Pyramid Engineering, P.C. was created as a professional corporation chartered in Pennsylvania. The company is privately owned by the four founding partners.
The company is project oriented, where each project involves:
We offer innovative and economical design services, maintaining state-of-art design technology. We meet client needs on projects of all sizes.
Services include defining client needs, preparing bid documents, tendering bid analysis, construction review, payment certification, contract administration, warranty inspections. Projects include new facilities, renovations, repairs, and remodeling.
We have developed a brochure system which covers a broad spectrum of target market segments. This system is modular in nature and includes many ‘boiler plate’ sections which may be edited to suite specific needs. Brochure inserts are maintained as individual sheets to facilitate their assembly in any custom situation.
Our website includes a description of services, the areas which we plan to serve, contact information, a list of representative projects, and brief resumes. The website address is http:\\www.pyramidmep.com.
We will continue to develop a series of templates for project proposals. The format for all proposals will include:
Pyramid Engineering utilizes modern technology at all phases of a project. All work is carried out using CAD software, including preliminary design and presentation work. It is more cost effective, quicker and more accurate than traditional methods. We also use specialty design software as well as internet transfer of information between ourselves, other consultants and our clients.
Pyramid maintains comprehensive, Windows based analysis tools for design.
Pyramid maintains an Internet website complete with file transfer and e-mail capabilities.
Project Consulting: Proposed and billed on a per-project and per-milestone basis, project consulting offers a client company a way to harness our specific qualities and use our expertise to develop and / or implement plans, from conceptual planning to turnover. Proposal costs will be associated with each project.
Dispute Resolution: We will draw upon our broad range of construction and contract administration experience to provide dispute resolution services, including arbitration, mediation and expert reports for litigation.
Restoration Engineering: We would provide condition survey, design, and construction review services for repair of buildings.
Fabrication and Detailing Drawings: To serve the special needs of mechanical contractors, Pyramid will be offering these services to contractors in the future.
A very broad and extensive market base exists which, if properly pursed, can easily allow us to achieve our stated revenue / growth goals. Our targeted client base is taken from the following sectors:
Market Analysis | |||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | |||
Potential Customers | Growth | CAGR | |||||
Educational | 3% | 200,000 | 250,000 | 300,000 | 262,656 | 269,222 | 7.71% |
Health Care / Senior Facilities | 0% | 75,000 | 75,000 | 75,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | -9.64% |
Commercial | 0% | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 0.00% |
Government | 0% | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 0.00% |
Program Management | 0% | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 0.00% |
Contractor / Design Build | 0% | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 0.00% |
Sub Contracting | 0% | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 0.00% |
Total | 3.02% | 350,000 | 400,000 | 450,000 | 387,656 | 394,222 | 3.02% |
All of our target market segments have buildings or facility needs which require skilled engineering work to design and implement. They need engineers who understand their needs, their budget constraints, and the legal and code requirements for their facilities’ purposes and locations.
Our engineers are certified, with many years of experience in their fields, and ongoing relationships with government developers and planners, commercial developers, and local school districts throughout the Northeast. We will use these contacts to learn of new projects, develop competitive bids, and provide high-quality services to these market segments.
In addition, architectural and engineering firms often have need additional engineering consulting. Architects will always need skilled engineers to make their designs a reality, and large engineering firms sometimes have more work than they can handle.
In targeting work established architectural firms, our strategy is to offer them a viable resource from which to draw upon. We can undertake the entire mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering process for their architectural projects.
The engineering, design and consulting business consists of many smaller consulting organizations and individual consultants for every one of the few dozen well-known architectural / engineering companies.
Consulting participants range from major international name-brand consultants to hundreds of individuals. One of Pyramid’s challenges will be establishing itself as a “real” engineering, design and consulting company, positioned as a relatively risk-free corporate purchase.
The key element in purchase decisions made at the Pyramid client level is trust in the professional reputation and reliability of the engineering firm.
Clients rarely compare consultants directly, looking for two, or more, possible providers for a proposed project or job. Usually, they follow word-of-mouth recommendations and past reputation, rather than selecting from a menu of possible providers.
The most important element of general competition, by far, is what it takes to keep clients for repeat business. It is worth making huge concessions in any single project to maintain a client relationship that brings the client back for the future projects.
Pyramid will utilize its existing contacts with architects, governmental agencies, commercial developers and local school districts to increase word-of-mouth about our business. We have a standard brochure on our expertise and specialties which will be sent to architectural firms recommended to us by our current contacts.
Our marketing to architects and developers focuses on our thorough engineering expertise across the full range of skills necessary for any project. Examples of previous work and recommendations from former employers are available for the asking. Our individual reputations as reliable, skilled, knowledgeable resources, combined with our range of expertise as a team, will appeal strongly to those looking for subcontractors.
Pyramid has focused on the western and central Pennsylvania area initially. We are licensed to practice in most states in the eastern United States, and will continue to expand into these areas.
Pyramid Engineering, P.C. has the following competitive edges:
For established engineering and architectural firms who require mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering and consulting services, Pyramid offers a competitive and economical option. Projects may be delegated to Pyramid directly or arrangements can be made to supplement and assist their own in-house staff.
Most engineering work is billed on an hourly basis to predetermined levels dictated by project schedule milestones. We have assigned a rate of $75/hour for basic engineering/consulting services and $40/hour for drafting services. These are conservative values for the engineering market. We have used conservative unit rates to remain more competitive.
We will be using the internet and personal contacts in our sales promotion. These, together with a well targeted direct mail and e-mail campaign, will make all the major players in the marketplace aware of our presence.
We will focus our limited advertising budgets to promote community sponsored events. We will also offer technical services at discount rates to non-profit organizations.
Sales in our business is client service. It is repeat business. One doesn’t sell an engineering project, one develops a proposal that works for the client.
We must always be aware of the big-company consulting phenomenon of the split between selling the job and fulfilling the job, which leads to client dissatisfaction. The job should be developed, scoped, sold, and fulfilled by the same people. Our clients should never buy a job from one partner and have it delivered by anybody other than that same partner.
We need to avoid the temptation to drop fees to gain jobs. When a potential client questions the cost of a project, we explain the benefits. If the budget is for less money, then we must offer less service. Billing rates are not negotiated.
The following table and chart give a run-down on forecasted sales. In the last four months we have achieved sales of roughly $29,000 per month. We expect sales to remain at a relatively constant level for the next year.
Direct unit costs for the year consist solely of labor; these can be found in the Personnel Plan. Labor rates have been set at 70% of unit revenues, which yields a 30% gross margin. In the next year, we plan to increase gross margin to 35% as a result of providing a more efficient service to our clients.
Our unit rate for basic engineering/consulting service has been set at $75/hour. This is a conservative assumption based on published salary guideline levels for engineering professionals. Our unit rate for CAD services is $40/hour
Sales Forecast | |||
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
Sales | |||
Educational | $199,992 | $250,000 | $238,304 |
Health Care / Senior Facilities | $75,000 | $75,000 | $99,188 |
Commercial | $30,000 | $30,000 | $39,675 |
Government | $30,000 | $30,000 | $39,675 |
Program Management | $4,980 | $5,727 | $6,586 |
Contractor / design Build | $4,980 | $5,229 | $5,490 |
Consulting Income | $4,800 | $4,800 | $4,800 |
Total Sales | $349,752 | $400,756 | $433,718 |
Direct Cost of Sales | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
See Personnel Table | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Other | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Subtotal Direct Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 |
The accompanying table lists important milestones, with dates and managers in charge, and budgets for each. The milestone schedule indicates our emphasis on planning for implementation. Early milestones concern planning for the next three years, followed by further development of marketing and sales literature. We have also included ongoing meetings and reviews to confirm that our planned sales and expenses are matching our actual results.
Milestones | |||||
Milestone | Start Date | End Date | Budget | Manager | Department |
Business Plan | 10/15/2003 | 1/15/2004 | $0 | Lavoie | Administration |
Secure line of credit | 10/15/2003 | 1/15/2004 | $0 | Haugh | Administration |
Accounting Plan | 10/1/2003 | 2/1/2004 | $0 | Haugh/Lavoie | Administration |
Professional Licensing Plan | 1/1/2004 | 2/1/2004 | $0 | Solaeczyk | Engineering |
Press Release | 10/1/2003 | 2/1/2004 | $0 | Haugh | Marketing |
Networking Plan | 10/1/2003 | 2/1/2004 | $0 | All | Marketing |
Engineering proposal guides | 10/1/2003 | 3/1/2004 | $0 | Heasley | Marketing |
Client Presentations Plan | 10/1/2003 | 3/1/2004 | $0 | Solarczyk | Marketing |
Write / Update Mailer | 1/1/2004 | 3/15/2004 | $0 | Lavoie | Marketing |
Review / Revise Brochure | 10/1/2003 | 3/15/2004 | $0 | Lavoie | Marketing |
Client Contact Plan | 10/1/2003 | 3/15/2004 | $0 | Heasley | Marketing |
Advertising Campagn Plan | 10/1/2003 | 3/15/2004 | $0 | Heasley | Marketing |
Contract Guideline / Samples | 1/1/2004 | 3/15/2004 | $0 | Solarczyk | Department |
Initiate Direct Mailer Plan | 1/1/2004 | 3/31/2004 | $0 | Lavoie | Marketing |
Weekly Sales meetings | 1/1/2004 | 12/31/2004 | $0 | All | Marketing |
Internet up and running | 10/1/2003 | 12/31/2004 | $0 | Haugh | Marketing |
Regular check DGS & other sites | 1/1/2004 | 12/31/2004 | $0 | Solarczyk | Marketing |
Weekly check PitCon Listings | 1/1/2004 | 12/31/2004 | $0 | Haugh | Marketing |
Totals | $0 |
The website will be used as a marketing tool. It will offer a description of the services offered as well as listing of different clients served. Also included is a history of the firm, resumes of key members of the management team, and completed project descriptions and photographs.
The plan for marketing the site is fairly simple: we will submit it to search engines such as Google, and list the website on all the company’s correspondence and printed marketing/sales media.
Pyramid will develop and build the site. The initial website, www.pyramidmep.com, was up and running May 2003.
The company will be led by the four principals: John Lavoie, Tom Heasley, John Solarczyk and Eric Haugh.
John Lavoie has over 50 years of experience in electrical engineering, project management, and consulting management for both large consulting firms and industry.He has designed power distribution, lighting, communication, security and fire protection systems for both newly constructed and renovated industrial, commercial, and institutional buildings. He is equally familiar and experienced in primary power, distribution, variable speed drives systems, PLC, process control and instrumentation. His consulting firm management experience will provide the firm with direction and guidance needed in development of a new firm.
John Solarczyk has over 14 years experience in mechanical engineering and project management. His experience includes the design of chilled water, hot water steam and heat pump systems, performing energy efficient surveys, and utilizing measuring and testing equipment. He is also very familiar with the latest building control systems, in particular, direct digital control systems. John will be in charge of all HVAC and mechanical design.
Eric Haugh has over 11 years experience in mechanical engineering. His experience includes the design of sanitary, storm, domestic water, gas and medical gas systems. He is also NICET certified in sprinkler system layout, which includes the design of wet, dry, FM200 and standpipe fire protection systems. Eric will be in charge of all plumbing and fire protection designs.
All four principals have professional engineering licenses in multiple states.
The Personnel table summarizes payroll for the next three years. John Lavoie will work on a part-time basis, while the other three partners will work full-time. We have no plans to hire any other employees at this time.
Our labor costs represent the direct cost of sales, but payments are made monthly, regardless of hours billed to clients.
Personnel Plan | |||
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
John J. Solarczyk | $73,452 | $76,144 | $78,069 |
Thomas C. Heasley | $78,696 | $84,159 | $86,744 |
Eric C. Haugh | $73,452 | $76,144 | $78,069 |
John M. Lavoie | $22,728 | $22,843 | $24,722 |
Other | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total People | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Total Payroll | $248,328 | $259,290 | $267,604 |
We want to finance growth mainly through cash flow and equity, but will need a second short-term loan, in the amount of $26,391, in the next year to cover our cash flow.
The most important factor in our case is collection days. We can’t push our clients hard on collection days, because they are larger companies and will normally have marketing authority, not financial authority. Therefore we need to develop a permanent systems of receivables financing, using one of the established accounting systems. In turn, we must intend to ensure that our investment is compatible with our growth plan, management style, and vision.
Compatibility in this regard means:
The financial plan which follows summarizes information regarding the following items:
The financial plan depends on important assumptions. From the beginning, we recognize that collection days are critical, but not a factor we can influence easily. Interest rates, tax rates, and personnel burden are based on conservative assumptions.
Some of the more important underlying assumptions are:
Others include 60-day average collection days, sales entirely on invoice basis, including a favorable deposit policy, expenses on a net 39-day basis, 30 days on the average for payment of invoices, and present-day interest rates.
General Assumptions | |||
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
Plan Month | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Current Interest Rate | 6.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% |
Long-term Interest Rate | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% |
Tax Rate | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The gross margin for a service-based business is a reflection of the efficiency at which those services are offered. labor is our primary expense, and the only cost directly associated with sales. Given our sales rate over the last 6 months, we expect both to remain fairly constant. Gross margin, because we use no inventory, looks to be 100% for all year. After taking labor into account, a more realistic gross margin for Year 1 is 26%. We expect that our increased efficiency in Years 2 and 3 will produce a higher annual gross margin of 34% and 38%, respectively.
Net Profit /Sales will increase steadily through 2005.
Pro Forma Profit and Loss | |||
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
Sales | $349,752 | $400,756 | $433,718 |
Direct Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hidden Row | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Gross Margin | $349,752 | $400,756 | $433,718 |
Gross Margin % | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
Expenses | |||
Payroll | $248,328 | $259,290 | $267,604 |
Sales and Marketing and Other Expenses | $7,200 | $7,200 | $7,200 |
Depreciation | $612 | $612 | $612 |
Rent | $7,200 | $7,200 | $7,200 |
Utilities | $13,560 | $8,400 | $8,400 |
Insurance | $12,000 | $12,000 | $12,000 |
Payroll Taxes | $9,600 | $9,600 | $9,600 |
125 – Flexible Spending Account | $9,600 | $9,600 | $9,600 |
Automobile Expense | $5,400 | $3,600 | $3,600 |
Bank Service Charges | $600 | $600 | $600 |
Charity / Contributions | $600 | $600 | $600 |
Interest Expense | $1,800 | $360 | $360 |
Licenses and Permits | $1,800 | $720 | $720 |
Office Supplies | $6,000 | $6,000 | $6,000 |
Payroll taxes & Expenses | $9,600 | $9,600 | $9,600 |
Postage and Delivery | $840 | $850 | $860 |
Printing and Reproduction | $2,400 | $2,400 | $2,400 |
Professional Fees | $1,200 | $1,200 | $1,200 |
Professional Improvement (CEUs) | $600 | $600 | $600 |
Travel & Ent | $1,200 | $1,200 | $1,200 |
Other | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Operating Expenses | $340,140 | $341,632 | $349,956 |
Profit Before Interest and Taxes | $9,612 | $59,124 | $83,762 |
EBITDA | $10,224 | $59,736 | $84,374 |
Interest Expense | $2,243 | $2,137 | $1,338 |
Taxes Incurred | $2,211 | $17,096 | $24,727 |
Net Profit | $5,158 | $39,891 | $57,697 |
Net Profit/Sales | 1.47% | 9.95% | 13.30% |
The following chart and table summarize our break-even analysis. We are currently averaging sales above our break-even point. Any decrease in sales lasting longer than 3 months will generate decreases in payroll across the board to maintain net profits and capital.
Break-even Analysis | |
Monthly Revenue Break-even | $28,345 |
Assumptions: | |
Average Percent Variable Cost | 0% |
Estimated Monthly Fixed Cost | $28,345 |
Cash flow projections are critical to our success. The monthly cash flow is shown in the illustration, with one bar representing the cash flow per month, and the other the monthly balance. The first few months are critical. It may be necessary to inject additional capital in this time frame if the need arises. The annual cash flow figures are included here and more important detailed monthly numbers are included in the appendices.
Pro Forma Cash Flow | |||
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
Cash Received | |||
Cash from Operations | |||
Cash Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Cash from Receivables | $359,562 | $392,397 | $428,316 |
Subtotal Cash from Operations | $359,562 | $392,397 | $428,316 |
Additional Cash Received | |||
Sales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Received | $0 | $0 | $0 |
New Current Borrowing | $26,000 | $0 | $0 |
New Other Liabilities (interest-free) | $0 | $0 | $0 |
New Long-term Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Sales of Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Sales of Long-term Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 |
New Investment Received | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Subtotal Cash Received | $385,562 | $392,397 | $428,316 |
Expenditures | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
Expenditures from Operations | |||
Cash Spending | $248,328 | $259,290 | $267,604 |
Bill Payments | $95,598 | $100,387 | $107,243 |
Subtotal Spent on Operations | $343,926 | $359,677 | $374,847 |
Additional Cash Spent | |||
Sales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Paid Out | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Principal Repayment of Current Borrowing | $13,326 | $13,325 | $13,325 |
Other Liabilities Principal Repayment | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Long-term Liabilities Principal Repayment | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Purchase Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Purchase Long-term Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Dividends | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Subtotal Cash Spent | $357,252 | $373,002 | $388,172 |
Net Cash Flow | $28,310 | $19,395 | $40,144 |
Cash Balance | $30,909 | $50,304 | $90,448 |
With the payment of our liabilities, relatively low payroll and operating expenses, and a conservative sales forecast, our Balance Sheet shows an increasing net worth in every month and year of our plan. As a consulting and design business, the majority of our “capital” is intangible – the skills, experience, and reputation of our team. However, the nature of our work also keeps our costs low, so careful debt management and billing will soon produce a good profit, and a valuable company.
Pro Forma Balance Sheet | |||
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
Assets | |||
Current Assets | |||
Cash | $30,909 | $50,304 | $90,448 |
Accounts Receivable | $57,320 | $65,679 | $71,082 |
Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Current Assets | $88,229 | $115,983 | $161,529 |
Long-term Assets | |||
Long-term Assets | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 |
Accumulated Depreciation | $5,957 | $6,569 | $7,181 |
Total Long-term Assets | $3,671 | $3,059 | $2,447 |
Total Assets | $91,900 | $119,042 | $163,976 |
Liabilities and Capital | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
Current Liabilities | |||
Accounts Payable | $7,722 | $8,298 | $8,861 |
Current Borrowing | $42,283 | $28,958 | $15,633 |
Other Current Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Subtotal Current Liabilities | $50,005 | $37,256 | $24,494 |
Long-term Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Liabilities | $50,005 | $37,256 | $24,494 |
Paid-in Capital | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Retained Earnings | $36,737 | $41,895 | $81,786 |
Earnings | $5,158 | $39,891 | $57,697 |
Total Capital | $41,895 | $81,786 | $139,483 |
Total Liabilities and Capital | $91,900 | $119,042 | $163,976 |
Net Worth | $41,895 | $81,786 | $139,483 |
Business ratios for the years of this plan are shown below. Industry profile ratios based on the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 8712.01, Architectural Engineering, are shown for comparison.
Our business ratios look different from the industry standards in part because we are counting our only direct cost of sales, our engineering labor, as an operating expense. The company is structured so that employees receive a monthly salary regardless of hours billed, so our expenses are all, essentially, operating expenses.
Ratio Analysis | ||||
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | Industry Profile | |
Sales Growth | 54.82% | 14.58% | 8.22% | 6.40% |
Percent of Total Assets | ||||
Accounts Receivable | 62.37% | 55.17% | 43.35% | 33.49% |
Other Current Assets | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 37.48% |
Total Current Assets | 96.01% | 97.43% | 98.51% | 75.03% |
Long-term Assets | 3.99% | 2.57% | 1.49% | 24.97% |
Total Assets | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
Current Liabilities | 54.41% | 31.30% | 14.94% | 34.27% |
Long-term Liabilities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.64% |
Total Liabilities | 54.41% | 31.30% | 14.94% | 47.91% |
Net Worth | 45.59% | 68.70% | 85.06% | 52.09% |
Percent of Sales | ||||
Sales | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
Gross Margin | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
Selling, General & Administrative Expenses | 34.29% | 21.45% | 19.18% | 83.39% |
Advertising Expenses | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Profit Before Interest and Taxes | 2.75% | 14.75% | 19.31% | 2.49% |
Main Ratios | ||||
Current | 1.76 | 3.11 | 6.59 | 1.84 |
Quick | 1.76 | 3.11 | 6.59 | 1.49 |
Total Debt to Total Assets | 54.41% | 31.30% | 14.94% | 56.44% |
Pre-tax Return on Net Worth | 17.59% | 69.68% | 59.09% | 6.92% |
Pre-tax Return on Assets | 8.02% | 47.87% | 50.27% | 15.90% |
Additional Ratios | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
Net Profit Margin | 1.47% | 9.95% | 13.30% | n.a |
Return on Equity | 12.31% | 48.77% | 41.36% | n.a |
Activity Ratios | ||||
Accounts Receivable Turnover | 6.10 | 6.10 | 6.10 | n.a |
Collection Days | 60 | 56 | 58 | n.a |
Accounts Payable Turnover | 12.39 | 12.17 | 12.17 | n.a |
Payment Days | 29 | 29 | 29 | n.a |
Total Asset Turnover | 3.81 | 3.37 | 2.65 | n.a |
Debt Ratios | ||||
Debt to Net Worth | 1.19 | 0.46 | 0.18 | n.a |
Current Liab. to Liab. | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | n.a |
Liquidity Ratios | ||||
Net Working Capital | $38,224 | $78,727 | $137,036 | n.a |
Interest Coverage | 4.28 | 27.66 | 62.61 | n.a |
Additional Ratios | ||||
Assets to Sales | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.38 | n.a |
Current Debt/Total Assets | 54% | 31% | 15% | n.a |
Acid Test | 0.62 | 1.35 | 3.69 | n.a |
Sales/Net Worth | 8.35 | 4.90 | 3.11 | n.a |
Dividend Payout | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | n.a |
Sales Forecast | |||||||||||||
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | ||
Sales | |||||||||||||
Educational | 0% | $16,666 | $16,666 | $16,666 | $16,666 | $16,666 | $16,666 | $16,666 | $16,666 | $16,666 | $16,666 | $16,666 | $16,666 |
Health Care / Senior Facilities | 0% | $6,250 | $6,250 | $6,250 | $6,250 | $6,250 | $6,250 | $6,250 | $6,250 | $6,250 | $6,250 | $6,250 | $6,250 |
Commercial | 0% | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 |
Government | 0% | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 |
Program Management | 0% | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 |
Contractor / design Build | 0% | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 | $415 |
Consulting Income | 0% | $400 | $400 | $400 | $400 | $400 | $400 | $400 | $400 | $400 | $400 | $400 | $400 |
Total Sales | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | |
Direct Cost of Sales | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
See Personnel Table | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Other | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Subtotal Direct Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Personnel Plan | |||||||||||||
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | ||
John J. Solarczyk | 0% | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 |
Thomas C. Heasley | 0% | $6,558 | $6,558 | $6,558 | $6,558 | $6,558 | $6,558 | $6,558 | $6,558 | $6,558 | $6,558 | $6,558 | $6,558 |
Eric C. Haugh | 0% | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 | $6,121 |
John M. Lavoie | 0% | $1,894 | $1,894 | $1,894 | $1,894 | $1,894 | $1,894 | $1,894 | $1,894 | $1,894 | $1,894 | $1,894 | $1,894 |
Other | 0% | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total People | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
Total Payroll | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 |
General Assumptions | |||||||||||||
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | ||
Plan Month | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
Current Interest Rate | 6.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | |
Long-term Interest Rate | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | 10.00% | |
Tax Rate | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pro Forma Profit and Loss | |||||||||||||
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | ||
Sales | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | |
Direct Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Hidden Row | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Total Cost of Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Gross Margin | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | |
Gross Margin % | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
Expenses | |||||||||||||
Payroll | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | |
Sales and Marketing and Other Expenses | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | |
Depreciation | 0% | $51 | $51 | $51 | $51 | $51 | $51 | $51 | $51 | $51 | $51 | $51 | $51 |
Rent | 0% | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 | $600 |
Utilities | 0% | $1,130 | $1,130 | $1,130 | $1,130 | $1,130 | $1,130 | $1,130 | $1,130 | $1,130 | $1,130 | $1,130 | $1,130 |
Insurance | 0% | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 |
Payroll Taxes | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | |
125 – Flexible Spending Account | 0% | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 |
Automobile Expense | 0% | $450 | $450 | $450 | $450 | $450 | $450 | $450 | $450 | $450 | $450 | $450 | $450 |
Bank Service Charges | 0% | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 |
Charity / Contributions | 0% | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 |
Interest Expense | 0% | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 |
Licenses and Permits | 0% | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 | $150 |
Office Supplies | 0% | $500 | $500 | $500 | $500 | $500 | $500 | $500 | $500 | $500 | $500 | $500 | $500 |
Payroll taxes & Expenses | 0% | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 | $800 |
Postage and Delivery | 0% | $70 | $70 | $70 | $70 | $70 | $70 | $70 | $70 | $70 | $70 | $70 | $70 |
Printing and Reproduction | 0% | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 | $200 |
Professional Fees | 0% | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 |
Professional Improvement (CEUs) | 0% | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 |
Travel & Ent | 0% | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 | $100 |
Other | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Total Operating Expenses | $28,345 | $28,345 | $28,345 | $28,345 | $28,345 | $28,345 | $28,345 | $28,345 | $28,345 | $28,345 | $28,345 | $28,345 | |
Profit Before Interest and Taxes | $801 | $801 | $801 | $801 | $801 | $801 | $801 | $801 | $801 | $801 | $801 | $801 | |
EBITDA | $852 | $852 | $852 | $852 | $852 | $852 | $852 | $852 | $852 | $852 | $852 | $852 | |
Interest Expense | $162 | $167 | $171 | $176 | $180 | $185 | $189 | $194 | $198 | $203 | $207 | $211 | |
Taxes Incurred | $192 | $190 | $189 | $188 | $186 | $185 | $184 | $182 | $181 | $180 | $178 | $177 | |
Net Profit | $447 | $444 | $441 | $438 | $435 | $431 | $428 | $425 | $422 | $419 | $416 | $413 | |
Net Profit/Sales | 1.53% | 1.52% | 1.51% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.46% | 1.45% | 1.44% | 1.43% | 1.42% |
Pro Forma Cash Flow | |||||||||||||
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | ||
Cash Received | |||||||||||||
Cash from Operations | |||||||||||||
Cash Sales | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Cash from Receivables | $33,565 | $34,537 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | |
Subtotal Cash from Operations | $33,565 | $34,537 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | $29,146 | |
Additional Cash Received | |||||||||||||
Sales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Received | 0.00% | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
New Current Borrowing | $4,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | |
New Other Liabilities (interest-free) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
New Long-term Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Sales of Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Sales of Long-term Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
New Investment Received | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Subtotal Cash Received | $37,565 | $36,537 | $31,146 | $31,146 | $31,146 | $31,146 | $31,146 | $31,146 | $31,146 | $31,146 | $31,146 | $31,146 | |
Expenditures | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
Expenditures from Operations | |||||||||||||
Cash Spending | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | $20,694 | |
Bill Payments | $7,931 | $7,954 | $7,957 | $7,960 | $7,963 | $7,967 | $7,970 | $7,973 | $7,976 | $7,979 | $7,982 | $7,985 | |
Subtotal Spent on Operations | $28,625 | $28,648 | $28,651 | $28,654 | $28,657 | $28,661 | $28,664 | $28,667 | $28,670 | $28,673 | $28,676 | $28,679 | |
Additional Cash Spent | |||||||||||||
Sales Tax, VAT, HST/GST Paid Out | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Principal Repayment of Current Borrowing | $1,111 | $1,111 | $1,111 | $1,111 | $1,111 | $1,111 | $1,111 | $1,111 | $1,111 | $1,111 | $1,111 | $1,111 | |
Other Liabilities Principal Repayment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Long-term Liabilities Principal Repayment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Purchase Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Purchase Long-term Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Dividends | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Subtotal Cash Spent | $29,736 | $29,759 | $29,762 | $29,765 | $29,768 | $29,771 | $29,774 | $29,777 | $29,780 | $29,784 | $29,787 | $29,790 | |
Net Cash Flow | $7,829 | $6,778 | $1,384 | $1,381 | $1,378 | $1,375 | $1,372 | $1,369 | $1,366 | $1,362 | $1,359 | $1,356 | |
Cash Balance | $10,428 | $17,206 | $18,590 | $19,972 | $21,350 | $22,725 | $24,096 | $25,465 | $26,831 | $28,193 | $29,552 | $30,909 |
Pro Forma Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | ||
Assets | Starting Balances | ||||||||||||
Current Assets | |||||||||||||
Cash | $2,599 | $10,428 | $17,206 | $18,590 | $19,972 | $21,350 | $22,725 | $24,096 | $25,465 | $26,831 | $28,193 | $29,552 | $30,909 |
Accounts Receivable | $67,130 | $62,711 | $57,320 | $57,320 | $57,320 | $57,320 | $57,320 | $57,320 | $57,320 | $57,320 | $57,320 | $57,320 | $57,320 |
Other Current Assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Current Assets | $69,729 | $73,139 | $74,527 | $75,911 | $77,292 | $78,670 | $80,045 | $81,417 | $82,785 | $84,151 | $85,513 | $86,873 | $88,229 |
Long-term Assets | |||||||||||||
Long-term Assets | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 | $9,628 |
Accumulated Depreciation | $5,345 | $5,396 | $5,447 | $5,498 | $5,549 | $5,600 | $5,651 | $5,702 | $5,753 | $5,804 | $5,855 | $5,906 | $5,957 |
Total Long-term Assets | $4,283 | $4,232 | $4,181 | $4,130 | $4,079 | $4,028 | $3,977 | $3,926 | $3,875 | $3,824 | $3,773 | $3,722 | $3,671 |
Total Assets | $74,012 | $77,371 | $78,708 | $80,041 | $81,371 | $82,698 | $84,022 | $85,343 | $86,660 | $87,975 | $89,286 | $90,595 | $91,900 |
Liabilities and Capital | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
Current Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Accounts Payable | $7,666 | $7,689 | $7,692 | $7,695 | $7,698 | $7,701 | $7,704 | $7,707 | $7,710 | $7,713 | $7,716 | $7,719 | $7,722 |
Current Borrowing | $29,609 | $32,499 | $33,388 | $34,278 | $35,167 | $36,057 | $36,946 | $37,836 | $38,725 | $39,615 | $40,504 | $41,394 | $42,283 |
Other Current Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Subtotal Current Liabilities | $37,275 | $40,187 | $41,080 | $41,972 | $42,865 | $43,757 | $44,650 | $45,542 | $46,435 | $47,327 | $48,220 | $49,113 | $50,005 |
Long-term Liabilities | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Liabilities | $37,275 | $40,187 | $41,080 | $41,972 | $42,865 | $43,757 | $44,650 | $45,542 | $46,435 | $47,327 | $48,220 | $49,113 | $50,005 |
Paid-in Capital | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Retained Earnings | $55,858 | $36,737 | $36,737 | $36,737 | $36,737 | $36,737 | $36,737 | $36,737 | $36,737 | $36,737 | $36,737 | $36,737 | $36,737 |
Earnings | ($19,121) | $447 | $891 | $1,332 | $1,769 | $2,204 | $2,635 | $3,063 | $3,488 | $3,911 | $4,329 | $4,745 | $5,158 |
Total Capital | $36,737 | $37,184 | $37,628 | $38,069 | $38,506 | $38,941 | $39,372 | $39,800 | $40,225 | $40,648 | $41,066 | $41,482 | $41,895 |
Total Liabilities and Capital | $74,012 | $77,371 | $78,708 | $80,041 | $81,371 | $82,698 | $84,022 | $85,343 | $86,660 | $87,975 | $89,286 | $90,595 | $91,900 |
Net Worth | $36,737 | $37,184 | $37,628 | $38,069 | $38,506 | $38,941 | $39,372 | $39,800 | $40,225 | $40,648 | $41,066 | $41,482 | $41,895 |
Fill-in-the-blanks and automatic financials make it easy.
No thanks, I prefer writing 40-page documents.
Discover the world’s #1 plan building software
The Office of Safety Programs Management is responsible for administering and managing the New Jersey Highway Safety Program (HSIP) and associated funding, including compiling and submitting the federal reporting requirements for the program.
This Office coordinates the development and implementation of the New Jersey 2020 Strategic Highway Safety Plan (NJ 2020 SHSP) and provides project development support and technical guidance for all HSIP-funded projects.
This Office develops Problem Statements for high-risk safety locations and manages all HSIP funded safety planning contracts.
This Office develops and maintains the Safety Management System, conducting and reviewing crash analyses and Data Driven Safety Analyses (DDSA). The team also serve as safety subject matter experts on all capital projects at the Department.
Route 1 | Milepost (MP) |
---|---|
Trenton to West Windsor | MP .06 - MP 10 |
South Brunswick to Edison | MP 20 - MP 30 |
Woodbridge to Elizabeth | MP 35 - MP 45 |
Route 9 | |
Lakewood to Howell | MP 100 - MP 110 |
Howell to Marlboro | MP 110 - MP 120 |
Marlboro to South Amboy | MP 120 - MP 130 |
Route 22 | |
Branchburg to Green Brook | MP 30 - MP 40 |
Moutainside to Newark | MP 50 - MP 60 |
Route 40-322 | |
Hamilton to Egg Harbor | MP 50 - MP 60 |
Netcong to Rockaway | MP 30 - MP 40 |
Parsippany-Troy Hills to Clifton | MP 50 - MP 60 |
Millville to Vineland | MP 40 - MP 50 |
Voorhees to Maple Shade | MP 19 - MP 30 |
Montgomery to Somerville | MP 60 - MP 70 |
What is moscow prioritization.
MoSCoW prioritization, also known as the MoSCoW method or MoSCoW analysis, is a popular prioritization technique for managing requirements.
The acronym MoSCoW represents four categories of initiatives: must-have, should-have, could-have, and won’t-have, or will not have right now. Some companies also use the “W” in MoSCoW to mean “wish.”
Software development expert Dai Clegg created the MoSCoW method while working at Oracle. He designed the framework to help his team prioritize tasks during development work on product releases.
You can find a detailed account of using MoSCoW prioritization in the Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM) handbook . But because MoSCoW can prioritize tasks within any time-boxed project, teams have adapted the method for a broad range of uses.
Before running a MoSCoW analysis, a few things need to happen. First, key stakeholders and the product team need to get aligned on objectives and prioritization factors. Then, all participants must agree on which initiatives to prioritize.
At this point, your team should also discuss how they will settle any disagreements in prioritization. If you can establish how to resolve disputes before they come up, you can help prevent those disagreements from holding up progress.
Finally, you’ll also want to reach a consensus on what percentage of resources you’d like to allocate to each category.
With the groundwork complete, you may begin determining which category is most appropriate for each initiative. But, first, let’s further break down each category in the MoSCoW method.
Moscow prioritization categories.
As the name suggests, this category consists of initiatives that are “musts” for your team. They represent non-negotiable needs for the project, product, or release in question. For example, if you’re releasing a healthcare application, a must-have initiative may be security functionalities that help maintain compliance.
The “must-have” category requires the team to complete a mandatory task. If you’re unsure about whether something belongs in this category, ask yourself the following.
If the product won’t work without an initiative, or the release becomes useless without it, the initiative is most likely a “must-have.”
Should-have initiatives are just a step below must-haves. They are essential to the product, project, or release, but they are not vital. If left out, the product or project still functions. However, the initiatives may add significant value.
“Should-have” initiatives are different from “must-have” initiatives in that they can get scheduled for a future release without impacting the current one. For example, performance improvements, minor bug fixes, or new functionality may be “should-have” initiatives. Without them, the product still works.
Another way of describing “could-have” initiatives is nice-to-haves. “Could-have” initiatives are not necessary to the core function of the product. However, compared with “should-have” initiatives, they have a much smaller impact on the outcome if left out.
So, initiatives placed in the “could-have” category are often the first to be deprioritized if a project in the “should-have” or “must-have” category ends up larger than expected.
One benefit of the MoSCoW method is that it places several initiatives in the “will-not-have” category. The category can manage expectations about what the team will not include in a specific release (or another timeframe you’re prioritizing).
Placing initiatives in the “will-not-have” category is one way to help prevent scope creep . If initiatives are in this category, the team knows they are not a priority for this specific time frame.
Some initiatives in the “will-not-have” group will be prioritized in the future, while others are not likely to happen. Some teams decide to differentiate between those by creating a subcategory within this group.
Although Dai Clegg developed the approach to help prioritize tasks around his team’s limited time, the MoSCoW method also works when a development team faces limitations other than time. For example:
What if a development team’s limiting factor is not a deadline but a tight budget imposed by the company? Working with the product managers, the team can use MoSCoW first to decide on the initiatives that represent must-haves and the should-haves. Then, using the development department’s budget as the guide, the team can figure out which items they can complete.
A cross-functional product team might also find itself constrained by the experience and expertise of its developers. If the product roadmap calls for functionality the team does not have the skills to build, this limiting factor will play into scoring those items in their MoSCoW analysis.
Cross-functional teams can also find themselves constrained by other company priorities. The team wants to make progress on a new product release, but the executive staff has created tight deadlines for further releases in the same timeframe. In this case, the team can use MoSCoW to determine which aspects of their desired release represent must-haves and temporarily backlog everything else.
Although many product and development teams have prioritized MoSCoW, the approach has potential pitfalls. Here are a few examples.
One common criticism against MoSCoW is that it does not include an objective methodology for ranking initiatives against each other. Your team will need to bring this methodology to your analysis. The MoSCoW approach works only to ensure that your team applies a consistent scoring system for all initiatives.
Pro tip: One proven method is weighted scoring, where your team measures each initiative on your backlog against a standard set of cost and benefit criteria. You can use the weighted scoring approach in ProductPlan’s roadmap app .
To know which of your team’s initiatives represent must-haves for your product and which are merely should-haves, you will need as much context as possible.
For example, you might need someone from your sales team to let you know how important (or unimportant) prospective buyers view a proposed new feature.
One pitfall of the MoSCoW method is that you could make poor decisions about where to slot each initiative unless your team receives input from all relevant stakeholders.
Because MoSCoW does not include an objective scoring method, your team members can fall victim to their own opinions about certain initiatives.
One risk of using MoSCoW prioritization is that a team can mistakenly think MoSCoW itself represents an objective way of measuring the items on their list. They discuss an initiative, agree that it is a “should have,” and move on to the next.
But your team will also need an objective and consistent framework for ranking all initiatives. That is the only way to minimize your team’s biases in favor of items or against them.
MoSCoW prioritization is effective for teams that want to include representatives from the whole organization in their process. You can capture a broader perspective by involving participants from various functional departments.
Another reason you may want to use MoSCoW prioritization is it allows your team to determine how much effort goes into each category. Therefore, you can ensure you’re delivering a good variety of initiatives in each release.
If you’re considering giving MoSCoW prioritization a try, here are a few steps to keep in mind. Incorporating these into your process will help your team gain more value from the MoSCoW method.
Remember, MoSCoW helps your team group items into the appropriate buckets—from must-have items down to your longer-term wish list. But MoSCoW itself doesn’t help you determine which item belongs in which category.
You will need a separate ranking methodology. You can choose from many, such as:
For help finding the best scoring methodology for your team, check out ProductPlan’s article: 7 strategies to choose the best features for your product .
To make sure you’re placing each initiative into the right bucket—must-have, should-have, could-have, or won’t-have—your team needs context.
At the beginning of your MoSCoW method, your team should consider which stakeholders can provide valuable context and insights. Sales? Customer success? The executive staff? Product managers in another area of your business? Include them in your initiative scoring process if you think they can help you see opportunities or threats your team might miss.
MoSCoW gives your team a tangible way to show your organization prioritizing initiatives for your products or projects.
The method can help you build company-wide consensus for your work, or at least help you show stakeholders why you made the decisions you did.
Communicating your team’s prioritization strategy also helps you set expectations across the business. When they see your methodology for choosing one initiative over another, stakeholders in other departments will understand that your team has thought through and weighed all decisions you’ve made.
If any stakeholders have an issue with one of your decisions, they will understand that they can’t simply complain—they’ll need to present you with evidence to alter your course of action.
Related Terms
2×2 prioritization matrix / Eisenhower matrix / DACI decision-making framework / ICE scoring model / RICE scoring model
Talk to an expert.
Schedule a few minutes with us to share more about your product roadmapping goals and we'll tailor a demo to show you how easy it is to build strategic roadmaps, align behind customer needs, prioritize, and measure success.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Explore a real-world engineering business plan example and download a free template with this information to start writing your own business plan. ... Its founder is Mr. Martin Compton, a former engineering geology department head with Wilson and Brown, Inc. Mr. Compton has brought together a highly respected group of geologists, hydrologists ...
1. Don't worry about finding an exact match. We have over 550 sample business plan templates. So, make sure the plan is a close match, but don't get hung up on the details. Your business is unique and will differ from any example or template you come across. So, use this example as a starting point and customize it to your needs.
Writing an engineering consulting business plan is a crucial step toward the success of your business. Here are the key steps to consider when writing a business plan: 1. Executive Summary. An executive summary is the first section planned to offer an overview of the entire business plan. However, it is written after the whole business plan is ...
Our Engineering Business Plan Template & Guidebook is designed to help you easily create a comprehensive business plan for your engineering business. This guidebook provides step-by-step instructions on how to create each section of your business plan, as well as helpful tips and examples to ensure that your plan is thorough and effective.
Mining Software Business Plan. Rekayasa Tambang Indonesia is a start-up custom software and consulting company. Engineers have a unique set of circumstances that make their businesses different from many others. That's why you'll find these specific sample business plans for engineering firms so helpful. Explore our library of Engineering ...
4. Write an Engineering Consulting Business Plan. A business plan is a document that outlines your business goals, strategies, and how you plan to achieve them. Your engineering consulting business plan should include the following: Business Description: Describe what your engineering company does, who your target market is, and how you will ...
Use This Template. Make a lasting impression and drive your engineering company's success with this professional business plan template. Articulate vital business elements such as your company's vision, objectives, SWOT analysis, and financial forecast with this clean and sophisticated template designed for engineering companies.
This template is specifically designed to help engineers outline their goals, strategies, financial projections, and marketing plans, providing a comprehensive framework for their engineering ventures. With this template, you can: Clearly define your business objectives and target market. Outline your strategies for success and growth.
Start now. 1. Perform market analysis. Embarking on the journey to start an engineering business requires a keen understanding of the market you're entering. An in-depth market analysis provides insights into industry trends, competition, and customer needs, ensuring your business is well-positioned for success.
If YES, here is a complete sample engineering consulting business plan template & feasibility report you can use for FREE. Okay, so we have considered all the requirements for starting an engineering consulting company. We also took it further by analyzing and drafting a sample engineering consulting marketing plan template backed up by ...
A business plan has 2 main parts: a financial forecast outlining the funding requirements of your mechanical engineering consulting firm and the expected growth, profits and cash flows for the next 3 to 5 years; and a written part which gives the reader the information needed to decide if they believe the forecast is achievable.
Here is a typical Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) table of contents example: Introduction. 1.1 Purpose and scope of the SEMP. 1.2 Project background and context. Project Overview. 2.1 Project objectives and goals. 2.2 Stakeholder identification and engagement. Systems Engineering Process.
DevFinOps Engineering Investment and Business Alignment How Technical Leaders Should Prepare for Budget Planning. Phil Braden October 13, 2020 ... Sometimes this is an important input into the operating plan: if the business already knows what it needs from the engineering team, the engineering team in turn needs to tell the business what ...
A good engineering business plan must include a vision. A vision that supports and realizes the goals and intention of the clients. And to realize this vision, it has to have some strategies. 2. Standardization. To meet standards, it must follow correct procedures in every transaction. These are the standards as required by the different ...
Retail Hardware Store Business Plan. Solar Water Heater Distributor Business Plan. Surveyor Instrument Business Plan. Tools Rental Business Plan. As an experienced construction worker, architect, or engineer, you know how vital a detailed plan is for success. It provides a path forward for even the most technical projects to be streamlined ...
As a new department manager, now that you've completed the initial six critical steps and established your rhythm of business model (ROB), next up is creating your department's tactical plan ...
Firstly, make the process as inclusive as possible. Seek input from a wide range of perspectives and embrace the concept of co-invention, which will help ensure your teams are fully engaged with the strategy. Secondly, don't plan your engineering strategy in a silo.
How to Create an Engineering Roadmap
The University of Idaho College of Engineering offers degree programs in a variety of fields online and in Moscow, Coeur d'Alene, Boise and Idaho Falls. Experience the difference and what it means to engineer like a Vandal. No. 1 Best Value Public University in the West Four Years Running - ranked by U.S. News and World Report.
The Engineering Division oversees the quality control and administration of Community Development construction projects and maintains an archive of plans, specifications, maps and other pertinent records. From design, surveying and inspection activities to inter-departmental and public assistance, the Engineering Division is a professional ...
Explore a real-world architectural engineering business plan example and download a free template with this information to start writing your own business plan. ... Department: Initiate Direct Mailer Plan: 1/1/2004: 3/31/2004: $0 : Lavoie: Marketing: Weekly Sales meetings: 1/1/2004: 12/31/2004: $0 : All: Marketing: Internet up and running: 10/1 ...
Permits. Grading/Erosion Control Application (PDF) Grading/Erosion Control Application (fillable PDF) Right of Way Use Application (fillable PDF) Right of Way Permit Application (PDF) Right of Way Inspection Requirements (PDF) Water Conservation Variance Application.
This Office coordinates the development and implementation of the New Jersey 2020 Strategic Highway Safety Plan (NJ 2020 SHSP) and provides project development support and technical guidance for all HSIP-funded projects. This Office develops Problem Statements for high-risk safety locations and manages all HSIP funded safety planning contracts.
What is MoSCoW Prioritization?