essay on food insecurity in english

Home — Essay Samples — Law, Crime & Punishment — Security — Hungry For Change: Advocating for Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture

Hungry for Change: Advocating for Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture

• Categories: Security

About this sample

Words: 501 |

Published: Jun 13, 2024

Words: 501 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

Table of contents

Introduction, body paragraph.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Prof. Kifaru

Verified writer

• Expert in: Law, Crime & Punishment

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1447 words

1 pages / 641 words

1 pages / 436 words

2 pages / 695 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Security

The legality of stop-and-frisk practices remains a topic of significant controversy, with differing viewpoints among scholars, policymakers, and the general public. While stop-and-frisk practices have been upheld by the courts [...]

In the contemporary digital age, the concepts of security and privacy have gained paramount significance. The rapid proliferation of technology has brought about unprecedented levels of connectivity and convenience, but it has [...]

INFORMATION SECURITY: Information security (IS) is designed to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of computer system data from those with malicious intentions. Confidentiality, integrity and availability are [...]

Property crimes are often referred to as criminal offenses such as burglary, larceny, fraud, embezzlement, forgery, car theft, and arson. Street robberies, violence, home break ins or burglary, and kidnapping are common crimes. [...]

It is both the accomplishment and the progress of legal codes with the intentionality of preserving the country against assualts, illegal foreign invasions and terrorism. It greatly helps to maintain security in worldwide trade [...]

Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) represent the most critical menace to modern organizations. Unlike automated broad range attacks, APTs are human-driven infiltrations, perpetrated over long periods of time, customized for the [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Food Insecurity - Essay Examples And Topic Ideas For Free

Food Insecurity refers to the lack of reliable access to sufficient quantities of affordable, nutritious food. Essays could delve into the causes, effects, and possible solutions to food insecurity both in the United States and globally, addressing issues like poverty, agricultural practices, and climate change. A substantial compilation of free essay instances related to Food Insecurity you can find at PapersOwl Website. You can use our samples for inspiration to write your own essay, research paper, or just to explore a new topic for yourself.

Child Food Insecurity

It is wrong to think that child food insecurity, malnourishment, and other food issues are only present in "third-world" countries because in reality, they occur worldwide ("Woodhouse"). They are especially prevalent in the United States ("Morrissey"), which is considered to be one of the most advanced and affluent countries in the world. Children from low-income families feel the greatest effects of food insecurity in the United States because they have minimal access to fresh foods, which is caused by the […]

Food Insecurity on College Campuses: Prevalence, Consequences and Solutions

Food insecurity in the United Sates has become a topic of high concern due to the rapid rate at which it has increased in recent years. Food insecurity is defined as "the limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods or limited or uncertain ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways" (Holben & Marshall 2017). Food insecurity is an issue that must be addressed, as the consequences are devastating for those that are affected. Until recently, […]

Escherichia Coli – an Overview

Escherichia coli is coliform bacterium of the genus Escherichia and is a Gram negative, facultative anaerobic, rod-shaped bacteria. E. coli lives a life of luxury in the lower intestines of warm blooded animals, including humans but when forced out, it lives a life of deprivation and hazard in water, sediment and soil. Most E. coli strain are harmless and are an important part of a healthy human intestinal tract. However, some E. coli are pathogenic cause either diarrhea or illness […]

We will write an essay sample crafted to your needs.

The Effects of Food Insecurity in the Community

Abstract Food insecurity is not having the ability to acquire nutritious foods essential for a healthy diet and life (Feeding America, 2011). This problem is a common issue in the Monterey County Salinas Valley, especially among the Latinos, African Americans, single mothers, senior citizens, and children who live in low-income households (Kresge, 2011). Factors that indicate food insecurity are location, unemployment, availability of nutritious foods, and conditions of markets. Effects of food insecurity are health problems, emotional stress, behavior issues, […]

Food Insecurity Among Asian Americans

This study evaluated the prevalence and burden of food insecurity among disaggregated Asian American populations. In this research, prevalence of food insecurity among Asian American subgroups was assessed, with the primary exposure variable of interest being acculturation. This assessment utilized the California Health Interview Survey, the largest state health survey. The results demonstrated that the highest prevalence of food insecurity was found among Vietnamese (16.42%), while the lowest prevalence was among Japanese (2.28%). A significant relationship was noted between the […]

Poor Nutrition and its Effects on Learning

Nutrition is essential to human welfare, however, numerous number of people are badly affected by poor nutrition especially children. Malnutrition is a major concern which ranges from undernutrition to problems of overweight and obesity. It’s usually caused by deficiency in essential vitamins and nutrients needed for intellectual development and learning. The most critical stage for brain development is mainly from conception to the first 2 years of life. It’s highly important that pregnant mothers are given the necessary vitamins and […]

What is Food Insecurity in America?

Throughout the United States, access to healthy food is a privilege. Cumulative institutionalized racism is deeply embedded in the foundation of the country, throughout historical and present public policies, ultimately manifesting injustice within many entities throughout the nation, specifically the food industry (American Civil Liberties Union). This oppressive industry, which includes fast food corporations and agricultural components, takes advantage of vulnerable minority and low-income populations. They do this in many ways, some of which include manipulating the market, pushing out […]

Food Insecurity at Berkeley

During their time in college, many UC Berkeley undergraduate and graduate students experience some type of basic need insecurity. Contrary to basic needs security, basic needs insecurity refers to the inability to obtain food, housing, and financial stability. Students who face food insecurity undergo the struggles of skipping meals or consuming unhealthy food due to their financial inability to afford healthier or complete meals. According to the “2016 UC Food Access & Security Study”, 48% of undergraduate students across the […]

Hunger in ?olleges

Introduction: The Problem Hunger in colleges is a serious issue that has been existing for years as student's lack access to reliable and affordable food. Food insecurity is "a household-level economic and social condition of limited or uncertain access to adequate food (USDA)." Students in colleges, not only hunger for knowledge but also for food. The food insecurity issue has the potential of undermining academic success. Most students do not get enough to eat and are hence fatigued and worried. […]

Food Insecurity in African American Elders

Food insecurity occurs when the availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods or the ability to acquire them in socially acceptable ways is limited or uncertain. It is a growing problem in older adults (Sengupta, 2016). Nine percent of older persons who live alone are food insecure, and about 15 percent are at risk. This issue is particularly concerning in African American older adults who are at a greater risk compared to their Hispanic and non-Hispanic white counterparts (16.66%, 13.26%, […]

College Food Insecurity: how Big is the Problem?

Working while attending college or university is also associated with food insecurity. 4,5,9 Higher rates of food insecurity have been reported among students working longer hours. 4,5 Rates of food insecurity for students working over 20 hours per week have ranged from 38-46%. 4,5 In addition, university students who live off campus and those who do not have a meal plan tend to have an increased risk for food insecurity as compared to students living on campus and those with […]

Food Insecurity in Mozambique: Going to Bed in Debt and Waking up Hungry

Abstract Food insecurity is a global problem that varies in magnitude on regional and local levels. It is also a problem that does not receive equal representation or efforts between and within nations. Some of the problems facing food insecurities, however, overlap between nations, for example, climate change, distribution of resources, and governmental roles and impacts. When compared to other nations of the world, which may or may not have dire food insecurities, Mozambique has its unique set of challenges, […]

Food Insecurity in the Bronx

The story of Jettie Young illustrates the widespread problem of food insecurity and how it affects individuals from any area or economic background across the United States. When Jettie Young was looking to purchase a house for her small family in Austin, Texas, affordability was foremost on her mind. She and her husband decided on a starter home in the Hornsby Bend area, a neighborhood made up of many families with young children, much like her own. What she did […]

Additional Example Essays

• The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Food
• Junk Food Should be Taxed
• David Zinczenko: “Don't Blame the Eater”
• Fast Food vs Home Cooked
• Why Parents and Schools Shouldn't Ban Junk Food
• Homeschooling vs Public School
• Homeschooling vs Traditional Schooling
• Teaching is my dream job
• Dweck's Fixed and Growth Mindsets
• A Raisin in the Sun Theme
• Why Abortion Should be Illegal
• Death Penalty Should be Abolished

The gap between the poor and the rich across the globe is getting broader. As a result, a vast proportion of the world’s population suffers from malnutrition, or worse, is on the verge of hunger and starvation. The United States is no exception, and the number of undernourished is continuously increasing.

So how are developed and developing countries tackling the problem of poor nutrition and food security? Why has food become a means of getting rich instead of ensuring people’s well-being and safety? Is healthy food a privilege of the wealthy?

To draw attention to the issue, educational institutions often assign argumentative essays about food insecurity in America. College students should express their views on essay topics like food insecurity and scarcity, its causes and effects, GMOs, and sustainability. They can also work on new methods to ensure we produce enough food for everyone.

When writing your research paper, ensure your introduction contains an intriguing thesis statement for food insecurity. For instance, pose a question or challenge an approach in tackling the problem. Once you frame the hook, continue with the body paragraphs to present your views supported by evidence and credible sources. The final section of your manuscript is the conclusion which wraps up your ideas and offers an overview or solution to the issue.

As always, PapersOwl has the best essay examples on food insecurity solutions you can read for free. These ideas will help you outline the perfect cause-and-effect paper. If your work needs improvement, contact the expert team at PapersOwl, and they will be more than happy to assist you.

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

• Increase Font Size

Food Insecurity Among College Students: The Food Pantry Predicament

By Taylor Lance

Food insecurity is an imperative issue in colleges across the country. “Food insecurity” is a broad term for the two types of low food security: low food security and extremely low food security (Yashamiro). This means that these individuals are not consistently getting the food that they need in order to be healthy. Many students attempting to gain a higher education at two-year colleges and four-year universities are facing food insecurity. To help these student’s, colleges are trying out various methods. There are many concerns for students who are experiencing food insecurity, their overall health is at risk, and their grades are destined to suffer. It is extremely concerning how prevalent this issue is. In the article “Why a Food Pantry isn’t Enough” Gwen Dilworth, a   fourth-year student and executive director of The College and University Food Bank Alliance, reported that “…the GAO concluded that about a third of U.S. college students struggle with food insecurity”. Colleges across the country are becoming progressively more aware of this issue and are taking steps to intervene by adding food pantries to help students get the nutrition they need. Although food pantries are helpful and should be supported, they alone are not enough to completely combat food insecurity among college students.

Food insecurity among college students is a critical issue in dire need of a solution. “In studies among children and adults, FI [Food Insecurity] has been associated with poorer nutrition and health outcomes, higher stress and depression, and adverse learning, academic outcomes and/or productivity…Findings were generally consistent across peer reviewed and gray literature, despite using different metrics” (Bruening et al.). These are all reasons to be concerned for students in these situations. These individuals are trying to get a higher education because they simply want to have a successful future and are met with the obstacle of not being able to afford both education and basic needs. Students struggling with food insecurity are not able to get the nutrition they need; therefore, they are unable to focus on their academics. Since students are preoccupied with the struggle of meeting their basic need for food and safety they cannot focus on their studies. One solution has been the introduction of food pantries, although these are helpful, colleges cannot stop at just this.

Food pantries are popping up in many colleges across the country in attempt to reduce food insecurity. While these are showing to benefit the students, there are still limitations to how much they can help. In the case study titled “Hungry for a Higher Education” the author determined that food pantries “may not address larger systematic issues of hunger and poverty experienced by students, but focus on immediate needs” (Yashamiro). Food pantries are not a long-term solution to the problem, their intent is to be a short-term solution. Another reason food pantries are not able to reduce food insecurity among college students on their own is attributable to the students view and perception of the food pantries. “It was reported that 36% of students studied associated the pantry with social stigma and embarrassment…” (Yashamiro). This means that many students are hesitant to take advantage of the food pantry because they fear that people will judge them for it and they do not want to be subjected to that embarrassment. Many students know of the food pantries available but are not aware of how the system works or if they are eligible for this help. “33.8% noted unawareness of how the food pantry worked, and if they would even qualify for the services” (Yashamiro). To improve effectiveness of food pantries some colleges might consider adding more ways to inform students on the operation of food pantries and who among the students might be eligible for access to the food pantries. Colleges should not have the misconception that they have solved the problem by only installing food pantries on campus; there needs to be more long-lasting efforts and programs in place.

In the case study “Hungry for a Higher Education” Connie Moreno Yashamiro discusses some other food insecurity intervention methods such as “developing a single point of contact”. This means having one place that students can go to seek help if they are experiencing food insecurity. By creating a single point of contact the student does not have to keep repeating their situation to numerous people across campus, they can instead, talk to one person to get the help and support they need. Another approach mentioned by Yashamiro was to introduce swipe programs. These programs would make it an option for students that have left-over meals on their cards to donate them to students that are food insecure. The individuals that are food insecure and have received the donated meal swipes will be able to use them the same way as any other student and it would be completely confidential (Yashamiro). This would take away any risk that the students might feel judged or embarrassed by their situation. In addition to those tactics, there are still other ways to help students struggling with food insecurity such as mobile notifications when there is food leftover from events on campus. There is a limitation to this strategy however, students who do not have access to cell phones might not be able to be made aware of when there is food leftover from these events. Gardens on campus can serve multiple purposes, they could be used for agricultural education and could also help supply students in need with healthy foods (Yashamiro). The authors of the scholarly article “Hunger In Higher Education” determined that “While there is public resistance to such efforts, policy changes that expand SNAP [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program] eligibility or extend the National School Lunch Program to higher education are likely cost effective responses since undergraduates who receive public benefits are more likely to persist than observably similar peers”. These college students are here by choice and have the desire to achieve higher education. Therefore, it makes sense financially to extend the National School Lunch Program to enable these students to be healthy while pursuing an education and working to reach their goals. Although food pantries are a valuable addition to the effort to fight food insecurity, they should not be seen as more than temporary help to students who run out of food.

There are many variations in the food pantries that are in these different schools. Food pantries vary in size, available resources, how much students can take, and hours of operation. It is difficult to measure the success of food pantries when all of them are different. There is a lack of research on the effectiveness of food pantries so in order to get a complete understanding of the help that they provide, more studies need to be done. For these reasons’ colleges need to be cautious of having the mindset that food pantries will be an end-all solution when in reality colleges need to combine various programs and efforts to have the greatest impact.

Food insecurity among college students cannot be solved by merely introducing short term solutions such as food pantries. The combination of many approaches and tactics is the best way to tackle this issue. The steps that need to be taken in order to unravel this type of large-scale problem are efforts that colleges can make, such as the swipe program, alongside policy changes to extend eligibility for assistance.

Works Cited

Broton, K. M., et al. “Hunger in higher education: Experiences and Correlates of Food Insecurity Among Wisconsin Undergraduates from Low-income Families.” Social Sciences,  vol. 7, no. 10, 2018, doi: dx.doi.org.lcc.idm.oclc.org/10.3390/socsci7100179. Accessed 20 Apr. 2020.

Bruening, Meg, et al. “The Struggle Is Real: A Systematic Review of Food Insecurity on Postsecondary Education Campuses.”  Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics , vol. 117, no. 11, 2017, pp. 1767–1791., doi:10.1016/j.jand.2017.05.022. Accessed 20 Apr. 2020.

Dilworth, Gwen. “Why a Food Pantry isn’t Enough.” UWIRE Text , 26 Feb. 2019, p. 1. Gale OneFile: News , link-gale-com.lcc.idm.oclc.org/apps/doc/A575986285/STND?u=lom_lansingcc&sid=STND&xid=4dba1729 . Accessed 20 Apr. 2020.

Yamashiro, Connie Moreno. “Hungry for a Higher Education: A Case Study on Undergraduate Student Experiences with a Campus Food Pantry.” Order No. 13881227 California State University, Long Beach, 2019.  ProQuest.  Accessed 20 Apr. 2020.

Writing LCC by is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

America at Hunger’s Edge

Photographs by Brenda Ann Kenneally Sept. 2, 2020

• Share full article

A shadow of hunger looms over the United States. In the pandemic economy, nearly one in eight households doesn’t have enough to eat. The lockdown, with its epic lines at food banks, has revealed what was hidden in plain sight: that the struggle to make food last long enough, and to get food that’s healthful — what experts call ‘food insecurity’ — is a persistent one for millions of Americans.

Beginning in May, Brenda Ann Kenneally set out across the country, from New York to California , to capture the routines of Americans who struggle to feed their families, piecing together various forms of food assistance, community support and ingenuity to make it from one month to the next.

Food insecurity is as much about the threat of deprivation as it is about deprivation itself: A food-insecure life means a life lived in fear of hunger, and the psychological toll that takes. Like many hardships, this burden falls disproportionately on Black and Hispanic families, who are almost twice as likely to experience food insecurity as white families.

Like so many who live at hunger’s edge, the members of the extended Stocklas family — whom Kenneally has photographed for years — gain and lose food stamps depending on fluctuating employment status in an unstable economy. They often have trouble stretching their funds to the end of the month, so they pool resources to provide family-style dinners for all.

Just days before Kenneally arrived, the governor closed schools statewide, creating a new source of stress for food-insecure families, which often rely on free school lunches to keep their school-age children fed. This made the family’s big collective meals all the more crucial. “Even if it’s just pitching in $10 when we don’t have food stamps,” Kandice Zakrzewski says, “we all pitch in.”

Late last year, Doris Hall, 63, moved back to Gary, her hometown, to look after her great-grandchildren — “so they don’t have to be in daycare,” she says. On weekends, she takes in as many as nine of the children — occasionally all 14 — so that their parents can work.

For lunch, it’s “microwaveable stuff,” like corndogs, hot dogs and chicken nuggets that Hall picks up at the nearby food bank. Dinners vary: spaghetti, chicken, soups, tacos. When she has a rare moment to eat alone, she makes her favorite meal for herself: greens and tacos.

In the face of deprivation, food-insecure families often seize any opportunity to get and store food when it’s available.

Kenneally arrived in Illinois in early June, soon after nationwide unemployment claims filed during the pandemic had topped 40 million.

In Cicero, just west of Chicago, Jennifer Villa, 29, was living in an apartment with a kitchen that needed plumbing repairs. She and her family were already struggling — a disability makes it hard for her to work — and the pandemic had meant less fresh food and even longer pantry lines.

Whenever food deliveries came, Villa’s kids would celebrate. “Oh, Mommy, we’re going to have food tonight,” they would tell her. “We’re not going to go to sleep with no food in our tummy.”

By June, the social upheavals following the killing of George Floyd created even more instability for some families. Kenneally visited Manausha Russ, 28, a few days after protests led to the closure of a nearby Family Dollar, where Russ used to get basics like milk, cereal and diapers. “The stores by my house were all looted,” she says.

Russ lives with her four daughters on the west side of St. Louis. She receives about $635 per month in food stamps, but with the girls at home all day, and her partner, Lamarr, there too, it isn’t always sufficient. “Some days I feel like I have a lot,” she says, “and some days I feel like I don’t have enough.”

In so many places, Kenneally found food-insecure families were helping one another out despite their own hardship. Here, in a condominium complex on the city’s east side, a neighbor picked up free school lunches and distributed them to children in the building, including the Boughton sisters: Brooklyn, 4, on the far right, Chynna, 9, and Katie, 8, seen here with a neighbor’s toddler who has since moved away.

Most of the families Kenneally photographed had struggled to feed themselves adequately for years. But she also met families who had been thrown into food insecurity by the pandemic.

Facing Hunger For The First Time

The federal government’s food-stamp program has been dramatically expanded to confront the economic devastation of the pandemic. But even that hasn’t been enough, as the ranks of the needy grow.

In long conversations around the country this August — at kitchen tables, in living rooms and sitting in cars in slow-moving food lines with rambunctious children in the back — Americans reflected on their new reality. The shame and embarrassment. The loss of choice in something as basic as what to eat. The worry over how to make sure their children get a healthy diet. The fear that their lives will never get back on track.

“Folks who had really good jobs and were able to pay their bills and never knew how to find us,” says Ephie Johnson, the president and chief executive of Neighborhood Christian Charities. “A lot of people had finally landed that job, were helping their family, and able to do a little better. And then this takes you out.”

By late June, Kenneally had reached Mississippi , where the economic toll of Covid-19 was falling hard on some of America’s most chronically impoverished areas, where residents have lived under hunger’s shadow for years. The pandemic dropped the state’s labor participation rate to just 53 percent, the lowest in the nation.

Even before the pandemic, more than half of Mississippi’s seniors — 56 percent — experienced regular shortfalls in food. One in 4 Mississippians is now experiencing food insecurity, according to the nonprofit Feeding America.

The city of Jackson (population 164,000) is often classified as a “food desert” for its high rate of food insecurity and the scarcity of well-stocked stores. Deidre Lyons lives there with her three kids, sister, niece and father. Lyons, 28, receives $524 a month in food stamps, but without access to a car, she can’t easily get to a grocery store to use them.

“My kids, they love to eat,” says Lyons, whose cousin will occasionally drive her to the grocery store when she isn’t caring for her own children. “My kids eat whatever we cook because they aren’t picky eaters. I’m hoping they stay like that.”

The causes of chronic food insecurity are many: unemployment; low wages; unaffordable or unstable housing; rising medical costs; unreliable transportation.

How Hunger Persists In America

Treating hunger as a temporary emergency, instead of a symptom of systemic problems, has always informed the American response to it — and as a result government programs have been designed to alleviate each peak, rather than address the factors that produce them.

Food banks are supposed to fill in the gaps, but more than 37 million Americans are food insecure, according to the U.S.D.A. “We call it an emergency food system, but it’s a 50-year emergency,” says Noreen Springstead, executive director of WhyHunger, which supports grass-roots food organizations.

In early July, the pandemic was cresting in Texas just as Kenneally arrived.

Kelly Rivera, a single mother with three kids who makes $688 every two weeks as a teacher’s aide, goes to the food bank on Wednesdays to supplement what she is able to buy with food stamps. “There are times they give you what you need, and there are times they don’t give you what you need,” she says. “You can’t be picky.”

The family had to wait for hours at the Catholic Charities in 100-degree heat. But Rivera has a message for her struggling neighbors who are too proud to visit food banks: “Don’t be ashamed. That is what the community is there for, to help.”

Some 800 miles west in New Mexico, near the town of Hatch, workers pick onions for $15 a box, which translates to less than a minimum wage for many workers. There are no food pantries nearby, and so the workers are forced to eat extremely simply on their earnings, making nearly everything they eat from scratch.

Juan Pablo Reyes is using the money he made picking onions to help pay for college. “People that work at the bottom of the food chain, cultivating all these different crops, are basically the builders of our country,” he says.

Leaving New Mexico, Kenneally headed west across Arizona. She finished her journey in Southern California at the end of July. The story there was no different than it had been across the country, except that wildfires were also beginning to ravage the state — yet another crisis in a year full of them.

An event planner and hairstylist who has been out of work since early in the pandemic, Alexis Frost Cazimero, 40, now spends her days driving around the county with three of her children — Mason, 6 (not pictured); Carson, 5; and Coco, 1 — collecting food for her family and for neighbors and friends who are unable to leave their homes or reluctant to seek help.

Cazimero says she is grateful she has been able to help others. “Being that person in the community that shares and brings resources to the people that can’t get them brings purpose to my family.”

Kenneally’s photographs reveal the fragility of American life, exposed and exacerbated by the pandemic. They show us how close to the edge so many families live, how vulnerable and insecure their arrangements are, and also how resilient they can be when faced with a crisis.

But nothing stands out from these images more vividly than the children: eating whatever they can, whenever and wherever they can, somehow managing to maintain, in the midst of this historically desperate time, some innocence and some hope.

They are the greatest victims of the food-insecurity crisis. Research has shown long-term links between food insecurity and a wide variety of health issues in children — elevated risks of asthma and other chronic illnesses, lags in educational attainment. And according to a Brookings Institution researcher, the number of U.S. children in need of immediate food assistance is approximately 14 million.

For most of these children, the pandemic did not cause the instability that plagues their lives; when it is over, they will face a crisis no less acute, one that has persisted in this country for generations.

In the richest nation on earth, they live at the edge of hunger.

Kenneally visited many food distribution sites along her journey, including ones run by: the Salvation Army , Catholic Charities , Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Pennsylvania , Parma City School District , St . Louis Area Foodbank , Operation Food Search , Neighborhood Christian Centers , Y.M.C.A . of Memphis and t he Mid-South , Stewpot Community Services , Houston Food Bank , Houston Independent School District , Community Food Bank of Southern Arizona and Tucson Interfaith HIV/AIDS Network .

Brenda Ann Kenneally is a multimedia journalist who, over 30 years, has produced participatory media projects with families from her home community, including “Upstate Girls: Unraveling Collar City.” She is currently assembling a multimedia autobiography, charting her experience from being a disenfranchised youth to becoming a Guggenheim fellow and frequent contributor to the magazine. Read more about Kenneally’s journey.

Adrian Nicole LeBlanc , an independent journalist and MacArthur fellow, was embedded in an assisted-living facility as Kenneally began her trip for this issue. They have worked together since 2003.

Tim Arango is a Los Angeles-based national correspondent for The Times. He spent seven years as Baghdad bureau chief and also covered Turkey. Before heading overseas, he had been a media reporter for The Times since 2007.

Additional Reporting by Maddy Crowell , Lovia Gyarkye , Concepción de León , Jaime Lowe , Jake Nevins , Kevin Pang and Malia Wollan .

Photo Editors: Amy Kellner and Rory Walsh .

Design by Aliza Aufrichtig and Eden Weingart .

Advertisement

• Games & Quizzes
• History & Society
• Science & Tech
• Biographies
• Animals & Nature
• Geography & Travel
• Arts & Culture
• On This Day
• One Good Fact
• New Articles
• Lifestyles & Social Issues
• Philosophy & Religion
• Politics, Law & Government
• World History
• Health & Medicine
• Browse Biographies
• Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
• Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
• Environment
• Fossils & Geologic Time
• Entertainment & Pop Culture
• Sports & Recreation
• Visual Arts
• Demystified
• Image Galleries
• Infographics
• Top Questions
• Britannica Kids
• Saving Earth
• Space Next 50
• Student Center
• Introduction

Health effects

Solutions to food insecurity.

food insecurity

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

• Table Of Contents

Recent News

food insecurity , the limited or uncertain access to nutritious food , which also includes limitations on the ability to obtain nutritious food in ways that are socially acceptable. Approximately 2.4 billion people worldwide (some 29.6 percent of the human population) experience moderate or severe food insecurity. Although food insecurity does occur in developed countries, the overwhelming majority of food-insecure people are concentrated in developing countries in Central and South America , Asia , and sub-Saharan Africa .

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations (UN) divides food insecurity into two categories, moderate food insecurity (characterized by reduced food quality and quantity, the tendency to skip meals, and rising uncertainty about obtaining food) and severe food insecurity (characterized by running out of food and going without food for a day or more). Moderate food insecurity is a condition that affected some 1.5 billion people worldwide in 2022, and severe food insecurity impacted an additional 900 million people.

The causes of food insecurity are varied and complex and stem from a number of human-driven and natural factors. Almost three-quarters of people who do not have enough to eat live in politically unstable countries. War and other forms of conflict may affect people in the midst of the fighting, and it may also affect those outside the immediate region. For example, the Russia-Ukraine War (2014–present) has reduced grain shipments from Ukraine to countries in sub-Saharan Africa that rely on them. Such supply-chain disruptions cause food shortages. In addition, increases in fertilizer and fuel costs raise food prices , which reduces the amount of food poor individuals and countries can purchase. Climate change also contributes to food insecurity. Floods , droughts , and other changing weather conditions destroy crops and livestock while interfering with people’s ability to work—further contributing to supply-chain disruptions.

Food insecurity also occurs wealthier countries . For example, in early 2023 roughly one in ten U.S. adults were food insecure because of any of several factors, which include having low income or lack of income, rising costs associated with housing and medicine , the inability to access the medical system, systemic racism and discrimination , and the creation of food deserts . The period of rising inflation in the U.S. that followed the COVID-19 pandemic combined with stagnant wages to result in lower discretionary income, which contributed to greater food insecurity. Food insecurity in wealthy countries can also be triggered by loss of employment, injury, unanticipated home repairs, and changes to government benefits that restrict and reduce the types of foods that can be purchased.

Food insecurity also contributes to poor health , since people may skip meals, eat less, or switch to lower-quality foods. Malnutrition can lead to weakness, pain , illness, and even death . Food insecurity also contributes to type 2 diabetes , obesity , and hypertension (high blood pressure ) when less-expensive foods with lower nutritional value are substituted for healthy foods over the long term. Existing health issues can be worsened if people forgo necessary medication or medical treatment in order to buy food. Children who live in food-insecure homes may have difficulty learning and may not develop properly. Food insecurity is associated with poor mental health , low educational attainment, and poor job performance.

Nearly one billion people experience hunger; however, there is enough food produced each year to feed the world’s population . Food insecurity stems from challenges to food availability, food access, and food utilization. Food availability involves ensuring not only that enough food is available to feed a population but that food supplies are available consistently. Food access, in contrast, involves having the resources necessary that give people the ability to obtain appropriate foods for a nutritious diet. Broadly speaking, food can be made more available by increasing a population’s access to the resources that grow food (that is, fertilizer, water , and arable land) and to networks of food distribution. In addition, governments, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and relief groups can improve the structures that provide people with jobs and other financial resources that help people purchase food, as well as helping them with food utilization—that is, the process of consuming a nutritious diet by having access to clean water, adequate sanitation, and the education necessary to both grow nutritious food (rather than low-nutrition food) and prepare it hygienically.

To attain these goals worldwide, international organizations have partnered with local governments and other groups. In 2012 the UN launched the Zero Hunger Challenge with the goal of eradicating hunger by 2030, as part of its global sustainable development objectives. In 2021 the UN held a summit to address hunger and consider the progress made by the Zero Hunger Challenge effort. While several UN organizations (including the World Hunger Programme and the FAO), lending organizations (such as the World Bank ), and relief groups (such as the Peace Corps ) continue to work with communities to prevent food insecurity, summit participants and organizers and a follow-on report (“ The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World, ” produced by the FAO) revealed that hunger had increased through the late 2010s and early 2020s because of the effects of climate change, conflict, and the distribution challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. They recommended that governments and NGOs work harder to improve sustainable food production and distribution systems through, for example, better communication between local and regional stakeholders, better management of water resources and fisheries , and accelerated financing to fund research, innovation , and the rollout of food-production projects.

At local, regional, and national scales there are a number of ways to reduce food insecurity. Shorter-term actions include donating to humanitarian organizations that provide food directly to people, funding food banks, and removing protectionist export bans, the last of which would allow surplus food stores to move to areas in need. Longer-term actions include creating community social nets (that is, assistance programs and services that provide poor individuals with resources), improving access to arable land, reducing food waste, coordinating efforts among various stakeholders from different economic sectors, finding peaceful resolutions to international conflicts, and implementing agricultural practices that combat climate change and economic policies that lower inflation and slow increases in the cost of living .

What Causes Food Insecurity and What are Solutions to It?

What is food insecurity.

Imagine the entire state of California not knowing where their next meal will come from. For 38.3 million Americans—just shy of California’s 39.5 million population—this uncertainty is a reality of daily life.

The effects of poverty are greatly varied, but many of them like homelessness, a lack of healthcare, and low wages, all are frequently a focus of public conversation. But several go largely undetected. One of these issues is food insecurity.

According to the USDA , food security “means access by all people at all times to enough food for a healthy life.” However, over 10% of the U.S. population struggle with food insecurity. Of these 38.3 million, 11.7 million of them—more than New York City’s population—are children.

Such figures lead to difficult questions: why do so many families and individuals struggle with food insecurity, and who are they? What are the consequences for our society when so many people go hungry? And finally, what can we do to fix this massive issue? In this article, we’ll get to know food insecurity and what we can do about it.

Let’s start with the term itself:

Giving Food Insecurity a Definition

Going by the USDA's definition of food security as “access by all people at all times to enough food for an active, healthy life.” Food insecurity, therefore, can be understood as any time an individual or family doesn’t experience food security.

Many families and individuals experience food insecurity differently. The USDA gives four general ranges of both food security and food insecurity to understand these differences in experiences:

Food Security:

• High Food Security: The USDA defines high food security as individuals or households that don’t report any difficulties with accessing food or suffering from limitations. These households probably don’t worry about food, at least in any significant way.
• Marginal Food Security: According to the USDA, households with marginal food security have reported their occasional anxiety of having enough food, although they don’t indicate any noteworthy changes to their diet or consumption.

Food Insecurity:

• Low Food Security: Households or individuals with low food security report that they consume lower quality food, less variety of foods, and have a generally less desirable diet, although they don’t necessarily consume less food overall.
• Very Low Food Security: Households with very low food security report that their eating patterns and food intake has been reduced or otherwise interrupted. These are people and families who may take actions such as foregoing meals to stretch their food over a longer period of time.

Essentially, food insecurity occurs when a person or group of people can’t access or afford enough quality food. Food insecurity is not hunger, although hunger may be a symptom of food insecurity.

Who is Food Insecure?

We’ve already briefly touched on how children are impacted greatly by food insecurity—you could populate a city larger than New York with all of America’s food-insecure children—but who are the communities most impacted by food insecurity?

Well, the answer is not so simple. With more than one in ten people in the U.S. being food insecure, you will find food insecurity in every community. However, some communities are more impacted by food insecurity than others. Households composed of Black or Hispanic families or individuals are twice as likely to be food insecure than the national average. Communities of color that have been and are still systematically oppressed and impoverished are the most affected by food insecurity.

What Causes Food Insecurity?

The causes that impact food insecurity are wide in scope, and we won’t be able to cover them all here. They are both historical and present-day, deliberate and unintended, but regardless, they are all real and impact a massive portion of our population here in the U.S.

Geography and urban planning has some impact on food insecurity. A food desert is a popular term used to describe areas where the residents can’t access affordable, healthy foods. This means a majority of the population lives a mile or more from an affordable grocery store in urban areas, and 10 miles in rural areas. For areas that have no public transportation or unreliable transport, individuals who don’t own a car, and individuals who struggle with mobility, healthy, nutritious foods are simply out of reach, both physically and economically.

However, despite their impact, pinning the issue of food insecurity on food deserts conveniently ignores the systemic issues contributing to food insecurity. Most people, even low-income individuals, don’t automatically grocery shop at whichever store is closest to them. They may instead opt for a preferred grocery store or chain with lower prices, or instead choose to shop near their workplace, chaining multiple trips together. 

Thus, access, geographic location, and food deserts actually aren’t the main problems facing food-insecure households. The main cause of food insecurity is poverty . While mobility, transportation, and car-centricity are still issues that are deeply connected with poverty, geographic access, as stated by the USDA in a 2014 report , is not “associated with the percentage of households that [are] food insecure.”

The fact is that 38.3 million Americans simply can’t afford food, or enough quality food; living within a mile of a grocery store and having reliable transportation there and back still wouldn’t change that. Low wages and centuries of discrimination have led to a situation where many low-income households spend over a quarter of their income on food , whereas middle and high-income households spend more money, but still a smaller percentage of their income, on food.

The Impact of Food Insecurity

The impacts of food insecurity are wide-ranging. For one thing, considering that food-insecure households spend upwards of 27% of their income on food, it makes budgeting and prioritizing other expenses painfully difficult. When budgeting the cost of food in the face of other necessary expenses like housing, energy, and healthcare, it creates an impossible balancing act: to choose between staying in your apartment, eating, or taking necessary medications.

Medications, too, are related to food insecurity, as food insecurity has ranging health impacts for both children and adults. Food insecure adults may be at higher risk for chronic diseases such as diabetes , obesity , and depression . 

Now, food insecurity is not permanent. It can be brief while a member of the household is between jobs, or during times of other financial hardship, or it can last over an extended period of time, particularly in the case of individuals who can’t work due to disabilities. However, children who experience extended food insecurity are even more at risk, as its effects can compound throughout their life and development. 

Learning outcomes can also be adversely impacted by food insecurity. Inadequate nutrients from their diets can lead to a weakened immune system in children, which can lead to frequent absences. When food-insecure children are at school, they may be unable to focus, resulting in worse performance and retention. Essentially, when children experience food insecurity, it can set them up for challenges for the rest of their lives.

Solutions to Ending Food Insecurity

Systemic changes.

Continue Modernizing SNAP Benefits: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, often known as SNAP , provides benefits to households and individuals struggling with food insecurity. However, while crucial to helping millions of families, SNAP benefits need to be modernized. They are still based on the USDA’s Thrifty Food Plan (TFP), which is no longer an accurate measure for food expenditures. The TFP doesn’t even meet all the U.S.’s federal nutrition standards .

SNAP benefits are also equal across the country, regardless of differences in cost of living—a feature that is very beneficial to some, while detrimental to others. Many households living in areas where they must devote a larger portion of their income to expenses like housing often have less money available for food, and SNAP benefits are insufficient in these instances. Additionally, SNAP benefits don’t account for the amount of time it takes to cook and prepare meals, a fact that does a great disservice to the many low-wage workers who need to work long, often odd hours to cover expenses such as rent—they’re already stretched for time.

Reduce Food Waste: According to the USDA , between 30 and 40% of the nation’s food supply goes to waste. Globally, the number is closer to about 30%, which would be enough to feed 2 billion people, effectively eliminating hunger. However, there’s a long way to go in reducing and eliminating food waste. 

Food is wasted at various stages of production. Regardless of how products are wasted, be it through spoilage during transportation, being discarded for aesthetic blemishes, or being binned after passing sell-by dates, an astronomical amount of food in the U.S. goes to waste. 

One solution is to improve transparency and clarity for food safety by instituting consistent labeling conventions. The discrepancies between best-by dates, use-by dates, and sell-by dates often cause confusion for customers and lead to food being discarded before it needs to be. According to the USDA , most foods are safe and wholesome until there’s evidence of spoilage, provided that they’re handled properly. 

Additionally, policies should be set in place that protect national grocery retailers from rare liabilities not covered under the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act , so they can donate surplus and unsold goods to charities and local food banks, greatly reducing hunger within communities. 

Offer Free School Lunches For All: School lunch should be free for all students. It is essential for students' ability to remain focused throughout the day and improve learning outcomes. And while learning is one of the most important parts of school, providing free school lunches to all students would come with a host of benefits :

• Reduced stigma around needing school lunch
• Improved variety and quality of foods in students’ diets, particularly with fresh fruits and vegetables
• Improved health and lowered obesity rates
• Higher attendance rates from low-income, food insecure students

School is most beneficial when students are prepared, both mentally and physically, to learn. When students don’t have access to the necessary food and nutrients they need, especially when they’re growing, it reduces their chances of success.

As we’ve said, food insecurity impacts every community. It’s less common in some places, and more common in others, but every state and community is impacted nonetheless. Helping reduce food insecurity is a great way to effect change for the good of your community. There are a few simple ways to get involved and make an impact, regardless of your own comfort level. 

Volunteer: Volunteering with food banks, co-ops, and mutual aid networks is a great way to both fight food insecurity and strengthen bonds in your community. Volunteering benefits everyone involved: it gives you opportunities to make new friends and connections, learn new skills, and is fun (it really is!).

Contact Your Representatives: To create systemic change effectively, you need power. Your representatives, both nationally and locally, are elected to serve you and your community. Use your voice to contact them with your concerns about food insecurity. You can find your local representative here .

Donate: Donations are always welcome by many organizations fighting food insecurity. Whether in the form of money or food products, your donations can go a long way to helping people in need.

Take Action Against Food Insecurity Today

The U.S. is commonly referred to as the most abundant land on the planet. We produce more food than we can consume, and still over a tenth of our population, including millions of children, go hungry and struggle with food insecurity.

While there are countless factors that lead to food insecurity, none is more obvious and culpable than poverty itself. The benefits and support we provide our impoverished brothers and sisters are not enough, and we can afford to do so much more: after all, we currently end up throwing out over 30% of the food we produce. 

Addressing food insecurity is a massive challenge, but it can be done. Progress can be made systemically and on a community level; they’re often one and the same. 

Nation Data

• Give Monthly
• Give in Honor

Hunger and food insecurity

Food insecurity is when people can't access the food they need to live their fullest lives. There are many causes of food insecurity. But one thing is clear: financial security for everyone is the most effective way to end hunger.

What is food insecurity

Food insecurity is an official term from the USDA. It's when people don't have enough to eat and don't know where their next meal will come from. It's a big problem in the United States, where over 44 million people, including 13 million children, experience food insecurity annually. However, many more people, including millions who do not meet the definition of food insecure—turn to the charitable food sector for support. Learn more about how Feeding America measures hunger in America.

Causes of food insecurity

Food insecurity is a systemic issue that can happen to anyone, not a personal failure. According to our Elevating Voices Report , people facing hunger struggle with high living costs, expensive housing, unemployment, and low-wage jobs.

Poverty and unemployment

People who don't have a lot of money can't afford to buy food regularly and may live in places where there aren't many stores that sell healthy food at a good price.

Lack of affordable housing

Even if you're careful with your money and savings, paying for a place to live can be so expensive that it can be hard to have enough left over to buy food.

Chronic health conditions

If someone has a long-term health issue, it can be harder for them to work and earn enough money. They may also have to spend a lot of money on medical bills.

Racism and discrimination

Marginalized communities, including people of color, LGTBQ individuals, and those with disabilities, are at higher risk of food insecurity due to systemic discrimination and poverty.

Even people with a steady income and access to affordable housing can experience a temporary setback that leads to food insecurity, including job loss, medical emergency, natural disaster or family crisis.

Effects of food insecurity

Food insecurity, or the lack of access to enough nutritious food, can have serious consequences on people's health and well-being.

Physical health

People who experience food insecurity are more likely to experience malnutrition and chronic conditions like heart disease and diabetes.

Mental health

Food insecurity can also hurt people's mental health and result in depression, anxiety, and stress.

Not meeting basic needs like food and shelter can lead to social isolation, stigma, and shame.

School and work

Without enough food, people who experience food insecurity may have difficulty concentrating, have low energy, or miss school and work due to illness.

Discover how the Feeding America network addresses overall health and well-being , not just hunger.

A thriving economy solves hunger

Poverty, unemployment and low wages lead to food insecurity. It's why Feeding America helps people experiencing food insecurity get the food and resources they need by increasing access to food in their communities. We also work locally and nationally to expand economic opportunities. Get the facts on hunger and poverty.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Exploration of Food Security Challenges towards More Sustainable Food Production: A Systematic Literature Review of the Major Drivers and Policies

Sabreen wahbeh.

1 Faculty of Business, University of Wollongong in Dubai, Dubai 20183, United Arab Emirates

Foivos Anastasiadis

2 Department of Agribusiness and Supply Chain Management, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece

Balan Sundarakani

Ioannis manikas, associated data.

Not applicable.

Food security is a central priority for international policy as one of the world’s most significantly urgent targets to achieve. It is considered one of the most pressing issues in many countries, the degree of food security representing the level of self-sufficiency and well-being of citizens. In particular, in the current COVID-19 pandemic era, it has more than ever become a mission-critical goal. In this research, we report on the food security drivers and the current state of recommended policies addressing chronic food insecurity aimed at ensuring the sustainability of future food production. Mapping the determinants of food security contributes to a better understanding of the issue and aids in the development of appropriate food security policies and strategies to enhance the sustainability of food production in all facets; namely environmental, social, and economic. Adopting the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) data screening and selection guidelines and standards, we carried out a comprehensive, reliable, systematic, and rigorous review of research from the last ten years in order to identify the most frequently mentioned drivers and policies of food security in the literature available in two databases: Scopus and Web of Science (WOS). The number of extracted articles was 141 papers in total. An analysis revealed 34 drivers of food security and 17 most recommended policies for the mitigation of food insecurity. The existence of food loss and waste (FLW) policies was the primary driver of food security, followed by food security policies (FSP) in their different forms. However, FSP were the most recommended policies, followed by FLW policies. The identified food security drivers and recommended policies should be used by policy-makers to improve food security, thus contributing to sustainable food production. Our research findings, reflected in the latest version of the Global Food Security Index (GFSI), resulted in more tangible policy implications, suggesting the addition of two dimensions regarding food security. We also identified elements not listed under the GFSI that could be considered in its future revision, including environmental policies/indicators, consumer representation, and traceability throughout the entire supply chain. Overall, it can be concluded that food security is a complicated and multi-faceted issue that cannot be restricted to a single variable, necessitating the deeper integration of various multi-disciplinary interventions.

1. Introduction

Food security (FS) is “a situation that exists when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life” [ 1 ] p.3. It is a significant priority for international policy [ 2 ], and has been perceived as being among the key challenges worldwide [ 3 ] as it represents a country’s degree of self-sufficiency and the well-being of its citizens [ 4 ]. Securing a nation’s self-sufficiency has become a top priority in the context of the current COVID-19 global epidemic era, even more so than earlier [ 5 ]. Economic expansion, rising incomes, urbanization, and growing population are driving up the demand for food, as people adopt more diverse and resource-intensive dietary habits [ 2 , 6 ]. The world’s current population is steadily increasing, placing significant pressure on the available natural resources to feed the growing population [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]; however, this dramatic growth in the global population is anticipated mainly in developing countries, which already suffer from devastating hunger and food insecurity [ 7 ]. One of the biggest obstacles to ensuring global food security is the need to roughly double food production within the coming few decades, particularly in the context of the developing world’s rapidly increasing demand [ 10 , 11 ]. The natural resources such as land, water, energy, and other resources used in food production are all subject to increasing competition [ 12 , 13 ]. Climate change poses difficulties for agricultural production [ 14 ], mainly in developing nations, while some existing farming practices harm the environment and contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) [ 15 , 16 ]. There is a real danger that less developed countries may be forced to reverse direction. The FAO’s statistics on world hunger in 2009 showed a dramatic rise to 1.023 billion people, demonstrating precisely such a situation. When commodity prices fell the following year, this number dropped to 925 million, which was still more prominent than in 2007 (i.e., before the price spike) [ 17 ]. According to recent data published by the Global Hunger Index, the number of malnourished people grew from 785 million in 2015 to 822 million in 2018. Moreover, 43 out of 117 countries reported extreme hunger [ 18 ]. Approximately 20% of developing countries lack the resources and physical access necessary to provide their citizens with the most basic food. Children in developing countries face vitamin and nutritional deficiencies and being underweight, which puts them at risk for various sicknesses due to food insecurity [ 12 ]. National and global imbalances brought on by food insecurity are expected to worsen human suffering and make it harder for people to survive [ 12 ]. Despite the efforts of multiple global organizations such as the FAO and the UN, the problem of food insecurity is worsening [ 19 ], which means that more effective and sustainable solutions must be provided to ensure the alleviation of food insecurity and the sustainability of food production. Hence, policy-makers must understand that in a world that is becoming more globalized, food insecurity in one region could have significant political, economic, and environmental impacts elsewhere [ 2 ].

Throughout the twentieth century, policy-makers used the concept of food security as a key notion in formulating food-related policies [ 17 ]. Lang and Barling [ 17 ] have proposed two main schools of thought on food security: the first focused on increased production as the primary solution to under-consumption and hunger, while the second is a newer one that is more socially and environmentally conscious and accepts the need to address a wide range of issues, not just production. The former is primarily concerned with agriculture, while the latter is concerned with food systems. One approach to solve the food security challenge is to intensify agricultural production in ways that impose much less environmental stress and do not jeopardize our long-term ability to continue producing food [ 2 ]. The above sustainable intensification strategy comprises a policy agenda for several governments worldwide, but has also drawn criticism for being overly production-focused or incoherent [ 2 ]. The central mission of the twenty-first century is to establish a sustainable food system, which calls for a more concrete policy framework than that which is currently in place [ 17 ]. This mission has been disrupted by competing solutions for policy focus and policies that have, so far, failed to incorporate the complex array of evidence from social, environmental, and economic components into such an integrated and comprehensive policy response [ 17 ]. Millions of people are being pushed into a cycle of food insecurity and poverty due to climate change; however, we can combat both food insecurity and climate change by implementing climate-friendly agricultural production methods [ 12 ]. Tsolakis and Srai [ 20 ] have stated that any comprehensive food security policy should entail multi-dimensional policies considering aspects such as resilience, trade, self-sufficiency, food waste, and sustainability. As it is traditionally understood, food security concerns individuals, while ecological and environmental concepts operate locally and at supra-national, regional, and international levels [ 1 ]. According to Guiné, Pato [ 21 ], the four pillars of food security—availability, access, utilization, and stability—should be reconsidered to include additional factors such as climate change. Clapp, Moseley [ 22 ] has also stressed that it is time to officially update the existing food security definition to involve two further dimensions—sustainability and agency—containing broader dynamics that have an impact on hunger and malnutrition [ 23 ]. Sustainability relates to the long-term ability of food systems to ensure food and nutrition security in a way that does not jeopardize the economic, social, and environmental foundations that generate food and nutrition security for upcoming generations [ 22 , 23 ]. Agency represents the ability of people or groups to decide what they consume, what they produce, and how they produce, process, and distribute their food within food systems, as well as their capacity to participate in processes that shape the food system’s policies and governance [ 22 , 23 ]. Instead of dismissing food security as being insufficient, Clapp, Moseley [ 22 ] has contended that the inclusion of two extra dimensions—agency and sustainability—into food security policy and assessment frameworks will help to guarantee that every human has access to food, not just now but also in the future. Sustainability can be viewed as a pre-requisite for long-term food security [ 1 ]. Environmental aspects—particularly climate and the availability of natural resources—are pre-requisite for food availability and biodiversity protection [ 24 ]. The availability of food for everybody depends on economic and social sustainability. Food utilization, too, is influenced by social sustainability. The three components of sustainability—social, economic, and environmental—ensure the continuity of the three food security dimensions and the food system stability on which they rely. As confirmation of the vital relationship between food security and sustainability, “The International Food Policy Research Institute” has launched a 2020 Vision of Food Security to achieve food security, stating that “a world where every person has economic and physical access to sufficient food to sustain a healthy and productive life, where malnutrition is absent, and where food originates from efficient, effective, and low-cost food and agricultural systems that are compatible with sustainable use and management of natural resources” [ 12 ] (p357). Many policies, priorities, technologies, and long-term solutions must be developed and implemented worldwide to achieve the 2020 food security vision [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. However, there is a scarcity of systematic studies analyzing the food security drivers and the recommended policies to improve food security.

Following a review of the academic literature, we discovered a scarcity of research that systemically summarizes the major drivers of food security, outlines the recommended policies to improve food security, ensures the sustainability of future food production, and provides policy recommendations to enhance food security based on a country’s context. In response to this gap in the literature, we carried out a comprehensive, reliable, systematic, and rigorous review of previous research from the last ten years in order to identify the most frequently mentioned drivers/policies in the scanned literature. The rationale behind this study is to identify and list food security drivers and the current state of recommended policies that address chronic food insecurity to ensure the sustainability of future food production, utilizing a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology. Moreover, we hope to identify drivers/policies in order to aid policy-makers in selecting the most appropriate policies based on each nation’s context (e.g., agricultural production, natural resource availability, climate, political stability, and so on). Most importantly, policy-makers can use the identified drivers of food security and the recommended policies in the literature to customize appropriate policies that ensure the sustainability of future food production and, hence, ensure food sustainability for future generations. Based on the evidence reported in the literature, the identified food security drivers and recommended policies will aid the policy- and decision-makers of various countries in sustainably improving the food security situation. The need to identify the main drivers of food security arises from the notable increase in households and individuals suffering from food shortages and insecurity globally [ 25 ]. Finally, the findings of this research will be used to inform the GFSI developers in order to include more comprehensive indicators expected to contribute to the sustainability of future food production.

2. Materials and Methods

This research aims to report on food security drivers and the current state of recommended policies that address chronic food insecurity in order to ensure the sustainability of future food production through the use of a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology. We highlight existing food security drivers and outline recommended policies to alleviate food insecurity following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) data screening and selection guidelines [ 26 ]. The extraction process was meticulously documented in order to ensure the transparency and replicability of this systematic literature review [ 27 ]. A panel of researchers was formed, following the systematic review guidelines [ 26 ], to define the research field and questions, select keywords and the intended databases, and develop the sets of inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The research began by formulating the research questions to guide this systematic review based on identified gaps in the literature, guiding us in an attempt to answer the following research questions:

• Q1. What are the main drivers of food security?
• Q2. What are the main recommended policies to alleviate food insecurity?

By answering these questions, this paper provides a reference that policy-makers and practitioners can use to identify the main drivers of food security and the recommended policies in the literature in order to customize and choose appropriate policies that ensure the sustainability of future food production. The identified food security drivers and recommended policies are expected to aid policy- and decision-makers in improving the state of FS. This study also provides a roadmap for future research based on the evidence reported in the literature.

A specific research criterion was used to ensure that the research sources selected were sufficient and comprehensive enough to capture all of the significant and salient points to adequately answer the research questions [ 26 ]. To this end, we provide a critical review of the existing literature that has been published in two databases—Scopus and Web of Science (WOS)—between 2010 and 15 March 2021, to answer the abovementioned research questions. The time limit was set to cover the period following the global financial crisis of 2008/2009 and its effect on rising food prices, increased unemployment rates, and increasing food insecurity worldwide [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. This period allows for consideration of policies designed to ensure global food security following the food shortage crisis. The use of Scopus and Web of Science (WOS) databases helped us to include most potential published works in a broad scope of journals, thereby limiting the risks of bias and possible exclusions associated with the use of fewer journals.

We employed a set of identified keywords, which are summarized in detail in Table 1 . A critical analysis was conducted regarding the most relevant concepts that are available in the literature and which affect each of the four dimensions of FS: Food availability, food access, food utilization, and food stability. For instance, the research string “Agrifood supply chain” OR “Agri food supply chain” OR “Agri-food supply chain” was added as a secondary search string, because food availability is highly dependent on the food supply chain and how well its activities are managed. The food supply chain is exposed to many factors that can negatively impact the country’s food security level, such as severe weather conditions [ 31 , 32 ]. Therefore, it is critical to consider some characteristics of the food supply chain, such as biophysical and organoleptic features, shelf life, transport conditions, production time, and storage, to efficiently and effectively manage it [ 33 ]. Effective supply chain management is seen as a significant contributor to gaining and enhancing industrial competitive advantage and efficiency at the company level, possibly impacting food security positively [ 34 ]. “MENA Region” OR “Middle East and North Africa” OR “Middle East” OR “North Africa” research string was added due to the severity of food insecurity there and to ensure the inclusion of papers that address the problem in these countries and propose strategies to overcome food insecurity. According to the GFSI data [ 25 ], MENA region countries are experiencing a decline in food security; moreover, the number of households and individuals suffering from food shortages and insecurity is dramatically increasing.

Primary and secondary search strings used in this research.

The research string “Sustainable supply chain” OR “Resilient supply chain” was added due to much research that stressed the impact of designing a proper supply chain structure due to its significant impact on the future improvement of its performance [ 33 ]. The central mission of the twenty-first century is to establish a sustainable food system, which calls for a more concrete policy framework than what is currently in place [ 17 ]. Sustainability can be viewed as a prerequisite for long-term food security [ 1 ]. The environment, particularly climate and the availability of natural resources, is a prerequisite for food availability and biodiversity protection [ 24 ]. The availability of food for everybody depends on economic and social sustainability. Food utilization, too, is influenced by social sustainability. The three components of sustainability—social, economic, and environmental—assure the continuity of the three food security dimensions and the food system stability on which they rely. Moreover, food security is increasingly considered a prerequisite for long-term sustainability [ 1 ]. Adopting a “sustainable production and consumption approach throughout the global food supply chain” is a solution that will help reduce the amount of food waste along the food supply chain [ 35 , 36 ]. Cooper and Ellram [ 37 ] argued that building a resilient supply chain has many advantages such as decreasing inventory time, which will lead to cost and time savings, increasing the availability of goods, reducing the order cycle time, improving customer service and satisfaction, and gaining a competitive advantage. Stone and Rahimifard [ 38 ] stressed the importance of having a resilient agricultural food supply chain to achieve food security due to the incremental increase in volatility across the supply chain.

The research string “Food Safety” OR “Food diversity” OR “Food quality” OR “Food standards” OR “Micronutrient availability” was added due to one of the food security dimensions: utilization, which is concerned with all aspects of food safety, and nutrition quality [ 39 ]. According to FAO (2019), the utilization dimension should assess food diversity, food safety, food standards, and micronutrient availability. It is inadequate to provide enough food to someone unable to benefit from it because they are constantly sick due to a lack of sanitary conditions. It indicates that in the country, individuals are taking advantage of the food they receive or have access to, with extra emphasis on the dietary quality that contains nutritious ingredients such as vitamins (vitamin-A) and minerals (Iron, Zinc, Iodine) [ 40 ]. According to the World Health Organization, people diagnosed with malnutrition usually suffer from micronutrient deficiencies, protein deficiency, obesity, or undernutrition. The lack of micro-ingredients can increase the risk of developing severe chronic and infectious diseases for people in general and children in particular (toddlers 9–24 months). These diseases have an irreversible negative impact on people’s health, which enhances the persistence of poverty and food insecurity. It is critical to invest in the health and nutrition elements on a global scale by ensuring safe drinking water, immunization, enhancing sewage discharge, improving public health services, and reducing poverty levels [ 41 ].

The research string “Agricultural infrastructure” OR “Agricultural production volatility” OR “Vulnerability assessment” was chosen because much research has emphasized the importance of investing in a strong agricultural infrastructure to improve food security levels, especially in light of current challenges such as climate change, increased urbanization, water scarcity, and the shift away from using cropland for non-agricultural activities [ 7 , 8 , 41 ]. Food security is vulnerable to severe weather conditions, whereas harsh weather conditions may adversely impact the food supply chain in weak areas [ 31 , 32 ]. Therefore, it is critical to assess the vulnerability level of each country to protect the food supply chain. The use of the “Food loss” OR “Food waste” OR “Food waste and loss” research string was due to the general agreement among researchers on the importance of reducing food waste to improve food security [ 35 , 42 , 43 ]. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (2013), around one-third of the food produced globally (1.3 billion tons) is wasted or lost. Most wasted food is either fresh and perishable or leftovers from eating and cooking [ 36 , 42 ]. Basher, Raboy [ 43 ] argued that eliminating just one-fourth of the food waste would be enough to feed all the currently undernourished people. One of the Sustainable Development Goals established by the United Nations, “SDG 12.3 Food Waste Index” stresses that decreasing the amount of food loss and waste will help reduce hunger levels, promote sustainable production and consumption, and enhance food security [ 44 ].

The use of “Policy description” OR “Policy assessment” OR “Policy recommendation” OR “Policymaking” OR “Policy-making” OR “Policy making” research string was due to the impact of adequate and proper policy formulation on food security ( Table 1 ). Establishing effective and efficient food policies that ensure that each individual has an optimal level of food security is critical in every country because it directly enhances the country’s competitive advantage and efficiency [ 34 , 45 ]. Timmer [ 46 ] emphasized that designing the proper set of policies to end hunger based on each country’s context is challenging and requires collaborative participation from multiple stakeholders. Murti Mulyo Aji [ 34 ] stressed the role of the government’s policies in developing a collaborative supply chain that creates value throughout the supply chain by improving information, logistics, and relationship management. Effective and efficient supply chain management significantly impacts managing long-term partnerships and corporations among a wide range of firms that vary in size and sectors (public or private). This collaboration will enhance prediction of changes in customer demands in domestic and international markets. If previous policies were insufficient to ensure that country’s true competitive advantage, it could cause market distortion [ 34 , 47 ]. Countries are encouraged to gradually reduce the adoption of inequitable trade policies to focus on enhancing their true competitive advantage, demonstrating fair competition, and increasing economic efficiency, particularly in the spirit of trade liberalization [ 34 ].

The selection of research sources was accomplished in March 2021, and the search for keywords was enabled for titles, abstracts, and full texts in both electronic search engines (i.e., Scopus and WOS). Several keywords were identified to retrieve the available literature, and search strings consisted of primary and secondary keywords. The primary search string used was as follows: “food security” OR “food insecurity” OR “food availability” OR “food affordability” OR “food access” OR “food utilization” OR “food stability”. The reason behind including these multiple strings was to cover the maximum number of articles that handle the topic of food security or any of its four dimensions.

Specific exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied in order to develop high-quality evidence [ 26 ]. A reasonable number of articles were limited for deep analysis by following the specific exclusion and inclusion criteria to control the quality of the review in the food security field, as detailed in Table 2 above. Only peer-reviewed journal articles were included within the time frame (2010–15 March 2021) and only those written in English. Furthermore, due to this study’s nature and to ensure consistency with the topic area, the most common and effective approach for examining drivers and recommended policies were limited to the business, management, accounting, and agricultural fields [ 48 ]. We have used the “business, management and accounting” research field in the Scopus database to ensure that all the included articles were business-related. Then, we restricted the research field to” Economics, business, and agriculture Economics” in the WoS database to ensure the inclusion of agriculture-related papers and maximize the inclusion of a diverse range of articles. Another round of retrieval was applied using a set of secondary keywords in order to narrow down the search to specific areas of food security. For this purpose, the primary keywords were escorted each time with “AND” and other secondary keywords, as listed in Table 2 .

Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The initial search using the primary keywords (“food security” OR “food insecurity” OR “food availability” OR “food affordability” OR “food access” OR “food utilization” OR “food stability”) revealed a total of 113,709 documents (Scopus, n = 63,860; WOS, n = 49,849). Strict selection criteria were applied to the first search pool in order to maintain transparency and guarantee the selection of relevant material that answers the research questions. To ensure academic rigor, the search was restricted to including only peer-reviewed publications [ 49 ] (Scopus, n = 47,673; WOS, n = 40,305). The research was then restricted by publication date to between 2010 and 15 March 2021 (Scopus, n = 34,789; WOS, n = 31,278). Only journal articles published in English were selected (Scopus, n = 33,292; WOS, n = 30,313). Then, advanced research was conducted by combining the primary keywords with one of the secondary keywords. The results and the number of articles identified in each search step are detailed in Figure 1 . After removing duplicate articles from each database, a total of 281 journal articles (Scopus, n = 140; WOS, n = 141) were revealed. After combining both databases, 248 journal articles were obtained. These collected 248 journal articles were scanned by reading their abstracts in order to check their applicability to answering the research questions. At this point, 107 articles were excluded as they were considered irrelevant and outside the scope of the research. Finally, the total number of extracted articles was 141, as can be seen in Figure 1 . Data extraction and analysis were performed by a single reviewer (SW), and all extracted data and revealed results were double-checked by three researchers (FA, IM, and BS) to enhance the research and reduce bias in study selection. A complete description of the validity threats (Construct, Internal, External, and Conclusion Validity) following the validation process of Zhou, Jin [ 50 ] is provided in detail in Table 3 .

Research protocol following the PRISMA guidelines.

A reporting of validity threats in this systematic literature review.

Among the selected 141 articles, 28 (19.86%) were published in the Journal of Cleaner Production , 20 (14.18%) were published in Food Policy , and 5 (3.55%) were published in Quality-Access to Success . The rest of the journal names are visualized in Figure 2 .

The most popular journals publishing the 141 included articles. Others denotes journals that were cited once or twice.

After the 141 articles have been extracted, they were analyzed and summarized individually by listing all the discussed food security drivers, as well as the recommended policies for the improvement of food security and sustainable food production. Then, we synthesized the extracted information from all sources in order to identify the gaps, list the similarities between all the resources, and extract significant insights regarding the main drivers of food security and the recommended policies [ 26 ].

3.1. The Major Drivers of Food Security

Analysis of the retrieved literature revealed 34 different drivers of food security, as visualized in Figure 3 . Detailed information, along with a full citation list for all the drivers, is provided in Appendix A .

Summary of the major drivers of food security.

Most papers discussed food loss and waste (FLW) and emphasized its impact on food security [ 6 , 19 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 ]. Around one-third of the food produced globally (1.3 million tons) is wasted or lost [ 96 ]. Basher, Raboy [ 43 ] has argued that, if we could save just one-fourth of the wasted food, it would be enough to feed all the world’s undernourished people, contributing positively to FS. The previous finding supports our research findings that FLW is the primary driver of FS. To reduce FLW, Halloran, Clement [ 6 ] has argued that effective communication, more efficient food packaging, and a better consumer understanding of food packaging could lead to solutions. To decrease food loss, Garcia-Herrero, Hoehn [ 62 ] has suggested improving food labelling, enhancing consumer planning, and developing technological advances in packaging and shelf life for perishable products. Morone, Falcone [ 83 ] has suggested the repetition of large-scale research to help define a set of policies encouraging the transition to a new model for consumption that promotes sustainably procured food and dramatically reduces the amount of waste (more details are provided in Section 3.2 ).

Additionally, several authors have considered food security policy (FSP) as a driver of food security in its different forms [ 56 , 63 , 65 , 69 , 70 , 74 , 79 , 85 , 94 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 ]. The primary goal of establishing food security policies that consider the factors influencing individuals and groups is to reduce poverty and eliminate hunger. One example is safety-net programs or public food assistance programs (FAPs). The main goal of providing safety-net programs is to increase food consumption among poor people and improve food security [ 102 ].

Many papers have discussed the importance of technological advancement as an enabler of food security [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 63 , 69 , 71 , 74 , 77 , 85 , 90 , 94 , 95 , 109 , 116 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 ]. The use of technology to promote behavioral changes has increasingly become a vital instrument to reduce food waste and indirectly improve food security [ 130 ]. Mobile applications offer households helpful guidance on increasing shelf life and experimenting with dishes using leftovers [ 58 ]. Shukla, Singh [ 130 ] has elaborated that, at present, farmers have access to mobile applications that provide them with reasonably and timely priced information.

Some authors have discussed sustainable agricultural development and practices as enablers of food security [ 56 , 57 , 59 , 64 , 71 , 73 , 94 , 97 , 105 , 109 , 111 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 124 , 130 , 132 , 134 , 136 , 137 , 139 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 ]. Some authors have discussed local production enhancement as a driver of food security to enhance the self-reliance of countries [ 57 , 69 , 85 , 87 , 89 , 94 , 98 , 103 , 105 , 109 , 112 , 117 , 120 , 134 , 137 , 144 , 148 , 149 ]. For example, Ahmed, Begum [ 98 ] has emphasized how, following the GCC ban, Qatar took several successful steps to foster local production, support domestic businesses, and promote the consumption of locally produced food by its citizens. Some authors have argued that building the capacities of small farmers is essential to achieving FS. Education policies are critical for educating farmers, building their capacities, and increasing their human capital; moreover, educational programs should also include food preparation and health education programs in order to ensure the safety of consumed food [ 101 ].

The government’s role in managing a country’s agriculture can also be seen as a driver of food security [ 67 , 75 , 84 , 86 , 100 , 109 , 116 , 117 , 119 , 121 , 137 , 138 , 147 , 150 , 151 , 152 ], as it is responsible for various aspects such as designing, testing, and implementing the right policies to ensure the welfare of its citizens, while providing the necessary assistance to small-scale farmers and ensuring their safety and security in all aspects of life. Governments in developing nations must focus on R&D, agriculture infrastructure (e.g., technologies for irrigation and soil preservation), expansion services, early warning systems, or subsidized farm income in order to alter the production function of the population [ 101 ].

Many authors have discussed the importance of food safety policies as an enabler of food security [ 61 , 64 , 69 , 103 , 105 , 111 , 112 , 129 , 149 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 ]. Food safety policies include food and water safety at several points throughout the supply chain where food-borne diseases might develop [ 69 ]. Environmental policies are also seen as a fundamental enabler of food security [ 59 , 73 , 121 , 124 , 130 , 135 , 139 , 147 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 ]. Regardless of the various approaches discussed by the authors, they all agreed that environmental protection would help to ensure food availability for current and future generations. According to some authors, trade policies [ 69 , 94 , 95 , 103 , 111 , 112 , 114 , 123 , 129 , 141 , 146 , 161 , 164 ] and import policies [ 69 , 95 , 100 , 103 , 120 , 124 , 126 , 129 , 146 ] are enablers of food security. Regulating international trade can help to ensure food security. Lowering trade barriers, for example, has been proposed as a way to mitigate the adverse effects of market regulation caused by climate change [ 141 ].

Many authors have recognized policies that promote consumer education on sustainable consumption and increase consumer awareness and knowledge of the environmental impact of their purchases as a driver of food security [ 52 , 60 , 67 , 69 , 86 , 133 , 144 , 151 , 163 , 165 , 166 , 167 ]. Others have stressed proper communication among all stakeholders as a driver of food security [ 6 , 56 , 68 , 69 , 84 , 92 , 129 , 130 , 156 , 157 , 168 ]. Some authors have considered risk management as an enabler of food security [ 94 , 117 , 118 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 145 , 154 , 155 , 157 ]. For example, the aims of building a disaster risk reduction framework in the Pacific include boosting resilience, protecting investments (e.g., in infrastructure, operations, and FS), and decreasing poverty and hunger [ 169 ].

Some authors have proposed the effective gleaning process as a driver of food security [ 70 , 72 , 74 , 80 , 84 , 92 , 142 , 170 ]. Gleaning is the collection of the remaining crops in agricultural fields after their commercial harvest, or just in crop fields where their harvest is not cost-effective. Some old cultures have fostered gleaning as an early form of social assistance [ 80 ]. Some authors have considered the management of government food reserves to be a food security driver [ 64 , 104 , 112 , 117 , 118 , 124 , 136 ]. Despite the high cost of storing food, any country must maintain adequate food reserves to serve the country in case of a crisis scenario [ 171 ]. Some authors have considered integrative policies (i.e., food–water–energy, food–energy, or water–food) as a driver of food security due to their impact on environmental improvement through natural resource handling efficiency [ 56 , 73 , 133 , 139 , 172 , 173 ]. Some authors have considered establishing dietary standard policies as an enabler of food security [ 69 , 151 , 163 , 174 ]. The government should impose policies on healthy food consumption to prevent obesity, such as prohibiting trans-fats. Moreover, they should restrict trans-fat usage in food outlets, establish institutional food standards, implement menu labelling regulations for chain restaurants, and ensure that disadvantaged people have better access to healthy meals [ 151 ].

Authors have highlighted various additional arguments or policies that are considered drivers for FS such as establishing public programs to influence diets in a healthy manner, reducing yield volatility [ 85 , 94 , 105 , 119 , 124 , 126 , 175 ], the country’s natural resources [ 85 , 105 , 119 , 124 , 137 , 145 , 162 , 163 , 176 ], geopolitical and political stability [ 69 , 98 , 104 , 117 , 123 , 124 , 142 ], agricultural infrastructure [ 64 , 114 , 116 , 118 , 142 , 146 , 175 ], food distribution infrastructure [ 71 , 75 , 76 , 112 , 177 , 178 ], economic integration [ 109 , 112 , 123 , 179 , 180 ], collaboration among all supply chain stakeholders [ 75 , 130 , 134 , 157 ], proper measurement of food security dimensions [ 123 , 181 , 182 , 183 ], urban agriculture policies [ 56 , 147 , 148 ], adjustments in dietary structure [ 59 , 86 , 163 ], establishing employment programs for poor household representatives [ 110 , 152 ], customer engagement in designing public policies [ 158 ], and trust in public institutions [ 166 ].

3.2. The Recommended Policies to Alleviate the Food Insecurity

Analysis of the 141 retrieved papers revealed 17 major recommended policies, as visualized in Figure 4 . We also determined sub-policies under each category which were grouped based on common characteristics, relevance, and how they were categorized in the papers. The complete list of sub-policy categories and related references is provided in Appendix B .

The main 17 recommended policies and statistics.

Most authors recommended establishing FSP, in general, as a primary solution for food insecurity in developing and developed countries [ 56 , 57 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 69 , 81 , 85 , 87 , 89 , 91 , 94 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 126 , 127 , 130 , 131 , 133 , 134 , 137 , 142 , 144 , 145 , 148 , 149 , 151 , 152 , 175 , 177 , 180 , 182 , 184 , 185 ]. Many authors have suggested food consumption policies that offer safety-net programs or public food assistance programs (FAPs) such as food price subsidies, cash-based programs, structural pricing adjustments, or micro-credits as enablers of FS. The main goal of providing safety-net programs is to increase food consumption among poor people and improve food security [ 102 ]. Given the solid bidirectional causal link between poverty and malnutrition, FAPs have been recognized as critical components of the overall poverty reduction strategy. Food aid policies and initiatives can fill the gaps left by the for-profit food system and the informal (non-profit) social safety nets, ensuring food security for disadvantaged individuals, families, and communities [ 108 ]. Several authors have recommended establishing policies to enhance the performance and asset bases of small-scale farmers, such as loans, subsidies, access to information, and knowledge-sharing, to address food insecurity. Governments should adopt direct interventions such as structural price adjustments and targeted food subsidies to enhance the food access of farmers by lowering market prices and stabilizing consumption during high food price inflation [ 116 ]. Others have recommended establishing government input subsidy programs (input subsidy policies) that provide farmers with subsidies for investment into high-yielding technology (e.g., automation, fertilizers, high-yield seed). They all claimed this as an effective policy instrument for agricultural development, but each focused on a different mechanism. Shukla, Singh [ 130 ], for example, has discussed public distribution programs; Sinyolo [ 131 ] has emphasized policies aimed at increasing the amount of land planted with enhanced maize varieties among smallholder farmers; Wiebelt, Breisinger [ 124 ] has suggested investments in water-saving technologies, while Tokhayeva, Almukhambetova [ 137 ] have proposed the development of an agricultural innovation system. Others have recommended rural development policies to reduce yield volatility and improve the agricultural infrastructure (e.g., irrigation and water-saving technologies). Governments in developing nations must focus on R&D, agricultural infrastructure (technologies for irrigation and soil preservation), expansion services, and early warning systems [ 101 ]. Technological advancement, in general, is seen as a vital element in reducing yield volatility [ 85 ]. Capacity-building policies (e.g., educational, training, and technical support) have received considerable attention in the literature as a fundamental component of urban farming initiatives, and as attempts to promote self-reliance and networking. Capacity building in many areas connected to urban agriculture is essential for equipping residents with knowledge and expertise [ 148 ]. To enhance FS, some researchers have suggested policies supporting locally produced food, diversified agricultural production policies, policies that impact farm-level commodity pricing, food stock policies, establishing policies to increase the income of farmers, buffer stock policies, and resource allocation policies (for a complete list of references, see Appendix B ).

Many authors have proposed different policy recommendations to reduce food waste and, thus, food insecurity [ 6 , 19 , 51 , 52 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 103 , 130 , 138 , 144 , 150 , 160 , 167 , 168 , 170 , 177 ]. Many have agreed on the importance of policies that promote information and education campaigns that spread awareness at household and public levels by improving meal planning and management in consumers. However, each author suggested a different approach. For example, Schanes, Dobernig [ 58 ] have discussed face-to-face door-stepping campaigns (online and in traditional newspaper leaflets), word-of-mouth, and television shows or movies. However, Septianto, Kemper [ 66 ] have highlighted the importance of social marketing campaign design and framing (having vs. not having) in conveying the intended message to consumers. Tucho and Okoth [ 73 ] have asserted the advantages of producing bio-wastes and bio-fertilizers from food waste and human excreta (in a food–energy–sanitation nexus approach), and also advocated for educating families on how to do so at the household level. Xu, Zhang [ 86 ] has argued that governments should help society to develop a logical perspective on food consumption and aggressively promote the habit of eating simple meals, particularly in social catering. Von Kameke and Fischer [ 52 ] and Zorpas, Lasaridi [ 60 ] have emphasized the importance of teaching customers about efficient meal planning to reduce food waste. Von Kameke and Fischer [ 52 ] have proposed using the Nudging tool rather than campaigning. Xu, Zhang [ 86 ] have suggested initiating suitable policy instruments to nudge individuals to adopt sustainable consumption habits, with important implications for decreasing food waste and increasing food security in China. Smart (innovative) food packaging and labelling policies have received significant attention in the literature, as they are critical in reducing food waste and, thus, improving FS. The nature, size, and labelling of the packaging impact the lifetime of the food. Smart packaging innovations and new technologies are steadily penetrating markets, thus increasing the shelf-life of foods through enhanced protection, communication, convenience, and control [ 58 ].

Food banks, food sharing, and food rescue policies have also received significant attention in the global literature, as they help reduce food waste and improve FS. Food banking is a critical long-term rescue policy for re-distributing surplus food to those in need and reducing poverty and food insecurity [ 80 , 92 ]. Several authors have recommended positive sanctions such as financial rewards, tax credits, federal and state funding, vouchers, or reduced taxes to decrease food waste and improve FS. Positive sanctions consist mainly of financial incentives to encourage restaurants and grocery retailers to donate their leftover food [ 60 ]. Addressing liability concerns might be one incentive, as the research participants have highlighted this as a universal barrier and that this issue, in particular, must be handled [ 51 ]. Negative sanction policies have received considerable attention in the literature as a tool for reducing food waste and improving FS. These include fines and fees imposed on companies and individuals accountable for food waste [ 58 ]. Taxes and fines are a potential way to manage and motivate restaurants and retailers to donate their leftover food to charities and community centers [ 65 ].

The establishment of policies that regulate the sharing of information and knowledge among supply chain stakeholders has received some attention in the literature in terms of reducing food waste and improving food security. Comprehensive food waste legislation has been discussed as a potential enabler of food security. A possible regulatory tool would be to revise and remove unnecessary food safety requirements that result in excessive food waste levels [ 58 ]. According to Halloran, Clement [ 6 ], food waste increased due to European food safety regulations and standardization. Food waste recycling policies have been used as a method to reduce food waste. Food waste can be utilized for value generation at any point of the food supply chain process through efficient techniques, then reincorporated into the cycle [ 77 ]. Food waste has a long history as a source of ecologically friendly animal feed [ 61 ].

A few authors have highlighted the impact of technological advancement (e.g., mobile applications) as a strategy to reduce food waste. Some authors have proposed implementing gleaning operation policies that provide tax incentives and government assistance to gleaners in order to decrease food waste. Some authors have proposed implementing peak storage reduction policies, such as stock-holding incentives. Nudging tools (which nudge people toward forming sustainable consumption behaviors) have been mentioned by a few authors.

Food safety policies received significant attention in the retrieved literature [ 61 , 64 , 69 , 70 , 103 , 105 , 111 , 112 , 120 , 125 , 129 , 130 , 137 , 138 , 149 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 ]; however, they have been discussed in various different forms. Few authors have discussed food quality and food hygiene compliance certifications. Compliance with sanitary standards is required to maintain the best practices for preventing food-borne diseases and food security threats [ 155 ]. Other authors have discussed the importance of food safety standards. Meanwhile, few authors have emphasized the importance of food safety throughout the supply chain, but each proposed a different strategy to achieve it. For example, some authors have suggested using an effective IT system [ 130 ], RFID [ 138 ], or developing food safety training policies [ 155 ].

Many authors have advocated for the implementation of trade policies to address food insecurity in developing and developed countries [ 94 , 95 , 101 , 103 , 111 , 112 , 119 , 123 , 129 , 136 , 141 , 146 , 148 , 149 , 152 , 157 , 161 , 164 , 178 , 180 ], but in different contexts. For example, some have suggested establishing infrastructure development policies that target agricultural logistic infrastructure, or improving the speed and quality of shipping logistics. In contrast, some authors have agreed on the importance of state trading and private trade-supporting policies. Others have suggested the removal of tariff and non-tariff barriers, while a few authors recommended reliable marine connection and transportation logistics policies.

Environmental policies are a fundamental enabler of food security [ 59 , 73 , 94 , 120 , 121 , 124 , 130 , 135 , 139 , 141 , 145 , 147 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 166 ]. However, authors have focused on many different aspects of these policies. Some authors, for example, have emphasized the importance of establishing policies to mitigate the effects of climate change. Others were too specific, suggesting greenhouse gas reduction policies, and proposed penalizing non-compliance. Due to the strong links between climate change, poverty, and food insecurity, some authors have proposed establishing coordinating policies among the three. Other authors have stressed the consideration of policies that encourage the optimization of fertilizer use.

Many authors have considered food import policies as a solution to food insecurity [ 94 , 95 , 100 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 109 , 112 , 116 , 117 , 119 , 120 , 124 , 126 , 134 , 146 ]; however, most authors provided different opinions regarding the most effective policy to implement. For example, some authors have stressed the importance of policies that provide direct government financial assistance to local agriculture, or the importance of policies that sustain local agricultural product prices compared to imported products. Some have recommended providing temporary tax benefits for agricultural investment, while others recommended import ban (substitution) policies. A few authors have recommended direct budget subsidies, subsidized loan interest rates, and strategies for the diversification of imported food origin.

Many authors have discussed the importance of establishing a common agricultural policy (CAP) to address sustainable agriculture [ 56 , 57 , 64 , 89 , 109 , 111 , 118 , 119 , 132 , 142 , 143 , 149 , 161 , 172 , 184 , 186 ]. Others have stressed the importance of food surplus policies in enhancing a country’s food security status [ 51 , 58 , 70 , 72 , 75 , 76 , 79 , 82 , 84 , 90 , 91 ]. Some authors have suggested strategies to regulate a company’s liability regarding the donation of surplus food. A few authors have proposed food policies that subsidize the purchase of surplus food—also known as “ugly food”—by controlling for prices and surplus item characteristics. Some authors have suggested establishing food loss policies. However, few authors have specified the need for policies promoting food loss quantification.

Many authors have discussed the policies that promote traceability across the whole supply chain as an enabler for food security [ 56 , 69 , 103 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 137 , 138 , 168 , 178 ]. However, the different authors discussed different technologies such as investment into information technology such as RFID, effective IT systems, ICT systems, and blockchain technology. Government policies should promote investments into traceability systems that focus on rapid withdrawal in unsafe food scenarios such as product recall regulations, fines imposed on hazardous product distributors, and food-borne food risk monitoring [ 129 ]. Many authors have discussed various risk management strategies to improve a country’s food security [ 94 , 117 , 118 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 145 , 154 , 155 , 157 ]. However, each considered a different approach to overcome the risk. Specifically, they have discussed food scandal policies, the COVID-19 pandemic, programmed risk identification, proactive policy measures to handle flood crises, early warning systems for natural disasters, or risk management throughout the food supply chain. Some authors have highlighted water quality policies such as efficient water-use policies, improving water resources policies, using water-efficient crops, investments into water-saving technologies, and food and water safety throughout the supply chain.

Some authors have discussed the management of government food reserves as an enabler of food security [ 64 , 104 , 112 , 117 , 118 , 124 , 136 ], and others have discussed integrative and coherent policies between food, water, and energy (as a nexus) [ 56 , 73 , 133 , 139 , 172 , 173 ]. Meanwhile, other authors have discussed policies that promote consumer education on sustainable consumption, improving consumer status awareness and knowledge regarding the ecological impact of their purchases [ 60 , 69 , 133 , 144 , 163 , 165 ]. Few authors have addressed the importance of dietary standard policies [ 69 , 151 , 163 , 174 ], urban agriculture policies [ 56 , 147 , 148 ], and food-aid policies [ 118 , 150 ].

Some policies were suggested in one paper only such as devising the right population policy in China [ 85 ], flexible retail modernization policies [ 158 ], policies that facilitate short-term migration [ 187 ], policies to stimulate equitable economic growth through manufacturing and services [ 95 ], and sound research governance policies [ 140 ].

4. Discussion

In this section, we discuss the polices and drivers in the greater areas, then compare them based on specific contexts. This approach serves to provide better understanding, thus informing decision-makers about the importance of choosing the right policies through considering many food security dimensions. By looking deeply at the extracted food security drivers and policies and the way in which they can be applied to each country’s context, we take an example from the MENA region. The MENA region includes a diverse range of nations, including low-income and less-developed (e.g., Sudan, Syria, and Yemen), low–middle-income (e.g., Algeria, Egypt, Iran, Morocco, and Tunisia), upper middle-income (e.g., Jordan, Lebanon, and Libya), and high-income (e.g., the UAE, Qatar, Oman, Bahrain, Israel, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia) countries [ 126 ]. As food availability is a serious problem in the MENA region low-income countries (Syria and Yemen), due to war and violent conflicts [ 188 ], policies aimed at increasing food availability continue to pique the interest of policy-makers. In these countries, where citizens are incapable of fulfilling their basic food needs [ 189 ], the existence of food security policies in different forms is crucial for achieving food security [ 53 , 97 , 98 , 124 , 184 ], more than FLW policies. Policy-makers should focus on ensuring the availability of either locally produced or imported food, which requires appropriate trade policies to deal with food shortages and improve the availability dimension in these countries. Trade policies should focus on creating infrastructure development policies that target agricultural logistic infrastructure, improve the speed and quality of shipping logistics, and establish reliable marine connections and transportation logistics policies that remove tariff and non-tariff barriers.

Policy-makers should establish import policies that sustain local agricultural product prices compared to imported products, provide direct government financial assistance to local agriculture, and provide temporary tax benefits for agricultural investment.

Additionally, the governments should improve food access in the MENA region low-income countries by reducing or stabilizing consumer and producer food prices. To enhance food access, FSPs (e.g., education policies in general and capacity-building policies) may help to improve individual human capital. Governments also must provide supplemental feeding programs, typically targeting vulnerable groups in need of special diets, such as pregnant women and children [ 101 ].

Moreover, the government should improve credit access through the following means: policies that enhance the performance and asset base of small-scale farmers; the existence of policies that impact farm-level commodity pricing, thus retaining farmers and increasing local production; the existence of government input subsidy programs for individuals, and the existence of policies supporting locally produced food. These are all possible policies to improve the MENA region FS. Governments and global health organizations should promote food utilization in MENA low-income countries through the development of policies that monitor overall food quality, such as access to clean water and micronutrient fortification, or through individual educational programs on safe food preparation [ 155 ]. Finally, enhancing food quality can optimize the individual nutrient absorption [ 101 ].

In contrast, discussions of food security in the MENA region high-income countries have indicated that food availability, access, and utilization are generally higher and not a problem. However, food stability is low, which requires the attention of policy-makers to improve FS. Food stability impacts the other food security pillars (access, availability, and utilization). Moreover, it requires the economic, political, and social sustainability of food systems, which are vulnerable to environmental conditions, land distribution, available resources, conflicts, and political situations [ 190 ]. Food stability necessitates increased efforts and expenditures to achieve food security in the sustainable development goals, especially in light of increased academic and governmental interest in incorporating sustainability values into policies.

As food waste is prevalent in these countries, FLW policies are more critical than FSP, which is in alignment with our findings regarding food security drivers. FLW makes it difficult for the poor in developing countries to access food by significantly depleting natural resources such as land, water, and fossil fuels while raising the greenhouse gas emissions related to food production [ 115 ]. Addressing food loss and waste in these countries can hugely influence the reduction of wasted food and indirectly enhance food security. The number of food-insecure individuals may be reduced in developing regions by up to 63 million by reducing food loss, which will directly reduce the over-consumption of cultivated areas, water, and greenhouse gas emissions related to food production [ 115 ]. According to Abiad and Meho [ 189 ], food waste produced at the household level differs across MENA-region countries. For example, it ranges from 68 to 150 kg/individual/year in Oman, 62–76 kg/individual/year in Iraq, 194–230 kg/individual/year in Palestine, and 177–400 kg/individual/year in the UAE. It is critical to take more aggressive but scientifically sound initiatives to minimize FLW, which will require the participation of everyone involved in the food supply chain such as policy-makers, food producers and suppliers, and the final consumers [ 191 , 192 ]. Food waste reflects an inefficient usage of valuable agricultural input resources and contributes to unnecessary environmental depletion [ 191 , 193 ]. Furthermore, food loss is widely recognized as a major obstacle to environmental sustainability and food security in developing nations [ 194 ]. Preventing FLW can result in a much more environmentally sustainable agricultural production and consumption process by increasing the efficiency and productivity of resources, especially water, cropland, and nutrients [ 115 , 191 , 192 , 195 ]. Preventing FLW is crucial in areas where water scarcity is a prevalent concern, as irrigated agriculture makes up a sizeable portion of total food production, and yield potential may not be fully achieved under nutrient or water shortages [ 191 , 196 , 197 ]. According to the study of Chen, Chaudhary [ 197 ], food waste per capita in high-income countries is enough to feed one individual a healthy balanced diet for 18 days. Chen, Chaudhary [ 197 ] also found that high-income countries have embedded environmental effects that are ten times greater than those of low-income countries, and they tend to waste six times more food by weight than low-income countries. Consequently, implementing proper FLW policies in high-income countries can help to alleviate the food insecurity problem while maintaining the economic, social, and environmental sustainability of future food production.

Implementing effective food storage techniques and capacities is considered a key component of a comprehensive national food security plan to promote both food utilization and food stability; furthermore, proper food storage at the household level maintains food products for a more prolonged period [ 198 ]. Encouragement of economic integration between MENA region countries is very applicable considering the heterogeneity of these countries. For example, countries with limited arable land and high income, such as the UAE and Saudi Arabia, can invest in countries with a lower middle income, such as Egypt, and use its land to benefit both countries. On the other hand, Boratynska and Huseynov [ 101 ] have proposed food technology innovation as a sustainable driver of food security and a promising solution to the problem of food insecurity in developing countries. Due to the higher food production demand to support the expanding urban population while having limited water and land availability, higher investments in technology and innovation are needed to ensure that food systems are more resilient [ 190 ]. Boratynska and Huseynov [ 101 ] have argued that, in general, using innovative technologies to produce healthy food products is frequently a concern. However, improving the probability that innovative food technology will enable the production of a diverse range of food products with enhanced texture and flavor while also providing a variety of health advantages to the final consumer is essential. Jalava, Guillaume [ 193 ] have argued that, along with reducing FLW, shifting people’s diets from animal- to plant-based foods can help to slow environmental degradation.

The MENA region example described above can be adapted to different regions based on their food security situation, and relevant policies can be devised to improve food security more sustainably.

5. Conclusions

Food security is a complicated and multi-faceted issue that cannot be restricted to a single variable, necessitating the deeper integration of many disciplinary viewpoints. It is essential to admit the complexity of designing the right policy to improve food security that matches each country’s context [ 46 ] while considering the three pillars of sustainability. Furthermore, it is of utmost importance to implement climate-friendly agricultural production methods to combat food insecurity and climate change [ 12 ]. Mapping the determinants of food security contributes to better understanding of the issue and aids in developing appropriate food security policies to enhance environmental, social, and economic sustainability.

This research contributes to the body of knowledge by summarizing the main recommended policies and drivers of food security detailed in 141 research articles, following a systematic literature review methodology. We identified 34 food security drivers and outlined 17 recommended policies to improve food security and contribute to sustainable food production. Regarding the drivers, one of the foremost priorities to drive food security is reducing FLW globally, followed by food security policies, technological advancement, sustainable agricultural development, and so on (see Appendix A ). Regarding the recommended policies, most studies have detailed the contents and impacts of food security policies, food waste policies, food safety policies, trade policies, environmental policies, import policies, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), food surplus policies, and so on (see Appendix B ).

5.1. Policy Implications

We assessed the obtained results in comparison to the latest version of the GFSI. Using the GFSI (2021) indicators as a proxy resulted in the identification of gaps and specific policy implications of the results. The idea was to identify which of the policies and drivers have been already implemented and which have not (or, at least, have not been very successfully implemented). We used the GFSI as it is a very well-established benchmarking tool used globally by 113 countries to measure the food security level. We examined the indicators mentioned under each of the four dimensions of food security, and listed associations with the identified policies and drivers found in the literature. Accordingly, we suggest the addition of two dimensions to the current index:

• Sustainability

The first dimension relates to measuring the sustainability dimensions that each participating country adopts in its food production process. We noticed that many authors stressed the importance of the existence of clear environmental policies that drive long-term food security. However, the current GFSI lacks indicators measuring this dimension. The reviewed literature suggested environmental indicators considering optimized fertilizer use, carbon taxes, aquaculture environment, bio-energy, green and blue infrastructure, gas emissions reduction policies, policies to reduce the impacts of climate change, and heavy metal soil contamination monitoring.

• Consumer representation

The second dimension is related to consumer voice representation within the GFSI. The reviewed literature suggested implementing policy measures that promote consumer education on sustainable consumption and improve the consumer status, consciousness, and knowledge regarding the ecological impact of their purchases. Any sustainability initiative should be supported and implemented by the final consumer.

Additional gaps in the policies and drivers of food security were identified and allocated under the relevant indicators in the GFSI based on the four dimensions of food security. Under the affordability dimension, we found a lack of policies in the reviewed literature addressing the Inequality-adjusted income index. Regarding the Change in average food costs indicator, we observed that the policies that exist in the literature concern the farmer level only (e.g., policies that impact farm-level commodity pricing and policies supporting locally produced food), and not all of the citizens at the national level. Additionally, policies that promote traceability across the whole supply chain were missing. There were no policies in the reviewed literature under the food quality and safety dimension representing the following: the dietary diversity indicator; micronutrient availability (e.g., dietary availability of vitamin A, iron, and zinc); regulation of the protein quality indicator; the food safety indicator (specifically the two sub-indicators of food safety mechanisms and access to drinking water), and illustration of the national nutrition plan or strategy indicator. Therefore, future research should pay more attention to and emphasize the importance of such policies, particularly in developed countries seeking to improve their food security status and score high on the GFSI.

Moreover, the reviewed literature suggested “developing food safety training policies” to improve food safety and FS; however, no indicators or sub-indicators within the GFSI represent such training policies. The GFSI developers should pay more attention to safety training practices and include them in the index’s future development. Under the availability dimension, the reviewed literature suggested establishing a food loss policy that promotes the quantification of food loss under the food loss indicator. This indicator should be enhanced through well-articulated policies that address the problem of food loss and attempt to mitigate its impact. However, while there were various policies concerning food waste or surplus, there were no indicators within the GFSI that represented food loss. As food loss and waste was identified as the primary driver of food security in this study, we recommend expanding the GFSI to include food loss quantification and reduction policies under the availability dimension. Finally, under the political commitment to adaptation dimension, some policies were identified in the reviewed literature in two sub-indicators: early warning measures/climate-smart agriculture (e.g., proactive policy measures to handle flood crises, programmed risk identification, and early warning systems for natural disasters) and disaster risk management (e.g., food scandals, COVID-19, and risk management throughout the food supply chain). However, under the other two relevant sub-indicators—commitment to managing exposure and national agricultural adaptation policy—there were no identified policies.

5.2. Contributions of the Study

The key contributions of this study to the existing literature are threefold. First, we identified the (34) main food security drivers and the (17) most-recommended policies to improve food security and enhance the future food production sustainability. Several studies have partially covered this area, but none have employed a systematic literature review of 141 papers covering such an scope in this topic. The gravity of food security worldwide is well established; hence the contribution of this work. Second, we provide a reflection of policies/drivers on the latest version of the GFSI, resulting in more tangible policy implications (see Section 5.1 ). Third, through a systematic literature review, we identified elements not listed under the GFSI that could be considered in its future revision. Examples include environmental policies/indicators such as optimized fertilizer use, carbon taxes, aquaculture environment, bio-energy, green and blue infrastructure, gas emission reduction, policies to reduce the impact of climate change, and heavy metal soil contamination monitoring; consumer representation, as the reviewed literature suggested policy measures that promote consumer education on sustainable consumption, as well as improving consumer status, consciousness, and knowledge regarding the ecological impact of their purchases; and traceability throughout the entire supply chain.

5.3. Study Limitations and Future Research

In this study, we identified the major drivers and the recommended policies to improve food security and enhance the future food production sustainability based on the reviewed literature. However, we recommend conducting a Delphi research study in consultation with policy-makers and industry experts. A Delphi study can be used to validate the findings of this systematic literature review based on a specific country’s context. This research was conducted using only 141 articles from two databases; therefore, we suggest replicating this research using different databases, which will allow for the inclusion of more related papers. Moreover, this research included only peer-reviewed articles, which may be considered, based on the guidelines of Keele [ 185 ], as a source of publication bias. Future research may consider including gray literature and conference proceedings. This research did not include the three sustainability pillars within its research string; therefore, we recommend considering the inclusion of the three pillars in future research. Future research should also investigate the use of alternative protein food technology innovation, such as plant-based protein, cultured meat, and insect-based protein, as a sustainable solution to the food security problem. Additionally, understanding the factors influencing acceptance of various technologies by the final consumer is particularly important given some regional characteristics such as harsh arid environments and the scarcity of arable land, freshwater, and natural resources.

Appendix A. Summary Table of Major Drivers of Food Security

Appendix B. Summary Table of Most-Recommended Policies

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the UAE Ministry of Education, Resilient Agrifood Dynamism through evidence-based policies-READY project, grant number 1733833.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W., F.A., B.S. and I.M.; methodology, S.W., F.A., B.S. and I.M.; validation, S.W., F.A., B.S. and I.M.; formal analysis, S.W.; investigation, S.W., F.A., B.S. and I.M.; resources, I.M. and B.S.; data curation, S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W.; writing—review and editing, F.A.; visualization, S.W.; supervision, F.A., B.S. and I.M.; project administration, B.S. and I.M.; funding acquisition, B.S. and I.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Conflicts of interest.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

• Nutrition and Dietetics
• Food Insecurity

Food Insecurity: Concept, Causes, Effects and Possible Solutions

• November 2021
• 2(1):105-113

• Aligarh Muslim University

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• Putri Nur Fatimah
• Yayuk Farida Baliwati
• Ezra Chitando

• Angela D Liese

• Nicholas Sambanis
• Kevin Watkins
• G.A. Epstein
• FUTURE CHILD
• Craig Gundersen

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Essay Service Examples Crime Security

Food Security Essay

Table of contents

Defining food security: a multidimensional perspective, the sociocultural significance of food, global population growth and food demand, challenges to achieving global food security, addressing food insecurity: global efforts and challenges, the future of food systems and sustainability.

• Proper editing and formatting
• Free revision, title page, and bibliography
• Flexible prices and money-back guarantee

Our writers will provide you with an essay sample written from scratch: any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

Cite this paper

Related essay topics.

Get your paper done in as fast as 3 hours, 24/7.

Related articles

Most popular essays

• Individual Rights

In this paper I talk about the history of human rights as a background. But mainly I focused on...

The IAFIS stands for Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification system. It is managed by the...

• Conversation

Theodore Roosevelt once stated, “I recognize the right and duty of this generation to develop and...

• Criminal Behavior
• Perspective

Endpoint security is the process of securing the various endpoints on a network, often defined as...

• Mount Everest

In India, the Concept of Social Security was found to be well embedded in the institutions like...

• Data Collection

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will be replacing Data Protection Directive 95/46/ec...

Number of data security models have been developed to address the data security issues in cloud...

• Accountability

With the advanced rapid growth of technology within computer networks and multiple business...

In this universe of pervasive CPU and persevering dangers from specialist, ensuring your CPU is an...

Join our 150k of happy users

• Get original paper written according to your instructions
• Save time for what matters most

Fair Use Policy

EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].

We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.

Provide your email, and we'll send you this sample!

By providing your email, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Say goodbye to copy-pasting!

Get custom-crafted papers for you.

Enter your email, and we'll promptly send you the full essay. No need to copy piece by piece. It's in your inbox!

Acute food insecurity to rise in 18 ‘hunger hotspots’, warn aid agencies

Facebook Twitter Print Email

No less than 18 crisis locations already suffering from dire food insecurity could see a “firestorm of hunger” unless aid reaches them urgently, UN humanitarians said on Wednesday.

Although many “hunger hotspots” are in Africa, fears of famine persist in Gaza and Sudan, where conflict continues to rage,  fuelling the regional risk of new hunger emergencies , warned the Food and Agriculture Organization ( FAO ) and the World Food Programme ( WFP ).

“ Once a famine is declared, it is too late – many people will have already starved to death ,” said Cindy McCain, WFP Executive Director. “In Somalia in 2011, half of the 250,000 people who died of hunger perished before famine was officially declared. The world failed to heed the warnings at the time and the repercussions were catastrophic.  We must learn the lesson and act now to stop these hotspots from igniting a firestorm of hunger.” 

The UN-agency partnered early warning report which covers 17 countries and the drought-hit cluster of Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe – warns that Mali, Palestine, Sudan and South Sudan  remain at the highest alert level and require the most urgent attention. Haiti was also added to that list amid escalating violence and threats to food security.

South Sudan focus

The devastating hunger crises underway in South Sudan is so bad that the number of people facing starvation and death there is projected to almost double between April and July 2024, compared to the same period in 2023.

“Tight domestic food supplies and sharp currency depreciation are driving food prices to soar, compounded by likely floods and recurrent waves of subnational conflict, the report explained, in reference to South Sudan. “A projected further rise of returnees and refugees from the Sudan is likely to increase acute food insecurity among both new arrivals and host communities.”

Chad, Syria and Yemen in spotlight, too

Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar, the Syrian Arab Republic and Yemen are also hotspots of “very high concern”, the report noted.

“A large number of people” in these countries face critical acute food insecurity, coupled with worsening drivers that are expected to further intensify life-threatening conditions in the coming months. 

Since October 2023, the Central African Republic, Lebanon, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Zambia  joined Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Malawi, Somalia and Zimbabwe on the list of hunger hotspots, where acute food insecurity is likely to deteriorate further in coming months.

Climate extremes remain

Although conflict remains one of the main drivers of food insecurity, the joint early warning report from WFP and FAO emphasized that climate shocks are responsible too, not least the “still lingering” El Niño. 

Although that weather phenomenon is now coming to an end, “it is evident that its impact was severe and widespread”, the report’s authors insisted, pointing to devastating drought in southern Africa and extensive floods in east Africa.

Turning to the potential impact and “ looming threat” of La Niña between August and February 2025, the UN agencies’ assessment is that it is expected to “significantly” influence rainfall. This could lead to a climate shift with “major implications” in several countries including flooding in South Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, Haiti, Chad, Mali and Nigeria, as well as Sudan.

Preventing starvation and death

Both weather phenomenons could bring further climate extremes “that could upend lives and livelihoods”, the UN-partnered report warned, in support of calls for immediate humanitarian action delivered at scale “to prevent further starvation and death”.

• Research article
• Open access
• Published: 15 February 2023

The impact of food insecurity on health outcomes: empirical evidence from sub-Saharan African countries

• Sisay Demissew Beyene   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7347-4168 1  

BMC Public Health volume  23 , Article number:  338 ( 2023 ) Cite this article

25k Accesses

19 Citations

7 Altmetric

Metrics details

Food insecurity adversely affects human health, which means food security and nutrition are crucial to improving people’s health outcomes. Both food insecurity and health outcomes are the policy and agenda of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, there is a lack of macro-level empirical studies (Macro-level study means studies at the broadest level using variables that represent a given country or the whole population of a country or economy as a whole. For example, if the urban population (% of the total population) of XYZ country is 30%, it is used as a proxy variable to represent represent country's urbanization level. Empirical study implies studies that employ the econometrics method, which is the application of math and statistics.) concerning the relationship between food insecurity and health outcomes in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries though the region is highly affected by food insecurity and its related health problems. Therefore, this study aims to examine the impact of food insecurity on life expectancy and infant mortality in SSA countries.

The study was conducted for the whole population of 31 sampled SSA countries selected based on data availability. The study uses secondary data collected online from the databases of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), and the World Bank (WB). The study uses yearly balanced data from 2001 to 2018. This study employs a multicountry panel data analysis and several estimation techniques; it employs Driscoll-Kraay standard errors (DKSE), a generalized method of momentum (GMM), fixed effects (FE), and the Granger causality test.

A 1% increment in people’s prevalence for undernourishment reduces their life expectancy by 0.00348 percentage points (PPs). However, life expectancy rises by 0.00317 PPs with every 1% increase in average dietary energy supply. A 1% rise in the prevalence of undernourishment increases infant mortality by 0.0119 PPs. However, a 1% increment in average dietary energy supply reduces infant mortality by 0.0139 PPs.

Conclusions

Food insecurity harms the health status of SSA countries, but food security impacts in the reverse direction. This implies that to meet SDG 3.2, SSA should ensure food security.

Peer Review reports

Food security is essential to people’s health and well-being [ 1 ]. Further, the World Health Organization (WHO) argues that health is wealth and poor health is an integral part of poverty; governments should actively seek to preserve their people’s lives and reduce the incidence of unnecessary mortality and avoidable illnesses [ 2 ]. However, lack of food is one of the factors which affect health outcomes. Concerning this, the Food Research and Action Center noted that the social determinants of health, such as poverty and food insecurity, are associated with some of the most severe and costly health problems in a nation [ 3 ].

According to the FAO, the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), and the World Food Programme (WFP), food insecurity is defined as "A situation that exists when people lack secure access to sufficient amounts of safe and nutritious food for normal growth and development and an active and healthy life" ([ 4 ]; p50). It is generally believed that food security and nutrition are crucial to improving human health and development. Studies show that millions of people live in food insecurity, which is one of the main risks to human health. Around one in four people globally (1.9 billion people) were moderately or severely food insecure in 2017 and the greatest numbers were in SSA and South Asia. Around 9.2% of the world's population was severely food insecure in 2018. Food insecurity is highest in SSA countries, where nearly one-third are defined as severely insecure [ 5 ]. Similarly, 11% (820 million) of the world's population was undernourished in 2018, and SSA countries still share a substantial amount [ 5 ]. Even though globally the number of people affected by hunger has been decreasing since 1990, in recent years (especially since 2015) the number of people living in food insecurity has increased. It will be a huge challenge to achieve the SDGs of zero hunger by 2030 [ 6 ]. FAO et al. [ 7 ] projected that one in four individuals in SSA were undernourished in 2017. Moreover, FAO et al. [ 8 ] found that, between 2014 and 2018, the prevalence of undernourishment worsened. Twenty percent of the continent's population, or 256 million people, are undernourished today, of which 239 million are in SSA. Hidden hunger is also one of the most severe types of malnutrition (micronutrient deficiencies). One in three persons suffers from inadequacies related to hidden hunger, which impacts two billion people worldwide [ 9 ]. Similarly, SSA has a high prevalence of hidden hunger [ 10 , 11 ].

An important consequence of food insecurity is that around 9 million people die yearly worldwide due to hunger and hunger-related diseases. This is more than from Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), malaria, and tuberculosis combined [ 6 ]. Even though the hunger crisis affects many people of all genders and ages, children are particularly affected in Africa. There are too many malnourished children in Africa, and malnutrition is a major factor in the high infant mortality rates and causes physical and mental development delays and disorders in SSA [ 12 ]. According to UN statistics, chronic malnutrition globally accounts for 165 million stunted or underweight children. Around 75% of these kids are from SSA and South Asia. Forty percent of children in SSA are impacted. In SSA, about 3.2 million children under the age of five dies yearly, which is about half of all deaths in this age group worldwide. Malnutrition is responsible for almost one child under the age of five dying every two minutes worldwide. The child mortality rate in the SSA is among the highest in the world, about one in nine children pass away before the age of five [ 12 ].

In addition to the direct impact of food insecurity on health outcomes, it also indirectly contributes to disordered eating patterns, higher or lower blood cholesterol levels, lower serum albumin, lower hemoglobin, vitamin A levels, and poor physical and mental health [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Iodine, iron, and zinc deficiency are the most often identified micronutrient deficiencies across all age groups. A deficiency in vitamin A affects an estimated 190 million pre-schoolers and 19 million pregnant women [ 16 ]. Even though it is frequently noted that hidden hunger mostly affects pregnant women, children, and teenagers, it further affects people’s health at all stages of life [ 17 ].

With the above information, researchers and policymakers should focus on the issue of food insecurity and health status. The SDGs that were developed in 2015 intend to end hunger in 2030 as one of its primary targets. However, a growing number of people live with hunger and food insecurity, leading to millions of deaths. Hence, this study questioned what is the impact of food insecurity on people's health outcomes in SSA countries. In addition, despite the evidence implicating food insecurity and poor health status, there is a lack of macro-level empirical studies concerning the impact of food insecurity on people’s health status in SSA countries, which leads to a knowledge (literature) gap. Therefore, this study aims to examine the impact of food insecurity on life expectancy and infant mortality in SSA countries for the period ranging from 2001–2018 using panel mean regression approaches.

Theoretical and conceptual framework

Structural factors, such as climate, socio-economic, social, and local food availability, affect people’s food security. People’s health condition is impacted by food insecurity through nutritional, mental health, and behavioral channels [ 18 ]. Under the nutritional channel, food insecurity has an impact on total caloric intake, diet quality, and nutritional status [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Hunger and undernutrition may develop when food supplies are scarce, and these conditions may potentially lead to wasting, stunting, and immunological deficiencies [ 22 ]. However, food insecurity also negatively influences health due to its effects on obesity, women's disordered eating patterns [ 23 ], and poor diet quality [ 24 ].

Under the mental health channel, Whitaker et al. [ 25 ] noted that food insecurity is related to poor mental health conditions (stress, sadness, and anxiety), which have also been linked to obesity and cardiovascular risk [ 26 ]. The effects of food insecurity on mental health can worsen the health of people who are already sick as well as lead to disease acquisition [ 18 ]. Similarly, the behavioral channel argues that there is a connection between food insecurity and health practices that impact disease management, prevention, and treatment. For example, lack of access to household food might force people to make bad decisions that may raise their risk of sickness, such as relying too heavily on cheap, calorically dense, nutrient-poor meals or participating in risky sexual conduct. In addition, food insecurity and other competing demands for survival are linked to poorer access and adherence to general medical treatment in low-income individuals once they become sick [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]

Food insecurity increases the likelihood of exposure to HIV and worsens the health of HIV-positive individuals [ 18 ]. Weiser et al. [ 31 ] found that food insecurity increases the likelihood of unsafe sexual activities, aggravating the spread of HIV. It can also raise the possibility of transmission through unsafe newborn feeding practices and worsening maternal health [ 32 ]. In addition, food insecurity has been linked to decreased antiretroviral adherence, declines in physical health status, worse immunologic status [ 33 ], decreased viral suppression [ 34 , 35 ], increased incidence of serious illness [ 36 ], and increased mortality [ 37 ] among people living with HIV.

With the above theoretical relationship between target variables and since this study focuses on the impact of food insecurity on health outcomes, and not on the causes, it adopted the conceptual framework of Weiser et al. [ 18 ] and constructed Fig.  1 .

A conceptual framework of food insecurity and health. Source: Modified and constructed by the author using Weiser et al. [ 18 ] conceptual framework. Permission was granted by Taylor & Francis to use their original Figs. (2.2, 2.3, and 2.4); to develop the above figure. Permission number: 1072954

Several findings associate food insecurity with poorer health, worse disease management, and a higher risk of premature mortality even though they used microdata. For instance, Stuff et al. [ 38 ] found that food insecurity is related to poor self-reported health status, obesity [ 39 ], abnormal blood lipids [ 40 ], a rise in diabetes [ 24 , 40 ], increased gestational diabetes[ 41 ], increased perceived stress, depression and anxiety among women [ 25 , 42 ], Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) acquisition risk [ 43 , 44 , 45 ], childhood stunting [ 46 ], poor health [ 47 ], mental health and behavioral problem [ 25 , 48 , 49 ].

The above highlight micro-level empirical studies, and since the scope of this study is macro-level, Table 1 provides only the existing macro-level empirical findings related to the current study.

Empirical findings in Table 1 are a few, implying a limited number of macro-level level empirical findings. Even the existing macro-level studies have several limitations. For instance, most studies either employed conventional estimation techniques or overlooked basic econometric tests; thus, their results and policy implications may mislead policy implementers. Except for Hameed et al. [ 53 ], most studies’ data are either outdated or unbalanced; hence, their results and policy implications may not be valuable in the dynamic world and may not be accurate like balanced data. Besides, some studies used limited (one) sampled countries; however, few sampled countries and observations do not get the asymptotic properties of an estimator [ 56 ]. Therefore, this study tries to fill the existing gaps by employing robust estimation techniques with initial diagnostic and post-estimation tests, basic panel econometric tests and robustness checks, updated data, a large number of samples.

Study setting and participants

According to Smith and Meade [ 57 ], the highest rates of both food insecurity and severe food insecurity were found in Sub-Saharan Africa in 2017 (55 and 28%, respectively), followed by Latin America and the Caribbean (32 and 12%, respectively) and South Asia (30 and 13%). Similarly, SSA countries have worst health outcomes compared to other regions. For instance, in 2020, the region had the lowest life expectancy [ 58 ] and highest infant mortality [ 59 ]. Having the above information, this study's target population are SSA countries chosen purposively. However, even though SSA comprises 49 of Africa's 55 countries that are entirely or partially south of the Sahara Desert. This study is conducted for a sample of 31 SSA countries (Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Cabo Verde, Chad, Congo Rep., Côte d'Ivoire, Ethiopia, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, and Togo). The sampled countries are selected based on data accessibility for each variable included in the empirical models from 2001 to 2018. Since SSA countries suffer from food insecurity and related health problems, this study believes the sampled countries are appropriate and represent the region. Moreover, since this study included a large sample size, it improves the estimator’s precision.

Data type, sources, and scope

This study uses secondary data collected in December 2020 online from the databases of the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and the World Bank (WB) (see Table 2 ). In addition, the study uses yearly balanced data from 2001 to 2018, which is appropriate because it captures the Millennium Development Goals, SDGs, and other economic conditions, such as the rise of SSA countries’ economies and the global financial crisis of the 2000s. Therefore, this study considers various global development programs and events. Generally, the scope of this study (sampled countries and time) is sufficient to represent SSA countries. In other words, the study has n*T = 558 observations, which fulfills the large sample size criteria recommended by Kennedy [ 56 ].

The empirical model

Model specification is vital to conduct basic panel data econometric tests and estimate the relationship of target variables. Besides social factors, the study includes economic factors determining people's health status. Moreover, it uses two proxies indicators to measure both food insecurity and health status; hence, it specifies the general model as follows:

The study uses four models to analyze the impact of food insecurity on health outcomes.

where LNLEXP and LNINFMOR (dependent variables) refer to the natural logarithm of life expectancy at birth and infant mortality used as proxy variables for health outcomes. Similarly, PRUND and AVRDES are the prevalence of undernourishment and average dietary energy supply adequacy – proxy and predictor variables for food insecurity.

Moreover, to regulate countries’ socio-economic conditions and to account for time-varying bias that can contribute to changes in the dependent variable, the study included control variables, such as GDPPC, GOVEXP, MNSCHOOL, and URBAN. GDPPC is GDP per capita, GOVEXP refers to domestic general government health expenditure, MNSCHOOL is mean years of schooling and URBAN refers to urbanization. Further, n it , v it , ε it , and μ it are the stochastic error terms at period t. The parameters \({\alpha }_{0}, { \beta }_{0}, { \theta }_{0},{ \delta }_{0}\) refer to intercept terms and \({\alpha }_{1}-{\alpha }_{5}, {\beta }_{1}-{\beta }_{5}, { \theta }_{1}-{\theta }_{5}, and {\delta }_{1}-{\delta }_{5}\) are the long-run estimation coefficients. Since health outcomes and food insecurity have two indicators used as proxy variables, this study estimates different alternative models and robustness checks of the main results. Furthermore, the above models did not address heterogeneity problems; hence, this study considers unobserved heterogeneity by introducing cross-section and time heterogeneity in the models. This is accomplished by assuming a two-way error component for the disturbances with:

From Eq.  2 , the unobservable individual (cross-section) and unobservable time heterogeneities are described by \({\delta }_{i} and {\tau }_{t}\) (within components), respectively. Nonetheless, the remaining random error term is \({\gamma }_{it}\) (panel or between components). Therefore, the error terms in model 1A-1D will be substituted by the right-hand side elements of Eq.  2 .

Depending on the presumptions of whether the error elements are fixed or random, the FE and RE models are the two kinds of models that will be evaluated. Equation ( 2 ) yields a two-way FE error component model, or just a FE model if the assumptions are that \({\delta }_{i} and {\tau }_{t}\) are fixed parameters to be estimated and that the random error component, \({\gamma }_{it}\) , is uniformly and independently distributed with zero mean and constant variance (homoscedasticity).

Equation ( 2 ), on the other hand, provides a two-way RE error component model or a RE model if we suppose \({\delta }_{i} and {\tau }_{t}\) are random, just like the random error term, or \({\delta }_{i},{\tau }_{t}, and {\gamma }_{it}\) are all uniformly and independently distributed with zero mean and constant variance, or they are all independent of each other and independent variables [ 60 ].

Rather than considering both error components, \({\delta }_{i}, and {\tau }_{t}\) , we can examine only one of them at a time (fixed or random), yielding a one-way error component model, FE or RE. The stochastic error term \({\varpi }_{it}\) in Eq.  2 will then be:

Statistical analysis

This study conducted descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and initial diagnosis tests (cross-sectional and time-specific fixed effect, outliers and influential observations, multicollinearity, normality, heteroscedasticity, and serial correlation test). Moreover, it provides basic panel econometric tests and panel data estimation techniques. For consistency, statistical software (STATA) version 15 was used for all analyses.

Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis

Descriptive statistics is essential to know the behavior of the variables in the model. Therefore, it captures information, such as the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, skewness, and kurtosis. Similarly, the study conducted Pearson correlation analysis to assess the degree of relationship between the variables.

Initial diagnosis

Cross-sectional and time-specific fixed effect.

One can anticipate differences arising over time or within the cross-sectional units, given that the panel data set comprises repeated observations over the same units gathered over many periods. Therefore, before estimation, this study considered unexplained heterogeneity in the models. One fundamental limitation of cross-section, panel, and time series data regression is that they do not account for country and time heterogeneity [ 60 ]. These unobserved differences across nations and over time are crucial in how the error term is represented and the model is evaluated. These unobserved heterogeneities, however, may be represented by including both country and time dummies in the regression. However, if the parameters exceed the number of observations, the estimate will fail [ 60 ]. However, in this study, the models can be estimated. If we include both country and time dummies, we may assume that the slope coefficients are constant, but the intercept varies across countries and time, yielding the two-way error components model. As a result, this study examines the null hypothesis that intercepts differ across nations and time in general.

Detecting outliers and influential observations

In regression analysis, outliers and influential observations may provide biased findings. Therefore, the Cooks D outlier and influential observation test was used in the study to handle outliers and influencing observations. To evaluate whether these outliers have a stronger impact on the model to be estimated, each observation in this test was reviewed and compared with Cook’s D statistic [ 61 ]. Cook distance evaluates the extent to which observation impacts the entire model or the projected values. Hence, this study tested the existence of outliers.

Normality, heteroscedasticity, multicollinearity, and serial correlation test

Before the final regression result, the data used for the variables were tested for normality, heteroscedasticity, multicollinearity, and serial correlation to examine the characteristics of the sample.

Regression models should be checked for nonnormal error terms because a lack of Gaussianity (normal distribution) can occasionally compromise the accuracy of estimation and testing techniques. Additionally, the validity of inference techniques, specification tests, and forecasting critically depends on the normalcy assumption [ 62 ]. Similarly, multicollinearity in error terms leads to a dataset being highly sensitive to a minor change, instability in the regression model, and skewed and unreliable results. Therefore, this study conducted the normality using Alejo et al. [ 62 ] proposed command and multicollinearity (using VIF) tests.

Most conventional panel data estimation methods rely on homoscedastic individual error variance and constant serial correlation. Since the error component is typically connected to the variance that is not constant during the observation and is serially linked across periods, these theoretical presumptions have lately reduced the applicability of various panel data models. Serial correlation and heteroskedasticity are two estimate issues frequently connected to cross-sectional and time series data, respectively. Similarly, panel data is not free from these issues because it includes cross-sections and time series, making the estimated parameters ineffective, and rendering conclusions drawn from the estimation incorrect [ 63 ]. Therefore, this study used the Wooldridge [ 63 ] test for serial correlation in linear panel models as well as the modified Wald test for heteroskedasticity.

Basic panel econometric tests

The basic panel data econometric tests are prerequisites for estimating the panel data. The three main basic panel data tests are cross-sectional dependence, unit root, and cointegration.

Cross-sectional dependence (CD)

A growing body of the panel data literature concludes that panel data models are likely to exhibit substantial CD in the errors resulting from frequent shocks, unobserved components, spatial dependence, and idiosyncratic pairwise dependence. Even though the impact of CD in estimation depends on several factors, relative to the static model, the effect of CD in dynamic panel estimators is more severe [ 64 ]. Moreover, Pesaran [ 65 ] notes that recessions and economic or financial crises potentially affect all countries, even though they might start from just one or two countries. These occurrences inevitably introduce cross-sectional interdependencies across the cross-sectional unit, their regressors, and the error terms. Hence, overlooking the CD in panel data leads to biased estimates and spurious results [ 64 , 66 ]. Further, the CD test determines the type of panel unit root and cointegration tests we should apply. Therefore, examining the CD is vital in panel data econometrics.

In the literature, there are several tests for CD, such as the Breusch and Pagan [ 67 ] Lagrange multiplier (LM) test, Pesaran [ 68 ] scaled LM test, Pesaran [ 68 ] CD test, and Baltagi et al. [ 69 ] bias-corrected scaled LM test (for more detail, see Tugcu and Tiwari [ 70 ]). Besides, Friedman [ 71 ] and Frees [ 72 , 73 ] also have other types of CD tests (for more detail, see De Hoyos and Sarafidis [ 64 ]). This study employs Frees [ 72 ] and Pesaran [ 68 ] among the existing CD tests. This is because, unlike the Breusch and Pagan [ 67 ] test, these tests do not require infinite T and fixed N, and are rather applicable for both a large N and T. Additionally, Free’s CD test can overcome the irregular signs associated with correlation. However, it also employs Friedman [ 71 ] CD for mixed results of the above tests.

Unit root test

The panel unit root and cointegration tests are common steps following the CD test. Generally, there are two types of panel unit root tests: (1) the first-generation panel unit root tests, such as Im et al. [ 74 ], Maddala and Wu [ 75 ], Choi [ 76 ], Levin et al. [ 77 ], Breitung [ 78 ] and Hadri [ 79 ], and (2) the second-generation panel unit root tests, such as [ 66 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 ].

The first-generation panel unit root tests have been criticized because they assume cross-sectional independence [ 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 ]. This hypothesis is somewhat restrictive and unrealistic, as macroeconomic time series exhibit significant cross-sectional correlation among countries in a panel [ 92 ], and co-movements of economies are often observed in the majority of macroeconomic applications of unit root tests [ 91 ]. The cross-sectional correlation of errors in panel data applications in economics is likely to be the rule rather than the exception [ 93 ]. Moreover, applying first-generation unit root tests under CD models can generate substantial size distortions [ 90 ], resulting in the null hypothesis of nonstationary being quickly rejected [ 66 , 94 ]. As a result, second-generation panel unit root tests have been proposed to take CD into account. Therefore, among the existing second-generation tests, this study employs Pesaran’s [ 66 ] cross-sectionally augmented panel unit root test (CIPS) for models 1A–1C . The rationale for this is that, unlike other unit root tests that allow CD, such as Bai and Ng [ 80 ], Moon and Perron [ 87 ], and Phillips and Sul [ 84 ], Pesaran’s [ 66 ] test is simple and clear. Besides, Pesaran [ 66 ] is robust when time-series’ heteroscedasticity is observed in the unobserved common factor [ 95 ]. Even though theoretically, Moon and Perron [ 87 ], Choi [ 96 ] and Pesaran [ 66 ] require large N and T, Pesaran [ 66 ] is uniquely robust in small sample sizes [ 97 ]. Therefore, this study employs the CIPS test to take into account CD, and heteroskedasticity in the unobserved common factor and both large and small sample countries. However, since there is no CD in model 1D , this study employs the first-generation unit root tests called Levin, Lin, and Chu (LLC), Im, Pesaran, Shin (IPS) and Fisher augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) for model 1D .

Cointegration test

The most common panel cointegration tests when there is CD are Westerlund [ 98 ], Westerlund and Edgerton [ 99 ], Westerlund and Edgerton [ 100 ], Groen and Kleibergen [ 101 ], Westerlund’s [ 102 ] Durbin-Hausman test, Gengenbach et al. [ 103 ] and Banerjee and Carrion-i-Silvestre [ 104 ]. However, except for a few, most tests are not coded in Statistical Software (STATA) and are affected by insufficient observations. The current study primarily uses Westerlund [ 98 ] and Banerjee and Carrion-i-Silvestre [ 104 ] for models 1A–1C . However, to decide uncertain results, it also uses McCoskey and Kao [ 105 ] cointegration tests for model 1C . The rationale for using Westerlund’s [ 98 ] cointegration test is that most panel cointegration has failed to reject the null hypothesis of no cointegration due to the failure of common-factor restriction [ 106 ]. However, Westerlund [ 98 ] does not require any common factor restriction [ 107 ] and allows for a large degree of heterogeneity (e.g., individual-specific short-run dynamics, intercepts, linear trends, and slope parameters) [ 92 , 107 , 108 ]. Besides, its command is coded and readily available in STATA. However, it suffers from insufficient observations, especially when the number of independent variables increases. The present study employs the Banerjee and Carrion-i-Silvestre [ 104 ] and McCoskey and Kao [ 105 ] cointegration tests to overcome this limitation. The two Engle-Granger-based cointegration tests applicable when there is no CD and are widely used and available in STATA are Pedroni [ 109 , 110 ] and Kao [ 111 ]. However, the Pedroni test has two benefits over Kao: it assumes cross-sectional dependency and considers heterogeneity by employing specific parameters [ 112 ]. Hence, this study uses the Pedroni cointegration test for model 1D .

Panel data estimation techniques

The panel data analysis can be conducted using different estimation techniques and is mainly determined by the results of basic panel econometric tests. Thus, this study mainly employs the Driscoll-Kraay [ 113 ] standard error (DKSE) (for models 1A and 1B ), FE (for model 1C ), and two-step GMM (for model 1D ) estimation techniques to examine the impact of food insecurity on health outcomes. It also employs the Granger causality test. However, for robustness checks, it uses fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS), panel-corrected standard error (PCSE), and feasible generalized least squares (FGLS) methods (for models 1A and 1B ). Moreover, it uses a random effect (RE) for model 1C and panel dynamic fixed effect (DFE) techniques for model 1D .

Even though several panel estimation techniques allow CD, most of them – such as cross-section augmented autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL), cross-section augmented distributed lag (CS-DL), common correlated effects pooled (CCEP), and common correlated effects mean group (CCEMG) estimators – require a large number of observations over groups and periods. Similarly, the continuously updated fully modified (CUP-FM) and continuously updated bias-corrected (CUP-BC) estimators are not coded in STATA. Others, like the PCSE, FGLS, and seemingly unrelated regression (SUR), are feasible for T (the number of time series) > N (the number of cross-sectional units) [ 114 , 115 ]. However, a DKSE estimate is feasible for N > T [ 114 ]. Therefore, depending on the CD, cointegration test, availability in STATA, and comparing N against T, this study mainly employs the DKSE regression for models 1A and 1B , FE model for model 1C , and GMM for model 1C .

Finally, to check the robustness of the main result, this study employs FMOLS, FGLS, and PCSE estimation techniques for models 1A and 1B . Furthermore, even though the Hausman test confirms that the FE is more efficient, the study employs the RE for model 1C . This is because Firebaugh et al. [ 116 ] note that the RE and FE models perform best in panel data. Besides, unlike FE, RE assumes that individual differences are random. In addition, this study uses panel DFE for model 1D (selected based on the Hausman test). Finally, the robustness check is also conducted using an alternative model (i.e., when a dependent variable is without a natural log and Granger causality test).

Table 3 shows the overall mean of LNLEXP of the region is 4.063 years which indicates that the region can achieve only 57.43 (using ln(x) = 4.063 = loge (x)  = e 4.063 , where e = 2.718) years of life expectancy. This is very low compared to other regions. Besides, the ranges in the value of LNLEXP are between 3.698 and 4.345 or (40–76 years), implying high variation. Similarly, the mean value of LNINFMOR is 3.969; implying SSA countries recorded 52 infants death per 1000. Moreover, the range of LNINFMOR is between 2.525 and 4.919 or (12 – 135 infant death per 1000), implying high variation within the region. The mean value of people’s prevalence for undernourishment is 21.26; indicating 21% of the population is undernourished. However, the mean value of AVRDES is 107.826, which is greater than 100, implying that the calorie supply is adequate for all consumers if the food is distributed according to the requirements of individuals. When we observe the skewness and kurtosis of the variables of the models, except for LNLEXP and LNINFMOR, all variables are positively skewed. In addition, all variables have positive kurtosis with values between 2.202 and 6.092.

Table 3 also shows the degree of relationship between variables, such that most values are below the threshold or rule of thumb (0.7) for a greater association [ 117 ]. However, the association between LNINFMOR and LNLEXP, as well as between PRUNP and AVRDES, is over the threshold and seems to have a multicollinearity issue. Nevertheless, these variables did not exist together in the models, indicating the absence of a multicollinearity problem.

Table 4 shows whether the cross-sectional specific and time-specific FE in extended models ( model 1A-1D plus Eq.  2 ) are valid. The result reveals that the null hypothesis of the captured unobserved heterogeneity is homogenous across the countries, and time is rejected at 1%, implying the extended models are correctly specified. Besides, to check the robustness of the two-way error component model relative to the pooled OLS estimator, this study conducted an additional poolability test. The result shows the null hypothesis that intercepts homogeneity (pooling) is rejected at a 1% level; thus, the FE model is most applicable, but the pooled OLS is biased.

Cooks D is an indicator of high leverage and residuals. The impact is high when D exceeds 4/N, (N = number of observations). A D > 1 implies a significant outlier problem. The Cooks D result of this study confirms the absence of outliers' problem (see supplementary file 1 ).

Normality, heteroscedasticity, serial correlation, and multicollinearity tests

The results in Table 5 indicate that the probability value of the joint test for normality on e and u are above 0.01, implying that the residuals are normally distributed. The heteroscedasticity results show that the probability value of the chi-square statistic is less than 0.01 in all models. Therefore, the null hypothesis of constant variance can be rejected at a 1% level of significance. In other words, the modified Wald test result for Groupwise heteroskedasticity presented in Table 5 , rejects the null hypothesis of Groupwise homoskedasticity observed by the probability value of 0.0000, which implies the presence of heteroscedasticity in the residuals. Similarly, all models suffer from serial correlation since the probability value of 0.0000 rejects the null hypothesis of no first-order serial correlation, indicating the presence of autocorrelation in all panel models. Finally, the multicollinearity test reveals that the models have no multicollinearity problem since the Variance inflation Factors (VIF) values are below 5.

Cross-sectional dependence test

Results in Table 6 strongly reject the null hypothesis of cross-sectional independence for models 1A – 1C . However, for model 1D , the study found mixed results (i.e., Pesaran [ 68 ] fails to reject the null hypothesis of no CD while Frees [ 72 ] strongly rejects it). Thus, to decide, this study employs the Friedman [ 71 ] CD test. The result fails to reject the null hypothesis of cross-sectional independence, implying that two out of three tests fail to reject the null hypothesis of cross-sectional independence in model 1D . Therefore, unlike others, there is no CD in model 1D (see Table 6 ).

Unit root tests

Table 7 shows that all variables are highly (at 1% level) significant either at level (I(0)) or first difference (I(1)), which implies all variables are stationary. In other words, the result fails to reject the null hypothesis of unit root (non-stationary) for all variables at a 1%-significance level, either at levels or the first differences. Thus, we might expect a long-run connection between these variables collectively.

Cointegration tests

The results in Table 8 show that both the Westerlund [ 98 ] and Banerjee and Carrion-i-Silvestre [ 104 ] cointegration tests strongly reject the null hypothesis of no-cointegration in models 1A and 1B . However, model 1C provides a mixed result, i.e. the Banerjee and Carrion-i-Silvestre [ 104 ] test rejects the null hypothesis of no cointegration, yet the reverse is true for the Westerlund [ 98 ] test. Therefore, this study conducted further cointegration tests for model 1C . Even though Westerlund and Edgerton [ 99 ] suffer from insufficient observation, it is based on the McCoskey and Kao [ 105 ] LM test [ 118 ]. Thus, we can use a residual-based cointegration test in the heterogeneous panel framework proposed by McCoskey and Kao [ 105 ]. However, an efficient estimation technique of cointegrated variables is required, and hence the FMOLS and DOLS estimators are recommended. The residuals derived from the FMOLS and DOLS will be tested for stationarity with the null hypothesis of no cointegration amongst the regressors. Since the McCoskey and Kao [ 105 ] test involves averaging the individual LM statistics across the cross-sections, for testing the residuals FMOLS and DOLS stationarity, McCoskey, and Kao [ 105 ] test is in the spirit of IPS (Im et al. [ 74 ]) [ 119 ].

Though FMOLS and DOLS are recommended for the residuals cointegration test, DOLS is better than FMOLS (for more detail, see Kao and Chiang [ 120 ]); therefore, this study uses a residual test derived from DOLS. The result fails to reject the null hypothesis of no cointegration. Two (Banerjee and Carrion-i-Silvestre [ 104 ] and McCoskey and Kao [ 105 ]) out of three tests fail to reject the null hypothesis of no cointegration; hence, we can conclude that there is no long-run relationship among the variables in model 1C .

Unlike other models, since there is CD in model 1D , this study employs the Pedroni [ 109 ] and Kao [ 111 ] cointegration tests for model 1D . The result strongly rejects the null hypothesis of no cointegration, which is similar to models 1A and 1B , that a long-run relationship exists among the variables in model 1D (see Table 5 ).

Panel data estimation results

Table 9 provides long-run regression results of all models employing appropriate estimation techniques such as DKSE, FE, and two-step GMM, along with the Granger causality test. However, the DKSE regression can be estimated in three ways: FE with DKSE, RE with DKSE, and pooled Ordinary Least Squares/Weighted Least Squares (pooled OLS/WLS) regression with DKSE. Hence, we must choose the most efficient model using Hausman and Breusch-Pagan LM for RE tests (see supplementary file 2 ). As a result, this study employed FE with DKSE for models 1A and 1B . Further, due to Hausman's result, absence of cointegration and to deal with heterogeneity and spatial dependence in the dynamic panel, this study employs FE for the model1C (see the supplementary file 2). However, due to the absence of CD, the presence of cointegration, and N > T, this study uses GMM for model 1D . Moreover, according to Roodman [ 121 ], the GMM approach can solve heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation problems. Furthermore, even though two-step GMM produces only short-run results, it is possible to generate long-run coefficients from short-run results [ 122 , 123 ].

The DKSE result of model 1A shows that a 1% increment in people's prevalence for undernourishment reduces their life expectancy by 0.00348 PPs (1 year or 366 days). However, in model 1C, a 1% rise in the prevalence of undernourishment increases infant mortality by 0.0119 PPs (1 year or 369 days). The DKSE estimations in model 1B reveal that people’s life expectancy rises by 0.00317 PPs with every 1% increase in average dietary energy supply. However, the GMM result for model 1D confirms that a 1% incrementin average dietary energy supply reduces infant mortality by 0.0139 PPs. Moreover, this study conducted a panel Granger causality test to confirm whether or not food insecurity has a potential causality to health outcomes. The result demonstrates that the null hypothesis of change in people’s prevalence for undernourishment and average dietary energy supply does not homogeneously cause health outcomes is rejected at 1% significance, implying a change in food insecurity does Granger-cause health outcomes of SSA countries (see Table 9 ).

In addition to the main results, Table 9 also reports some post-estimation statistics to ascertain the consistency of the estimated results. Hence, in the case of DKSE and FE models, the validity of the models is determined by the values of R 2 and the F statistics. For instance, R 2 quantifies the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable explained by the independent variables, representing the model’s quality. The results in Table 9 demonstrate that the explanatory variables explain more than 62% of the variance on the dependent variable. Cohen [ 125 ] classifies the R 2 value of 2% as a moderate influence in social and behavioral sciences, while 13 and 26% are considered medium and large effects, respectively. Therefore, the explanatory variables substantially impact this study's models. Similarly, the F statistics explain all independent variables jointly explain the dependent one. For the two-step system GMM, the result fails to reject the null hypothesis of no first (AR(1)) and second-order (AR(2)) serial correlation, indicating that there is no first and second-order serial correlation. In addition, the Hansen [ 126 ] and Sargan [ 127 ] tests fail to reject the null hypothesis of the overall validity of the instruments used, which implies too many instruments do not weaken the model.

Robustness checks

The author believes the above findings may not be enough for policy recommendations unless robustness checks are undertaken. Hence, the study estimated all models without the natural logarithm of the dependent variables (see Table 10 ). The model 1A result reveals, similar to the above results, individuals’ prevalence for undernourishment significantly reduces their life expectancy in SSA countries. That means a 1% increase in the people's prevalence of undernourishment reduces their life expectancy by 0.1924 PPs. Moreover, in model 1B , life expectancy rises by 0.1763 PPs with every 1% increase in average dietary energy supply. In model 1C , the rise in infants’ prevalence for undernourishment has a positive and significant effect on their mortality rate in SSA countries. The FE result implies that a 1% rise in infants’ prevalence for undernourishment increases their mortality rate by 0.9785 PPs. The GMM result in model 1D indicates that improvement in average dietary energy supply significantly reduces infant mortality. Further, the Granger causality result confirms that the null hypothesis of change in the prevalence of undernourishment and average dietary energy supply does not homogeneously cause health outcomes and is rejected at a 1% level of significance. This implies a change in food insecurity does Granger-cause health outcomes in SSA countries (see Table 10 ).

The study also conducted further robustness checks using the same dependent variables (as Table 9 ) but different estimation techniques. The results confirm that people’s prevalence of undernourishment has a negative and significant effect on their life expectancy, but improvement in average dietary energy supply significantly increases life expectancy in SSA countries. However, the incidence of undernourishment in infants contributes to their mortality; however, progress in average dietary energy supply for infants significantly reduces their mortality (see Table 11 ).

The main objective of this study is to examine the impact of food insecurity on the health outcomes of SSA countries. Accordingly, the DKSE result of model 1A confirms that the rise in people’s prevalence for undernourishment significantly reduces their life expectancy in SSA countries. However, the FE result shows that an increment in the prevalence of undernourishment has a positive and significant impact on infant mortality in model 1C . This indicates that the percentage of the population whose food intake is insufficient to meet dietary energy requirements is high, which leads to reduce life expectancy but increases infant mortality in SSA countries. The reason for this result is linked to the insufficient food supply in SSA due to low production and yields, primitive tools, lack of supporting smallholder farms and investment in infrastructure, and government policies. Besides, even though the food is available, it is not distributed fairly according to the requirements of individuals. Moreover, inadequate access to food, poor nutrition, and chronic illnesses are caused by a lack of well-balanced diets. In addition, many of these countries are impacted by poverty, making it difficult for citizens to afford nutritious food. All these issues combine to create an environment where individuals are more likely to suffer malnutrition-related illnesses, resulting in a lower life expectancy rate. The DKSE estimation result in model 1B reveals that improvement in average dietary energy supply positively impacts people's life expectancy in SSA countries. However, the improvement in average dietary energy supply reduces infant mortality.

Based on the above results, we can conclude that food insecurity harms SSA nations' health outcomes. This is because the prevalence of undernourishment leads to increased infant mortality by reducing the vulnerability, severity, and duration of infectious diseases such as diarrhea, pneumonia, malaria, and measles. Similarly, the prevalence of undernourishment can reduce life expectancy by increasing the vulnerability, severity, and duration of infectious diseases. However, food security improves health outcomes – the rise in average dietary energy supply reduces infant mortality and increases the life expectancy of individuals.

Several facts and theories support the above findings. For instance, similar to the theoretical and conceptual framework section, food insecurity in SSA countries can affect health outcomes in nutritional, mental health, and behavioral channels. According to FAO et al. [ 128 ], the prevalence of undernourishment increased in Africa from 17.6% of the population in 2014 to 19.1% in 2019. This figure is more than twice the global average and the highest of all regions of the world. Similarly, SSA is the world region most at risk of food insecurity [ 129 ]. According to Global Nutrition [ 130 ] report, anemia affects an estimated 39.325% of women of reproductive age. Some 13.825% of infants have a low weight at birth in the SSA region. Excluding middle African countries (due to lack of data), the estimated average prevalence of infants aged 0 to 5 months who are exclusively breastfed is 35.73%, which is lower than the global average of 44.0%. Moreover, SSA Africa still experiences a malnutrition burden among children aged under five years. The average prevalence of overweight is 8.15%, which is higher than the global average of 5.7%. The prevalence of stunting is 30.825%—higher than the worldwide average of 22%. Conversely, the SSA countries’ prevalence of wasting is 5.375%, which is higher than most regions such as Central Asia, Eastern Asia, Western Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, and North America. The SSA region's adult population also faces a malnutrition burden: an average of 9.375% of adult (aged 18 and over) women live with diabetes, compared to 8.25% of men. Meanwhile, 20.675% of women and 7.85% of men live with obesity.

According to Saltzman et al. [ 17 ], micronutrient deficiencies can affect people’s health throughout their life cycle. For instance, at the baby age, it causes (low birth weight, higher mortality rate, and impaired mental development), child (stunting, reduced mental capacity, frequent infections, reduced learning capacity, higher mortality rate), adolescent (stunting, reduced mental capacity, fatigue, and increased vulnerability to infection), pregnant women (increased mortality and perinatal complications), adult (reduced productivity, poor socio-economic status, malnutrition, and increased risk of chronic disease), elderly (increased morbidity (including osteoporosis and mental impairment), and higher mortality rate).

Though this study attempts to fill the existing gaps, it also has limitations. It examined the impact of food insecurity on infant mortality; however, their association is reflected indirectly through other health outcomes. Hence, future studies can extend this study by examining the indirect effect of food insecurity on infant mortality, which helps to look at in-depth relationships between the variables. Moreover, this study employed infant mortality whose age is below one year; hence, future studies can broaden the scope by decomposing infant mortality into (neonatal and postnatal) and under-five mortality.

Millions of people are dying every year due to hunger and hunger-related diseases worldwide, especially in SSA countries. Currently, the link between food insecurity and health status is on researchers' and policymakers' agendas. However, macro-level findings in this area for most concerned countries like SSA have been given only limited attention. Therefore, this study examined the impact of food insecurity on life expectancy and infant mortality rates. The study mainly employs DKSE, FE, two-step GMM, and Granger causality approaches, along with other estimation techniques for robustness checks for the years between 2001 and 2018. The result confirms that food insecurity harms health outcomes, while food security improves the health status of SSA nations'. That means that a rise in undernourishment increases the infant mortality rate and reduces life expectancy. However, an improvement in the average dietary energy supply reduces infant mortality and increases life expectancy. Therefore, SSA countries need to guarantee their food accessibility both in quality and quantity, which improves health status. Both development experts and political leaders agree that Africa has the potential for agricultural outputs, can feed the continent, and improve socio-economic growth. Besides, more than half of the world's unused arable land is found in Africa. Therefore, effective utilization of natural resources is essential to achieve food security. Moreover, since the majority of the food in SSA is produced by smallholder farmers [ 131 ] while they are the most vulnerable to food insecurity and poverty [ 132 , 133 ]; hence, special focus and support should be given to smallholder farmers that enhance food self-sufficiency. Further, improvement in investment in agricultural research; improvement in markets, infrastructures, and institutions; good macroeconomic policies and political stability; and developing sub-regional strategies based on their agroecological zone are crucial to overcoming food insecurity and improving health status. Finally, filling a stomach is not sufficient; hence, a person's diet needs to be comprehensive and secure, balanced (including all necessary nutrients), and available and accessible. Therefore, SSA countries should ensure availability, accessibility, usability, and sustainability to achieve food and nutrition security.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available in supplementary materials.

Abbreviations

Augmented Dickey–Fuller

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Average Dietary Energy Supply

Common Correlated Effects Mean Group

Common Correlated Effects Pooled

Cross-Sectional Dependence

Cross-Sectionally Augmented Panel Unit Root Test

Cross-Section Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag

Cross-Section Augmented Distributed Lag

Continuously Updated Bias-Corrected

Continuously Updated Full Modified

Dynamic Fixed Effect

Driscoll-Kraay Standard Errors

Dynamic Ordinary Least Square

Error Correction Model

Food and Agricultural Organization

Fixed Effect

Feasible Generalised Least Squares

Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita

Generalised Method of Momentum

Domestic General Government Health Expenditure

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Integration at First Difference

International Fund for Agricultural Development

Infant Mortality Rate

Im, Pesaran, Shin

Lag of Infant Mortality Rate

Lag of Natural Logarithm of Infant Mortality Rate

Life Expectancy at Birth

Levin, Lin, and Chu

Lagrange Multiplier

Natural Logarithm of Infant Mortality Rate

Natural Logarithm of Life Expectancy at Birth

Mean Years of Schooling

Ordinary Least Squares

Panel-Corrected Standard Error

Pooled Mean Group

Prevalence of Undernourishment

Random Effect

Sustainable Development Goals

Sub-Saharan African

Statistical Software

Seemingly Unrelated Regression

Urbanisation

World Food Programme

World Health Organization

Weighted Least Squares

Giller KE. The food security conundrum of sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Food Sec. 2020;2020(26): 100431.

Article   Google Scholar  

WHO. Reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Report. Switzerland: WHO; 2002. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42510/WHR_2002.pdf?sequence=1 .

Food Research and Action Center. Hunger and health: the impact of poverty, food insecurity, and poor nutrition on health and well-being. Washington, DC: Food Research & Action Center; 2017.  https://frac.org/research/resource-library/hunger-health-impact-poverty-food-insecurity-poor-nutrition-health-well .

Google Scholar  

FAO, IFAD, WFP. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2013. The multiple dimensions of food security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013. Available from:  http://www.fao.org/3/i3434e/i3434e00.htm .

Roser M, Ritchie H. Hunger, and Undernourishment. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2013. Available from:  https://ourworldindata.org/hunger-and-undernourishment .

Word Count. How many people die from hunger each year. Denmark: The World Counts; 2020. Available from:  https://www.theworldcounts.com/challenges/people-and-poverty/hunger-and-obesity/how-many-people-die-from-hunger-each-year/story .

FAO IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, and WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2018. Building Climate Resilience for Food Security and Nutrition. Technical report. FAO. 11 September 2018. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/I9553EN/i9553en.pdf or https://www.wfp.org/publications/2018-state-food-security-and-nutrition-world-sofi-report .

FAO, ECA, AUC. Africa regional overview of food security and nutrition 2019 -in brief. 2020.

UNHCR. UNHCR describes the alarming health and nutrition situation in South Sudan camps. News Stories, 24 August 2012. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/503881659.html .

Laxmaiah A, Arlappa N, Balakrishna N, Mallikarjuna RK, Galreddy C, Kumar S, Ravindranath M, Brahmam GN. Prevalence and determinants of micronutrient deficiencies among rural children of eight states in India. Ann NutrMetab. 2013;62(3):231–41.

CAS   Google Scholar  

Muthayya S, Rah JH, Sugimoto JD, Roos FF, Kraemer K, Black RE. The global hidden hunger indices and maps: an advocacy tool for action. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6): e67860.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

SOS. Hunger and Food Scarceness in Africa. Washington, DC: SOS Children’s Villages; 2018. Available from:  https://www.sos-usa.org/about-us/where-we-work/africa/hunger-in-africa .

Gulliford MC, Mahabir D, Rocke B. Food insecurity, food choices, and body mass index in adults: nutrition transition in Trinidad and Tobago. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:508–16.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Stuff JE, Casey PH, Szeto K, Gossett J, Weber J, Simpson P, et al. Household food insecurity and adult chronic disease in the lower Mississippi delta. J Federation Am Soc Experiment Biol. 2005;19:A986.

Parker ED, Widome R, Nettleton JA, Pereira MA. Food security and metabolic syndrome in U.S. adults and adolescents: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2006. Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20:364–70.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

WHO. Global Prevalence of Vitamin A Deficiency in Populations at Risk 1995–2005: WHO Global Database on Vitamin A Deficiency. 2009. Available from: www.who.int/vmnis/vitamina/en/ .

Saltzman A, Birol E, Wiesman D, Prasai N, Yohannes Y, Menon P, Thompson J. 2014 global hunger index: The challenge of hidden hunger. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2014.

Weiser SD, Palar K, Hatcher AM, Young SL, Frongillo EA. Food insecurity and health: a conceptual framework. In: Ivers L, editors. Food insecurity and public health (pp. 23-50). 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015.

Rose D. Economic determinants and dietary consequences of food insecurity in the United States. J Nutr. 1999;129(2):517S-S520.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Dixon LB, Winkleby MA, Radimer KL. Dietary intakes and serum nutrients differ between adults from food-insufficient and food-sufficient families: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Nutr. 2001;131(4):1232–46.

Kirkpatrick SI, Tarasuk V. Food insecurity is associated with nutrient inadequacies among Canadian adults and adolescents. J Nutr. 2008;138(3):604–12.

Schaible UE, Kaufmann SH. Malnutrition and infection: complex mechanisms and global impacts. PLoS Med. 2007;4(5): e115.

Laraia B, Epel E, Siega-Riz AM. Food insecurity with the experience of restrained eating is a recipe for increased gestational weight gain. Appetite. 2013;65:178–84.

Seligman HK, Bindman AB, Vittinghoff E, Kanaya AM, Kushel MB. Food insecurity is associated with diabetes mellitus: results from the National Health Examination and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2002. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(7):1018–23.

Whitaker RC, Phillips SM, Orzol SM. Food insecurity and the risks of depression and anxiety in mothers and behavior problems in their preschool-aged children. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):e859–68.

Black PH, Garbutt LD. Stress, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(1):1–23.

Cunningham WE, Andersen RM, Katz MH, Stein MD, Turner BJ, Crystal S, Zierler S, Kuromiya K, Morton SC, St. Clair P, Bozzette SA. The impact of competing subsistence needs and barriers on access to medical care for persons with human immunodeficiency virus receiving care in the United States. Med Care. 1999;37(12):1270–81.

Kushel MB, Gupta R, Gee L, Haas JS. Housing instability and food insecurity as barriers to health care among low-income Americans. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(1):71–7.

Weiser SD, Tuller DM, Frongillo EA, Senkungu J, Mukiibi N, Bangsberg DR. Food insecurity as a barrier to sustained antiretroviral therapy adherence in Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(4): e10340.

Bengle R, Sinnett S, Johnson T, Johnson MA, Brown A, Lee JS. Food insecurity is associated with cost-related medication non-adherence in community-dwelling, low-income older adults in Georgia. J Nutr Elder. 2010;29(2):170–91.

Weiser SD, Leiter K, Bangsberg DR, Butler LM, Percy-de Korte F, Hlanze Z, Phaladze N, Iacopino V, Heisler M. Food insufficiency is associated with high-risk sexual behavior among women in Botswana and Swaziland. PLoS med. 2007;4(10): e260.

Mehta S, Manji KP, Young AM, Brown ER, Chasela C, Taha TE, Read JS, Goldenberg RL, Fawzi WW. Nutritional indicators of adverse pregnancy outcomes and mother-to-child transmission of HIV among HIV-infected women. Am J ClinNutr. 2008;87(6):1639–49.

Weiser SD, Bangsberg DR, Kegeles S, Ragland K, Kushel MB, Frongillo EA. Food insecurity among homeless and marginally housed individuals living with HIV/AIDS in San Francisco. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(5):841–8.

Weiser SD, Frongillo EA, Ragland K, Hogg RS, Riley ED, Bangsberg DR. Food insecurity is associated with incomplete HIV RNA suppression among homeless and marginally housed HIV-infected individuals in San Francisco. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(1):14–20.

Kalichman SC, Cherry C, Amaral C, White D, Kalichman MO, Pope H, Swetsze C, Jones M, Macy R. Health and treatment implications of food insufficiency among people living with HIV/AIDS, Atlanta. Georgia J Urban Health. 2010;87(4):631–41.

Weiser SD, Gupta R, Tsai AC, Frongillo EA, Grede N, Kumbakumba E, Kawuma A, Hunt PW, Martin JN, Bangsberg DR. Changes in food insecurity, nutritional status, and physical health status after antiretroviral therapy initiation in rural Uganda. J Acquir Immune DeficSyndr (1999). 2012;61(2):179.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Weiser SD, Fernandes KA, Brandson EK, Lima VD, Anema A, Bangsberg DR, Montaner JS, Hogg RS. The association between food insecurity and mortality among HIV-infected individuals on HAART. J Acquir Immune DeficSyndr (1999). 2009;52(3):342.

Stuff JE, Casey PH, Szeto KL, Gossett JM, Robbins JM, Simpson PM, et al. Household food insecurity is associated with adult health status. J Nutr. 2004;134(9):2330–5.

Dinour LM, Bergen D, Yeh MC. The food insecurity–obesity paradox: a review of the literature and the role food stamps may play. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(11):1952–61.

Seligman HK, Davis TC, Schillinger D, Wolf MS. Food insecurity is associated with hypoglycemia and poor diabetes self-management in a low-income sample with diabetes. J Health Care Poor U. 2010;21(4):1227.

Laraia B, Siega-Riz AM, Gundersen C. Household food insecurity is associated with self-reported pregravid weight status, gestational weight gain, and pregnancy complications. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:692–701.

Laraia BA, Siega-Riz AM, Gundersen C, Dole N. Psychosocial factors and socioeconomic indicators are associated with household food insecurity among pregnant women. J Nutr. 2006;136:177–82.

Miller CL, Bangsberg DR, Tuller DM, Senkungu J, Kawuma A, Frongillo EA, et al. Food insecurity and sexual risk in an HIV endemic community in Uganda. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(7):1512–9.

Tsai AC, Bangsberg DR, Frongillo EA, Hunt PW, Muzoora C, Martin JN, et al. Food insecurity, depression and the modifying role of social support among people living with HIV/AIDS in rural Uganda. SocSci Med. 2012;74(12):2012–9.

Vogenthaler NS, Kushel MB, Hadley C, Frongillo EA, Riley ED, Bangsberg DR, et al. Food insecurity and risky sexual behaviors among homeless and marginally housed HIV-infected individuals in San Francisco. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(5):1688–93.

Baig-Ansari N, Rahbar MH, Bhutta ZA, Badruddin SH. Child’s Child’s gender and household food insecurity are associated with stunting among young Pakistani children residing in urban squatter settlements. Food Nutr Bull. 2006;27(2):114–27.

Gundersen C, Kreider B. Bounding the effects of food insecurity on children’s health outcomes. J Health Econ. 2009;28(5):971–83.

Cole SM, Tembo G. The effect of food insecurity on mental health: panel evidence from rural Zambia. SocSci Med. 2011;73(7):1071–9.

Weaver LJ, Owens C, Tessema F, Kebede A, Hadley C. Unpacking the “black box” of global food insecurity and mental health. SocSci Med. 2021;282: 114042.

Uchendu FN. Hunger influenced life expectancy in war-torn Sub-Saharan African countries. J Health PopulNutr. 2018;37(1):1–4.

Asiseh F, Naanwaab C, Quaicoe O. The association between food insecurity and child health outcomes in low and middle-income countries. J Afr Dev. 2018;20(2):79–90.

Justice AE, Louis AA. The nexus between food security and infant mortality-further evidence from Nigeria. Amity J Econ. 2018;3(1):1–5.

Hameed S, Wei W, Chaudhary N. A dynamics appraisal of association among food Insecurity, women and child health: Evidence from developing countries. 2020. Available from:  https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202007.0291/v1 .

Banerjee S, Radak T, Khubchandani J, Dunn P. Food insecurity and mortality in American adults: results from the NHANES-linked mortality study. Health PromotPract. 2021;22(2):204–14.

Cassidy-Vu L, Way V, Spangler J. The correlation between food insecurity and infant mortality in North Carolina. Public Health Nutr. 2022;25(4):1038–44.

Kennedy P. A guide to econometrics. 6th ed. Toronto: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.

Smith MD, Meade B. Who Are the World’s Food Insecure? Identifying the Risk Factors of Food Insecurity around the World. Amber Waves: 2019. The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2019/june/who-are-the-world-s-food-insecure-identifying-the-risk-factors-of-food-insecurity-around-the-world/ .

The World Bank. Life expectancy at birth, total (years). 2022a. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN .

The World Bank. Mortality rate, infant (per 1,000 live births). 2022b. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.IMRT.IN

Vijayamohanan PN. Panel data analysis with Stata Part 1 fixed effects and random effects models. 2016. MPRA Paper. Available from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/76869/1/MPRA_paper_76869.pdf .

Cook RD. Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics. 1977;19:15–8.

Alejo J, Galvao A, Montes-Rojas G, Sosa-Escudero W. Tests for normality in linear panel-data models. Stand Genomic Sci. 2015;15(3):822–32.

Wooldridge JM. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2010.

De Hoyos RE, Sarafidis V. Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. STATA J. 2006;6(4):482–96.

Pesaran MH. Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica. 2006;74(4):967–1012.

Pesaran MH. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J ApplEconomet. 2007;22(2):265–312.

Breusch TS, Pagan AR. The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud. 1980;47(1):239–53.

Pesaran MH. General diagnostic tests for cross-section dependence in panels. UK: IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240, University of Cambridge; 2004.

Book   Google Scholar  

Baltagi BH, Feng Q, Kao C. A Lagrange Multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. J Econometrics. 2012;170(1):164–77.

Tugcu CT, Tiwari AK. Does renewable and/or non-renewable energy consumption matter for total factor productivity (TFP) growth? Evidence from the BRICS. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016;65:610–6.

Friedman M. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc. 1937;32(200):675–701.

Frees EW. Assessing cross-sectional correlation in panel data. J Econometrics. 1995;69:393–414.

Frees EW. Longitudinal and panel data: analysis and applications in the social sciences. Illustrated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y. Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. J Econometrics. 2003;115(1):53–74.

Maddala GS, Wu S. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford B Econ Stat. 1999;61(S1):631–52.

Choi I. Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Finance. 2001;20:249–72.

Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econometrics. 2002;108(1):1–24.

Breitung J. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: B. Baltagi (ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels. Adv Econom. 2000;15(JAI):161–178.

Hadri K. Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Economist J. 2000;3(2):148–61.

Bai J, Ng S. A panic attack on unit roots and Cointegration. Econometrica. 2004;72:1127–77.

Chang Y, Non-linear IV. Unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency. J Econometrics. 2002;110:261–92.

Chang Y. Bootstrap unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency. J Econometrics. 2004;120:263–93.

Choi I. Combination unit root tests for cross-sectionally correlated panels. 2002.

Phillips PCB, Sul D. Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. Economist J. 2003;6:217–59.

Harris R, Sollis R. Applied time series modeling and forecasting. 1st ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley; 2003.

Smith LV, Leybourne S, Kim TH, Newbold P. More powerful panel data unit root tests with an application to mean reversion in real exchange rates. J ApplEconomet. 2004;19(2):147–70.

Moon HR, Perron B. Testing for unit root in panels with dynamic factors. J Econometrics. 2004;122:81–126.

Cerrato M, Sarantis N. A bootstrap panel unit root test under cross-sectional dependence, with an application to PPP. Comput Stat Data An. 2007;51(8):4028–37.

Palm FC, Smeekes S, Urbain JP. Cross-sectional dependence robust block bootstrap panel unit root tests. J Econometrics. 2011;163(1):85–104.

O’Connell PGJ. The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. J Int Econ. 1998;44:1–19.

Hurlin C, Mignon V. Une Synthèse des Tests de Racine Unitaire sur Données de panel. Economie et Prévision. 2005;3–4(169):253–94.

Baltagi BH. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.

Chudik A, Pesaran MH. Large panel data models with cross-sectional dependence: a survey. In: Baltagi BH, editor. The Oxford Handbook of panel data. New York: rd University Press; 2015. p. 3–45.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Eberhardt M, Presbitero AF. Public debt and growth: Heterogeneity and non-linearity. J Int Econ. 2015;97(1):45–58.

Hashiguchi Y, Hamori S. Small sample properties of CIPS panel unit root test under conditional and unconditional heteroscedasticity. 2010. MPRA Paper No. 24053. Available from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/24053/ .

Choi I. Unit root tests for cross-sectionally correlated panels. In: Econometric theory and practice: frontiers of analysis and applied research. 2006.

Albulescu CT, Pépin D, Tiwari AK. A re-examination of real interest parity in CEECs using ‘old’ and ‘new’ second-generation panel unit root tests. B Econ Res. 2016;68(2):133–50.

Westerlund J. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford B Econ Stat. 2007;69(6):709–48.

Westerlund J, Edgerton DL. A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Econ Lett. 2007;97(3):185–90.

Westerlund J, Edgerton DL. A simple test for cointegration in dependent panels with structural breaks. Oxford B Econ Stat. 2008;70(5):665–704.

Groen JJJ, Kleibergen F. Likelihood-based cointegration analysis in panels of vector error-correction models. J Bus Econ Stat. 2003;21(2):295–318.

Westerlund J. Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. J ApplEconomet. 2008;23(2):193–233.

Gengenbach C, Urbain JP, Westerlund J. Error correction testing in panels with common stochastic trends. J ApplEconomet. 2016;31(6):982–1004.

Banerjee A, Carrion-i-Silvestre JL. Testing for panel cointegration using common correlated effects estimators. J Time Ser Anal. 2017;38(4):610–36.

McCoskey S, Kao C. A residual-based test of the null of cointegration in panel data. Economet Rev. 1998;17(1):57–84.

Banerjee A, Dolado J, Mestre R. Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. J Time Ser Anal. 1998;19(3):267–83.

Abdullah SM, Siddiqua S, Huque R. Is health care a necessary or luxury product for Asian countries? An answer using the panel approach. Heal Econ Rev. 2017;7(1):1–12.

Martins PM. Aid absorption and spending in Africa: a panel cointegration approach. J Dev Stud. 2011;47(12):1925–53.

Pedroni P. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford B Econ Stat. 1999;61:653–70.

Pedroni P. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economet Theor. 2004;20(3):597–625.

Kao C. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econometrics. 1999;90:1–44.

Beyene SD. Kotosz B Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: an empirical study for East African countries. Int J Environ Stud. 2020;77(4):636–54.

Driscoll JC, Kraay AC. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat. 1998;80(4):549–60.

Hoechle D. Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. STATA J. 2007;7(3):281–312.

Breitung J, Pesaran MH. Unit roots and cointegration in panels. In: The econometrics of panel data. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008.

Firebaugh G, Warner C, Massoglia M. Fixed effects, random effects, and hybrid models for causal analysis. In: Morgan S, editor. Handbook of causal analysis for social research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. p. 113–32.

Allard A, Takman J, Uddin GS, Ahmed A. The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach. Environ SciPollut Res. 2018;25(6):5848–61.

Bayar Y, Odabas H, Sasmaz MU, Ozturk OF. Corruption and shadow economy in transition economies of European Union countries: a panel cointegration and causality analysis. Econ Res-Ekon Istraz. 2018;31(1):1940–52.

Barbieri L. Panel Cointegration Tests: A Survey. Rivista Internazionale Di Scienze Sociali. 2008;116(1):3–36.

Kao C, Chiang MH. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In Baltagi BH, Fomby TB, Hill RC (Ed.) Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15, pp.179–222). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2001.

Roodman D. How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stand Genomic Sci. 2009;9(1):86–136.

Eslamloueyan K, Jokar Z. Energy consumption and economic growth in the Middle East and north Africa: a multivariate causality test. Iran J Econ Stud. 2014;18(57):27–46.

CrunchEconometrix. Econometrics and Data Analysis Resources: (Stata13): How to Generate Long-run GMM Coefficients. 2022. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01wUyHVZnTY&ab_channel=CrunchEconometrix

Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C. Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model. 2012;29(4):1450–60.

Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Psychology Press; 1988.

Hansen LP. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica. 1982;50(4):1029–54.

Sargan JD. The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica. 1958;26(3):393–415.

FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World. Transforming Food Systems to Deliver Affordable Healthy Diets for All FAO. 2020. Available from: https://www.fao.org/publications/sofi/2020/en/ .

Van Ittersum MK, Van Bussel LG, Wolf J, Grassini P, Van Wart J, Guilpart N, Claessens L, De Groot H, Wiebe K, Mason-D’Croz D, Yang H. Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself? Proce Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(52):14964–9.

Global Nutrition Report. Country Nutrition Profiles. 2021.  https://globalnutritionreport.org/resources/nutrition-profiles/africa/ .

Herrero M, Thornton PK, Power B, Bogard JR, Remans R, Fritz S, Gerber JS, Nelson G, See L, Waha K, Watson RA. Farming and the geography of nutrient production for human use: a transdisciplinary analysis. Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1(1):e33-42.

Sibhatu KT, Qaim M. Rural food security, subsistence agriculture, and seasonality. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10): e0186406.

Fanzo J. The role of farming and rural development is central to our diets. Physiol Behav. 2018;193:291–7.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author sincerely thanks the Editor, the three anonymous reviewers, and BalázsKotosz (Adjunct Professor) for their comments and advice.

This study did not receive any specific grant.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Business and Economics, Department of Economics, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia

Sisay Demissew Beyene

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

SDB collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data, and wrote and approved the paper for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sisay Demissew Beyene .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Competing interests.

The author declares that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:.

  Table S1. Cook’s D results

Additional file 2:

  Table S2. Hausman and Breusch-Pagan LM for REtests. 

Additional file 3.

Rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Beyene, S.D. The impact of food insecurity on health outcomes: empirical evidence from sub-Saharan African countries. BMC Public Health 23 , 338 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15244-3

Download citation

Received : 07 March 2022

Accepted : 08 February 2023

Published : 15 February 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15244-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Food insecurity
• Life expectancy
• Infant mortality
• Panel data estimations
• SSA countries

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

• General enquiries: [email protected]

• Skip to main content
• Skip to secondary menu
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer

A Plus Topper

Improve your Grades

Food Security in India Essay | Essay on Food Security in India for Students and Children in English

February 12, 2024 by Prasanna

Food Security in India Essay: Food security means availability of adequate food grains to meet the domestic demand along with availability at the individual level, to sufficient quantities of food at affordable prices.

Despite rapid economic growth in recent years, low access to food by people living below the poverty line remains a crisis in India. Right to food is a fundamental right. Yet food security remains a farfetched dream in our country.

You can also find more  Essay Writing  articles on events, persons, sports, technology and many more.

Long and Short Essays on Food Security in India for Students and Kids in English

We provide children and students with essay samples on a long essay of 500 words and a short essay of 150 words on the topic “Food Security In India” for reference.

Long Essay on Food Security in India 500 Words in English

Long Essay on Food Security in India is usually given to classes 7, 8, 9, and 10.

Food security is a factor that ensures the public to have access to sufficient, sanitary and nutritious food to suffice their nutritional needs and food preference for them to live a healthy and active life. Food Security has three chief and closely related workings, which are the– availability of food, access to food, and absorption of food.

Even with India’s fast-growing economy throughout the past few years, food security among the below poverty line population still is a far-off dream in our nation. It is estimated that around 50% of children and infants are malnourished and about half of the pregnant women population are anaemic.

In 2016’s Global Hunger Index, India has been ranked 97th in 118 countries. In the history of this country, it has suffered from14 famines, the Bengal Famine in 1943 being the worst. Food availability here has been largely dependent on the monsoon season. Environmental situations like floods, droughts, depletion in soil fertility, erosion and waterlogging have created obstacles in the normal running of the agricultural activities. With increasing population, agricultural areas are getting occupied for accommodation areas, roads, factories and other activities.

In the past, multiple efforts were executed to attain food security by massively increasing food grain production. The Green Revolution during Indira Gandhi’s governance was a step towards achieving Food Security. Ultimately revolutionary self-sufficiency in food was achieved with the Green Revolution during the late 1960s and 1970s in India.

Over the years, the White Revolution and structural transformation in agro-industry have helped to make sure food security to a large degree. During the 1960s, the Government of India launched the Public Distribution System (PDS), to ensure physical and economic availability of food to all sectors of the society, principally for the poor.

In 1995, the “Mid Day Meal Scheme” was launched. This was a scheme to feed underprivileged school children. The “Antyoday Ann Yojana” scheme was launched in 2000 for the most economically background people; National Food Security Act 2013 etc. to supply food and nutritional security to every segment of the country.

But with the power of progressing science and innovation in today’s world India hopes to increase the rate of food production in the agricultural as well as the livestock area including pisciculture. Advance biotechnology used in agriculture to improve soil production by employing various environmental friendly tools for insect and pest management. These measures are to ensure national and household nutritional and food security, by reducing poverty at a rapid rate, and to achieve accelerated growth in the agricultural sector.

The supply chain between the farmers and the consumers should be shortened, and farmer-friendly marketing processes are to be introduced.Such efforts would bring about positive developments and prosperity for everyone living in India. In a big country like India with a rapidly growing population, a large chunk of it is malnourished and under-weight; thus, it’s necessary to attain food security. Therefore a second revolution is extremely necessary to bring about stability in the Food Security in this nation.

Short Essay on Food Security in India 150 Words in English

Short Essay on Food Security in India is usually given to classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.

Food security is a factor that ensures sufficient food supply to people, particularly those who are deprived of basic nutrition. Food security is a major concern in India. Ironically, the vision for food security in a primarily agricultural country seems distant from reality. There are nearly 19.5 crore undernourished people in India, according to the UN, which is equivalent to a quarter of the world’s hunger burden. Also, around 43% of children in this country are chronically malnourished.

India ranks 74 out of 113 major countries in food security index. Though the available nutritional standard is 100% of the requirement, India lags far behind in terms of quality protein intake at 20% which needs to be tackled by making available protein-rich food products at affordable prices. India needs to work on methods to improve the accessibility and affordability of protein-rich food products using the latest environmentally friendly technology without the need for additional land and water to make this nation 100% food secure.

10 Lines on Food Security in India in English

• Food is essential to the survival of people.
• Food Security is the availability of food and one’s access to it.
• A household is deemed food-secure when its occupants do not live in hunger or fear of starvation.
• Six million children die of hunger every year.
• More than 850 million people worldwide live every day being food insecure. One in seven people lives with a problem that can be fixed.
• Indian contributes a quarter of the population across the world suffering from hunger.
• There are 19.5 crore undernourished people in India.
• The Green Revolution was the first step taken in India to attain food security.
• Average India’s diet consists of grains and vegetables and is deficient in protein.
• India’s malnutrition figures are not coming down despite several government programmes, says a new report released by World Food Programme.

FAQ’s on Food Security in India Essay

Question 1. What do you mean by food security in India?

Answer: According to the World Health Organization, food security is when people at all times have physical and economic access to adequate and nutritious food for a healthy and active life.

Question 2.  Does India have food security?

Answer: Data reports show that is the country with the largest population of food-insecure people. By 2019, 6.2+ crore people were living with food insecurity than the number in 2014.

Question 3. What are the five components of food security?

Answer: 5 components of food security:

• Availability of Food
• Access to Food
• Utilization of Food
• Malnutrition
• Picture Dictionary
• English Speech
• English Slogans
• English Letter Writing
• English Essay Writing
• English Textbook Answers
• Types of Certificates
• ICSE Solutions
• Selina ICSE Solutions
• ML Aggarwal Solutions
• HSSLive Plus One
• HSSLive Plus Two
• Kerala SSLC
• Distance Education

• UN Audiovisual for Professionals
• UN Photo - Digital Asset Management System
• Media Accreditation and Liaison
• Meetings Coverage
• UNifeed Home
• Information for Broadcasters

WFP / GAZA FOOD DISTRIBUTION

You need to first accept the terms and conditions before download.

Subject to the Terms of usage of UNifeed , UNifeed materials are available free of charge for news purposes only. UNifeed materials may not be sold or redistributed to third parties without the prior written consent of the UN or the UN entity which is source of the UNifeed material. All users of UNifeed materials must provide due credit to the United Nations or any UN entity source(s) in their use and broadcast of UNifeed materials.

STORY: WFP / GAZA FOOD DISTRIBUTION TRT:3:06 SOURCE: WFP RESTRICTIONS: PLEASE CREDIT WFP ON SCREEN LANGUAGE: ARABIC / ENGLISH / NATS

DATELINE: 31 MAY 2024 AND 13 JUNE 2024, GAZA

13 JUNE 2024, DEIR EL BALAH

1. Wide shot, driving on the street and destruction WFP operations are being severely impacted by the escalation of fighting in the south and centre of Gaza, the limited flow of humanitarian assistance and the breakdown of law and order in the south. 2. Various shots, WFP Food Distribution In central and southern Gaza, limited distributions of food parcels containing are taking place providing families with reduced rations. We have been able to resume food distribution due to new food parcels received through the port and more recently Karam Abu Salem/Kerem Shalom.

31 MAY 2024, GAZA CITY

3. Various shots, destruction, Displaced People There has been improvement in assistance to northern Gaza. WFP has been delivering supplies through Western Erez crossing. We hope we can continue using this route in a safe, sustained, and scaled-up manner.Problems remain with access to clean water, healthcare, fuel needed for bakeries, generators to pump water and for trucking, and medical supplies – garbage collection, sewage not being pumped, tons of rubble blocking movements in Gaza City and the north.  All these factors are essential to achieve a stable food security situation. 4. Various shots, market While basic commodities are available in markets in southern and central Gaza – despite being unaffordable for many people – the lack of commercial goods entering through northern crossings means markets in northern Gaza are either empty or food is sold at astronomical prices. 5. SOUNDBITE (Arabic) Samiha Skaik: “Vegetables are available in the market, but they are all sold at very high prices. For me, a widow, I have no income and I cannot feed my children.”

13 JUNE 2024, JABALIA

6.Wide shot, UNWRA School Sheltering Displaced People 150 people are crowded in this damaged school building.

6. SOUNDBITE (English) Um Mohammed: “Everything is destroyed completely. We find nothing to eat. We find no bed to sleep in.” 7. SOUNDBITE (Arabic) Um Imad: “It’s been 250 days of war but it feels like 250 years to us. We wake up and go to sleep hearing the sounds of bombings and airstrikes. We cant find food or anything else.”

13 JUNE 2024, GAZA CITY

8. SOUNDBITE (English) Carl Skau, WFP Deputy Executive Director: “This is also where we had famine-like conditions only about a month ago. But in the past month, during May, we have been able to move in with a lot of food.//Now our concerns are really in the south where the progress that we had made is being reversed. But beyond that, of course, people need more than food to survive and the people that I have been speaking with here in Gaza City tell me that they need sanitation, they need basic health care and frankly they need some level of dignity. Everyone I speak to want a ceasefire. They want this war to end.”

31 MAY 2024, JABALIA

9. Various shots, bread bakery All bakeries in Rafah have shut down. Only 9 out of the 17 bakeries that WFP supports are operating: 6 in Deir El Balah, 3 in Gaza City and north Gaza. WFP continues helping bakeries by providing wheat flour and other resources. Bakery operations risk closing if fuel and resources are not provided regularly.

The World Food Programme (WFP) operations are being severely impacted by the escalation of fighting in the south and centre of Gaza, the limited flow of humanitarian assistance and the breakdown of law and order in the south. Humanitarian space needs to be protected to ensure safe, unhindered access to people in need.

In the last week, WFP warehouses have been caught in the crossfire twice. WFP and other aid agencies have been struggling to access humanitarian aid from Karam Abu Salem/ Kerem Shalom due to active conflict, damaged roads, unexploded ordnance, fuel shortages, delays at checkpoints and Israeli restrictions.

WFP’s main warehouse in Rafah, currently in a warzone, has been emptied. Most partners and other humanitarian agencies have been displaced.

Since May 20, aid coming through Karam Abu Salem/ Kerem Shalom crossing has increased slightly, but it needs to expand significantly.

Fuel remains a major concern. Consistent fuel supply needed for trucks, hospitals, sewage pumping systems, desalination systems.  

Southern Gaza could see the same extreme hunger that was seen before in the north. The military incursion into Rafah is having a devastating impact.

There has been an exodus of nearly one million people from Rafah. People are now forced to live in areas with insufficient clean water, medical supplies, fuel, and limited food assistance.

More aid needs to enter via south -- people need dietary diversity, access to healthcare, and water. A multi-sectoral and strategically balanced response required. 

Northern Gaza has seen an improvement, but that improvement must be supported with more supplies of commercial fresh food that people can afford. Despite the arrival of some commercial, people cannot afford high prices.

Telecommunications remains key challenge. Palestinian networks in south running out of fuel for their generators.

Despite the multiple challenges, in May WFP managed to provide assistance to more than 1 million people in Gaza, with reduced rations due access constraints and dwindling food stocks. To roll back six months of near starvation conditions requires a multi-sectoral response that addresses the short, medium and long-term needs.      

WFP is on the ground, working with partners to deliver - In the north, WFP is distributing food parcels, wheat flour, hot meals, and supporting bakeries.     - In central areas, WFP is prioritizing hot meals to reach more people with fewer resources and are gradually providing parcels to families again. - In the south (Rafah), WFP is distributing very limited food and hot meals in areas that are accessible, with the limited stocks coming in from Karam Abu Salem.

Two bakeries operating in Gaza City; one just opened in Jabalia, providing essential bread in north. Of 17 bakeries WFP operates in Gaza, only nine are operating.  

WFP is shifting from providing canned foods, biscuits and ready-to-eat meals to giving people the purchasing power to choose the food their families want, invest in local markets, infrastructure and food systems, to have a tangible impact on peoples’ health and nutrition.

Related Content

WFP / RAFAH CROSSING OPENING

UN / GAZA WFP INTERVIEW

WHO / GAZA FOOD INSECURITY

UN / GAZA FOOD INSECURITY GUTERRES

UN / GAZA MCGOLDRICK HUMANITARIAN

UN / GLOBAL FOOD INSECURITY

YEMEN / BEASLEY VISIT

DPRK / FOOD SHORTAGES

SOUTH SUDAN / FOOD CRISIS

Food Security Crisis Resolution Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Global governance, importance and aids by global governance, works cited.

Food is one of the fundamental needs of human. Food security is the ability to access food by those who need it. Every household is termed as secured food wise if it has access to safe and enough food hence freedom from hunger. The World Food Organization describes this security as access to nutritious, safe and sufficient food to cater for the basic human desires.

The rapid increase of population all over the world is the major result for food insecurity (Harman 18). To ensure the situation does not run out of hand, the global body Food and Agricultural Organization has been at the forefront since time immemorial to cater for issues related to this basic human need. Central to this organization is governance. This can ensure that even if there is increased population, there can be enough resources or produce to cater for the increase and even shortages.

Food security has become a complex task to achieve with the development of globalization. Initially the main focus of the governing body was on agriculture. This ensured carefully monitoring of production and even the surplus that are stored. Today, different issues of concern have cropped up. These are in terms of food processing, food distribution and food consumption. Governance of food security has become challenging with the forms of contradictory policies that exist.

Most third world countries have weak connections with the global governance (Harman 18). These countries are always the worst hit groups when there is hunger breakout. On the other hand America and most of its environs have high influence in the global governance. Their exports have greatly increased while other third world countries exports have reduced. These countries used to export in a massive way but have since declined in production.

These countries are not promising at all. Therefore they have less influence of the global investment kitties. One will find that those countries that are stable in terms of agricultural production and are also doing great in the processing have much attraction to investment and are therefore considered a priority by the governing bodies

Several methods have been employed to cater for increasing cases of food insecurity. One of these methods is research. The cases of reduced land for tenure have been the main cause of low agricultural production. Currently, researchers have introduced novel ways of producing crops.

This has been aided greatly by biotechnology. This new research concept has enabled the production of crops that can resist adverse conditions. In addition, other crops can also do well in green houses. Unfortunately, other countries cannot afford this. Although global governance has given out these good options, some countries cannot afford. This is because their government cannot afford the finances in one way or another (Harman 18). This paints a bad picture of the governance while it is evident that it is not their fault.

Other forms of governance that would improve food security include Rule of law, internal peace, improvement of infrastructure from rural areas and support from the government for research. These proposals are best when employed on the ground. Developed countries have already put these practices in place and are ahead. There have been problems caused by global warming and other related disaster but this has been solved by having alternative methods. This does not mean that the conventional methods have been neglected.

Adoption measures have been for the purpose of bridging the gap between production and consumption. There is need for all countries to be stakeholders of global food programmes and government. This will ensure that there is a legitimate process for handling problems and also providing solutions for future activities. Unfortunately, the developing countries do not take part in the same footing. This therefore calls for a better government that will have honor for legitimate, political and democratic process.

Current Global Economic Situation

This is an economy which comprises all the economies of the world. The issue of globalization brought a great revolution in the economy of the world. This revolution comprised of merging of trade markets, free trade in international stock markets and many more. Initially, this impacted nations in a positive way (Harman 18). There was expansion of markets and industries, creation of employment opportunities for both the young and old the people and a paradigm shift from job search to creation of jobs. More so was the issue of innovation that brought about great investment both in foreign and indigenous countries.

Developed and developing countries have had different effects due to the dynamic global economy. Currently, the economy is at its worst. The economic metrics stand at a free fall at the moment. Some are quite rapid that it has become so scary. The situation has continued to deepen day by day from banks bail out to individual country bail outs.

Central to this crisis is the unavailability of basic commodities such as food. In addition, oil prices have posed the hardest hit to most countries. The oil crisis was brought about by the unstable situation in Japan and Northern part of America. These unrests led to reduced production of oil from the main oil producing countries such as Libya. The rising oil prices have been due to the scarce in the commodity or the raw material. This crisis has also translated to the current energy crisis

On the other hand is food crisis. This has also arisen due to globalization of the economy. Increased industries led to the deterioration of the environment. This consequently led to global warming. Global warming has had a great impact on Agriculture. The climate of the globe has changed tremendously towards the negative. This has contributed to the accumulation of greenhouse gases hence global warming.

Therefore the climate has changed affecting the agricultural activities. This has directly affected food prices mostly for people living in poor countries and the Asian community. This has since resulted in high increase in food prices. For instance, in Asia the food prices have increased to 10%. This has affected about sixty five million people in the country.

Another factor that has put the current economy at risk is the weakening of the Dollar. This has led to the rapid rise in market prices. The American people have huge debts to pay hence this has greatly affected their economy and even the grand global economy. Goods traded across the global market are as expensive as has never been experienced before.

The most affected are the developing countries which have to add an extra coin to get goods across the global market. There has been cumulative unemployment for fresh college students in both developing and developed nations. Also there has been a rebound in the trade globally. In 2010 the increase in trade was about 12% which was positive.

Resolution for the Crisis

The main resolution strategy to the current economic crisis is the issue of changing policies. This can be achieved by using neutral bodies that can help save the matter starting with the matters that are of priorities. First of all the weakening of the Dollar is one crisis that should be resolved. It actually affects the global markets and hence touches every part of the world. The crisis in the economic sector unfortunately combines almost all international affairs from trade, agriculture, social status, political status and many more affairs.

This then means that there is need to restructure the financial operations. As mentioned above, a policy reform is the ways to go. International organizations dealing with specific global issues should sit down and allow room for policy interventions that will be able to advocate for the independence of countries in terms of control of each country resources (Pacula etal., 276).

For instance, every country should have the sovereign authority to strategize on self sufficiency. That is, every country should have the capacity to state their productivity, consumption and even surplus without being influenced externally. Central regulation has proven to lack transparency hence failure in the part of governance.

The issue of central control can be avoided by having each country regulate their resources and present what they have to the international organizations. This does not mean that the mandates of these international organizations are being neglected but it means that the essence of external interventions is nullified.

Another critical sector that needs quick salvaging is the financial sector. There are policies that were imposed by the World health organization, World Bank, international Monetary Fund and the regional and bilateral trade (Pacula etal., 276).

These policies have tremendously caused the current financial crisis that has been predicted to last for about two years before it picks up in a steady state. It is speculated that the years 2012 and 2013 will be bad years for more so the developed countries. Controls such as the forced quotas, regulated market prizes, control of imports should be solely left within the agreements by countries.

In the case of finances, the issue of financial literacy needs to be worked out. The current crisis means that there has been inefficiency in management of money matters. It there was a well sophisticated system able to work out the financial problem and even speculate the trends in an actual way then the issue of global crisis could not be a pandemic at the moment. For example, the issue of high mortgage ownership in developed countries has led to the banks running in huge debts hence a need for bailouts.

If there were plans put in place to train the consumers who were taking credits then there would not be the issue of debt default. This would mean that the consumers would be aware of the steps they are taking and would only participate in taking debts that they are able to clear. This can also translate in the global credit acquisition by countries. There have been increasing complexities in the financial markets both in individual countries and globally. Having financial literacy would solve the issue of this crisis.

Approach to Crisis Resolution

Fortunately, these approaches are underway as there have been non partisan groups that are lobbying for reforms and policy change in international organizations. Having and ear for the cry of these lobbyists will be a good step taken by the developed countries and even the international organization in working out the crisis. Therefore, to have success, there should be great interest by these organizations and countries to take part in reforms especially on the issue of financial education which is very important.

Harman, Chris. “Financial and Economic Crisis”. The Guardian Weekly 3 Aug. 2007: 18. Print.

Pacula etal. “Politics of the United Nations”. Journal of Political Economy . 95.2 (2006): 107-300. Print.

• Human Factor in Global Warming
• Effects on Society From Global Warming
• Concepts of Global Warming: Survival of Living Organisms
• Biodiversity and Business Risk
• Application of Geography (GIS) in Biotechnology in Field of Agriculture and Environment
• Brazil Sustainable and Productive Agricultural Practices
• Essay on Sustainable Agriculture
• Biofuels: Economic and Environmental Perspective
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2019, May 20). Food Security Crisis Resolution. https://ivypanda.com/essays/food-security-essay/

"Food Security Crisis Resolution." IvyPanda , 20 May 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/food-security-essay/.

IvyPanda . (2019) 'Food Security Crisis Resolution'. 20 May.

IvyPanda . 2019. "Food Security Crisis Resolution." May 20, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/food-security-essay/.

1. IvyPanda . "Food Security Crisis Resolution." May 20, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/food-security-essay/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Food Security Crisis Resolution." May 20, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/food-security-essay/.

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar

UPSC Coaching, Study Materials, and Mock Exams

Enroll in ClearIAS UPSC Coaching Join Now Log In

Call us: +91-9605741000

Food Security in India

Last updated on June 9, 2024 by ClearIAS Team

Food security in India has been a significant policy concern for many years. India’s economy may be the one that is booming most rapidly in the world, but it is also seeing an increase in food price inflation. Read here to understand the food insecurity in India.

The price of food began to rise rapidly in 2019 and has continued to grow ever since. Annual inflation in July 2023 hit 11%, which was the highest level in a decade.

A portion of the population may have difficulty obtaining food with sufficient nutritional content as a result of the ongoing high food price inflation.

The term “food security” refers to the availability, accessibility, and affordability of safe and nutritious food for all individuals in a country.

Table of Contents

Food insecurity in India

Food insecurity in India has been a longstanding and complex issue, despite significant improvements in food production and distribution over the years. Several factors contribute to food insecurity in the country:

• Poverty: A significant portion of India’s population lives below the poverty line. Low income and lack of economic opportunities can limit people’s access to nutritious food.
• Unequal Distribution: While India produces enough food to feed its population, the distribution of food is unequal. Food often doesn’t reach those who need it the most, leading to food shortages in certain regions.
• Price Fluctuations: Price fluctuations in essential food commodities, such as rice and wheat, can make them unaffordable for many people during times of high inflation.
• Agricultural Challenges: India’s agriculture sector faces challenges such as unpredictable weather patterns, water scarcity, soil degradation, and inadequate infrastructure. These factors can lead to lower crop yields and affect food production.
• Land Ownership: Unequal land ownership patterns can limit small-scale farmers’ access to land and resources, making it difficult for them to produce sufficient food for their families.
• Food Wastage: A significant amount of food is lost or wasted during production, storage, and distribution. This wastage contributes to food scarcity.
• Malnutrition: Food insecurity is often linked to malnutrition. Even when food is available, it may lack the necessary nutrients for a balanced diet, leading to malnutrition issues, especially among children.
• Urbanization: Rapid urbanization has led to changes in dietary habits, with a greater reliance on processed and less nutritious foods, contributing to health-related food insecurity issues.
• Natural Disasters: India is prone to natural disasters like droughts, floods, and cyclones. These events can disrupt food production and lead to food shortages in affected areas.
• COVID-19 Pandemic: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns further exacerbated food insecurity by disrupting supply chains, affecting livelihoods, and increasing the vulnerability of marginalized populations.

While India has implemented various food security programs like the Public Distribution System (PDS) , the National Food Security Act (NFSA), and the Mid-Day Meal Scheme, there are often challenges in their effective implementation, including issues related to leakages and corruption.

Also read: Global Food Security Index 2021

Food security in India

India has made significant progress in improving food security, but challenges still exist.

• Food Production: India has made remarkable progress in increasing food production, particularly in staple crops like rice and wheat. The Green Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s played a crucial role in boosting agricultural productivity.
• Buffer Stocks: India maintains strategic grain reserves, known as buffer stocks , to stabilize food prices and meet emergencies. These stocks are managed by agencies like the Food Corporation of India (FCI) .
• Addressing Malnutrition: India has implemented programs to address malnutrition, particularly among children and pregnant women. These programs focus on improving nutritional intake and health outcomes.
• Containing Pandemic Impact: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in India’s food security system, as lockdowns disrupted supply chains and livelihoods. The government implemented relief measures, including distributing free food grains to vulnerable populations.
• Nutrition Quality: While food availability has improved, the focus is shifting toward improving the quality of food and addressing issues of hidden hunger, where people lack essential vitamins and minerals in their diet.
• Sustainable Agriculture: There is a growing emphasis on sustainable agriculture practices, including organic farming, to ensure long-term food security while protecting the environment.
• Climate Change Resilience: Building resilience to climate change is a priority for ensuring food security in the face of changing weather patterns and extreme events.
• Role of Technology: Technology is being increasingly harnessed for better crop management , weather forecasting, and food distribution, which can enhance food security efforts.

Government initiatives

National Food Security Act (NFSA)

• The NFSA, enacted in 2013, is a landmark legislation aimed at providing legal entitlements to food for a large section of India’s population. It aims to ensure that a specified quantity of food grains is made available to eligible beneficiaries at affordable prices.

Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS)

• The Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme, which began on October 2, 1975, is one of the Government of India’s flagship programs and one of the world’s largest and most innovative early childhood care and development programs.

Public Distribution System

• It is defined as the system in which food procured by the FCI is distributed among the weaker or poorer sections of society.

Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY)

• This scheme was launched in December 2000. Under this scheme, one crore of the poorest among the BPL families covered under the targeted public distribution system was identified. In this scheme, the State Rural Development Department has identified poor families through the Below poverty line survey.

Other schemes and initiatives:

• Eat Right India Movement
• POSHAN Abhiyan
• Food Fortification
• National Innovations Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)

Way forward

Improving food security in India is a multifaceted challenge that requires a combination of policies, programs, and initiatives aimed at increasing food availability, access, and utilization.

Enhance Agricultural Productivity:

• Invest in agricultural research and development to develop high-yield and climate-resilient crop varieties.
• Promote sustainable farming practices, including organic farming and precision agriculture.
• Improve access to modern farming technologies, such as improved seeds, fertilizers, and irrigation systems.

Increase Crop Diversification:

• Encourage diversification of crops to reduce dependency on a few staple crops and improve dietary diversity.
• Promote the cultivation of nutritious crops, fruits, and vegetables to address malnutrition issues.

Support Small-Scale Farmers:

• Provide small-scale farmers with access to credit, affordable crop insurance, and agricultural extension services.
• Promote farmer cooperatives and self-help groups to enhance collective bargaining power.

Water Management:

• Invest in water conservation and management techniques to address water scarcity issues.
• Promote efficient irrigation practices, such as drip irrigation and rainwater harvesting.

Infrastructure Development:

• Improve rural infrastructure, including roads, storage facilities, and markets, to reduce post-harvest losses and connect farmers to consumers.

Food Distribution and Supply Chain Enhancement:

• Strengthen the Public Distribution System (PDS) and other food distribution networks to ensure efficient and equitable access to food.
• Address issues related to food wastage during storage and transportation.

Nutrition Education:

• Launch public awareness campaigns to educate people about balanced nutrition and healthy eating habits.
• Implement school-based nutrition programs to improve the health and nutrition of children.

Social Safety Nets:

• Expand and strengthen social safety net programs like the National Food Security Act (NFSA) and the Mid-Day Meal Scheme to provide subsidized food to vulnerable populations.

Support for Women in Agriculture:

• Empower women in agriculture by providing training, credit, and land rights.
• Recognize and value the crucial role of women in food production and household nutrition.

Climate Resilience:

• Develop climate-resilient farming practices and provide support to farmers to adapt to changing climate patterns.
• Promote agroforestry and sustainable land use practices.

Reduce Food Loss and Waste:

• Implement measures to reduce food loss and waste at all stages of the supply chain, from farm to fork.
• Encourage food donation and redistribution programs to redirect surplus food to those in need.

Research and Innovation:

• Invest in research and innovation to find solutions to food security challenges, including crop diseases, pests, and climate-related issues.

Policy and Governance:

• Strengthen governance and transparency in food-related policies and programs to reduce corruption and ensure effective implementation.
• Monitor and evaluate food security initiatives to assess their impact and make necessary improvements.

International Cooperation:

• Collaborate with international organizations and neighbouring countries on food security initiatives, trade agreements, and disaster response.

Also read: Malnutrition in India

Addressing food insecurity in India requires a multi-pronged approach that includes improving agricultural practices, ensuring equitable distribution, reducing food wastage, enhancing access to social safety nets, and addressing poverty and malnutrition.

Government policies and programs, as well as international cooperation and support, play crucial roles in mitigating food insecurity and improving food access for all segments of the population.

India has made significant strides in improving food security, but challenges such as poverty, inequality, and the impacts of climate change continue to influence the nation’s efforts to ensure that all its citizens have access to adequate and nutritious food.

Addressing these challenges requires ongoing policy measures, investment in agriculture and rural development, and a commitment to social safety nets and nutrition programs.

Also read: 

• Biofortification; 
• Agri-food Policies for Soil, water, air, and Biodiversity
• Child food poverty

-Article by Swathi Satish

Aim IAS, IPS, or IFS?

About ClearIAS Team

ClearIAS is one of the most trusted learning platforms in India for UPSC preparation. Around 1 million aspirants learn from the ClearIAS every month.

Our courses and training methods are different from traditional coaching. We give special emphasis on smart work and personal mentorship. Many UPSC toppers thank ClearIAS for our role in their success.

Download the ClearIAS mobile apps now to supplement your self-study efforts with ClearIAS smart-study training.

Reader Interactions

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Don’t lose out without playing the right game!

Follow the ClearIAS Prelims cum Mains (PCM) Integrated Approach.

Join ClearIAS PCM Course Now

UPSC Online Preparation

• Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)
• Indian Administrative Service (IAS)
• Indian Police Service (IPS)
• IAS Exam Eligibility
• UPSC Free Study Materials
• UPSC Exam Guidance
• UPSC Prelims Test Series
• UPSC Syllabus
• UPSC Online
• UPSC Prelims
• UPSC Interview
• UPSC Toppers
• UPSC Previous Year Qns
• UPSC Age Calculator
• UPSC Calendar 2024
• About ClearIAS
• ClearIAS Programs
• ClearIAS Fee Structure
• IAS Coaching
• UPSC Coaching
• UPSC Online Coaching
• ClearIAS Blog
• Important Updates
• Announcements
• Book Review
• ClearIAS App
• Work with us
• Advertise with us
• Privacy Policy
• Terms and Conditions
• Talk to Your Mentor

Featured on

and many more...

ClearIAS YouTube Channel: Subscribe Now!

Thank You 🙌

Download Self-Study Plan

Analyse Your Performance and Track Your Progress

Download Study Plan

IAS/IPS/IFS Online Coaching: Target CSE 2025

Cover the entire syllabus of UPSC CSE Prelims and Mains systematically.

Content Search

Central african republic: ipc acute food insecurity snapshot | april – august 2024, attachments.

This projection update shows that the food insecurity situation in Central African Republic remains concerning, with around 2.5 million people (41 percent of the population analysed) in IPC Phase 3 or above. This includes 508,000 people who are in IPC Phase 4 (Emergency) and 2 million people in IPC Phase 3 (Crisis). These people require immediate action to save lives, protect their livelihoods and reduce food consumption gaps.

The prefectures of Mbomou, Haut-Mbomou, Haute-Kotto, Mambéré-Kadéi, Mnbomou, Nana-Mambéré and Ouham-Pende have the highest rates of food insecurity, with more than 50 percent of the population in IPC Phase 3 or above. These prefectures are followed by Kémo (48 percent), Ouaka (45 percent), Vakaga and Lobaye (40 percent), etc. A total of 11 sub-prefectures have been classified in Phase 4, while 59 have been classified in Phase 3.

The sub-prefectures classified in Phase 4 are mainly those of Bambouti, Djéma and Obo (Haut-Mbomou), Ouadda and Yalinga (Haute-Kotto), Ouanga (Mbomou), Nana-Bakasa and Nana-Boguila (Ouham), Birao and Ouada-Djallé (Vakaga). The people experiencing high levels of acute food insecurity are mainly displaced or affected by armed conflict across the country.

People experiencing high levels of acute food insecurity are mainly those living in situations of displacement as well as those affected by armed groups’ activities. People living in landlocked areas have difficulties accessing markets and selling local agricultural products because of poor road infrastructure. Poor households in urban or peri-urban areas face particular challenges as their access to food is dependent on markets but that access capacity is limited due to low purchasing power, the increase in prices of basic foodstuffs and the deterioration of livelihoods.

Related Content

CAR + 3 more

Central African Republic - Complex Emergency Fact Sheet #3, Fiscal Year (FY) 2024

République centrafricaine (rca) : analyse de l’insécurité alimentaire aigüe de l'ipc, avril - août 2024 (publié le 13 juin 2024).

CAR + 2 more

Central African Republic: Situation Report, 12 June 2024

République centrafricaine : rapport de situation, 12 juin 2024.