- High School
- You don't have any recent items yet.
- You don't have any courses yet.
- You don't have any books yet.
- You don't have any Studylists yet.
- Information
Peer Review Worksheet
21st century skills: critical thinking and problem solving (phi-105), grand canyon university.
Recommended for you
Students also viewed.
- Persuasive Essay Final Submission
- PHI105 T4 Outline Worksheet Persuasive Essay Planning
- PHI105 - Thinking and language reflection worksheet
- Dalesha Williams PHI105 Persuasive Essay Planning 9 5 22
- Marijuana article
- Apa templet
Related documents
- PHI105 T2 Brainstorming Worksheet 4 13 2023
- PHI105 - calss assignement
- Final Essay Draft
- PHI-105 Fallacy Study Guide-v1
- T1 Topicand Audience Worksheet PHI105 Persuasive Essay Planning 9 5 22
- Fallacies Study Guide july 28
Preview text
Persuasive essay: peer review worksheet.
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers to help them improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Submit this review as an attachment to both your instructor within the assignment bin and into your reply to your peer’s post containing the assigned draft. Name of the Draft’s Author: Amanda Nottoli Name of the Peer Reviewer: Isaac Wyer Summary After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the paper. This should include the stance and the three sub-topics used to support the position within the essay. Do not place your own critique of the essay within this space. After reviewing Amanda’s paper her thesis is: Abortions should not be a possibility when there are an infinite number of resources like contraception, adoption, and resources that support parenthood. She does a great job in each paragraph about each sub topic, making points on each of the subtopics and uses citations that refer to where she got the information. Evaluate the Essay
After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the Persuasive Essay: Final Draft rubric below. Determine the level of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement ranges from Unsatisfactory to Target and are found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.). Please use the highlighting tool to score your peer within each criterion. Then use the right-hand side of the rubric to include a rationale with evidence and examples for the score. Criteria % Va lu e
Unsatisfa ctory
Insufficien t
Approachi ng
Acceptable 5: Target Why was this score determined for your peer’s essay? What evidence/exam ples do you have for this score? % Scaling 0% 65% 75% 85% 100% Content – 70% I would say the essay is good however the conclusion paragraph does not rephrase all 3subtopics very well and the reference page is not setup per APA guidelines Evidence/ Informed Position GED3C
No evidence is used to documen t that the Presents minimal evidence to support the Presents minimal evidence to support the decided Presents key evidence to support the decided Presents key evidence to support the decided Rationale for score: I would say the essay is good however the conclusion
analysis, evaluation, and synthesis) to issues and questions. collected. The writer relies entirely on their personal experien ce and/or feelings to justify their position on the issue. reflection on the issue displays potential trouble maintainin g objectivity . Opposing viewpoints are incomplet e or inaccurate. Works to identify the main points of the issue. Essay may lack in its persuasive ness due to errors in managing emotion and avoiding fallacies within the essay. reflection on the issue is evident. Opposing viewpoints may not be completely clear. Identifies the main points of the issue. Upholds persuasive tone rather than manipulati ve by managing emotion and avoiding fallacies with few errors. Internal reflection on the issue is evident. An opposing viewpoint is considered. Identifies not only the main points, but also some of the embedded, implicit, or unspoken aspects of the issue. Upholds persuasive tone rather than manipulativ e by managing emotion and avoiding fallacies with minimal errors. on the issue is evident. Opposing viewpoints are considered. Identifies not only the main points, but also the embedded, implicit, or unspoken aspects of the issue. Upholds persuasive tone rather than manipulati ve by managing emotions and avoiding fallacies. Word Count Word Count
Word count is less than half the minimu m or Body of essay is more than 100 words over or under the Body of essay is more than 50 but less than 100 words over Body of essay is over or under the word count by 50 words Within the appropriate word count. The word count is only 589 compared to the 750 – 1000 requirement for
more than double the maximu m. word count. or under the word count. or less. the essay Organization and Effectiveness – 20% Logical Position and Clear Thesis Statement GED3C Demonstra te clarity and logic in asking questions and acquiring knowledge . Communic ates reason for writing
The point of view (position ) and reasons on the issue are not discernib le. Fewer than two reasons for the position may be provided The position and reasons for position may not be containe d in any sort of formal Formulate s an informatio nal statement about the topic their chosen issue resides in. This contribute s to an unfocused point of view (position) on an issue. Trouble determinin g alignment and/or logic of the reasons provided. Two or Formulates a point of view (position) on an issue that can be assumed but may not be clearly stated. Reasons provided to support position are mostly logical. Two or more reasons are provided. The position and reasons to support the position as a logical stance are Formulates a clear point of view (position) on an issue. Reasons provided to support position are mostly logical. The position and reasons to support the position as a logical stance are contained within a one- sentence thesis statement at the end of the introductory paragraph. Formulates a clear, precise, and logical point of view (position) on an issue. Reasons provided to support position are all logical. The position and reasons to support the position as a logical stance are concisely contained within a one- sentence thesis statement at the end Rationale for score:
and logical reasons to support the position. Thesis may not be restated in the conclusion . Developm ent, Paragrap h Structure, and Transitio ns Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from developme nt.
Paragrap hs and transition s consisten tly lack unity and coherenc e. No apparent connecti ons between paragrap hs are establish ed. Transitio ns are inapprop riate to purpose and scope. Organiza tion is disjointe Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progressio n of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiven ess. Some degree of organizati on is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsisten cy in organizatio n and/or in their relationshi ps to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesivenes s. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticat ed constructio n of paragraphs and transitions. Includes topic sentences that are persuasive and align with thesis statement. Includes details and rationale that support the main points of each supporting paragraph. Ideas progress Rationale for score:
d. and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition constructio n guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless with smooth transition between paragraphs Mechanic s of Writing Includes spelling, capitalizati on, punctuatio n, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found througho ut. Frequent and repetitive mechanica l errors are present. Inconsiste ncies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate . Varied sentence structure is attempted. Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. No mechanical errors are present. Appropriat e language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. Rationale for score: Format – 10%
- Multiple Choice
Course : 21st Century Skills: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving (PHI-105)
University : grand canyon university.
- Discover more from: 21st Century Skills: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PHI-105 Grand Canyon University 999+ Documents Go to course
- More from: 21st Century Skills: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PHI-105 Grand Canyon University 999+ Documents Go to course
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
1. Does the essay have a catchy and intriguing title? 2. Is the introduction interesting? Does the writer draw you in immediately? 3. Does the thesis establish a specific focus for the essay? 4. Is there one idea explored in each paragraph? Are there transitions between these paragraphs? 5.
This handout offers practical strategies and a sample checklist to help you participate in the peer review process. However, always tailor your work to your specific audience and assignment.
PEER REVIEW GUIDELINES Use the following questions as guidelines to help the writer better see his or her work through the eyes of the reader. As a critic/editor, be specific and thorough with your feedback. Title and Formatting 1. Does the writer provide an original and provocative title for the essay? 2.
Sharon - Persuasive essay, 150 words, seventh edition APA style. Received a perfect grade. skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Submit this review as an attachment to both your instructor within. After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the paper.
1. What is the essay's argument? Is this argument "debatable," or is it a statement that every reader would agree with? Explain your answer. 2. Identify, by number, the paragraph(s) that offer the strongest support for the argument. Remember: support must contain evidence and analysis. Briefly explain why the support is effective.
to understand the writer’s process in composing each essay? Has the writer provided effective examples of each element of the writing process for each essay?
Peer-Editing Form for Argumentative Essay Directions: Check your partner’s paper for the following items and write comments. Topic Comments Does the introduction engage the reader? Copy the thesis of the essay. What side is the writer on? What are two claims that the writer mentions from the other side? 1. 2. Does the writer refute these
SYNTHESIS ESSAY PEER REVIEW WORKSHEET For our peer editing session, you will be responsible for reviewing another student’s essay. Writer’s Name: _____ Editor’s Name: _____ Title of the Essay: _____ The Introduction
Thesis‐Driven Essay Restate the thesis in your own words. If you are having trouble identifying a thesis, please explain why. What position is the writer taking in this paper? What is the writer’s argument? List the paper’s three most important pieces of evidence or support.
Persuasive Essay: Peer Review Worksheet. Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers to help them improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback.