essay on power and politics in nepal

• Click here - to use the wp menu builder

• Editorial Team
• Contributors
• Environment
• Privacy Policy
• Issue 1 – July 2011
• Issue 2 – October 2011
• Issue 3 – January 2012
• Issue 4 – April 2012
• Issue 5 – July 2012
• Issue 6 – October 2012
• Issue 7 – January 2013
• Issue 8 – Spring 2013
• Issue 9 – Summer 2013
• Issue 10 – Winter 2014
• Issue 11 – Fall 2014
• Issue 12 – Winter 2015
• Issue 13 – Spring 2015
• Issue 14 – Fall 2015
• Issue 15 – Winter 2016
• Issue 16 – Spring 2016
• Issue 17 – Summer 2016
• Issue 18 – Fall 2016
• Issue 19 – Winter 2017
• Issue 20 – Spring 2017
• Issue 21 – Summer 2017
• Issue 22 – Fall 2017
• Issue 23 – Winter 2018
• Issue 24 – Spring 2018
• Issue 25 – Summer 2018
• Issue 26 – Fall 2018
• Special Issue 2018
• Issue 27 – Winter 2019
• Issue 28 – Spring 2019
• Issue 29 – Summer 2019
• Issue 30 – Fall 2019
• Issue 31 – Winter 2020
• Issue 32 – Fall 2020
• Issue 33 – Winter 2020
• Issue 34 – Spring 2021
• Issue 35 – Winter 2021
• Issue 36 – Spring 2022
• Issue 37 – Fall 2022
• Issue 38 – Spring 2023
• Issue 39 – Spring 2024
• Issue 40 – Fall 2024

The political instability in Nepal and its geopolitical implications

Share this:

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

EDITOR PICKS

Eid mubarak, book review: the black coat, a novel by neamat imam, a bangladeshi builds a $4b pharma in us with promises of cheap covid treatment, popular posts, not only in ladakh, india losing ground in bangladesh too, human rights violations in kashmir: a case study of 2017, bangladesh: an open letter to foreign minister abdul momen, popular category.

• Commentary 4933
• Reviews 175
• Issue 22 - Fall 2017 50
• Issue 25 – Summer 2018 48
• Issue 27 – Winter 2019 46

Founded in 2011, South Asia Journal (SAJ) is a policy magazine focused on issues relating to South Asia. Bearing no political affiliation, the journal’s goal is to provide discerning, critical perspectives on the South Asian sub-continent and its evolving relationship to the broader world. SAJ aims to highlight emerging regional trends, especially issues which call for more emphasis among decision makers and policy framers.

Contact us: [email protected]

© South Asia Journal

Political Instability And Uncertainty Loom Large In Nepal

By  gaurab shumsher thapa.

• February 16, 2021

This article was originally published in South Asian Voices.

Nepal’s domestic politics have been undergoing a turbulent and significant shift. On December 20, 2020, at the recommendation of Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, President Bidya Devi Bhandari  dissolved  the House of Representatives, calling for snap elections in April and May 2021. Oli’s move was a result of a serious internal rift within the ruling Nepal Communist Party (NCP) that threatened to depose him from power. Opposition parties and other civil society stakeholders have condemned the move as unconstitutional and several writs have been  filed  against the move at the Supreme Court (SC) with hearings underway. Massive  protests  have taken place condemning the prime minister’s move. If the SC reinstates the parliament, Oli is in course to lose the moral authority to govern and could be subject to a vote of no-confidence. If the SC validates his move, it is unclear if he would be able to return to power with a majority.

The formation of a strong government after decades of political instability was expected to lead to a socioeconomic transformation of Nepal. Regardless of the SC’s decision, the country is likely to see an escalation of political tensions in the days ahead. The internal rift that led to the December parliamentary dissolution and the political dimensions of the current predicament along with the domestic and geopolitical implications of internal political instability will lead to a serious and long-term weakening of Nepal’s democratic fabric.

Power Sharing and Legitimacy in the NCP

Differences between NCP chairs Oli and former Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal have largely premised on a power-sharing arrangement, leading to a vertical division in the party. In the December 2017 parliamentary elections, a coalition between the Oli-led Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist Leninist or UML) and the Dahal-led Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Center or MC)  won  nearly two-thirds of the seats. In May 2018, both parties merged to  form  the NCP. However, internal politics weakened this merger. While both the factions claim to represent the authentic party, the Election Commission has sought clarifications from both factions before deciding on the matter. According to the  Political Party Act , the faction that can substantiate its claim by providing signatures of at least 40 percent of its central committee members is eligible to get recognized as the official party. The faction that is officially recognized will get the privilege of retaining the party and election symbol, while the unrecognized faction will have to register as a new party which can hamper its future electoral prospects. A faction led by Dahal and former Prime Minister Madahav Kumar Nepal, was planning to initiate a vote of no-confidence motion against Oli but, sensing an imminent threat to his position, Oli decided to motion for the dissolution of the parliament.

Internal Party Dynamics

Several internal political dynamics have led to the current state of turmoil within the NCP. Dahal has accused Oli of disregarding the power-sharing arrangement agreed upon during the formation of NCP according to which Oli was  supposed  to hand over either the premiership or the executive chairmanship of the party to Dahal. In September 2020, both the leaders reached an  agreement  under which Oli would serve the remainder of his term as prime minister and Dahal would act as the executive chair of the party. Yet, Oli  failed  to demonstrate any intention to relinquish either post, increasing friction within the party. Additionally, Oli made unilateral appointments to several cabinet and government positions, further consolidating his individual authority over the newly formed NCP. He also  sidelined  the senior leader of the NCP and former Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal, leading Nepal to side with Dahal over Oli. Consequently, Oli chose to dissolve the parliament and seek a fresh mandate rather than face a vote of no-confidence. Importantly, party unity between the Marxist-Leninist CPN (UML) and the Maoist CPN (MC) did not lead to expected ideological unification.

Domestic Politics and Geopolitics

Geopolitical factors and external actors have historically impacted Nepal’s domestic political landscape. Recently, in a bid to cement his authority over the NCP, Oli has attempted to improve ties with India—lately strained due to Nepal’s  inclusion  of disputed territories in its new political map—resulting in recent  high-level visits  from both countries. India has also  provided  Nepal with one million doses of COVID-19 vaccines as part of its vaccine diplomacy efforts in the region. However, while India has previously  interfered  in Nepal’s  domestic politics , it has described the current power struggle as an “ internal matter ” to prevent backlash from Nepali policymakers and to avoid a potential spillover of political unrest.

However, India’s traditionally dominant influence in Nepal has been challenged by China’s ascendancy in recent years. Due to  fears  of Tibetans potentially using Nepal’s soil to conduct anti-China activities, China considers Nepal important to its national security strategy. Beijing has traditionally maintained a non-interventionist approach to foreign policy; however, this approach is gradually changing as is evident from the Chinese ambassador to Nepal’s  proactive efforts  to  address  current crises within the NCP. Nepal’s media  speculates  that China is in favor of keeping the NCP intact as the ideological affinity between the NCP and the Communist Party of China could help China exert its political and economic influence over Nepal.

Although China is aware of India’s traditionally influential role in Nepal, it is also  skeptical  of growing U.S. interest in the Himalayan state; especially considering Oli’s push for parliamentary approval of the USD $500 million Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) grant assistance from the United States to finance the construction of electrical transmission lines in Nepal. In contrast, Dahal has opposed the MCC and has described it as part of the U.S.-led Indo-Pacific Strategy to contain China. Given Nepal is a signatory to China’s Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing might prefer development projects under the BRI framework and could lobby the Nepali government to delay or reject U.S.-led projects.

Implications for Future Governance

After the political  changes  of 2006 which ended Nepal’s decade-long armed conflict, it was expected that political stability would usher in economic development to the country. Moreover, a strong majority government under Oli raised hopes of achieving modernization. Sadly, ruling party leaders have instead engaged in a bitter power struggle, and government  corruption scandals  have undermined trust in the administration.

Amidst the current turmoil within the NCP, the main opposition party, Nepali Congress (NC), is hoping that an NCP division will raise its prospects of coming to power in the future. Although the NC has  denounced  Oli’s move for snap elections as unconstitutional, it has also stated that it will not shy away from elections if the SC decides to dissolve the lower house. Sensing increasing instability, several royalist parties and groups have accused the government of  corruption  and protested on the streets for the reinstatement of the Hindu state and constitutional monarchy to reinvent and stabilize Nepal’s image and identity.

The last parliamentary elections had provided a  mandate  of five years for the NCP to govern the country. However, Oli  decided  to seek a fresh mandate, claiming that the Dahal-Nepal faction obstructed the smooth functioning of the government. Unfortunately, domestic political instability has resurfaced as the result of an internal personality rift within the party. This worsening democratic situation will not benefit either India or China—both want to circumvent potential spillover effects. Even if the SC validates Oli’s move, elections in April are not confirmed. If elections were not held within six months from the date of dissolution, a constitutional crisis could occur. If the Supreme Court overturns Oli’s decision, he could lose his position as both the prime minister and the NCP chair. Regardless of the outcome, Nepali politics is bound to face deepening uncertainty in the days ahead.

This article was originally published in  South Asian Voices.

Recent & Related

About Stimson

Transparency.

• 202.223.5956
• 1211 Connecticut Ave NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036
• Fax: 202.238.9604
• 202.478.3437
• Caiti Goodman
• Communications Dept.
• News & Announcements

Copyright The Henry L. Stimson Center

Privacy Policy

Subscription Options

Research areas trade & technology security & strategy human security & governance climate & natural resources pivotal places.

• Asia & the Indo-Pacific
• Middle East & North Africa

Publications & Project Lists South Asia Voices Publication Highlights Global Governance Innovation Network Updates Mekong Dam Monitor: Weekly Alerts and Advisories Middle East Voices Updates 38 North: News and Analysis on North Korea

• All News & Analysis (Approx Weekly)
• 38 North Today (Frequently)
• Only Breaking News (Occasional)

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Download Free PDF

Federalism: Opportunities and Challenges in Context of Nepal and It’s Relevancy to Democracy

Related papers

Molung Educational Frontier

It is assumed that the main aspect of the Constitution of Nepal promulgated on September 20, 2015 is the transfer of power from central/federal to the provincial and local government. However, the devolution process has not been satisfactorily experienced as had been expected when it was promulgated by the overwhelming majority of the then Constituent Assembly. One of the reasons for this slow progress might be some confusion and/ or problem in matters of power sharing between different levels of governments. So, the primary objective of the researcher is to review the power sharing modality existing in the new constitution on different sectors and areas of the state machinery. This paper focuses on the federal structure, demography, power sharing between the provincial and local level, opportunities and challenges of federalism in Nepal. It argues that the restructuring initiatives have not been successful in minimizing the political, social, economic, regional and ethnic inequalit...

Nepal practiced a centralized unitary governing system for long and has gone through the federal system after the promulgation of the new constitution on 20 September 2015. There is a big paradigm shift in terms of governance after it. Now, there are three levels of governments, one federal government in the center, seven provincial governments and 753 local governments. Federalism refers to a political governing system with multiple tiers of government working together with coordination. It is preferred for self and shared rule. Though it has opened the door for rights of the people, political stability, state restructuring, and sustainable peace and development, there are many prospects and challenges for its proper implementation. This research analyzes the discourses of federalism implementation in Nepal with special reference to one of seven provinces, Gandaki. Federalism is a new phenomenon in Nepali politics and informed debates on it are required for its right evolution. Thi...

Since the second democratic opening in 1990, Nepal has suffered from a democratic deficit due to the new leaders’ failure to institutionalise democracy by promoting inclusion, representation, and responsiveness. The concept of federalism, as argued in Nepal today, reflects the failure of the past and the determination to give local governance the real political and economic power. The fringe leftist and rightist parties oppose federalism, arguing that it will create deep divisions. Some of them even assume that the country may ultimately disappear altogether. In view of the widespread popular support, the challenge is to use federalism as an opportunity for prudently promoting inclusive, participatory, and responsive governance in the interest of economic prosperity and social wellbeing of the Nepali people.

This article is prepared by means of primary and secondary sources in the printed books and online portals; and questionnaire. Qualitative approach was applied to collect and analysis of the data. This article intends to explore the concept of federalism, history, practice and impact in Nepal. Federalism is a kind of governance system in which the political power is divided among the central or federal government, provincial government and local level territorial units. Currently, federal executive and federal legislature; state executive and state legislature; and local executive (village executive and municipal executive) and local legislature has been in practice in Nepal. Likewise, Supreme Court, high court, special court, district court and judicial committee in the local level under the vice-chair person of village executive and municipality are the organ of current judicial system in Nepal. Federal system has not been implementing as the will of people, a fewer services of ce...

Nepal has been serious about establishing Federal model of constitution therein since there last movement for democracy, and especially after 2006 when the monarchy was completely thrown over, leaving zero scope for monarchial restoration there in Nepal. Of course it was a common agenda of all political parties therein and to greater extent it might be the willingness of external actors, but has happened after 2006 in Nepal in the name of finalization of the Constitution and formulation of federal model was not healthier. Besides, it was either more cautiousness or hyper sensitivity towards it that there happened a mass up and downs in politics, beginning with majority of Maovadies in first election and the crowning Prachanda as the Prime Minister of Nepal; and later thrown up of the same party to opposition status and bringing of Nepali Congress and UML coalition in power. As a result the country suffered for more than 9 years to get a constitution, which has been implemented on 20 th Sept. 2015 therein. The marathon for constitutional drafting and delineating federal territories was complicated by the political parties themselves, and whatever has been formulated is again seem to be tentative as it again not able to satisfy public grievances, especially that of Madhesies. It is essentially to mention that the adopted federal territories are more or less the same of Development Regions with some changes therein and creating a total 7 federal units in Democratic Federal state of Nepal. The implemented constitution is a sort of political compromise to fulfill their personal greed and not the public needs.

Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 2021

This study examines how far Nepal's current practice of federalism has progressed toward people's aspirations, based on power separation, public trust, power equalization, and intergovernmental relationships. Primary data was collected on purposively 72 key informant interviews, which were then triangulated by the KII response. Finding demonstrates that functions and authorities were devolved in accordance with the principle of separation of powers at all three levels of government. However, the constitutional provisions were completely disregarded, and power was centralized by an unholy alliance of political leadership and bureaucracy. Second, people expected the democratic government to take a welfare approach to ensure greater pluralism and alliances, but special interests of politicians for their election constituencies, as well as identity-based issues, caused havoc in the effective operation of federalism. Third, the provision of three tiers of power-sharing mechanisms was based on coexistence, cooperation, and coordination. However, the federal government appears hesitant to support sub-national governments due to the centralized mindset of bureaucrats and politicians. Fourth, the constitution has focused on intergovernmental relations, but such relationships fail due to imbalances in vertical and horizontal relationships, fiscal dependency, and the bureaucracy's power-seeking attitude. In the end, two key questions for the discussions are raised. First, the institutionalization of accountability at the local level is it a true commitment, or is it merely an ivory tower? Second, the provision of autonomy has been used as a means of transformation or simply as a bargaining tool at the local level?

Journal of South Asian Studies, 2021

This paper examines the core attributes and characteristics of federalism such as state restructuring, power-sharing, ensuring fundamental rights, and intergovernmental relationships. These are underpinned by constitutional provisions of 2015. Both primary and secondary information were used as a data sources. However, the constitution 2015 and citizens' responses were used as major sources of information. Seventy-two key informant interviews were administered purposely to triangulate the results. Findings indicate that the state was reformed into 7 provinces, and 753 local government units. However, much debate and discussions could not take place adequately on behalf of the state regarding the state restructuring process, nor had any established principles and criteria been used. As a result, there are many doubts have been emerged to implement federalism at the grassroots level. Although the government saying was that few indicators were designed to restructure the local governments, the political parties mainly Madheshi and identity-based sub-regional groups differed to the government decision. In addition, the constitution gives legislative, executive, and judiciary functions to all levels of governments, while capacity restraints, and lack of adequate legal procedures; federation have been extending its dominant role. Latterly, the inter-government relationship was adversely affected due for various reasons. For instance, firstly, imbalances of vertical and horizontal relationships; Secondly, provincial, and local governments' fiscal dependency on the federal government; and thirdly, power-seeking attitude of the bureaucracy. In the end, an applicable mechanism of service delivery and governance integrity is recommended for to effective federalization.

Democracy is a living political institution. Every nation has been trying to establish it, because 'living under democratic institutions makes people much happier than living under authoritarian ones'. New democracy faces different forms of challenges either internally or externally. Nepal is on the way of constructing federal democratic republic since the promulgation of a new constitution in 2015. Hence, this paper aims to understand the present situation of Nepal, challenges in deepening democracy and finally it analyzes the prospect of federal democracy. This paper, is a desk study based on secondary sources of information, argues foundational challenge and deepening challenge are the twin obstacle in developing and maintaining democracy. It seems that the prospect of federal democracy in Nepal is infertile soil, she is facing a triple crisis, geographically, the country lack adequate food to feed her citizens, culturally, democratic values are absent in family, educational institutions, associations and in leaders and economically it raises the question of sustainability of the regime.

Academia Molecular Biology and Genomics, 2024

After the skin suffers an injury, pro-inflammatory factors and blood cells aggregate at the site, initiating the coagulation cascade for clot formation and angiogenesis. Activated platelets, via 5-HTR2A (5-hydroxytryptamine receptor-2A) receptors, secrete serotonin, which is implicated in the pro-inflammatory response to acute injury, especially in the recruitment of neutrophils and proliferation of lymphocytes, thus playing a role important role in the inflammatory stage of wound healing. Abnormalities in the different stages of the healing process cause its impairment, by inducing metabolic changes, in gene expression and, consequently, in the phenotype. Therefore, genetic alterations, especially in platelet 5-HTR2A receptors, impair the initial processes of tissue repair with a consequent decrease in the inflammatory response and detriment to the continuity of the healing process, regardless of the triggering factor. Polymorphisms in the serotonin receptor gene (5-HTR2A) are associated with several platelet disorders by affecting the serotonergic system and, among them, the 102T-C polymorphism can lead to molecular changes in the effectiveness of tissue repair control, with implications for wound healing. This review highlights the need for a new look to broaden the horizons of molecular understanding of the tissue repair and wound healing.

Perfiles Educativos, 2014

Assessoria jurídica laboral, 2024

PROMETHEUS. Rivista di studi classici, 2023

Berliner Theologische Zeitschrift 38 (2021) 48–66, 2021

Journal of the Canadian Historical Association, 1995

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1991

Physical Review D, 2017

Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2002

Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2011

Fisheries Research, 2020

Jurnal Tarbiyah, 2017

Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2017

Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 2018

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024