non vegetarian essay

ADVERTISEMENTS:

396 words short essay on Vegetarianism and Non-Vegetarianism

Free sample essay on Vegetarianism and Non-Vegetarianism. There are two schools of thought regarding our eating habits. Some say that vegetarianism is good for the health of the human beings and some others say that non-vegetarianism is good for the health of the human beings. Those who eat rice, wheat and vegetables are not physically as strong and mentally as alert as those who are non-vegetarian, it is said.

Non-vegetarian food is protein-rich food. Animal protein contributes to our health, it is said. This is true. Vegetables and rice or wheat are not rich resources of protein. Protein is very essential for our healthy growth and resistance power. The practice of non-vegetarianism is based mainly on the fact that vegetarian food is poor in protein.

All over the world most of the people are non-vegetarian. The Chinese, the Thais, the Americans, the British, the people of the Arab countries are non-vegetarian. They eat, beef, pork, chicken, fish and even fried, large worms. Some even drink snake- soup. Some in the west do not know what vegetarianism is. They scoff at those who take only rice or wheat and vegetables. They ask the vegetarians how they live having eaten only rice, wheat and vegetables.

Image Source : sachkiavaaz.com

But those who advocate vegetarianism say that the vegetables, rice and wheat have all kinds of nutrient properties and they are sufficient for a human being to live in good health. Green leafy vegetables are said to contain many nutrients. Soya beans are a rich source of protein. The advocates of vegetarianism say that a human being’s teeth are not meant to eat the flesh of animals. Research reveals that the human beings’ teeth are meant only to eat vegetarian r ood. It is a sin to kill birds and animals for our food. The Jains are vegetarians. They believe in not causing harm to any living creature.

The main contention against non-vegetarianism is that a non-vegetarian eats fatty food. As the fatty substance increases in the blood it may cause heart attack and other deadly diseases. Food of excessive fat should be avoided, the vegetarians advocate.

Great saints and poets like Thiruvalluvar and Rambling Daigle advocate vegetarianism.

Many have switched over from non-vegetarianism to vegetarianism. They have realized that vegetarianism is better than non-vegetarianism. It is good not to be non-vegetarian, not to get addicted to liquor and drugs.

Restraint in eating and drinking is most essential for old health.

Related Essays:

531 Words Essay on Horrors of War
237 Words Essay on Archery Rules
483 Words Essay on Gandhi a Great Leader
1600 Words Essay on qualities of a good leader

Privacy Overview

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

IELTS Scores
Life Skills Test
Find a Test Centre
Alternatives to IELTS
General Training
Academic Word List
Topic Vocabulary
Collocation
Phrasal Verbs
Writing eBooks
Reading eBook
All eBooks & Courses
Sample Essays

Vegetarianism Essay

This is a model vegetarianism essay .

As I always stress, you should read the question very carefully before you answer it to make sure you are writing about the right thing.

Take a look at the question:

Every one of us should become a vegetarian because eating meat can cause serious health problems.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Staying on topic

If you rush to start writing and don't analyse the question and brainstorm some ideas you may include the wrong information.

There are religious or moral arguments for not eating meat, but if you discuss those you will be going off topic .

This question is specifically about the health problems connected to eating meat.

So you must discuss in your answer what some of these problems are and if you think there are real health risks or not.

Knowing about the topic

And don't get worried that you do not know much about diet and health.

As part of your IELTS study it will help if you know the basics of most topics such as some health vocabulary in this case, but you are not expected to be an expert on nutrition.

Remember, you are being judged on your English ability and your ability to construct an argument in a coherent way, not to be an expert in the subject matter. So relax and work with

Organisation

In this vegetarianism essay, the candidate disagrees with the statement, and is thus arguing that everyone does not need to be a vegetarian.

The essay has been organised in the following way:

Body 1: Health issues connected with eating meat (i.e. arguments in support of being a vegetarian Body 2: Advantages of eating meat

Now take a look at the model answer.

Model Essay

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Write at least 250 words.

IELTS Vegetarianism Essay - Sample Answer

Vegetarianism is becoming more and more popular for many people, particularly because of the harm that some people believe meat can cause to the body. However, I strongly believe that it is not necessary for everybody to be a vegetarian.

Vegetarians believe that meat is unhealthy because of the diseases it has been connected with. There has been much research to suggest that red meat is particularly bad, for example, and that consumption should be limited to eating it just a few times a week to avoid such things as cancer. Meats can also be high in saturated fats so they have been linked to health problems such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes.

However, there are strong arguments for eating meat. The first reason is that as humans we are designed to eat meat, which suggests it is not unhealthy, and we have been eating meat for thousands of years. For example, cavemen made hunting implements so that they could kill animals and eat their meat. Secondly, meat is a rich source of protein which helps to build muscles and bones. Vegetarians often have to take supplements to get all the essential vitamins and minerals. Finally, it may be the case that too much meat is harmful, but we can easily limit the amount we have without having to cut it out of our diet completely.

To sum up, I do not agree that everyone should turn to a vegetarian diet. Although the overconsumption of meat could possibly be unhealthy, a balanced diet of meat and vegetables should result in a healthy body.

(264 words)

You should begin by intoducing the topi c. The introduction in this vegetarianism essay begins by mentioning vegetarians and the possible harm of eating meat .

It then goes on to the thesis statement , which makes it clear what the candidate's opinion is.

The first body paragraph has a topic sentence which makes it clear that the paragraph is going to address the possible health issues of eating meat.

Some reasons and examples are then given to support this.

The second body paragraph then has a topic sentence which makes it clear that the main idea is now about the arguments for eating meat .

The conclusion in this vegetarianism essay then repeats the opinion and gives the candidates final thoughts.

<<< Back

Next >>>

More Agree / Disagree Essays:

Extinction of Animals Essay: Should we prevent this from happening?

In this extinction of animals essay for IELTS you have to decide whether you think humans should do what they can to prevent the extinction of animal species.

Employing Older People Essay: Is the modern workplace suitable?

Employing Older People Essay. Examine model essays for IELTS Task 2 to improve your score. This essay tackles the issue of whether it it better for employers to hire younger staff rather than those who are older.

Essay for IELTS: Are some advertising methods unethical?

This is an agree / disagree type question. Your options are: 1. Agree 100% 2. Disagree 100% 3. Partly agree. In the answer below, the writer agrees 100% with the opinion. There is an analysis of the answer.

Truthfulness in Relationships Essay: How important is it?

This truthfulness in relationships essay for IELTS is an agree / disagree type essay. You need to decide if it's the most important factor.

Return of Historical Objects and Artefacts Essay

This essay discusses the topic of returning historical objects and artefacts to their country of origin. It's an agree/disagree type IELTS question.

Examinations Essay: Formal Examinations or Continual Assessment?

Examinations Essay: This IELTS model essay deals with the issue of whether it is better to have formal examinations to assess student’s performance or continual assessment during term time such as course work and projects.

Free University Education Essay: Should it be paid for or free?

Free university education Model IELTS essay. Learn how to write high-scoring IELTS essays. The issue of free university education is an essay topic that comes up in the IELTS test. This essay therefore provides you with some of the key arguments about this topic.

Dying Languages Essay: Is a world with fewer languages a good thing?

Dying languages essays have appeared in IELTS on several occasions, an issue related to the spread of globalisation. Check out a sample question and model answer.

Internet vs Newspaper Essay: Which will be the best source of news?

A recent topic to write about in the IELTS exam was an Internet vs Newspaper Essay. The question was: Although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Scientific Research Essay: Who should be responsible for its funding?

Scientific research essay model answer for Task 2 of the test. For this essay, you need to discuss whether the funding and controlling of scientific research should be the responsibility of the government or private organizations.

Human Cloning Essay: Should we be scared of cloning humans?

Human cloning essay - this is on the topic of cloning humans to use their body parts. You are asked if you agree with human cloning to use their body parts, and what reservations (concerns) you have.

Multinational Organisations and Culture Essay

Multinational Organisations and Culture Essay: Improve you score for IELTS Essay writing by studying model essays. This Essay is about the extent to which working for a multinational organisation help you to understand other cultures.

Sample IELTS Writing: Is spending on the Arts a waste of money?

Sample IELTS Writing: A common topic in IELTS is whether you think it is a good idea for government money to be spent on the arts. i.e. the visual arts, literary and the performing arts, or whether it should be spent elsewhere, usually on other public services.

Paying Taxes Essay: Should people keep all the money they earn?

Paying Taxes Essay: Read model essays to help you improve your IELTS Writing Score for Task 2. In this essay you have to decide whether you agree or disagree with the opinion that everyone should be able to keep their money rather than paying money to the government.

Role of Schools Essay: How should schools help children develop?

This role of schools essay for IELTS is an agree disagree type essay where you have to discuss how schools should help children to develop.

Technology Development Essay: Are earlier developments the best?

This technology development essay shows you a complex IELTS essay question that is easily misunderstood. There are tips on how to approach IELTS essay questions

IELTS Internet Essay: Is the internet damaging social interaction?

Internet Essay for IELTS on the topic of the Internet and social interaction. Included is a model answer. The IELTS test usually focuses on topical issues. You have to discuss if you think that the Internet is damaging social interaction.

Airline Tax Essay: Would taxing air travel reduce pollution?

Airline Tax Essay for IELTS. Practice an agree and disagree essay on the topic of taxing airlines to reduce low-cost air traffic. You are asked to decide if you agree or disagree with taxing airlines in order to reduce the problems caused.

IELTS Sample Essay: Is alternative medicine ineffective & dangerous?

IELTS sample essay about alternative and conventional medicine - this shows you how to present a well-balanced argument. When you are asked whether you agree (or disagree), you can look at both sides of the argument if you want.

Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay: Should the government ban it?

Ban smoking in public places essay: The sample answer shows you how you can present the opposing argument first, that is not your opinion, and then present your opinion in the following paragraph.

Any comments or questions about this page or about IELTS? Post them here. Your email will not be published or shared.

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

Click on the HTML link code below.
Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.

Band 7+ eBooks

"I think these eBooks are FANTASTIC!!! I know that's not academic language, but it's the truth!"

Linda, from Italy, Scored Band 7.5

All 4 Writing eBooks for just $25.86 30% Discount Find out more >>

IELTS Modules:

Other resources:.

All Lessons
Band Score Calculator
Writing Feedback
Speaking Feedback
Teacher Resources
Free Downloads
Recent Essay Exam Questions
Books for IELTS Prep
Useful Links

Recent Articles

5 Key Grammar Rules for IELTS

Jun 14, 24 10:05 AM

Referencing in IELTS Reading: Comprehending the Text

Jun 08, 24 05:30 AM

IELTS Bundle Writing eBooks: 30% Off

Jun 01, 24 09:55 AM

Important pages

IELTS Writing IELTS Speaking IELTS Listening IELTS Reading All Lessons Vocabulary Academic Task 1 Academic Task 2 Practice Tests

Connect with us

Before you go...

Check out the ielts buddy band 7+ ebooks & courses.

IELTS is a registered trademark of University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia.

24/7 writing help on your phone

To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”

Vegetarians and Non-vegetarians

Save to my list

Remove from my list

Vegetarians and Non-vegetarians. (2016, Apr 15). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/vegetarians-and-non-vegetarians-essay

"Vegetarians and Non-vegetarians." StudyMoose , 15 Apr 2016, https://studymoose.com/vegetarians-and-non-vegetarians-essay

StudyMoose. (2016). Vegetarians and Non-vegetarians . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/vegetarians-and-non-vegetarians-essay [Accessed: 15 Jun. 2024]

"Vegetarians and Non-vegetarians." StudyMoose, Apr 15, 2016. Accessed June 15, 2024. https://studymoose.com/vegetarians-and-non-vegetarians-essay

"Vegetarians and Non-vegetarians," StudyMoose , 15-Apr-2016. [Online]. Available: https://studymoose.com/vegetarians-and-non-vegetarians-essay. [Accessed: 15-Jun-2024]

StudyMoose. (2016). Vegetarians and Non-vegetarians . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/vegetarians-and-non-vegetarians-essay [Accessed: 15-Jun-2024]

Advantages and Disadvantages of Vegetarians Pages: 1 (275 words)
Eggless cake recipes for vegetarians Pages: 2 (381 words)
Non-Action and Non-Violence in Sikhism and Jainism Pages: 5 (1365 words)
The Interplay of Sex and Violence: Literary and Non-Literary Perspectives Pages: 5 (1270 words)
The Differences Between an Absolute and a Non-Absolute Ruler and Whether a State Can Function Under Both Types of Rule Pages: 2 (575 words)
Cellular Respiration, Yeast Fermentation and Germinating and Non-Germinating Seeds Pages: 3 (766 words)
Benefits and Threats of GMO and Non-GMO Production Pages: 5 (1203 words)
Work and non-work relation Pages: 13 (3892 words)
Living and non living things Pages: 7 (1816 words)
Effect of Corporal and Non-Corporal Punishment Pages: 6 (1610 words)

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

Non-Vegetarian Diet and Its Health Effects

Prewriting for the theses, one specific experience that helped to produce my opinion.

In the count down to the Copenhagen conference on Climate Change, there was heated debate around the globe on the need to stem global warming and what the best approach to the issue is. Personally, I always blamed those with big gas guzzlers, factories, and general deforestation around the globe for climatic change. I was reclining on a couch listening to a BBC Radio program known as “world have your say.”

I was attracted to the program because they were discussing global warming as a phenomenon. The question was, ‘is this phenomenon a hoax or a reality we need to address now.’ One caller into the program caught my attention; he suggested that to stem global warming, we should start by killing all cattle on the globe. This was not exciting because I really enjoy my meaty meals. However, his explanation got me thinking, and I am now convinced that we have to stop eating meat if we are to survive as inhabitants of the earth.

Reasons for or specific examples in support of my belief about the issue.

The food an individual consumes determines his or her level of health. A diet of meat has more fat than a vegetarian diet. Overconsumption of fat is the reason why many Americans are struggling with overweight or obesity issues
Livestock management is resource-intensive and contributes heavily to global warming. Becoming vegetation would help save the scarce resources on earth and avert climatic change.
Vegetarian practices would contribute heavily to greener environments. Livestock consumes a lot of vegetation and also lead to deforestation for the purposes of creating pasture land. Becoming vegetarian would mean less consumption of vegetation and ultimately making the world greener.
Health is more than just physical wellness. The choice to be vegetarian is necessitated by the need to leave this world better for the next generations. Knowing we have done all in our capacity towards this end is gratifying psychologically than otherwise.

At least two opposing viewpoints on the issue (which person or groups might Disagree with my position)

Some people are generally opposed to diet restriction, arguing that such restrictions renege on human freedom.
Some other people may think that personal habits have minimal contribution to global warming.
Due to technological advances, if cow farms are releasing many emissions, we can rely on meat generated in labs rather than becoming vegetarians.

One reason to support each opposing viewpoint from C.

Personal freedom is an important aspect of human living. We believe in people being free and making their own choices. Therefore, even in matters of diet, people should be left free.
Eating the right quantity and quality of meat in itself is not harmless. The focus should be on what really is causing mishaps or problems.
If it is possible to produce meat using other means, then there is no need for individuals to become vegetarian.

I want my peers to do in response to my argument

I hope to help my peers understand the relation between meat-eating and global warming
I hope to persuade them towards a change of eating habits that are irresponsible or contribute to putting human survival in jeopardy.

Becoming vegetarian is the most powerful contribution any of us can make towards mitigating climate change.

Plan of Argument

Diet is an expression of human freedom and responsibility

There is a direct link between meat-eating and global warming

In consideration of health, we have to look beyond physical wellness to psychological and moral wellness.
There are people who argue that diet restrictions or specifications are a ploy to renege on personal freedom.
As discussed by Nestle Marion (2007, 82), In the case of obesity, many have been blaming the big food companies and fast foods for their problems. It is true that the proximity of food and food content plays a big role in accentuating obesity. The sugar content in the foods sold and the way of preparation have often been cited as great contributors to overweight problems. Food companies package food in an enticing way. Fast food cafes are all over, which means that one can access a bite whenever one feels like munching something. The center for consumer freedom looks at it very differently (Nestle, 2007, 58). Ultimately, it is the individual who picks whatsoever food and eats. The food companies do not force anyone to eat certain foods; they are just in business. Although the foregoing points are debatable, in essence, the capacity to choose what to eat from what not to eat is a true manifestation of personal freedom. We exercise true freedom when we have options. The capacity to choose one alluring option from another of closer magnitude due to well-stipulated reasons is what personal freedom is about.
This is why, as Williams and Schlenker (2003) Indicates, food-related problems are referred to as eating disorders. Those who have an eating disorder or eat unhealthily are not exercising their personal freedom; they are sick. To find health, people often have to be helped to appreciate personal freedom towards being more careful in choosing what they eat. Healthy people choose food, not merely basing on taste but value. Therefore, the choice against meat or consideration to become vegetarian so as to safeguard generation to come from rough weather is only possible with a certain level of personal maturity.
As stated by the International Vegetarian Union (2009), the food and agriculture organization of the United Nations has established that “livestock contribute more to global warming than transport, producing 18% of all global greenhouse gas emissions.” The world food organization is concerned with food security in the world. Its interest is not to posit any sloppy theories for partisan interest but rather to guide the world towards food security. When it proclaims that meat processing and livestock rearing is a number one contributor to global warming, there must be a level of acceptable evidence supporting the claim.
ABC news (2006) quotes scientists who carried a research and concluded that what people ate contributed to global warming more than the gas guzzlers that people drive around.

Houghton (1997, 141-146) discusses in depth why we need be concerned about global warming. The idea is that although we of this generation will not suffer the bigger effects of global warming, we have to consider the generations to come. He calls us to a moral consideration of being fair to the generations to come.

Lodge (2000) discussing the moral theory of Plato shows clearly the interconnection between the physical, moral and emotional self in guaranteeing an individual a healthy existence. It follows that health goes beyond physical well being to encompass moral and emotional self. Unless we are attentive to moral considerations, there is no way we are to be a healthy society.

Global warming is a reality that needs urgent responses. Politicians, scientists and activists are doing their bit. However, much ground can be covered if individuals took personal initiative and responsibility towards alleviating the aggravating effects of climatic change. Becoming vegetarian or lowering meat consumption seems to be a simple choice all human being can take which will radically contribute towards lowering carbon emissions.

Final Draft of the Essay

I recently listened to a radio program that awakened me to the reality that the diets we take as individuals have an impact on the earth as a whole. Diet is often understood in the light of being mean towards oneself and not enjoying what would otherwise be yummy dishes. This conception is erroneous and leads to formation of attitudes towards foods. Often things are as we think them to be. For example, the same event is experienced differently by different people.

This results from people thinking differently about the same happening. Change anything, our way of thinking about it has to change or we have to think further. Yummy-ness as an attribute of food is more of a conception in the mind than a reality. Proper choice of diet is a manifestation of personal freedom rather than a manifestation of limitations to personal freedom. As we all know, freedom always comes with responsibility.

In 2006, Food and Agricultural organization released a report linking meat consumption and global warming or climatic change. In the report, it was argued clearly that the process of producing food for livestock is very labor and resource intensive. Some of the required resources or materials come in the form of herbicides and fertilizers. According to the report, as discussed by the international vegetation union (2009), it takes more that 10 billion Kg of fertilizer to produce animal feed on the US farms. The amount of food a cow consumes on a daily basis is too much compared to what a single human being consumes.

Much of the food sold around the world is processed food. The procedure of processing food sold around the world takes more energy than the energy in the food itself. Somehow, the world can not avoid relying on processed food. However, relying on crops as a source of food is cheaper than relying on meat. Research, as presented by ABC News in 2006, indicates that Animal proteins require more energy to process than plant proteins; animal protein production takes ten times more energy to produce.

One would argue that the whole population becoming vegetarian would mean the extinction of livestock; such an argument has some weight. However, it is my take that human beings will continue to rear livestock, not for consumption but maybe as pets.

A shift in the reason why livestock is reared would definitely reduce the number of animals each individual may want to rear. People will devote more energy to the production of plants that are nutritious and highly recommended. Loosing livestock would be a better option than hanging on them, aggravating climate change, polar bears becoming extinct and in the end, the survival of human beings and livestock being challenged.

Already crop failures all around the world are on the rise. Crop failure means even the livestock has no food. Generally, the whole food web is disturbed or broken by crop failure. How is this related to need to become vegetarian? Of course, one would argue that as some scientists have suggested, meat can be generated in the Laboratories. How safe is meat generated in laboratories? I am convinced that strange diseases especially cancers are on the increase as a result of human experiments.

The meat generation in laboratories would need or require use of energy. As already discussed, food processing uses more energy than energy in the food itself. The generation of meat in the laboratory would definitely require use of more energy than what is applied in the processing. Therefore, generation of good through lab cultures threatens human survival even more than the global warming we are alarmed about.

The more livestock reared on earth, the more methane and carbon emissions. The cow farms in the US contribute substantially to the emission of carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere. The cow farms thrive on the money of those of us who consume meat. In some parts of the world, deforestation is done in the name of affording livestock pasture land. Trees are crucial in sustaining life because they purify the air by absorbing carbon while releasing oxygen into the air.

If the whole population chose not to eat meat, the cow farms would be deprived of cash that is enabling them to thrive. Some people may contend that the contribution of personal habits towards global warming is minimal. However, it is the cumulative contributions of individuals that are aggravating the situation. The need to consider personal habits in relation to global warming can not be wished away; all measures towards averting this danger are better engaged now or never. Tsunamis or hurricanes have increased considerably and the danger of another one occurring looms every day. The countries at sea level are likely to be submerged sooner than imagined if water in the ocean continues to rise.

In conclusion, when considering the health issue, our focus can not be limited to physical wellness of individuals. One would argue that by eating the right quantity and quality of meat, one runs no health risk. Eating the right quantity would mean eating less meat or more vegetarian diets, which is what I am advocating for. Meat has more fat than plants and fat is the cause of all obesity related complications. However, moral health requires that we consider the ultimate consequences of our actions. For the human race becoming vegetarian is not a question of mere good health and ill health, it is actually a choice between life and death.

The process of acquiring meat which consists in having cow farms, then meat processing plants, then meat handling or selling plants does more harm to life on earth than sustaining life. Rearing cattle requires large tracts of land on which the cattle graze or from which their plant is grown. Often such land is acquired through deforestation activities. The livestock farms themselves are a great source of harmful emissions due to animal waste management processes. In solidarity with generations to come, becoming vegetarian and encouraging others towards the same is the only choice we have as individuals.

Reference List

ABC News. (2006). Meat-Eaters Aiding Global Warming? New Research Suggests What You Eat As Important As What You Drive . Web.

Houghton J. T. (1997). Global Warming: The Complete Briefing . 2 nd Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

International Vegetarian Union. (2009). Meat Eating and Global Warming . Web.

Lodge, R.C. (2000). Plato’s Theory of Ethics: The Moral Criterion and the Highest Good . New York: Routledge.

Nestle M. (2007). Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health 2 nd Ed. California: University of California Press.

Williams, S. R., Schlenker D. E. (2003). Essentials of Nutrition and Diet Therapy . 8th Ed. Oklahoma: Elsevier Health Sciences.

Cite this paper

Chicago (N-B)
Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2021, January 2). Non-Vegetarian Diet and Its Health Effects. https://studycorgi.com/non-vegetarian-diet-and-its-health-effects/

"Non-Vegetarian Diet and Its Health Effects." StudyCorgi , 2 Jan. 2021, studycorgi.com/non-vegetarian-diet-and-its-health-effects/.

StudyCorgi . (2021) 'Non-Vegetarian Diet and Its Health Effects'. 2 January.

1. StudyCorgi . "Non-Vegetarian Diet and Its Health Effects." January 2, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/non-vegetarian-diet-and-its-health-effects/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "Non-Vegetarian Diet and Its Health Effects." January 2, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/non-vegetarian-diet-and-its-health-effects/.

StudyCorgi . 2021. "Non-Vegetarian Diet and Its Health Effects." January 2, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/non-vegetarian-diet-and-its-health-effects/.

This paper, “Non-Vegetarian Diet and Its Health Effects”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: January 2, 2021 .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.

India Votes 2024

Reading list: Science fiction writer Gautam Bhatia recommends 15 books to sample the genre

Has the Election Commission violated the Constitution?

Kumkum Mohanty helped shape Odissi. Now she is wearily watching it change

Why a community-run Gondi-language school in Gadchiroli is a revolutionary step

VV Ganeshanathan’s novel about the Sri Lankan civil war wins the 2024 Women’s Prize for Fiction

‘Gaanth Chapter 1: Jamnaa Paar’ review: A bold and grisly exploration of an unnerving crime

Vadodara: Residents of housing complex protest after Muslim woman allotted flat under CM scheme

How a global organisation of volunteers is kindling love for Urdu

Union minister HD Kumaraswamy questions $2 billion subsidies to US semiconductor firm in Gujarat

ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2024, India vs Canada, as it happened: Match abandoned due to wet outfield

How I became a ‘non-vegetarian’: Lessons from India’s diverse food systems

My personal journey has taught me that meat is an essential component of food systems and that it is no less ecological and humane than plant foods..

During the last rainy season, I ate eseellu, or winged termites, for the first time. For years, I had considered these insects a nuisance as they swarmed around light sources during the rains, before shedding their wings and dying. But my attitude changed after I learnt that these creatures are dried and roasted for consumption, mainly by Dalit communities in the southern Deccan. Roasted with red rice and horse gram, the eseellu tasted delicious.

It was certainly the most unique dish I have sampled since I expanded my diet to include animal foods 10 years ago. In addition to chicken, mutton, beef, pork and fish, I have consumed wild hog and rabbit. Some people find my shift puzzling. Most activists I meet, especially in farming circles, grew up vegetarian or converted to vegetarianism or veganism. But my personal journey has taught me that meat is an essential component of food systems and that it is no less ecological and humane than plant foods. Besides, religious vegetarianism in India is rooted in casteist and discriminatory practices, which treat animal foods (except milk) as impure – even disgusting.

I grew up in a vegetarian, Telugu-speaking family from the Komati, or merchant caste. However, my parents did not exhibit an aversion to meat. Visiting Europe and the United States in the 1970s, they had learnt to discard what they could not avoid, often just consuming the sides and desserts. As many families did in those times, they introduced eggs into our diet.

In school, I observed many kinds of food practices. My Parsi friend brought corned beef sandwiches, while my Jain friend gave up root vegetables (onions, potatoes) during fasting periods. I was told that we were vegetarian because we believed in ahimsa or non-violence. But as I grew up, I recognised the contradictions. For instance, the vegetarian aunties and uncles in my circles often wore garments made of silk – a fabric whose production required cocoons and the larvae inside to be boiled.

When I moved to the US for postgraduate studies in the late 1990s, I began reading about the belief systems of the indigenous Americans. I was struck by the description of hunting as a spiritual activity. The hunter and prey are both part of the divine spirit, they believed. The hunter prays and asks the prey to gift itself to him. The hunter’s community respects the prey’s sacrifice by hunting only as much as necessary, and making full use of the prey.

Similar narratives deifying nature can be found in most indigenous communities and explain why they are better stewards of the environment than most mainstream populations.

Still, I remained a vegetarian, because of the argument by environmentalists such as Rachel Carson that rearing animals for meat requires more resources than producing plant-based foods. At the time, I was in Iowa, in the middle of the never-ending cornfields for which the state is famous. Most of this corn was used to feed pigs, which I found wasteful.

Today, 50%-70% of Iowa’s corn is used to make ethanol – a “green fuel” in the graveyard of a beautiful prairie ecosystem and Native American culture.

After graduating, I moved to Minnesota for work. As I became active in social and political causes, I quit my corporate job. When I spent some time on an organic farm, one of the owners, a retired psychiatrist, explained why meat eating was not as environmentally harmful as I had thought.

She kept her chickens in a large cage that could be moved from place to place, parking it in one spot for a few days at a time to fertilise the soil. She pointed out that farm animals mostly consumed farm waste, unlike animals in factory farms that are fed specially prepared fodder. Seeing how animals were an essential component of the farming system and improved farm efficiency eroded my resistance to animal-based food.

Back in India a few years later, I began working with grassroots organisations in Uttar Pradesh and Karnataka on farming, health and livelihood. I realised that my food practices distanced me from many of my colleagues. At the Bengaluru non-profit where I worked for a few years, I was the “madam” who needed a separate vegetarian meal when chicken was ordered for the team. I was the odd one out. After all, the fifth National Family Health Survey, 2019-’21, showed that more than 90% of Indians eat fish, chicken or meat .

These were the early 2010s, when self-proclaimed gau rakshaks or cow protectors began lynching people, mainly working-class Muslims and Dalits, on the mere suspicion of eating beef or transporting cattle for slaughter.

In rural India, these communities lived in the worst part of the village and owned marginal plots of the least fertile land – if they were lucky enough to own land. In cities, they lived in slums with the meanest of amenities. Untouchability prevailed. My Dalit colleagues are often served tea in disposable cups and dominant caste Hindus refuse to eat food cooked by them.

The practices of small and marginal farmers and pastoralists in India are ecologically sound, even more so than those of my farmer-friend Minnesota. I have watched farmers gather fodder from the riverbank, or in and around fields, and even feed their cows and goats leftover rotis. Backyard poultry rearing is even more resource-friendly – desi or naati chickens roam freely and are fed grains or leftover food.

These communities are affectionate towards their animals, but also recognise them as their “fixed deposits” – resources that can be encashed whenever required. Recognising the need to acknowledge these ecologically superior practices and to protest the violence against these communities, I began eating animal foods.

In the past decades, calls by the elite for vegetarianism have been bolstered by global advocacy to reduce the consumption of animal foods – mostly red meat – to “save the planet”. These calls are unfairly applied to India. They do not acknowledge that Indians, especially the less privileged, have historically contributed little to climate change, and that they consume a fraction of animal foods compared to the West.

At the same time, spiritual movements across India have advocated vegetarianism. In central Uttar Pradesh, many Dalit families that I work with proudly proclaim that they have given up meat and eggs. But these families cannot afford the diverse foods necessary to maintain good nutrition on a vegetarian diet – instead, they eat rotis, rice, potatoes and a smattering of vegetables. National goals to eradicate malnutrition cannot be achieved with such protein-deficient diets.

Agrarian communities across the country are now experiencing droughts, heavy rainfall during harvest season, hailstorms and unseasonal heat that are devastating their crops. Animal rearing is one of the few livelihood options that have kept them afloat economically.

However, small and marginal farmers and pastoralists are struggling due to the loss of grazing lands, rising fodder costs and the vulnerability of “improved” animal breeds to disease. Threats to their livelihoods have made things worse: where animal sacrifices were once an integral part of Hindu festivals, today festivals are marked by bans on the sale of meat. Now, hygiene is being invoked to ban the sale of meat and even eggs by small vendors.

It is essential for traditionally vegetarian Indians to recognise that our diets are privileged and resource-intensive. The diets of most Indians are diverse, local and seasonal and include animal foods. These diets should be celebrated. Demeaning and demonising animal foods, or invisibilising them – as more well-meaning vegetarians and vegans do – contributes to deepening poverty and malnutrition among less privileged communities.

It is time to question our collective discomfort towards animal foods, and to work together to build inclusive, just and sustainable food systems.

Sudha Nagavarapu works with grassroots organisations on food systems, sustainable agriculture, health and livelihoods, and with various networks campaigning for justice and equity.

Food and Caste
Vegetarianism

Undergraduate
High School
Architecture
American History
Asian History
Antique Literature
American Literature
Asian Literature
Classic English Literature
World Literature
Creative Writing
Linguistics
Criminal Justice
Legal Issues
Anthropology
Archaeology
Political Science
World Affairs
African-American Studies
East European Studies
Latin-American Studies
Native-American Studies
West European Studies
Family and Consumer Science
Social Issues
Women and Gender Studies
Social Work
Natural Sciences
Pharmacology
Earth science
Agriculture
Agricultural Studies
Computer Science
IT Management
Mathematics
Investments
Engineering and Technology
Engineering
Aeronautics
Medicine and Health
Alternative Medicine
Communications and Media
Advertising
Communication Strategies
Public Relations
Educational Theories
Teacher's Career
Chicago/Turabian
Company Analysis
Education Theories
Shakespeare
Canadian Studies
Food Safety
Relation of Global Warming and Extreme Weather Condition
Movie Review
Admission Essay
Annotated Bibliography
Application Essay
Article Critique
Article Review
Article Writing
Book Review
Business Plan
Business Proposal
Capstone Project
Cover Letter
Creative Essay
Dissertation
Dissertation - Abstract
Dissertation - Conclusion
Dissertation - Discussion
Dissertation - Hypothesis
Dissertation - Introduction
Dissertation - Literature
Dissertation - Methodology
Dissertation - Results
GCSE Coursework
Grant Proposal
Marketing Plan
Multiple Choice Quiz
Personal Statement
Power Point Presentation
Power Point Presentation With Speaker Notes
Questionnaire
Reaction Paper

Research Paper

Research Proposal
SWOT analysis
Thesis Paper
Online Quiz
Literature Review
Movie Analysis
Statistics problem
Math Problem
All papers examples
How It Works
Money Back Policy
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
We Are Hiring

Vegetarian or Non-Vegetarian, Essay Example

Pages: 2

Words: 652

Hire a Writer for Custom Essay

Use 10% Off Discount: "custom10" in 1 Click 👇

You are free to use it as an inspiration or a source for your own work.

My typical daily diet includes some type of meat; therefore, I am not a vegetarian. However, I do my best to include lean meat products in my daily diet and try to refrain from products that are too fatty or processed. The vegetarian diet typically involves the consumption of plant-based foods as the primary source of nutrients, and vegetarians with fewer dietary restrictions (i.e. vegans) also consume dairy products. It is important for vegetarians to have a healthy and balanced diet that includes a variety of different foods from the various food groups, such as fresh vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and dairy products. It is important to consider these alternatives in the development of a successful vegetarian diet strategy.

As with other types of diets, a vegetarian food pyramid also exists and provides a basis for a healthy diet and encourages the highest level of consumption of grains, then high protein foods such as nuts and legumes, then vegetables, fruits, and fats (Mayo Clinic). The daily dietary recommendations are as follows: 2 servings of fats, 2 servings of fruits, 4 servings of vegetables, 5 servings of legumes and nuts, and 6 servings of grains (Mayo Clinic). Each of these recommendations is an important contributor to a healthy vegetarian diet on a daily basis.

A plant-based diet is important for optimal health and nutrition for vegetarians; however, there is a greater risk of vitamin deficiencies for this group, such as calcium, iron, Vitamin B12, and zinc (MedlinePlus). It is important for vegetarians to focus on these items in their diet plans in order to achieve successful nutritional outcomes (MedlinePlus). Any plant-based diet must incorporate a variety of different food products to achieve proper nutrition; however, another area to consider is the ability to obtain adequate amounts of energy from the plant-based foods that are consumed (Abraham). It is expected that a plant-based diet will provide sufficient energy for daily living and will also contribute to a healthier lifestyle and a leaner approach to eating (Abraham). For those persons interested in a vegetarian diet, experimentation with new types of foods, such as soy products and veggie-based products such as burgers are a good start towards this direction (Abraham). These examples offer variety in the plant-based diet and support the development of a healthier direction to acquire proper nutrition (Abraham).

It is evident that for vegetarians, plant-based diets provide a level of energy and positive health that supports greater wellbeing (NIH). One of the key benefits to a vegetarian plant-based diet is the likelihood of greater overall health and a reduced risk of chronic illness (NIH). Vegetarian diets also represent a set of personal beliefs regarding food and nutrition, whether they are based upon religious preferences or customs, or the general need to consume healthier foods (NIH). Therefore, it is important to recognize the reasons why a vegetarian diet is preferred and how to integrate these types of foods into the daily diet (NIH). Long-term vegetarians have demonstrated lower levels of cancer and generally weigh less than meat eaters, and also reduce the risks associated with high cholesterol and heart disease (NIH). As a result, the vegetarian diet provides many health-related benefits to those who prefer this type of nutrition (NIH). For vegetarians, the concept of consuming plant-based foods is relatively simple and provides numerous benefits, and for those interested in a vegetarian diet, it is recommended that experimenting with different types of foods that might be unfamiliar is a strategy to determine if this type of diet will provide the desired benefits without losing the taste and the variety that certain meat-based diets offer (NIH).

Works Cited

Abraham, L., 2013. “Vegetarian diet: plant-based eating good for health and energy.” 28 March 2013: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/02/18/vegetarian-diet_n_2712282.html

Mayo Clinic, 2013. “Nutrition and Healthy Eating.” 28 March 2013: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/vegetarian-diet/HQ01596

MedlinePlus, 2013. “Vegetarian diet: how to get the best nutrition.” 28 March 2013: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/vegetarian-diet/HQ01596

National Institutes of Health, 2012. “Digging a vegetarian diet.” 28 March 2013: http://newsinhealth.nih.gov/issue/jul2012/feature1

Stuck with your Essay?

Get in touch with one of our experts for instant help!

Terrorism: Sex Trade and Terrorist Organizations, Term Paper Example

PESTLE Analysis, Research Paper Example

Time is precious

don’t waste it!

Plagiarism-free guarantee

Privacy guarantee

Secure checkout

Money back guarantee

Related Essay Samples & Examples

Voting as a civic responsibility, essay example.

Pages: 1

Words: 287

Utilitarianism and Its Applications, Essay Example

Words: 356

The Age-Related Changes of the Older Person, Essay Example

Words: 448

The Problems ESOL Teachers Face, Essay Example

Pages: 8

Words: 2293

Should English Be the Primary Language? Essay Example

Pages: 4

Words: 999

The Term “Social Construction of Reality”, Essay Example

Words: 371

Veg vs Non-Veg debate

Mragank Shandilya
11 Min To Read
March 27, 2021
Vegetarianism

If you like discussions and debates, then it’s pretty likely that you have been a part of vegetarian versus non-vegetarian debate, at least at one point of your life.

In this article, we will approach this topic from all the angles and critically analyze it. Be assured; you will get a lot of new veg vs non veg debate points. Our focus will be more on the philosophical, moral and anthropological aspects, rather than on the health pros and cons. Read on!

Meaning of Vegetarianism / Definition of Vegetarianism

Is man vegetarian or non-vegetarian, veg vs non-veg debate points, some disadvantages of non-vegetarian food.

Vegetarianism is a practice wherein people completely abstain from eating meat or any by-product of animal slaughter.

By meat we mean all forms of animal, bird or fish flesh. Products gained from animals without slaughtering them (e.g. milk) are not considered non-veg items.

Before we dive into the veg and non-veg debate, we need to settle our own position. Are we herbivores or carnivores ?

Carnivorous animals are only capable of cutting action through their jaws. That is, they can only cut their food and swallow, they cannot grind (chew). In contrast, we humans have both a cutting action and also a grinding action. We have sharp incisors to cut our food, as well as molars to grind the food.

There is an enzyme in our saliva (called Ptyalin), which converts carbohydrates into sugar right in our mouth. So, we humans start digesting our food right there in our mouth. This is not the case with carnivores.

Another fact that proves that we are at best herbivores (or omnivores) and not carnivores is the length of the alimentary canal. In herbivorous it is five to six times the length of the body, while for carnivores it is just two to three times their own body length. Even with this yardstick, we humans do not fall in the category of carnivores.

Also, herbivorous need to eat daily, while most of the carnivorous animals only eat once in three to four days, or more. Humans also need to eat daily.

So, we are probably herbivores, or omnivores at best.

Now, as we have clearly shown that humans are not carnivores, let us focus on the issue of food preference.

Should we opt for a vegetarian lifestyle?

What are the arguments that are generally put forward by people who are in favour of and against vegetarianism?

Non-Veg Argument 1: There will be scarcity of food if everyone becomes Vegetarian

Earth has a limited quantity of food resources. If all of us become vegetarians, then there will be a lot of load on agriculture and dairy products. People will start starving.

Veg Counter-argument 1

Of the available agricultural land on Earth, only 24% of the land is used to grow crops and feed humans. Rest of the land is used to raise and feed the livestock. So, we can increase the farm land to some extent, if majority of the people become vegetarians.

Also, around 33% of the farm produce gets wasted. If demand will increase, then this wastage will definitely reduce.

Non-Veg Argument 2: There will be population blast in animals if we stop eating them

If we all become vegetarians, then who will take care of animals like chickens, pigs, etc. We provide them food and shelter and in return we deserve to eat them.

Also, if we stop eating these animals, there will be no check on their population. For example, there will be over-population of chickens and sheep and they will destroy all crops and fields etc. Oceans will get over-crowded with fishes and crabs etc.

Veg Counter-argument 2

This is a typical thinking, wherein humans think too much about themselves. Life in this planet has been thriving since millions of years. Humans have become a major player only recently, say a few thousand years back, after their population became large enough.

But there have never been an imbalance in past. If there’s some imbalance, nature has its way to reinstall the equilibrium. Nature never needed us in the past for restoring balance, and it does not need us even now. On the contrary, we have done more damage than good. The ecological cycle and various food chains worked fine till humans came and destroyed and damaged a lot of them.

Just to give an example, Chinese under Mao in 1960s decided to kill sparrows in large numbers because they used to eat a lot of crops. They were killed in millions by left party comrades. But this led to a huge crop loss due to widespread pest problem. The sparrows used to eat these pests and in turn that used keep the crops healthy. All this led to a large-scale famine in China in 1960s.

Apart from this, these all animals do not need us to feed them or take care of them. We have domesticized some of them for our own self-interests; some for security, some for food, some just as showpieces etc.

Moreover, just have a look at the state of animals at butcher shops, the way these animals are kept in cages, how they are transported, how they are processed in assembly lines in factories. You can’t say that as “taking care”. That’s hell on Earth. These animals are in constant distress. In fact, many diseases like COVID-19 may have been caused by wild exotic species of animals in distress situation, in wet markets of China.

One more point to ponder. We have taken their reproduction in our hands to fulfil the huge demand. These animals are forcefully breeded and artificially produced in mass-scale to keep up with the demand of non-veg food. So, we humans are not eating these animals because they are in plenty and doing a service to nature. Rather, we are mass-producing them by unnatural methods. Such meat may not even be that healthy for humans. For example, do you know that many chickens are given hormonal injections to make them grow much faster. It’s too painful for them, and the meat is of inferior quality.

Around 80 billion animals are killed every year. That is more than 10 times the population of humans on this planet!

Non-Veg Argument 3: Survival of the fittest

Can you go to a lion or tiger and tell him to eat grass, rather than meat? You cannot.

Nature has made them carnivorous. How can nature be wrong? Carnivores kill and eat the weaker herbivores. It’s Darwin’s survival of the fittest.

Similarly, some animals like bears are omnivores. It’s their inherent nature. Similarly, humans can eat both vegetables, digest milk and eat meat too.

Veg Counter-Argument 3

Can you really compare animals, fishes and birds to humans?

Animals are slave to their survival instincts. They are driven by hunger and sex drive. They don’t have any choice. We do!

Their consciousness and cognitive level are way below humans. Do you know even the smartest dog breeds are cognitively only as good as a two-year-old human baby?

There was a time when even humans were like that. But we have evolved. We have learnt to control our urges and move beyond. That’s how we created civilizations and developed values and morals.

As the most intelligent and dominant species on the planet, isn’t it our duty to act like a big brother. Treat other species with mercy, if not empathy!

Till just a few decades back, there used to be a lot of cannibal tribes in the world, including India (you can still find some in the world). What’s your take on cannibalism? Sounds disgusting, isn’t it. Probably that’s how a vegetarian person feels when he thinks about non-veg diet.

Cannibalism was banned and those cannibal tribes were hunted down and punished. Some of them evolved. Because that was considered barbarism. It was a lower form of human civilization. Rightly so!

As humans we should aim to improve our civilization. Probably all of us will agree that a more non-violent civilization is a better civilization. By this parameter, a vegetarian civilization will be considered as a better form of civilization than a non-vegetarian one. Isn’t it?

Non-Veg Argument 4: Essential nutrients

There are many nutrients that can only be got from animal food or they are more easily available in them, e.g. proteins, omega-3 fatty acids in fishes etc.

Even vegetarians consume a lot of animal products like milk and cheese. Isn’t it immoral to take milk from cows, which is for their own babies?

Also, there are many countries and regions where vegetarian food is not that easily available. Imagine all the communities living near the sea-shores. They cannot afford vegetarian food on a daily basis, especially if they are poor. Vegetarian diet in many such places lacks enough variety, essential minerals and vitamins. This will lead to malnutrition.

Veg Counter-argument 4

We should definitely eat meat, if there is no option. We do not expect all people to become monks!

But ask yourself, do we all eat meat because there are not enough good vegetarian options available?

Do we all eat meat just for nutrition or taste?

We understand that we should eat meat if it’s essential for one’s survival. But the sad truth is that most of us eat animal meat just for taste. Satisfying our taste buds is more important to us than the life of an innocent animal!

Believe me, vegetarian food provides us all the needed minerals. Specially, if you are eating home-cooked food, fruits, seasonal vegetables, pulses etc. and following Ayurvedic traditions to some extent.

Non-Veg Argument 5: Aren’t plants living beings too?

Are not plant and trees living beings?

Don’t they feel pain?

Aren’t vegetarians also killing living beings to eat.

Moreover, don’t many of the vegetarians consume cow or buffalo milk. Is it ethical to consume dairy products?

Veg Counter-argument 5

Sure, plants are living organisms. Some studies have shown that they even feel pain.

But one thing is for sure. Plants are at a much lower conscious level than animals. Just as humans are much more conscious than animals. Any nervous system they have is rudimentary as compared to animals, and so any pain they feel cannot be compared to what an animal will feel. Have you heard an animal’s scream of horror? If you have, you will understand.

As we said earlier, we are not monks. We need to survive. But we should do so as humanely as possible. Probably everyone will agree that getting milk from a cow in limited amount is much more humane that slaughtering it. If you have no good vegetarian option, there’s no shame in eating non-veg. Not at all!

We can’t deny the fact that eating veg seems much less cruel than eating non-veg. So, it’s relatively a better way of life, isn’t it? Nothing in life is black and white. It’s all different shades of grey.

Apart from all this, non-veg food habit of ours has some peripheral disadvantages too.

Greenhouse gases: Around 18% of the greenhouse gas emissions (mostly methane) in the world come from livestock. Methane is a much worse greenhouse gas than Carbon Dioxide.

Water: Livestock consumes around 70% of the fresh water consumption in the world. Around 94% of the biomass generated by animals is generated by livestock. That is, wildlife generates much less biomass than our livestock. And most of this goes untreated into the oceans or fresh water bodies, causing massive water pollution.

Endangered species: Out of all the species of animals and birds which are endangered in the world, almost 80% are directly threatened by our livestock industry or the aquaculture industry.

There are many more disadvantages like the health issues of consuming non-veg food, animal brutality etc. But we will not go into that here.

So, we can say that vegetarian lifestyle seems much better than a non-vegetarian lifestyle, from various perspectives - morally, health-wise, etc. Let’s summarize what we discussed in this article.

We humans are most probably herbivores, rather than carnivores.
No matter what our ancestors used to eat, we need to constantly improve our civilization. Most of us will agree that an emphatic, non-violent civilization is probably better than a violent civilization.
Most of us eat meat for taste, not for nutrients. Moreover, vegetarian diet can provide all the essential minerals and vitamins.
There won’t be any population blast in animals or scarcity of food, if most of us switch to vegetarian diet.

But we live in a society where individual freedom is of utmost importance. We honour everyone’s choice, liberty and freedom. Anyone can eat anything he or she wants to.

So, vegetarian diet cannot be forced upon someone. The inspiration for it must come from within.

We should hope that one day our human civilization will evolve to such an extent that we start acknowledging the freedom, liberty and rights of animals too, even those that we eat.

Some scientists have recently developed meat in the laboratory. Maybe such a scientific advancement will prove to be a win-win solution and satisfy both the parties in this centuries old debate.

Indian culture believes in ‘Vasudhaiv Kutumbakam’ (World is one big family). Probably, our spiritually inclined ancestors included not only humans, but also animals in the world family they were talking about. That’s why vegetarianism was considered better.

But we must remember; there’s no absolute right or absolute wrong. There’s only relatively right and relatively wrong. Everything in this world is relative!

If you think we have missed something, you have a new argument in favour of veg or non-veg diet, or you think there’s some flaw in any of the arguments mentioned in this article, then do let us know in the comment section.

Vegetarian vs Non Vegetarian Diet - Which is Better?

There has been an intense debate, which is in the loop for years and has been raging back and forth regarding the deficiencies of a vegetarian diet versus non-vegetarian perils This heated debate is both accurate as well as unfounded. Probably, that’s the entire reason it is still a debate. In fact, if you look into the diet of both groups, you will be able to identify the fact that, there is a space for healthy living in both. Here we compare the vegetarian and non-vegetarian diet benefits and some cons if you not these food items in your diet.

Vegetarian vs Non-Vegetarian Diet

Vegetarian Diet Benefits: Vegetarian Diet Benefits: In a vegetarian diet, the food intake of a person is confined to a large variety of foods derived from plants along with milk and dairy. And, any form of meat and products derived from animals are completely avoided.

Pros of a Vegetarian Diet

Vegetarians have been noted to consume a lesser amount of proteins, but they do not suffer from problems related to a high protein diet, such as osteoporosis (characterized by brittle and weak bones) and kidney failure .
The diet includes a high level of antioxidants such as vitamin E & C as well as carotene , which is available in vegetables and fruits.
Additionally, they consume less amount of saturated fats.

Cons of Vegetarian Diet

The deficiency of vitamin B12 is common amongst vegetarians, as it is mainly available in meat, eggs, and fish. Deficiency of vitamin B12 can yield rare symptoms such as increased fatigue , shortness of breath , and a temporary loss of body balance.
Lack of protein , as stated above, along with iron and zinc deficiency is also common.

Symptoms of protein deficiency can be troublesome and include signs like

Sluggish metabolism
Loss of body muscles (as the body tries to derive the regular protein intake from your muscles, thus making them weak),
Trouble gaining or losing weight
Persistent fatigue
Longer healing time in case of wounds and injuries
Pain in joints
Drastic changes in blood sugar level that might result in diabetes
A weak immune system makes you vulnerable to all kinds of diseases.

Non-vegetarian Diet Benefits: A non-vegetarian diet includes all forms of plant foods as well as foods and by-products that are derived from animals, such as poultry, fish, meat, etc.

Benefits of Nonvegetarian Diet

Vitamin B12 is present in adequate level since they are derived from sources such as meat, eggs, and fish. Adequate intake of proteins is never an issue for non-vegetarians

Cons of Non-Vegetarian Diet

Have a shorter lifespan and are more vulnerable to chronic diseases.
Tend to develop diabetes, heart diseases, and hypertension .
Usually, non vegetarians eat less amount of vegetables and fruits than what is recommended.

Hope you understand the benefits and side effects of vegetarian and non-vegetarian diet. If you want to know more food item's advantages or wish to discuss any specific problem, you can consult a Dietitian/Nutritionist .

Update From Lybrate: Keep a check on your overall well-being by consuming healthy and delicious products. These Food Products Online not only soothe your taste buds but also keep you healthy.

RELATED ISSUES

Goodbox Weight
6 Month Old Baby
PCOD/PCOS Diet
Healthy Heart Diet

RELATED SPECIALITIES

General Physician
Ayurvedic Doctor
Homeopathy Doctor
Dietitian/Nutritionist
Acupuncturist
Toxicologist

Ask a free question

Get FREE multiple opinions from Doctors

Book appointment with top doctors for Staying Healthy treatment

Treatment enquiry.

Study Abroad Get upto 50% discount on Visa Fees
Top Universities & Colleges
Abroad Exams
Top Courses
Read College Reviews
Admission Alerts 2024
Education Loan
Institute (Counselling, Coaching and More)
Ask a Question
College Predictor
Test Series
Practice Questions
Course Finder
Scholarship
All Courses
B.Sc (Nursing)

Collegedunia Team

Content Curator

Some People Say That Non-Vegetarian Food Should Be Banned IELTS Writing Task 2 is an agree-disagree essay and consists of three sample answers. The task requires the candidates to provide a tentative and argumentative answer to the question. The IELTS sample answers - Some People Say That Non-Vegetarian Food Should Be Banned IELTS Writing Task 2 comprises two parts: Introduction and body. The introduction is a brief description of the topic. The body contains argumentative statements and tentative answers to support the test-taker's perspective. IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. Some People Say That Non-Vegetarian Food Should Be Banned IELTS Writing Task 2 is measured by the areas like grammar, content, and structure. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check : Get 10 Free Sample Papers Check : Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic : Some people say that non-vegetarian food should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Band 7.5 Essay

Orthodox vegetarians have consistently raised arguments to put a ban on non-vegetarian food. This is because they consider it to be an inhumane act that encourages mass animal killing and puts lives of animals in danger for the convenience and self-indulgence of meat eaters. It is a hotly debated subject in many nations, which has increased the need to consider whether or not it ought to be outlawed. It will be a fair decision, to let diners choose what to eat rather than imposing it on them.

Initially, it is assumed that because of their upbringing in a particular ethical and social environment, humans are wise and possess the capacity to discern what is right and wrong for themselves. No one has the right or the power to impose their own will on another person because everyone has the freedom to make decisions independently. For instance, if the government put a ban or restriction on the availability of non-vegetarian food, it would be seen as a violation of their right to freedom of choice and cause stress, repression, and agitation among the population. When their rights are taken away, they will feel that the government doesn't value them as much, and their judgment and decision-making will come under scrutiny. Therefore, if they are given the freedom to make a better decision, it will be a thoughtful gesture. In addition, many people must consume animal-based food because of their dietary requirements and the geographic location of where they live. Animal hunting is the only way for people to survive and get the nutrients they need to maintain a daily healthy lifestyle in some geologically restricted areas. To give an example, hunting is the only way to survive in places like snow deserts where it is impossible to grow vegetation all year long. People will either leave these areas or die of hunger if non-vegetarian food is prohibited there. In such environments, it becomes crucial to rely on animal hunting to maintain life.

In summary, it's critical to avoid outright banning non-vegetarian food because people are capable of making wise decisions based on the situation.

Band 6.5 Essay

The decision to become a vegetarian or not or to ban nonvegetarian foods has long been a controversial one. Many think it's a great way to prevent serious health problems. This essay will clarify the paradoxical advantages of not being a vegetarian.

The first and most important argument in favor of eating meat is that it is rich in nutrients like fiber, protein, and calcium, all of which are crucial for maintaining energy levels throughout the day. Additionally, some professionals, like athletes, strongly advise against following a vegetarian diet. The recent example of an Indian wrestler named Geeta Phogat, who had to start eating chicken in order to build up enough stamina for wrestling, provides a good explanation for this. As a result, it has been discovered that eating meat keeps one physically fit. Furthermore, eating meat strengthens one's immune system. For instance, meat eaters can survive in extremely cold or hot weather because of their high physical resilience and therefore they are less likely to contract common illnesses like the common cold and high fever. One study conducted at the Apollo hospital in India revealed that 65% of those who had been afflicted with such illnesses tended to follow a vegetarian diet. And hence, it should go without saying that eating non-vegetarian food can benefit your health.

To summarize, this essay has shown how a non-vegetarian diet has a significant potential to increase one's physical strength and ability to combat common illnesses. Given these health advantages, it is likely that more people will begin following a non-vegetarian diet in the near future and so it is not advisable to ban it.

Band 8 Essay

Every aspect of life has changed as a result of technological and globalization advancements, and eating habits are no exception. Due to their need for food, people have been known to hunt since the dawn of recorded history. However, since the dawn of civilization, there have been ferocious debates about whether or not non-vegetarian food should be prohibited. This essay provides perspective reasons on why meat should not be prohibited because it is an essential part of our diets.

To start, foods made from animal flesh are renowned for having nutritive components that are almost nonexistent in vegetables. It's true that red meat is the only food that contains such a large amount of unsaturated fats as Omega-3. In general, Omega-3 is just fat that is good for human health and does not dissolve in the body. Therefore, removing non-vegetarian foods from diets is not a good idea. Animals are also essential components of the food chain. Clearly, the wilds are an important part of the food cycle on Earth; as a result, they must be used to keep the cycle's proper balance. For example, if wild animals are eliminated from the cycle, there will be an abundance of animals that could harm the environment. Additionally, going vegetarian will require using almost one-third of the planet's vegetation annually.

In conclusion, it is essentially impossible to eliminate meat from the diet due to the availability of highly nutritious elements and its presence in the food cycle, and its consumption in diet must be promoted to preserve the earth's natural habitat.

Letter to your Travel Agent IELTS Writing Task 1...

Letter to your Friend Inviting him her to a Get Together Party IELTS Writing Task 1...

People think that Developing Countries need Financial Help IELTS Writing Task 2...

The Wild West Village near Tabernas Reading Answers...

Want to know more?

Ask questions to our experts

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER

IELTS Essay: Vegetarianism

by Dave | EBooks | 5 Comments

This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on the topic of vegetarianism from the real IELTS exam:

Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

This one is only available for subscribers on my Patreon. You can sign up here .

Recommended For You

Latest IELTS Writing Task 1 2024 (Graphs, Charts, Maps, Processes)

by Dave | Sample Answers | 147 Comments

These are the most recent/latest IELTS Writing Task 1 Task topics and questions starting in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and continuing into 2024. ...

Recent IELTS Writing Topics and Questions 2024

by Dave | Sample Answers | 342 Comments

Read here all the newest IELTS questions and topics from 2024 and previous years with sample answers/essays. Be sure to check out my ...

Find my Newest IELTS Post Here – Updated Daily!

by Dave | IELTS FAQ | 18 Comments

IELTS PDF: Cryptocurrency / Online Currencies

by Dave | EBooks | 0 Comment

Here is my newest IELTS EBook, featuring the topic of cryptocurrencies and online currencies - which is available only on my Patreon.com/howtodoielts. The ...

IELTS Essay: Physical Exercise for Adults

by Dave | General Training | 0 Comment

This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay from the general training exam on the topic of physical exercise for adults. ...

IELTS Cambridge 18: Households Annual Income

by Dave | Cambridge 18 | 0 Comment

This is an IELTS writing task 1 sample answer essay from the new IELTS Cambridge 18 book of past tests on the topic of the number ...

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

There is a statement that people should place barely vegetables in diets and abandon meat from desks, as meat is not necessary for health. In my opinion, I disagree with forcing people to eat vegetables. Because eating meat not only entertains people who like them, but also keeps the ecosystem in a normal situation.

On the one hand, there are a lot of people who like eating meat, which is not harmful for their health. There are plenty of delicious dishes which are made with meat. Steaks in Australia, cow meat in Japan, and various meat dishes in China are famous around the world, and loved by many people. It would be unkind to stop them from eating what they love. Moreover, a global diet survey indicates that the country that has the biggest meat consumption is America. There are more than 300 million citizens in the US. Most of them live healthy lives, which may be thanks to various kinds of protein that meat provides.

On the other hand, the ecosystem is based on relationships with eating. Many animals, such as rabbits and cows, eat plants, and other animals, such as lions and tigers, eat animals that are meat. In the popular cartoon film The Lion King, the lion king, Mufasa, tells his son Simba that lions eat animals that eat grass, and the lion’s body will become grass after their death, which is the cycle of life. From this story, the ecosystem is combined by not only the grass eater, but also the meat eater. If the lions are all gone, the number of grass-eaters will increase, and the consumption of grass will go up, which will lead to the vanishment of grass, grass-eaters’ extinction later, and the disaster of an ecosystem. Similar to the earth, once human stops eating meat, animals that rely on plants become more, the plants themselves will face a calamity later, and human lives are harder at last.

In sum, eating meat is not harmful to health, and it also brings happiness to people and the balance of the ecosystem. In addition, becoming a vegetarian or not is solely a personal choice rather than an option of better lives, and both of them should be respected and understood.

Great, Gakki – nice use of vocabulary and grammar throughout!

Hello, sir . I will be grateful if you could evaluate this essay.

In past few years, vegetarianism has entered the mainstream of many societies. It is often argued that individuals can maintain a healthy lifestyle without the need of meat. I agree that being a vegetarian means being healthier. However, I argue they removing meat completely from a diet can lead to various nutrition deficiencies. Proponents of solely vegetarian diet often point out its accessibility, affordability and nutritional value. Vegetarian food options are cheaper and easily accessible in supermarkets and local shops because they require minimum special arrangements, such as, cold storage, to keep them fresh. Moreover,there plant based food are cheaper, hence, rich or people from any socio-economic background can afford it. Lastly, vegetables and fruits are rich in vitamins and natural sugars, which is essential for the functioning of healthy body. Nonetheless, obsoleting meat completely from a diet would do more harm than good as it is an essential element of a healthy diet. Various non vegetarian foods are often rife with protein which is essential for music building and strong immune systems. Moreover, meat is a rich source of vitamin B complex that is crucial for nervous system. Those following strict vegetarian diet, must rely on supplements to fulfil their daily nutritional requirements. Therefore, it is not feasible to supplant a balance diet containing both vegetables and meat with a pure vegetarian one. To sum up, although many individuals are following ‘veg-only’ trend these days , however, I believe that an individual’s well- being and life-expectancy is wholly depend on an overall balance diet. People, therefore, strive to select healthy options whenever possible.

I think you have used the word rife in a wrong context because often used for something unpleasant

Ok. Thanx for reply!

Exclusive Ebooks, PDFs and more from me!

Don't miss out!

"The highest quality materials anywhere on the internet! Dave improved my writing and vocabulary so much. Really affordable options you don't want to miss out on!"

Minh, Vietnam

Hi, I’m Dave! Welcome to my IELTS exclusive resources! Before you commit I want to explain very clearly why there’s no one better to help you learn about IELTS and improve your English at the same time... Read more

Patreon Exclusive Ebooks Available Now!

New study: vegetarian vs. non-vegetarian diets in the battle against cardiometabolic diseases

Download PDF Copy

In a recent study published in the Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases Journal, researchers conducted a comprehensive review to compare the impacts of vegetarian and non-vegetarian diets on the outcomes of major cardiometabolic and other non-communicable diseases.

Study: A comprehensive review of healthy effects of vegetarian diets. Image Credit: Elena.Katkova/Shutterstock.com

The opinions about the association between meat consumption and health have been divided, with diets low in or devoid of animal food sources being considered low in nutritional content, resulting in essential nutrient deficiencies.

Emerging research supports contrasting opinions that plant-based diets meet the regular nutritional requirements and provide various health benefits, such as lowering the risks of multiple diseases.

However, the term ‘vegetarian’ is used loosely to encompass various dietary patterns such as vegan, ovo-vegetarian, lacto-vegetarian, lacto-ovo-vegetarian, and semi-vegetarian.

Vegetarian diets also range from the Western patterns of vegetarianism mentioned above to dietary patterns based on ethnicities, such as Buddhist or Asian diets, where the availability of animal food sources or socio-economical or cultural factors influences the diet.

This wide range of variations in vegetarian diets has resulted in contrasting results among studies that examine the relationship between vegetarian diets and health benefits.

Individuals in developing countries generally follow a more balanced and well-developed vegetarian diet in comparison to those in developing countries where access to food is dependent on socioeconomic factors.

About the study

In the present study, the researchers conducted a comprehensive review of research that examined various vegetarian diets and their effects on outcomes related to health, including the risks of various non-communicable diseases.

Studies examining various types of vegetarian diets, from Western vegetarian dietary patterns to vegetarian diets influenced by religious beliefs, were reviewed.

Conclusions

Overall, the review covered a comprehensive set of studies that compared the impacts of vegetarian and non-vegetarian diets on overall human health and in lowering the risk of many non-communicable diseases.

Although many studies have reported that vegetarian diets have various beneficial effects on human health and are believed to lower the incidence and mortality risks of major non-communicable diseases, the methodologies and classifications of vegetarian diets continue to be too non-uniform to form definitive inferences on the subject.

Agnoli, C. et al. (2023) "A comprehensive review of healthy effects of vegetarian diets", Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases , 33(7), pp. 1308-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.04.005 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0939475323001497

Posted in: Medical Science News | Medical Research News | Medical Condition News | Healthcare News

Tags: Atherosclerosis , Blood , Blood Pressure , Carbohydrate , Cardiometabolic , Cholesterol , Diabetes , Diet , Dyslipidemia , Food , Heart , Heart Disease , Inflammation , Insulin , Ischemic Heart Disease , Lipoprotein , Meat , Metabolic Syndrome , Metabolism , Mortality , Nutrition , Obesity , Oxidative Stress , Research , Saturated Fats , Stress , Syndrome , Type 2 Diabetes , Vegan , Vegetarian , Weight Loss

Dr. Chinta Sidharthan

Chinta Sidharthan is a writer based in Bangalore, India. Her academic background is in evolutionary biology and genetics, and she has extensive experience in scientific research, teaching, science writing, and herpetology. Chinta holds a Ph.D. in evolutionary biology from the Indian Institute of Science and is passionate about science education, writing, animals, wildlife, and conservation. For her doctoral research, she explored the origins and diversification of blindsnakes in India, as a part of which she did extensive fieldwork in the jungles of southern India. She has received the Canadian Governor General’s bronze medal and Bangalore University gold medal for academic excellence and published her research in high-impact journals.

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

Sidharthan, Chinta. (2023, July 03). New study: vegetarian vs. non-vegetarian diets in the battle against cardiometabolic diseases. News-Medical. Retrieved on June 15, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230703/New-study-vegetarian-vs-non-vegetarian-diets-in-the-battle-against-cardiometabolic-diseases.aspx.

Sidharthan, Chinta. "New study: vegetarian vs. non-vegetarian diets in the battle against cardiometabolic diseases". News-Medical . 15 June 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230703/New-study-vegetarian-vs-non-vegetarian-diets-in-the-battle-against-cardiometabolic-diseases.aspx>.

Sidharthan, Chinta. "New study: vegetarian vs. non-vegetarian diets in the battle against cardiometabolic diseases". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230703/New-study-vegetarian-vs-non-vegetarian-diets-in-the-battle-against-cardiometabolic-diseases.aspx. (accessed June 15, 2024).

Sidharthan, Chinta. 2023. New study: vegetarian vs. non-vegetarian diets in the battle against cardiometabolic diseases . News-Medical, viewed 15 June 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230703/New-study-vegetarian-vs-non-vegetarian-diets-in-the-battle-against-cardiometabolic-diseases.aspx.

Revolutionizing Life Science: An Interview with SCIEX on ASMS, the SCIEX 7500+ System, and AI-Driven Quantitation

Jose Castro-Perez and Chris Lock, SCIEX

In our latest interview, News Medical speaks with SCIEX, a global leader in life science analytical technologies, about their exciting announcements at ASMS, the SCIEX 7500+ System, and how they utilize AI quantitation software to streamline solutions.

Revolutionizing Life Science: An Interview with SCIEX on ASMS, the SCIEX 7500+ System, and AI-Driven Quantitation

From Discovery Biology to ELRIG Chair

Melanie Leveridge

In this interview, we speak with Melanie Leveridge, Vice President of Discovery Biology at AstraZeneca and Chair of the Board for ELRIG UK, to discuss her extensive career in the pharmaceutical industry, her role in fostering scientific innovation, and her vision for ELRIG's future.

Breathing New Life into Diagnostics: Plasmion's SICRIT Technology

Revolutionizing Non-Invasive Diagnostics with Plasmion’s SICRIT Breath Analysis.

Latest News

New insights into predictors of organ damage in childhood-onset SLE

Newsletters you may be interested in

Your AI Powered Scientific Assistant

Hi, I'm Azthena, you can trust me to find commercial scientific answers from News-Medical.net.

A few things you need to know before we start. Please read and accept to continue.

Use of “Azthena” is subject to the terms and conditions of use as set out by OpenAI .
Content provided on any AZoNetwork sites are subject to the site Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Large Language Models can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.

Great. Ask your question.

Azthena may occasionally provide inaccurate responses. Read the full terms .

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions .

Provide Feedback

Write better, score higher.

IELTS Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Some people say that non-vegetarian food should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.

🤩 Sample answers

Model essay #1:, some people say that non-vegetarian food should be banned. do you agree or disagree.

In today's society, the topic of whether non-vegetarian food should be banned has sparked intense debate. Some individuals argue that non-vegetarian food should be prohibited, while others oppose this view. In my opinion, I disagree with the notion that non-vegetarian food should be banned. There are valid reasons to support this stance.

Firstly, banning non-vegetarian food would infringe upon individuals' freedom of choice. Every person has the right to choose their dietary preferences based on their cultural, religious, or personal beliefs. By imposing a ban on non-vegetarian food, the government would be interfering with people's personal choices and traditions.

Additionally, non-vegetarian food provides essential nutrients that are beneficial for human health. For example, lean meats are rich in protein, iron, and B vitamins, which are vital for maintaining a balanced diet. Banning non-vegetarian food could lead to nutritional deficiencies, particularly for individuals who rely on these sources for their dietary requirements.

Moreover, the economy heavily relies on the non-vegetarian food industry. Banning non-vegetarian food would have a detrimental impact on farmers, suppliers, and businesses within the meat industry. This could result in job losses and economic instability within the agricultural sector.

In conclusion, while some may argue for the prohibition of non-vegetarian food, I believe that it is unjustifiable. People should have the freedom to make their own dietary choices, and non-vegetarian food plays a crucial role in providing essential nutrients and supporting the economy. Therefore, a ban on non-vegetarian food would not be practical or beneficial for society as a whole.

Model Essay #2:

There is a growing sentiment among some individuals that non-vegetarian food should be banned. While this viewpoint has its merits, I firmly disagree with the notion of prohibiting non-vegetarian food. There are several compelling reasons to support this perspective.

First and foremost, imposing a ban on non-vegetarian food would infringe upon cultural and dietary diversity. Many communities around the world have a long-standing tradition of consuming non-vegetarian food as part of their cultural heritage. Banning such food would disregard these cultural practices and limit the culinary choices of individuals.

Furthermore, non-vegetarian food is a valuable source of essential nutrients that are crucial for maintaining a healthy diet. For instance, lean meats are rich in protein, which is vital for muscle growth and repair. Additionally, fish is a significant source of omega-3 fatty acids, which contribute to heart health. Banning non-vegetarian food would deprive individuals of these nutritional benefits.

In addition, the non-vegetarian food industry plays a significant role in the economy, providing employment opportunities and contributing to economic growth. Prohibiting non-vegetarian food would have adverse effects on farmers, suppliers, and workers within the industry, leading to job losses and economic repercussions.

In conclusion, while there are arguments in favor of banning non-vegetarian food, I believe that such a prohibition is unwarranted. It is essential to respect cultural diversity, acknowledge the nutritional value of non-vegetarian food, and consider the economic implications of such a ban. Therefore, I firmly oppose the idea of prohibiting non-vegetarian food.

✍️ Evaluate your essay for free

You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.

🤓 More IELTS Writing Task 2 topics

Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television. H...
If we look back at history it is seen that violence and conflict we...
Poor students or students who come from rural areas often find it i...
Some countries have laws that prohibit animals being used in circus...
The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication by ma...
Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life. Is t...

Or view the list of all tasks .

Home / Essay Samples / Life / Lifestyle / Vegetarianism

Vegetarianism Essay Examples

Understanding the concept and benefits of vegetarianism.

Vegetarianism may seem like a popular diet fad, but it has been advocated by many cultures around the world. Restaurants’ advertising “vegetarian options” on their menu is becoming customary. Vegetarianism is a dietary choice, to abstain from meat that people adopt for many reasons. There...

Vegetarian Diet: Examining the Arguments

As the world grapples with issues of ethics, environment, and health, the debate over adopting a vegetarian diet has gained significant attention. This essay delves into the multifaceted arguments surrounding vegetarianism, evaluating its potential benefits and challenges while considering the broader impact on individuals and...

A Vegetarian Clritical Response to Burger King Commmericial

In our constantly changing society, the stereotypical social norms are assumably diminishing and the term "genderless" society is also becoming more widespread. The world we live in surely sounds promising without expectations from society, without having to force everything into stereotypical categories, but is this...

Challenges of Pursuing the Lifestyle of a Vegetarian

Have you ever tried a diet in hopes that it’ll change your life? The vegetarian lifestyle is one of the most common diets teenagers participate in. Those who participate in a vegetarian diet were either born into it or acted by choice. Vegetarianism consists of...

Why Morality Does not Require Vegetarianism

There has been a great debate about the relationship between vegetarianism and morality. While the arguments against eating meat are quite convincing, there were only a few researches to justify the morality of consuming animal product. However, I believe that morality does not require vegetarianism...

Vegetarianism is not a Healthier Choice

Simply ask people around, most people would think vegetarianism is healthier whether they are Vegetarians or not. It is obviously healthy to eat vegetables, but is it healthy when eating vegetables only? I believe the answer is a no. Organism needs vitamins in small quantities...

How the Vegetarianism Could Change Our Life for Better

Have you wondered why vegetarianism has become so popular nowadays? Do you imagine everyone being vegetarian? Well, this is similarly to a person with distinct ideals from the rest, having another way of putting them on practice. Vegetarianism has changed trough the time, previously being...

The Hidden Politics of Vegetarianism Caste and the Hindu Canteen (hugo Gorringe, D Karthikeyan)

Food practices varies in Indian culture to its diverse traditions. Hindus, considered as vegetarians, as a common assumption though the fact remains some of them including Brahmins, eat meat. The Vedic texts strongly recommend non-violence against all life forms while it doesn’t explicitly prohibit eating...

Historical Lens: Inevitable Vegetarianism and Its Positive Effect on Society

“Earth’s carrying capacity is estimated to be between 8 and 16 billion,” was found in a 2012 United Nations Environment Programme discussion paper on the Rio+20 which lead to member states deciding to launch a process to develop a set of sustainable development goals that...

The Predposition of Veg and Non Veg to Hypertension

The relationship between diet and hypertension remains an area of controversy and research interest. Hypertension exerts a staggering worldwide burden on human quality of life and healthy care system resources via contribution to increased mortality and risk of cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial infraction, angina...

Trying to find an excellent essay sample but no results?

Don’t waste your time and get a professional writer to help!