experimental research synonym

• Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

Synonyms and antonyms of experimental in English

Experimental.

Word of the Day

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

the distance down either from the top of something to the bottom, or to a distance below the top surface of something

Never say die! (Idioms and phrases in newspapers)

Learn more with +Plus

• Recent and Recommended {{#preferredDictionaries}} {{name}} {{/preferredDictionaries}}
• Definitions Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English English Learner’s Dictionary Essential British English Essential American English
• Grammar and thesaurus Usage explanations of natural written and spoken English Grammar Thesaurus
• Pronunciation British and American pronunciations with audio English Pronunciation
• English–Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Simplified)–English
• English–Chinese (Traditional) Chinese (Traditional)–English
• English–Dutch Dutch–English
• English–French French–English
• English–German German–English
• English–Indonesian Indonesian–English
• English–Italian Italian–English
• English–Japanese Japanese–English
• English–Norwegian Norwegian–English
• English–Polish Polish–English
• English–Portuguese Portuguese–English
• English–Spanish Spanish–English
• English–Swedish Swedish–English
• Dictionary +Plus Word Lists

To add ${headword} to a word list please sign up or log in.

Add ${headword} to one of your lists below, or create a new one.

{{message}}

Something went wrong.

There was a problem sending your report.

Differences Between Experimental & Descriptive Research

Stuart robertson.

There are several differences between descriptive research and experimental research that are important for anyone conducting research or reading the research of others to understand. Descriptive research, while easier to do, is less suited to explaining a connection between two variables. Experimental research is often seen as more important, but is harder to conduct for several reasons.

Explore this article

• Causal Relationship
• Data Source
• Field of Study

1 Causal Relationship

The most important difference between descriptive research and experimental research is the relationship that can be proven between two variables. In descriptive research, all that can be proven is a correlation. Descriptive research can show a link between two events--a country's average saturated fat consumption and that same country's rate of heart disease, for instance--but not how that relationship actually works, which is an example of something experimental research could be used to demonstrate.

Another key difference between descriptive research and experimental research is the design process. A descriptive research project is fairly straightforward to design, but when designing an experimental project, many additional things have to be considered. Most experimental research, for example, depends on manipulating an independent variable to observe its effect on the dependent variable, but many other incidental variables have to be controlled and accounted for, or the results could be inaccurate or tainted.

3 Data Source

Descriptive research is primarily concerned with taking available data and trying to tease some insight out of that data using statistical analysis. Experimental researchers will often do this same sort of analysis, the difference being that they are also collecting the data. There is a key difference, then, in where the data of an experiment comes from. Descriptive research will sometimes incorporate the raw data collected from other previous experimental research.

4 Field of Study

Another important difference between descriptive research and experimental research is the fields of study where the two are commonly used. Both descriptive and experimental research are used throughout the sciences, for instance, but in many of the social sciences primarily descriptive research is used. Many social sciences, like Political Science or Sociology for example, concern themselves with societal issues, and it would not be practical to, for instance, run an experiment on which political ideology resulted in a better run country. Psychology, however, is one example of a social science focused more on individuals, where experimental research is often used.

• 1 Research Design in Occupational Education; Descriptive Research; James P. Key; 1997
• 2 Research Design in Occupational Education; Experimental Research and Design; James P. Key; 1997

About the Author

Stuart Robertson has been freelance writing since 2008, covering topics such as health, environmental issues and technology for websites such as Chiff.com and Environmental Graffiti. He has a bachelor's degree in political science.

Related Articles

What Is the Difference Between Qualitative & Quantitative...

What Are the Advantages & Disadvantages of Correlation...

Define Primary & Secondary Data

Characteristics of a Comparative Research Design

Correlational Methods vs. Experimental Methods

Do Opposites Attract When It Comes to Love?

What Is the Meaning of the Descriptive Method in Research?

How to Write a Descriptive Research Design

Methods of Research Design

What Are the Differences Between Controlled & Comparative...

What Are the Advantages & Disadvantages of Non-Experimental...

The Advantages of Exploratory Research Design

Different Types of Methodologies

Problems in Research: Quantitative & Qualitative Methods

Research Study Design Types

US Army Bases in Thailand

Does Having Two Wireless Adapters Connected Boost Your...

The Difference Between an MBA Vs. an M.A., M.S., or...

How to Propose a Formal Hypothesis

What Is the Difference Between a Degree in Chemistry...

Regardless of how old we are, we never stop learning. Classroom is the educational resource for people of all ages. Whether you’re studying times tables or applying to college, Classroom has the answers.

• Accessibility
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Copyright Policy
• Manage Preferences

© 2020 Leaf Group Ltd. / Leaf Group Media, All Rights Reserved. Based on the Word Net lexical database for the English Language. See disclaimer .

Experimental Research: Meaning And Examples Of Experimental Research

Ever wondered why scientists across the world are being lauded for discovering the Covid-19 vaccine so early? It’s because every…

Ever wondered why scientists across the world are being lauded for discovering the Covid-19 vaccine so early? It’s because every government knows that vaccines are a result of experimental research design and it takes years of collected data to make one. It takes a lot of time to compare formulas and combinations with an array of possibilities across different age groups, genders and physical conditions. With their efficiency and meticulousness, scientists redefined the meaning of experimental research when they discovered a vaccine in less than a year.

What Is Experimental Research?

Characteristics of experimental research design, types of experimental research design, advantages and disadvantages of experimental research, examples of experimental research.

Experimental research is a scientific method of conducting research using two variables: independent and dependent. Independent variables can be manipulated to apply to dependent variables and the effect is measured. This measurement usually happens over a significant period of time to establish conditions and conclusions about the relationship between these two variables.

Experimental research is widely implemented in education, psychology, social sciences and physical sciences. Experimental research is based on observation, calculation, comparison and logic. Researchers collect quantitative data and perform statistical analyses of two sets of variables. This method collects necessary data to focus on facts and support sound decisions. It’s a helpful approach when time is a factor in establishing cause-and-effect relationships or when an invariable behavior is seen between the two.  

Now that we know the meaning of experimental research, let’s look at its characteristics, types and advantages.

The hypothesis is at the core of an experimental research design. Researchers propose a tentative answer after defining the problem and then test the hypothesis to either confirm or disregard it. Here are a few characteristics of experimental research:

• Dependent variables are manipulated or treated while independent variables are exerted on dependent variables as an experimental treatment. Extraneous variables are variables generated from other factors that can affect the experiment and contribute to change. Researchers have to exercise control to reduce the influence of these variables by randomization, making homogeneous groups and applying statistical analysis techniques.
• Researchers deliberately operate independent variables on the subject of the experiment. This is known as manipulation.
• Once a variable is manipulated, researchers observe the effect an independent variable has on a dependent variable. This is key for interpreting results.
• A researcher may want multiple comparisons between different groups with equivalent subjects. They may replicate the process by conducting sub-experiments within the framework of the experimental design.

Experimental research is equally effective in non-laboratory settings as it is in labs. It helps in predicting events in an experimental setting. It generalizes variable relationships so that they can be implemented outside the experiment and applied to a wider interest group.

The way a researcher assigns subjects to different groups determines the types of experimental research design .

Pre-experimental Research Design

In a pre-experimental research design, researchers observe a group or various groups to see the effect an independent variable has on the dependent variable to cause change. There is no control group as it is a simple form of experimental research . It’s further divided into three categories:

• A one-shot case study research design is a study where one dependent variable is considered. It’s a posttest study as it’s carried out after treating what presumably caused the change.
• One-group pretest-posttest design is a study that combines both pretest and posttest studies by testing a single group before and after administering the treatment.
• Static-group comparison involves studying two groups by subjecting one to treatment while the other remains static. After post-testing all groups the differences are observed.

This design is practical but lacks in certain areas of true experimental criteria.

True Experimental Research Design

This design depends on statistical analysis to approve or disregard a hypothesis. It’s an accurate design that can be conducted with or without a pretest on a minimum of two dependent variables assigned randomly. It is further classified into three types:

• The posttest-only control group design involves randomly selecting and assigning subjects to two groups: experimental and control. Only the experimental group is treated, while both groups are observed and post-tested to draw a conclusion from the difference between the groups.
• In a pretest-posttest control group design, two groups are randomly assigned subjects. Both groups are presented, the experimental group is treated and both groups are post-tested to measure how much change happened in each group.
• Solomon four-group design is a combination of the previous two methods. Subjects are randomly selected and assigned to four groups. Two groups are tested using each of the previous methods.

True experimental research design should have a variable to manipulate, a control group and random distribution.

With experimental research, we can test ideas in a controlled environment before marketing. It acts as the best method to test a theory as it can help in making predictions about a subject and drawing conclusions. Let’s look at some of the advantages that make experimental research useful:

• It allows researchers to have a stronghold over variables and collect desired results.
• Results are usually specific.
• The effectiveness of the research isn’t affected by the subject.
• Findings from the results usually apply to similar situations and ideas.
• Cause and effect of a hypothesis can be identified, which can be further analyzed for in-depth ideas.
• It’s the ideal starting point to collect data and lay a foundation for conducting further research and building more ideas.
• Medical researchers can develop medicines and vaccines to treat diseases by collecting samples from patients and testing them under multiple conditions.
• It can be used to improve the standard of academics across institutions by testing student knowledge and teaching methods before analyzing the result to implement programs.
• Social scientists often use experimental research design to study and test behavior in humans and animals.
• Software development and testing heavily depend on experimental research to test programs by letting subjects use a beta version and analyzing their feedback.

Even though it’s a scientific method, it has a few drawbacks. Here are a few disadvantages of this research method:

• Human error is a concern because the method depends on controlling variables. Improper implementation nullifies the validity of the research and conclusion.
• Eliminating extraneous variables (real-life scenarios) produces inaccurate conclusions.
• The process is time-consuming and expensive
• In medical research, it can have ethical implications by affecting patients’ well-being.
• Results are not descriptive and subjects can contribute to response bias.

Experimental research design is a sophisticated method that investigates relationships or occurrences among people or phenomena under a controlled environment and identifies the conditions responsible for such relationships or occurrences

Experimental research can be used in any industry to anticipate responses, changes, causes and effects. Here are some examples of experimental research :

• This research method can be used to evaluate employees’ skills. Organizations ask candidates to take tests before filling a post. It is used to screen qualified candidates from a pool of applicants. This allows organizations to identify skills at the time of employment. After training employees on the job, organizations further evaluate them to test impact and improvement. This is a pretest-posttest control group research example where employees are ‘subjects’ and the training is ‘treatment’.
• Educational institutions follow the pre-experimental research design to administer exams and evaluate students at the end of a semester. Students are the dependent variables and lectures are independent. Since exams are conducted at the end and not the beginning of a semester, it’s easy to conclude that it’s a one-shot case study research.
• To evaluate the teaching methods of two teachers, they can be assigned two student groups. After teaching their respective groups on the same topic, a posttest can determine which group scored better and who is better at teaching. This method can have its drawbacks as certain human factors, such as attitudes of students and effectiveness to grasp a subject, may negatively influence results. 

Experimental research is considered a standard method that uses observations, simulations and surveys to collect data. One of its unique features is the ability to control extraneous variables and their effects. It’s a suitable method for those looking to examine the relationship between cause and effect in a field setting or in a laboratory. Although experimental research design is a scientific approach, research is not entirely a scientific process. As much as managers need to know what is experimental research , they have to apply the correct research method, depending on the aim of the study.

Harappa’s Thinking Critically program makes you more decisive and lets you think like a leader. It’s a growth-driven course for managers who want to devise and implement sound strategies, freshers looking to build a career and entrepreneurs who want to grow their business. Identify and avoid arguments, communicate decisions and rely on effective decision-making processes in uncertain times. This course teaches critical and clear thinking. It’s packed with problem-solving tools, highly impactful concepts and relatable content. Build an analytical mindset, develop your skills and reap the benefits of critical thinking with Harappa!

Explore Harappa Diaries to learn more about topics such as Main Objective Of Research , Definition Of Qualitative Research , Examples Of Experiential Learning and Collaborative Learning Strategies to upgrade your knowledge and skills.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• Guide to Experimental Design | Overview, Steps, & Examples

Guide to Experimental Design | Overview, 5 steps & Examples

Published on December 3, 2019 by Rebecca Bevans . Revised on June 21, 2023.

Experiments are used to study causal relationships . You manipulate one or more independent variables and measure their effect on one or more dependent variables.

Experimental design create a set of procedures to systematically test a hypothesis . A good experimental design requires a strong understanding of the system you are studying.

There are five key steps in designing an experiment:

• Consider your variables and how they are related
• Write a specific, testable hypothesis
• Design experimental treatments to manipulate your independent variable
• Assign subjects to groups, either between-subjects or within-subjects
• Plan how you will measure your dependent variable

For valid conclusions, you also need to select a representative sample and control any  extraneous variables that might influence your results. If random assignment of participants to control and treatment groups is impossible, unethical, or highly difficult, consider an observational study instead. This minimizes several types of research bias, particularly sampling bias , survivorship bias , and attrition bias as time passes.

Table of contents

Step 1: define your variables, step 2: write your hypothesis, step 3: design your experimental treatments, step 4: assign your subjects to treatment groups, step 5: measure your dependent variable, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about experiments.

You should begin with a specific research question . We will work with two research question examples, one from health sciences and one from ecology:

To translate your research question into an experimental hypothesis, you need to define the main variables and make predictions about how they are related.

Start by simply listing the independent and dependent variables .

Then you need to think about possible extraneous and confounding variables and consider how you might control  them in your experiment.

Finally, you can put these variables together into a diagram. Use arrows to show the possible relationships between variables and include signs to show the expected direction of the relationships.

Here we predict that increasing temperature will increase soil respiration and decrease soil moisture, while decreasing soil moisture will lead to decreased soil respiration.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Now that you have a strong conceptual understanding of the system you are studying, you should be able to write a specific, testable hypothesis that addresses your research question.

The next steps will describe how to design a controlled experiment . In a controlled experiment, you must be able to:

• Systematically and precisely manipulate the independent variable(s).
• Precisely measure the dependent variable(s).
• Control any potential confounding variables.

If your study system doesn’t match these criteria, there are other types of research you can use to answer your research question.

How you manipulate the independent variable can affect the experiment’s external validity – that is, the extent to which the results can be generalized and applied to the broader world.

First, you may need to decide how widely to vary your independent variable.

• just slightly above the natural range for your study region.
• over a wider range of temperatures to mimic future warming.
• over an extreme range that is beyond any possible natural variation.

Second, you may need to choose how finely to vary your independent variable. Sometimes this choice is made for you by your experimental system, but often you will need to decide, and this will affect how much you can infer from your results.

• a categorical variable : either as binary (yes/no) or as levels of a factor (no phone use, low phone use, high phone use).
• a continuous variable (minutes of phone use measured every night).

How you apply your experimental treatments to your test subjects is crucial for obtaining valid and reliable results.

First, you need to consider the study size : how many individuals will be included in the experiment? In general, the more subjects you include, the greater your experiment’s statistical power , which determines how much confidence you can have in your results.

Then you need to randomly assign your subjects to treatment groups . Each group receives a different level of the treatment (e.g. no phone use, low phone use, high phone use).

You should also include a control group , which receives no treatment. The control group tells us what would have happened to your test subjects without any experimental intervention.

When assigning your subjects to groups, there are two main choices you need to make:

• A completely randomized design vs a randomized block design .
• A between-subjects design vs a within-subjects design .

Randomization

An experiment can be completely randomized or randomized within blocks (aka strata):

• In a completely randomized design , every subject is assigned to a treatment group at random.
• In a randomized block design (aka stratified random design), subjects are first grouped according to a characteristic they share, and then randomly assigned to treatments within those groups.

Sometimes randomization isn’t practical or ethical , so researchers create partially-random or even non-random designs. An experimental design where treatments aren’t randomly assigned is called a quasi-experimental design .

Between-subjects vs. within-subjects

In a between-subjects design (also known as an independent measures design or classic ANOVA design), individuals receive only one of the possible levels of an experimental treatment.

In medical or social research, you might also use matched pairs within your between-subjects design to make sure that each treatment group contains the same variety of test subjects in the same proportions.

In a within-subjects design (also known as a repeated measures design), every individual receives each of the experimental treatments consecutively, and their responses to each treatment are measured.

Within-subjects or repeated measures can also refer to an experimental design where an effect emerges over time, and individual responses are measured over time in order to measure this effect as it emerges.

Counterbalancing (randomizing or reversing the order of treatments among subjects) is often used in within-subjects designs to ensure that the order of treatment application doesn’t influence the results of the experiment.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Finally, you need to decide how you’ll collect data on your dependent variable outcomes. You should aim for reliable and valid measurements that minimize research bias or error.

Some variables, like temperature, can be objectively measured with scientific instruments. Others may need to be operationalized to turn them into measurable observations.

• Ask participants to record what time they go to sleep and get up each day.
• Ask participants to wear a sleep tracker.

How precisely you measure your dependent variable also affects the kinds of statistical analysis you can use on your data.

Experiments are always context-dependent, and a good experimental design will take into account all of the unique considerations of your study system to produce information that is both valid and relevant to your research question.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Student’s  t -distribution
• Normal distribution
• Null and Alternative Hypotheses
• Chi square tests
• Confidence interval
• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Data cleansing
• Reproducibility vs Replicability
• Peer review
• Likert scale

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Framing effect
• Cognitive bias
• Placebo effect
• Hawthorne effect
• Hindsight bias
• Affect heuristic

Experimental design means planning a set of procedures to investigate a relationship between variables . To design a controlled experiment, you need:

• A testable hypothesis
• At least one independent variable that can be precisely manipulated
• At least one dependent variable that can be precisely measured

When designing the experiment, you decide:

• How you will manipulate the variable(s)
• How you will control for any potential confounding variables
• How many subjects or samples will be included in the study
• How subjects will be assigned to treatment levels

Experimental design is essential to the internal and external validity of your experiment.

The key difference between observational studies and experimental designs is that a well-done observational study does not influence the responses of participants, while experiments do have some sort of treatment condition applied to at least some participants by random assignment .

A confounding variable , also called a confounder or confounding factor, is a third variable in a study examining a potential cause-and-effect relationship.

A confounding variable is related to both the supposed cause and the supposed effect of the study. It can be difficult to separate the true effect of the independent variable from the effect of the confounding variable.

In your research design , it’s important to identify potential confounding variables and plan how you will reduce their impact.

In a between-subjects design , every participant experiences only one condition, and researchers assess group differences between participants in various conditions.

In a within-subjects design , each participant experiences all conditions, and researchers test the same participants repeatedly for differences between conditions.

The word “between” means that you’re comparing different conditions between groups, while the word “within” means you’re comparing different conditions within the same group.

An experimental group, also known as a treatment group, receives the treatment whose effect researchers wish to study, whereas a control group does not. They should be identical in all other ways.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bevans, R. (2023, June 21). Guide to Experimental Design | Overview, 5 steps & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 3, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/experimental-design/

Is this article helpful?

Rebecca Bevans

Other students also liked, random assignment in experiments | introduction & examples, quasi-experimental design | definition, types & examples, how to write a lab report, what is your plagiarism score.

• Dictionaries home
• American English
• Collocations
• German-English
• Grammar home
• Practical English Usage
• Learn & Practise Grammar (Beta)
• Word Lists home
• My Word Lists
• Recent additions
• Resources home
• Text Checker

Definition of experimental adjective from the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary

experimental

• The school's experimental teaching methods include letting the children decide what to study.
• experimental theatre/art/music
• The equipment is still at the experimental stage.
• Doctors stress that this kind of treatment is still experimental.
• These techniques are still highly experimental.
• Actors and audience worked together to create three pieces of experimental theatre.

Questions about grammar and vocabulary?

Find the answers with Practical English Usage online, your indispensable guide to problems in English.

• experimental conditions/data/evidence
• experimental physics

Other results

• Experimental Prototype Community of Tomorrow

Nearby words

Interpreting the CTCF-mediated sequence grammar of genome folding with AkitaV2

• Find this author on Google Scholar
• Find this author on PubMed
• Search for this author on this site
• ORCID record for Paulina N Smaruj
• ORCID record for Fahad Kamulegeya
• ORCID record for David R Kelley
• ORCID record for Geoffrey Fudenberg
• For correspondence: [email protected]
• Info/History
• Preview PDF

Interphase mammalian genomes are folded in 3D with complex locus-specific patterns that impact gene regulation. CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) is a key architectural protein that binds specific DNA sites, halts cohesin-mediated loop extrusion, and enables long-range chromatin interactions. There are hundreds of thousands of annotated CTCF-binding sites in mammalian genomes; disruptions of some result in distinct phenotypes, while others have no visible effect. Despite their importance, the determinants of which CTCF sites are necessary for genome folding and gene regulation remain unclear. Here, we update and utilize Akita, a convolutional neural network model, to extract the sequence preferences and grammar of CTCF contributing to genome folding. Our analyses of individual CTCF sites reveal four predictions: (i) only a small fraction of genomic sites are impactful, (ii) insulation strength is highly dependent on sequences flanking the core CTCF binding motif, (iii) core and flanking sequences are broadly compatible, and (iv) core and flanking nucleotides contribute largely additively to overall strength. Our analysis of collections of CTCF sites make two predictions for multi-motif grammar: (i) insulation strength depends on the number of CTCF sites within a cluster, and (ii) pattern formation is governed by the orientation and spacing of these sites, rather than any inherent specialization of the CTCF motifs themselves. In sum, we present a framework for using neural network models to probe the sequences instructing genome folding and provide a number of predictions to guide future experimental inquiries.

Competing Interest Statement

D.R.K. is an employee of Calico Life Sciences, LLC. All other authors declare no competing interests.

https://github.com/calico/basenji/tree/master/manuscripts/akita/v2

https://github.com/Fudenberg-Research-Group/akita_utils

https://github.com/Fudenberg-Research-Group/akitaX1-analyses

View the discussion thread.

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Citation Manager Formats

• EndNote (tagged)
• EndNote 8 (xml)
• RefWorks Tagged
• Ref Manager
• Tweet Widget
• Facebook Like
• Google Plus One
• Animal Behavior and Cognition (5500)
• Biochemistry (12481)
• Bioengineering (9352)
• Bioinformatics (30650)
• Biophysics (15764)
• Cancer Biology (12829)
• Cell Biology (18396)
• Clinical Trials (138)
• Developmental Biology (9943)
• Ecology (14877)
• Epidemiology (2067)
• Evolutionary Biology (19070)
• Genetics (12682)
• Genomics (17441)
• Immunology (12585)
• Microbiology (29575)
• Molecular Biology (12296)
• Neuroscience (64369)
• Paleontology (478)
• Pathology (1984)
• Pharmacology and Toxicology (3433)
• Physiology (5289)
• Plant Biology (11019)
• Scientific Communication and Education (1725)
• Synthetic Biology (3050)
• Systems Biology (7650)
• Zoology (1724)

Grab your spot at the free arXiv Accessibility Forum

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title: a new approach for encoding code and assisting code understanding.

Abstract: Some companies(e.g., Microsoft Research and Google DeepMind) have discovered some of the limitations of GPTs autoregressive paradigm next-word prediction, manifested in the model lack of planning, working memory, backtracking, and reasoning skills. GPTs rely on a local and greedy process of generating the next word, without a global understanding of the task or the output.We have confirmed the above limitations through specialized empirical studies of code comprehension. Although GPT4 is good at producing fluent and coherent text, it cannot handle complex logic and generate new code that haven not been seen, and it relies too much on the formatting of the prompt to generate the correct code.We propose a new paradigm for code understanding that goes beyond the next-word prediction paradigm, inspired by the successful application of diffusion techniques to image generation(Dalle2, Sora) and protein structure generation(AlphaFold3), which have no autoregressive constraints.Instead of encoding the code in a form that mimics natural language, we encode the code as a heterogeneous image paradigm with a memory of global information that mimics both images and protein structures.We then refer to Sora's CLIP upstream text-to-image encoder model to design a text-to-code encoder model that can be applied to various downstream code understanding tasks.The model learns the global understanding of code under the new paradigm heterogeneous image, connects the encoding space of text and code, and encodes the input of text into the vector of code most similar to it.Using self-supervised comparative learning on 456,360 text-code pairs, the model achieved a zero-shot prediction of new data. This work is the basis for future work on code generation using diffusion techniques under a new paradigm to avoid autoregressive limitations.

Submission history

Access paper:.

• HTML (experimental)
• Other Formats

References & Citations

• Google Scholar
• Semantic Scholar

BibTeX formatted citation

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, data and media associated with this article, recommenders and search tools.

• Institution

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

• Help Center

Synonyms for Research experiment

36 other terms for research experiment - words and phrases with similar meaning.

Alternatively