Wind a strip of reusable adhesive poster hanging putty around the needle. The putty will form a seal with the neck of the bottle.
Pour 10 to 20 millilitres of antispetic medicinal rubbing alcohol (isopropyl alcohol) or methylated spirits into an empty soft drink bottle.
If you're a young whipper-snapper, please remember you need adult supervision when handling these liquids.
Rotate and wiggle the bottle to swirl the alcohol around for 10 or 20 seconds to 'encourage' it to evaporate.
Insert the pump to form a seal between the poster putty and the neck of the bottle. Pump air into the bottle until it feels 'full'.
Remove the pump swiftly so that the air pressure inside the bottle drops suddenly and rapidly. The bottle will instantly fill with a dense, opaque white fog.
If you're feeling fancy, you can fire off a few nifty fog rings at this stage by gently squeezing the bottle.
For yet more "wow", reinsert the pump and re-pressurise the bottle while it is still full of dense white fog. As you pump, the thick white fog vanishes right before your eyes and the air turns crystal clear.
If you want to make another thick, dense cloud, you'll need to shake and jiggle the bottle again before repeating the demonstration from the top.
You've probably heard the phrase 'high pressure, fair weather' or that a 'falling barometer' means rain approaching. This trick demonstrates the phenomenon behind those sayings.
Like water, isopropyl alcohol evaporates to form an invisible vapour. Like water vapour, that invisible isopropyl alcohol vapour can condense again to become visible liquid isopropyl alcohol. If that happens in mid-air (as opposed to on a surface), the tiny droplets produce what we call a cloud (or fog).
While the temperature and pressure inside the bottle remain steady, nothing much happens. When you start pumping air in, the internal pressure rises and the air inside the bottle becomes noticeably clearer. When you suddenly release the pressure, something rather stunning and surprising happens. A dense white cloud forms instantaneously inside the bottle. But why?
The first thing to remember is that pumping air into a bicycle or car tyre increases its temperature. You might have noticed that the pump and valve both get warmer as you pump air in. The second thing you might recall is that a drop in gas pressure causes cooling. You have almost certainly noticed this while spraying deodorant from an aerosol bottle under your armpits. The compressed gas moves from the region of high pressure inside the aerosol can to a region of much lower pressure outside the can, which causes the gas temperature to plummet. You'll notice the same thing if you let the air rush out of an inflated tyre.
So increasing pressure of a gas causes warming and decreasing pressure causes cooling. But there's one more thing. Pumping air into your soft drink bottle increases the internal temperature and therefore also increases the rate of evaporation of the isopropyl alcohol (and some water) from the wet surfaces inside. Releasing that high pressure suddenly causes a rapid and dramatic fall of temperature inside the bottle causing the isopropyl alcohol vapour (and some water vapour) to condense into tiny droplets of visible liquid. Each of those droplets reflects visible light forming a dense white fog, or cloud.
Pumping air back into the bottle causes the internal temperature to rise again so those droplets evaporate once more and the air inside turns crystal clear once more.
The same fundamental principle produces the clear skies and fair weather we associate with high pressure weather systems that form over land. The air in a high pressure system warms as it descends so the skies tend to remain cloud-free. The relatively warm rising air of a low pressure weather system, however, cools as it ascends into the atmosphere causing the invisible water vapour it carries to condense into beautiful, fluffy clouds.
Tags: physics
Published 21 May 2013
Email ABC Science
Use these social-bookmarking links to share Cloud in a bottle .
Use this form to email 'Cloud in a bottle' to someone you know: https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2013/05/21/3759793.htm?
By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message.
Despite being as 'Aussie as', Ruben Meerman was actually born in Holland. He moved to Bundaberg, Queensland when he was 9 and started surfing a few years later.
He decided to study physics at school in an attempt to sit next to a hot girl. Sadly, this didn't work but it was the beginning of another beautiful relationship…with science! Read more»
Abc science.
Receive ABC Science's weekly newsletter Science Updates
Twisting a plastic water bottle changes its volume, pressure, and temperature—and ends with a bang.
Caution: This Snack involves flying bottle caps. Use eye protection and aim safely away from yourself or anyone nearby.
None needed.
Note: If your water bottle happens to be full of water, drink up to empty it. It’s fine—even preferable—if there are still a few droplets of water left inside.
Put on your goggles.
Screw the cap on the bottle, but not all the way: The cap should be tight enough to make an airtight seal, but loose enough so you can unscrew it with a flick of your thumb. (You’ll figure this out after one or two tries.)
Grab the bottle at both ends and twist your hands in opposite directions. Twist hard—hard enough to create a narrow “waist” around the middle of the bottle. (Click to enlarge photos below.) Do you notice the bottle feeling warmer as you do this?
Point the top of the bottle away from yourself or anyone nearby. While holding tension on the twisted bottle, remove the cap with a sideways flick of your thumb. Caution: The cap will fly off rapidly. Never aim it at another person.
Watch carefully: You may see a small cloud of mist form near the mouth of the bottle after you release the cap. Note: If you can’t get mist to emerge from the mouth of the bottle, try adding a few drops of isopropyl alcohol, and then shake the bottle. Isopropyl alcohol’s lower vapor pressure will condense more easily than water vapor when you unscrew the cap.
If you happen to have an infrared thermometer, repeat the experiment and have a partner measure the temperature of the bottle before you squeeze it, as it is being squeezed, and then after the cap has been released. (Click photo to enlarge.)
If you want to do this Snack again, just blow into the bottle to re-inflate it and you'll be ready to go. The bottle can be used multiple times. Note: Do not re-inflate by mouth if you've previously used isopropyl alcohol in the bottle.
Did the cap go flying off? Did you hear a “pop”? Did you see mist wafting from the mouth of the bottle? All of these events tell you that your “empty” bottle was anything but empty.
When you twist the sealed bottle, you decrease the volume of the air trapped inside. When gas molecules are forced closer together in this way, the pressure inside the bottle increases. This increased pressure is what makes the cap fly across the room when released.
The “pop” you hear is caused by a sudden change in air pressure. When you release the cap, the higher-pressure air inside the bottle rushes out into the lower-pressure air inside the room. This sudden expansion creates a pressure wave that you hear as sound.
As you twist the bottle, you might feel (or measure) it getting warmer. After the cap flies, you might notice the bottle getting cooler. There is a direct relationship between pressure and temperature in a gas: increasing the pressure increases the temperature; reducing the pressure reduces the temperature.
The mist that forms reveals that there’s not just air inside your bottle, but also some water vapor. At the relatively higher temperatures and pressures inside the twisted bottle, the water vapor remains a gas. But when you release the cap, the sudden drop in pressure and temperature causes the water to condense into visible droplets of liquid water.
There are several other experiments and engineering challenges you can do with this Snack. For instance, you might want to investigate how far your cap will fly. Is there a relationship between the number of twists and the distance at which the cap lands?
How much does the pressure change when you twist the bottle? Can you engineer a system to determine the internal pressure of the bottle before and after twisting?
How much does the volume change? Can you figure this out using graduated cylinders, measuring cups, or other tools?
Can you use the measurements from the activities above to come up with a relationship between temperature, pressure, and volume? This relationship is known as the ideal gas law .
As a homework assignment, ask students to bring in empty plastic water bottles. Take students outside or into a gym. With no introduction and with a twist of the wrist and a flick of the thumb pop the top off a bottle. This is an exciting way to introduce this Snack with a bang!
Let students engage in this activity after a quick demonstration (including a discussion of proper safety precautions). Note: Since you can re-inflate your bottle by mouth, each experimenter should have their own bottle. Do not re-inflate by mouth if you've previously used isopropyl alcohol in the bottle. Depending on the number of students involved a further safety precaution would be to label each bottle and cap so students can retrieve their own associated part.
After students have had a chance to launch their bottle caps, ask them what they want to do or try next. This Snack can lead to an explosion of investigations and questions relating directly relate to core scientific concepts and Science and Engineering Practices. Many questions or self-imposed challenges might arise such as: How can I make my cap go further? Who can make the most clouds in their bottle? Who can make the loudest pop? Have students take notes and make measurements; encourage them to write down their questions and design experiments to investigate further.
This Snack requires no background knowledge, just a strong wrist and fast thumb. However, this Snack can lead to discussions and lessons on a variety of gas-laws as well as kinematic concepts. It can reveal practical applications of this phenomena in modern machines—like combustion engines, refrigerators, and rockets—as well as the study of the weather (meteorology).
You don’t need a lab or fancy equipment to find DNA—the genetic instructions for all living things. Learn how to extract DNA from strawberries in your own kitchen!
As with all science experiments, safety is extremely important. We recommend wearing safety goggles for this experiment. Parent supervision is required.
But first, what is DNA?
As you learned in the steps above, the long stringy white pieces that you pulled out of the glass cup with your tweezers are actual strands of strawberry DNA. Strawberries have a lot of DNA when compared to other fruits. This makes the strawberry DNA not only easy to extract but also visible to see.T he extraction mixture played a crucial role in the extraction process. Strawberries are made up of cells that have an outer layer called membranes. The liquid dish soap in the extraction solution helps to dissolve those cell membranes. Inside those cells are also protein chains that hold nucleic acids. The salt in the extraction solution will break up the protein chains and release the strawberry’s DNA. You added isopropyl alcohol to keep the DNA from being dissolved in the extraction solution.
Did you know that you can cook an egg without heat ? Cooking occurs when proteins are denatured, so any process that produces a chemical change in protein can cook food. Here’s a simple science project that demonstrates you can cook an egg in alcohol. The resulting egg resembles one that has been hard boiled.
Basically, all you need for this cooking chemistry project is a raw egg and alcohol:
For the alcohol, you can use vodka, 151 rum, or any other high-proof ethanol that is fit for human consumption . The higher the alcohol percentage or proof, the faster the chemical reaction and cooking occurs. While the egg will cook using other types of alcohol ( denatured alcohol , rubbing alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, methanol), these types of alcohol are toxic and the cooked egg will be inedible.
Here’s how to cook the egg:
Depending on the percentage of alcohol, the reaction takes at least an hour. The egg would cook a lot more quickly if you boiled it the regular way; you have to wait for the alcohol to work its way into the egg.
The egg cooked in alcohol is edible, but it contains a high concentration of alcohol. If you choose to eat it, probably its best use is in a cocktail.
The egg white consists mostly of the protein albumin. Within a few minutes of adding the egg to the alcohol, the translucent egg white starts to turn cloudy. The alcohol participates in a chemical reaction, denaturing or changing the conformation of the protein molecules so they can form new linkages with each other. As the alcohol diffuses into the egg white, the reaction proceeds and the egg white turns white.
The egg yolk contains some protein, but also a lot of fat, which is not as affected by the alcohol. Within 1 to 3 hours, depending mainly on alcohol concentration, the egg white is white and solid and the egg yolk is firm.
Cooking also kills nasty disease-causing pathogens that could cause food poisoning. Alcohol, like heat, is an excellent disinfectant.
Alcohol is not the only chemical that can cook food without heat. For example, you can cook an egg in vinegar. This reaction, called pickling, results from the acetic acid in the vinegar. Acetic acid lowers the pH in food to 4.6 or lower, killing more bacteria. The low pH and exclusion of air promotes fermentation by a Lactobacillus bacteria. The bacteria produce lactic acid that preserves the food. Pickling changes the flavor and texture of food.
Salt or brine preserves food by changing the osmotic pressure . This deters microbial growth, plus the process seasons food and enhances tenderness. Brining is often combined with pickling.
January 31, 2013
A genetically geared activity from Science Buddies
By Science Buddies
Key concepts DNA Genome Genes Extraction Laboratory techniques
Introduction Have you ever wondered how scientists extract DNA from an organism? All living organisms have DNA, which is short for deoxyribonucleic acid; it is basically the blueprint for everything that happens inside an organism’s cells. Overall, DNA tells an organism how to develop and function, and is so important that this complex compound is found in virtually every one of its cells. In this activity you’ll make your own DNA extraction kit from household chemicals and use it to separate DNA from strawberries. Background Whether you’re a human, rat, tomato or bacterium, each of your cells will have DNA inside of it (with some rare exceptions, such as mature red blood cells in humans). Each cell has an entire copy of the same set of instructions, and this set is called the genome. Scientists study DNA for many reasons: They can figure out how the instructions stored in DNA help your body to function properly. They can use DNA to make new medicines or genetically modify crops to be resistant to insects. They can solve who is a suspect of a crime, and can even use ancient DNA to reconstruct evolutionary histories!
To get the DNA from a cell, scientists typically rely on one of many DNA extraction kits available from biotechnology companies. During a DNA extraction, a detergent will cause the cell to pop open, or lyse, so that the DNA is released into solution. Then alcohol added to the solution causes the DNA to precipitate out. In this activity, strawberries will be used because each strawberry cell has eight copies of the genome, giving them a lot of DNA per cell. (Most organisms only have one genome copy per cell.)
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing . By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Rubbing alcohol
Measuring cup
Measuring spoons
Dishwashing liquid (for hand-washing dishes)
Glass or small bowl
Cheesecloth
Tall drinking glass
Three strawberries
Resealable plastic sandwich bag
Small glass jar (such as a spice or baby food jar)
Bamboo skewer, available at most grocery stores. (If you use a baby food or short spice jar, you could substitute a toothpick for the skewer.)
Preparation
Chill the rubbing alcohol in the freezer. (You’ll need it later.)
Mix one half teaspoon of salt, one third cup of water and one tablespoon of dishwashing liquid in a glass or small bowl. Set the mixture aside. This is your extraction liquid. Why do you think there is detergent in the extraction liquid?
Completely line the funnel with cheesecloth. Insert the funnel tube into the tall drinking glass (not the glass with the extraction liquid in it).
Remove and discard the green tops from the strawberries.
Put the strawberries into a resealable plastic sandwich bag and push out all of the extra air. Seal the bag tightly.
With your fingers, squeeze and smash the strawberries for two minutes. How do the smashed strawberries look?
Add three tablespoons of the extraction liquid you prepared to the strawberries in the bag. Push out all of the extra air and reseal the bag. How do you think the detergent and salt will affect the strawberry cells?
Squeeze the strawberry mixture with your fingers for one minute. How do the smashed strawberries look now?
Pour the strawberry mixture from the bag into the funnel. Let it drip through the cheesecloth and into the tall glass until there is very little liquid left in the funnel (only wet pulp remains). How does the filtered strawberry liquid look?
Pour the filtered strawberry liquid from the tall glass into the small glass jar so that the jar is one quarter full.
Measure out one half cup of cold rubbing alcohol.
Tilt the jar and very slowly pour the alcohol down its side. Pour until the alcohol has formed approximately a one-inch-deep layer on top of the strawberry liquid. You may not need all of the one half cup of alcohol to form the one-inch layer. Do not let the strawberry liquid and alcohol mix.
Study the mixture inside of the jar. The strawberry DNA will appear as gooey clear/white stringy stuff. Do you see anything in the jar that might be strawberry DNA? If so, where in the jar is it?
Dip the bamboo skewer into the jar where the strawberry liquid and alcohol layers meet and then pull up the skewer. Did you see anything stick to the skewer that might be DNA? Can you spool any DNA onto the skewer?
Extra: You can try using this DNA extraction activity on lots of other things. Grab some oatmeal or kiwis from the kitchen and try it again! Which foods give you the most DNA?
Extra: If you have access to a milligram scale (called a balance), you can measure how much DNA you get (called a yield). Just weigh your clean bamboo skewer and then weigh the skewer again after you have used it to fish out as much DNA as you could from your strawberry DNA extraction. Subtract the initial weight of the skewer from its weight with the DNA to get your final yield of DNA. What was the weight of your DNA yield?
Extra: Try to tweak different variables in this activity to see how you could change your strawberry DNA yield. For example, you could try starting with different amounts of strawberries, using different detergents or different DNA sources (such as oatmeal or kiwis). Which conditions give you the best DNA yield?
Observations and results Were you able to see DNA in the small jar when you added the cold rubbing alcohol? Was the DNA mostly in the layer with the alcohol and between the layers of alcohol and strawberry liquid?
When you added the salt and detergent mixture to the smashed strawberries, the detergent helped lyse (pop open) the strawberry cells, releasing the DNA into solution, whereas the salt helped create an environment where the different DNA strands could gather and clump, making it easier for you to see them. (When you added the salt and detergent mixture, you probably mostly just saw more bubbles form in the bag because of the detergent.) After you added the cold rubbing alcohol to the filtered strawberry liquid, the alcohol should have precipitated the DNA out of the liquid while the rest of the liquid remained in solution. You should have seen the white/clear gooey DNA strands in the alcohol layer as well as between the two layers. A single strand of DNA is extremely tiny, too tiny to see with the naked eye, but because the DNA clumped in this activity you were able to see just how much of it three strawberries have when all of their octoploid cells are combined! (“Octoploid” means they have eight genomes.)
More to explore Do-It-Yourself Strawberry DNA, from the Tech Museum of Innovation, Stanford School of Medicine About Genetics , from the Tech Museum of Innovation, Stanford School of Medicine DNA Extraction Virtual Lab, from Learn Genetics, the University of Utah Do-It-Yourself DNA , from Science Buddies
This activity brought to you in partnership with Science Buddies
Let’s find out.
1. Label your three cups water , alcohol , and oil .
2. Add 1 tablespoon of water, isopropyl alcohol, and oil to its labeled cup.
3. Take three M&Ms of the same color and put one in each cup.
4. Swirl each cup for about 20 seconds to see if one liquid is better than another at dissolving the candy coating.
The coating on the M&M in the water will dissolve the most. You may even see the chocolate on the inside. There will be a little dissolving in the alcohol but not nearly as much as in the water. In the oil, you probably will not be able to see any dissolving.
Why does the color come off differently in each liquid? The candy coating is made up of coloring and sugar. The coloring and the sugar molecules both have positive and negative charges on them.
The water molecule has positive and negative charges so it can attract and dissolve the color and sugar pretty well.
The alcohol molecules don’t have as many positive and negative areas as the water. The alcohol molecules can’t attract the coloring and sugar molecules as well as the water so the candy coating doesn’t dissolve well in alcohol.
The oil molecules have no positive and negative areas. They don’t attract the coloring or sugar molecules so the candy coating doesn’t dissolve at all in oil.
You’ve seen that water is the best liquid for dissolving the candy coating from an M&M. But have you ever tried putting two or more M&Ms in water at the same time? You can get some pretty cool-looking patterns.
The coating comes off the M&M in a round shape surrounding the M&M. The dissolved coatings from different M&Ms drift toward each other and touch. The colors seem to form a line and don’t seem to mix right away.
1. Pour water in the plate until it covers the bottom and is about as deep as an M&M.
2. Place two or more M&Ms near each other in the center of the plate.
3. Do not stir the water or bump the plate.
4. Watch for about 1-2 minutes.
5. Try different arrangements of M&Ms.
Why don't the colors mix?
It may seem weird that the colors don’t mix right away. But if you think about it, we usually stir or shake things if we want them to mix. We usually don’t just let two liquids touch and expect them to mix right away. As the molecules from the dissolved coatings interact with each other, they will mix but it takes some time.
Copyright © 2024 American Chemical Society
I recently had the opportunity to attend a conference of the Associated Chemistry Teachers of Texas (ACT2). I had great time interacting with and learning from a whole bunch of wonderful chemical educators from the great state of Texas. One of the most interesting things I learned was in reference to the classic “whoosh bottle” experiment, which is powered by the combustion of isopropyl alcohol:
2 C 3 H 7 OH(l) + 9 O 2 (g) → 6 CO 2 (g) + 8 H 2 O(g) Equation 1
Interestingly, the reaction in this experiment yields different results when conducted at different temperatures (Video 1).
Video 1: Effect of temperature on a combustion reaction , pchemstud on TikTok. June 20, 2022.
That’s quite a significant difference! When I shared this video online, I had a few people comment that the difference observed might not be due to a faster reaction rate at the higher temperature. Instead, it was argued that the difference was because more alcohol vapor is contained in the warm bottle as compared to the cold one, on account of the higher vapor pressure of alcohol at higher temperatures. We can see this quantitatively by first noting the vapor pressures of isopropyl alcohol at 5.0 o C (12 mmHg = 0.016 atm) and 32 o C and 20 o C (32 mm Hg = 0.042 atm). 1 Because the volume of the bottle is known (5 gallons = 19 L), we can then use the idea gas law (as n = PV/RT) to calculate the moles of isopropyl alcohol present in each bottle:
That’s about 2.5 times more alcohol vapor in the warm bottle over the cool one. Because reaction rates increase with higher concentration of reactants, perhaps the effect observed really is due to the presence of more fuel in the warm bottle.
I decided to look into this a bit further, attempting to use the Arrhenius Equation to compare the kinetic rates of the reaction at the different temperatures:
Where k is the rate constant for the reaction, A is the pre-exponential factor, E a is the activation energy for the reaction, T is temperature, and R = 8.314 J mol -1 K -1 . The ratio of the values of the rate constants at 20 o C (293 K) and 5 o C (278 K) would therefore be:
Substitution of 125 kJ mol -1 as an estimate for the activation energy of the combustion of isopropanol 2-4 into Equation 3 yields:
Therefore, this analysis suggests combustion in the warm bottle should proceed about 16 times faster than in the cold bottle.
So which is it?
Well, 16 (kinetic temperature effect) is over 5 times bigger than 2.5 (amount of fuel effect), so perhaps these analyses should lead me to conclude that combustion in the hot “whoosh bottle” goes faster because of the effect of temperature on reaction rates – not from the presence of more fuel in the hot bottle as compared to the cool one. But honestly, I’m not sure. I’m not entirely comfortable with my estimation of the activation energy of isopropanol combustion used in the Arrhenius analysis. I’m also not sure that the Arrhenius analysis I did is entirely appropriate. Furthermore, what I am confident about is that multiple types of combustion took place in the warm bottle but not in the cool bottle. I say this because I saw soot had formed on the outside of the warm bottle, but not the cool one after the reaction subsided (look for this carefully in Video 1). The formation of soot indicates incomplete combustion, in which carbon monoxide (Equation 4) and soot (Equation 5) are formed:
C 3 H 7 OH(l) + 3 O 2 (g) → 3 CO(g) + 4 H 2 O(g) Equation 4
2 C 3 H 7 OH(l) + 3 O 2 (g) → 6 C (s, soot) + 8 H 2 O(g) Equation 5
If multiple reactions occurred in the warm bottle but only complete combustion in the cool bottle, this complicates matters further. In the end, if I had to guess, I’d venture that both effects play a role.
But I’d like to know what you think. Why does the “whoosh bottle” go faster at higher temperatures? Is it simply because of the effect of temperature on reaction kinetics? Or is it because more alcohol vapor is present in the warmer bottle due to the higher vapor pressure of alcohol at increased temperature? Might both impact the reaction rate? What thoughts or criticisms do you have on my analysis presented here? Do you have any suggestions for experiments I might try to test which of these two possibilities better describes the observations? I look forward to hearing from you, and to carrying out more experiments on the effect of temperature on the “whoosh bottle.”
Happy Experimenting!
Acknowledgement:
Thanks to Dr. Bob Shelton from Texas A&M University in San Antonio for showing me this demonstration.
References:
Demonstration videos presented here are not meant as tools to teach chemical demonstration techniques. They are meant as a tool for classroom use. The demonstrations may present safety hazards or show phenomena that are difficult for an entire class to observe in a live demonstration.
Those performing the demonstrations shown in this video have been trained and adhere to best safety practices.
Anyone thinking about performing a chemistry demonstration should first read and then adhere to the ACS Safety Guidelines for Chemical Demonstrations (2016) These guidelines are also available at ChemEd X.
For Laboratory Work: Please refer to the ACS Guidelines for Chemical Laboratory Safety in Secondary Schools (2016) .
For Demonstrations: Please refer to the ACS Division of Chemical Education Safety Guidelines for Chemical Demonstrations .
RAMP : Recognize hazards; Assess the risks of hazards; Minimize the risks of hazards; Prepare for emergencies
Asking questions and defining problems in grades 9–12 builds from grades K–8 experiences and progresses to formulating, refining, and evaluating empirically testable questions and design problems using models and simulations.
questions that challenge the premise(s) of an argument, the interpretation of a data set, or the suitability of a design.
Scientific questions arise in a variety of ways. They can be driven by curiosity about the world (e.g., Why is the sky blue?). They can be inspired by a model’s or theory’s predictions or by attempts to extend or refine a model or theory (e.g., How does the particle model of matter explain the incompressibility of liquids?). Or they can result from the need to provide better solutions to a problem. For example, the question of why it is impossible to siphon water above a height of 32 feet led Evangelista Torricelli (17th-century inventor of the barometer) to his discoveries about the atmosphere and the identification of a vacuum.
Questions are also important in engineering. Engineers must be able to ask probing questions in order to define an engineering problem. For example, they may ask: What is the need or desire that underlies the problem? What are the criteria (specifications) for a successful solution? What are the constraints? Other questions arise when generating possible solutions: Will this solution meet the design criteria? Can two or more ideas be combined to produce a better solution?
Constructing explanations and designing solutions in 9–12 builds on K–8 experiences and progresses to explanations and designs that are supported by multiple and independent student-generated sources of evidence consistent with scientific ideas, principles, and theories.
Constructing explanations and designing solutions in 9–12 builds on K–8 experiences and progresses to explanations and designs that are supported by multiple and independent student-generated sources of evidence consistent with scientific ideas, principles, and theories. Construct and revise an explanation based on valid and reliable evidence obtained from a variety of sources (including students’ own investigations, models, theories, simulations, peer review) and the assumption that theories and laws that describe the natural world operate today as they did in the past and will continue to do so in the future.
Science practice: planning and carrying out investigations.
Planning and carrying out investigations in 9-12 builds on K-8 experiences and progresses to include investigations that provide evidence for and test conceptual, mathematical, physical, and empirical models.
Planning and carrying out investigations in 9-12 builds on K-8 experiences and progresses to include investigations that provide evidence for and test conceptual, mathematical, physical, and empirical models. Plan and conduct an investigation individually and collaboratively to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence, and in the design: decide on types, how much, and accuracy of data needed to produce reliable measurements and consider limitations on the precision of the data (e.g., number of trials, cost, risk, time), and refine the design accordingly.
Mathematical and computational thinking at the 9–12 level builds on K–8 and progresses to using algebraic thinking and analysis, a range of linear and nonlinear functions including trigonometric functions, exponentials and logarithms, and computational tools for statistical analysis to analyze, represent, and model data. Simple computational simulations are created and used based on mathematical models of basic assumptions. Use mathematical representations of phenomena to support claims.
Matter and its Interactions help students formulate an answer to the question, “How can one explain the structure, properties, and interactions of matter?” The PS1 Disciplinary Core Idea from the NRC Framework is broken down into three subideas: the structure and properties of matter, chemical reactions, and nuclear processes. Students are expected to develop understanding of the substructure of atoms and to provide more mechanistic explanations of the properties of substances. Chemical reactions, including rates of reactions and energy changes, can be understood by students at this level in terms of the collisions of molecules and the rearrangements of atoms. Students are able to use the periodic table as a tool to explain and predict the properties of elements. Using this expanded knowledge of chemical reactions, students are able to explain important biological and geophysical phenomena. Phenomena involving nuclei are also important to understand, as they explain the formation and abundance of the elements, radioactivity, the release of energy from the sun and other stars, and the generation of nuclear power. Students are also able to apply an understanding of the process of optimization in engineering design to chemical reaction systems. The crosscutting concepts of patterns, energy and matter, and stability and change are called out as organizing concepts for these disciplinary core ideas. In the PS1 performance expectations, students are expected to demonstrate proficiency in developing and using models, planning and conducting investigations, using mathematical thinking, and constructing explanations and designing solutions; and to use these practices to demonstrate understanding of the core ideas.
*More information about this category of NGSS can be found at https://www.nextgenscience.org/dci-arrangement/hs-ps1-matter-and-its-interactions .
" Matter and its Interactions help students formulate an answer to the question, “How can one explain the structure, properties, and interactions of matter?” The PS1 Disciplinary Core Idea from the NRC Framework is broken down into three subideas: the structure and properties of matter, chemical reactions, and nuclear processes. Students are expected to develop understanding of the substructure of atoms and to provide more mechanistic explanations of the properties of substances. Chemical reactions, including rates of reactions and energy changes, can be understood by students at this level in terms of the collisions of molecules and the rearrangements of atoms. Students are able to use the periodic table as a tool to explain and predict the properties of elements. Using this expanded knowledge of chemical reactions, students are able to explain important biological and geophysical phenomena. Phenomena involving nuclei are also important to understand, as they explain the formation and abundance of the elements, radioactivity, the release of energy from the sun and other stars, and the generation of nuclear power. Students are also able to apply an understanding of the process of optimization in engineering design to chemical reaction systems. The crosscutting concepts of patterns, energy and matter, and stability and change are called out as organizing concepts for these disciplinary core ideas. In the PS1 performance expectations, students are expected to demonstrate proficiency in developing and using models, planning and conducting investigations, using mathematical thinking, and constructing explanations and designing solutions; and to use these practices to demonstrate understanding of the core ideas."
Students who demonstrate understanding can construct and revise an explanation for the outcome of a simple chemical reaction based on the outermost electron states of atoms, trends in the periodic table, and knowledge of the patterns of chemical properties.
*More information about all DCI for HS-PS1 can be found at https://www.nextgenscience.org/dci-arrangement/hs-ps1-matter-and-its-interactions and further resources at https://www.nextgenscience.org .
Assessment is limited to chemical reactions involving main group elements and combustion reactions.
Examples of chemical reactions could include the reaction of sodium and chlorine, of carbon and oxygen, or of carbon and hydrogen.
Students who demonstrate understanding can apply scientific principles and evidence to provide an explanation about the effects of changing the temperature or concentration of the reacting particles on the rate at which a reaction occurs.
Assessment is limited to simple reactions in which there are only two reactants; evidence from temperature, concentration, and rate data; and qualitative relationships between rate and temperature.
Emphasis is on student reasoning that focuses on the number and energy of collisions between molecules.
On whether the concentration or temperature influences more..
I think that to verify this, it is enough to measure the time it takes to carry out each of the reactions, since it is very easy to calculate that time on video, even if it is approximate. I have taken the trouble to measure this time, and in the first reaction at 5ºC it takes approximately 5 s to complete and in the second at 20ºC it takes approximately 2 s, then the first is 2.5 times slower than the second or vice versa the second is 2.5 times faster, curiously exactly the largest amount of alcohol there is, this is no coincidence. If we remember the kinetics of the reactions, in the first place we have the concentration of reagents and secondly the Temperature, and studying it like this in that order is not by chance seeing what happened. It can be assumed that it is at the same concentrations where the effect of temperature is relevant, but at different concentrations the temperature hardly has any effect on the kinetics of the reaction.
(Sobre si influye mas la concentración o la temperatura. Creo que para comprobar esto es suficiente con medir el tiempo que tarda en realizarse cada una de las reacciones, ya que esta en video es muy fácil calcular ese tiempo, aunque sea aproximado. M ehe tomado la moletia de medir dicho tiempo, y en la primera reaccion a 5ºC tarda aproximadamente 5 s en completarse y en la segunda a 20ºC tarda aproximadamente 2 s, luego la primera es 2,5 veces mas lenta que la segunda o al revés la segunda es 2,5 veces mas rápida, curiosamente exactamente la cantidad mayor de alcohol que hay, esto no es casualidad. Si recordamos la cinética de las reacciones, en primer lugar tenemos la concetración de reactivos y en segundo lugar la Temperatura, y estudiarlo así en ese orden no es casualidad viendo lo ocurrido. Se puede suponer que es a iguales concentraciones donde el efecto de la temperatura es relevante, pero a distintas concentraciones la temperatura apenas tiene efectos sobre la cinética de la reacción.)
Hi Josefpm,
Thank you so much for taking the time to analyze how long it takes for each of these reactions to complete. What a great idea! It is indeed very interesting that the reaction happens 2.5 times more quickly at a warmer temperature than at a cooler temperature, and that this matches the estimated difference in concentration of the vapor in each container! In my opinion, this does not demonstrate that the reaction is only influenced by the differences in concentration, and that temperature has no effect on the kinetics. I would argue that the match in concentration and reaction time could indeed be coincidence. I say this because we certainly know that temperature influences the rates of reactions. Of course concentration does as well, as you rightly point out.
What do you think, Josepfpm? Am I off base? How might you provide further evidence to convince me that the difference in reaction kinetics is due only to concentration and not temperature?
I wonder what others think about this. Anyone else want to chime in?
Again, thanks so much for the discussion!
Oh, thanks for taking the time to answer, I agree with you, that does not mean that the temperature does not affect it, but I do believe, as I indicated, that at different concentrations the determining factor is the concentration and not the temperature, although the temperature has its effect, this effect is much less. That is why I suppose that at the same concentration the effect of temperature or at very high temperatures would be much more decisive. could it be coincidence? Yes, it could be, but wouldn't it be too much of a coincidence? and more when we know that the concentration in a factor that influences the speed of reaction. It would be a matter of carrying out the experiment with other concentrations and measuring the speed and seeing if that relationship is maintained or, as he says, it was coincidence. The question would not be to see if the temperature affects or not the speed of reaction, or if the concentration affects or not, it is evident that both affect; The question would be to what extent do they affect? which is more decisive? It occurs to me that you can try carrying out the HCl+NaHCO3 reaction, using the same concentration at two temperatures and measuring the reaction time, it would be approximate, for example at room temperature and inside a refrigerator or cold room... umm I'll try to do it this summer if I have time...
(Oh, gracias por tomarte tiempo en contestar, coincido con usted, eso no indica que la temperatura no afecte, pero si creo, como indico, que a diferentes concentraciones el factor determinante es la concentración y no la temperatura, aunque la temperatura tenga su efecto este efecto es mucho menor. Por eso supongo que a igual concentración si sería mucho mas determinante el efecto de la temperatura o a muy altas temperaturas. ¿podría ser casualidad? Si, podría ser pero, ¿no sería demasiada casualidad? y más cuando sabemos que la concentración en un factor que influye en la velocidad de reacción. Sería cuestión de realizar el experimento con otras concentraciones y medir la velocidad y ver si se mantiene ese relación o como dice fue casualidad. La cuestión no sería ver si la temperatura afecta o no a la velocidad de reacción, o si la concentración afecta o no, es evidente que ambas afectan; la cuestión sería ¿en qué medida afectan? ¿cual es mas determinante? Se me ocurre que se puede probar a realizar la reacción del HCl+NaHCO3, usando al misma concentración a dos temperaturas y medir el tiempo, de reacción, sería aproximado, por ejemplo a temperatura ambiente y dentro de un refrigerador o cámara frigorífica... umm intentaré hacerlo este verano si tengo tiempo...)
Looking for a student learning guide? You’ll find a link on the main menu for your course. Use the “Courses” menu above.
In the previous tutorial , we looked at the chemistry of water. We saw how water’s polar structure allows water molecules to form hydrogen bonds with other water molecules. In this tutorial, we’ll do a virtual lab that lets us look at water’s unique properties: properties that result from hydrogen bonding.
If it suits your learning style, you might want to start by watching the video below.
To get a sense of the properties of water, we’re going to do a virtual lab comparing water to alcohol. Since real science is always preferable to virtual science, I want to encourage you to get the supplies for this lab and to independently try the activities. Alternatively, your teacher might be taking you through this lab in a classroom setting.
If you’re working independently, here’s what you’ll need:
Based on our last tutorial, you already know a lot about water. Here’s a quick review of water’s key properties.
Water: structural formula | Water molecules forming hydrogen bonds |
Here’s isopropyl alcohol.
Isopropyl alcohol: structural formula | Isopropyl alcohol. This is a model. Each sphere is an atom, connected by a single covalent bond. White = hydrogen, black = carbon, and red = oxygen. |
Here’s what you need to know about isopropyl alcohol:
So, isopropyl alcohol is slightly polar. But it’s much less polar than water is.
less polar than water |
Knowing that, let’s do a few experiments where we compare them.
Please record your predictions for each of the experiments that follow on your student learning guide. You’ll learn a lot more if you make a prediction before clicking “show the answer.”
[qwiz style = ” width: 600px !important; min-height: 400px !important; border: 3px solid black; ” qrecord_id=”sciencemusicvideosMeister1961-Water v Alcohol Virtual Lab (2.0)”]
[h]Water v. alcohol: Virtual Lab
[q] EXPERIMENT 1: Let’s start by predicting the way that a single drop of water and a single drop of alcohol will look when you put them on a surface like a penny or wax paper. Do the following
[c]IMKgc2hvdyB0 aGUgYW5zd2Vy[Qq]
[f]IEFOU1dFUg==
[Qq] | |
Because the water molecules are polar, they grab onto one another through hydrogen bonds. The mutual attraction of water molecules is called cohesion . Cohesion pulls a drop of water into a spherical shape that allows for the maximum number of bonds. Though gravity is trying to pull the water molecules down, the hydrogen bonds keep the water droplet in a spherical shape. Because alcohol is so much less polar, it can’t resist gravity, and all of the molecules are pulled down into a flat sheet over the penny’s surface.
[q] EXPERIMENT 2: Use what you just observed to predict the following: How many drops of water can you put onto a penny before the water spills over the side? How many drops of alcohol before the alcohol spills over the side? Make a prediction, give it a try, and, most importantly, explain what’s happening.
When you’re ready, click “show the answer” to see the results and verify your prediction.
[c]wqBzaG93IHRo ZSBhbnN3ZXI=[Qq]
Many variables influence the exact number of drops, but you should have been able to pile many more drops of water on the penny than drops of alcohol. Again, this is because the water molecules, which form hydrogen bonds with one another, have much more cohesion than alcohol molecules. Cohesion forces the water to form a sphere, with more and more water molecules filling that sphere (until gravity overcome hydrogen bonding, and water spills out over the side.
With less polarity, the alcohol can’t resist gravity. Its molecules are pulled down into a flat sheet over the penny’s surface that can accommodate many fewer drops than the hydrogen-bond induced sphere that’s on the penny with water.
[q] EXPERIMENT 3: Speed of Evaporation in Water and Alcohol
This video compares the evaporation of a drop of alcohol (left) with a drop of water (right). I used my phone as both a surface and a timer (and then speeded up the video about 60 times, so that each minute on the clock goes by in a second). If you can do the same, go ahead and try it.
Explain why the evaporation times for water and alcohol are so different.
VGhlIHNwZWNpZmljIHByb3BlcnR5IHRoYXQgd2UmIzgyMTc7cmUgY29tcGFyaW5nIGhlcmUgaXMgdGhlIA== aGVhdCBvZiB2YXBvcml6YXRpb24= 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
Because alcohol is mostly a nonpolar molecule (with just a bit of polarity) there’s very little attraction between one alcohol molecule and the next. Consequently, when alcohol molecules absorb enough energy from the environment to start moving around quickly, they can easily accelerate to a high enough speed to jump away from the surface of the liquid. No hydrogen bonds are holding them back. As molecule after molecule of alcohol jumps away from the liquid, the volume of the liquid decreases…until all of it has evaporated.
[q] EXPERIMENT 4: Predict how water and alcohol will feel when you place a few drops of each liquid on your skin.
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[Qq]
[q] EXPERIMENT 5: Now let’s predict how easily salt will dissolve in water and alcohol.
V2hpbGUgc2FsdCBxdWlja2x5IGRpc3NvbHZlcyBpbiB3YXRlciwgaXQgd29uJiM4MjE3O3QgZGlzc29sdmUgaW4gYWxjb2hvbC4=
Table salt is sodium chloride (NaCl). Sodium chloride is an ionic compound, held together by ionic bonds between positively charged sodium ions and negatively charged chlorine ions. When water and salt are mixed, water’s polarity makes dissolving the salt easy. The positively charged side of water pulls the chlorine ions away from the salt crystal. The negatively charged side of water pulls the sodium ions away from the salt crystal. In the image on the left, developed by Professor Angelos Michaelides, University College, London, you can see this. The green spheres are chlorine; the blue spheres are sodium.
In less polar alcohol, the alcohol molecules have no way to “grab” onto the sodium or chloride ions, which stay connected through ionic bonds, and don’t dissolve.
[q] EXPERIMENT 6: See if you can float a paper clip on the surface of a cup of water. Then see if you can do the same with alcohol. Here’s the procedure. If you don’t have the materials, read the procedure anyway, and try to predict what will happen in each case.
[Qq] | |
Here’s what’s happening.
Because water molecules are polar, they connect through hydrogen bonds. So imagine the paper clip floating on a web of water molecules (as shown in this image, which is ridiculously not drawn to scale). As long as the clip doesn’t break the web, it can float on top. The name for this web of water molecules on the surface of a body of water is surface tension.
Alcohol is much less polar than water. Because it’s non-polar, the molecules don’t form hydrogen bonds. Because they don’t form hydrogen bonds, the clips sink through the surface. Essentially, in the alcohol solution, there’s no surface tension (or, at least, not nearly enough to support a paper clip).
In the lab above, we addressed
Here are a few more AP Bio-related concepts to know about related to water and hydrogen bonding.
Water has a relatively high freezing point . That’s because when water molecules get cool enough, they’ll grab onto one another through hydrogen bonding. Those bonds lock the molecules into the fixed, solid molecular matrix we know as ice. By contrast, isopropyl alcohol forms few hydrogen bonds and has to be cooled to -89 °C to become a solid. Methane (CH 4 ), which is completely nonpolar, has about the same molecular weight as water, but only liquifies at -182°C (and won’t solidify at all).
Water is less dense as a solid than as a liquid. As a result, ice floats on water. This is because when water freezes, the hydrogen bonds generate a crystal matrix in which the molecules are more spread out than when water is in a liquid form. This is a unique property: water might be the only substance whose solid form is less dense than its liquid form.
Hydrogen bonding can lead to adhesion as well as cohesion. Adhesion is the molecular attraction between adjacent surfaces. Through hydrogen bonding, water can bond to other polar substances. This explains phenomena such as capillary action, in which water will flow into a narrow space such as a thin tube, even in opposition to the force of gravity. Adhesion between water molecules and the thin tubes in the stems of plants plays a major role in the process of transpiration, which is how plants move water from their roots up to their leaves.
Because of hydrogen bonding, water also has a very high specific heat : the amount of heat required to raise one gram of a substance by one degree C. Water has a high specific heat because the hydrogen bonds that form between water molecules constrain their movement. Since temperature is the average kinetic energy of the molecules within an object, that means that as you add heat to a body of water, there’s not a corresponding increase in the molecules’ kinetic energy. As a result, the temperature doesn’t rise. One such watery body that resists wide temperature fluctuations is your body (or the body of any relatively large animal). Hydrogen bonds help keep the temperature within the body of any relatively large organism — on a molecular scale, that means anything the size of an earthworm or larger — relatively constant. It also keeps the Earth’s planetary temperature mild, because the oceans can absorb lots of heat without their temperature rising.
For example, the two strands of DNA are held together by hydrogen bonds. These bonds are shown at number 6 in the image of DNA on the left below. On the right, you can see a closeup of the bonds between the nitrogenous bases that make up the central core of a DNA molecule. Note that the hydrogen bonds form between oxygen atoms and hydrogen atoms, or between nitrogen atoms and hydrogen atoms.
[qwiz random = “false” qrecord_id=”sciencemusicvideosMeister1961-Properties of Water F-I-B Quiz”]
[h]Properties of Water Quiz
[i]This quiz is a combination of the game “hangman” and a flashcard deck. With each question, you’ll type in the answer. If you get the question wrong, it goes back in the deck for you to repeat it.
[q] Water is a [hangman] molecule. As a result, water molecules form [hangman] bonds with one another.
[c]cG9sYXI=[Qq]
[c]aHlkcm9nZW4=[Qq]
[q]Whereas the [hangman] side of water has a partial positive charge, the [hangman] side of water has a partial negative charge
[c]b3h5Z2Vu[Qq]
[q]Because it has less [hangman] bonding, a drop of alcohol will have a much [hangman] shape than a drop of water. That’s because the bonds between water molecules create a lot of [hangman], a property that’s lacking in alcohol.
[c]ZmxhdHRlcg==[Qq]
[c]Y29oZXNpb24=[Qq]
[q]The amount of heat required to make a liquid into a gas is its heat of [hangman].
[c]dmFwb3JpemF0aW9u[Qq]
[q]Because it forms fewer [hangman] bonds, alcohol has a much [hangman] heat of vaporization than water.
[c]bG93ZXI=[Qq]
[q]Because water is polar, it’s great at dissolving [hangman] substances like salt and just about any [hangman] substance (such as sugar).
[c]aW9uaWM=[Qq]
[q]Because of hydrogen bonding, water has a lot of [hangman] [hangman], enabling a paper clip to float on the surface of a body of water.
[c]c3VyZmFjZQ==[Qq]
[c]dGVuc2lvbg==[Qq]
[q]Because of hydrogen bonding, water freezes at a relatively [hangman] temperature. In addition, hydrogen bonding makes ice [hangman] dense than water, causing ice to [hangman].
[c]aGlnaA==[Qq]
[c]bGVzcw==[Qq]
[c]ZmxvYXQ=[Qq]
[q]Whereas [hangman] involves attraction between water molecules (caused by hydrogen bonds), [hangman] involves hydrogen bonds forming between water molecules and another surface (such as the walls of the tubes that conduct water up the stem of a plant.
[c]YWRoZXNpb24=[Qq]
[q]The diagram below shows how [hangman] bonds can form between any two [hangman] molecules, and not just between water molecules.
[q] [hangman] heat is the amount of heat required to raise one gram of a substance by one degree C. Because of this property, bodies of water resist fluctuations in [hangman]. This has created a moderate climate on Earth owing to the role of the oceans as climate regulators.
[c]c3BlY2lmaWM=[Qq]
[c]dGVtcGVyYXR1cmU=[Qq]
[x][restart]
First, you need to find something that contains DNA. Since DNA is the blueprint for life, everything living contains DNA.
For this experiment, we like to use green split peas. But there are lots of other DNA sources too, such as:
Certain sources of DNA should not be used, such as:
Put in a blender:
Blend on high for 15 seconds.
The blender separates the pea cells from each other, so you now have a really thin pea-cell soup.
Pour your thin pea-cell soup through a strainer into another container (like a measuring cup).
Add 2 tablespoons liquid detergent (about 30ml) and swirl to mix.
Let the mixture sit for 5-10 minutes.
Pour the mixture into test tubes or other small glass containers, each about 1/3 full.
Add a pinch of enzymes to each test tube and stir gently. Be careful! If you stir too hard, you'll break up the DNA, making it harder to see.
Use meat tenderizer for enzymes. If you can't find tenderizer, try using pineapple juice or contact lens cleaning solution.
Tilt your test tube and slowly pour rubbing alcohol (70-95% isopropyl or ethyl alcohol) into the tube down the side so that it forms a layer on top of the pea mixture. Pour until you have about the same amount of alcohol in the tube as pea mixture.
Alcohol is less dense than water, so it floats on top. Look for clumps of white stringy stuff where the water and alcohol layers meet.
DNA is a long, stringy molecule. The salt that you added in step one helps it stick together. So what you see are clumps of tangled DNA molecules!
DNA normally stays dissolved in water, but when salty DNA comes in contact with alcohol it becomes undissolved. This is called precipitation. The physical force of the DNA clumping together as it precipitates pulls more strands along with it as it rises into the alcohol.
You can use a wooden stick or a straw to collect the DNA. If you want to save your DNA, you can transfer it to a small container filled with alcohol.
Now that you've successfully extracted DNA from one source, you're ready to experiment further. Try these ideas or some of your own:
Experiment with other DNA sources. Which source gives you the most DNA? How can you compare them?
Experiment with different soaps and detergents. Do powdered soaps work as well as liquid detergents? How about shampoo or body scrub?
Experiment with leaving out or changing steps. We've told you that you need each step, but is this true? Find out for yourself. Try leaving out a step or changing how much of each ingredient you use.
Do only living organisms contain DNA? Try extracting DNA from things that you think might not have DNA.
Frequently Asked Questions
Download a PDF version of this page
Blending separated the pea cells.
But each cell is surrounded by a sack (the cell membrane). DNA is found inside a second sack (the nucleus) within each cell.
To see the DNA, we have to break open these two sacks.
We do this with detergent.
Why detergent? How does detergent work?
Think about why you use soap to wash dishes or your hands. To remove grease and dirt, right?
Soap molecules and grease molecules are made of two parts:
Heads, which like water. Tails, which hate water.
Both soap and grease molecules organize themselves in bubbles (spheres) with their heads outside to face the water and their tails inside to hide from the water.
When soap comes close to grease, their similar structures cause them to combine, forming a greasy soapy ball.
A cell's membranes have two layers of lipid (fat) molecules with proteins going through them.
When detergent comes close to the cell, it captures the lipids and proteins.
After adding the detergent, what do you have in your pea soup?
In this experiment, meat tenderizer acts as an enzyme to cut proteins just like a pair of scissors.
The DNA in the nucleus of the cell is molded, folded, and protected by proteins.
The meat tenderizer cuts the proteins away from the DNA.
1. I don't think I'm seeing DNA. What should I be looking for?
Look closely. Your DNA may be lingering between the two layers of alcohol and pea soup. Try to help the DNA rise to the top, alcohol layer. Dip a wooden stick into the pea soup and slowly pull upward into the alcohol layer. Also, look very closely at the alcohol layer for tiny bubbles. Even if your yield of DNA is low, clumps of DNA may be loosely attached to the bubbles.
2. What can I do to increase my yield of DNA?
Allow more time for each step to complete. Make sure to let the detergent sit for at least five minutes. If the cell and nuclear membranes are still intact, the DNA will be stuck in the bottom layer. Or, try letting the test tube of pea mixture and alcohol sit for 30-60 minutes. You may see more DNA precipitate into the alcohol layer over time.
Keep it cold. Using ice-cold water and ice-cold alcohol will increase your yield of DNA. The cold water protects the DNA by slowing down enzymes that can break it apart. The cold alcohol helps the DNA precipitate (solidify and appear) more quickly.
Make sure that you started with enough DNA. Many food sources of DNA, such as grapes, also contain a lot of water. If the blended cell soup is too watery, there won't be enough DNA to see. To fix this, go back to the first step and add less water. The cell soup should be opaque, meaning that you can't see through it.
3. Why add salt? What is its purpose?
Salty water helps the DNA precipitate (solidify and appear) when alcohol is added.
4. Why is cold water better than warm water for extracting DNA?
Cold water helps keep the DNA intact during the extraction process. How? Cooling slows down enzymatic reactions. This protects DNA from enzymes that can destroy it.
Why would a cell contain enzymes that destroy DNA? These enzymes are present in the cell cytoplasm (not the nucleus) to destroy the DNA of viruses that may enter our cells and make us sick. A cell's DNA is usually protected from such enzymes (called DNases) by the nuclear membrane, but adding detergent destroys that membrane.
5. How is the cell wall of plant cells broken down?
It is broken down by the motion and physical force of the blender.
6. What enzyme is found in meat tenderizer?
The two most common enzymes used in meat tenderizer are Bromelain and Papain. These two enzymes are extracted from pineapple and papaya, respectively. They are both proteases, meaning they break apart proteins. Enzymatic cleaning solutions for contact lenses also contain proteases to remove protein build-up. These proteases include Subtilisin A (extracted from a bacteria) and Pancreatin (extracted from the pancreas gland of a hog).
7. How much pineapple juice or contact lens solution should I use to replace the meat tenderizer?
You just need a drop or two, because a little bit of enzyme will go a long way. Enzymes are fast and powerful!
8. Why does the DNA clump together?
DNA precipitates when in the presence of alcohol, which means it doesn't dissolve in alcohol. This causes the DNA to clump together when there is a lot of it. And, usually, cells contain a lot of it!
For example, each cell in the human body contains 46 chromosomes (or 46 DNA molecules). If you lined up those DNA molecules end to end, a single cell would contain six feet of DNA! If the human body is made of about 100 trillion cells, each of which contains six feet of DNA, our bodies contain more than a billion miles of DNA!
9. How can we confirm the white, stringy stuff is DNA?
There is a protocol that would allow you to stain nucleic acids, but the chemical used would need to be handled by a teacher or an adult. So, for now, you'll just have to trust that the molecules precipitating in the alcohol are nucleic acids.
10. Isn't the white, stringy stuff actually a mix of DNA and RNA?
That's exactly right! The procedure for DNA extraction is really a procedure for nucleic acid extraction.
11. How long will my DNA last? Will it eventually degrade and disappear?
Your DNA may last for years if you store it in alcohol in a tightly-sealed container. If it is shaken, the DNA strands will break into smaller pieces, making the DNA harder to see. If it disappears it's likely because enzymes are still present that are breaking apart the DNA in your sample.
Using more sophisticated chemicals in a lab, it is possible to obtain a sample of DNA that is very pure. DNA purified in this way is actually quite stable and will remain intact for months or years.
12. Does chromosome number noticeably affect the mass of DNA you'll see?
Cells with more chromosomes contain relatively more DNA, but the difference will not likely be noticeable to the eye. The amount of DNA you will see depends more on the ratio of DNA to cell volume.
For example, plant seeds yield a lot of DNA because they have very little water in the cell cytoplasm. That is, they have a small volume. So the DNA is relatively concentrated. You don't have to use very many seeds to get a lot of DNA!
13. Why are peas used in this experiment? Are they the best source of DNA?
Peas are a good source of DNA because they are a seed. But, we also chose the pea for historical reasons. Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics, did his first experiments with the pea plant.
14. How does the experiment compare when using animal cells instead of plant cells?
The DNA molecule is structurally the same in all living things, including plants and animals. That being said, the product obtained from this extraction protocol may look slightly different depending on whether it was extracted from a plant or an animal. For example, you may have more contaminants (proteins, carbohydrates) causing the DNA to appear less string-like, or the amount of DNA that precipitates may vary.
15. What sources might I use to extract DNA from animal cells?
Good sources for animal cells include chicken liver, calf thymus, meats and eggs (from chicken or fish).
16. Why do peas require meat tenderizer, but wheat germ does not?
We at the GSLC have done a fair amount of testing with the split pea protocol and the wheat germ protocol. We have found no difference in the "product" (nucleic acids) that is observable, whether using meat tenderizer or not. So, the step was left out of the wheat germ protocol, but kept in the split pea protocol just for fun.
Even though it's not necessary, it may be doing something we can't see. For example, perhaps by using the meat tenderizer you get a purer sample of DNA, with less protein contaminating the sample.
17. Can you extract human DNA using this protocol?
Yes, in theory. The same basic materials are required, but the protocol would need to be scaled down (using smaller volumes of water, soap and alcohol). This is because you're not likely starting the protocol with the required amount—1/2 cup—of human cells! That means that you will not extract an amount of DNA large enough to visualize with the naked eye. If you wanted to see it, you would need a centrifuge to spin down (to the bottom of the tube) the small amount of DNA present in the sample.
18. What can be done with my extracted DNA?
This sample could be used for gel electrophoresis, for example, but all you will see is a smear. The DNA you have extracted is genomic, meaning that you have the entire collection of DNA from each cell. Unless you cut the DNA with restriction enzymes, it is too long and stringy to move through the pores of the gel.
A scientist with a lab purified sample of genomic DNA might also try to sequence it or use it to perform a PCR reaction. But, your sample is likely not pure enough for these experiments to really work.
19. How is DNA extraction useful to scientists? When do they use such a protocol, and why is it important?
The extraction of DNA from a cell is often a first step for scientists who need to obtain and study a gene. The total cell DNA is used as a pattern to make copies (called clones) of a particular gene. These copies can then be separated away from the total cell DNA, and used to study the function of that individual gene.
Once the gene has been studied, genomic DNA taken from a person might be used to diagnose him or her with a genetic disease. Alternatively, genomic DNA might be used to mass produce a gene or protein important for treating a disease. This last application requires techniques that are referred to as recombinant DNA technology or genetic engineering.
20. Can I use a microscope to see the DNA that I extract?
Unfortunately, a microscope will not allow you to see the double helical structure of the DNA molecule. You'll only see a massive mess of many, many DNA molecules clumped together. In fact, the width of the DNA double helix is approximately one billionth of a meter! This is much too small to see, even with the most powerful microscope. Instead, a technique called X-ray crystallography can be used to produce a picture of the DNA molecule. It was by looking at such a picture (taken by Rosalind Franklin) that James Watson and Francis Crick were able to figure out what the DNA molecule looks like.
Sorry but it looks as if your browser is out of date. To get the best experience using our site we recommend that you upgrade or switch browsers.
Find a solution
In association with Nuffield Foundation
A mixture of alcohol and air in a large polycarbonate bottle is ignited. The resulting rapid combustion reaction, often accompanied by a dramatic ‘whoosh’ sound and flames, demonstrates the large amount of chemical energy released in the combustion of alcohols
This demonstration requires careful preparation and is the subject of a supplementary risk assessment by CLEAPSS, SRA006 . Schools are advised not to deviate from the details described in this risk assessment. If any variation is necessary, members should contact CLEAPSS for preparing a special risk assessment. Teachers should also, of course, consult their own employer’s risk assessment.
A single demonstration will take 5–10 minutes. Repeat demonstrations will require either the drying out of the reaction vessel used for the first demonstration or spare dry reaction vessels.
One or more of the following alcohols, 40 cm 3 of each one used:
The experiment demonstrates dramatically just how much chemical energy is released from such a small quantity of fuel.
The flame colour varies with the proportion of carbon in the alcohol molecule. With methanol and ethanol there is a very quick ‘whoosh’ sound and a blue flame shoots out of the bottle. With propan-1-ol and propan-2-ol, the sound is similar but the reaction is slightly slower, easier to observe, and blue and yellow flames may be observed ‘dancing’ in the bottle. The presence of water reduces the likelihood of dancing flames.
This is a resource from the Practical Chemistry project , developed by the Nuffield Foundation and the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Practical Chemistry activities accompany Practical Physics and Practical Biology .
The experiment is also part of the Royal Society of Chemistry’s Continuing Professional Development course: Chemistry for non-specialists .
© Nuffield Foundation and the Royal Society of Chemistry
2024-06-24T06:59:00Z By Emma Owens
Use this poster, fact sheet and storyboard activity to ensure your 14–16 students understand dynamic equilibrium
2024-06-10T05:00:00Z By Declan Fleming
Use this reworking of the classic non-burning £5 note demonstration to explore combustion with learners aged 11–16 years
2024-06-04T08:22:00Z By Dan Beech
Help your 14–16 learners to master the fundamentals of the reactions of alkenes with these ideas and activities
Only registered users can comment on this article., more experiments.
By Dorothy Warren and Sandrine Bouchelkia
Practical experiment where learners produce ‘gold’ coins by electroplating a copper coin with zinc, includes follow-up worksheet
By Kirsty Patterson
Observe chemical changes in this microscale experiment with a spooky twist.
By Kristy Turner
Use this practical to investigate how solutions of the halogens inhibit the growth of bacteria and which is most effective
Site powered by Webvision Cloud
Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
I'm curious how to test purity of isopropyl alcohol? I simply got very curious today. I bought rubbing alcohol and it doesn't say what's the purity anywhere. It could be 70%, but it could also be 90%, or 99% or even 99.9%. I'm a curious man so I started googling but couldn't find anything.
If I were a chemist, how would I test the purity?
If the isopropanol mixture was bought commercially, the chances that it contains significant amounts of methanol or ethanol are fairly small, I think. (I've never seen commercial isopropanol in the US that contains > 3% of these impurities, at least, but the situation may vary in other countries or markets.)
If you can assume that the only other main component is water, the easiest way to estimate purity is simply by measuring the density. 100% pure isopropanol has a density at 20 °C of 0.786 g per mL. Pure water has a density of 1.00 g/mL. At intermediate concentrations of isopropanol, the density is in between those values. If you can accurately measure both (a) the volume and (b) the weight of a portion of isopropanol, you should be able to measure the density. I know my kitchen scale and kitchen measuring cups would be precise enough for this.
If you can't assume that water is the only other impurity, other methods such as NMR, chromatography, or spectroscopy would probably be required. I think NMR would probably be the most informative (but perhaps the least accessible to the home chemist.)
If you really want to figure what the “purity” Or rather the volume of isopropyl to water by weight aka $70\%$ , $91\%$ . And you don’t have a gas chromatograph, this is about the closest your going to get to an accurate Volumetric representation.
This is a fractional distillation column same basic principle as distilling drinking alcohol but much different equipment and processes. However using this column you are able to precisely control the temperature of the liquid or in this case the isopropyl alcohol in the heating mantle and allow it to evaporate and be distilled and collect after passing through a water jacket to condense the vapor and as long as you monitor the temperature at the neck located at the very top where the vertical column branches off to the right and have a thermometer right at that joint and maintain a temperature of $\pu{80 ^{\circ}C}$ ( $\pu{176 ^{\circ}F}$ ) and let the isopropyl evaporate. Once the temperature begins to rise above $\pu{80 ^{\circ}C}$ ( $\pu{176 ^{\circ}F}$ ) to $\pu{82 ^{\circ}C}$ ( $\pu{180 ^{\circ}F}$ ) or higher, you stop the heat and remove the distillate container. Once everything has cooled down, you can measure what is remaking in the first Vessel and the distillate vessel. And with a bit of a margin for error using the original volume used, in my case for this rig I used I was using 70% and a starting volume of $\pu{500 ml}$ . So my resulting measurements were, distillate - $\pu{347 ml}$ , undistilled liquid - $\pu{148 ml}$ . Resulting in a total volume of $\pu{495 ml}$ with a distillate percentage of $70.10\%$ (isopropyl) and remaining liquid (water) percentage $29.89\%$ .
I hope this helps!!!
Dissolve non iodine table salt into a known amount and let it sit, measure the amount of water that sits in the bottom compared to the amount of alcohol that is in the top after about 10-15 minutes of sitting. You can then extrapolate what percentage of alcohol you bought. Example would be about half water and half alcohol if you got 50% isopropyl alcohol.
For very quick test, you can go for flame test. Pure IPA when poured on a cotton burns upto a certain flame length . when impurities are added , the length of flame decreases. Do not forget to keep the size of cotton same while comparing
Simple method is measure 100 ml Isopropyl alcohol water mixture heat at 80 degrees centigrade and after distilling left of liquid,cool and measure the volume. You get water content and the balance quantity is IPA.///
Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools are not allowed on Chemistry Stack Exchange. Learn more
Post as a guest.
Required, but never shown
By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Pour 5 teaspoons of rubbing alcohol into the dent. Gently mix 1 teaspoon of baking soda with 4 teaspoons of sugar in a separate bowl. Pour the mixture into the dent on top of the rubbing alcohol. Stir the mixture gently without making the mound collapse. Light the mound with a match by touching the flame to the mixture at the top of the mound.
Learn how to make a cloud in a bottle with this super simple and really cool weather science experiment. Materials: Empty plastic water bottle with cap Scissors Isopropyl rubbing alcohol Safety goggles Instructions: Use the scissors to carefully remove the label from the plastic water bottle. Put on your safety goggles. Pour a small amount of alcohol into the bottle. Put the cap on the bottle ...
Took an old highschool science experiment and Supersized it.To use this video in a commercial player or in broadcasts, please email [email protected]
In this easy experiment, students can extract a bit of their own DNA. ... Alcohol (You can use regular rubbing alcohol, but if you can find 91-percent isopropyl alcohol at the drugstore get that ...
99% isopropyl alcohol is a highly flammable liquid that can also cause serious eye irritation. Keep it away from heat, sparks, open flames, and hot surfaces. ... The two liquids you will use to make your mixture in this experiment are water and isopropyl alcohol. There is just one thing left to say before you start with your experiment: ...
Explain how the properties of water and isopropyl alcohol differ due to their molecular structures. ... (a type of rubbing alcohol). Before conducting each experiment, you will make a prediction about what you think will happen. You will then read about and do the experiment. Afterwards, you will write an explanation of what was happening at ...
calculations to determine the volume of water expected from the starting amount of isopropyl alcohol. For example, if 20 mL of isopropyl alcohol (density = 0.78 g/mL) are used: 20 mL × 0.78 g/mL = 15.6 g× 1 mole/60 g = 0.26 mol isopropyl alcohol From the balanced equation, 0.26 mol isopropyl alcohol × 4 mol H 2 O/1 mol isopropyl alcohol = 1. ...
Take the isopropyl alcohol out of the freezer. Ideally, it spent the entire night there. ... Finally, cold alcohol is crucial in making this a science experiment instead of a soapy strawberry ...
Rubbing, or isopropyl, alcohol is at least 70% alcohol and therefore less than 30% water. This should cause water to move from the egg into the solution, and the egg should lose mass. ... Having each small group design an experiment with one egg will allow you to do the activity with fewer eggs per class, and collecting several sets of data ...
Pour 10 to 20 millilitres of antispetic medicinal rubbing alcohol (isopropyl alcohol) or methylated spirits into an empty soft drink bottle. If you're a young whipper-snapper, please remember you ...
Isopropyl alcohol's lower vapor pressure will condense more easily than water vapor when you unscrew the cap. If you happen to have an infrared thermometer, repeat the experiment and have a partner measure the temperature of the bottle before you squeeze it, as it is being squeezed, and then after the cap has been released. ...
Instructions: Put the bottle of the Isopropyl Alcohol in the freezer - about fifteen minutes before starting the experiment! You want the alcohol cold but not frozen. Pour 90 ml (or 18 tsp) of water into a cup. Then add 10 ml (or 2 tsp) of liquid dish soap to the water. Next add 1/4 tsp of salt to the water and soap mixture.
Pour the alcohol into a glass or other small container. Crack the egg and place it in the alcohol. Make certain the egg is completely covered by the liquid. Wait for the egg to cook. After the egg white whitens, allow more time for the yolk to cook. Depending on the percentage of alcohol, the reaction takes at least an hour.
During a DNA extraction, a detergent will cause the cell to pop open, or lyse, so that the DNA is released into solution. Then alcohol added to the solution causes the DNA to precipitate out. In ...
1. Label your three cups water, alcohol, and oil. 2. Add 1 tablespoon of water, isopropyl alcohol, and oil to its labeled cup. 3. Take three M&Ms of the same color and put one in each cup. 4. Swirl each cup for about 20 seconds to see if one liquid is better than another at dissolving the candy coating.
Procedure. Equipment required for measuring heat energy from burning alcohol. Measure 100 cm 3 of cold tap water into a conical flask. Clamp the flask at a suitable height so that a spirit burner can easily be placed below. Weigh the spirit burner (and cap) containing the alcohol and record this mass and the name of the alcohol.
One of the most interesting things I learned was in reference to the classic "whoosh bottle" experiment, which is powered by the combustion of isopropyl alcohol: 2 C3H7OH (l) + 9 O2(g) → 6 CO2(g) + 8 H2O (g) Equation 1. Interestingly, the reaction in this experiment yields different results when conducted at different temperatures (Video 1).
C 3 H 7 OH + Na → C 3 H 7 ONa (sodium propoxide) + ½H 2. Both alcohols are oxidised to aldehydes, which have a sour but fruity smell. C 2 H 5 OH + [O] → CH 3 CHO (ethanal) + H 2 O. C 3 H 7 OH + [O] → CH 3 CH 2 CHO (propanal) + H 2 O. These experiments show that alcohols react similarly in all these reactions.
Experiment 6 Qualitative Tests for Alcohols, Alcohol Unknown, IR of Unknown. In this experiment you are going to do a series of tests in order to determine whether or not an alcohol is a primary (1°), secondary (2°) or tertiary (3°) alcohol. The tests can also determine whether or not there is a secondary methyl alcohol functionality in the ...
Most of the isopropyl alcohol (the three carbons and the hydrogens attached to them) is non-polar. ... Water v. alcohol: Virtual Lab [q]EXPERIMENT 1: Let's start by predicting the way that a single drop of water and a single drop of alcohol will look when you put them on a surface like a penny or wax paper. Do the following
Tilt your test tube and slowly pour rubbing alcohol (70-95% isopropyl or ethyl alcohol) into the tube down the side so that it forms a layer on top of the pea mixture. ... How does the experiment compare when using animal cells instead of plant cells? The DNA molecule is structurally the same in all living things, including plants and animals ...
The alcohol vapour should ignite with a loud 'whoosh', with flames shooting out of the top of the vessel. Teaching notes. The experiment demonstrates dramatically just how much chemical energy is released from such a small quantity of fuel. The flame colour varies with the proportion of carbon in the alcohol molecule.
1. 3. Add a comment. Simple method is measure 100 ml Isopropyl alcohol water mixture heat at 80 degrees centigrade and after distilling left of liquid,cool and measure the volume. You get water content and the balance quantity is IPA.///. answered Apr 3, 2020 at 6:46.