crypto research report 2022

Download The Block's reports on digital assets, crypto and blockchain

Keep up with the latest news, trends, charts and views on crypto and DeFi with a new biweekly newsletter from The Block's Frank Chaparro

The State of Crypto: Fairer, Cheaper, Faster Everyday Finance- in partnership with Coinbase

Protocol Prism: Unveiling the Architectural Tradeoffs of Modern Blockchains

2024 Digital Assets Outlook

Trends in Regulation of Digital Assets- Commissioned by FTI Consulting

Tokenization of Off-Chain Assets- Presented by Avalanche and Ava Labs

The State of Crypto: Corporate Adoption

The State of Digital Assets Data and Infrastructure: 2023 Edition

Digital Asset Funding Landscape presented by HashKey Capital

Comparing Layer-1 Platforms: 2022 Edition- Presented by Solana Foundation and Ava Labs

2023 Digital Asset Outlook

14th “crypto research report” published

Join us on social networks

Liechtenstein, Nov.1, 2022 — The annual survey of institutional and professional investor holdings of cryptocurrencies was published by CryptoResearchReport.com in collaboration with Cointelegraph , the largest crypto media company in the world. 

The survey found that 43% of professional investors currently own digital assets , and 19% plan to buy them in the next 12 months. The survey's 84 respondents manage $316 billion in assets, with a whopping $10.42 billion invested into cryptocurrencies. Some professional investors reported over 50% exposure to digital assets, but the respondents' median percentage invested in cryptocurrencies is 3.3%.

The Institutional Demand for Cryptocurrencies Global Survey 2022 Report can be downloaded from the following link:

Crypto Research Report — English

The institutions are here, and they are buying the dip. BlackRock, the largest asset manager in the world with $10 trillion in assets, just announced its second blockchain exchange-traded fund , one month after the debut of its first one. Goldman Sachs took on principal risk in a crypto over-the-counter trade for the first time with Galaxy Digital. Goldman Sachs now has a part of its website dedicated to the investment case for cryptocurrencies and the metaverse. The largest hedge fund in the world with $140 billion in assets under management, Bridgewater Associates, announced it was backing a Bitcoin fund . Fidelity is weighing a plan to allow its brokerage customers — some 34.4 million individual investors — to trade the world's largest cryptocurrency. Citadel, Brevan Howard, Investment Bank Cowen — soon, the list of institutional investors in crypto will be longer than the list not involved. Not only will these institutions bring liquidity to the cryptocurrency space but they also hold significant power in local politics and governments. Finance, insurance and real estate lobbyist groups in the United States spent $539 million in 2020 on influencing regulation and public policy.

Key topics covered in the report:

• In total, the respondents manage $316 billion in assets, 3.3% of which, or approximately $10.43 billion, is invested into cryptocurrencies.  
• Professional investors primarily hold Bitcoin (94%) and Ether (75%). Institutions are also interested in security tokens (31%) and stablecoins (31%). Smaller holdings included Polkadot ( DOT ) (25%), Solana ( SOL ) (13%) and Litecoin ( LTC ) (13%). mentioned they are also interested in publicly traded blockchain stocks. 
• Institutional investors, including public corporations and governments, own 1.39 million+ Bitcoin.
• Institutional investors are more likely to buy Ether than Bitcoin in the next 12 months. 62% of investors say Ether ( ETH ) is on their buy list, compared to only 54% for Bitcoin ( BTC ). 
• A slim majority of investors (55%) prefer to hold cryptocurrencies directly. Interestingly, professional investors prefer to buy a regulated fund before buying structured products or trading futures. Active strategies beat out passive strategies by a narrow margin, and their returns outperformed in 2022.  

However, some key questions remain. How much of the cryptocurrency market capitalization and daily trading volume is done by institutions versus retail investors? The answer to this question helps us understand if crypto is mainly a retail phenomenon or if institutions already own a considerable chunk of Are professional traders currently buying or selling Bitcoin? Are institutions primarily interested in Bitcoin, Ether or other methods for gaining exposure to blockchain technology, such as private equity or mergers and acquisitions? they plan to increase their exposure to blockchain over the next 12 months? 

To answer these questions, Cointelegraph Research took a data-driven approach in the second annual  “Institutional Demand for Cryptocurrencies Global Survey 2022 Report .” To gain a deeper understanding of how professional investors feel about blockchain assets, this 60+ page research report presents 32 questions about crypto assets answered by 84 wealthy investors across Asia, the US and Europe. TLDR; 43% currently hold digital assets, and 19% plan to buy them in the future. investors are already in the market, and new ones join daily. 

“The latest Cointelegraph research highlights the continued appetite by institutions to gain exposure to digital assets, and a key statistic to underpin this is that over 7% of the Bitcoin supply is held by institutions. At Flow Traders, we are ready to embrace this trend further and remain committed to contributing to the development of the ecosystem and supporting institutions with the adoption of digital assets,” said Michael Lie, head of digital assets at Flow Traders .

The report was supported by 22 research partners and contributors from six countries including sFOX ,  Zeltner & Co ,  BBVA Switzerland , PostFinance , Shyft Network ,  VeVe ,  GonnaMakeIt NFT Marketplace ,  Energi Core ,  LCX ,  Lisk ,  Flow Traders ,  Phemex ,  Bequant and  Finoa .

Crypto Research Report has a strategic partnership with Cointelegraph. All editions of the Crypto Research Report are available on the Cointelegraph , which gets over 11 million views a month. 

For information about sponsoring an upcoming report by Cointelegraph and Crypto Research Report, contact [email protected] . Further information about the report and the authors can be found at www.cryptoresearch.report . 

Crypto Research Report 9492 – Eschen/Liechtenstein

http://www.cryptoresearch.report

Email: [email protected]

Demelza Hays: [email protected]

This publication is provided by the client. Cointelegraph does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to the company. Cointelegraph is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned in the press release.

• # Press Release

All Articles

Research & Analysis

2022 Year Review & 2023 Year Ahead

2022 has been a ride for the crypto industry. In this report, we curate the top ten crypto events and trends of 2022, followed by our outlook for 2023.

Research Disclaimer

Crypto.com Research and Insights disclaimer for research reports

2022 Year in Review

• In 2022, the global economy struggled under macro and geopolitical headwinds, including monetary tightening by central banks around the world to combat inflation, the conflict in Europe, supply chain disruptions, and lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the expected global GDP growth in 2022 is 3.2%, a sharp drop from ~6% in 2021. Meanwhile, the inflation growth rate continued to spike, reaching 8.8% YoY.

• In addition to macro headwinds, the crypto market was also negatively impacted by several events, notably the Terra stablecoin (UST) collapse in May and the FTX bankruptcy in November. Both events and the subsequent fallouts produced ripple effects, which affected other players in the ecosystem, and dampened confidence in the sector. It’s arguably still “Crypto Winter” at the time of writing. That being said, it is natural for market cycles to fluctuate between bearish and bullish periods, as indicated by the graph below.

Read more about crypto bear markets in our report Crypto Bear Markets – A Detailed Analysis.

• Ethereum’s Merge on 15 September 2022 is widely considered one of the most anticipated crypto events this year. One of the positive effects of The Merge is that Ethereum’s energy consumption dropped by 99.95%, as PoS does not require the energy-intensive mining rigs of PoW. Instead, PoS blockchains rely on validators to verify the transactions. The PoS Ethereum blockchain’s energy consumption is estimated to be roughly 1% of PayPal, and orders of magnitude smaller than PoW networks.

• Following the bankruptcy of FTX in late 2022, we saw decentralised exchanges (DEXs) take up a higher share of total crypto spot trading volume. As of November 2022, DEXs took up 14% of spot trading volume, compared to 9% in October. In addition, with the growing adoption of non-custodial wallets like the Crypto.com DeFi Wallet , users are showing an inclination towards having full control of their funds.

• In 2022, new layer-1 (L1) blockchains were under the spotlight; notable examples are Aptos and Sui, which are both created by ex-developers from Meta’s Diem team. Therefore, Sui and Aptos use similar technologies, including the parallel engine and Move programming language. Besides the L1s, other blockchains like Cronos also gained popularity in the community.

• PoS staking requires locking up tokens by default, which means the token holder has to choose between earning yield or preserving liquidity. Liquid staking attempts to solve the problem by letting the tokenholder enjoy the best of both worlds – enjoying yield on the PoS token while maintaining some degree of liquidity. The flexibility that liquid staking provides to depositors are some of the reasons it flourished in 2022. According to the market cap of the liquidity staking tokens, ETH is the most popular token choice. Lido Finance continues to lead the liquid staking market, taking around 78% of the market share.

• In the first half of 2022, the NFT market was vibrant with strong trading volumes. In May 2022, OpenSea hit a high of US$544 million in daily volume, which was driven by the launch of the “ Otherdeed for Otherside ” collection by Yuga Labs, the company behind the blue-chip Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs. In spite of softer trading volumes in recent months, NFT partnerships and innovations continued. For example, Crypto.com collaborated with A Story to develop the “Extraordinary Whales Club” social NFT series — a project based on the Korean drama Extraordinary Attorney Woo . In November, Crypto.com extended its first foray into Web3 by launching Crypto.com Land: The First Frontier NFTs, which will power a new blockchain game developed on the Cronos blockchain.

• Despite the market downturn, there were still around 1 million daily blockchain gamers for most of 2022. The Wax blockchain is currently leading in terms of the number of daily gamers at 315,000 at the time of writing. Wax hosts several top games , such as Splinterlands and Farmers World .  In terms of developer tools, Cronos announced Cronos Play , a comprehensive modular suite of developer tools for blockchain games in the Cronos ecosystem. Cronos Play is a key pillar of Cronos’s strategy to bring millions of end users to Web3 and consists of a wide range of integrations, developer products, and services supporting multiple game platforms. Loaded Lions: Mane City , a tycoon-style idle game powered by Cronos , was first announced in November 2022. In Mane City, each Land NFT owned will grant a plot to build businesses with superior gaming experiences.

• Blockchain-based social media applications gained traction in 2022, as seen by the sharp growth in the total number of unique wallets interacting with the smart contracts of social dApps.

• Capital investment and incubation of projects in the blockchain space continued to grow. About US$29 billion in funding was raised in the first half of 2022 alone, with infrastructure and Web3 startups — including NFT, blockchain gaming, and metaverse — taking up the lion’s share of the funding pool. The total amount of funds raised in those first six months already outpaced figures from 2021, which saw 1,313 rounds with $30.2 billion invested for the entire year. In terms of sector, the blockchain service category saw consistent spread of investments throughout the year. It received the most funding with a total of 592 deal rounds made, followed by the DeFi and GameFi categories.

• The issue of security is a focus for any blockchain network. In 2022, we continued to see hacks and exploits. At the time of writing, the total amount of money lost in crypto hacks in 2022 is about US$3.7 billion, which dropped by 63% compared with 2021. Vulnerabilities in bridges accounted for over one-third of the overall amount.

2023 Year Ahead

• Despite challenging macro conditions, crypto adoption growth remained strong in 2022. As of November 2022, the number of crypto owners crossed the 400 million milestone, reaching 402 million. During the year, the monthly average adoption growth rate was 2.9%. Depending on market conditions, we expect the number of global crypto owners could reach 600 – 800 million in 2023.

• In the blockchain gaming sector, we expect to see a few AAA games in the next year or two, which will provide players with new gaming experiences that integrate high-performance gameplay with blockchain technology.  
• The increasing use cases for Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) could be another potential market driver. SBTs are NFTs tied to an individual or entity that are non-transferable and non-tradeable. They aim to represent the holder’s social identity by containing the holder’s commitments, credentials, and affiliations. It is similar to the concept of a resume or CV. The adoption of SBTs can direct us to a decentralised society (DeSoc) or a co-determined sociality, where Souls and communities convene in a bottom-up way. DeSoc, based on non-transferable SBTs, aims to represent the commitments, credentials, and affiliations of ‘Souls’ that can encode the trust networks of the real economy to establish provenance and reputation.

• In 2022, we have seen an interesting phenomenon of more and more Web2 developers having great interest in Web3. The downloads of the two popular Web3 development libraries, Ethers.js and Web3.js, have surged 10x since 2018. Developers flocking to Web3 will stimulate the growth of the companies that provide Web3 development tools.

• In the aftermath of a few bankruptcies and hacks in the industry in 2022, we have seen a growing focus on security as well as user education. The key to building a successful business model is to establish trust with end users. Going into 2023, we expect this trend of more focus on security and user education to continue. On one hand, we may see more platforms invest in security audits and certifications. On the other hand, we also look forward to seeing more educational initiatives rolled out in this space, continuing the trend from 2022. For example, in November 2022, Crypto.com launched a new University module in its app , a one-stop learning hub for users to enhance their crypto knowledge. To make the user experience more engaging and fun, users who successfully complete a learning course could redeem an array of items in the rewards store. We look forward to seeing more interactive learning experiences in the year ahead.
• Besides the above trending topics, developments in other areas are expected to be watched, including the new blockchain infrastructure, ZK proofs adoption, more utility-based DeFi applications, Ethereum’s Shanghai upgrade and institutional adoption. Interested readers can access the full version of our outlook in 2023 by becoming a Private Member or Exchange VIP .

Read the full report: 2022 Year Review and 2023 Year Ahead [December 2022 Thematic Report]

Crypto.com Research and Insights Team

Get fresh market updates delivered straight to your inbox:

Subscribe to newsletters  

Be the first to hear about new insights:

Follow us on Twitter

Share with Friends

Ready to start your crypto journey?

Get your step-by-step guide to setting up an account with Crypto.com

Buy and Sell

Crypto Earn

On-chain Staking

Crypto.com Pay

Pay for Business

Margin Trading

Derivatives Trading

Supercharger

Trading Arena

What is Ethereum?

What is Blockchain?

How to buy Bitcoin?

How to buy Ethereum?

How to buy Crypto?

What is Crypto?

What is DeFi?

Crypto Prices

Bitcoin Price

Ethereum Price

BTC/USD Converter

Site Widgets

What's Trending

Market Updates

Product News

Company News

Proof of Reserves

The purpose of this website is solely to display information regarding the products and services available on the Crypto.com App. It is not intended to offer access to any of such products and services. You may obtain access to such products and services on the Crypto.com App.

Please note that the availability of the products and services on the Crypto.com App is subject to jurisdictional limitations. Crypto.com may not offer certain products, features and/or services on the Crypto.com App in certain jurisdictions due to potential or actual regulatory restrictions.

Copyright © 2018 - 2024 Crypto.com. All rights reserved.

Privacy Notice

Cookie Preferences

Common Keywords: 

Ethereum / Dogecoin / Dapp / Tokens

Q1 2022 Cryptocurrency Report

Hey Geckos!  The Top 30 coins continued to bleed since hitting all-time highs in Nov 2021. By the time it hit the bottom on 23rd January, the Top 30 coins had shed over $1 trillion in market cap from their peak, closing out the quarter at pretty much where it started at ~$1.9T.​ The relative market share of the Top 30 Coins remained largely similar, with BTC at 47% and ETH at 21.4%.​

Here are our Top 5 Q1 2022 crypto highlights:

1. Of the top 5 cryptocurrencies, only BTC and XRP managed to finish off Q1 above water

Top 5 cryptocurrencies took losses in Q1 2022, in sharp contrast to the exuberance and astronomical gains of 2021.

SOL and BNB took the biggest hits in terms of returns, while BTC and XRP showed resilience.

The biggest gainer within the Top 10 was LUNA (+24.1%), now ranked #6 and rapidly closing in on XRP and Solana. Besides LUNA, BTC and XRP, all other Top 10 tokens suffered losses in Q1. 

Within the Top 30, the only other gainers were ETC (+45.7%), FTT (+33.6%) and WAVES (+256.1%).

2. Bearish lull in markets fueled further growth in stablecoins

In contrast with the rest of the crypto market, the market cap of top 5 stablecoins grew by 13%. The top 5 order remain unchanged since 2021.

Stablecoin market share continued to increase likely owing to investors derisking in the midst of geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainties.

Tether still retains its lead, though growth has slowed greatly compared to USDC , BUSD and UST . Growth of Dai has also slowed significantly compared to its peers. 

UST experienced the strongest growth, though it is USDC that has gained the most in terms of absolute market cap. 

3. ETH staking spiked after successful testing of The Merge; Kraken & LIDO lead staking services

Despite a dip in ETH price within the same period, total staked ETH for consensus layer saw strong upward momentum (+25%) in Q1 2022

The successful Kiln testnet merge on March 14 ushered a spike in staked ETH. At 11M ETH by end Q1 2022, this represents ~9% of total ETH supply. 

Kraken (9.4%) and Lido (8.8%) still led as the Top 2 ETH staking services in validator count, far ahead of the pack with a combined dominance of ~18%. 

The Merge is estimated to reduce daily ETH emissions from 12,000 ETH to 1,280 ETH, a 90% reduction equivalent to a triple halving in Bitcoin terms.

4. Altchains continued to gain ground as Terra led the way

As we enter 2022, altchains continued to eat away at Ethereum’s dominance over TVL. Even as overall TVL has reduced by 9% to $177 billion, Ethereum’s share of TVL is now 54%, down from 61% in December 2021. 

BSC is still the dominant EVM network, but Avalanche is now neck-and-neck, likely due to the impending release of subnets and the recently-held Avalanche Summit.

Other EVM-chains seem to have retained their market share, even Fantom despite the departure of Andre Cronje.

One of the stars of 2021, Terra has continued its momentum into 2022, its share of overall TVL increasing to 10%. Solana however, has seen a decline. TVL of DefiChain has been growing steadily, crossing $1 billion as DeFi for Bitcoin is starting to gain more traction.

5. Total spot trading volume took a dip to an average $1.26T monthly volume in Q1 2022

Overall, Q1 2022 spot trading volume across the top-10 centralized and decentralized exchanges declined from $6.08 trillion to $3.79 trillion compared to Q4 2021.

Trading volume peaked in Nov 2021 and continued to decline in the subsequent months before having a bit of a rebound in March 2022 as the market recovered.

February’s trading volume of $1.1T was lower than any month in 2021.

The DEX:CEX ratio has increased slightly from 11.8% in December 2021 to 12.8% towards the end of March 2022.

This is just a fraction of what we cover in our report - Grab your copy of the full report:

(Psst! CoinGecko users can easily  grab all the quarterly reports right here !).

Like what you see?  Sign up for our newsletter  to get daily crypto updates!

Related Articles

Business development

• Billing management software
• Court management software
• Legal calendaring solutions

Practice management & growth

• Project & knowledge management
• Workflow automation software

Corporate & business organization

• Business practice & procedure

Legal forms

• Legal form-building software

Legal data & document management

• Data management
• Data-driven insights
• Document management
• Document storage & retrieval

Drafting software, service & guidance

• Contract services
• Drafting software
• Electronic evidence

Financial management

• Outside counsel spend

Law firm marketing

• Attracting & retaining clients
• Custom legal marketing services

Legal research & guidance

• Anywhere access to reference books
• Due diligence
• Legal research technology

Trial readiness, process & case guidance

• Case management software
• Matter management

Recommended Products

Conduct legal research efficiently and confidently using trusted content, proprietary editorial enhancements, and advanced technology.

Accelerate how you find answers with powerful generative AI capabilities and the expertise of 650+ attorney editors. With Practical Law, access thousands of expertly maintained how-to guides, templates, checklists, and more across all major practice areas.

A business management tool for legal professionals that automates workflow. Simplify project management, increase profits, and improve client satisfaction.

• All products

Tax & Accounting

Audit & accounting.

• Accounting & financial management
• Audit workflow
• Engagement compilation & review
• Guidance & standards
• Internal audit & controls
• Quality control

Data & document management

• Certificate management
• Data management & mining
• Document storage & organization

Estate planning

• Estate planning & taxation
• Wealth management

Financial planning & analysis

• Financial reporting

Payroll, compensation, pension & benefits

• Payroll & workforce management services
• Healthcare plans
• Billing management
• Client management
• Cost management
• Practice management
• Workflow management

Professional development & education

• Product training & education
• Professional development

Tax planning & preparation

• Financial close
• Income tax compliance
• Tax automation
• Tax compliance
• Tax planning
• Tax preparation
• Sales & use tax
• Transfer pricing
• Fixed asset depreciation

Tax research & guidance

• Federal tax
• State & local tax
• International tax
• Tax laws & regulations
• Partnership taxation
• Research powered by AI
• Specialized industry taxation
• Credits & incentives
• Uncertain tax positions

A powerful tax and accounting research tool. Get more accurate and efficient results with the power of AI, cognitive computing, and machine learning.

Provides a full line of federal, state, and local programs. Save time with tax planning, preparation, and compliance.

Automate work paper preparation and eliminate data entry

Trade & Supply

Customs & duties management.

• Customs law compliance & administration

Global trade compliance & management

• Global export compliance & management
• Global trade analysis
• Denied party screening

Product & service classification

• Harmonized Tariff System classification

Supply chain & procurement technology

• Foreign-trade zone (FTZ) management
• Supply chain compliance

Software that keeps supply chain data in one central location. Optimize operations, connect with external partners, create reports and keep inventory accurate.

Automate sales and use tax, GST, and VAT compliance. Consolidate multiple country-specific spreadsheets into a single, customizable solution and improve tax filing and return accuracy.

Risk & Fraud

Risk & compliance management.

• Regulatory compliance management

Fraud prevention, detection & investigations

• Fraud prevention technology

Risk management & investigations

• Investigation technology
• Document retrieval & due diligence services

Search volumes of data with intuitive navigation and simple filtering parameters. Prevent, detect, and investigate crime.

Identify patterns of potentially fraudulent behavior with actionable analytics and protect resources and program integrity.

Analyze data to detect, prevent, and mitigate fraud. Focus investigation resources on the highest risks and protect programs by reducing improper payments.

News & Media

Who we serve.

• Broadcasters
• Governments
• Marketers & Advertisers
• Professionals
• Sports Media
• Corporate Communications
• Health & Pharma
• Machine Learning & AI

Content Types

• All Content Types
• Human Interest
• Business & Finance
• Entertainment & Lifestyle
• Reuters Community
• Reuters Plus - Content Studio
• Advertising Solutions
• Sponsorship
• Verification Services
• Action Images
• Reuters Connect
• World News Express
• Reuters Pictures Platform
• API & Feeds
• Reuters.com Platform

Media Solutions

• User Generated Content
• Reuters Ready
• Ready-to-Publish
• Case studies
• Reuters Partners
• Standards & values
• Leadership team
• Reuters Best
• Webinars & online events

Around the globe, with unmatched speed and scale, Reuters Connect gives you the power to serve your audiences in a whole new way.

Reuters Plus, the commercial content studio at the heart of Reuters, builds campaign content that helps you to connect with your audiences in meaningful and hyper-targeted ways.

Reuters.com provides readers with a rich, immersive multimedia experience when accessing the latest fast-moving global news and in-depth reporting.

• Reuters Media Center
• Jurisdiction
• Practice area
• View all legal
• Organization
• View all tax

Featured Products

• Blacks Law Dictionary
• Thomson Reuters ProView
• Recently updated products
• New products

Shop our latest titles

ProView Quickfinder favorite libraries

• Visit legal store
• Visit tax store

APIs by industry

• Risk & Fraud APIs
• Tax & Accounting APIs
• Trade & Supply APIs

Use case library

• Legal API use cases
• Risk & Fraud API use cases
• Tax & Accounting API use cases
• Trade & Supply API use cases

Related sites

United states support.

• Account help & support
• Communities
• Product help & support
• Product training

International support

• Legal UK, Ireland & Europe support

New releases

• Westlaw Precision
• 1040 Quickfinder Handbook

Join a TR community

• ONESOURCE community login
• Checkpoint community login
• CS community login
• TR Community

Free trials & demos

• Westlaw Edge
• Practical Law
• Checkpoint Edge
• Onvio Firm Management
• Proview eReader

Special Report

Cryptos on  the rise 2022

• Introduction
• 2. Beyond Bitcoin
• 3. Oversight in a crypto world
• 4. Compendium: Cryptocurrency regulations by country

Crypto-assets and the vast universe of associated products and services have grown rapidly in recent years and are becoming increasingly interlinked with the regulated financial system. Policymakers appear to be struggling to keep track of risks posed by a sector where most activities are unregulated, or at best lightly regulated.

Financial stability risks could soon become systemic in some countries, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

There is also concern that uncoordinated regulatory actions may facilitate potentially destabilizing capital flows. The IMF estimates cryptos’ market capitalization at $2.5 trillion. This may be an indication of the significant economic value of the underlying technological innovations such as the blockchain, although it might also reflect froth in an environment of stretched valuations.

Cryptos’ potential to transform the traditional financial system means the associated challenges are attracting considerable regulatory attention. The focus is twofold: cryptos’ possible impact on financial stability and the need to protect vulnerable customers.

The principal challenge is the need for an internationally coherent policy approach, including definitions and jurisdictional perimeters, and in terms of exchanges, prevention of market manipulation and systemic risks. Lending and payment risks, banking, payments and anti-money laundering (AML) risks, tax policy and tax evasion risks, securities fraud and scams, together with cyber security, hacking and privacy risk will all need to be addressed.

The increasing regulatory challenges are exacerbated by the growing public awareness, acceptance and use of cryptos. From the U.S. perspective, research published [1]   in November 2021 by Pew Research, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, reported 16% of respondents saying they personally have invested in, traded or otherwise used cryptocurrencies. Newsweek Magazine cited a survey in January 2022 by the crypto firm New York Digital Investment Group, estimating the total number of Americans who own cryptos at 46 million (about 14% of the population).

In the UK, in June 2021, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published its fourth consumer research publication on crypto-assets ownership [2]  which found heightened public interest in, and media coverage of, cryptos, with 78% of adults now having heard of cryptocurrencies. Around 2.3 million now own crypto-assets, up from around 1.9 million in 2020.

The UK regulator also found attitudes have shifted, as cryptocurrencies appear to have become more normalized — fewer crypto users regard them as a gamble (38%, down from 47%) and more see them as an alternative or complement to mainstream investments, with half of crypto users saying they intend to invest more in the future.

In the European Union, as of February 2022, the total market capitalization of crypto-assets is reported [3]  as having increased eightfold in the last two years to around 1.5 trillion euros now, although around 1 trillion euros below its peak in November 2021. The suggestion is that crypto-assets are beginning to gain mainstream acceptability, with ownership peaking at 6% of Slovakians and 8% of Dutch nationals reported as owning crypto-assets.

This report is a follow-up to Regulatory Intelligence’s “Cryptos on Rise” special report [4]  published in 2021. That report highlighted the need for policymakers, regulators and firms all to play their part in ensuring that cryptos are as "safe" as possible, not only in terms of investment risk but also with regards to regulatory certainty and cyber resilience.

The 2022 special report expands beyond cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin. Considering the need to develop a regulatory framework, it investigates other crypto-related instruments, such as central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and stablecoins, and highlights policy work in key countries. It examines some of the misconceptions which persist about cryptos, as well as the ramifications for financial stability and the future of money. It also considers changing structural models for financial institutions emerging from the crypto world, as represented by decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).

As with the 2021 report there is a compendium which analyzes the tax, legal and regulatory status of cryptos in various jurisdictions.

[1]   https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/11/11/16-of-americans-say-they-have-ever-invested-in-traded-or-used-cryptocurrency/

[2]   https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/research/research-note-cryptoasset-consumer-research-2021  

[3]   https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma50-164-5533_keynote_speech_-_verena_ross_-_keeping_on_track_in_an_evolving_digital_world.pdf  

[4]  https://www.thomsonreuters.com.sg/en/resources/cryptos-on-the-rise.html

Chapter Two

Beyond Bitcoin

Central bank digital currencies.

There are some structural similarities between crypto-assets and central bank digital currencies, but CBDCs are best described as the digital equivalent of a country’s fiat currency. As a result, they are often seen as an alternative or competitor to cryptos. The most advanced CBDC thus far is China’s digital yuan. During the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic Games athletes, coaches and media made digital payments via smartphone apps, payment cards, or wristbands.

From the crypto regulatory landscape in the compendium of this report, it is apparent that many of the early movers on CBDCs also adopt restrictive stances or outright bans on other cryptos. Prime examples include China, Russia, Iran and Venezuela.

The G7 countries have been deliberately cautious about CBDCs’ potential, particularly with regards to retail CBDCs used by the public. The G7 has reiterated that the decision on whether to launch a CBDC is for each country to make, and no G7 jurisdiction has yet done so. In a 2021 survey of central banks [5] , the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) found that 86% are actively researching the potential for CBDCs, 60% are experimenting with the technology and 14% are deploying pilot projects.

[5]  https://www.bis.org/about/bisih/topics/cbdc.htm  

Retail CBDC

A retail CBDC would be a digital form of central bank money, denominated in the national unit of account, distinct from electronic reserves (which cannot be accessed by individuals) and physical cash. As a direct liability of the central bank, CBDCs would also be distinct from commercial bank money. If issued, CBDCs, as a form of central bank money, could act as both a liquid, safe settlement asset and as an anchor for the payments system.

Not crypto-assets

The G7 is clear that CBDCs are not crypto-assets. Crypto-assets are not issued by a central bank, can be highly volatile, and are not widely used for payments. CBDCs are fundamentally different from privately issued digital currencies such as stablecoins, which are a liability of private entities that seek to maintain stability in their price (typically in relation to stable assets such as fiat currency). CBDCs can be considered in two parts:

• the CBDC itself, an instrument issued by the central bank that can be transferred as a means of payment or held as a store of value; and
• the wider “ecosystem” in which a CBDC operates, including the supporting infrastructure that allows CBDC balances to be managed and payments made.

This wider infrastructure could involve both public and private participants (such as banks, digital wallet providers or other payment entities).

Public policy principles

In October 2021 the G7 published [6]  a set of 13 public policy principles for possible future retail CBDCs. Principles 1-8 cover foundational issues and principles 9-13 cover the opportunities. The “foundational issues” are those that any CBDC must demonstrate if it is to command the confidence and trust of users. These include the preservation of monetary and financial stability, the protection of users’ privacy, strong standards of operational and cyber resilience, the avoidance of financial crime and sanctions evasion, and environmental sustainability.

The G7 principles also highlight the potential for CBDCs to support safe and efficient transactions. They make it a political priority to harness opportunities and address the monetary and financial stability risks, as well as ensure trust in the financial system. The G7 notes that CBDCs could also advance public policy goals, including digital-economy innovation, financial inclusion and reducing frictions in cross-border payments.

[6]  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1025235/G7_Public_Policy_Principles_for_ Retail_CBDC_FINAL.pdf

A divided UK stance

The UK’s stance on CBDC is at best unproven and at worst divided. In January 2022, the parliamentary Economic Affairs Committee published a report which concluded that there is no convincing case for UK to have a CBDC. The committee found that while a CBDC may provide some advantages, it could present significant challenges for financial stability and the protection of privacy.

The committee report [7]  builds on a November 2021 joint statement [8]  by the Bank of England and HM Treasury, which announced the next steps on the exploration of a UK CBDC. Specifically, the Bank and HM Treasury intend to launch a consultation in 2022 which will set out their assessment of the case for a UK CBDC. The consultation will form part of a “research and exploration” phase and will seek to inform policy development in the next few years.

The committee report adds several challenges and questions to the proposed consultation and evaluation process. The report’s findings, however, make it clear that the UK has some way to go before the case has been made for a UK retail CBDC. It also recommends that the UK government and Bank of England take action to shape international standards which suit the UK’s values and interests, particularly with regards to privacy, security and operational standards.

The U.S. approach to CBDCs

The potential for a CBDC in the United States took a step forward in February when the findings of a project by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) were released. The project, dubbed “Project Hamilton,” achieved its preliminary goals of using emerging technology to deliver, in theory, high-speed transactions within a resilient infrastructure.

[7]   https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5802/ldselect/ldeconaf/131/131.pdf

[8]   https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2021/november/statement-on-central-bank-digital-currency-next-steps

Separately, the Federal Reserve Board in January opened debate [9]  on the merits of a CBDC. The “white paper” said creating an official digital version of the U.S. dollar could give Americans more, and speedier, payment options, but it would also present financial stability risks and privacy concerns. The paper, however, made no policy recommendations and offered no clear signal about where the Fed stands on whether to launch a CBDC.

The Federal Reserve’s Board said it would not proceed with creating a CBDC “without clear support from the executive branch and from Congress, ideally in the form of a specific authorizing law.”

Leaders of the Boston Fed/MIT project said the next phase will explore alternative designs and look more closely at other issues such as security and programmability. They will also look at ways to balance privacy issues with concerns about compliance.

“There are still many remaining challenges in determining whether or how to adopt a central bank payment system for the United States,” said Neha Narula, director of MIT’s Digital Currency Initiative.

In March 2022, the White House issued an Executive Order requiring the government to ensure the responsible development of digital assets and to assess the risks and benefits associated with of creating a central bank digital dollar.

[9]   https://www.reuters.com/business/fed-lays-out-risks-benefits-cbdc-paper-takes-no-policy-stance-2022-01-20/

Stablecoins

A stablecoin is any cryptocurrency designed to have a stable price, typically through being reserved, backed, or pegged to an underlying asset such as a commodity or currency, or through algorithmic mechanisms to its reference asset. The potential use cases for stablecoins are far-reaching and potentially disruptive to the established banking and payments industries.

Regulators are developing their approach to stablecoins. In October 2021, the international Financial Stability Board (FSB) published [10]  a progress report on the implementation of the high-level recommendations with regards to the regulation, supervision and oversight of global stablecoin (GSC) arrangements.

The progress report concluded that “cross-border cooperation and coordination” were the highest regulatory priorities, followed by further work regarding when a so-called stablecoin may be appropriately identified as a GSC.

Individual jurisdictions are developing their own approaches to stablecoins. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a discussion paper [11]  on crypto-assets and stablecoins inviting views from the industry and public on the relevant regulatory approach.

The paper, which closed for comments at the end of March 2022, sets out the HKMA’s thinking on the regulatory approach for crypto-assets, particularly payment-related stablecoins. The HKMA has considered, among other things, the international recommendations, the market and regulatory landscape locally and in other major jurisdictions, and the characteristics of payment-related stablecoins.

The paper considers five policy options across the entire spectrum, from “no action” to a “blanket ban.” 

United States 

Stablecoins are a likely early crypto priority for U.S. regulators. In November 2021, the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets, a government-industry body, released a report on stablecoins [12]  that urged Congress to pass new legislation to “fill regulatory gaps.”

In the meantime, U.S. market regulators are prepared to play a leading role in stablecoin oversight, Gary Gensler, the chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), said in announcing the working group’s report.

Similarly, the federal Financial Stability Oversight Council, chaired by Janet Yellen, Treasury secretary, noted in its annual report [13]  in December 2021 that it “will further assess and monitor the potential risks of stablecoins and recommends that its members consider appropriate actions within each member’s jurisdiction to address those risks while continuing to coordinate and collaborate on issues of common interest.”

Gensler cited similarities between stablecoins and stable value funds and said the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) “will deploy the full protections of the federal securities laws and the Commodity Exchange Act to these products and arrangements, where applicable.”

The SEC and CFTC are also likely to play an integral role in the oversight of crypto trading platforms or exchanges. Market structure, potential market manipulation, scams and investment and trading activities will be priorities.

Concerns about investor protection have already been voiced by several prominent members of Congress. The SEC and CFTC will also oversee investor protection and overall policing and enforcement, with input from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

Some use cases for stablecoins will “trigger obligations under federal consumer financial protection laws, including the prohibition on unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices,” said Rohit Chopra, chair of the CFPB.

The CFPB has launched a review of stablecoins’ potential to cause harm in three main areas: concentrated market power, systemic risk and consumer abuse.

The banking regulators will play a role in regulating stablecoins because of their potential uses in payments, borrowing, lending and deposit-like functions.

[10]  https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P071021.pdf

[11]  https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-information/press-release/2022/20220112e3a1.pdf

[12]  https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/gensler-statement-presidents-working-group-report-stablecoins-110121

[13]  https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/261/FSOC2021AnnualReport.pdf

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has repeatedly cautioned that investing in cryptocurrencies is risky, and unsuitable for retail investors. Cryptocurrency funds are not authorized for sale to retail investors in Singapore.

In December 2019, MAS issued a public consultation seeking views on the interactions between money, e-money and cryptocurrencies, including stablecoins, and the appropriate regulatory treatment for cryptocurrencies, particularly stablecoins.

The consultation sought views on the defining characteristics of e-money and cryptocurrency, considered the potential ability of stablecoins to function as money, and discussed its relevance in the regulatory class of e-money or cryptocurrency.

The differing regulatory priorities for e-money and cryptocurrency services have different implications for how stablecoins would be regulated if placed in either of these categories.

E-money services are regulated for the safeguarding of customers’ money, whereas cryptocurrency services are regulated for AML risk, with a disclosure requirement to warn customers of the risk of loss. Other issues were also touched on, such as whether a global stablecoin should be regulated differently from other stablecoins and how the stabilization mechanism should be regulated.

The consultation received mixed views over whether a stablecoin was a single-currency or multi-currency stablecoin and whether there was a claim on the issuer of the stablecoin. There were also varying views regarding whether stablecoins should be treated as a payment instrument or an investment product, depending on the assets backing the stablecoins.

MAS intends to continue its work on reviewing the appropriate regulatory treatment for stablecoins, such as the treatment under different legislation, taking into consideration its practical use and risks, and informed by the continuing work of the international standard-setting bodies.

Non-fungible tokens

A non-fungible token (NFT) is a unique digital code stored on a blockchain, a form of distributed or digital ledger. Non-fungible tokens represent rights to the particular asset. The term "non-fungible" distinguishes NFTs from other digital assets that are fungible or interchangeable, such as bitcoin.

The use cases for NFTs are far-reaching as they provide an ability to authenticate virtually anything where there is a need to establish authenticity and ownership. Their popularity thus far has centred on the art and collectibles world — NFTs representing works of art, collectibles, video clips, or other digital media have exploded in price and popularity — but other potential uses include real-estate and auto titles, coupons, transit, or event tickets.

NFT and blockchain technology can also be useful in logistics and supply-chain applications, where metadata and timestamps can authenticate and help track the origins and journeys of commodities.

Critics may see the NFT market as yet another speculative bubble, but proponents point to broader applications in other industrial, legal and commercial uses that could be transformative.

The popularity of NFTs has raised concerns that the marketplace could be fertile ground for illicit activities such as scams, cybercrime, price manipulation, or money laundering. Indeed, many are baffled as to why so much money is spent on items that do not physically exist.

NFTs have been noticeably absent from the regulatory policy debate so far. How far financial regulators ultimately attempt to expand the perimeters of their authority — potentially into this new digital art and collectibles world, or even beyond into commercial applications — remains to be seen.

With such broad technological utility and complexity, regulation will be complex and likely to be challenged in courts. It appears obvious that AML requirements should apply in some areas. Another question is whether an NFT is deemed a financial instrument or security. Many legal experts already agree that if an NFT is fractionalized, thus representing partial ownership, or has royalty streams of income associated with it, it will likely be deemed a security and thus subject to regulatory oversight.

European Union

In September 2021, the European Union introduced a proposal to regulate crypto-assets. The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), if adopted, will regulate all issuers and service providers dealing with crypto-assets.

NFTs were explicitly excluded from MICA’s scope. Article 4 (2) of the draft provides that issuers of “crypto-assets that are unique and non-fungible” do not need to publish or register a white paper for them. MICA does state, however, that fractional NFTs should not be considered unique and would therefore be subject to MiCA.

United States

The United States has yet to issue direct guidance on NFTs as their use cases and potential value remain to be clarified. The structure of NFTs and the intellectual property rights, such as rights to use, copy and display, and whether revenue streams are associated, are just some of the legal uncertainties.

There is no direct state regulatory framework or guidance on NFTs, but several states, including New York and Louisiana, which do have virtual currency regulations could attempt to hold NFTs under their purview.

The U.S. Treasury’s anti-money laundering arm has yet to issue guidance specific to NFTs but has published general guidance related to how the Bank Secrecy Act and related regulations relate to virtual currencies that might apply to NFTs.

Established financial services firms and venues are getting into NFTs. In February 2022, the New York Stock Exchange filed an application to register the term “NYSE” for a marketplace for NFTs, appearing to take a step closer to setting up an online trading place for cryptocurrencies and NFTs.

If the NYSE launches a new marketplace, it will compete with SuperRare, Rarible and NFT marketplace OpenSea, which was valued at $13.3 billion after its latest private funding round.

A spokesperson for the NYSE said, however, that it has no immediate plans to launch cryptocurrency or NFT trading.

The NYSE minted its first set of NFTs in April 2021 commemorating the first trades of six “notable” listings. 

Investors in Hong Kong have shown considerable interest in NFTs. Projects have been launched at a steady pace, attracting enthusiastic bidders. Bricks and mortar marketplaces such as Sotheby’s and Christie’s have auctioned NFTs to buyers in Hong Kong, either as standalone items or as add-ons to luxury items such as watches, as well as facilitating bidding for locally produced NFT art.

NFT activity in Hong Kong has been further buoyed by regulatory uncertainty in mainland China. Financial authorities there have yet to clarify whether a recently implemented ban on all cryptocurrency transactions includes producing, selling or trading NFTs. As a result, some Chinese digital art and entertainment creators have turned to Hong Kong to issue NFTs.

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has stated that virtual assets fall within the legal definition of securities or derivatives and are therefore subject to local securities laws. Cryptocurrency trading platforms such as Binance have withdrawn from Hong Kong after receiving written warnings from the SFC. The regulator’s move to assert jurisdiction over platforms suggests that it firmly considers virtual assets, such as cryptocurrencies and tokens that function as securities, to fall within its jurisdiction.

The natural next question is whether financial regulators will also consider NFTs as a class of virtual assets that fall within their jurisdiction. They have yet to issue regulations specifically concerning NFTs, although recent legislative developments in Hong Kong have tended to apply certain regulatory requirements, such as anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing rules, to all classes of virtual assets.

Chapter Three

Oversight in a crypto world

Financial stability and regulatory challenges.

The identification, monitoring and management of risks continue to concern and on occasion confound regulators and firms alike. The challenges include operational and financial integrity risks from crypto-asset exchanges and wallets, investor protection, and inadequate reserves and inaccurate disclosure for some stablecoins. Moreover, in emerging markets and developing economies, the advent of crypto can accelerate what the IMF has badged “cryptoization”— when these assets replace domestic currency and circumvent exchange restrictions and capital account management measures.

Financial stability

The FSB raised [14]  potentially serious concerns about financial stability in a recent paper. Given the international and diverse nature of the crypto-asset markets, it has advocated that regulatory authorities prioritize cross-border and cross-sectoral cooperation. Financial stability risks could escalate rapidly, and the FSB is clear that a ”timely and pre-emptive evaluation of possible policy responses” is required.

The need for policymaking pre-emption and cooperation is seen as increasingly urgent as, while crypto-assets account for only a small portion of overall financial system assets, they are growing rapidly. Direct connections between crypto-assets and systemically important financial institutions and core financial markets are rapidly evolving, opening the door to the potential for regulatory gaps, fragmentation or arbitrage.

A lack of consistency

The cross-sector, cross-border nature of cryptos limits the effectiveness of national approaches. Countries are adopting different strategies, and existing regulations may not allow for national approaches that comprehensively cover all elements of these assets. Importantly, many crypto service providers operate across borders, making the task for supervision and enforcement even more difficult.

[14]   https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P160222.pdf

A particular challenge is a lack of consistency between, or absence of, definitions related to new technology applications. There are also legal and jurisdictional questions to be resolved. As an example, the U.S. CFTC and the courts have established that bitcoin is a commodity. The banking regulators see cryptos as a form of payment subject to their purview. The SEC, as the lead U.S. financial services regulator, however, sees things differently.

U.S. Executive Order and SEC take steps toward crypto regulation

In March 2022, the White House issued an Executive Order which emphasized the importance of digital assets and the need for coordination and cooperation between government departments, agencies and regulators. The Order said, “We must reinforce United States leadership in the global financial system and in technological and economic competitiveness, including through the responsible development of payment innovations and digital assets.”

The Order took a holistic approach to addressing risks and harnessing the potential benefits of digital assets. It emphasized six key priorities: consumer and investor protection, financial stability; illicit finance; U.S. leadership in the global financial system and economic competitiveness; financial inclusion; and responsible innovation.

New proposed rules from the SEC related to alternative trading systems (ATSs) have raised speculation in the crypto industry that the regulatory expansion could include blockchain and cryptocurrency platforms.

The proposal does not specifically reference cryptocurrencies or blockchain. However, a reference to “communication protocol systems” could apply to trading venues of all types, such as unregulated platforms according to several attorneys.

The rule proposal [15]  announced in January 2022 may have come as a surprise to the crypto and blockchain industries, some elements of which perceived it as an early shot in what will be a long and complex regulatory battle.

Alternative trading systems are SEC-regulated electronic trading systems that match orders for buyers and sellers of securities. Trading in U.S. government securities on such platforms has grown significantly in recent years. The level of regulatory oversight and investor transparency at these venues has not matched similar platforms for corporate bonds or equity securities.

The proposed rules are intended to protect investors and enhance cybersecurity in ATSs that trade U.S. Treasury securities. They expand on a similar 2020 proposal under Jay Clayton, former SEC chair.

The 650-page document raised about a dozen significant issues, according to Hester Peirce, an SEC commissioner. Peirce cited [16]  a reach to “currently unregulated communication protocol systems” and noted that the proposal “goes well beyond government securities, or even fixed-income securities; key parts of the proposal affect trading venues that make any type of security available for trading.”

Critics have said the proposal could include wallets, block explorers that allow users to call smart contracts, and other market participants including virtually every blockchain-based application. The proposal considers definitions such as “orders” “trading interests,” and “communication protocol systems” in place of “exchanges.”

[15]   https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2022/34-94062.pdf

[16]   https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/peirce-ats-20220126 

Crypto advertising

Supervisory approaches to the advertising of cryptos to retail investors vary considerably among jurisdictions.

In February 2022, the UK FCA updated its prohibition [17]  on the retail marketing, distribution and sale of crypto-asset derivatives and crypto-asset exchange-traded notes. The UK is also consulting on further potential restrictions.

[17]   https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/COBS/22/6.pdf

Crypto advertising in the United States is big business. When celebrity Kim Kardashian was paid to ask her 250 million Instagram followers to speculate on crypto tokens by “joining the Ethereum Max Community,” she disclosed that her post was an advertisement. She did not, however, have to disclose that Ethereum Max — not to be confused with the cryptocurrency ethereum — was a speculative digital token created a month before, one of hundreds of such tokens that fill the crypto-exchanges.

On television, meanwhile, potential retail investors in cryptos can watch movie stars pitch them in prime-time slots during major sporting events. Sporting venues have been re-named after crypto trading platforms, most notably Crypto.com, which paid $700 million for the naming rights of the Staples Center, home of the NBA’s Los Angeles Lakers, for a 20-year term. During the 2022 Super Bowl, four cryptocurrency commercials aired. A one-minute advertisement costing nearly $14 million, which featured nothing more than a floating QR code, drove more than 20 million hits to Coinbase’s landing page within one minute, according to Bitcoin Magazine.

Regulators in the United States have thus far focused their attention and enforcement efforts on unregistered securities offerings, and fraudulent scams. However, with investor protection and risk disclosures as core tenets, stricter advertising regulations surrounding cryptos are likely inevitable.

The Spanish securities regulator (CNMV) said in January that would begin to regulate rampant advertising of crypto-assets, including by social media influencers, to ensure investors are aware of risks. New regulations [18] set out requirements for the content and format of promotional messages for crypto-asset campaigns.

Advertisers and companies that market crypto-assets will have to inform the CNMV at least 10 days in advance about the content of campaigns targeting more than 100,000 people.

In November 2021, the CNMV scolded soccer star Andres Iniesta after he promoted the cryptocurrency exchange platform Binance on his Twitter and Instagram accounts, telling him that he should be thoroughly informed about cryptocurrencies before making any investment in them or recommending others to do so.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore in January published guidelines [19]  “discouraging” cryptocurrency trading by the general public and giving effect to MAS’ expectations that cryptocurrency service providers should not promote their services to the general public in Singapore.

Also in January 2022, Russia’s central bank proposed to ban the use and mining of cryptocurrencies on Russian territory, citing threats to financial stability, citizens’ wellbeing and its monetary policy sovereignty. Russia has argued for years against cryptocurrencies, saying they could be used in money laundering or to finance terrorism. It eventually gave them legal status in 2020 but banned their use as a means of payment.

The Russian central bank stated that speculative demand primarily determined cryptocurrencies’ rapid growth and that they carried characteristics of a financial pyramid, warning of potential bubbles in the market, threatening financial stability and citizens. The bank has proposed to prevent financial institutions from carrying out any operations with cryptocurrencies and said mechanisms should be developed to block transactions aimed at buying or selling cryptocurrencies for fiat currencies. The proposed ban would include crypto exchanges.

[18]   https://cnmv.es/DocPortal/Legislacion/Circulares/Circular_1_2022_EN.pdf

[19]   https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/MAS-Media-Library/regulation/guidelines/PSO/ps-g02-guidelines-on-provision-of-digital-payment-token-ser­vices-to-the-public/Guidelines-on-Provision-of-Digital-Payment-Token-Services-to-the-Public-PS-G02.pdf

The DFSA advises consumers and potential investors to exercise caution and undertake due diligence to understand the risks involved when buying crypto-assets. Risks include:

• Fraud:  Criminals often use crypto-assets and new technology to perpetrate fraudulent schemes by misleading customers as to the nature of the product on offer and “take the money and run” shortly after the token is issued. Also, fraudsters may entice customers by touting crypto-assets as an investment or an “opportunity” to get into a cutting-edge space without any real benefit behind the offer.
• Volatility:  Crypto-asset valuation and pricing can be difficult because of volatility and lack of real underlying assets, and holders may suffer significant losses if the price of the crypto-asset drops quickly.
• Liquidity:  Illiquid or flat market structures can make it hard to sell or trade crypto-assets. It may also be difficult to exit the market and “cash out.”
• Information:  Information may be missing, inaccurate, incomplete and unclear with respect to the project and associated risks. Documents may be technical and require additional knowledge to understand the characteristics of the crypto-assets and what the holder is (not) getting.
• Money laundering:  Crypto-asset platforms commonly rely on complex infrastructures using several entities (spanning across jurisdictions) to transfer funds and/or execute payments. This can mean that AML/CTF compliance, supervision and enforcement may not be effective. Consumers should exercise caution when dealing with crypto-asset entities, unless they are sure that the entities are properly regulated, to be protected against financial misconduct or wrongdoing.”  -- Extract from Dubai Financial Services Authority statement on crypto-assets, November 2021.
• Trust:  Trust is a particular challenge with regards to the increasingly widespread use of cryptos, especially as cryptos are seen to be eroding or replacing existing monetary norms such as fiat currency. Policymakers are beginning to consider the possible economic and regulatory ramifications of the adoption of digital currencies, together with the potential impact on the international monetary system.

Trust is primarily needed to maintain the societal conventions regarding the use of money. Part of that convention is that central banks provide, and critically are seen to provide, an open, neutral, trusted and stable platform. Private companies use their ingenuity and dynamism to develop new payment methods and financial products and services. This combination has been a powerful driver of innovation and welfare. The successful symbiosis cannot be taken for granted, however, and some recent developments may threaten money’s essence as a public good, if taken too far.

In a speech [20]   entitled “Digital currencies and the soul of money,” Agustín Carstens, general manager of the Bank for International Settlements, offers three plausible scenarios for the future of money:

Big Tech stablecoins compete with national currencies and also against each other, fragmenting the monetary system.

The elusive promise of crypto and decentralized finance, or “DeFi,” which claims to offer a financial system free from powerful intermediaries but may deliver something very different.

The realization of the vision of an open monetary and financial system that harnesses technology for the benefit of all.

[20]   https://www.bis.org/speeches/sp220118.htm

Carstens is an advocate of the third scenario, with an ideal of incumbent financial institutions, Big Techs and new innovative entrants all competing in an open marketplace that guarantees interoperability, building on central bank public goods. This is also the goal of the BIS Innovation Hub [21] .

Gatekeeping the gatekeepers — big tech and banking licenses

The growing interconnectedness between the traditional financial system and cryptos is demonstrated by the potential for, and the implications of, Big Tech firms and other digital asset firms taking stakes in or owning banks and financial services companies.

In January 2022, a paper by the Bank for International Settlements’ Financial Stability Institute assessed [22]  the benefits and risks of extending banking licenses to Big Techs and fintechs. The findings are based on publicly available licensing requirements in seven jurisdictions covering Asia, Europe and North America.

The paper compares the merits of bank ownership by tech firms in relation to ownership by commercial or industrial non-financial companies (NFCs).

The perceived benefits of allowing tech firms to operate with a banking license are “compelling but require scrutiny,” the paper says. Unburdened by legacy infrastructure, tech firms can offer superior technology and user-friendly apps that may allow them to reach more consumers and perform various aspects of the banking business (onboarding, deposit-taking, lending, payments) more efficiently than incumbents, including commercial or industrial NFCs that may own banks.

Collectively, their technology-centric approach to the delivery of financial services is expected to advance some authorities’ broader goals of fostering financial inclusion, promoting competition and delivering better outcomes for society. Nevertheless, as part of the authorization process — and subsequently through continuing supervision — authorities need to examine the ability and willingness of tech firms to deliver on their stated objectives.

A particular policy concern is whether the risks of allowing tech firms to own banks can be offset through licensing requirements without undermining the potential benefits they bring to consumers. Policy responses may differ across countries, but they are likely to be guided by three main considerations: the policy priorities of each jurisdiction; the inherent risks posed across and within each group of tech firms; and the applicability of the existing licensing regime in addressing the risks of tech-owned banks.

[21]   https://www.bis.org/about/bisih/about.htm

[22]   https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights39.pdf

Warning from history

The UK has a stark warning for policymakers regarding the risks associated with non-financial services owners or controllers of banks, in a report on the Co-operative Bank’s failure in 2013. The report [23]  by Sir Christopher Kelly, which considered the events leading to the Co-operative Bank’s capital shortfall, highlights lessons relevant to the policy debate on tech firms owning or controlling banks or other financial services firms.

It found that mistakes had not stemmed from regulatory grey areas or misinterpretations of risk, regulation or compliance. Rather, the Co-operative Group’s board lacked the skills, knowledge or understanding required to manage a bank. It did not know what management information to expect, did not understand the role of the regulator and fundamentally did not understand banking.

The potential relevance to, say, a Big Tech owning a bank is clear. In the words of Kelly, “one of the most surprising features of this whole episode is that the board seemed unaware of its limitations.”

Policymakers will need to ensure there is credible deterrence inherent in the approach to tech firm bank ownership and specifically that any senior manager who is unaware of or ignores their regulatory responsibilities will be vulnerable to investigation and sanction.

[23]   https://assets.ctfassets.net/5ywmq66472jr/3LpckmtCnuWiuuuEM2qAsw/9bc99b1cd941261bca5d674724873deb/kelly-review.pdf

Decentralized autonomous organizations

The blockchain-based economy has spawned a new structure of financial institution called the “digital autonomous organization.” This type of organization, based on computerized “smart contracts” recorded on a blockchain, raises significant issues regarding governance and accountability.

Decentralized autonomous organizations 

The emergence of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) represents a revolutionary change in the ways people and businesses can organize. DAOs leverage blockchain technology and are decentralized models of control and governance. They are characterized by transparency, clarity of rule, and process-driven decisions, primarily using smart contracts on distributed ledgers. Once a DAO has been established, via a blockchain, participants take ownership of its token, which allows them to participate in the system. Token holders can propose changes, and can vote on those changes, with the subsequent actions being taken “leaderlessly.” There are no chief executives, chief financial officers or chief technical officers, only code and community.

Close to 5,000 DAOs have been formed to date, and this is expected to grow exponentially. Many involve pooling digital money together to purchase assets, both physical and digital. ConstitutionDAO was established seven days prior to the auctioning of one of the 11 remaining copies of the U.S. Constitution. The intent was to purchase and house it at a protected public location. Participants in the DAO contributed money in ETH (Ethereum token), raising $45 million. Separately, the AssangeDAO raised $53 million for the criminal defense of Julian Assange. These are just two examples of how quickly DAOs can be created, and of how powerful they can be.

Central to a DAO is transparency. Anyone can see which individual (wallet address) owns tokens. Tokens allow for people to vote on proposals. Anyone can create a proposal. Simply stated, and in an ideal setting, it is egalitarian. One challenge to the model, however, is its democratic nature which can make DAOs overly deliberate and result in a slower process compared with more traditional organizations.

The regulatory landscape for DAOs is nearly non-existent at the state level. Wyoming, which has led the United States on regulation for blockchain and cryptocurrency, recently codified rules for DAOs residing in the state. A DAO could, therefore, be created under the laws of the State of Wyoming. No other state enables this yet. Further, there is a movement afoot for corporations in the cryptocurrency sector to dissolve and become DAOs. With potentially hawkish regulation on the horizon for cryptocurrency, DAOs, by their very nature, are code-based, self-running, leaderless entities running via a decentralized network, which permits actions based on how users interact under brassbound, predefined rules. Theoretically, under the current regulatory landscape there is nothing the law can do about such an entity. A corporation converted to a DAO would no longer be in control of the platform, which reverts to a completely new decentralized model, unlike anything regulated currently.

The SEC is reportedly looking into true DAOs such as Uniswap, which operates in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector as a decentralized exchange (DEX) and is a code-based organization that matches buyers and sellers of cryptocurrency. One area of focus is lending pools, where users will provide their assets for other users to trade, which produces healthy yields, just as banks provide interest on assets. This may fall into the Howey Test investment contract realm.

Financial crime

There is also concern that crypto firms can, and are, being used as conduits for facilitating financial crime. Many such firms, if not most, are outside the regulatory perimeter and have often found stepping into the regulated world challenging. One example of this is Binance, which has suffered multiple setbacks in its attempts to become regulated in several jurisdictions.

New research shows that decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols in particular are becoming an increasingly significant route for money launderers. The January 2022 update [24] from data provider Chainalysis reported that $8.6 billion worth of cryptocurrency was laundered in 2021 — a figure that has fluctuated from $6.6 billion in 2020 to $10.9 billion in 2019.

The 2021 figure represents a 30% increase in money laundering activity compared with 2020, although, as the update points out, “such an increase is unsurprising given the significant growth of both legitimate and illicit cryptocurrency activity in 2021.” Chainalysis also notes that the numbers only account for funds derived from “cryptocurrency-native” crime. This refers to cyber-criminal activity such as darknet market sales or ransomware attacks in which profits are virtually always derived in cryptocurrency rather than fiat currency. It is more difficult to measure how much fiat currency derived from offline crime — traditional drug trafficking, for example — is converted into cryptocurrency to be laundered. 

[24]   https://blog.chainalysis.com/reports/2022-crypto-crime-report-preview-cryptocurrency-money-laundering/

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced recently that it had seized a record $3.6 billion in bitcoin tied to the 2016 hack of digital currency exchange Bitfinex and had arrested a husband-and-wife team on money laundering charges.

The couple allegedly conspired to launder 119,754 bitcoin stolen after a hacker broke into Bitfinex and initiated more than 2,000 unauthorized transactions. DOJ officials said the transactions at the time were valued at $71 million in bitcoin, but with the rise in the currency’s value, the value now is more than $4.5 billion. Bitfinex said in a statement it was working with the DOJ to “establish our rights to a return of the stolen bitcoin.”

This showed that cryptocurrency was “not a safe haven for criminals,” said Lisa Monaco, deputy attorney general.

In another high-profile example last year, former partners and associates of the ransomware group REvil [25] caused a widespread gas shortage on the U.S. East Coast when it used encryption software called DarkSide to launch a cyber attack on the Colonial Pipeline. The DOJ recovered some $2.3 million in cryptocurrency ransom that Colonial paid to the hackers just days later.

Cases like these demonstrate that the DOJ “can follow money across the blockchain, just as we have always followed it within the traditional financial system,” said Kenneth Polite, assistant attorney general of the DOJ’s Criminal Division. This showed that cryptocurrency was “not a safe haven for criminals,” said Lisa Monaco, deputy attorney general.

Transparency

Overall, cyber-criminals have laundered more than $33 billion worth of cryptocurrency since 2017, with most of the total over time moving to centralized exchanges. For comparison, the UN (United Nations) Office on Drugs and Crime estimates that between $800 billion and $2 trillion of fiat currency is laundered each year — as much as 5% of GDP worldwide, whereas money laundering accounted for just 0.05% of all cryptocurrency transaction volume in 2021.

The biggest difference between fiat and cryptocurrency-based money laundering is that, due to the inherent transparency of blockchains, it is much easier to trace how criminals move cryptocurrency between wallets and services in their efforts to convert their funds into cash.

For the first time since 2018, centralized exchanges did not receive most of the funds sent by illicit addresses, taking in just 47%. Instead, the illicit funds were routed through DeFi protocols, which received 17% of all funds sent from illicit wallets in 2021, up from 2% the previous year. That translates to a 1,964% year-over-year increase in total value received by DeFi protocols from illicit addresses, reaching a total of $900 million in 2021. Mining pools, high-risk exchanges and mixers also saw substantial increases in value received from illicit addresses. 

[25]   https://www.reuters.com/technology/exclusive-governments-turn-tables-ransomware-gang-revil-by-pushing-it-offline-2021-10-21/

The increasing concern about DeFi was highlighted in 2021 when the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Suex and Chatex, two DeFi “gateway services” that regularly laundered funds from ransomware operators, scammers, and other cyber criminals.

In a different vein, HM’s Revenue & Customs in the UK is reported to have seized NFTs for the first time in February 2022 as part of a fraud investigation.

That said, the Belgian financial services regulator reported [26] that fraud linked specifically to cryptocurrencies fell 11% between 2020 and 2021.

Cryptos are undoubtedly being used in financial crime, but it still appears that, for instance, cryptocurrencies are substantially less likely to be used for money laundering than fiat currency. That said, the war in Ukraine has raised further questions and concerns about the potential for cryptos to be used in the avoidance of, or non-compliance with, sanctions.

[26]   https://www.fsma.be/en/news/fraudulent-online-trading-platforms-53-cent-increase-reports

The way forward

Policymakers are all-too aware of the need for a coherent approach to cryptos. “Global crypto regulation should be comprehensive, consistent and coordinated,” according to the IMF.

Specifically, the international regulatory framework should provide a level playing field along the activity and risk spectrum. The IMF believes this should have the following elements:

• Crypto-asset service providers that deliver critical functions should be licensed or authorized.      This would include storage, transfer, settlement and custody of reserves and assets, among others, as with existing rules for financial service providers.
• Requirements should be tailored to the main use cases of crypto-assets and stablecoins.
• Authorities should provide clear requirements on regulated financial institutions concerning their exposure to and engagement with crypto. 

Firms and their risk and compliance officers must engage with policymakers and regulators to ensure the best possible supervisory approach. Fast-moving digital transformation and adoption, even in limited terms, of innovative new technology, products and solutions will require skill sets to keep pace.

In addition to crypto, respondents to Regulatory Intelligence’s Fintech, regtech and role of compliance report for 2022 [27] highlighted a swath of other technological skills, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, cyber resilience and digital ledger technology, as being future knowledge requirements for risk and compliance functions.

[27]   https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/insights/reports/fintech-regtech-and-the-role-of-compliance-in-2022/form

A positive and transformative force?

Cryptos have huge potential to be a positive and transformative force for the future of financial services. The point was made in a November 2021 speech [28] by Carolyn A Wilkins, an external member of the Financial Policy Committee at the Bank of England.

Wilkins said she saw crypto-assets as the bedrock of the emerging financial ecosystem. The opportunities and risks extend well past the crypto-assets themselves to encompass a rapidly expanding range of financial services, from lending to insurance, she said. The future of this new frontier will depend critically on the regulatory response to these new activities and how fast the traditional financial system modernizes, and there will need to be major investment in domestic and cross-border payments, as well as digital governance, she said.

Tipping point

In many countries, cryptos appear to be at a legal and regulatory tipping point. Concerns about financial stability and vulnerable customers, together with the apparently persistent misperceptions about financial crime, are driving policymakers to consider significant action. Policymakers must, however, balance these considerations with the benefits which could be derived from the more widespread adoption of cryptos.

Other countries, meanwhile, are welcoming cryptos with seemingly few regulatory concerns. Cryptos’ borderless nature makes this even more challenging, as is evidenced by the near-overnight relocation of miners and crypto firms out of China. Most countries are reluctant to stifle innovation, but it would be politically unacceptable to deliberately risk either wholesale financial stability or widespread retail customer detriment.

There is an urgent need for a coherent approach to the regulation and oversight of cryptos; otherwise, there is a danger that they will fail to achieve their potential, and the world will lose the considerable benefits they could bring.

[28]   https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2021/november/carolyn-a-wilkins-keynote-speaker-at-autorite-des-marches-financiers-annual-meeting

Chapter Four

Compendium: Cryptocurrency regulations by country

In 2021 digital assets moved from the fringes of the economy and began to enter the mainstream, prompting more widespread public adoption. Commercials for crypto trading platforms blanket network television in the United States and the sector has become a focus of everyday conversation.

In November 2021, with bitcoin prices peaking around the $60,000 level, the total value of all cryptocurrencies surpassed $3 trillion, an increase from approximately $500 billion in December 2020. Today there are more than 16,000 individual cryptocurrencies in circulation, led by bitcoin. Total daily trading volumes are now estimated to be more than $275 billion on more than 400 platforms.

2021 was a transformative year for digital assets, and the stage is set for regulators to build a framework to govern this massive new market. Thus far, the regulatory response is best described as ad-hoc, rhetorical or driven by enforcement in some instances. The challenge in such a new and disruptive area will likely take years to finalize. Adding to the challenge is the ambiguous nature of digital assets themselves and the lack of standardized definitions, thus creating questions of overlap and jurisdiction.

The regulation of this new sector will require international coordination and engagement with the industry as it presents an opportunity for progress. An overly restrictive approach could stifle innovation and drive the industry to more welcoming jurisdictions, as the new digital universe is inherently global and borderless.

The regulatory framework is evolving rapidly and changing quickly. Some jurisdictions have imposed outright bans while others are staunch advocates.

Complete restrictions are rare and difficult to enforce, but regulators are scrambling to clarify rules to keep pace with crypto’s popularity.

Many market participants are desperately seeking a more defined regulatory framework and thus, certainty. This will mean new rules, regulations, or at a minimum official guidance. The race to regulate is now underway.

Crypto-assets, cryptocurrencies, central bank digital currencies and non-fungible tokens make up the new “crypto” universe, and each provides unique benefits, as well as regulatory challenges and complexities. This compendium to the report provides a summary of the regulatory picture in each jurisdiction. The summary below is grouped by region and focuses primarily on cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin. It provides an overview for each country, the regulatory state of play and links to the primary financial regulatory authorities or other relevant information.

Much of the regulatory framework is still developing, and regulations and restrictions also vary depending on uses such as payments, investments, derivatives, and tax status. Most countries have generally found ways to tax gains or income derived from cryptocurrencies, and some have more specific obligations than others. Few pure “tax havens” remain.

North America

Canada has approved bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) [29] and the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) [30] have issued guidance requiring crypto trading platforms and dealers in Canada to register with the local provincial regulators. In 2021 Canada adopted a clear registration regime for trading platforms that offer custodial services to Canadian clients. Several firms have registered under the new rules. Canada has also provided guidance on advertising and marketing of cryptos. The Ontario Securities Commission has actively enforced the regulations against several unregistered foreign trading platforms.

The Canada Revenue Authority (CRA) generally treats cryptocurrency like a commodity for purposes of the Income Tax Act.

Cryptocurrencies are prohibited in Mexico. The government and the financial authority, CNBV, enacted a set of fintech laws [31] in March 2018 that developed a regulatory framework and “sandbox” for virtual assets. The country has, however, taken a conservative approach to virtual assets with their relationship to existing financial system.

In June 2021 financial authorities said crypto-assets are not legal tender and not considered currencies under existing laws, warning that financial institutions that operate with them are subject to sanctions. “The financial authorities reiterate their warnings ... on the risks inherent in the use of so-called ‘virtual assets’ as a means of exchange, as a store of value or as another form of investment,” the statement said.

“The country’s financial institutions are not authorized to carry out and offer to the public operations with virtual assets, such as bitcoin, Ether, XRP and others in order to maintain a healthy distance between them and the financial system.”

Despite the restrictions, some of population has embraced cryptocurrencies. Mexico’s largest crypto exchange, Bitsos, has more than one million users on its platform.

Mexico’s Federal AML Law was amended in March 2018 to include transactions with “virtual assets” and considers them vulnerable activities under Financial Action Task Force (FATF) purposes.

The tax framework for cryptocurrencies is expected to change as there is no official position.

[29]   https://www.securities-administrators.ca/news/canadian-securities-regulators-outline-regulatory-framework-for-compliance-for-crypto-asset-trading-platforms/

[30]   https://www.iiroc.ca/news-and-publications/notices-and-guidance/joint-csaiiroc-staff-notice-21-329-guidance-crypto-asset-trading-platforms-compliance-regulatory

[31]   http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/lritf.htm

The regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies is evolving despite overlap and differences in viewpoints between agencies. Although the Securities and Exchange Commission [32] (SEC) is widely seen as the most powerful regulator, Treasury’s FinCEN [33] , the Federal Reserve Board [34] and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [35] (CFTC) have issued their own differing interpretations and guidance. An Executive Order from the White House [36] released in March directs the agencies to coordinate their regulatory efforts.

The SEC often views many cryptos as securities, the CFTC calls bitcoin a commodity, and Treasury calls it a currency. To iron out the regulatory differences, confusion about definitions, and jurisdiction, the President’s Working Group and the Financial Stability Oversight Council will play important roles in the development of a future regulatory framework.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) defines cryptocurrencies as “a digital representation of value that functions as a medium of exchange, a unit of account, and/or a store of value” and has issued tax guidance [37] accordingly. The IRS requires investors to disclose yearly cryptocurrency activity on their tax returns.

The United States is home to the largest number of crypto investors, exchanges, trading platforms, crypto mining firms and investment funds.

Central and South America

In Argentina, investing in cryptocurrencies is legal. It has become a large industry and accounts for a considerable portion of the country’s savings and assets. The government has issued regulations regarding cryptocurrencies related to taxation and AML/CFT. The government has proposed legislation which would create a legal and regulatory framework for crypto-assets as a means of payments, investments and transactions.

Argentina agreed with the IMF that it would adopt a program of fiscal, monetary and financial stability as it refinanced external debt in January. The promise may lead to higher taxes on cryptos.

The Argentina Securities and Exchange Commission [38] (CNV) will be the regulatory body with oversight responsibilities. It plans to maintain a national registry of operations, with transactions reported to the Financial Information Unit for compliance with AML requirements.

Argentina’s Federal Administration of Public Income and central bank have requested more information from domestic crypto exchanges and banks. Gains from cryptos are generally taxable at a 4% to 6.5% rate on gross income for each digital currency transaction.

[32]   https://www.sec.gov/files/digital-assets-risk-alert.pdf

[33]   https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm1216

[34]   https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/tokens-and-accounts-in-the-context-of-digital-currencies-122320.htm

[35]   https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8291-20

[36]   https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/03/09/executive-order-on-ensuring-responsible-development-of-digital-assets/

[37]   https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-virtual-currency-guidance

[38]   https://www.argentina.gob.ar/cnv

The Bolivian government banned the use of cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin in 2014, in the belief that it would facilitate tax evasion and monetary instability. “It is illegal to use any kind of currency that is not issued and controlled by a government or an authorized entity,” Bolivia’s central bank [39] (BCB) said.

Bolivia has refrained from cracking down on or criminalizing the holding or trading cryptos, but it has not allowed businesses and brokers seeking to provide crypto-related services in the country. The BCB has publicly said, “…crypto-assets may not be operated through the Bolivian financial system. They do not operate with the authorization of the BCB or the Financial System Supervision Authority.” The BCB has said the measures were necessary to protect the public from “risks, frauds and swindles.”

In 2021 as the Brazilian real struggled, many Brazilians turned to cryptos. According to CoinMarketCap, approximately 10 million Brazilians now participate in the crypto market. Legislators in Brazil have proposed a series of regulations in the past several years and created a regulatory “sandbox.” Brazilian lawmakers have also passed legislation [40] requiring “virtual asset service providers to follow rules of communication of financial transactions, with identification of customers and recordkeeping.”

The Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission [41] (CVM) has approved several crypto ETFs. The government has declared that bitcoin is an asset and therefore is subject to capital gains taxes. Brazil has said that existing AML laws extend to virtual currencies in certain contexts.

The Special Department of Federal Revenue of Brazil [42] has published a document on cryptocurrency taxes in the country.

The Central Bank of Brazil [43] said a CBDC, the digital real, could be launched as early as 2023.

Lawmakers in Chile are working to develop a regulatory and oversight framework for cryptocurrencies and to potentially recognize bitcoin as legal form of payment [44] . The government is also working on a CBDC. With a growing number of cryptocurrency exchanges in the country, and in the absence of a legal framework, the Central Bank and the Financial Market Commission [45] has said that existing regulations are applicable to cryptocurrencies.

The Chilean Internal Revenue Service (SII) is the only institution so far to have issued legislation on cryptocurrencies in Notice no 963, issued on May 14, 2018, [46] . The SII released a determination on the taxation of income obtained from buying and selling cryptocurrencies. It said that Tax Form 22 would require the declaration “from the sale of foreign currencies of legal course or assets digital/virtual, such as cryptocurrencies (for example, bitcoins).”

[39]   https://www.bcb.gob.bo/

[40]   https://www.camara.leg.br/noticias/811726-comissao-aprova-pena-maior-para-lavagem-de-dinheiro-com-moedas-virtuais

[41]   https://www.gov.br/cvm/en

[42]   http://normas.receita.fazenda.gov.br/sijut2consulta/link.action?visao=anotado&idAto=100592

[43]   https://www.bcb.gov.br/en/pressdetail/2397/nota

[44]   https://www.senado.cl/appsenado/templates/tramitacion/index.php?boletin_ini=14708-03

The Colombian government has prohibited banks from providing financial services to cryptocurrency companies. The country’s restrictive approach has created a challenge for the industry as firms may not use banking institutions.

The Banco de la República [47] , the country’s monetary, exchange and credit authority, and the Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia (SFC) [48] , the government agency responsible for overseeing financial regulation and market systems, released statements on cryptos. The authorities said cryptos are not legal tender or valid investments for supervised entities, and that firms are not authorized to advise or manage them.

The Superintendency of Corporations in Colombia [49] has stated that companies can legally purchase cryptos such as bitcoin, although such “intangible assets” are unregulated. The country’s tax authority, the Directorate of National Taxes and Customs (DIAN) [50] , said “virtual currencies are not money for legal purposes. However, in the context of mining activity, insofar as they are received in exchange for services and/or commissions, they correspond to income and, in any case, to goods that can be valued and generate income for those who obtain them as from be part of your patrimony and take effect in tax matters.”

There is no specific legislation or prohibition on the use of cryptocurrencies, but warnings from the government have led banks to deactivate cryptocurrency-related accounts and created an environment which makes it impossible for cryptocurrency-oriented companies to operate.

In January 2018, the Central Bank of Ecuador [51] informed citizens that bitcoin “is not a means of payment authorized for use in the country.” It clarified that bitcoin is not backed by any authority as its value is based on speculation. Financial transactions are not controlled, supervised, or regulated by any entity in the country, and this presents a financial risk to those who use it.

Despite this warning, the central bank has said that “the purchase and sale of cryptocurrencies — such as bitcoin — through the internet is not prohibited.”

In January 2022, Guillermo Avellan, the manager of the Central Bank of Ecuador, said there are plans to issue regulations later this year, which would bring clarity and contribute to the prevention of financial crimes such as money laundering.

[45]   https://www.cmfchile.cl/portal/principal/613/w3-article-25729.html

[46]   https://www.sii.cl/normativa_legislacion/jurisprudencia_administrativa/ley_impuesto_renta/2018/ja963.htm

[47]   https://www.banrep.gov.co/es/publicaciones/documento-tecnico-criptoactivos

[48]   https://www.superfinanciera.gov.co/jsp/index.jsf

[49]  https://www.supersociedades.gov.co/nuestra_entidad/normatividad/normatividad_conceptos_juridicos/OFICIO_100-237890_DE_2020.pdf

[50]   https://www.dian.gov.co/Prensa/ComunicadosPrensa/009-DIAN-realiza-acciones-de-fiscalizacion-a-operacion-con-criptoactivos-BITCOIN.pdf

[51]   https://www.bce.fin.ec/index.php/boletines-de-prensa-archivo/item/1028-comunicado-oficial-sobre-el-uso-del-bitcoin

El Salvador

El Salvador has established itself as a pioneer in cryptocurrencies with its 2021 adoption [52] of bitcoin as legal tender in the country. President Nayib Bukele has fully embraced bitcoin with promises of no income tax on cryptos and plans to build a geo-thermal powered city to try to attract bitcoin mining.

The International Monetary Fund, has urged El Salvador to reverse course, citing concerns about the country’s financial stability. The move to legal tender status is widely seen as a risky experiment, with credit rating agencies downgrading the country’s debt ratings. The move has also raised concerns related to AML and KYC compliance.

In December 2022, a new cryptocurrency law was introduced which seeks to define crypto-assets and regulate crypto transactions. The proposed law, “Crypto-asset Marketing Framework,” was introduced in the Peruvian Congress under the number N° 1042/2021-CR [53] , The law is seen as a first step to establish regulatory clarity for virtual asset service providers and others involved in blockchain and cryptography. The law proposes the creation of a public register and provides that registrants must operate lawfully in the country. It also considers the use of crypto-assets to create and incorporate companies and proposes that the assets could be considered property or intangible assets.

Thus far, the government has warned that no supervision is provided by the Securities Agency [54] (SMV), the Banking, Insurance and Pension Fund Manager Agency [55] (SBS), or the Peruvian Central Reserve Bank [56] (BCRP).

The BCRP has said that these financial assets are not legal tender, nor are they supported by central banks, so they fail fully to meet the functions of money as a medium of exchange, unit of account and store of value.

[52]   https://www.asamblea.gob.sv/sites/default/files/documents/decretos/8EE85A5B-A420-4826-ABD0-463380E2603B.pdf

[53]   https://wb2server.congreso.gob.pe/spley-portal-service/archivo/OTM0MA==/pdf/PL0104220211220

[54]   https://www.smv.gob.pe/

[55]   https://www.sbs.gob.pe/

[56]   https://www.bcrp.gob.pe/en

There is no specific legislation on cryptocurrencies. The Uruguayan Chamber of FinTech [57] has, however, announced the formation of a cryptocurrency committee to analyze what future regulations might look like. The country is widely viewed as bitcoin- and blockchain-friendly with no regulations specifically banning or permitting the use of cryptocurrencies.

On October 1, 2021, the Central Bank of Uruguay issued a statement about virtual assets and outlined a process for regulating cryptos. Peru has actively embraced the industry with a view of achieving a regulatory approach that is in line with international organizations.

The central bank clarified that the assets are not considered legal tender and that a regulatory framework would be very different from that of El Salvador.

Prior to 2018, law enforcement arrested and seized assets of bitcoin miners but has now declared cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin legal. The Superintendency of Crypto-assets and Related Activities of Venezuela (SUPCACVEN) is the governmental agency in charge of regulations, control and protection of crypto-assets.

On September 21, 2020, Venezuela legalized bitcoin mining. Miners must, however, be registered and all activities must be overseen through the “National Mining Pool,” with the government in charge of distributing the rewards from such activities.

The government has also created its own cryptocurrency called the Petro, which is backed by the value of Venezuelan oil.

The Financial Market Authority (FMA) has warned [58] investors that cryptocurrencies are risky and that the FMA does not supervise or regulate virtual currencies, including bitcoin, or cryptocurrency trading platforms. The FMA’s regulations follow Austria’s implementation of the Fifth Money Laundering Directive (AMLD5), defining crypto-assets as “financial instruments.” The FMA regulations provide registration requirements with respect to the issuance and selling of virtual currencies as well as transferring them, trading and exchange platforms for them as well as providers of custodian wallets.

Cryptocurrencies are legal but are not considered as legal tender. The Austrian Ministry of Finance [59] classes cryptocurrencies as “other (intangible) commodities.” As part of a nationwide tax overhaul, Austria will apply a 27.5% capital gains tax on digital currencies, bringing the treatment of cryptos into line with that of stocks and bonds, to “streamline” conditions between asset classes.

As a member of the EU, regulations and guidance issued by the European supervisory authorities (the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)) apply. Virtual currencies are defined by the European Central Bank (ECB) as “a digital representation of value, not issued by a central bank, credit institution or e-money institution, which, in some circumstances, can be used as an alternative to money.”

[57]   https://fintech.org.uy/

[58]   https://www.fma.gv.at/en/bitcoins/

[59]   https://www.bmf.gv.at/en.html

Bailiwick of Guernsey

The territory of Guernsey within the British Isles is known as a Crown Dependency but is not part of the United Kingdom; rather, it is a self-governing possession of the British Crown. The Guernsey Financial Services Commission (GFSC) is the body responsible for the regulation of the finance sector.

The GFSC has warned of the risks associated with cryptos, although it has taken a light regulatory approach. According to the GFSC website [60] , “Virtual or crypto currencies could interact with our regulatory laws in a number of ways and therefore any application would need to be assessed on its individual merits. We will assess any application by the same criteria we use for other asset types or structures, which means we would look to ensure that key controls are appropriate — for example, around custody, liquidity, valuation of assets and investor information.”

The GFSC has said it will assess applications on individual merits against the criteria used for asset types or structures, because cryptocurrencies, “could interact with regulatory laws in a number of ways.” Applicants must demonstrate how they will comply with AML/CTF laws and rules. The GFSC has also said it would be cautious about approving applications for ICOs, and also about the establishment of any kind of digital currency exchange within the jurisdiction.

Guernsey has announced plans for crypto-asset regulations later this year. The laws are expected to include a licensing regime for VASPs. Guernsey has approved a bitcoin fund.

[60]   https://www.gfsc.gg/faqs-0

Bailiwick of Jersey

The territory of Jersey within the British Isles is known as a Crown Dependency but is not part of the United Kingdom; rather, it is a self-governing possession of the British Crown. In 2016 amendments to the Proceeds in Crime Law categorized virtual currency as a form of currency.

Financial services business such as exchanges are subject to Jersey’s AML requirements and must comply with the island’s laws, regulations, policies and procedures related to AML/CTF.

Virtual currency exchanges are a supervised business and are required to register with, and fall under the supervision of, the Jersey Financial Services Commission [61] (JFSC).

Mining of cryptos on a small scale in Jersey is not taxable [62] , although the exchange of cryptocurrencies to and from conventional currencies and other cryptocurrencies will be liable to income tax, if it is considered to be “trading.”

The Belgian Financial Services and Markets Authority [63] and the National Bank of Belgium are the primary regulatory bodies for financial services in Belgium. The regulators have published guidance and warnings to the public that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender and have also issued statements regarding scams and investor protection. Belgium has, however, fostered a strong fintech community involved in digital assets and blockchain. The minister of justice has announced plans to establish a legal framework related to cryptos.

In February 2022 Belgium announced new rules [64] for certain virtual asset service providers. The rules, which take effect in May 2022, will require service providers “to meet a series of conditions, including ones relating to their professional integrity and compliance with the anti-money laundering legislation.”

Gains on cryptocurrencies are taxable by as “miscellaneous income.”

As a member of the EU, regulations issued by the EBA, EIOPA and ESMA apply. Virtual currencies are defined by the ECB as “a digital representation of value, not issued by a central bank, credit institution or e-money institution, which, in some circumstances, can be used as an alternative to money.”

The Bulgarian National Bank [65] and the Bulgarian Commission for Financial Supervision [66] have not defined cryptocurrencies as financial instruments or electronic money. Cryptocurrencies and bitcoin mining are not illegal and not regulated.

Bulgarian regulators have issued various standard warnings to the public and potential investors about risks associated with digital assets and initial coin offerings, and has not defined cryptocurrencies as financial instruments or legal tender for payments.

The Bulgarian National Revenue Agency [67] has issued a statement to define tax treatment for businesses and individuals and declare activities. Gains on cryptocurrency gains are taxed at 10%.

As a member of the EU, Bulgaria is one of only eight countries that has not adopted the euro, although national bank officials have said they intend to adopt the euro in 2024. Other EBA, EIOPA and ESMA regulations and guidance apply.

[61]   https://www.jerseyfsc.org/

[62]   https://www.gov.je/TaxesMoney/IncomeTax/Technical/Guidelines/Pages/CryptocurrenciesTreatment.aspx

[63]   https://www.fsma.be/en

[64]   https://www.fsma.be/en/news/cryptocurrencies-new-rules-certain-service-providers

[65]   https://www.bnb.bg/

[66]   https://www.fsc.bg/en/

Czech Republic

In the Czech Republic, cryptocurrency is largely unregulated and is regarded as a commodity rather than a currency. It is not an official means of payment.

The Czech National Bank [68] permits Czech banks to offer crypto-related services as long as they comply with AML regulations. The Czech Republic has said cryptocurrencies present no danger to the banking system and has deferred to EU directives. The Czech Republic has, however, implemented a stricter legal model than AMLD5 requiring that every cryptocurrency-related firm be regulated by the Czech government. AML regulations apply to anyone that provides cryptocurrency services, including “those who buy, sell, store, manage, or mediate the purchase or sale of cryptocurrencies or provide other services related to such currencies as a business.”

Gains on cryptos are taxed at rates between 15 and 19%.

The Danish Financial Supervisory Authority [69] is the main regulator in Denmark. Cryptocurrency regulation is, however, influenced by EU law. An amendment in January 2020 to the Danish Act on Measures to Prevent Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism [70] defines a virtual currency as “a digital representation of value that is not issued or guaranteed by a central bank or a public authority, is not necessarily attached to a legally established currency and does not possess a legal status of currency or money, but is accepted by natural or legal persons as a means of exchange and which can be transferred, stored and traded electronically.”

There is no regulation of mining for virtual currencies in Denmark.

Denmark amended the AML Act in 2020 to implement AMLD5, which is designed to bring virtual currencies within the scope of the 4MLD.

The Danish central bank, the Nationalbanken [71] , is researching the development of a digital currency, the “e-krone.”

[67]   https://www.iota-tax.org/organization/national-revenue-agency

[68]  https://www.cnb.cz/en/public/media-service/speeches-conferences-seminars/presentations-and-speeches/Cryptoassets-Central-Banks-and-the- Current-Monetary-System-pdf-754-kB/

[69]   https://www.dfsa.dk/

[70]   https://www.dfsa.dk/Rules-and-Practice/AML_act_guide

[71]   https://www.nationalbanken.dk/en/publications/Pages/2017/12/Central-bank-digital-currency-in-Denmark.aspx

Estonia has been an early crypto frontrunner, with more than 1,300 crypto exchanges. In January 2021 the Ministry of Finance in Estonia proposed regulations for virtual currency service providers. The new regulations require “virtual currency service” firms to have their registered office, management and place of business located in Estonia. Such firms include wallets and trading platforms.

Although virtual currencies are not subject to securities regulation in the EU, the new draft rules attempt to address some of the regulatory issues and tighten regulation on virtual asset service providers. Firms will be subject to the supervision of the Financial Supervision Authority [72] , which will require minimum capital standards, IT standards, audits and reporting. All license holders are required to re-apply for a new license.

In December 2021, Estonia’s minister of finance published an informational page [73] addressing commonly asked questions about the proposed bill. “The legislation does not contain any measures to ban customers from owning and trading virtual assets and does not in any way require customers to share their private keys to wallets,” the minister said.

The proposed bill is seen as Estonia’s answer to the FATF guidance on regulating VASPs.

Income derived from cryptocurrencies in Estonia is taxable by the county’s Tax and Custom Board [74] .

In May 2019, Finland’s Financial Supervisory Authority [75] (FSA) began regulating virtual currency exchange providers, wallets and issuers of virtual currencies. Registration is required to ensure compliance with statutory requirements surrounding reliability of the provider, protection of client money, segregation of assets, marketing and compliance with AML/CFT regulations.

The FSA has warned consumers of the risky, volatile and speculative nature of the investments.

The Finnish FSA has published stricter rulings regarding crypto marketing saying “Only registered virtual currency providers can market virtual currencies and related services in Finland. The marketing of virtual currencies in Finnish and in Finland is only allowed for entities registered as virtual currency providers in Finland.”

The list of supervised entities [76] operating in the cryptocurrency and digital currency sector is small, with fewer than 10 companies registered; although, the FSA does not advise on or restrict Finnish customers visiting foreign websites.

Finland has joined the European Blockchain Partnership [77] and agreed to AMLD5.

[72]   https://www.fi.ee/en/finantsinspektsioon/financial-innovation/virtual-currencies-and-ico/information-entities-engaging-virtual-currencies-and-icos

[73]   https://www.fin.ee/en/faq-how-will-new-estonian-draft-legislation-affect-virtual-assets-and-crypto#can-i-be-fined-for-o

[74]  https://www.emta.ee/eng/private-client/declaration-income/other-income/taxation-private-persons-virtual

[75]   https://www.finanssivalvonta.fi/en/publications-and-press-releases/supervision-releases/2019/virtual-currency-providers-to-be-supervised-by-the-fin-fsa--briefing-for-virtual-currency-providers-on-15-may/

[76]   https://www.finanssivalvonta.fi/en/registers/supervised-entities/

[77]   https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/european-countries-join-blockchain-partnership

In April 2019, the French National Assembly adopted the Plan d’Action pour la Croissance et la Transformation de Enterprises [78] (PACTE – Action Plan for Business Growth and Transformation) that will establish a framework for digital asset services providers. France’s Financial Market Authority [79] (AMF) has adopted new rules and regulations for cryptocurrency service providers and ICOs, related to the (PACTE). Ordinance № 2020-1544 [80] , was issued on December 9, 2020, to compliment France’s cryptocurrency regulations.

In June 2021, the regulations were finalized and went into effect. Firms are now subject to mandatory registration and subject to stricter KYC regulations. The rules established new AML/CFT rules related to digital assets. They imposed new requirements on crypto exchanges and prohibit anonymous accounts, expand AML/CFT and KYC obligations to better harmonize the French AML framework with Financial Action Task Force [81] (FATF) principles and respond to new risks associated with digital assets.

Lawmakers in France have recently debated changing the tax structure related to cryptos. Cryptos are taxed similar to movable property. Occasional traders are charged a flat tax of 30% while miners and professional traders are taxed 45%.

The German government was one of the first countries to provide legal certainty to financial institutions, allowing them to hold crypto-assets. Regulations stipulate that citizens and legal entities can buy or trade crypto-assets as long as it is done through licensed exchanges and custodians. Firms must be licensed with the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority [82] (BaFin).

BaFin views and classifies cryptos as “units of account” within the meaning of the German Banking Act. They are therefore not legal tender, money, or foreign exchange notes or coins. The regulators have agreed, however, that they are deemed “crypto-assets” in accordance with the definition of financial instruments.

Germany has signed up to requirements under AMLD5. It has established licensing requirements for custody services. Crypto-assets are, however, based on agreement and accepted as a means of exchange or payment or as an investment, and can be transferred, stored, and traded electronically.

The German Federal Central Tax Office considers cryptocurrencies as private money for tax purposes. For individuals, gains of less than 600 euros held for less than a year are considered tax-free. Sales of cryptos held for more than a year are tax-exempt in Germany. If neither of the conditions are met, the gains are taxed subject to ordinary income rates.

[78]   https://www.gouvernement.fr/en/pacte-the-action-plan-for-business-growth-and-transformation

[79]   https://www.amf-france.org/en

[80]   https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000042636234

[81]   https://www.fatf-gafi.org/

[82]   https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/EN/Merkblatt/BA/mb_Hinweise_zum_Erlaubnisantrag_fuer_das_Kryptoverwahrgeschaeft_en.html

In the midst of the Greek debt crisis in 2015 bitcoin exploded in popularity in the country. Crypto regulation centers around Europe-wide directives. The Bank of Greece has issued and adopted European warnings and the country joined the European Blockchain Partnership.

The Hellenic Capital Market Commission [83] views cryptocurrencies as portfolio assets and not currency. It requires providers of digital wallets, custody services and exchange services between cryptos and fiat currencies such as ATMs to be registered. The registry is seen as an important first step in the country’s regulatory efforts. As an EU member state, Greece has agreed to follow any EU initiatives and to AMLD5.

The Bank of Greece set up an Innovation Hub or “sandbox” to enable fintech activities and became a member of the European Forum for Innovation Facilitators (EFIF) in April 2019.

There is no dedicated tax regime for blockchain or cryptocurrencies, although taxation for mining is considered income from commercial enterprises and the profits that will arise after deducting the operating expenses are taxed according to the general provisions and the applicable tax rates. Holders of cryptocurrencies are taxed at a rate of 15% plus a progressive increase as income from capital gains.

As an autonomous Danish dependent territory under the Kingdom of Denmark, financial services, banking, and crypto laws and regulations in Greenland are within the scope of the Danish regime.

The National Bank of Hungary, the Magyar Nemzeti Bank (MNB), [84] has issued a public statement warning citizens who use or invest in cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin about their unregulated nature and associated risks. The MNB published a report [85] on fintech and digitalization in April 2020 that included an analysis of the fintech sector, profitability and services across the fintech market.

Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender and regulations are underdeveloped in Hungary as there are no laws specifically regulating crypto activities. Hungary has, however, joined the European Blockchain Partnership and agreed to AMLD5.

Taxes on crypto mining and trading were lowered in 2022 to 15% of income. Exchanges from crypto to crypto are not taxable events. The taxes apply only when cryptos are converted to fiat currency. The 15% rate is favorable compared with the rest of Europe.

[83]    http://www.hcmc.gr/el_GR/web/portal/mlaundering1

[84]    https://www.mnb.hu/foreign-warnings

[85]   https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/fintech-es-digitalizacios-jelente-s-final-eng.pdf

The Central Bank of Ireland [86] has issued warnings on the risks associated with cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin and Ether. It points out that they are unregulated, with a particular warning about ICOs. Cryptos are not considered as money or as equivalent to fiat currency in Ireland, and they are not backed by either the Irish government or the Central Bank. Ireland has taken a “wait-and-see” approach with regards to implementing domestic crypto regulation; rather, it has followed guidance from international regulators, most notably EU supervisory authorities.

Ireland’s Department of Finance has proposed the creation of a new blockchain working group to help create a coordinated approach to crypto regulation. The group published a report, “Virtual Currencies And Blockchain Technology.” [87]  Ireland has joined the European Blockchain Partnership and agreed to AMLD5.

Ireland’s Office of the Revenue Commissioners released a manual [88] on the tax treatment of various transactions under cryptocurrencies. It clarified that ordinary tax rules apply, and that cryptocurrency mining would generally not be subject to VAT. Generally, profits and losses from crypto transaction are taxable as normal income. There is some uncertainty as to capital gains tax and whether they are held as “investments” under “Badges of Trade” and related case law.

Isle of Man

The Isle of Man within the British Isles is known as a Crown Dependency but is not part of the United Kingdom; rather, it is a self-governing possession of the British Crown. The Isle of Man is considered one of the most attractive locations for crypto companies because of its secure data centers, low-cost electricity and its friendly regulatory and tax environment.

The Isle of Man Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the Digital Isle of Man, an executive agency within the government’s enterprise department, published guidance [89] aimed at giving companies greater clarity when setting up blockchain-related business in the jurisdiction.

Cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin are considered securities and fall outside regulatory oversight. Companies involved with the assets must, however, register with the FSA and comply with AML/CTF requirements. Tokens or cryptocurrencies that offer a store of value or access to services and are not a form of e-money would be unregulated.

[86]   https://www.centralbank.ie/consumer-hub/consumer-notices/consumer-warning-on-virtual-currencies

[87]   https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/d59daf-virtual-currencies-and-blockchain-technology/?referrer=http://www.finance.gov.ie/wp-content/up­loads/2018/03/Virtual-Currencies-and-Blockchain-Technology-March-2018.pdf

[88]  https://www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/tdm/income-tax-capital-gains-tax-corporation-tax/part-02/02-01-03.pdf

[89]   https://www.iomfsa.im/media/2720/regulatory-perimeter-for-tokens.pdf

In February 2022, Italy published [90] new AML rules for crypto firms which outline registration and reporting requirements for VASPs that align with the EU AMLD5 and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) guidelines for crypto firms.

The new rules also require virtual asset service providers to register in a special roster for crypto firms. Registration is required if firms offer any digital asset-related services in the country.

Italy joined the European Blockchain Partnership (EBP) along with 22 other countries in April 2018. The EBP was established to enable member states to work together with the European Commission on blockchain technology.

Cryptocurrencies and blockchain are regulated at the legislative level in Italy under Legislative Act no. 90. The decree in 2017 grouped cryptocurrency exchanges with foreign currency exchanges. Although the decree states that cryptocurrencies are not issued by the central bank and are not correlated with other currencies, it is a virtual currency used as a medium of exchange for goods and services.

Latvia’s Financial and Capital Market Commission [91] has warned investors that in Latvia there is no regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. Nor are there any particular prohibitions or obligations to obtain special licenses. Furthermore, bitcoin and other cryptos are not classified as currency of any state.

Commercial activities related to the purchase and distribution of bitcoins or similar cryptocurrencies are not considered financial instruments or money issuance, nor are they payment services. Those conducting crypto activities are not licensed or registered with the Commission.

In the past several years Latvia has launched an effort to improve its AML regulations. In 2019 it expanded the role of the Financial and Capital Market Commission to cover AML/CTF and impose beneficial ownership requirements on local limited companies, foundations, unions and other enterprises.

The Latvian Finance Ministry imposes a 20% tax on capital gains from cryptocurrencies.

Latvia has signed a declaration joining the European Blockchain Partnership.

The Bank of Lithuania defined [92] cryptocurrencies in 2017. Also known as virtual currencies, cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin are unregulated and are not guaranteed by the central bank.

Lithuania requires crypto firms to register with the country’s Center of Registers. Registrants must adopt comprehensive KYC and AML procedures and are expected to inform the Financial Crime Investigation Service (FCIS) about large transfers. Companies that are registered as virtual currency exchange operators are not supervised as financial service providers. They have no right to provide any financial services, including investment services. The list of financial institutions authorized to provide investment services is published on the Bank of Lithuania website [93] .

A June 2020 report [94] from Moneyval — the Council of Europe’s committee of experts on the evaluation of AML/CFT measures — found Lithuania had made progress toward eliminating gaps in its regulation and supervision of cryptocurrency and claimed to have gone beyond requirements in AMLD5.

In July 2021, the Bank of Lithuania warned [95] an exchange operator about unlicensed investment services in the country and ordered that publicly available information must not be misleading.

The Lithuania State Tax Inspectorate considers cryptos as “property” and levies a 15% rate on the gains. Income from mining activities is only considered as income upon the sale of the cryptos after mining.

[90]  https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/atto/serie_generale/caricaDettaglioAtto/originario?atto.dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=2022-02-17&atto.codiceRe­dazionale=22A01127&elenco30giorni=false

[91]   https://www.fktk.lv/en/

[92]   https://www.lb.lt/uploads/documents/files/Pozicijos%20del%20virtualiu%20valiutu%20ir%20VV%20zetonu%20platinimo%20EN.pdf

The Netherlands

The Dutch Central National Bank De Nederlandsche N.V. (DNB) [96] requires crypto firms to register with it. Dutch regulations require VASPs to provide identifying information on themselves and their customers. The DNB also supervises crypto service providers’ compliance with the Sanctions Act 1977.

The DNB defines cryptos as “a digital representation of value that is not issued or guaranteed by a central bank or a public authority, is not necessarily attached to a legally established currency and does not possess a legal status of currency or money but is accepted by natural or legal persons as a means of exchange and which can be transferred, stored and traded electronically.”

In May 2020 the Dutch Implementation Act amended Dutch AML rules and implemented 5MLD.

The Netherlands does not impose taxes on capital gains, but rather imposes a deemed interest on the value of all assets minus all liabilities. The deemed interest is taxable against a flat rate of 31% (in 2021, 30% in 2020).

[93]   https://www.lb.lt/en/sfi-financial-market-participants

[94]   https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/fur/Moneyval-1st-Follow-Up-Report-Lithuania.pdf

[95]   https://www.lb.lt/en/news/bank-of-lithuania-issued-warning-regarding-binance-uab-and-other-crypto-asset-service-providers

[96]  https://www.dnb.nl/en/sector-information/supervision-sectors/crypto-service-providers/registration-of-crypto-service-providers/

Cryptocurrencies are legal . They are defined as an asset and not any type of money. Norway has been an attractive location for blockchain start-ups.

The Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway “Finanstilsynet” [97] and the country’s Ministry of Finance has established money laundering regulations which apply to “Norwegian providers of virtual currency exchange and storage services.”

The legislation requires firms such as storage services and exchanges that convert cryptos to fiat currency to comply with AML rules, but it does not impose regulatory obligations on other crypto services.

“Finanstilsynet will ensure that virtual currency exchange and storage providers comply with the money laundering rules. However, FSA does not have any tasks monitoring other areas of these providers, such as investor protection,” the regulator said.

In June 2021, Finanstilsynet published a warning [98] which said, “Most cryptocurrencies are subject to extreme price fluctuations. The risk of loss is high… Price formation is in many cases not transparent.” It also warned of significant criminal activity. “Scammers use spam, computer viruses, fake drawings and a variety of other techniques to deceive consumers,” the warning stated.

Bitcoin profits are subject to wealth tax and use of cryptos falls under sales tax regulations

The Central Bank of Norway is exploring the development of a CBDC.

Like many other countries in Europe, Poland has not regulated cryptos outside EU requirements. The National Bank of Poland and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority [99] (KNF) have warned of the risks associated with cryptocurrencies. The KNF has said that the cryptocurrency market is not a regulated or supervised market. “The KNF does not authorize, supervise or exercise any other supervisory powers in relation to the trade in cryptocurrencies. Some entities operating in the cryptocurrency market are authorized to provide payment services, in particular to settle payments made with legal tender (fiat money) in exchange for the cryptocurrencies being bought or sold.”

Poland’s AML regime adopted AMLD5, which had a significant impact on the approach to crypto businesses. The main goal was to increase transparency and protection from suspicious transactions. As of October 31, 2021, companies were required to register with the Ministry of Finance. Registration is not connected with any controlling aspect, however, and does not grant authority to operate or provide legal security.

Poland has signed a declaration joining the European Blockchain Partnership.

Cryptocurrencies are not considered legal tender. Gains on digital assets are subject to capital gains taxes and VAT. Polish tax rates on cryptos are 19% plus an additional 4% for those with income in excess of PLN 1 million.

[97]   https://www.finanstilsynet.no/en/

[98]   https://www.finanstilsynet.no/nyhetsarkiv/nyheter/2021/forbrukere-og-kryptovaluta/

[99]   https://www.knf.gov.pl/en/news?articleId=71711&p_id=19#:~:text=In%20the%20light%20of%20the,to%2C%20the%20trade%20in%20cryptocurrencies .

Despite having issued warnings about the risks related to cryptos, Portugal is widely seen as the most crypto-friendly country in Europe. The legal status of cryptocurrency in Portugal was officially clarified in a statement [100] by the Portuguese tax authorities and was subsequently reaffirmed by the Journal de Negocios [101] . Portugal does, however, follow EU regulation as has agreed to AMLD5.

In April 2020, the Portuguese government published a Digital Transition Action Plan [102] which included 12 pillars, the most important of which were the digital empowerment of people, the digital transformation of companies, the digitization of the state. The plan also established a flexible regulatory environment for technology testing and development.

A 2016 law ruled that because cryptocurrencies are not considered currencies, they are not legal tender and are therefore untaxable. The country’s non-habitual tax regime (NHR) has attracted many crypto traders as it allows for exemptions and reductions in tax for a 10-year period for individuals of high cultural or economic worth. “An exchange of cryptocurrency for ’real’ currency constitutes an on-demand, VAT-free exercise of services,” the Portuguese tax authorities have said.

Like its neighbor Portugal, Spain was a notable early hot spot for cryptocurrencies among EU members, with merchants accepting payments and bitcoin kiosks in the streets. Despite having no formal legal status, virtual currencies in Spain are taxable as income and under VAT.

In 2021 the Spanish Securities and Exchange Commission, the Comision Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) and the Bank of Spain issued a joint statement warning of the risks and volatility associated with cryptos. The joint statement [103] also highlighted that, from a legal standpoint, cryptocurrencies are not a means of payment and are not backed by a central bank or other customer protection mechanisms or authority.

Spain issued Royal Decree Law 5/2021 [104] which included a provision giving the CNMV power to regulate advertising related to cryptocurrencies. In January 2022, the CNMV published a circular [105] saying it would begin to regulate rampant advertising of crypto assets, including by social media influencers, to make sure investors are aware of risks.

[100]   https://www.audico.pt/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/57_INFORMACAO_14436.pdf

[101]   https://www.jornaldenegocios.pt/economia/impostos/detalhe/troca-e-remuneracao-de-criptomoeda-isentas-de-iva?ref=Economia_outros

[102]   https://eportugal.gov.pt/en/noticias/governo-lanca-plano-de-acao-para-a-transicao-digital

[103]   https://www.cnmv.es/portal/verDoc.axd?t=%7B52286f9f-c592-4418-9559-b75bf97115d2%7D

[104]   https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2021-3946

The Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) and the central bank have publicly declared that bitcoin is legal but not an official form of payment or legal tender. From a tax perspective they are viewed as an asset, not a currency or cash.

The FSA has warned [106] of the risks associated with cryptos and investment products with cryptos as underlying assets such as exchange-traded products (ETPs). Sweden has imposed registration requirements that mean custodians, wallet providers and exchanges must comply with the Swedish Currency Exchange Act. The act requires certain types of financial institutions (which are otherwise largely unregulated and unsupervised) to comply with AML provisions.

The scope of the Currency Exchange Act now includes custodian wallet providers and providers of virtual currency exchange services in accordance with the implementation of AMLD5.

Mining activities are not regulated under Swedish law. There are no licensing or registration requirements specifically applicable to virtual currency mining activities.

Sweden’s Central Bank, the Riksbanken, has been a leader in developing a CBDC, the e-krona.

Swedish income tax law has different categories of income such as employment income, self-employment income, business income and investment income. Capital gains are treated as investment income. Sweden imposes capital gains tax on cryptocurrencies at a flat rate of 30%. Losses are deductible up to 70%. Income tax is based on a progressive model with average rates around 32%.

Switzerland

Switzerland is known as one of the most cryptocurrency-friendly nations in the world. Switzerland’s financial markets regulator, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority [107] (FINMA) has defined licensing requirements for cryptocurrency businesses of all types including bitcoin kiosk operations, and has created requirements for blockchain companies.

Cryptocurrency businesses are subject to AML regulations and licensing requirements under FINMA. FINMA’s regulatory environment complies with the FATF’s digital asset regulation issued in June 2019.

Switzerland further improved its regulations surrounding tokens with the July 2021 implementation of the Federal Act on the Adaptation of Federal Law to Developments in Distributed Ledger Technology [108] (the DLT Act).

In Switzerland capital gains arising from a “private wealth asset” are exempt from income tax. This applies to capital gains from cryptos. Realized gains arising from the disposal of cryptocurrency are therefore not subject to tax. Losses arising from the disposal of cryptocurrency assets are not tax-deductible. Under Swiss tax law, cryptocurrencies are considered items that can be valued and traded. They are therefore assets that are subject to wealth tax. Tax rates vary.

[105]   http://www.cnmv.es/Portal/verDoc.axd?t=%7b1cbaf61c-57c2-4830-bd6a-071f806795e2%7d

[106]   https://www.fi.se/en/published/press-releases/2021/fi-warns-consumers-of-risks-connected-to-crypto-asset-products/

[107]  https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/faktenblaetter/faktenblatt-virtuelle-waehrungen.pdf?la=en

In the midst of a financial, currency and debt crisis, Turkey’s regulatory environment surrounding cryptos is a very mixed picture. Although it is not “illegal” to own cryptos, authorities have demanded user information from crypto trading platforms and regulators frequently cite crypto as a form of evasion for capital controls and taxes.

In April 2021, Turkey’s Central Bank [109] banned the use of cryptocurrencies saying they may be used, directly or indirectly, to pay for goods and services.

In May 2021, President Erdoğan issued a decree that added [110] cryptocurrency exchanges to a list of institutions that must operate under AML/CTF regulations. Despite the harsh rhetoric, bans on use in payments, and lack of any regulatory supervisory authority, public interest by Turkey’s citizens has soared as they are increasingly adopting and using cryptocurrencies.

The Financial Crimes Investigation Board (MASAK) oversees crypto service providers on AML and compliance issues. The Capital Markets Board (SPK) governs the crypto market, including ICOs and token offerings.

MASAK published [111] a guide for crypto asset service providers and President Erdogan have announced that a bill regulating digital assets is forthcoming.

Turkey is developing a digital central bank currency.

Ukraine is one of the top countries in usage of cryptocurrencies. In September 2021, the Ukrainian Parliament adopted a draft Law No. 3637 “On Virtual Assets” which introduced a basic regulation regarding all virtual assets. The law establishes general provisions regarding ownership, conduct of businesses, their circulation, and liabilities. The law uses the term “virtual asset” as which covers any type of crypto asset. Under the law, a virtual asset means a set of electronic data which has certain value and exists in the system of virtual assets circulation.

The law stipulates and distinguishes cryptos as assets and that they are not to be used as instruments of payments. It further distinguishes between “secured” or “unsecured” virtual assets. Secured virtual assets are secured by fiat currency and unsecured are any other type of virtual asset. Secured assets presumably would include stablecoins and unsecured would include other cryptos such as bitcoin.

The bill was passed [112] in February 2022 and signed into law by President Volodymyr Zelensky in March 2022. After the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the country received more than $100 million in crypto donations to support the country’s defense effort.

[108]   https://www.newsd.admin.ch/newsd/message/attachments/60601.pdf

[109]   https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/en/tcmb+en

[110]   https://www.reuters.com/technology/turkey-adds-crypto-firms-money-laundering-terror-financing-rules-2021-05-01/

[111]  https://panel.cetinkaya.com/dcdc07d0-3637-461c-b59a-c68460d5bb20_Masak%20Guide%20Translation%20PDF.pdf

United Kingdom

The UK Financial Conduct Authority [113] (FCA), HM Treasury and the Bank of England make up the country’s Crypto-assets Taskforce.

The FCA has created regulations to cover KYC, AML and CFT tailored for crypto-assets. It has also created regulations to cover VASPs, but has been careful to not stifle innovation.

Crypto exchanges must register with the FCA unless they have applied for an e-money license. Cryptocurrencies are not considered legal tender and taxes are levied based on activities. The FCA has banned the trading of cryptocurrency derivatives.

The Law Commission published a call for evidence [114] on digital assets in April 2021. The request seeks input from stakeholders ahead of publication of a consultation paper on digital assets which will make proposals for new legislation.

In February 2022, the UK government and the FCA published complementary reform proposals to bring financial promotions for some “qualifying crypto-assets” into HM Treasury’ financial promotions regime and into the FCA financial promotions rules.

There is no specific UK regulatory regime that captures the activities of crypto miners.

Although there is no specific UK tax legislation applicable to cryptos, HM Revenue and Customs has set out its view of the treatment based on normal principles. Receipt of cryptos from an employer are treated as “money’s worth” and are taxed as income based on the value of the assets at the time of receipt. Where cryptos are held as personal investments, capital gains tax applies upon disposal. In cases where frequent trading is involved, income tax rather than capital gains may apply.

[112]   https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/parlament-uhvaliv-zakon-pro-virtualni-aktivi-zgidno-z-propoziciyami-prezidenta

[113]   https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-provides-clarity-current-cryptoassets-regulation

[114]   https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/digital-assets/#digital-assets-call-for-evidence

Pacific region, Asia, and Australia

In 2018 new laws for digital currency exchange providers were implemented by the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) [115] , the financial intelligence agency and AML/CTF regulator.

Firms are required to register and implement KYC policies, report suspicious transactions and comply with AML legislation.

In December 2021, Australia said it will create a licensing framework for cryptocurrency exchanges and consider launching a retail CBDC as part of an overhaul of its payment industry. Josh Frydenberg, the Treasurer, said the government would begin consultation in early 2022 on establishing a licensing framework for digital exchanges, allowing the purchase and sale of crypto-assets by consumers in a regulated environment.

The government would also consult on regulating businesses that hold crypto-assets on behalf of consumers, and on the feasibility of a central bank digital currency, Frydenberg said.

Taxes on cryptos in Australia [116] , generally are subject to capital gains taxes which range from 19 to 45%.

The Bangladesh Central Bank issued warnings in 2014 and 2017 related to transactions in cryptocurrencies and warned violations could be punishable by up to 12 years in jail under existing money laundering and terrorist financing regulations. Despite prohibitions on the use of cryptocurrencies, Bangladesh has proposed a national blockchain strategy, [117] perhaps signaling a change in the future. Concerns about a foreign flight of local capital are a major concern hindering cryptos, however.

Despite an international reputation for being hostile to cryptos, some attorneys argue that the acts of parliament fall short of criminalizing or even banning cryptos. Despite the restrictions, there are no verified reports of arrests, charges or convictions, related to the use of cryptos.

The People’s Bank of China [118] banned financial institutions from dealing in cryptocurrencies in 2013 and later expanded the ban to cover crypto exchanges and ICOs. China was the epicenter for mining because of low electricity costs. At its peak it was estimated that more than 65% of bitcoin mining was taking place in China.

The government considered a ban on crypto mining, but in 2019 reconfirmed that it would remain legal. In May 2021, China’s Financial Stability and Development Committee, the financial regulatory agency under Vice-Premier Liu He, said the Chinese government would “crack down on bitcoin mining and trading behaviour, and resolutely prevent the transfer of individual risks to the society.”

Most experts now estimate Chinese mining to be, in effect, near zero.

Despite the PBOC’s embrace of blockchain technology and efforts to be on the forefront of developing the central bank’s digital currency, the digital yuan, the ban on mining and all other crypto-related activities was one of the most noteworthy events in cryptos in 2021.

[115]  https://www.austrac.gov.au/new-australian-laws-regulate-cryptocurrency-providers

[116]  https://www.ato.gov.au/General/Other-languages/In-detail/Information-in-other-languages/Cryptocurrency-and-tax/

[117]  https://bcc.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bcc.portal.gov.bd/page/bdb0a706_e674_4a40_a8a8_7cfccf7e9d9b/2020-10-19-15-03-391a6d­9d1eb062836b440256cee34935.pdf

[118]   http://www.pbc.gov.cn/english/130437/index.html

Hong Kong has long been vying to establish itself as a fintech innovation hub. The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) [119] has, however, enacted a strict regulatory framework and licensing requirements for VASPs.

It has also proposed a ban on crypto trading for retail investors under which only professional investors who have more than HK$8 million in assets would be allowed to trade.

Hong Kong’s regulation of crypto has been unclear in recent years. China’s ban on cryptos has caused uneasiness in Hong Kong, with many fintech and crypto firms leaving or downsizing operations in the region.

Hong Kong began to take steps to close legal loopholes which have allowed crypto exchanges to operate. In January 2022, however, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued two papers: one on stablecoins [120] and another on crypto-related exchange-traded funds [121] .

Bitcoin is defined as a virtual commodity and not legal tender. There are no capital gains taxes and AML/CFT laws apply to every individual or business in Hong Kong, irrespective of activity and are in accordance with FATF requirements.

In Indonesia virtual currencies are not considered legal tender. In 2019 the Indonesian Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti) approved regulation no. 5/2019, [122] which legally recognizes and regulates bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as commodities. Derivative transactions and cryptocurrency exchanges are also subject to regulatory requirements of Bappebti.

The regulation defines a crypto-asset as “an intangible commodity in the form of a digital asset that uses cryptography, a peer-to-peer network and distributed-ledger technology to regulate the creation of new units, verify transactions and ensure transaction security without the involvement of a third-party intermediary.”

Bank Indonesia, the country’s central bank, has banned the use of cryptocurrencies as a payment tool.

Indonesia has also banned financial firms from facilitating crypto sales. Indonesia’s Financial Services Authority (OJK) said it has “strictly prohibited financial service institutions from using, marketing and/or facilitating crypto asset trading,” the regulator said in a statement [123] posted on Instagram.

The ministry is facilitating the establishment of a separate bourse for digital assets, called the Digital Futures Exchange, which officials say will be launched in the first quarter of 2022.

It warned that the value of crypto-assets often fluctuates and that people buying into the digital assets should fully understand the risks.

The warning follows similar concerns by the central banks of Thailand [124] and Singapore [125] .

Japan has one of the most progressive and developed regulatory regimes for cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrency exchanges must be registered and comply with traditional AML/CFT and other regulations. They are regulated under the Payment Services Act (PSA), which defines “cryptocurrency” as a property value and not a legal tender. The PSA defines “crypto-assets” as payment methods that are not denominated in fiat currency and can be used to pay unspecified persons.

In December 2017, Japan’s National Tax Agency [126] ruled that gains on cryptocurrencies should be categorized as “miscellaneous income” and taxed accordingly. There have been several new regulations and amendments to the PSA, and to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act [127] (FIEA), introducing the term “crypto-asset,” and regulating crypto derivatives trading. Cryptocurrency custody service providers (that do not sell or purchase crypto-assets) fall under the scope of the PSA, while cryptocurrency derivatives businesses fall under the scope of the FIEA.

In April 2020, Japan was the first country to create self-regulatory bodies, the Japanese Virtual Currency Exchange Association [128] (JVCEA) and the Japan STO Association [129] . The JVCEA and the STO Association promote regulatory compliance and play a significant role in establishing best practices and ensuring compliance with regulations.

In Japan, gains associated with cryptos are considered miscellaneous income. Tax rates on crypto gains vary and depend on individual income. Rates can be as high as 55%.

[119]   https://apps.sfc.hk/edistributionWeb/gateway/EN/news-and-announcements/news/doc?refNo=19PR105

[120]   https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-information/press-release/2022/20220112e3a1.pdf

[121]   https://apps.sfc.hk/edistributionWeb/gateway/EN/circular/intermediaries/supervision/doc?refNo=22EC10

[122]   http://bappebti.go.id/resources/docs/peraturan/sk_kep_kepala_bappebti/sk_kep_kepala_bappebti_2019_02_01_w9i365pf_id.pdf

[123]   https://www.instagram.com/p/CZIgoP2PjI2/

[124]   https://www.reuters.com/markets/funds/thai-central-bank-says-doesnt-support-digital-assets-payments-2021-12-01/

[125]   https://www.reuters.com/technology/singapore-cbank-issues-guidelines-discourage-crypto-trading-by-public-2022-01-17/

[126]   https://www.nta.go.jp/english/

[127]   https://www.fsa.go.jp/en/policy/fiel/

[128]   https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASL4R3VLKL4RULFA00M.html

[129]   https://www.fsa.go.jp/news/r1/shouken/20200430.html

The Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) issued guidelines on the regulation of various digital currency platforms operating in the country. The Capital Markets and Services (Prescription of Securities) (Digital Currency and Digital Token) Order 2019 [130] ruled that digital tokens are “securities” for purposes of securities laws.

Digital currency is defined as “a digital representation of value recorded on a distributed digital ledger that functions as a medium of exchange and is interchangeable with any money, including through the crediting and debiting of an account.” All exchange offerings and digital asset custodians are required to register and “assess and conduct the necessary due diligence on the issuer, review the issuer’s proposal and the disclosures in the whitepaper, and assess the issuer’s ability to comply with the requirements of the Guidelines and the SC’s Guidelines on Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing.”

The position on the taxation of cryptos in Malaysia is unclear. The Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia (IRB) has not issued definitive guidelines on the taxation of cryptos.

With regards to cryptocurrency transactions, the IRB has cited Section 3 of the Income Tax Act 1967 and indicated that the provision can be applied to active cryptocurrency traders.

The IRB has said further that several factors may determine whether profits from crypto activities would be subject to income tax.

New Zealand

The Financial Markets Authority of New Zealand (FMA) [131] has determined that additional obligations will apply to certain activities considered “financial services” include exchanges, wallets, deposits, broking and ICOs involving crypto-assets that are classed as “financial products” under the FMC Act of 2013 [132] .

However, the FMA said in September 2021, “Cryptocurrencies are not legal tender (money that must be accepted as payment) in most countries and do not exist physically as notes and coins. They are also not viewed as financial products so are not regulated in New Zealand.”

The Inland Revenue Department [133] of New Zealand considers cryptocurrencies as “property,” with gains and losses taxable as income.

[130]   https://www.sc.com.my/api/documentms/download.ashx?id=8c8bc467-c750-466e-9a86-98c12fec4a77

[131]   https://www.fma.govt.nz/compliance/role/cryptocurrencies/

[132]   https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2013/0069/latest/DLM4090578.html

[133]   https://www.ird.govt.nz/cryptoassets/taxing

Philippines

The Philippine Central Bank, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) requires [134] VASPs to register. The BSP has developed an AML framework in line with FATF guidelines.

The BSP licensing requirements include exchanges of virtual assets and fiat currency. All transactions are treated as cross-border wire transfers and crypto service providers are expected to comply with relevant BSP rules. Additionally, BSP licensed firms must comply with rules for money service businesses such as liquidity risk management, IT risk management and consumer protection.

The BSP has published and updated FAQs for the public related to virtual currencies.

The National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) of the Philippines states that any income of an individual or corporation, in whatever form, obtained in the Philippines is taxable.

Cryptocurrencies are regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [135] (MAS). The Payment Services Act of 2019 regulates traditional and cryptocurrency payments and exchanges. The Securities and Futures Act is also applicable to public offerings and issues of digital tokens.

A May 2020 Guide to Digital Token Offerings [136] published by the MAS details the regulations surrounding digital tokens and their applicability to securities, collective investments, derivative contracts and the determination of whether a token is a type of “capital market product.” The AML/CFT provisions under the PSA address the risk of financial crimes and promotes best practices, including KYC, to help crypto businesses comply with the new regulatory framework.

In February 2022, the MAS issued Guidelines to Discourage Cryptocurrency Trading by General Public [137] . The new guidelines clarify the expectations that digital payment token (DPT) service providers should not engage in marketing or advertising of DPT services to the general public in Singapore.

The Inland Revenue Authority [138] has said, “Businesses that choose to accept digital tokens such as bitcoins for their remuneration or revenue are subject to normal income tax rules. They will be taxed on the income derived from or received in Singapore. Tax deductions will be allowed, where permissible, under our tax laws.”

[134]   https://www.bsp.gov.ph/Media_and_Research/Primers%20Faqs/VC.pdf

[135]   https://www.mas.gov.sg/regulation/acts/payment-services-act

[136]   https://www.mas.gov.sg/regulation/explainers/a-guide-to-digital-token-offerings

[137]   https://www.mas.gov.sg/news/media-releases/2022/mas-issues-guidelines-to-discourage-cryptocurrency-trading-by-general-public

[138]   https://www.iras.gov.sg/taxes/corporate-income-tax/income-deductions-for-companies/taxable-non-taxable-income#:~:text=Trading%20in%20 Digital%20Tokens,-Businesses%20that%20buy&text=Businesses%20that%20buy%20digital%20tokens,are%20not%20subject%20to%20tax.

South Korea

South Koreans were early bitcoin pioneers and have been enthusiastic traders and investors in cryptos. In 2021, total trading volumes for cryptos in South Korea surpassed that of the domestic equities market. Regulators in South Korea have taken a cautious approach to cryptocurrency exchanges and companies. Companies are subject to equivalent AML and tax obligations as other financial institutions.

Following several large crypto-exchange hacks, South Korea passed the “Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information,” also known as the Financial Transaction Reports Act [139] (FTRA), which requires VASPs to register and comply with AML regulations.

South Korea has sought to ensure market integrity compliance with the FATF. Regulators have also emphasized the importance of safety of trading platforms. New rules went into effect in 2021 requiring all crypto service providers to register with the Korean Financial Services Commission. Platforms must also comply with AML obligations and acquire an Information Security Management System (ISMS) certificate [140] from the Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA).

In South Korea virtual assets are categorized under “other income” for tax purposes. In late 2020, South Korea authorized an initiative to tax crypto trading profits in 2022. Gains will be taxed at a rate of 20%. Korea’s National Tax Service has also widened the crypto tax law to include foreign crypto exchanges and businesses.

The amended law will tax 20% of profit from crypto transactions in excess of 2.5 million Korean won, or about $2,200. Korea’s National Tax Service (NTS) has since expanded [141] the crypto tax law on accounts by domestic investors to foreign crypto exchanges and businesses.

Taiwan’s Central Bank and Financial Supervisory Commission [142] (FSC) have warned that cryptocurrencies are not currencies, but rather commodities and have no legal protection. The FSC has been empowered under the country’s Money Laundering Control Act [143] and Terrorism Financing Prevention Act to require users on trading platforms to register their “real names.” The FSC implemented new money laundering regulations for the nation’s cryptocurrency exchanges, requiring them to report transactions valued at more than NT$500,000 ($17,770),

The FSC has required platform operators operating STO business to obtain a securities dealer’s license and comply with the securities business prevention system Money Laundering and Anti- Terrorism (AML/CFT) regulations. Banks must report suspicious anonymous transactions.

There are no regulations on crypto mining.

With the exodus from China following the government crackdown, many expected Taiwan to be a beneficiary; but, many still view Singapore as more crypto-friendly.

The trading of cryptos on a platform within Taiwan may be deemed a sale of services and thus subject to Taiwan business tax.

[139]   https://www.kofiu.go.kr/eng/legislation/financial.do#:~:text=The%20Financial%20Transaction%20Reports%20Act,%2Fanalysis%2Fdissemina­tion%20of%20STRs.

[140]  https://www.kisa.or.kr/eng/main.jsp

[141]   https://forkast.news/headlines/south-korea-tax-overseas-crypto-asset-accounts/

[142]   https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202104200003&dtable=News

[143]   https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=G0380131

The Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand regulates cryptocurrencies under an Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 [144] issued in 2018. Under the decree, digital asset businesses are required to apply for a license, monitor for unfair trading practices, and are considered “financial institutions” for AML purposes among others.

The Thailand Central Bank has said repeatedly that it does not support use of crypto as payments. In January 2022, the central bank and market regulator announced plans to ban digital asset operators from facilitating use of crypto as a means of payment for goods and services.

Digital asset business operators have expanded their businesses to cover services related to the use of digital assets as payments, which may result in a wider adoption of such activity, they said in a joint statement [145] .

That could potentially affect financial stability and the overall economic system, they said in the statement.

A public hearing on the new rule will be held until February 8 before it will be effective, Charuphan Intararoong, assistant secretary-general at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), told a news conference. It will not yet cover use of digital assets as payments between merchants and customers, while trading of crypto assets is still allowed, Charuphan said.

“Investors, consumers, and citizens can still trade digital assets for investment as usual,” she said.

The central bank and relevant agencies will consider allowing digital assets that are beneficial to the country to operate, however, said Siritida Panomwon Na Ayudhya, assistant central bank governor, without elaborating.

Trading and use of cryptocurrencies have gained momentum in Thailand, with retailers and real estate developers accepting digital assets as payments.

Gains are taxed as income and subject to the highest tax bracket of 35%.

[144]   https://www.sec.or.th/TH/Documents/DigitalAsset/enactment_digital_2561_summary_en.pdf

[145]  https://www.bot.or.th/en/news-and-media/news/news-20220125.html

Russia, Middle East, Africa, and other countries

The 2018 Financial Law of Algeria prohibits the use of any cryptocurrencies as well as the purchase, sale, use, and possession of virtual currencies.

In 2020 the Bahamas passed the Digital Assets and Registered Exchange Bill (DARE) putting in place a framework for digital assets. The law creates opportunities for FinTech firms and facilitates the registration of exchanges and other business involved with digital tokens.

The legal framework [146] is being heralded as one of the most comprehensive regulatory structures and standards in the world while also welcoming to the industry.

The Bahamas Central Bank was the first to launch a CBDC, the Bahamian “Sand Dollar” [147] in October 2020.

The Bahamas are considered an investor-friendly tax haven where there is no income or capital gains tax.

The offshore finance and insurance center Bermuda, has adopted a business-friendly approach to the oversight of cryptos and related businesses. The Digital Asset Business Act [148] and the Companies and Limited Liability Company Initial Coin Offering Amendment Act, passed in 2018, defines digital assets and provide standards governing ICOs and digital asset businesses.

The Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) has issued requirements [149] through the Digital Asset Business Act creating a licensing regime for custodians, service providers, trading platforms and other crypto businesses.

Initial coin offerings are classified as a restricted business activity that requires approval from the BMA. Digital asset businesses are required to register and comply with AML/CTF regulations, specifically, the Proceeds of Crime Acts.

There are no specific taxes on income, capital gains, or other taxes on digital assets in Bermuda.

[146]   https://www.bahamas.gov.bs/wps/portal/public/gov/government/news/

[147]   https://www.sanddollar.bs/

[148]   https://www.bma.bm/digital-assets-supervision-regulation

[149]   https://www.bma.bm/digital-assets-supervision-regulation

Cayman Islands

In May 2020, Cayman Islands lawmakers enacted several new legislative acts [150] regulating the cryptocurrency industry. The centerpiece, the Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) Law, makes it mandatory for digital asset businesses to be registered with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA).

The Cayman’s crypto regulations provided regulatory certainty for VASPs and align with international AML/CFT regulations to protect consumers and to meet the requirements of the FATF recommendations.

The Caymans have no income, inheritance, gift, capital gains, or corporate taxes with respect to the issuance, holding, or transfer of digital assets.

The Egyptian government banned trading of cryptos in 2018 because of religious decrees under Islamic law. Despite the ban, several international crypto trading platforms have reported significant user growth in the country in recent years. The Central Bank of Egypt [151] has cited the importance of art 206 of the Central Bank and Banking System Law promulgated by Law No. 194 of 2020. The law prohibits the issuance, trading, promotion, platforms, and other activities related to cryptos.

In 2018 the Reserve Bank of India [152] banned cryptocurrency trading and prohibited Indian banks from dealing with cryptocurrency exchanges following consumer protection, AML and market integrity concerns. In 2020, however, the Indian Supreme Court struck down the ban, and clarified that no prohibition exists.

Despite widespread concerns, skepticism, and prior bans on cryptocurrencies, India has encouraged innovation and the use of blockchain. It has also begun work on a state-backed CBDC, the digital rupee.

A proposed crypto regulatory framework was published [153] on the website of the Lok Sabha in 2021. The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021 was dropped in the final days of the session but will likely resurface in the future.

The Advertising Standards Council of India announced new guidance [154] related to the advertising of cryptos and NFTs in February 2022. The new rules, which come into effect on April 1, prohibit the use of the words “currency, securities, custodian, and depositories” in advertisements, as consumers often associate the terms with regulated products.

[150]   https://www.cfatf-gafic.org/home/what-s-happening/649-cayman-islands-adopts-regulatory-framework-for-virtual-asset-services

[151]   https://www.cbe.org.eg/en/Pages/default.aspx

[152]   https://www.rbi.org.in/

[153]   http://loksabhadocs.nic.in/bull2mk/2021/23.11.21.pdf

[154]  https://ascionline.in/images/pdf/vda-guidelines-press-release-feb-23.pdf

The Iranian Central Bank [155] has authorized banks and currency exchanges to use crypto-currencies mined by licensed crypto miners in the county. Although mining is legal, the country takes a heavy-handed approach requiring firms to sell cryptos to the central bank to fund imports.

The country has issued more than 1,000 licenses to crypto miners and shut down unlicensed firms. Trading outside the country has been banned, to stop capital flight. The use of cryptos for payments has also been banned.

In early 2022, the country said [156] it was exploring the possible use of cryptos for international trade, which potentially would allow some businesses to make international payments using cryptos.

The Israeli Securities Authority has ruled that cryptocurrency is a security [157] (link in Hebrew) subject to Israel’s Securities Laws.

The regulator has warned [158] the public of the risks associated with cryptocurrencies.

On November 14, 2021, an anti-money laundering order [159] regulating transactions in digital currencies came into effect. The new law is seen as the first step toward the need for entities dealing in digital currencies to have a permanent operating license.

The Israel Money Laundering and Terror Financing Prohibition Authority has taken a similar approach to AML/CTF requirements as FATF.

The Israel Tax Authority defines cryptocurrency as an asset and levies 25% on capital gains.

The Central Bank of Kenya [160] issued a public notice in December 2015 warning that bitcoin and other cryptos are unregulated and not guaranteed by any government or central bank. The notice said no entity is licensed to offer money remittance services and products using virtual currencies.

Despite of lack of any regulatory framework, Kenya is considered as one of the leading markets for Bitcoin.

The Central Bank is reportedly considering a CBDC.

[155]  https://www.cbi.ir/default_en.aspx

[156]   https://www.mehrnews.com/news/5396149/

[157]   https://www.isa.gov.il/%d7%92%d7%95%d7%a4%d7%99%d7%9d%20%d7%9e%d7%a4%d7%95%d7%a7%d7%97%d7%99%d7%9d/Corporations/Staf_Positions/Preliminary_Inquiries/Prospectuses/Documents/T3121.pdf

[158]   https://www.isa.gov.il/sites/ISAEng/Pages/unregulated-investments.aspx

[159]   https://perma.cc/JN4X-F7P5

[160]   https://www.centralbank.go.ke/images/docs/media/Public_Notice_on_virtual_currencies_such_as_Bitcoin.pdf

Despite a law in 2017 banning cryptos in Morocco, the public continues to operate underground, circumventing the restrictions.

The Morocco Foreign Exchange Office [161] has said it does not support “hidden payment systems” not backed by government institutions. However, the country’s central bank has reportedly confirmed [162] , that it is exploring a CBDC.

The two primary financial regulators in Nigeria view cryptos differently. The Central Bank of Nigeria [163] has barred banks and financial institutions from dealing in cryptos. The central bank has argued that cryptos are unregulated and not legal tender. Meanwhile the Nigerian Securities and Exchange Commission [164] (SEC) has sought to regulate cryptocurrency investments on the grounds that they qualify as securities transactions.

Both regulators said they had identified certain risks within the digital asset sector, without explaining further.

The central bank has argued that cryptocurrencies, which are unregulated and not legal tender, are risky for the user.

Use of bitcoin, the original and biggest cryptocurrency, has boomed in Nigeria in recent years, especially among small businesses, as the weakening naira currency makes it difficult to get the U.S. dollars needed to import goods or services.

The Central Bank of Nigeria officially launched the “eNaira,” its CBDC, on October 25, 2021.

There is no Nigerian legislation clarifying the tax treatment of transactions involving virtual currencies.

[161]   https://www.finances.gov.ma/en/The_Ministry/Pages/The-Foreign-Exchange-Office.aspx

[162]   https://www.ledgerinsights.com/morocco-central-bank-confirms-exploring-digital-currency-cbdc/

[163]   https://www.cbn.gov.ng/

[164]   https://sec.gov.ng/

[165]   http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202007310056?index=0&rangeSize=1

In 2020, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law [165] that regulates digital financial asset transactions. Under the law, which took effect on January 1, 2021, digital currencies are recognized as a payment means and investment. The digital currency cannot be used to pay for any goods and services, however.

Digital currencies were previously banned. Russian banks and exchanges can become exchange operators of digital financial assets if they register with the Bank of Russia.

The Central Bank of Russia [166] has also begun a pilot program to develop a digital central bank currency, the Digital Ruble. The central bank has staunchly opposed cryptos, while Russia’s Ministry of Finance has pushed for regulations on cryptos.

The Ministry of Finance introduced a bill “On Digital Currency” [167] in February 2022, which creates a “mechanism for organizing the circulation of digital currencies.”

Despite the regulatory confusion, Russia is considered a significant player, and estimates peg Russian ownership of cryptos at approximately 12% of the international crypto economy.

Saudi Arabia

The Saudi Central Bank and Minster of Finance have warned [168] “against dealing or investing in virtual currencies including cryptocurrencies as they are not recognized by legal entities in the kingdom. They are outside the scope of the regulatory framework and are not traded by financial institutions locally. Such crypto currencies have been associated with fraudulent activities and attract concern that they may be used in illegal and illegitimate financial activities in addition to their high-investment risks related to frequent price fluctuations.”

While the Saudi Central Bank has warned the public of the risks associated with cryptocurrencies, and that they are not legal tender, bitcoin is accepted by small businesses and merchants, and the government has taken a very light regulatory approach thus far. In recent years, Saudi Arabia has worked with the United Arab Emirates to attract crypto companies to the region. Cryptos are sure to play and important role in the country’s long-term effort to diversify its economy and become an innovation hub — “Saudi Vision 2030.”

The Saudi Central Bank has begun to use blockchain technology in its activities in the banking sector and to keep pace with market trends. It has also created a regulatory sandbox [169] for collaboration on new digital banking services and blockchain education programs.

South Africa

The South African Reserve Bank [170] , the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FCSA) and the National Treasury, together with an Intergovernmental FinTech Working Group [171] , have published plans to develop a registration regulatory framework. The plans would codify FATF AML recommendations.

The regulatory framework is expected in 2022 and comes as a response to major crypto scams where investors have been defrauded. The FCSA aims to also address how cryptos will interact with traditional financial services and overall financial stability. Virtual currency is not considered legal tender in South Africa.

The South African Revenue Service considers cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin to be intangible assets rather than currency or property. They are taxed as long-term or short-term income ranging from 18% to 40% allowing for deduction of costs.

United Arab Emirates

The UAE is estimated to be the third-largest crypto market in the Middle East, with total transaction values estimated at approximately $26 billion. The Dubai Financial Services Authority included a crypto regulatory framework in its 2021 business plan for firms operating in the Dubai International Financial Center.

In early 2022 the UAE announced a licensing program to be rolled out early in the year. The UAE also said it wants to build and attract a mining ecosystem in the region. The UAE Securities and Commodities Authority issued [172] its regulation in 2020, which seeks to provide clarity as to how crypto and other digital assets may be used as a stored value when purchasing various goods and services.

The Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) of Abu Dhabi Global Market has enhanced its “Guidance for the Regulation of Crypto Asset Activities.” [173]

The UAE and Saudi Arabia are reportedly working on research for a CBDC dubbed “Project Aber.”

[166]   https://www.cbr.ru/press/event/?id=9761

[167]   https://tass.com/economy/1406879?

[168]   https://www.sama.gov.sa/en-US/News/Pages/news21082019.aspx

[169]   https://www.sama.gov.sa/en-us/news/pages/news-575.aspx

[170]   https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/quick-links/frequently-asked-questions

[171]   https://www.ifwg.co.za/Pages/default.aspx

[172]   https://www.sca.gov.ae/en/regulations/drafts.aspx#page=1

[173]   https://www.adgm.com/media/announcements/adgm-enhances-guidance-on-regulation-of-crypto-asset-activities

Thomson Reuters Institute

The Thomson Reuters Institute brings together people from across the legal, corporate, tax & accounting and government communities to ignite conversation and debate, make sense of the latest events and trends and provide essential guidance on the opportunities and challenges facing their world today. As the dedicated thought leadership arm of Thomson Reuters, our content spans blog commentaries, industry-leading data sets, informed analyses, interviews with industry leaders, videos, podcasts and world-class events that deliver keen insight into a dynamic business landscape.

Visit Thomson Reuters Institute  for more details.

About the authors

SUSANNAH HAMMOND

  Susannah Hammond is Senior Regulatory Intelligence Expert for Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence with more than 25 years of wide-ranging compliance, regulatory and risk experience in international and UK financial services. She is co-author of “Conduct and Accountability in Financial Services: A Practical Guide” published by Bloomsbury Professional.

  Todd Ehret is a Senior Regulatory Intelligence Expert for Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence. He has more than 25 years’ experience in the financial industry where he held key positions in trading, operations, accounting, audit, and compliance for broker-dealers, asset managers, private equity, and hedge funds. Before joining Thomson Reuters he served as a Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Operating Officer at a Registered Investment Adviser/Hedge Fund for nearly a decade.

Explore Regulatory Intelligence , the regulatory compliance solution from Thomson Reuters.

More reports

RISK FRAUD & COMPLIANCE

Digital Currency Forum: Law enforcement, regulation & the search for crypto-savvy investigators

COMPLIANCE & RISK

Cryptocurrency ATMs: Risks, rewards and getting to know your customers

Digital currency forum: will a us digital coin upend ideas of crypto risk & regulation.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• 04 April 2022

Crypto and digital currencies — nine research priorities

• Andrew Urquhart 0 &
• Brian Lucey 1

Andrew Urquhart is professor of finance and financial technology at ICMA Centre, University of Reading, Henley Business School, Reading, UK.

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Brian Lucey is professor of international finance and commodities at Trinity Business School, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland; Institute of Business Research, University of Economics, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; and Institute for Industrial Economics, Jiangxi University of Economics and Finance, Nanchang, China.

Money is at a crossroads. A race is on to decide who creates it, who can access it and how, who controls it, and to what degree and how it is regulated. The outcome could decide whether governments have access to all our financial data, whether criminals can easily launder vast sums unseen, and whether the benefits of finance can be extended to the billions of people globally who lack access to banks.

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

185,98 € per year

only 3,65 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 604 , 36-39 (2022)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00927-5

Nakamoto, S. Decentralized Business Rev. 21260 (2008).

Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A. & Yarovaya, L. Int. Rev. Finan. Anal. 62 , 182–199 (2019).

Article   Google Scholar  

Teichmann, F. M. J. & Falker, M.-C. J. Money Laundering Control 24 , 775–788 (2020).

Foley, S., Karlsen, J. R. & Putnins, T. J. Rev. Finan. Stud. 32 , 1798–1853 (2019).

Shen, D., Urquhart, A. & Wang, P. Eur. Finan. Manage. 26 , 1294–1323 (2020).

Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Peat, M. & Vigne, S. Econ. Lett. 172 , 23–27 (2018).

Lucey, B. M., Vigne, S. A., Yarovaya, L. & Wang, Y. Finan. Res. Lett. 45 , 102147 (2022).

Easley, D., O’Hara, M. & Basu, S. J. Finan. Econ. 134 , 91–109 (2019).

Baur, D. G., Hong, K. & Lee, A. D. J. Int. Finan. Markets Inst. Money 54 , 177–189 (2018).

Agur, I., Ari, A. & Dell’Ariccia, G. J. Monet. Econ. 125 , 62–79 (2022).

Download references

Reprints and permissions

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Related Articles

• Information technology
• Mathematics and computing

Securing your science: the researcher’s guide to financial management

Career Feature 14 JUN 24

Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance

Article 12 JUN 24

Equality doesn’t equal sustainability — even high-welfare states must do more

Correspondence 11 JUN 24

Unease as US drug agency weighs its use of independent scientists

News 14 JUN 24

To save the high seas, plan for climate change

Comment 12 JUN 24

Hybrid working has benefits over fully in-person working — the evidence mounts

Editorial 12 JUN 24

The dream of electronic newspapers becomes a reality — in 1974

News & Views 07 MAY 24

How scientists are making the most of Reddit

Career Feature 01 APR 24

A global timekeeping problem postponed by global warming

Article 27 MAR 24

Tenure-Track Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor

Westlake Center for Genome Editing seeks exceptional scholars in the many areas.

Westlake Center for Genome Editing, Westlake University

Subeditor, Nature Magazine

About the Brand Nature Portfolio is a flagship portfolio of journals, products and services including Nature and the Nature-branded journals, dedic...

New York City, New York (US)

Springer Nature Ltd

Faculty Positions in Bioscience and Biomedical Engineering (BSBE) Thrust, Systems Hub, HKUST (GZ)

Tenure-track and tenured faculty positions at all ranks (Assistant Professor/Associate Professor/Professor)

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)

Faculty Positions at the Center for Machine Learning Research (CMLR), Peking University

CMLR's goal is to advance machine learning-related research across a wide range of disciplines.

Beijing, China

Center for Machine Learning Research (CMLR), Peking University

Postdoctoral Research Fellows at Suzhou Institute of Systems Medicine (ISM)

ISM, based on this program, is implementing the reserve talent strategy with postdoctoral researchers.

Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

Suzhou Institute of Systems Medicine (ISM)

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser or activate Google Chrome Frame to improve your experience.

Log ins to  www.aima.org are provided to AIMA member contacts registered with us.

If you work for an AIMA member firm and are not registered with us for a personal login, or if you are otherwise in need of assistance, please  contact us .

4th Annual Global Crypto Hedge Fund Report 2022

Key takeaways

1. Approximately one in three of “traditional” hedge funds surveyed are currently investing in digital assets, compared to one in five when we surveyed last year. The average allocation to digital assets by these funds measures 4% (a slight increase from 3% last year).  

2. By strategy, hedge funds with the most digital assets exposure include multi-strategy (32%), macro (21%), equity (18%), and systematic (12%).  

3. Of those hedge funds who are invested in digital assets, 57% have a toe-hold position with less than 1% of their total hedge fund AuM invested.  

4. Two thirds of those hedge funds (67%) who are currently investing in digital assets intend to deploy more capital into the asset class by the end of 2022.  

5. 29% of hedge fund managers who are not yet investing in digital assets confirmed that they are in late-stage planning to invest or looking to invest.  

6. Regulatory and tax uncertainty continues to be the greatest barrier to investing (cited by 83% of respondents). Of greatest concern is the globally fragmented regulatory approach/environment, followed by unclear guidance with heightened threat of rulemaking through enforcement.  

7. The lack of infrastructure/service provider availability also remains a challenge with audit and accounting now seen as the market infrastructure area being the most in need of essential improvements (94%), surpassing custody and safekeeping as the major service provider challenge to greater adoption.  

8. Around a third of respondents not currently investing say that if the main barriers were to be removed, they would actively accelerate their involvement/investment in digital assets (27%), an increase from 18% last year. While 45% of respondents stated that the removal of barriers would still probably not impact their current approach.

About the research

The Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) is delighted to partner once again on this industry-wide initiative to offer the very latest insights into the growing interest in the digital assets market by “traditional” hedge funds (funds that do not invest exclusively in digital assets).

The AIMA chapter offers insights into the current approach taken by these funds when assessing whether to invest in digital assets and explores the main barriers with respect to investments. Overall, the chapter offers insights into whether “traditional” hedge funds have investments in digital assets, their views on the asset class, and what they believe would be the catalysts for them to invest initially and more significantly in digital assets.

The research contained in the chapter comes from a survey that was conducted in Q1 2022 by AIMA, with 89 hedge funds that accounted for an estimated US$436 billion in Assets Under Management (AuM). 57% of the responses were from hedge funds managing assets in excess of US$1 billion.

This survey was put together with the assistance of the AIMA Digital Assets Working Group (AIMA DAWG) – a cross-section of around 300 senior industry experts including institutional investors, custodians, exchanges and other service providers. It is tasked with driving AIMA’s regulatory engagement, thought-leadership initiatives and operational guidance in the area of digital assets.

We would like to thank everyone that participated in the survey and shared their insights. If you would like to learn more about AIMA DAWG, please contact James Delaney ( [email protected] ) or Michelle Noyes ( [email protected] ).

Download the guide

Members with a log-in should log-in here to be provided with a download link to the Guide 

 Availability for non-members  

Crypto Report 2022: Industry Overview & Trends

Table of Contents

Other good reads on CoinWire:

MEXC Referral Code

MEXC Review

Best Crypto Copy Trading Platforms

Best Zero Fee Crypto Exchanges

Best Crypto Exchanges for Day Trading

Binance Referral Code

Best Crypto Futures Exchanges

cheapest crypto to transfer

Introduction

In 2022, the cryptocurrency market underwent a winter season marked by significant fluctuations. However, the market remains in a state of constant innovation and development. In collaboration with CoinWire, TK Ventures has succinctly summarized the market conditions throughout the past year and provided readers with the most important insights into the market.

Our Crypto Report 2022 offers a comprehensive analysis of the crypto market, focusing on well-visualized data-driven insights and global investor perspectives, including an overview of the current state of the cryptocurrency market, a detailed analysis of market trends, and information on the fundraising status of various projects. This report results from extensive research conducted by a team of over 10 members and surveys of over 10,000 participants.

Our in-depth 121-page report covers 10 topics within the cryptocurrency market:

• Market Overview & Notable Events
• Fundraising Overview
• Layer 1 Overview
• Layer 2 Solutions
• DeFi Statistics
• Web3 Gaming Overview
• Web3 Gaming Transition
• Web3 Awareness
• AML, KYC & Regulations

Here are our top 12 key findings: 

#1. 66% of asked crypto investors have faith in Binance and their along ecosystem.

#2. In terms of fundraising in 2022, Web3 is the category that has the most conducted deals (33%) while most of the money (25%) is invested in Infrastructure.

#3. Fake covers for projects to rug pull are believed to be the leading causes of most hacks, according to 31% of investors.

#4. The terrible year 2022 has ended with the fact that most Blockchain Platforms have evaporated up to 90% of their value.

$5. BNB Chain and Polygon are believed to achieve mass adoption in the next year with 57% and 46.8% of total investors’ choices, respectively.

#6. Three out of five investors felt uncomfortable DeFi security risks & complications.

#7. 59% of investors believe that stablecoin is a gateway and a must for crypto, despite the collapse of the algorithmic stablecoin.

#8. In the last five years, not Meta but Microsoft has made the biggest attempt to dominate the metaverse via patents (158 patents, July 2022).

#9. Risk of speculation is believed to be the main reason why traditional gaming companies reject blockchain and NFT, according to 78% of investors.

#10. Worldwide investors expressed continual confusion about Web3 in 52% of cases, with American investors expressing the greatest confusion.

#11. 51.4% of investors think Web3 is mostly hype, in which American crypto users take the majority.

#12. Asian crypto investors are more concerned about “Tracking for crypto behavior” than European ones.

For more detail about the top key findings above, please explore our full Crypto 2022 Report.

Major Key Findings

I. state of the market.

• After the FTX Crash, Hot Wallets is the most used method to store funds of Investors with 53.6% crypto investors’ responses. 
• 66% of asked crypto investors have their faith to Binance and their along ecosystem 
• BNB Chain is the most trusted blockchain in terms of storing funds on DeFi protocols with 63% responses. 
• The number of rounds and the amount raised in 2022 is ~48% higher than this amount in 2021.
• In terms of fundraising in 2022, Web3 is the category that has the most conducted deals (33%) while most of the money (25%) is invested in Infrastructure.

• 50.4% of Investors have been a victim of Crypto Hacks & Exploits in 2022. 
• Fake covers for projects to rug pull are believed to be the main causes for most of the hacks, according to 31% of investors.

• 64% of iInvestors think the market is reaching its bottom, however, 43% among them still stay safe & keep the majority of their portfolio in stablecoin.

• 48.9% of investors agree that the crypto market is increasingly influenced by traditional finance & macroeconomics.
• Most investors (53.6%) agree that The crypto market will be recognized by financial institutions & governments in the future.

II. Blockchain Platform 

• The terrible year 2022 has ended with the fact that most Blockchain Platforms have evaporated 20 – 90% of their value.

• Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Polygo n are the blockchain platforms most used by investors while making payments, skin in the game, and storing assets.
• BNB Chain and Polygon are believed to achieve mass adoption in the next year with 57% and 46.8% of investors’ choice, respectively.

• Sui is the New Blockchain platform that people are most interested in (35.4%)

• Layer-2 development organizations have already raised ~1.25b so far in 2022.
• Compared to Ethereum Layer-1 transactions, Layer-2 transactions reduce fees by 80%–95%.
• Arbitrum, Optimism, Starknet, and zkSync are also highly regarded Layer 2 scaling solutions.

III. State of DeFi 

• Three out of five investors felt uncomfortable with DeFi security risks & complications.
• Surprisingly, only 13% of DeFi Users are skeptical about DeFi regulation of the government in the future.

• In 2022, Ethereum, BNB, and Tron are the leading blockchains in terms of TVL.
• 58% of the respondents believe regulation and funding will push DeFi to mass adoption.
• 59% investors believe that stablecoin is a gateway and a must for crypto, despite the collapse of algorithmic stablecoin.
• Revenue of DeFi has plummeted 55% to $1.54B.
• DeFi’s revenue is focused primarily on the Ethereum ecosystem, led by Uniswap with about $700 millions in revenue.

IV. NFT & Web3 Gaming

• NFT Market Value has jumped 122 times to $12.2 billion since 2020.
• Although a gloomy market and traders are leaving, total NFT holders increase from 1.5M to 3.7M (Rising ~ 250%).
• 4/5 NFT users still have faith in the future of NFT even with the significant decline in 2022.
• Yuga Labs dominated the NFT collection, taking all three top 3 positions, generating over $3.5B worth of trading.

• America is the most innovative continent to adopt the new technology – Metaverse into daily life.

• People believe Metaverse will reshape social lifestyle with a new approach to entertainment and social activities (69% and 65% respectively total choices).
• In the last 5 years, not Meta but Microsoft has made the biggest attempt to dominate the metaverse via patents (158 patents, July 2022).

• The majority of worldwide investors (78%) believe “Play-To-Earn” is the most common term for Web3 games, which is one of the biggest factor prevent Web3 Gaming transition.
• Risk of speculation is believed to be the main reason why traditional gaming companies reject blockchain and NFT, according to 78% of investors.
• 67% of worldwide investors anticipate that traditional game publishers will be highly interested in Web3 gaming in the future.

V. Web3 Evolution

• 89% of worldwide investors have often heard or heard a lot about Web3.
• Worldwide investors expressed continual confusion about Web3 in 52% of cases, with American investors expressing the greatest level of confusion.
• 51.4% of investors think Web3 mostly hype, in which American crypto users take the majority.

• Russia, Ukraine, China, USA are the top countries by value sent to or received from drug-focused darknet markets.
• Asia and North America are currently the havens for money laundering and the biggest countries in that region are taking the cake.

• “Scam” is the biggest activity over the years, often accounting for 50%+ of all other criminal activities.
• Sanctions, Scam and Stolen funds tend to use DeFi more than other activities.

• Loss of personal information is the biggest concern associated with KYC.
• Asian crypto investors are more concerned about “Tracking for crypto behavior” than European ones.
• Regulation is at the center of the need to find a common voice between crypto and governments.
• More than 60% of investors participating in the survey want to apply regulation to the web3 industry.

This report is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security or cryptocurrency. The information contained in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the organization’s views.

The crypto market is highly volatile and subject to rapid changes. The performance of any particular security or cryptocurrency in the past is not indicative of future results. The value of any investment can go up or down depending on market conditions. Investors should conduct their own research and seek professional advice before making any investment decisions.

Read more about

• Cryptocurrency
• Ethereum (ETH)
• Polygon (MATIC)
• Solana (SOL)

Want to be a crypto expert? Get the best of Coinwire straight to your inbox.

Get daily crypto news updates + weekly roundups on our most important stories.

gread concept coinwire ✨

Great project

It’s a great project.

It’s realy good project!

Comments are closed.

Recommended News

Best Crypto Trading Bots For Beginners (Free) in 2024

The world of cryptocurrency requires precision and good decision-making skills without any emotion, and luckily for you, the best crypto trading bots, like MEXC and TradeSanta, are here to take […]

MEXC Referral Code (2024): mexc-cwrefcode – Earn $1000 Sign-Up Bonus

Get exclusive insights on unlocking and applying your MEXC referral code and generating passive income.

Crypto.com Referral Code for 2024: “coinwire” – $50 SignUp Bonus

Maximize your crypto gains using our invite code and join now for special rewards and bonuses.

Huobi Global Referral Code 2024: c4yx6223 (Claim Sign-Up Bonus)

Enjoy exclusive benefits and fee discounts with our Huobi Global invitation code.

Best Gate.io Referral Code (2024): gate-BgdCUgtf- Earn $6666 Mystery Box

Explore the perks and bonuses that our exclusive Gate.io referral code, gate-BgdCUgtf unlocks - sign up now!

• Consumer & Retail
• Enterprise Tech
• Financial Services
• Healthcare & Life Sciences
• Industrials
• Media & Entertainment
• Climate Tech
• Information Security
• Quantum Tech
• Big Tech Reports
• Future Of Reports
• Investment Thesis Maps
• Market Maps
• Market Reports & ESPs
• MVP Technology Frameworks
• State Of Reports
• Strategy Maps
• Top Company Lists
• Valuations Reports
• Yardstiq Vendor Reports
• The CB Insights Newsletter
• Upcoming Webinars

Join 500,000+ CB Insights newsletter readers

State of Blockchain Q2’22 Report

• July 26, 2022
• Banking & Payments
• Wealth Tech
• Share State of Blockchain Q2’22 Report on Facebook
• Share State of Blockchain Q2’22 Report on Twitter
• Share State of Blockchain Q2’22 Report on LinkedIn
• Share State of Blockchain Q2’22 Report via Email

Blockchain venture funding declined quarter-over-quarter for the first time in 2 years amid the crypto market downturn.

Venture capital investors scaled back crypto investments in Q2’22 due to macroeconomic pressures and concerns about crypto valuations and stablecoins. Global funding fell by 29% quarter-over-quarter.

Below, take a look at a few highlights from our 192-page, data-driven State of Blockchain Q2’22 Report. For all the record figures, private market data, and deeper insights, download the full report.

download The State of Blockchain 2022 report

Get the latest data on blockchain funding trends, unicorns, exits, and more.

• Blockchain venture funding fell to $6.5B in Q1’22 — the first QoQ drop in 2 years. ​
• Blockchain unicorn births dropped from a record high 16 last quarter to just 8 in Q2’22.
• Web3 accounted for over half (57%) of blockchain funding for the second straight quarter.
• Europe was the only region in the world with QoQ growth in blockchain venture funding (40%) and deals (18%) in Q2’22.
• Infrastructure & development was one of the only blockchain categories with deal growth in Q2’22, hitting a new record of 47 deals.​
• Blockchain M&A deals were 40+ for the 5th straight quarter and are on pace to surpass last year’s record.

Download our Q2’22 State of Blockchain Report to dive into all these trends and more.

Pioneering the Industry

We’re dedicated to leading research and thought leadership that helps us and others better understand how blockchain can impact the broader world

Introduction to Crypto

Blockchain’s cryptoasset investment thesis.

Since Blockchain was founded in 2011, we’ve seen bitcoin and other digital asset ownership grow from thousands of pioneers to over 30 million people today. Our investment thesis provides a comprehensive view of the factors driving that growth, and the remaining challenges ahead for cryptoassets to be widely adopted.

The Future is Decentralised

In this document, we discuss our economic and legal rationales with a set of guiding principles for airdrop planning and execution. Finally, we set forth the foundation for the Blockchain Airdrops, together with the criteria that will guide Blockchain in selecting which tokens we will airdrop to our users.

Institutional

Q1 2022 institutional framework.

In this framework, we discuss our view of current market conditions and the forces that may shape crypto markets in the coming months.

Q4 2021 Institutional Framework

In this framework, we discuss our view of market conditions during Q4 2021, including the interplay between institutional interest in crypto and increasing regulatory headwinds.

Research Primers

Primer series: a look at tether (usdt).

Tether has overcome numerous challenges to reign as the top stablecoin, but maintaining dominance will prove difficult and users must remember that caveat emptor still applies when holding Tether.

Primer Series: A Look at Gold Backed Crypto Tokens (DGLD, PAXG, XAUT, DGX)

The investment case for gold, an analysis of gold-backed tokens compared to other ways of owning gold, and gold vs bitcoin.

Primer Series: A Look At USD PAX (PAX)

In September 2018, Paxos launched the Paxos Standard (PAX), a stablecoin fully backed by physical U.S. dollars stored in FDIC-insured banks and regulated by the New York State Department of Financial Services. By eliminating price volatility, PAX gives users an entirely new way to send value, manage inflation, mitigate trading risk, and gain exposure to the US dollar. This primer dives deeper into the strengths, data and competitive landscape for PAX.

Primer Series: A Look at Stellar (XLM)

Founded in 2014, Stellar is designed to be a world-wide payment network that facilitates the exchange of any currency, asset or token. Its native asset, Lumens (XLM), has steadily ranked as one of the leading cryptoassets in terms of market value and ecosystem support. A key focus in this primer is laying out the differences of the Stellar and Ripple projects, as well as shedding light on XLM’s consistently impressive transaction growth and flexibility.

Primer Series: A Look at Bitcoin Cash (BCH)

In November of last year, Bitcoin Cash underwent a contentious network split. As a result, we have received more questions about Bitcoin Cash in recent weeks than any other cryptoasset supported by the Blockchain Wallet. A key focus in this primer is a comparison between Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCH) and Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV), including new data shared with us by Coinmetrics on the post-fork movement coins on each respective blockchain.

Crypto Categories

Introducing: 2019 state of stablecoins.

The 2019 report builds on its predecessor to provide an updated and expanded look at the current state of the stablecoin market - a space where we expect to see significant innovation in the coming years. It includes:

• New research primers on three leading stablecoins: Paxos Standard, Stasis and Reserve
• A new in-depth comparison of Paxos Standard, USD Coin and Gemini Dollar
• Expanded data profiles on 34 stablecoins, including many new stablecoins (the report is twice the size of its predecessor!)
• Refreshed data and analysis across the full report to reflect the substantial changes observed over the last six months; and
• An overview of how to gain investment exposure to the growing use of stablecoins

2018 | The State of Stablecoins

Stablecoins, as the name suggests, are cryptocurrencies designed to minimize price volatility and are in stark contrast with more volatile cryptoassets like bitcoin, which lack any inbuilt price stability mechanism. Significant volatility is often cited as one of the main reasons why many institutions and individuals have remained on the cryptocurrency sidelines to date and stablecoins have been developed to address this issue.

A Framework for Airdrops

Non-fungible token (nft) overview report.

An NFT is a unique digital identifier that cannot be copied, substituted, or subdivided, that is recorded in a blockchain, and that is used to certify authenticity and ownership of a specific digital asset. Find out more about NFTs and the emerging digital asset economy in a presentation by Penrose Partners.

Let us take you from zero to crypto

• Cryptocurrency

Top 10 Cryptocurrencies Of June 11, 2024

Updated: Jun 11, 2024, 10:35am

From bitcoin and Ethereum to Dogecoin and Tether, there are thousands of different cryptocurrencies, which can make it overwhelming when you’re first getting started in the world of crypto. To help you get your bearings, these are the top 10 cryptocurrencies to invest in based on their market capitalization or the total value of all the coins currently in circulation.

Easy to use mobile investing app

Account Minimum

Trading Commissions

$0 for stocks, ETFs and options

Guide to Top Cryptocurrency

Best crypto to buy now, what are cryptocurrencies, pros and cons of cryptocurrency, how to choose the best crypto to invest in, how to invest in cryptocurrency.

• How much does it cost to buy Cryptocurrency?

How To Report Crypto on Taxes

Crypto frequently asked questions (faqs), 1. bitcoin (btc).

• Market cap: $1.3 trillion
• Year-over-year return: 160%

Created in 2009 by Satoshi Nakamoto, bitcoin (BTC) is the original cryptocurrency. As with most cryptocurrencies, BTC runs on a blockchain , or a ledger logging transactions distributed across a network of thousands of computers. Because additions to the distributed ledgers must be verified by solving a cryptographic puzzle, a process called proof of work, bitcoin is kept secure and safe from fraudsters.

Bitcoin’s price has skyrocketed as it’s become a household name. In May 2016, you could buy one bitcoin for about $500. As of Jun. 11, 2024, a single bitcoin’s price was around $67,097. That’s a growth of 13,319%.

Related: How To Buy Bitcoin

2. Ethereum (ETH)

• Market cap: $424.8 billion
• Year-over-year return: 103%

Both a cryptocurrency and a blockchain platform, Ethereum is a favorite of program developers because of its potential applications, like so-called smart contracts that automatically execute when conditions are met and non-fungible tokens ( NFTs ).

Ethereum has also experienced tremendous growth. From April 2016 to the end of June 2024, its price went from about $11 to around $3,536, increasing 32,043%.

Related: How To Buy Ethereum

3. Tether (USDT)

• Market cap: $112.4 billion
• Year-over-year return: 0%

Unlike some other forms of cryptocurrency, Tether (USDT) is a stablecoin, meaning it’s backed by fiat currencies like U.S. dollars and the Euro and hypothetically keeps a value equal to one of those denominations. In theory, this means Tether’s value is supposed to be more consistent than other cryptocurrencies, and it’s favored by investors who are wary of the extreme volatility of other coins.

4. Binance Coin (BNB)

• Market cap: $89.9 billion
• Year-over-year return: 164%

Binance Coin (BNB) is a form of cryptocurrency that you can use to trade and pay fees on Binance , one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world. Since its launch in 2017, Binance Coin has expanded past merely facilitating trades on Binance’s exchange platform. Now, it can be used for trading, payment processing or even booking travel arrangements. It can also be traded or exchanged for other forms of cryptocurrency, such as Ethereum or bitcoin.

BNB’s price in 2017 was just $0.10. By late June 2024, its price had risen to around $609, a gain of 609,370%.

Related: How To Buy Cryptocurrency

5. Solana (SOL)

• Market cap: $70.8 billion
• Year-over-year return: 906%

Developed to help power decentralized finance ( DeFi ) uses, decentralized apps (DApps) and smart contracts, Solana runs on a unique hybrid proof-of-stake and proof-of-history mechanisms to process transactions quickly and securely. SOL, Solana’s native token, powers the platform.

When it launched in 2020, SOL’s price started at $0.77. By late June 2024, its price was around $153.68, a gain of 19,858%.

6. U.S. Dollar Coin (USDC)

• Market cap: $32.0 billion

Like Tether, USD Coin (USDC) is a stablecoin, meaning it’s backed by U.S. dollars and aims for a 1 USD to 1 USDC ratio. USDC is powered by Ethereum, and you can use USD Coin to complete global transactions.

7. XRP (XRP)

• Market cap: $26.9 billion
• Year-over-year return: -6%

Created by some of the same founders as Ripple , a digital technology and payment processing company, XRP can be used on that network to facilitate exchanges of different currency types, including fiat currencies and other major cryptocurrencies.

At the beginning of 2017, the price of XRP was $0.006. As of Jun. 11, 2024, its price reached $0.48, equal to a rise of 7,966%.

8. Dogecoin (DOGE)

• Market cap: $20.3 billion
• Year-over-year return: 130%

Dogecoin was famously started as a joke in 2013 but rapidly evolved into a prominent cryptocurrency thanks to a dedicated community and creative memes. Unlike many other cryptos, there is no limit on the number of Dogecoins that can be created, which leaves the currency susceptible to devaluation as supply increases.

Dogecoin’s price in 2017 was $0.0002. By June 2024, its price was at $0.14, up 70,012%.

9. Toncoin (TON)

• Market cap: $16.6 billion
• Year-over-year return: 354%

Originally developed as a layer-1 blockchain for Telegram’s encrypted messaging platform, Toncoin was soon abandoned before being taken over by the TON foundation. The project name was even changed to “The Open Network” from its original name “Telegram Open Network,” both of which are referred to by their acronym: TON.

Toncoin—first known as Gram—is the native token for TON. It is an application that allows users to buy, send and store funds on TON’s incredibly fast, environmentally friendly network.

10. Cardano (ADA)

• Market cap: $15.3 billion
• Year-over-year return: 53%

Somewhat later to the crypto scene, Cardano (ADA) is notable for its early embrace of proof-of-stake validation. This method expedites transaction time and decreases energy usage and environmental impact by removing the competitive, problem-solving aspect of transaction verification in platforms like bitcoin. Cardano also works like Ethereum to enable smart contracts and decentralized applications, which ADA, its native coin, powers.

Cardano’s ADA token has had relatively modest growth compared to other major crypto coins. In 2017, ADA’s price was $0.02. As of Jun. 11, 2024, its price was at $0.43. This is an increase of 2,044%.

*Market caps and pricing sourced from coinmarketcap.com, current as of 8:33 a.m. UTC on Jun. 11, 2024.

Cryptocurrency is a form of currency that exists solely in digital form. Cryptocurrency can be used to pay for purchases online without going through an intermediary, such as a bank, or it can be held as an investment.

How Does Cryptocurrency Work?

Cryptocurrencies are various forms of digital money that are usually based on blockchain technology. Blockchain technology allows most cryptocurrencies to exist as “trustless” forms of transactions. This means there is no centralized authority overseeing the transactions on a cryptocurrency’s blockchain.

Why Are There So Many Cryptocurrencies?

Cryptocurrency is an emerging area with more than 9,000 crypto projects in existence as of March 2024.

While some crypto function as currencies, others are used to develop infrastructure. For instance, in the case of Ethereum or Solana, developers are building other cryptos on top of these platform currencies, and that creates even more possibilities (and cryptos).

There are both pros and cons to investing in cryptocurrencies. Some of the most common ones an investor might run into are:

When choosing the best cryptocurrency to invest in, it is important to consider your individual goals, investing timeline and risk profile, just as you would with any investment. Additionally, you should do your due diligence to make sure that any crypto project you are interested in is legitimate and secure.

In general, investors should consider the following when evaluating a crypto:

• Market capitalization

You can buy cryptocurrencies through crypto exchanges, such as Coinbase , Kraken or Gemini . In addition, some brokerages, such as WeBull and Robinhood, also allow consumers to buy cryptocurrencies.

How Much Does It Cost To Buy Cryptocurrency?

How much it costs to buy cryptocurrency depends on a number of factors, including which crypto you are buying. Many small altcoins trade for a fraction of a cent, while a single bitcoin will cost you tens of thousands of dollars. However, many brokerages and exchanges now allow fractional trading, offering investors the option to buy a portion of a cryptocurrency.

There are also often costs and fees associated with having a crypto wallet and/or an account on a brokerage or crypto exchange. Be sure that you understand all of the costs associated with buying and holding any cryptocurrency before you invest.

If you buy and sell coins, it’s important to pay attention to cryptocurrency tax rules .

Cryptocurrency is treated as a capital asset, like stocks, rather than cash. That means if you sell cryptocurrency at a profit, you’ll have to pay capital gains taxes . This is the case even if you use your crypto to pay for a purchase. If you receive a greater value for it than you paid, you’ll owe taxes on the difference.

Is Robinhood Right For You?

Via Robinhood's secure website

How does trading cryptocurrencies differ from trading stocks?

While you can invest in cryptocurrencies, they differ a great deal from traditional investments, like stocks. When you buy stock, you are buying a share of ownership of a company, which means you’re entitled to do things like vote on the direction of the company. If that company goes bankrupt, you also may receive some compensation once its creditors have been paid from its liquidated assets.

Buying cryptocurrency doesn’t grant you ownership over anything except the token itself; it’s more like exchanging one form of currency for another. If the crypto loses its value, you won’t receive anything after the fact.

There are several other key differences to keep in mind:

• Trading hours: Stocks are only traded during stock exchange hours, typically 9:30 am to 4:30 pm ET, Monday through Friday. Cryptocurrency markets never close, so you can trade 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
• Regulation: Stocks are regulated financial products, meaning a governing body verifies their credentials and their finances are matters of public record. By contrast, cryptocurrencies are not regulated investment vehicles, so you may not be aware of the inner dynamics of your crypto or the developers working on it.
• Volatility: Both stocks and cryptocurrency involve risk; the money you invest can lose value. However, stocks are directly linked to companies and generally rise and fall based on those companies’ performance. Cryptocurrency prices are more speculative—no one is quite sure of their value yet. That makes them much more volatile and affected by something as small as a celebrity’s tweet.

Are there cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds?

Given the thousands of cryptocurrencies in existence and the high volatility associated with most of them, it’s understandable you might want to take a diversified approach to investing in crypto to minimize the risk that you might lose money.

There are exchange-traded funds , or ETFs, that trade in both bitcoin futures and bitcoin’s spot price. The bitcoin ETF that is right for you, however, depends upon many factors, including your risk tolerance and investment horizon.

What are altcoins?

When we first think of crypto, we usually think of bitcoin. That’s because bitcoin represents more than 45% of the total cryptocurrency market. So when we talk about any cryptos outside of bitcoin, all of those cryptos are considered altcoins.

Ethereum, for instance, is regarded as the most popular altcoin.

Why is bitcoin valuable?

Part of what makes bitcoin so valuable is its scarcity. Bitcoin’s maximum supply is limited to 21 million coins. Currently, there are 19 million coins in circulation.

To create supply, bitcoin rewards crypto miners with a set bitcoin amount. To be exact, 6.25 BTC is issued when a miner has successfully mined a single block. To keep the process in check, the rewards given for mining bitcoin are cut in half almost every four years.

Why are cryptocurrencies important?

While the initial premise of cryptocurrency was to fix the problems with traditional currencies, there are now a whole host of utility cryptocurrencies that have sprung up, thanks to the creation of the blockchain.

• What Is Cryptocurrency?
• Best Crypto Exchanges
• Best Blockchain ETFs
• Best Crypto Credit Cards
• What Is An NFT?
• Cryptocurrency Tax Calculator
• How To Buy Cryptocurrency
• How To Buy XRP (Ripple)
• How To Buy Shiba Inu (SHIB)
• How To Buy Bitcoin (BTC)
• How To Buy Dogecoin (DOGE)
• How To Buy Ethereum (ETH)
• How To Buy Cronos (CRO)
• How To Buy Safemoon
• More In Cryptocurrency
• Crypto.com Review
• Coinbase Review
• Binance.US Review
• Kraken Review
• Bitstamp Review
• eToro Review

Next Up In Investing

• Top 10 Altcoins
• Best Crypto Exchanges and Apps
• Best Crypto Stocks
• Best Crypto Staking Platforms
• Different Types of Cryptocurrencies
• Best Crypto Wallets

CEX.IO Review For 2024

Best Crypto Exchanges Of June 2024

7 Top Metaverse Coins

Top 10 Altcoins Of June 2024

Best Crypto Stocks Of June 2024

7 Best Blockchain ETFs Of June 2024

Michael Adams is lead editor, investing at Forbes Advisor. He's researched, written about and practiced investing for nearly two decades. As a writer, Michael has covered everything from stocks to cryptocurrency and ETFs for many of the world's major financial publications, including Kiplinger, U.S. News and World Report, The Motley Fool and more. Michael holds a master’s degree in philosophy from The New School for Social Research and an additional master's degree in Asian classics from St. John’s College.

$66,242.47 (-1.05%)

$3,549.84 (1.19%), $607.49 (-0.28%).

Track your Portfolio

Global crypto adoption report 2023 : a pivotal year for crypto acceptance worldwide, author: nidhi kolhapur nidhi kolhapur.

Nidhi is a Certified Digital Marketing Executive and Passionate crypto Journalist covering the world of alternative currencies. She shares the latest and trending news on Cryptocurrency and Blockchain.

Reviewed by: Sohrab Khawas

Sohrab Khawas

Sohrab is a passionate cryptocurrency news writer with over five years of experience covering the industry. He keeps a keen interest in blockchain technology and its potential to revolutionize finance. Whether he's trading or writing, Sohrab always keeps his finger on the pulse of the crypto world, using his expertise to deliver informative and engaging articles that educate and inspire. When he's not analyzing the markets, Sohrab indulges in his hobbies of graphic design, minimal design or listening to his favorite hip-hop tunes.

Crypto as an asset has been gaining interest widely. It is definitely a topic of significant interest owing to the power of earning it gives to the individuals. This report by Coinpedia encloses the major questions related to the acceptance of crypto in 2023.

We will step-by-step unfold the adoption of crypto in 2023 worldwide by mentioning all about the leading nations which have embraced cryptocurrency and digital finance facets. We will also look at all the minute details of crypto adoption scenarios among individuals, covering the important lists like the new-comers, new countries and demographic representation of the crypto adoption in 2023.

This report holds all that one needs to know about the important events which affected crypto adoption among nations and what could 2024 have in store for all the crypto investors!

A Brief Overview

In a world on the verge of a complete financial revolution, the 2023 Global Crypto Adoption Report by Coinpedia gives us some in-depth information about how the East and the West are adapting themselves to the digital financial evolution. In this report, we will understand all about the challenges which the nations have to overcome in order to be on the crypto track. We will also shed some light on the overall market situation, adoption metrics, global patterns, and the upcoming challenges in 2024.

Introduction

If we talk about the Global Crypto Adoption Report, its goal is to combine the on-chain data and real-world information. This is done to deduct the countries leading the world in grassroots crypto adoption. It is not about the countries’ transaction volumes ( we could already guess that the wealthier countries are ahead in this case) but it highlights the countries where average, everyday people are accepting crypto the most. The Global Crypto Adoption Index is there to identify countries where people are putting a major part of their wealth in the cryptocurrency lane. In this report, we will highlight the top 20 nations with the highest level of crypto adoption in 2023. 

Also Read: Crypto Mining Report 2023 : Analyzing The Impact Of Miners’ Actions On Bitcoin And Market Prices

Crypto Market Overview

By keeping the overall crypto landscape in mind, here are a few deductions made by the experts.

• Global market cap is $1.55 trillion, currently in 2023. Recent development in AI is expected to affect the growth and adoption of crypto worldwide.
• Revenue is expected to show an annual growth rate (CAGR 2023-2027) of 14.40% leading to a projected total amount of US$64.9bn by 2027.
• The average revenue per user in the Cryptocurrency market amounts to US$56.2 in 2023.
• From a global comparison perspective, it is shown that the highest revenue is reached in the United States (US$17,960.00m in 2023).
• In the Cryptocurrencies market, the number of users is expected to reach 994.30 million users by the end of 2027.
• User penetration was 8.77% in 2023 and is expected to hit 12.51% by 2027. There are around 420 million crypto users worldwide in 2023.

Let us have a look at the global ownership of Bitcoin in 2023:

The chart represents ownership of Bitcoins in 2023 region-wise (in millions)

A Major development in the Market

The Year 2023 has witnessed unprecedented growth , technological innovation, more regulatory clarity, and an increment in the acceptance of cryptocurrency worldwide. Majorly, we have seen the crypto adoption by retail and institutional players in 2023. 

Mass adoption

There has been a significant surge in mainstream acceptance of digital currencies. Despite so many regulations by the US SEC, cryptocurrency has seen a huge rate of acceptance among countries worldwide. Major financial giants embraced crypto, thus laying the foundation for 2024 to see a boom in mass adoption. With regulatory clarity among various jurisdictions worldwide, more traditional investors are expected to enter the market in 2024.

CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies)

CBDCs have been on the radar of the banks worldwide. 2024 could be the year when several countries are foreseen to develop and implement their CBDCs. 2023 has marked a paradigm shift in the way governments look at cryptocurrencies. Let us have a look at the 2023 updates in CBDCs among different nations:

• As of November 2023, 130 countries are exploring a CBDC, representing 98 percent of global GDP.
• Asia and Africa are the current hotbeds of crypto adoption! The Bank of Korea announced its first step to adopt CBDCs in October,2023.
• In 2023, 64 countries got into the advanced phase of exploring CBDCs. 
• The European Central Bank took a significant step toward CBDC exploration, announcing the preparation phase for a digital Euro in October,2023.
• In October 2023, MasterCard concluded a CBDC blockchain pilot with the Reserve Bank of Australia.
• The Central Bank of Brazil is currently addressing privacy issues as it has already developed digital real (DREX). 
• PetroChina, a Chinese oil and gas company, has already completed the first international crude oil trade using e-CNY. 
• Reserve Bank of India plans to launch its CBDC in the interbank borrowing market, using the tokens for call money settlement. It is undergoing a pilot phase.
• Bank of Japan launched a forum in partnership with 60 companies for a pilot program on digital Yen.
• Nepal Rastra Bank also announced the plans to develop CBDCs.
• Russia aims for mass adoption of its digital Ruble by 2027.

Global Patchwork of Regulations

In 2023, we saw different countries approaching crypto regulations in diverse ways, reflecting the unique economic, social and political landscapes of each region. Some of them have accepted crypto as a legitimate form of finance, while others remain sceptical.

So what’s really driving the adoption of crypto in 2023?

In recent surveys, respondents actively said that they wanted more control over their online identities and data. But is it driving folks to Web3? The evidence points to speculation! As consumers are gaining all the information about the crypto world, their interest is peaking. There have been many driving forces paving the way for crypto adoption in 2023.

Also Read: Stablecoin Performace in 2023: A Research Report on Trends, Insights, and Predictions

Crypto Adoption Scenario: 2023

As the year 2023 comes to an end,we have reported all the major events which marked the adoption of crypto in 2023. This report by Coinpedia aims to highlight all the yearly developments which aided in the acceptance of cryptocurrency worldwide. We have also studied the factors which have helped in this entire process. With Bitcoin crossing the USD $40,000 mark, we are hopeful of massive 2024 profits. Do you know about the halving scenario in 2024? Do you think 2024 will be the bull season for crypto enthusiasts? 

We will analyse the 2023 trends and share the crypto insights for 2024 in our yearly report on Crypto Global Adoption by Coinpedia.

Countries To Look At In 2023 

New crypto-friendly policies in 2023.

We all know that El Salvador became the first country to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender, mandating that businesses accept crypto as a form of payment. Recently, the country has shown more crypto-friendliness by announcing a joint initiative with Tether called “Adopting El Salvador Freedom” that allows foreigners to obtain a Salvadoran passport in exchange for paying $1 million in Bitcoin. While some nations have put strict bans on crypto usage, others have embraced this monetary evolution dearly. 

Country with the largest crypto ownership in 2023

UAE becomes the country with the largest crypto ownership in 2023. With almost 28% of its population owning crypto as an asset, UAE tops the list here. It is followed by Vietnam with 18.73% and Saudi Arabia with 17.53% of the population owning cryptocurrency.

Crypto-friendly countries in 2023

Let us have a look at the countries which are favourable for cryptocurrencies in 2023.Here is a list of the countries which are crypto-friendly in 2023:

Crypto adoption rate in 2023

Let us see the difference in the rate of crypto adoption among countries from last year till now. Crypto adoption rate differences have been recorded from 10 countries all across the world in this table:

Deductions from this report by Statista confirm that the consumers from countries in Africa, Asia and South America were most likely to be an owner of cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, in 2023. 

Also Read: Top Crypto Hacks of 2023: Analyzing the Biggest Crypto Security Breaches – Research Report

2023 International Summits and Crypto

G20 and the crypto asset reporting framework.

• The biggest announcement in favour of Cryptocurrency was made in September’s G20 summit held in India. The G-20 leaders decided on swift implementation of the reporting framework for crypto assets. They quoted a need for the significant number of member nations wanting information exchange on such non-financial assets by 2027.
• The Crypto Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) is the major outcome of the summit. It is going to be developed to make sure that the crypto assets are not used by tax evaders to conceal their unaccounted wealth.
• As the world’s largest economies gathered in India for the G20 Summit in September 2023, the global crypto community was abuzz with hopes . 
• This event had a profound impact on how future regulations and advancements on crypto will be outlined, both in India and across the globe. Thus, giving optimism to the crypto enthusiasts.
• In October 2023, The G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors (FMCBG) under India’s presidency released a joint communique in October in Marrakech, Morocco, adopting the roadmap proposed in the Synthesis Paper as a G20 Roadmap on Crypto Assets.

The International Summit showcased the growing rate of adoption of crypto in developing and recently developed nations as well.

Crypto Demographics 2023

There have been 420 million crypto owners worldwide in 2023. here is a simple breakdown:.

Brands Accepting Crypto in 2023

• In October 2023, Ferrari started to accept payment in cryptocurrency for its luxury sports cars in the U.S. and might extend the scheme to Europe following requests from its wealthy customers.
• Ralph Lauren Miami store has started accepting crypto as payment in April,2023.

Institutional Adoption Of Crypto in 2023

The crypto landscape is going through a seismic shift and the adoption is increasing by institutional investors. No longer restricted to the finance fringes, crypto is making its way into the portfolios of some of the world’s largest banks and investment places. Here are some of the findings about the institutional adoption of crypto in 2023:

• 83% of institutional investors believe that crypto will become a major part of the mainstream financial system within the next five years.
• BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley are a few examples of institutional players that have already taken a crypto plunge.
• In Q3 alone, Microstrategy added over 6600 Bitcoin to its portfolio and now has 158,400 BTC.
• The approval of a US Spot Bitcoin ETF will attract more institutions into the space. 
• In September 2023, Visa Inc. revealed that it is expanding its stablecoin capabilities. The company would now introduce the USDC stablecoin on the Solana blockchain network. The company has been experimenting with the USDC stablecoin since 2021 and has now integrated the Solana network due to its efficient and speedy systems. 
• Block Inc. is a leading financial technology firm based in the United States. The company formerly began the development of Bitkey, a crypto product. The company is making leaps in the industry and reports strong earnings, which reflects that the crypto industry is far from declining. In August 2023, Block, Inc. reported results from the second quarter of 2023. The company’s revenue for the quarter jumped 25.67% year over year and amounted to $5.53 billion, ahead of market consensus by $433.36 million. Isn’t it a positive sign for crypto ascent in 2024?
• Fortune 100 companies have made 109 private venture capital investments across 80 crypto blockchain startups since 2017, participating in rounds totaling more than $8 billion. The average Fortune 500 company initiative or project budget for 2023 is nearly $5.8 million. That’s surely an optimistic way led by institutions adopting crypto in 2023.
• Global payment processing giant PayPal announced its United States dollar-pegged payment stablecoin called PayPal USD (PYUSD) in August 2023. The stablecoin is developed on Ethereum (ERC-20) and will be issued by Paxos Trust Co. PYUSD is reportedly fully backed by U.S. dollar deposits, short-term Treasurys and similar cash equivalents.PayPal said that the launch showcases the company’s focus on becoming a crypto payment giant and aims to make the stablecoin a key part of its payment infrastructure. 

Crypto 2023: Driving Forces Vs. Setbacks

• Following the bankruptcies of FTX, BlockFi, Voyager Digital, and other cryptocurrency platforms, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accelerated its push to subject these markets to the full potential of its financial regulations. In the first half of 2023 alone, the SEC took 24 cryptocurrency enforcement actions.
• FTX crypto scandal (2022-2023) : FTX, once the leader among global cryptocurrency exchanges, became the face of crypto fraud when its founder and former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried was arrested on behalf of U.S. authorities on charges of fraud, money laundering, and violating campaign finance laws. FTX quickly went into bankruptcy.
• Voyager bankruptcy (2023) : Voyager, a New Jersey-based crypto lender, declared bankruptcy in 2023 as part of the fallout from the liquidation of crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital, which defaulted on loans to Voyager totaling $654 million. This put a spotlight on the high-risk nature of crypto lending practices​.

Major Crypto Adoption Headlines of 2023

• In September 2023,Morocco came in the top 20 countries with highest Bitcoin usage.
• Half of the people in Turkey own crypto by September 2023.
• Crypto flourishes in Vietnam with 16.6 million holders.
• More than half the Fortune 100 are developing Blockchain initiatives to stay ahead of the game.
• India becomes the second largest crypto market despite the high taxes.
• China, Hong Kong and East Asia slowed down in crypto trading this year.

Also Read: A Detailed Report of Centralized Exchanges in 2023: Market Mayhem & Lessons Learned

Grassroot  Crypto Adoption Report

Here is a list of the top 10 nations based on different adoption metrics. We have provided a description of each sub-index, how it is calculated and why we believe it is valuable for measuring the grassroots crypto adoption.

While India beats other countries which had high rates of crypto trading as well as mining, it also came in second when looking at the top countries by raw estimated crypto value received between July 2022 and June 2023. India reported around $250 billion in crypto value in the past year, behind only the U.S. and roughly $1 trillion it recorded in crypto value received during the same time.

India currently taxes crypto gains at 30% and also subtracts 1% from the source. After TDS implementation by exchanges, many international exchanges are not doing it effectively for the users here.

Thus, allowing a rise in web traffic from India to foreign crypto exchanges. Home-grown crypto exchanges , like WazirX, saw their funds frozen and were investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) last year. Indian crypto traders invest in top-value assets like Bitcoin and Ether. They also work with meme-based assets like Dogecoin and Shiba Inu.

Global Crypto Trends in 2023

Here is a rundown of highlights in 2023:

Crypto Adoption rates dropped in Q1 and Q2 2023:

After 2022’s setbacks, grassroots crypto adoption dipped in Q1 and Q2. However, after U.S Bitcoin Spot ETF Speculations, the adoption rate increased comparatively.

North America’s dominance

The global crypto transaction volumes are still led by North America, backed by the U.S. 24.4% of the total transaction volume lies in the hands of North America.

Emerging Nations Leading Adoption

Lower middle income (LMI) countries like India, Vietnam, and Nigeria outshine more developed counterparts in the crypto adoption realm.

North America’s Stablecoin Demand dips, Latin America goes upwards

Due to regulatory concerns, the demand for stablecoins dipped in North America. In contrast, Latin America faced high inflation , and showed rising demand for stablecoins.

DeFi adoption slowed down

Since the market peak in November 2021, the total value locked (TVL) has dropped from $180 billion to $47 billion today. However, DeFi adoption is not stagnant. In Central, Northern, and Western Europe, DeFi accounted for 54.8% of the total value of crypto assets gained. Central and Southern Asia, Oceania, and Eastern Europe also joined the line of the nations which witnessed regional year-over-year (Y0Y) growth of value sent to DeFi.

Main drivers for Crypto Adoption in 2023:

Challenges in Crypto Adoption

2023 has faced a lot of challenges in terms of crypto adoption. We have compiled the top crypto adoption challenges in 2023 here:

• Lack of awareness about cryptocurrency and how it works! 
• Due to extreme volatility, users hesitate to put their money in crypto.
• The Lack of regulatory framework and the unregulated status of crypto make some areas sceptical about crypto adoption thoughts.
• Taxation and its uncertainty in different regions of the world make it difficult for individuals to understand the concept.
• Hacking and theft cases have demotivated a lot of investors.
• The irreversibility of transactions makes people cautious of the usage of digital money.
• Lack of trust in digital space has led to people thinking a hundred times before investing in the crypto pool.

Also Read: Crypto Market Prediction 2024: Which Sector Will Fuel the Next Bull Run?

Outlook for Crypto Adoption 2024

Will cryptocurrency soar or fall in 2024? Will Bitcoin continue its volatility? Will the market be more regulated? Will crypto adoption increase in 2024? All this comes up when we look at the current crypto scenario in 2023. Our experts predict these five things for the cryptocurrency arena in 2024:

• Bitcoin might hit USD $100,000 by the end of 2024 but it is unsure to say anything precisely.
• According to The Ascent, more than 500 million people worldwide will own Bitcoin by 2024’s end.
• The first Spot Bitcoin ETF could get the final approval,giving the investors direct exposure to cryptocurrency.
• There might be a movement towards decentralized finance (DeFi). DAOs could show some remarkable growth in 2024. 
• 2024 might see some key regulatory changes in the crypto market and there could be some stern deductions in the ongoing cases. 

We would like to put some extra focus on Bitcoin Halving in 2024! It is a historical fact that when the availability of newly minted bitcoins goes down, the price goes up. Start dreaming of all the gains you can enjoy if you do not miss the next halving wave. Game on? We advise you to learn before investing in crypto and be 2024 ready for the major events.

Final Thoughts

This is how the crypto market has seen evolution in the last few years. With 2023 being one of the major years in its progress, we have a lot in store for 2024 too. According to the experts, Regulatory conditions and worldwide crypto adoption are going to improve as we move through this decade.

Was this writing helpful?

Tell us why, related articles.

This Week in Crypto: Top News, Price Analysis, Major Hacks, & More!

Web3, Blockchain & Crypto Weekly Report

Bitcoin ETF Tracker: May Month Performance Review and Insights 

Stablecoin Performance and Analysis May Update: An In-depth Monthly Report 

Login To Coinpedia.

Or continue with.

You do not have permission to login. please contact administrator for more details. (email: [email protected] )

Create coinpedia account.

A Platform to over 1 million + Crypto and Blockchain enthusiasts in the world.

Full Name *

Connect wallet.

Click here to connect Wallet

Referral ID

By creating account with us, you clarify you have read and accepted the Privacy policy and Terms & Conditions

Select a Country

• No related data found for - " ".

Verify your email

A code has been sent to . Enter it below to verify your email. The code is valid for Resend OTP

Registration Successful !

Hello ,Welcome to Coinpedia! Now, you can join contests, ace quizzes, read exclusive crypto insights, and unlock your potential in the cryptocurrency world with us.

Advertisement

Supported by

Bitcoin Hits Record High, Completing a Stunning Comeback

Bitcoin’s price surged above $69,000, breaking the record the digital currency set in November 2021 when the crypto industry was booming.

• Share full article

Price of Bitcoin

By David Yaffe-Bellany

David Yaffe-Bellany covers the cryptocurrency industry.

Bitcoin hit a record high of more than $69,000 on Tuesday, capping a remarkable comeback for the volatile cryptocurrency after its value plunged in 2022 amid a market meltdown .

Bitcoin’s price has risen more than 300 percent since November 2022, a resurgence that few predicted when the price dropped below $20,000 that year. Its previous record was just under $68,790 in November 2021, as crypto markets boomed and amateur investors poured savings into experimental digital coins.

The cryptocurrency was “pronounced dead for the 150th time,” said Cory Klippsten , the chief executive of Swan, a financial services firm focused on Bitcoin. “And Bitcoin continues to do what Bitcoin does, which is win people over as they take the time to actually learn about it.”

Bitcoin’s recent surge has been driven by investor enthusiasm for a new financial product tied to the digital coin. In January, U.S. regulators authorized a group of crypto companies and traditional finance firms to offer exchange-traded funds, or E.T.F.s, which track Bitcoin’s price. The funds provide a simple way for people to invest in the crypto markets without directly owning the virtual currency.

As of last week, investors had poured more than $7 billion into the investment products, propelling Bitcoin’s rapid rise, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.

The price of Ether, the second-most-valuable digital currency after Bitcoin, has also risen more than 50 percent this year, reaching about $3,800. Its increase has been driven partly by enthusiasm over the prospect that regulators may also approve an E.T.F. tied to Ether.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Take action

• Report an antitrust violation
• File adjudicative documents
• Find banned debt collectors
• View competition guidance
• Competition Matters Blog

Slow the Roll-up: Help Shine a Light on Serial Acquisitions

View all Competition Matters Blog posts

We work to advance government policies that protect consumers and promote competition.

View Policy

Search or browse the Legal Library

Find legal resources and guidance to understand your business responsibilities and comply with the law.

Browse legal resources

• Find policy statements
• Submit a public comment

Vision and Priorities

Memo from Chair Lina M. Khan to commission staff and commissioners regarding the vision and priorities for the FTC.

Technology Blog

Global perspectives from the international competition network tech forum.

View all Technology Blog posts

Advice and Guidance

Learn more about your rights as a consumer and how to spot and avoid scams. Find the resources you need to understand how consumer protection law impacts your business.

• Report fraud
• Report identity theft
• Register for Do Not Call
• Sign up for consumer alerts

Get Business Blog updates

• Get your free credit report
• Find refund cases
• Order bulk publications
• Consumer Advice
• Shopping and Donating
• Credit, Loans, and Debt
• Jobs and Making Money
• Unwanted Calls, Emails, and Texts
• Identity Theft and Online Security
• Business Guidance
• Advertising and Marketing
• Credit and Finance
• Privacy and Security
• By Industry
• For Small Businesses
• Browse Business Guidance Resources
• Business Blog

Servicemembers: Your tool for financial readiness

Visit militaryconsumer.gov

Get consumer protection basics, plain and simple

Visit consumer.gov

Learn how the FTC protects free enterprise and consumers

Visit Competition Counts

Looking for competition guidance?

• Competition Guidance

News and Events

Latest news, ftc data shows major increases in cash payments to government impersonation scammers.

View News and Events

Upcoming Event

Closed commission meeting - june 20, 2024.

View more Events

Sign up for the latest news

Follow us on social media

-->   -->   -->   -->   -->  

Playing it Safe: Explore the FTC's Top Video Game Cases

Learn about the FTC's notable video game cases and what our agency is doing to keep the public safe.

Latest Data Visualization

FTC Refunds to Consumers

Explore refund statistics including where refunds were sent and the dollar amounts refunded with this visualization.

About the FTC

Our mission is protecting the public from deceptive or unfair business practices and from unfair methods of competition through law enforcement, advocacy, research, and education.

Learn more about the FTC

Meet the Chair

Lina M. Khan was sworn in as Chair of the Federal Trade Commission on June 15, 2021.

Chair Lina M. Khan

Looking for legal documents or records? Search the Legal Library instead.

• Cases and Proceedings
• Premerger Notification Program
• Merger Review
• Anticompetitive Practices
• Competition and Consumer Protection Guidance Documents
• Warning Letters
• Consumer Sentinel Network
• Criminal Liaison Unit
• FTC Refund Programs
• Notices of Penalty Offenses
• Advocacy and Research
• Advisory Opinions
• Cooperation Agreements
• Federal Register Notices
• Public Comments
• Policy Statements
• International
• Office of Technology Blog
• Military Consumer
• Consumer.gov
• Bulk Publications
• Data and Visualizations
• Stay Connected
• Commissioners and Staff
• Bureaus and Offices
• Budget and Strategy
• Office of Inspector General
• Careers at the FTC

Reports show scammers cashing in on crypto craze

From Super Bowl ads to Bitcoin ATMs, cryptocurrency seems to be everywhere lately. Although it’s yet to become a mainstream payment method, reports to the FTC show it’s an alarmingly common method for scammers to get peoples’ money. Since the start of 2021, more than 46,000 people have reported losing over $1 billion in crypto to scams [1] – that’s about one out of every four dollars reported lost, [2] more than any other payment method. The median individual reported loss? A whopping $2,600. The top cryptocurrencies people said they used to pay scammers were Bitcoin (70%), Tether (10%), and Ether (9%). [3]  

Crypto has several features that are attractive to scammers, which may help to explain why the reported losses in 2021 were nearly sixty times what they were in 2018. There’s no bank or other centralized authority to flag suspicious transactions and attempt to stop fraud before it happens. Crypto transfers can’t be reversed – once the money’s gone, there’s no getting it back. And most people are still unfamiliar with how crypto works. These considerations are not unique to crypto transactions, but they all play into the hands of scammers.

Reports point to social media and crypto as a combustible combination for fraud. Nearly half the people who reported losing crypto to a scam since 2021 said it started with an ad, post, or message on a social media platform. [4]

During this period, nearly four out of every ten dollars reported lost to a fraud originating on social media was lost in crypto, far more than any other payment method. [5] The top platforms identified in these reports were Instagram (32%), Facebook (26%), WhatsApp (9%), and Telegram (7%). [6]

Of the reported crypto fraud losses that began on social media, most are investment scams . [7] Indeed, since 2021, $575 million of all crypto fraud losses reported to the FTC were about bogus investment opportunities, far more than any other fraud type. The stories people share about these scams describe a perfect storm: false promises of easy money paired with people’s limited crypto understanding and experience. Investment scammers claim they can quickly and easily get huge returns for investors. But those crypto “investments” go straight to a scammer’s wallet. People report that investment websites and apps let them track the growth of their crypto, but it’s all fake. Some people report making a small “test” withdrawal – just enough to convince them it’s safe to go all in. When they really try to cash out, they’re told to send more crypto for (fake) fees, and they don’t get any of their money back.

Romance scams are a distant second to investment scams, with $185 million in reported cryptocurrency losses since 2021 – that’s nearly one in every three dollars reported lost to a romance scam during this period. [8] And many have an investment twist too. These keyboard Casanovas reportedly dazzle people with their supposed wealth and sophistication. Before long, they casually offer tips on getting started with crypto investing and help with making investments. People who take them up on the offer report that what they really got was a tutorial on sending crypto to a scammer. The median individual reported crypto loss to romance scammers is an astounding $10,000.

Business and government impersonation scams are next with $133 million in reported crypto losses since 2021. These scams can start with a text about a supposedly unauthorized Amazon purchase, or an alarming online pop-up made to look like a security alert from Microsoft. From there, people are reportedly told the fraud is extensive and their money is at risk. The scammers may even get the “bank” on the line to back up the story. (Pro tip: it’s not the bank.) In another twist, scammers impersonating border patrol agents have reportedly told people their accounts will be frozen as part of a drug trafficking investigation. These scammers tell people the only way to protect their money is to put it in crypto: people report that these “agents” direct them to take out cash and feed it into a crypto ATM. The “agent” then sends a QR code and says to hold it up to the ATM camera. But that QR code is embedded with the scammer’s wallet address. Once the machine scans it, their cash is gone.

People ages 20 to 49 were more than three times as likely as older age groups to have reported losing cryptocurrency to a scammer. [9] Reports point to people in their 30s as the hardest hit – 35% of their reported fraud losses since 2021 were in cryptocurrency. [10] But median individual reported losses have tended to increase with age, topping out at $11,708 for people in their 70s. [11]

Here are some things to know to steer clear of a crypto con:

• Only scammers will guarantee profits or big returns. No cryptocurrency investment is ever guaranteed to make money, let alone big money.
• Nobody legit will require you to buy cryptocurrency. Not to sort out a problem, not to protect your money. That’s a scam.
• Never mix online dating and investment advice . If a new love interest wants to show you how to invest in crypto, or asks you to send them crypto, that’s a scam.

To learn more about cryptocurrency scams – and how to spot and avoid scams generally – visit ftc.gov/cryptocurrency and ftc.gov/scams . Report scams to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov .

[1]These figures and figures throughout this Spotlight, unless otherwise noted, are based on fraud reports made directly to the FTC in the Consumer Sentinel Network database from January 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022 that indicated cryptocurrency as the payment method. Reports provided by Sentinel data contributors are excluded because of inconsistencies among contributors in capturing payment information. Because the vast majority of frauds are not reported, these figures reflect just a small fraction of the public harm.  See  Anderson, K. B.,  To Whom Do Victims of Mass-Market Consumer Fraud Complain?  at 1 (May 2021),  available at   https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3852323  (study showed only 4.8% of people who experienced mass-market consumer fraud complained to a Better Business Bureau or a government entity).

[2] From January 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022, cryptocurrency was identified as the payment method for 24% of reported dollar losses in fraud reports to the FTC.

[3]These figures exclude reports that did not specify the type of cryptocurrency.

[4] From January 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022, 49% of fraud reports to the FTC indicating cryptocurrency as the payment method specified that the scam started on social media, compared to 37% in 2020, 18% in 2019, and 11% in 2018.

[5] From January 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022, $1.1 billion was reported to the FTC as lost to fraud originating on social media. Of that number, 39% was reported as paid using cryptocurrency, followed by bank transfer or payment (20%), and wire transfer (9%). 8% did not indicate a payment method.

[6] These figures exclude reports that did not specify a social media platform.

[7] From January 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022, people reported to the FTC that $417 million in cryptocurrency was lost to fraud originating on social media. $273 million of these losses were to fraud categorized as investment related, followed by romance scams ($69 million), and business imposters ($35 million).

[8] From January 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022, cryptocurrency was identified as the payment method for 29% of reported dollar losses to romance scams.

[9] From January 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022, people ages 20 to 49 submitted fraud loss reports to the FTC indicating social media as the contact method at a rate 3.4 times greater than people 50 and over. About 91% of fraud reports indicating cryptocurrency as the payment method during this period included age information. This age comparison is normalized based on the number of loss reports per million population by age during this period. Population numbers were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Selected Age Groups by Sex for the United States (June 2020).

[10] From January 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022, the percentage of total reported fraud losses that were lost in cryptocurrency by age were as follows: 12% (18-19), 23% (20-29), 35% (30-39), 33% (40-49), 28% (50-59), 19% (60-69), 10% (70-79), and 2% (80 and over). These figures exclude reports that did not indicate age.

[11] From January 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022, the median individual reported cryptocurrency losses to fraud by age were as follows: $1,000 (18-19), $1,600 (20-29), $2,500 (30-39), $3,200 (40-49), $5,000 (50-59), $8,500 (60-69), $11,708 (70-79), and $8,100 (80 and over).

File Data Spotlight: Reports show scammers cashing in on crypto craze (336.43 KB)

More from the Data Spotlight

Who’s who in scams: a spring roundup, impersonation scams: not what they used to be, social media: a golden goose for scammers, iykyk: the top text scams of 2022.

• My View My View
• Following Following
• Saved Saved

SEC reaches $4.47 bln settlement with now-bankrupt crypto firm Terraform Labs

• Medium Text

• Company Terraform Labs Pte Ltd Follow

Sign up here.

Reporting by Niket Nishant in Bengaluru and Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Anil D'Silva and Chizu Nomiyama

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. New Tab , opens new tab

Read Next / Editor's Picks

Industry Insight Chevron

David Thomas

Mike Scarcella, David Thomas

Karen Sloan

Henry Engler