how to link literature review to findings

Examples of literature reviews. Step 1 - Search for relevant literature. Step 2 - Evaluate and select sources. Step 3 - Identify themes, debates, and gaps. Step 4 - Outline your literature review's structure. Step 5 - Write your literature review.

This literature should allow you to link your question or hypothesis and provide input into your conceptual and theoretical framework. It may assist you to establish specific research methodologies and methods that have been used in prior investigations. Furthermore, it should assist you to formulate and continuously improve your questions or ...

Demonstrate your knowledge of the research topic. Identify the gaps in the literature and show how your research links to these. Provide the foundation for your conceptual framework (if you have one) Inform your own methodology and research design. To achieve this, your literature review needs a well-thought-out structure.

How to synthesize. In the synthesis step of a literature review, researchers analyze and integrate information from selected sources to identify patterns and themes. This involves critically evaluating findings, recognizing commonalities, and constructing a cohesive narrative that contributes to the understanding of the research topic. Synthesis.

A literature review is an integrated analysis-- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings and other relevant evidence related directly to your research question.That is, it represents a synthesis of the evidence that provides background information on your topic and shows a association between the evidence and your research question.

Reviews summarizing evidence can inform practice and serve as examples to inspire faculty and trainee research projects. While each review type is unique, some common elements are applicable to all reviews. In this article, we describe these commonalities and offer tips based on our experience as knowledge synthesis librarians.

What kinds of literature reviews are written? Narrative review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified.

Writing: Synthesize your findings. Use your own voice to explain to your readers what you learned about the literature on your topic. ... When doing literature reviews, you will want to take advantage of these features since they can facilitate not only finding the articles that you really need but also controlling the number of results and how ...

When writing a literature review it is important to start with a brief introduction, followed by the text broken up into subsections and conclude with a summary to bring everything together. A summary table including title, author, publication date and key findings is a useful feature to present in your review (see Table 1 for an example).

Synthesize your findings. Your findings are your evaluation of the literature reviewed: what you consider the strengths and weakness of the studies reviewed; the comparison you did between studies; research trends and gaps in the research that you identified, etc. Across the articles that you read, pay attention to the: Common/contested findings

1. Outline and identify the purpose of a literature review. As a first step on how to write a literature review, you must know what the research question or topic is and what shape you want your literature review to take. Ensure you understand the research topic inside out, or else seek clarifications.

Organize your review according to the following structure: Abstract (it might help to write this section last!) Provide a concise overview of your primary thesis and the studies you explore in your review. Introduction. Present the subject of your review. Outline the key points you will address in the review. Use your thesis to frame your paper.

People often simply summarize their results because they do not know how to interpret their findings. Summary, however, is not interpretation. Interpreting your findings is about seeing whether what you found confirms or does not confirm the findings of previous studies in your literature review. Your findings may also offer novel insights or ...

Writing a Literature Review. A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels ...

The topic must at least be: interesting to you (ideally, you should have come across a series of recent papers related to your line of work that call for a critical summary), an important aspect of the field (so that many readers will be interested in the review and there will be enough material to write it), and.

In the literature review, the "elements" are the findings of the literature you gather and read; the "new whole" is the conclusion you draw from those findings. Your goal is to compare and contrast, critically evaluate, interpret, so that you can draw conclusion. Each work should be critically summarized and evaluated for its premise ...

Use Cooper's taxonomy to explore and determine what elements and categories to incorporate into your review; Revise and proofread your review to ensure your arguments, supporting evidence and writing is clear and precise; Source. Cronin, P., Ryan, F. & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach.

This is called a review matrix. When you create a review matrix, the first few columns should include (1) the authors, title, journal, (2) publication year, and (3) purpose of the paper. The remaining columns should identify important aspects of each study such as methodology and findings. Click on the image below to view a sample review matrix.

Literature reviews offer a critical synthesis of empirical and theoretical literature to assess the strength of evidence, develop guidelines for practice and policymaking, and identify areas for future research.1 It is often essential and usually the first task in any research endeavour, particularly in masters or doctoral level education. For effective data extraction and rigorous synthesis ...

Annotated Bibliographies. Annotated bibliographies can help you clearly see and understand the research before diving into organizing and writing your literature review. Although typically part of the "summarize" step of the literature review, annotations should not merely be summaries of each article - instead, they should be critical ...

in literature review are an indicator of the quality of paper being evaluated. Literature reviews use a combination of primary, secondary and tertiary sources to document and analyse what has been published on any given topic through time. Academic research is based on primary sources whereas literature review is based on secondary sources.

A synthesis matrix helps you record the main points of each source and document how sources relate to each other. After summarizing and evaluating your sources, arrange them in a matrix or use a citation manager to help you see how they relate to each other and apply to each of your themes or variables. By arranging your sources by theme or ...

This variability can make it challenging to assess the quality and reliability of scoping review findings. Difficulty in analyzing and presenting findings: Scoping reviews often involve synthesizing information from a large and diverse body of literature. Analyzing and presenting this information in a meaningful and concise way can be demanding ...

In the blog, Student Journalist Ho Man Hee explains the remaining dissertation parts: research design & methodology, findings & analysis, and conclusion. For part 1 that discusses the structure of research topics, research questions, literature review, and theoretical framework, read it on the UCL SoM's blog.

Results and findings are preferred to be discussed with the past studies ( review of literature) which is relevant to the issue of the study that the researchers try to find out or solve. In a ...

Peer review simply means other experts believe the methods, the evidence, the conclusions of an article have met important standards of legitimacy, reliability, and intellectual honesty. Searching the journal literature is part of being a responsible researcher at any level: professor, grad student, concentrator, first-year.

Using Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews. Literature reviews are known to be time-consuming. From finding the articles to reading and analyzing all the components of the publications, it can take a long time to conduct a literature review. However, AI-based tools can help researchers speed up the process.

Primary pulmonary meningioma: report of a case and review of the literature. Lung Cancer. 2008;62:401-7. Article PubMed Google Scholar Satoh Y, Ishikawa Y. Multiple primary pulmonary meningiomas: 20-year follow-up findings for a first reported case confirming a benign biological nature.

This review article explores the scientific literature on managing neurodiversity in workplaces, aiming to identify emerging research directions, gaps, and methods used. A systematic literature review in the hybrid form was implemented, combining bibliometric analysis and structured review. A review of selected social sciences publications from the SCOPUS database was conducted. The literature ...

This letter discusses the recent study by Izzo et al., which explored intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) during asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease. The study's integration of a systematic review positions its findings within the broader context of neurosurgical advances. Highlighting the practicality and patient comfort of the ...