cyberbullying essay 123helpme

• Type 2 Diabetes
• Heart Disease
• Digestive Health
• Multiple Sclerosis
• Diet & Nutrition
• Health Insurance
• Public Health
• Patient Rights
• Caregivers & Loved Ones
• End of Life Concerns
• Health News
• Thyroid Test Analyzer
• Doctor Discussion Guides
• Hemoglobin A1c Test Analyzer
• Lipid Test Analyzer
• Complete Blood Count (CBC) Analyzer
• What to Buy
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Medical Expert Board

Cyberbullying: Everything You Need to Know

• Cyberbullying
• How to Respond

Cyberbullying is the act of intentionally and consistently mistreating or harassing someone through the use of electronic devices or other forms of electronic communication (like social media platforms).

Because cyberbullying mainly affects children and adolescents, many brush it off as a part of growing up. However, cyberbullying can have dire mental and emotional consequences if left unaddressed.

This article discusses cyberbullying, its adverse effects, and what can be done about it.

FangXiaNuo / Getty Images

Cyberbullying Statistics and State Laws

The rise of digital communication methods has paved the way for a new type of bullying to form, one that takes place outside of the schoolyard. Cyberbullying follows kids home, making it much more difficult to ignore or cope.

Statistics 

As many as 15% of young people between 12 and 18 have been cyberbullied at some point. However, over 25% of children between 13 and 15 were cyberbullied in one year alone.

About 6.2% of people admitted that they’ve engaged in cyberbullying at some point in the last year. The age at which a person is most likely to cyberbully one of their peers is 13.

Those subject to online bullying are twice as likely to self-harm or attempt suicide . The percentage is much higher in young people who identify as LGBTQ, at 56%.

Cyberbullying by Sex and Sexual Orientation

Cyberbullying statistics differ among various groups, including:

• Girls and boys reported similar numbers when asked if they have been cyberbullied, at 23.7% and 21.9%, respectively.
• LGBTQ adolescents report cyberbullying at higher rates, at 31.7%. Up to 56% of young people who identify as LGBTQ have experienced cyberbullying.
• Transgender teens were the most likely to be cyberbullied, at a significantly high rate of 35.4%.

State Laws 

The laws surrounding cyberbullying vary from state to state. However, all 50 states have developed and implemented specific policies or laws to protect children from being cyberbullied in and out of the classroom.

The laws were put into place so that students who are being cyberbullied at school can have access to support systems, and those who are being cyberbullied at home have a way to report the incidents.

Legal policies or programs developed to help stop cyberbullying include:

• Bullying prevention programs
• Cyberbullying education courses for teachers
• Procedures designed to investigate instances of cyberbullying
• Support systems for children who have been subject to cyberbullying 

Are There Federal Laws Against Cyberbullying?

There are no federal laws or policies that protect people from cyberbullying. However, federal involvement may occur if the bullying overlaps with harassment. Federal law will get involved if the bullying concerns a person’s race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, disability, or religion.

Examples of Cyberbullying 

There are several types of bullying that can occur online, and they all look different.

Harassment can include comments, text messages, or threatening emails designed to make the cyberbullied person feel scared, embarrassed, or ashamed of themselves.

Other forms of harassment include:

• Using group chats as a way to gang up on one person
• Making derogatory comments about a person based on their race, gender, sexual orientation, economic status, or other characteristics
• Posting mean or untrue things on social media sites, such as Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram, as a way to publicly hurt the person experiencing the cyberbullying  

Impersonation

A person may try to pretend to be the person they are cyberbullying to attempt to embarrass, shame, or hurt them publicly. Some examples of this include:

• Hacking into someone’s online profile and changing any part of it, whether it be a photo or their "About Me" portion, to something that is either harmful or inappropriate
• Catfishing, which is when a person creates a fake persona to trick someone into a relationship with them as a joke or for their own personal gain
• Making a fake profile using the screen name of their target to post inappropriate or rude remarks on other people’s pages

Other Examples

Not all forms of cyberbullying are the same, and cyberbullies use other tactics to ensure that their target feels as bad as possible. Some tactics include:

• Taking nude or otherwise degrading photos of a person without their consent
• Sharing or posting nude pictures with a wide audience to embarrass the person they are cyberbullying
• Sharing personal information about a person on a public website that could cause them to feel unsafe
• Physically bullying someone in school and getting someone else to record it so that it can be watched and passed around later
• Circulating rumors about a person

How to Know When a Joke Turns Into Cyberbullying

People may often try to downplay cyberbullying by saying it was just a joke. However, any incident that continues to make a person feel shame, hurt, or blatantly disrespected is not a joke and should be addressed. People who engage in cyberbullying tactics know that they’ve crossed these boundaries, from being playful to being harmful.

Effects and Consequences of Cyberbullying 

Research shows many negative effects of cyberbullying, some of which can lead to severe mental health issues. Cyberbullied people are twice as likely to experience suicidal thoughts, actions, or behaviors and engage in self-harm as those who are not.

Other negative health consequences of cyberbullying are:

• Stomach pain and digestive issues
• Sleep disturbances
• Difficulties with academics
• Violent behaviors
• High levels of stress
• Inability to feel safe
• Feelings of loneliness and isolation
• Feelings of powerlessness and hopelessness

If You’ve Been Cyberbullied 

Being on the receiving end of cyberbullying is hard to cope with. It can feel like you have nowhere to turn and no escape. However, some things can be done to help overcome cyberbullying experiences.

Advice for Preteens and Teenagers

The best thing you can do if you’re being cyberbullied is tell an adult you trust. It may be challenging to start the conversation because you may feel ashamed or embarrassed. However, if it is not addressed, it can get worse.

Other ways you can cope with cyberbullying include:

• Walk away : Walking away online involves ignoring the bullies, stepping back from your computer or phone, and finding something you enjoy doing to distract yourself from the bullying.
• Don’t retaliate : You may want to defend yourself at the time. But engaging with the bullies can make matters worse.
• Keep evidence : Save all copies of the cyberbullying, whether it be posts, texts, or emails, and keep them if the bullying escalates and you need to report them.
• Report : Social media sites take harassment seriously, and reporting them to site administrators may block the bully from using the site.
• Block : You can block your bully from contacting you on social media platforms and through text messages.

In some cases, therapy may be a good option to help cope with the aftermath of cyberbullying.

Advice for Parents

As a parent, watching your child experience cyberbullying can be difficult. To help in the right ways, you can:

• Offer support and comfort : Listening to your child explain what's happening can be helpful. If you've experienced bullying as a child, sharing that experience may provide some perspective on how it can be overcome and that the feelings don't last forever.
• Make sure they know they are not at fault : Whatever the bully uses to target your child can make them feel like something is wrong with them. Offer praise to your child for speaking up and reassure them that it's not their fault.
• Contact the school : Schools have policies to protect children from bullying, but to help, you have to inform school officials.
• Keep records : Ask your child for all the records of the bullying and keep a copy for yourself. This evidence will be helpful to have if the bullying escalates and further action needs to be taken.
• Try to get them help : In many cases, cyberbullying can lead to mental stress and sometimes mental health disorders. Getting your child a therapist gives them a safe place to work through their experience.

In the Workplace 

Although cyberbullying more often affects children and adolescents, it can also happen to adults in the workplace. If you are dealing with cyberbullying at your workplace, you can:

• Let your bully know how what they said affected you and that you expect it to stop.
• Keep copies of any harassment that goes on in the workplace.
• Report your cyberbully to your human resources (HR) department.
• Report your cyberbully to law enforcement if you are being threatened.
• Close off all personal communication pathways with your cyberbully.
• Maintain a professional attitude at work regardless of what is being said or done.
• Seek out support through friends, family, or professional help.

Effective Action Against Cyberbullying

If cyberbullying continues, actions will have to be taken to get it to stop, such as:

• Talking to a school official : Talking to someone at school may be difficult, but once you do, you may be grateful that you have some support. Schools have policies to address cyberbullying.
• Confide in parents or trusted friends : Discuss your experience with your parents or others you trust. Having support on your side will make you feel less alone.
• Report it on social media : Social media sites have strict rules on the types of interactions and content sharing allowed. Report your aggressor to the site to get them banned and eliminate their ability to contact you.
• Block the bully : Phones, computers, and social media platforms contain options to block correspondence from others. Use these blocking tools to help free yourself from cyberbullying.

Help Is Available

If you or someone you know are having suicidal thoughts, dial  988  to contact the  988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline  and connect with a trained counselor. To find mental health resources in your area, contact the  Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) National Helpline  at  800-662-4357  for information.

Cyberbullying occurs over electronic communication methods like cell phones, computers, social media, and other online platforms. While anyone can be subject to cyberbullying, it is most likely to occur between the ages of 12 and 18.

Cyberbullying can be severe and lead to serious health issues, such as new or worsened mental health disorders, sleep issues, or thoughts of suicide or self-harm. There are laws to prevent cyberbullying, so it's essential to report it when it happens. Coping strategies include stepping away from electronics, blocking bullies, and getting.

Alhajji M, Bass S, Dai T. Cyberbullying, mental health, and violence in adolescents and associations with sex and race: data from the 2015 youth risk behavior survey . Glob Pediatr Health. 2019;6:2333794X19868887. doi:10.1177/2333794X19868887

Cyberbullying Research Center. Cyberbullying in 2021 by age, gender, sexual orientation, and race .

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: StopBullying.gov. Facts about bullying .

John A, Glendenning AC, Marchant A, et al. Self-harm, suicidal behaviours, and cyberbullying in children and young people: systematic review .  J Med Internet Res . 2018;20(4):e129. doi:10.2196/jmir.9044

Cyberbullying Research Center. Bullying, cyberbullying, and LGBTQ students .

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: StopBullying.gov. Laws, policies, and regulations .

Wolke D, Lee K, Guy A. Cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup? . Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;26(8):899-908. doi:10.1007/s00787-017-0954-6

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: StopBullying.gov. Cyberbullying tactics .

Garett R, Lord LR, Young SD. Associations between social media and cyberbullying: a review of the literature . mHealth . 2016;2:46-46. doi:10.21037/mhealth.2016.12.01

Nemours Teens Health. Cyberbullying .

Nixon CL. Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health . Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2014;5:143-58. doi:10.2147/AHMT.S36456

Nemours Kids Health. Cyberbullying (for parents) .

By Angelica Bottaro Bottaro has a Bachelor of Science in Psychology and an Advanced Diploma in Journalism. She is based in Canada.

Cyberbullying: What is it and how can you stop it?

Explore the latest psychological science about the impact of cyberbullying and what to do if you or your child is a victim

• Mental Health
• Social Media and Internet

Cyberbullying can happen anywhere with an internet connection. While traditional, in-person bullying is still more common , data from the Cyberbullying Research Center suggest about 1 in every 4 teens has experienced cyberbullying, and about 1 in 6 has been a perpetrator. About 1 in 5 tweens, or kids ages 9 to 12, has been involved in cyberbullying (PDF, 5.57MB) .

As technology advances, so do opportunities to connect with people—but unfettered access to others isn’t always a good thing, especially for youth. Research has long linked more screen time with lower psychological well-being , including higher rates of anxiety and depression. The risk of harm is higher when kids and teens are victimized by cyberbullying.

Here’s what you need to know about cyberbullying, and psychology’s role in stopping it.

What is cyberbullying?

Cyberbullying occurs when someone uses technology to demean, inflict harm, or cause pain to another person. It is “willful and repeated harm inflicted through the use of computers, cell phones, and other electronic devices.” Perpetrators bully victims in any online setting, including social media, video or computer games, discussion boards, or text messaging on mobile devices.

Virtual bullying can affect anyone, regardless of age. However, the term “cyberbullying” usually refers to online bullying among children and teenagers. It may involve name calling, threats, sharing private or embarrassing photos, or excluding others.

One bully can harass another person online or several bullies can gang up on an individual. While a stranger can incite cyberbullying, it more frequently occurs among kids or teens who know each other from school or other social settings. Research suggests bullying often happens both at school and online .

Online harassment between adults can involve different terms, depending on the relationship and context. For example, dating violence, sexual harassment, workplace harassment, and scamming—more common among adults—can all happen on the internet.

How can cyberbullying impact the mental health of myself or my child?

Any form of bullying can negatively affect the victim’s well-being, both at the time the bullying occurs and in the future. Psychological research suggests being victimized by a cyberbully increases stress and may result in anxiety and depression symptoms . Some studies find anxiety and depression increase the likelihood adolescents will become victims to cyberbullying .

Cyberbullying can also cause educational harm , affecting a student’s attendance or academic performance, especially when bullying occurs both online and in school or when a student has to face their online bully in the classroom. Kids and teens may rely on negative coping mechanisms, such as substance use, to deal with the stress of cyberbullying. In extreme cases, kids and teens may struggle with self-harm or suicidal ideation .

How can parents talk to their children about cyberbullying?

Parents play a crucial role in preventing cyberbullying and associated harms. Be aware of what your kids are doing online, whether you check your child’s device, talk to them about their online behaviors, or install a monitoring program. Set rules about who your child can friend or interact with on social media platforms. For example, tell your child if they wouldn’t invite someone to your house, then they shouldn’t give them access to their social media accounts. Parents should also familiarize themselves with signs of cyberbullying , such as increased device use, anger or anxiety after using a device, or hiding devices when others are nearby.

Communicating regularly about cyberbullying is an important component in preventing it from affecting your child’s well-being. Psychologists recommend talking to kids about how to be safe online before they have personal access to the internet. Familiarize your child with the concept of cyberbullying as soon as they can understand it. Develop a game plan to problem solve if it occurs. Cultivating open dialogue about cyberbullying can ensure kids can identify the experience and tell an adult, before it escalates into a more harmful situation.

It’s also important to teach kids what to do if someone else is being victimized. For example, encourage your child to tell a teacher or parent if someone they know is experiencing cyberbullying.

Keep in mind kids may be hesitant to open up about cyberbullying because they’re afraid they’ll lose access to their devices. Encourage your child to be open with you by reminding them they won’t get in trouble for talking to you about cyberbullying. Clearly explain your goal is to allow them to communicate with their friends safely online.

How can I report cyberbullying?

How you handle cyberbullying depends on a few factors, such as the type of bullying and your child’s age. You may choose to intervene by helping a younger child problem solve whereas teens may prefer to handle the bullying on their own with a caregiver’s support.

In general, it’s a good practice to take screenshots of the cyberbullying incidents as a record, but not to respond to bullies’ messages. Consider blocking cyberbullies to prevent future harassment.

Parents should contact the app or website directly about removing bullying-related posts, especially if they reveal private or embarrassing information. Some social media sites suspend perpetrators’ accounts.

If the bullying also occurs at school or on a school-owned device, or if the bullying is affecting a child’s school performance, it may be appropriate to speak with your child’s teacher or school personnel.

What are the legal ramifications of cyberbullying?

In some cases, parents should report cyberbullying to law enforcement. If cyberbullying includes threats to someone’s physical safety, consider contacting your local police department.

What’s illegal can vary from state to state. Any illegal behaviors, such as blackmailing someone to send money, hate crimes, stalking, or posting sexual photos of a minor, can have legal repercussions. If you’re not sure about what’s legal and what’s not, check your state’s laws and law enforcement .

Are big tech companies responsible for promoting positive digital spaces?

In an ideal world, tech companies would prioritize creating safer online environments for young people. Some companies are working toward it already, including partnering with psychologists to better understand how their products affect kids, and how to keep them safe. But going the extra mile isn’t always profitable for technology companies. For now, it’s up to individuals, families, and communities to protect kids’ and teens’ best interest online.

What does the research show about psychology’s role in reducing this issue?

Many studies show preventative measures can drastically reduce cyberbullying perpetration and victimization . Parents and caregivers, schools, and technology companies play a role in educating kids about media literacy and mental health. Psychologists—thanks to their expertise in child and teen development, communication, relationships, and mental health—can also make important contributions in preventing cyberbullying.

Because cybervictimization coincides with anxiety and depression, research suggests mental health clinicians and educators should consider interventions that both address adolescents’ online experiences and support their mental, social, and emotional well-being. Psychologists can also help parents speak to their kids about cyberbullying, along with supporting families affected by it.

You can learn more about cyberbullying at these websites:

• Cyberbullying Research Center
• StopBullying.gov
• Nemours Kids Health

Acknowledgments

APA gratefully acknowledges the following contributors to this publication:

• Sarah Domoff, PhD, associate professor of psychology at Central Michigan University
• Dorothy Espelage, PhD, William C. Friday Distinguished Professor of Education at the University of North Carolina
• Stephanie Fredrick, PhD, NCSP, assistant professor and associate director of the Dr. Jean M. Alberti Center for the Prevention of Bullying Abuse and School Violence at the University at Buffalo, State University of New York
• Brian TaeHyuk Keum, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Social Welfare at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs
• Mitchell J. Prinstein, PhD, chief science officer at APA
• Susan Swearer, PhD, Willa Cather Professor of School Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; licensed psychologist

Recommended Reading

You may also like

Essay on Cyberbullying

Students are often asked to write an essay on Cyberbullying in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Cyberbullying

What is cyberbullying.

Cyberbullying is when someone uses the internet, cell phones, or other devices to send or post text or images intended to hurt or embarrass another person. It can happen through a message, email, or on social media sites.

Forms of Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying can take many forms. It can be public or private. Some examples are mean text messages, rumors sent by email or posted on social networking sites, and embarrassing pictures or videos.

Effects of Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying can make a person feel sad, lonely, or scared. They may want to avoid school or social events. In severe cases, it might lead to depression or even suicide.

Preventing Cyberbullying

To prevent cyberbullying, don’t share private information online, and think before you post. Always treat others with respect. If you’re a victim, don’t respond or retaliate. Instead, save the evidence and report it.

Role of Schools and Parents

250 words essay on cyberbullying.

Cyberbullying is when someone uses the internet to hurt, embarrass, or scare another person. It can happen on social media, in online games, or in messages. The person doing the bullying might send mean messages, share personal information, or post embarrassing photos.

Cyberbullying can make a person feel sad, scared, or alone. They might not want to go to school or spend time with friends. It can also affect their grades and their health. Some people might even think about hurting themselves because of cyberbullying.

How to Deal with Cyberbullying

If you are being bullied online, tell a trusted adult. This could be a parent, teacher, or school counselor. You can also report the bullying to the website or app where it happened. Most websites and apps have rules against bullying and can take action.

To help stop cyberbullying, be kind online. Think before you post or send a message. Ask yourself, “Would I want someone to say this to me?” If the answer is no, don’t post it. Also, stand up for others. If you see someone being bullied online, report it.

Remember, everyone deserves to feel safe and respected, both in person and online. By understanding and taking action against cyberbullying, we can make the internet a better place for everyone.

500 Words Essay on Cyberbullying

How cyberbullying happens.

Cyberbullying can happen in many ways. It can take place through social media sites, chat rooms, text messages, and emails. Sometimes, it can be public, like a mean comment on a social media post. Other times, it can be private, like a threatening text message. Cyberbullies can even create fake accounts to harass someone without revealing their identity.

Cyberbullying can hurt people deeply. It can make them feel scared, sad, or angry. It can also make them feel alone, like no one understands what they’re going through. Some people may even feel unsafe or worry about their reputation. In severe cases, cyberbullying can lead to mental health problems like depression and anxiety, or even self-harm.

What to Do If You’re Cyberbullied

If you’re being cyberbullied, remember it’s not your fault. Don’t respond to the bully, as it could make things worse. Instead, save the evidence and report it. You can report it to the website or app where it happened, or to an adult you trust. If the bullying is threatening or severe, you may even need to report it to the police.

Cyberbullying is a serious problem that can hurt people both emotionally and mentally. But by being respectful online, protecting our personal information, and knowing how to respond if we’re bullied, we can help stop cyberbullying. Remember, everyone deserves to feel safe and respected, both in person and online.

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Workplace bullying and harassment in higher education institutions: a scoping review.

1. Introduction

Workplace bullying and harassment in higher education institutions (heis), 2.1. research questions, 2.2. identification of relevant studies, 2.3. study selection, 2.4. data charting.

• Studies that are primarily descriptive, viz., descriptive reporting of levels of exposure with demographic or other (e.g., section or staff group) breakdown. The context is a workplace ( n = 29).
• Studies that are exploratory, i.e., aiming to advance the understanding of bullying and harassment through moderators, mediators, and/or processes and organisational nuances. The context is the workplace as a complex organisation ( n = 64).
• The focus on is on the particularities of the HE environment (beyond the brief mention of high levels of bullying/the topic being understudied, etc.), including power differentials in the context of gender inequity or students, and/or (b) the challenges inherent in the changing context of HE. Category three does not preclude category two. The categorisation is on the basis of the inclusion of contextual discussion within the paper ( n = 47).

3.1. Collation and Summary of Data

3.2. the impact of neoliberalism, 3.2.1. neoliberalism compounds existing contextual factors, 3.2.2. precarity and job insecurity, 3.3. complex and malevolent gendered power dynamics, 4. discussion, 5. conclusions and future directions, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Nielsen, M.; Einarsen, S. What we know, what we do not know, and what we should and could have known about workplace bullying: An overview of the literature and agenda for future research. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2018 , 42 , 71–83. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hodgins, M.; Mannix McNamara, P. Bullying and incivility in higher education workplaces: Micropolitics and the abuse of power. Qual. Res. Organ. Manag. Int. J. 2017 , 12 , 190–206. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Einarsen, S. The nature and causes of bullying at work. Int. J. Manpow. 1999 , 20 , 16–27. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fevre, R.; Lewis, D.; Robinson, A.; Jones, T. Insight into Ill-Treatment in the Workplace: Patterns, Causes and Solutions ; Cardiff School of Social Sciences: Cardiff, UK, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pearson, C.; Porath, C. On the nature, consequences and remedies of workplace incivility: No time for “nice”? Think again. Acad. Manag. Exec. 2005 , 19 , 7–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schilpzand, P.; De Pater, I.E.; Erez, A. Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. J. Organ. Behav. 2016 , 37 , 57–88. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Einarsen, S.V.; Hoel, H.; Zapf, D.; Cooper, C.L. The Concept of Bullying and Harassment at Work: The European Tradition. In Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace Theory, Research and Practice ; Einarsen, S.V., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., Cooper, C.L., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 2020; pp. 3–53. [ Google Scholar ]
• Muller-Heyndyk, R. Quarter of BAME Staff Bullied or Harassed at Work. HR. 2019. Available online: https://pearnkandola.com/press/quarter-of-bame-staff-bullied-or-harassed-at-work/ (accessed on 29 May 2024).
• Nielsen, M.B.; Bjorkelo, B.; Notelaers, G.; Einarsen, S. Sexual Harassment: Prevalence, Outcomes, and Gender Differences Assessed by Three Different Estimation Methods. J. Aggress. Maltreatment Trauma 2010 , 19 , 252–274. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hoel, H.; Lewis, D.; Einarsdottir, A. The Ups and Downs of LGBs’ Workplace Experiences: Discrimination, Bullying and Harassment of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Employees in Britain ; Manchester University Business School: Manchester, UK, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zapf, D.; Einarsen, S. Bullying in the workplace: Recent Trends in research and practice. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2001 , 10 , 369–373. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rosander, M.; Nielsen, M.; Blomberg, S. The last resort: Workplace bullying and the consequences of changing jobs. Health Work Psychol. 2022 , 63 , 124–135. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cortina, L.; Areguin, M.A. Putting People Down and Pushing Them Out: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2021 , 8 , 285–309. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mikkelsen, E.G.; Hansen, A.M.; Persson, R.; Byrgesen, M.F.; Hogh, A. Individual Consequences of Being Exposed to Workplace Bullying. In Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace Theory, Research and Practice ; Einarsen, S.V., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., Cooper, C.L., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 2020; pp. 163–208. [ Google Scholar ]
• Richman, J.A.; Rospenda, K.M.; Nawyn, S.J.; Flaherty, J.A.; Fendrich, M.; Drum, M.L.; Johnson, T.P. Sexual Harassment and Generalized Workplace Abuse Among University Employees:Prevalence and Mental Health Correlates. Am. J. Public Health 1999 , 89 , 358–363. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McDonald, P. Workplace Sexual Harassment 30 Years on: A Review of the Literature. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2012 , 14 , 1–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cortina, L.M.; Berdahl, J.L. Sexual harassment in organizations: A decade of research in review. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior: Vol. I. Micro Approaches ; Cooper, C.L., Ed.; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008; pp. 469–497. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lewis, M. Nurse bullying: Organizational considerations in the maintenance and perpetration of health care bullying cultures. J. Nurs. Manag. 2006 , 14 , 52–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lewis, M. Will the real bully please stand up. Occup. Health 2004 , 56 , 22–28. [ Google Scholar ]
• O’Moore, M.; Seigne, E.; McGuire, L.; Smith, M. Victims of workplace bullying in Ireland. Ir. J. Psychol. 1998 , 19 , 345–357. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hodgins, M.; McNamara, P.M. An Enlightened Environment? Workplace Bullying and Incivility in Irish Higher Education. SAGE Open 2019 , 9 , 1–13. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• D’Cruz, P.; Noronha, E. Clarifying My World: Identity Work in the Context of Workplace Bullying. Qual. Rep. 2012 , 17 , 16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hogh, A.; Mikklesen, E.G.; Hansen, A.M. Individual consequences of workplace bullying/mobbing. In Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace ; Einarsen, S.H.H., Zapf, D., Cooper, C., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• De Vos, J.; Kirsten, G.J.C. The nature of workplace bullying experienced by teachers and the biopsychosocial health effects. S. Afr. J. Educ. 2015 , 35 , 1–9. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hoel, H.; Faragher, B.; Cooper, C.L. Bullying is detrimental to health, but all bullying behaviours are not necessarily equally damaging. Br. J. Guid. Couns. 2004 , 32 , 367–387. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hurley, J.; Hutchinson, M.; Jackson, D.; Bradbury, J.; Browne, G. Nexus between preventive policy inadequacies, workplace bullying, and mental health: Qualitativefindings from the experiences of Australian public sector employees. Ment. Health Nurs. 2016 , 25 , 12–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lewis, D. Bullying at work: The impact of shame among university and college lecturers. Br. J. Guid. Couns. 2004 , 32 , 281–299. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hallberg, L.R.M.; Strandmark, M.K. Health consequences of workplace bullying: Experiences from the perspective of employees in the public service sector. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-Being 2006 , 1 , 109–119. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Naezer, M.; Benschop, Y.; van den Brink, M.C.L. Harassment in Dutch Academics. Exploring Manifestations, Facilitataing Factors, Effects and Solutions ; Landelijk Netwerk Vrouwelijke Hoogleraren: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zapf, D.; Escartin, J.; Einarsen, S.; Hoel, H.; Vartia, M. Empirical Findings on Prevalance and Risk Groups of Bullying in the Workplace. In Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace ; Einarsen, S.V., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., Cooper, C.L., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zapf, D.; Escartin, J.; Scheppa-Lahyani, M.; Einarsen, S.V.; Hoel, H.; Vaartia, M. Empirical Findings on Prevalence and Risk Groups of Bullying in the Workplace. In Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace , 3rd ed.; Einarsen, S.V., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., Cooper, C.L., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Reknes, I.; Einarsen, S.; Gejerstad, J.; Nielsen, M. Dispositional affect as a moderator in the relationship between role conflict and exposure to bullying behaviors. Front. Psychol. 2019 , 10 , 44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Van den Brande, W.; Baillien, E.; De Witte, H.; Vander Elst, T.; Godderis, L. The role of work stressors, coping strategies and coping resources in the process of workplace bullying: A systematic review and development of a comprehensive model. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2016 , 29 , 61–71. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hauge, L.J.; Skogstad, A.; Einarsen, S. Individual and situational predictors of workplace bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others? Work Stress 2009 , 23 , 349–358. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• O’Connell, P.J.; Calvert, E.; Watson, D. Bullying in the Workplace: Survey Reports ; Economic and Social Research Institute: Dublin, Ireland, 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hodgins, M.; Lewis, D.; MacCurtain, S.; Mannix McNamara, P.; Pursell, L.; Hogan, V. ‘…a bit of a Joke’: Policy and workplace bullying. SAGE Open 2020 , 10 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lewis, S. Restructuring workplace cultures: The ultimate work-familiy challenge? Gend. Manag. Int. J. 2010 , 25 , 355–365. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stevens, S. Nursing Workforce Retention: Challenging a Bullying Culture. Health Aff. 2002 , 21 , 189–193. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vijfeijken, T. “Culture Is What You See When Compliance Is Not in the Room”: Organizational Culture as an Explanatory Factor in Analyzing Recent INGO Scandals. Nonprofit Policy Forum 2019 , 10 , 20190031. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leymann, H. The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 1996 , 5 , 165–184. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Salin, D. Ways of Explaining Workplace Bullying: A Review of Enabling, Motivating and Precipitating Structures and Processes in the Work Environment. Hum. Relat. 2003 , 56 , 1213–1232. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liefooghe, A.P.D.; MacDavey, K. Accounts of Workplace Bullying: The Role of the Organisation. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2010 , 10 , 375–392. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hodgins, M.; MacCurtain, S.; Mannix McNamara, P. Power and inaction: Why organizations fail to address workplace bullying. Int. J. Workplace Health Manag. 2020 , 13 , 265–290. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• D’Cruz, P.; Noronha, E. Experiencing depersonalised bullying: A study of Indian call-centre agents. Work. Organ. Labour Glob. 2009 , 3 , 26–46. [ Google Scholar ]
• Branch, S.; Shallcross, L.; Barker, M.; Ramsay, S.; Murray, J.P. Theoretical Frameworks That Have Explained Workplace Bullying: Retracing Contributions Across the Decades. In Concepts Approachs and Methods ; D’Cruz, P., Noronha, E., Notelaers, G., Rayner, C., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; Volume 1, pp. 87–130. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lim, S.; Cortina, L.M.; Magley, V.J. Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 2008 , 93 , 95–107. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Giga, S.I.; Hoel, H.; Lewis, D. The Costs of Workplace Bullying ; Universities of Bradford: Manchester, UK, 2008. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hoel, H.; Sparks, K.; Cooper, C.L. The Cost of Violence/Stress at Work and the Benefits of a Violence/Stress-Free Working Environment ; International Labour Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cullinan, J.; Hodgins, M.; Hogan, V.; Pursell, L. The value of lost productivity from workplace bullying in Ireland. Occup. Med. 2020 , 70 , 251–258. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Thirlwall, A. Organisational sequestering of workplace bullying: Adding insult to injury. J. Manag. Organ. 2015 , 21 , 145–158. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Woodrow, C.; Guest, D.E. When good HR gets bad results: Exploring the challenge of HR implementation in the case of workplace bullying. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2013 , 24 , 38–56. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hodgins, M.; Pursell, L.; Hogan, V.; MacCurtain, S.; Mannix-McNamara, P. Irish Workplace Behaviour Study ; Institute of Occupational Safety Health: Wigston, UK, 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• D’Cruz, P.; Norohna, E.; Mendonca, A.; Bhatt, R. Engaging with the East: Showcasing workplace bullying in Asia. In Asian Perspectives on Workplace Bullying and Harassment ; D’Cruz, P., Norohna, E., Mendonca, A., Bhatt, R., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–20. [ Google Scholar ]
• Keashly, L.; Neuman, J.H. Faculty Experiences with Bullying in Higher Education. Adm. Theory Prax. (ME Sharpe) 2010 , 32 , 48–70. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Raskauskas, J. Bullying in Academia: An Examination of Workplace Bullying in New Zealand Universities ; American Education Research Association: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2006. [ Google Scholar ]
• Conco, D.N.; Baldwin-Ragaven, L.; Christofides, N.J.; Libhaber, E.; Rispel, L.C.; White, J.A.; Kramer, B. Experiences of workplace bullying among academics in a health sciences faculty at a South African university. S. Afr. Med. J. 2021 , 111 , 315–320. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McKay, R.; Arnold, D.H.; Fratzl, J.; Thomas, R. Workplace Bullying in Academia: A Canadian Study. Empl. Rights Responsib. J. 2008 , 20 , 77–100. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thomas, M. Bullying among support staff in a higher education instituion. Health Educ. 2004 , 105 , 273287. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bondestam, F.; Lundqvist, M. Sexual harassment in higher education—A systematic review. Eur. J. High. Educ. 2020 , 10 , 397–419. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Task Force on the Prevention of Workplace Bullying ; Economic and Social Research Institute: Dublin, Ireland, 2001.
• Baillien, E.; Griep, Y.; Vander Elst, T.; De Witte, H. The relationship between organisational change and being a perpetrator of workplace bullying: A three-wave longitudinal study. Work Stress 2018 , 33 , 211–230. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mercelle, J.; Murphy, E. The Neoliberalisation of Irish Higher Education under Austerity. Crit. Sociol. 2017 , 43 , 371–387. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Smyth, J. The Toxic University. Zombie Leadership. Academic Rock Stars, and Neoliberal Ideology ; Palgrave: London, UK, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ivancheva, M.; Lynch, K.; Keating, K. Precarity, gender and care in the neoliberal academy. Gend. Work. Organ. 2019 , 26 , 448–462. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lynch, K.; Ivancheva, M. Academic freedom and the commercialisation of universities: A critical ethical analysis. Ethics Sci. Environ. Politics 2015 , 15 , 6–21. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• O’Connor, P. Why is it so difficult to reduce gender inequality in male-dominated higher educational organizations? A feminist institutional perspective. Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 2020 , 45 , 207–228. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Carson, L.; Batrtneck, C.; Voges, K. Over-Competitiveness in Academia: A Literature Review. Disruptive Sci. Technol. 2013 , 1 , 183–190. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Binswanger, M. Excellence by Nonesense: The Competition for Publications in Modern Science. Open. Sci. 2014 , 8 , 49–72. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zapf, D.; Vaartia, M. Prevention and treatment of workplace bullying: An overview. In Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace Theory Research and Practice ; Einarsen, S.V., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., Cooper, C.L., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Keashly, L.; Neuman, J. Bullying in Higher Education: What Current Research, Theorizing and Practice tell us. In Wotrkplace Bullying in Higher Education ; Lester, J., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Henning, M.A.; Zhou, C.; Adams, P.; Moir, F.; Hobson, J.; Hallett, C.; Webster, C.S. Workplace harassment among staff in higher education: A systematic review. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2017 , 18 , 521–539. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Goh, H.S.; Hosier, S.; Zhang, H. Prevalence, Antecedents, and Consequences of Workplace Bullying among Nurses—A Summary of Reviews. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022 , 19 , 8256. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Colaprico, C.; Addari, S.; La Torre, G. The effects of bullying on healthcare workers: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Riv. Psichiatr. 2023 , 58 , 41–49. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Arksey, H.; O’Malley, L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. Theory Pract. 2005 , 8 , 19–32. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aromatrais, E.; Munn, Z. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual ; The Joanna Briggs Institute: Adelaide, Australia, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. TPRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMAScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Internal Med. 2018 , 169 , 467–473. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Berlingieri, A. Workplace bullying: Exploring an emerging framework. Work Employ. Soc. 2015 , 29 , 342–353. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hodgins, M.; MacCurtain, S.; Mannix-McNamara, P. Workplace Bullying and Incivility: A systematic review of interventions. Int. J. Workplace Health Manag. 2014 , 7 , 54–72. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nielsen, M.; Indregard, A.-M.; Overland, S. Workplace bullying and sickness absence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the research literature. Scandanavian J. Work Environ. Health 2016 , 42 , 359–370. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Feijó, F.R.; Gräf, D.D.; Pearce, N.; Fassa, A.G. Risk factors for workplace bullying: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019 , 16 , 1945. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gillen, P.A.S.M.; Kernohan, W.G.; Begley, C.M.; Luyben, A.G. Interventions for Prevention of Bullying in the Workplace. Cochrane. DB Syst. Rev. 2017 , 1 , CD009778. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rose, A.M. Theory and Method on the Social Sciences ; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1954. [ Google Scholar ]
• Meriläinen, M.; Sinkkonen, H.; Puhakka, H.; Käyhkö, K. Bullying and inappropriate behaviour among faculty personnel. Policy Futures Educ. 2016 , 14 , 617–634. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lee, D. Students and managers behaving badly: An exploratory analysis of the vulnerability of feminist academics in anti-feminist, market-driven UK higher education. Women’s Stud. Int. Forum 2005 , 28 , 195–208. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zawadzki, M.; Jensen, T. Bullying and the neoliberal university: A co-authored autoethnography. Manag. Learn. 2020 , 51 , 398–413. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zabrodska, K.; Linnell, S.; Laws, C.; Davies, B. Bullying as intra-active process in neoliberal universities. Qual. Inq. 2011 , 17 , 709–719. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• O’Connor, P.; Hodgins, M.; Woods, D.R.; Wallwaey, E.; Palmen, R.; Van Den Brink, M.; Schmidt, E.K. Organisational Characteristics That Facilitate Gender-Based Violence and Harassment in Higher Education? Adm. Sci. 2021 , 11 , 138. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Erdemir, B.; Demir, C.E.; Yıldırım Öcal, J.; Kondakçı, Y. Academic Mobbing in Relation to Leadership Practices: A New Perspective on an Old Issue. Educ. Forum 2020 , 84 , 126–139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Miner, K.N.; Smittick, A.L.; He, Y.; Costa, P.L. Organizations Behaving Badly: Antecedents and Consequences of Uncivil Workplace Environments. J. Psychol. Interdiscip. Appl. 2019 , 153 , 528–554. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Berquist, R.; St-Pierre, I.; Holmes, D. Uncaring Nurses: An Exploration of Faculty-to-Faculty Violence in Nursing Academia. Int. J. Hum. Caring 2017 , 21 , 112. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lemon, K.; Barnes, K. Workplace Bullying Among Higher Education Faculty: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature. J. High. Educ. Theory Pract. 2021 , 21 , 203–216. [ Google Scholar ]
• Goodboy, A.K.; Martin, M.M.; Mills, C.B.; Clark-Gorden, C.V. Workplace Bullying in Academia: A Conditional Process Model. Manag. Commun. Q. 2022 , 36 , 664–687. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fahie, D. The lived experience of toxic leadership in Irish higher education. Int. J. Workplace Health Manag. 2020 , 13 , 341–355. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meriläinen, M.; Käyhkö, K.; Kõiv, K.; Sinkkonen, H.M. Academic bullying among faculty personnel in Estonia and Finland. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 2019 , 41 , 241–261. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cortina, L.M.; Cortina, M.G.; Cortina, J.M. Regulating rude: Tensions between free speech and civility in academic employment. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 2019 , 12 , 357–375. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sedivy-Benton, A.; Stroheschen, G.; Cavazos, N.; Boden-McGill, C. Good Ol’ Boys, Mean Girls and Tyrants. A Phenomenological Study of the Lived Experiences and Survival Strategies of Bullied Women Adult Educators. Adult Learn. 2014 , 26 , 35–42. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Phipps, A. Reckoning up: Sexual harassment and violence in the neoliberal university. Gend. Educ. 2020 , 32 , 227–243. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hodgins, M.; Mannix McNamara, P. The Neoliberal university in Ireland: Institutional bullying by another name? Societies 2021 , 11 , 52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Carr, C.T. Spotlight on ethics: Institutional review boards as systemic bullies. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 2015 , 37 , 14–29. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Coy, M.; Bull, A.; Libarkin, J.; Page, T. Who is the Practitioner in Faculty-Staff Sexual Misconduct Work?: Views from the UK and US. J. Interpers. Violence 2022 , 37 , NP14996–NP15019. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Simpson, R.; Cohen, C. Dangerous Work: The Gendered Nature of Bullying in the Context of Higher Education. Gend. Work Organ. 2004 , 11 , 163–186. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Qiu, G.; Cheng, H. Gender and power in the ivory tower: Sexual harassment in graduate supervision in China. J. Gend. Stud. 2023 , 32 , 600–615. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eller, A. Transactional sex and sexual harassment between professors and students at an urban university in Benin. Cult. Health Sex. 2016 , 18 , 742–755. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Guizardi, M.; Gonzálvez, H.; Stefoni, C. The Shoemaker and Her Barefooted Daughter: Power Relations and Gender Violence in University Contexts. Front. J. Women Stud. 2022 , 43 , 32–67. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hollis, L.P. In the Room, but no Seat at the Table: Mixed Methods Analysis of HBCU Women Faculty and Workplace Bullying. J. Educ. 2024 , 204 , 92–106. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lombardo, E.; Bustelo, M. Sexual and sexist harassment in Spanish universities: Policy implementation and resistances against gender equality measures. J. Gend. Stud. 2022 , 31 , 8–22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bhatti, A.; Ali, R. Negotiating Sexual Harassment: Experiences of Women Academic Leaders in Pakistan. J. Int. Women’s Stud. 2022 , 23 , 263–279. [ Google Scholar ]
• D’Cruz, P.; Noronoha, E. Mapping “Varieties of Workplace Bullying”: The Scope of the Field. In Concepts, Approaches and Methods ; Handbooks of Workplace Bullying Emotional Abuse and Harassment Vol. 1; D’Cruz, P., Noronha, E., Notelaers, G., Rayner, C., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• D’Cruz, P. India: A paradoxical context for workplace bullying. In Workplace Abuse, Incivility and Bullying: Methodological and Cultural Perspectives ; Omari, M., Paull, M., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2016; pp. 55–70. [ Google Scholar ]
• McMahon, J.; O’Sullivan, M.; MacCurtain, S.; Murphy, C.; Ryan, L. “It’s not us, it’s you”: Extending Managerial Control through Coercion and Internalisation in the Context of Workplace Bullying amongst Nurses in Ireland. Societies 2021 , 11 , 55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Poland, B.; Krupa, G.; McCall, D. Settings for Health Promotion: An analytic Framework to Guide Intervention Design and Implementation. Health Promot. Pract. 2009 , 10 , 505–516. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sims, M. Bullshit Towers ; Lang: Oxford, UK, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Desierto, A.; de Maio, C. The impact of neoliberalism on academics and students in higher education: A call to adopt alternative philosophies. J. Acad. Lang. Learn. 2020 , 14 , 148–159. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fleming, P. Dark Academia. How Universities Die ; Pluto Press: London, UK, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Agócs, C. Institutionalized Resistance to Organizational Change: Denial, Inaction and Repression. J. Bus. Ethics 1997 , 16 , 917–931. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eylon, D. Understanding empowerment and resolving its paradox: Lessons from Mary Parker Follett. J. Manag. Hist. 1998 , 4 , 16–28. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fevre, R.; Lewis, D.; Robinson, A.; Jones, T. Trouble at Work ; Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Hodgins, M.; Kane, R.; Itzkovich, Y.; Fahie, D. Workplace Bullying and Harassment in Higher Education Institutions: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024 , 21 , 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091173

Hodgins M, Kane R, Itzkovich Y, Fahie D. Workplace Bullying and Harassment in Higher Education Institutions: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 2024; 21(9):1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091173

Hodgins, Margaret, Rhona Kane, Yariv Itzkovich, and Declan Fahie. 2024. "Workplace Bullying and Harassment in Higher Education Institutions: A Scoping Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 9: 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091173

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Jay Stansfield’s sensational homecoming doesn't hide another Birmingham City gaffe

Birmingham City defeated Wigan Athletic 2-1 thanks to goals from Alfie May and Scott Wright as Blues continued their bright start to the season

• 08:00, 1 SEP 2024
• Updated 10:39, 1 SEP 2024

Never miss breaking news by signing up to our free email updates

We have more newsletters

Scott Wright announced himself to his new public by ramming home a debut goal to give Birmingham City their first home win under new manager Chris Davies.

The 27-year-old, a deadline day signing from Rangers, produced an emphatic finish to seal a 2-1 victory that had at times been very much up for debate.

Blues went in front through the clinical Alfie May, were pegged back by Thelo Aasgaard – more of which later – before Wright crashed home the winner.

The result lifts Blues to third in the embryonic table, not that it means much at this stage, other than the fact their results have been where they need to be if Championship status is to be regained at the first time of asking. They have now won three of their first four games and are level with Stockport and Wrexham on ten points.

But at this stage of the season it’s as much about performances as results – and here’s what stood out on an enjoyable afternoon at St Andrew’s.

READ MORE: Chris Davies issues concerning Ethan Laird fitness update as injuries start to bite Birmingham City

READ MORE: Chris Davies drops Jay Stansfield debut hint after deadline day transfer blockbuster

Avoidable mistake

Let’s not lose sight of the main thing, Saturday was another good day for Birmingham City. Tony Mowbray returned to the ground for the first time since being forced to take a leave of absence, nothing is more important than someone’s health.

Blues paraded huge-money signing Jay Stansfield before kick-off and more than 27,000 watched Chris Davies' side secure a win with an injury time goal from a deadline days signing in front of the Tilton. Saturdays don’t get much better than that.

But that’s not to say the afternoon couldn’t have been even better. Blues started fast in the first minute, got sucked into a bit of to and fro, then hit their stride after May gave them the lead.

However, they were flat for 25 minutes of the second half, Shaun Maloney’s half-time decision to change Dion Rankine from the left to the right wing and replace James Carragher with Steven Sessegnon paid real dividends and the visitors created several chances.

They deserved to equalise but perhaps not in the manner they did as Bailey Peacock-Farrell allowed a pretty tame effort from Aasgaard to slither through his grasp. It was the second time in two games the goalkeeper had gifted a goal to the opposition.

Chris Davies excused the first one, away to Leyton Orient when he was caught in possession trying to acquiesce with his manager’s demands and play out from the back. He insisted he’d never criticise a player for trying to do the ‘right thing’.

However, this was just a plain gaffe and – as we’ve said let’s not lose sight of the main thing – which for a goalkeeper is keeping the ball out of the net. Peacock-Farrell can't afford many of these Blues won’t always be able to manufacture a late winner and Davies does have a very, very credible Plan B with Ryan Allsop sitting on the bench.

Sky has slashed the price of its Sky Sports, Sky Stream, Sky TV and Netflix bundle in an unbeatable new deal that saves £216 and includes 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more.

With Ultra HD included at no extra cost, football fans can enjoy the 2024/25 season with crystal clear picture quality.

Back for good

The feeling going into the game was one of excitement. Blues played their deadline day to perfection, indeed their entire transfer window looks on first impressions to have been very, very successful. Amazing how much more straightforward it is when you’ve got engaged owners willing to spend money.

Never was that more evident than at 11pm on Friday night when the rumours came to fruition and Blues confirmed Jay Stansfield had returned to the club permanently, on a seven-year contact no less. How much did he cost? Honestly I don’t know.

Fulham seemed to have been briefing that they’d got £15million plus £5m in add-ons and a 20 per cent sell-on. Those figures have been denied in conversations at this end – but those conversations never conclude in a different figure, nor indeed any figure at all. Blues stance seems to be: ‘That’s wrong but we’re not telling you what’s right’.

Anyway, the maxim says you should never fall in love with a loan player, unless of course they fall in love with you too and Stansfield seems to have done just that. Davies suggested afterwards he had the pick of the Championship but it was his relationship with the club and their supporters that meant it was effectively a one-horse race.

The 21-year-old was introduced to the crowd to a fanfare of ‘Stanno’ and flame-throwers as St Andrew’s rose in appreciation. Blues have a quartet of strikers that would be the envy of most Championship teams. May is so much more than an arch-poacher, Lyndon Dykes more than a target man, Lukas Jutkiewicz is probably does what it says on the tin but Stansfield offers real tactical flexibility.

It’s easy to see him coming off the left of a 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3, running behind, going round the back or even being deployed as a No. 10. The options are as mind-boggling as the fee, whatever that was.

Bench bounce

This was the third time in four League One matches that Blues substitutes have provided either a goal or an assist and with each occasion Davies’ assertion that players are either starters or finishers, rather than first XI and subs, looks more than mere sugar-coating.

Indeed the manager reiterated afterwards that Blues are designed to be strong late in games, the starters tenderising the opposition by making them cover huge distances before fatigue sets in and fresh replacements come on to exploit the space that has emerged.

Davies effectively doubled down on that claiming that Wigan were not unlucky to be reduced to ten men when they ran out of substitutes and couldn’t replace the injured Steven Sessegnon, but that they had been played into that position by Blues.

Sometimes though it’s just a good old tactical switch that pays dividends and that was certainly how it felt here. May wasn’t having too much joy dropping off to link play that would eventually find him in the box. By contrast Dykes gave the team a focal point, someone to tie up the Wigan centre backs and stop them shadowing May wherever he went. Dykes was only on the pitch for 17 minutes plus added time and he still won more headers than everyone bar Krystian Bielik. It was his presence that created confusion and the string of corners with which Blues eventually won the game.

Similarly Marc Leonard, who was superb in midweek against Fulham, came on after an hour and started to dictate proceedings. Remarkably he made 38 passes and completed every single one of them. Taylor Gardner-Hickman made 39 in twice as long with a completion ratio of 80 per cent.

That’s not to say Leonard should start ahead of TGH in every game, more than the more physically powerful TGH is better suited to certain situations and the neat orchestrator Leonard others.

Oh, then there’s Japan international Tomoki Iwata to throw into the equation.

What is Blues' best XI? Have your say here

• Tony Mowbray
• Birmingham City FC
• Wigan Athletic FC
• Chris Davies (football coach)
• Jay Stansfield
• Bailey Peacock-Farrell
• Most Recent