher Education Policy Institute polled around 10,000 U.K. undergraduates, 61 percent use AI at least a little each month, “in a way allowed by their institution,” while 31 percent do so every week.
Professor Fitzgerald said that although some colleagues “think we just need to live with this, even that we have a duty to teach students to use it well,” he was “totally against” the use of AI tools for essays.
“ChatGPT is completely antithetical to everything I think I’m doing as a teacher—working with students to engage with texts, thinking through ideas, learning to clarify and express complex thoughts, taking some risks with those thoughts, locating some kind of distinctive inner voice. ChatGPT is total poison for all of this, and we need to simply ban it,” he said.
Steve Fuller, professor of sociology at the University of Warwick , agreed that AI use had “become more noticeable” this year despite his students signing contracts saying they would not use it to write essays.
He said he was not opposed to students using it “as long as what they produce sounds smart and on point, and the marker can’t recognize it as simply having been lifted from another source wholesale.”
Those who leaned heavily on the technology should expect a relatively low mark, even though they might pass, said Professor Fuller.
“Students routinely commit errors of fact, reasoning and grammar [without ChatGPT], yet if their text touches enough bases with the assignment, they’re likely to get somewhere in the low- to mid-60s. ChatGPT does a credible job at simulating such mediocrity, and that’s good enough for many of its student users,” he said.
Having to mark such mediocre essays partly generated by AI is, however, a growing complaint among academics. Posting on X, Lancaster University economist Renaud Foucart said marking AI-generated essays “takes much more time to assess [because] I need to concentrate much more to cut through the amount of seemingly logical statements that are actually full of emptiness.”
“My biggest issue [with AI] is less the moral issue about cheating but more what ChatGPT offers students,” Professor Fitzgerald added. “All it is capable of is [writing] bad essays made up of non-ideas and empty sentences. It’s not a machine for cheating; it’s a machine for producing crap.”
Amid the stress and clutter of our daily lives, and the divisions straining our politics and culture, we need sustain
More from global.
Four in five institutions could face deficits given stalling domestic enrollment and declines in international recrui
A Cornell University philosopher is calling out the discrimination—which is often blatant—faced by scholars deemed ov
Hackers known as Anonymous Sudan reportedly took responsibility and cited the “U.K.’s continued support for Israel” a
4 /5 Articles remaining this month.
Advertisement
Supported by
Björn Höcke has done more than take the far right into the mainstream. He is tilting the mainstream toward the far right.
By Erika Solomon
Erika Solomon reported from Halle, Germany, and the state of Thuringia in eastern Germany.
From the small stage of a pub in a wooded town of eastern Germany, the right-wing ideologue Björn Höcke regaled a crowd of followers late last year with the tale of his imminent trial. He faced charges for saying “Everything for Germany” at a political rally — breaking German laws against uttering Nazi slogans.
Despite that approaching court date, he looked down at the crowd, and gestured to them with an impish grin. “Everything for?” he asked.
“Germany!” they shouted.
After a decade of testing the boundaries of political speech in Germany, Mr. Höcke, a leader of the Alternative for Germany party, or AfD, no longer needed to push the limits himself. The crowd did it for him.
That moment crystallizes why, to his critics, Mr. Höcke is not simply a challenge to the political order, but a threat to German democracy itself.
For years, Mr. Höcke has methodically chipped away at the prohibitions Germany has imposed on itself to prevent being taken over by extremists again. It takes a tougher stance on free speech than many Western democracies, a consequence of the bitter lessons of the 1930s, when the Nazis used democratic elections to seize the levers of power.
“Everything for Germany” was the slogan once engraved on the knives of Nazi storm troopers. By reviving such phrases, Mr. Höcke’s opponents say, he has sought to make fascist ideas more acceptable in a society where such expressions are not only taboo, but illegal.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
Support Intelligent, In-Depth, Trustworthy Journalism.
Nick Schifrin Nick Schifrin
Teresa Cebrián Aranda Teresa Cebrián Aranda
Mekhi Hill Mekhi Hill
Leave your feedback
Israel indicated it's close to ending what it called the “intense” phase of its operations in Gaza, and would soon transition to a new stage of the war. That word came as Israel’s defense minister met with senior U.S. officials in Washington and as the U.S. and Israel continued a public spat over weapons deliveries. Nick Schifrin reports.
Notice: Transcripts are machine and human generated and lightly edited for accuracy. They may contain errors.
Geoff Bennett:
Israel today indicated it's close to ending what it called the intense phase of its operations in Gaza and would soon transition to a new stage of the war. That word came as Israel's defense minister met with senior U.S. officials here in Washington today and as the U.S. and Israel continued a public spat over weapons deliveries.
Nick Schifrin joins us now.
Nick, it's good to see you.
So what did Israel say about the future of the war?
Nick Schifrin:
Geoff, for months, Israel has described its operation in Rafah as targeting the final four Hamas battalions.
And, today, Israel's chief of the general staff said that Israeli soldiers in Rafah were — quote — "approaching the point" where Hamas' Rafah brigade was — quote — "defeated."
And, as you said, Geoff, just now, Netanyahu described that as a transition from the intense phase of combat, allowing Israel to shift its focus to the north, to Lebanon. There has been an extraordinary amount of U.S. concern in the last few weeks about cross-border fire between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon becoming a full-scale war.
And, this weekend, C.Q. Brown, the chairman and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned that Iran could come to Hezbollah's aid if there were a war between Israel and Hezbollah and that the U.S. could not defend Israel like it did against Iran's attack in April if Hezbollah actually opened fire against Israel, a warning sign, another warning sign, by U.S. officials, who are really concerned about escalation, but U.S. officials insist that they will help Israel defend against all enemies.
On the point of escalation, the U.S. has said that the best way to prevent an expansion of the war is to get a cease-fire in Gaza. So where do things stand on that front?
Regional officials tell me that they are still trying to bridge the gaps between Israel and Hamas, but there's been no public progress.
There's also been public doubts, as you and I have talked about, Geoff, about whether Israel, whether Prime Minister Netanyahu would actually endorse the deal that President Biden laid out that he said was actually created by Israel.
And in the last 24 hours, Netanyahu has made no fewer than three contradictory statements about the hostage negotiation, including on Israeli TV last night.
Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister (through interpreter):
I am not willing to stop the war and leave Hamas intact. I am prepared to make a partial deal, this is no secret, that will return to us some of the people, but we are committed to continuing the war after a pause in order to complete the goal of eliminating Hamas.
That is the first time Netanyahu used the phrases partial deal or some hostages, suggesting he was walking back his own plan, which calls for the release of all 120 hostages currently held in Gaza and the negotiation toward a permanent cease-fire.
Now, last night, after his interview on TV, he walked that statement back, saying — quote — "It is Hamas which opposes a deal, not Israel. Prime Minister Netanyahu has made it clear he will not leave Gaza until we return all 120 of our hostages, living and deceased."
That was last night. And, today, he further walked his Sunday comments back. We
Benjamin Netanyahu (through interpreter):
We are committed to the Israeli proposal that President Biden welcomed. Our position has not changed.
So, three statements, all in all, in 24 hours. That left a rather bemused State Department spokesman, Matt Miller, to respond this way today.
Matthew Miller, State Department Spokesman:
I think all of us that speak publicly at times make mistakes and misspeak. And when we do so, we have an obligation to come clarify, and we're glad he did.
So, at the end of the day, Geoff, I guess we are where we were, which is that a hostage deal endorsed by Israel, made public by President Biden, negotiators continue to try and figure out the gaps since Hamas proposed changes.
Hamas itself said that Netanyahu's Sunday comments means he doesn't want this deal. And the hostage families, I should add, said that those Sunday comments indicated Netanyahu was — quote — "abandoning the hostages."
Well, meantime, he has accused the U.S. on multiple occasions of withholding weapon deliveries. Is that the case?
Well, look, U.S. officials insist they have frozen only one weapon delivery, 3,500 bombs that are unguided, and that was back in May.
But a U.S. official does describe this process, that, after October the 7th, Israel and the United States worked together, and they went back and found many Israeli weapons purchases, some of them many years old, that hadn't yet actually been delivered. And what they did is, they worked to actually deliver all of those previous purchases, and that did increase the pace of weapons deliveries to Israel to an unprecedented level for, frankly, an unprecedented level of munitions that Israel was asking for in order to prosecute their war in Gaza.
But once those orders were fulfilled, they had to create new orders through the U.S. government or through the defense contractors, and that takes time between the administration, between those defense contractors, and the notifications to Congress.
And so the pace of delivery, according to this U.S. official who works on this, is slower than it was after October the 7th. But the U.S. strongly denies it is withholding weapons, and it believes that Netanyahu knows that. And so most analysts I talk to say that Netanyahu is playing domestic politics here with this accusation, including with Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who happens to be in Washington now.
And you see them — you see him meeting Secretary of State Antony Blinken. Today, he later met with CIA Director Bill Burns. Now, Gallant is a political rival to Netanyahu, and the two could fight over taking credit for any weapons deliveries that do come out of the U.S. in the coming weeks.
And Netanyahu, as we have talked about before, has a right-wing coalition. He needs to stay in power, and doing so, or at least the political decision-making that he's been making with this right-wing coalition since October the 7th, is, he works with the right-wing, and he criticizes President Biden publicly.
And that has been a winning formula, he believes, that could keep in power — keep him in power, especially as he continues to face years-old corruption cases, Geoff, including one today. A panel accused him of undermining Israeli national security in a case involving submarines. That is a charge that he denied yet again today.
Nick Schifrin, got to say, thank you for walking us through all of this. We deeply appreciate it.
Thanks very much.
Watch the Full Episode
Nick Schifrin is PBS NewsHour’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Correspondent. He leads NewsHour’s daily foreign coverage, including multiple trips to Ukraine since the full-scale invasion, and has created weeklong series for the NewsHour from nearly a dozen countries. The PBS NewsHour series “Inside Putin’s Russia” won a 2017 Peabody Award and the National Press Club’s Edwin M. Hood Award for Diplomatic Correspondence. In 2020 Schifrin received the American Academy of Diplomacy’s Arthur Ross Media Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis of Foreign Affairs. He was a member of the NewsHour teams awarded a 2021 Peabody for coverage of COVID-19, and a 2023 duPont Columbia Award for coverage of Afghanistan and Ukraine. Prior to PBS NewsHour, Schifrin was Al Jazeera America's Middle East correspondent. He led the channel’s coverage of the 2014 war in Gaza; reported on the Syrian war from Syria's Turkish, Lebanese and Jordanian borders; and covered the annexation of Crimea. He won an Overseas Press Club award for his Gaza coverage and a National Headliners Award for his Ukraine coverage. From 2008-2012, Schifrin served as the ABC News correspondent in Afghanistan and Pakistan. In 2011 he was one of the first journalists to arrive in Abbottabad, Pakistan, after Osama bin Laden’s death and delivered one of the year’s biggest exclusives: the first video from inside bin Laden’s compound. His reporting helped ABC News win an Edward R. Murrow award for its bin Laden coverage. Schifrin is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a board member of the Overseas Press Club Foundation. He has a Bachelor’s degree from Columbia University and a Master of International Public Policy degree from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS).
Teresa is a Producer on the Foreign Affairs & Defense Unit at PBS NewsHour. She writes and produces daily segments for the millions of viewers in the U.S. and beyond who depend on PBS NewsHour for timely, relevant information on the world’s biggest issues. She’s reported on authoritarianism in Latin America, rising violence in Haiti, Egypt’s crackdown on human rights, Israel’s judicial reforms and China’s zero-covid policy, among other topics. Teresa also contributed to the PBS NewsHour’s coverage of the war in Ukraine, which was named recipient of a duPont-Columbia Award in 2023, and was part of a team awarded with a Peabody Award for the NewsHour’s coverage of the Israel-Hamas war.
Mekhi Hill is a production assistant at the PBS NewsHour.
Support Provided By: Learn more
Support PBS News:
Educate your inbox.
Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else.
Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm.
But the defeat of one progressive congressman only shows how deep the party’s divisions run.
Y OU MIGHT expect a party’s leaders to inspire its activists about an upcoming election by invoking the vision of their standard-bearer. But on a recent sweltering Saturday afternoon, in a park in the Democratic stronghold of the South Bronx, in New York, Democrat after Democrat, including three congressmen and a senator, spent 75 minutes addressing a crowd of more than a thousand without mentioning President Joe Biden .
For all the enthusiasm, there was, in retrospect, a touching quality to the scene, and not only because the congressman who was the focus of the rally, Jamaal Bowman (pictured), would go on to lose his primary three days later, on June 25th. It captured the predicament Mr Biden has presented to his party’s leftists, and that they are presenting him in return. Can they praise Mr Biden, and he them, without alienating key supporters? Can they criticise one another to court such supporters without helping Donald Trump ?
The war in Gaza has so sharpened such questions about where Democrats stand that it is splitting the anti-war left itself. Mr Bowman’s criticism of Israel prompted the American Israel Public Affairs Committee ( AIPAC ), a pro-Israel group, to spend a record amount of money to defeat him. Yet during the rally, scores of protesters, blocked off by steel barricades and watched by police, chanted for a “free Palestine” and against Mr Bowman and the other Democrats on stage, who included such stars of the left as Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Bernie Sanders. “ AOC , Bowman, Sanders: Shills for ‘Genocide Joe’ Biden!” read one sign. Even from inside the barricades, Mr Sanders drew some boos when he said Israel “had the right to defend itself against a terrorist attack” before adding, “It does not have the right to go to war against the entire Palestinian people.”
Mr Biden beat Donald Trump in New York in 2020 by 23 points, but a Siena College poll this month found Mr Biden leading by just eight. He and Democrats generally have lost favour with independent voters and others who do not affiliate with either major party, the state’s second-biggest bloc after Democrats. With six congressional seats in New York believed to be up for grabs—including five picked up by Republicans in 2022—Democrats are trying to reclaim the political centre. Mondaire Jones, a former congressman running in a district adjoining Mr Bowman’s, once advocated defunding the police, but recently told the Washington Post that was “one of the dumbest phrases ever to exist in American politics”. Mr Jones alienated former allies on the left by endorsing Mr Bowman’s opponent, George Latimer.
Though Democrats’ lurch towards the centre in New York is unmistakable, Mr Bowman’s race is better understood as an indicator of the tensions building within the party than of how they will be resolved. Mr Bowman, a 48-year-old former school principal given to joyfully rapping in social-media posts, is the first member of the “Squad” of progressive legislators to lose a primary. He is black, and his defeat by a 70-year-old white moderate endorsed by the likes of Hillary Clinton might be read as a sign that the establishment is back in control. But Mr Latimer was a formidable candidate with a long record of service as a local elected official, and Mr Bowman, who first won his congressional seat in 2020, was particularly vulnerable.
Mr Bowman went well beyond criticising Israel’s war in Gaza—a mainstream Democratic position—to dismissing reports of rape by Hamas as “propaganda”. He apologised for that, but as recently as the final debate of the primary he accused Israel of “75 years of military occupation”, a view questioning the legitimacy of the state itself. He had troubles apart from the politics of Israel. It emerged in the campaign that in years past he indulged in conspiracy theories about the attacks of September 11th and other subjects. He was caught on video last year pulling a fire alarm in a House office building, prompting an evacuation before a vote on a funding bill, and he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanour. He could be tone deaf to the politics of his district, mostly composed of suburbs of New York City. “We’re gonna show fuckin’ AIPAC the power of the motherfuckin’ South Bronx!” he roared on Saturday—a vow that might have jarred his constituents not merely for its profanity but also because the South Bronx is not in their district.
The role of AIPAC in the race also complicates its lessons. The group’s political arm spent more than $14.5m helping Mr Latimer, the most ever spent by an interest group on a House race, but not by emphasising Mr Bowman’s views on Israel. Instead, its ads portrayed him as undermining Mr Biden by, for example, voting against his infrastructure bill.
Because AIPAC ’s donors include Republican billionaires, Mr Bowman charged that “Republican racist MAGA Trump money” was trying to buy the district for Mr Latimer. Indeed, to some on the left, how Mr Bowman lost is a sign they are winning the larger struggle. As Usamah Andrabi, the communications director for Justice Democrats, a political action committee, argues, “It shows how weak the establishment and AIPAC are that they have to resort to breaking records alongside Republican billionaires to advance their interests.” For its part AIPAC is already boosting the primary opponent of another vulnerable member of the Squad, Congresswoman Cori Bush of Missouri, whose contest is in August.
Far more than admiration for Mr Biden, antipathy to Donald Trump is holding the Democratic Party together. That may prove enough to turn out progressives to vote again for the president this autumn. But whoever wins, any polite silence within the party will end after November, and a great, noisy struggle will begin over whether the likes of Mr Bowman, or of Mr Latimer, should represent its future. ■
More from united states.
Americans are worryingly unconfident in the sanity of the two men
Encouraged by research, more states are requiring schools to teach personal finance
Republican primary voters’ favourite thing is anything that horrifies Democrats
They were “warriors”—that’s the problem
In the bondage of others they saw their freedom
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Worksheets and downloads. A for and against essay - exercises 945.25 KB. A for and against essay - answers 293.66 KB. A for and against essay - essay 786.07 KB. A for and against essay - writing practice 497.45 KB.
Below are examples of signposts that are used in argumentative essays. Signposts enable the reader to follow our arguments easily. When pointing out opposing arguments (Cons): Opponents of this idea claim/maintain that… Those who disagree/ are against these ideas may say/ assert that… Some people may disagree with this idea,
An essay is an academic formal piece of writing which describes, analyses or discusses a particular issue The most common types are: Opinion essays: presents the writer's personal opinion of the topic, supporting this opinion with examples and reasons. For and against essays: it presents both sides of an issue in a balanced way. In the
This is a 'for and against' essay where you will discuss two contrasting views about a topic. You should only give your opinion if you are explicitly instructed to do so. Learn how to write a good for and against essay. With step by step instructions, two sample argumentative compositions and a few exercises to work on expressions and ...
4. That is to say. Usage: "That is" and "that is to say" can be used to add further detail to your explanation, or to be more precise. Example: "Whales are mammals. That is to say, they must breathe air.". 5. To that end. Usage: Use "to that end" or "to this end" in a similar way to "in order to" or "so".
For and against essays. A "for and against" essay is a formal piece of writing in which a topic is considered from opposing points of view. You should present both sides in a fair way by discussing them objectively and in equal detail. ... Useful expressions and linking words/phrases • To list points: Firstly, First of all, In the first place ...
When you write an essay, you need to ensure that it has a clear structure. Paragraph 1: introduction (stating the issue) Paragraph 2: arguments for the statement. Paragraph 3: arguments against the statement. Paragraph 4: summary, your own opinion. 1. Read the Writing Strategy and the task below.
In the concluding paragraph you can say why you find one side more convincing than the other. In this post, I'll guide you step by step to help you write a good for and against essay. Step 1. Tips and Guidelines +sample essay (pdf) Step 2. Presentation + sample essay (reinforcing) Step 3. Using connectors of contrast. Step 4.
For and Against Discussion Essays (FADEs) ... However, the discussion would not be complete without some consideration of how adverbials and prepositional phrases in particular are used in a FADE. Here are some key examples: Location refers to both time and place. In a FADE, the topic will normally determine which are most relevant.
Complete the tips for writing a for and against essay with a word from the box. disagree formal plan reasons opinions 1. You should give your _____ on the topic. 2. Always give _____ for your opinions. ... Check your writing: gap fill - useful phrases Fill the gaps in the essay with the correct word or phrase from the box.
Read the main body of the for and against essay below on the topic: "Discuss the view that advertising promotes excessive consumerism." Then read the beginnings and endings and say which of the techniques has been used in each one. Finally, replace the bold type words or phrases in the main body with ones similar in meaning. BEGINNINGS… 1.
25 for and against essay topics that can be also used for class debates. For and against essay topics: layout. ... Include at least two arguments, if possible. Give examples where appropriate, introduced by phrases like For example or For instance. There are several advantages to sharing with friends. Firstly, it gives you the opportunity to ...
Do you agree? 1. Read the task and the model essay. Does the writer agree or disagree with the statement in the task? Agrees Disagrees . [1] Nowadays, the number of students who do a second degree is increasing. In order to decide if this is a good thing, we must examine the advantages and disadvantages of taking a postgraduate course.
an introductory paragraph in which you clearly state the topic to be discussed, without giving your opinion. a main body in which the points for and against along with your justifications, examples or reasons are presented in separate paragraphs. a closing paragraph in which you give a balanced consideration of the topic and state your opinion.
Look at the essay and do the exercises to practise and improve your writing skills. Preparation Are these arguments for or against reality TV shows? Write them in the correct group. There are lots of different types of reality shows. Some competitions are very difficult or dangerous. People on reality shows have fun experiences and meet new people.
What your custom essay should include. Introduction. Set out the key points for and against the argument, making it clear that there are several different ideas on each side: avoid the trap of making it sound like a simple argument with only one point on either side. Paragraph 1. Using a signpost sentence to make it clear which point you are ...
For and Against Essays useful phrases - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. This document provides a list of useful expressions and linking words for writing for and against essays. It includes phrases for listing points, advantages, and disadvantages, as well as introducing arguments and examples.
Opinion essays are formal in style. They require your opinion on a topic which must be clearly stated and supported by reasons. It is necessary to include the opposing viewpoint in another paragraph. successful opinion essay should have: INTRODUCTION. Paragraph 1: You state the topic and your opinion clearly.
In this video, you'll learn all the details about "For and Against Essay Writing". Whether you're a student preparing for an exam or someone simply intereste...
For & Against Essay - LINKING WORDS - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. This document provides a list of linking words that can be used when writing to connect ideas and make arguments. Some of the linking words listed are for listing points, listing advantages and disadvantages, introducing arguments for and against a position ...
A "for and against" essay is a formal piece of writing in which a topic is considered from opposing points of view. You should present both sides in a fair way by discussing them objectively and in equal detail. ... Useful expressions and linking words/phrases: Conclusion expressing balanced considerations/opinion indirectly In conclusion, On ...
At the end of the day, every admission office just wants to know more about you, what you value, and what excites you. They want to hear about your experiences through your own words and in your ...
"Across a batch of essays, you do start to notice the tics of ChatGPT essays, which is partly about repetition of certain words or phrases, but is also just a kind of aura of machinic blandness that's hard to describe to someone who hasn't encountered it—an essay with no edges, that does nothing technically wrong or bad, but not much right or good, either," said Professor Fitzgerald.
The essay ends with a warning: The goal is to appear harmless — not to become so. Image Mr. Höcke during a televised debate in April against Mario Voigt, the Christian Democratic Union ...
Essays; Brief But Spectacular; World. ... but U.S. officials insist that they will help Israel defend against all enemies. ... That is the first time Netanyahu used the phrases partial deal or ...
Answers to A for and against essay ... 3. No 4. Yes 5. Yes 6. No 7. No 8. Yes 2. Check your writing: gap fill - useful phrases 1. There is no doubt 2. One advantage of 3. positive aspect of 4. In addition 5. On the other hand 6. Another drawback is 7. To conclude 8. Personally . BRITISH COUNCIL Teens . Author: Rickard, Jonathan (Hong Kong) ...
ir phones when they vote.The winners win great priz. s.2. Check your writing: reordering - essay structure Write numbers 1-4 to pu. Conclusion - writer's opinion. Introduction - the situation. ts. for reality TV showsArguments against reality TV shows3. Check your writing: rewriting sentences - linking words. ewrite the sentences ...
Essay; Schools brief ... but recently told the Washington Post that was "one of the dumbest phrases ever to exist in American politics". Mr Jones alienated former allies on the left by ...