Benefit 1: Accessibility
One of the main benefits claimed for cryptocurrencies is that they are easily accessible by anyone with secure web access.
• Development of cryptocurrencies has reflected all the elements of Smith’s (2001) model of innovative cultures: ease of participation, freedom from external control, and the prospect of social and financial rewards.
• More than 5000 cryptocurrencies on the market – total market valuation estimated > $300 bn (Brown & Smith, 2021)
Benefit 2: Innovation
Easy access to cryptocurrencies has encouraged the development of innovative applications
Examples: BAT tipping; Litecoin ease of use; Sports club cryptocurrencies (Patel, 2021)
Benefit 3: Return on investment
Cryptocurrencies have not yet shown that they can retain or grow their initial value. However, for Bitcoin in particular, investors have been attracted by the promise of significant return on their investment.
• Highest rate of return – 18% (Dasman, 2021)
Risk 1: Volatility
Cryptocurrencies are subject to price volatility due to the combined influence of supply and demand, investor and user sentiments, government regulations and media hype.
• Bitcoin price jump after media promoted Proshare’s introduction of exchange-traded fund (Reiff, 2022).
• Examples of investor speculation and reactive trading impacting particular cryptocurrency price (Van Welle, 2021)
• “The Musk Effect” - how the value of Bitcoin is affected by Elon Musk’s tweets (Lapin, 2021)
Risk 2: Insecurity
Cryptocurrencies have inherent vulnerabilities, creating insecurity that cannot be overcome solely by regulation.
• Cryptocurrency is designed so as not to need gatekeepers such as banks or government – this means there is no third party to undo any harm if a protocol or code turns out to contain bugs (Power, 2021).
• Global crypto exchanges are poorly regulated and vulnerable to political instability and turmoil. This affects investor’s confidence in their ability to translate crypto balances into widely accepted currency. (Blowden, 2021)
Risk 3: Limited liquidity
The high trading volume of cryptocurrencies put strain on a nascent system of global crypto exchanges. Whilst improving volume capacity has helped, a more robust system is required to meet the burgeoning trading demand and improve liquidity.
• The success of cryptocurrency is dependant on the ability to ‘cash out’ to fiat (government issued) currencies via crypto exchanges. These are currently insufficiently regulated and developed, causing confidence and supply issues (Rutherham, 2021).
To be recommended in very limited circumstances
Paragraph plans provide an overview of your essay and provide an effective starting point for structured writing. The next step is using this plan to expand on the points as you write your essay.
In almost all cases, written assignments call for students to explore complex topics or aspects of an area of study. Any academic writing task is an opportunity to show how well you understand a particular topic, theme or area. Usually this means demonstrating how various ideas, knowledge, information or ways of thinking are connected within the context of the task or area of focus.
This means that successful academic writing presents ideas logically, and that there is high connectivity within the writing. In other words, the aim should be for writing to have high flow to help make the connections clear.
Three ways to achieve this include:
Topic sentences, or the leading sentences of a paragraph, play a key role in connecting the ideas of an essay. High-flow topic sentences should look to include three key elements:
Consider the following examples of topic sentences in response to an essay question about Virtue Ethics.
A low-flow topic sentence : Aristotle defined phronesis as practical wisdom.
This sentence does not reference the topic (virtue ethics), nor does it link to an idea from a previous paragraph. It does however, introduce the sub-topic of the paragraph (phronesis).
A high-flow topic sentence: Another fundamental concept in Virtue Ethics is phronesis.
This sentence refers to the essay topic (virtue ethics), acknowledges that this is an additional concept that build on the previous paragraph, and introduces the topic of this paragraph (phronesis).
Well-constructed paragraphs have high connections between sentences. In general sentences that promote flow should:
The following paragraph example can be considered high-flow. It includes sentences that reference the previous sentence ( underlined ), add new information ( maroon ) and use topic words ( green ).
Another fundamental concept in Virtue Ethics is phronesis. According to Aristotle, phronesis is a form of practical wisdom through which individuals make principled decisions in line with virtues such as courage and honesty (reference). Its practical nature means that phronesis can only be developed over a lifetime of carefully considered actions and sober reflection . This practice builds a person’s moral character, allowing them to make morally-defensible choices even in unfamiliar and complex situations (reference). In other words, it is a kind of social and professional skill, which at first requires conscious effort and can still result in mistakes. However, through discipline and persistence, it becomes second nature. As a result, practitioners consistently act wisely and in accordance with the virtues they uphold . Their wise actions further strengthen their own character and contribute to human fulfilment at both individual and community levels (reference).
Transition words help make the relationships and connections between ideas clear. Some examples of helpful transition words and phrases for various types of connections include:
Like X, Y is... Unlike X, Y is... In other words, This means that... For example, For instance, | Moreover, Furthermore, Additionally, Likewise, Similarly, | However, On the other hand, Therefore, As a result, Consequently, Hence, Thus, |
Success Now! workshops are available live online or on campus. Register here for workshops on research and writing . You can also organise an individual consultation here to talk to a learning advisor about planning your assignments.
Dustin schutte | 8 hours ago.
Purdue (1-0) will play the role of underdog heading into Saturday's game against Notre Dame (1-1). The Fighting Irish are a 10.5-point favorite over the Boilermakers, according to FanDuel .com.
Notre Dame is coming off a devastating home loss to Northern Illinois, falling 16-14 in front of a home crowd in South Bend. The Huskies converted on a 35-yard field goal attempt by Kanon Woodill to pull off the upset.
It was a huge blow to the College Football Playoff hopes of the Fighting Irish.
The Boilermakers enjoyed an off week after defeating Indiana State 49-0 in the season opener on Aug. 31. Quarterback Hudson Card tied an FBS record, completing 24-of-25 passes (96%) for 273 yards and four touchdowns in the blowout victory.
Purdue hasn't had much luck against the Irish recently. The Boilermakers have lost six straight games to the in-state rival, with the last victory coming in 2007 — a 33-19 win in Ross-Ade Stadium.
The Boilers and Irish last played in 2021, with the Irish posting a 27-13 victory in South Bend. Notre Dame also won the last meeting at Ross-Ade Stadium 31-24 in 2013.
Kickoff between Purdue and Notre Dame is scheduled for 3:30 p.m. ET at Ross-Ade Stadium. The game will air on CBS.
Game odds refresh periodically and are subject to change
If you or someone you know has a gambling problem and wants help, call 1-800-GAMBLER.
RYAN WALTERS TALKS SCHEDULING : Purdue has regularly played one of the most challenging nonconference schedules in the Big Ten. But coach Ryan Walters hinted at changes potentially coming. CLICK HERE
HARRELL'S OFFENSE CAN WORK AT PURDUE : Purdue's offense racked up 49 points in a blowout win over Indiana State. Is it the real deal? It looks like Graham Harrell's scheme can work. CLICK HERE
PURDUE FOCUSING ON DETAILS IN OFF WEEK : A 49-0 final score looks great on paper, but Purdue coach Ryan Walters says the Boilermakers still have a lot of room for improvement moving forward. CLICK HERE
UPDATES ON PURDUE FOOTBALL INJURIES : Key Purdue players Nyland Green, CJ Smith, Corey Stewart and Kam Brown missed the season opener on Saturday. Coach Ryan Walters provided updates on all of them. CLICK HERE
DUSTIN SCHUTTE
University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Patrick Hassan, Nietzsche’s Struggle Against Pessimism , Cambridge University Press, 2023, 278 pp., $110.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781009380287.
Reviewed by Julian Young, Wake Forest University and University of Auckland
A familiar way of writing a book about Nietzsche is to follow a particular topic through the corpus: art, religion, or truth, for instance. Patrick Hassan’s topic is pessimism. This is a good choice. Nothing is more central to Nietzsche than his “struggle” against the pessimism of his always revered “educator”, Arthur Schopenhauer. What is distinctive of Hassan’s discussion, however, is that he focusses not on Schopenhauer, but on the post-Schopenhauerian pessimists of whom Nietzsche had some knowledge: philosophers such as Julius Bahnsen, Eduard von Hartmann, and Philipp Mainländer. The confrontation between neo-Schopenhauerians such as these and critics such as Eugen Dühring constituted the “pessimism dispute” that endured from Schopenhauer’s death in 1860 until the end of the century. Though Nietzsche hardly even mentions such figures in the published texts—evidence of Nietzsche’s knowledge of them relies almost entirely on the Nachlass— Hassan justifies this change of focus by quoting Frederick Beiser (9). Unless we study Nietzsche’s “dialogue” with such contemporaries, he claims, “Nietzsche, despite the vast literature about him, will remain largely unknown” (9). [1]
The book is divided into three parts corresponding to the three phases into which Nietzsche’s career is usually divided: an early Wagnerian phase, a middle, positivistic phase, and a final mature phase that one might think of as a synthesis of the two earlier phases.
Part I discusses Nietzsche’s initial engagement with pessimism in The Birth of Tragedy . [2] The form of pessimism it considers is an argument from description to evaluation. “Descriptive pessimism” claims that “life’s sufferings essentially outweigh life’s pleasures” (34), while “evaluative pessimism” concludes that “Life is not worth living; non-existence is preferable to existence” (21). The suppressed premiss is “axiological hedonism”: “The only thing good for its own sake is pleasure or the absence of pain” (227). Not only Schopenhauer but also Hartmann and Mainländer subscribe to the hedonic principle.
The Birth accepts the truth of descriptive pessimism, but rejects the evaluative conclusion. It approaches the problem through art. According to Schopenhauer’s quasi-Kantian metaphysics to which The Birth subscribes, the world of spatio-temporal individuality is a realm of mere appearance, behind which is hidden the single, genuinely real entity, “the primal unity”. Nietzsche claims that in the Greek tragic festival we are carried away by the hypnotic singing of the chorus and as a result penetrate the illusion of individuality. We “become one” with the primal unity and share in its “creative delight” in the world of appearance (89). As Hassan puts it, the tragic audience “experiences a rapturous dissolution of their individuality and takes up a certain third-person, cosmic perspective on life as a whole, akin to an “artist-god” looking at existence as if it were a painting of a battlefield, and each individual was a soldier depicted in the spectacle (BT 5)” (91). From this Nietzsche concludes that as, but only as, an “aesthetic phenomenon” is existence “justified” (91). In transcending individuality, “the primal source of all evil” (BT 10), we transcend pain. Pessimism ceases to be our problem.
Hassan calls this “ the artistic approach” (93: my emphasis) that The Birth takes to pessimism. This is odd since the whole point of the work is to explain the “Dionysian-Apollonian genius” (BT 5) that gave birth to Greek tragedy, a duality that never appears in Hassan’s discussion. In The Birth , there are, in fact, two kinds of art: the purely “Apollonian” art of Homer that covers over the horrors of life with a “veil” of glamorous illusion, and the art of the fifth-century tragedians. Here, while the singing of the Dionysian chorus gives us the “metaphysical comfort” of sensing our identity with the primal unity, the “healing balm” (BT 19) of Apollonian illusion make us incapable of understanding why we are comforted. The words and actions produce the “noble deception” (BT 21) that the world of individuals is the only real world, so that we exit the festival deceived into thinking that existence in the world of individuals is worth having (which implies that subjectively at least, it is worth having).
The problem with Hassan’s failure to recognise the element of Apollonian deception is that, as he presents Nietzsche, there is not even the appearance of a response to pessimism. On his account, life as the “artist god” is indeed enjoyable. But that is irrelevant to evaluative pessimism which claims that life as an individual (as one of the “soldiers” on the “battlefield”) is not worth having. And so the noble lie is an essential element in The Birth ’s “solution” to pessimism. Needless to say, it is not a very good solution, if only because smart people like Nietzsche cannot help seeing through the deception. This is why the “struggle” against pessimism has to continue.
Part II of the work focusses on Nietzsche’s middle period. In Human-All-Too-Human , its central work, Nietzsche rejects neo-Kantian metaphysics and turns instead to naturalism, positivism, and axiological non-cognitivism. Influenced by Dühring and Paul Rée, he decides that the question of whether life is worth living is not a question of fact: “the world is neither good nor evil” because “‘good’ and ‘evil’ possess meaning only when applied to men” (120). Value judgments are “projections” of feeling, the varying ways which “paint” the world of facts (113). The only cognitive information they disclose concerns the psychology of the judger. The issue between life affirmation and life denial thus reduces to the familiar glass of beer: half-empty or half-full, depending on one’s psychological disposition.
Part III of the book begins with The Gay Science in which, says Hassan, Nietzsche’s attitude to pessimism takes its final form. As Human-All-Too-Human suggests, pessimism is “not really a philosophical theory at all but rather a non-cognitive state rooted in and expressive of the adherent’s character” (155). This sets the stage for an inquiry into the difference between the life-denier’s and the life-affirmer’s character. Nietzsche’s claim is that while the pessimist’s life-denial is the expression of a sick, “degenerate” character, life-affirmation is the expression of psychic “health”. Though Hassan goes into great detail concerning the “degeneration theory” circulating among Nietzsche’s contemporaries, his presentation of pessimism as pathological is really just an elaboration of the commonsense knowledge that while an increase in psychic energy brightens the world, a decrease darkens it. After a good night’s sleep the world sparkles and our problems are trivial; infected by the flu, the world is black and our problems are insurmountable. Pessimism and pessimistic worldviews such as Christianity are, says Nietzsche, the products of a lack of energy, of exhaustion: “Weariness . . . creates all gods and afterworlds” (184). Nietzsche’s (non-physiological) account of weariness and vigour as character traits seems to me an elaboration of Plato’s claim that to achieve anything significant one must become “one man”. The vigorous, puissant person has disciplined his or her drives into a hierarchy under the command of a single “master-drive” (168), the weary pessimist is someone who is exhausted by the effort of trying to make the horses of the soul pull in the same direction.
This presentation of the pessimist as a negative role model is part of Nietzsche’s “project of life-affirmation” (197). The problem, however, is that Schopenhauer, the zestful, flute-playing eviscerator of Hegel is anything but a low-energy type. Recognising the problem, Nietzsche resorts to a desperate expedient: Schopenhauer played the flute; therefore Schopenhauer was “not a pessimist” (193). But, of course, Schopenhauer is not an exception: the philosophical pessimists in general are likely to be reasonably vigorous types—it takes a lot of energy to write a book—so it seems clear to me, if not to Hassan, that Nietzsche is on a losing wicket here. “Assassinating” (EH III 2) the pessimist’s character will not do; if it is to be defeated, philosophical pessimism must be accorded theoretical status and subjected to rational critique. [3]
Recall that, in the main, Nietzsche confronts pessimism in its hedonistic form: (1) life’s suffering outweighs its pleasures; (2) the only thing that makes life worth living is pleasure; therefore (3), life is not worth living. Hassan says that the “mature” Nietzsche never questions (1) (a claim to which I shall return). Instead, he attacks (2). There are “sources of value other than hedonism on the basis of which life can be found worth living” (228–9). Specifically, there is “greatness”, high, “history-shaping” achievement (245). Stereotypically, the lives of great individuals—Beethoven, van Gogh, tortured poets in general—are filled with suffering. Yet at least some of that suffering is “constitutive” of their greatness. Just as winning a race would not be a great achievement without stiff competition, so writing a “brilliant symphony” would not be a great achievement without “resistance”, i.e., suffering, without the achievement being, both subjectively and objectively, very difficult (248–9). I am sceptical of the analogy between athletics and art—Mozart’s Symphony no. 41 was called the “Jupiter Symphony” because it seemed (and perhaps was) tossed off with the effortless ease of a god—but Hassan is surely right that (at least in the case of military heroes such as Caesar and Napoleon), suffering is constitutive of their stature. And so since we allegedly admire great individuals more than any other while recognising that their lives often contain more pain than pleasure, greatness is a value we recognise as making a life worth living even though it contains more pain than pleasure.
One of the problems with this response to pessimism is that it seems to confine the possibility of a worthwhile life to the great, leaving the rest of us to live lives that are actually worthless.
Nietzsche deals with this problem, says Hassan, by allowing ordinary people to find derivative value in their lives either by committing themselves to the production of greatness (someone other than Goethe needs to wash his socks) or by basking in the reflected glory of the great (234–5). This is Nietzsche’s “aristocratism” that most people will find repellent—Hassan hastens to emphasise that his book is “wholly exegetical” (263). What he misses, however, is a quite different element in the “mature” Nietzsche’s response to pessimism according to which all of us, great and non-great alike, can, in fact, live worthwhile lives.
To become healthy life affirmers we must, says Nietzsche, become “poets of our lives” (GS 299). We must (long story short) narrate our lives as Bildungsromanen , stories of progress towards a life-defining goal in which the traumatic events—“the loss of a friend, sickness, slander, the failure of some letter to arrive, the straining of an ankle”—turn out to be things that have a “profound significance and use precisely for us” so that they “must not be missing” (GS 277). In a well-narrated life, traumas turn out to be causal contributions to (or possibly constitutive of) one’s life-defining goal: it was the injury to the ankle, perhaps, that turned me from the nasty, brutish, and short life of professional football to the wonderful life of professional philosophy. Here, the key concept is not “greatness” but rather “meaning”. “If you have your ‘ why? ’ of life”, says Nietzsche, “you can put up with almost any ‘ how? ’: man does not strive for pleasure ( Glück ); only the Englishman does that” (TI I 12).
This critique of hedonistic utilitarianism is clearly a rejection of the second premiss in the pessimist’s argument (only pleasure makes life worth living). But I think that Nietzsche also rejects the first premiss (life’s suffering outweighs its pleasures). In Thus Spoke Zarathustra , the hero is asked by his “animals” whether he is “searching” for happiness. “What matters happiness to me”, he replies, “I have my work”—his mission to redeem humanity. “But”, reply the animals, “do you not dwell in a sky-blue lake of happiness?” Smiling at their unexpected perspicacity, Zarathustra admits that he does (Z IV 1). This is the “paradox of happiness”. As psychologists increasingly recognise, happiness is achieved not by its “pursuit” but is rather the by-product of absorbed dedication to a project, best of all, to a life-defining project. This, however, is precisely what is achieved in a life of meaning, a life constructed and lived as a Bildungsroman . And so—barring some unsurmountable tragedy—the life of meaning is a happy life. What follows from this is that Nietzsche has an impressive, and in my view conclusive, argument against descriptive pessimism. Most well-constructed lives will be, on balance, happy—i.e., “pleasurable”—lives, [4] in which traumas are all “redeemed” (TI IX 49) as essential parts of a happy whole. Barring catastrophe, those who live lives of suffering will be those who narrate their lives badly, or not at all.
If one is interested in nineteenth-century German intellectual history, Nietzsche’s Struggle Against Pessimism is a fascinating book. The reader will have noticed, however, that despite Hassan’s claim that without a close examination of Nietzsche’s “dialogue” with Schopenhauer’s epigones he remains “largely unknown”, I have managed to summarise most of the content of his book with virtually no reference to the epigones. Apart from the treatment of Hartmann’s philosophy as a joke in the second Untimely Mediation (which Hassan does not discuss) and two other glancing references to him, GS 357 is the only place in which the epigones appear in the published texts. This raises the question of why, if there really was a “dialogue”, Nietzsche never allowed it to become public. He was, after all, far from unwilling to interact with those he recognised as “significant others”—Socrates, Plato, Epicurus, Spinoza, Goethe, Darwin, Wagner, and, of course, Schopenhauer—in the published texts. In GS 357 he says that while Schopenhauer is an essential figure who really understood what pessimism was, neither Hartmann, Bahnsen, not Mainländer did—and are thus discountable. I have not been convinced that he was wrong about this.
[1] Frederik C. Beiser. Weltschmerz: Pessimism in German Philosophy 1860–1900 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 12.
[2] Abbreviations: BT The Birth of Tragedy , trans. R. Speirs (Cambridge University Press, 1999); EH Ecce Homo, in The Anti-Christ , Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols , trans. J. Norman (Cambridge University Press, 2005); GS The Gay Science , trans. J. Neuhoff (Cambridge University Press, 2001); TI Twilight of the Idols , Z Thus Spoke Zarathustra , both in The Portable Nietzsche trans. W. Kaufmann. Numerals refer to sections not pages. I have made minor modifications to some of the translations.
[3] Hassan recognises that Nietzsche indeed provides such a critique but sometimes (though not always) treats it as a falling away from the official and best view, as something Nietzsche “often cannot help himself” from doing (262).
[4] As the above reference to the English utilitarians indicates, neither the Germans nor Nietzsche draw a sharp distinction between “happiness” and “pleasure”. The translation of Glück —usually “happiness”—as “pleasure” is Walter Kaufmann’s.
Scientists have the knowledge to combat misinformation online, and now some are receiving the institutional support to communicate with a broad public audience.
By Kathryn Palmer
You have / 5 articles left. Sign up for a free account or log in.
Kate Biberdorf, known to her fans as Kate the Chemist, breathes fire during a chemistry demonstration at the University of Notre Dame in 2023.
University of Notre Dame
When Kate Biberdorf, a professor known to her 287,300 TikTok followers as Kate the Chemist , gave a guest lecture at the University of Notre Dame last December, she deployed one of her signature science influencer moves: breathing fire to demonstrate a combustion reaction.
Her performance led to another dramatic outcome: Notre Dame offered Biberdorf, then an associate professor of instruction in chemistry at the University of Texas at Austin, a job as its inaugural professor for the public understanding of science.
Biberdorf’s new position, which she started this fall, is among the first professorships of its kind in the United States. It’s part of a broader plan by Notre Dame’s College of Science to engage scientific experts with a general public that’s both increasingly distrustful of scientists and bombarded with misinformation.
Biberdorf isn’t required to teach classes; instead, she has her own makerspace to develop ideas for publicly promoting scientific research through demonstrations and other projects.
“We have been treating science outreach as a side gig. It’s not a side gig,” said Santiago Schnell, dean of Notre Dame’s College of Science, who modeled the new professorship on one the University of Oxford first created in the mid-1990s. “It’s time that we get very serious about this, because the more advanced the science becomes, the more distance there will be between the general public and politicians and academia.”
Already the public’s view of scientists has taken a hit since the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2019, a Pew Research Center survey found that most Americans had a positive view of research scientists (though only about half viewed them as good communicators). But between 2019 and 2023, the share of American adults who said they had little to no trust in scientists rose from 13 percent to 27 percent, according to a 2023 Pew survey .
If anyone is equipped to overcome such challenges, it’s a professor like Biberdorf.
She got the job at Notre Dame in part because she already had years of experience translating her scientific knowledge into publicly digestible snippets. In addition to reaching people through her popular videos on social media, she hosts a podcast on NPR called Seeking a Scientist , has written science-related children’s books and appeared on television, and launched Fun with Chemistry , a Texas-based outreach organization designed to get K-12 students interested in science careers.
While Biberdorf has always had a flair for performance, she refined her stage presence and public messaging through a partnership with Amy Poehler’s Smart Girls, an organization the former Saturday Night Live cast member launched as a “place where people can truly be their weird and wonderful selves.”
“You don’t have to look like a stereotypical nerd with a bow tie. You can just be a scientist,” Biberdorf said in a video posted on the Smart Girls’ webpage back in 2018. “I’m coming for you, Bill Nye,” she warned, referring to the host of the hugely popular science education program Bill Nye the Science Guy , which aired on PBS in the 1990s.
And after an agent told her she had the potential to indeed become the next Bill Nye, she rebranded herself as a science entertainer named Kate the Chemist.
Over the past several years, Biberdorf has posted viral videos of herself doing science experiments and filmed science segments on programs such as The Late Show with Stephen Colbert , the Today show and The Kelly Clarkson Show .
“I’ve been on a 10-year journey to make science fun and accessible,” said Biberdorf, adding that she “loves to blow up stereotypes” and considers herself a role model for the next generation of scientists. “I want to show young kids—and everybody—that science is laced into everything we do.”
To be sure, the rise of social media platforms such as YouTube, Instagram and TikTok has given a diverse cohort of medical professionals and research scientists the opportunity to share their expertise with people who are also exposed to other creators peddling inaccurate pseudoscience.
“It’s allowing many more people to have a voice,” said mathematician Marcus du Sautoy, who has served as Oxford’s Charles Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science since 2008. “Of course, then we have to question if we trust those voices. This new professorship at Notre Dame will be able to use the university as a platform to legitimize the messages that are coming through a new channel that a professor might create.”
In addition to Notre Dame and Oxford, other universities in England, including the Universities of Sussex and Birmingham, are making investments in advancing the public understanding of science. But du Sautoy believes it’s incumbent on the entire scientific community to prioritize communicating their knowledge.
“We shouldn’t just rely on a few of these professorships,” he said. “We need to make it part of the whole fabric of the profession, that this is part of what being a scientist is: discovering science, teaching science, administering science—but also communicating to the public about science.”
Some academics say formalizing support for the ever-expanding group of social media–savvy scientists like Biberdorf is an overlooked tool universities could use to raise their research profiles as well as fight scientific misinformation.
While at UT Austin, Biberdorf juggled public communication with the traditional faculty responsibilities as both a chemistry instructor and director of demonstrations and outreach.
When it came time to apply for grants, both experiences helped her—and her colleagues—write successful applications that brought thousands of dollars in funding to their department. That’s because many granting agencies, including the National Science Foundation, require applicants to explain the broader impact of their proposed projects.
In an email to Inside Higher Ed , an NSF spokesperson said the agency prioritizes “outreach and transparency to the entire American public so they can see firsthand how that investment has improved their everyday lives and will continue to produce impacts that strengthen our economy and security for decades to come.”
It’s especially helpful when researchers can point to a concrete mechanism, like Biberdorf ’s outreach program, to show how they’ll communicate with the public.
“All of my colleagues immediately realized they could use me in their broader-impact section for their grant applications,” said Biberdorf, who worked with her UT colleagues to strategize ways to publicize their research. “It actually gets out into the community so researchers can talk about what they’re doing. Hopefully that gets people excited about it and will help that researcher get more grants in the future and more notoriety.”
One of her former colleagues, Michael Rose, an associate professor of chemistry at UT Austin, believes that pledging to use Biberdorf’s outreach program has helped him secure nearly $500,000 in grants.
Still, Rose said, “it’s hard to convince institutions” that having a faculty member dedicated solely to publicizing science can more than pay for itself by elevating an institution’s research efforts. “There’s not a historical model for it.”
That doesn’t mean departments should stop trying, he added. “It’s important to make the case that somebody who would be in that position would be catalytic in terms of being able to extract grant money from different agencies.”
@dr.brein How to properly wear masks for going out in public #quarantine #coronavirus #fyp #facialmask ♬ original sound - Dr. Ben Rein
Ben Rein, a neuroscientist with 713,800 followers on TikTok, was still completing a doctorate at the University at Buffalo when he made a viral video about proper mask wearing at the start of the pandemic. At first he kept his online persona separate from his professional life, fearful of negative reactions from his colleagues. Then he realized most of them had already seen his videos and approved of his efforts to debunk public health myths, explain how the human brain works and offer insights into the world of scientific research.
Rein, who went on to a research fellowship at Stanford University, didn’t get any explicit institutional support for his public communication endeavors, but he said doing so has return-on-investment potential.
For smaller schools especially, having a social media–savvy researcher is “a hugely overlooked resource,” Rein said, adding that while he was at Buffalo he recruited some students with an interest in science after they watched his videos.
Rein, who recently left academe to become chief science officer of the Mind Science Foundation, said his time as a science influencer showed him both “how fraught the relationships between science and society” are and how bringing more scientists into public conversations is an effective weapon against misinformation.
According to a peer-reviewed research paper he published in the journal Neuroscience in 2023, 84 percent of TikTok users he surveyed reported feeling more trustful of science and scientists after following Rein’s account.
“If we are not making efforts to engage the public beyond traditional methods, we are not only failing to achieve a major goal of science, but we’re also setting ourselves back because we’re actively losing to misinformation and nonexperts who pose as experts,” Rein said.
Figuring out the best way to combat scientific misinformation is one of Biberdorf’s priorities as she settles into her new role at Notre Dame.
“We want to be a safe, resourceful place for the community,” she said, adding that she plans to take a delicate approach to tackling misinformation in her new role. “We don’t want to attack any of the other people out there who are trying to communicate science and do good. We have to figure out what the balance is.”
If you’re a president or aspire to such a role, you’ll do a better job if you gain your social media footing, write R
More from teaching.
A new experiential learning initiative at Georgia State promotes research skills, critical thinkin
Elizabeth H. Bradley and Jonathon S.
The university says creative writing faculty recommended returning its Jones Lectureships to their “original intent”
4 /5 Articles remaining this month.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
University of Notre Dame Supplemental Essay Prompts. Prompt 1: Everyone has different priorities when considering their higher education options and building their college or university list. Tell us about your "non-negotiable" factor (s) when searching for your future college home. (150 words) Prompt 2: Please choose three questions from ...
The University of Notre Dame Writing Section consists of responses to two (2) brief essay questions and three (3) short-answer responses to questions you select from the options provided. Notre Dame University Supplemental Essay Prompt #1. Please choose two questions from the options below. Your brief essay response to each question should be ...
Make sure you choose a real problem in your community. You may personally find it terrible that there's no frozen yogurt place in town, but try to dream a little bigger. Notre Dame takes their prompts fairly seriously, and they want to know what you value. #2: Being too general.
The University of Notre Dame Writing Section consists of responses to two (2) brief essay questions and three (3) short-answer responses to questions you select from the options provided. Essay. Directions: Please provide a response to two (2) of the following questions. The word count is a maximum of 150 words per response.
Welcome to our second blog post on Understanding the College Essay. As part of Notre Dame's Virtual Preview Days, my fellow admissions counselor Maria Finan and I offered advice on how to write your essays. You had so many great questions that we wanted to take some time to answer a few more.
The Notre Dame supplemental essays an important part of the 2024-25 application. This blog offers advice for Fighting Irish hopefuls. ... There are several parts to Notre Dame's writing supplement and you must answer a total of five prompts—two short answer (150 words or fewer) and three very short answer (100 words or fewer). Below are ...
The second of the required Notre Dame essays, however, is more open-ended. For the second essay, each applicant must choose one of four additional Notre Dame supplemental essay prompts to answer. Keep reading this guide for a breakdown of each of the Notre Dame essay prompts. Every Notre Dame application essay has a limit of 200 words.
Notre Dame's acceptance rate for the class of 2022 was roughly 17.6% with applications up 4% over the previous year. With three 150 word short responses, Notre Dame's writing supplement allows you to set yourself apart from the 20,000+ applications that vie for the coveted spots. To apply to Notre Dame, candidates may submit either the ...
Notre Dame Essay Prompt 1. The first essay prompt for the University of Notre Dame's 2023-2024 application cycle delves into the university's core values. It reads: "Notre Dame fosters an undergraduate experience dedicated to the intellectual, moral, and spiritual development of each individual, characterized by a collective sense of care ...
The University of Notre Dame requires students to write and submit five supplemental essays in total—two essays of 150 words in length chosen from a list of three options, and three short-answer responses of 50 words chosen from a list of five options. It is important to note that the admissions officers do not have a preference as to which prompts you choose to answer, so you choose the ...
Yes, the University of Notre Dame requires students to submit Notre Dame supplemental essays. As stated on their website, Notre Dame supplemental essays allow admissions to "get to know you!". In total, applicants must submit the Notre Dame Writing Supplement as well as the Common Application or Coalition Application.
Again, this essay isn't just about Notre Dame. It's also about you. Make sure you're relating what you want to do at Notre Dame to your past experiences—that the professors and courses that interest you will help you build on your most impressive achievements. Please provide responses to TWO (2) of the following questions:
By writing a strong why Notre Dame essay, you can maximize your odds in the admissions process. It's important to include specific details about Notre Dame in your Why Notre Dame essay. By reading through Notre Dame essay examples, you can find some inspiration for your own supplements. When you read Notre Dame essays that worked, you'll ...
Fresh Writing. Fresh Writing is a journal of exemplary essays produced by students in their first year of study at the University of Notre Dame. Essays are chosen for their engaging prose and the extent to which they successfully execute the conventions of writing genres students may encounter in other academic, civic, or professional contexts.
Dedicated Tutors. The Writing Center at the University of Notre Dame is dedicated to helping students become better writers. Our tutors accomplish this goal by listening attentively in writing conferences, reading papers carefully, and asking questions that can help writers better express their ideas and construct their arguments.
Essays are where we get to engage with students' hopes, fears, dreams, life experiences (and more) in their authentic voice. We are humbled every year getting to "meet" all the incredible young people who are applying to Notre Dame through their essays! Yet, writing an essay introducing yourself can be really hard.
Submission Guidelines. How to submit a work. Submission Guidelines. University Writing Program. College of Arts & Letters. University Writing Program. Fresh Writing. 219 Coleman Morse. Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA [email protected].
Essays, both traditional and multimodal, written by students in their first year of study at Notre Dame.
University of Notre Dame 2024-25 Application Essay Question Explanations. The Requirements: 1 Short answer of 100 words; 1 Short Essay of 150 words; 3 Short Answers of 50-100 words each. Supplemental Essay Type (s): Why, Oddball, Community, Short Answer.
Writing the University of Notre Dame Supplement. It's no easy task to craft a compelling narrative in only a few words, especially when the stakes are so high. As Notre Dame only asks for shorter written supplements in addition to the common app personal statement, you'll need to be strategic about how you make your case.
The University of Notre Dame Writing Supplement consists of one (1) essay response to a required question and two (2) essay responses to questions you select from the options provided. In total, you will write three (3) essay responses. The word count is a maximum of 200 words per essay.
Avoid spending too much time explaining the "what" or "who" and focus on the "how.". Reserve two or three sentences making the connection between your education and who you will serve, and spend the rest of the essay telling the reader how you will serve. You don't need to have a final ending to your essay.
Introduction. An essay introduction usually: clearly states the topic that will be the focus of the essay;; offers a preview of main aspects that will addressed, or the particular angle that will be taken in; and; clearly articulates the position that will be argued. This is known as the thesis statement.; Consider this introduction:
Notre Dame also won the last meeting at Ross-Ade Stadium 31-24 in 2013. Kickoff between Purdue and Notre Dame is scheduled for 3:30 p.m. ET at Ross-Ade Stadium. The game will air on CBS.
A familiar way of writing a book about Nietzsche is to follow a particular topic through the corpus: art, religion, or truth, for instance. Patrick Hassan's topic is pessimism. This is a good choice.
Scientists have the knowledge to combat misinformation online, and now some are receiving the institutional support to communicate with a broad public audience. When Kate Biberdorf, a professor known to her 287,300 TikTok followers as Kate the Chemist, gave a guest lecture at the University of Notre Dame last December, she deployed one of her signature science influencer moves: breathing fire ...