Section # 2
Nigeria celebrates its independence every year on October 1st, both in the capital and 36 states. A public holiday is observed on Nigeria Independence Day.
On the morning of 1st October, the President broadcasts a live speech on television and radio to commemorate the Independence Day.
There is a flag raising ceremony to honor the nation. Festivals and parades are held all across the country, including the display of tanks, missiles, and advanced armories. The armed forces parades with cultural dances are followed after the Presidential speech.
Millions of people take part in the Nigeria Independence Day celebrations & same day Cyprus Independence Day . Special homage and tribute is paid to the freedom fighters and other national leaders who fought for the independence of Nigeria from colonial rule.
Finally, the national Nigerian cake is cut to commemorate the celebrations at Aso Rock (the name given to the Presidential Villa).
The Nigerians celebrate their country’s independence day by decorating their streets, homes, and towns with Nigeria Flags. People are out in the streets waving and wearing the colors of the flag – green and white.
Most clubs and entertainment centers in the cities host special independence day-themed events. Some venues even offer free entrance for women and kids. Special parties for people of all ages are held, where they can enjoy games, food, and raffles.
For many Nigerians, this special public holiday is well spent with family or friends and sharing traditional meals. Many youngsters buy their fireworks from local vendors and light them in the celebration of Nigeria Independence Day. Thousands of people also head to the beach with picnics.
Section # 3
How did nigeria gain its independence from great britain.
On 1 October 1960, Nigeria achieved independence from Great Britain. The Executive Council, consisting completely of Nigerians, was headed by Alhaji Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa (who later served as the first Prime Minister of independent Nigeria).
The country’s first government was a coalition of conservationist parties and came to power in the mid-20th century, in response to increasingly passionate requests for political independence from the colonial powers.
Great Britain recognized that the drive for independence began to gain momentum after the 2nd World War, and they guided the nation, then Nigeria’s Colony and Protectorate, towards a model for self-government.
So this is how Nigeria won its independence.
Nigeria got its independence on October 1st, 1960.
Nigeria didn’t fight for independence with the British. There was just a ‘struggle’ which led to Nigeria’s independence from Great Britain. However, there were civil wars later on.
The ethnic groups which started the civil war included: Hausa of the north, The Yoruba of the southwest, and Igbo of the southeast.
In 1960, Great Britain gave Nigeria its autonomy. A better-known Nigerian Civil War for Nigeria’s Independence ( the Biafran War ) took place in Nigeria on July 6th, 1967. The War led to an uncomfortable peace and stability in which the Nation had been afflicted in 1960 by independence. This newly established country had a multiplicity of various ethnic groups who took part in this civil war.
The civil conflict for Nigeria’s Independence was a consequence of the tensions between the different populations of Nigeria, economic, ethnic, cultural and religious. Like many other African countries, Nigeria was launched by the British as an artificial framework that had ignored religious, cultural, and ethnic distinctions.
Olayinka Herbert Samuel Heelas Badmus Macaulay is considered by Nigerians as the founder/father of Nigerian nationalism. Herbert Macaulay was one of the first Nigerian nationalists, who was considered a fierce opponent of colonial policies. Throughout his life, he worked to expose the colonial government. He even founded news magazines like Nigerian Daily News, where he used to write his opinions against the British rule.
Section # 4
Naad-e-Ali Sulehria , Marvin G. Weinbaum
On Aug. 14, Pakistan celebrated its 78th Independence Day against the backdrop of a widening ideological and societal divide between proponents of Islamic nationalism and those championing democracy. Seizing the occasion, both the military and political leaders, recognizing Pakistan’s vulnerability to political instability and eroding social cohesion, have sought to shape the national discourse and sway public opinion with their respective narratives.
Politicians’ democratic principles vs. military’s Islamic nationalism
As politicians rely heavily on the democratic framework for their survival, they have portrayed their allegiance in terms of the fundamental principles of democracy, constitutionalism, and the separation of powers, linking these values to the legacy of the historic political struggle of Pakistan’s founding fathers. By contrast, the military, which often operates independently of the democratic system, has stressed the Islamization of Pakistan’s ideology and its centrality to shaping national identity. This close relationship between Islam and the military's strategic vision has been articulated by the army from time to time, most clearly during the Zia-ul-Haq years in the late 1970s and 1980s.
Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff Gen. Asim Munir is known for his strong conservative religious beliefs and, as a Hafiz-e-Quran (one who has memorized the Quran), consistently infuses his statements with religious appeals. He frequently references Islamic scripture and draws analogies from Islamic history, reflecting his effort to position himself as a military leader with profound Islamic knowledge, capable of providing religious guidance to his troops. Under his leadership, Pakistan’s military has presented itself as agents of God engaged in a righteous struggle against God’s enemies, with victory assured by divine promise.
Gen. Munir's Independence Day address: Key highlights
In keeping with this tradition, Gen. Munir, in his latest Independence Day address, once again invoked Islamic principles and linked them to national ideology and identity, delivering a rhetorically powerful speech that can be divided into four distinct parts. His speech, blending offensive and defensive rhetoric, served as a direct rebuttal to many of Imran Khan’s accusations against the military.
In the first part of his speech, Gen. Munir articulated his vision of Pakistan’s national ideology, reaffirming the country’s founding as a purely Islamic state established to preserve a separate Muslim identity. He rejected Western ideals as unsuitable for the country, using this to justify the army's role as the sole guardian of the state and Islam. Equating Pakistan's stability and progress with the strength of its military, he warned that undermining the armed forces was tantamount to weakening the state itself.
In the second part of the speech, Gen. Munir addressed Pakistan’s threat landscape, focusing on internal strife and anarchy. He identified two key internal enemies: what he called politically motivated “ digital terrorists ” — those conspiring against or defaming the army using social media platforms — and violent extremist groups, or Fitna al-Khawarij — a term used by the army to describe the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). He condemned these digital terrorists for allegedly carrying out anti-state activities that violate the constitution by misusing freedom of speech for destructive purposes. Similarly, he denounced violent extremist groups as un-Islamic, saying that their actions were contrary to shari’a.
In the third part of his speech, Gen. Munir presented the military’s solution to these challenges through the recently launched Azm-e-Istekham (Resolve for Stability) vision, which involves a coordinated multi-dimensional approach combining kinetic military actions with non-kinetic measures to combat terrorism and political polarization alike.
In the final part of the speech, Gen. Munir outlined the military’s demands for the nation, calling for the people’s unwavering trust. He emphasized that mutual trust and a strong relationship between the people and the armed forces are the state’s most valuable assets. He urged the public, especially the youth, to remain vigilant against hostile propaganda aimed at the military. Instilling hope for a brighter future and commending the sacrifices of the people and armed forces in combating terrorism, Gen. Munir concluded his remarks with a warning that the enemies of God and Pakistan, who spread hopelessness and anarchy, would fail miserably, promising a swift and decisive response from the military, whether in conventional or unconventional forms.
Imran Khan’s counter-narrative
Khan's populist narrative focuses on portraying the military establishment as responsible for leading the country to a dangerous crossroads. He not only accuses the military of imposing undeclared martial law and waging an oppressive campaign against him and his party, but also characterizes his resistance as righteous — a jihad (holy war) for Haqeeqi Azadi (true freedom), aimed at defending the constitution and restoring democracy.
Khan has dismissed the military’s claims of “digital terrorism” as counterproductive, arguing that it fuels the growing divide between the military and citizens. He contends that 90 percent of Pakistanis support his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party and warns of repercussions if his supporters are labeled as terrorists. Khan maintains that the current political system, controlled by the military, is a mockery of democracy and alleges that an illegitimate authoritarian regime usurped the PTI’s majority mandate in a rigged election on Feb. 8, 2024. Recently, Khan accused Pakistan’s Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa of bias against his party and of acting under military orders. Khan calls for very different solutions from Gen. Munir — namely that he and other political prisoners be immediately released and his claimed political mandate be restored by holding fresh elections. Drawing parallels with the recent regime change in Bangladesh, Khan has argued that Pakistan’s situation is even more dire, warning of potential widespread unrest if his proposed solutions are not implemented.
Escalating conflict and fears
The escalating conflict between Khan and the military leadership is seen as a primary cause of Pakistan's destabilization, with populism and authoritarianism locked in a potentially deadly confrontation. The polarized discourse from both sides reveals a deep internal fracture within Pakistan over long-standing concepts of patriotism and nationalism. Despite this tension, a mutual fear influences the behavior of both the populist PTI and the military establishment. On the one hand, the PTI fears that intensifying its rhetoric against the military might provoke an even harsher response, possibly leading to indefinite direct military rule. On the other hand, the military fears that Khan’s popularity could incite public protests, creating a chaotic situation akin to what happened in Bangladesh, and might even inspire sympathy and internal dissent within its own ranks. While Khan aims to confine the military establishment to its constitutional role of defense and eliminate its political influence, the military’s goal is not only to defeat Khan but also to prevent any future scenario where a politician’s popularity could threaten the status quo.
This fear may explain why, facing a legitimacy crisis, Gen. Munir has resorted to Islamic injunctions to reinforce hierarchy, discipline, and a sense of pride among soldiers, symbolically transforming their loyalty to the army chief into a matter of faith rather than just one of military duty. In the aftermath of Gen. Munir's speech, the military seems to be intensifying its efforts to root out those it believes are responsible for political instability and tightening its grip on Khan and his supporters, including within its own ranks. The arrest and court-martial of former spy chief Lt. Gen. (ret.) Faiz Hameed — whom Imran Khan refers to as an “asset” — along with three other retired military officers, on charges of abusing power and engaging in activities detrimental to national stability, is a clear example of this.
Government’s amplified support for the military
The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government, which has praised the army’s actions, has further claimed that Hameed and the other officers were acting under Khan's orders in an effort to create chaos in Pakistan, with the May 9 uprising — which saw nationwide attacks on army installations — being their most significant attempt. The government has hinted at major revelations and more arrests in the coming days. Optimistic about these developments, the PML-N is aiming to see Khan finally tried in a military court. If evidence emerges proving Hameed's connection to Khan in orchestrating the May 9 riots, the military, which has so far hesitated to prosecute Khan for various reasons, may finally take action. This would shift the case from civilian courts — where Khan has received rulings offering relief through the suspension of his sentences — to a military court, where overturning a conviction would be much more challenging.
A lose-lose situation
Khan appears to understand that his transfer to military custody is inevitable, which would deprive him of his last line of defense by severing his ability to communicate with the outside world — a connection he has managed to maintain effectively under civilian detention. Aware that reconciliation with the army chief is no longer an option, Khan is now relying on his party to forge alliances with other political groups that share similar grievances against the military establishment, in hopes of sparking widespread protests, particularly in the volatile regions of Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. However, these protests alone will not be enough unless they spread on a massive scale to Punjab and Sindh, where the majority of Pakistan's population lives. The country's fragmented political landscape makes this a challenge though, reducing the likelihood of a nationwide uprising.
Khan is also counting on the incoming chief justice of Pakistan, Mansoor Ali Shah, whom he hopes will free him from the military's grip. But then he has reason to worry that the government could prevent this from happening by extending the tenure of the current chief justice, Qazi Faez Isa. As Khan reaches the final stages of his battle with the military establishment, he is still pinning his hopes on the fact that his overwhelming popular support will influence the military, mindful of the potentially irreparable damage his political decapitation could do to it.
In this looming confrontation between Khan and the army chief, it seems clear that, given the high stakes, the outcome will likely be a lose-lose situation. Neither Khan's goal of achieving constitutional supremacy and restoring democracy, nor the army chief's aim of instilling religiously inspired stability is likely to be realized. This confrontation will leave a lasting scar on the nation's collective memory, further eroding the reputation of state institutions and reducing the chances of national reconciliation and unity. While the state may survive this unprecedented crisis, a fractured and polarized Pakistan will fail to achieve the goals envisioned by its founders more than three-quarters of a century ago.
Naad-e-Ali Sulehria has over five years of involvement working with international organizations and think tanks in different capacities as a political researcher, policy advisor, peace strategist, and human rights practitioner. He currently serves as a Research Assistant to Dr. Marvin G. Weinbaum, director of the Afghanistan and Pakistan Studies Program at the Middle East Institute.
Dr. Marvin G. Weinbaum is the director of the Afghanistan and Pakistan Studies Program at the Middle East Institute.
Photo by AAMIR QURESHI/AFP via Getty Images
The Middle East Institute (MEI) is an independent, non-partisan, non-for-profit, educational organization. It does not engage in advocacy and its scholars’ opinions are their own. MEI welcomes financial donations, but retains sole editorial control over its work and its publications reflect only the authors’ views. For a listing of MEI donors, please click here .
Advertisement
She wants to protect the right to abortion nationally. Here’s what else to know about her positions.
By Maggie Astor
With Vice President Kamala Harris having replaced President Biden on the Democratic ticket, her stances on key issues will be scrutinized by both parties and the nation’s voters.
She has a long record in politics: as district attorney of San Francisco, as attorney general of California, as a senator, as a presidential candidate and as vice president.
Here is an overview of where she stands.
Ms. Harris supports legislation that would protect the right to abortion nationally, as Roe v. Wade did before it was overturned in 2022, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
After the Dobbs ruling, she became central to the Biden campaign’s efforts to keep the spotlight on abortion, given that Mr. Biden — with his personal discomfort with abortion and his support for restrictions earlier in his career — was a flawed messenger. In March, she made what was believed to be the first official visit to an abortion clinic by a president or vice president.
She consistently supported abortion rights during her time in the Senate, including cosponsoring legislation that would have banned common state-level restrictions, like requiring doctors to perform specific tests or have hospital admitting privileges in order to provide abortions.
As a presidential candidate in 2019, she argued that states with a history of restricting abortion rights in violation of Roe should be subject to what is known as pre-clearance for new abortion laws — those laws would have to be federally approved before they could take effect. That proposal is not viable now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
IMAGES
COMMENTS
In 1914, the Southern Nigeria Protectorate was combined with the Northern Nigeria Protectorate to create the Colony and Protectorate of Nigeria, which has the borders of modern-day Nigeria. [2] By the late 1950s, the call for independence of territories in Africa and the decline of the British Empire led to the country being granted independence on 1 October 1960 as the Federation of Nigeria. [3]
October 1, 2024. Nigeria Independence Day is on October 1. It celebrates the country's independence from British rule which occurred in 1960. The government of Nigeria celebrates this holiday annually. The President's address to the public marks the beginning of the festivities, this is broadcasted on radio and television.
Nigeria got independence from Britain on 1 October 1960.As the country celebrates its political journey in the last 62 years, political scientist Ayo Olukotun takes a look at the nation's ...
On October 1,1960 Nigeria gained its independence. Afterwards, an all-Nigerian Executive Council was formed and headed by Prime Minister, Alhaji Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa until three years later, when Nigeria became a republic led by Nnamdi Azikiwe as its first President. Today, Nigeria's three main tribes are the Yoruba, the Igbo and the ...
I'm a Nigerian and I say No to injustice, No to corruption and No to discrimination. We are one Nigerians. We are united. Let Nigeria rise. Let's get up and fight our limitations. Let's take a step in setting ourselves loose from the chains we have held ourselves in. Making the Happy Independence we say worthy should be our priority. Nigeria is ...
Alhaji Shehu Shagari. 2001 October 1: Former President, Olusegun Obasanjo announced the formation of a National Security Commission to address the issue of communal violence. 1960 October 1: Nigeria's Independence Day. Nigeria gained independence from Britain, with late Abubakar Tafawa Balewa as the Prime Minister leading a.
Public Domain Image. On Saturday, October 1, 1960, Nigeria became an independent nation. What follows is Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa's speech delivered at Tafawa Balewa Square in Lagos at the Independence Ceremony. Today is Independence Day. The first of October 1960 is a date to which for two years every Nigerian has been eagerly looking forward.
It is nice and interesting to note that prior to the much-anticipated Independence Day celebration in Nigeria on 1st October, 1960, there were high expectations by the Nigerian populace and our founding fathers (nationalists) at the dawn of a new beginning for the Federation of Nigeria which had operated and practised the Regional System of Government which was created by the Richard's ...
Four years before Nigeria gained independence from Britain, oil was discovered. The potential for prosperity was clear. Between the oil boom of 1970 and 2007 the Nigerian government's coffers ...
Nigeria celebrates its independence day on 1 October every year.. West Africa's most populous nation - home to approximately 186 million in 2018 - freed itself from British colonial rule on this ...
70. To address these negative trends, the Federal Government of Nigeria suspended the operations of Twitter in Nigeria on June 5, 2021 to allow the Government put measures in place to address these challenges. 71. Following the suspension of Twitter operations, Twitter Inc. reached out to the Federal Government of Nigeria to resolve the impasse.
October 1, 2018. 0. Nigeria's Independence Day. Nigeria's Independence Day. 1 October 1960: On this particular day and month in 1960, the nation, acclaimed to be the 'giant of Africa,' got her independence from the British Colony. The British Union Jack was lowered and replaced by the nation's Green-white-green flag, and with the ...
Protesters in Lagos during Nigeria's 60th Independence Day anniversary on 1 October 2020. ... Nigeria attained its independence from Britain on 1 October 1960. Nearly half a century earlier, in ...
Nigeria - People, Culture, Economy: Nigeria was granted independence on October 1, 1960. A new constitution established a federal system with an elected prime minister and a ceremonial head of state. The NCNC, now headed by Azikiwe (who had taken control after Macaulay's death in 1946), formed a coalition with Balewa's NPC after neither party won a majority in the 1959 elections.
The 60-year celebration of Nigerian independence Day in 2020 is the celebration of faux independence as Nigeria has yet to fully emancipate herself from the shackles of slavery. This slavery, however, isn't overt but covert, it isn't manifest but subliminal. Hitherto gaining independence in 1960, the slavery was manifest.
Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 3:11 PM by Adrianna Simwa 4 min read. When the Independence Day of Nigeria comes, the whole country celebrates it. 58 years ago, Nigeria gained independence from the colonial government and finally became a free state. However, the journey towards this freedom was long and every Nigerian should know about it.
Independence Day: How Nigeria gain independence. Queen Elizabeth II dey inspect men of di Royal West African Frontier Force, for Kaduna Airport during her Commonwealth Tour, 2nd February 1956. On ...
Nigeria Independence Day, celebrated on October 1st, holds immense significance both for the nation and the broader African continent. It marks the moment when Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa, emerged from the shackles of British colonial rule in 1960. This event symbolizes the triumph of a people's enduring struggle for self ...
2. Conscious that today's address would be my last on an Independence Day as your President; I speak to the millions of Nigerians, who believed in me, propelled and stood by me in my quest to bequeath a country where all citizens have equal opportunities to achieve their lives desires in a peaceful atmosphere. 3.
Nigeria celebrates its National Day on the day it acquired independence from British rule. In 1960, the country proclaimed its autonomy from the British Empire. From then on, the 1st of October each year is celebrated as Nigeria's Independence Day, also known as its National Day. Here is everything you need to know about National Day ...
Photo Essay: Nigerian Independence Day Parade in NYC. On Oct. 7, six days after the official Oct. 1 anniversary, thousands gathered on Manhattan's East Side to celebrate Nigeria's 57th independence day. After several hundred years of British presence in the area and official colonial control since the late 19th century, Nigeria won its ...
The Nigerian Independence Day is celebrated every year on October 1st. It's a very special and important event in the history of Nigeria as it marks the marks the independence from their former colonial master. The country was once a colony of Great Britain until it became an independent and free state on October 1st, 1960. Happy Birthday ...
On Aug. 14, Pakistan celebrated its 78th Independence Day against the backdrop of a widening ideological and societal divide between proponents of Islamic nationalism and those championing democracy. Seizing the occasion, both the military and political leaders, recognizing Pakistan's vulnerability to political instability and eroding social cohesion, have sought to shape the national ...
In a speech in 2022 marking the anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, she said that day had showed "what our nation would look like if the forces who seek to dismantle our ...