Practice assessor (or) Nursing tutor (or) Nursing instructor (or) Nursing educator
As per the second stage of the JBI search strategy protocol, the same keywords from Table 1 will be searched in the remaining aforementioned databases. During this stage, the research team will review and ‘hand search’ the reference list to identify any additional relevant studies. Given that this is an exploratory scoping review, the authors are interested in identifying all literature including RCTs, exploratory studies and discussion papers. Therefore a “web search” of the grey literature will also be conducted using “OpenGrey” and “Google Scholar”. Specific educational policy publications by regulatory and professional bodies for preceptorship education and training programmes will also be searched to examine the focus of interpersonal and communication skills required for a preceptorship role. Table 2 outlines the search terms for grey literature and regulatory and professional bodies for preceptorship education and training programmes.
Source and Link | Search terms |
---|---|
Open Grey In subject: Humanities, psychology, and social sciences | Preceptorship interpersonal and communication skills Education and Training (First 10 pages) |
Google Scholar | Preceptorship interpersonal and communication skills Education and Training (First 10 pages) |
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland (NMBI) | Preceptorship Interpersonal relationships Interpersonal and communication skills |
Nursing and Midwifery Council (England) | Preceptorship/Mentorship/Practise Supervisors Interpersonal relationships Interpersonal and communication skills |
Health Education England | Preceptorship/Mentorship/Practise Supervisors Interpersonal relationships Interpersonal and communication skills |
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia | Preceptorship Interpersonal relationships Interpersonal and communication skills |
Canadian Nurses Association | Preceptorship Interpersonal relationships Interpersonal and communication skills |
Each search conducted will be systematically documented (date, search terms, results per string) and saved by two independent authors (PH, AD), with the findings of the searches compared and then imported into Mendeley (1.19.6 / 2020), a bibliographic reference manager, where any duplicates of literature will be removed before the initial screening of title and extract is divided out and screened by all of the authors. Covidence screening and data extraction software tool ( www.covidence.org ) will be utilised by the authors for screening. Each article will be required to be approved by two independent screeners before either being included or excluded in the review. A pilot testing of articles (n=50) using Covidence software package and inclusion and exclusion criteria will be undertaken by the authors to ensure consistency of the methodology adopted in the selection process ( Peters et al ., 2020 ). Full text screening will then be carried out on all articles that meet the inclusion criteria during the initial screening round by two independent authors (PH, CR). For any articles in which a disagreement may arise a third independent author (AL) known as the “tie-breaker” will further review the article against the inclusion criteria to settle the difference of opinion. The number of articles identified, screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review will be captured using the Covidence software package. A PRISMA flow diagram will be created to ensure transparency of reporting, decisions for the exclusion of studies permitting replication and comparison of any further studies.
The inclusion and exclusion criteria, highlighted in Table 3 , will be developed through an iterative process based on the PCC elements of the review question, plus a specification of the types of studies that have addressed the scoping review question and discussions amongst the authors ( McKenzie et al ., 2020 ). The primary author will record any changes. All authors will utilise and adhere to its criteria during the screening process to ensure consistency.
Inclusion | Rationale |
---|---|
Articles written in the English Language | Searches will be limited to English language due to increased resource challenges concerning costs, time, and expertise in non- English languages. |
Publications between 2000 and 2020 | The search will be conducted for literature published within the last twenty years. |
Peer-reviewed empirical studies with either qualitative or quantitative data, mixed methods, reviews, book chapters and grey literature with a principal focus on the development of interpersonal and communication skills in preceptorship education and training programmes. | The focus of the review is to examine the development of interpersonal and communication skills in preceptorship education and training programmes; Peer-reviewed empirical studies will provide reliable and a high standard of evidence. Grey literature will capture unpublished works and local evaluation of preceptorship education and training practices. |
Exclusion | Rationale |
Non-English Language Studies | The English language is the primary language of the research team. Therefore, all non-English studies will be excluded due to the constraints of time, cost, and translator availability. |
Studies relating to the development of interpersonal and communication skills in non-preceptorship nursing education | The focus of this review is to establish current educational practices for the development of interpersonal and communication skills in preceptorship education and training programmes. Therefore, studies that are not specifically part of a preceptorship education and training programme will not be included. |
In this stage, a data extraction form will be created by the lead author (PH) ( Table 4 ) based on JBI (2020) data charting form, mapping it with the objectives and research question of the scoping review ( Peters et al ., 2020 ) and piloted on two articles by all authors. Any changes to the chart will be documented and reported in the final scoping review for transparency in the reporting.
Data chart heading | Description |
---|---|
Author | Name of author/s |
Date | Date article sourced |
Title of article | Title of the article or study |
Publication year | The year that the article was published |
Publication type | Journal, website, conference, etc. |
Study details | Type of study, empirical or review, etc. |
Study Aim | The aims of the study |
Research Design | The framework of research methods and techniques chosen by the researcher/s. |
Methodological Approaches | Approach taken to examine the topic |
Data Analysis | Analysis of data |
Keywords | What keywords were present |
Study setting | Country/hospital/programme |
Nursing field | General, Children’s, Mental Health, Intellectual Disability, Midwifery |
Study population | The population studied with regard to demographics |
Theoretical framework | What educational frameworks were implemented to offer a distinctive way to frame teaching practices of IP & C skills |
Pedagogical methods | Pedagogical methods applied to teaching IP & C skills |
Educational strategies | Whether they include both preceptors and students or preceptors alone |
Reported challenges or limitations | What challenges were encountered |
Findings | Noteworthy results of the study |
Conclusion | Important aspects of the conclusion |
Each data charting form will be logged electronically using Microsoft Excel to capture relevant information for each study and will be available for all members of the research team via a shared drive. All authors will discuss the data before a descriptive analysis commences. As recommended by Peters et al . (2020) , the analysis of data extracted should not involve any more than descriptive analysis to achieve the desired outcomes of a scoping review. Therefore, a narrative report will be produced, using a deductive thematic analysis approach summarising the extracted data concerning the objectives and scoping review question, for example, the pedagogy adopted for interpersonal and communication skills development and the impact of such training on trainee preceptors. Identification of areas in which a gap in the literature exists will also be reported. Quality appraisal of studies will not be conducted, as this review aims to explore the general scope of research conducted in the field of interpersonal and communication skills development in preceptorship education and training programmes and identify current pedagogical practices implemented to contribute a theoretical and empirical basis for the future development of preceptorship education and training programmes.
Initial findings from the scoping review will be presented to several stakeholders. The primary author (PH) will disseminate the results of the review with local academic networks within the authors’ place of work (third level institution) and associated clinical settings. The author will specifically report the findings to Clinical Placement Coordinators (CPC), who typically develop and facilitate preceptorship education and training days in the clinical settings in Ireland. The primary author will also share the results at the Clinical Skills Network of Ireland in which he is a stakeholder to reach a national targeted audience. The authors will engage with these groups to share and discuss our findings and interpretations to capture their perspective on the evidence identified. The primary author also aims to deliver an oral or poster presentation at National and International conferences such as the International Nursing & Midwifery Research and Education Conference, scheduled for March 2022. Finally, the authors aim to publish the scoping review findings in a peer-reviewed journal for a wider communication of the results. All data generated and analysed during the scoping review will be included in the published scoping review article; including search results, list of included studies, data extraction spreadsheets and final results, to ensure transparency and reproducibility of the review.
This study is at Stage 2 – a preliminary search of the literature has been conducted and the software packages Mendeley and Covidence have been trialled.
This scoping review protocol has been designed in line with the latest literature and evidence ( Arksey & O’Malley’s, 2005 ; Peters et al ., 2020 ; Tricco et al ., 2018 ) to create and perform a systematic scoping review. The distinguishing features of a scoping review will permit the authors to answer the specified research question, applying a systematic and evidence-based approach to identify the current knowledge on educational practices for the development of interpersonal and communication skills as part of preceptorship education and training programmes. It will also enable the authors to identify gaps in our knowledge base in this field which could justify new research and also inform the design, conduct and reporting of future research.
While this scoping review will not formally evaluate the quality of evidence available, it will provide a comprehensive overview of the available literature that will inform the researcher on current educational practices for the development of interpersonal and communication skills as part of preceptorship education and training programmes. This knowledge may identify the gaps in training that are contributing to interpersonal conflicts in preceptorship relationships that are widely reported throughout the literature. Only articles in English will be utilised; however, there will be no restrictions on the country of origin where the publications were produced, which should therefore provide a diverse range of opinions, experiences and cultural contexts. Following the open peer-review process and achieved approval, the authors will commence the systematic scoping review.
Acknowledgements.
Diarmuid Stokes, UCD Librarian
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Karen poole.
1 Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University Of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Thank you for inviting me to review this protocol. The authors make a compelling case for conducting a scoping review on the pedagogic practices used to develop communication and interpersonal skills in nurse preceptors. This protocol draws upon the most recent guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews, with a clear and well written account of the planned search strategies, data extraction and dissemination plans.
In terms of "context" scope, it may be helpful to clarify if you are including the educational preparation of preceptors for supporting Newly Qualified Nurses taking part in preceptorship programmes as well as undergraduate nursing programmes.
I agree with Elisabeth Carlson (first reviewer) regarding the difficulty of applying the concept of the therapeutic relationship to the preceptor and nursing student. There are characteristics that are relevant, but I am not sure whether it is a faithful representation of this concept. You may wish to consider a minor revision to this paragraph? Preceptors have a critical role in shaping students' clinical experiences, but are also responsible for assessing their developmental progress both formatively and summatively (often in a placement of short duration). As such, there is a complex relationship between preceptors and nursing students and the use of effective communication and interpersonal skills (in both parties) is essential in negotiating learning opportunities and navigating safe honest formative feedback/feed-forward that enables students to optimise learning in practice placements through their programmes.
Here are a couple of minor suggestions for inclusion in your plans for data extraction:
This scoping review has the potential to make an important contribution in shaping how preceptors are prepared and support the future nursing workforce.
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
Reviewer Expertise:
Education of Healthcare Professionals, Integrated Programmatic Assessment, Self-regulated Learning, Teaching Evidence-based Practice, Cancer Care.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
The authors would like to thank you for your comments on our scoping review protocol and for your suggestions.
We have responded to your comments below:
1 Department of Nursing, Health Science and Disability Studies, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
2 St. Angela's College Lough Gill Sligo, Lough Gill, Ireland
The preceptor holds a dual role of practitioner and teacher. The preceptor must utilise complex teaching strategies to the foster the student’s ability to practise nursing competently and compassionately. One of the core competencies inherent in all nursing programmes is the student's ability to communicate effectively and develop positive professional interpersonal relationship with both patients and other health care professionals. It is essential that the preceptor trainee is proficient in these skills in order to be able to provide patient centered care and utilise the teaching techniques of role modelling, coaching and contextual questioning to facilitate the student’s learning. Students often find these skills a challenge to learn and preceptors often undervalue their own professional interpersonal communication skills ( Mallik et al 2009 1 , Mc Sharry 2013 2 ).
Preceptorship preparation varies in length and content and some studies have reported that preceptors do not feel adequately prepared for their teaching and assessment role. This scoping review focusing on interpersonal and communication skill development of preceptor trainees will contribute to existing literature that can inform the development of preparation programmes both nationally and internationally. It has the potential to contribute to pedological approaches that enhance both preceptor trainee skills and student’s interpersonal and communication skills. Any enhancement in these skills are can only positively contribute to the provision of quality person- centered care. The protocol is clearly written with well-defined aim and objectives, inclusion and exclusion criteria and appropriate search terms. It aligns wells to recent writings on methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
I have 3 suggestions that the authors may find useful in refining this protocol:
clinical education, digital learning, internationalisation
1 Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
The training and preparation of preceptors vary over the world. Some programs or rather initiatives are merely a couple of days or even hours long while others are full academic credit bearing courses at universities. This implies that studies on preceptor preparation is a subject always worthy of investigation. The protocol is well written, easy to follow and uses current methodological references. I applaud the authors that despite their educational context being Ireland, the protocol is written in such a way that it is easily transferable to an international context. I have three minor comments or rather thoughts that might be useful.
Keywords: Alphabetical order
Page 3 Definition (the quote): While this is very true and a frequently used definition, I would also recommend the more elaborated definition to be found in CARLSON E. (2013) Precepting and symbolic interactionism – a theoretical look
at preceptorship during clinical practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing 69(2), 457– 464. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06047.x 1
Page 3: I am not quite sure if I agree that there is a therapeutic relationship between preceptor an nursing student. I would say there should be a strong educational and trustful professional relationship which in turn enables therapeutic interpersonal relationships with patients.
Higher Health Care Education, Learning theories, Preceptorship, Clinical Training, Methodology, Interprofessional Collaboration and learning, Educational models.
Practice Techniques
Language & Concepts/Word Games
ICPS Dialogue Ladder
Problem Solving Tree CBT#20-001
Download Available | Worksheet
Although very different from other popular methods of child management, the Interpersonal Cognitive Problem Solving [ICPS] approach, now called I Can Problem Solve, [also ICPS], developed by Myrna Shure continues the movement toward positive childrearing. As Shure states “In 1965 Haim Ginott sparked interest in positive parenting by suggesting in his book, Between Parent and Child, that instead of telling a child what not to do [“Don’t run!”], parent should emphasize the positive by telling them what to do [“Walk!”]. Then, in 1970, Thomas Gordon wrote the acclaimed book Parent Effectiveness Training [PET], which opened the door to the idea that active listening and using “I” messages [“I feel angry when your room is messy”] instead of “you” messages [“You are too messy”] are learned parenting skills.” These two landmark books paved the way for Shure’s book Raising a Thinking Child to take parents a step further. “ICPS moves from a primary focus on skills of the parent to focus on skills of the child as well. The thinking child does not have to be told how people feel or what to do; the thinking child can appreciate how people feel, decide what to do, and evaluate whether the idea is, or is not, a good one.”
Although educators and clinicians have historically asserted that relief of emotional tension can help one think straight, ICPS supports the reverse idea – the ability to think straight can help relieve emotional tension. ICPS will help children:
For twenty-five years, ICPS has demonstrated successful outcomes through careful evaluation of thousands of ICPS trained youngsters from ages four to twelve with varied IQ levels from urban and suburban schools nationwide. This approach has been documented in three books for professional audiences, in educational training manuals, and in numerous articles in professional journals and has received several national awards. To cite just a few: In 1982 ICPS was chosen by the National Mental Health Association to receive the prestigious Lela Rowland Prevention Award, and in 1987 ICPS was selected as a model mental health prevention program by the Task Force on Promotion, Prevention and Intervention Alternatives, sponsored by the American Psychological Association. In 1992 the National Mental Health Association selected ICPS as one of its recommended programs. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration recently recognized the intervention as an evidence-based exemplary violence prevention program. The most recent acknowledgments include kudos from Strengthening America’s Families Project and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency prevention as a model violence prevention program.
The teaching of these social competencies has been demonstrated to prevent behaviors – social withdrawal and conduct problems – that are associated with later problems in living such as depression, substance abuse, delinquency and suicide and also with other serious problem behaviors such as early and unsafe sexual activity, school dropout and violence.
Younger children up to about age eight, can benefit from ICPS by learning interpersonal problem solving skills that can reduce and prevent high risk behaviors in only three months time with three one half hour sessions per week or about thirteen and one half hours. Older children can also benefit, though it may take two three month programs or about twenty six hours of exposure to ICPS. Older children may already know the language and concepts, but find it difficult to overcome preconcieved reflex or automatic thoughts about problem areas.
To the extent that interpersonal cognitive processes precede action, and that good problem solvers are better adjusted and more socially competent than poor ones, we can begin to envision social competence as a problem solving skill, not just in adults, but, as far as we can measure it in children as young as four [04] years of age.
An individual who can plan his or her actions, weigh the pros and cons, and consider the effects of interpersonal acts upon others is less likely to fail and make impulsive mistakes, and thereby suffers less frustration. If problem after problem should remain unresolved, and interpersonal needs remain consistently unsatisfied, maladaptive behavior and other social difficulties often ensue.
One process of thought, that of means-ends thinking, includes the ability to plan, step by step, ways to reach an interpersonal goal. As part of this process, one considers potential obstacles that could interfere with reaching that goal, and also recognizes that problem resolution does not always occur immediately.
Another process involves the spontaneous tendency to weigh pros and cons of transgression, a form of consequential thinking.
Means-ends thinking skills significantly distinguish typical children from the diagnostically disturbed or behaviorally troubled – beginning at about nine [09] years of age, while a spontaneous tendency to weigh pros and cons of an act emerges as a significant behavior during the adolescent years.
ICPS has a particular concern not only with being assured that the child is clear in understanding concepts, but in the way you and other adults talk to the child. Talking in ways that help children think about their problems is what ICPS is all about.
Shure tells us that four [04] year olds can not plan sequential means to reach a goal, but they can conceive of alternative ways to solve problems by naming different types of categories of solutions. Spontaneous weighing of pros and cons to an act is beyond their developmental level, but if specifically asked, they can describe what might happen next or what another person might do or say if an act were carried out.
Given these conceptual gifts, the first responsibility is to teach a consistent language that can be used to promote problem solving and to test the concepts engendered by this language. For young children, this is done by playing with words. Play is the work of children, and through play, children absorb and test themselves against the world. By incorporating word games with significant words and concepts into a play arena, the adult can capture both the learning and valuing aspect of such development. After the child is familiar with the words and concepts, the helper can provide a formal dialogue at the time when problems occur to help the child think through the problem and make the appropriate decisions.
Word pairs such as is/is not, and/or, some/all, before/after, now/later, same/different are important for framing the problem solving environment. Although the child may already be familiar with all or most of these words, they are used in a special way in the formal dialogue. These words are used in play because when children learn to associate particular words with play, they are more likely to use them when it’s time to settle disputes.
Young children will laugh when you first say, ‘Mommy is a lady, but she is not a kitten.’ Or, ‘Our feet look the same, but your feet are a different size.’ Or, ‘Do you think I should eat this banana before or after I peel it?’
These word pairs help children think if an idea is or is not a good one, and to think about what happened before a fight began, and whether ‘he hit you before or after you hit him’. Children enjoy thinking about different ways to solve their problem when they associate the word different with fun. And the are more willing to wait until later when they recognize the word later from their play games.
This does not mean that adolescents can not benefit from the use of such words, although it is likely that you will need to find an artful way to present them. They are not words that are unused in an adolescent vocabulary, but developing a formal dialogue in which you address in vivo problem experiences and help the adolescent ‘walk though’ the process after the fact, is in itself, a teaching process. For older children, the process is one of bringing the process into conscious consideration and overcoming ‘automatic thinking’.
Poor problem solvers are likely to display behavior characteristics of impulsivity or inhibition, to show little concern for or even awareness of others in distress and are less liked by their peers.
The use of the formal dialogue changes the usual context for such an child or adolescents. Common themes of antisocial thinking include the belief and mind-set that they are being victimized. Many children and adolescents are accustomed to feeling unfairly treated and have learned a defiant, hostile attitude as part of their basic orientation toward life and other people. From the cognitive perspective, both their perception of being victimized and their hostile response to it are learned cognitive behaviors. These are learned ways of thinking that are reinforced by experiences of success and self gratification. For instance, the sense of victim outrage is itself a feeling of strength and righteousness, much preferable (in their mind) to feelings of weakness and vulnerability.
Unfortunately, such beliefs are all to often supported by the ‘power assertion’ approach to child management, which is focused on punishment, rather than resolution of the problem.
The use of the formal dialogue of ICPS specifically redirects the disruptive person to focus on the facts of the situation, including his/her own thoughts in regard to the means-ends and consequences of their actions. The language and concepts need to be consistent, although the process of dialogue will follow a natural course.
Shure suggests that there is a dialogue ladder with rungs indicating the approach to the child/adolescent in relationship to problems. At the bottom of that ladder is a command and control process which demands, belittles and punishes. This is easily identified by such power assertions statements such as ‘Go to your room!”, “That’s stupid!’, for ‘Get out of the way!’; which may be followed by yanking the child and/or slapping.
One of the Mentor’s responsibilities is to collect data on in vivo events, and you should identify when and how often and by whom, the child is confronted with such power assertions and other lower rung approaches, and report this information to the Clinical Supervisor. In this way, the Clinical Supervisor may be able to teach the adult responsible a better method of child management.
Rung 2 is identified by Shure as Suggestion Without Explanation – such as ‘Please move over to one side of the TV.’ While this is less confrontational, the locus of control is still with the adult and for children with whom control is an issue, this may still lead to confrontation and ultimately Command and Control responses.
Rung 3 is only slightly better in that it provides Suggestion with Explanation, Including Feelings. “If you stand in front of the TV, we can not see.’ or ‘I feel angry when you block our view.’ While this may be helpful to many children, it is unlikely to appease the need for control of the disruptive child.
Rung 4 is the Formal ICPS Dialogue which focuses the whole decision process on the child and provides a clear process of consideration of word concepts, feelings, solutions and consequences and allows the child/adolescent to make the choice. This process does not preclude the implementation of strong consequences for continued poor choices, but it helps to make explicit to the child and adolescent what those choices are and that they are responsible for their choices [giving the child a sense of power].
The responsibility of the Mentor is to always stay on the Formal ICPS Dialogue rung of the ladder regardless of what other authoritative people may be doing. The process is one of training the child/adolescent how to think, not what to think.
Give the child/adolescent a means-ends story depicting hypothetical problems between an adult and a child/adolescent, or between two children/adolescents. Then ask the child/adolescent to make up a story connecting the beginning and the end. Score the number of means provided to reach the stated goal; and the number of obstacles conceptualized which might impede reaching the goal. Many children with problems in living will have a higher degree of capacity to identify the problems than the solutions.
Increasing the number of alternative means or solutions requires two components:
To be creative requires, that the habitual be made conscious. We must focus our attention. Wonder & Donovan [1984] propose that we construct a mental, slow motion movie of a situation looking for aspects that we have previously overlooked.
We tend to formulate our point of view to protect our preconceived attitudes. It makes us distort, rationalize or forget things. In order to be creative, we must abandon or at least constrain our attitudes. One way to do this is to deliberately look at the issue from different perspectives.
Certain basics can be extrapolated.
All of these changes of perspectives are important, but perspective is not limited to these constructs. We can change our perspective by becoming someone or something else. One effective method is to prohibit your present thinking. If they passed a law prohibiting what you think should be done; what would you do?
As a quick review the table below captures the three basic principles of creative thinking techniques:
Attention: to what?
Escape from what?
Movement in what sense?
With these factors in mind, many of the creative thinking gurus can offer specific techniques for consideration. However, if we look closely at the Formal ICPS Dialogue, we see the principles of creative thinking captured within the process. We gain attention through shaping the criteria to is/is not, before/after, etc. Moving to the mental processes that make up problem solving, we escape through probing for sameness & differences from our past experiences and hierarchy of ideas, while moving into a differing point of view through the exploratory concepts of and/or. Thus, the Formal ICPS Dialogue is a process of stimulating creative thinking.
You may not need more than the Formal ICPS Dialogue, but if you believe that you or the child need additional creative thinking support.. For older children lateral thinking or thinking hats may have some appeal.
The people in society who repeatedly respond to their problems with others in insensitive, cruel or destructive ways haven’t grown up in the habit of thinking about the consequences of their solutions before they act. It is difficult for some children to think about what they could do and what might happen if they carry out an action.
The goal of consequential thinking is to help the child think about what might happen next if a particular solution is carried out. Therefore, consequences make sense only when children know that events follow one another in a certain order.
Sequential thinking can be reviewed by looking back at the word games for before and after. You can practice this concept with the child while you are doing any two step process. ‘I put the toothpaste on my brush before I brush my teeth.’
Story building is another sequential game. Make up a story about anything at all and then let the child finish it. Or stop and allow the child to add an event. ‘Mother mixed all the ingredients for a cake and then she…..’ After the child interjects a step, you can continue the story to the next stop. Or you can gather a group of children and have them take turns interjecting or finishing.
You can also review the idea of sequence with a game called ‘What might happen IF…’ This can be shaped for older adolescents by the way you develop the circumstances. You give the child the circumstances and let them fill in the consequences. You can try the following for starters:
‘What might happen IF…..
The advantage of this game is that it provides not only the opportunity to practice the concept of consequences, but offers some inferences about the child’s values and belief systems.
As with alternative thinking, the word might is emphasized because no one can predict what will happen next – consequences when other people are involved are never a certainty.
For younger child you can consider consequences by following this procedure:
If the child offers a chain reaction consequence, point it out to the child and then get back on the right track. If the consequence is unclear or seemingly irrelevant, probe the child to find out what s/he had in mind. It is especially important to question the child as to who is doing the action. An answer of ‘nothing’ or ‘I don’t know’ may be a genuine response that shows that the child is stuck and can’t think of anything, but may also mean that they don’t care or don’t want to think about it.
It is important to figure out if it is an ‘I’m stuck’ or ‘I don’t care’ response. If a child’s answer is ‘nothing’, you can respond by saying Maybe nothing will happen, but let’s just make up something that might happen. Encourage the child to ‘pretend’ a consequence. If a child’s answer is ‘I don’t know’, you can agree with them that no one can be sure what will happen, but then encourage them to pretend and make up something that might happen.
If a child gets stuck on variations of the same theme, you can point out that those things are ‘kind of alike because they all __________________[tell someone].
When you give children the freedom to think of ways to solve their own problems they will occasionally come up with solutions you may not like. Research shows that when they learn to think the ICPS way they are, in time, less likely to act on the kinds of solutions that really don’t solve problems.
If the child offers solutions that seem inappropriate or undesirable, you can help them reevaluate their ideas by asking such questions as:
‘How would (the other person) feel if you did that?
‘What else might happen if you do that?’
‘What is something different you can do so that won’t happen’
In continuing to seek alternatives, there is the implication that the solution is not the ideal one, without the criticism. Children, even very young children or children with severe problems in living, know good solutions when they consider them. The problem is to get them to consider them. For older, confrontational children, the problem is one of power. They need to have the power to decide – sometimes even to do what they know is not an adequate solution to reach their goals, but to do it without your authority.
What is needed is a different experience; a new and fortifying relationship. One which will engage the individual’s positive will and affirm his/her right to be different from others. Having had this difference accepted by others, the individual can now accept him/herself. Self acceptance becomes possible through the love experience [Rank] of being accepted by another person. The valid love relationship requires acceptance of the self-willing in another, bestowing worthiness in preparation for choosing meaning. Thus worthiness is not in ourselves and our behavior, but in the acceptance of that behavior by someone significant to us.
This does not imply, that there are not necessary consequences to such self-willed behavior. But those consequences are not personal, they are formal. And the more the consequences are oriented towards training the child to make better choices rather than punishing the child for transgression; the more they transfer discipline to the child as self-discipline. In order to gain the trust and assistance of the child, you will need to understand that better is defined by the child. The art of the approach is to help the child reach his/her goals regarding problem solutions, not reach goals that you or other authorities sanction. This may require work on the development of other goals than simply avoiding what adult authorities believe is in his/her best interest [See Technique #27 – Motivation &Goal Setting].
Depending on the age of the child, you can use the Problem Solving Tree [CBT#20-001] to have the child work out the problem solving situation on paper and determine how well such solutions meet his/her goals. And in the process, determine the need for training the child in goal setting.
Have the child list in the left hand column an event that seems to have been a problem in the past. Discuss with the child the type of event and ask the child to state what they would identify as the best possible outcome of the event. Have the child write this as a goal statement.
In the next column, have the child list as many solutions as s/he can think of [leave space between the solutions]. After all the solutions have been listed, ask the child to list what might happen if s/he were to implement the solution. Probe until the child has listed all of the possible consequences s/he can think of for each possible solution. Have the child draw arrows from the appropriate solution to the consequences that are connected.
After the consequences are listed, have the child prioritize the consequence with #1 being the consequence that is closest to the goal statement.
The child can develop a different problem solving tree for each problem situation identified.
As the process of the formal dialogue become habitual, the child will be able to use these skills without formal prodding or with minor ‘cues’. The skill is one that, once mastered, tends to improve over time. While we could hope that all four year olds are taught the skill, it is never too late.
INTERNSHIP - MECHANICAL ENGINEER SUMMER 2025
INEOS Enterprises is a global market leader in the production of intermediary chemicals that are used as an essential input into chemical value chains across a broad variety of end markets and sectors. INEOS Joliet is part of the INEOS Enterprises portfolio. INEOS Joliet is a leading producer of chemical intermediates. At our site in Channahon, Illinois (about 40 miles southwest of Chicago) we produce three products: Purified Isophthalic Acid (PIA) and Maleic Anhydride (MAN).
This internship is a paid opportunity. Housing assistance is not provided .
Roles & Responsibilities
The successful candidate could work as a key member of the Maintenance, Technology, or Reliability Teams providing day-to-day technical service, completing small design projects for repair and/or replacement of mechanical equipment, and serving on teams to address mechanical equipment reliability, safety, and design initiatives.
Required Competencies:
Strong basic engineering skills with knowledge of process equipment including pumps, compressors, piping systems, pressure vessels, fired equipment, exchangers, and relief valves.
Ability to be innovative and to apply technical skills to improve safety and quality, reduce costs, and increase production.
We use cookies to make sure you get the most from our website. Need to know more?
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Generally speaking, problem-solving and communication are key components of customer service abilities. A common belief is that customer service is a "soft skill." 5. Interpersonal skills. The personality qualities you rely on while interacting and communicating with others are known as interpersonal skills.
Decision making and problem solving are entwined, as are collaboration and teamwork. Employers value strong interpersonal skills because they help teams function more effectively," said Jill Bowman, director of people at New York-based fintech company Octane. Interpersonal skills such as active listening, collaboration, empathy, team building ...
Problem-Solving Skills Definition. Problem-solving skills are the ability to identify problems, brainstorm and analyze answers, and implement the best solutions. An employee with good problem-solving skills is both a self-starter and a collaborative teammate; they are proactive in understanding the root of a problem and work with others to ...
Problem-solving skills defined. Problem-solving skills are skills that allow individuals to efficiently and effectively find solutions to issues. This attribute is a primary skill that employers look for in job candidates and is essential in a variety of careers. This skill is considered to be a soft skill, or an individual strength, as opposed ...
The relationship between decision-making and problem-solving is complex. Decision-making is perhaps best thought of as a key part of problem-solving: one part of the overall process. Our approach at Skills You Need is to set out a framework to help guide you through the decision-making process. You won't always need to use the whole framework ...
Volunteer work and extracurriculars can also reveal soft skills. Helping plan a community event, volunteering at a library and running a fundraiser for a senior care facility are all scenarios that require emotional intelligence, problem solving and other interpersonal skills. Add Interpersonal Skills in a Skills Section
8. Stay positive. A positive outlook can help boost your interpersonal skills by setting a pleasant tone for your interactions. Staying positive can also be a good way to support a growth mindset when you are working on improving your interpersonal skills. Related: Using a Growth Mindset To Develop Your Skills.
If you are wondering what are the 7 Key Steps of Effective Interpersonal Problem-Solving, then please find the list below: Don't be afraid to admit the problem exists. Remain positive. Find the ROOT of the problem. Choose the RIGHT MOMENT. Make Good-Points.
Interpersonal skills are those we use every day to communicate and interact with others, including listening, speaking and questioning skills. ... Problem solving and decision-making - working with others to identify, define and solve problems, which includes making decisions about the best course of action.
What are interpersonal skills? Interpersonal skills help professionals effectively communicate with others and actively listen. This often includes possessing empathy, listening skills, presentation skills, assertiveness and conflict management.Interpersonal skills can be essential for success in a work setting since they foster other beneficial traits, including leadership and communication ...
Interpersonal relationships fail and businesses fail because of poor problem solving. This is often due to either problems not being recognised or being recognised but not being dealt with appropriately. Problem solving skills are highly sought after by employers as many companies rely on their employees to identify and solve problems.
Although problem-solving is often identified as its own separate skill, there are other related skills that contribute to this ability. Some key problem-solving skills include: Active listening. Analysis. Research. Creativity. Communication. Decision-making. Team-building.
Here are some examples of leadership skills: Problem-solving. Coaching and mentoring. Management. Strategic thinking. 3. Teamwork. Teamwork involves the ability to work with others toward a shared ...
Customer service and interpersonal skills If you work in a customer service role, a large aspect of your job is to make sure the customer has an enjoyable experience. It can be common to come across customers who aren't happy, using problem-solving and interpersonal skills to deflate the situation and leave them with a good outcome.
interpersonal problems by giving guidelines, a lot of practice using what you've learned, and some assignments of work to do outside of the group. You will watch and practice problem solving on number of problem scenes on videotape. After you have solved these videotape problems, you will practice solving some of your own problems using the skills
Interpersonal Problem Solving Skills (AIPSS). The AIPSS is designed to determine cognitive and behavioral performance deficits that persons have in social problem solving. AIPSS is used to determine whether persons have specific difficulty in recognizing problems, in determining the nature of the problem, deciding on a solution, and performing the
Interpersonal communication involves the face-to-face exchange of thoughts, ideas, feelings and emotions between two or more people. This includes both verbal and nonverbal elements of personal interaction. Employers seek candidates with interpersonal skills as they contribute to the efficiency of teamwork and business communications.
4. Share an experience where active listening improved a work situation. Understanding the emotions and intentions behind the words is part of active listening. In the workplace, this skill is essential for resolving conflicts, building teamwork, and ensuring that tasks are understood and executed effectively.
As with any human skill, interpersonal and communication skills, also referred to as "soft skills" can be improved through conscious effort ( Moss, 2020). McConnell (2004, pg. 178) describes soft skills as " those essential skills involved in dealing with and relating to other people, largely on a one-to-one basis ".
Younger children up to about age eight, can benefit from ICPS by learning interpersonal problem solving skills that can reduce and prevent high risk behaviors in only three months time with three one half hour sessions per week or about thirteen and one half hours. Older children can also benefit, though it may take two three month programs or ...
Excellent interpersonal skills Team player Excellent communicator at all levels Good listening and influencing skills Focus on good customer service Ability to manage change and multiple priorities Ability to deliver results Strong problem solving and decision-making skills Education: Actively enrolled in a Bachelor's Degree program in ...