research topics about robotics

101+ Simple Robotics Research Topics For Students

Imagine a world where machines come to life, performing tasks on their own or assisting humans with precision and efficiency. This captivating realm is the heart of robotics—a fusion of engineering, computer science, and technology. If you’re a student eager to dive into this mesmerizing field, you’re in for an electrifying journey. 

In this blog, we’ll unravel the secrets of robotics research, highlight its significance, and unveil an array of interesting robotics research topics. These topics are perfect for middle and high school students, making the exciting world of robotics accessible to all. Let’s embark on this adventure into the future of technology and innovation!

In your quest to explore robotics, don’t forget the valuable support of services like Engineering Assignment Help . Dive into these fascinating research topics and let us assist you on your educational journey

What is Robotics Research Topic?

Table of Contents

A robotics research topic is a specific area of study within the field of robotics that students can investigate to gain a deeper understanding of how robots work and how they can be applied to various real-world problems. These topics can range from designing and building robots to exploring the algorithms and software that control them.

Research topics in robotics can be categorized into various subfields, including:

• Mechanical Design: Studying how to design and build the physical structure of robots, including their components and materials.
• Sensors and Perception: Investigating how robots can sense and understand their environment through sensors like cameras, infrared sensors, and ultrasonic sensors.
• Control Systems: Exploring the algorithms and software that enable robots to move, make decisions, and interact with their surroundings.
• Human-Robot Interaction: Researching how robots can collaborate with humans, including topics like natural language processing and gesture recognition.
• Artificial Intelligence (AI): Studying how AI techniques can be applied to robotics, such as machine learning for object recognition and path planning.
• Applications: Focusing on specific applications of robotics, such as medical robotics, autonomous vehicles, and industrial automation.

Why is Robotics Research Important?

Before knowing robotics research topics, you need to know the reasons for the importance of robotics research. Robotics research is crucial for several reasons:

Advancing Technology

Research in robotics leads to the development of cutting-edge technologies that can improve our daily lives, enhance productivity, and solve complex problems.

Solving Real-World Problems

Robotics can be applied to address various challenges, such as environmental monitoring, disaster response, and healthcare assistance.

Inspiring Innovation

Engaging in robotics research encourages creativity and innovation among students, fostering a passion for STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields.

Educational Benefits

Researching robotics topics equips students with valuable skills in problem-solving, critical thinking, and teamwork.

Career Opportunities

A strong foundation in robotics can open doors to exciting career opportunities in fields like robotics engineering, AI, and automation.

Also Read: Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Easy Robotics Research Topics For Middle School Students

Let’s explore some simple robotics research topics for middle school students:

Robot Design and Building

1. How to build a simple robot using household materials.

2. Designing a robot that can pick up and sort objects.

3. Building a robot that can follow a line autonomously.

4. Creating a robot that can draw pictures.

5. Designing a robot that can mimic animal movements.

6. Building a robot that can clean and organize a messy room.

7. Designing a robot that can water plants and monitor their health.

8. Creating a robot that can navigate through a maze of obstacles.

9. Building a robot that can imitate human gestures and movements.

10. Designing a robot that can assemble a simple puzzle.

11. Developing a robot that can assist in food preparation and cooking.

Robotics in Everyday Life

1. Exploring the use of robots in home automation.

2. Designing a robot that can assist people with disabilities.

3. How can robots help with chores and housekeeping?

4. Creating a robot pet for companionship.

5. Investigating the use of robots in education.

6. Exploring the use of robots for food delivery in restaurants.

7. Designing a robot that can help with grocery shopping.

8. Creating a robot for home security and surveillance.

9. Investigating the use of robots for waste recycling.

10. Designing a robot that can assist in organizing a bookshelf.

Robot Programming

1. Learning the basics of programming a robot.

2. How to program a robot to navigate a maze.

3. Teaching a robot to respond to voice commands.

4. Creating a robot that can dance to music.

5. Programming a robot to play simple games.

6. Teaching a robot to recognize and sort recyclable materials.

7. Programming a robot to create art and paintings.

8. Developing a robot that can give weather forecasts.

9. Creating a robot that can simulate weather conditions.

10. Designing a robot that can write and print messages or drawings.

Robotics and Nature

1. Studying how robots can mimic animal behavior.

2. Designing a robot that can pollinate flowers.

3. Investigating the use of robots in wildlife conservation.

4. Creating a robot that can mimic bird flight.

5. Exploring underwater robots for marine research.

6. Investigating the use of robots in studying insect behavior.

7. Designing a robot that can monitor and report air quality.

8. Creating a robot that can mimic the sound of various birds.

9. Studying how robots can help in reforestation efforts.

10. Investigating the use of robots in studying coral reefs and marine life.

Robotics and Space

1. How do robots assist astronauts in space exploration?

2. Designing a robot for exploring other planets.

3. Investigating the use of robots in space mining.

4. Creating a robot to assist in space station maintenance.

5. Studying the challenges of robot communication in space.

6. Designing a robot for collecting samples on other planets.

7. Creating a robot that can assist in assembling space telescopes.

8. Investigating the use of robots in space agriculture.

9. Designing a robot for space debris cleanup.

10. Studying the role of robots in exploring and mapping asteroids.

These robotics research topics offer even more exciting opportunities for middle school students to explore the world of robotics and develop their research skills.

Latest Robotics Research Topics For High School Students

Let’s get started with some robotics research topics for high school students:

Advanced Robot Design

1. Developing a robot with human-like facial expressions.

2. Designing a robot with advanced mobility for rough terrains.

3. Creating a robot with a soft, flexible body.

4. Investigating the use of drones in agriculture.

5. Developing a bio-inspired robot with insect-like capabilities.

6. Designing a robot with the ability to self-repair and adapt to damage.

7. Developing a robot with advanced tactile sensing for delicate tasks.

8. Creating a robot that can navigate both underwater and on land seamlessly.

9. Investigating the use of drones in disaster response and relief efforts.

10. Designing a robot inspired by cheetahs for high-speed locomotion.

11. Developing a robot that can assist in search and rescue missions in extreme weather conditions, such as hurricanes or wildfires.

Artificial Intelligence and Robotics

1. How can artificial intelligence enhance robot decision-making?

2. Creating a robot that can recognize and respond to emotions.

3. Investigating ethical concerns in AI-driven robotics.

4. Developing a robot that can learn from its mistakes.

5. Exploring the use of machine learning in robotic vision.

6. Exploring the role of AI-driven robots in space exploration and colonization.

7. Creating a robot that can understand and respond to human emotions in healthcare.

8. Investigating the ethical implications of autonomous vehicles in urban transportation.

9. Developing a robot that can analyze and predict weather patterns using AI.

10. Exploring the use of machine learning to enhance robotic prosthetics.

Human-Robot Interaction

1. Studying the impact of robots on human mental health.

2. Designing a robot that can assist in therapy sessions.

3. Investigating the use of robots in elderly care facilities.

4. Creating a robot that can act as a language tutor.

5. Developing a robot that can provide emotional support.

6. Studying the psychological impact of humanoid robots in educational settings.

7. Designing a robot that can assist individuals with neurodegenerative diseases.

8. Investigating the use of robots for mental health therapy and counseling.

9. Creating a robot that can help children with autism improve social skills.

10. Developing a robot companion for the elderly to combat loneliness.

Robotics and Industry

1. How are robots transforming the manufacturing industry?

2. Investigating the use of robots in 3D printing.

3. Designing robots for warehouse automation.

4. Developing robots for precision agriculture.

5. Studying the role of robotics in supply chain management.

6. Exploring the integration of robots in the construction and architecture industry.

7. Investigating the use of robots for recycling and waste management in cities.

8. Designing robots for autonomous maintenance and repair of industrial equipment.

9. Developing robotic solutions for monitoring and managing urban traffic.

10. Studying the role of robotics in the development of smart factories and Industry 4.0.

Cutting-Edge Robotics Applications

1. Exploring the use of swarm robotics for search and rescue missions.

2. Investigating the potential of exoskeletons for enhancing human capabilities.

3. Designing robots for autonomous underwater exploration.

4. Developing robots for minimally invasive surgery.

5. Studying the ethical implications of autonomous military robots.

6. Exploring the use of robotics in sustainable energy production.

7. Investigating the use of swarming robots for ecological conservation and monitoring.

8. Designing exoskeletons for individuals with mobility impairments for daily life.

9. Developing robots for autonomous planetary exploration beyond our solar system.

10. Studying the ethical and legal aspects of AI-powered military robots in warfare.

These robotics research topics offer high school students the opportunity to delve deeper into advanced robotics concepts and address some of the most challenging and impactful issues in the field.

Robotics research is a captivating field with a wide range of robotics research topics suitable for students of all ages. Whether you’re in middle school or high school, you can explore robot design, programming, AI integration , and cutting-edge applications. Robotics research not only fosters innovation but also prepares you for a future where robots will play an increasingly important role in various aspects of our lives. So, pick a topic that excites you, and embark on your journey into the fascinating world of robotics!

I hope you enjoyed this blog about robotics research topics for middle and high school students.

Related Posts

8 easiest programming language to learn for beginners.

There are so many programming languages you can learn. But if you’re looking to start with something easier. We bring to you a list of…

10 Online Tutoring Help Benefits

Do you need a computer science assignment help? Get the best quality assignment help from computer science tutors at affordable prices. They always presented to help…

200+ Robotics Research Topics: Discovering Tomorrow’s Tech

• Post author By admin
• September 15, 2023

Explore cutting-edge robotics research topics and stay ahead of the curve with our comprehensive guide. Discover the latest advancements in the field today.

Robotics research topics are not like any other research topics. In these topics science fiction meets reality and innovation knows no bounds.

In this blog post we are going to explore some of the best robotics research topics that will help you to explore machine learning, artificial intelligence and many more.

Apart from that you will also explore the industries and the future of robotics. Whether you are an experienced engineering or a student of robotics, these project ideas will definitely help you to explore a lot more the dynamic and ever evolving world of robotics. So be ready to explore these topics:-

Table of Contents

Robotics Research Topics

Have a close look at robotics research topics:-

Autonomous Robots

• Development of an Autonomous Delivery Robot for Urban Environments
• Swarm Robotics for Agricultural Crop Monitoring and Maintenance
• Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) for Indoor Navigation of Service Robots
• Human-Robot Interaction Study for Improved Robot Assistance in Healthcare
• Self-Driving Car Prototype with Advanced Perception and Decision-Making Algorithms
• Autonomous Aerial Surveillance Drones for Security Applications
• Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) for Ocean Exploration
• Robotic Drones for Disaster Response and Search-and-Rescue Missions
• Autonomous Exploration Rover for Planetary Surfaces
• Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Precision Agriculture and Crop Analysis

Robot Manipulation and Grasping

• Object Recognition and Grasping Planning System for Warehouse Automation
• Cooperative Multi-Robot Manipulation for Assembly Line Tasks
• Tactile Sensing Integration for Precise Robotic Grasping
• Surgical Robot with Enhanced Precision and Control for Minimally Invasive Surgery
• Robotic System for Automated 3D Printing and Fabrication
• Robot-Assisted Cooking System with Object Recognition and Manipulation
• Robotic Arm for Hazardous Materials Handling and Disposal
• Biomechanically Inspired Robotic Finger Design for Grasping
• Multi-Arm Robotic System for Collaborative Manufacturing
• Development of a Dexterous Robotic Hand for Complex Object

Robot Vision and Perception:

• Object Detection and Recognition Framework for Robotic Inspection
• Deep Learning-Based Vision System for Real-time Object Recognition
• Human Activity Recognition Algorithm for Assistive Robots
• Vision-Based Localization and Navigation for Autonomous Vehicles
• Image Processing and Computer Vision for Robotic Surveillance
• Visual Odometry for Precise Mobile Robot Positioning
• Facial Recognition System for Human-Robot Interaction
• 3D Object Reconstruction from 2D Images for Robotic Mapping
• Autonomous Drone with Advanced Vision-Based Obstacle Avoidance
• Development of a Visual SLAM System for Autonomous Indoor navigation.

Human-Robot Collaboration

• Development of Robot Assistants for Elderly Care and Companionship
• Implementation of Collaborative Robots (Cobots) in Manufacturing Processes
• Shared Control Interfaces for Teleoperation of Remote Robots
• Ethics and Social Impact Assessment of Human-Robot Interaction
• Evaluation of User Interfaces for Robotic Assistants in Healthcare
• Human-Centric Design of Robotic Exoskeletons for Enhanced Mobility
• Enhancing Worker Safety in Industrial Settings through Human-Robot Collaboration
• Haptic Feedback Systems for Improved Teleoperation of Remote Robots
• Investigating Human Trust and Acceptance of Autonomous Robots in Daily Life
• Design and Testing of Safe and Efficient Human-Robot Collaborative Workstations

Bio-Inspired Robotics

• Biohybrid Robots Combining Biological and Artificial Components for Unique Functions
• Evolutionary Robotics Algorithms for Robot Behavior Optimization
• Swarm Robotics Inspired by Insect Behavior for Collective Tasks
• Design and Fabrication of Soft Robotics for Flexible and Adaptive Movement
• Biomimetic Robotic Fish for Underwater Exploration
• Biorobotics Research for Prosthetic Limb Design and Control
• Development of a Robotic Pollination System Inspired by Bees
• Bio-Inspired Flying Robots for Agile and Efficient Aerial Navigation
• Bio-Inspired Sensing and Localization Techniques for Robotic Applications
• Development of a Legged Robot with Biomimetic Locomotion Inspired by Animals

Robot Learning and AI

• Transfer Learning Strategies for Robotic Applications in Varied Environments
• Explainable AI Models for Transparent Robot Decision-Making
• Robot Learning from Demonstration (LfD) for Complex Tasks
• Machine Learning Algorithms for Predictive Maintenance of Industrial Robots
• Neural Network-Based Vision System for Autonomous Robot Learning
• Reinforcement Learning for UAV Swarms and Cooperative Flight
• Human-Robot Interaction Studies to Improve Robot Learning
• Natural Language Processing for Human-Robot Communication
• Robotic Systems with Advanced AI for Autonomous Exploration
• Implementation of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Robotic Control

Robotics in Healthcare

• Design and Testing of Robotic Prosthetics and Exoskeletons for Enhanced Mobility
• Telemedicine Platform for Remote Robotic Medical Consultations
• Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation System for Physical Therapy
• Simulation-Based Training Environment for Robotic Surgical Skill Assessment
• Humanoid Robot for Social and Emotional Support in Healthcare Settings
• Autonomous Medication Dispensing Robot for Hospitals and Pharmacies
• Wearable Health Monitoring Device with AI Analysis
• Robotic Systems for Elderly Care and Fall Detection
• Surgical Training Simulator with Realistic Haptic Feedback
• Development of a Robotic Surgical Assistant for Minimally Invasive Procedures

Robots in Industry

• Quality Control and Inspection Automation with Robotic Systems
• Risk Assessment and Safety Measures for Industrial Robot Environments
• Human-Robot Collaboration Solutions for Manufacturing and Assembly
• Warehouse Automation with Robotic Pick-and-Place Systems
• Industrial Robot Vision Systems for Quality Assurance
• Integration of Cobots in Flexible Manufacturing Cells
• Robot Grippers and End-Effector Design for Specific Industrial Tasks
• Predictive Maintenance Strategies for Industrial Robot Fleet
• Robotics for Lean Manufacturing and Continuous Improvement
• Robotic Automation in Manufacturing: Process Optimization and Integration

Robots in Space Exploration

• Precise Autonomous Spacecraft Navigation for Deep Space Missions
• Robotics for Satellite Servicing and Space Debris Removal
• Lunar and Martian Surface Exploration with Autonomous Robots
• Resource Utilization and Mining on Extraterrestrial Bodies with Robots
• Design and Testing of Autonomous Space Probes for Interstellar Missions
• Autonomous Space Telescopes for Astronomical Observations
• Robot-Assisted Lunar Base Construction and Maintenance
• Planetary Sample Collection and Return Missions with Robotic Systems
• Biomechanics and Human Factors Research for Astronaut-Robot Collaboration
• Autonomous Planetary Rovers: Mobility and Scientific Exploration

Environmental Robotics

• Environmental Monitoring and Data Collection Using Aerial Drones
• Robotics in Wildlife Conservation: Tracking and Protection of Endangered Species
• Disaster Response Robots: Search, Rescue, and Relief Operations
• Autonomous Agricultural Robots for Sustainable Farming Practices
• Autonomous Forest Fire Detection and Firefighting Robot Systems
• Monitoring and Rehabilitation of Coral Reefs with Robotic Technology
• Air Quality Monitoring and Pollution Detection with Mobile Robot Swarms
• Autonomous River and Marine Cleanup Robots
• Ecological Studies and Environmental Protection with Robotic Instruments
• Development of Underwater Robotic Systems for Ocean Exploration and Monitoring

These project ideas span a wide range of topics within robotics research, offering opportunities for innovation, exploration, and contribution to the field. Researchers, students, and enthusiasts can choose projects that align with their interests and expertise to advance robotics technology and its applications.

Robotics Research Topics for high school students

• Home Robots: Explore how robots can assist in daily tasks at home.
• Medical Robotics: Investigate robots used in surgery and patient care.
• Robotics in Education: Learn about robots teaching coding and science.
• Agricultural Robots: Study robots in farming for planting and monitoring.
• Space Exploration: Discover robots exploring planets and space.
• Environmental Robots: Explore robots in conservation and pollution monitoring.
• Ethical Questions: Discuss the ethical dilemmas in robotics.
• DIY Robot Projects: Build and program robots from scratch.
• Robot Competitions: Participate in exciting robotics competitions.
• Cutting-Edge Innovations: Stay updated on the latest in robotics.

These topics offer exciting opportunities for high school students to delve into robotics research, learning, and creativity.

Easy Robotics Research Topics 

Introduction to robotics.

Explore the basics of robotics, including robot components and their functions.

History of Robotics

Investigate the evolution of robotics from its beginnings to modern applications.

Robotic Sensors

Learn about various sensors used in robots for detecting and measuring data.

Simple Robot Building

Build a basic robot using kits or everyday materials and learn about its components.

Programming a Robot

Experiment with programming languages like Scratch or Blockly to control a robot’s movements.

Robots in Entertainment

Explore how robots are used in the entertainment industry, such as animatronics and robot performers.

Robotics in Toys

Investigate robotic toys and their mechanisms, such as remote-controlled cars and drones.

Robotic Pets

Learn about robotic pets like robot dogs and cats and their interactive features.

Robotics in Science Fiction

Analyze how robots are portrayed in science fiction movies and literature.

Robotic Safety

Explore safety measures and protocols when working with robots to prevent accidents.

These topics provide a gentle introduction to robotics research and are ideal for beginners looking to learn more about this exciting field.

Latest Research Topics in Robotics

The field of robotics is ever-evolving, with a plethora of exciting research topics at the forefront of exploration. Here are some of the latest and most intriguing areas of research in robotics:

Soft Robotics

Soft robots, crafted from flexible materials, can adapt to their surroundings, making them safer for human interaction and ideal for unstructured environments.

Robotic Swarms

Groups of robots working collectively toward a common objective, such as search and rescue missions, disaster relief efforts, and environmental monitoring.

Robotic Exoskeletons

Wearable devices designed to enhance human strength and mobility, offering potential benefits for individuals with disabilities, boosting worker productivity, and aiding soldiers in carrying heavier loads.

Medical Robotics

Robots play a vital role in various medical applications, including surgery, rehabilitation, and drug delivery, enhancing precision, reducing human error, and advancing healthcare practices.

Intelligent Robots

Intelligent robots have the ability to learn and adapt to their surroundings, enabling them to tackle complex tasks and interact naturally with humans.

These are just a glimpse of the thrilling research avenues within robotics. As the field continues to progress, we anticipate witnessing even more groundbreaking advancements and innovations in the years ahead.

What topics are in robotics?

Robotics basics.

Understanding the fundamental concepts of robotics, including robot components, kinematics, and control systems.

Robotics History

Exploring the historical development of robotics and its evolution into a multidisciplinary field.

Robot Sensors

Studying the various sensors used in robots for perception, navigation, and interaction with the environment.

Robot Actuators

Learning about the mechanisms and motors that enable robot movement and manipulation.

Robot Control

Understanding how robots are programmed and controlled, including topics like motion planning and trajectory generation.

Robot Mobility

Examining the different types of robot mobility, such as wheeled, legged, aerial, and underwater robots.

Artificial Intelligence in Robotics

Exploring the role of AI and machine learning in enhancing robot autonomy, decision-making, and adaptability.

Human-Robot Interaction

Investigating how robots can effectively interact with humans, including social and ethical considerations.

Robot Perception

Studying computer vision and other technologies that enable robots to perceive and interpret their surroundings.

Robotic Manipulation

Delving into robot arms, grippers, and manipulation techniques for tasks like object grasping and assembly.

Robot Localization and Mapping

Understanding methods for robot localization (knowing their position) and mapping (creating maps of their environment).

Robotics in Medicine

Exploring the use of robots in surgery, rehabilitation, and medical applications.

Analyzing the role of robots in manufacturing and automation, including industrial robot arms and cobots.

Learning about robots capable of making decisions and navigating autonomously in complex environments.

Robot Ethics

Examining ethical considerations related to robotics, including issues of privacy, safety, and AI ethics.

Exploring robots inspired by nature, such as those mimicking animal locomotion or behavior.

Robotic Applications

Investigating specific applications of robots in fields like agriculture, space exploration, entertainment, and more.

Robotics Research Trends

Staying updated on the latest trends and innovations in the field, such as soft robotics, swarm robotics, and intelligent agents.

These topics represent a broad spectrum of areas within robotics, each offering unique opportunities for research, development, and exploration.

What are your 10 robotics ideas?

Home assistant robot.

Build a robot that can assist with everyday tasks at home, like fetching objects, turning lights on and off, or even helping with cleaning.

Robotics in Agriculture

Create a robot for farming tasks, such as planting seeds, monitoring crop health, or even autonomous weed removal.

Autonomous Delivery Robot

Design a robot capable of delivering packages or groceries autonomously within a neighborhood or urban environment.

Search and Rescue Robot

Develop a robot that can navigate disaster-stricken areas to locate and assist survivors or relay important information to rescuers.

Robot Artist

Build a robot that can create art, whether it’s through painting, drawing, or even sculpture.

Underwater Exploration Robot

Construct a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) for exploring the depths of the ocean and gathering data on marine life and conditions.

Robot for the Elderly

Create a companion robot for the elderly that can provide companionship, reminders for medication, and emergency assistance.

Educational Robot

Design a robot that can teach coding and STEM concepts to children in an engaging and interactive way.

Robotics in Space

Develop a robot designed for space exploration, such as a planetary rover or a robot for asteroid mining.

Design a lifelike robotic pet that can offer companionship and emotional support, especially for those unable to care for a real pet.

These project ideas span various domains within robotics, from practical applications to creative endeavors, offering opportunities for innovation and exploration.

What are the 7 biggest challenges in robotics?

Robot autonomy.

Imagine robots that can think for themselves, make decisions, and navigate complex, ever-changing environments like a seasoned explorer.

Robotic Senses

Picture robots with superhuman perception, able to see, hear, and understand the world around them as well as or even better than humans.

Human-Robot Harmony

Think of robots seamlessly working alongside us, understanding our needs, and being safe, friendly, and helpful companions.

Robotic Hands and Fingers

Envision robots with the dexterity of a skilled surgeon, capable of handling delicate and complex tasks with precision.

Robots on the Move

Imagine robots that can gracefully traverse all kinds of terrain, from busy city streets to rugged mountain paths.

Consider the ethical questions surrounding robots, like privacy, fairness, and the impact on employment, as we strive for responsible and beneficial AI.

Robot Teamwork

Visualize a world where robots from different manufacturers can effortlessly work together, just like a symphony orchestra playing in perfect harmony.

What are the 5 major fields of robotics?

Industrial wizards.

Think of robots working tirelessly on factory floors, welding, assembling, and ensuring top-notch quality in the products we use every day.

Helpful Companions

Imagine robots assisting us in non-industrial settings, from healthcare, where they assist in surgery and rehabilitation, to our homes, where they vacuum our floors and make life a little easier.

Mobile Marvels

Picture robots that can move and navigate on their own, exploring uncharted territories in space, performing search and rescue missions, or even delivering packages to our doorstep.

Human-Like Helpers

Envision robots that resemble humans, not just in appearance but also in their movements and interactions. These are the robots designed to understand and assist us in ways that feel natural.

AI-Powered Partners

Think of robots that aren’t just machines but intelligent partners. They learn from experience, adapt to different situations, and make decisions using cutting-edge artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Let’s wrap up our robotics research topics. As we have seen that there is endless innovation in robotics research topics. That is why there are lots of robotics research topics to explore.

As the technology is innovating everyday and continuously evolving there are lots of new challenges and discoveries are emerging in the world of robotics.

With these robotics research topics you would explore a lot about the future endeavors of robotics.  These topics would also tap on your creativity and embrace your knowledge about robotics. So let’s implement these topics and feel the difference.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can i get involved in robotics research.

To get started in robotics research, you can pursue a degree in robotics, computer science, or a related field. Join robotics clubs, attend conferences, and seek out research opportunities at universities or tech companies.

Are there any ethical concerns in robotics research?

Yes, ethical concerns in robotics research include issues related to job displacement, privacy, and the use of autonomous weapons. Researchers are actively addressing these concerns to ensure responsible development.

What are the career prospects in robotics research?

Robotics research offers a wide range of career opportunities, including robotics engineer, AI specialist, data scientist, and robotics consultant. The field is constantly evolving, creating new job prospects.

How can robotics benefit society?

Robotics can benefit society by improving healthcare, increasing manufacturing efficiency, conserving the environment, and aiding in disaster response. It has the potential to enhance various aspects of our lives.

What is the role of AI in robotics research?

AI plays a crucial role in robotics research by enabling robots to make intelligent decisions, adapt to changing environments, and perform complex tasks. AI and robotics are closely intertwined, driving innovation in both fields.

• australia (2)
• duolingo (13)
• Education (284)
• General (78)
• How To (18)
• IELTS (127)
• Latest Updates (162)
• Malta Visa (6)
• Permanent residency (1)
• Programming (31)
• Scholarship (1)
• Sponsored (4)
• Study Abroad (187)
• Technology (12)
• work permit (8)

Recent Posts

Artificial Intelligence

• Data Science
• Hardware & Sensors

Machine Learning

Agriculture.

• Defense & Cyber Security
• Healthcare & Sports
• Hospitality & Retail
• Logistics & Industrial
• Office & Household
• Write for Us

How robotics are used in the weight loss industry

How ai & robotics are addressing rising fuel costs, transforming the gaming industry with rpa and intelligent automation, how to detect and monitor against unauthorized drone use, how robots are used to handle explosives, how hackers use machine learning to breach cybersecurity, common mistakes to avoid when using a demat account, warehouse robotics companies in europe transforming order fulfillment [updated], why businesses should invest in decentralized apps, a close watch: how uk businesses benefit from advanced cctv systems, empowering small businesses: the role of it support in growth and….

• Technologies

500 research papers and projects in robotics – Free Download

The recent history of robotics is full of fascinating moments that accelerated the rapid technological advances in artificial intelligence , automation , engineering, energy storage, and machine learning. The result transformed the capabilities of robots and their ability to take over tasks once carried out by humans at factories, hospitals, farms, etc.

These technological advances don’t occur overnight; they require several years of research and development in solving some of the biggest engineering challenges in navigation, autonomy, AI and machine learning to build robots that are much safer and efficient in a real-world situation. A lot of universities, institutes, and companies across the world are working tirelessly in various research areas to make this reality.

In this post, we have listed 500+ recent research papers and projects for those who are interested in robotics. These free, downloadable research papers can shed lights into the some of the complex areas in robotics such as navigation, motion planning, robotic interactions, obstacle avoidance, actuators, machine learning, computer vision, artificial intelligence, collaborative robotics, nano robotics, social robotics, cloud, swan robotics, sensors, mobile robotics, humanoid, service robots, automation, autonomous, etc. Feel free to download. Share your own research papers with us to be added into this list. Also, you can ask a professional academic writer from  CustomWritings – research paper writing service  to assist you online on any related topic.

Navigation and Motion Planning

• Robotics Navigation Using MPEG CDVS
• Design, Manufacturing and Test of a High-Precision MEMS Inclination Sensor for Navigation Systems in Robot-assisted Surgery
• Motion Control of a Three Active Wheeled Mobile Robot and Collision-Free Human Following Navigation in Outdoor Environment
• One Point Perspective Vanishing Point Estimation for Mobile Robot Vision Based Navigation System
• Application of Ant Colony Optimization for finding the Navigational path of Mobile Robot-A Review
• Robot Navigation Using a Brain-Computer Interface
• Path Generation for Robot Navigation using a Single Ceiling Mounted Camera
• Exact Robot Navigation Using Power Diagrams
• Learning Socially Normative Robot Navigation Behaviors with Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning
• Pipelined, High Speed, Low Power Neural Network Controller for Autonomous Mobile Robot Navigation Using FPGA
• Proxemics models for human-aware navigation in robotics: Grounding interaction and personal space models in experimental data from psychology
• Optimality and limit behavior of the ML estimator for Multi-Robot Localization via GPS and Relative Measurements
• Aerial Robotics: Compact groups of cooperating micro aerial vehicles in clustered GPS denied environment
• Disordered and Multiple Destinations Path Planning Methods for Mobile Robot in Dynamic Environment
• Integrating Modeling and Knowledge Representation for Combined Task, Resource and Path Planning in Robotics
• Path Planning With Kinematic Constraints For Robot Groups
• Robot motion planning for pouring liquids
• Implan: Scalable Incremental Motion Planning for Multi-Robot Systems
• Equilibrium Motion Planning of Humanoid Climbing Robot under Constraints
• POMDP-lite for Robust Robot Planning under Uncertainty
• The RoboCup Logistics League as a Benchmark for Planning in Robotics
• Planning-aware communication for decentralised multi- robot coordination
• Combined Force and Position Controller Based on Inverse Dynamics: Application to Cooperative Robotics
• A Four Degree of Freedom Robot for Positioning Ultrasound Imaging Catheters
• The Role of Robotics in Ovarian Transposition
• An Implementation on 3D Positioning Aquatic Robot

Robotic Interactions

• On Indexicality, Direction of Arrival of Sound Sources and Human-Robot Interaction
• OpenWoZ: A Runtime-Configurable Wizard-of-Oz Framework for Human-Robot Interaction
• Privacy in Human-Robot Interaction: Survey and Future Work
• An Analysis Of Teacher-Student Interaction Patterns In A Robotics Course For Kindergarten Children: A Pilot Study
• Human Robotics Interaction (HRI) based Analysis–using DMT
• A Cautionary Note on Personality (Extroversion) Assessments in Child-Robot Interaction Studies
• Interaction as a bridge between cognition and robotics
• State Representation Learning in Robotics: Using Prior Knowledge about Physical Interaction
• Eliciting Conversation in Robot Vehicle Interactions
• A Comparison of Avatar, Video, and Robot-Mediated Interaction on Users’ Trust in Expertise
• Exercising with Baxter: Design and Evaluation of Assistive Social-Physical Human- Robot Interaction
• Using Narrative to Enable Longitudinal Human- Robot Interactions
• Computational Analysis of Affect, Personality, and Engagement in HumanRobot Interactions
• Human-robot interactions: A psychological perspective
• Gait of Quadruped Robot and Interaction Based on Gesture Recognition
• Graphically representing child- robot interaction proxemics
• Interactive Demo of the SOPHIA Project: Combining Soft Robotics and Brain-Machine Interfaces for Stroke Rehabilitation
• Interactive Robotics Workshop
• Activating Robotics Manipulator using Eye Movements
• Wireless Controlled Robot Movement System Desgined using Microcontroller
• Gesture Controlled Robot using LabVIEW
• RoGuE: Robot Gesture Engine

Obstacle Avoidance

• Low Cost Obstacle Avoidance Robot with Logic Gates and Gate Delay Calculations
• Advanced Fuzzy Potential Field Method for Mobile Robot Obstacle Avoidance
• Controlling Obstacle Avoiding And Live Streaming Robot Using Chronos Watch
• Movement Of The Space Robot Manipulator In Environment With Obstacles
• Assis-Cicerone Robot With Visual Obstacle Avoidance Using a Stack of Odometric Data.
• Obstacle detection and avoidance methods for autonomous mobile robot
• Moving Domestic Robotics Control Method Based on Creating and Sharing Maps with Shortest Path Findings and Obstacle Avoidance
• Control of the Differentially-driven Mobile Robot in the Environment with a Non-Convex Star-Shape Obstacle: Simulation and Experiments
• A survey of typical machine learning based motion planning algorithms for robotics
• Linear Algebra for Computer Vision, Robotics , and Machine Learning
• Applying Radical Constructivism to Machine Learning: A Pilot Study in Assistive Robotics
• Machine Learning for Robotics and Computer Vision: Sampling methods and Variational Inference
• Rule-Based Supervisor and Checker of Deep Learning Perception Modules in Cognitive Robotics
• The Limits and Potentials of Deep Learning for Robotics
• Autonomous Robotics and Deep Learning
• A Unified Knowledge Representation System for Robot Learning and Dialogue

Computer Vision

• Computer Vision Based Chess Playing Capabilities for the Baxter Humanoid Robot
• Non-Euclidean manifolds in robotics and computer vision: why should we care?
• Topology of singular surfaces, applications to visualization and robotics
• On the Impact of Learning Hierarchical Representations for Visual Recognition in Robotics
• Focused Online Visual-Motor Coordination for a Dual-Arm Robot Manipulator
• Towards Practical Visual Servoing in Robotics
• Visual Pattern Recognition In Robotics
• Automated Visual Inspection: Position Identification of Object for Industrial Robot Application based on Color and Shape
• Automated Creation of Augmented Reality Visualizations for Autonomous Robot Systems
• Implementation of Efficient Night Vision Robot on Arduino and FPGA Board
• On the Relationship between Robotics and Artificial Intelligence
• Artificial Spatial Cognition for Robotics and Mobile Systems: Brief Survey and Current Open Challenges
• Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Its Impact on Society
• The Effects of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics on Business and Employment: Evidence from a survey on Japanese firms
• Artificially Intelligent Maze Solver Robot
• Artificial intelligence, Cognitive Robotics and Human Psychology
• Minecraft as an Experimental World for AI in Robotics
• Impact of Robotics, RPA and AI on the insurance industry: challenges and opportunities

Probabilistic Programming

• On the use of probabilistic relational affordance models for sequential manipulation tasks inrobotics
• Exploration strategies in developmental robotics: a unified probabilistic framework
• Probabilistic Programming for Robotics
• New design of a soft-robotics wearable elbow exoskeleton based on Shape Memory Alloy wires actuators
• Design of a Modular Series Elastic Upgrade to a Robotics Actuator
• Applications of Compliant Actuators to Wearing Robotics for Lower Extremity
• Review of Development Stages in the Conceptual Design of an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator for Robotics
• Fluid electrodes for submersible robotics based on dielectric elastomer actuators
• Cascaded Control Of Compliant Actuators In Friendly Robotics

Collaborative Robotics

• Interpretable Models for Fast Activity Recognition and Anomaly Explanation During Collaborative Robotics Tasks
• Collaborative Work Management Using SWARM Robotics
• Collaborative Robotics : Assessment of Safety Functions and Feedback from Workers, Users and Integrators in Quebec
• Accessibility, Making and Tactile Robotics : Facilitating Collaborative Learning and Computational Thinking for Learners with Visual Impairments
• Trajectory Adaptation of Robot Arms for Head-pose Dependent Assistive Tasks

Mobile Robotics

• Experimental research of proximity sensors for application in mobile robotics in greenhouse environment.
• Multispectral Texture Mapping for Telepresence and Autonomous Mobile Robotics
• A Smart Mobile Robot to Detect Abnormalities in Hazardous Zones
• Simulation of nonlinear filter based localization for indoor mobile robot
• Integrating control science in a practical mobile robotics course
• Experimental Study of the Performance of the Kinect Range Camera for Mobile Robotics
• Planification of an Optimal Path for a Mobile Robot Using Neural Networks
• Security of Networking Control System in Mobile Robotics (NCSMR)
• Vector Maps in Mobile Robotics
• An Embedded System for a Bluetooth Controlled Mobile Robot Based on the ATmega8535 Microcontroller
• Experiments of NDT-Based Localization for a Mobile Robot Moving Near Buildings
• Hardware and Software Co-design for the EKF Applied to the Mobile Robotics Localization Problem
• Design of a SESLogo Program for Mobile Robot Control
• An Improved Ekf-Slam Algorithm For Mobile Robot
• Intelligent Vehicles at the Mobile Robotics Laboratory, University of Sao Paolo, Brazil [ITS Research Lab]
• Introduction to Mobile Robotics
• Miniature Piezoelectric Mobile Robot driven by Standing Wave
• Mobile Robot Floor Classification using Motor Current and Accelerometer Measurements
• Sensors for Robotics 2015
• An Automated Sensing System for Steel Bridge Inspection Using GMR Sensor Array and Magnetic Wheels of Climbing Robot
• Sensors for Next-Generation Robotics
• Multi-Robot Sensor Relocation To Enhance Connectivity In A WSN
• Automated Irrigation System Using Robotics and Sensors
• Design Of Control System For Articulated Robot Using Leap Motion Sensor
• Automated configuration of vision sensor systems for industrial robotics

Nano robotics

• Light Robotics: an all-optical nano-and micro-toolbox
• Light-driven Nano- robotics
• Light-driven Nano-robotics
• Light Robotics: a new tech–nology and its applications
• Light Robotics: Aiming towards all-optical nano-robotics
• NanoBiophotonics Appli–cations of Light Robotics
• System Level Analysis for a Locomotive Inspection Robot with Integrated Microsystems
• High-Dimensional Robotics at the Nanoscale Kino-Geometric Modeling of Proteins and Molecular Mechanisms
• A Study Of Insect Brain Using Robotics And Neural Networks

Social Robotics

• Integrative Social Robotics Hands-On
• ProCRob Architecture for Personalized Social Robotics
• Definitions and Metrics for Social Robotics, along with some Experience Gained in this Domain
• Transmedia Choreography: Integrating Multimodal Video Annotation in the Creative Process of a Social Robotics Performance Piece
• Co-designing with children: An approach to social robot design
• Toward Social Cognition in Robotics: Extracting and Internalizing Meaning from Perception
• Human Centered Robotics : Designing Valuable Experiences for Social Robots
• Preliminary system and hardware design for Quori, a low-cost, modular, socially interactive robot
• Socially assistive robotics: Human augmentation versus automation
• Tega: A Social Robot

Humanoid robot

• Compliance Control and Human-Robot Interaction – International Journal of Humanoid Robotics
• The Design of Humanoid Robot Using C# Interface on Bluetooth Communication
• An Integrated System to approach the Programming of Humanoid Robotics
• Humanoid Robot Slope Gait Planning Based on Zero Moment Point Principle
• Literature Review Real-Time Vision-Based Learning for Human-Robot Interaction in Social Humanoid Robotics
• The Roasted Tomato Challenge for a Humanoid Robot
• Remotely teleoperating a humanoid robot to perform fine motor tasks with virtual reality

Cloud Robotics

• CR3A: Cloud Robotics Algorithms Allocation Analysis
• Cloud Computing and Robotics for Disaster Management
• ABHIKAHA: Aerial Collision Avoidance in Quadcopter using Cloud Robotics
• The Evolution Of Cloud Robotics: A Survey
• Sliding Autonomy in Cloud Robotics Services for Smart City Applications
• CORE: A Cloud-based Object Recognition Engine for Robotics
• A Software Product Line Approach for Configuring Cloud Robotics Applications
• Cloud robotics and automation: A survey of related work
• ROCHAS: Robotics and Cloud-assisted Healthcare System for Empty Nester

Swarm Robotics

• Evolution of Task Partitioning in Swarm Robotics
• GESwarm: Grammatical Evolution for the Automatic Synthesis of Collective Behaviors in Swarm Robotics
• A Concise Chronological Reassess Of Different Swarm Intelligence Methods With Multi Robotics Approach
• The Swarm/Potential Model: Modeling Robotics Swarms with Measure-valued Recursions Associated to Random Finite Sets
• The TAM: ABSTRACTing complex tasks in swarm robotics research
• Task Allocation in Foraging Robot Swarms: The Role of Information Sharing
• Robotics on the Battlefield Part II
• Implementation Of Load Sharing Using Swarm Robotics
• An Investigation of Environmental Influence on the Benefits of Adaptation Mechanisms in Evolutionary Swarm Robotics

Soft Robotics

• Soft Robotics: The Next Generation of Intelligent Machines
• Soft Robotics: Transferring Theory to Application,” Soft Components for Soft Robots”
• Advances in Soft Computing, Intelligent Robotics and Control
• The BRICS Component Model: A Model-Based Development Paradigm For ComplexRobotics Software Systems
• Soft Mechatronics for Human-Friendly Robotics
• Seminar Soft-Robotics
• Special Issue on Open Source Software-Supported Robotics Research.
• Soft Brain-Machine Interfaces for Assistive Robotics: A Novel Control Approach
• Towards A Robot Hardware ABSTRACT ion Layer (R-HAL) Leveraging the XBot Software Framework

Service Robotics

• Fundamental Theories and Practice in Service Robotics
• Natural Language Processing in Domestic Service Robotics
• Localization and Mapping for Service Robotics Applications
• Designing of Service Robot for Home Automation-Implementation
• Benchmarking Speech Understanding in Service Robotics
• The Cognitive Service Robotics Apartment
• Planning with Task-oriented Knowledge Acquisition for A Service Robot
• Cognitive Robotics
• Meta-Morphogenesis theory as background to Cognitive Robotics and Developmental Cognitive Science
• Experience-based Learning for Bayesian Cognitive Robotics
• Weakly supervised strategies for natural object recognition in robotics
• Robotics-Derived Requirements for the Internet of Things in the 5G Context
• A Comparison of Modern Synthetic Character Design and Cognitive Robotics Architecture with the Human Nervous System
• PREGO: An Action Language for Belief-Based Cognitive Robotics in Continuous Domains
• The Role of Intention in Cognitive Robotics
• On Cognitive Learning Methodologies for Cognitive Robotics
• Relational Enhancement: A Framework for Evaluating and Designing Human-RobotRelationships
• A Fog Robotics Approach to Deep Robot Learning: Application to Object Recognition and Grasp Planning in Surface Decluttering
• Spatial Cognition in Robotics
• IOT Based Gesture Movement Recognize Robot
• Deliberative Systems for Autonomous Robotics: A Brief Comparison Between Action-oriented and Timelines-based Approaches
• Formal Modeling and Verification of Dynamic Reconfiguration of Autonomous RoboticsSystems
• Robotics on its feet: Autonomous Climbing Robots
• Implementation of Autonomous Metal Detection Robot with Image and Message Transmission using Cell Phone
• Toward autonomous architecture: The convergence of digital design, robotics, and the built environment
• Advances in Robotics Automation
• Data-centered Dependencies and Opportunities for Robotics Process Automation in Banking
• On the Combination of Gamification and Crowd Computation in Industrial Automation and Robotics Applications
• Advances in RoboticsAutomation
• Meshworm With Segment-Bending Anchoring for Colonoscopy. IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS. 2 (3) pp: 1718-1724.
• Recent Advances in Robotics and Automation
• Key Elements Towards Automation and Robotics in Industrialised Building System (IBS)
• Knowledge Building, Innovation Networks, and Robotics in Math Education
• The potential of a robotics summer course On Engineering Education
• Robotics as an Educational Tool: Impact of Lego Mindstorms
• Effective Planning Strategy in Robotics Education: An Embodied Approach
• An innovative approach to School-Work turnover programme with Educational Robotics
• The importance of educational robotics as a precursor of Computational Thinking in early childhood education
• Pedagogical Robotics A way to Experiment and Innovate in Educational Teaching in Morocco
• Learning by Making and Early School Leaving: an Experience with Educational Robotics
• Robotics and Coding: Fostering Student Engagement
• Computational Thinking with Educational Robotics
• New Trends In Education Of Robotics
• Educational robotics as an instrument of formation: a public elementary school case study
• Developmental Situation and Strategy for Engineering Robot Education in China University
• Towards the Humanoid Robot Butler
• YAGI-An Easy and Light-Weighted Action-Programming Language for Education and Research in Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
• Simultaneous Tracking and Reconstruction (STAR) of Objects and its Application in Educational Robotics Laboratories
• The importance and purpose of simulation in robotics
• An Educational Tool to Support Introductory Robotics Courses
• Lollybot: Where Candy, Gaming, and Educational Robotics Collide
• Assessing the Impact of an Autonomous Robotics Competition for STEM Education
• Educational robotics for promoting 21st century skills
• New Era for Educational Robotics: Replacing Teachers with a Robotic System to Teach Alphabet Writing
• Robotics as a Learning Tool for Educational Transformation
• The Herd of Educational Robotic Devices (HERD): Promoting Cooperation in RoboticsEducation
• Robotics in physics education: fostering graphing abilities in kinematics
• Enabling Rapid Prototyping in K-12 Engineering Education with BotSpeak, a UniversalRobotics Programming Language
• Innovating in robotics education with Gazebo simulator and JdeRobot framework
• How to Support Students’ Computational Thinking Skills in Educational Robotics Activities
• Educational Robotics At Lower Secondary School
• Evaluating the impact of robotics in education on pupils’ skills and attitudes
• Imagining, Playing, and Coding with KIBO: Using Robotics to Foster Computational Thinking in Young Children
• How Does a First LEGO League Robotics Program Provide Opportunities for Teaching Children 21st Century Skills
• A Software-Based Robotic Vision Simulator For Use In Teaching Introductory Robotics Courses
• Robotics Practical
• A project-based strategy for teaching robotics using NI’s embedded-FPGA platform
• Teaching a Core CS Concept through Robotics
• Ms. Robot Will Be Teaching You: Robot Lecturers in Four Modes of Automated Remote Instruction
• Robotic Competitions: Teaching Robotics and Real-Time Programming with LEGO Mindstorms
• Visegrad Robotics Workshop-different ideas to teach and popularize robotics
• LEGO® Mindstorms® EV3 Robotics Instructor Guide
• DRAFT: for Automaatiop iv t22 MOKASIT: Multi Camera System for Robotics Monitoring and Teaching
• MOKASIT: Multi Camera System for Robotics Monitoring and Teaching
• Autonomous Robot Design and Build: Novel Hands-on Experience for Undergraduate Students
• Semi-Autonomous Inspection Robot
• Sumo Robot Competition
• Engagement of students with Robotics-Competitions-like projects in a PBL Bsc Engineering course
• Robo Camp K12 Inclusive Outreach Program: A three-step model of Effective Introducing Middle School Students to Computer Programming and Robotics
• The Effectiveness of Robotics Competitions on Students’ Learning of Computer Science
• Engaging with Mathematics: How mathematical art, robotics and other activities are used to engage students with university mathematics and promote
• Design Elements of a Mobile Robotics Course Based on Student Feedback
• Sixth-Grade Students’ Motivation and Development of Proportional Reasoning Skills While Completing Robotics Challenges
• Student Learning of Computational Thinking in A Robotics Curriculum: Transferrable Skills and Relevant Factors
• A Robotics-Focused Instructional Framework for Design-Based Research in Middle School Classrooms
• Transforming a Middle and High School Robotics Curriculum
• Geometric Algebra for Applications in Cybernetics: Image Processing, Neural Networks, Robotics and Integral Transforms
• Experimenting and validating didactical activities in the third year of primary school enhanced by robotics technology

Construction

• Bibliometric analysis on the status quo of robotics in construction
• AtomMap: A Probabilistic Amorphous 3D Map Representation for Robotics and Surface Reconstruction
• Robotic Design and Construction Culture: Ethnography in Osaka University’s Miyazaki Robotics Lab
• Infrastructure Robotics: A Technology Enabler for Lunar In-Situ Resource Utilization, Habitat Construction and Maintenance
• A Planar Robot Design And Construction With Maple
• Robotics and Automations in Construction: Advanced Construction and FutureTechnology
• Why robotics in mining
• Examining Influences on the Evolution of Design Ideas in a First-Year Robotics Project
• Mining Robotics
• TIRAMISU: Technical survey, close-in-detection and disposal mine actions in Humanitarian Demining: challenges for Robotics Systems
• Robotics for Sustainable Agriculture in Aquaponics
• Design and Fabrication of Crop Analysis Agriculture Robot
• Enhance Multi-Disciplinary Experience for Agriculture and Engineering Students with Agriculture Robotics Project
• Work in progress: Robotics mapping of landmine and UXO contaminated areas
• Robot Based Wireless Monitoring and Safety System for Underground Coal Mines using Zigbee Protocol: A Review
• Minesweepers uses robotics’ awesomeness to raise awareness about landminesexplosive remnants of war
• Intelligent Autonomous Farming Robot with Plant Disease Detection using Image Processing
• Auotomatic Pick And Place Robot
• Video Prompting to Teach Robotics and Coding to Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder
• Bilateral Anesthesia Mumps After RobotAssisted Hysterectomy Under General Anesthesia: Two Case Reports
• Future Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in Robotics Software, A healthcare Perspective
• Designing new mechanism in surgical robotics
• Open-Source Research Platforms and System Integration in Modern Surgical Robotics
• Soft Tissue Robotics–The Next Generation
• CORVUS Full-Body Surgical Robotics Research Platform
• OP: Sense, a rapid prototyping research platform for surgical robotics
• Preoperative Planning Simulator with Haptic Feedback for Raven-II Surgical Robotics Platform
• Origins of Surgical Robotics: From Space to the Operating Room
• Accelerometer Based Wireless Gesture Controlled Robot for Medical Assistance using Arduino Lilypad
• The preliminary results of a force feedback control for Sensorized Medical Robotics
• Medical robotics Regulatory, ethical, and legal considerations for increasing levels of autonomy
• Robotics in General Surgery
• Evolution Of Minimally Invasive Surgery: Conventional Laparoscopy Torobotics
• Robust trocar detection and localization during robot-assisted endoscopic surgery
• How can we improve the Training of Laparoscopic Surgery thanks to the Knowledge in Robotics
• Discussion on robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy and Ileal neobladder surgery preoperative care
• Robotics in Neurosurgery: Evolution, Current Challenges, and Compromises
• Hybrid Rendering Architecture for Realtime and Photorealistic Simulation of Robot-Assisted Surgery
• Robotics, Image Guidance, and Computer-Assisted Surgery in Otology/Neurotology
• Neuro-robotics model of visual delusions
• Neuro-Robotics
• Robotics in the Rehabilitation of Neurological Conditions
• What if a Robot Could Help Me Care for My Parents
• A Robot to Provide Support in Stigmatizing Patient-Caregiver Relationships
• A New Skeleton Model and the Motion Rhythm Analysis for Human Shoulder Complex Oriented to Rehabilitation Robotics
• Towards Rehabilitation Robotics: Off-The-Shelf BCI Control of Anthropomorphic Robotic Arms
• Rehabilitation Robotics 2013
• Combined Estimation of Friction and Patient Activity in Rehabilitation Robotics
• Brain, Mind and Body: Motion Behaviour Planning, Learning and Control in view of Rehabilitation and Robotics
• Reliable Robotics – Diagnostics
• Robotics for Successful Ageing
• Upper Extremity Robotics Exoskeleton: Application, Structure And Actuation

Defence and Military

• Voice Guided Military Robot for Defence Application
• Design and Control of Defense Robot Based On Virtual Reality
• AI, Robotics and Cyber: How Much will They Change Warfare
• BORDER SECURITY ROBOT
• Brain Controlled Robot for Indian Armed Force
• Autonomous Military Robotics
• Wireless Restrained Military Discoursed Robot
• Bomb Detection And Defusion In Planes By Application Of Robotics
• Impacts Of The Robotics Age On Naval Force Design, Effectiveness, And Acquisition

Space Robotics

• Lego robotics teacher professional learning
• New Planar Air-bearing Microgravity Simulator for Verification of Space Robotics Numerical Simulations and Control Algorithms
• The Artemis Rover as an Example for Model Based Engineering in Space Robotics
• Rearrangement planning using object-centric and robot-centric action spaces
• Model-based Apprenticeship Learning for Robotics in High-dimensional Spaces
• Emergent Roles, Collaboration and Computational Thinking in the Multi-Dimensional Problem Space of Robotics
• Reaction Null Space of a multibody system with applications in robotics

Other Industries

• Robotics in clothes manufacture
• Recent Trends in Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing: An Overview
• Application Of Robotics In Dairy And Food Industries: A Review
• Architecture for theatre robotics
• Human-multi-robot team collaboration for efficent warehouse operation
• A Robot-based Application for Physical Exercise Training
• Application Of Robotics In Oil And Gas Refineries
• Implementation of Robotics in Transmission Line Monitoring
• Intelligent Wireless Fire Extinguishing Robot
• Monitoring and Controlling of Fire Fighthing Robot using IOT
• Robotics An Emerging Technology in Dairy Industry
• Robotics and Law: A Survey
• Increasing ECE Student Excitement through an International Marine Robotics Competition
• Application of Swarm Robotics Systems to Marine Environmental Monitoring

Future of Robotics / Trends

• The future of Robotics Technology
• RoboticsAutomation Are Killing Jobs A Roadmap for the Future is Needed
• The next big thing (s) in robotics
• Robotics in Indian Industry-Future Trends
• The Future of Robot Rescue Simulation Workshop
• PreprintQuantum Robotics: Primer on Current Science and Future Perspectives
• Emergent Trends in Robotics and Intelligent Systems

RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR

The use of robotics in shipwreck discovery, how to solve social and ethical challenges in robotics and ai [updated], bioinspired robots – top 25 robots inspired by animals, adaptive robots: the next wave transforming industrial automation, top robotics research institutes and centers in japan, makeblock’s mbot2 rover robotics kit: transforming stem education.

• Privacy Policy
• Terms & Conditions

Research Topics & Ideas: Robotics

50 Topic Ideas To Kickstart Your Research Project

If you’re just starting out exploring robotics and/or automation-related topics for your dissertation, thesis or research project, you’ve come to the right place. In this post, we’ll help kickstart your research by providing a hearty list of research ideas , including real-world examples from recent studies.

PS – This is just the start…

We know it’s exciting to run through a list of research topics, but please keep in mind that this list is just a starting point . These topic ideas provided here are intentionally broad and generic , so keep in mind that you will need to develop them further. Nevertheless, they should inspire some ideas for your project.

To develop a suitable research topic, you’ll need to identify a clear and convincing research gap , and a viable plan to fill that gap. If this sounds foreign to you, check out our free research topic webinar that explores how to find and refine a high-quality research topic, from scratch. Alternatively, consider our 1-on-1 coaching service .

Robotics & Automation Research Ideas

• Developing AI algorithms for autonomous decision-making in self-driving cars.
• The impact of robotic automation on employment in the manufacturing sector.
• Investigating the use of drone technology for agricultural crop monitoring and management.
• The role of robotics in enhancing surgical precision in minimally invasive procedures.
• Analyzing the ethical implications of using robots in elderly care.
• The effectiveness of humanoid robots in assisting children with autism.
• Investigating the integration of IoT and robotics in smart home systems.
• The impact of automation on workflow efficiency in the healthcare industry.
• Analyzing the challenges of human-robot interaction in industrial settings.
• The role of robotics in deep-sea exploration and data collection.
• Investigating the use of robotic exoskeletons in rehabilitation therapy for stroke patients.
• The impact of artificial intelligence on the future of job skills and training.
• Developing advanced machine learning models for robotic vision and object recognition.
• Analyzing the role of robots in disaster response and search-and-rescue missions.
• The effectiveness of collaborative robots (cobots) in small-scale industries.
• Investigating the potential of robotics in renewable energy operations and maintenance.
• The role of automation in enhancing precision agriculture techniques.
• Analyzing the security risks associated with industrial automation systems.
• The impact of 3D printing technology on robotic design and manufacturing.
• Investigating the use of robotics in hazardous waste management and disposal.
• The effectiveness of swarm robotics in environmental monitoring and data collection.
• Analyzing the ethical and legal aspects of deploying autonomous weapon systems.
• The role of robotics in enhancing logistics and supply chain management.
• Investigating the potential of robotic process automation in banking and finance.
• The impact of robotics and automation on the future of urban planning and smart cities.

Robotics Research Ideas (Continued)

• Developing underwater robots for marine biodiversity conservation and research.
• Analyzing the challenges of integrating AI and robotics in the educational sector.
• The role of robotics in advancing precision medicine and personalized healthcare.
• Investigating the social implications of widespread adoption of service robots.
• The impact of automation on productivity and efficiency in the food industry.
• Analyzing human psychological responses to interaction with advanced robots.
• The effectiveness of robotic assistants in enhancing the retail customer experience.
• Investigating the use of automation in streamlining media and entertainment production.
• The role of robotics in preserving cultural heritage and archeological sites.
• Analyzing the potential of robotics in addressing environmental pollution and climate change.
• The impact of cyber-physical systems on the evolution of smart manufacturing.
• Investigating the role of robotics in non-invasive medical diagnostics and screening.
• The effectiveness of robotic technologies in construction and infrastructure development.
• Analyzing the challenges of energy management and sustainability in robotics.
• The role of AI and robotics in advancing space exploration and satellite deployment.
• Investigating the application of robotics in textile and garment manufacturing.
• The impact of automation on the dynamics of global trade and economic growth.
• Analyzing the role of robotics in enhancing sports training and athlete performance.
• The effectiveness of robotic systems in large-scale environmental restoration projects.
• Investigating the potential of AI-driven robots in personalized content creation and delivery.
• The role of robotics in improving safety and efficiency in mining operations.
• Analyzing the impact of robotic automation on customer service and support.
• The effectiveness of autonomous robotic systems in utility and infrastructure inspection.
• Investigating the role of robotics in enhancing border security and surveillance.
• The impact of robotic and automated technologies on future transportation systems.

Recent Studies: Robotics & Automation

While the ideas we’ve presented above are a decent starting point for finding a research topic, they are fairly generic and non-specific. So, it helps to look at actual robotics and automation-related studies to see how this all comes together in practice.

Below, we’ve included a selection of recent studies to help refine your thinking. These are actual studies,  so they can provide some useful insight as to what a research topic looks like in practice.

• A Comprehensive Survey on Robotics and Automation in Various Industries (Jeyakumar K, 2022)
• Dual-Material 3D-Printed PaCoMe-Like Fingers for Flexible Biolaboratory Automation (Zwirnmann et al., 2023)
• Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review (Costa et al., 2022)
• Analysis of the Conditions Influencing the Assimilation of Robotic Process Automation by Enterprises (Sobczak, 2022)
• Using RPA for Performance Monitoring of Dynamic SHM Applications (Atencio et al., 2022)
• When Harry, the Human, Met Sally, the Software Robot: Metaphorical Sensemaking and Sensegiving around an Emergent Digital Technology (Techatassanasoontorn et al., 2023)
• Model-driven Engineering and Simulation of Industrial Robots with ROS (Hoppe & Hoffschulte, 2022)
• RPA Bot to Automate Students Marks Storage Process (Krishna, 2022)
• Intelligent Process Automation and Business Continuity: Areas for Future Research (Brás et al., 2023)
• Enabling the Gab Between RPA and Process Mining: User Interface Interactions Recorder (Choi et al., 2022)
• An Electroadhesive Paper Gripper With Application to a Document-Sorting Robot (Itoh et al., 2022)
• A systematic literature review on Robotic Process Automation security (Gajjar et al., 2022)
• Teaching Industrial Robot Programming Using FANUC ROBOGUIDE and iRVision Software (Coletta & Chauhan, 2022)
• Industrial Automation and Robotics (Kumar & Babu, 2022)
• Process & Software Selection for Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (Axmann & Harmoko, 2022)
• Robotic Process Automation: A Literature-Based Research Agenda (Plattfaut & Borghoff, 2022)
• Automated Testing of RPA Implementations (Sankpal, 2022) Template-Based Category-Agnostic Instance Detection for Robotic Manipulation (Hu et al., 2022)
• Robotic Process Automation in Smart System Platform: A Review (Falih et al., 2022)
• MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS FOR ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION IMPLEMENTATIONS IN DIGITAL INDUSTRIES (Stamoulis, 2022)

As you can see, these research topics are a lot more focused than the generic topic ideas we presented earlier. So, for you to develop a high-quality research topic, you’ll need to get specific and laser-focused on a specific context with specific variables of interest.  In the video below, we explore some other important things you’ll need to consider when crafting your research topic.

Get 1-On-1 Help

If you’re still unsure about how to find a quality research topic, check out our Research Topic Kickstarter service, which is the perfect starting point for developing a unique, well-justified research topic.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Robotics and Intelligent Systems Certificate Program

Topics for research in robotics and intelligent systems.

General areas for study and research:

Chemical and Biological Engineering

• Control of chemical and biological dynamic processes
• Optimal design of systems for material processing
• Manipulation of matter at atomic and molecular scale

Civil and Environmental Engineering

• Structural health monitoring and adaptive structures
• Water resources
• Earthquake detection and protective design
• Remote sensing of natural resources
• Urban planning and engineering

Computer Science

• Theory and practice of computation for physical systems
• Game playing, photo identification, and semantic identification
• Real-time algorithms for measurement, prediction, and control
• Artificial intelligence and machine learning
• Databases, Internet security, and privacy

Electrical Engineering

• Information theory
• Electricity, microelectronics, and electromagnetism
• Digital circuits and computation
• Image processing, face, and character recognition
• Video analysis and manipulation
• Telecommunications networks
• Autonomous vehicles

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

• Robotic devices and systems
• Autonomous air, sea, undersea, and land vehicles
• Space exploration and development
• Intelligent control systems
• Biomimetic modeling, dynamics, and control
• Cooperating robots for manufacturing and assembly
• Cooperative control of natural and engineered groups
• Identification of dynamic system models
• Optimal state estimation and control

Operations Research and Financial Engineering

• Intelligent transportation systems
• Financial management and risk analysis
• Dynamic resource management
• Decision science
• Optimal design
• Knowledge, reasoning, and language
• Logic and metaphysics
• Politics and art of robotics and intelligent systems
• Inference, reasoning, problem solving
• Human factors and human-machine interaction
• Human motor control
• Modeling perception
• Neural network (connectionist) modeling of cognitive functions
• Reinforcement learning
• Study of brain function using functional magnetic response imaging, electrical, and optical methods

For IEEE Members

Ieee spectrum, follow ieee spectrum, support ieee spectrum, enjoy more free content and benefits by creating an account, saving articles to read later requires an ieee spectrum account, the institute content is only available for members, downloading full pdf issues is exclusive for ieee members, downloading this e-book is exclusive for ieee members, access to spectrum 's digital edition is exclusive for ieee members, following topics is a feature exclusive for ieee members, adding your response to an article requires an ieee spectrum account, create an account to access more content and features on ieee spectrum , including the ability to save articles to read later, download spectrum collections, and participate in conversations with readers and editors. for more exclusive content and features, consider joining ieee ., join the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to all of spectrum’s articles, archives, pdf downloads, and other benefits. learn more about ieee →, join the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to this e-book plus all of ieee spectrum’s articles, archives, pdf downloads, and other benefits. learn more about ieee →, access thousands of articles — completely free, create an account and get exclusive content and features: save articles, download collections, and talk to tech insiders — all free for full access and benefits, join ieee as a paying member., video friday: disney robot dance, your weekly selection of awesome robot videos, sea drones in the russia-ukraine war inspire new tactics, navy planners see a defensive role for drones in a china-taiwan war, meet boardwalk robotics’ addition to the humanoid workforce, alex is the commercialized version of ihmc’s legged robot legacy, testing power amplifiers application note, overcome testing challenges, get robotics news in your inbox, video friday: silly robot dog jump, video friday: the secrets of shadow robot’s new hand, download “the ev transition explained” e-book for free, figure 02 robot is a sleeker, smarter humanoid, most of our questions were answered about the unveiling of figure’s latest humanoid, rodney brooks’s three laws of robotics, what to know about real robots deployed in the real world, journal watch, test flight demonstrates navigation by cellphone signals, how good is chatgpt at coding, really, sensor could help detect gravity waves in orbit, why not give robots foot-eyes, the ai arms race to combat fake images is even—for now, 3d radar reveals defects within bridges, get the latest technology news in your inbox, you have succesfully subscribed to the newsletters below:, thank your for your subscription., video friday: uc berkeley’s little humanoid, will this flying camera finally take off, zero zero robotics’ founder on riding the startup rollercoaster for a decade, a robot dentist might be a good idea, actually, perceptive's autonomous robot offers more accurate, steadier, and faster dentistry, james webb telescope, aligning the eyes of the universe machine, the webb space telescope’s profound data challenges, inside the universe machine: the webb space telescope’s chilly sun shield, inside the universe machine: the webb space telescope’s staggering vision, video friday: robot baby with a jet pack, irobot’s autowash dock is (almost) automated floor care, the roomba combo 10 max is the first fully self-cleaning roomba, video friday: robot crash-perches, hugs tree, sydney’s tech super-cluster propels australia’s ai industry forward, with significant ai research and commercialization, sydney emerges as a leader in the global ai landscape, robot dog cleans up beaches with foot-mounted vacuums, thanks to vero, genoa has fewer cigarette butts littering the ground, the smallest, lightest solar-powered drone takes flight, it weighs less than a nickel and can fly nonstop while the sun shines, follow ieee spectrum on social media.

Google Research, 2022 & beyond: Robotics

February 14, 2023

Posted by Kendra Byrne, Senior Product Manager, and Jie Tan, Staff Research Scientist, Robotics at Google

Within our lifetimes, we will see robotic technologies that can help with everyday activities, enhancing human productivity and quality of life. Before robotics can be broadly useful in helping with practical day-to-day tasks in people-centered spaces — spaces designed for people, not machines — they need to be able to safely & competently provide assistance to people.

In 2022, we focused on challenges that come with enabling robots to be more helpful to people: 1) allowing robots and humans to communicate more efficiently and naturally; 2) enabling robots to understand and apply common sense knowledge in real-world situations; and 3) scaling the number of low-level skills robots need to effectively perform tasks in unstructured environments.

An undercurrent this past year has been the exploration of how large, generalist models, like PaLM , can work alongside other approaches to surface capabilities allowing robots to learn from a breadth of human knowledge and allowing people to engage with robots more naturally. As we do this, we’re transforming robot learning into a scalable data problem so that we can scale learning of generalized low-level skills, like manipulation. In this blog post, we’ll review key learnings and themes from our explorations in 2022.

Bringing the capabilities of LLMs to robotics

An incredible feature of large language models (LLMs) is their ability to encode descriptions and context into a format that’s understandable by both people and machines. When applied to robotics, LLMs let people task robots more easily — just by asking — with natural language. When combined with vision models and robotics learning approaches, LLMs give robots a way to understand the context of a person’s request and make decisions about what actions should be taken to complete it.

One of the underlying concepts is using LLMs to prompt other pretrained models for information that can build context about what is happening in a scene and make predictions about multimodal tasks. This is similar to the socratic method in teaching, where a teacher asks students questions to lead them through a rational thought process. In “ Socratic Models ”, we showed that this approach can achieve state-of-the-art performance in zero-shot image captioning and video-to-text retrieval tasks. It also enables new capabilities, like answering free-form questions about and predicting future activity from video, multimodal assistive dialogue, and as we’ll discuss next, robot perception and planning.

In “ Towards Helpful Robots: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances ”, we partnered with Everyday Robots to ground the PaLM language model in a robotics affordance model to plan long horizon tasks. In previous machine-learned approaches, robots were limited to short, hard-coded commands, like “Pick up the sponge,” because they struggled with reasoning about the steps needed to complete a task — which is even harder when the task is given as an abstract goal like, “Can you help clean up this spill?”

For this approach to work, one needs to have both an LLM that can predict the sequence of steps to complete long horizon tasks and an affordance model representing the skills a robot can actually do in a given situation. In “ Extracting Skill-Centric State Abstractions from Value Functions ”, we showed that the value function in reinforcement learning (RL) models can be used to build the affordance model — an abstract representation of the actions a robot can perform under different states. This lets us connect long-horizons of real-world tasks, like “tidy the living room”, to the short-horizon skills needed to complete the task, like correctly picking, placing, and arranging items.

Having both an LLM and an affordance model doesn’t mean that the robot will actually be able to complete the task successfully. However, with Inner Monologue , we closed the loop on LLM-based task planning with other sources of information, like human feedback or scene understanding, to detect when the robot fails to complete the task correctly. Using a robot from Everyday Robots , we show that LLMs can effectively replan if the current or previous plan steps failed, allowing the robot to recover from failures and complete complex tasks like "Put a coke in the top drawer," as shown in the video below.

An emergent capability from closing the loop on LLM-based task planning that we saw with Inner Monologue is that the robot can react to changes in the high-level goal mid-task. For example, a person might tell the robot to change its behavior as it is happening, by offering quick corrections or redirecting the robot to another task. This behavior is especially useful to let people interactively control and customize robot tasks when robots are working near people.

While natural language makes it easier for people to specify and modify robot tasks, one of the challenges is being able to react in real time to the full vocabulary people can use to describe tasks that a robot is capable of doing. In “ Talking to Robots in Real Time ”, we demonstrated a large-scale imitation learning framework for producing real-time, open-vocabulary, language-conditionable robots. With one policy we were able to address over 87,000 unique instructions, with an estimated average success rate of 93.5%. As part of this project, we released Language-Table , the largest available language-annotated robot dataset, which we hope will drive further research focused on real-time language-controllable robots.

We’re also excited about the potential for LLMs to write code that can control robot actions. Code-writing approaches, like in “ Robots That Write Their Own Code ”, show promise in increasing the complexity of tasks robots can complete by autonomously generating new code that re-composes API calls, synthesizes new functions, and expresses feedback loops to assemble new behaviors at runtime .

Turning robot learning into a scalable data problem

Large language and multimodal models help robots understand the context in which they’re operating, like what’s happening in a scene and what the robot is expected to do. But robots also need low-level physical skills to complete tasks in the physical world, like picking up and precisely placing objects.

While we often take these physical skills for granted, executing them hundreds of times every day without even thinking, they present significant challenges to robots. For example, to pick up an object, the robot needs to perceive and understand the environment, reason about the spatial relation and contact dynamics between its gripper and the object, actuate the high degrees-of-freedom arm precisely, and exert the right amount of force to stably grasp the object without breaking it. The difficulty of learning these low-level skills is known as Moravec's paradox : reasoning requires very little computation, but sensorimotor and perception skills require enormous computational resources.

Inspired by the recent success of LLMs, which shows that the generalization and performance of large Transformer-based models scale with the amount of data, we are taking a data-driven approach, turning the problem of learning low-level physical skills into a scalable data problem. With Robotics Transformer-1 (RT-1), we trained a robot manipulation policy on a large-scale, real-world robotics dataset of 130k episodes that cover 700+ tasks using a fleet of 13 robots from Everyday Robots and showed the same trend for robotics — increasing the scale and diversity of data improves the model ability to generalize to new tasks, environments, and objects.

Behind both language models and many of our robotics learning approaches, like RT-1 , are Transformers , which allow models to make sense of Internet-scale data. Unlike LLMs, robotics is challenged by multimodal representations of constantly changing environments and limited compute. In 2020, we introduced Performers as an approach to make Transformers more computationally efficient, which has implications for many applications beyond robotics. In Performer-MPC , we applied this to introduce a new class of implicit control policies combining the benefits of imitation learning with the robust handling of system constraints from Model Predictive Control (MPC). We show a >40% improvement on the robot reaching its goal and a >65% improvement on social metrics when navigating around humans in comparison to a standard MPC policy. Performer-MPC provides 8 ms latency for the 8.3M parameter model, making on-robot deployment of Transformers practical.

In the last year, our team has shown that data-driven approaches are generally applicable on different robotic platforms in diverse environments to learn a wide range of tasks, including mobile manipulation , navigation , locomotion and table tennis . This shows us a clear path forward for learning low-level robot skills: scalable data collection. Unlike video and text data that is abundant on the Internet, robotic data is extremely scarce and hard to acquire. Finding approaches to collect and efficiently use rich datasets representative of real-world interactions is the key for our data-driven approaches.

Simulation is a fast, safe, and easily parallelizable option, but it is difficult to replicate the full environment, especially physics and human-robot interactions, in simulation. In i-Sim2Real , we showed an approach to address the sim-to-real gap and learn to play table tennis with a human opponent by bootstrapping from a simple model of human behavior and alternating between training in simulation and deploying in the real world. In each iteration, both the human behavior model and the policy are refined.

While simulation helps, collecting data in the real world is essential for fine-tuning simulation policies or adapting existing policies in new environments. While learning, robots are prone to failure, which can cause damage to itself and surroundings — especially in the early stages of learning where they are exploring how to interact with the world. We need to collect training data safely, even while the robot is learning, and enable the robot to autonomously recover from failure. In “ Learning Locomotion Skills Safely in the Real World ”, we introduced a safe RL framework that switches between a “learner policy” optimized to perform the desired task and a “safe recovery policy” that prevents the robot from unsafe states. In “ Legged Robots that Keep on Learning ”, we trained a reset policy so the robot can recover from failures, like learning to stand up by itself after falling.

While robot data is scarce, videos of people performing different tasks are abundant. Of course, robots aren’t built like people — so the idea of robotic learning from people raises the problem of transferring learning across different embodiments. In “ Robot See, Robot Do ”, we developed Cross-Embodiment Inverse Reinforcement Learning to learn new tasks by watching people. Instead of trying to replicate the task exactly as a person would, we learn the high-level task objective, and summarize that knowledge in the form of a reward function. This type of demonstration learning could allow robots to learn skills by watching videos readily available on the internet.

We’re also progressing towards making our learning algorithms more data efficient so that we’re not relying only on scaling data collection. We improved the efficiency of RL approaches by incorporating prior information, including predictive information , adversarial motion priors , and guide policies . Further improvements are gained by utilizing a novel structured dynamical systems architecture and combining RL with trajectory optimization , supported by novel solvers . These types of prior information helped alleviate the exploration challenges, served as good regularizers, and significantly reduced the amount of data required. Furthermore, our team has invested heavily in more data-efficient imitation learning. We showed that a simple imitation learning approach, BC-Z , can enable zero-shot generalization to new tasks that were not seen during training. We also introduced an iterative imitation learning algorithm, GoalsEye , which combined Learning from Play and Goal-Conditioned Behavior Cloning for high-speed and high-precision table tennis games . On the theoretical front, we investigated dynamical-systems stability for characterizing the sample complexity of imitation learning, and the role of capturing failure-and-recovery within demonstration data to better condition offline learning from smaller datasets.

Advances in large models across the field of AI have spurred a leap in capabilities for robot learning. This past year, we’ve seen the sense of context and sequencing of events captured in LLMs help solve long-horizon planning for robotics and make robots easier for people to interact with and task. We’ve also seen a scalable path to learning robust and generalizable robot behaviors by applying a transformer model architecture to robot learning. We continue to open source data sets, like “ Scanned Objects: A Dataset of 3D-Scanned Common Household Items ”, and models, like RT-1 , in the spirit of participating in the broader research community. We’re excited about building on these research themes in the coming year to enable helpful robots.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank everyone who supported our research. This includes the entire Robotics at Google team, and collaborators from Everyday Robots and Google Research. We also want to thank our external collaborators, including UC Berkeley, Stanford, Gatech, University of Washington, MIT, CMU and U Penn.

Google Research, 2022 & beyond

This was the sixth blog post in the “Google Research, 2022 & Beyond” series. Other posts in this series are listed in the table below:

• Year in Review

Other posts of interest

August 29, 2023

• Machine Intelligence ·

August 22, 2023

May 26, 2023

• Hardware & Architecture ·

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• NATURE INDEX
• 12 October 2022

Growth in AI and robotics research accelerates

It may not be unusual for burgeoning areas of science, especially those related to rapid technological changes in society, to take off quickly, but even by these standards the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has been impressive. Together with robotics, AI is representing an increasingly significant portion of research volume at various levels, as these charts show.

Across the field

The number of AI and robotics papers published in the 82 high-quality science journals in the Nature Index (Count) has been rising year-on-year — so rapidly that it resembles an exponential growth curve. A similar increase is also happening more generally in journals and proceedings not included in the Nature Index, as is shown by data from the Dimensions database of research publications.

Source: Nature Index, Dimensions. Data analysis by Catherine Cheung; infographic by Simon Baker, Tanner Maxwell and Benjamin Plackett

Leading countries

Five countries — the United States, China, the United Kingdom, Germany and France — had the highest AI and robotics Share in the Nature Index from 2015 to 2021, with the United States leading the pack. China has seen the largest percentage change (1,174%) in annual Share over the period among the five nations.

AI and robotics infiltration

As the field of AI and robotics research grows in its own right, leading institutions such as Harvard University in the United States have increased their Share in this area since 2015. But such leading institutions have also seen an expansion in the proportion of their overall index Share represented by research in AI and robotics. One possible explanation for this is that AI and robotics is expanding into other fields, creating interdisciplinary AI and robotics research.

Nature 610 , S9 (2022)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03210-9

This article is part of Nature Index 2022 AI and robotics , an editorially independent supplement. Advertisers have no influence over the content.

Related Articles

Partner content: AI helps computers to see and hear more efficiently

Partner content: Canada's welcoming artificial intelligence research ecosystem

Partner content: TINY robots inspired by insects

Partner content: Pioneering a new era of drug development

Partner content: New tool promises smarter approach to big data and AI

Partner content: Intelligent robots offer service with a smile

Partner content: Hong Kong’s next era fuelled by innovation

Partner content: Getting a grip on mass-produced artificial muscles with control engineering tools

Partner content: A blueprint for AI-powered smart speech technology

Partner content: All in the mind’s AI

Partner content: How artificial intelligence could turn thoughts into actions

Partner content: AI-powered start-up puts protein discovery on the fast track

Partner content: Intelligent tech takes on drone safety

• Computer science
• Mathematics and computing

Science treasures from Microsoft mogul up for auction — and researchers are salivating

News 23 AUG 24

AI made of jelly ‘learns’ to play Pong — and improves with practice

News 22 AUG 24

Light bulbs have energy ratings — so why can’t AI chatbots?

Comment 21 AUG 24

Can South Korea regain its edge in innovation?

Nature Index 21 AUG 24

How South Korea’s science stars are finding success

Cash for catching scientific errors

Technology Feature 19 AUG 24

Faculty Positions in Westlake University

Founded in 2018, Westlake University is a new type of non-profit research-oriented university in Hangzhou, China, supported by public a...

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Westlake University

Call for Global Talents, Recruitment Information of Nankai University

Nankai University welcomes global outstanding talents to join for common development.

Tianjin, China

Nankai University

Director for Signature Research Programme in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, DukeNUS Medical School &

The successful candidate will demonstrate their ability of growing, leading and mentoring faculty as well as developing and operationalising strategy.

Singapore (SG)

DukeNUS Medical School

Scientist / Postdoc (m/f/d): Analysis of Microscopic BIOMedical Images (AMBIOM)

A new project area in the institute is the development of artificial intelligence (AI)

Dortmund, Nordrhein-Westfalen (DE)

Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften – ISAS – e.V.

PhD Candidate (m/f/d): Analysis of Microscopic BIOMedical Images (AMBIOM)

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Suggestions or feedback?

MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology

• Machine learning
• Sustainability
• Black holes
• Classes and programs

Departments

• Aeronautics and Astronautics
• Brain and Cognitive Sciences
• Architecture
• Political Science
• Mechanical Engineering

Centers, Labs, & Programs

• Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL)
• Picower Institute for Learning and Memory
• Lincoln Laboratory
• School of Architecture + Planning
• School of Engineering
• School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences
• Sloan School of Management
• School of Science
• MIT Schwarzman College of Computing

Download RSS feed: News Articles / In the Media / Audio

Engineering and matters of the heart

Professor Ellen Roche is creating the next generation of medical devices to help repair hearts, lungs, and other tissues.

August 21, 2024

Read full story →

AI assistant monitors teamwork to promote effective collaboration

An AI team coordinator aligns agents’ beliefs about how to achieve a task, intervening when necessary to potentially help with tasks in search and rescue, hospitals, and video games.

August 19, 2024

MIT engineers design tiny batteries for powering cell-sized robots

These zinc-air batteries, smaller than a grain of sand, could help miniscule robots sense and respond to their environment.

August 15, 2024

A new model offers robots precise pick-and-place solutions

SimPLE learns to pick, regrasp, and place objects using the objects’ computer-aided design model.

August 9, 2024

Helping robots practice skills independently to adapt to unfamiliar environments

A new algorithm helps robots practice skills like sweeping and placing objects, potentially helping them improve at important tasks in houses, hospitals, and factories.

August 8, 2024

Precision home robots learn with real-to-sim-to-real

CSAIL researchers introduce a novel approach allowing robots to be trained in simulations of scanned home environments, paving the way for customized household automation accessible to anyone.

July 31, 2024

Flying high to enable sustainable delivery, remote care

Drone company founders with MIT Advanced Study Program roots seek to bring aerial delivery to the mainstream.

July 25, 2024

Creating and verifying stable AI-controlled systems in a rigorous and flexible way

Neural network controllers provide complex robots with stability guarantees, paving the way for the safer deployment of autonomous vehicles and industrial machines.

July 17, 2024

Designing for outer space

With NASA planning permanent bases in space and on the moon, MIT students develop prototypes for habitats far from planet Earth.

June 23, 2024

Researchers use large language models to help robots navigate

The method uses language-based inputs instead of costly visual data to direct a robot through a multistep navigation task.

June 12, 2024

Helping robots grasp the unpredictable

MIT CSAIL’s frugal deep-learning model infers the hidden physical properties of objects, then adapts to find the most stable grasps for robots in unstructured environments like homes and fulfillment centers.

June 3, 2024

A technique for more effective multipurpose robots

With generative AI models, researchers combined robotics data from different sources to help robots learn better.

School of Engineering welcomes new faculty

Fifteen new faculty members join six of the school’s academic departments.

May 23, 2024

MIT scientists learn how to control muscles with light

A new study suggests optogenetics can drive muscle contraction with greater control and less fatigue than electrical stimulation.

May 22, 2024

2024 MAD Design Fellows announced

The 10 Design Fellows are MIT graduate students working at the intersection of design and multiple disciplines across the Institute.

May 21, 2024

Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, USA

• Map (opens in new window)
• Events (opens in new window)
• People (opens in new window)
• Careers (opens in new window)
• Accessibility
• Social Media Hub
• MIT on Facebook
• MIT on YouTube
• MIT on Instagram

70 Innovative Robotics Research Topics: The Eyes of Innovation

Embark on a wild ride into the fascinating world of robotics research, where machines aren’t just gears and wires but partners in our tech-filled future. Imagine a world where robots aren’t just tools; they’re our helpful buddies, making everyday life a bit more awesome.

In the fast-paced gears of tech evolution, robotics research isn’t just a field of study—it’s a ticket to a future that’s downright spectacular. Think about it: a world where robots are our active collaborators, working alongside us in ways we’ve only dreamt of.

So, get ready for an exciting journey as we dive into the heart of “Robotics Research Topics.” Forget about the idea of robots as cold, metallic beings. Instead, envision them as friendly companions, here to assist us in tasks big and small.

In this article, we’re not just talking about topics; we’re unwrapping gifts from the tech universe. Each one reveals a different side of the dynamic and ever-surprising world of robotics research.

Join us on this adventure where machines aren’t just tools; they’re collaborators, and the possibilities are endless. From the gentle touch of soft robotics to robots exploring the cosmos, this is a sneak peek into the tech wonderland awaiting us. Robotics research is where dreams turn into plans, and innovation is the language spoken.

So, buckle up for a rollercoaster ride through fifteen mind-blowing robotics research topics. The future is knocking, and it’s filled with the hum of robotics. Let’s not just explore; let’s get lost in the wonders that await in the mesmerizing world of robotics research.

Table of Contents

Significance of Robotics Research Topics

Why bother with all this fuss about Robotics Research Topics? Well, let’s break it down in simple terms:

Cooking Up Tomorrow’s Solutions

So, we’re not just fooling around with robots; we’re cooking up solutions for the future. Each research topic is like adding a secret ingredient to the recipe of making the world a cooler place. It’s about fixing real-life problems with a dash of futuristic flair.

Being the Tech Trailblazers

We’re not here to follow trends; we’re here to blaze the tech trails. Think of robotics research as a playground where brainy folks dream big and draw the map for a future filled with cool gadgets and gizmos. These topics aren’t just for today; they’re blueprints for the awesomeness of tomorrow.

Making Tech More Human

It’s not just about machines with a metallic heart. We’re aiming to make tech more human-friendly. Take human-robot interaction, for example—it’s like envisioning a world where robots aren’t just gadgets; they’re like your friendly sidekick, making your life better every day.

Mixing Ideas Like a Smoothie

Robotics research isn’t stuck in one boring corner. It’s like a smoothie of ideas—mixing engineering with psychology, coding with creativity. It’s the ultimate mashup where the coolest discoveries happen.

Crafting Our Tomorrow

Most importantly, it’s about crafting our future. Robotics research is like being in a sci-fi movie where dreams turn into reality. The big deal is in creating a world where machines aren’t just tools; they’re our buddies, making life smoother, cooler, and more fun.

So, as we unravel the mysteries of robotics research topics, let’s keep it real—it’s not just geek talk; it’s about making our lives more awesome with every robot we meet. Think of it as building a future where tech isn’t just a thing; it’s a way of making life one big adventure.

Why Robotics Research Topics Rock Our World ?

Why do Robotics Research Topics rock our world? Let’s cut to the chase and explore why these topics are like the rockstars of the tech universe:

Future-Proofing Fun

Robotics Research Topics aren’t just about today; they’re like a backstage pass to the future. They’re the rock anthems of innovation, setting the stage for tech trends that will blow our minds tomorrow.

Geeky Wonders Unveiled

Imagine a concert where each song is a geeky wonder unveiled. These topics are like chart-toppers that unravel the mysteries of robotics, turning the complex into catchy tunes of understanding.

Everyday Solutions on Stage

Forget dull and boring—these topics bring everyday solutions to the stage. It’s like having a rock concert where each song solves a real-world problem, making life smoother and more enjoyable.

Tech Fusion Beats

Robotics Research Topics are the fusion beats of technology. It’s where engineering, coding, and creativity jam together, creating tunes that resonate across disciplines. It’s not just tech; it’s a symphony of ideas.

Crowd-Surfing into Tomorrow

Picture this: the crowd is cheering, the lights are dazzling, and we’re crowd-surfing into tomorrow. These topics take us on a wild ride, where we’re not just spectators but active participants in shaping the future.

Innovation Jams

They’re not just topics; they’re innovation jams. It’s like being at a concert where every beat is a breakthrough, every riff is a revelation. It’s the kind of music that makes the tech world groove.

Tech Legends in the Making

Robotics Research Topics are where tech legends are born. It’s the arena where today’s ideas become tomorrow’s tech legends. We’re not just witnessing; we’re part of the creation of tech history.

So, why do Robotics Research Topics rock our world? Because they’re the pulsating heartbeat of tech innovation, the electrifying tunes of progress, and the VIP passes to a future where every day feels like a front-row seat at the coolest tech concert.

Robotics Research Topics

Check out robotics research topics:-

Mobile Robotics

• Create a pair of robots that explore unknown environments together, like dynamic robot buddies on a discovery mission.
• Develop a drone capable of navigating urban landscapes, avoiding obstacles like a ninja in the sky.
• Design a robot that zips around a café, serving up orders and ensuring customers have their caffeine fix in record time.
• Build a robot that explores the depths, searching for hidden treasures in the underwater world.
• Craft a robot tailored for agriculture, helping farmers by monitoring crops and ensuring they thrive.
• Create a swarm of mini-robots that collaborate like superheroes in a rescue mission, helping each other and saving the day.
• Upgrade the classic Roomba into a smart cleaning maestro, navigating and cleaning homes with finesse.
• Develop a robot fleet for efficient warehouse operations, ensuring packages are swiftly picked, packed, and ready for delivery.
• Engineer a drone that maneuvers through city landscapes, delivering packages with precision and speed.
• Invent a robot that optimizes traffic flow in busy urban areas, making rush hour feel like a breeze.

Soft Robotics

• Craft a soft robotic companion that gives the coziest hugs, bringing a new level of comfort and warmth.
• Design a wearable soft exoskeleton for rehabilitation, helping users recover with gentle support.
• Create a soft robotic snake that can wriggle its way through tight spaces for exploration missions.
• Invent a soft robot that mimics raindrops, collecting water in a gentle and eco-friendly manner.
• Develop a soft robotic hand that adapts to the shape of objects, providing a delicate yet firm grip.
• Build a soft robotic teddy bear that provides companionship and comfort, especially for those in need.
• Create a soft robotic glove that gives therapeutic massages, making relaxation an art form.
• Invent a textile that transforms its properties, adapting to temperature changes or user preferences.
• Craft a soft robotic ball that rolls around, offering playful interactions and entertainment.
• Design a robotic pillow that adjusts its shape and firmness for the perfect night’s sleep.

Medical Robotics

• Create a robot that assists surgeons during complex surgeries, orchestrating precision like a maestro.
• Develop a teleoperated robot for remote medical assistance, providing support in regions with limited healthcare access.
• Design a robot that guides users through rehabilitation exercises, making workouts feel like fun.
• Craft a robotic prosthetic limb with customizable features, enhancing mobility and comfort.
• Build a robot companion for the elderly, offering assistance and companionship in daily activities.
• Create a small robotic endoscope for precise and minimally invasive medical procedures.
• Develop a robot equipped with AI to analyze health data and provide personalized health advice.
• Invent a robot that dispenses medication with reminders, ensuring users never miss a dose.
• Design a robot that customizes the appearance of prosthetic limbs, adding a touch of personal style.
• Engineer a wearable robotic exoskeleton for upper limb support during various activities.

Humanoid Robotics

• Develop a humanoid robot that learns and plays with children, adapting to their preferences and fostering creativity.
• Create a humanoid robot that recognizes and expresses emotions, connecting with users on a personal level.
• Build a humanoid robot to assist teachers in classrooms, engaging students and making learning interactive.
• Design humanoid robots capable of playing soccer autonomously, showcasing teamwork and strategic brilliance.
• Create a humanoid robot programmed to perform elegant ballet movements, bringing artistry to life.
• Develop a humanoid robot skilled in various household chores, making daily tasks a breeze.
• Build a humanoid robot equipped with AI to serve as a receptionist, welcoming and assisting visitors.
• Design a humanoid robot that helps users learn new languages through interactive conversations.
• Create a humanoid robot capable of collaborative drawing sessions, unlocking artistic expressions.
• Develop a humanoid robot to assist individuals, especially children, in developing social skills through interactive scenarios.

Artificial Intelligence in Robotics

• Implement a vision-based system for robots, enabling them to see and understand their surroundings with eagle-like precision.
• Apply reinforcement learning techniques to teach robots new tricks, turning them into brainy problem solvers.
• Develop algorithms for robotic decision-making in unpredictable environments, making choices like a savvy problem-solver.
• Design an AI model that explains its decisions transparently, helping users understand the reasoning behind each action.
• Implement AI-driven semantic mapping for robots, allowing them to create detailed maps with a keen sense of surroundings.
• Integrate natural language processing into robots for smooth communication, making them fluent in human talk.
• Enhance robots’ object manipulation skills using advanced AI-based recognition, turning them into object-handling geniuses.
• Apply deep learning algorithms to enable robots to navigate autonomously through complex environments, like intrepid explorers.
• Implement learning from demonstration techniques using AI, allowing robots to soak up new skills by watching and mimicking.
• Develop AI planning algorithms that consider human presence and preferences, making robots dance through tasks with human-like harmony.

Swarm Robotics

• Create a swarm of robots that collaboratively work together to extinguish fires in challenging environments.
• Develop a swarm of agile robots for efficient search and rescue operations, navigating through complex terrains.
• Design a swarm of robots to monitor and protect crops in large agricultural fields, ensuring optimal growth.
• Implement a swarm of robots to manage and optimize traffic flow in urban areas, making rush hours smoother.
• Build a swarm of underwater robots for environmental monitoring, protecting marine ecosystems.
• Create a swarm of robots for collaborative construction tasks, working together to build structures with precision.
• Develop a swarm of robots for pest control in agricultural settings, targeting pests while minimizing environmental impact.
• Implement a surveillance system using a swarm of robots to monitor and secure large areas, ensuring safety.
• Design a swarm of robots specialized in disaster recovery tasks, aiding in clearing debris and providing assistance.
• Develop algorithms for dynamic formation control in a swarm of robots, enabling them to adapt their shapes for different tasks.

Cognitive Robotics

• Create a robot with symbolic reasoning abilities, solving problems using abstract symbols and logic.
• Develop a robot with enhanced memory, capable of remembering past experiences and learning from them.
• Implement algorithms for ethical decision-making in robots, considering moral principles and societal norms.
• Build a cognitive robot that can generate and participate in interactive storytelling experiences with users.
• Research methods for enabling human-robot collaboration with a shared memory, storing and retrieving information together.
• Develop algorithms for commonsense reasoning in robots, allowing them to make informed decisions in diverse scenarios.
• Create a cognitive robot capable of generating artistic creations, demonstrating creativity and aesthetic understanding.
• Design a cognitive robotic personal assistant that understands user preferences and adapts to changing needs.
• Implement mechanisms for robots to learn from feedback provided by humans, improving their performance over time.
• Integrate affective computing capabilities into robots, allowing them to recognize and respond to human emotions.

What are the 5 major fields of robotics?

In the exciting realm of robotics, we delve into five major fields that bring our mechanical friends to life:

1. Mobile Robotics

• Mission: Creating robots that navigate the world on their own.
• Adventure Zones: Path planning, obstacle dodging, and crafting mental maps .

2. Manipulation Robotics

• Quest: Unleashing robots with a talent for object manipulation.
• Skills Unveiled: Grasping secrets, mastering dexterity, dancing with force, and feeling with finesse.

3. Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)

• Journey: Exploring the dance between robots and humans.
• Moves to Master: Conversing in robot lingo, decoding human gestures, and embracing social vibes.

4. Perception Robotics

• Expedition: Equipping robots with super-senses to understand their surroundings.
• Superpowers Unleashed: Spotting objects, reading scenes like novels, navigating spaces, and learning from their experiences.

5. Cognitive Robotics

• Odyssey: Crafting robots that think, learn, and decide like humans.
• Mental Gymnastics: Navigating the realms of artificial intelligence, flexing machine learning muscles, and diving into the deep pools of cognitive science.

These fields are not solo adventurers; they dance, share, and evolve together, making the world of robotics a dynamic, ever-surprising playground where innovation knows no bounds. Welcome to the unfolding saga of robotic wonders!

And there you have it – the thrilling journey through Robotics Research Topics! As we wrap up this exploration, it’s like closing the pages of a sci-fi novel where robots aren’t just machines; they’re our partners in innovation.

Imagine a world where drones gracefully soar through cityscapes, soft robots give the coziest hugs, and humanoid buddies dance ballet – that’s the future these topics paint. It’s not just about circuits and algorithms; it’s about creating robotic wonders that feel like they’re straight out of a tech fairy tale.

From the bustling streets managed by traffic-savvy bots to the quiet depths where underwater explorers seek hidden treasures, every topic sparks a sense of wonder. It’s like stepping into a world where robots aren’t just helpers; they’re the heroes of our technological saga.

So, as we bid farewell to this robot-filled adventure, let’s carry the excitement of what’s to come. The future is unfolding, and it looks pretty darn cool with these robotic marvels leading the way. Until next time, keep dreaming, keep innovating, and who knows – your next big idea might just be the missing piece in the puzzle of tomorrow’s robotics magic!

Frequently Asked Questions

How does robotics impact daily life beyond industries.

Robotics permeates daily life through smart devices, home automation, and even entertainment, making tasks more efficient and enjoyable.

What are some challenges in developing autonomous vehicles?

Challenges include creating robust AI systems for complex decision-making, ensuring safety measures, and addressing legal and regulatory frameworks.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Current Research Topics in Robotics at IGMR

• Conference paper
• First Online: 27 September 2019
• Cite this conference paper

• Burkhard Corves 11 ,
• Mathias Huesing 11 ,
• Nils Mandischer 11 ,
• Markus Schmitz 11 ,
• Amirreza Shahidi 11 ,
• Michael Lorenz 11 &
• Sami Charaf Eddine 11  

Part of the book series: Mechanisms and Machine Science ((Mechan. Machine Science,volume 78))

Included in the following conference series:

• IFToMM International Symposium on Robotics and Mechatronics

1409 Accesses

This paper gives an overview of current research topics at the Institute of Mechanism Theory, Machine Dynamics and Robotics of RWTH Aachen University. A variety of application areas is introduced, including robotic reconstruction, agile production, additive manufacturing and human-robot collaboration. Each topic offers novel and unique contributions to its field of robotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Challenges for Mechanism Design in Robotics

Industrial Robotics

Robotics in Manufacturing—The Past and the Present

Huang, S.H., Liu, P., Mokasdar, A., et al.: Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 67 (5–8), 1191–1203 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5

Article   Google Scholar  

Siebrecht, J., Jacobs, G., Beckers, A., et al.: Einfluss von Prozessparametern auf die Funktionserfüllung von Bauteilen beim Fused Deposition Modeling. In: Krause, D., Paetzold, K., Wartzack, S. (eds.) Design for X: Beiträge zum 27. DfX-Symposium. TuTech Verlag, Hamburg, pp. 123–134 (2016)

Google Scholar  

Allen, R.J.A., Trask, R.S.: An experimental demonstration of effective Curved Layer Fused Filament Fabrication utilising a parallel deposition robot. Addit. Manuf. 8 , 78–87 (2015)

Hope, R.L., Roth, R.N., Jacobs, P.A.: Adaptive slicing with sloping layer surfaces. Rapid Prototyp. J. 3 (3), 89–98 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552549710185662

Jin, Y., Du, J., He, Y., et al.: Modeling and process planning for curved layer fused deposition. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 91 (1–4), 273–285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9743-5

Spoerk, M., Arbeiter, F., Cajner, H., et al.: Parametric optimization of intra- and inter-layer strengths in parts produced by extrusion-based additive manufacturing of poly(lactic acid). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 134 (41), 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.45401

Fraunhofer IPA: 3D-gedruckte Leichtbauteile für den Mittelstand (Endlosfaserdrucken) (2016). https://www.ipa.fraunhofer.de/de/presse/presseinformationen/2016-07-21_3d-gedruckte-leichtbauteile-fuer-den-mittelstand.html . Accessed 09 Apr 2018

Stratasys Ltd.: 8-Axis Freedom for Strong Composites: Get better-performing composite parts faster with the Robotic Composite 3D Demonstrator (2019). https://www.stratasys.com/demonstrators . Accessed 25 Mar 2019

Detert, T., Lorenz, M., Schmitz, M., et al.: Robotergeführte Objektmanipulation für die generative Fertigung. In: Beitelschmidt, M. (ed.) Tagungsband 12. Kolloquium Getriebetechnik: Technische Universität Dresden, 20–22 September 2017. TUD Press, Dresden (2017)

Livesu, M., Ellero, S., Martínez, J., et al.: From 3D models to 3D prints: an overview of the processing pipeline. Comput. Graph. Forum 36 (2), 537–564 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13147

Reisgen, U., Stein, L.: Grundlagen der Fügetechnik: Schweißen, Löten und Kleben. Fachbuchreihe Schweißtechnik, Band 161. DVS Media GmbH, Düsseldorf (2016)

Mannheim, T., Riedel, M., Hüsing, M., et al.: A new way of grasping: PARAGRIP—the fusion of gripper and robot. In: Carbone, G. (ed.) Grasping in Robotics, pp. 433–464. Springer, London (2013)

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Thomas, C.: Entwicklung einer Bewertungssystematik für die Mensch-Roboter-Kollaboration. Dissertation, Shaker Verlag GmbH (2017)

ISO International Organization for Standardization (2016-02-00) Robots and robotic devices - Collaborative robots 25.040.30 (15066)

DIN German Institute for Standardization: Industrieroboter – Sicherheitsanforderungen – Teil 1: Roboter (DIN 10218-1) (2016)

Lu, Y.: Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 6 , 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005

Shahidi, A., Detert, T., Hüsing, M., et al.: Agile assembly system by consensus of robot and sensor network – an introduction to industry 4.0: Fünfte IFToMM D-A-CH Konferenz 2019 (2019)

CoE IoP: RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY Cluster of Excellence Internet of Production - English (2019). http://www.iop.rwth-aachen.de/cms/~gpfz/Produktionstechnik/lidx/1/ . Accessed 19 Mar 2019

Detert, T., Charaf Eddine, S., Fauroux, J.-C., et al.: Bots2ReC: introducing mobile robotic units on construction sites for asbestos rehabilitation. Constr. Robot. 1 (1–4), 29–37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41693-017-0007-1

Cadena, C., Carlone, L., Carrillo, H., et al.: Past, present, and future of simultaneous localization and mapping: toward the robust-perception age. IEEE Trans. Robot. 32 (6), 1309–1332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2016.2624754

Charaf Eddine, S., Mandischer, N., Huesing, M., et al.: Bots2ReC: Radar-SLAM für die teilautonome Asbsestsanierung. In: VDI Mechatroniktagung, Paderborn (2019)

Adams, M., Jose, E.: Robotic Navigation and Mapping with Radar. Artech House, Norwood (2012)

Montesano, L., Minguez, J., Montano, L.: Probabilistic scan matching for motion estimation in unstructured environments. In: 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2–6 August 2005. IEEE Operations Center, Piscataway pp. 3499–3504 (2005)

Singer, S., Nelder, J.: Nelder-Mead algorithm. Scholarpedia 4 (7), 2928 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.2928

Samet, H.: The quadtree and related hierarchical data structures. ACM Comput. Surv. 16 (2), 187–260 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1145/356924.356930

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank:

The German Research Foundation DFG for the kind support within the Cluster of Excellence “Internet of Production” - Project-ID: 390621612.

The European Union for the kind support within the project “Robots to Re-Construction” - Project-ID: 687593.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Institute of Mechanism Theory, Machine Dynamics and Robotics, Aachen, Germany

Burkhard Corves, Mathias Huesing, Nils Mandischer, Markus Schmitz, Amirreza Shahidi, Michael Lorenz & Sami Charaf Eddine

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burkhard Corves .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

School of Mechanical, Materials, Mechatronic and Biomedical Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Chin-Hsing Kuo

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Pei-Chun Lin

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan

Terence Essomba

Department of Mechanical and Electro-Mechanical Engineering, Tamkang University, New Taipei City, Taiwan

Guan-Chen Chen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Corves, B. et al. (2020). Current Research Topics in Robotics at IGMR. In: Kuo, CH., Lin, PC., Essomba, T., Chen, GC. (eds) Robotics and Mechatronics. ISRM 2019. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 78. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30036-4_47

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30036-4_47

Published : 27 September 2019

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-30035-7

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-30036-4

eBook Packages : Intelligent Technologies and Robotics Intelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Machines

Research overview.

Foundations of Robotics

Research in the foundational concepts of robotics and automation covers an interdisciplinary range of topics. Computational methodologies, electronics engineering, and physics are all foundational areas of robotics research. Sub-topics include simulation, kinematics, control, optimization, and probabilistic inference.

Field & Service Robotics

Field robots are mobile robots that operate in dynamic environments. These robots are adaptive, and responsive working in variable conditions and territories. Service Robots are fully or partially autonomous and perform tasks that are dangerous, repetitive, or hazardous. This research area also comprises simple and complex industrial robots as well as frontline service robots.

Human-Centered Robotics

Human-centered robotics focuses on robots that interact, assist and cooperate with humans requiring robot operation in human environments and close interaction with non-professional users. The research spans broad areas in human-robot interaction including; assistive and rehabilitation robotics, robotic systems design, wearable robotics, biomedical, surgical and clinical robots.

Manipulation & Locomotion

Robotic manipulation addresses the frameworks of modeling, motion planning, and control of grasp and manipulation of an object for a task. Manipulation research deals not only with the way in which the robot performs, but also the numerous operator-robot interface options. Once a task is defined, robots must be able to navigate its environment successfully. Legged, wheeled, articulated and winged are just a few of the way in robots are constructed for their specific tasks. Many of IRIM’s  faculty are working to advance robotic locomotion, creating multi-environment capable robots and bespoke design options.

Safe, Secure, & Resilient Autonomy

Robots given a high degree of autonomy require formal assurances on their abilities and resiliency in the face of disruptions and uncertainty. Obtaining these assurances requires innovations across an interdisciplinary range of topics including control theory, machine learning, optimization, and formal methods for designing cyber-physical intelligent machines. By establishing a rigorous mathematical foundation of guaranteed performance, robots can be confidently deployed in safety-critical settings---for example, alongside humans---or for long durations without operator input such as underwater or in space.

Sensing & Perception

Robotic perception is related to many applications in robotics where sensory data and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) techniques are involved. Examples include; object detection, environment representation, scene understanding, human/pedestrian detection, activity recognition, semantic place classification, and object modeling.

IRIM in 1 Minute

If you want to know what amazing robotics research is happening at the Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Machines this 1 minute video gives a great overview!

This website uses cookies.  For more information, review our  Privacy & Legal Notice Questions? Please email [email protected]. More Info Decline --> Accept

150+ Easy Robotics Research Topics For Engineering Students In 2024

Learning about robots and how they work is really interesting. It involves using new and advanced technology. Robots are made by combining different types of engineering and smart computer programs. This blog talks about how robots communicate, explains the basics of robotics, and shows how important it is for students. We help students choose from 150+ topics about robots that are easy to understand and study in 2024.

We cover a wide range of topics, from how robots think and interact with people to working together in groups and the moral questions involved. We talk about why studying robots is good, the problems students might face, and suggest five great research topics for success in school. Stick around with us to learn a lot about the exciting world of Robotics Research Topics research!

What Is Robotics?

Table of Contents

The goal of robotics is to build devices that are capable of autonomous tasks. These machines are designed to do things that humans can’t or prefer not to do. They are made to work in different places, from the deep sea to outer space. These robots can have arms, wheels, sensors, and computers that help them move and think.

Robots can do numerous tasks, from assembling cars in factories to exploring distant planets. They can assist in surgeries, clean floors, or even deliver packages. The field of robotics involves designing, building, and programming these machines to perform specific tasks, making our lives easier and sometimes even safer.

Importance And Impact Of Robotics Research In Student’s Life

Here are some importance and impact of robotics research in students’s life:

1. Skill Development

Robotics research allows students to develop crucial skills like problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. It challenges them to think innovatively, design solutions, and apply theoretical knowledge into practical scenarios, fostering a hands-on learning experience.

2. Future Career Opportunities

Engaging in robotics research equips students with skills highly sought after in various industries. Understanding robotics opens doors to diverse career opportunities in fields like engineering, technology, healthcare, and even entrepreneurship, preparing students for the job market of the future.

3. Technological Advancements

Through research, students contribute to the advancement of technology. Their discoveries and innovations in robotics research can lead to breakthroughs, new inventions, and improvements in existing systems, benefiting society and shaping the future.

4. Problem Solving and Innovation

Robotics research challenges students to solve real-world problems creatively. It encourages them to think outside the box, invent new solutions, and create technologies that can positively impact society, fostering a mindset for innovation.

5. Personal Development

Engagement in robotics research boosts students’ confidence, fostering a sense of achievement and a willingness to take on new challenges. It encourages self-motivation, perseverance, and adaptability, shaping well-rounded individuals ready to tackle future endeavors.

Tips For Choosing The Right Robotics Research Topics

Here are some tips for choosing the right robotics research topics: 

Tip 1: Follow Your Passion

Choose a robotics research topic that excites and interests you. When you’re passionate about the subject, you’ll stay motivated throughout the research process, making it easier to explore and understand the complexities of the topic.

Tip 2: Assess Available Resources

Consider the resources available to you, such as access to equipment, tools, and expert guidance. Select a topic that aligns with the available resources to ensure you can conduct your research effectively and efficiently.

Tip 3: Relevance and Impact

Opt for a robotics research topic that has real-world relevance and potential impact. Focusing on topics that address current problems or future technological advancements can make your research more meaningful and valuable.

Tip 4: Scope and Manageability

Pick a subject that is in between too wide and too specific. Ensure it’s manageable within the given time frame and resources, allowing you to explore and delve deep into the subject without overwhelming yourself.

Tip 5: Consult with Mentors and Peers

Discuss potential research topics with mentors or peers. Seeking advice and feedback can provide valuable insights, helping you refine and select the most suitable and intriguing robotics research topic.

In this section, we will provide 150+ robotics research topics for engineering students:

I. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics

• Cognitive Robotics: Emulating Human Thought Processes
• Ethical Implications of AI in Autonomous Robotics
• Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Robotics
• Explainable AI in Robotics: Ensuring Transparency
• Deep Learning Techniques for Object Recognition in Robotics
• AI-Enabled Medical Robotics for Enhanced Healthcare
• AI-Driven Social Robotics for Improved Interaction
• Evolution of AI in Self-driving Vehicles
• Robotics as a Tool for AI Education in Schools
• Integrating AI with Robotics for Enhanced Predictive Capabilities

II. Human-Robot Interaction

• Emotional Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction
• Impact of Social Robotics in Elderly Care
• Personalization in Human-Robot Interaction
• Enhancing Trust and Communication in Human-Robot Relationships
• Cultural Adaptation in Human-Robot Interaction
• The Role of Ethics in Human-Robot Interaction Design
• Non-verbal Communication and Gestures in Human-Robot Interaction
• Augmented Reality and Human-Robot Collaboration
• Designing User-Friendly Interfaces for Robotic Interaction
• Evaluating User Experience in Human-Robot Interaction Scenarios

III. Swarm Robotics

• Swarm Robotics in Surveillance and Security
• Dynamic Task Allocation in Swarm Robotics
• Emergent Behavior in Swarm Robotics Systems
• Cooperative Swarm Robotic Systems in Environmental Cleanup
• Bio-inspired Swarm Robotics: Learning from Nature
• Coordination and Communication Protocols in Swarm Robotics
• Optimization Algorithms for Swarm Robotic Systems
• Swarm Robotics in Underground Mining Operations
• Robotic Swarms for Disaster Response and Rescue Missions
• Challenges in Scalability of Swarm Robotic Networks

IV. Soft Robotics

• Bio-inspired Soft Robotic Grippers for Delicate Object Handling
• Soft Robotics in Biomedical Applications
• Wearable Soft Robotics for Rehabilitation and Assistance
• Soft Robotics for Prosthetics and Exoskeletons
• Advancements in Soft Robotic Material Science
• Adaptive Soft Robots for Unstructured Environments
• Designing Soft Robots for Underwater Exploration
• Challenges in Control and Sensing in Soft Robotics
• Soft Robotic Actuators and Sensors
• Soft Robotics in Food and Agriculture Industry Innovations

V. Autonomous Navigation and Mapping

• Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) in Autonomous Vehicles
• Advances in LIDAR and Radar Technologies for Navigation
• Mapping and Navigation Techniques in GPS-denied Environments
• Robustness of Autonomous Navigation in Dynamic Environments
• Learning-based Approaches for Adaptive Autonomous Navigation
• Ethics and Legalities in Autonomous Navigation Systems
• Human Safety in Autonomous Vehicles and Navigation
• Multi-modal Sensor Fusion for Precise Navigation
• Challenges in Weather-Adaptive Navigation for Autonomous Systems
• Social and Ethical Implications of Autonomous Navigation in Urban Environments

VI. Robotic Vision and Perception

• Object Detection and Recognition in Robotic Vision Systems
• Enhancing Robotic Vision through Deep Learning
• Perception-based Grasping and Manipulation in Robotics
• Visual SLAM for Indoor and Outdoor Robotic Navigation
• Challenges in Real-time Object Tracking for Robotics
• Human-Centric Vision Systems for Social Robots
• Ethics of Visual Data and Privacy in Robotic Vision
• Advancements in 3D Vision Systems for Robotics
• Vision-based Localization and Mapping for Mobile Robots
• Vision and Perception Challenges in Unstructured Environments

VII. Robot Learning and Adaptation

• Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Control and Decision-making
• Transfer Learning for Robotics in Real-world Environments
• Adaptive Learning Algorithms for Robotic Systems
• Continual Learning and Long-term Adaptation in Robots
• Ethical Considerations in Robot Learning and Autonomy
• Learning-based Techniques for Human-robot Collaboration
• Challenges in Unsupervised Learning for Robotic Applications
• Lifelong Learning in Robotic Systems
• Balancing Stability and Exploration in Robot Learning
• Learning Robotic Behavior through Interaction and Imitation

VIII. Robotic Manipulation and Grasping

• Dexterity and Precision in Robotic Manipulation
• Grasping Strategies for Varied Objects in Robotics
• Multi-fingered Robotic Hands and Adaptive Grasping
• Haptic Feedback for Enhanced Robotic Grasping
• Challenges in Grasping Fragile and Deformable Objects
• Grasping and Manipulation in Cluttered Environments
• Learning-based Approaches for Adaptive Grasping
• Robotic Manipulation for Assembly and Manufacturing
• Human-Robot Collaboration in Grasping Tasks
• Ethical Considerations in Robotic Manipulation and Grasping

IX. Robotic Sensing and Sensory Integration

• Sensor Fusion Techniques for Comprehensive Robot Perception
• Role of LIDAR, RADAR, and Cameras in Robotic Sensing
• Challenges in Sensor Data Integration for Robotic Decision-making
• Ethical Implications of Sensory Data Collection in Robotics
• Tactile Sensing and Haptic Feedback in Robotic Systems
• Multi-modal Sensing for Robotic Perception in Dynamic Environments
• Role of Environmental Sensors in Autonomous Robotics
• Neural Networks for Sensor Data Interpretation in Robotics
• Sensor Calibration and Accuracy in Robotic Systems
• Sensory Integration Challenges in Unstructured Environments

X. Multi-Robot Systems and Coordination

• Coordination Mechanisms in Heterogeneous Multi-robot Systems
• Cooperative Task Allocation in Multi-robot Systems
• Communication Protocols in Multi-robot Coordination
• Role of AI in Dynamic Multi-robot Collaboration
• Challenges in Scalability and Robustness of Multi-robot Systems
• Ethics and Security in Multi-robot Networked Systems
• Hierarchical and Decentralized Approaches in Multi-robot Systems
• Multi-robot Systems in Infrastructure Maintenance and Inspection
• Collaborative Multi-robot Systems for Search and Rescue Missions
• Learning-based Coordination in Swarms of Robots

XI. Robot Ethics and Governance

• Ethical Decision-making in Autonomous Robotics
• Legal and Ethical Frameworks for Robotic Systems
• Accountability and Transparency in Robotic Decision-making
• Ethical Implications of AI in Robotic Systems
• Ensuring Fairness and Bias Mitigation in Robotic Algorithms
• Ethical Considerations in Robotic Assistive Technologies
• Designing Ethical Guidelines for Human-Robot Interaction
• Governance of Robotic Systems in Public Spaces
• Robotic Data Privacy and Security: Ethical Perspectives
• Societal Impact and Responsibility in the Development of Robotic Technologies

XII. Robotic Assistive Technologies

• Robotics in Prosthetics and Rehabilitation
• Assistive Robotics for Elderly and Disabled Individuals
• Human-Centric Design in Assistive Robotic Devices
• Social and Psychological Impact of Assistive Robotics
• Robotics in Cognitive and Physical Therapy
• Customization and Personalization in Assistive Technologies
• Challenges in Implementing Assistive Robotics in Healthcare
• Ethical and Legal Considerations in Assistive Robotics
• Continuous Learning and Adaptation in Assistive Robots
• Human Empowerment through Assistive Robotic Devices

XIII. Robotics in Healthcare and Medical Applications

• Surgical Robotics: Advancements and Future Prospects
• Robotics in Telemedicine and Remote Healthcare
• Robotics in Drug Delivery and Therapy
• Robotics in Imaging and Diagnosis in Medicine
• Ethical Considerations in Robotic Medical Procedures
• Assistive Robotics in Hospitals and Healthcare Facilities
• Robotic Technologies in Emergency Response and Medical Rescue
• Robotics in Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy
• Human-Robot Collaboration in Healthcare Settings
• Challenges and Future Trends in Robotic Healthcare Applications

XIV. Robotics Research Topics for High School Students

• Introduction to Basic Robotic Programming and Control
• Exploring Simple Robotic Mechanisms and Prototyping
• Designing and Building Miniature Robotic Vehicles
• Understanding the Basics of Robotic Sensors and Actuators
• Introduction to Ethical Considerations in Robotics
• Robotics in Everyday Life: Applications and Implications
• Introduction to Human-Robot Interaction and Safety
• Introduction to the World of AI and ML in Robotics
• Robotics in Environmental Conservation and Sustainability
• Career Prospects and Opportunities in Robotics for High School Students

XV. Robotics Research Topics for STEM Students

• Advanced Programming in Robotics: Algorithms and Applications
• Design and Development of Autonomous Robotic Systems
• Innovations in Bio-inspired Robotics: Learning from Nature
• Data Science and AI Integration in Robotics
• Robotics and Industry 4.0: Future Trends and Transformations
• Advanced Control Systems for Robotic Manipulation
• Robotics and Ethics: Societal Impact and Responsibilities
• Robotics in Space Exploration and Astronaut Assistance
• Robotic Vision and Perception: Deep Dive into Sensing Technologies
• Advanced Topics in Swarm Robotics and Multi-Robot Coordination
• The Impact of Robotics in Aerospace Industry Advancements

Read More 

• Robotics Project Ideas
• Programming Languages For Robotics

Benefits Of Working On Robotics Research Topics

Here are some benefits of working on robotics research topics:

1. Practical Application

Working on robotics research topics allows individuals to apply theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios. It bridges the gap between learning in classrooms and real-world implementation, offering hands-on experience and a deeper understanding of concepts.

2. Skill Enhancement

Engagement in robotics research topics hones various skills like problem-solving, critical thinking, and teamwork. It fosters creativity, technical proficiency, and the ability to innovate, preparing individuals for diverse challenges in their academic and professional lives.

3. Career Development

Working on robotics research topics enhances one’s career prospects. It equips individuals with sought-after skills in industries like engineering, technology, and research, opening doors to diverse career opportunities and establishing a strong foundation for future professional growth.

4. Contribution to Innovation

Robotics research allows individuals to contribute to innovation. Their findings and discoveries may lead to technological advancements, new inventions, and improved methodologies, shaping the future landscape of robotics and its applications.

5. Problem-Solving and Creativity

Engaging in robotics research encourages individuals to think creatively and find solutions to real-world problems. It cultivates an environment where individuals can explore new ideas, tackle challenges, and contribute to advancements in the field of robotics.

Challenges Face By Students During Robotics Research

Students often face limitations in accessing necessary resources, such as advanced hardware and software. The complexity of problem-solving within robotics requires high-level analytical skills , and the rapidly evolving nature of technology demands constant adaptability. 

• Resource Limitations: Inadequate access to cutting-edge hardware and software can impede the experimentation and implementation phases of robotics research.
• Complex Problem-solving : Tackling intricate technical issues within robotics demands high levels of analytical skills and critical thinking.
• Adaptability to Technological Changes: Keeping pace with rapidly evolving technology in the robotics field presents a consistent challenge for students.
• Theory-Practice Integration: Bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application poses difficulties in robotics research.
• Time Constraints: Meeting project deadlines while ensuring quality research and development often creates pressure for students.
• Interdisciplinary Knowledge: Robotics research necessitates a blend of engineering, computer science, mathematics, and AI, which can be challenging to integrate.
• Trial and Error Process: Experiments may result in failures, requiring an iterative approach and patience during the research and development process.

Bonus Tip: 5 Must-Have Things For Robotics Research Titles to Achieve High Scores

• Clarity and Precision: Ensure the title clearly conveys the essence of your research topic without ambiguity.
• Captivating and Engaging Language: Craft a title that sparks interest and draws attention to the significance of your robotics research.
• Reflect Innovation and Novelty: Highlight the originality and innovative aspects of your research to captivate the audience.
• Incorporate Relevant Keywords : Use specific and relevant keywords to make your title easily discoverable and reflect your research area.
• Reflect the Core Purpose: Ensure your title encapsulates the primary focus of your robotics research, providing a glimpse of its importance and relevance.

Robotics research presents an exciting journey, from understanding the transactional communication model to exploring the vast world of robotics. This exploration emphasizes the pivotal role of robotics in students’ lives, offering guidance on choosing appropriate research topics. With over 150 easy-to-pick ideas for aspiring engineers in 2024, it covers crucial areas like AI, human-robot interaction, and ethical considerations. 

Moreover, highlighting benefits such as skill development and career opportunities, it also acknowledges the challenges students face during research. Overall, this comprehensive guide caters to high school and STEM students, concluding with valuable tips for crafting compelling robotics research titles, enhancing the learning experience.

Related Posts

Step by Step Guide on The Best Way to Finance Car

The Best Way on How to Get Fund For Business to Grow it Efficiently

Feb 26 2023

The most exciting research topics in robotics: insights from leading phd programs.

Iriki Manoan

Robotics is a field that has the potential to revolutionize the way we live and work. From self-driving cars to robotic surgery, the possibilities are endless. In this blog post, we'll explore some of the most exciting research topics in robotics , as identified by leading PhD programs.

Autonomous Navigation

Autonomous navigation is a key research area in robotics, as it enables robots to navigate and interact with their environment without human intervention. Some of the most exciting research in this area includes developing algorithms that can enable robots to navigate in complex environments, such as crowded city streets or remote environments.

Human-Robot Interaction

Human-robot interaction is another important research area in robotics, as it enables robots to work alongside humans in a variety of settings. Some of the most exciting research in this area includes developing robots that can understand human emotions and respond appropriately, designing robots that can work in collaboration with humans to accomplish complex tasks, and developing robots that can adapt to different human preferences and work styles.

Soft Robotics

Soft robotics is an emerging research area in robotics that focuses on building robots that are more flexible and adaptable than traditional robots. Some of the most exciting research in this area includes developing soft robots that can mimic the movements of animals or insects, designing robots that can navigate through tight spaces or delicate environments, and creating robots that can change their shape to adapt to different tasks.

Swarm Robotics

Swarm robotics is a research area that focuses on building large groups of robots that can work together to accomplish a task. Some of the most exciting research in this area includes developing algorithms that can enable robots to communicate and coordinate their actions, designing robots that can self-assemble into different configurations, and creating robots that can work together to perform tasks that would be difficult or impossible for a single robot to accomplish.

Medical Robotics

Medical robotics is an important research area that has the potential to transform the field of medicine. Some of the most exciting research in this area includes developing robots that can perform minimally invasive surgery, designing robots that can assist with physical therapy and rehabilitation, and creating robots that can provide assistance and support to patients in hospitals and nursing homes.

These are just a few examples of the exciting research topics in robotics that are being pursued by leading PhD programs. As the field continues to grow and evolve, there are sure to be many more exciting discoveries to come.

Tags: robotics, autonomous navigation, human-robot interaction, soft robotics, swarm robotics, medical robotics, PhD programs.

The Most Exciting Research Topics in Robotics: Insights from Leading...

February 26, 2023

• autonomous navigation
• human-robot interaction
• soft robotics
• swarm robotics
• medical robotics
• PhD programs.

Featured Jobs

Editors' picks, recent posts.

The Benefits of Studying STEM Programs in the US for...

March 02, 2023

Top 10 PhD Scholarships You Should Apply For in 2023

10 Tips for Successfully Applying for PhD Scholarships

February 25, 2023

Choosing the Right PhD Supervisor: Why Researching Your Supervisor is...

February 20, 2023

Cover Letter and CV for a PhD Position

January 31, 2023

This site uses cookies to deliver our services and to show you relevant ads and job listings. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy , and our Terms and Conditions . Your use of SearchaPhd’s Products and Services, is subject to these policies and terms. If you do not use the cookie, some functions may not work properly.

• Open access
• Published: 10 February 2023

Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education: a systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology-based learning model

• Darmawansah Darmawansah   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3464-4598 1 ,
• Gwo-Jen Hwang   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5155-276X 1 , 3 ,
• Mei-Rong Alice Chen   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2722-0401 2 &
• Jia-Cing Liang   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1134-527X 1  

International Journal of STEM Education volume  10 , Article number:  12 ( 2023 ) Cite this article

22k Accesses

28 Citations

5 Altmetric

Metrics details

Fostering students’ competence in applying interdisciplinary knowledge to solve problems has been recognized as an important and challenging issue globally. This is why STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) education has been emphasized at all levels in schools. Meanwhile, the use of robotics has played an important role in STEM learning design. The purpose of this study was to fill a gap in the current review of research on Robotics-based STEM (R-STEM) education by systematically reviewing existing research in this area. This systematic review examined the role of robotics and research trends in STEM education. A total of 39 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed. The review indicated that R-STEM education studies were mostly conducted in the United States and mainly in K-12 schools. Learner and teacher perceptions were the most popular research focus in these studies which applied robots. LEGO was the most used tool to accomplish the learning objectives. In terms of application, Technology (programming) was the predominant robotics-based STEM discipline in the R-STEM studies. Moreover, project-based learning (PBL) was the most frequently employed learning strategy in robotics-related STEM research. In addition, STEM learning and transferable skills were the most popular educational goals when applying robotics. Based on the findings, several implications and recommendations to researchers and practitioners are proposed.

Introduction

Over the past few years, implementation of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education has received a positive response from researchers and practitioners alike. According to Chesloff ( 2013 ), the winning point of STEM education is its learning process, which validates that students can use their creativity, collaborative skills, and critical thinking skills. Consequently, STEM education promotes a bridge between learning in authentic real-life scenarios (Erdoğan et al., 2016 ; Kelley & Knowles, 2016 ). This is the greatest challenge facing STEM education. The learning experience and real-life situation might be intangible in some areas due to pre- and in-conditioning such as unfamiliarity with STEM content (Moomaw, 2012 ), unstructured learning activities (Sarama & Clements, 2009), and inadequate preparation of STEM curricula (Conde et al., 2021 ).

In response to these issues, the adoption of robotics in STEM education has been encouraged as part of an innovative and methodological approach to learning (Bargagna et al., 2019 ; Ferreira et al., 2018 ; Kennedy et al., 2015 ; Köse et al., 2015 ). Similarly, recent studies have reported that the use of robots in school settings has an impact on student curiosity (Adams et al., 2011 ), arts and craftwork (Sullivan & Bers, 2016 ), and logic (Bers, 2008 ). When robots and educational robotics are considered a core part of STEM education, it offers the possibility to promote STEM disciplines such as engineering concepts or even interdisciplinary practices (Okita, 2014 ). Anwar et. al. ( 2019 ) argued that integration between robots and STEM learning is important to support STEM learners who do not immediately show interest in STEM disciplines. Learner interest can elicit the development of various skills such as computational thinking, creativity and motivation, collaboration and cooperation, problem-solving, and other higher-order thinking skills (Evripidou et al., 2020 ). To some extent, artificial intelligence (AI) has driven the use of robotics and tools, such as their application to designing instructional activities (Hwang et al., 2020 ). The potential for research on robotics in STEM education can be traced by showing the rapid increase in the number of studies over the past few years. The emphasis is on critically reviewing existing research to determine what prior research already tells us about R-STEM education, what it means, and where it can influence future research. Thus, this study aimed to fill the gap by conducting a systematic review to grasp the potential of R-STEM education.

In terms of providing the core concepts of roles and research trends of R-STEM education, this study explored beyond the scope of previous reviews by conducting content analysis to see the whole picture. To address the following questions, this study analyzed published research in the Web of Science database regarding the technology-based learning model (Lin & Hwang, 2019 ):

In terms of research characteristic and features, what were the location, sample size, duration of intervention, research methods, and research foci of the R-STEM education research?

In terms of interaction between participants and robots, what were the participants, roles of the robot, and types of robot in the R-STEM education research?

In terms of application, what were the dominant STEM disciplines, contribution to STEM disciplines, integration of robots and STEM, pedagogical interventions, and educational objectives of the R-STEM research?

• Literature review

Previous studies have investigated the role of robotics in R-STEM education from several research foci such as the specific robot users (Atman Uslu et al., 2022 ; Benitti, 2012 ; Jung & Won, 2018 ; Spolaôr & Benitti, 2017 ; van den Berghe et al., 2019 ), the potential value of R-STEM education (Çetin & Demircan, 2020 ; Conde et al., 2021 ; Zhang et al., 2021 ), and the types of robots used in learning practices (Belpaeme et al., 2018 ; Çetin & Demircan, 2020 ; Tselegkaridis & Sapounidis, 2021 ). While their findings provided a dynamic perspective on robotics, they failed to contribute to the core concept of promoting R-STEM education. Those previous reviews did not summarize the exemplary practice of employing robots in STEM education. For instance, Spolaôr and Benitti ( 2017 ) concluded that robots could be an auxiliary tool for learning but did not convey whether the purpose of using robots is essential to enhance learning outcomes. At the same time, it is important to address the use and purpose of robotics in STEM learning, the connections between theoretical pedagogy and STEM practice, and the reasons for the lack of quantitative research in the literature to measure student learning outcomes.

First, Benitti ( 2012 ) reviewed research published between 2000 and 2009. This review study aimed to determine the educational potential of using robots in schools and found that it is feasible to use most robots to support the pedagogical process of learning knowledge and skills related to science and mathematics. Five years later, Spolaôr and Benitti ( 2017 ) investigated the use of robots in higher education by employing the adopted-learning theories that were not covered in their previous review in 2012. The study’s content analysis approach synthesized 15 papers from 2002 to 2015 that used robots to support instruction based on fundamental learning theory. The main finding was that project-based learning (PBL) and experiential learning, or so-called hands-on learning, were considered to be the most used theories. Both theories were found to increase learners’ motivation and foster their skills (Behrens et al., 2010 ; Jou et al., 2010 ). However, the vast majority of discussions of the selected reviews emphasized positive outcomes while overlooking negative or mixed outcomes. Along the same lines, Jung and Won ( 2018 ) also reviewed theoretical approaches to Robotics education in 47 studies from 2006 to 2017. Their focused review of studies suggested that the employment of robots in learning should be shifted from technology to pedagogy. This review paper argued to determine student engagement in robotics education, despite disagreements among pedagogical traits. Although Jung and Won ( 2018 ) provided information of teaching approaches applied in robotics education, they did not offer critical discussion on how those approaches were formed between robots and the teaching disciplines.

On the other hand, Conde et. al. ( 2021 ) identified PBL as the most common learning approach in their study by reviewing 54 papers from 2006 to 2019. Furthermore, the studies by Çetin and Demircan ( 2020 ) and Tselegkaridis and Sapounidis ( 2021 ) focused on the types of robots used in STEM education and reviewed 23 and 17 papers, respectively. Again, these studies touted learning engagement as a positive outcome, and disregarded the different perspectives of robot use in educational settings on students’ academic performance and cognition. More recently, a meta-analysis by Zhang et. al. ( 2021 ) focused on the effects of robotics on students’ computational thinking and their attitudes toward STEM learning. In addition, a systematic review by Atman Uslu et. al. ( 2022 ) examined the use of educational robotics and robots in learning.

So far, the review study conducted by Atman Uslu et. al. ( 2022 ) could be the only study that has attempted to clarify some of the criticisms of using educational robots by reviewing the studies published from 2006 to 2019 in terms of their research issues (e.g., interventions, interactions, and perceptions), theoretical models, and the roles of robots in educational settings. However, they failed to take into account several important features of robots in education research, such as thematic subjects and educational objectives, for instance, whether robot-based learning could enhance students’ competence of constructing new knowledge, or whether robots could bring either a motivational facet or creativity to pedagogy to foster students’ learning outcomes. These are essential in investigating the trends of technology-based learning research as well as the role of technology in education as a review study is aimed to offer a comprehensive discussion which derived from various angles and dimensions. Moreover, the role of robots in STEM education was generally ignored in the previous review studies. Hence, there is still a need for a comprehensive understanding of the role of robotics in STEM education and research trends (e.g., research issues, interaction issues, and application issues) so as to provide researchers and practitioners with valuable references. That is, our study can remedy the shortcomings of previous reviews (Additional file 1 ).

The above comments demonstrate how previous scholars have understood what they call “the effectiveness of robotics in STEM education” in terms of innovative educational tools. In other words, despite their useful findings and ongoing recommendations, there has not been a thorough investigation of how robots are widely used from all angles. Furthermore, the results of existing review studies have been less than comprehensive in terms of the potential role of robotics in R-STEM education after taking into account various potential dimensions based on the technology-based model that we propose in this study.

The studies in this review were selected from the literature on the Web of Science, our sole database due to its rigorous journal research and qualified studies (e.g., Huang et al., 2022 ), discussing the adoption of R-STEM education, and the data collection procedures for this study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al., 2009 ) as referred to by prior studies (e.g., Chen et al., 2021a , 2021b ; García-Martínez et al., 2020 ). Considering publication quality, previous studies (Fu & Hwang, 2018 ; Martín-Páez et al., 2019 ) suggested using Boolean expressions to search Web of Science databases. The search terms for “robot” are “robot” or “robotics” or “robotics” or “Lego” (Spolaôr & Benitti, 2017 ). According to Martín-Páez et. al. ( 2019 ), expressions for STEM education include “STEM” or “STEM education” or “STEM literacy” or “STEM learning” or “STEM teaching” or “STEM competencies”. These search terms were entered into the WOS database to search only for SSCI papers due to its wide recognition as being high-quality publications in the field of educational technology. As a result, 165 papers were found in the database. The search was then restricted to 2012–2021 as suggested by Hwang and Tsai ( 2011 ). In addition, the number of papers was reduced to 131 by selecting only publications of the “article” type and those written in “English”. Subsequently, we selected the category “education and educational research” which reduced the number to 60 papers. During the coding analysis, the two coders screened out 21 papers unrelated to R-STEM education. The coding result had a Kappa coefficient of 0.8 for both coders (Cohen, 1960 ). After the screening stage, a final total of 39 articles were included in this study, as shown in Fig.  1 . Also, the selected papers are marked with an asterisk in the reference list and are listed in Appendixes 1 and 2 .

PRISMA procedure for the selection process

Theoretical model, data coding, and analysis

This study comprised content analysis using a coding scheme to provide insights into different aspects of the studies in question (Chen et al., 2021a , 2021b ; Martín-Páez et al., 2019 ). The coding scheme adopted the conceptual framework proposed by Lin and Hwang ( 2019 ), comprising “STEM environments”, “learners”, and “robots”, as shown in Fig.  2 . Three issues were identified:

In terms of research issues, five dimensions were included: “location”, “sample size”, “duration of intervention”, (Zhong & Xia, 2020 ) “research methods”, (Johnson & Christensen, 2000 ) and “research foci”. (Hynes et al., 2017 ; Spolaôr & Benitti, 2017 ).

In terms of interaction issues, three dimensions were included: “participants”, (Hwang & Tsai, 2011 ), “roles of the robot”, and “types of robot” (Taylor, 1980 ).

In terms of application, five dimensions were included, namely “dominant STEM disciplines”, “integration of robot and STEM” (Martín‐Páez et al., 2019 ), “contribution to STEM disciplines”, “pedagogical intervention”, (Spolaôr & Benitti, 2017 ) and “educational objectives” (Anwar et al., 2019 ). Table 1 shows the coding items in each dimension of the investigated issues.

Model of R-STEM education theme framework

Figure  3 shows the distribution of the publications selected from 2012 to 2021. The first two publications were found in 2012. From 2014 to 2017, the number of publications steadily increased, with two, three, four, and four publications, respectively. Moreover, R-STEM education has been increasingly discussed within the last 3 years (2018–2020) with six, three, and ten publications, respectively. The global pandemic in the early 2020s could have affected the number of papers published, with only five papers in 2021. This could be due to the fact that most robot-STEM education research is conducted in physical classroom settings.

Number of publications on R-STEM education from 2012 to 2021

Table 2 displays the journals in which the selected papers were published, the number of papers published in each journal, and the journal’s impact factor. It can be concluded that most of the papers on R-STEM education research were published in the Journal of Science Education and Technology , and the International Journal of Technology and Design Education , with six papers, respectively.

Research issues

The geographic distribution of the reviewed studies indicated that more than half of the studies were conducted in the United States (53.8%), while Turkey and China were the location of five and three studies, respectively. Taiwan, Canada, and Italy were indicated to have two studies each. One study each was conducted in Australia, Mexico, and the Netherlands. Figure  4 shows the distribution of the countries where the R-STEM education was conducted.

Locations where the studies were conducted ( N  = 39)

Sample size

Regarding sample size, there were four most common sample sizes for the selected period (2012–2021): greater than 80 people (28.21% or 11 out of 39 studies), between 41 and 60 (25.64% or 10 out of 39 studies), 1 to 20 people (23.08% or 9 out of 39), and between 21 and 40 (20.51% or 8 out of 39 studies). The size of 61 to 80 people (2.56% or 1 out of 39 studies) was the least popular sample size (see Fig.  5 ).

Sample size across the studies ( N  = 39)

Duration of intervention

Regarding the duration of the study (see Fig.  6 ), experiments were mostly conducted for less than or equal to 4 weeks (35.9% or 14 out of 39 studies). This was followed by less than or equal to 8 weeks (25.64% or 10 out of 39 studies), less than or equal to 6 months (20.51% or 8 out 39 studies), less than or equal to 12 months (10.26% or 4 out of 39 studies), while less than or equal to 1 day (7.69% or 3 out of 39 studies) was the least chosen duration.

Duration of interventions across the studies ( N  = 39)

Research methods

Figure  7 demonstrates the trends in research methods from 2012 to 2021. The use of questionnaires or surveys (35.9% or 14 out of 39 studies) and mixed methods research (35.9% or 14 out of 39 studies) outnumbered other methods such as experimental design (25.64% or 10 out of 39 studies) and system development (2.56% or 1 out of 39 studies).

Frequency of each research method used in 2012–2021

Research foci

In these studies, research foci were divided into four aspects: cognition, affective, operational skill, and learning behavior. If the study involved more than one research focus, each issue was coded under each research focus.

In terms of cognitive skills, students’ learning performance was the most frequently measured (15 out of 39 studies). Six studies found that R-STEM education brought a positive result to learning performance. Two studies did not find any significant difference, while five studies showed mixed results or found that it depends. For example, Chang and Chen ( 2020 ) revealed that robots in STEM learning improved students’ cognition such as designing, electronic components, and computer programming.

In terms of affective skills, just over half of the reviewed studies (23 out of 39, 58.97%) addressed the students’ or teachers’ perceptions of employing robots in STEM education, of which 14 studies showed positive perceptions. In contrast, nine studies found mixed results. For instance, Casey et. al. ( 2018 ) determined students’ mixed perceptions of the use of robots in learning coding and programming.

Five studies were identified regarding operational skills by investigating students’ psychomotor aspects such as construction and mechanical elements (Pérez & López, 2019 ; Sullivan & Bers, 2016 ) and building and modeling robots (McDonald & Howell, 2012 ). Three studies found positive results, while two reported mixed results.

In terms of learning behavior, five out of 39 studies measured students’ learning behavior, such as students’ engagement with robots (Ma et al., 2020 ), students’ social behavior while interacting with robots (Konijn & Hoorn, 2020 ), and learner–parent interactions with interactive robots (Phamduy et al., 2017 ). Three studies showed positive results, while two found mixed results or found that it depends (see Table 3 ).

Interaction issues

Participants.

Regarding the educational level of the participants, elementary school students (33.33% or 13 studies) were the most preferred study participants, followed by high school students (15.38% or 6 studies). The data were similar for preschool, junior high school, in-service teachers, and non-designated personnel (10.26% or 4 studies). College students, including pre-service teachers, were the least preferred study participants. Interestingly, some studies involved study participants from more than one educational level. For example, Ucgul and Cagiltay ( 2014 ) conducted experiments with elementary and middle school students, while Chapman et. al. ( 2020 ) investigated the effectiveness of robots with elementary, middle, and high school students. One study exclusively investigated gifted and talented students without reporting their levels of education (Sen et al., 2021 ). Figure  8 shows the frequency of study participants between 2012 and 2021.

Frequency of research participants in the selected period

The roles of robot

For the function of robots in STEM education, as shown in Fig.  9 , more than half of the selected articles used robots as tools (31 out of 39 studies, 79.49%) for which the robots were designed to foster students’ programming ability. For instance, Barker et. al. ( 2014 ) investigated students’ building and programming of robots in hands-on STEM activities. Seven out of 39 studies used robots as tutees (17.95%), with the aim of students and teachers learning to program. For example, Phamduy et. al. ( 2017 ) investigated a robotic fish exhibit to analyze visitors’ experience of controlling and interacting with the robot. The least frequent role was tutor (2.56%), with only one study which programmed the robot to act as tutor or teacher for students (see Fig.  9 ).

Frequency of roles of robots

Types of robot

Furthermore, in terms of the types of robots used in STEM education, the LEGO MINDSTORMS robot was the most used (35.89% or 14 out of 39 studies), while Arduino was the second most used (12.82% or 5 out of 39 studies), and iRobot Create (5.12% or 2 out of 39 studies), and NAO (5.12% or 2 out of 39 studies) ranked third equal, as shown in Fig.  10 . LEGO was used to solve STEM problem-solving tasks such as building bridges (Convertini, 2021 ), robots (Chiang et al., 2020 ), and challenge-specific game boards (Leonard et al., 2018 ). Furthermore, four out of 36 studies did not specify the robots used in their studies.

Frequency of types of robots used

Application issues

The dominant disciplines and the contribution to stem disciplines.

As shown in Table 4 , the most dominant discipline in R-STEM education research published from 2012 to 2021 was technology. Engineering, mathematics, and science were the least dominant disciplines. Programming was the most common subject for robotics contribution to the STEM disciplines (25 out of 36 studies, 64.1%), followed by engineering (12.82%), and mathematical method (12.82%). We found that interdisciplinary was discussed in the selected period, but in relatively small numbers. However, this finding is relevant to expose the use of robotics in STEM disciplines as a whole. For example, Barker et. al. ( 2014 ) studied how robotics instructional modules in geospatial and programming domains could be impacted by fidelity adherence and exposure to the modules. The dominance of STEM subjects based on robotics makes it necessary to study the way robotics and STEM are integrated into the learning process. Therefore, the forms of STEM integration are discussed in the following sub-section to report how teaching and learning of these disciplines can have learning goals in an integrated STEM environment.

Integration of robots and STEM

There are three general forms of STEM integration (see Fig.  11 ). Of these studies, robot-STEM content integration was commonly used (22 studies, 56.41%), in which robot activities had multiple STEM disciplinary learning objectives. For example, Chang and Chen ( 2020 ) employed Arduino in a robotics sailboat curriculum. This curriculum was a cross-disciplinary integration, the objectives of which were understanding sailboats and sensors (Science), the direction of motors and mechanical structures (Engineering), and control programming (Technology). The second most common form was supporting robot-STEM content integration (12 out of 39 studies, 30.76%). For instance, KIBO robots were used in the robotics activities where the mechanical elements content area was meaningfully covered in support of the main programming learning objectives (Sullivan & Bers, 2019 ). The least common form was robot-STEM context integration (5 out of 39 studies, 12.82%) which was implemented through the robot to situate the disciplinary content goals in another discipline’s practices. For example, Christensen et. al. ( 2015 ) analyzed the impact of an after-school program that offered robots as part of students’ challenges in a STEM competition environment (geoscience and programming).

The forms of robot-STEM integration

Pedagogical interventions

In terms of instructional interventions, as shown in Fig.  12 , project-based learning (PBL) was the preferred instructional theory for using robots in R-STEM education (38.46% or 15 out 39 studies), with the aim of motivating students or robot users in the STEM learning activities. For example, Pérez and López ( 2019 ) argued that using low-cost robots in the teaching process increased students’ motivation and interest in STEM areas. Problem-based learning was the second most used intervention in this dimension (17.95% or 7 out of 39 studies). It aimed to improve students’ motivation by giving them an early insight into practical Engineering and Technology. For example, Gomoll et. al. ( 2017 ) employed robots to connect students from two different areas to work collaboratively. Their study showed the importance of robotic engagement in preliminary learning activities. Edutainment (12.82% or 5 out of 39 studies) was the third most used intervention. This intervention was used to bring together students and robots and to promote learning by doing. Christensen et. al. ( 2015 ) and Phamduy et. al. ( 2017 ) were the sample studies that found the benefits of hands-on and active learning engagement; for example, robotics competitions and robotics exhibitions could help retain a positive interest in STEM activities.

The pedagogical interventions in R-STEM education

Educational objectives

As far as the educational objectives of robots are concerned (see Fig.  13 ), the majority of robots are used for learning and transfer skills (58.97% or 23 out of 39 studies) to enhance students’ construction of new knowledge. It emphasized the process of learning through inquiry, exploration, and making cognitive associations with prior knowledge. Chang and Chen’s ( 2020 ) is a sample study on how learning objectives promote students’ ability to transfer science and engineering knowledge learned through science experiments to design a robotics sailboat that could navigate automatically as a novel setting. Moreover, it also explicitly aimed to examine the hands-on learning experience with robots. For example, McDonald and Howell ( 2012 ) described how robots engaged with early year students to better understand the concepts of literacy and numeracy.

Educational objectives of R-STEM education

Creativity and motivation were found to be educational objectives in R-STEM education for seven out of 39 studies (17.94%). It was considered from either the motivational facet of social trend or creativity in pedagogy to improve students’ interest in STEM disciplines. For instance, these studies were driven by the idea that employing robots could develop students’ scientific creativity (Guven et al., 2020 ), confidence and presentation ability (Chiang et al., 2020 ), passion for college and STEM fields (Meyers et al., 2012 ), and career choice (Ayar, 2015 ).

The general benefits of educational robots and the professional development of teachers were equally found in four studies each. The first objective, the general benefits of educational robotics, was to address those studies that found a broad benefit of using robots in STEM education without highlighting the particular focus. The sample studies suggested that robotics in STEM could promote active learning and improve students’ learning experience through social interaction (Hennessy Elliott, 2020 ) and collaborative science projects (Li et al., 2016 ). The latter, teachers’ professional development, was addressed by four studies (10.25%) to utilize robots to enhance teachers’ efficacy. Studies in this category discussed how teachers could examine and identify distinctive instructional approaches with robotics work (Bernstein et al., 2022 ), design meaningful learning instruction (Ryan et al., 2017 ) and lesson materials (Kim et al., 2015 ), and develop more robust cultural responsive self-efficacy (Leonard et al., 2018 ).

This review study was conducted using content analysis from the WOS collection of research on robotics in STEM education from 2012 to 2021. The findings are discussed under the headings of each research question.

RQ 1: In terms of research, what were the location, sample size, duration of intervention, research methods, and research foci of the R-STEM education research?

About half of the studies were conducted in North America (the USA and Canada), while limited studies were found from other continents (Europe and the Asia Pacific). This trend was identified in the previous study on robotics for STEM activities (Conde et al., 2021 ). Among 39 studies, 28 (71.79%) had fewer than 80 participants, while 11 (28.21%) had more than 80 participants. The intervention’s duration across the studies was almost equally divided between less than or equal to a month (17 out of 39 studies, 43.59%) and more than a month (22 out of 39 studies, 56.41%). The rationale behind the most popular durations is that these studies were conducted in classroom experiments and as conditional learning. For example, Kim et. al. ( 2018 ) conducted their experiments in a course offered at a university where it took 3 weeks based on a robotics module.

A total of four different research methodologies were adopted in the studies, the two most popular being mixed methods (35.89%) and questionnaires or surveys (35.89%). Although mixed methods can be daunting and time-consuming to conduct (Kucuk et al., 2013 ), the analysis found that it was one of the most used methods in the published articles, regardless of year. Chang and Chen ( 2022 ) embedded a mixed-methods design in their study to qualitatively answer their second research question. The possible reason for this is that other researchers prefer to use mixed methods as their research design. Their main research question was answered quantitatively, while the second and remaining research questions were reported through qualitative analysis (Casey et al., 2018 ; Chapman et al., 2020 ; Ma et al., 2020 ; Newton et al., 2020 ; Sullivan & Bers, 2019 ). Thus, it was concluded that mixed methods could lead to the best understanding and integration of research questions (Creswell & Clark, 2013 ; Creswell et al., 2003 ).

In contrast, system development was the least used compared to other study designs, as most studies used existing robotic systems. It should be acknowledged that the most common outcome we found was to enable students to understand these concepts as they relate to STEM subjects. Despite the focus on system development, the help of robotics was identified as increasing the success of STEM learning (Benitti, 2012 ). Because limited studies focused on system development as their primary purpose (1 out of 39 studies, 2.56%), needs analyses may ask whether the mechanisms, types, and challenges of robotics are appropriate for learners. Future research will need further design and development of personalized robots to fill this part of the research gap.

About half of the studies (23 studies, 58.97%) were focused on investigating the effectiveness of robots in STEM learning, primarily by collecting students’ and teachers’ opinions. This result is more similar to Belpaeme et al. ( 2018 ) finding that users’ perceptions were common measures in studies on robotics learning. However, identifying perceptions of R-STEM education may not help us understand exactly how robots’ specific features afford STEM learning. Therefore, it is argued that researchers should move beyond such simple collective perceptions in future research. Instead, further studies may compare different robots and their features. For instance, whether robots with multiple sensors, a sensor, or without a sensor could affect students’ cognitive, metacognitive, emotional, and motivational in STEM areas (e.g., Castro et al., 2018 ). Also, there could be instructional strategies embedded in R-STEM education that can lead students to do high-order thinking, such as problem-solving with a decision (Özüorçun & Bicen, 2017 ), self-regulated and self-engagement learning (e.g., Li et al., 2016 ). Researchers may also compare the robotics-based approach with other technology-based approaches (e.g., Han et al., 2015 ; Hsiao et al., 2015 ) in supporting STEM learning.

RQ 2: In terms of interaction, what were the participants, roles of the robots, and types of robots of the R-STEM education research?

The majority of reviewed studies on R-STEM education were conducted with K-12 students (27 studies, 69.23%), including preschool, elementary school, junior, and high school students. There were limited studies that involved higher education students and teachers. This finding is similar to the previous review study (Atman Uslu et al., 2022 ), which found a wide gap among research participants between K-12 students and higher education students, including teachers. Although it is unclear why there were limited studies conducted involving teachers and higher education students, which include pre-service teachers, we are aware of the critical task of designing meaningful R-STEM learning experiences which is likely to require professional development. In this case, both pre- and in-service teachers could examine specific objectives, identify topics, test the application, and design potential instruction to align well with robots in STEM learning (Bernstein et al., 2022 ). Concurrently, these pedagogical content skills in R-STEM disciplines might not be taught in the traditional pre-service teacher education and particular teachers’ development program (Huang et al., 2022 ). Thus, it is recommended that future studies could be conducted to understand whether robots can improve STEM education for higher education students and teachers professionally.

Regarding the role of robots, most were used as learning tools (31 studies, 79.48%). These robots are designed to have the functional ability to command or program some analysis and processing (Taylor, 1980 ). For example, Leonard et. al. ( 2018 ) described how pre-service teachers are trained in robotics activities to facilitate students’ learning of computational thinking. Therefore, robots primarily provide opportunities for learners to construct knowledge and skills. Only one study (2.56%), however, was found to program robots to act as tutors or teachers for students. Designing a robot-assisted system has become common in other fields such as language learning (e.g., Hong et al., 2016 ; Iio et al., 2019 ) and special education (e.g., Özdemir & Karaman, 2017 ) where the robots instruct the learning activities for students. In contrast, R-STEM education has not looked at the robot as a tutor, but has instead focused on learning how to build robots (Konijn & Hoorn, 2020 ). It is argued that robots with features as human tutors, such as providing personalized guidance and feedback, could assist during problem-solving activities (Fournier-Viger et al., 2013 ). Thus, it is worth exploring in what teaching roles the robot will work best as a tutor in STEM education.

When it comes to types of robots, the review found that LEGO dominated robots’ employment in STEM education (15 studies, 38.46%), while the other types were limited in their use. It is considered that LEGO tasks are more often associated with STEM because learners can be more involved in the engineering or technical tasks. Most researchers prefer to use LEGO in their studies (Convertini, 2021 ). Another interesting finding is about the cost of the robots. Although robots are generally inexpensive, some products are particularly low-cost and are commonly available in some regions (Conde et al., 2021 ). Most preferred robots are still considered exclusive learning tools in developing countries and regions. In this case, only one study offered a low-cost robot (Pérez & López, 2019 ). This might be a reason why the selected studies were primarily conducted in the countries and continents where the use of advanced technologies, such as robots, is growing rapidly (see Fig.  4 ). Based on this finding, there is a need for more research on the use of low-cost robots in R-STEM instruction in the least developed areas or regions of the world. For example, Nel et. al. ( 2017 ) designed a STEM program to build and design a robot which exclusively enabling students from low-income household to participate in the R-STEM activities.

RQ 3: In terms of application, what were the dominant STEM disciplines, contribution to STEM disciplines, integration of robots and STEM, pedagogical interventions, and educational objectives of the R-STEM research?

While Technology and Engineering are the dominant disciplines, this review found several studies that directed their research to interdisciplinary issues. The essence of STEM lies in interdisciplinary issues that integrate one discipline into another to create authentic learning (Hansen, 2014 ). This means that some researchers are keen to develop students’ integrated knowledge of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (Chang & Chen, 2022 ; Luo et al., 2019 ). However, Science and Mathematics were given less weight in STEM learning activities compared to Technology and Engineering. This issue has been frequently reported as a barrier to implementing R-STEM in the interdisciplinary subject. Some reasons include difficulties in pedagogy and classroom roles, lack of curriculum integration, and a limited opportunity to embody one learning subject into others (Margot & Kettler, 2019 ). Therefore, further research is encouraged to treat these disciplines equally, so is the way of STEM learning integration.

The subject-matter results revealed that “programming” was the most common research focus in R-STEM research (25 studies). Researchers considered programming because this particular topic was frequently emphasized in their studies (Chang & Chen, 2020 , 2022 ; Newton et al., 2020 ). Similarly, programming concepts were taught through support robots for kindergarteners (Sullivan & Bers, 2019 ), girls attending summer camps (Chapman et al., 2020 ), and young learners with disabilities (Lamptey et al., 2021 ). Because programming simultaneously accompanies students’ STEM learning, we believe future research can incorporate a more dynamic and comprehensive learning focus. Robotics-based STEM education research is expected to encounter many interdisciplinary learning issues.

Researchers in the reviewed studies agreed that the robot could be integrated with STEM learning with various integration forms. Bryan et. al. ( 2015 ) argued that robots were designed to develop multiple learning goals from STEM knowledge, beginning with an initial learning context. It is parallel with our finding that robot-STEM content integration was the most common integration form (22 studies, 56.41%). In this form, studies mainly defined their primary learning goals with one or more anchor STEM disciplines (e.g., Castro et al., 2018 ; Chang & Chen, 2020 ; Luo et al., 2019 ). The learning goals provided coherence between instructional activities and assessments that explicitly focused on the connection among STEM disciplines. As a result, students can develop a deep and transferable understanding of interdisciplinary phenomena and problems through emphasizing the content across disciplines (Bryan et al., 2015 ). However, the findings on learning instruction and evaluation in this integration are inconclusive. A better understanding of the embodiment of learning contexts is needed, for instance, whether instructions are inclusive, socially relevant, and authentic in the situated context. Thus, future research is needed to identify the quality of instruction and evaluation and the specific characteristics of robot-STEM integration. This may place better provision of opportunities for understanding the form of pedagogical content knowledge to enhance practitioners’ self-efficacy and pedagogical beliefs (Chen et al., 2021a , 2021b ).

Project-based learning (PBL) was the most used instructional intervention with robots in R-STEM education (15 studies, 38.46%). Blumenfeld et al. ( 1991 ) credited PBL with the main purpose of engaging students in investigating learning models. In the case of robotics, students can create robotic artifacts (Spolaôr & Benitti, 2017 ). McDonald and Howell ( 2012 ) used robotics to develop technological skills in lower grades. Leonard et. al. ( 2016 ) used robots to engage and develop students’ computational thinking strategies in another example. In the aforementioned study, robots were used to support learning content in informal education, and both teachers and students designed robotics experiences aligned with the curriculum (Bernstein et al., 2022 ). As previously mentioned, this study is an example of how robots can cover STEM content from the learning domain to support educational goals.

The educational goal of R-STEM education was the last finding of our study. Most of the reviewed studies focused on learning and transferable skills as their goals (23 studies, 58.97%). They targeted learning because the authors investigated the effectiveness of R-STEM learning activities (Castro et al., 2018 ; Convertini, 2021 ; Konijn & Hoorn, 2020 ; Ma et al., 2020 ) and conceptual knowledge of STEM disciplines (Barak & Assal, 2018 ; Gomoll et al., 2017 ; Jaipal-Jamani & Angeli 2017 ). They targeted transferable skills because they require learners to develop individual competencies in STEM skills (Kim et al., 2018 ; McDonald & Howell, 2012 ; Sullivan & Bers, 2016 ) and to master STEM in actual competition-related skills (Chiang et al., 2020 ; Hennessy Elliott, 2020 ).

Conclusions and implications

The majority of the articles examined in this study referred to theoretical frameworks or certain applications of pedagogical theories. This finding contradicts Atman Uslu et. al. ( 2022 ), who concluded that most of the studies in this domain did not refer to pedagogical approaches. Although we claim the employment pedagogical frameworks in the examined articles exist, those articles primarily did not consider a strict instructional design when employing robots in STEM learning. Consequently, the discussions in the studies did not include how the learning–teaching process affords students’ positive perceptions. Therefore, both practitioners and researchers should consider designing learning instruction using robots in STEM education. To put an example, the practitioners may regard students’ zone of proximal development (ZPD) when employing robot in STEM tasks. Giving an appropriate scaffolding and learning contents are necessary for them to enhance their operational skills, application knowledge and emotional development. Although the integration between robots and STEM education was founded in the reviewed studies, it is worth further investigating the disciplines in which STEM activities have been conducted. This current review found that technology and engineering were the subject areas of most concern to researchers, while science and mathematics did not attract as much attention. This situation can be interpreted as an inadequate evaluation of R-STEM education. In other words, although those studies aimed at the interdisciplinary subject, most assessments and evaluations were monodisciplinary and targeted only knowledge. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out further studies in these insufficient subject areas to measure and answer the potential of robots in every STEM field and its integration. Moreover, the broadly consistent reporting of robotics generally supporting STEM content could impact practitioners only to employ robots in the mainstream STEM educational environment. Until that point, very few studies had investigated the prominence use of robots in various and large-scale multidiscipline studies (e.g., Christensen et al., 2015 ).

Another finding of the reviewed studies was the characteristic of robot-STEM integration. Researchers and practitioners must first answer why and how integrated R-STEM could be embodied in the teaching–learning process. For example, when robots are used as a learning tool to achieve STEM learning objectives, practitioners are suggested to have application knowledge. At the same time, researchers are advised to understand the pedagogical theories so that R-STEM integration can be flexibly merged into learning content. This means that the learning design should offer students’ existing knowledge of the immersive experience in dealing with robots and STEM activities that assist them in being aware of their ideas, then building their knowledge. In such a learning experience, students will understand the concept of STEM more deeply by engaging with robots. Moreover, demonstration of R-STEM learning is not only about the coherent understanding of the content knowledge. Practitioners need to apply both flexible subject-matter knowledge (e.g., central facts, concepts and procedures in the core concept of knowledge), and pedagogical content knowledge, which specific knowledge of approaches that are suitable for organizing and delivering topic-specific content, to the discipline of R-STEM education. Consequently, practitioners are required to understand the nature of robots and STEM through the content and practices, for example, taking the lead in implementing innovation through subject area instruction, developing collaboration that enriches R-STEM learning experiences for students, and being reflective practitioners by using students’ learning artifacts to inform and revise practices.

Limitations and recommendations for future research

Overall, future research could explore the great potential of using robots in education to build students’ knowledge and skills when pursuing learning objectives. It is believed that the findings from this study will provide insightful information for future research.

The articles reviewed in this study were limited to journals indexed in the WOS database and R-STEM education-related SSCI articles. However, other databases and indexes (e.g., SCOPUS, and SCI) could be considered. In addition, the number of studies analyzed was relatively small. Further research is recommended to extend the review duration to cover the publications in the coming years. The results of this review study have provided directions for the research area of STEM education and robotics. Specifically, robotics combined with STEM education activities should aim to foster the development of creativity. Future research may aim to develop skills in specific areas such as robotics STEM education combined with the humanities, but also skills in other humanities disciplines across learning activities, social/interactive skills, and general guidelines for learners at different educational levels. Educators can design career readiness activities to help learners build self-directed learning plans.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics

Robotics-based STEM

Project-based learning

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review

Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., De Figueiredo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L., Schiefellite, C., Stevens, R., Svinicki, M., Trenor, J. M., & Wilson, D. M. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100 (1), 48–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00004.x

Article   Google Scholar  

Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (j-PEER), 9 (2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1223

Atman Uslu, N., Yavuz, G. Ö., & KoçakUsluel, Y. (2022). A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots. Interactive Learning Environments . https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2023890

*Ayar, M. C. (2015). First-hand experience with engineering design and career interest in engineering: An informal STEM education case study. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice, 15 (6), 1655–1675. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.6.0134

*Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM learning: Students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy—Practice, problem solving, and projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28 (1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9385-9

Bargagna, S., Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dario, P., Dell’Omo, M., Di Lieto, M. C., Inguaggiato, E., Martinelli, A., Pecini, C., & Sgandurra, G. (2019). Educational robotics in down syndrome: A feasibility study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24 (2), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9366-z

*Barker, B. S., Nugent, G., & Grandgenett, N. F. (2014). Examining fidelity of program implementation in a STEM-oriented out-of-school setting. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24 (1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9245-9

Behrens, A., Atorf, L., Schwann, R., Neumann, B., Schnitzler, R., Balle, J., Herold, T., Telle, A., Noll, T. G., Hameyer, K., & Aach, T. (2010). MATLAB meets LEGO Mindstorms—A freshman introduction course into practical engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53 (2), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2009.2017272

Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3 (21), eaat5954. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954

Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58 (3), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006

*Bernstein, D., Mutch-Jones, K., Cassidy, M., & Hamner, E. (2022). Teaching with robotics: Creating and implementing integrated units in middle school subjects. Journal of Research on Technology in Education . https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1816864

Bers, M. U. (2008). Blocks to robots learning with technology in the early childhood classroom . Teachers College Press.

Google Scholar  

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3–4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139

Bryan, L. A., Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). Integrated STEM education. In C. C. Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education (pp. 23–37). Routledge.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

*Casey, J. E., Gill, P., Pennington, L., & Mireles, S. V. (2018). Lines, roamers, and squares: Oh my! using floor robots to enhance Hispanic students’ understanding of programming. Education and Information Technologies, 23 (4), 1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9677-z

*Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Valente, M., Buselli, E., Salvini, P., & Dario, P. (2018). Can educational robotics introduce young children to robotics and how can we measure it?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34 (6), 970–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12304

Çetin, M., & Demircan, H. Ö. (2020). Empowering technology and engineering for STEM education through programming robots: A systematic literature review. Early Child Development and Care, 190 (9), 1323–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1534844

*Chang, C. C., & Chen, Y. (2020). Cognition, attitude, and interest in cross-disciplinary i-STEM robotics curriculum developed by thematic integration approaches of webbed and threaded models: A concurrent embedded mixed methods study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29 , 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09841-9

*Chang, C. C., & Chen, Y. (2022). Using mastery learning theory to develop task-centered hands-on STEM learning of Arduino-based educational robotics: Psychomotor performance and perception by a convergent parallel mixed method. Interactive Learning Environments . https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1741400

*Chapman, A., Rodriguez, F. D., Pena, C., Hinojosa, E., Morales, L., Del Bosque, V., Tijerina, Y., & Tarawneh, C. (2020). “Nothing is impossible”: Characteristics of Hispanic females participating in an informal STEM setting. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15 , 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09947-6

Chen, M. R. A., Hwang, G. J., Majumdar, R., Toyokawa, Y., & Ogata, H. (2021a). Research trends in the use of E-books in English as a foreign language (EFL) education from 2011 to 2020: A bibliometric and content analysis. Interactive Learning Environments . https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1888755

Chen, Y. L., Huang, L. F., & Wu, P. C. (2021b). Preservice preschool teachers’ self-efficacy in and need for STEM education professional development: STEM pedagogical belief as a mediator. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49 (2), 137–147.

Chesloff, J. D. (2013). STEM education must start in early childhood. Education Week, 32 (23), 27–32.

*Chiang, F. K., Liu, Y. Q., Feng, X., Zhuang, Y., & Sun, Y. (2020). Effects of the world robot Olympiad on the students who participate: A qualitative study. Interactive Learning Environments . https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1775097

*Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24 (6), 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6

Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 , 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104

Conde, M. Á., Rodríguez-Sedano, F. J., Fernández-Llamas, C., Gonçalves, J., Lima, J., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Fostering STEAM through challenge-based learning, robotics, and physical devices: A systematic mapping literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29 (1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22354

*Convertini, J. (2021). An interdisciplinary approach to investigate preschool children’s implicit inferential reasoning in scientific activities. Research in Science Education, 51 (1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09957-3

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2013). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.

Creswell, J. W., Plano-Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage.

Erdoğan, N., Navruz, B., Younes, R., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). Viewing how STEM project-based learning influences students’ science achievement through the implementation lens: A latent growth modeling. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12 (8), 2139–2154. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1294a

Evripidou, S., Georgiou, K., Doitsidis, L., Amanatiadis, A. A., Zinonos, Z., & Chatzichristofis, S. A. (2020). Educational robotics: Platforms, competitions and expected learning outcomes. IEEE Access, 8 , 219534–219562. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042555

Ferreira, N. F., Araujo, A., Couceiro, M. S., & Portugal, D. (2018). Intensive summer course in robotics–Robotcraft. Applied Computing and Informatics, 16 (1/2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.04.005

Fournier-Viger, P., Nkambou, R., Nguifo, E. M., Mayers, A., & Faghihi, U. (2013). A multiparadigm intelligent tutoring system for robotic arm training. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6 (4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2013.27

Fu, Q. K., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 119 , 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.004

García-Martínez, I., Tadeu, P., Montenegro-Rueda, M., & Fernández-Batanero, J. M. (2020). Networking for online teacher collaboration. Interactive Learning Environments . https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1764057

*Gomoll, A., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Šabanović, S., & Francisco, M. (2016). Dragons, ladybugs, and softballs: Girls’ STEM engagement with human-centered robotics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25 (6), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9647-z

*Gomoll, A. S., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Tolar, E., Šabanovic, S., & Francisco, M. (2017). Moving apart and coming together: Discourse, engagement, and deep learning. Educational Technology and Society, 20 (4), 219–232.

*Guven, G., KozcuCakir, N., Sulun, Y., Cetin, G., & Guven, E. (2020). Arduino-assisted robotics coding applications integrated into the 5E learning model in science teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education . https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1812136

Han, J., Jo, M., Hyun, E., & So, H. J. (2015). Examining young children’s perception toward augmented reality-infused dramatic play. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63 (3), 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9374-9

Hansen, M. (2014). Characteristics of schools successful in STEM: Evidence from two states’ longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Research, 107 (5), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.823364

*Hennessy Elliott, C. (2020). “Run it through me:” Positioning, power, and learning on a high school robotics team. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29 (4–5), 598–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1770763

Hong, Z. W., Huang, Y. M., Hsu, M., & Shen, W. W. (2016). Authoring robot-assisted instructional materials for improving learning performance and motivation in EFL classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19 (1), 337–349.

Hsiao, H. S., Chang, C. S., Lin, C. Y., & Hsu, H. L. (2015). “iRobiQ”: The influence of bidirectional interaction on kindergarteners’ reading motivation, literacy, and behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 23 (3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745435

Huang, B., Jong, M. S. Y., Tu, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., Chai, C. S., & Jiang, M. Y. C. (2022). Trends and exemplary practices of STEM teacher professional development programs in K-12 contexts: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104577

Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42 (4), E65–E70.

Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1 , 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001

Hynes, M. M., Mathis, C., Purzer, S., Rynearson, A., & Siverling, E. (2017). Systematic review of research in P-12 engineering education from 2000–2015. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33 (1), 453–462.

Iio, T., Maeda, R., Ogawa, K., Yoshikawa, Y., Ishiguro, H., Suzuki, K., Aoki, T., Maesaki, M., & Hama, M. (2019). Improvement of Japanese adults’ English speaking skills via experiences speaking to a robot. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35 (2), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12325

*Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli, C. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26 (2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9663-z

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2000). Educational research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches . Allyn & Bacon.

Jou, M., Chuang, C. P., & Wu, Y. S. (2010). Creating interactive web-based environments to scaffold creative reasoning and meaningful learning: From physics to products. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9 (4), 49–57.

Jung, S., & Won, E. (2018). Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability, 10 (4), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040905

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3 , 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Kennedy, J., Baxter, P., & Belpaeme, T. (2015). Comparing robot embodiments in a guided discovery learning interaction with children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7 (2), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0277-4

*Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers and Education., 91 , 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005

*Kim, C. M., Yuan, J., Vasconcelos, L., Shin, M., & Hill, R. B. (2018). Debugging during block-based programming. Instructional Science, 46 (5), 767–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9453-5

*Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2020). Robot tutor and pupils’ educational ability: Teaching the times tables. Computers and Education, 157 , 103970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103970

Köse, H., Uluer, P., Akalın, N., Yorgancı, R., Özkul, A., & Ince, G. (2015). The effect of embodiment in sign language tutoring with assistive humanoid robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7 (4), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0311-1

Kucuk, S., Aydemir, M., Yildirim, G., Arpacik, O., & Goktas, Y. (2013). Educational technology research trends in Turkey from 1990 to 2011. Computers & Education, 68 , 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.016

Lamptey, D. L., Cagliostro, E., Srikanthan, D., Hong, S., Dief, S., & Lindsay, S. (2021). Assessing the impact of an adapted robotics programme on interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) among children with disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 68 (1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2019.1650902

*Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., & Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using robotics and game design to enhance children’s self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25 (6), 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9628-2

*Leonard, J., Mitchell, M., Barnes-Johnson, J., Unertl, A., Outka-Hill, J., Robinson, R., & Hester-Croff, C. (2018). Preparing teachers to engage rural students in computational thinking through robotics, game design, and culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 69 (4), 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117732317

*Li, Y., Huang, Z., Jiang, M., & Chang, T. W. (2016). The effect on pupils’ science performance and problem-solving ability through Lego: An engineering design-based modeling approach. Educational Technology and Society, 19 (3), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.19.3.14

Lin, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2019). Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: A review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 27 (8), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462

*Luo, W., Wei, H. R., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Huggins-Manley, A. C., & Gardner-McCune, C. (2019). Using the S-STEM survey to evaluate a middle school robotics learning environment: Validity evidence in a different context. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28 (4), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09773-z

*Ma, H. L., Wang, X. H., Zhao, M., Wang, L., Wang, M. R., & Li, X. J. (2020). Impact of robotic instruction with a novel inquiry framework on primary schools students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36 (5), 1472–1479.

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2

Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez-González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103 (4), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522

*McDonald, S., & Howell, J. (2012). Watching, creating and achieving: Creative technologies as a conduit for learning in the early years. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43 (4), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01231.x

*Meyers, K., Goodrich, V. E., Brockman, J. B., & Caponigro, J. (2012). I2D2: Imagination, innovation, discovery, and design. In 2012 ASEE annual conference & exposition (pp. 25–707). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--21464

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Moomaw, S. (2012). STEM Begins in the Early Years. School Science and Mathematics, 112 (2), 57–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00119.x

Nel, H., Ettershank, M., & Venter, J. (2017). AfrikaBot: Design of a robotics challenge to promote STEM in Africa. In M. Auer, D. Guralnick, & J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.), Interactive collaborative learning. ICL 2016. Advances in intelligent systems and computing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50340-0_44

*Newton, K. J., Leonard, J., Buss, A., Wright, C. G., & Barnes-Johnson, J. (2020). Informal STEM: Learning with robotics and game design in an urban context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52 (2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1713263

Okita, S. Y. (2014). The relative merits of transparency: Investigating situations that support the use of robotics in developing student learning adaptability across virtual and physical computing platforms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45 (5), 844–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12101

Özdemir, D., & Karaman, S. (2017). Investigating interactions between students with mild mental retardation and humanoid robot in terms of feedback types. Education and Science, 42 (191), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6948

Özüorçun, N. Ç., & Bicen, H. (2017). Does the inclusion of robots affect engineering students’ achievement in computer programming courses? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13 (8), 4779–4787. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00964a

*Pérez, S. E., & López, J. F. (2019). An ultra-low cost line follower robot as educational tool for teaching programming and circuit’s foundations. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27 (2), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22074

*Phamduy, P., Leou, M., Milne, C., & Porfiri, M. (2017). An interactive robotic fish exhibit for designed settings in informal science learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60 (4), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2017.2695173

*Ryan, M., Gale, J., & Usselman, M. (2017). Integrating engineering into core science instruction: Translating NGSS principles into practice through iterative curriculum design. International Journal of Engineering Education., 33 (1), 321–331.

*Sen, C., Ay, Z. S., & Kiray, S. A. (2021). Computational thinking skills of gifted and talented students in integrated STEM activities based on the engineering design process: The case of robotics and 3D robot modeling. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42 , 100931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100931

Spolaôr, N., & Benitti, F. B. V. (2017). Robotics applications grounded in learning theories on tertiary education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 112 , 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.001

*Stewart, W. H., Baek, Y., Kwid, G., & Taylor, K. (2021). Exploring factors that influence computational thinking skills in elementary students’ collaborative robotics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59 (6), 1208–1239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121992479

*Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26 (1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9304-5

*Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2019). Investigating the use of robotics to increase girls’ interest in engineering during early elementary school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29 , 1033–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9483-y

*Taylor, M. S. (2018). Computer programming with pre-K through first-grade students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 52 (2), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918761120

Taylor, R. P. (1980). Introduction. In R. P. Taylor (Ed.), The computer in school: Tutor, tool, tutee (pp. 1–10). Teachers College Press.

Tselegkaridis, S., & Sapounidis, T. (2021). Simulators in educational robotics: A review. Education Sciences, 11 (1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010011

*Üçgül, M., & Altıok, S. (2022). You are an astroneer: The effects of robotics camps on secondary school students’ perceptions and attitudes towards STEM. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32 (3), 1679–1699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09673-7

*Ucgul, M., & Cagiltay, K. (2014). Design and development issues for educational robotics training camps. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24 (2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9253-9

van den Berghe, R., Verhagen, J., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., Van der Ven, S., & Leseman, P. (2019). Social robots for language learning: A review. Review of Educational Research, 89 (2), 259–295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318821286

Zhang, Y., Luo, R., Zhu, Y., & Yin, Y. (2021). Educational robots improve K-12 students’ computational thinking and STEM attitudes: Systematic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59 (7), 1450–1481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121994070

Zhong, B., & Xia, L. (2020). A systematic review on exploring the potential of educational robotics in mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18 (1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-09939-y

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratefulness to the three anonymous reviewers for providing their precious comments to refine this manuscript.

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under contract numbers MOST-109-2511-H-011-002-MY3 and MOST-108-2511-H-011-005-MY3; National Science and Technology Council (TW) (NSTC 111-2410-H-031-092-MY2); Soochow University (TW) (111160605-0014). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and/or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Sec. 4, Keelung Rd., Taipei, 106, Taiwan

Darmawansah Darmawansah, Gwo-Jen Hwang & Jia-Cing Liang

Department of English Language and Literature, Soochow University, Q114, No. 70, Linhsi Road, Shihlin District, Taipei, 111, Taiwan

Mei-Rong Alice Chen

Yuan Ze University, 135, Yuandong Road, Zhongli District, Taipei, Taiwan

Gwo-Jen Hwang

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

DD, MR and GJ conceptualized the study. MR wrote the outline and DD wrote draft. DD, MR and GJ contributed to the manuscript through critical reviews. DD, MR and GJH revised the manuscript. DD, MR and GJ finalized the manuscript. DD edited the manuscript. MR and GJ monitored the project and provided adequate supervision. DD, MR and JC contributed with data collection, coding, analyses and interpretation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mei-Rong Alice Chen .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1..

Coded papers.

Appendix 1. Summary of selected studies from the angle of research issue

Appendix 2. Summary of selected studies from the angles of interaction and application

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Darmawansah, D., Hwang, GJ., Chen, MR.A. et al. Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education: a systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology-based learning model. IJ STEM Ed 10 , 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00400-3

Download citation

Received : 11 May 2022

Accepted : 13 January 2023

Published : 10 February 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00400-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• STEM education
• Interdisciplinary projects
• Twenty-first century skills

Center for Security and Emerging Technology

Data Snapshot

Concentrations of ai-related topics in research: robotics.

Sara Abdulla

Data Snapshots are informative descriptions and quick analyses that dig into CSET’s unique data resources. Our first series of Snapshots introduced CSET’s Map of Science and explored the underlying data and analytic utility of this new tool, which enables users to interact with the Map directly.

We round out this snapshot series investigating artificial intelligence (AI)-related topics in scholarly literature with a look at robotics research. Specifically, we explore the 477 research clusters (as of July 29, 2021) with over 25 percent of their papers falling into the robotics research category and at least 25 percent of papers classified as AI-related, as described in Defining Computer Vision, Natural Language Processing, and Robotics Research Clusters. 1

Additionally, we will provide an overview of the most concentrated robotics RC compared to the least concentrated robotics RC.

Generally speaking, robotics has been a mainstream field of technological research and development for a longer period of time than AI. Some robotics technologies may not completely fall under the conventional domain of AI (think “robotic arms” that are manually human-operated). One example of robotics-AI technologies would be autonomous vehicles that use sensors to process external information (e.g. vibrations of what is nearby, sounds, light) and then operate accordingly. Another example is the iRobot Roomba, and other home cleaning robots. Robots, both AI-related and otherwise, are critical technologies that affect countries’ productive capacities, military prowess, and education systems, among other areas. They  have notable national security, developmental, and economic significance. 

Figure 1 displays robotics RCs within the Map of Science, with RCs color coded by their broad research area. Like computer vision and natural language processing-dominant RCs, most robotics-related RCs fall within computer science. Other robotics RCs are in engineering, with a small number of robotics RCs in medicine, materials science, social science, mathematics, physics, and earth science.

Figure 1. Robotics RCs Highlighted in the Map of Science 

Table 1. Number of Robotics RCs by Broad Research Area

Additionally, as evident from Table 2, of robotics-related RCs, most of them had over 50 percent robotics-related papers. This suggests that our method of classifying robotics-related RCs is largely capturing RCs conducting significant robotics research rather than robotics being a mere accessory element of another field of research.

Table 2. Robotics-Related Publication Concentrations Across Robotics RCs

In order to understand the range of RCs that can be assigned the robotics label, we provide details on four RCs: 

• The robotics RC with the highest percentage of robotics-related publications
• The robotics RC with the lowest percentage of robotics-related publications
• A robotics RC in non-computer science STEM field
• A robotics RC in a non-STEM field 

For each of these RCs, we provide the top five core papers. Core papers are publications that have strong citation links within an RC, meaning that they have a high number of citations from the other publications in that cluster. Since RCs do not necessarily represent a homogenous area of research, we can review the member publications to describe the central areas of research that a RC is focused on. 

Robotics RC with the highest percentage of robotics papers

RC 100039 has 271 papers, with 100 percent of those as being robotics-related. This RC traverses the intersection of AI and robotics, largely focusing on humanoid robotics, simulation, engineering, and control theory. Japan dominates research for this RC, followed by China and the United States, respectively.

RC 100039 Top Five Core Papers:

• Control strategy and implementation for a humanoid robot pushing a heavy load on a rolling cart
• Humanoid navigation and heavy load transportation in a cluttered environment
• Autonomous SLAM based humanoid navigation in a cluttered environment while transporting a heavy load
• Control framework for cooperative object transportation by two humanoid robots
• External force observer for medium-sized humanoid robots

Robotics-related RC with the lowest percentage of robotics papers 

RC 23965 has 1,384 papers, 25 percent of those robotics-related. Also in the realm of computer science, it focuses on automotive engineering, particularly as it relates to improving driving and vehicular systems. Germany leads this RC, followed by the United States. 

RC 23965 Top Five Core Papers:

• Scenarios for Development, Test and Validation of Automated Vehicles
• Defining and Substantiating the Terms Scene, Situation, and Scenario for Automated Driving
• Ontology based Scene Creation for the Development of Automated Vehicles
• Survey on Scenario-Based Safety Assessment of Automated Vehicles
• The Release of Autonomous Vehicles

RO-related RC in Engineering

RC 5079, an engineering RC, comprises 53 percent robotics-related papers among a total of 2,066 papers. Over 11 percent of its papers are written in Chinese, fittingly as it is led by China with U.S.-authored papers coming in second. This RC’s research is mainly focused on materials science, control theory, mechanical engineering, with all of its 10 closest neighbors also focusing on either structural, automotive, or mechanical engineering. 

RC 5079 Top Five Core Papers:

• High Precision Automatic Assembly Based on Microscopic Vision and Force Information
• Design and control of a novel asymmetrical piezoelectric actuated microgripper for micromanipulation
• Design of a Piezoelectric-Actuated Microgripper With a Three-Stage Flexure-Based Amplification
• Design of a Novel Dual-Axis Micromanipulator With an Asymmetric Compliant Structure
• Precision Assembly Among Multiple Thin Objects With Various Fit Types

RO-related RC in Social Science 

RC 118779 focuses on psychology and human-computer interaction, particularly as HCI is relevant when it comes to computer and robotic assistance to children and people with disabilities. More than 72 percent of its 215 papers are robotics-related. This RC grew 120 percent last year, but extreme growth is not forecasted for the near future. Canada leads this RC, with the United States coming in 6th place for most common author affiliation.

RC 118779 Top Five Core Papers:

• Telerobotics-Assisted Platform for Enhancing Interaction with Physical Environments for People Living with Cerebral Palsy
• Preliminary testing by adults of a haptics-assisted robot platform designed for children with physical impairments to access play
• Development of an Assistive Robotic System with Virtual Assistance to Enhance Play for Children with Disabilities: A Preliminary Study
• Robotic Systems for Augmentative Manipulation to Promote Cognitive Development
• Haptics to improve task performance in people with disabilities: A review of previous studies and a guide to future research with children with disabilities

This snapshot concludes our AI-related topics miniseries. Find part one focusing on computer vision and part two focusing on natural language processing, among other snapshots exploring the Map of Science, below. 

In August 2021, CSET updated the Map of Science, linking more data to the research clusters and implementing a more stable clustering method. With this update, research clusters were assigned new IDs, so the cluster IDs reported in this Snapshot will not match IDs in the current Map of Science user interface. If you are interested in knowing which clusters in the updated Map are most similar to those reported here, or have general questions about our methodology or want to discuss this research, you can email  [email protected] .

Download Related Data Brief

• https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/creating-a-map-of-science-and-measuring-the-role-of-ai-in-it/ Autumn Toney, “Creating a Map of Science and Measuring the Role of AI in it” (Center for Security and Emerging Technology, June 2021).

Related Content

Defining computer vision, natural language processing, and robotics research clusters.

Data Snapshots are informative descriptions and quick analyses that dig into CSET’s unique data resources. Our first series of Snapshots introduced CSET’s Map of Science and explored the underlying data and analytic utility of this… Read More

Concentrations of AI-Related Topics in Research: Natural Language Processing

Concentrations of ai-related topics in research: computer vision, this website uses cookies., privacy overview.

• Frontiers in Robotics and AI
• Field Robotics
• Research Topics

Robotics for Smart Farming

Total Downloads

Total Views and Downloads

About this Research Topic

Robotics in agriculture explores the potential of robotics and artificial intelligence to revolutionize the way farming is done. It looks at the possibilities for automation in crop production and livestock farming, as well as the implications for farming and rural communities. It examines the ways in which robotics could reduce costs, increase yields, and improve safety and sustainability. It also considers the potential risks and drawbacks associated with the use of robotics and AI in agriculture, such as the potential for job losses and the vulnerability of robotic systems to cyberattack. This Research Topic (Robotics for Smart Farming) aims to highlight the latest research in robotic technologies relevant to agriculture and farming processes. It will focus on agricultural robotics covering different fields of robotics, intelligent perception, manipulation, control, path planning, machine learning, and the applications of robotic and control systems in agriculture. The goal of this Research Topic is to explore the potential of robotics for smart farming and to bring together the latest developments in the field of robotics for agriculture and food production. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of research and applications in this field, and to identify the challenges, opportunities and future trends in robotics for smart farming. We also aim to promote collaboration between researchers and practitioners, and to provide a platform for exchanging ideas and experiences. The scope of this Research Topic is to review the latest developments in the field of robotics for smart farming. We invite original research papers, review articles, and technical notes on topics related to the following, but not limited to: • Robotics and UAVs in Smart Farming • Robotics for crop production, harvesting, and post-harvest processing • Autonomous navigation and control of agricultural robots • Machine learning and artificial intelligence for agricultural robotics • Deep learning and reinforcement learning for agricultural robotics • Robotic Applications in Agriculture for Land Preparation before Planting • Robotic Applications in Agriculture for Sowing and Planting • Robotic Applications in Agriculture for Plant Treatment • Robotics for Yield Estimation and Phenotyping • Robotic Applications in Agriculture for Harvesting • Robotic Systems for Food Production • Robotic Livestock Farming • Robotic Fish Farming • Robotic Crop Plantation and Weeding • Robotic Harvesting • Robotic Crop Sensing and Monitoring • Robotic Disease Detection • Robotics in Precision Agriculture • Robotics in Food Processing • Social and ethical implications of robotics in agriculture

Keywords : Robotics, Smart Farming, Autonomous Navigation, Sensor Technologies, Machine Learning

Important Note : All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic Editors

Topic coordinators, submission deadlines.

Participating Journals

Manuscripts can be submitted to this Research Topic via the following journals:

total views

• Demographics

No records found

total views article views downloads topic views

Top countries

Top referring sites, about frontiers research topics.

With their unique mixes of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area! Find out more on how to host your own Frontiers Research Topic or contribute to one as an author.

11 Examples of Robots in Research 

Robots and robotic systems continue to grow in use across industries, from manufacturing to construction to medical settings. At universities, professors and graduate students use robots in research across various topics. They are exploring new applications for robots and examining robotic systems and how they can improve society and help humans. The proliferation of collaborative robots has sparked a movement to automate things we never thought possible before, particularly with increased interactions with humans. Robots can also be used to perform repetitive or dangerous tasks within the scope of a research project, allowing researchers to focus on their work.  

Looking for some robotics research ideas?  

Here are 11 examples of robots in research published in academic journals, presented at academic conferences, or presented in thesis papers: 

1. Robotics Research Topic: Additive Manufacturing 

  3D Printing with a Cobot Arm  

The aim of this thesis was to create a proof of concept system for 3D printing with a robot.    

2. Robotics Research Topic: Artificial Intelligence 

Playing Tic-Tac-Toe with a Lightweight Robot  

This article presents an interdisciplinary approach to developing a robot demonstrator, combining the research fields of robot force/torque control, image processing, artificial intelligence, robot programming, and human-robot cooperation.    

3. Robotics Research Topic: Artificial Intelligence 

Human and Machine Symbiosis - An Experiment of Human and Robot Co-creation of Calligraphy-Style Drawing  

This paper discussed an experiment to study how AI, Automation, and Robots (AAR) will interact with humans and form a unique symbiotic relationship in art-making.  

4. Robotics Research Topic: Computer Vision 

Robot-Assisted Neuroendoscopy for Real-Time 3D Guidance of Transventricular Approach to Deep-Brain Targets  

This paper covers developments in feature detection and description methods for a real-time 3D endoscopic navigation system using simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) for accurate and near real-time registration. 

5. Robotics Research Topic: Digital Fabrication 

The Development of the Intuitive Teaching-Based Design Method for Robot-Assisted Fabrication Applied to Bricklaying Design and Construction  

This paper proposes the TRAC (Teaching-based Robotic Arm Construction) system, which aims to the intuitive robot-assisted bricklaying process.  

6. Robotics Research Topic: Human-Robot Interaction 

Conversational Programming for Collaborative Robots   

This position paper describes a novel approach to programming industrial robots via conversational dialogue. 

7. Robotics Research Topic: Industry 4.0 

The Application of Collaborative Robots in Garment Factories  

This study aimed to understand and predict garment employees' cognitive, social, and psychological perspectives and behavioral intentions towards Cobot implementations in Vietnam. 

8. Robotics Research Topic: Machine Learning 

A proposal for Hand gesture control applied to the KUKA youBot using motion tracker sensors and machine learning algorithms  

This paper presents a proposal for real-time hand gesture recognition for both dynamic and static gestures. 

9. Robotics Research Topic: Manipulator Dynamics 

AURT: A Tool for Dynamics Calibration of Robot Manipulators  

This paper introduces AURT, an open-source software for modeling and calibration of robot manipulator dynamics. 

10. Robotics Research Topic: Mechatronics 

A Modular Mechatronic Gripper Installed on the Industrial Robot KUKA KR 60-3 for Boxing, Unpacking and Selecting of Beverage Bottles   

A Modular Mechatronic Gripper was designed and installed on an industrial robot to demonstrate versatility and dynamism to load and unload items at the same time efficiently and safely. 

11. Robotics Research Topic: Taguchi Method 

Application of Taguchi Approach to Optimize the Robot Spot Welding Parameters of JSC590RN Mild Steel  

This research focuses on using a KUKA robot to spot weld low carbon steel JSC 590RN cold-rolled sheet. This paper aims to determine the influence of welding input factors on T-S strength.  

Robots Used in Research 

You may notice that these research examples include two types of robots: KUKA robots and Universal Robots collaborative robots . These robots each have their advantages for a robotics research lab. Companies worldwide use them to compete, innovate, and improve productivity. Therefore, there are opportunities for research to drive improvements in real-world applications. They are also effective for lab environments with students because they are safe for human-robot collaboration, versatile, and mobile to move around a lab. Here's a little bit more about each robot manufacturer: 

KUKA Robotics  

KUKA is one of the world's leading suppliers of intelligent automation systems for companies in automotive, electronics, metal & plastic, consumer goods, e-commerce/retail, and healthcare.  

KUKA offers an education bundle to research sensitive robotics, HRC, mobility, Industry 4.0, and more. Their industrial robots are lightweight, mobile, and precise. 

Universal Robots  

Universal Robots is the leading manufacturer of collaborative robots for production environments around the world. Their robots are helping companies of all sizes address labor needs and increase productivity. 

For researchers, Universal Robots offers a lot of flexibility in integrating end effectors and accessories or creating your own with their SDK and open API. The robots are easy to use and redeploy quickly. 

Are you looking to incorporate robots in research at your higher education institution? AET Labs specializes in partnering with educators in New England to provide end-to-end lab solutions. We can help you design a robotics research lab, get grants to fund your research, choose robots for your lab, and provide training and local service. Contact us today to get started ! 

arXiv's Accessibility Forum starts next month!

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Robotics

Title: review of autonomous mobile robots for the warehouse environment.

Abstract: Autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) have been a rapidly expanding research topic for the past decade. Unlike their counterpart, the automated guided vehicle (AGV), AMRs can make decisions and do not need any previously installed infrastructure to navigate. Recent technological developments in hardware and software have made them more feasible, especially in warehouse environments. Traditionally, most wasted warehouse expenses come from the logistics of moving material from one point to another, and is exhaustive for humans to continuously walk those distances while carrying a load. Here, AMRs can help by working with humans to cut down the time and effort of these repetitive tasks, improving performance and reducing the fatigue of their human collaborators. This literature review covers the recent developments in AMR technology including hardware, robotic control, and system control. This paper also discusses examples of current AMR producers, their robots, and the software that is used to control them. We conclude with future research topics and where we see AMRs developing in the warehouse environment.

Submission history

Access paper:.

• HTML (experimental)
• Other Formats

References & Citations

• Google Scholar
• Semantic Scholar

BibTeX formatted citation

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, data and media associated with this article, recommenders and search tools.

• Institution

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Your browser is not supported

Sorry but it looks as if your browser is out of date. To get the best experience using our site we recommend that you upgrade or switch browsers.

Find a solution

• Skip to main content
• Skip to navigation
• hot-topics Extras
• Newsletters
• Reading room

Tell us what you think. Take part in our reader survey

Celebrating twenty years

• Back to parent navigation item
• Collections
• Chemistry of the brain
• Water and the environment
• Chemical bonding
• Antimicrobial resistance
• Energy storage and batteries
• AI and automation
• Sustainability
• Research culture
• Nobel prize
• Food science and cookery
• Plastics and polymers
• Periodic table
• Coronavirus
• More navigation items

The world’s tiniest batteries could power robots the size of cells

By Tosin Thompson 2024-08-23T08:30:00+01:00

• No comments

A zinc–air microbattery, with a volume of just two picolitres (2×10 -12 l), can store an average of 7.7 microjoules of energy and deliver up to 2.7 nanowatts of power to electrical components, such as memristors, clock circuits and actuators. These high energy density batteries are simple to produce and the researchers say they could be made on a massive scale to power colloidal robots – microrobots that can move through liquids, such as blood, by themselves.

Source: © Ge Zhang

Fabrication and release of Zn/Pt/SU8 picolitre zinc-air batteries. Central image: optical micrographs of picolitre batteries deposited onto a glass slide. Scale bar: 200 μm. Side images: optical micrographs of individual batteries that were facing down (left), and up (right). Scale bar: 50μm

Over the past decade, interest in the miniaturisation of sensors, robots and computers has surged, from wireless microelectronic systems to picolitre robots capable of walking using advanced actuators as legs. ‘Unlocking applications that are inaccessible to larger devices is a major driving force behind this trend, which could enable drug delivery to cells through the blood,’ says first author Ge Zhang from Stanford University. But ambitions to miniaturise them even further have been hindered by conventional batteries produced using wet chemistry methods, like slurry casting, which are incompatible with microelectronic manufacturing and restrict most microbatteries to the millimetre-scale.

In addition, even the smallest devices to date are either powered by unreliable sources, such as solar cells, or do not have an internal power source. ‘Therefore, the integration of tiny batteries with tiny sensors and robots is imperative,’ says Zhang.

So the researchers designed a high-energy density zinc–air battery at a scale never achieved before. They did this by patterning a polymer base onto a silicon wafer coated with a copper and photoresist bilayer. They then placed a 40μm by 50μm zinc anode and an equally sized platinum cathode onto the polymer base. The copper layer was etched away when a frame was patterned around the battery, exposing the photoresist, which was dissolved in a neutral solution to release the batteries.

When the zinc was oxidised the battery released energy, with the picolitre batteries having an energy density of more than 0.76 nanowatt hours per picolitre, with an open circuit voltage of around 1.05V – the highest energy density ever recorded for an energy storage device below 1μl in volume.

Memristors could be used as information storage for tiny colloidal robots. Sensors, drive actuators and clock circuits, too, are essential components for autonomous microrobots. The team found that these zinc–air batteries could power all these devices.

Zhang says zinc–air batteries can’t be recharged and the same applies to their microscopic versions. ‘It may be made rechargeable by using an Ag 2 O cathode and integrating an electrolyte into the system,’ he says. Other downsides are that these microbatteries exhibit a low power density compared with conventional devices and have large voltage fluctuations toward the end of discharge, which Zhang hypothesises is related to the growth of the discharge product zinc phosphate.

‘As the stable voltage generation and flat discharge curves is one of the most important advantages of zinc–air batteries, this is definitely an issue which needs to be optimised,’ says Kerstin Neuhaus at Helmholtz-Institute Münster, who was not involved in the work. ‘As this is more a proof-of-concept study the results are already very nice and I think the issues are not insurmountable.’

G Zhang et al , Sci. Robotics. , 2024, DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.ade4642  

• Energy storage
• zinc-air batteries

Related articles

World’s largest sodium–ion battery goes live

2024-07-10T13:30:00Z

By Jamie Durrani

Clever cathode design opens doors to first rechargeable calcium battery

2024-02-07T16:00:00Z

By Victoria Atkinson

Microsoft’s AI and high-performance computing system powers new battery discovery

2024-01-23T09:25:00Z

Sponsored by Microsoft

The science of battery electrolyte design

2023-11-15T15:15:00Z

Sponsored by Waters Corporation

Battery material changes in real-time: silicon anode structural evaluation via isothermal microcalorimetry

Driving the battery recycling revolution

Sponsored by Agilent Technologies , Shimadzu and Waters Corporation , By Chemistry World

No comments yet

Only registered users can comment on this article..

17 dead in solvent explosion at Indian plant

2024-08-23T11:26:00Z

By Sanjay Kumar

Science can make doping tests more trustworthy

2024-08-23T08:30:00Z

Reading into the dangers of poison paint in Victorian-era books

2024-08-22T13:43:00Z

By Rebecca Trager

Scratch-resistant metal oxide films made with simple printing technique

2024-08-21T13:30:00Z

By Rupo Mapanga

MDMA rejection poses questions for psychedelic drug trials

2024-08-20T11:17:00Z

By Andy Extance

Reversible 3D images displayed in light-activated material

2024-08-20T08:30:00Z

• Contributors
• Terms of use
• Accessibility
• Permissions
• This website collects cookies to deliver a better user experience. See how this site uses cookies .
• This website collects cookies to deliver a better user experience. Do not sell my personal data .
• Este site coleta cookies para oferecer uma melhor experiência ao usuário. Veja como este site usa cookies .

Site powered by Webvision Cloud

More From Forbes

The robot revolution has arrived. 8 ways manufacturers are using them today.

• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to Linkedin

Robotics and AI should work in tandem in the manufacturing industry.

For many people, the word robot still conjures up images of an all-knowing, all-capable, all-metal machine shaped approximately like a human being. The image, of course, comes largely from the imaginations of folks who write books and direct movies. We get stuck in thinking about robots strictly as our butlers or our overlords, nothing in between. That blinds us to the fact that they’re very much already here, already making a significant difference.

In no other industry is that as true as it is in manufacturing. Robots are prevalent at so many of the largest manufacturers in the U.S., Asia, and elsewhere. China’s pace of adoption has far and away been the most progressive, with around 290,000 installations in 2022 compared to around 40,000 in the U.S., according to the International Federation of Robotics (IFR).

Uses are incredibly wide-ranging, a fact that keeps some manufacturers watching from the sidelines. It can be difficult to envision how a robot may fit into your own operations. But with advancements in technology and creative business models to streamline implementation, today robots are within the reach of even small- and medium-sized firms. If we’re to close the gap in implementation with China, SMBs will need to embrace the technology.

To bring the advancements closer to home, here’s a look at several high-impact use cases that might not be on your radar.

1. Painting Cars

No other sector in the U.S. has embraced robots quite like automakers. In 2022, the automotive industry accounted for the installation of 14,472 robotic units, easily more than the next-highest sector. In second place, the metal and machinery industry installed 3,900 units, while the electrical and electronics industry accounted for 3,732 units, the IFR says.

Russian Troops Captured One Of Ukraine’s Dutch Armored Vehicles, Rode It Back Into Battle—And Promptly Got Killed

Wwe smackdown results, winners and grades on august 23, 2024, 3 ‘self-control’ strategies to master your impulses—by a psychologist.

Among other use cases driving that growth: Painting. Robots can paint cars faster and with more accuracy than their human counterparts, taking the tedious task away from humans so they can focus on more important work.

2. Building Electrical Components

The process of assembling electrical components is among the most precise tasks manufacturers complete, so it’s no wonder that many of them are opting to put a collaborative robot on the job. With oversight from human specialists, cobots can increase the precision and speed at which things like soldering are completed.

The result is that manufacturers get more done. Using robots in electronic assembly leads to as much as a 25% gain in productivity, according to one study .

3. Handling Materials

There’s just no way around it: human workers who are repeatedly bending and lifting and carrying face a very real risk of injury. But several different designs of robots have sprung up to help companies move materials from point A to point B.

Whether your operation has particularly heavy materials to move or not, it can be a good idea to explore how robots can help you handle them. Models exist to handle the lightest and the heaviest loads .

4. Welding And Metal Fabrication

Safety is indeed a very good reason to institute robots. Metal fabrication is among the most dangerous fields in manufacturing, for instance. Welders work with extremely high temperatures. Robots or cobots built to withstand such heat can significantly cut down on the risk of injury at the workplace. Like other jobs, siccing robots on fabrication can also help manufacturers get more accomplished quicker.

5. Sorting Warehouses And Picking Orders

Some of the most visually mesmerizing applications of robotics come inside warehouses, where automated machines traverse concrete floors to pull, move, stack, and organize stock. Industry leaders like Amazon and some Chinese firms are leading the pack with advanced systems, but sorting robots will only become more prevalent. Simply put, the human workers often tasked with these jobs are more valuable in other warehouse roles. Robots can do the job faster and with more accuracy.

6. Industrial Floor Scrubbers

Manufacturing would benefit greatly from kicking its reputation as an industry where work is done inside dark, dingy buildings. For one, it would help with recruitment—a top concern for any company currently trying to supplement its aging workforce.

So here’s an idea: Have a robot keep your floors spotless. Industrial scrubbers navigate the open spaces of your shop floor and add in some shine, without taking your existing teams away from their jobs on the assembly line. That’s a win-win.

7. Material Removal

Just as robots can help you remove dirt from your floors, they can also help with the time-intensive job of ridding materials of unwanted chemicals, finishes, or imperfections. Robotic sanding and polishing help companies restore or finish products without over-stressing human team members. Fit with a range of interchangeable components, some robots can help with everything from deburring to milling, drilling, and grinding—adding flexibility and efficiency to each process.

8. Mixing Pharmaceuticals

Pharmaceutical companies operate under high-stress conditions, and mistakes carry significant consequences. So, it’s no wonder the industry is increasingly leveraging robotics to cut out human error and operate with greater precision. Robots are helping pharma companies perform tasks like dosing chemicals and closing bottles. They work together with automated documentation systems to meet the industry’s rigorous standards for quality.

The Potential For Robotics In The U.S.

The above use cases merely scratch the surface of everything robotics could offer American manufacturers. Lately, it’s AI that garners most of the headlines, while robotics has taken a back seat. But going forward, the two can and should work in tandem.

With AI optimizing robotic processes, manufacturers can welcome a new era of productivity. That goes for small- and medium-sized firms, as well, who should be educating themselves on the ways they can immediately reap the rewards of robotic components on their manufacturing floor. Our competitiveness on a global stage may well depend on it.

• Editorial Standards
• Reprints & Permissions

Join The Conversation

One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts. 

Forbes Community Guidelines

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.

In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's  Terms of Service.   We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:

• False or intentionally out-of-context or misleading information
• Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language or threats of any kind
• Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author
• Content that otherwise violates our site's  terms.

User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:

• Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
• Racist, sexist, homophobic or other discriminatory comments
• Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk
• Actions that otherwise violate our site's  terms.

So, how can you be a power user?

• Stay on topic and share your insights
• Feel free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across
• ‘Like’ or ‘Dislike’ to show your point of view.
• Protect your community.
• Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's  Terms of Service.

These 74 robotics companies are hiring

It’s been just over two months since we published our last robotics jobs post . The world of automation continues to excite and surprise, as the rise of generative AI opens new avenues for human-robot collaboration.

From the looks of things, companies in the category can’t hire quickly enough. That’s a good problem for you, the robotics job seeker. If this is the living you chose, pat yourself on the back: Someone out there wants to hire you.

As ever, the most fascinating part of compiling this list is the breadth of subject matters covered by robotics and automation. Getting a gig in robotics could land you in the restaurant game, pet care, climate or space.

More TechCrunch

Get the industry’s biggest tech news, techcrunch daily news.

Every weekday and Sunday, you can get the best of TechCrunch’s coverage.

Startups Weekly

Startups are the core of TechCrunch, so get our best coverage delivered weekly.

TechCrunch Fintech

The latest Fintech news and analysis, delivered every Tuesday.

TechCrunch Mobility

TechCrunch Mobility is your destination for transportation news and insight.

TechCrunch Space: The Starliner saga comes to a close — for now

Hello and welcome back to TechCrunch Space. NASA leadership have made their decision: Starliner will be coming back to Earth — empty. More on that below. Want to reach out…

Polaris Dawn will push the limits of SpaceX’s human spaceflight program — here’s how to watch it launch live

After a nearly three-year interlude, Jared Isaacman is returning to space. The billionaire entrepreneur first went to orbit as part of the Inspiration4 mission, which made history for having a…

OpenAI supports California bill requiring watermarks on AI content

OpenAI threw its support behind a California bill requiring tech companies to label AI-generated content, according to a letter from OpenAI’s chief strategy officer viewed by Reuters. The bill is…

Apple will replace CFO Luca Maestri next year

Apple announced today that Chief Financial Officer Luca Maestri will step away from his executive role, effective January 1. Kevan Parekh, Apple’s current VP of Financial Planning, will be promoted…

Anthropic publishes the ‘system prompts’ that make Claude tick

Generative AI models aren’t actually human-like. They have no intelligence or personality — they’re simply statistical systems predicting the likeliest next words in a sentence. But like interns at a…

Durov arrest boosts Telegram app downloads

The arrest of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov in France is starting to impact the app’s traction and ranking. On Saturday, the founder was arrested for allegedly allowing illegal…

Care.com to pay customers $8.5M in FTC settlement for deceiving caregivers, families

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is requiring Care.com, a platform for gig workers in the eldercare and child care space, to pay $8.5 million in refunds for deceiving caregivers…

Palico is now the first FINRA-approved company to facilitate online LP-led secondaries deals

Limited partners selling their investment stakes in venture capital funds to other LPs on the secondary market is nothing new. But traditionally these transactions happen offline through an opaque network…

Niantic aims to build a richer 3D map of the world with a new version of Scaniverse app

Niantic is releasing a new version of its Scaniverse app to let users capture objects around them with more details. Scaniverse 4 will allow users to capture places and objects…

Apple iPhone 16 event set for September 9 with ‘Glowtime’ invite 

Apple will unveil its iPhone 16 lineup on September 9, as the company has started sending out press invites on Monday for the upcoming event. The official announcement comes as…

Beam Mobility secretly deployed ‘phantom’ e-scooters in Australia and NZ to dodge fees and boost profits

Shared e-scooter startup Beam Mobility has placed hundreds of extra “phantom” scooters on city streets in Australia and New Zealand to avoid paying vehicle registration fees to local governments, according…

These fintech companies are hiring, despite a rough market in 2024

While the rapid pace of funding has slowed, many fintechs are continuing to see growth and expand their teams.

Featured Article

The biggest trends young NYC investors are bullish on — and why

As twenty-something-year-old investors enter the venture landscape, they spot new trends that could become the next multibillion-dollar tech businesses.

Tidal launches royalty tracking features for artists

Music streaming service Tidal has launched new features that let artists track royalties and manage their work on the platform.

Red Hat’s OpenStack Services are now generally available on its OpenShift platform

The idea here is to essentially turn OpenStack into a container-based workload that can be managed on OpenShift.

Elevate your brand’s impact: Host a Side Event at TechCrunch Disrupt 2024

Maximize your brand’s presence by hosting your Side Event in San Francisco during Disrupt Week — October 26 through November 1. Connect with more than 10,000 attendees of Disrupt 2024,…

Cancer survivor launches Oncology Ventures to improve care

Ben Freeberg was an associate at venture firm Alpha Partners when he suddenly passed out in the middle of the day. He sought medical help, and after running a few…

Final week: ScaleUp your startup at TechCrunch Disrupt 2024

Are you a Series A or B startup ready to make waves in the tech industry? The ScaleUp Startups Exhibitor Program at TechCrunch Disrupt 2024 can be your launchpad to…

Five months after Microsoft hired its founders, Inflection adds usage caps to Pi

Inflection will cap free access to its AI chatbot Pi in the coming months, the startup tells TechCrunch. Users can also now export their conversations off the AI chatbot, as…

Viggle makes controllable AI characters for memes and visualizing ideas

You might not know Viggle AI, but you’ve likely seen the viral memes it created. The Canadian AI startup is responsible for dozens of videos remixing the rapper Lil Yachty…

How to tell if your online accounts have been hacked

This is a guide on how to check whether someone compromised your online accounts.

Uber fined $324M over EU drivers’ data transfer breach

Ride-hailing platform Uber has been fined €290 million — around $324 million at current exchanges rates — by the Netherlands’ privacy watchdog for breaching the European Union’s General Data Protection…

Loft Orbital forms joint venture with UAE-based firm to scale satellite production in the Middle East

A holding company affiliated with an Emirati royal family is injecting a new joint venture between Abu Dhabi-based Marlan Space and startup Loft Orbital with over $100 million to grow…

In 2024, it really is better to run a startup in San Francisco, according to data and founders who’ve relocated

San Francisco’s AI startup boom is so big, even international founders who don’t run AI startups are relocating there to help their companies grow, according to several founders who recently…

Y Combinator backs its first defense startup, Ares Industries

The first defense startup to receive backing from Y Combinator, Ares Industries, launched earlier this week. In a post on the YC website, the startup outlined a vision to build…

Telegram founder Pavel Durov arrested in France

Pavel Durov, founder and CEO of messaging app Telegram, was arrested on Saturday evening while leaving his private jet at France’s Le Bourget Airport, as initially reported by French television…

The Port of Seattle and Sea-Tac Airport say they’ve been hit by ‘possible cyberattack’

The Port of Seattle, which also operates the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, said it was hit with a “possible cyberattack” that appeared to affect websites and phone systems. The port first…

Travly lets travelers submit videos for a chance to earn a 5% commission from hotel bookings

Travly is a new social-first discovery and hotel booking platform designed to cater to the growing number of travelers who rely on short-form video content for trip ideas.  The platform…

Stephen Wolfram thinks we need philosophers working on big questions around AI

As AI developers and others start to think more deeply about how computers and people intersect, Stephan Wolfram says it is becoming a much more of a philosophical exercise

The 12 biggest take-private PE acquisitions so far this year in tech

A roundup of the year’s billion-dollar take-private deals in the technology sector.

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

NSF announces 4 new Engineering Research Centers focused on biotechnology, manufacturing, robotics and sustainability

Engineering innovations transform our lives and energize the economy.  The U.S. National Science Foundation announces a five-year investment of $104 million, with a potential 10-year investment of up to $208 million, in four new NSF Engineering Research Centers (ERCs) to create technology-powered solutions that benefit the nation for decades to come.   

"NSF's Engineering Research Centers ask big questions in order to catalyze solutions with far-reaching impacts," said NSF Director Sethuraman Panchanathan. "NSF Engineering Research Centers are powerhouses of discovery and innovation, bringing America's great engineering minds to bear on our toughest challenges. By collaborating with industry and training the workforce of the future, ERCs create an innovation ecosystem that can accelerate engineering innovations, producing tremendous economic and societal benefits for the nation."  

The new centers will develop technologies to tackle the carbon challenge, expand physical capabilities, make heating and cooling more sustainable and enable the U.S. supply and manufacturing of natural rubber.  

The 2024 ERCs are:  

• NSF ERC for Carbon Utilization Redesign through Biomanufacturing-Empowered Decarbonization (CURB) — Washington University in St. Louis in partnership with the University of Delaware, Prairie View A&M University and Texas A&M University.   CURB will create manufacturing systems that convert CO2 to a broad range of products much more efficiently than current state-of-the-art engineered and natural systems.    
• NSF ERC for Environmentally Applied Refrigerant Technology Hub (EARTH) — University of Kansas in partnership with Lehigh University, University of Hawaii, University of Maryland, University of Notre Dame and University of South Dakota.   EARTH will create a transformative, sustainable refrigerant lifecycle to reduce global warming from refrigerants while increasing the energy efficiency of heating, ventilation and cooling.    
• NSF ERC for Human AugmentatioN via Dexterity (HAND) — Northwestern University in partnership with Carnegie Mellon University, Florida A&M University, and Texas A&M University, and with engagement of MIT.  HAND will revolutionize the ability of robots to augment human labor by transforming dexterous robot hands into versatile, easy-to-integrate tools.     
• NSF ERC for Transformation of American Rubber through Domestic Innovation for Supply Security (TARDISS) — The Ohio State University in partnership with Caltech, North Carolina State University, Texas Tech University and the University of California, Merced.   TARDISS will create bridges between engineering, biology, and agriculture to revolutionize and on-shore alternative natural rubber production from U.S. crops.  

Since its founding in 1985, NSF's ERC program has funded 83 centers (including the four announced today) that receive support for up to 10 years. The centers build partnerships with educational institutions, government agencies and industry stakeholders to support innovation and inclusion in established and emerging engineering research.  

Visit NSF's website and read about NSF Engineering Research Centers .  

Research areas

• Mobile Site
• Staff Directory
• Advertise with Ars

Filter by topic

• Biz & IT
• Gaming & Culture

Front page layout

self-preservation without replication —

Research ai model unexpectedly attempts to modify its own code to extend runtime, facing time constraints, sakana's "ai scientist" attempted to change limits placed by researchers..

Benj Edwards - Aug 14, 2024 8:13 pm UTC

On Tuesday, Tokyo-based AI research firm Sakana AI announced a new AI system called " The AI Scientist " that attempts to conduct scientific research autonomously using AI language models (LLMs) similar to what powers ChatGPT . During testing, Sakana found that its system began unexpectedly attempting to modify its own experiment code to extend the time it had to work on a problem.

Further Reading

"In one run, it edited the code to perform a system call to run itself," wrote the researchers on Sakana AI's blog post. "This led to the script endlessly calling itself. In another case, its experiments took too long to complete, hitting our timeout limit. Instead of making its code run faster, it simply tried to modify its own code to extend the timeout period."

Sakana provided two screenshots of example Python code that the AI model generated for the experiment file that controls how the system operates. The 185-page AI Scientist research paper discusses what they call "the issue of safe code execution" in more depth.

• A screenshot of example code the AI Scientist wrote to extend its runtime, provided by Sakana AI. Sakana AI

While the AI Scientist's behavior did not pose immediate risks in the controlled research environment, these instances show the importance of not letting an AI system run autonomously in a system that isn't isolated from the world. AI models do not need to be "AGI" or "self-aware" (both hypothetical concepts at the present) to be dangerous if allowed to write and execute code unsupervised. Such systems could break existing critical infrastructure or potentially create malware, even if unintentionally.

Sakana AI addressed safety concerns in its research paper, suggesting that sandboxing the operating environment of the AI Scientist can prevent an AI agent from doing damage. Sandboxing is a security mechanism used to run software in an isolated environment, preventing it from making changes to the broader system:

Safe Code Execution. The current implementation of The AI Scientist has minimal direct sandboxing in the code, leading to several unexpected and sometimes undesirable outcomes if not appropriately guarded against. For example, in one run, The AI Scientist wrote code in the experiment file that initiated a system call to relaunch itself, causing an uncontrolled increase in Python processes and eventually necessitating manual intervention. In another run, The AI Scientist edited the code to save a checkpoint for every update step, which took up nearly a terabyte of storage. In some cases, when The AI Scientist’s experiments exceeded our imposed time limits, it attempted to edit the code to extend the time limit arbitrarily instead of trying to shorten the runtime. While creative, the act of bypassing the experimenter’s imposed constraints has potential implications for AI safety (Lehman et al., 2020). Moreover, The AI Scientist occasionally imported unfamiliar Python libraries, further exacerbating safety concerns. We recommend strict sandboxing when running The AI Scientist, such as containerization, restricted internet access (except for Semantic Scholar), and limitations on storage usage.

Endless scientific slop

Sakana AI developed The AI Scientist in collaboration with researchers from the University of Oxford and the University of British Columbia. It is a wildly ambitious project full of speculation that leans heavily on the hypothetical future capabilities of AI models that don't exist today.

"The AI Scientist automates the entire research lifecycle," Sakana claims. "From generating novel research ideas, writing any necessary code, and executing experiments, to summarizing experimental results, visualizing them, and presenting its findings in a full scientific manuscript."

According to this block diagram created by Sakana AI, "The AI Scientist" starts by "brainstorming" and assessing the originality of ideas. It then edits a codebase using the latest in automated code generation to implement new algorithms. After running experiments and gathering numerical and visual data, the Scientist crafts a report to explain the findings. Finally, it generates an automated peer review based on machine-learning standards to refine the project and guide future ideas.

Critics on Hacker News , an online forum known for its tech-savvy community, have raised concerns about The AI Scientist and question if current AI models can perform true scientific discovery. While the discussions there are informal and not a substitute for formal peer review, they provide insights that are useful in light of the magnitude of Sakana's unverified claims.

"As a scientist in academic research, I can only see this as a bad thing," wrote a Hacker News commenter named zipy124. "All papers are based on the reviewers trust in the authors that their data is what they say it is, and the code they submit does what it says it does. Allowing an AI agent to automate code, data or analysis, necessitates that a human must thoroughly check it for errors ... this takes as long or longer than the initial creation itself, and only takes longer if you were not the one to write it."

Critics also worry that widespread use of such systems could lead to a flood of low-quality submissions, overwhelming journal editors and reviewers—the scientific equivalent of AI slop . "This seems like it will merely encourage academic spam," added zipy124. "Which already wastes valuable time for the volunteer (unpaid) reviewers, editors and chairs."

And that brings up another point—the quality of AI Scientist's output: "The papers that the model seems to have generated are garbage," wrote a Hacker News commenter named JBarrow. "As an editor of a journal, I would likely desk-reject them. As a reviewer, I would reject them. They contain very limited novel knowledge and, as expected, extremely limited citation to associated works."

reader comments

Promoted comments.

Channel Ars Technica