critical thinking journal pdf

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Critical Thinking: A Model of Intelligence for Solving Real-World Problems

Diane f. halpern.

1 Department of Psychology, Claremont McKenna College, Emerita, Altadena, CA 91001, USA

Dana S. Dunn

2 Department of Psychology, Moravian College, Bethlehem, PA 18018, USA; ude.naivarom@nnud

Most theories of intelligence do not directly address the question of whether people with high intelligence can successfully solve real world problems. A high IQ is correlated with many important outcomes (e.g., academic prominence, reduced crime), but it does not protect against cognitive biases, partisan thinking, reactance, or confirmation bias, among others. There are several newer theories that directly address the question about solving real-world problems. Prominent among them is Sternberg’s adaptive intelligence with “adaptation to the environment” as the central premise, a construct that does not exist on standardized IQ tests. Similarly, some scholars argue that standardized tests of intelligence are not measures of rational thought—the sort of skill/ability that would be needed to address complex real-world problems. Other investigators advocate for critical thinking as a model of intelligence specifically designed for addressing real-world problems. Yes, intelligence (i.e., critical thinking) can be enhanced and used for solving a real-world problem such as COVID-19, which we use as an example of contemporary problems that need a new approach.

1. Introduction

The editors of this Special Issue asked authors to respond to a deceptively simple statement: “How Intelligence Can Be a Solution to Consequential World Problems.” This statement holds many complexities, including how intelligence is defined and which theories are designed to address real-world problems.

2. The Problem with Using Standardized IQ Measures for Real-World Problems

For the most part, we identify high intelligence as having a high score on a standardized test of intelligence. Like any test score, IQ can only reflect what is on the given test. Most contemporary standardized measures of intelligence include vocabulary, working memory, spatial skills, analogies, processing speed, and puzzle-like elements (e.g., Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition; see ( Drozdick et al. 2012 )). Measures of IQ correlate with many important outcomes, including academic performance ( Kretzschmar et al. 2016 ), job-related skills ( Hunter and Schmidt 1996 ), reduced likelihood of criminal behavior ( Burhan et al. 2014 ), and for those with exceptionally high IQs, obtaining a doctorate and publishing scholarly articles ( McCabe et al. 2020 ). Gottfredson ( 1997, p. 81 ) summarized these effects when she said the “predictive validity of g is ubiquitous.” More recent research using longitudinal data, found that general mental abilities and specific abilities are good predictors of several work variables including job prestige, and income ( Lang and Kell 2020 ). Although assessments of IQ are useful in many contexts, having a high IQ does not protect against falling for common cognitive fallacies (e.g., blind spot bias, reactance, anecdotal reasoning), relying on biased and blatantly one-sided information sources, failing to consider information that does not conform to one’s preferred view of reality (confirmation bias), resisting pressure to think and act in a certain way, among others. This point was clearly articulated by Stanovich ( 2009, p. 3 ) when he stated that,” IQ tests measure only a small set of the thinking abilities that people need.”

3. Which Theories of Intelligence Are Relevant to the Question?

Most theories of intelligence do not directly address the question of whether people with high intelligence can successfully solve real world problems. For example, Grossmann et al. ( 2013 ) cite many studies in which IQ scores have not predicted well-being, including life satisfaction and longevity. Using a stratified random sample of Americans, these investigators found that wise reasoning is associated with life satisfaction, and that “there was no association between intelligence and well-being” (p. 944). (critical thinking [CT] is often referred to as “wise reasoning” or “rational thinking,”). Similar results were reported by Wirthwein and Rost ( 2011 ) who compared life satisfaction in several domains for gifted adults and adults of average intelligence. There were no differences in any of the measures of subjective well-being, except for leisure, which was significantly lower for the gifted adults. Additional research in a series of experiments by Stanovich and West ( 2008 ) found that participants with high cognitive ability were as likely as others to endorse positions that are consistent with their biases, and they were equally likely to prefer one-sided arguments over those that provided a balanced argument. There are several newer theories that directly address the question about solving real-world problems. Prominent among them is Sternberg’s adaptive intelligence with “adaptation to the environment” as the central premise, a construct that does not exist on standardized IQ tests (e.g., Sternberg 2019 ). Similarly, Stanovich and West ( 2014 ) argue that standardized tests of intelligence are not measures of rational thought—the sort of skill/ability that would be needed to address complex real-world problems. Halpern and Butler ( 2020 ) advocate for CT as a useful model of intelligence for addressing real-world problems because it was designed for this purpose. Although there is much overlap among these more recent theories, often using different terms for similar concepts, we use Halpern and Butler’s conceptualization to make our point: Yes, intelligence (i.e., CT) can be enhanced and used for solving a real-world problem like COVID-19.

4. Critical Thinking as an Applied Model for Intelligence

One definition of intelligence that directly addresses the question about intelligence and real-world problem solving comes from Nickerson ( 2020, p. 205 ): “the ability to learn, to reason well, to solve novel problems, and to deal effectively with novel problems—often unpredictable—that confront one in daily life.” Using this definition, the question of whether intelligent thinking can solve a world problem like the novel coronavirus is a resounding “yes” because solutions to real-world novel problems are part of his definition. This is a popular idea in the general public. For example, over 1000 business managers and hiring executives said that they want employees who can think critically based on the belief that CT skills will help them solve work-related problems ( Hart Research Associates 2018 ).

We define CT as the use of those cognitive skills or strategies that increase the probability of a desirable outcome. It is used to describe thinking that is purposeful, reasoned, and goal directed--the kind of thinking involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making decisions, when the thinker is using skills that are thoughtful and effective for the particular context and type of thinking task. International surveys conducted by the OECD ( 2019, p. 16 ) established “key information-processing competencies” that are “highly transferable, in that they are relevant to many social contexts and work situations; and ‘learnable’ and therefore subject to the influence of policy.” One of these skills is problem solving, which is one subset of CT skills.

The CT model of intelligence is comprised of two components: (1) understanding information at a deep, meaningful level and (2) appropriate use of CT skills. The underlying idea is that CT skills can be identified, taught, and learned, and when they are recognized and applied in novel settings, the individual is demonstrating intelligent thought. CT skills include judging the credibility of an information source, making cost–benefit calculations, recognizing regression to the mean, understanding the limits of extrapolation, muting reactance responses, using analogical reasoning, rating the strength of reasons that support and fail to support a conclusion, and recognizing hindsight bias or confirmation bias, among others. Critical thinkers use these skills appropriately, without prompting, and usually with conscious intent in a variety of settings.

One of the key concepts in this model is that CT skills transfer in appropriate situations. Thus, assessments using situational judgments are needed to assess whether particular skills have transferred to a novel situation where it is appropriate. In an assessment created by the first author ( Halpern 2018 ), short paragraphs provide information about 20 different everyday scenarios (e.g., A speaker at the meeting of your local school board reported that when drug use rises, grades decline; so schools need to enforce a “war on drugs” to improve student grades); participants provide two response formats for every scenario: (a) constructed responses where they respond with short written responses, followed by (b) forced choice responses (e.g., multiple choice, rating or ranking of alternatives) for the same situations.

There is a large and growing empirical literature to support the assertion that CT skills can be learned and will transfer (when taught for transfer). See for example, Holmes et al. ( 2015 ), who wrote in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , that there was “significant and sustained improvement in students’ critical thinking behavior” (p. 11,199) for students who received CT instruction. Abrami et al. ( 2015, para. 1 ) concluded from a meta-analysis that “there are effective strategies for teaching CT skills, both generic and content specific, and CT dispositions, at all educational levels and across all disciplinary areas.” Abrami et al. ( 2008, para. 1 ), included 341 effect sizes in a meta-analysis. They wrote: “findings make it clear that improvement in students’ CT skills and dispositions cannot be a matter of implicit expectation.” A strong test of whether CT skills can be used for real-word problems comes from research by Butler et al. ( 2017 ). Community adults and college students (N = 244) completed several scales including an assessment of CT, an intelligence test, and an inventory of real-life events. Both CT scores and intelligence scores predicted individual outcomes on the inventory of real-life events, but CT was a stronger predictor.

Heijltjes et al. ( 2015, p. 487 ) randomly assigned participants to either a CT instruction group or one of six other control conditions. They found that “only participants assigned to CT instruction improved their reasoning skills.” Similarly, when Halpern et al. ( 2012 ) used random assignment of participants to either a learning group where they were taught scientific reasoning skills using a game format or a control condition (which also used computerized learning and was similar in length), participants in the scientific skills learning group showed higher proportional learning gains than students who did not play the game. As the body of additional supportive research is too large to report here, interested readers can find additional lists of CT skills and support for the assertion that these skills can be learned and will transfer in Halpern and Dunn ( Forthcoming ). There is a clear need for more high-quality research on the application and transfer of CT and its relationship to IQ.

5. Pandemics: COVID-19 as a Consequential Real-World Problem

A pandemic occurs when a disease runs rampant over an entire country or even the world. Pandemics have occurred throughout history: At the time of writing this article, COVID-19 is a world-wide pandemic whose actual death rate is unknown but estimated with projections of several million over the course of 2021 and beyond ( Mega 2020 ). Although vaccines are available, it will take some time to inoculate most or much of the world’s population. Since March 2020, national and international health agencies have created a list of actions that can slow and hopefully stop the spread of COVID (e.g., wearing face masks, practicing social distancing, avoiding group gatherings), yet many people in the United States and other countries have resisted their advice.

Could instruction in CT encourage more people to accept and comply with simple life-saving measures? There are many possible reasons to believe that by increasing citizens’ CT abilities, this problematic trend can be reversed for, at least, some unknown percentage of the population. We recognize the long history of social and cognitive research showing that changing attitudes and behaviors is difficult, and it would be unrealistic to expect that individuals with extreme beliefs supported by their social group and consistent with their political ideologies are likely to change. For example, an Iranian cleric and an orthodox rabbi both claimed (separately) that the COVID-19 vaccine can make people gay ( Marr 2021 ). These unfounded opinions are based on deeply held prejudicial beliefs that we expect to be resistant to CT. We are targeting those individuals who beliefs are less extreme and may be based on reasonable reservations, such as concern about the hasty development of the vaccine and the lack of long-term data on its effects. There should be some unknown proportion of individuals who can change their COVID-19-related beliefs and actions with appropriate instruction in CT. CT can be a (partial) antidote for the chaos of the modern world with armies of bots creating content on social media, political and other forces deliberately attempting to confuse issues, and almost all media labeled “fake news” by social influencers (i.e., people with followers that sometimes run to millions on various social media). Here, are some CT skills that could be helpful in getting more people to think more critically about pandemic-related issues.

Reasoning by Analogy and Judging the Credibility of the Source of Information

Early communications about the ability of masks to prevent the spread of COVID from national health agencies were not consistent. In many regions of the world, the benefits of wearing masks incited prolonged and acrimonious debates ( Tang 2020 ). However, after the initial confusion, virtually all of the global and national health organizations (e.g., WHO, National Health Service in the U. K., U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) endorse masks as a way to slow the spread of COVID ( Cheng et al. 2020 ; Chu et al. 2020 ). However, as we know, some people do not trust governmental agencies and often cite the conflicting information that was originally given as a reason for not wearing a mask. There are varied reasons for refusing to wear a mask, but the one most often cited is that it is against civil liberties ( Smith 2020 ). Reasoning by analogy is an appropriate CT skill for evaluating this belief (and a key skill in legal thinking). It might be useful to cite some of the many laws that already regulate our behavior such as, requiring health inspections for restaurants, setting speed limits, mandating seat belts when riding in a car, and establishing the age at which someone can consume alcohol. Individuals would be asked to consider how the mandate to wear a mask compares to these and other regulatory laws.

Another reason why some people resist the measures suggested by virtually every health agency concerns questions about whom to believe. Could training in CT change the beliefs and actions of even a small percentage of those opposed to wearing masks? Such training would include considering the following questions with practice across a wide domain of knowledge: (a) Does the source have sufficient expertise? (b) Is the expertise recent and relevant? (c) Is there a potential for gain by the information source, such as financial gain? (d) What would the ideal information source be and how close is the current source to the ideal? (e) Does the information source offer evidence that what they are recommending is likely to be correct? (f) Have you traced URLs to determine if the information in front of you really came from the alleged source?, etc. Of course, not everyone will respond in the same way to each question, so there is little likelihood that we would all think alike, but these questions provide a framework for evaluating credibility. Donovan et al. ( 2015 ) were successful using a similar approach to improve dynamic decision-making by asking participants to reflect on questions that relate to the decision. Imagine the effect of rigorous large-scale education in CT from elementary through secondary schools, as well as at the university-level. As stated above, empirical evidence has shown that people can become better thinkers with appropriate instruction in CT. With training, could we encourage some portion of the population to become more astute at judging the credibility of a source of information? It is an experiment worth trying.

6. Making Cost—Benefit Assessments for Actions That Would Slow the Spread of COVID-19

Historical records show that refusal to wear a mask during a pandemic is not a new reaction. The epidemic of 1918 also included mandates to wear masks, which drew public backlash. Then, as now, many people refused, even when they were told that it was a symbol of “wartime patriotism” because the 1918 pandemic occurred during World War I ( Lovelace 2020 ). CT instruction would include instruction in why and how to compute cost–benefit analyses. Estimates of “lives saved” by wearing a mask can be made meaningful with graphical displays that allow more people to understand large numbers. Gigerenzer ( 2020 ) found that people can understand risk ratios in medicine when the numbers are presented as frequencies instead of probabilities. If this information were used when presenting the likelihood of illness and death from COVID-19, could we increase the numbers of people who understand the severity of this disease? Small scale studies by Gigerenzer have shown that it is possible.

Analyzing Arguments to Determine Degree of Support for a Conclusion

The process of analyzing arguments requires that individuals rate the strength of support for and against a conclusion. By engaging in this practice, they must consider evidence and reasoning that may run counter to a preferred outcome. Kozyreva et al. ( 2020 ) call the deliberate failure to consider both supporting and conflicting data “deliberate ignorance”—avoiding or failing to consider information that could be useful in decision-making because it may collide with an existing belief. When applied to COVID-19, people would have to decide if the evidence for and against wearing a face mask is a reasonable way to stop the spread of this disease, and if they conclude that it is not, what are the costs and benefits of not wearing masks at a time when governmental health organizations are making them mandatory in public spaces? Again, we wonder if rigorous and systematic instruction in argument analysis would result in more positive attitudes and behaviors that relate to wearing a mask or other real-world problems. We believe that it is an experiment worth doing.

7. Conclusions

We believe that teaching CT is a worthwhile approach for educating the general public in order to improve reasoning and motivate actions to address, avert, or ameliorate real-world problems like the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence suggests that CT can guide intelligent responses to societal and global problems. We are NOT claiming that CT skills will be a universal solution for the many real-world problems that we confront in contemporary society, or that everyone will substitute CT for other decision-making practices, but we do believe that systematic education in CT can help many people become better thinkers, and we believe that this is an important step toward creating a society that values and practices routine CT. The challenges are great, but the tools to tackle them are available, if we are willing to use them.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.F.H. and D.S.D.; resources, D.F.H.; data curation, writing—original draft preparation, D.F.H.; writing—review and editing, D.F.H. and D.S.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

No IRB Review.

Informed Consent Statement

No Informed Consent.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

• Abrami Philip C., Bernard Robert M., Borokhovski Evgueni, Wade C. Anne, Surkes Michael A., Tamim Rana, Zhang Dai. Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A Stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 2008; 78 :1102–34. doi: 10.3102/0034654308326084. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Abrami Philip C., Bernard Robert M., Borokhovski Evgueni, Waddington David I., Wade C. Anne. Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 2015; 85 :275–341. doi: 10.3102/0034654314551063. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Burhan Nik Ahmad Sufian, Kurniawan Yohan, Sidek Abdul Halim, Mohamad Mohd Rosli. Crimes and the Bell curve: Th e role of people with high, average, and low intelligence. Intelligence. 2014; 47 :12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.08.005. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Butler Heather A., Pentoney Christopher, Bong Maebelle P. Predicting real-world outcomes: Critical thinking ability is a better predictor of life decisions than intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2017; 25 :38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.005. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cheng Vincent Chi-Chung, Wong Shuk-Ching, Chuang Vivien Wai-Man, So Simon Yung-Chun, Chen Jonathan Hon-Kwan, Sridhar Sidharth, To Kelvin Kai-Wwang, Chan Jasper Fuk-Wu, Hung Ivan Fan-Ngai, Ho Pak-Leung, et al. The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Infectious Disease. 2020; 81 :107–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chu Derek K., Aki Elie A., Duda Stephanie, Solo Karla, Yaacoub Sally, Schunemann Holger J. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: A system atic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020; 395 :1973–87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Donovan Sarah J., Guss C. Dominick, Naslund Dag. Improving dynamic decision-making through training and self-re flection. Judgment and Decision Making. 2015; 10 :284–95. [ Google Scholar ]
• Drozdick Lisa Whipple, Wahlstrom Dustin, Zhu Jianjun, Weiss Lawrence G. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition and the Wechsler Memory Scale—Fourth Edition. In: Flanagan Dawn P., Harrison Patti L., editors. Contemporary Intellectual as Sessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues. The Guilford Press; New York: 2012. pp. 197–223. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gigerenzer Gerd. When all is just a click away: Is critical thinking obsolete in the digital age? In: Sternberg Robert J., Halpern Diane F., editors. Critical Thinking IN Psychology. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2020. pp. 197–223. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gottfredson Linda S. Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence. 1997; 24 :79–132. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90014-3. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Grossmann Igor, Varnum Michael E. W., Na Jinkyung, Kitayama Shinobu, Nisbett Richard E. A route to well-being: Intelligence ver sus wise reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2013; 142 :944–53. doi: 10.1037/a0029560. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Halpern Diane F. Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment. Schuhfried Test Publishers; Modling: 2018. [(accessed on 30 March 2021)]. Available online: www.schuhfried.com [ Google Scholar ]
• Halpern Diane F., Butler Heather A. Is critical thinking a better model of intelligence? In: Sternberg Robert J., editor. The nature of Intelligence. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2020. pp. 183–96. [ Google Scholar ]
• Halpern Diane F., Dunn Dana S. Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. 6th ed. Taylor & Francis; New York: Forthcoming. in press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Halpern Diane F., Millis Keith, Graesser Arthur, Butler Heather, Forsyth Carol, Cai Zhiqiang. Operation ARA: A computerized learn ing game that teaches critical thinking and scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2012; 7 :93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.03.006. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hart Research Associates [(accessed on 30 March 2021)]; Employers Express Confidence in Colleges and Universities: See College as Worth the Investment, New Research Finds. 2018 Aug 29; Available online: https://hartresearch.com/employers-express-confidence-in-colleges-and-universities-see-college-as-worth-the-investment-new-research-finds/
• Heijltjes Anita, Gog Tamara van, Lippink Jimmie, Paas Fred. Unraveling the effects of critical thinking instructions, practice, and self-explanation on students’ reasoning performance. Instructional Science. 2015; 43 :487–506. doi: 10.1007/s11251-015-9347-8. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Holmes Natasha G., Wieman Carl E., Bonn DougA. Teaching critical thinking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015; 112 :11199–204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505329112. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hunter John E., Schmidt Frank L. Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 1996; 2 :447–72. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.2.3-4.447. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kozyreva Anastasia, Lewandowsky Stephan, Hertwig Ralph. Citizens versus the internet: Confronting digital challenges with cognitive tools. [(accessed on 30 March 2021)]; Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2020 21 doi: 10.1177/1529100620946707. Available online: https://www.psychologi calscience.org/publications/confronting-digital-challenges-with-cognitive-tools.html [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kretzschmar Andre, Neubert Jonas C., Wusternberg Sascha, Greiff Samuel. Construct validity of complex problem- solv ing: A comprehensive view on different facts of intelligence and school grades. Intelligence. 2016; 54 :55–69. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.11.004. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lang Jonas W.B., Kell Harrison J. General mental ability and specific abilities: Their relative importance for extrinsic career success. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2020; 105 :1047–61. doi: 10.1037/apl0000472. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lovelace Berkeley., Jr. Medical Historians Compare the Coronavirus to the 1918 Flu Pandemic: Both Were Highly Political. [(accessed on 30 March 2021)]; CNBC. 2020 Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/28/comparing-1918-flu-vs-corona virus.html?fbclid=IwAR1RAVRUOIdN9qqvNnMPimf5Q4XfV-pn_qdC3DwcfnPu9kavwumDI2zq9Xs
• Marr Rhuaridh. Iranian Cleric Claims COVID-19 Vaccine Can Make People Gay. [(accessed on 30 March 2021)]; Metro Weekly. 2021 Available online: https://www.metroweekly.com/2021/02/iranian-cleric-claims-covid-19-vaccine-can-make-people-gay/
• McCabe Kira O., Lubinski David, Benbow Camilla P. Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2020; 119 :390–416. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000239. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mega Emiliano R. COVID Has Killed more than One Million People. How Many more will Die? [(accessed on 30 March 2021)]; Nature. 2020 Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02762-y [ PubMed ]
• Nickerson Raymond S. Developing intelligence through instruction. In: Sternberg Robert J., editor. The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2020. pp. 205–37. [ Google Scholar ]
• OECD . The Survey of Adult Skills: Reader’s Companion. 3rd ed. OECD Publishing; Paris: 2019. OECD Skills Studies. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Smith Matthew. Why won’t Britons Wear Face Masks? [(accessed on 30 March 2021)]; YouGov. 2020 Available online: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/health/articles-reports/2020/07/15/why-wont-britons-wear-face-masks
• Stanovich Keith E. What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought. Yale University Press; New Haven: 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Stanovich Keith E., West Richard F. On the failure of cognitive ability to predict my-side bias and one-sided thinking biases. Thinking & Reasoning. 2008; 14 :129–67. doi: 10.1080/13546780701679764. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stanovich Keith E., West Richard F. What intelligence tests miss. The Psychologist. 2014; 27 :80–83. doi: 10.5840/inquiryctnews201126216. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sternberg Robert J. A theory of adaptive intelligence and its relation to general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence. 2019; 7 :23. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence7040023. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tang Julian W. COVID-19: Interpreting scientific evidence—Uncertainty, confusion, and delays. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2020; 20 :653. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05387-8. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wirthwein Linda, Rost Detlef H. Giftedness and subjective well-being: A study with adults. Learning and Individuals Differences. 2011; 21 :182–86. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.001. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

• DOI: 10.22329/IL.V9I1.2656
• Corpus ID: 51750178

Critical and Creative Thinking

• Sharon Bailin
• Published 1987
• Informal Logic

153 Citations

From critical thinking – to creativity: steps to understanding, a framework for critical thinking, rational thinking, and intelligence., building a test to assess creative and critical thinking simultaneously, complex thinking in a project-based classroom, valuing both critical and creative thinking in clinical practice: narrowing the research-practice gap, mapping the relationship between critical thinking and design thinking, a comprehensive approach to the development of thinking skills, critical and creative thinking as a form of making in art education, de-idealising the educational ideal of critical thinking, 11 references, frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences, reasoning as imagination, critical thinking as an educational ideal, imagination and thinking, book review: taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, handbook i: cognitive domain, critical thinking: educating for responsible citizenship in a democracy., the mechanism of mind, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Reflective journals and critical thinking

2012, Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education

Related Papers

International Journal for Educational Integrity

Neera Handa

This paper reports on findings of evaluative research into student perceptions of a structured academic development workshop, which was specifically designed to induct and orient international students into the academic expectations of their program of study at a university in Australia. With most Australian universities engaged in the business of internationalisation of higher education, there is some debate about the adequacy of practices adopted by these institutions to familiarise their non English-speaking background (NESB) international students with the Australian academic culture. While the practices of some Western universities are sometimes said to be inadequate, there also appears some consternation about international students’ lack of motivation to learn and their inability to master Western academic conventions. Against this backdrop, the paper outlines the impetus for collaboration between the university’s Learning Skills Unit and faculty staff in designing and facili...

Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education

Lloyd Davis

Frances Martin , Debra Bath

The Australian Universities Teaching Committee (AUTC) is committed to the identification of 'examples of best practice in teaching and learning in Australian universities at the level of discipline or field of study'. The AUTC funded project Learning Outcomes and Curriculum Development in Psychology was awarded this year to a team representing a diverse cross-section of Schools and Departments of Psychology in Australia. The project brief demands 'an evaluative overview of courses… with a focus on the specification and assessment of learning outcomes and must identify strategic directions for universities to enhance teaching and learning in these areas'. Although the final project outcomes will include a discussion of the teaching of psychology beyond that taking place within Schools and Departments of Psychology, this preliminary report will consider only information relevant to the teaching of psychology in core programs within Australian Psychological Society (APS...

Leigh N Wood

Paula Myatt

… of Uniserve National …

Gwendolyn Lawrie

Abstract: With 40 separate programs represented amongst the students enrolled in 1st year chemistry at The University of Queensland (UQ), an integrative teaching and learning framework has evolved which incorporates inductive approaches to increase the ...

Catriona Bonfiglioli

sydney.edu.au

Alexandra Yeung

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Eszter Szenes

… SEPTEMBER 29 TH- …

Michelle Kofod , Nisha Tak , Jacquelyn Cranney

IEEE Transactions on Education

Journal of University Teaching Learning Practice

aBout sYnergY

Megan Le Masurier

Sophie Kennedy

Studies in Higher Education

Carol Johnston

Zeynep Kocoglu

HOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology

Jan H F Meyer

Michael Paton

Glen Donnar

B. Lidbury , Felicia Z Zhang

Asian Journal of Education and Training

May Siaw-Mei Liu

Teacher education: local and global

Leonie Rowan

Edited by: Maxine Cooper

The Acpet Journal For Private Higher Education

Peter Grimbeek

Teacher Education: Local and Global

Neill Ustick

Australian Journal of Education

Noella Mackenzie

Fiona Bryer , Peter Grimbeek

aare.edu.au

Janice Pinder , Viola Rosario

Lisbeth Kitson

Journal of International Education in Business

Rose Opengart

Quality in Higher Education

Howard Harris

International Journal for …

Anna Maldoni , Doug Davies

Ako Aotearoa

Liz Chinlund

Maintaining Control: Autonomy and Language

Sara M Cotterall

Alyson Simpson

Pierre Benckendorff

Journal of university …

Wendy Larcombe

ASCILITE 2010: 27th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Curriculum, Technology and Transformation for an Unknown Future

Helen Farley

Marina Orsini-Jones

ascilite.org.au

Sue Gregory

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Collaborative working and critical thinking: adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education.

1. Introduction

2. literature review, 2.1. generative ai tools in higher education, 2.2. importance and challenges of collaborative work and critical thinking, 2.3. principles and applications of generative ai tools, 2.4. best practices and success stories, 2.5. limitations of existing studies and how this article addresses them, 2.6. comparative table of existing studies, 2.7. cluster analysis and emerging trends.

• Cluster 1 (Red): Artificial Intelligence and Education
• Cluster 2 (Green): Education and Technology
• Cluster 3 (Blue): Higher Education and Innovation
• Cluster 4 (Yellow): Research and Critical Thinking

2.8. Enhancing Collaborative Work with Generative AI Tools

2.9. contribution of artificial intelligence tools to critical thinking, 3. materials and methods, 3.1. context of the population, 3.2. justification of the selection process, 3.3. survey distribution and response rate, 3.4. the rationale for the mixed methods approach, 3.5. inclusion of statistical measures, 3.6. designing activities with generative ai tools using the 4padafe methodology, 3.7. integrating generative ai tools into activities, 3.8. assessing the effectiveness of generative ai-powered activities, 4.1. quantitative and qualitative analyses, 4.2. results of the survey on the use of generative ai tools, 5. discussion, 6. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Disability|United Nations Enable. 2022. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/about-us/sustainable-development-goals-sdgs-and-disability.html (accessed on 10 March 2024).
• Weng, J.C. Putting Intellectual Robots to Work: Implementing Generative AI Tools in Project Management ; NYU SPS Applied Analytics Laboratory: New York, NY, USA, 2023. [ Google Scholar ]
• Muca, E.; Cavallini, D.; Odore, R.; Baratta, M.; Bergero, D.; Valle, E. Are Veterinary Students Using Technologies and Online Learning Resources for Didactic Training? A Mini-Meta Analysis. Educ. Sci. 2022 , 12 , 573. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Luan, H.; Geczy, P.; Lai, H.; Gobert, J.; Yang, S.J.H.; Ogata, H.; Baltes, J.; Guerra, R.; Li, P.; Tsai, C.-C. Challenges and future directions of big data and artificial intelligence in education. Front. Psychol. 2020 , 11 , 580820. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ibda, H.; Syamsi, I.; Rukiyati, R. Professional elementary teachers in the digital era: A systematic. Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ. 2023 , 12 , 459–467. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Peramunugamage, A.; Ratnayake, U.W.; Karunanayaka, S.P. Systematic review on mobile collaborative learning for engineering education. J. Comput. Educ. 2023 , 10 , 83–106. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hemachandran, K.; Verma, P.; Pareek, P.; Arora, N.; Rajesh Kumar, K.V.; Ahanger, T.A.; Pise, A.A.; Ratna, R. Artificial Intelligence: A Universal Virtual Tool to Augment Tutoring in Higher Education. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022 , 2022 , 1–8. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• OpenAI. ChatGPT V4. 2024. Available online: https://chat.openai.com/ (accessed on 10 March 2024).
• Tome, M. Tome AI. 2024. Available online: https://tome.app/ (accessed on 11 March 2024).
• AI Chatbot to Search the Web. 2023. Available online: https://you.com/ (accessed on 15 April 2024).
• Canva. What Will You Design Today? 2024. Available online: https://www.canva.com/ (accessed on 15 April 2024).
• Google. Google Docs. Available online: https://docs.google.com/ (accessed on 22 April 2024).
• Zoom Video Communications. Video Communications. 2024. Available online: https://zoom.us/meeting (accessed on 8 June 2024).
• Ruiz-Rojas, L.I.; Acosta-Vargas, P.; De-Moreta-Llovet, J.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, M. Empowering Education with Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools: Approach with an Instructional Design Matrix. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 11524. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lin, Z. Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2023 , 10 , 1–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bansal, G.; Mitchell, A.; Li, D. A Panel Report on Higher Education in the Age of AI from the Perspective of Academic Leaders in the Midwest U.S. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2024 , 54 , 360–375. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pavlik, J.V. Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education. J. Mass Commun. Educ. 2023 , 78 , 84–93. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Orduño-Osuna, J.H.; Cota-Rivera, E.I.; Raygoza, L.M.E.; Jimenez-Sanchez, R.; Limón-Molina, G.M.; Bravo-Zanoguera, M.; Mercado-Herrera, A.; Rico, F.N.M. Exploring the challenges and applications of generative AI on engineering education in Mexico. In Facilitating Global Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing in Higher Education with Generative AI ; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 259–286. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yu, P.; Mulli, J.; Syed, Z.A.S.; Umme, L. Facilitating Global Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing in Higher Education with Generative AI ; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 1–356. [ Google Scholar ]
• Branig, M.; Engel, C.; Schmalfuß-Schwarz, J.; Müller, E.F.; Weber, G. Where Are we with Inclusive Digital Further Education? Accessibility Through Digitalization. Lect. Notes Netw. Syst. 2022 , 389 LNNS , 21–33. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ssemugenyi, F. Teaching and learning methods compared: A pedagogical evaluation of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture methods in developing learners’ cognitive abilities. Cogent Educ. 2023 , 10 , 2187943. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Guerra, E. The contribution of critical thinking to STEM disciplines at the time of generative intelligence. STEM Educ. 2024 , 4 , 71–81. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, J.; Shu, Y.; Yu, H. Fairness in design: A framework for facilitating ethical artificial intelligence designs. Int. J. Crowd Sci. 2023 , 7 , 32–39. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fotaris, P.; Mastoras, T.; Lameras, P. Designing Educational Escape Rooms with Generative AI: A Framework and ChatGPT Prompt Engineering Guide. Proc. Eur. Conf. Games-Based Learn. 2023 , 2023 , 180–189. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, T.; Ji, Y.; Zhan, Z. Expert or machine? Comparing the effect of pairing student teacher with in-service teacher and ChatGPT on their critical thinking, learning performance, and cognitive load in an integrated-STEM course. Asia Pac. J. Educ. 2024 , 44 , 45–60. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Miller, D.D.; Wood, E.A. AI, autonomous machines and human awareness: Towards shared machine-human contexts in medicine. Hum.-Mach. Shar. Contexts 2020 , 10 , 205–220. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abrami, P.C.; Bernard, R.M.; Borokhovski, E.; Waddington, D.I.; Wade, C.A.; Persson, T. Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 2015 , 85 , 275–314. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Halaweh, M. ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 2023 , 15 , 421. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Fui-Hoon Nah, F.; Zheng, R.; Cai, J.; Siau, K.; Chen, L. Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl. Res. 2023 , 25 , 277–304. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van Den Berg, G.; Du Plessis, E. ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Educ. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 998. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Okuogume, A.; Toledano, N. Co-Creation in Sustainable Entrepreneurship Education: Lessons from Business–University Educational Partnerships. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 2272. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Santórum, M.; Carrión-Toro, M.; Morales-Martínez, D.; Maldonado-Garcés, V.; Acosta-Vargas, G.; Acosta-Vargas, P. PAR: Towards a Reference Architecture for Accessible Platforms in Respiratory Therapies. Appl. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 840. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Salinas-Navarro, D.E.; Vilalta-Perdomo, E.; Michel-Villarreal, R.; Montesinos, L. Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools to Explain and Enhance Experiential Learning for Authentic Assessment. Educ. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 83. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Spiros, M.C.; Plemons, A.M.; Biggs, J.A. Pedagogical access and ethical considerations in forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology. Sci. Justice 2022 , 62 , 708–720. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hall, P.; Ellis, D. A systematic review of socio-technical gender bias in AI algorithms. Online Inf. Rev. 2023 , 47 , 1264–1279. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Michel-Villarreal, R.; Vilalta-Perdomo, E.; Salinas-Navarro, D.E.; Thierry-Aguilera, R.; Gerardou, F.S. Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Educ. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 856. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thornhill-Miller, B.; Camarda, A.; Mercier, M.; Burkhardt, J.M.; Morisseau, T.; Bourgeois-Bougrine, S.; Vinchon, F.; El Hayek, S.; Augereau-Landais, M.; Mourey, F.; et al. Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. J. Intell. 2023 , 11 , 54. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Kim, J. Leading teachers’ perspective on teacher-AI collaboration in education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023 , 29 , 8693–8724. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, X.; Xie, H.; Zou, D.; Wang, F.L. ChatGPT for generating stories and mind-maps in storytelling. In Proceedings of the 2023 10th International Conference on Behavioural and Social Computing (BESC), Larnaca, Cyprus, 30 October–1 November 2023; pp. 1–8. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; Yao, B.; Chen, J.; Wang, D.; Ma, X.; Lu, Y.; Xu, Y.; He, L. Exploring Parent’s Needs for Children-Centered AI to Support Preschoolers’ Storytelling and Reading Activities. arXiv 2024 , arXiv:2401.13804. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kang, M.; Shin, J.; Park, J. StudioGAN: A taxonomy and benchmark of GANs for image synthesis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 , 45 , 15725–15742. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Albisua, M.J.B.; Ruiz, M.P.; Nogueira, D.F.; Turnes, S.A.; Carrasco, L.C. Critical thinking from the perspective of university teachers. Estud. Pedagog. 2018 , 44 , 89–113. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Koreshnikova, J.N.; Froumin, I.D. Teachers’ professional skills as a factor in the development of students’ critical thinking. Psychol. Sci. Educ. 2021 , 25 , 88–103. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ruiz Rojas, L.I.; Castillo, C.; Cañizares, S. Digital Teaching Skills to Design Virtual Learning Classrooms with the 4PADAFE Methodology. Lect. Notes Educ. Technol. 2023 , 1062–1071. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Ruiz-Rojas, L.I.; Salvador-Ullauri, L.; Acosta-Vargas, P. Collaborative Working and Critical Thinking: Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher Education. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 5367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135367

Ruiz-Rojas LI, Salvador-Ullauri L, Acosta-Vargas P. Collaborative Working and Critical Thinking: Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher Education. Sustainability . 2024; 16(13):5367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135367

Ruiz-Rojas, Lena Ivannova, Luis Salvador-Ullauri, and Patricia Acosta-Vargas. 2024. "Collaborative Working and Critical Thinking: Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher Education" Sustainability 16, no. 13: 5367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135367

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals