thematic analysis model essay

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Do Thematic Analysis | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples

How to Do Thematic Analysis | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples

Published on September 6, 2019 by Jack Caulfield . Revised on June 22, 2023.

Thematic analysis is a method of analyzing qualitative data . It is usually applied to a set of texts, such as an interview or transcripts . The researcher closely examines the data to identify common themes – topics, ideas and patterns of meaning that come up repeatedly.

There are various approaches to conducting thematic analysis, but the most common form follows a six-step process: familiarization, coding, generating themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and writing up. Following this process can also help you avoid confirmation bias when formulating your analysis.

This process was originally developed for psychology research by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke . However, thematic analysis is a flexible method that can be adapted to many different kinds of research.

Table of contents

When to use thematic analysis, different approaches to thematic analysis, step 1: familiarization, step 2: coding, step 3: generating themes, step 4: reviewing themes, step 5: defining and naming themes, step 6: writing up, other interesting articles.

Thematic analysis is a good approach to research where you’re trying to find out something about people’s views, opinions, knowledge, experiences or values from a set of qualitative data – for example, interview transcripts , social media profiles, or survey responses .

Some types of research questions you might use thematic analysis to answer:

• How do patients perceive doctors in a hospital setting?
• What are young women’s experiences on dating sites?
• What are non-experts’ ideas and opinions about climate change?
• How is gender constructed in high school history teaching?

To answer any of these questions, you would collect data from a group of relevant participants and then analyze it. Thematic analysis allows you a lot of flexibility in interpreting the data, and allows you to approach large data sets more easily by sorting them into broad themes.

However, it also involves the risk of missing nuances in the data. Thematic analysis is often quite subjective and relies on the researcher’s judgement, so you have to reflect carefully on your own choices and interpretations.

Pay close attention to the data to ensure that you’re not picking up on things that are not there – or obscuring things that are.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Once you’ve decided to use thematic analysis, there are different approaches to consider.

There’s the distinction between inductive and deductive approaches:

• An inductive approach involves allowing the data to determine your themes.
• A deductive approach involves coming to the data with some preconceived themes you expect to find reflected there, based on theory or existing knowledge.

Ask yourself: Does my theoretical framework give me a strong idea of what kind of themes I expect to find in the data (deductive), or am I planning to develop my own framework based on what I find (inductive)?

There’s also the distinction between a semantic and a latent approach:

• A semantic approach involves analyzing the explicit content of the data.
• A latent approach involves reading into the subtext and assumptions underlying the data.

Ask yourself: Am I interested in people’s stated opinions (semantic) or in what their statements reveal about their assumptions and social context (latent)?

After you’ve decided thematic analysis is the right method for analyzing your data, and you’ve thought about the approach you’re going to take, you can follow the six steps developed by Braun and Clarke .

The first step is to get to know our data. It’s important to get a thorough overview of all the data we collected before we start analyzing individual items.

This might involve transcribing audio , reading through the text and taking initial notes, and generally looking through the data to get familiar with it.

Next up, we need to code the data. Coding means highlighting sections of our text – usually phrases or sentences – and coming up with shorthand labels or “codes” to describe their content.

Let’s take a short example text. Say we’re researching perceptions of climate change among conservative voters aged 50 and up, and we have collected data through a series of interviews. An extract from one interview looks like this:

In this extract, we’ve highlighted various phrases in different colors corresponding to different codes. Each code describes the idea or feeling expressed in that part of the text.

At this stage, we want to be thorough: we go through the transcript of every interview and highlight everything that jumps out as relevant or potentially interesting. As well as highlighting all the phrases and sentences that match these codes, we can keep adding new codes as we go through the text.

After we’ve been through the text, we collate together all the data into groups identified by code. These codes allow us to gain a a condensed overview of the main points and common meanings that recur throughout the data.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Next, we look over the codes we’ve created, identify patterns among them, and start coming up with themes.

Themes are generally broader than codes. Most of the time, you’ll combine several codes into a single theme. In our example, we might start combining codes into themes like this:

At this stage, we might decide that some of our codes are too vague or not relevant enough (for example, because they don’t appear very often in the data), so they can be discarded.

Other codes might become themes in their own right. In our example, we decided that the code “uncertainty” made sense as a theme, with some other codes incorporated into it.

Again, what we decide will vary according to what we’re trying to find out. We want to create potential themes that tell us something helpful about the data for our purposes.

Now we have to make sure that our themes are useful and accurate representations of the data. Here, we return to the data set and compare our themes against it. Are we missing anything? Are these themes really present in the data? What can we change to make our themes work better?

If we encounter problems with our themes, we might split them up, combine them, discard them or create new ones: whatever makes them more useful and accurate.

For example, we might decide upon looking through the data that “changing terminology” fits better under the “uncertainty” theme than under “distrust of experts,” since the data labelled with this code involves confusion, not necessarily distrust.

Now that you have a final list of themes, it’s time to name and define each of them.

Defining themes involves formulating exactly what we mean by each theme and figuring out how it helps us understand the data.

Naming themes involves coming up with a succinct and easily understandable name for each theme.

For example, we might look at “distrust of experts” and determine exactly who we mean by “experts” in this theme. We might decide that a better name for the theme is “distrust of authority” or “conspiracy thinking”.

Finally, we’ll write up our analysis of the data. Like all academic texts, writing up a thematic analysis requires an introduction to establish our research question, aims and approach.

We should also include a methodology section, describing how we collected the data (e.g. through semi-structured interviews or open-ended survey questions ) and explaining how we conducted the thematic analysis itself.

The results or findings section usually addresses each theme in turn. We describe how often the themes come up and what they mean, including examples from the data as evidence. Finally, our conclusion explains the main takeaways and shows how the analysis has answered our research question.

In our example, we might argue that conspiracy thinking about climate change is widespread among older conservative voters, point out the uncertainty with which many voters view the issue, and discuss the role of misinformation in respondents’ perceptions.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Measures of central tendency
• Chi square tests
• Confidence interval
• Quartiles & Quantiles
• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Discourse analysis
• Cohort study
• Peer review
• Ethnography

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Conformity bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Availability heuristic
• Attrition bias
• Social desirability bias

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Caulfield, J. (2023, June 22). How to Do Thematic Analysis | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 4, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/thematic-analysis/

Is this article helpful?

Jack Caulfield

Other students also liked, what is qualitative research | methods & examples, inductive vs. deductive research approach | steps & examples, critical discourse analysis | definition, guide & examples, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Thematic Analysis: A Step by Step Guide

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

What is Thematic Analysis?

Thematic analysis is a qualitative research method used to identify, analyze, and interpret patterns of shared meaning (themes) within a given data set, which can be in the form of interviews , focus group discussions , surveys, or other textual data.

Thematic analysis is a useful method for research seeking to understand people’s views, opinions, knowledge, experiences, or values from qualitative data.

This method is widely used in various fields, including psychology, sociology, and health sciences.

Thematic analysis minimally organizes and describes a data set in rich detail. Often, though, it goes further than this and interprets aspects of the research topic.

Key aspects of Thematic Analysis include:

• Flexibility : It can be adapted to suit the needs of various studies, providing a rich and detailed account of the data.
• Coding : The process involves assigning labels or codes to specific segments of the data that capture a single idea or concept relevant to the research question.
• Themes : Representing a broader level of analysis, encompassing multiple codes that share a common underlying meaning or pattern. They provide a more abstract and interpretive understanding of the data.
• Iterative process : Thematic analysis is a recursive process that involves constantly moving back and forth between the coded extracts, the entire data set, and the thematic analysis being produced.
• Interpretation : The researcher interprets the identified themes to make sense of the data and draw meaningful conclusions.

It’s important to note that the types of thematic analysis are not mutually exclusive, and researchers may adopt elements from different approaches depending on their research questions, goals, and epistemological stance.

The choice of approach should be guided by the research aims, the nature of the data, and the philosophical assumptions underpinning the study.

1. Coding Reliability Thematic Analysis

Coding reliability TA emphasizes using coding techniques to achieve reliable and accurate data coding, which reflects (post)positivist research values.

This approach emphasizes the reliability and replicability of the coding process. It involves multiple coders independently coding the data using a predetermined codebook.

The goal is to achieve a high level of agreement among the coders, which is often measured using inter-rater reliability metrics.

This approach often involves a coding frame or codebook determined in advance or generated after familiarization with the data.

In this type of TA, two or more researchers apply a fixed coding frame to the data, ideally working separately.

Some researchers even suggest that at least some coders should be unaware of the research question or area of study to prevent bias in the coding process.

Statistical tests are used to assess the level of agreement between coders, or the reliability of coding. Any differences in coding between researchers are resolved through consensus.

This approach is more suitable for research questions that require a more structured and reliable coding process, such as in content analysis or when comparing themes across different data sets.

2. Codebook Thematic Analysis

Codebook TA, such as template, framework, and matrix analysis, combines elements of coding reliability and reflexive.

Codebook TA, while employing structured coding methods like those used in coding reliability TA, generally prioritizes qualitative research values, such as reflexivity.

In this approach, the researcher develops a codebook based on their initial engagement with the data. The codebook contains a list of codes, their definitions, and examples from the data.

The codebook is then used to systematically code the entire data set. This approach allows for a more detailed and nuanced analysis of the data, as the codebook can be refined and expanded throughout the coding process.

It is particularly useful when the research aims to provide a comprehensive description of the data set.

Codebook TA is often chosen for pragmatic reasons in applied research, particularly when there are predetermined information needs, strict deadlines, and large teams with varying levels of qualitative research experience

The use of a codebook in this context helps to map the developing analysis, which is thought to improve teamwork, efficiency, and the speed of output delivery.

3. Reflexive Thematic Analysis

This approach emphasizes the role of the researcher in the analysis process. It acknowledges that the researcher’s subjectivity, theoretical assumptions, and interpretative framework shape the identification and interpretation of themes.

In reflexive TA, analysis starts with coding after data familiarization. Unlike other TA approaches, there is no codebook or coding frame. Instead, researchers develop codes as they work through the data.

As their understanding grows, codes can change to reflect new insights—for example, they might be renamed, combined with other codes, split into multiple codes, or have their boundaries redrawn.

If multiple researchers are involved, differences in coding are explored to enhance understanding, not to reach a consensus. The finalized coding is always open to new insights and coding.

Reflexive thematic analysis involves a more organic and iterative process of coding and theme development. The researcher continuously reflects on their role in the research process and how their own experiences and perspectives might influence the analysis.

This approach is particularly useful for exploratory research questions and when the researcher aims to provide a rich and nuanced interpretation of the data.

Six Steps Of Thematic Analysis

The process is characterized by a recursive movement between the different phases, rather than a strict linear progression.

This means that researchers might revisit earlier phases as their understanding of the data evolves, constantly refining their analysis.

For instance, during the reviewing and developing themes phase, researchers may realize that their initial codes don’t effectively capture the nuances of the data and might need to return to the coding phase. 

This back-and-forth movement continues throughout the analysis, ensuring a thorough and evolving understanding of the data

Step 1: Familiarization With the Data

Familialization is crucial, as it helps researchers figure out the type (and number) of themes that might emerge from the data.

Familiarization involves immersing yourself in the data by reading and rereading textual data items, such as interview transcripts or survey responses.

You should read through the entire data set at least once, and possibly multiple times, until you feel intimately familiar with its content.

• Read and re-read the data (e.g., interview transcripts, survey responses, or other textual data) : The researcher reads through the entire data set (e.g., interview transcripts, survey responses, or field notes) multiple times to gain a comprehensive understanding of the data’s breadth and depth. This helps the researcher develop a holistic sense of the participants’ experiences, perspectives, and the overall narrative of the data.
• Listen to the audio recordings of the interviews : This helps to pick up on tone, emphasis, and emotional responses that may not be evident in the written transcripts. For instance, they might note a participant’s hesitation or excitement when discussing a particular topic. This is an important step if you didn’t collect the data or transcribe it yourself.
• Take notes on initial ideas and observations : Note-making at this stage should be observational and casual, not systematic and inclusive, as you aren’t coding yet. Think of the notes as memory aids and triggers for later coding and analysis. They are primarily for you, although they might be shared with research team members.
• Immerse yourself in the data to gain a deep understanding of its content : It’s not about just absorbing surface meaning like you would with a novel, but about thinking about what the data  mean .

By the end of the familiarization step, the researcher should have a good grasp of the overall content of the data, the key issues and experiences discussed by the participants, and any initial patterns or themes that emerge.

This deep engagement with the data sets the stage for the subsequent steps of thematic analysis, where the researcher will systematically code and analyze the data to identify and interpret the central themes.

Step 2: Generating Initial Codes

Codes are concise labels or descriptions assigned to segments of the data that capture a specific feature or meaning relevant to the research question.

The process of qualitative coding helps the researcher organize and reduce the data into manageable chunks, making it easier to identify patterns and themes relevant to the research question.

Think of it this way:  If your analysis is a house, themes are the walls and roof, while codes are the individual bricks and tiles.

Coding is an iterative process, with researchers refining and revising their codes as their understanding of the data evolves.

The ultimate goal is to develop a coherent and meaningful coding scheme that captures the richness and complexity of the participants’ experiences and helps answer the research questions.

Coding can be done manually (paper transcription and pen or highlighter) or by means of software (e.g. by using NVivo, MAXQDA or ATLAS.ti).

Decide On Your Coding Approach

• Will you use predefined deductive codes (based on theory or prior research), or let codes emerge from the data (inductive coding)?
• Will a piece of data have one code or multiple?
• Will you code everything or selectively? Broader research questions may warrant coding more comprehensively.

If you decide not to code everything, it’s crucial to:

• Have clear criteria for what you will and won’t code
• Be transparent about your selection process in research reports
• Remain open to revisiting uncoded data later in analysis

Do A First Round Of Coding

• Go through the data and assign initial codes to chunks that stand out
• Create a code name (a word or short phrase) that captures the essence of each chunk
• Keep a codebook – a list of your codes with descriptions or definitions
• Be open to adding, revising or combining codes as you go

After generating your first code, compare each new data extract to see if an existing code applies or a new one is needed.

Coding can be done at two levels of meaning:

• Semantic:  Provides a concise summary of a portion of data, staying close to the content and the participant’s meaning. For example, “Fear/anxiety about people’s reactions to his sexuality.”
• Latent:  Goes beyond the participant’s meaning to provide a conceptual interpretation of the data. For example, “Coming out imperative” interprets the meaning behind a participant’s statement.

Most codes will be a mix of descriptive and conceptual. Novice coders tend to generate more descriptive codes initially, developing more conceptual approaches with experience.

This step ends when:

• All data is fully coded.
• Data relevant to each code has been collated.

You have enough codes to capture the data’s diversity and patterns of meaning, with most codes appearing across multiple data items.

The number of codes you generate will depend on your topic, data set, and coding precision.

Step 3: Searching for Themes

Searching for themes begins after all data has been initially coded and collated, resulting in a comprehensive list of codes identified across the data set.

This step involves shifting from the specific, granular codes to a broader, more conceptual level of analysis.

Thematic analysis is not about “discovering” themes that already exist in the data, but rather actively constructing or generating themes through a careful and iterative process of examination and interpretation.

1 . Collating codes into potential themes :

The process of collating codes into potential themes involves grouping codes that share a unifying feature or represent a coherent and meaningful pattern in the data.

The researcher looks for patterns, similarities, and connections among the codes to develop overarching themes that capture the essence of the data.

By the end of this step, the researcher will have a collection of candidate themes and sub-themes, along with their associated data extracts.

However, these themes are still provisional and will be refined in the next step of reviewing the themes.

The searching for themes step helps the researcher move from a granular, code-level analysis to a more conceptual, theme-level understanding of the data.

This process is similar to sculpting, where the researcher shapes the “raw” data into a meaningful analysis.

This involves grouping codes that share a unifying feature or represent a coherent pattern in the data:

• Review the list of initial codes and their associated data extracts
• Look for codes that seem to share a common idea or concept
• Group related codes together to form potential themes
• Some codes may form main themes, while others may be sub-themes or may not fit into any theme

Thematic maps can help visualize the relationship between codes and themes. These visual aids provide a structured representation of the emerging patterns and connections within the data, aiding in understanding the significance of each theme and its contribution to the overall research question.

Example : Studying first-generation college students, the researcher might notice that the codes “financial challenges,” “working part-time,” and “scholarships” all relate to the broader theme of “Financial Obstacles and Support.”

Shared Meaning vs. Shared Topic in Thematic Analysis

Braun and Clarke distinguish between two different conceptualizations of  themes : topic summaries and shared meaning

• Topic summary themes , which they consider to be underdeveloped, are organized around a shared topic but not a shared meaning, and often resemble “buckets” into which data is sorted.
• Shared meaning themes  are patterns of shared meaning underpinned by a central organizing concept.

When grouping codes into themes, it’s crucial to ensure they share a central organizing concept or idea, reflecting a shared meaning rather than just belonging to the same topic.

Thematic analysis aims to uncover patterns of shared meaning within the data that offer insights into the research question

For example, codes centered around the concept of “Negotiating Sexual Identity” might not form one comprehensive theme, but rather two distinct themes: one related to “coming out and being out” and another exploring “different versions of being a gay man.”

Avoid : Themes as Topic Summaries (Shared Topic)

In this approach, themes simply summarize what participants mentioned about a particular topic, without necessarily revealing a unified meaning.

These themes are often underdeveloped and lack a central organizing concept.

It’s crucial to avoid creating themes that are merely summaries of data domains or directly reflect the interview questions. 

Example : A theme titled “Incidents of homophobia” that merely describes various participant responses about homophobia without delving into deeper interpretations would be a topic summary theme.

Tip : Using interview questions as theme titles without further interpretation or relying on generic social functions (“social conflict”) or structural elements (“economics”) as themes often indicates a lack of shared meaning and thorough theme development. Such themes might lack a clear connection to the specific dataset

Ensure : Themes as Shared Meaning

Instead, themes should represent a deeper level of interpretation, capturing the essence of the data and providing meaningful insights into the research question.

These themes go beyond summarizing a topic by identifying a central concept or idea that connects the codes.

They reflect a pattern of shared meaning across different data points, even if those points come from different topics.

Example : The theme “‘There’s always that level of uncertainty’: Compulsory heterosexuality at university” effectively captures the shared experience of fear and uncertainty among LGBT students, connecting various codes related to homophobia and its impact on their lives.

2. Gathering data relevant to each potential theme

Once a potential theme is identified, all coded data extracts associated with the codes grouped under that theme are collated. This ensures a comprehensive view of the data pertaining to each theme.

This involves reviewing the collated data extracts for each code and organizing them under the relevant themes.

For example, if you have a potential theme called “Student Strategies for Test Preparation,” you would gather all data extracts that have been coded with related codes, such as “Time Management for Test Preparation” or “Study Groups for Test Preparation”.

You can then begin reviewing the data extracts for each theme to see if they form a coherent pattern. 

This step helps to ensure that your themes accurately reflect the data and are not based on your own preconceptions.

It’s important to remember that coding is an organic and ongoing process.

You may need to re-read your entire data set to see if you have missed any data that is relevant to your themes, or if you need to create any new codes or themes.

The researcher should ensure that the data extracts within each theme are coherent and meaningful.

Example : The researcher would gather all the data extracts related to “Financial Obstacles and Support,” such as quotes about struggling to pay for tuition, working long hours, or receiving scholarships.

Here’s a more detailed explanation of how to gather data relevant to each potential theme:

• Start by creating a visual representation of your potential themes, such as a thematic map or table
• List each potential theme and its associated sub-themes (if any)
• This will help you organize your data and see the relationships between themes
• Go through your coded data extracts (e.g., highlighted quotes or segments from interview transcripts)
• For each coded extract, consider which theme or sub-theme it best fits under
• If a coded extract seems to fit under multiple themes, choose the theme that it most closely aligns with in terms of shared meaning
• As you identify which theme each coded extract belongs to, copy and paste the extract under the relevant theme in your thematic map or table
• Include enough context around each extract to ensure its meaning is clear
• If using qualitative data analysis software, you can assign the coded extracts to the relevant themes within the software
• As you gather data extracts under each theme, continuously review the extracts to ensure they form a coherent pattern
• If some extracts do not fit well with the rest of the data in a theme, consider whether they might better fit under a different theme or if the theme needs to be refined

3. Considering relationships between codes, themes, and different levels of themes

Once you have gathered all the relevant data extracts under each theme, review the themes to ensure they are meaningful and distinct.

This step involves analyzing how different codes combine to form overarching themes and exploring the hierarchical relationship between themes and sub-themes.

Within a theme, there can be different levels of themes, often organized hierarchically as main themes and sub-themes.

• Main themes  represent the most overarching or significant patterns found in the data. They provide a high-level understanding of the key issues or concepts present in the data. 
• Sub-themes , as the name suggests, fall under main themes, offering a more nuanced and detailed understanding of a particular aspect of the main theme.

The process of developing these relationships is iterative and involves:

• Creating a Thematic Map : The relationship between codes, sub-themes and main themes can be visualized using a thematic map, diagram, or table. Refine the thematic map as you continue to review and analyze the data.
• Examine how the codes and themes relate to each other : Some themes may be more prominent or overarching (main themes), while others may be secondary or subsidiary (sub-themes).
• Refining Themes : This map helps researchers review and refine themes, ensuring they are internally consistent (homogeneous) and distinct from other themes (heterogeneous).
• Defining and Naming Themes : Finally, themes are given clear and concise names and definitions that accurately reflect the meaning they represent in the data.

Consider how the themes tell a coherent story about the data and address the research question.

If some themes seem to overlap or are not well-supported by the data, consider combining or refining them.

If a theme is too broad or diverse, consider splitting it into separate themes or sub-theme.

Example : The researcher might identify “Academic Challenges” and “Social Adjustment” as other main themes, with sub-themes like “Imposter Syndrome” and “Balancing Work and School” under “Academic Challenges.” They would then consider how these themes relate to each other and contribute to the overall understanding of first-generation college students’ experiences.

Step 4: Reviewing Themes

The researcher reviews, modifies, and develops the preliminary themes identified in the previous step.

This phase involves a recursive process of checking the themes against the coded data extracts and the entire data set to ensure they accurately reflect the meanings evident in the data.

The purpose is to refine the themes, ensuring they are coherent, consistent, and distinctive.

According to Braun and Clarke, a well-developed theme “captures something important about the data in relation to the research question and represents some level of patterned response or meaning within the data set”.

A well-developed theme will:

• Go beyond paraphrasing the data to analyze the meaning and significance of the patterns identified.
• Provide a detailed analysis of what the theme is about.
• Be supported with a good amount of relevant data extracts.
• Be related to the research question.

Revisions at this stage might involve creating new themes, refining existing themes, or discarding themes that do not fit the data

Level One : Reviewing Themes Against Coded Data Extracts

• Researchers begin by comparing their candidate themes against the coded data extracts associated with each theme.
• This step helps to determine whether each theme is supported by the data and whether it accurately reflects the meaning found in the extracts. Determine if there is enough data to support each theme.
• Look at the relationships between themes and sub-themes in the thematic map. Consider whether the themes work together to tell a coherent story about the data. If the thematic map does not effectively represent the data, consider making adjustments to the themes or their organization.
• It’s important to ensure that each theme has a singular focus and is not trying to encompass too much. Themes should be distinct from one another, although they may build on or relate to each other.
• Discarding codes : If certain codes within a theme are not well-supported or do not fit, they can be removed.
• Relocating codes : Codes that fit better under a different theme can be moved.
• Redrawing theme boundaries : The scope of a theme can be adjusted to better capture the relevant data.
• Discarding themes : Entire themes can be abandoned if they do not work.

Level Two : Evaluating Themes Against the Entire Data Set

• Once the themes appear coherent and well-supported by the coded extracts, researchers move on to evaluate them against the entire data set.
• This involves a final review of all the data to ensure that the themes accurately capture the most important and relevant patterns across the entire dataset in relation to the research question.
• During this level, researchers may need to recode some extracts for consistency, especially if the coding process evolved significantly, and earlier data items were not recoded according to these changes.

Step 5: Defining and Naming Themes

The themes are finalized when the researcher is satisfied with the theme names and definitions.

If the analysis is carried out by a single researcher, it is recommended to seek feedback from an external expert to confirm that the themes are well-developed, clear, distinct, and capture all the relevant data.

Defining themes  means determining the exact meaning of each theme and understanding how it contributes to understanding the data.

This process involves formulating exactly what we mean by each theme. The researcher should consider what a theme says, if there are subthemes, how they interact and relate to the main theme, and how the themes relate to each other.

Themes should not be overly broad or try to encompass too much, and should have a singular focus. They should be distinct from one another and not repetitive, although they may build on one another.

In this phase the researcher specifies the essence of each theme.

• What does the theme tell us that is relevant for the research question?
• How does it fit into the ‘overall story’ the researcher wants to tell about the data?

Naming themes  involves developing a clear and concise name that effectively conveys the essence of each theme to the reader. A good name for a theme is informative, concise, and catchy.

• The researcher develops concise, punchy, and informative names for each theme that effectively communicate its essence to the reader.
• Theme names should be catchy and evocative, giving the reader an immediate sense of what the theme is about.
• Avoid using jargon or overly complex language in theme names.
• The name should go beyond simply paraphrasing the content of the data extracts and instead interpret the meaning and significance of the patterns within the theme.
• The goal is to make the themes accessible and easily understandable to the intended audience. If a theme contains sub-themes, the researcher should also develop clear and informative names for each sub-theme.
• Theme names can include direct quotations from the data, which helps convey the theme’s meaning. However, researchers should avoid using data collection questions as theme names. Using data collection questions as themes often leads to analyses that present summaries of topics rather than fully realized themes.

For example, “‘There’s always that level of uncertainty’: Compulsory heterosexuality at university” is a strong theme name because it captures the theme’s meaning. In contrast, “incidents of homophobia” is a weak theme name because it only states the topic.

For instance, a theme labeled “distrust of experts” might be renamed “distrust of authority” or “conspiracy thinking” after careful consideration of the theme’s meaning and scope.

Step 6: Producing the Report

A thematic analysis report should provide a convincing and clear, yet complex story about the data that is situated within a scholarly field.

A balance should be struck between the narrative and the data presented, ensuring that the report convincingly explains the meaning of the data, not just summarizes it.

To achieve this, the report should include vivid, compelling data extracts illustrating the themes and incorporate extracts from different data sources to demonstrate the themes’ prevalence and strengthen the analysis by representing various perspectives within the data.

The report should be written in first-person active tense, unless otherwise stated in the reporting requirements.

The analysis can be presented in two ways :

• Integrated Results and Discussion section:  This approach is suitable when the analysis has strong connections to existing research and when the analysis is more theoretical or interpretive.
• Separate Discussion section:  This approach presents the data interpretation separately from the results.

Regardless of the presentation style, researchers should aim to “show” what the data reveals and “tell” the reader what it means in order to create a convincing analysis.

• Presentation order of themes: Consider how to best structure the presentation of the themes in the report. This may involve presenting the themes in order of importance, chronologically, or in a way that tells a coherent story.
• Subheadings: Use subheadings to clearly delineate each theme and its sub-themes, making the report easy to navigate and understand.

The analysis should go beyond a simple summary of participant’s words and instead interpret the meaning of the data.

Themes should connect logically and meaningfully and, if relevant, should build on previous themes to tell a coherent story about the data.

The report should include vivid, compelling data extracts that clearly illustrate the theme being discussed and should incorporate extracts from different data sources, rather than relying on a single source.

Although it is tempting to rely on one source when it eloquently expresses a particular aspect of the theme, using multiple sources strengthens the analysis by representing a wider range of perspectives within the data.

Researchers should strive to maintain a balance between the amount of narrative and the amount of data presented.

Potential Pitfalls to Avoid

• Failing to analyze the data : Thematic analysis should involve more than simply presenting data extracts without an analytic narrative. The researcher must provide an interpretation and make sense of the data, telling the reader what it means and how it relates to the research questions.
• Using data collection questions as themes : Themes should be identified across the entire dataset, not just based on the questions asked during data collection. Reporting data collection questions as themes indicates a lack of thorough analytic work to identify patterns and meanings in the data.
• Conducting a weak or unconvincing analysis : Themes should be distinct, internally coherent, and consistent, capturing the majority of the data or providing a rich description of specific aspects. A weak analysis may have overlapping themes, fail to capture the data adequately, or lack sufficient examples to support the claims made.
• Mismatch between data and analytic claims : The researcher’s interpretations and analytic points must be consistent with the data extracts presented. Claims that are not supported by the data, contradict the data, or fail to consider alternative readings or variations in the account are problematic.
• Misalignment between theory, research questions, and analysis : The interpretations of the data should be consistent with the theoretical framework used. For example, an experiential framework would not typically make claims about the social construction of the topic. The form of thematic analysis used should also align with the research questions.
• Neglecting to clarify assumptions, purpose, and process : A good thematic analysis should spell out its theoretical assumptions, clarify how it was undertaken, and for what purpose. Without this crucial information, the analysis is lacking context and transparency, making it difficult for readers to evaluate the research.

Reducing Bias

When researchers are both reflexive and transparent in their thematic analysis, it strengthens the trustworthiness and rigor of their findings.

The explicit acknowledgement of potential biases and the detailed documentation of the analytical process provide a stronger foundation for the interpretation of the data, making it more likely that the findings reflect the perspectives of the participants rather than the biases of the researcher.

Reflexivity

Reflexivity involves critically examining one’s own assumptions and biases, is crucial in qualitative research to ensure the trustworthiness of findings.

It requires acknowledging that researcher subjectivity is inherent in the research process and can influence how data is collected, analyzed, and interpreted.

Identifying and Challenging Assumptions:

Reflexivity encourages researchers to explicitly acknowledge their preconceived notions, theoretical leanings, and potential biases.

By actively reflecting on how these factors might influence their interpretation of the data, researchers can take steps to mitigate their impact.

This might involve seeking alternative explanations, considering contradictory evidence, or discussing their interpretations with others to gain different perspectives.

Transparency

Transparency refers to clearly documenting the research process, including coding decisions, theme development, and the rationale behind behind theme development.

This openness allows others to understand how the analysis was conducted and to assess the credibility of the findings

This transparency helps ensure the trustworthiness and rigor of the findings, allowing others to understand and potentially replicate the analysis.

Documenting Decision-Making:

Transparency requires researchers to provide a clear and detailed account of their analytical choices throughout the research process.

This includes documenting the rationale behind coding decisions, the process of theme development, and any changes made to the analytical approach during the study.

By making these decisions transparent, researchers allow others to scrutinize their work and assess the potential for bias.

Practical Strategies for Reflexivity and Transparency in Thematic Analysis:

• Maintaining a reflexive journal:  Researchers can keep a journal throughout the research process to document their thoughts, assumptions, and potential biases. This journal serves as a record of the researcher’s evolving understanding of the data and can help identify potential blind spots in their analysis.
• Engaging in team-based analysis:  Collaborative analysis, involving multiple researchers, can enhance reflexivity by providing different perspectives and interpretations of the data. Discussing coding decisions and theme development as a team allows researchers to challenge each other’s assumptions and ensure a more comprehensive analysis.
• Clearly articulating the analytical process:  In reporting the findings of thematic analysis, researchers should provide a detailed account of their methods, including the rationale behind coding decisions, the process of theme development, and any challenges encountered during analysis. This transparency allows readers to understand the steps taken to ensure the rigor and trustworthiness of the analysis.
• Flexibility:  Thematic analysis is a flexible method, making it adaptable to different research questions and theoretical frameworks. It can be employed with various epistemological approaches, including realist, constructionist, and contextualist perspectives. For example, researchers can focus on analyzing meaning across the entire data set or examine a particular aspect in depth.
• Accessibility:  Thematic analysis is an accessible method, especially for novice qualitative researchers, as it doesn’t demand extensive theoretical or technical knowledge compared to methods like Discourse Analysis (DA) or Conversation Analysis (CA). It is considered a foundational qualitative analysis method.
• Rich Description:  Thematic analysis facilitates a rich and detailed description of data9. It can provide a thorough understanding of the predominant themes in a data set, offering valuable insights, particularly in under-researched areas.
• Theoretical Freedom:  Thematic analysis is not restricted to any pre-existing theoretical framework, allowing for diverse applications. This distinguishes it from methods like Grounded Theory or Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), which are more closely tied to specific theoretical approaches

Disadvantages

• Subjectivity and Interpretation:  The flexibility of thematic analysis, while an advantage, can also be a disadvantage. The method’s openness can lead to a wide range of interpretations of the same data set, making it difficult to determine which aspects to emphasize. This potential subjectivity might raise concerns about the analysis’s reliability and consistency.
• Limited Interpretive Power:  Unlike methods like narrative analysis or biographical approaches, thematic analysis may not capture the nuances of individual experiences or contradictions within a single account. The focus on patterns across interviews could result in overlooking unique individual perspectives.
• Oversimplification:  Thematic analysis might oversimplify complex phenomena by focusing on common themes, potentially missing subtle but important variations within the data. If not carefully executed, the analysis may present a homogenous view of the data that doesn’t reflect the full range of perspectives.
• Lack of Established Theoretical Frameworks:  Thematic analysis does not inherently rely on pre-existing theoretical frameworks. While this allows for inductive exploration, it can also limit the interpretive power of the analysis if not anchored within a relevant theoretical context. The absence of a theoretical foundation might make it challenging to draw meaningful and generalizable conclusions.
• Difficulty in Higher-Phase Analysis:  While thematic analysis is relatively easy to initiate, the flexibility in its application can make it difficult to establish specific guidelines for higher-phase analysis1. Researchers may find it challenging to navigate the later stages of analysis and develop a coherent and insightful interpretation of the identified themes.
• Potential for Researcher Bias:  As with any qualitative research method, thematic analysis is susceptible to researcher bias. Researchers’ preconceived notions and assumptions can influence how they code and interpret data, potentially leading to skewed results.

Further Information

• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology . Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysi s. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11 (4), 589–597.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18 (3), 328–352.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales . Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13 (2), 201–216.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis .  Qualitative psychology ,  9 (1), 3.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022b). Thematic analysis: A practical guide . Sage.
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2022). ‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis.  Qualitative research in psychology ,  19 (2), 424-445.
• Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (Eds.). (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Blackwell Science.
• Gibbs, G. R. (2013). Using software in qualitative analysis. In U. Flick (ed.) The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 277–294). London: Sage.
• McLeod, S. (2024, May 17). Qualitative Data Coding . Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/qualitative-data-coding.html
• Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2021). Essentials of thematic analysis . American Psychological Association.

Example TA Studies

• Braun, V., Terry, G., Gavey, N., & Fenaughty, J. (2009). ‘ Risk’and sexual coercion among gay and bisexual men in Aotearoa/New Zealand–key informant accounts .  Culture, Health & Sexuality ,  11 (2), 111-124.
• Clarke, V., & Kitzinger, C. (2004). Lesbian and gay parents on talk shows: resistance or collusion in heterosexism? .  Qualitative Research in Psychology ,  1 (3), 195-217.

What (Exactly) Is Thematic Analysis?

Plain-Language Explanation & Definition (With Examples)

By: Jenna Crosley (PhD). Expert Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | April 2021

Thematic analysis is one of the most popular qualitative analysis techniques we see students opting for at Grad Coach – and for good reason. Despite its relative simplicity, thematic analysis can be a very powerful analysis technique when used correctly. In this post, we’ll unpack thematic analysis using plain language (and loads of examples) so that you can conquer your analysis with confidence.

Thematic Analysis 101

• Basic terminology relating to thematic analysis
• What is thematic analysis
• When to use thematic analysis
• The main approaches to thematic analysis
• The three types of thematic analysis
• How to “do” thematic analysis (the process)
• Tips and suggestions

First, the lingo…

Before we begin, let’s first lay down some terminology. When undertaking thematic analysis, you’ll make use of codes . A code is a label assigned to a piece of text, and the aim of using a code is to identify and summarise important concepts within a set of data, such as an interview transcript.

For example, if you had the sentence, “My rabbit ate my shoes”, you could use the codes “rabbit” or “shoes” to highlight these two concepts. The process of assigning codes is called qualitative coding . If this is a new concept to you, be sure to check out our detailed post about qualitative coding .

Codes are vital as they lay a foundation for themes . But what exactly is a theme? Simply put, a theme is a pattern that can be identified within a data set. In other words, it’s a topic or concept that pops up repeatedly throughout your data. Grouping your codes into themes serves as a way of summarising sections of your data in a useful way that helps you answer your research question(s) and achieve your research aim(s).

Alright – with that out of the way, let’s jump into the wonderful world of thematic analysis…

What is thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is the study of patterns to uncover meaning . In other words, it’s about analysing the patterns and themes within your data set to identify the underlying meaning. Importantly, this process is driven by your research aims and questions , so it’s not necessary to identify every possible theme in the data, but rather to focus on the key aspects that relate to your research questions .

Although the research questions are a driving force in thematic analysis (and pretty much all analysis methods), it’s important to remember that these questions are not necessarily fixed . As thematic analysis tends to be a bit of an exploratory process, research questions can evolve as you progress with your coding and theme identification.

When should you use thematic analysis?

There are many potential qualitative analysis methods that you can use to analyse a dataset. For example, content analysis , discourse analysis , and narrative analysis are popular choices. So why use thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is highly beneficial when working with large bodies of data ,  as it allows you to divide and categorise large amounts of data in a way that makes it easier to digest. Thematic analysis is particularly useful when looking for subjective information , such as a participant’s experiences, views, and opinions. For this reason, thematic analysis is often conducted on data derived from interviews , conversations, open-ended survey responses , and social media posts.

Your research questions can also give you an idea of whether you should use thematic analysis or not. For example, if your research questions were to be along the lines of:

• How do dog walkers perceive rules and regulations on dog-friendly beaches?
• What are students’ experiences with the shift to online learning?
• What opinions do health professionals hold about the Hippocratic code?
• How is gender constructed in a high school classroom setting?

These examples are all research questions centering on the subjective experiences of participants and aim to assess experiences, views, and opinions. Therefore, thematic analysis presents a possible approach.

In short, thematic analysis is a good choice when you are wanting to categorise large bodies of data (although the data doesn’t necessarily have to be large), particularly when you are interested in subjective experiences .

What are the main approaches?

Broadly speaking, there are two overarching approaches to thematic analysis: inductive and deductive . The approach you take will depend on what is most suitable in light of your research aims and questions. Let’s have a look at the options.

The inductive approach

The inductive approach involves deriving meaning and creating themes from data without any preconceptions . In other words, you’d dive into your analysis without any idea of what codes and themes will emerge, and thus allow these to emerge from the data.

For example, if you’re investigating typical lunchtime conversational topics in a university faculty, you’d enter the research without any preconceived codes, themes or expected outcomes. Of course, you may have thoughts about what might be discussed (e.g., academic matters because it’s an academic setting), but the objective is to not let these preconceptions inform your analysis.

The inductive approach is best suited to research aims and questions that are exploratory in nature , and cases where there is little existing research on the topic of interest.

The deductive approach

In contrast to the inductive approach, a deductive approach involves jumping into your analysis with a pre-determined set of codes . Usually, this approach is informed by prior knowledge and/or existing theory or empirical research (which you’d cover in your literature review ).

For example, a researcher examining the impact of a specific psychological intervention on mental health outcomes may draw on an existing theoretical framework that includes concepts such as coping strategies, social support, and self-efficacy, using these as a basis for a set of pre-determined codes.

The deductive approach is best suited to research aims and questions that are confirmatory in nature , and cases where there is a lot of existing research on the topic of interest.

Regardless of whether you take the inductive or deductive approach, you’ll also need to decide what level of content your analysis will focus on – specifically, the semantic level or the latent level.

A semantic-level focus ignores the underlying meaning of data , and identifies themes based only on what is explicitly or overtly stated or written – in other words, things are taken at face value.

In contrast, a latent-level focus concentrates on the underlying meanings and looks at the reasons for semantic content. Furthermore, in contrast to the semantic approach, a latent approach involves an element of interpretation , where data is not just taken at face value, but meanings are also theorised.

“But how do I know when to use what approach?”, I hear you ask.

Well, this all depends on the type of data you’re analysing and what you’re trying to achieve with your analysis. For example, if you’re aiming to analyse explicit opinions expressed in interviews and you know what you’re looking for ahead of time (based on a collection of prior studies), you may choose to take a deductive approach with a semantic-level focus.

On the other hand, if you’re looking to explore the underlying meaning expressed by participants in a focus group, and you don’t have any preconceptions about what to expect, you’ll likely opt for an inductive approach with a latent-level focus.

Simply put, the nature and focus of your research, especially your research aims , objectives and questions will  inform the approach you take to thematic analysis.

What are the types of thematic analysis?

Now that you’ve got an understanding of the overarching approaches to thematic analysis, it’s time to have a look at the different types of thematic analysis you can conduct. Broadly speaking, there are three “types” of thematic analysis:

• Reflexive thematic analysis
• Codebook thematic analysis
• Coding reliability thematic analysis

Let’s have a look at each of these:

Reflexive thematic analysis takes an inductive approach, letting the codes and themes emerge from that data. This type of thematic analysis is very flexible, as it allows researchers to change, remove, and add codes as they work through the data. As the name suggests, reflexive thematic analysis emphasizes the active engagement of the researcher in critically reflecting on their assumptions, biases, and interpretations, and how these may shape the analysis.

Reflexive thematic analysis typically involves iterative and reflexive cycles of coding, interpreting, and reflecting on data, with the aim of producing nuanced and contextually sensitive insights into the research topic, while at the same time recognising and addressing the subjective nature of the research process.

Codebook thematic analysis , on the other hand, lays on the opposite end of the spectrum. Taking a deductive approach, this type of thematic analysis makes use of structured codebooks containing clearly defined, predetermined codes. These codes are typically drawn from a combination of existing theoretical theories, empirical studies and prior knowledge of the situation.

Codebook thematic analysis aims to produce reliable and consistent findings. Therefore, it’s often used in studies where a clear and predefined coding framework is desired to ensure rigour and consistency in data analysis.

Coding reliability thematic analysis necessitates the work of multiple coders, and the design is specifically intended for research teams. With this type of analysis, codebooks are typically fixed and are rarely altered.

The benefit of this form of analysis is that it brings an element of intercoder reliability where coders need to agree upon the codes used, which means that the outcome is more rigorous as the element of subjectivity is reduced. In other words, multiple coders discuss which codes should be used and which shouldn’t, and this consensus reduces the bias of having one individual coder decide upon themes.

Quick Recap: Thematic analysis approaches and types

To recap, the two main approaches to thematic analysis are inductive , and deductive . Then we have the three types of thematic analysis: reflexive, codebook and coding reliability . Which type of thematic analysis you opt for will need to be informed by factors such as:

• The approach you are taking. For example, if you opt for an inductive approach, you’ll likely utilise reflexive thematic analysis.
• Whether you’re working alone or in a group . It’s likely that, if you’re doing research as part of your postgraduate studies, you’ll be working alone. This means that you’ll need to choose between reflexive and codebook thematic analysis.

Now that we’ve covered the “what” in terms of thematic analysis approaches and types, it’s time to look at the “how” of thematic analysis.

Need a helping hand?

How to “do” thematic analysis

At this point, you’re ready to get going with your analysis, so let’s dive right into the thematic analysis process. Keep in mind that what we’ll cover here is a generic process, and the relevant steps will vary depending on the approach and type of thematic analysis you opt for.

Step 1: Get familiar with the data

The first step in your thematic analysis involves getting a feel for your data and seeing what general themes pop up. If you’re working with audio data, this is where you’ll do the transcription , converting audio to text.

At this stage, you’ll want to come up with preliminary thoughts about what you’ll code , what codes you’ll use for them, and what codes will accurately describe your content. It’s a good idea to revisit your research topic , and your aims and objectives at this stage. For example, if you’re looking at what people feel about different types of dogs, you can code according to when different breeds are mentioned (e.g., border collie, Labrador, corgi) and when certain feelings/emotions are brought up.

As a general tip, it’s a good idea to keep a reflexivity journal . This is where you’ll write down how you coded your data, why you coded your data in that particular way, and what the outcomes of this data coding are. Using a reflexive journal from the start will benefit you greatly in the final stages of your analysis because you can reflect on the coding process and assess whether you have coded in a manner that is reliable and whether your codes and themes support your findings.

As you can imagine, a reflexivity journal helps to increase reliability as it allows you to analyse your data systematically and consistently. If you choose to make use of a reflexivity journal, this is the stage where you’ll want to take notes about your initial codes and list them in your journal so that you’ll have an idea of what exactly is being reflected in your data. At a later stage in the analysis, this data can be more thoroughly coded, or the identified codes can be divided into more specific ones.

Step 2: Search for patterns or themes in the codes

Step 2! You’re going strong. In this step, you’ll want to look out for patterns or themes in your codes. Moving from codes to themes is not necessarily a smooth or linear process. As you become more and more familiar with the data, you may find that you need to assign different codes or themes according to new elements you find. For example, if you were analysing a text talking about wildlife, you may come across the codes, “pigeon”, “canary” and “budgerigar” which can fall under the theme of birds.

As you work through the data, you may start to identify subthemes , which are subdivisions of themes that focus specifically on an aspect within the theme that is significant or relevant to your research question. For example, if your theme is a university, your subthemes could be faculties or departments at that university.

In this stage of the analysis, your reflexivity journal entries need to reflect how codes were interpreted and combined to form themes.

Step 3: Review themes

By now you’ll have a good idea of your codes, themes, and potentially subthemes. Now it’s time to review all the themes you’ve identified . In this step, you’ll want to check that everything you’ve categorised as a theme actually fits the data, whether the themes do indeed exist in the data, whether there are any themes missing , and whether you can move on to the next step knowing that you’ve coded all your themes accurately and comprehensively . If you find that your themes have become too broad and there is far too much information under one theme, it may be useful to split this into more themes so that you’re able to be more specific with your analysis.

In your reflexivity journal, you’ll want to write about how you understood the themes and how they are supported by evidence, as well as how the themes fit in with your codes. At this point, you’ll also want to revisit your research questions and make sure that the data and themes you’ve identified are directly relevant to these questions .

Step 4: Finalise Themes

By this point, your analysis will really start to take shape. In the previous step, you reviewed and refined your themes, and now it’s time to label and finalise them . It’s important to note here that, just because you’ve moved onto the next step, it doesn’t mean that you can’t go back and revise or rework your themes. In contrast to the previous step, finalising your themes means spelling out what exactly the themes consist of, and describe them in detail . If you struggle with this, you may want to return to your data to make sure that your data and coding do represent the themes, and if you need to divide your themes into more themes (i.e., return to step 3).

When you name your themes, make sure that you select labels that accurately encapsulate the properties of the theme . For example, a theme name such as “enthusiasm in professionals” leaves the question of “who are the professionals?”, so you’d want to be more specific and label the theme as something along the lines of “enthusiasm in healthcare professionals”.

It is very important at this stage that you make sure that your themes align with your research aims and questions . When you’re finalising your themes, you’re also nearing the end of your analysis and need to keep in mind that your final report (discussed in the next step) will need to fit in with the aims and objectives of your research.

In your reflexivity journal, you’ll want to write down a few sentences describing your themes and how you decided on these. Here, you’ll also want to mention how the theme will contribute to the outcomes of your research, and also what it means in relation to your research questions and focus of your research.

By the end of this stage, you’ll be done with your themes – meaning it’s time to write up your findings and produce a report.

Step 5: Produce your report

You’re nearly done! Now that you’ve analysed your data, it’s time to report on your findings. A typical thematic analysis report consists of:

• An introduction
• A methodology section
• Your results and findings
• A conclusion

When writing your report, make sure that you provide enough information for a reader to be able to evaluate the rigour of your analysis. In other words, the reader needs to know the exact process you followed when analysing your data and why. The questions of “what”, “how”, “why”, “who”, and “when” may be useful in this section.

So, what did you investigate? How did you investigate it? Why did you choose this particular method? Who does your research focus on, and who are your participants? When did you conduct your research, when did you collect your data, and when was the data produced? Your reflexivity journal will come in handy here as within it you’ve already labelled, described, and supported your themes.

If you’re undertaking a thematic analysis as part of a dissertation or thesis, this discussion will be split across your methodology, results and discussion chapters . For more information about those chapters, check out our detailed post about dissertation structure .

It’s absolutely vital that, when writing up your results, you back up every single one of your findings with quotations . The reader needs to be able to see that what you’re reporting actually exists within the results. Also make sure that, when reporting your findings, you tie them back to your research questions . You don’t want your reader to be looking through your findings and asking, “So what?”, so make sure that every finding you represent is relevant to your research topic and questions.

Quick Recap: How to “do” thematic analysis

Getting familiar with your data: Here you’ll read through your data and get a general overview of what you’re working with. At this stage, you may identify a few general codes and themes that you’ll make use of in the next step.

Search for patterns or themes in your codes : Here you’ll dive into your data and pick out the themes and codes relevant to your research question(s).

Review themes : In this step, you’ll revisit your codes and themes to make sure that they are all truly representative of the data, and that you can use them in your final report.

Finalise themes : Here’s where you “solidify” your analysis and make it report-ready by describing and defining your themes.

Produce your report : This is the final step of your thematic analysis process, where you put everything you’ve found together and report on your findings.

Tips & Suggestions

In the video below, we share 6 time-saving tips and tricks to help you approach your thematic analysis as effectively and efficiently as possible.

Wrapping Up

In this article, we’ve covered the basics of thematic analysis – what it is, when to use it, the different approaches and types of thematic analysis, and how to perform a thematic analysis.

If you have any questions about thematic analysis, drop a comment below and we’ll do our best to assist. If you’d like 1-on-1 support with your thematic analysis, be sure to check out our research coaching services here .

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

23 Comments

I really appreciate the help

Hello Sir, how many levels of coding can be done in thematic analysis? We generate codes from the transcripts, then subthemes from the codes and themes from subthemes, isn’t it? Should these themes be again grouped together? how many themes can be derived?can you please share an example of coding through thematic analysis in a tabular format?

I’ve found the article very educative and useful

Excellent. Very helpful and easy to understand.

This article so far has been most helpful in understanding how to write an analysis chapter. Thank you.

My research topic is the challenges face by the school principal on the process of procurement . Thematic analysis is it sutable fir data analysis ?

It is a great help. Thanks.

Best advice. Worth reading. Thank you.

Where can I find an example of a template analysis table ?

Finally I got the best article . I wish they also have every psychology topics.

Hello, Sir/Maam

I am actually finding difficulty in doing qualitative analysis of my data and how to triangulate this with quantitative data. I encountered your web by accident in the process of searching for a much simplified way of explaining about thematic analysis such as coding, thematic analysis, write up. When your query if I need help popped up, I was hesitant to answer. Because I think this is for fee and I cannot afford. So May I just ask permission to copy for me to read and guide me to study so I can apply it myself for my gathered qualitative data for my graduate study.

Thank you very much! this is very helpful to me in my Graduate research qualitative data analysis.

Thank you very much. I find your guidance here helpful. Kindly let help me understand how to write findings and discussions.

i am having troubles with the concept of framework analysis which i did not find here and i have been an assignment on framework analysis

I was discouraged and felt insecure because after more than a year of writing my thesis, my work seemed lost its direction after being checked. But, I am truly grateful because through the comments, corrections, and guidance of the wisdom of my director, I can already see the bright light because of thematic analysis. I am working with Biblical Texts. And thematic analysis will be my method. Thank you.

lovely and helpful. thanks

very informative information.

thank you very much!, this is very helpful in my report, God bless……..

Thank you for the insight. I am really relieved as you have provided a super guide for my thesis.

Thanks a lot, really enlightening

excellent! very helpful thank a lot for your great efforts

I am currently conducting a research on the Economic challenges to migrant integration. Using interviews to understand the challenges by interviewing professionals working with migrants. Wouks appreciate help with how to do this using the thematic approach. Thanks

The article cleared so many issues that I was not certain of. Very informative. Thank you.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Reference management. Clean and simple.

How to do a thematic analysis

What is a thematic analysis?

When is thematic analysis used, braun and clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis, the six steps of thematic analysis, 1. familiarizing, 2. generating initial codes, 3. generating themes, 4. reviewing themes, 5. defining and naming themes, 6. creating the report, the advantages and disadvantages of thematic analysis, disadvantages, frequently asked questions about thematic analysis, related articles.

Thematic analysis is a broad term that describes an approach to analyzing qualitative data . This approach can encompass diverse methods and is usually applied to a collection of texts, such as survey responses and transcriptions of interviews or focus group discussions. Learn more about different research methods.

A researcher performing a thematic analysis will study a set of data to pinpoint repeating patterns, or themes, in the topics and ideas that are expressed in the texts.

In analyzing qualitative data, thematic analysis focuses on concepts, opinions, and experiences, as opposed to pure statistics. This requires an approach to data that is complex and exploratory and can be anchored by different philosophical and conceptual foundations.

A six-step system was developed to help establish clarity and rigor around this process, and it is this system that is most commonly used when conducting a thematic analysis. The six steps are:

• Familiarization
• Generating codes
• Generating themes
• Reviewing themes
• Defining and naming themes
• Creating the report

It is important to note that even though the six steps are listed in sequence, thematic analysis is not necessarily a linear process that advances forward in a one-way, predictable fashion from step one through step six. Rather, it involves a more fluid shifting back and forth between the phases, adjusting to accommodate new insights when they arise.

And arriving at insight is a key goal of this approach. A good thematic analysis doesn’t just seek to present or summarize data. It interprets and makes a statement about it; it extracts meaning from the data.

Since thematic analysis is used to study qualitative data, it works best in cases where you’re looking to gather information about people’s views, values, opinions, experiences, and knowledge.

Some examples of research questions that thematic analysis can be used to answer are:

• What are senior citizens’ experiences of long-term care homes?
• How do women view social media sites as a tool for professional networking?
• How do non-religious people perceive the role of the church in a society?
• What are financial analysts’ ideas and opinions about cryptocurrency?

To begin answering these questions, you would need to gather data from participants who can provide relevant responses. Once you have the data, you would then analyze and interpret it.

Because you’re dealing with personal views and opinions, there is a lot of room for flexibility in terms of how you interpret the data. In this way, thematic analysis is systematic but not purely scientific.

A landmark 2006 paper by Victoria Braun and Victoria Clarke (“ Using thematic analysis in psychology ”) established parameters around thematic analysis—what it is and how to go about it in a systematic way—which had until then been widely used but poorly defined.

Since then, their work has been updated, with the name being revised, notably, to “reflexive thematic analysis.”

One common misconception that Braun and Clarke have taken pains to clarify about their work is that they do not believe that themes “emerge” from the data. To think otherwise is problematic since this suggests that meaning is somehow inherent to the data and that a researcher is merely an objective medium who identifies that meaning.

Conversely, Braun and Clarke view analysis as an interactive process in which the researcher is an active participant in constructing meaning, rather than simply identifying it.

The six stages they presented in their paper are still the benchmark for conducting a thematic analysis. They are presented below.

This step is where you take a broad, high-level view of your data, looking at it as a whole and taking note of your first impressions.

This typically involves reading through written survey responses and other texts, transcribing audio, and recording any patterns that you notice. It’s important to read through and revisit the data in its entirety several times during this stage so that you develop a thorough grasp of all your data.

After familiarizing yourself with your data, the next step is coding notable features of the data in a methodical way. This often means highlighting portions of the text and applying labels, aka codes, to them that describe the nature of their content.

In our example scenario, we’re researching the experiences of women over the age of 50 on professional networking social media sites. Interviews were conducted to gather data, with the following excerpt from one interview.

In the example interview snippet, portions have been highlighted and coded. The codes describe the idea or perception described in the text.

It pays to be exhaustive and thorough at this stage. Good practice involves scrutinizing the data several times, since new information and insight may become apparent upon further review that didn’t jump out at first glance. Multiple rounds of analysis also allow for the generation of more new codes.

Once the text is thoroughly reviewed, it’s time to collate the data into groups according to their code.

Now that we’ve created our codes, we can examine them, identify patterns within them, and begin generating themes.

Keep in mind that themes are more encompassing than codes. In general, you’ll be bundling multiple codes into a single theme.

To draw on the example we used above about women and networking through social media, codes could be combined into themes in the following way:

You’ll also be curating your codes and may elect to discard some on the basis that they are too broad or not directly relevant. You may also choose to redefine some of your codes as themes and integrate other codes into them. It all depends on the purpose and goal of your research.

This is the stage where we check that the themes we’ve generated accurately and relevantly represent the data they are based on. Once again, it’s beneficial to take a thorough, back-and-forth approach that includes review, assessment, comparison, and inquiry. The following questions can support the review:

• Has anything been overlooked?
• Are the themes definitively supported by the data?
• Is there any room for improvement?

With your final list of themes in hand, the next step is to name and define them.

In defining them, we want to nail down the meaning of each theme and, importantly, how it allows us to make sense of the data.

Once you have your themes defined, you’ll need to apply a concise and straightforward name to each one.

In our example, our “perceived lack of skills” may be adjusted to reflect that the texts expressed uncertainty about skills rather than the definitive absence of them. In this case, a more apt name for the theme might be “questions about competence.”

To finish the process, we put our findings down in writing. As with all scholarly writing, a thematic analysis should open with an introduction section that explains the research question and approach.

This is followed by a statement about the methodology that includes how data was collected and how the thematic analysis was performed.

Each theme is addressed in detail in the results section, with attention paid to the frequency and presence of the themes in the data, as well as what they mean, and with examples from the data included as supporting evidence.

The conclusion section describes how the analysis answers the research question and summarizes the key points.

In our example, the conclusion may assert that it is common for women over the age of 50 to have negative experiences on professional networking sites, and that these are often tied to interactions with other users and a sense that using these sites requires specialized skills.

Thematic analysis is useful for analyzing large data sets, and it allows a lot of flexibility in terms of designing theoretical and research frameworks. Moreover, it supports the generation and interpretation of themes that are backed by data.

There are times when thematic analysis is not the best approach to take because it can be highly subjective, and, in seeking to identify broad patterns, it can overlook nuance in the data.

What’s more, researchers must be judicious about reflecting on how their own position and perspective bears on their interpretations of the data and if they are imposing meaning that is not there or failing to pick up on meaning that is.

Thematic analysis offers a flexible and recursive way to approach qualitative data that has the potential to yield valuable insights about people’s opinions, views, and lived experience. It must be applied, however, in a conscientious fashion so as not to allow subjectivity to taint or obscure the results.

The purpose of thematic analysis is to find repeating patterns, or themes, in qualitative data. Thematic analysis can encompass diverse methods and is usually applied to a collection of texts, such as survey responses and transcriptions of interviews or focus group discussions. In analyzing qualitative data, thematic analysis focuses on concepts, opinions, and experiences, as opposed to pure statistics.

A big advantage of thematic analysis is that it allows a lot of flexibility in terms of designing theoretical and research frameworks. It also supports the generation and interpretation of themes that are backed by data.

A disadvantage of thematic analysis is that it can be highly subjective and can overlook nuance in the data. Also, researchers must be aware of how their own position and perspective influences their interpretations of the data and if they are imposing meaning that is not there or failing to pick up on meaning that is.

How many themes make sense in your thematic analysis of course depends on your topic and the material you are working with. In general, it makes sense to have no more than 6-10 broader themes, instead of having many really detailed ones. You can then identify further nuances and differences under each theme when you are diving deeper into the topic.

Since thematic analysis is used to study qualitative data, it works best in cases where you’re looking to gather information about people’s views, values, opinions, experiences, and knowledge. Therefore, it makes sense to use thematic analysis for interviews.

After familiarizing yourself with your data, the first step of a thematic analysis is coding notable features of the data in a methodical way. This often means highlighting portions of the text and applying labels, aka codes, to them that describe the nature of their content.

How to do thematic analysis

Last updated

8 February 2023

Reviewed by

Miroslav Damyanov

Short on time? Get an AI generated summary of this article instead

Uncovering themes in data requires a systematic approach. Thematic analysis organizes data so you can easily recognize the context.

• What is thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is   a method for analyzing qualitative data that involves reading through a data set and looking for patterns to derive themes . The researcher's subjective experience plays a central role in finding meaning within the data.

Streamline your thematic analysis

Find patterns and themes across all your qualitative data when you analyze it in Dovetail

• What are the main approaches to thematic analysis?

Inductive thematic analysis approach

Inductive thematic analysis entails   deriving meaning and identifying themes from data with no preconceptions.  You analyze the data without any expected outcomes.

Deductive thematic analysis approach

In the deductive approach, you analyze data with a set of expected themes. Prior knowledge, research, or existing theory informs this approach.

Semantic thematic analysis approach

With the semantic approach, you ignore the underlying meaning of data. You take identifying themes at face value based on what is written or explicitly stated.

Latent thematic analysis approach

Unlike the semantic approach, the latent approach focuses on underlying meanings in data and looks at the reasons for semantic content. It involves an element of interpretation where you theorize meanings and don’t just take data at face value.

• When should thematic analysis be used?

Thematic analysis is beneficial when you’re working with large bodies of data. It allows you to divide and categorize huge quantities of data in a way that makes it far easier to digest.  

The following scenarios warrant the use of thematic analysis:

You’re new to qualitative analysis

You need to identify patterns in data

You want to involve participants in the process

Thematic analysis is particularly useful when you’re looking for subjective information such as experiences and opinions in surveys , interviews, conversations, or social media posts. 

• What are the advantages and disadvantages of thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is a highly flexible approach to qualitative data analysis that you can modify to meet the needs of many studies. It enables you to generate new insights and concepts from data. 

Beginner researchers who are just learning how to analyze data will find thematic analysis very accessible. It’s easy for most people to grasp and can be relatively quick to learn.

The flexibility of thematic analysis can also be a disadvantage. It can feel intimidating to decide what’s important to emphasize, as there are many ways to interpret meaning from a data set.

• What is the step-by-step process for thematic analysis?

The basic thematic analysis process requires recognizing codes and themes within a data set. A code is a label assigned to a piece of data that you use to identify and summarize important concepts within a data set. A theme is a pattern that you identify within the data. Relevant steps may vary based on the approach and type of thematic analysis, but these are the general steps you’d take:

1. Familiarize yourself with the data(pre-coding work)

Before you can successfully work with data, you need to understand it. Get a feel for the data to see what general themes pop up. Transcribe audio files and observe any meanings and patterns across the data set. Read through the transcript, and jot down notes about potential codes to create. 

2. Create the initial codes (open code work)

Create a set of initial codes to represent the patterns and meanings in the data. Make a codebook to keep track of the codes. Read through the data again to identify interesting excerpts and apply the appropriate codes. You should use the same code to represent excerpts with the same meaning. 

3. Collate codes with supporting data (clustering of initial code)

Now it's time to group all excerpts associated with a particular code. If you’re doing this manually, cut out codes and put them together. Thematic analysis software will automatically collate them.

4. Group codes into themes (clustering of selective codes)

Once you’ve finalized the codes, you can sort them into potential themes. Themes reflect trends and patterns in data. You can combine some codes to create sub-themes.

5. Review, revise, and finalize the themes (final revision)

Now you’ve decided upon the initial themes, you can review and adjust them as needed. Each theme should be distinct, with enough data to support it. You can merge similar themes and remove those lacking sufficient supportive data. Begin formulating themes into a narrative. 

6. Write the report

The final step of telling the story of a set of data is writing the report. You should fully consider the themes to communicate the validity of your analysis.

A typical thematic analysis report contains the following:

An introduction

A methodology section

Results and findings

A conclusion

Your narrative must be coherent, and it should include vivid quotes that can back up points. It should also include an interpretive analysis and argument for your claims. In addition, consider reporting your findings in a flowchart or tree diagram, which can be independent of or part of your report.  

In conclusion, a thematic analysis is a method of analyzing qualitative data. By following the six steps, you will identify common themes from a large set of texts. This method can help you find rich and useful insights about people’s experiences, behaviors, and nuanced opinions.

• How to analyze qualitative data

Qualitative data analysis is the process of organizing, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical and subjective data . The goal is to capture themes and patterns, answer questions, and identify the best actions to take based on that data. 

Researchers can use qualitative data to understand people’s thoughts, feelings, and attitudes. For example, qualitative researchers can help business owners draw reliable conclusions about customers’ opinions and discover areas that need improvement. 

In addition to thematic analysis, you can analyze qualitative data using the following:

Content analysis

Content analysis examines and counts the presence of certain words, subjects, and contexts in documents and communication artifacts, such as: 

Text in various formats

This method transforms qualitative input into quantitative data. You can do it manually or with electronic tools that recognize patterns to make connections between concepts.  

Free AI content analysis generator

Make sense of your research by automatically summarizing key takeaways through our free content analysis tool.

Narrative analysis

Narrative analysis interprets research participants' stories from testimonials, case studies, interviews, and other text or visual data. It provides valuable insights into the complexity of people's feelings, beliefs, and behaviors.

Discourse analysis

In discourse analysis , you analyze the underlying meaning of qualitative data in a particular context, including: 

Historical 

This approach allows us to study how people use language in text, audio, and video to unravel social issues, power dynamics, or inequalities. 

For example, you can look at how people communicate with their coworkers versus their bosses. Discourse analysis goes beyond the literal meaning of words to examine social reality.

Grounded theory analysis

In grounded theory analysis, you develop theories by examining real-world data. The process involves creating hypotheses and theories by systematically collecting and evaluating this data. While this approach is helpful for studying lesser-known phenomena, it might be overwhelming for a novice researcher. 

• Challenges with analyzing qualitative data

While qualitative data can answer questions that quantitative data can't, it still comes with challenges.

If done manually, qualitative data analysis is very time-consuming.

It can be hard to choose a method. 

Avoiding bias is difficult.

Human error affects accuracy and consistency.

To overcome these challenges, you should fine-tune your methods by using the appropriate tools in collaboration with teammates.

Learn more about thematic analysis software

What is thematic analysis in qualitative research.

Thematic analysis is a method of analyzing qualitative data. It is applied to texts, such as interviews or transcripts. The researcher closely examines the data to identify common patterns and themes.

Can thematic analysis be done manually?

You can do thematic analysis manually, but it is very time-consuming without the help of software.

What are the two types of thematic analysis?

The two main types of thematic analysis include codebook thematic analysis and reflexive thematic analysis.

Codebook thematic analysis uses predetermined codes and structured codebooks to analyze from a deductive perspective. You draw codes from a review of the data or an initial analysis to produce the codebooks.

Reflexive thematic analysis is more flexible and does not use a codebook. Researchers can change, remove, and add codes as they work through the data. 

What makes a good thematic analysis?

The goal of thematic analysis is more than simply summarizing data; it's about identifying important themes. Good thematic analysis interprets, makes sense of data, and explains it. It produces trustworthy and insightful findings that are easy to understand and apply. 

What are examples of themes in thematic analysis?

Grouping codes into themes summarize sections of data in a useful way to answer research questions and achieve objectives. A theme identifies an area of data and tells the reader something about it. A good theme can sit alone without requiring descriptive text beneath it.

For example, if you were analyzing data on wildlife, codes might be owls, hawks, and falcons. These codes might fall beneath the theme of birds of prey. If your data were about the latest trends for teenage girls, codes such as mini skirts, leggings, and distressed jeans would fall under fashion.  

Thematic analysis is straightforward and intuitive enough that most people have no trouble applying it.

Should you be using a customer insights hub?

Do you want to discover previous research faster?

Do you share your research findings with others?

Do you analyze research data?

Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 18 April 2023

Last updated: 27 February 2023

Last updated: 22 August 2024

Last updated: 5 February 2023

Last updated: 16 August 2024

Last updated: 9 March 2023

Last updated: 30 April 2024

Last updated: 12 December 2023

Last updated: 11 March 2024

Last updated: 4 July 2024

Last updated: 6 March 2024

Last updated: 5 March 2024

Last updated: 13 May 2024

Latest articles

Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.

Get started for free

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars

Data analysis is central to credible qualitative research. Indeed the qualitative researcher is often described as the research instrument insofar as his or her ability to understand, describe and interpret experiences and perceptions is key to uncovering meaning in particular circumstances and contexts. While much has been written about qualitative analysis from a theoretical perspective we noticed that often novice, and even more experienced researchers, grapple with the ‘how’ of qualitative analysis. Here we draw on Braun and Clarke’s (2006) framework and apply it in a systematic manner to describe and explain the process of analysis within the context of learning and teaching research. We illustrate the process using a worked example based on (with permission) a short extract from a focus group interview, conducted with undergraduate students.

Related Papers

Book Chapter in: Data Collection and Analysis in Scientific Qualitative Research

Aziz QAISSI

Thematic analysis has evolved as a prominent qualitative data analysis method, rooted in the rich history of social sciences and, in particular, psychology. It stands as a cornerstone in qualitative inquiry, offering researchers a systematic approach to identifying and interpreting patterns, or themes, within qualitative data. This chapter seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of thematic analysis within the context of qualitative research, addressing its theoretical foundations, methodolog-ical considerations, and practical applications. It explores approaches to thematic analysis, including induction, deduction, and abduction, highlighting their distinctive characteristics and applications to qualitative data analysis. It also outlines key steps involved in conducting thematic analysis. Overall, this chapter aims to equip researchers, practitioners, and students with the knowledge and skills necessary to conduct rigorous and insightful thematic analyses of qualitative data.

A Brief Introduction to Thematic Analysis

Abisha Kampira

This paper discusses thematic analysis, a popular yet often misunderstood qualitative data analysis method. It is written with postgraduate and institutional researchers who already have an appreciation of qualitative data analysis in mind. The paper takes a practical rather than a theoretical approach to thematic analysis focusing on methods and processes that are applied by our researchers as they go about the analysis. The approaches taken may, therefore, slightly differ from theory although they are highly relatable.

Katina Zammit

Thematic analysis (TA), as a qualitative analytic method, is widely used in health care, psychology, and beyond. However, scant details are often given to demonstrate the process of data analysis, especially in the field of education. This article describes how a hybrid approach of TA was applied to interpret multiple data sources in a practitioner inquiry. Particular attention is given to the inductive and deductive coding and theme development process of TA. Underpinned by the constructivist epistemology, codes were driven by both data per se and theories, through a "bottom-up" and "top-down" approach to identify themes. A detailed example of six steps of data analysis is presented, which evidences the systematic analysis of raw data from observation and research journals, students' focus groups, and a classroom teacher's semistructured interviews. This example demonstrates how classroom practice was unpacked and how insiders' insights were interpre...

carly smith

The Qualitative Report

Elih Sutisna Yanto

Gareth Terry and Nikki Hayfield's book, Essentials of Thematic Analysis, introduces readers to reflexive thematic analysis, a method for analyzing interview and focus group transcripts, qualitative survey responses, and other qualitative data. This method is based on the understanding that we all exist in a context from which we can see and speak. In this way, researchers produce knowledge that represents situated truths and allow them to understand others' perspectives on a given topic. The book shows how to construct a "positioned reality of the situation" from qualitative data. According to the authors, this method is not a methodology but rather a method; that is, a theoretical framework. They emphasize adaptability and subjectivity and go beyond data summaries to understand underlying structures. This method requires frequent data exploration and re-evaluation. It can be studied by both novices and experts. The method is illustrated with notes, illustration, and examples. This book provides a straightforward, concise, and comprehensive description of the authors' approach, including its methodological rigor, advantages, and limitations.

Qualitative techniques for workplace data analysis

Anindita Majumdar

The popularity of qualitative methods in social science research is a well-noted and most welcomed fact. Thematic analysis, the often-used methods of qualitative research, provides concise description and interpretation in terms of themes and patterns from a data set. The application of thematic analysis requires trained expertise and should not be used in a prescriptive, linear, and inflexible manner while analyzing data. It should rather be implemented in relation to research question and data availability. To ensure its proper usage, Braun and Clarke have propounded the simplest yet effective six-step method to conduct thematic analysis. In spite of its systematic step-driven process, thematic analysis provides core skills to conduct different other forms of qualitative analysis. Thematic analysis, through its theoretical freedom, flexibility, rich and detailed yet complex analytical account has emerged as the widely used and most effective qualitative research tool in social and organizational context.

Prokopis A Christou

Thematic analysis has received increased attention from the research academic community, echoing Braun and Clarke's (2006) influential argument of its theoretical accessibility and flexibility. Along with its current status, dilemmas have arisen in regard to its practice as a result of escalated demand for analytical software programs. Synchysis, the rhetorical practice of creating bewilderment by scattering words, endures in critical reviews and in the analysis of data derived from social media platforms. This paper departs from a simple replication of existing studies by addressing current issues as a result of the evolution of thematic analysis. Furthermore, it outlines specific implications (step-by-step guidance) while incorporating the somewhat overlooked phase of the creation of conceptual diagrams and theory-development during the stages of conducting a rigorous thematic analysis.

Demola V Akinyoade

Qualitative data analysis is a distinctive form of analysis in the social research enterprise. It is an approach that is less understood than its counterpart—quantitative analysis. Diversity and flexibility are main features of qualitative data analysis. These features also expose it to the danger of doing it anyhow—a slapdash analysis unbecoming of scientific endeavor. Despite its diversity there are common features to the analysis of qualitative data that beginning researchers or trainee-social scientists, such as undergraduates, should be familiar with. This is the focus of this chapter. It focuses on necessary areas in data analysis to help this category of students to make sense of their qualitative data. It covers sources and types of qualitative data, basic issues and procedures in qualitative data analysis. It presents a systematic, disciplined, transparent and describable process to the analysis of qualitative data in consonance with the nature of the science and its method.

Nurse Researcher

Sharon Rallis

Dr King Costa

The C.O.S.T.A. Research Framework is a tool that was developed to assist students and novice researchers to navigate postgraduate studies with clarity and understanding. The emphasis of the method is on a five step approach comprising of (1) Concepts in research that are foundational to research language; (2) Objective of research which is being undertaken-likened to development of protocol or proposal; (3) Situation, emphasizing pre-comprehension of the current debate, likened to literature review; (4) Tact, which deals with methodological approaches to formulation of conclusions; (5) Assessment of output-ability to make judgments on trajectory followed and study results. This current study focused on the use of thematic analysis by students and novice researchers in completion of their research reports and scientific writings, which essentially forms part of Stage 4 of the C.O.S.T.A Framework. The author used a systematic mapping review to select units of analysis for the sole purpose of demonstrating gaps and inconsistencies on the application of the concept of thematic analysis. In most research reports, students demonstrate clear articulation of methods in coding and themes generation, however, evidence of these codes and how themes were generated was not reflected on most of reports reviewed. This situation seems to be a prevalent in most research reports, which detailed explication of interpretation of participant's comments during interviews taking the prominent feature of presentation of results/findings section. It is for this reason that the C.O.S.T.A. Research Framework (Costak, 2019) is proposed as one of the methods for teaching students about different methods of qualitative data analysis in general and thematic analysis in particular.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Victoria Clarke

Marcella Stark , Julie Combs , John Slate Ph. D.

Ellie Drago-Severson

Sandra Mathison

Human Resource Development Review

Chad Lochmiller

Oliver Mason

Qualitative Research

Kerry Woolfall

International Forum

Safary Wa-Mbaleka

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Kate Roberts

heather elliott , Julia Brannen , Paulette Morris

robina shaheen

Qualitative research in psychology

virginia braun

Evidence-Based Nursing

Helen Noble

Marie-Hélène Paré

Will Gibson

Changsong Wang

Thomas Dana

Social Science Computer Review. 22: 187-196

Grant Blank

John Schostak

Journal of advanced nursing

mistir lingerew mehari

British Dental Journal

Lizette Hollander

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

The Guide to Thematic Analysis

• What is Thematic Analysis?
• Advantages of Thematic Analysis
• Disadvantages of Thematic Analysis
• Introduction

Thematic analysis example list

Takeaways for qualitative research and data analysis.

• How to Do Thematic Analysis
• Thematic Coding
• Collaborative Thematic Analysis
• Thematic Analysis Software
• Thematic Analysis in Mixed Methods Approach
• Abductive Thematic Analysis
• Deductive Thematic Analysis
• Inductive Thematic Analysis
• Reflexive Thematic Analysis
• Thematic Analysis in Observations
• Thematic Analysis in Surveys
• Thematic Analysis for Interviews
• Thematic Analysis for Focus Groups
• Thematic Analysis for Case Studies
• Thematic Analysis of Secondary Data
• Thematic Analysis Literature Review
• Thematic Analysis vs. Phenomenology
• Thematic vs. Content Analysis
• Thematic Analysis vs. Grounded Theory
• Thematic Analysis vs. Narrative Analysis
• Thematic Analysis vs. Discourse Analysis
• Thematic Analysis vs. Framework Analysis
• Thematic Analysis in Social Work
• Thematic Analysis in Psychology
• Thematic Analysis in Educational Research
• Thematic Analysis in UX Research
• How to Present Thematic Analysis Results
• Increasing Rigor in Thematic Analysis
• Peer Review in Thematic Analysis

Thematic Analysis Examples

Thematic analysis in qualitative research is a widely utilized qualitative research method that provides a systematic approach to identifying, analyzing, and reporting potential themes and patterns within data. Whereas quantitative data often relies on statistical analysis to make judgments about insights, thematic analysis involves researchers conducting qualitative data analysis to interpret various aspects (or themes) of the research topic they are exploring, offering rich, detailed, and complex accounts of the underlying meanings within the data. Thematic analysis is flexible and applicable across a diverse range of disciplines, underscoring its utility in providing insightful interpretations of nuanced datasets.

By focusing on examples of thematic analysis, this article aims to illustrate the practical steps involved in this method and showcase how it can be effectively applied to identify patterns and draw meaningful conclusions from qualitative data . Through this approach, readers will gain an understanding of the systematic nature of thematic analysis and its contribution to a deeper comprehension of research findings.

A typical thematic analysis report conveys researchers' identification of patterns or themes across various domains that answers their research questions . This robust analytical method is particularly valuable in the social sciences, where understanding human behavior, experiences, and societal structures is key. The following sections illustrate how various types of thematic analysis can be applied in different social science fields, each through a hypothetical qualitative research process.

Education: Understanding student motivation

In an educational context, a study was designed to explore the motivational drivers among high school students. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with a diverse group of 30 students, probing into their academic experiences, aspirations, and challenges. The thematic analysis of interview transcripts revealed distinct but interconnected themes.

Firstly, 'Teacher Influence' emerged as a critical theme, illustrating how educators' attitudes, feedback, and engagement levels affected student motivation. Positive reinforcement, constructive criticism, and personal attention were highlighted as aspects that fueled students' drive to learn and succeed. Another prominent theme was 'Peer Dynamics,' reflecting the impact of classmates and friends on students' motivation. This theme encompassed both positive influences, such as camaraderie and academic collaboration, and negative aspects like peer pressure and competition.

'Personal Aspirations' was identified as a third theme, indicating how students' goals and perceived future opportunities shaped their current academic engagement. Ambitions related to higher education, career prospects, and personal fulfillment were common motivators. Lastly, 'Learning Environment' emerged, encompassing aspects of the school setting that influenced motivation, including extracurricular activities, school facilities, and the overall educational atmosphere.

Identifying themes such as these underscores the complexity of student motivation, suggesting that multifaceted strategies are needed to enhance educational engagement and achievement.

Healthcare: Patient experiences in chronic disease management

In the healthcare sector, a qualitative study focused on patients with chronic conditions to understand their daily management challenges and support needs. Through interviews and diary entries from patients dealing with diseases like diabetes and hypertension, researchers conducted a thematic analysis to distill the patient experience into core themes.

The 'Healthcare Interaction' theme underscored the importance of patient-provider relationships, highlighting how empathy, communication, and responsiveness from healthcare professionals can significantly impact patient satisfaction and engagement in disease management. Another critical theme was 'Lifestyle Adaptation,' reflecting the ongoing adjustments patients make in diet, exercise, and medication routines. This theme highlighted the emotional and practical challenges of integrating disease management into daily life, as well as the strategies patients employed to cope with these changes.

'Social Support Networks' emerged as a vital theme, illustrating the role of family, friends, and peer support groups in providing emotional encouragement, practical assistance, and motivation. The contrast between strong and lacking support networks provided insights into how social dynamics can influence disease management outcomes. 'Psychological Resilience' was identified as a theme capturing patients' mental and emotional responses to living with a chronic condition. This included coping mechanisms, attitudes toward illness, and the impact on personal identity and life perspective.

These themes offer a comprehensive view of the patient experience in chronic disease management, suggesting areas for improvement in healthcare practices and support systems.

Organizational behavior: Workplace culture and employee satisfaction

A study within the realm of organizational behavior examined how workplace culture influences employee satisfaction and retention. Through thematic analysis of focus group discussions with employees from various sectors, researchers identified key themes that shaped workplace experiences.

The 'Leadership Influence' theme highlighted the critical role of management styles, communication, and decision-making processes in shaping employees' perceptions of their workplace. Leadership approaches that fostered transparency, involvement, and recognition were associated with higher satisfaction levels. 'Work Environment and Resources' was another significant theme, emphasizing the importance of physical workspace, tools, and resources in employee productivity and contentment. Factors such as workspace design, technology access, and resource availability were pivotal.

'Interpersonal Relationships and Team Dynamics' emerged as a theme reflecting the impact of collegial relationships and team cohesion on job satisfaction. Positive interactions, collaborative teamwork, and a supportive atmosphere were key drivers of employee engagement. 'Personal Growth and Development' captured employees' desire for opportunities to learn, advance, and take on new challenges. The availability of training programs, career advancement paths, and feedback mechanisms were crucial to employee fulfillment.

These findings underscore the multifaceted nature of workplace satisfaction, providing valuable insights for organizational development and employee engagement strategies.

Sociology: Social media's role in shaping public opinion

In a sociological study, researchers explored the influence of social media on public opinion regarding environmental issues. Content analysis and narrative analysis of discussions, posts, and comments across various platforms provided a semantic approach for thematic analysis, revealing how online narratives shaped perceptions and discourse. Meanwhile, the resulting themes support discussion for potential applications within social media and other forms of online discourse.

The 'Information Dissemination' theme illustrated the rapid spread of environmental information and misinformation, highlighting the dual role of social media as a tool for awareness and a source of confusion. 'Influencer Impact' emerged as a theme, underscoring the role of prominent figures and opinion leaders in shaping environmental discourse. The credibility and reach of these influencers significantly affected public engagement and perspective.

'Community Engagement' was also identified, showing how online communities mobilized around environmental causes, sharing experiences, organizing actions, and providing mutual support. This theme reflected the potential of social media to foster collective action and advocacy. Lastly, 'Emotional Engagement' captured the affective responses elicited by environmental content, including hope, anger, anxiety, and inspiration. These emotional reactions were pivotal in driving awareness, concern, and action among the public.

Through these themes, the study illustrates the complex dynamics through which social media influences public opinion on critical issues, offering insights into the power of digital platforms in shaping societal discourse.

Qualitative researchers everywhere turn to ATLAS.ti

Get to coding and analysis right away with our user-friendly interface. Start with a free trial of ATLAS.ti.

While these thematic analysis examples span various fields within the social sciences, they share common methodological threads that highlight best practices in conducting effective thematic analysis. These commonalities can serve as valuable pointers for researchers aiming to employ thematic analysis in their work, regardless of their specific domain of study.

Systematic data engagement : Across all examples, a systematic approach to qualitative analysis is fundamental. Researchers personally engage in data collection and immerse themselves in the resulting data through repeated readings, enabling a deep familiarity to identify themes relevant to the data and research question . This immersion facilitates the initial coding process, where researchers employ data coding to capture data features relevant to the research questions. Researchers should approach their data systematically, ensuring thorough and consistent engagement to capture the depth and breadth of themes.

Iterative theme development : The examples illustrate that identifying themes is an iterative process. Preliminary themes are generated from initial codes that cluster similar data segments. These themes are then reviewed and refined, ensuring they accurately represent the data set. Researchers should be prepared to revisit their data and themes multiple times, refining their themes to ensure they are coherent, distinct, and meaningful. This iterative process is central to the rigor of thematic analysis.

Richness and complexity of themes : Thematic analysis, as demonstrated in these examples, excels in capturing the richness and complexity of qualitative data. Themes are not just surface-level categories; they encapsulate intricate patterns that provide deep insights into the data. Researchers should strive for generating themes that capture the complexity of their data, offering rich, detailed, and nuanced interpretations.

Contextual understanding : Each example underscores the importance of understanding the context from which the data are derived. Context shapes the data and the themes that emerge from them, influencing how researchers interpret and understand the identified patterns. Effective thematic analysis requires researchers to be acutely aware of their data's contextual backdrop, integrating this understanding into their analysis and interpretation.

Transparency and rigor : These examples demonstrate the need for rigor throughout the thematic analysis process. This includes maintaining detailed records of the process of coding data, providing clear definitions for each theme, and offering comprehensive explanations of how themes were derived from the data. Researchers should document their analytic decisions meticulously, ensuring their analysis is transparent and credible.

Triangulation and validation : These hypothetical studies exemplify the value of triangulating thematic analysis findings with other data sources, theories, or methods to enhance credibility. Researchers should consider using additional data sources or analytical methods to validate and enrich their thematic analysis findings, ensuring robust and trustworthy conclusions.

Reflective practice : Finally, these examples highlight the importance of a reflexive thematic analysis. Researchers must continually reflect on their own contexts, assumptions, and perspectives, considering how these might influence their analysis. By engaging in reflective practice, researchers can mitigate potential biases, enhance analytic rigor, and ensure their findings are a credible representation of the data.

These common threads across different thematic analysis examples provide a foundation for conducting robust and insightful thematic analysis. By adhering to these best practices, researchers can leverage thematic analysis to yield meaningful, impactful insights from their qualitative data.

Develop powerful research with ATLAS.ti

Intuitive tools for analysis make qualitative research easier than ever. Download a free trial today.

• How it works

Thematic Analysis – A Guide with Examples

Published by Alvin Nicolas at August 16th, 2021 , Revised On August 29, 2023

Thematic analysis is one of the most important types of analysis used for qualitative data . When researchers have to analyse audio or video transcripts, they give preference to thematic analysis. A researcher needs to look keenly at the content to identify the context and the message conveyed by the speaker.

Moreover, with the help of this analysis, data can be simplified.  

Importance of Thematic Analysis

Thematic analysis has so many unique and dynamic features, some of which are given below:

Thematic analysis is used because:

• It is flexible.
• It is best for complex data sets.
• It is applied to qualitative data sets.
• It takes less complexity compared to other theories of analysis.

Intellectuals and researchers give preference to thematic analysis due to its effectiveness in the research.

How to Conduct a Thematic Analysis?

While doing any research , if your data and procedure are clear, it will be easier for your reader to understand how you concluded the results . This will add much clarity to your research.

Understand the Data

This is the first step of your thematic analysis. At this stage, you have to understand the data set. You need to read the entire data instead of reading the small portion. If you do not have the data in the textual form, you have to transcribe it.

Example: If you are visiting an adult dating website, you have to make a data corpus. You should read and re-read the data and consider several profiles. It will give you an idea of how adults represent themselves on dating sites. You may get the following results:

I am a tall, single(widowed), easy-going, honest, good listener with a good sense of humor. Being a handyperson, I keep busy working around the house, and I also like to follow my favourite hockey team on TV or spoil my two granddaughters when I get the chance!! Enjoy most music except Rap! I keep fit by jogging, walking, and bicycling (at least three times a week). I have travelled to many places and RVD the South-West U.S., but I would now like to find that special travel partner to do more travel to warm and interesting countries. I now feel it’s time to meet a nice, kind, honest woman who has some of the same interests as I do; to share the happy times, quiet times, and adventures together

I enjoy photography, lapidary & seeking collectibles in the form of classic movies & 33 1/3, 45 & 78 RPM recordings from the 1920s, ’30s & ’40s. I am retired & looking forward to travelling to Canada, the USA, the UK & Europe, China. I am unique since I do not judge a book by its cover. I accept people for who they are. I will not demand or request perfection from anyone until I am perfect, so I guess that means everyone is safe. My musical tastes range from Classical, big band era, early jazz, classic ’50s & 60’s rock & roll & country since its inception.

Development of Initial Coding:

At this stage, you have to do coding. It’s the essential step of your research . Here you have two options for coding. Either you can do the coding manually or take the help of any tool. A software named the NOVIC is considered the best tool for doing automatic coding.

For manual coding, you can follow the steps given below:

• Please write down the data in a proper format so that it can be easier to proceed.
• Use a highlighter to highlight all the essential points from data.
• Make as many points as possible.
• Take notes very carefully at this stage.
• Apply themes as much possible.
• Now check out the themes of the same pattern or concept.
• Turn all the same themes into the single one.

Example: For better understanding, the previously explained example of Step 1 is continued here. You can observe the coded profiles below:

Make Themes

At this stage, you have to make the themes. These themes should be categorised based on the codes. All the codes which have previously been generated should be turned into themes. Moreover, with the help of the codes, some themes and sub-themes can also be created. This process is usually done with the help of visuals so that a reader can take an in-depth look at first glance itself.

Extracted Data Review

Now you have to take an in-depth look at all the awarded themes again. You have to check whether all the given themes are organised properly or not. It would help if you were careful and focused because you have to note down the symmetry here. If you find that all the themes are not coherent, you can revise them. You can also reshape the data so that there will be symmetry between the themes and dataset here.

For better understanding, a mind-mapping example is given here:

Reviewing all the Themes Again

You need to review the themes after coding them. At this stage, you are allowed to play with your themes in a more detailed manner. You have to convert the bigger themes into smaller themes here. If you want to combine some similar themes into a single theme, then you can do it. This step involves two steps for better fragmentation. 

You need to observe the coded data separately so that you can have a precise view. If you find that the themes which are given are following the dataset, it’s okay. Otherwise, you may have to rearrange the data again to coherence in the coded data.

Corpus Data

Here you have to take into consideration all the corpus data again. It would help if you found how themes are arranged here. It would help if you used the visuals to check out the relationship between them. Suppose all the things are not done accordingly, so you should check out the previous steps for a refined process. Otherwise, you can move to the next step. However, make sure that all the themes are satisfactory and you are not confused.

When all the two steps are completed, you need to make a more précised mind map. An example following the previous cases has been given below:

Define all the Themes here

Now you have to define all the themes which you have given to your data set. You can recheck them carefully if you feel that some of them can fit into one concept, you can keep them, and eliminate the other irrelevant themes. Because it should be precise and clear, there should not be any ambiguity. Now you have to think about the main idea and check out that all the given themes are parallel to your main idea or not. This can change the concept for you.

The given names should be so that it can give any reader a clear idea about your findings. However, it should not oppose your thematic analysis; rather, everything should be organised accurately.

Does your Research Methodology Have the Following?

• Great Research/Sources
• Perfect Language
• Accurate Sources

If not, we can help. Our panel of experts makes sure to keep the 3 pillars of Research Methodology strong.

Also, read about discourse analysis , content analysis and survey conducting . we have provided comprehensive guides.

Make a Report

You need to make the final report of all the findings you have done at this stage. You should include the dataset, findings, and every aspect of your analysis in it.

While making the final report , do not forget to consider your audience. For instance, you are writing for the Newsletter, Journal, Public awareness, etc., your report should be according to your audience. It should be concise and have some logic; it should not be repetitive. You can use the references of other relevant sources as evidence to support your discussion.  

Frequently Asked Questions

What is meant by thematic analysis.

Thematic Analysis is a qualitative research method that involves identifying, analyzing, and interpreting recurring themes or patterns in data. It aims to uncover underlying meanings, ideas, and concepts within the dataset, providing insights into participants’ perspectives and experiences.

You May Also Like

Action research for my dissertation?, A brief overview of action research as a responsive, action-oriented, participative and reflective research technique.

Quantitative research is associated with measurable numerical data. Qualitative research is where a researcher collects evidence to seek answers to a question.

Disadvantages of primary research – It can be expensive, time-consuming and take a long time to complete if it involves face-to-face contact with customers.

USEFUL LINKS

LEARNING RESOURCES

COMPANY DETAILS

• How It Works

How to Do Thematic Analysis: 6 Steps & Examples

Unlock qualitative insights with our step-by-step guide on thematic analysis. Identify patterns, and generate meaningful insights in six simple steps.

Thematic analysis is a game-changer for qualitative researchers. It's the key to unlocking the hidden patterns and meanings buried deep within your data.

In this step-by-step guide, you'll discover how to master thematic analysis and transform your raw data into powerful insights. From familiarizing yourself with the data to generating codes and themes, you'll learn the essential techniques to conduct a rigorous and systematic analysis.

Whether you're a seasoned researcher or just starting out, this guide will demystify the process and provide you with a clear roadmap to success. So get ready to dive into the world of thematic analysis!

Table of contents

What is thematic analysis

6 Steps for doing thematic analysis

Thematic Analysis in Action: A Real-World Example

Method Pros and Cons

Applications in Qualitative Research

What is thematic analysis.

Thematic analysis is a qualitative research method that focuses on identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns or themes within a dataset. Thematic analysis involves reading through a data set, identifying patterns in meaning, and deriving themes, providing a systematic and flexible way to interpret various aspects of the research topic.

The primary purpose of thematic analysis is to uncover and make sense of the collective or shared meanings and experiences within a dataset. By identifying common threads that extend across the data, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon under study and draw meaningful conclusions.

Key Characteristics

One of the key characteristics of thematic analysis is its flexibility. The approach is adaptable to a wide range of research questions and data types. Researchers can use thematic analysis inductively, allowing themes to emerge from the data itself, or, deductively, using existing theories or frameworks to guide the analysis process.

Another important aspect of thematic analysis is its focus on identifying and describing both implicit and explicit ideas within the data. Themes are not always directly observable but can be uncovered through a careful and systematic analysis of the dataset. This process involves looking beyond the surface-level content and examining the underlying meanings, assumptions, and ideas that shape participants' responses.

Inductive vs. Deductive Approaches

When conducting thematic analysis, researchers can choose between inductive (data-driven) or deductive (theory-driven) analysis approach. Inductive data analysis involves allowing themes to emerge from the data without any preconceived notions or theoretical frameworks guiding the analysis. This approach is particularly useful when exploring a new or under-researched topic, as it allows for the discovery of unexpected insights and patterns.

On the other hand, the deductive approach involves using existing theories or frameworks to guide the analysis process. In this case, researchers start with a set of pre-determined themes or categories and look for evidence within the data that supports or refutes these ideas. This approach is useful when testing or extending existing theories or when comparing findings across different studies or populations.

Thematic Analysis Simplified: A 6 Step-by-Step Process for Qualitative Data Analysis

This step-by-step guide breaks down the process into six manageable stages.

By following these steps, you can effectively analyze and interpret qualitative data to gain valuable insights .

Step 1: Familiarize Yourself with the Data

The first step in thematic analysis is to immerse yourself in the data. Read and re-read the transcripts, field notes, or other qualitative data sources to gain a deep understanding of the content. As you read, take notes on initial ideas and observations that come to mind. This process helps you become familiar with the depth and breadth of the data.

Pay attention to patterns, recurring ideas, and potential themes that emerge during this initial review. It's important to approach the data with an open mind, allowing the content to guide your understanding rather than imposing preconceived notions or expectations.

Tips for Familiarizing Yourself with the Data

Set aside dedicated time to read through the data without distractions.

Use colors or and notes to mark interesting or significant passages.

Create a summary or overview of each data source to help you remember key points.

Step 2: Generate Initial Codes

Once you've familiarized yourself with the data, the next step is to generate initial codes. Coding involves systematically labeling and organizing the data into meaningful groups. Go through the entire dataset and assign codes to interesting features or segments that are relevant to your research question.

Codes can be descriptive, interpretive, or pattern-based. Descriptive codes summarize the content, interpretive codes reflect the researcher's understanding, and pattern codes identify emerging themes or explanations. As you code, collate the data relevant to each code.

Tips for Generating Initial Codes

Use a qualitative data analysis software or a spreadsheet to organize your codes.

Be open to creating new codes as you progress through the data.

Regularly review and refine your codes to ensure consistency and relevance.

Step 3: Search for Themes

After coding the data, the next step is to search for themes. Themes are broader patterns or categories that capture significant aspects of the data in relation to the research question. Review your codes and consider how they can be grouped or combined to form overarching themes.

Collate all the data relevant to each potential theme. This may involve creating thematic maps or diagrams to visualize the relationships between codes and themes. Consider the different levels of themes, such as main themes and sub-themes , and how they connect to one another.

Tips for Searching for Themes

Look for recurring ideas, concepts, or patterns across the coded data.

Consider the relationships and connections between different codes.

Use visual aids like mind maps or sticky notes to organize and explore potential themes.

Step 4: Review Themes

Once you've identified potential themes, it's crucial to review and refine them. Check if the themes work in relation to the coded extracts and the entire dataset. This involves a two-level review process.

First, read through the collated extracts for each theme to ensure they form a coherent pattern. If some extracts don't fit, consider reworking the theme, creating a new theme, or discarding the extracts. Second, re-read the entire dataset to assess whether the themes accurately represent the data and capture the most important and relevant aspects.

Tips for Reviewing Themes

Ensure each theme is distinct and coherent.

Look for any data that contradicts or challenges your themes.

Create a thematic map to visually represent the relationships between themes.

Step 5: Define and Name Themes

After refining your themes, the next step is to define and name them. Conduct ongoing analysis to identify the essence and scope of each theme. Develop a clear and concise name for each theme that captures its central concept and significance.

Write a detailed analysis for each theme, explaining its meaning, relevance, and how it relates to the research question. Consider the story that each theme tells and how it contributes to the overall understanding of the data.

Tips for Defining and Naming Themes

Choose names that are concise, informative, and engaging.

Ensure the theme names and definitions are easily understandable to others.

Use quotes or examples from the data to illustrate and support each theme.

Step 6: Write Up

The final step in thematic analysis is to write up your findings in a clear and structured report. Your report should include an introduction that outlines the research question and methodology, followed by a detailed presentation of your themes and their significance.

Use examples and quotes from the data to support and illustrate each theme. Discuss how the themes relate to one another and to the overall research question. Consider the implications of your findings and how they contribute to existing knowledge or practice.

Tips for Writing Up

Use a clear and logical structure to guide the reader through your analysis.

Provide sufficient evidence and examples to support your themes.

Discuss the limitations of your study and suggest areas for future research.

Let's consider a real-world example to illustrate thematic analysis in action. Suppose an online retailer was looking to conduct semi-structured interviews with 20 customers who recently purchased products in their new footwear line. The researcher will likely want to understand the customers' experiences with the product, including its performance, design, and overall impact on their quality of life.

Step 1: Familiarizing Yourself with the Data

The first step in thematic analysis is to become familiar with the data. In this case, the researcher would transcribe the audio recordings of the interviews and read through the transcripts multiple times to get a sense of the overall content.

Immersing Yourself in the Data

During this familiarization process, the researcher should take notes on initial impressions, ideas, and potential patterns. This step is crucial for gaining a deep understanding of the data and laying the foundation for the subsequent analysis.

Step 2: Generating Initial Codes

Once familiar with the data, the researcher begins the coding process . Coding involves identifying and labeling segments of the text that are relevant to the research question.

In this example, the researcher might create codes such as "side effects," "quality of life," "treatment effectiveness," and "patient satisfaction." These codes help organize the data and make it easier to identify patterns and themes.

Using Coding Software

To streamline the coding process, researchers can use qualitative data analysis software like Kapiche . The platform allows uers to highlight and label segments of text , organize codes into categories, and visualize the relationships between the data.

Step 3: Searching for Themes

After coding the data, the researcher looks for broader patterns of meaning, known as themes. Themes capture something important about the data in relation to the research question and represent a level of patterned response or meaning within the dataset.

In this example, the researcher might identify themes such as "patients experienced significant improvement in symptoms," "side effects were manageable and tolerable," and "treatment enhanced overall quality of life."

Step 4: Reviewing and Refining Themes

The researcher then reviews and refines the themes to ensure they accurately represent the data. This process involves checking that the themes work in relation to the coded extracts and the entire dataset.

Ensuring Theme Coherence

The researcher should also consider whether the themes are internally coherent, consistent, and distinctive. If necessary, themes may be combined, split, or discarded to better capture the essence of the data.

Step 5: Defining and Naming Themes

The researcher defines and names the themes, capturing the essence of what each theme is about. Clear and concise theme names help convey the key findings of the analysis to readers.

In this example, the researcher might define and name the themes as "Treatment Effectiveness," "Manageable Side Effects," and "Improved Quality of Life."

By following these steps, the researcher can use thematic analysis to make sense of the patient interview data and gain valuable insights into their experiences with the new treatment. This real-world example demonstrates the power of thematic analysis in identifying patterns of meaning and providing a rich, detailed account of qualitative data.

Step 6: Report write-up

Finally, the researcher can package the findings in a clear report to communicate to other key stakeholders. The report would ideally include a summary themes, methodology, as well as detailed examples that bring the overarching trends to life.

Thematic Analysis: Weighing the Pros and Cons

Having explored the steps in doing thematic analysis, it's important to consider the advantages and disadvantages of the research method.

Thematic analysis has gained popularity due to its flexibility and accessibility, but it also has some limitations that researchers should be aware of.

Advantages of Thematic Analysis

Thematic analysis offers several benefits, making it a popular choice for qualitative analysis. One of its main advantages is its flexibility in application across a range of theoretical approaches. This means that researchers can use thematic analysis in various fields, from psychology and sociology to healthcare and education.

Another advantage is that thematic analysis is accessible to researchers with little or no experience in qualitative research methods. The process is relatively straightforward and does not require advanced technical skills or specialized software. This makes it an attractive option for novice researchers or those working with limited resources.

Thematic analysis also produces results that are generally accessible to an educated general public. The themes generated from the data are often easy to understand and can be presented in a clear and concise manner. This is particularly useful when communicating research findings to stakeholders or policymakers who may not have a background in the specific field of study.

Disadvantages of Thematic Analysis

Despite its advantages, thematic analysis also has some limitations that researchers should consider. One of the main disadvantages is the lack of substantial rigour on thematic analysis methodology compared to other qualitative approaches. This can make it challenging for researchers to find guidance or examples of best practices when conducting thematic analysis.

The flexibility of thematic analysis can also be a double-edged sword. While it allows for adaptability across different research contexts, it can also lead to inconsistency and lack of coherence in developing themes. Researchers may struggle to maintain a consistent approach throughout the analysis process, resulting in themes that are not well-defined or integrated.

Another limitation of thematic analysis is its limited interpretive power if not used within an existing theoretical framework. Without a guiding theory or conceptual framework, the analysis may remain descriptive rather than interpretive, failing to provide the deeper insights you're after.

Ensuring Rigorous Thematic Analysis

To overcome the limitations of thematic analysis process and ensure rigorous results, researchers should:

Familiarize themselves with the existing literature on thematic analysis and seek guidance from experienced researchers in the field.

Develop a clear and consistent approach to coding and theme development, documenting each step of the process to ensure transparency and reproducibility.

Consider using thematic analysis in conjunction with other qualitative methods or within an existing theoretical framework to enhance its interpretive power.

Be flexible throughout the research process, acknowledging biases and assumptions and how these may influence the analysis.

By weighing the pros and cons of thematic analysis and taking steps to ensure rigour, researchers can harness the benefits of this method while minimizing its limitations, producing valuable insights from qualitative data.

Thematic analysis is widely used in various fields, including psychology, social sciences, and health research. This approach is particularly suitable for anyone doing qualitative content analysis of interviews, focus groups, and open-ended survey responses.

In psychology, thematic analysis has been used to explore a range of topics, such as experiences of mental health issues, identity formation, and interpersonal relationships. A key paper by Braun and Clarke (2006) demonstrated how thematic analysis can be used in psychology studies, providing guidelines on how to approach generating themes and leveraging a systematic coding process.

Combining Thematic Analysis with Other Methods

Thematic analysis can be used as a standalone method or in combination with other qualitative or quantitative approaches. When used in conjunction with other methods, thematic analysis can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research topic and can enhance the credibility of the findings.

For example, researchers can use thematic analysis to analyze raw interview data, and then use the identified themes to inform the development of a quantitative survey to probe deeper. This approach allows for effective exploration of a topic, providing a more complete picture of the research themes.

Thematic Analysis: Your Key to Unlocking Qualitative Insights

Thematic analysis is a powerful tool for making sense of research data. By familiarizing yourself with data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing and refining them, and finally writing up your findings, you can uncover rich insights that might otherwise remain hidden.

Ready to put thematic analysis into practice? Start by gathering your qualitative data, whether it's interview transcripts, open-ended survey responses, or focus group discussions.

Then, leverage a tool like Kapiche as you follow the step-by-step process outlined in this guide. From pre-coding to post-coding, this guide should help arrive at the themes that best capture the essence of your data.

Want to see how Kapiche can support your thematic research goals? Watch a demo here today to get a tour of the platform.

You might also like

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• How to Do Thematic Analysis | Guide & Examples

How to Do Thematic Analysis | Guide & Examples

Published on 5 May 2022 by Jack Caulfield . Revised on 7 June 2024.

Thematic analysis is a method of analysing qualitative data . It is usually applied to a set of texts, such as an interview or transcripts . The researcher closely examines the data to identify common themes, topics, ideas and patterns of meaning that come up repeatedly.

There are various approaches to conducting thematic analysis, but the most common form follows a six-step process:

• Familiarisation
• Generating themes
• Reviewing themes
• Defining and naming themes

This process was originally developed for psychology research by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke . However, thematic analysis is a flexible method that can be adapted to many different kinds of research.

Table of contents

When to use thematic analysis, different approaches to thematic analysis, step 1: familiarisation, step 2: coding, step 3: generating themes, step 4: reviewing themes, step 5: defining and naming themes, step 6: writing up.

Thematic analysis is a good approach to research where you’re trying to find out something about people’s views, opinions, knowledge, experiences, or values from a set of qualitative data – for example, interview transcripts , social media profiles, or survey responses .

Some types of research questions you might use thematic analysis to answer:

• How do patients perceive doctors in a hospital setting?
• What are young women’s experiences on dating sites?
• What are non-experts’ ideas and opinions about climate change?
• How is gender constructed in secondary school history teaching?

To answer any of these questions, you would collect data from a group of relevant participants and then analyse it. Thematic analysis allows you a lot of flexibility in interpreting the data, and allows you to approach large datasets more easily by sorting them into broad themes.

However, it also involves the risk of missing nuances in the data. Thematic analysis is often quite subjective and relies on the researcher’s judgement, so you have to reflect carefully on your own choices and interpretations.

Pay close attention to the data to ensure that you’re not picking up on things that are not there – or obscuring things that are.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Once you’ve decided to use thematic analysis, there are different approaches to consider.

There’s the distinction between inductive and deductive approaches:

• An inductive approach involves allowing the data to determine your themes.
• A deductive approach involves coming to the data with some preconceived themes you expect to find reflected there, based on theory or existing knowledge.

There’s also the distinction between a semantic and a latent approach:

• A semantic approach involves analysing the explicit content of the data.
• A latent approach involves reading into the subtext and assumptions underlying the data.

After you’ve decided thematic analysis is the right method for analysing your data, and you’ve thought about the approach you’re going to take, you can follow the six steps developed by Braun and Clarke .

The first step is to get to know our data. It’s important to get a thorough overview of all the data we collected before we start analysing individual items.

This might involve transcribing audio , reading through the text and taking initial notes, and generally looking through the data to get familiar with it.

Next up, we need to code the data. Coding means highlighting sections of our text – usually phrases or sentences – and coming up with shorthand labels or ‘codes’ to describe their content.

Let’s take a short example text. Say we’re researching perceptions of climate change among conservative voters aged 50 and up, and we have collected data through a series of interviews. An extract from one interview looks like this:

In this extract, we’ve highlighted various phrases in different colours corresponding to different codes. Each code describes the idea or feeling expressed in that part of the text.

At this stage, we want to be thorough: we go through the transcript of every interview and highlight everything that jumps out as relevant or potentially interesting. As well as highlighting all the phrases and sentences that match these codes, we can keep adding new codes as we go through the text.

After we’ve been through the text, we collate together all the data into groups identified by code. These codes allow us to gain a condensed overview of the main points and common meanings that recur throughout the data.

Next, we look over the codes we’ve created, identify patterns among them, and start coming up with themes.

Themes are generally broader than codes. Most of the time, you’ll combine several codes into a single theme. In our example, we might start combining codes into themes like this:

At this stage, we might decide that some of our codes are too vague or not relevant enough (for example, because they don’t appear very often in the data), so they can be discarded.

Other codes might become themes in their own right. In our example, we decided that the code ‘uncertainty’ made sense as a theme, with some other codes incorporated into it.

Again, what we decide will vary according to what we’re trying to find out. We want to create potential themes that tell us something helpful about the data for our purposes.

Now we have to make sure that our themes are useful and accurate representations of the data. Here, we return to the dataset and compare our themes against it. Are we missing anything? Are these themes really present in the data? What can we change to make our themes work better?

If we encounter problems with our themes, we might split them up, combine them, discard them, or create new ones: whatever makes them more useful and accurate.

For example, we might decide upon looking through the data that ‘changing terminology’ fits better under the ‘uncertainty’ theme than under ‘distrust of experts’, since the data labelled with this code involves confusion, not necessarily distrust.

Now that you have a final list of themes, it’s time to name and define each of them.

Defining themes involves formulating exactly what we mean by each theme and figuring out how it helps us understand the data.

Naming themes involves coming up with a succinct and easily understandable name for each theme.

For example, we might look at ‘distrust of experts’ and determine exactly who we mean by ‘experts’ in this theme. We might decide that a better name for the theme is ‘distrust of authority’ or ‘conspiracy thinking’.

Finally, we’ll write up our analysis of the data. Like all academic texts, writing up a thematic analysis requires an introduction to establish our research question, aims, and approach.

We should also include a methodology section, describing how we collected the data (e.g., through semi-structured interviews or open-ended survey questions ) and explaining how we conducted the thematic analysis itself.

The results or findings section usually addresses each theme in turn. We describe how often the themes come up and what they mean, including examples from the data as evidence. Finally, our conclusion explains the main takeaways and shows how the analysis has answered our research question.

In our example, we might argue that conspiracy thinking about climate change is widespread among older conservative voters, point out the uncertainty with which many voters view the issue, and discuss the role of misinformation in respondents’ perceptions.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Caulfield, J. (2024, June 07). How to Do Thematic Analysis | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 3 September 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/thematic-analysis-explained/

Is this article helpful?

Jack Caulfield

Other students also liked, qualitative vs quantitative research | examples & methods, inductive reasoning | types, examples, explanation, what is deductive reasoning | explanation & examples.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Chapter 22: Thematic Analysis

Darshini Ayton

Learning outcomes

Upon completion of this chapter, you should be able to:

• Describe the different approaches to thematic analysis.
• Understand how to conduct the three types of thematic analysis.
• Identify the strengths and limitations of each type of thematic analysis.

What is thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is a common method used in the analysis of qualitative data to identify, analyse and interpret meaning through a systematic process of generating codes (see Chapter 20) that leads to the development of themes. 1 Thematic analysis requires the active engagement of the researcher with the data, in a process of sorting, categorising and interpretation. 1 Thematic analysis is exploratory analysis whereby codes are not predetermined and are data-derived, usually from primary sources of data (e,g, interviews and focus groups). This is in contrast to themes generated through directed or summative content analysis, which is considered confirmatory hypothesis-driven analysis, with predetermined codes typically generated from a hypothesis (see Chapter 21). 2 There are many forms of thematic analysis. Hence, it is important to treat thematic analysis as one of many methods of analysis, and to justify the approach on the basis of the research question and pragmatic considerations such as resources, time and audience. The three main forms of thematic analysis used in health and social care research, discussed in this chapter, are:

Applied thematic analysis

• Framework analysis
• Reflexive thematic analysis.

This involves multiple, inductive analytic techniques designed to identify and examine themes from textual data in a way that is transparent and credible, drawing from a broad range of theoretical and methodological perspectives. It focuses on presenting the stories of participants as accurately and comprehensively as possible. Applied thematic analysis mixes a bit of everything: grounded theory, positivism, interpretivism and phenomenology. 2

Applied thematic analysis borrows what we feel are the more useful techniques from each theoretical and methodological camp and adapts them to an applied research context. 2(p16)

Applied thematic analysis involves five elements:

• Text s egmentation  involves identifying a meaningful segment of text and the boundaries of the segment. Text segmentation is a useful process as a transcript from a 30-minute interview can be many pages long. Hence, segmenting the text provides a manageable section of the data for interrogation of meaning. For example, text segmentation may be a participant’s response to an interview question, a keyword or concept in context, or a complete discourse between participants. The segment of text is more than a short phrase and can be both small and large sections of text. Text segments can also overlap, and a smaller segment may be embedded within a larger segment. 3
• Creation of the codebook is a critical element of applied thematic analysis. The codebook is created when the segments of text are systematically coded into categories, types and relationships, and the codes are defined by the observed meaning in the text. The codes and their definitions are descriptive in the beginning, and then evolve into explanatory codes as the researcher examines the commonalities, differences and relationships between the codes. The codebook is an iterative document that the researcher builds and refines as they become more immersed and familiar with the data. 3 Table 22.1 outlines the key components of a codebook. 3

Table 22.1. Codebook components and an example

• Structural coding can be useful if a structured interview guide or focus group guide has been used by the researcher and the researcher stays close to the wording of the question and its prompts. The structured question is the structural code in the codebook, and the text segment should include the participant’s response and any dialogue following the question. Of course, this form of coding can be used even if the researcher does not follow a structured guide, which is often the reality of qualitative data collection. The relevant text segments are coded for the specific structure, as appropriate. 3
• Content coding is informed by the research question(s) and the questions informing the analysis. The segmented text is grouped in different ways to explore relationships, hierarchies, descriptions and explanations of events, similarities, differences and consequences. The content of the text segment should be read and re-read to identify patterns and meaning, with the generated codes added to the codebook.
• Themes vary in scope, yet at the core they are phrases or statements that explain the meaning of the text. Researchers need to be aware that themes are considered a higher conceptual level than codes, and therefore should not be comprised of single words or labels. Typically, multiple codes will lead to a theme. Revisiting the research and analysis questions will assist the researcher to identify themes. Through the coding process, the researcher actively searches the data for themes. Examples of how themes may be identified include the repetition of concepts within and across transcripts, the use of metaphors and analogies, key phrases and common phrases used in an unfamiliar way. 3

Framework a nalysis

This method originated in the 1980s in social policy research. Framework analysis is suited to research seeking to answer specific questions about a problem or issue, within a limited time frame and with homogenous data (in topics, concepts and participants); multiple researchers are usually involved in the coding process. 4-6 The process of framework analysis is methodical and suits large data sets, hence is attractive to quantitative researchers and health services researchers. Framework analysis is useful for multidisciplinary teams in which not all members are familiar with qualitative analysis. Framework analysis does not seek to generate theory and is not aligned with any particular epistemological, philosophical or theoretical approach. 5 The output of framework analysis is a matrix with rows (cases), columns (codes) and cells of summarised data that enables researchers to analyse the data case by case and code by code. The case is usually an individual interview, or it can be a defined group or organisation. 5

The process for conducting framework analysis is as follows 5 :

1. Transcription – usually verbatim transcription of the interview.

2. Familiarisation with the interview – reading the transcript and listening to the audio recording (particularly if the researcher doing the analysis did not conduct the interview) can assist in the interpretation of the data. Notes on analytical observations, thoughts and impressions are made in the margins of the transcript during this stage.

3. Coding – completed in a line-by-line method by at least two researchers from different disciplines (or with a patient or public involvement representative), where possible. Coding can be both deductive – (using a theory or specific topics relevant to the project – or inductive, whereby open coding is applied to elements such as behaviours, incidents, values, attitudes, beliefs, emotions and participant reactions. All data is coded.

4. Developing a working analytical framework – codes are collated and organised into categories, to create a structure for summarising or reducing the data.

5. Applying the analytical framework – indexing the remaining transcripts by using the categories and codes of the analytical framework.

6. Charting data into the framework matrix – summarising the data by category and from each transcript into the framework matrix, which is a spreadsheet with numbered cells in which summarised data are entered by codes (columns) and cases (rows). Charting needs to balance the reduction of data to a manageable few lines and retention of the meaning and ‘feel’ of the participant. References to illustrative quotes should be included.

7. Interpreting the data – using the framework matrix and notes taken throughout the analysis process to interpret meaning, in collaboration with team members, including lay and clinical members.

Reflexive thematic analysis

This is the thematic analysis approach developed by Braun and Clarke in 2006 and explained in the highly cited article ‘ Using thematic analysis in psychology ’ . 7 Reflexive thematic analysis recognises the subjectiveness of the analysis process, and that codes and themes are actively generated by the researcher. Hence, themes and codes are influenced by the researcher’s values, skills and experiences. 8 Reflexive thematic analysis ‘exists at the intersection of the researcher, the dataset and the various contexts of interpretation’. 9(line 5-6) In this method, the coding process is less structured and more organic than in applied thematic analysis. Braun and Clarke have been critical of the use of the term ‘emerging themes’, which many researchers use to indicate that the theme was data-driven, as opposed to a deductive approach:

This language suggests that meaning is self evident and somehow ‘within’ the data waiting to be revealed, and that the researcher is a neutral conduit for the revelation of said meaning. In contrast, we conceptualise analysis as a situated and interactive process, reflecting both the data, the positionality of the researcher, and the context of the research itself… it is disingenuous to evoke a process whereby themes simply emerge, instead of being active co-productions on the part of the researcher, the data/participants and context. 10 (p15)

Since 2006, Braun and Clarke have published extensively on reflexive thematic analysis, including a methodological paper comparing reflexive thematic analysis with other approaches to qualitative analysis, 8 and have provided resources on their website to support researchers and students. 9 There are many ways to conduct reflexive thematic analysis, but the six main steps in the method are outlined following. 9 Note that this is not a linear, prescriptive or rule-based process, but rather an approach to guide researchers in systematically and robustly exploring their data.

1.  Familiarisation with data – involves reading and re-reading transcripts so that the researcher is immersed in the data. The researcher makes notes on their initial observations, interpretations and insights for both the individual transcripts and across all the transcripts or data sources.

2.  Coding – the process of applying succinct labels (codes) to the data in a way that captures the meaning and characteristics of the data relevant to the research question. The entire data set is coded in numerous rounds; however, unlike line-by-line coding in grounded theory (Chapter 27), or data segmentation in applied thematic analysis, not all sections of data need to be coded. 8 After a few rounds of coding, the codes are collated and relevant data is extracted.

3.  Generating initial themes – using the collated codes and extracted data, the researcher identifies patterns of meaning (initial or potential themes). The researcher then revisits codes and the data to extract relevant data for the initial themes, to examine the viability of the theme.

4 .  Developing and reviewing themes – checking the initial themes against codes and the entire data set to assess whether it captures the ‘story’ of the data and addresses the research question. During this step, the themes are often reworked by combining, splitting or discarding. For reflexive thematic analysis, a theme is defined as a ‘pattern of shared meaning underpinned by a central concept or idea’. 8 (p 39 )

5.  Refining, defining and naming themes – developing the scope and boundaries of the theme, creating the story of the theme and applying an informative name for the theme.

6.  Writing up – is a key part of the analysis and involves writing the narrative of the themes, embedding the data and providing the contextual basis for the themes in the literature.

Themes versus c odes

As described above, themes are informed by codes, and themes are defined at a conceptually higher level than codes. Themes are broader categorisations that tend to describe or explain the topic or concept. Themes need to extend beyond the code and are typically statements that can stand alone to describe and/or explain the data. Fereday and Muir-Cochrane explain this development from code to theme in Table 22.2. 11

Table 22.2. Corroborating and legitimating coded themes to identify second-order themes

*Note: This table is from an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

When I [the author] first started publishing qualitative research, many of my themes were at the code level. I then got advice that when the themes are the subheadings of the results section of my paper, they should tell the story of the research. The difference in my theme naming can be seen when comparing a paper from my PhD thesis, 12 which explores the challenges of church-based health promotion, with a more recent paper that I published on antimicrobial stewardship 13 (refer to the theme tables in the publications).

Table 22.3. Examples of thematic analysis

Advantages and challenges of thematic analysis

Thematic analysis is flexible and can be used to analyse small and large data sets with homogenous and heterogenous samples. Thematic analysis can be applied to any type of data source, from interviews and focus groups to diary entries and online discussion forums. 1 Applied thematic analysis and framework analysis are accessible approaches for non-qualitative researchers or beginner researchers. However, the flexibility and accessibility of thematic analysis can lead to limitations and challenges when thematic analysis is misapplied or done poorly. Thematic analysis can be more descriptive than interpretive if not properly anchored in a theoretical framework. 1 For framework analysis, the spreadsheet matrix output can lead to quantitative researchers inappropriately quantifying the qualitative data. Therefore, training and support from a qualitative researcher with the appropriate expertise can help to ensure that the interpretation of the data is meaningful. 5

Thematic analysis is a family of analysis techniques that are flexible and inductive and involve the generation of codes and themes. There are three main types of thematic analysis: applied thematic analysis, framework analysis and reflexive thematic analysis. These approaches span from structured coding to organic and unstructured coding for theme development. The choice of approach should be guided by the research question, the research design and the available resources and skills of the researcher and team.

• Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. J Posit Psychol . 2017;12(3):297-298. doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
• Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Introduction to applied thematic analysis. In: Guest G, MacQueen, K.M., Namey, E.E., ed. Applied thematic analysis . SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2014. Accessed September 18, 2023. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/applied-thematic-analysis
• Guest G, MacQueen, K.M., Namey, E.E.,. Themes and Codes. In: Guest G, MacQueen, K.M., Namey, E.E., ed. Applied thematic analysis . SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2014. Accessed September 18, 2023. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/applied-thematic-analysis
• Srivastava A, Thomson SB. Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Journal of Administration and Governance . 2009;72(3). Accessed September 14, 2023. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2760705
• Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol . 2013;13:117. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
• Smith J, Firth J. Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach. Nurse Res . 2011;18(2):52-62. doi:10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol . 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Braun V, Clarke V. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Couns Psychother Res . 2021;21(1):37-47. doi:10.1002/capr.12360
• Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. University of Auckland. Accessed September 18, 2023. https://www.thematicanalysis.net/
• Braun V, Clarke V. Answers to frequently asked questions about thematic analysis. University of Auckland. Accessed September 18, 2023. https://www.thematicanalysis.net/faqs/
• Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating Rigour Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods . 2006;5(1):80-92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107
• Ayton D, Manderson L, Smith BJ. Barriers and challenges affecting the contemporary church’s engagement in health promotion. Health Promot J Austr . 2017;28(1):52-58. doi:10.1071/HE15037
• Ayton D, Watson E, Betts JM, et al. Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program in the Australian private hospital system: qualitative study of attitudes to antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial stewardship. BMC Health Serv Res . 2022;22(1):1554. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08938-8
• McKenna-Plumley PE, Graham-Wisener L, Berry E, Groarke JM. Connection, constraint, and coping: A qualitative study of experiences of loneliness during the COVID-19 lockdown in the UK. PLoS One . 2021;16(10):e0258344. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258344
• Dickinson BL, Gibson K, VanDerKolk K, et al. “It is this very knowledge that makes us doctors”: an applied thematic analysis of how medical students perceive the relevance of biomedical science knowledge to clinical medicine. BMC Med Educ . 2020;20(1):356. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02251-w
• Bunzli S, O’Brien P, Ayton D, et al. Misconceptions and the acceptance of evidence-based nonsurgical interventions for knee osteoarthritis. A Qualitative Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2019;477(9):1975-1983. doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000000784

Qualitative Research – a practical guide for health and social care researchers and practitioners Copyright © 2023 by Darshini Ayton is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis

• Open access
• Published: 26 June 2021
• Volume 56 , pages 1391–1412, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• David Byrne   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0587-4677 1  

581k Accesses

776 Citations

118 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Since the publication of their inaugural paper on the topic in 2006, Braun and Clarke’s approach has arguably become one of the most thoroughly delineated methods of conducting thematic analysis (TA). However, confusion persists as to how to implement this specific approach to TA appropriately. The authors themselves have identified that many researchers who purport to adhere to this approach—and who reference their work as such—fail to adhere fully to the principles of ‘reflexive thematic analysis’ (RTA). Over the course of numerous publications, Braun and Clarke have elaborated significantly upon the constitution of RTA and attempted to clarify numerous misconceptions that they have found in the literature. This paper will offer a worked example of Braun and Clarke’s contemporary approach to reflexive thematic analysis with the aim of helping to dispel some of the confusion regarding the position of RTA among the numerous existing typologies of TA. While the data used in the worked example has been garnered from health and wellbeing education research and was examined to ascertain educators’ attitudes regarding such, the example offered of how to implement the RTA would be easily transferable to many other contexts and research topics.

Similar content being viewed by others

Thematic Analysis

Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development

Examining grounded theory through the lens of rationalist epistemology

Explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

Although the lineage of thematic analysis (TA) can be traced back as far as the early twentieth century (Joffe 2012 ), it has up until recently been a relatively poorly demarcated and poorly understood method of qualitative analysis. Much of the credit for the recent enlightenment and subsequent increase in interest in TA can arguably be afforded to Braun and Clarke’s ( 2006 ) inaugural publication on the topic of thematic analysis in the field of psychology. These authors have since published several articles and book chapters, as well as their own book, all of which make considerable contributions to further delineating their approach to TA (see, for example, Braun and Clarke 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2019 , 2020 ; Braun et al. 2016 ; Terry et al. 2017 ). However, on numerous occasions Braun and Clarke have identified a tendency for scholars to cite their 2006 article, but fail to fully adhere to their contemporary approach to RTA (see Braun and Clarke 2013 , 2019 , 2020 ). Commendably, they have acknowledged that their 2006 paper left several aspect of their approach incompletely defined and open to interpretation. Indeed, the term ‘reflexive thematic analysis’ only recently came about in response to these misconceptions (Braun and Clarke 2019 ). Much of their subsequent body of literature in this area addresses these issues and attempts to correct some of the misconceptions in the wider literature regarding their approach. Braun and Clarke have repeatedly iterated that researchers who chose to adopt their approach should interrogate their relevant publications beyond their 2006 article and adhere to their contemporary approach (Braun and Clarke 2019 , 2020 ). The purpose of this paper is to contribute to dispelling some of the confusion and misconceptions regarding Braun and Clarke’s approach by providing a worked example of their contemporary approach to reflexive thematic analysis. The worked example will be presented in relation to the author’s own research, which examined the attitudes of post-primary educators’ regarding the promotion of student wellbeing. This paper is intended to be a supplementary resource for any prospective proponents of RTA, but may be of particular interest to scholars conducting attitudinal studies in an educational context. While this paper is aimed at all scholars regardless of research experience, it may be most useful to research students and their supervisors. Ultimately, the provided example of how to implement the six-phase analysis is easily transferable to many contexts and research topics.

2 What is reflexive thematic analysis?

Reflexive thematic analysis is an easily accessible and theoretically flexible interpretative approach to qualitative data analysis that facilitates the identification and analysis of patterns or themes in a given data set (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). RTA sits among a number of varied approaches to conducting thematic analysis. Braun and Clarke have noted that very often, researchers who purport to have adopted RTA have failed to fully delineate their implementation of RTA, of have confused RTA with other approaches to thematic analysis. The over-riding tendency in this regard is for scholars to mislabel their analysis as RTA, or to draw from a number of different approaches to TA, some of which may not be compatible with each other (Braun and Clarke 2012 , 2013 , 2019 ; Terry et al. 2017 ). In an attempt to resolve this confusion, Braun and Clarke have demarcated the position of RTA among the other forms of thematic analysis by differentiating between three principal approaches to TA: (1) coding reliability TA; (2) codebook approaches to TA, and; (3) the reflexive approach to TA (Braun et al. 2019 ).

Coding reliability approaches, such as those espoused by Boyatzis ( 1998 ) and Joffe ( 2012 ), accentuate the measurement of accuracy or reliability when coding data, often involving the use of a structured codebook. The researcher would also seek a degree of consensus among multiple coders, which can be measured using Cohen’s Kappa (Braun and Clarke 2013 ). When adopting a coding reliability approach, themes tend to be developed very early in the analytical process. Themes can be hypothesised based on theory prior to data collection, with evidence to support these hypotheses then gathered from the data in the form of codes. Alternatively, themes can be hypothesised following a degree of familiarisation with the data (Terry et al. 2017 ). Themes are typically understood to constitute ‘domain summaries’, or “summaries of what participants said in relation to a particular topic or data collection question” (Braun et al. 2019 , p. 5), and are likely to be discussed as residing within the data in a positivistic sense.

Codebook approaches, such as framework analysis (Smith and Firth 2011 ) or template analysis (King and Brooks 2017 ), can be understood to be something of a mid-point between coding reliability approaches and the reflexive approach. Like coding reliability approaches, codebook approaches adopt the use of a structured codebook and share the conceptualisation of themes as domain summaries. However, codebook approaches are more akin to the reflexive approach in terms of the prioritisation of a qualitative philosophy with regard to coding. Proponents of codebook approaches would typically forgo positivistic conceptions of coding reliability, instead recognising the interpretive nature of data coding (Braun et al. 2019 ).

The reflexive approach to TA highlights the researcher’s active role in knowledge production (Braun and Clarke 2019 ). Codes are understood to represent the researcher’s interpretations of patterns of meaning across the dataset. Reflexive thematic analysis is considered a reflection of the researcher’s interpretive analysis of the data conducted at the intersection of: (1) the dataset; (2) the theoretical assumptions of the analysis, and; (3) the analytical skills/resources of the researcher (Braun and Clarke 2019 ). It is fully appreciated—even expected—that no two researchers will intersect this tripartite of criteria in the same way. As such, there should be no expectation that codes or themes interpreted by one researcher may be reproduced by another (although, this is of course possible). Prospective proponents of RTA are discouraged from attempting to provide accounts of ‘accurate’ or ‘reliable’ coding, or pursuing consensus among multiple coders or using Cohen’s Kappa values. Rather, RTA is about “the researcher’s reflective and thoughtful engagement with their data and their reflexive and thoughtful engagement with the analytic process” (Braun and Clarke 2019 , p. 594). Multiple coders may, however, be beneficial in a reflexive manner (e.g. to sense-check ideas, or to explore multiple assumptions or interpretations of the data). If analysis does involve more than one researcher, the approach should be collaborative and reflexive, aiming to achieve richer interpretations of meaning, rather than attempting to achieve consensus of meaning. Indeed, in this sense it would be beneficial for proponents of RTA to remain cognisant that qualitative analysis as a whole does not contend to provide a single or ‘correct’ answer (Braun and Clarke 2013 ).

The process of coding (and theme development) is flexible and organic, and very often will evolve throughout the analytical process (Braun et al. 2019 ). Progression through the analysis will tend to facilitate further familiarity with the data, which may in turn result in the interpretation of new patterns of meaning. This is converse to the use of codebooks, which can often predefine themes before coding. Through the reflexive approach, themes are not predefined in order to ‘find’ codes. Rather, themes are produced by organising codes around a relative core commonality, or ‘central organising concept’, that the researcher interprets from the data (Braun and Clarke 2019 ).

In their 2006 paper, Braun and Clarke ( 2006 ) originally conceptualised RTA as a paradigmatically flexible analytical method, suitable for use within a wide range of ontological and epistemological considerations. In recent publications, the authors have moved away from this view, instead defining RTA as a purely qualitative approach. This pushes the use RTA into exclusivity under appropriate qualitative paradigms (e.g. constructionism) (Braun and Clarke 2019 , 2020 ). As opposed to other forms of qualitative analysis such as content analysis (Vaismoradi et al. 2013 ), and even other forms of TA such as Boyatzis’ ( 1998 ) approach, RTA eschews any positivistic notions of data interpretation. Braun and Clarke ( 2019 ) encourage the researcher to embrace reflexivity, subjectivity and creativity as assets in knowledge production, where they argue some scholars, such as Boyatzis ( 1998 ), may otherwise construe these assets as threats.

3 A worked example of reflexive thematic analysis

The data used in the following example is taken from the qualitative phase of a mixed methods study I conducted, which examined mental health in an educational context. This study set out to understand the attitudes and opinions of Irish post-primary educators with regard to the promotion of students’ social and emotional wellbeing, with the intention to feed this information back to key governmental and non-governmental stakeholders such as the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment and the Department of Education. The research questions for this study aimed to examine educators’ general attitudes toward the promotion of student wellbeing and towards a set of ‘wellbeing guidelines’ that had recently been introduced in Irish post-primary schools. I also wanted to identify any potential barriers to wellbeing promotion and to solicit educators’ opinions as to what might constitute apposite remedial measures in this regard.

The qualitative phase of this study, from which the data for this example is garnered, involved eleven semi-structured interviews, which lasted approximately 25–30 min each. Participants consisted of core-curriculum teachers, wellbeing curriculum teachers, pastoral care team-members and senior management members. Participants were questioned on their attitudes regarding the promotion of student wellbeing, the wellbeing curriculum, the wellbeing guidelines and their perceptions of their own wellbeing. When conducting these interviews, I loosely adhered to an interview agenda to ensure each of these four key topics were addressed. However, discussions were typically guided by what I interpreted to be meaningful to the interviewee, and would often weave in and out of these different topics.

The research questions for this study were addressed within a paradigmatic framework of interpretivism and constructivism. A key principle I adopted for this study was to reflect educators’ own accounts of their attitudes, opinions and experiences as faithfully as was possible, while also accounting for the reflexive influence of my own interpretations as the researcher. I felt RTA was highly appropriate in the context of the underlying theoretical and paradigmatic assumptions of my study and would allow me to ensure qualitative data was collected and analysed in a manner that respected and expressed the subjectivity of participants’ accounts of their attitudes, while also acknowledging and embracing the reflexive influence of my interpretations as the researcher.

In the next section, I will outline the theoretical assumptions of the RTA conducted in my original study in more detail. It should be noted that outlining these theoretical assumptions is not a task specific to reflexive thematic analysis. Rather, these assumptions should be addressed prior to implementing any form of thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke 2012 , 2019 , 2020 ; Braun et al. 2016 ). The six-phase process for conducting reflexive thematic analysis will then be appropriately detailed and punctuated with examples from my study.

3.1 Addressing underlying theoretical assumptions

Across several publications, Braun and Clarke ( 2012 , 2014 , 2020 ) have identified a number of theoretical assumptions that should be addressed when conducting RTA, or indeed any form of thematic analysis. These assumptions are conceptualised as a series of continua as follows: essentialist versus constructionist epistemologies; experiential versus critical orientation to data; inductive versus deductive analyses, and; semantic versus latent coding of data. The aim is not just for the researcher to identify where their analysis is situated on each of these continua, but why the analysis is situated as it is and why this conceptualisation is appropriate to answering the research question(s).

3.1.1 Essentialist versus constructionist epistemologies

Ontological and epistemological considerations would usually be determined when a study is first being conceptualised. However, these considerations may become salient again when data analysis becomes the research focus, particularly with regard to mixed methods. The purpose of addressing this continuum is to conceptualise theoretically how the researcher understands their data and the way in which the reader should interpret the findings (Braun and Clarke 2013 , 2014 ). By adhering to essentialism, the researcher adopts a unidirectional understanding of the relationship between language and communicated experience, in that it is assumed that language is a simple reflection of our articulated meanings and experiences (Widdicombe and Wooffiitt 1995 ). The meanings and systems inherent in constructing these meanings are largely uninterrogated, with the interpretive potential of TA largely unutilised (Braun et al. 2016 ).

Conversely, researchers of a constructionist persuasion would tend to adopt a bidirectional understanding of the language/experience relationship, viewing language as implicit in the social production and reproduction of both meaning and experience (Burr 1995 ; Schwandt 1998 ). A constructionist epistemology has particular implications with regard to thematic analysis, namely that in addition to the recurrence of perceptibly important information, meaningfulness is highly influential in the development and interpretation of codes and themes. The criteria for a theme to be considered noteworthy via recurrence is simply that the theme should present repeatedly within the data. However, what is common is not necessarily meaningful or important to the analysis. Braun and Clarke ( 2012 , p. 37) offer this example:

…in researching white-collar workers’ experiences of sociality at work, a researcher might interview people about their work environment and start with questions about their typical workday. If most or all reported that they started work at around 9:00 a.m., this would be a pattern in the data, but it would not necessarily be a meaningful or important one.

Furthermore, there may be varying degrees of conviction in respondents’ expression when addressing different issues that may facilitate in identifying the salience of a prospective theme. Therefore, meaningfulness can be conceptualised, firstly on the part of the researcher, with regard to the necessity to identify themes that are relevant to answering the research questions, and secondly on the part of the respondent, as the expression of varying degrees of importance with regard to the issues being addressed. By adopting a constructionist epistemology, the researcher acknowledges the importance of recurrence, but appreciates meaning and meaningfulness as the central criteria in the coding process.

In keeping with the qualitative philosophy of RTA, epistemological consideration regarding the example data were constructionist. As such, meaning and experience was interpreted to be socially produced and reproduced via an interplay of subjective and inter-subjective construction. Footnote 1

3.1.2 Experiential versus critical orientation

An experiential orientation to understanding data typically prioritises the examination of how a given phenomenon may be experienced by the participant. This involves investigating the meaning ascribed to the phenomenon by the respondent, as well as the meaningfulness of the phenomenon to the respondent. However, although these thoughts, feelings and experiences are subjectively and inter-subjectively (re)produced, the researcher would cede to the meaning and meaningfulness ascribed by the participant (Braun and Clarke 2014 ). Adopting an experiential orientation requires an appreciation that the thoughts, feelings and experiences of participants are a reflection of personal states held internally by the participant. Conversely, a critical orientation appreciates and analyses discourse as if it were constitutive, rather than reflective, of respondents’ personal states (Braun and Clarke 2014 ). As such, a critical perspective seeks to interrogate patterns and themes of meaning with a theoretical understanding that language can create, rather than merely reflect, a given social reality (Terry et al. 2017 ). A critical perspective can examine the mechanisms that inform the construction of systems of meaning, and therefore offer interpretations of meaning further to those explicitly communicated by participants. It is then also possible to examine how the wider social context may facilitate or impugn these systems of meaning (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). In short, the researcher uses this continuum to clarify their intention to reflect the experience of a social reality (experiential orientation) or examine the constitution of a social reality (critical orientation).

In the present example, an experiential orientation to data interpretation was adopted in order to emphasise meaning and meaningfulness as ascribed by participants. Adopting this approach meant that this analysis did not seek to make claims about the social construction of the research topic (which would more so necessitate a critical perspective), but rather acknowledged the socially constructed nature of the research topic when examining the subjective ‘personal states’ of participants. An experiential orientation was most appropriate as the aim of the study was to prioritise educators’ own accounts of their attitudes, opinions. More importantly, the research questions aimed to examine educators’ attitudes regarding their experience of promoting student wellbeing—or the ‘meanings made’—and not, for example, the socio-cultural factors that may underlie the development of these attitudes—or the ‘meaning making’.

3.1.3 Inductive versus deductive analysis

A researcher who adopts a deductive or ‘theory-driven’ approach may wish to produce codes relative to a pre-specified conceptual framework or codebook. In this case, the analysis would tend to be ‘analyst-driven’, predicated on the theoretically informed interpretation of the researcher. Conversely, a researcher who adopts an inductive or ‘data-driven’ approach may wish to produce codes that are solely reflective of the content of the data, free from any pre-conceived theory or conceptual framework. In this case, data are not coded to fit a pre-existing coding frame, but instead ‘open-coded’ in order to best represent meaning as communicated by the participants (Braun and Clarke 2013 ). Data analysed and coded deductively can often provide a less rich description of the overall dataset, instead focusing on providing a detailed analysis of a particular aspect of the dataset interpreted through a particular theoretical lens (Braun and Clarke 2020 ). Deductive analysis has typically been associated with positivistic/essentialist approaches (e.g. Boyatzis 1998 ), while inductive analysis tends to be aligned with constructivist approaches (e.g. Frith and Gleeson 2004 ). That being said, inductive/deductive approaches to analysis are by no means exclusively or intrinsically linked to a particular epistemology.

Coding and analysis rarely fall cleanly into one of these approaches and, more often than not, use a combination of both (Braun and Clarke 2013 , 2019 , 2020 ). It is arguably not possible to conduct an exclusively deductive analysis, as an appreciation for the relationship between different items of information in the data set is necessary in order to identify recurring commonalities with regard to a pre-specified theory or conceptual framework. Equally, it is arguably not possible to conduct an exclusively inductive analysis, as the researcher would require some form of criteria to identify whether or not a piece of information may be conducive to addressing the research question(s), and therefore worth coding. When addressing this issue, Braun and Clarke ( 2012 ) clarify that one approach does tend to predominate over the other, and that the predominance of the deductive or inductive approach can indicate an overall orientation towards prioritising either researcher/theory-based meaning or respondent/data-based meaning, respectively.

A predominantly inductive approach was adopted in this example, meaning data was open-coded and respondent/data-based meanings were emphasised. A degree of deductive analysis was, however, employed to ensure that the open-coding contributed to producing themes that were meaningful to the research questions, and to ensure that the respondent/data-based meanings that were emphasised were relevant to the research questions.

3.1.4 Semantic versus latent coding

Semantic codes are identified through the explicit or surface meanings of the data. The researcher does not examine beyond what a respondent has said or written. The production of semantic codes can be described as a descriptive analysis of the data, aimed solely at presenting the content of the data as communicated by the respondent. Latent coding goes beyond the descriptive level of the data and attempts to identify hidden meanings or underlying assumptions, ideas, or ideologies that may shape or inform the descriptive or semantic content of the data. When coding is latent, the analysis becomes much more interpretive, requiring a more creative and active role on the part of the researcher. Indeed, Braun and Clarke ( 2012 , 2013 , 2020 ) have repeatedly presented the argument that codes and themes do not ‘emerge’ from the data or that they may be residing in the data, waiting to be found. Rather, the researcher plays an active role in interpreting codes and themes, and identifying which are relevant to the research question(s). Analyses that use latent coding can often overlap with aspects of thematic discourse analysis in that the language used by the respondent can be used to interpret deeper levels of meaning and meaningfulness (Braun and Clarke 2006 ).

In this example, both semantic and latent coding were utilised. No attempt was made to prioritise semantic coding over latent coding or vice-versa. Rather, semantic codes were produced when meaningful semantic information was interpreted, and latent codes were produced when meaningful latent information was interpreted. As such, any item of information could be double-coded in accordance with the semantic meaning communicated by the respondent, and the latent meaning interpreted by the researcher (Patton 1990 ). This was reflective of the underlying theoretical assumptions of the analysis, as the constructive and interpretive epistemology and ontology were addressed by affording due consideration to both the meaning constructed and communicated by the participant and my interpretation of this meaning as the researcher.

3.2 The six-phase analytical process

Braun and Clarke ( 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2020 ) have proposed a six-phase process, which can facilitate the analysis and help the researcher identify and attend to the important aspects of a thematic analysis. In this sense, Braun and Clarke ( 2012 ) have identified the six-phase process as an approach to doing TA, as well as learning how to do TA. While the six phases are organised in a logical sequential order, the researcher should be cognisant that the analysis is not a linear process of moving forward through the phases. Rather, the analysis is recursive and iterative, requiring the researcher to move back and forth through the phases as necessary (Braun and Clarke 2020 ). TA is a time consuming process that evolves as the researcher navigates the different phases. This can lead to new interpretations of the data, which may in turn require further iterations of earlier phases. As such, it is important to appreciate the six-phase process as a set of guidelines, rather than rules, that should be applied in a flexible manner to fit the data and the research question(s) (Braun and Clarke 2013 , 2020 ).

3.2.1 Phase one: familiarisation with the data

The ‘familiarisation’ phase is prevalent in many forms of qualitative analysis. Familiarisation entails the reading and re-reading of the entire dataset in order to become intimately familiar with the data. This is necessary to be able to identify appropriate information that may be relevant to the research question(s). Manual transcription of data can be a very useful activity for the researcher in this regard, and can greatly facilitate a deep immersion into the data. Data should be transcribed orthographically, noting inflections, breaks, pauses, tones, etc. on the part of both the interviewer and the participant (Braun and Clarke 2013 ). Often times, data may not have been gathered or transcribed by the researcher, in which case, it would be beneficial for the researcher to watch/listen to video or audio recordings to achieve a greater contextual understanding of the data. This phase can be quite time consuming and requires a degree of patience. However, it is important to afford equal consideration across the entire depth and breadth of the dataset, and to avoid the temptation of being selective of what to read, or even ‘skipping over’ this phase completely (Braun and Clarke 2006 ).

At this phase, I set about familiarising myself with the data by firstly listening to each interview recording once before transcribing that particular recording. This first playback of each interview recording required ‘active listening’ and, as such, I did not take any notes at this point. I performed this active-listen in order to develop an understanding of the primary areas addressed in each interview prior to transcription. This also provided me an opportunity, unburdened by tasks such as note taking, to recall gestures and mannerisms that may or may not have been documented in interview notes. I manually transcribed each interview immediately after the active-listen playback. When transcription of all interviews was complete, I read each transcripts numerous times. At this point, I took note of casual observations of initial trends in the data and potentially interesting passages in the transcripts. I also documented my thoughts and feelings regarding both the data and the analytical process (in terms of transparency, it would be beneficial to adhere to this practice throughout the entire analysis). Some preliminary notes made during the early iterations of familiarisation with the data can be seen in Box 1. It will be seen later that some of these notes would go on to inform the interpretation of the finalised thematic framework.

Example of preliminary notes taken during phase one

3.2.2 Phase two: generating initial codes

Codes are the fundamental building blocks of what will later become themes. The process of coding is undertaken to produce succinct, shorthand descriptive or interpretive labels for pieces of information that may be of relevance to the research question(s). It is recommended that the researcher work systematically through the entire dataset, attending to each data item with equal consideration, and identifying aspects of data items that are interesting and may be informative in developing themes. Codes should be brief, but offer sufficient detail to be able to stand alone and inform of the underlying commonality among constituent data items in relation to the subject of the research (Braun and Clarke 2012 ; Braun et al. 2016 ).

A brief excerpt of the preliminary coding process of one participant’s interview transcript is presented in Box 2. The preliminary iteration of coding was conducted using the ‘comments’ function in Microsoft Word (2016). This allowed codes to be noted in the side margin, while also highlighting the area of text assigned to each respective code. This is a relatively straightforward example with no double-codes or overlap in data informing different codes, as new codes begin where previous codes end. The code C5 offers an exemplar of the provision of sufficient detail to explain what I interpreted from the related data item. A poor example of this code would be to say “the wellbeing guidelines are not relatable” or “not relatable for students”. Each of these examples lack context. Understanding codes written in this way would be contingent upon knowledge of the underlying data extract. The code C8 exemplifies this issue. It is unclear if the positivity mentioned relates to the particular participant, their colleagues, or their students. This code was subsequently redefined in later iterations of coding. It can also be seen in this short example that the same code has been produced for both C4 and C9. This code was prevalent throughout the entire dataset and would subsequently be informative in the development of a theme.

Extract of preliminary coding

Any item of data that might be useful in addressing the research question(s) should be coded. Through repeated iterations of coding and further familiarisation, the researcher can identify which codes are conducive to interpreting themes and which can be discarded. I would recommend that the researcher document their progression through iterations of coding to track the evolution of codes and indeed prospective themes. RTA is a recursive process and it is rare that a researcher would follow a linear path through the six phases (Braun and Clarke 2014 ). It is very common for the researcher to follow a particular train of thought when coding, only to encounter an impasse where several different interpretations of the data come to light. It may be necessary to explore each of these prospective options to identify the most appropriate path to follow. Tracking the evolution of codes will not only aid transparency, but will afford the researcher signposts and waypoints to which they may return should a particular approach to coding prove unfruitful. I tracked the evolution of my coding process in a spreadsheet, with data items documented in the first column and iterations of codes in each successive column. I found it useful to highlight which codes were changed in each successive iteration. Table 1 provides an excerpt of a Microsoft Excel (2016) spreadsheet that was established to track iterations of coding and document the overall analytical process. All codes developed during the first iteration of coding were transferred into this spreadsheet along with a label identifying the respective participant. Subsequent iterations of coding were documented in this spreadsheet. The original transcripts were still regularly consulted to assess existing codes and examine for the interpretation of new codes as further familiarity with the data developed. Column one presents a reference number for the data item that was coded, while column two indicates the participant who provided each data item. Column three presents the data item that was coded. Columns four and five indicate the iteration of the coding process to be the third and fourth iteration, respectively. Codes revised between iterations three and four are highlighted.

With regard to data item one, I initially considered that a narrative might develop exploring a potential discrepancy in levels of training received by wellbeing educators and non-wellbeing educators. In early iterations of coding, I adopted a convention of coding training-related information with reference to the wellbeing or non-wellbeing status of the participant. While this discrepancy in levels of training remained evident throughout the dataset, I eventually deemed it unnecessary to pursue interpretation of the data in this way. This coding convention was abandoned at iteration four in favour of the pre-existing generalised code “insufficient training in wellbeing curriculum”. With data item three, I realised that the code was descriptive at a semantic level, but not very informative. Upon re-evaluating this data item, I found the pre-existing code “lack of clarity in assessing student wellbeing” to be much more appropriate and representative of what the participant seemed to be communicating. Finally, I realised that the code for data item five was too specific to this particular data item. No other data item shared this code, which would preclude this code (and data item) from consideration when construction themes. I decided that this item would be subsumed under the pre-existing code “more training is needed for wellbeing promotion”.

The process of generating codes is non-prescriptive regarding how data is segmented and itemised for coding, and how many codes or what type of codes (semantic or latent) are interpreted from an item of data. The same data item can be coded both semantically and latently if deemed necessary. For example, when discussing how able they felt to attend to their students’ wellbeing needs, one participant stated “…if someone’s struggling a bit with their schoolwork and it’s getting them down a bit, it’s common sense that determines what we say to them or how we approach them. And it might help to talk, but I don’t know that it has a lasting effect” [2B]. Here, I understood that the participant was explicitly sharing the way in which they address their students’ wellbeing concerns, but also that the participant was implying that this commonsense approach might not be sufficient. As such, this data item was coded both semantically as “educators rely on common sense when attending to wellbeing issues”, and latently as “common sense inadequate for wellbeing promotion”. Both codes were revised later in the analysis. However, this example illustrates the way in which any data item can be coded in multiple ways and for multiple meanings. There is also no upper or lower limit regarding how many codes should be interpreted. What is important is that, when the dataset is fully coded and codes are collated, sufficient depth exists to examine the patterns within the data and the diversity of the positions held by participants. It is, however, necessary to ensure that codes pertain to more than one data item (Braun and Clarke 2012 ).

3.2.3 Phase three: generating themes

This phase begins when all relevant data items have been coded. The focus shifts from the interpretation of individual data items within the dataset, to the interpretation of aggregated meaning and meaningfulness across the dataset. The coded data is reviewed and analysed as to how different codes may be combined according to shared meanings so that they may form themes or sub-themes. This will often involve collapsing multiple codes that share a similar underlying concept or feature of the data into one single code. Equally, one particular code may turn out to be representative of an over-arching narrative within the data and be promoted as a sub-theme or even a theme (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). It is important to re-emphasise that themes do not reside in the data waiting to be found. Rather, the researcher must actively construe the relationship among the different codes and examine how this relationship may inform the narrative of a given theme. Construing the importance or salience of a theme is not contingent upon the number of codes or data items that inform a particular theme. What is important is that the pattern of codes and data items communicates something meaningful that helps answer the research question(s) (Braun and Clarke 2013 ).

Themes should be distinctive and may even be contradictory to other themes, but should tie together to produce a coherent and lucid picture of the dataset. The researcher must be able and willing to let go of codes or prospective themes that may not fit within the overall analysis. It may be beneficial to construct a miscellaneous theme (or category) to contain all the codes that do not appear to fit in among any prospective themes. This miscellaneous theme may end up becoming a theme in its own right, or may simple be removed from the analysis during a later phase (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). Much the same as with codes, there is no correct amount of themes. However, with too many themes the analysis may become unwieldy and incoherent, whereas too few themes can result in the analysis failing to explore fully the depth and breadth of the data. At the end of this stage, the researcher should be able to produce a thematic map (e.g. a mind map or affinity map) or table that collates codes and data items relative to their respective themes (Braun and Clarke 2012 , 2020 ).

At this point in the analysis, I assembled codes into initial candidate themes. A thematic map of the initial candidate themes can be seen in Fig.  1 . The theme “best practice in wellbeing promotion” was clearly definable, with constituent coded data presenting two concurrent narratives. These narratives were constructed as two separate sub-themes, which emphasised the involvement of the entire school staff and the active pursuit of practical measures in promoting student wellbeing, respectively. The theme “recognising student wellbeing” was similarly clear. Again, I interpreted a dichotomy of narratives. However, in this case, the two narratives seemed to be even more synergetic. The two sub-themes for “best practice…” highlighted two independently informative factors in best practice. Here, the sub-themes are much more closely related, with one sub-theme identifying factors that may inhibit the development of student wellbeing, while the second sub-theme discusses factors that may improve student wellbeing. At this early stage in the analysis, I was considering that this sub-theme structure might also be used to delineate the theme “recognising educator wellbeing”. Finally, the theme “factors influencing wellbeing promotion” collated coded data items that addressed inhibitive factors with regard to wellbeing promotion. These factors were conceptualised as four separate sub-themes reflecting a lack of training, a lack of time, a lack of appropriate value for wellbeing promotion, and a lack of knowledge of supporting wellbeing-related documents. While it was useful to bring all of this information together under one theme, even at this early stage it was evident that this particular theme was very dense and unwieldy, and would likely require further revision.

Initial thematic map indicating four candidate themes

3.2.4 Phase four: reviewing potential themes

This phase requires the researcher to conduct a recursive review of the candidate themes in relation to the coded data items and the entire dataset (Braun and Clarke 2012 , 2020 ). At this phase, it is not uncommon to find that some candidate themes may not function well as meaningful interpretations of the data, or may not provide information that addresses the research question(s). It may also come to light that some of the constituent codes and/or data items that inform these themes may be incongruent and require revision. Braun and Clarke ( 2012 , p. 65) proposed a series of key questions that the researcher should address when reviewing potential themes. They are:

Is this a theme (it could be just a code)?

If it is a theme, what is the quality of this theme (does it tell me something useful about the data set and my research question)?

What are the boundaries of this theme (what does it include and exclude)?

Are there enough (meaningful) data to support this theme (is the theme thin or thick)?

Are the data too diverse and wide ranging (does the theme lack coherence)?

The analysis conducted at this phase involves two levels of review. Level one is a review of the relationships among the data items and codes that inform each theme and sub-theme. If the items/codes form a coherent pattern, it can be assumed that the candidate theme/sub-theme makes a logical argument and may contribute to the overall narrative of the data. At level two, the candidate themes are reviewed in relation to the data set. Themes are assessed as to how well they provide the most apt interpretation of the data in relation to the research question(s). Braun and Clarke have proposed that, when addressing these key questions, it may be useful to observe Patton’s ( 1990 ) ‘dual criteria for judging categories’ (i.e. internal homogeneity and external heterogeneity). The aim of Patton’s dual criteria would be to observe internal homogeneity within themes at the level one review, while observing external heterogeneity among themes at the level two review. Essentially, these two levels of review function to demonstrate that items and codes are appropriate to inform a theme, and that a theme is appropriate to inform the interpretation of the dataset (Braun and Clarke 2006 ). The outcome of this dual-level review is often that some sub-themes or themes may need to be restructured by adding or removing codes, or indeed adding or removing themes/sub-themes. The finalised thematic framework that resulted from the review of the candidate themes can be seen in Fig.  2 .

Finalised thematic map demonstrating five themes

During the level one review, inspection of the prospective sub-theme “sources of negative affect” in relation to the theme “recognising educator wellbeing” resulted in a new interpretation of the constituent coded data items. Participants communicated numerous pre-existing work-related factors that they felt had a negative impact upon their wellbeing. However, it was also evident that participants felt the introduction of the new wellbeing curriculum and the newly mandated task of formally attending to student wellbeing had compounded these pre-existing issues. While pre-existing issues and wellbeing-related issues were both informative of educators’ negative affect, the new interpretation of this data informed the realisation of two concurrent narratives, with wellbeing-related issues being a compounding factor in relation to pre-existing issues. This resulted in the “sources of negative affect” sub-theme being split into two new sub-themes; “work-related negative affect” and “the influence of wellbeing promotion”. The “actions to improve educator wellbeing” sub-theme was folded into these sub-themes, with remedial measures for each issue being discussed in respective sub-themes.

During the level two review, my concerns regarding the theme “factors inhibiting wellbeing promotion” were addressed. With regard to Braun and Clarke’s key questions, it was quite difficult to identify the boundaries of this theme. It was also particularly dense (or too thick) and somewhat incoherent. At this point, I concluded that this theme did not constitute an appropriate representation of the data. Earlier phases of the analysis were reiterated and new interpretations of the data were developed. This candidate theme was subsequently broken down into three separate themes. While the sub-themes of this candidate theme were, to a degree, informative in the development of the new themes, the way in which the constituent data was understood was fundamentally reconceptualised. The new theme, entitled “the influence of time”, moves past merely describing time constraints as an inhibitive factor in wellbeing promotion. A more thorough account of the bi-directional nature of time constraints was realised, which acknowledged that previously existing time constraints affected wellbeing promotion, while wellbeing promotion compounded previously existing time constraints. This added an analysis of the way in which the introduction of wellbeing promotion also produced time constraints in relation to core curricular activities.

The candidate sub-themes “lack of training” and “knowledge of necessary documents” were re-evaluated and considered to be topical rather than thematic aspects of the data. Upon further inspection, I felt that the constituent coded data items of these two sub-themes were informative of a single narrative of participants attending to their students’ wellbeing in an atheoretical manner. As such, these two candidate sub-themes were folded into each other to produce the theme “incompletely theorised agreements”. Finally, the level two review led me to the conclusion that the full potential of the data that informed the candidate sub-theme “lack of value of wellbeing promotion” was not realised. I found that a much richer understanding of this data was possible, which was obscured by the initial, relatively simplistic, descriptive account offered. An important distinction was made, in that participants held differing perceptions of the value attributed to wellbeing promotion by educators and by students. Further, I realised that educators’ perceptions of wellbeing promotion were not necessarily negative and should not be exclusively presented as an inhibitive factor in wellbeing promotion. A new theme, named “the axiology of wellbeing” and informed by the sub-themes “students’ valuation of wellbeing promotion” and “educators’ valuation of wellbeing promotion”, was developed to delineate this multifaceted understanding of participants’ accounts of the value of wellbeing promotion.

It is quite typical at this phase that codes, as well as themes, may be revised or removed to facilitate the most meaningful interpretation of the data. As such, it may be necessary to reiterate some of the activities undertaken during phases two and three of the analysis. It may be necessary to recode some data items, collapse some codes into one, remove some codes, or promote some codes as sub-themes or themes. For example, when re-examining the data items that informed the narrative of the value ascribed to wellbeing promotion, I observed that participants offered very different perceptions of the value ascribed by educators and by students. To pursue this line of analysis, numerous codes were reconceptualised to reflect the two different perspectives. Codes such as “positivity regarding the wellbeing curriculum” were split into the more specified codes “student positivity regarding the wellbeing curriculum” and “educator positivity regarding the wellbeing curriculum”. Amending codes in this way ultimately contributed to the reinterpretation of the data and the development of the finalised thematic map.

As with all other phases, it is very important to track and document all of these changes. With regard to some of the more significant changes (removing a theme, for example), I would recommend making notes on why it might be necessary to take this action. The aim of this phase is to produce a revised thematic map or table that captures the most important elements of the data in relation to the research question(s).

3.2.5 Phase five: defining and naming theme

At this phase, the researcher is tasked with presenting a detailed analysis of the thematic framework. Each individual theme and sub-theme is to be expressed in relation to both the dataset and the research question(s). As per Patton’s ( 1990 ) dual criteria, each theme should provide a coherent and internally consistent account of the data that cannot be told by the other themes. However, all themes should come together to create a lucid narrative that is consistent with the content of the dataset and informative in relation to the research question(s). The names of the themes are also subject to a final revision (if necessary) at this point.

Defining themes requires a deep analysis of the underlying data items. There will likely be many data items underlying each theme. It is at this point that the researcher is required to identify which data items to use as extracts when writing up the results of the analysis. The chosen extracts should provide a vivid and compelling account of the arguments being made by a respective theme. Multiple extracts should be used from the entire pool of data items that inform a theme in order to convey the diversity of expressions of meaning across these data items, and to demonstrate the cohesion of the theme’s constituent data items. Furthermore, each of the reported data extracts should be subject to a deep analysis, going beyond merely reporting what a participant may have said. Each extract should be interpreted in relation to its constitutive theme, as well as the broader context of the research question(s), creating an analytic narrative that informs the reader what is interesting about this extract and why (Braun and Clarke 2012 ).

Data extracts can be presented either illustratively, providing a surface-level description of what participants said, or analytically, interrogating what has been interpreted to be important about what participants said and contextualising this interpretation in relation to the available literature. If the researcher were aiming to produce a more illustrative write-up of the analysis, relating the results to the available literature would tend to be held until the ‘discussion’ section of the report. If the researcher were aiming to produce an analytical write-up, extracts would tend to be contextualised in relation to the literature as and when they are reported in the ‘results’ section (Braun and Clarke 2013 ; Terry et al. 2017 ). While an illustrative write-up of RTA results is completely acceptable, the researcher should remain cognisant that the narrative of the write-up should communicate the complexities of the data, while remaining “embedded in the scholarly field” (Braun and Clarke 2012 , p. 69). RTA is an interpretive approach to analysis and, as such, the overall report should go beyond describing the data, providing theoretically informed arguments as to how the data addresses the research question(s). To this end, a relatively straightforward test can reveal a researcher’s potential proclivity towards one particular reporting convention: If an extract can be removed and the write-up still makes sense, the reporting style is illustrative; if an extract is removed and the write-up no longer makes sense, the reporting style is analytical (Terry et al. 2017 ).

The example in Box 3 contains a brief excerpt from the sub-theme “the whole-school approach”, which demonstrates the way in which a data extract may be reported in an illustrative manner. Here, the narrative discussed the necessity of having an ‘appropriate educator’ deliver the different aspects of the wellbeing curriculum. One participant provided a particularly useful real-world example of the potential negative implications of having ‘the wrong person’ for this job in relation to physical education (one of the aspects of the wellbeing curriculum). This data extract very much informed the narrative and illustrated participants’ arguments regarding the importance of choosing an appropriate educator for the job.

Example of data extract reported illustratively

In Box 4, an example is offered of how a data extract may be reported in an analytical manner. This excerpt is also taken from the sub-theme “the whole-school approach”, and also informs the ‘appropriate educator for the job’ narrative. Here, however, sufficient evidence has already been established to illustrate the perspectives of the participants. The report turns to a deeper analysis of what has been said and how it has been said. Specifically, the way in which participants seemed to construe an ‘appropriate educator’ was examined and related to existing literature. The analytical interpretation of this data extract (and others) proposes interesting implications regarding the way in which participants constructed their schema of an ‘appropriate educator’.

Example of data extract reported analytically

The names of themes are also subject to a final review (if necessary) at this point. Naming themes may seem trivial and might subsequently receive less attention than it actually requires. However, naming themes is a very important task. Theme names are the first indication to the reader of what has been captured from the data. Names should be concise, informative, and memorable. The overriding tendency may be to create names that are descriptors of the theme. Braun and Clarke ( 2013 , 2014 , 2020 ) encourage creativity and advocate the use of catchy names that may more immediately capture the attention of the reader, while also communicating an important aspect of the theme. To this end, they suggest that it may be useful to examine data items for a short extract that could be used to punctuate the theme name.

3.2.6 Phase six: producing the report

The separation between phases five and six can often be blurry. Further, this ‘final’ phase would rarely only occur at the end of the analysis. As opposed to practices typical of quantitative research that would see the researcher conduct and then write up the analysis, the write-up of qualitative research is very much interwoven into the entire process of the analysis (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). Again, as with previous phases, this will likely require a recursive approach to report writing. As codes and themes change and evolve over the course of the analysis, so too can the write-up. Changes should be well documented by this phase and reflected in informal notes and memos, as well as a research journal that should be kept over the entire course of the research. Phase six then, can be seen as the completion and final inspection of the report that the researcher would most likely have begun writing before even undertaking their thematic analysis (e.g. a journal article or thesis/dissertation).

A useful task to address at this point would be to establish the order in which themes are reported. Themes should connect in a logical and meaningful manner, building a cogent narrative of the data. Where relevant, themes should build upon previously reported themes, while remaining internally consistent and capable of communicating their own individual narrative if isolated from other themes (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). I reported the theme “best practice in wellbeing promotion” first, as I felt it established the positivity that seemed to underlie the accounts provided by all of my participants. This theme was also strongly influence by semantic codes, with participants being very capable of describing what they felt would constitute ‘best practice’. I saw this as an easily digestible first theme to ease the reader into the wider analysis. It made sense to report “the axiology of wellbeing promotion” next. This theme introduced the reality that, despite an underlying degree of positivity, participants did indeed have numerous concerns regarding wellbeing promotion, and that participants’ attitudes were generally positive with a significant ‘but’. This theme provided good sign-posting for the next two themes that would be reported, which were “the influence of time” and “incompletely theorised agreements”, respectively. I reported “the influence of time” first, as this theme established how time constraints could negatively affect educator training, contributing to a context in which educators were inadvertently pushed towards adopting incompletely theorised agreements when promoting student wellbeing. The last theme to be reported was “recognising educator wellbeing”. As the purpose of the analysis was to ascertain the attitudes of educators regarding wellbeing promotion, it felt appropriate to offer the closing commentary of the analysis to educators’ accounts of their own wellbeing. This became particularly pertinent when the sub-themes were revised to reflect the influence of pre-existing work-related issues and the subsequent influence of wellbeing promotion.

An issue proponents of RTA may realise when writing up their analysis is the potential for incongruence between traditional conventions for report writing and the appropriate style for reporting RTA—particularly when adopting an analytical approach to reporting on data. The document structure for academic journal articles and Masters or PhD theses typically subscribe to the convention of reporting results of analyses in a ‘results’ section and then synthesising and contextualising the results of analyses in a ‘discussion’ section. Conversely, Braun and Clarke recommend synthesising and contextualising data as and when they are reported in the ‘results’ section (Braun and Clarke 2013 ; Terry et al. 2017 ). This is a significant departure from the traditional reporting convention, which researchers—particularly post-graduate students—may find difficult to reconcile. While Braun and Clarke do not explicitly address this potential issue, it is implicitly evident that they would advocate that researchers prioritise the appropriate reporting style for RTA and not cede to the traditional reporting convention.

4 Conclusion

Although Braun and Clarke are widely published on the topic of reflexive thematic analysis, confusion persists in the wider literature regarding the appropriate implementation of this approach. The aim of this paper has been to contribute to dispelling some of this confusion by provide a worked example of Braun and Clarke’s contemporary approach to reflexive thematic analysis. To this end, this paper provided instruction in how to address the theoretical underpinnings of RTA by operationalising the theoretical assumptions of the example data in relation to the study from which the data was taken. Clear instruction was also provided in how to conduct a reflexive thematic analysis. This was achieved by providing a detailed step-by-step guide to Braun and Clarke’s six-phase process, and by providing numerous examples of the implementation of each phase based on my own research. Braun and Clarke have made (and continue to make) an extremely valuable contribution to the discourse regarding qualitative analysis. I strongly recommended that any prospective proponents of RTA who may read this paper thoroughly examine Braun and Clarke’s full body of literature in this area, and aim to achieve an understanding of RTA’s nuanced position among the numerous different approaches to thematic analysis.

While the reconceptualisation of RTA as falling within the remit of a purely qualitative paradigm precipitates that the research fall on the constructionist end of this continuum, it is nevertheless good practice to explicate this theoretical position.

Boyatzis, R.E.: Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)

Google Scholar  

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3 (2), 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Article   Google Scholar  

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Thematic analysis. In: Cooper, H., Camic, P.M., Long, D.L., Panter, A.T., Rindskopf, D., Sher, K.J. (eds.) APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Research Designs, vol. 2, pp. 57–71. American Psychological Association, Washington (2012)

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2013)

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Thematic analysis. In: Teo, T. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology, pp. 1947–1952. Springer, New York (2014)

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health 11 (4), 589–597 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual. Res. Psychol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Weate, P.: Using Thematic Analysis in sport and exercise research. In: Smith, B., Sparkes, A.C. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, pp. 191–205. Routledge, London (2016)

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Terry, G., Hayfield, N.: Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong, P. (ed.) Handbook of Research Methods in Health and Social Sciences, pp. 843–860. Springer, Singapore (2018)

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Terry, G.: Answers to frequently asked questions about thematic analysis (2019). Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our-research/documents/Answers%20to%20frequently%20asked%20questions%20about%20thematic%20analysis%20April%202019.pdf

Burr, V.: An Introduction to Social Constructionism. Routledge, London, UK (1995)

Book   Google Scholar  

Clarke, V., Braun, V.: Thematic Analysis. In: Lyons, E., Coyle, A. (eds.) Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology, 2nd edn., pp. 84–103. Sage Publications, London (2016)

Frith, H., Gleeson, K.: Clothing and embodiment: men managing body image and appearance. Psychol. Men Mascul. 5 (1), 40–48 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.5.1.40

Joffe, H.: Thematic analysis. In: Harper, D., Thompson, A.R. (eds.) Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners, pp. 209–223. Wiley, Chichester (2012)

King, N., Brooks, J.M.: Template analysis for business and management students. Sage Publications, London, UK (2017)

Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1990)

Schwandt, T.A.: Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues, pp. 221–259. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)

Smith, J., Firth, J.: Qualitative data analysis: The framework approach. Nurse Res. 18 (2), 52–62 (2011). https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284

Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Thematic analysis. In: Willig, C., Rogers, W.S. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, pp. 17–37. Sage Publications, London (2017)

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., Bondas, T.: Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs. Health Sci. 15 (3), 398–405 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

Widdicombe, S., Wooffitt, R.: The Language of Youth Subcultures: Social Identity in Action. Harvester, Hemel Hempstead (1995)

Download references

Open Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium. This study was funded by Technological University Dublin Research Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Technological University Dublin – Blanchardstown Campus, Dublin, Ireland

David Byrne

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Byrne .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The author declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Byrne, D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant 56 , 1391–1412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Download citation

Accepted : 06 June 2021

Published : 26 June 2021

Issue Date : June 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Thematic analysis
• Qualitative
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Customer Reviews
• Extended Essays
• IB Internal Assessment
• Theory of Knowledge
• Literature Review
• Dissertations
• Essay Writing
• Research Writing
• Assignment Help
• Capstone Projects
• College Application
• Online Class

How to Write a Thematic Essay: The Complete Guide

by  Antony W

June 24, 2024

In this guide, you'll learn exactly how to write a thematic essay step-by-step.

Thematic essays, or theme essays, require you to really examine a literary object such as a book, journal, paper, or other art form and pick out the main ideas (themes).

You will then explain how these themes are brought on and what literary devices are used to do that.

Key Takeaways 

To write an outstanding theme essay, you should: 

• Select a literary work to base your thematic analysis on.
• Choose a primary theme.
• Identify supporting evidence and literary devices   used.
• Plan and outline the essay.
• Write the first draft.
• Edit and proofread your work for submission.

What is a Thematic Essay? 

A thematic essay is a one in which you identify the main idea (theme) expressed in a chosen literary object and explore how the writer of that literature chooses to address that theme through various literary devices.

The devices can be metaphors, hyperbole, imagery, allegory, and many others.

Writing a thematic analysis essay is a great way to learn how to pick out themes in the literature you read as well as how to improve your writing skills.

A thematic essay will be at least five paragraphs long , but usually longer depending on the complexity of the work being reviewed.

You can write a thematic essay based on a book, a speech, a magazine article, a video, audio, or any other art form.

Choosing a Theme for a Thematic Essay 

Choosing the main idea or theme of such a work is not a straightforward process.

It is highly subjective, and what you consider the main theme in a book may not be somebody else’s.

You have to make sure that what you pick as your main theme is fully supported throughout the book and makes significant appearances in most chapters, if not all of them.

How to Write a Thematic Essay Step by Step 

Writing a thematic essay is easy. You just have to: 

1. Choose a Literary Object

If your instructor does not provide the topic, think back to a book or article that made a strong impression to you, or think about your favorite pieces of literature.

Another option is to brainstorm. Brainstorming hardly fails, especially if you incorporate the help of your friends and even your instructor.

Collect different ideas and be sure to write each of them down, no matter how unlikely they sound. From there, eliminate most of these the following criteria:

• The topic should be interesting and captivating. Avoid those that are too common and overly used in academia unless you can provide a fresh twist or insight.
• The topic needs to have one or more important themes running through.
• It should be a literary work that is relatively well known and in the public domain.
• Some of the shorter works are best because they guarantee your essay won’t be too long.

This process will likely leave you with one or two possible topics, but make sure to confirm with your instructor that what you choose to focus on is acceptable.

2. Find a Relevant Theme

A theme is a significant idea that recurs throughout the literary work you have chosen. You can think of it as the main message the author is trying to pass across. 

There are major and minor themes differentiated by how much attention the author gives to each.

For the best outcome, your theme should be one of the major themes addressed throughout the work.

There are a few things you can do to figure out what major themes are present: 

• As you read the work, note and write down what tone, setting, language styles, and characterization the writer is using.
• What is the plot of the book and what does it lead to? Think about what you would tell somebody else about the book.
• Identify who the protagonist (main character) is and what they represent. Do they change at all in the book? 

For example, in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, Atticus Finch does not change and represents morality, love, fairness, and good reason to the end.

• Put yourself in the author’s shoes and observe from their point of view. What message do you think they want to pass on as the most important?

3. Pick Material for the Essay

Read through the book again with the main theme in mind.

See how the author plays with it, what literary devices are used to highlight their thematic approach, and write down all these for reference.

What you are doing at this stage is a literary analysis.

The tools in the author’s hands include character development, mood, setting, irony, allegory, simile, alliteration, symbolism, metaphor, among many others.

Think about how effective these tools are in shining the light upon the main theme. It helps to read between the lines as well because sometimes the most important thing is what the author leaves unsaid.

4. Planning: Thematic Essay Outline 

A thematic essay is very simple and straightforward. Like most essays, it will have an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Each of these parts should be considered carefully in the planning stage and map out which ideas will go where.

Introduction

The introduction serves to catch the reader’s interest, set the background, and mention what exactly you intend to discuss in the essay.

The first one or two sentences should be a hook, that is, a statement that will be intriguing enough to make the reader want to keep reading. It can be a clever observation, a surprising statement, or even a relevant question.

Second, provide a very brief background on which to build your essay.

However, you will be assuming that the reader has already read the literary work that is the subject of the essay. So you don’t have to give too much detail.

In winding up the introductory, write your thesis statement . This is a one-sentence statement that tells the reader what your essay is about.

However, don’t say it like this: “My thesis statement is ... “ Instead, let the introduction flow and link smoothly up to this point.

Body paragraphs

You will have three or more body paragraphs detailing your arguments about the main theme. In a thematic essay, each of the body paragraphs will be focusing on one literary device and how it is useful in presenting the theme message.

As with most essays, body paragraphs will follow the TEEL format. 

• Topic Sentence : The introductory sentence introduces the idea that the paragraph is about. Think of it as a mini-thesis statement. The rest of the paragraph will be explaining and supporting this one statement.
• Explanation:  Explain your topic idea clearly.
• Evidence : Give compelling evidence for your claims. It can be a quote, a direct observation, similar use of the same method elsewhere in the book, a citation from an authoritative work, etc.
• Link : Show how the idea you just described links with the rest of the essay and thesis statement. Again, you won’t say, “this idea relates to my thesis statement because …” Instead, let the whole paragraph flow smoothly and seamlessly.

The number of body paragraphs will depend on how much evidence you have collected. However, make sure to keep within the reasonable word count parameters as given by your instructor.

Recap the main arguments in your body and restate your thesis statement.

The purpose of the conclusion is to give your “take-home” argument, what you feel the reader should retain from the whole work.

Customize your theme essay outline accordingly; don’t make it as generic as this example here.

Fill it with details like what ideas you will include in your first paragraph, what your thesis statement will be, and what your introduction hook is. With this thematic essay format, you are now ready to do the write-up.

5. Write the Essay

With a good outline, writing a thematic essay becomes a piece of cake. You will simply be fleshing out the template.

6. Proofreading and Revision

Make sure to read through your essay at least twice.

Note how well your ideas flow, how the arguments and evidence presented link back to the thesis statement, and of course, clear any grammatical errors. 

Thematic Essay Writing Help 

If you don’t have the time to read your subject thoroughly and analytically, you can hire Help for Assessment’s  essay writing service .  We have a suitable writer that can help you get the assignment completed on time. 

Frequently Asked Questions 

1. how do you start a theme essay.

The introduction of your theme essay should be an intriguing hook about the subject you wish to discuss.

Ensure the hook is concise and strong enough to grab your reader’s attention.

2. What are the Elements of a Thematic Essay? 

The elements of a thematic essay are the introduction, body paragraphs, and the conclusion.

Ensure the introduction includes a thesis statement. The body paragraphs should support the thesis using relevant examples, evidence, and arguments.

Lastly, the conclusion should be logical enough to tie everything together at the end.

3. What is the Main Point of a Thematic Essay? 

The main point of a thematic essay is to identify themes from a source, present a theme statement, and address a specific issue within the requirement of the assignment. 

About the author 

Antony W is a professional writer and coach at Help for Assessment. He spends countless hours every day researching and writing great content filled with expert advice on how to write engaging essays, research papers, and assignments.

• - Google Chrome

Intended for healthcare professionals

• My email alerts
• BMA member login
• Username * Password * Forgot your log in details? Need to activate BMA Member Log In Log in via OpenAthens Log in via your institution

Search form

• Advanced search
• Search responses
• Search blogs
• Practical thematic...

Practical thematic analysis: a guide for multidisciplinary health services research teams engaging in qualitative analysis

• Related content
• Peer review
• on behalf of the Coproduction Laboratory
• 1 Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, USA
• 2 Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
• 3 Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Lausanne, Switzerland
• 4 Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
• 5 Highland Park, NJ, USA
• 6 Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
• Correspondence to: C H Saunders catherine.hylas.saunders{at}dartmouth.edu
• Accepted 26 April 2023

Qualitative research methods explore and provide deep contextual understanding of real world issues, including people’s beliefs, perspectives, and experiences. Whether through analysis of interviews, focus groups, structured observation, or multimedia data, qualitative methods offer unique insights in applied health services research that other approaches cannot deliver. However, many clinicians and researchers hesitate to use these methods, or might not use them effectively, which can leave relevant areas of inquiry inadequately explored. Thematic analysis is one of the most common and flexible methods to examine qualitative data collected in health services research. This article offers practical thematic analysis as a step-by-step approach to qualitative analysis for health services researchers, with a focus on accessibility for patients, care partners, clinicians, and others new to thematic analysis. Along with detailed instructions covering three steps of reading, coding, and theming, the article includes additional novel and practical guidance on how to draft effective codes, conduct a thematic analysis session, and develop meaningful themes. This approach aims to improve consistency and rigor in thematic analysis, while also making this method more accessible for multidisciplinary research teams.

Through qualitative methods, researchers can provide deep contextual understanding of real world issues, and generate new knowledge to inform hypotheses, theories, research, and clinical care. Approaches to data collection are varied, including interviews, focus groups, structured observation, and analysis of multimedia data, with qualitative research questions aimed at understanding the how and why of human experience. 1 2 Qualitative methods produce unique insights in applied health services research that other approaches cannot deliver. In particular, researchers acknowledge that thematic analysis is a flexible and powerful method of systematically generating robust qualitative research findings by identifying, analysing, and reporting patterns (themes) within data. 3 4 5 6 Although qualitative methods are increasingly valued for answering clinical research questions, many researchers are unsure how to apply them or consider them too time consuming to be useful in responding to practical challenges 7 or pressing situations such as public health emergencies. 8 Consequently, researchers might hesitate to use them, or use them improperly. 9 10 11

Although much has been written about how to perform thematic analysis, practical guidance for non-specialists is sparse. 3 5 6 12 13 In the multidisciplinary field of health services research, qualitative data analysis can confound experienced researchers and novices alike, which can stoke concerns about rigor, particularly for those more familiar with quantitative approaches. 14 Since qualitative methods are an area of specialisation, support from experts is beneficial. However, because non-specialist perspectives can enhance data interpretation and enrich findings, there is a case for making thematic analysis easier, more rapid, and more efficient, 8 particularly for patients, care partners, clinicians, and other stakeholders. A practical guide to thematic analysis might encourage those on the ground to use these methods in their work, unearthing insights that would otherwise remain undiscovered.

Given the need for more accessible qualitative analysis approaches, we present a simple, rigorous, and efficient three step guide for practical thematic analysis. We include new guidance on the mechanics of thematic analysis, including developing codes, constructing meaningful themes, and hosting a thematic analysis session. We also discuss common pitfalls in thematic analysis and how to avoid them.

Summary points

Qualitative methods are increasingly valued in applied health services research, but multidisciplinary research teams often lack accessible step-by-step guidance and might struggle to use these approaches

A newly developed approach, practical thematic analysis, uses three simple steps: reading, coding, and theming

Based on Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis, our streamlined yet rigorous approach is designed for multidisciplinary health services research teams, including patients, care partners, and clinicians

This article also provides companion materials including a slide presentation for teaching practical thematic analysis to research teams, a sample thematic analysis session agenda, a theme coproduction template for use during the session, and guidance on using standardised reporting criteria for qualitative research

In their seminal work, Braun and Clarke developed a six phase approach to reflexive thematic analysis. 4 12 We built on their method to develop practical thematic analysis ( box 1 , fig 1 ), which is a simplified and instructive approach that retains the substantive elements of their six phases. Braun and Clarke’s phase 1 (familiarising yourself with the dataset) is represented in our first step of reading. Phase 2 (coding) remains as our second step of coding. Phases 3 (generating initial themes), 4 (developing and reviewing themes), and 5 (refining, defining, and naming themes) are represented in our third step of theming. Phase 6 (writing up) also occurs during this third step of theming, but after a thematic analysis session. 4 12

Key features and applications of practical thematic analysis

Step 1: reading.

All manuscript authors read the data

All manuscript authors write summary memos

Step 2: Coding

Coders perform both data management and early data analysis

Codes are complete thoughts or sentences, not categories

Step 3: Theming

Researchers host a thematic analysis session and share different perspectives

Themes are complete thoughts or sentences, not categories

Applications

For use by practicing clinicians, patients and care partners, students, interdisciplinary teams, and those new to qualitative research

When important insights from healthcare professionals are inaccessible because they do not have qualitative methods training

When time and resources are limited

Steps in practical thematic analysis

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

We present linear steps, but as qualitative research is usually iterative, so too is thematic analysis. 15 Qualitative researchers circle back to earlier work to check whether their interpretations still make sense in the light of additional insights, adapting as necessary. While we focus here on the practical application of thematic analysis in health services research, we recognise our approach exists in the context of the broader literature on thematic analysis and the theoretical underpinnings of qualitative methods as a whole. For a more detailed discussion of these theoretical points, as well as other methods widely used in health services research, we recommend reviewing the sources outlined in supplemental material 1. A strong and nuanced understanding of the context and underlying principles of thematic analysis will allow for higher quality research. 16

Practical thematic analysis is a highly flexible approach that can draw out valuable findings and generate new hypotheses, including in cases with a lack of previous research to build on. The approach can also be used with a variety of data, such as transcripts from interviews or focus groups, patient encounter transcripts, professional publications, observational field notes, and online activity logs. Importantly, successful practical thematic analysis is predicated on having high quality data collected with rigorous methods. We do not describe qualitative research design or data collection here. 11 17

In supplemental material 1, we summarise the foundational methods, concepts, and terminology in qualitative research. Along with our guide below, we include a companion slide presentation for teaching practical thematic analysis to research teams in supplemental material 2. We provide a theme coproduction template for teams to use during thematic analysis sessions in supplemental material 3. Our method aligns with the major qualitative reporting frameworks, including the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). 18 We indicate the corresponding step in practical thematic analysis for each COREQ item in supplemental material 4.

Familiarisation and memoing

We encourage all manuscript authors to review the full dataset (eg, interview transcripts) to familiarise themselves with it. This task is most critical for those who will later be engaged in the coding and theming steps. Although time consuming, it is the best way to involve team members in the intellectual work of data interpretation, so that they can contribute to the analysis and contextualise the results. If this task is not feasible given time limitations or large quantities of data, the data can be divided across team members. In this case, each piece of data should be read by at least two individuals who ideally represent different professional roles or perspectives.

We recommend that researchers reflect on the data and independently write memos, defined as brief notes on thoughts and questions that arise during reading, and a summary of their impressions of the dataset. 2 19 Memoing is an opportunity to gain insights from varying perspectives, particularly from patients, care partners, clinicians, and others. It also gives researchers the opportunity to begin to scope which elements of and concepts in the dataset are relevant to the research question.

Data saturation

The concept of data saturation ( box 2 ) is a foundation of qualitative research. It is defined as the point in analysis at which new data tend to be redundant of data already collected. 21 Qualitative researchers are expected to report their approach to data saturation. 18 Because thematic analysis is iterative, the team should discuss saturation throughout the entire process, beginning with data collection and continuing through all steps of the analysis. 22 During step 1 (reading), team members might discuss data saturation in the context of summary memos. Conversations about saturation continue during step 2 (coding), with confirmation that saturation has been achieved during step 3 (theming). As a rule of thumb, researchers can often achieve saturation in 9-17 interviews or 4-8 focus groups, but this will vary depending on the specific characteristics of the study. 23

Data saturation in context

Braun and Clarke discourage the use of data saturation to determine sample size (eg, number of interviews), because it assumes that there is an objective truth to be captured in the data (sometimes known as a positivist perspective). 20 Qualitative researchers often try to avoid positivist approaches, arguing that there is no one true way of seeing the world, and will instead aim to gather multiple perspectives. 5 Although this theoretical debate with qualitative methods is important, we recognise that a priori estimates of saturation are often needed, particularly for investigators newer to qualitative research who might want a more pragmatic and applied approach. In addition, saturation based, sample size estimation can be particularly helpful in grant proposals. However, researchers should still follow a priori sample size estimation with a discussion to confirm saturation has been achieved.

Definition of coding

We describe codes as labels for concepts in the data that are directly relevant to the study objective. Historically, the purpose of coding was to distil the large amount of data collected into conceptually similar buckets so that researchers could review it in aggregate and identify key themes. 5 24 We advocate for a more analytical approach than is typical with thematic analysis. With our method, coding is both the foundation for and the beginning of thematic analysis—that is, early data analysis, management, and reduction occur simultaneously rather than as different steps. This approach moves the team more efficiently towards being able to describe themes.

Building the coding team

Coders are the research team members who directly assign codes to the data, reading all material and systematically labelling relevant data with appropriate codes. Ideally, at least two researchers would code every discrete data document, such as one interview transcript. 25 If this task is not possible, individual coders can each code a subset of the data that is carefully selected for key characteristics (sometimes known as purposive selection). 26 When using this approach, we recommend that at least 10% of data be coded by two or more coders to ensure consistency in codebook application. We also recommend coding teams of no more than four to five people, for practical reasons concerning maintaining consistency.

Clinicians, patients, and care partners bring unique perspectives to coding and enrich the analytical process. 27 Therefore, we recommend choosing coders with a mix of relevant experiences so that they can challenge and contextualise each other’s interpretations based on their own perspectives and opinions ( box 3 ). We recommend including both coders who collected the data and those who are naive to it, if possible, given their different perspectives. We also recommend all coders review the summary memos from the reading step so that key concepts identified by those not involved in coding can be integrated into the analytical process. In practice, this review means coding the memos themselves and discussing them during the code development process. This approach ensures that the team considers a diversity of perspectives.

Coding teams in context

The recommendation to use multiple coders is a departure from Braun and Clarke. 28 29 When the views, experiences, and training of each coder (sometimes known as positionality) 30 are carefully considered, having multiple coders can enhance interpretation and enrich findings. When these perspectives are combined in a team setting, researchers can create shared meaning from the data. Along with the practical consideration of distributing the workload, 31 inclusion of these multiple perspectives increases the overall quality of the analysis by mitigating the impact of any one coder’s perspective. 30

Coding tools

Qualitative analysis software facilitates coding and managing large datasets but does not perform the analytical work. The researchers must perform the analysis themselves. Most programs support queries and collaborative coding by multiple users. 32 Important factors to consider when choosing software can include accessibility, cost, interoperability, the look and feel of code reports, and the ease of colour coding and merging codes. Coders can also use low tech solutions, including highlighters, word processors, or spreadsheets.

Drafting effective codes

To draft effective codes, we recommend that the coders review each document line by line. 33 As they progress, they can assign codes to segments of data representing passages of interest. 34 Coders can also assign multiple codes to the same passage. Consensus among coders on what constitutes a minimum or maximum amount of text for assigning a code is helpful. As a general rule, meaningful segments of text for coding are shorter than one paragraph, but longer than a few words. Coders should keep the study objective in mind when determining which data are relevant ( box 4 ).

Code types in context

Similar to Braun and Clarke’s approach, practical thematic analysis does not specify whether codes are based on what is evident from the data (sometimes known as semantic) or whether they are based on what can be inferred at a deeper level from the data (sometimes known as latent). 4 12 35 It also does not specify whether they are derived from the data (sometimes known as inductive) or determined ahead of time (sometimes known as deductive). 11 35 Instead, it should be noted that health services researchers conducting qualitative studies often adopt all these approaches to coding (sometimes known as hybrid analysis). 3

In practical thematic analysis, codes should be more descriptive than general categorical labels that simply group data with shared characteristics. At a minimum, codes should form a complete (or full) thought. An easy way to conceptualise full thought codes is as complete sentences with subjects and verbs ( table 1 ), although full sentence coding is not always necessary. With full thought codes, researchers think about the data more deeply and capture this insight in the codes. This coding facilitates the entire analytical process and is especially valuable when moving from codes to broader themes. Experienced qualitative researchers often intuitively use full thought or sentence codes, but this practice has not been explicitly articulated as a path to higher quality coding elsewhere in the literature. 6

Example transcript with codes used in practical thematic analysis 36

• View inline

Depending on the nature of the data, codes might either fall into flat categories or be arranged hierarchically. Flat categories are most common when the data deal with topics on the same conceptual level. In other words, one topic is not a subset of another topic. By contrast, hierarchical codes are more appropriate for concepts that naturally fall above or below each other. Hierarchical coding can also be a useful form of data management and might be necessary when working with a large or complex dataset. 5 Codes grouped into these categories can also make it easier to naturally transition into generating themes from the initial codes. 5 These decisions between flat versus hierarchical coding are part of the work of the coding team. In both cases, coders should ensure that their code structures are guided by their research questions.

Developing the codebook

A codebook is a shared document that lists code labels and comprehensive descriptions for each code, as well as examples observed within the data. Good code descriptions are precise and specific so that coders can consistently assign the same codes to relevant data or articulate why another coder would do so. Codebook development is iterative and involves input from the entire coding team. However, as those closest to the data, coders must resist undue influence, real or perceived, from other team members with conflicting opinions—it is important to mitigate the risk that more senior researchers, like principal investigators, exert undue influence on the coders’ perspectives.

In practical thematic analysis, coders begin codebook development by independently coding a small portion of the data, such as two to three transcripts or other units of analysis. Coders then individually produce their initial codebooks. This task will require them to reflect on, organise, and clarify codes. The coders then meet to reconcile the draft codebooks, which can often be difficult, as some coders tend to lump several concepts together while others will split them into more specific codes. Discussing disagreements and negotiating consensus are necessary parts of early data analysis. Once the codebook is relatively stable, we recommend soliciting input on the codes from all manuscript authors. Yet, coders must ultimately be empowered to finalise the details so that they are comfortable working with the codebook across a large quantity of data.

Assigning codes to the data

After developing the codebook, coders will use it to assign codes to the remaining data. While the codebook’s overall structure should remain constant, coders might continue to add codes corresponding to any new concepts observed in the data. If new codes are added, coders should review the data they have already coded and determine whether the new codes apply. Qualitative data analysis software can be useful for editing or merging codes.

We recommend that coders periodically compare their code occurrences ( box 5 ), with more frequent check-ins if substantial disagreements occur. In the event of large discrepancies in the codes assigned, coders should revise the codebook to ensure that code descriptions are sufficiently clear and comprehensive to support coding alignment going forward. Because coding is an iterative process, the team can adjust the codebook as needed. 5 28 29

Quantitative coding in context

Researchers should generally avoid reporting code counts in thematic analysis. However, counts can be a useful proxy in maintaining alignment between coders on key concepts. 26 In practice, therefore, researchers should make sure that all coders working on the same piece of data assign the same codes with a similar pattern and that their memoing and overall assessment of the data are aligned. 37 However, the frequency of a code alone is not an indicator of its importance. It is more important that coders agree on the most salient points in the data; reviewing and discussing summary memos can be helpful here. 5

Researchers might disagree on whether or not to calculate and report inter-rater reliability. We note that quantitative tests for agreement, such as kappa statistics or intraclass correlation coefficients, can be distracting and might not provide meaningful results in qualitative analyses. Similarly, Braun and Clarke argue that expecting perfect alignment on coding is inconsistent with the goal of co-constructing meaning. 28 29 Overall consensus on codes’ salience and contributions to themes is the most important factor.

Definition of themes

Themes are meta-constructs that rise above codes and unite the dataset ( box 6 , fig 2 ). They should be clearly evident, repeated throughout the dataset, and relevant to the research questions. 38 While codes are often explicit descriptions of the content in the dataset, themes are usually more conceptual and knit the codes together. 39 Some researchers hypothesise that theme development is loosely described in the literature because qualitative researchers simply intuit themes during the analytical process. 39 In practical thematic analysis, we offer a concrete process that should make developing meaningful themes straightforward.

Themes in context

According to Braun and Clarke, a theme “captures something important about the data in relation to the research question and represents some level of patterned response or meaning within the data set.” 4 Similarly, Braun and Clarke advise against themes as domain summaries. While different approaches can draw out themes from codes, the process begins by identifying patterns. 28 35 Like Braun and Clarke and others, we recommend that researchers consider the salience of certain themes, their prevalence in the dataset, and their keyness (ie, how relevant the themes are to the overarching research questions). 4 12 34

Use of themes in practical thematic analysis

Constructing meaningful themes

After coding all the data, each coder should independently reflect on the team’s summary memos (step 1), the codebook (step 2), and the coded data itself to develop draft themes (step 3). It can be illuminating for coders to review all excerpts associated with each code, so that they derive themes directly from the data. Researchers should remain focused on the research question during this step, so that themes have a clear relation with the overall project aim. Use of qualitative analysis software will make it easy to view each segment of data tagged with each code. Themes might neatly correspond to groups of codes. Or—more likely—they will unite codes and data in unexpected ways. A whiteboard or presentation slides might be helpful to organise, craft, and revise themes. We also provide a template for coproducing themes (supplemental material 3). As with codebook justification, team members will ideally produce individual drafts of the themes that they have identified in the data. They can then discuss these with the group and reach alignment or consensus on the final themes.

The team should ensure that all themes are salient, meaning that they are: supported by the data, relevant to the study objectives, and important. Similar to codes, themes are framed as complete thoughts or sentences, not categories. While codes and themes might appear to be similar to each other, the key distinction is that the themes represent a broader concept. Table 2 shows examples of codes and their corresponding themes from a previously published project that used practical thematic analysis. 36 Identifying three to four key themes that comprise a broader overarching theme is a useful approach. Themes can also have subthemes, if appropriate. 40 41 42 43 44

Example codes with themes in practical thematic analysis 36

Thematic analysis session

After each coder has independently produced draft themes, a carefully selected subset of the manuscript team meets for a thematic analysis session ( table 3 ). The purpose of this session is to discuss and reach alignment or consensus on the final themes. We recommend a session of three to five hours, either in-person or virtually.

Example agenda of thematic analysis session

The composition of the thematic analysis session team is important, as each person’s perspectives will shape the results. This group is usually a small subset of the broader research team, with three to seven individuals. We recommend that primary and senior authors work together to include people with diverse experiences related to the research topic. They should aim for a range of personalities and professional identities, particularly those of clinicians, trainees, patients, and care partners. At a minimum, all coders and primary and senior authors should participate in the thematic analysis session.

The session begins with each coder presenting their draft themes with supporting quotes from the data. 5 Through respectful and collaborative deliberation, the group will develop a shared set of final themes.

One team member facilitates the session. A firm, confident, and consistent facilitation style with good listening skills is critical. For practical reasons, this person is not usually one of the primary coders. Hierarchies in teams cannot be entirely flattened, but acknowledging them and appointing an external facilitator can reduce their impact. The facilitator can ensure that all voices are heard. For example, they might ask for perspectives from patient partners or more junior researchers, and follow up on comments from senior researchers to say, “We have heard your perspective and it is important; we want to make sure all perspectives in the room are equally considered.” Or, “I hear [senior person] is offering [x] idea, I’d like to hear other perspectives in the room.” The role of the facilitator is critical in the thematic analysis session. The facilitator might also privately discuss with more senior researchers, such as principal investigators and senior authors, the importance of being aware of their influence over others and respecting and eliciting the perspectives of more junior researchers, such as patients, care partners, and students.

To our knowledge, this discrete thematic analysis session is a novel contribution of practical thematic analysis. It helps efficiently incorporate diverse perspectives using the session agenda and theme coproduction template (supplemental material 3) and makes the process of constructing themes transparent to the entire research team.

Writing the report

We recommend beginning the results narrative with a summary of all relevant themes emerging from the analysis, followed by a subheading for each theme. Each subsection begins with a brief description of the theme and is illustrated with relevant quotes, which are contextualised and explained. The write-up should not simply be a list, but should contain meaningful analysis and insight from the researchers, including descriptions of how different stakeholders might have experienced a particular situation differently or unexpectedly.

In addition to weaving quotes into the results narrative, quotes can be presented in a table. This strategy is a particularly helpful when submitting to clinical journals with tight word count limitations. Quote tables might also be effective in illustrating areas of agreement and disagreement across stakeholder groups, with columns representing different groups and rows representing each theme or subtheme. Quotes should include an anonymous label for each participant and any relevant characteristics, such as role or gender. The aim is to produce rich descriptions. 5 We recommend against repeating quotations across multiple themes in the report, so as to avoid confusion. The template for coproducing themes (supplemental material 3) allows documentation of quotes supporting each theme, which might also be useful during report writing.

Visual illustrations such as a thematic map or figure of the findings can help communicate themes efficiently. 4 36 42 44 If a figure is not possible, a simple list can suffice. 36 Both must clearly present the main themes with subthemes. Thematic figures can facilitate confirmation that the researchers’ interpretations reflect the study populations’ perspectives (sometimes known as member checking), because authors can invite discussions about the figure and descriptions of findings and supporting quotes. 46 This process can enhance the validity of the results. 46

In supplemental material 4, we provide additional guidance on reporting thematic analysis consistent with COREQ. 18 Commonly used in health services research, COREQ outlines a standardised list of items to be included in qualitative research reports ( box 7 ).

Reporting in context

We note that use of COREQ or any other reporting guidelines does not in itself produce high quality work and should not be used as a substitute for general methodological rigor. Rather, researchers must consider rigor throughout the entire research process. As the issue of how to conceptualise and achieve rigorous qualitative research continues to be debated, 47 48 we encourage researchers to explicitly discuss how they have looked at methodological rigor in their reports. Specifically, we point researchers to Braun and Clarke’s 2021 tool for evaluating thematic analysis manuscripts for publication (“Twenty questions to guide assessment of TA [thematic analysis] research quality”). 16

Avoiding common pitfalls

Awareness of common mistakes can help researchers avoid improper use of qualitative methods. Improper use can, for example, prevent researchers from developing meaningful themes and can risk drawing inappropriate conclusions from the data. Braun and Clarke also warn of poor quality in qualitative research, noting that “coherence and integrity of published research does not always hold.” 16

Weak themes

An important distinction between high and low quality themes is that high quality themes are descriptive and complete thoughts. As such, they often contain subjects and verbs, and can be expressed as full sentences ( table 2 ). Themes that are simply descriptive categories or topics could fail to impart meaningful knowledge beyond categorisation. 16 49 50

Researchers will often move from coding directly to writing up themes, without performing the work of theming or hosting a thematic analysis session. Skipping concerted theming often results in themes that look more like categories than unifying threads across the data.

Unfocused analysis

Because data collection for qualitative research is often semi-structured (eg, interviews, focus groups), not all data will be directly relevant to the research question at hand. To avoid unfocused analysis and a correspondingly unfocused manuscript, we recommend that all team members keep the research objective in front of them at every stage, from reading to coding to theming. During the thematic analysis session, we recommend that the research question be written on a whiteboard so that all team members can refer back to it, and so that the facilitator can ensure that conversations about themes occur in the context of this question. Consistently focusing on the research question can help to ensure that the final report directly answers it, as opposed to the many other interesting insights that might emerge during the qualitative research process. Such insights can be picked up in a secondary analysis if desired.

Inappropriate quantification

Presenting findings quantitatively (eg, “We found 18 instances of participants mentioning safety concerns about the vaccines”) is generally undesirable in practical thematic analysis reporting. 51 Descriptive terms are more appropriate (eg, “participants had substantial concerns about the vaccines,” or “several participants were concerned about this”). This descriptive presentation is critical because qualitative data might not be consistently elicited across participants, meaning that some individuals might share certain information while others do not, simply based on how conversations evolve. Additionally, qualitative research does not aim to draw inferences outside its specific sample. Emphasising numbers in thematic analysis can lead to readers incorrectly generalising the findings. Although peer reviewers unfamiliar with thematic analysis often request this type of quantification, practitioners of practical thematic analysis can confidently defend their decision to avoid it. If quantification is methodologically important, we recommend simultaneously conducting a survey or incorporating standardised interview techniques into the interview guide. 11

Neglecting group dynamics

Researchers should concertedly consider group dynamics in the research team. Particular attention should be paid to power relations and the personality of team members, which can include aspects such as who most often speaks, who defines concepts, and who resolves disagreements that might arise within the group. 52

The perspectives of patient and care partners are particularly important to cultivate. Ideally, patient partners are meaningfully embedded in studies from start to finish, not just for practical thematic analysis. 53 Meaningful engagement can build trust, which makes it easier for patient partners to ask questions, request clarification, and share their perspectives. Professional team members should actively encourage patient partners by emphasising that their expertise is critically important and valued. Noting when a patient partner might be best positioned to offer their perspective can be particularly powerful.

Insufficient time allocation

Researchers must allocate enough time to complete thematic analysis. Working with qualitative data takes time, especially because it is often not a linear process. As the strength of thematic analysis lies in its ability to make use of the rich details and complexities of the data, we recommend careful planning for the time required to read and code each document.

Estimating the necessary time can be challenging. For step 1 (reading), researchers can roughly calculate the time required based on the time needed to read and reflect on one piece of data. For step 2 (coding), the total amount of time needed can be extrapolated from the time needed to code one document during codebook development. We also recommend three to five hours for the thematic analysis session itself, although coders will need to independently develop their draft themes beforehand. Although the time required for practical thematic analysis is variable, teams should be able to estimate their own required effort with these guidelines.

Practical thematic analysis builds on the foundational work of Braun and Clarke. 4 16 We have reframed their six phase process into three condensed steps of reading, coding, and theming. While we have maintained important elements of Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis, we believe that practical thematic analysis is conceptually simpler and easier to teach to less experienced researchers and non-researcher stakeholders. For teams with different levels of familiarity with qualitative methods, this approach presents a clear roadmap to the reading, coding, and theming of qualitative data. Our practical thematic analysis approach promotes efficient learning by doing—experiential learning. 12 29 Practical thematic analysis avoids the risk of relying on complex descriptions of methods and theory and places more emphasis on obtaining meaningful insights from those close to real world clinical environments. Although practical thematic analysis can be used to perform intensive theory based analyses, it lends itself more readily to accelerated, pragmatic approaches.

Strengths and limitations

Our approach is designed to smooth the qualitative analysis process and yield high quality themes. Yet, researchers should note that poorly performed analyses will still produce low quality results. Practical thematic analysis is a qualitative analytical approach; it does not look at study design, data collection, or other important elements of qualitative research. It also might not be the right choice for every qualitative research project. We recommend it for applied health services research questions, where diverse perspectives and simplicity might be valuable.

We also urge researchers to improve internal validity through triangulation methods, such as member checking (supplemental material 1). 46 Member checking could include soliciting input on high level themes, theme definitions, and quotations from participants. This approach might increase rigor.

Implications

We hope that by providing clear and simple instructions for practical thematic analysis, a broader range of researchers will be more inclined to use these methods. Increased transparency and familiarity with qualitative approaches can enhance researchers’ ability to both interpret qualitative studies and offer up new findings themselves. In addition, it can have usefulness in training and reporting. A major strength of this approach is to facilitate meaningful inclusion of patient and care partner perspectives, because their lived experiences can be particularly valuable in data interpretation and the resulting findings. 11 30 As clinicians are especially pressed for time, they might also appreciate a practical set of instructions that can be immediately used to leverage their insights and access to patients and clinical settings, and increase the impact of qualitative research through timely results. 8

Practical thematic analysis is a simplified approach to performing thematic analysis in health services research, a field where the experiences of patients, care partners, and clinicians are of inherent interest. We hope that it will be accessible to those individuals new to qualitative methods, including patients, care partners, clinicians, and other health services researchers. We intend to empower multidisciplinary research teams to explore unanswered questions and make new, important, and rigorous contributions to our understanding of important clinical and health systems research.

Acknowledgments

All members of the Coproduction Laboratory provided input that shaped this manuscript during laboratory meetings. We acknowledge advice from Elizabeth Carpenter-Song, an expert in qualitative methods.

Coproduction Laboratory group contributors: Stephanie C Acquilano ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-5531 ), Julie Doherty ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-6536 ), Rachel C Forcino ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9938-4830 ), Tina Foster ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-4031 ), Megan Holthoff, Christopher R Jacobs ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-8657 ), Lisa C Johnson ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7448-4931 ), Elaine T Kiriakopoulos, Kathryn Kirkland ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9851-926X ), Meredith A MacMartin ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6091 ), Emily A Morgan, Eugene Nelson, Elizabeth O’Donnell, Brant Oliver ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7399-622X ), Danielle Schubbe ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9858-1805 ), Gabrielle Stevens ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9001-178X ), Rachael P Thomeer ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5974-3840 ).

Contributors: Practical thematic analysis, an approach designed for multidisciplinary health services teams new to qualitative research, was based on CHS’s experiences teaching thematic analysis to clinical teams and students. We have drawn heavily from qualitative methods literature. CHS is the guarantor of the article. CHS, AS, CvP, AMK, JRK, and JAP contributed to drafting the manuscript. AS, JG, CMM, JAP, and RWY provided feedback on their experiences using practical thematic analysis. CvP, LCL, SLB, AVC, GE, and JKL advised on qualitative methods in health services research, given extensive experience. All authors meaningfully edited the manuscript content, including AVC and RKS. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

Funding: This manuscript did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at https://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

• Ziebland S ,
• ↵ A Hybrid Approach to Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Research: Using a Practical Example. 2018. https://methods.sagepub.com/case/hybrid-approach-thematic-analysis-qualitative-research-a-practical-example .
• Maguire M ,
• Vindrola-Padros C ,
• Vindrola-Padros B
• ↵ Vindrola-Padros C. Rapid Ethnographies: A Practical Guide . Cambridge University Press 2021. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=n80HEAAAQBAJ
• Schroter S ,
• Merino JG ,
• Barbeau A ,
• ↵ Padgett DK. Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Public Health . SAGE Publications 2011. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=LcYgAQAAQBAJ
• Scharp KM ,
• Korstjens I
• Barnett-Page E ,
• ↵ Guest G, Namey EE, Mitchell ML. Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research . SAGE 2013. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=-3rmWYKtloC
• Sainsbury P ,
• Emerson RM ,
• Saunders B ,
• Kingstone T ,
• Hennink MM ,
• Kaiser BN ,
• Hennink M ,
• O’Connor C ,
• ↵ Yen RW, Schubbe D, Walling L, et al. Patient engagement in the What Matters Most trial: experiences and future implications for research. Poster presented at International Shared Decision Making conference, Quebec City, Canada. July 2019.
• ↵ Got questions about Thematic Analysis? We have prepared some answers to common ones. https://www.thematicanalysis.net/faqs/ (accessed 9 Nov 2022).
• ↵ Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic Analysis. SAGE Publications. 2022. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481 .
• Kalpokas N ,
• Radivojevic I
• Campbell KA ,
• Durepos P ,
• ↵ Understanding Thematic Analysis. https://www.thematicanalysis.net/understanding-ta/ .
• Saunders CH ,
• Stevens G ,
• CONFIDENT Study Long-Term Care Partners
• MacQueen K ,
• Vaismoradi M ,
• Turunen H ,
• Schott SL ,
• Berkowitz J ,
• Carpenter-Song EA ,
• Goldwag JL ,
• Durand MA ,
• Goldwag J ,
• Saunders C ,
• Mishra MK ,
• Rodriguez HP ,
• Shortell SM ,
• Verdinelli S ,
• Scagnoli NI
• Campbell C ,
• Sparkes AC ,
• McGannon KR
• Sandelowski M ,
• Connelly LM ,
• O’Malley AJ ,

100+ Most Popular Rhetorical Analysis Essay Topics in 2024

Writing a rhetorical analysis essay can feel like stepping into a world where words are weapons, and arguments are battles to be won. Whether you’re in high school or college, finding the right rhetorical analysis essay topic can set the stage for a compelling and insightful piece. In 2024, with the ever-evolving landscape of media, literature, and public discourse, there’s no shortage of fascinating topics to choose from. So, let’s dive into some of the most popular and intriguing rhetorical analysis essay topics that can help you craft an essay that not only meets your academic requirements but also captivates your audience.

What is a Rhetorical Analysis Essay?

Rhetorical analysis is the process of examining how an author or speaker uses language to persuade or influence their audience. It goes beyond simply understanding the message; it involves analyzing the techniques and strategies used to convey that message effectively. This includes looking at the use of ethos, or credibility; pathos, or emotional appeal; and logos, or logical reasoning. By breaking down these elements, a rhetorical analysis seeks to understand the effectiveness of the communication and how it achieves its intended purpose.

The Importance of Choosing the Right Topic

Choosing the right topic is crucial. A well-chosen topic not only makes your writing process smoother but also engages your readers from the get-go. You want something that has enough depth for analysis, but not so obscure that you can’t find sources or examples. The following list of rhetorical analysis essay topics in 2024 offers a wide range of options, ensuring that you can find a topic that interests you and meets your assignment’s requirements.

Literary Works: Classic and Contemporary

• The Use of Rhetoric in George Orwell’s “1984”
• Persuasive Techniques in Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird”
• Rhetorical Strategies in Margaret Atwood’s “The Handmaid’s Tale”
• Analyzing the Use of Irony in Mark Twain’s “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn”
• The Role of Pathos in Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein”
• How Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar” Employs Rhetoric to Influence the Audience
• The Use of Symbolism in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby”
• Rhetorical Analysis of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s “We Should All Be Feminists”

Literary works often provide a rich ground for rhetorical analysis because of the intricate ways in which authors weave their arguments. Whether it’s classic literature or contemporary works, analyzing these texts helps you understand how authors have historically used rhetoric to influence societal perspectives.

Political Speeches: Power of Persuasion

• The Rhetoric of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” Speech
• Barack Obama’s 2008 Victory Speech: A Rhetorical Analysis
• The Persuasive Techniques in Winston Churchill’s “We Shall Fight on the Beaches” Speech
• Analyzing the Use of Ethos in John F. Kennedy’s Inaugural Address
• The Role of Logos in Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address
• How Rhetoric Shaped Donald Trump’s Presidential Campaign Speeches
• Rhetorical Strategies in Greta Thunberg’s Climate Change Speeches
• The Impact of Pathos in Nelson Mandela’s “I Am Prepared to Die” Speech

Political speeches are gold mines for rhetorical analysis. These speeches are crafted to influence, motivate, and sometimes manipulate public opinion. Analyzing these can provide deep insights into how leaders shape narratives and rally support.

Advertising Campaigns: Selling Through Words

• Nike’s “Just Do It” Campaign: A Rhetorical Analysis
• The Use of Pathos in Coca-Cola’s “Share a Coke” Campaign
• Analyzing Ethos in Apple’s “Think Different” Ads
• The Rhetorical Strategies Behind Dove’s “Real Beauty” Campaign
• How Fear Appeals are Used in Anti-Smoking Ads
• Persuasion in Political Campaign Advertisements
• The Role of Humor in Old Spice’s “The Man Your Man Could Smell Like” Campaign
• The Use of Rhetoric in Social Awareness Campaigns like “Stop the Spread”

Advertising is all about persuasion. Companies spend millions to craft messages that resonate with their audience, and rhetorical analysis can peel back the layers to reveal how these campaigns influence consumer behavior.

Analyzing Modern Media: Films, TV Shows, and Music

Film and television.

• The Rhetoric of Heroism in Marvel’s “The Avengers”
• Analyzing the Use of Rhetoric in “Breaking Bad”
• How “The Handmaid’s Tale” TV Series Uses Rhetoric to Highlight Gender Inequality
• The Persuasive Techniques in Netflix’s “13th”
• Rhetorical Analysis of Jordan Peele’s “Get Out”
• The Use of Pathos in Pixar’s “Up”
• Analyzing Rhetorical Devices in HBO’s “Game of Thrones”
• The Role of Ethos in “Schindler’s List”

Music and Lyrics

• The Rhetoric of Protest in Bob Dylan’s “The Times They Are A-Changin’”
• Analyzing Pathos in Adele’s “Someone Like You”
• The Use of Logos in Kendrick Lamar’s “Alright”
• How Beyoncé’s “Formation” Employs Ethos to Empower
• The Persuasive Power of Lyrics in John Lennon’s “Imagine”
• Rhetorical Analysis of Taylor Swift’s “Blank Space”
• The Role of Repetition in Queen’s “We Will Rock You”
• The Use of Symbolism in Pink Floyd’s “Another Brick in the Wall”

Modern media, whether films, TV shows, or music, is a reflection of the society we live in. Analyzing the rhetoric in these mediums not only deepens your understanding of the content but also helps you appreciate the subtle ways in which messages are conveyed.

Rhetoric in Social Media: The Digital Influence

• The Rhetorical Power of Memes in Political Campaigns
• How Influencers Use Rhetoric to Build Their Brand on Instagram
• Analyzing the Rhetoric of Cancel Culture on Twitter
• The Persuasive Techniques in Viral TikTok Trends
• The Role of Pathos in Mental Health Advocacy on Social Media
• Rhetorical Strategies in Facebook’s Data Privacy Communications
• The Use of Ethos in LinkedIn Professional Branding
• How Rhetoric Shapes Public Perception in Online Debates

Social media has revolutionized the way we communicate, and with it, the way rhetoric is used. Whether it’s a viral tweet or a YouTube video, rhetorical analysis can uncover the persuasive tactics that define the digital age.

Public Discourse: Shaping Society

• The Rhetoric of Fear in Post-9/11 Political Speeches
• Analyzing Ethos in the Me Too Movement’s Public Statements
• The Role of Logos in the Gun Control Debate in America
• Rhetorical Strategies in the Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice Argument
• The Persuasive Techniques in Environmental Activism Speeches
• How Rhetoric Shapes Public Perception in Immigration Reform Debates
• Analyzing the Use of Pathos in Campaigns Against Human Trafficking
• The Rhetoric of Anti-Vaccination Movements on Social Media
• Persuasive Strategies in the LGBTQ+ Rights Movement
• The Impact of Rhetoric in the Black Lives Matter Movement’s Messaging

Public discourse plays a significant role in shaping societal beliefs and actions. Analyzing the rhetoric used in these discussions reveals how language can mobilize, polarize, and inspire change. By examining these topics, students can gain insight into the power of words in public arenas and their role in societal transformations.

Business and Corporate Communications: The Language of Commerce

• Analyzing the Rhetoric in Amazon’s Corporate Social Responsibility Reports
• The Use of Ethos in Apple’s Product Launch Presentations
• Persuasive Techniques in Nike’s Social Justice Advertising
• How Rhetoric is Used in Tesla’s Earnings Calls
• The Role of Logos in Corporate Apologies after Scandals
• Rhetorical Strategies in Coca-Cola’s Global Advertising Campaigns
• Analyzing Pathos in Charity Appeals by Large Corporations
• The Rhetoric of Inclusivity in Fortune 500 Companies’ Diversity Statements
• The Impact of Rhetoric in Anti-Smoking Campaigns by Big Tobacco
• Persuasive Techniques in Pharmaceutical Industry Advertising

Corporate communications are carefully crafted to influence public perception, consumer behavior, and shareholder confidence. By analyzing the rhetoric in business contexts, students can understand how companies use language to build brand loyalty, manage crises, and navigate the competitive market.

Cultural Movements: The Power of Collective Voice

• Analyzing the Rhetoric in the Feminist Movement’s Key Texts
• The Use of Ethos in the Civil Rights Movement’s Leadership Speeches
• Rhetorical Strategies in the Gay Rights Movement’s Historic Campaigns
• The Role of Pathos in the Anti-Apartheid Movement
• Persuasive Techniques in the Native American Rights Movement
• Analyzing Logos in the Disability Rights Movement’s Advocacy
• The Rhetoric of Solidarity in the Labor Union Movement
• The Impact of Rhetoric in the Anti-War Movement during the Vietnam Era
• Persuasive Strategies in the Global Human Rights Movement
• The Role of Social Media Rhetoric in the Arab Spring

Cultural movements are often driven by powerful rhetoric that rallies support and fosters a sense of unity. Analyzing these movements offers valuable insights into how language can drive social change and empower marginalized communities to voice their demands.

Education and Academia: Rhetoric in Learning

• The Use of Rhetoric in Educational Policy Debates
• Analyzing Ethos in University Commencement Speeches
• Persuasive Techniques in the Debate Over Standardized Testing
• How Rhetoric Shapes Public Opinion on Charter Schools
• The Role of Pathos in Advocating for Higher Education Funding
• Rhetorical Strategies in the Fight for Free College Tuition
• Analyzing the Use of Logos in Academic Research Presentations
• The Rhetoric of Inclusivity in Diversity and Inclusion Statements
• Persuasive Techniques in Promoting STEM Education
• The Impact of Rhetoric in the Debate Over Student Loan Forgiveness

Education and academia are fertile grounds for rhetorical analysis, as debates over policy, funding, and access to education often hinge on the effective use of language. By examining these topics, students can explore how rhetoric is used to advocate for educational reforms and shape public discourse around learning.

Health and Medicine: Persuasion in Public Health

• The Rhetoric of Fear in Anti-Smoking Campaigns
• Analyzing Pathos in Public Health Campaigns Against Obesity
• The Role of Ethos in Vaccine Promotion Efforts
• Persuasive Strategies in Anti-Drug Campaigns
• How Rhetoric Shapes Public Perception of Mental Health Issues
• The Use of Logos in Debates Over Universal Healthcare
• Analyzing the Rhetoric of Pro-Choice vs. Pro-Life in Reproductive Health
• The Impact of Rhetoric in Anti-AIDS Campaigns in the 1980s
• Persuasive Techniques in Government Health Warnings on Tobacco Products
• The Rhetoric of Wellness in Alternative Medicine Promotions

Tips for Writing Your Rhetorical Analysis Essay Topics

Writing a rhetorical analysis essay doesn’t have to be daunting. Here are a few tips to keep in mind:

• Choose a Topic You’re Passionate About: If you’re interested in the topic, it’ll be easier to write and more engaging for your readers.
• Identify the Rhetorical Strategies Used: Look for examples of ethos, pathos, and logos, and analyze how effective they are.
• Support Your Analysis with Examples: Always back up your points with evidence from the text, speech, or media you’re analyzing.
• Keep Your Audience in Mind: Consider who will be reading your essay and tailor your analysis to their interests and knowledge level.
• Revise and Edit: Always leave time to go back and refine your essay. A polished essay will make a stronger impression.

Finding the right rhetorical analysis essay topic is the first step towards crafting a compelling essay. Whether you’re analyzing a classic novel, a modern film, or a political speech, the key is to dig deep and uncover the persuasive techniques at play. With the topics listed above, you’re well on your way to writing an essay that not only meets your academic requirements but also engages and enlightens your readers. Happy writing!

You may also like

Top 20 most famous motivational speakers, how to formulate a tentative thesis: tips and examples, how to write a thematic statement in 5 easy steps, leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.