experimental and theoretical probability answer key

EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORICAL PROBABILITY WORKSHEET

Experimental probability - practice questions.

Problem 1 :

Find the experimental probability of 

(a)  Tossing a head with one toss of a coin if it falls heads 96 times in 200 tosses.

(b) Rolling a six with a die given that when it was rolled 300 times, a six occurred 54 times

Problem 2 :

Find the experimental probability of rolling an odd number with a die if an odd number occurred 33 times when the die was rolled 60 times.              Solution

Problem 3 :

Clem fired 200 arrows at a target and hit the target 168 times. Find the experimental probability of Clem hitting the target.              Solution

Problem 4 :

Ivy has free-range hens. Out of the first 123 eggs that they laid she found that 11 had double-yolks. Calculate the experimental probability of getting a double-yolk egg from her hens.             Solution

Problem 5 :

Jackson leaves for work at the same time each day. Over a period of 227 working days, on his way to work he had to wait for a train at the railway crossing on 58 days. Calculate the experimental probability that Jackson has to wait for a train on his way to work.

Problem 6 :

Ravi has a circular spinner marked P, Q and R on equal sectors. Find the experimental probability of getting a Q if the spinner was twirled 417 times and finished on Q on 138 occasions.

Problem 7 :

Each time Claude shuffled a pack of cards before a game, he recorded the suit of the top card of the pack His results for 140 games were 34 Hearts, 36 Diamonds, 38 Spades and 32 Clubs.

Find the experimental probability that the top card of a shuffled pack is :

(a) a Heart  (b) a Club or Diamond

(1)  (a)   96/200    (b)   54/300

(2)   11/20

(3)   168/200

(4)   11/123

(5)   58/227

(6)   138/417

(7)  (a)   34/140   (b)   68/140

Theoretical Probability

A die is rolled. What is the theoretical probability of getting :

b) a "prime number"?

A bag contains 1 yellow, 2 green and 5 blue beds. One bead is chosen at random. Find the probability that it is :

(a)  Yellow  (b)  not yellow

1 A die numbered 1 to 6 is rolled once. Find:

b) P(even number)

c) P(a number at least 1)

e) P(not a 5)

f) P(a number greater than 6)

The five illustrated cards are well shuffled and placed face down on a table. One of the cards is randomly chosen. 

A bag contains 10 beads. 5 are white, 2 are red, 1 is blue, 1 is green and 1 is black. A bead is taken at random from the bag. Find:

a) P(white)

c) P(not black)              Solution

A letter is randomly chosen from GENEVA.

a)  Find the probability that it is:

b) Given that the letter chosen first is a G and it is removed, what is the probability that a second randomly chosen letter is a vowel?           Solution

A dart board has 30 sectors, numbered 1 to 30. A dart is thrown towards the bulls-eye and misses in a random direction. Determine the probability that the dart hits:

a) a multiple of 5

b) a number between 7 and 13 inclusive

c) a number greater than 18

e) a multiple of 7

f) an even number that is a multiple of 3.

(1)  (a)   1/6   (b)  1/2

(2)  (a)  1/8   (b)  7/8

(3)  (a)  1/6  (b)  1/2  (c)  1  (d)   1/6  (e)  5/6  (f)   0

(4)  (a)   2/5  (b)  1/5  (c)  4/5  (d)  4/5

(5)  (a)   1/2  (b)     1/10  (c)  9/10

(6)  (a)  (i)     1/3  (ii)   0  (b)   3/5

(7)  (a)   1/5  (b)   7/30  (c)   11/30  (d)   1/30  (e)   2/15

(f)   1/6

Apart from the stuff given above, i f you need any other stuff in math, please use our google custom search here.

Kindly mail your feedback to   [email protected]

We always appreciate your feedback.

© All rights reserved. onlinemath4all.com

• Sat Math Practice
• SAT Math Worksheets
• PEMDAS Rule
• BODMAS rule
• GEMDAS Order of Operations
• Math Calculators
• Transformations of Functions
• Order of rotational symmetry
• Lines of symmetry
• Compound Angles
• Quantitative Aptitude Tricks
• Trigonometric ratio table
• Word Problems
• Times Table Shortcuts
• 10th CBSE solution
• PSAT Math Preparation
• Privacy Policy
• Laws of Exponents

Recent Articles

Digital sat math problems and solutions (part - 7).

Aug 28, 24 08:09 PM

Digital SAT Math Problems and Solutions (Part - 6)

Aug 28, 24 07:59 PM

Digital SAT Math Problems and Solutions (Part - 5)

Aug 28, 24 07:50 PM

Theoretical Probability with Dice Practice Grid ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers )

Theoretical Probability with Spinners Practice Grid ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers )

Theoretical Probability with Counters Practice Grid ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers )

Theoretical Probability with Playing Cards Practice Grid ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers )

Theoretical Probability Practice Strips ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers )

Theoretical Probability Odd One Out ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers )

Constructing Two-Way Tables Practice Grid ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers )

Completing Two-Way Tables Practice Grid ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers )

Finding Probability from Two-Way Tables Practice Grid ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers )

Two-Way Tables and Probability Practice Strips ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers )

Experimental Probability Practice Strips ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers )

Estimating Probability Experiments Activity ( Editable Word | PDF )

Theoretical and Experimental Probability Revision Practice Grid ( Editable Word | PDF | Answers ​ )

Experimental and Theoretical Probability

Related Topics: More Lessons for Grade 8 Math Math Worksheets

Examples, solutions, videos, and worksheets to help Grade 8 students learn about experimental and theoretical probability.

Experimental and Theoretical Probability This video defines and uses both experimental and theoretical probabilities. Examples: A player hits the bull’s eye on a circular dart board 8 times out of 50.

• Find the experimental probability that the player hits the bull’s eye.
• Find the theoretical probability of rolling a multiple of 3 with a number cube.

We welcome your feedback, comments and questions about this site or page. Please submit your feedback or enquiries via our Feedback page.

• Pre-Algebra Topics
• Algebra Topics
• Algebra Calculator
• Algebra Cheat Sheet
• Algebra Practice Test
• Algebra Readiness Test
• Algebra Formulas
• Want to Build Your Own Website?

Sign In / Register

Theoretical Probability versus Experimental Probability

You've heard the terms, theoretical probability and experimental probability , but what do they mean?

Are they in anyway related? This is what we are going to discover in this lesson.

If you've completed the lessons on i ndependent and dependent probability , then you've already found the theoretical probability for numerous problems.

Theoretical Probability

Theoretical probability is the probability that is calculated using math formulas. This is the probability based on math theory.

Experimental Probability

Experimental probability is calculated when the actual situation or problem is performed as an experiment. In this case, you would perform the experiment, and use the actual results to determine the probability.

In order to accurately perform an experiment, you must:

• Identify what constitutes a " trial ".
• Perform a minimum of 25 trials
• Set up an organizer (table or chart) to record your data.

Let's take a look at an example where we first calculate the theoretical probability, and then perform the experiment to determine the experimental probability.

It will be interesting to compare the theoretical probability and the experimental probability. Do you think the two calculations will be close?

Example 1 - Theoretical Versus Experimental

This problem is from Example 1 in the  independent events  lesson. We calculated the theoretical probability to be 1/12 or 8.3%. Take a look:

Since we know that the theoretical probability is 8.3% chance of flipping a head and rolling a 6, let's see what happens when we actually perform the experiment.

Identify a trial: A trial consists of flipping a coin once and rolling a die once.

Conduct 25 trials and record your data in the table below.

For each trial, I flipped the coin once and rolled the die. I recorded and H for heads and a T for tails in the row labeled "Coin."

I recorded the number on the die in the row labeled "Die".

In the last row I determined whether the trial completed the event of flipping a head and rolling a six.

In this experiment, there was only 1 trial (out of 25) where a head was flipped on the coin and a 6 was rolled on the die.

This means that the experimental probability is 1/25 or 4%.

Please note that everyone's experiment will be different; thus allowing the experimental probability to differ.

Also, the more trials that you conduct in your experiment, the closer your calculations will be for the experimental and theoretical probabilities.

Conclusions

The theoretical probability is 8.3% and the experimental probability is 4%. Although the experimental probability is slightly lower, this is not a significant difference.

In most experiments, the theoretical probability and experimental probability will not be equal; however, they should be relatively close.

If the calculations are not close, then there's a possibility that the experiment was conducted improperly or more trials need to be completed.

I hope this helps to give you a sense of how to set up an experiment in order to compare theoretical versus experimental probabilities.

• Probability
• Theoretical/Experimental Probability

Need More Help With Your Algebra Studies?

Get access to hundreds of video examples and practice problems with your subscription! 

Click here for more information on our affordable subscription options.

Not ready to subscribe?  Register for our FREE Pre-Algebra Refresher course.

ALGEBRA CLASS E-COURSE MEMBERS

Click here for more information on our Algebra Class e-courses.

Need Help? Try This Online Calculator!

Affiliate Products...

On this site, I recommend only one product that I use and love and that is Mathway   If you make a purchase on this site, I may receive a small commission at no cost to you. 

Privacy Policy

Let Us Know How we are doing!

  send us a message to give us more detail!

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

• Click on the HTML link code below.
• Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.

Copyright © 2009-2020   |   Karin Hutchinson   |   ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Theoretical and Experimental Probability Worksheets

Probability is the branch of mathematics concerning numerical descriptions of how likely an event is to occur, or how likely it is that a proposition is true. The probability of an event is a number between 0 and 1, where, roughly speaking, 0 indicates impossibility of the event and 1 indicates certainty.

Benefits of Theoretical and Experimental Probability Worksheets

Experimental probability is the results of an experiment, let's say for the sake of an example marbles in a bag. Experimental probability would be drawing marbles out of the bag and recording the results. Theoretical probability is calculating the probability of it happening, not actually going out and experimenting.

Download Theoretical and Experimental Probability Worksheet PDFs

These math worksheets should be practiced regularly and are free to download in PDF formats.

• > Statistics
• > Probability

Comparing experimental and theoretical probability

• Examples 0/5

Get the most by viewing this topic in your current grade. Pick your course now .

• Experimental probability VS. Theoretical probability

• What is the experimental probability of both coins landing on heads?
• Calculate the theoretical probability of both coins landing on heads.
• Compare the theoretical probability and experimental probability.
• What can Jessie do to decrease the difference between the theoretical probability and experimental probability?

Free to Join!

• Join for Free

Easily See Your Progress

Make Use of Our Learning Aids

Last Viewed

Practice accuracy, suggested tasks.

Get quick access to the topic you're currently learning.

See how well your practice sessions are going over time.

Stay on track with our daily recommendations.

Earn Achievements as You Learn

Create and Customize Your Avatar

Topic Notes

Introduction.

Comparing experimental and theoretical probability is a fundamental concept in statistics that helps us understand the relationship between predicted outcomes and real-world results. Our introduction video provides a comprehensive overview of this topic, serving as an essential starting point for students and enthusiasts alike. This article delves deeper into the subject, exploring the definitions, key differences, and practical applications of both theoretical and experimental probability. Theoretical probability is based on mathematical calculations and assumes ideal conditions, while experimental probability relies on actual observations and data collection . Understanding the interplay between these two types of probability is crucial for making informed decisions in various fields, from scientific research to everyday life. As we progress through this article, we'll examine how these concepts are applied in real-world scenarios, highlighting their importance in fields such as finance, weather forecasting, and quality control. By the end, you'll have a solid grasp of how theoretical and experimental probability complement each other in our quest to understand and predict outcomes.

Defining Theoretical and Experimental Probability

Probability is a fundamental concept in mathematics that helps us understand the likelihood of events occurring. Two key types of probability are theoretical probability and experimental probability. Understanding these concepts is crucial for anyone studying statistics or working with data analysis.

Theoretical probability, also known as classical probability, is based on mathematical calculations and logical reasoning. It represents the expected likelihood of an event occurring under ideal conditions. This type of probability is determined by analyzing the possible outcomes of a situation and calculating the ratio of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes. Theoretical probability is often expressed as a fraction, decimal, or percentage.

On the other hand, experimental probability, sometimes called empirical probability, is derived from actual trials or experiments. It represents the observed frequency of an event occurring in real-world situations. Experimental probability is calculated by conducting multiple trials and recording the number of times a specific outcome occurs, then dividing that number by the total number of trials. Like theoretical probability, it can be expressed as a fraction, decimal, or percentage.

To illustrate these concepts, let's consider the classic example of a coin flip. In theory, a fair coin has two equally likely outcomes: heads or tails. The theoretical probability of getting heads on a single flip is 1/2 or 50%. This calculation is based on the assumption that the coin is perfectly balanced and the flip is unbiased.

However, when we actually flip a coin multiple times, we might observe slightly different results. For instance, if we flip a coin 100 times and get 48 heads, the experimental probability of getting heads would be 48/100 or 48%. This result is based on the actual outcomes of the experiment rather than theoretical calculations.

Calculating theoretical probability involves identifying all possible outcomes and determining the number of favorable outcomes. For example, when rolling a six-sided die, the theoretical probability of rolling an even number is 3/6 or 1/2, as there are three favorable outcomes (2, 4, and 6) out of six possible outcomes.

Experimental probability calculations require conducting multiple trials and recording the results. For instance, if we roll a die 200 times and observe 98 even numbers, the experimental probability would be 98/200 or 49%. This approach provides a real-world estimate of the probability based on observed data.

It's important to note that as the number of trials in an experiment increases, the experimental probability tends to converge towards the theoretical probability. This phenomenon is known as the law of large numbers. However, due to various factors such as imperfections in objects or experimental conditions, there may always be slight differences between theoretical and experimental probabilities.

Understanding both theoretical and experimental probability is essential in various fields, including statistics, science, and data analysis. Theoretical probability provides a baseline expectation, while experimental probability offers insights into real-world outcomes. By comparing these two types of probability, researchers can identify discrepancies, validate theories, and make informed decisions based on both mathematical models and empirical evidence.

Comparing Theoretical and Experimental Probability

Understanding the key differences between theoretical and experimental probability is crucial in the field of statistics and probability theory. Theoretical probability, also known as classical probability, is based on mathematical calculations and assumes ideal conditions. It represents the expected likelihood of an event occurring in the long run. On the other hand, experimental probability, or empirical probability, is derived from actual observations and experiments conducted in real-world scenarios.

The main distinction between these two types of probability lies in their approach and application. Theoretical probability is calculated using mathematical formulas and logical reasoning, without the need for physical experiments. It assumes that all outcomes are equally likely and that the conditions remain constant. For instance, when considering a fair six-sided die, the theoretical probability of rolling any number is 1/6, as there are six equally possible outcomes.

Experimental probability, however, is determined by conducting actual trials or experiments and recording the results. It takes into account real-world factors and variations that may influence the outcomes. This type of probability is based on the frequency of occurrences in a given number of trials. For example, if you roll a die 100 times and observe that the number 4 appears 18 times, the experimental probability of rolling a 4 would be 18/100 or 0.18.

One of the most intriguing aspects of probability is that experimental results might not always match theoretical expectations, especially when dealing with small sample sizes. This discrepancy can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, random chance plays a significant role in small samples, leading to potential deviations from the expected outcomes. Secondly, real-world conditions may introduce subtle biases or imperfections that are not accounted for in theoretical calculations.

To illustrate this point, let's consider the die rolling example from the video. In theory, each number on a fair die has an equal probability of 1/6 or approximately 0.167. However, if you were to roll the die only 10 times, you might observe results that differ significantly from this theoretical expectation. For instance, you might roll a 3 four times out of 10 rolls, giving an experimental probability of 0.4 for rolling a 3. This result clearly deviates from the theoretical probability of 0.167.

The reason for this discrepancy lies in the small sample size. With only 10 rolls, random fluctuations have a more pronounced effect on the results. It's important to note that such deviations do not necessarily indicate that the die is unfair or that the theoretical probability is incorrect. Instead, it highlights the impact of sample size on experimental probability.

As the number of trials increases, a fascinating phenomenon occurs: experimental probability tends to approach theoretical probability. This concept is known as the Law of Large Numbers. In our die rolling example, if you were to increase the number of rolls to 1,000 or even 10,000, you would likely observe that the experimental probabilities for each number start to converge towards the theoretical probability of 1/6.

This convergence happens because larger sample sizes provide more opportunities for random fluctuations to balance out. With more trials, the impact of short-term variations diminishes, and the overall pattern begins to align more closely with the expected theoretical outcomes. It's important to note that while experimental probability may approach theoretical probability with a large number of trials, it may never exactly match it due to real-world factors and inherent randomness.

Understanding the relationship between theoretical and experimental probability is crucial in various fields, including scientific research, quality control, and data analysis. It helps researchers and analysts interpret results more accurately, especially when dealing with small sample sizes. By recognizing the potential for discrepancies between theoretical expectations and experimental outcomes, one can avoid drawing hasty conclusions and instead consider the role of sample size and other influencing factors.

In conclusion, while theoretical and experimental probability offer different approaches to understanding the likelihood of events, they are complementary in nature. Theoretical probability provides a foundation for expectations, while experimental probability offers insights into real-world outcomes. By considering both aspects and understanding their relationship, we can gain a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of probability in various contexts.

Calculating and Interpreting Probabilities

Understanding how to calculate both theoretical and experimental probabilities is crucial in various fields, from statistics to everyday decision-making. This guide will walk you through the process step-by-step, using practical examples to illustrate the concepts.

How to Calculate Theoretical Probability

Theoretical probability is based on the assumption that all outcomes are equally likely. To calculate it:

• Identify the total number of possible outcomes.
• Determine the number of favorable outcomes (those that meet your criteria).
• Divide the number of favorable outcomes by the total number of possible outcomes.

Example: Finding the probability of rolling an even number on a six-sided die.

• Total outcomes: 6 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
• Favorable outcomes: 3 (2, 4, 6)
• Probability = 3/6 = 1/2 or 0.5 or 50%

How to Find Experimental Probability

Experimental probability is based on actual trials or observations. To calculate it:

• Conduct a series of trials or observations.
• Count the number of times the desired outcome occurs.
• Divide the number of favorable outcomes by the total number of trials.

Example: Rolling a die 100 times and counting even numbers.

• Total rolls: 100
• Number of even rolls: 48
• Experimental probability = 48/100 = 0.48 or 48%

Using Frequency Charts for Experimental Probability

Frequency charts for probability are valuable tools for determining experimental probability:

• Create a chart listing all possible outcomes.
• Tally the occurrences of each outcome during your trials.
• Calculate the probability by dividing each outcome's frequency by the total number of trials.

Example: A frequency chart for probability for 50 coin flips might show:

• Heads: 27 (Probability: 27/50 = 0.54)
• Tails: 23 (Probability: 23/50 = 0.46)

Interpreting Probability Results

Understanding what probability results mean is crucial:

• A probability of 0 means the event will never occur.
• A probability of 1 (or 100%) means the event will always occur.
• A probability of 0.5 (or 50%) means the event is equally likely to occur or not occur.

In practical terms, a 60% chance of rain means that, under similar conditions, it rains 60 out of 100 times. It doesn't guarantee rain but suggests it's more likely than not.

Comparing Theoretical and Experimental Probabilities

Often, theoretical and experimental probabilities differ slightly:

• Theoretical probability assumes ideal conditions.
• Experimental probability reflects real-world variations.
• As the number of trials increases, experimental probability typically approaches theoretical probability.

Practical Applications

Understanding probability is essential in various fields:

• Weather forecasting: Predicting the likelihood of specific weather conditions.

Advantages and Limitations of Theoretical and Experimental Probability

Probability is a fundamental concept in mathematics and statistics, with two primary approaches: theoretical and experimental probability. Each method has its own set of advantages and limitations, making them suitable for different situations. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurately predicting outcomes and making informed decisions.

Theoretical probability, also known as classical probability, is based on mathematical calculations and assumes ideal conditions. Its main advantage lies in its ability to provide precise predictions for well-defined scenarios. For instance, when calculating the probability of rolling a specific number on a fair die, theoretical probability offers an exact mathematical solution. This approach is particularly useful in games of chance, risk assessment, and scientific modeling where conditions can be controlled or standardized.

However, theoretical probability has limitations. It often assumes perfect conditions that may not exist in the real world. For example, a coin toss is theoretically a 50/50 chance, but factors like air resistance, the tosser's technique, or an uneven surface can influence the outcome. In complex real-world scenarios, theoretical probability may oversimplify the situation, leading to inaccurate predictions.

On the other hand, experimental probability, also called empirical probability, is based on actual observations and data collection . One of the key advantages of experimental probability is its ability to account for real-world factors that theoretical models might miss. This approach is particularly valuable in situations where conditions are not ideal or when multiple variables are at play. For instance, in weather forecasting, experimental probability based on historical data and current observations often provides more accurate predictions than purely theoretical models.

A significant advantage that experimental probability has over theoretical probability is its capacity to reveal unexpected patterns or influences that might not be apparent in a theoretical model. By conducting repeated trials and collecting data, researchers can uncover factors affecting outcomes that weren't initially considered. This makes experimental probability invaluable in fields like medicine, social sciences, and economics, where human behavior and complex interactions play a crucial role.

However, experimental probability is not without its limitations. It requires a large number of trials to produce reliable results, which can be time-consuming and costly. The accuracy of experimental probability also depends on the quality of data collection and the representativeness of the sample. Biases in sampling or measurement errors can lead to skewed results. Additionally, rare events may be underrepresented in experimental data, potentially leading to inaccurate probability estimates for uncommon occurrences.

In practice, the choice between theoretical and experimental probability often depends on the specific situation and available resources. Theoretical probability is preferred in scenarios where conditions can be well-defined and controlled, such as in casino games or basic physics problems. It's also useful for initial predictions or when conducting experiments is impractical or impossible.

Experimental probability, however, shines in complex, real-world applications where multiple factors influence outcomes. It's particularly valuable in fields like epidemiology, market research, and environmental science. In these areas, the ability to account for unforeseen variables and real-world conditions makes experimental probability a more reliable approach.

Ultimately, the most effective approach often involves combining both methods. Theoretical probability can provide a baseline expectation, while experimental probability can refine and validate these predictions in real-world contexts. This complementary use of both approaches allows for more robust and accurate probability assessments, leading to better decision-making and more reliable predictions across various fields of study and practical applications.

Practical Applications and Examples

Theoretical and experimental probability play crucial roles in various fields, from statistics and science to everyday decision-making. Let's explore some real-world examples and applications of these concepts, along with exercises to help you practice calculating probabilities.

Weather Forecasting

Meteorologists use both theoretical and experimental probability to predict weather patterns. Theoretical probability is applied when analyzing historical data and atmospheric models, while experimental probability comes into play as they gather real-time data from weather stations and satellites. For example, a meteorologist might state that there's a 70% chance of rain tomorrow based on a combination of these probabilities.

Sports Statistics

In sports analytics, theoretical probability is used to calculate the likelihood of certain outcomes based on past performance and team statistics. Experimental probability is then applied as games are played and new data is collected. For instance, a basketball player's free throw percentage is an example of experimental probability, while the theoretical probability of making a three-pointer might be calculated based on court position and defensive pressure.

Medical Research

In clinical trials, researchers use theoretical probability to design studies and determine sample sizes. As the trial progresses, they collect data and calculate experimental probabilities to assess the effectiveness of treatments. For example, the theoretical probability of a new drug's success might be estimated based on its chemical properties, while the experimental probability is determined through actual patient outcomes.

Insurance Industry

Insurance companies rely heavily on probability to set premiums and assess risk. They use theoretical probability models based on demographic data and historical trends, then adjust these models with experimental probability as they gather data from their policyholders. For instance, the probability of a car accident for a specific age group might be theoretically calculated, then refined with actual claim data.

Quality Control in Manufacturing

Manufacturers use probability to maintain product quality. Theoretical probability helps in setting quality standards, while experimental probability is used in sampling and testing products. For example, a theoretical model might predict the probability of defects in a production line, which is then compared to the actual defect rate found through quality control checks.

Financial Markets

Investors and financial analysts use probability to assess market trends and make investment decisions. Theoretical models predict stock performance based on economic indicators, while experimental probability is derived from actual market data. For instance, the probability of a stock price increase might be theoretically calculated, then compared to its actual performance over time.

1. Theoretical Probability: A fair six-sided die is rolled. Calculate the probability of rolling an even number.

2. Experimental Probability: In a bag of 100 marbles, you draw marbles 50 times with replacement and find that you've drawn a red marble 15 times. What is the experimental probability of drawing a red marble?

3. Combined Exercise: A weather forecast predicts a 30% chance of rain based on historical data. Over the next 10 days, it actually rains on 4 days. Compare the theoretical and experimental probabilities.

4. Real-world Application: A basketball player has made 80 out of 100 free throws this season. What is the experimental probability of them making their next free throw? How might this differ from the theoretical probability based on their career average?

By understanding and applying both theoretical and experimental probability, we can make more informed decisions in various aspects of life. Whether it's predicting outcomes, assessing risks, or analyzing data, probability serves as a powerful tool across numerous fields. Practice with these concepts will enhance your ability to interpret and use probability in real-world situations.

In this article, we've explored the fundamental concepts of theoretical and experimental probability, building upon the foundation laid in the introductory video. We've discussed the key differences between these two approaches and their practical applications in various fields. Understanding both theoretical calculations and real-world experimental results is crucial for a comprehensive grasp of probability. The examples provided illustrate how these concepts apply to everyday situations, from coin tosses to complex scientific experiments. As you continue your studies, remember to apply these principles to enhance your critical thinking and decision-making skills. Probability theory is not just an academic exercise but a powerful tool for navigating uncertainties in life. We encourage you to delve deeper into this fascinating subject, experiment with probability scenarios, and share your insights with others. For further exploration, consider joining online forums, attending workshops, or exploring advanced probability courses to expand your knowledge and practical skills in this essential mathematical field.

Step 1: Understanding the Problem

First, we need to understand the problem. Jessie flips two coins 20 times to determine the experimental probability of landing on heads versus tails. The results are given in a table format, showing the outcomes and the number of times each outcome occurred. Our task is to find the experimental probability of both coins landing on heads (H, H).

Step 2: Analyzing the Results

• H, H: 4 times
• H, T: 5 times
• T, H: 6 times
• T, T: 5 times

Step 3: Calculating the Experimental Probability

To calculate the experimental probability, we use the formula: Experimental Probability = (Number of Successful Outcomes) / (Total Number of Trials) In this case, the number of successful outcomes (both coins landing on heads) is 4, and the total number of trials is 20. Therefore, the experimental probability is: Experimental Probability = 4 / 20

Step 4: Simplifying the Fraction

To simplify the fraction, we find the greatest common divisor (GCD) of the numerator and the denominator. The GCD of 4 and 20 is 4. We divide both the numerator and the denominator by their GCD: 4 ÷ 4 = 1 20 ÷ 4 = 5 Therefore, the simplified fraction is: 1 / 5

Step 5: Interpreting the Result

The experimental probability of both coins landing on heads is 1 out of 5, or 1/5. This means that, based on Jessie's experiment, there is a 20% chance (since 1/5 = 0.20) that both coins will land on heads in any given trial.

Here are some frequently asked questions about theoretical and experimental probability:

1. What is the difference between theoretical and experimental probability?

Theoretical probability is based on mathematical calculations and assumes ideal conditions, while experimental probability is derived from actual observations and data collection. Theoretical probability predicts outcomes based on logical reasoning, whereas experimental probability reflects real-world results.

2. How do you calculate theoretical probability?

To calculate theoretical probability, use the formula: P(event) = (number of favorable outcomes) / (total number of possible outcomes). For example, the theoretical probability of rolling a 3 on a fair six-sided die is 1/6, as there is one favorable outcome out of six possible outcomes.

3. What is an example of experimental probability?

An example of experimental probability is flipping a coin 100 times and observing 52 heads. The experimental probability of getting heads would be 52/100 = 0.52 or 52%. This result is based on actual observations rather than theoretical calculations.

4. Why might theoretical and experimental probabilities differ?

Theoretical and experimental probabilities may differ due to factors such as sample size, random variation, and real-world conditions that aren't accounted for in theoretical models. As the number of trials increases, experimental probability tends to converge towards theoretical probability.

5. Which is more reliable, theoretical or experimental probability?

Neither is inherently more reliable; they serve different purposes. Theoretical probability provides a baseline expectation, while experimental probability reflects real-world outcomes. In practice, combining both approaches often yields the most comprehensive understanding of probability in a given situation.

Prerequisite Topics

Before delving into the intricacies of comparing experimental and theoretical probability, it's crucial to understand the foundational concepts that support this topic. One of the most important prerequisite topics is influencing factors in data collection . This fundamental concept plays a significant role in shaping our understanding of probability and its practical applications.

Understanding the influencing factors in data collection is essential when comparing experimental and theoretical probability. These factors directly impact the quality and reliability of the data we use to calculate experimental probability. For instance, when conducting experiments to determine probability, the methods used for data collection can significantly influence the outcomes. Biases, sample size, and data collection techniques all play crucial roles in shaping the experimental results.

Moreover, the concept of data collection is intrinsically linked to the process of gathering empirical evidence, which is the cornerstone of experimental probability. By understanding how various factors can influence data collection, students can better appreciate the potential discrepancies between experimental and theoretical probability.

For example, when comparing the theoretical probability of rolling a six on a die (1/6) with the experimental probability derived from actual rolls, the influencing factors in data collection become evident. The number of rolls (sample size), the randomness of the rolling technique, and even the physical characteristics of the die can all affect the experimental results. These factors highlight the importance of understanding data collection principles when interpreting and comparing probabilities.

Furthermore, grasping the concepts related to influencing factors in data collection helps students develop a critical eye when analyzing probability studies. It enables them to identify potential sources of error or bias in experimental setups, leading to a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between theoretical and experimental probabilities.

In conclusion, the prerequisite topic of influencing factors in data collection serves as a crucial foundation for comparing experimental and theoretical probability. It equips students with the necessary tools to critically evaluate data, understand the limitations of experimental results, and appreciate the complexities involved in real-world probability calculations. By mastering this prerequisite, students will be better prepared to tackle the challenges of comparing different types of probabilities and apply their knowledge in various statistical contexts.

Basic Concepts

• Introduction to probability
• Organizing outcomes
• Probability of independent events

Related Concepts

• Determining probabilities using tree diagrams and tables
• Probability

Become a member to get more!

No Javascript

It looks like you have javascript disabled.

You can still navigate around the site and check out our free content, but some functionality, such as sign up, will not work.

If you do have javascript enabled there may have been a loading error; try refreshing your browser.

Have an account?

Suggestions for you See more

Probability

7th -  9th  , 3rd -  5th  , basic probability, 9th -  10th  , 11th -  12th  , university -  professional development  , two step word problems.

Unit 9 Lesson 2 - Theoretical and Experi...

Mathematics.

Unit 9 Lesson 2 - Theoretical and Experimental Probability

6 questions

Introducing new   Paper mode

No student devices needed.   Know more

The spinner is divided into eight equal parts. Find the theoretical probability of landing on the given section of the spinner. P(white) =

The theoretical probability of rolling an even number on a dice.

This is what SHOULD happen in an experiment or event.

theoretical probability

tree diagram

simple event

A bag has 3 red marbles, 2 blue, 4 green, and 1 yellow. What is the theoretical probability of pulling a red?

The chart below represents the number of marbles in a jar.

Explore all questions with a free account

Continue with email

Continue with phone

• Find Gizmos
• Lesson Info

Theoretical and Experimental Probability

Experiment with spinners and compare the experimental probability of a particular outcome to the theoretical probability. Select the number of spinners, the number of sections on a spinner, and a favorable outcome of a spin. Then tally the number of favorable outcomes.

Lesson Materials

Student Exploration Sheet

Exploration Sheet Answer Key

Assessment Questions

Teacher Guide

Vocabulary Sheet

Cell Energy Cycle

Explore the processes of photosynthesis and respiration that occur within plant and animal cells. The cyclical nature of the two processes can be constructed visually, and the simplified photosynthesis and respiration formulae can be balanced.

Flower Pollination

Observe the steps of pollination and fertilization in flowering plants. Help with many parts of the process by dragging pollen grains to the stigma, dragging sperm to the ovules, and removing petals as the fruit begins to grow. Quiz yourself when you are done by dragging vocabulary words to the correct plant structure.

Growing Plants

Investigate the growth of three common garden plants: tomatoes, beans, and turnips. You can change the amount of light each plant gets, the amount of water added each day, and the type of soil the seed is planted in. Observe the effect of each variable on plant height, plant mass, leaf color and leaf size. Determine what conditions produce the tallest and healthiest plants. Height and mass data are displayed on tables and graphs.

Plants and Snails

Study the production and use of gases by plants and animals. Measure the oxygen and carbon dioxide levels in a test tube containing snails and elodea (a type of plant) in both light and dark conditions. Learn about the interdependence of plants and animals.

Find Your Solution

Start playing, exploring and learning today with a free account. Or contact us for a quote or demo.

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Time-resolved circular dichroism in molecules: experimental and theoretical advances.

1. Introduction

2. trcd: experimental aspects, 2.1. ultrafast trcd: differential absorption and ellipsometric setup.

Click here to enlarge figure

2.2. Broadband TRCD Detection

2.3. single-shot ellipsometric trcd, 2.4. high-harmonic generation and photoelectron measurements for cd applications, 3. trcd: theoretical methods, 3.1. non-adiabatic molecular dynamics, 3.2. excited-state cd spectra, 4. discussion and outlook.

• coupling techniques such as NAMD, which explore excited-state PESs, with approaches that compute ESCD spectra, with explicit focus on the population of excited states over time;
• using the time-resolved version of methods such as LR-TDDFT to easily calculate ESCD in a general way, once an excited-state geometry is provided (from dynamics or geometry optimization).

Author Contributions

Data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Pelayo, J.J.; Valencia, I.; García, A.P.; Chang, L.; López, M.; Toffoli, D.; Stener, M.; Fortunelli, A.; Garzón, I.L. Chirality in bare and ligand-protected metal nanoclusters. Adv. Phys. X 2018 , 3 , 1509727. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gray, L.E., Jr.; Ostby, J.; Furr, J.; Price, M.; Veeramachaneni, D.R.; Parks, L. Perinatal exposure to the phthalates DEHP, BBP, and DINP, but not DEP, DMP, or DOTP, alters sexual differentiation of the male rat. Toxicol. Sci. 2000 , 58 , 350–365. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Kim, J.H.; Scialli, A.R. Thalidomide: The tragedy of birth defects and the effective treatment of disease. Toxicol. Sci. 2011 , 122 , 1–6. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Brooks, W.H.; Guida, W.C.; Daniel, K.G. The significance of chirality in drug design and development. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2011 , 11 , 760. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Müller, C.; Bauer, A.; Bach, T. Licht-getriebene enantioselektive Organokatalyse. Angew. Chem. 2009 , 121 , 6767–6769. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kameta, N.; Masuda, M.; Shimizu, T. Qualitative/chiral sensing of amino acids by naked-eye fluorescence change based on morphological transformation and hierarchizing in supramolecular assemblies of pyrene-conjugated glycolipids. Chem. Commun. 2015 , 51 , 11104–11107. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Frank, F.C. On spontaneous asymmetric synthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1953 , 11 , 459–463. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Budin, I.; Szostak, J.W. Expanding roles for diverse physical phenomena during the origin of life. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2010 , 39 , 245–263. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meierhenrich, U.J. Amino acids and the asymmetry of life. Eur. Rev. 2013 , 21 , 190–199. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pavlov, V.A.; I Klabunovskii, E. Homochirality origin in nature: Possible versions. Curr. Org. Chem. 2014 , 18 , 93–114. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Berova, N.; Nakanishi, K.; Woody, R.W. Circular Dichroism: Principles and Applications ; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
• Stephens, P.J. Theory of vibrational circular dichroism. J. Phys. Chem. 1985 , 89 , 748–752. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Riehl, J.P.; Richardson, F.S. Circularly polarized luminescence spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 1986 , 86 , 1–16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kuball, H.G. Chiroptical Analysis. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Science , 3rd ed.; Worsfold, P., Poole, C., Townshend, A., Miró, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 1–21. [ Google Scholar ]
• Berova, N.; Di Bari, L.; Pescitelli, G. Application of electronic circular dichroism in configurational and conformational analysis of organic compounds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007 , 36 , 914–931. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Fasman, G.D. Circular Dichroism and the Conformational Analysis of Biomolecules ; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Serber, R. The Theory of the Faraday Effect in Molecules. Phys. Rev. 1932 , 41 , 489. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Buckingham, A.D.; Stephens, P.J. Magnetic Optical Activity. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1966 , 17 , 399. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mason, W.R. A Practical Guide to Magnetic Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy ; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
• Piepho, S.B.; Schatz, P.N. Group Theory in Spectroscopy: With Applications to Magnetic Circular Dichroism ; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1983. [ Google Scholar ]
• Elove, G.A.; Chaffotte, A.F.; Roder, H.; Goldberg, M.E. Early steps in cytochrome c folding probed by time-resolved circular dichroism and fluorescence spectroscopy. Biochemistry 1992 , 31 , 6876–6883. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jones, C.M.; Henry, E.R.; Hu, Y.; Chan, C.K.; Luck, S.D.; Bhuyan, A.; Roder, H.; Hofrichter, J.; Eaton, W.A. Fast events in protein folding initiated by nanosecond laser photolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993 , 90 , 11860–11864. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• van der Laan, G.; Figueroa, A.I. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism—A versatile tool to study magnetism. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014 , 277–278 , 95. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fan, T.; Grychtol, P.; Knut, R.; Hernandez-Garcia, C.; Hickstein, D.D.; Zusin, D.; Gentry, C.; Dollar, F.J.; Mancuso, C.A.; Hogle, C.W.; et al. Bright circularly polarized soft X-ray high harmonics for X-ray magnetic circular dichroism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015 , 112 , 14206. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stamm, C.; Kachel, T.; Pontius, N.; Mitzner, R.; Quast, T.; Holldack, K.; Khan, S.; Lupulescu, C.; Aziz, E.F.; Wietstruk, M.; et al. Femtosecond modification of electron localization and transfer of angular momentum in nickel. Nat. Mater. 2007 , 6 , 740. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boeglin, C.; Beaurepaire, E.; Halté, V.; López-Flores, V.; Stamm, C.; Pontius, N.; Dürr, H.A.; Bigot, J.Y. Distinguishing the ultrafast dynamics of spin and orbital moments in solids. Nature 2010 , 465 , 458. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sun, S.; Gu, B.; Hu, H.; Lu, L.; Tang, D.; Chernyak, V.Y.; Li, X.; Mukamel, S. Direct Probe of Conical Intersection Photochemistry by Time-Resolved X-ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024 , 146 , 19863. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bayley, P. Fast kinetic studies with chiroptical techniques: Stopped flow circular dichroism and related methods. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 1981 , 37 , 149–180. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Anson, M.; Martin, S.R.; Bayley, P.M. Transient CD measurements at submillisecond time resolution—Application to studies of temperature-jump relaxation of equilibria of chiral biomolecules. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1977 , 48 , 953–962. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ferrone, F.; Hopfield, J.; Schnatterly, S. The measurement of transient circular dichroism: A new kinetic technique. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1974 , 45 , 1392–1396. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Laouer, K.; Schmid, M.; Wien, F.; Changenet, P.; Hache, F. Folding Dynamics of DNA G-Quadruplexes Probed by Millisecond Temperature Jump Circular Dichroism. J. Phys. Chem. B 2021 , 125 , 8088–8098. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khuc, M.T.; Mendonça, L.; Sharma, S.; Solinas, X.; Volk, M.; Hache, F. Measurement of circular dichroism dynamics in a nanosecond temperature-jump experiment. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2011 , 82 , 054302. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mendonça, L.; Steinbacher, A.; Bouganne, R.; Hache, F. Comparative Study of the Folding/Unfolding Dynamics of Poly(glutamic acid) in Light and Heavy Water. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014 , 118 , 5350–5356. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Chen, E.; Wittung-Stafshede, P.; Kliger, D.S. Far-UV Time-Resolved Circular Dichroism Detection of Electron-Transfer-Triggered Cytochrome c Folding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999 , 121 , 3811–3817. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kuwajima, K.; Yamaya, H.; Miwa, S.; Sugai, S.; Nagamura, T. Rapid formation of secondary structure framework in protein folding studied by stopped-flow circular dichroism. FEBS Lett. 1987 , 221 , 115–118. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thomas, Y.G.; Szundi, I.; Lewis, J.W.; Kliger, D.S. Microsecond Time-Resolved Circular Dichroism of Rhodopsin Photointermediates. Biochemistry 2009 , 48 , 12283–12289. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Clinger, J.A.; Chen, E.; Kliger, D.S.; Phillips, G.N.J. Pump–Probe Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy of Cyanobacteriochrome TePixJ Yields: Insights into Its Photoconversion. J. Chem. Phys. B 2021 , 125 , 202–210. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Milder, S.; Bjorling, S.; Kuntz, I.; Kliger, D. Time-resolved circular dichroism and absorption studies of the photolysis reaction of (carbonmonoxy) myoglobin. Biophys. J. 1988 , 53 , 659–664. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, E.; Kliger, D.S. Time-resolved near UV circular dichroism and absorption studies of carbonmonoxymyoglobin photolysis intermediates. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1996 , 242 , 149–158. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Björling, S.C.; Goldbeck, R.A.; Paquette, S.J.; Milder, S.J.; Kliger, D.S. Allosteric Intermediates in Hemoglobin. 1. Nanosecond Time-Resolved Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy. Biochemistry 1996 , 35 , 8619–8627. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lewis, J.W.; Goldbeck, R.A.; Kliger, D.S.; Xie, X.; Dunn, R.C.; Simon, J.D. Time-resolved circular dichroism spectroscopy: Experiment, theory, and applications to biological systems. J. Phys. Chem. 1992 , 96 , 5243–5254. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Goldbeck, R.A.; Kim-Shapiro, D.B.; Kliger, D.S. Fast Natural and Magnetic Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1997 , 48 , 453–479. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, E.; Goldbeck, R.A.; Kliger, D.S. Nanosecond time-resolved polarization spectroscopies: Tools for probing protein reaction mechanisms. Methods 2010 , 52 , 3–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hache, F.; Changenet, P. Multiscale conformational dynamics probed by time-resolved circular dichroism from seconds to picoseconds. Chirality 2021 , 33 , 747–757. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meyer-Ilse, J.; Akimov, D.; Dietzek, B. Recent advances in ultrafast time-resolved chirality measurements: Perspective and outlook. Laser Photonics Rev. 2013 , 7 , 495–505. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Changenet, P.; Hache, F. Recent advances in the development of ultrafast electronic circular dichroism for probing the conformational dynamics of biomolecules in solution. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2023 , 232 , 2117–2129. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lewis, J.; Tilton, R.; Einterz, C.; Milder, S.; Kuntz, I.; Kliger, D. New technique for measuring circular dichroism changes on a nanosecond time scale. Application to (carbonmonoxy) myoglobin and (carbonmonoxy) hemoglobin. J. Phys. Chem. 1985 , 89 , 289–294. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xie, X.; Simon, J.D. Picosecond time-resolved circular dichroism spectroscopy: Experimental details and applications. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1989 , 60 , 2614–2627. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dartigalongue, T.; Hache, F. Observation of sub-100ps conformational changes in photolyzed carbonmonoxy-myoglobin probed by time-resolved circular dichroism. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005 , 415 , 313–316. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Niezborala, C.; Hache, F. Measuring the dynamics of circular dichroism in a pump-probe experiment with a Babinet-Soleil Compensator. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2006 , 23 , 2418–2424. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dartigalongue, T.; Hache, F. Time-resolved circular dichroism in carbonmonoxy-myoglobin: The central role of the proximal histidine. Chirality 2006 , 18 , 273–278. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Dartigalongue, T.; Niezborala, C.; Hache, F. Subpicosecond UV spectroscopy of carbonmonoxy-myoglobin: Absorption and circular dichroism studies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007 , 9 , 1611–1615. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hache, F.; Khuc, M.T.; Brazard, J.; Plaza, P.; Martin, M.M.; Checcucci, G.; Lenci, F. Picosecond transient circular dichroism of the photoreceptor protein of the light-adapted form of Blepharisma japonicum. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009 , 483 , 133–137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mendonça, L.; Hache, F.; Changenet-Barret, P.; Plaza, P.; Chosrowjan, H.; Taniguchi, S.; Imamoto, Y. Ultrafast carbonyl motion of the photoactive yellow protein chromophore probed by femtosecond circular dichroism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013 , 135 , 14637–14643. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schmid, M.; Martinez-Fernandez, L.; Markovitsi, D.; Santoro, F.; Hache, F.; Improta, R.; Changenet, P. Unveiling excited-state chirality of binaphthols by femtosecond circular dichroism and quantum chemical calculations. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019 , 10 , 4089–4094. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dartigalongue, T.; Hache, F. Calculation of the circular dichroism spectra of carbon monoxy- and deoxy myoglobin: Interpretation of a time-resolved circular dichroism experiment. J. Chem. Phys. 2005 , 123 , 184901. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meyer-Ilse, J.; Akimov, D.; Dietzek, B. Ultrafast Circular Dichroism Study of the Ring Opening of 7-Dehydrocholesterol. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012 , 3 , 182–185. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tapavicza, E.; Reutershan, T.; Thompson, T. Ab Initio Simulation of the Ultrafast Circular Dichroism Spectrum of Provitamin D Ring-Opening. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023 , 14 , 5061. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Trifonov, A.; Buchvarov, I.; Lohr, A.; Würthner, F.; Fiebig, T. Broadband femtosecond circular dichroism spectrometer with white-light polarization control. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2010 , 81 , 043104. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Scholz, M.; Morgenroth, M.; Cho, M.J.; Choi, D.H.; Oum, K.; Lenzer, T. Ultrafast Broadband Transient Absorption and Circular Dichroism Reveal Relaxation of a Chiral Copolymer. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019 , 10 , 5160–5166. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Morgenroth, M.; Scholz, M.; Lenzer, T.; Oum, K. Ultrafast UV–Vis Transient Absorption and Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy of a Polyfluorene Copolymer Showing Large Chiral Induction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020 , 124 , 10192–10200. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jespersen, K.G.; Beenken, W.J.D.; Zaushitsyn, Y.; Yartsev, A.; Andersson, M.; Pullerits, T.; Sundström, V. The electronic states of polyfluorene copolymers with alternating donor-acceptor units. J. Chem. Phys. 2004 , 121 , 12613–12617. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Morgenroth, M.; Scholz, M.; Cho, M.J.; Choi, D.H.; Oum, K.; Lenzer, T. Mapping the broadband circular dichroism of copolymer films with supramolecular chirality in time and space. Nat. Commun. 2022 , 13 , 210. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gust, D.; Scholz, M.; Schumacher, V.; Mulatier, J.C.; Pitrat, D.; Guy, L.; Oum, K.; Lenzer, T. Annealing temperature-dependent induced supramolecular chiroptical response of copolymer thin films studied by pump-modulated transient circular dichroism spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2024 , 14 , 12694. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ress, L.; Malỳ, P.; Landgraf, J.B.; Lindorfer, D.; Hofer, M.; Selby, J.; Lambert, C.; Renger, T.; Brixner, T. Time-resolved circular dichroism of excitonic systems: Theory and experiment on an exemplary squaraine polymer. Chem. Sci. 2023 , 14 , 9328–9349. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Oppermann, M.; Bauer, B.; Rossi, T.; Zinna, F.; Helbing, J.; Lacour, J.; Chergui, M. Ultrafast broadband circular dichroism in the deep ultraviolet. Optica 2019 , 6 , 56–60. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gold, J.S.; Milder, S.J.; Lewis, J.W.; Kliger, D.S. Transient circular dichroism of the luminescent state of Ru(bpy)32+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985 , 107 , 8285–8286. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Milder, S.J.; Gold, J.S.; Kliger, D.S. Time-resolved circular dichroism of the lowest excited state of ( Δ )-Ru(bpy)32+. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988 , 144 , 269–272. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Oppermann, M.; Spekowius, J.; Bauer, B.; Pfister, R.; Chergui, M.; Helbing, J. Broad-Band Ultraviolet CD Spectroscopy of Ultrafast Peptide Backbone Conformational Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019 , 10 , 2700–2705. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mangot, L.; Taupier, G.; Romeo, M.; Boeglin, A.; Cregut, O.; Dorkenoo, K.D.H. Broadband transient dichroism spectroscopy in chiral molecules. Opt. Lett. 2010 , 35 , 381–383. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eom, I.; Ahn, S.H.; Rhee, H.; Cho, M. Single-Shot Electronic Optical Activity Interferometry: Power and Phase Fluctuation-Free Measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012 , 108 , 103901. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hiramatsu, K.; Nagata, T. Communication: Broadband and ultrasensitive femtosecond time-resolved circular dichroism spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 2015 , 143 , 121102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Preda, F.; Perri, A.; Réhault, J.; Dutta, B.; Helbing, J.; Cerullo, G.; Polli, D. Time-domain measurement of optical activity by an ultrastable common-path interferometer. Opt. Lett. 2018 , 43 , 1882–1885. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nishiyama, Y.; Ishikawa, S.; Nagatani, H. Phase-stable optical activity measurement by common-path spectral interferometry. Opt. Lett. 2020 , 45 , 5868–5871. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ghosh, S.; Herink, G.; Perri, A.; Preda, F.; Manzoni, C.; Polli, D.; Cerullo, G. Broadband Optical Activity Spectroscopy with Interferometric Fourier-Transform Balanced Detection. ACS Photonics 2021 , 8 , 2234–2242. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Changenet, P.; Hache, F. Artifact-free balanced detection for the measurement of circular dichroism with a sub-picosecond time resolution. Opt. Express 2023 , 31 , 21296–21310. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Niezborala, C.; Hache, F. Excited-State Absorption and Circular Dichroism of Ruthenium(II) Tris(phenanthroline) in the Ultraviolet Region. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007 , 111 , 7732–7735. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ayuso, D.; Ordonez, A.F.; Smirnova, O. Ultrafast chirality: The road to efficient chiral measurements. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022 , 24 , 26962. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Powis, I. Photoelectron Circular Dichroism in Chiral Molecules. Adv. Chem. Phys. 2008 , 138 , 267. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cireasa, R.; Boguslavskiy, A.E.; Pons, B.; Wong, M.C.H.; Descamps, D.; Petit, S.; Ruf, H.; Thiré, N.; Ferré, A.; Suarez, J.; et al. Probing molecular chirality on a sub-femtosecond timescale. Nat. Phys. 2015 , 11 , 654. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harada, Y.; Haraguchi, E.; Kaneshima, K.; Sekikawa, T. Circular dichroism in high-order harmonic generation from chiral molecules. Phys. Rev. A 2018 , 98 , 021401. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Baykusheva, D.; Wörner, H.J. Chiral Discrimination through Bielliptical High-Harmonic Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X 2018 , 9 , 031060. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Baykusheva, D.; Zindel, D.; Svoboda, V.; Bommeli, E.; Ochsner, M.; Tehlar, A.; Wörner, H.J. Real-time probing of chirality during a chemical reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019 , 116 , 23923. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Svoboda, V.; Ram, N.B.; Baykusheva, D.; Zindel, D.; Waters, M.D.J.; Spenger, B.; Ochsner, M.; Herburger, H.; Stohner, J.; Wörner, H.J. Femtosecond photoelectron circular dichroism of chemical reactions. Sci. Adv. 2022 , 8 , 28. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Faccialà, D.; Devetta, M.; Beauvarlet, S.; Besley, N.; Calegari, F.; Callegari, C.; Catone, D.; Cinquanta, E.; Ciriolo, A.G.; Colaizzi, L.; et al. Time-Resolved Chiral X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy with Transiently Enhanced Atomic Site Selectivity: A Free-Electron Laser Investigation of Electronically Excited Fenchone Enantiomers. Phys. Rev. X 2023 , 13 , 011044. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tikhonov, D.S.; Blech, A.; Leibscher, M.; Greenman, L.; Schnell, M.; Koch, C.P. Pump-probe spectroscopy of chiral vibrational dynamics. Sci. Adv. 2022 , 8 , 49. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Comby, A.; Beaulieu, S.; Boggio-Pasqua, M.; Descamps, D.; Légaré, F.; Nahon, L.; Petit, S.; Pons, B.; Fabre, B.; Mairesse, Y.; et al. Relaxation Dynamics in Photoexcited Chiral Molecules Studied by Time-Resolved Photoelectron Circular Dichroism: Toward Chiral Femtochemistry. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016 , 7 , 4514. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Beaulieu, S.; Comby, A.; Fabre, B.; Descamps, D.; Ferré, A.; Garcia, G.; Géneaux, R.; Légaré’, F.; Nahon, L.; Petit, S.; et al. Probing Ultrafast Dynamics of Chiral Molecules Using Time-Resolved Photoelectron Circular Dichroism. Faraday Discuss. 2016 , 194 , 325. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Blanchet, V.; Descamps, D.; Petit, S.; Mairesse, Y.; Pons, B.; Fabre, B. Ultrafast Relaxation Investigated by Photoelectron Circular Dichroism: An Isomeric Comparison of Camphor and Fenchone. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021 , 23 , 25612. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rouxel, J.R.; Kowalewski, M.; Mukamel, S. Photoinduced molecular chirality probed by ultrafast resonant x-ray spectroscopy. Struct. Dyn. 2017 , 4 , 044006. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Zhang, Y.; Rouxel, J.R.; Autschbach, J.; Govind, N.; Mukamel, S. X-ray circular dichroism signals: A unique probe of local molecular chirality. Chem. Sci. 2017 , 8 , 5969–5978. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rouxel, J.R.; Zhang, Y.; Mukamel, S. X-ray Raman optical activity of chiral molecules. Chem. Sci. 2019 , 10 , 898–908. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Corkum, P.B. Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993 , 71 , 1994. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lewenstein, M.; Balcou, P.; Ivanov, M.Y.; L’Huillier, A.; Corkum, P.B. Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields. Phys. Rev. A 1994 , 49 , 2117. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Corkum, P.B.; Krausz, F. Attosecond Science. Nat. Phys. 2007 , 3 , 381. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Turchini, S.; Catone, D.; Zema, N.; Contini, G.; Prosperi, T.; Decleva, P.; Stener, M.; Rondino, F.; Piccirillo, S.; Prince, K.C.; et al. Conformational Sensitivity in Photoelectron Circular Dichroism of 3-Methylcyclopentanone. ChemPhysChem 2013 , 14 , 1723. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ilchen, M.; Hartmann, G.; Rupprecht, P.; Artemyev, A.N.; Coffee, R.N.; Li, Z.; Ohldag, H.; Ogasawara, H.; Osipov, T.; Ray, D.; et al. Emitter-Site-Selective Photoelectron Circular Dichroism of Trifluoromethyloxirane. Phys. Rev. A 2017 , 95 , 053423. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schuetz, G.; Wagner, W.; Wilhelm, W.; Kienle, P.; Zeller, R.; Frahm, R.; Materlik, G. Absorption of circularly polarized x-rays in iron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987 , 58 , 737. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Chen, C.; Idzerda, Y.; Lin, H.J.; Smith, N.; Meigs, G.; Chaban, E.; Ho, G.; Pellegrin, E.; Sette, F. Experimental Confirmation of the X-ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism Sum Rules for Iron and Cobalt. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995 , 75 , 152. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Funk, T.; Deb, A.; George, S.J.; Wang, H.; Cramer, S.P. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism—A high energy probe of magnetic properties. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2005 , 249 , 3. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zamudio-Bayer, V.; Hirsch, K.; Langenberg, A.; Niemeyer, M.; Vogel, M.; Ławicki, A.; Terasaki, A.; Lau, J.T.; Von Issendorff, B. Maximum Spin Polarization in Chromium Dimer Cations as Demonstrated by X-ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015 , 54 , 4498. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wilhelm, F.; Sanchez, J.P.; Rogalev, A. Magnetism of uranium compounds probed by XMCD spectroscopy. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018 , 51 , 333001. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bar, A.K.; Kalita, P.; Singh, M.K.; Rajaraman, G.; Chandrasekhar, V. Low-coordinate mononuclear lanthanide complexes as molecular nanomagnets. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018 , 367 , 163. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pedersen, K.S.; Meihaus, K.R.; Rogalev, A.; Wilhelm, F.; Aravena, D.; Amoza, M.; Ruiz, E.; Long, J.R.; Bendix, J.; Clérac, R. [UF 6 ] 2− : A Molecular Hexafluorido Actinide(IV) Complex with Compensating Spin and Orbital Magnetic Moments. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019 , 58 , 15650. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kowalska, J.K.; Henthorn, J.T.; Van Stappen, C.; Trncik, C.; Einsle, O.; Keavney, D.; DeBeer, S. X-ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy Applied to Nitrogenase and Related Models: Experimental Evidence for a Spin-Coupled Molybdenum (III) Center. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019 , 58 , 9373. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jungcharoen, P.; Pédrot, M.; Choueikani, F.; Pasturel, M.; Hanna, K.; Heberling, F.; Tesfa, M.; Marsac, R. Probing the effects of redox conditions and dissolved Fe 2+ on nanomagnetite stoichiometry by wet chemistry, XRD, XAS and XMCD. Environ. Sci. Nano 2021 , 8 , 2098. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• N’Diaye, A.; Bordage, A.; Nataf, L.; Baudelet, F.; Rivière, E.; Bleuzen, A. Interplay between Transition-Metal K-edge XMCD and Magnetism in Prussian Blue Analogs. ACS Omega 2022 , 7 , 36366. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Takubo, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Hirata, Y.; Yokoyama, Y.; Kubota, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Yamamoto, S.; Matsuda, I.; Shin, S.; Seki, T.; et al. Capturing ultrafast magnetic dynamics by time-resolved soft x-ray magnetic circular dichroism. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017 , 110 , 162401. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ishii, Y.; Yamasaki, Y.; Kozuka, Y.; Lustikova, J.; Nii, Y.; Onose, Y.; Yokoyama, Y.; Mizumaki, M.; ichi Adachi, J.; Nakao, H.; et al. Microscopic evaluation of spin and orbital moment in ferromagnetic resonance. Sci. Rep. 2024 , 14 , 15504. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Emori, S.; Maizel, R.E.; Street, G.T.; Jones, J.L.; Arena, D.A.; Shafer, P.; Klewe, C. Quantifying the orbital-to-spin moment ratio under dynamic excitation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2024 , 124 , 122404. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Iftimie, R.; Minary, P.; Tuckerman, M.E. Ab initio molecular dynamics: Concepts, recent developments, and future trends. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005 , 102 , 6654. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tully, J.C. Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions. J. Chem. Phys. 1990 , 93 , 1061–1071. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tapavicza, E.; Tavernelli, I.; Rothlisberger, U. Trajectory Surface Hopping within Linear Response Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007 , 98 , 023001. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McWeeny, R. Methods of Molecular Quantum Mechanics , 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schellman, J.A. Circular dichroism and optical rotation. Chem. Rev. 1975 , 75 , 323–331. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tapavicza, E.; Bellchambers, G.D.; Vincent, J.C.; Furche, F. Ab initio non-adiabatic molecular dynamics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013 , 15 , 18336–18348. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, J.; Neukirch, A.J.; Prezhdo, O.V. Non-radiative electron–hole recombination in silicon clusters: Ab initio non-adiabatic molecular dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014 , 118 , 20702–20709. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chapman, S. The Classical Trajectory-Surface-Hopping Approach to Charge-Transfer Processes. In Advances in Chemical Physics: State-Selected and State-To-State Ion-Molecule Reaction Dynamics, Part 2, Theory ; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1992; Volume 82, pp. 423–483. [ Google Scholar ]
• Subotnik, J.E.; Jain, A.; Landry, B.; Petit, A.; Ouyang, W.; Bellonzi, N. Understanding the surface hopping view of electronic transitions and decoherence. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2016 , 67 , 387–417. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Malhado, J.P.; Bearpark, M.J.; Hynes, J.T. Non-adiabatic dynamics close to conical intersections and the surface hopping perspective. Front. Chem. 2014 , 2 , 97. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Barbatti, M. Nonadiabatic dynamics with trajectory surface hopping method. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2011 , 1 , 620–633. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Furche, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Adiabatic time-dependent density functional methods for excited state properties. J. Chem. Phys. 2002 , 117 , 7433–7447. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Send, R.; Furche, F. First-order nonadiabatic couplings from time-dependent hybrid density functional response theory: Consistent formalism, implementation, and performance. J. Chem. Phys. 2010 , 132 , 044107. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tavernelli, I.; Curchod, B.F.; Rothlisberger, U. On nonadiabatic coupling vectors in time-dependent density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2009 , 131 , 196101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sofferman, D.L.; Konar, A.; Spears, K.G.; Sension, R.J. Ultrafast excited state dynamics of provitamin D3 and analogs in solution and in lipid bilayers. J. Chem. Phys. 2021 , 154 , 094309. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Tapavicza, E.; Meyer, A.M.; Furche, F. Unravelling the details of vitamin D photosynthesis by non-adiabatic molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011 , 13 , 20986–20998. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sałek, P.; Vahtras, O.; Helgaker, T.; Ågren, H. Density-functional theory of linear and nonlinear time-dependent molecular properties. J. Chem. Phys. 2002 , 117 , 9630–9645. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jansik, B.; Sałek, P.; Jonsson, D.; Vahtras, O.; Ågren, H. Cubic response functions in time-dependent density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2005 , 122 , 054107. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Gaw, J.; Handy, N. Ab initio quadratic, cubic and quartic force constants for the calculation of spectroscopic constants. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985 , 121 , 321–329. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rizzo, A.; Vahtras, O. Ab initio study of excited state electronic circular dichroism. Two prototype cases: Methyl oxirane and R-(+)-1, 1 ′ -bi (2-naphthol). J. Chem. Phys. 2011 , 134 , 244109. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Helgaker, T.; Coriani, S.; Jørgensen, P.; Kristensen, K.; Olsen, J.; Ruud, K. Recent advances in wave function-based methods of molecular-property calculations. Chem. Rev. 2012 , 112 , 543–631. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Koch, H. Coupled cluster response functions. J. Chem. Phys. 1990 , 93 , 3333–3344. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Christiansen, O.; Jørgensen, P.; Hättig, C. Response functions from Fourier component variational perturbation theory applied to a time-averaged quasienergy. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1998 , 68 , 1–52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Andersen, J.H.; Nanda, K.D.; Krylov, A.I.; Coriani, S. Probing Molecular Chirality of Ground and Electronically Excited States in the UV–vis and X-ray Regimes: An EOM-CCSD Study. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022 , 18 , 1748–1764. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pescitelli, G.; Bruhn, T. Good computational practice in the assignment of absolute configurations by TDDFT calculations of ECD spectra. Chirality 2016 , 28 , 466–474. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bannwarth, C.; Seibert, J.; Grimme, S. Electronic circular dichroism of [16]Helicene with simplified TD-DFT: Beyond the single structure approach. Chirality 2016 , 28 , 365–369. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jang, H.; Kim, N.J.; Heo, J. Benchmarking study on time-dependent density functional theory calculations of electronic circular dichroism for gas-phase molecules. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2018 , 1125 , 63–68. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bannwarth, C.; Grimme, S. A simplified time-dependent density functional theory approach for electronic ultraviolet and circular dichroism spectra of very large molecules. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2014 , 1040 , 45–53. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mikhailov, I.A.; Tafur, S.; Masunov, A.E. Double excitations and state-to-state transition dipoles in π - π * excited singlet states of linear polyenes: Time-dependent density-functional theory versus multiconfigurational methods. Phys. Rev. A 2008 , 77 , 012510. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tretiak, S.; Mukamel, S. Density matrix analysis and simulation of electronic excitations in conjugated and aggregated molecules. Chem. Rev. 2002 , 102 , 3171–3212. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nayyar, I.H.; Masunov, A.E.; Tretiak, S. Comparison of TD-DFT methods for the calculation of two-photon absorption spectra of oligophenylvinylenes. J. Chem. Phys. C 2013 , 117 , 18170–18189. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Segatta, F.; Russo, M.; Nascimento, D.R.; Presti, D.; Rigodanza, F.; Nenov, A.; Bonvicini, A.; Arcioni, A.; Mukamel, S.; Maiuri, M.; et al. In Silico Ultrafast Nonlinear Spectroscopy Meets Experiments: The Case of Perylene Bisimide Dye. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021 , 17 , 7134–7145. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Casida, M.E. Time-dependent density-functional theory for molecules and molecular solids. J. Mol. Struc. THEOCHEM 2009 , 914 , 3–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Monti, M.; Stener, M.; Coccia, E. Electronic circular dichroism from real-time propagation in state space. J. Chem. Phys 2023 , 158 , 084102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Biancorosso, L.; D’Antoni, P.; Corni, S.; Stener, M.; Coccia, E. Time-dependent quantum/continuum modelling of plasmon-enhanced electronic circular dichroism. J. Chem. Phys. 2024; submitted . [ Google Scholar ]
• Coccia, E.; Fregoni, J.; Guido, C.A.; Marsili, M.; Corni, S. Hybrid theoretical models for molecular nanoplasmonics. J. Chem. Phys. 2020 , 153 , 200901. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Grobas Illobre, P.; Marsili, M.; Corni, S.; Stener, M.; Toffoli, D.; Coccia, E. Time-Resolved Excited-State Analysis of Molecular Electron Dynamics by TDDFT and Bethe–Salpeter Equation Formalisms. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021 , 17 , 6314. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Scott, M.; Rehn, D.R.; Norman, P.; Dreuw, A. Ab initio excited-state electronic circular dichroism spectra exploiting the third-order algebraic-diagrammatic construction scheme for the polarization propagator. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021 , 12 , 5132–5137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schirmer, J. Beyond the random-phase approximation: A new approximation scheme for the polarization propagator. Phys. Rev. A 1982 , 26 , 2395. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fetter, A.L.; Walecka, J.D. Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems ; Courier Corporation: North Chelmsford, MA, USA, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dickhoff, W.H.; Van Neck, D.V. Many-Body Theory Exposed! Propagator Description of Quantum Mechanics in Many-Body Systems ; World Scientific Publishing Company: Singapore, 2008. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dreuw, A.; Wormit, M. The algebraic diagrammatic construction scheme for the polarization propagator for the calculation of excited states. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2015 , 5 , 82–95. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dreuw, A.; Dempwolff, A.L. Algebraic diagrammatic construction schemes for the simulation of electronic spectroscopies. In Theoretical and Computational Photochemistry ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 119–134. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sokolov, A.Y. Multi-reference algebraic diagrammatic construction theory for excited states: General formulation and first-order implementation. J. Chem. Phys. 2018 , 149 , 204113. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Mertins, F.; Schirmer, J. Algebraic propagator approaches and intermediate-state representations. I. The biorthogonal and unitary coupled-cluster methods. Phys. Rev. A 1996 , 53 , 2140. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Knippenberg, S.; Rehn, D.; Wormit, M.; Starcke, J.; Rusakova, I.; Trofimov, A.; Dreuw, A. Calculations of nonlinear response properties using the intermediate state representation and the algebraic-diagrammatic construction polarization propagator approach: Two-photon absorption spectra. J. Chem. Phys. 2012 , 136 , 064107. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Schirmer, J. Closed-form intermediate representations of many-body propagators and resolvent matrices. Phys. Rev. A 1991 , 43 , 4647. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schirmer, J.; Trofimov, A.B. Intermediate state representation approach to physical properties of electronically excited molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2004 , 120 , 11449–11464. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stanton, J.F.; Bartlett, R.J. The equation of motion coupled-cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal approach to molecular excitation energies, transition probabilities, and excited state properties. J. Chem. Phys. 1993 , 98 , 7029–7039. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Krylov, A.I. Equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods for open-shell and electronically excited species: The hitchhiker’s guide to Fock space. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2008 , 59 , 433–462. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nascimento, D.R.; DePrince III, A.E. Linear absorption spectra from explicitly time-dependent equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016 , 12 , 5834–5840. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Nascimento, D.R.; DePrince, A.E. A general time-domain formulation of equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory for linear spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 2019 , 151 , 204107. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Friese, D.H.; Hättig, C.; Rizzo, A. Origin-independent two-photon circular dichroism calculations in coupled cluster theory. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016 , 18 , 13683–13692. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Faber, R.; Ghidinelli, S.; Hättig, C.; Coriani, S. Magnetic circular dichroism spectra from resonant and damped coupled cluster response theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2020 , 153 , 114105. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vidal, M.L.; Feng, X.; Epifanovsky, E.; Krylov, A.I.; Coriani, S. New and efficient equation-of-motion coupled-cluster framework for core-excited and core-ionized states. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019 , 15 , 3117–3133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Nanda, K.D.; Krylov, A.I. The effect of polarizable environment on two-photon absorption cross sections characterized by the equation-of-motion coupled-cluster singles and doubles method combined with the effective fragment potential approach. J. Chem. Phys. 2018 , 149 , 164109. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Coriani, S.; Koch, H. Communication: X-ray absorption spectra and core-ionization potentials within a core-valence separated coupled cluster framework. J. Chem. Phys. 2015 , 143 , 181103. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pulm, F.; Schramm, J.; Hormes, J.; Grimme, S.; Peyerimhoff, S.D. Theoretical and experimental investigations of the electronic circular dichroism and absorption spectra of bicyclic ketones. Chem. Phys. 1997 , 224 , 143–155. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hoerner, P.; Lee, M.K.; Schlegel, H.B. Angular dependence of strong field ionization of N 2 by time-dependent configuration interaction using density functional theory and the Tamm-Dancoff approximation. J. Chem. Phys. 2019 , 151 , 054102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rüger, R.; Franchini, M.; Trnka, T.; Yakovlev, A.; van Lenthe, E.; Philipsen, P.; van Vuren, T.; Klumpers, B.; Soini, T. AMS 2022.1, SCM, Theoretical Chemistry ; Vrije Universiteit: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]

Share and Cite

Monti, M.; Biancorosso, L.; Coccia, E. Time-Resolved Circular Dichroism in Molecules: Experimental and Theoretical Advances. Molecules 2024 , 29 , 4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174049

Monti M, Biancorosso L, Coccia E. Time-Resolved Circular Dichroism in Molecules: Experimental and Theoretical Advances. Molecules . 2024; 29(17):4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174049

Monti, Marta, Leonardo Biancorosso, and Emanuele Coccia. 2024. "Time-Resolved Circular Dichroism in Molecules: Experimental and Theoretical Advances" Molecules 29, no. 17: 4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174049

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals