types of research gaps ppt

This document provides guidance on identifying research gaps for a PhD dissertation literature review. It defines a research gap as an unexplored area that has potential for further study.

This document discusses different types of research gaps. It begins by defining a research gap as a missing or insufficient area of knowledge that has been identified through a literature analysis. Some common types of research gaps are then outlined, including theoretical, empirical, methodological, practical, literature, historical, cultural ...

The document recommends systematically analyzing gaps by identifying a broad research area, thoroughly researching the gap's viability with an expected outcome, and using an evidence-based scientific method.

A research gap is an unanswered question or unresolved problem in a field, which reflects a lack of existing research in that space. The four most common types of research gaps are the classic literature gap, the disagreement gap, the contextual gap and the methodological gap.

Types of Research Gap. There are different types of research gaps that can be identified, and each type is associated with a specific situation or problem. Here are the main types of research gaps and their explanations: Theoretical Gap. This type of research gap refers to a lack of theoretical understanding or knowledge in a particular area.

A research gap is any space where there’s a lack of solid, agreed-upon research regarding a specific topic/issue/phenomenon. Unique research topics emerge from research gaps, so it’s essential to first identify high-quality research gaps before you attempt to define a topic.

The first known article that developed a framework for defining research gaps was by Robinson, Saldanhea, and McKoy (2011). In their model, they identified and described five types of research gaps types: (a) Population, (b) Intervention, (c) Comparison, (d) Outcomes, and (e) Setting.

After you’ve completed the scoping review you should be able to identify gaps in the research literature. If you haven’t identified any gaps or found several systematice reviews or other in-depth comprehensive reviews on your topic then that might tell you.

20 research gaps from the review mapped to the key questions, presented to a group of 12 stakeholders, including funders, advocates, clinicians, regulators, researchers, and policymakers.

Different Types of Research Gaps. Identifying research gaps is an essential step in conducting research, as it helps researchers to refine their research questions and to focus their research efforts on areas where there is a need for more knowledge or understanding. 1. Knowledge gaps