11+ Psychology Experiment Ideas (Goals + Methods)

practical psychology logo

Have you ever wondered why some days you remember things easily, while on others you keep forgetting? Or why certain songs make you super happy and others just…meh?

Our minds are like big, mysterious puzzles, and every day we're finding new pieces to fit. One of the coolest ways to explore our brains and the way they work is through psychology experiments.

A psychology experiment is a special kind of test or activity researchers use to learn more about how our minds work and why we behave the way we do.

It's like a detective game where scientists ask questions and try out different clues to find answers about our feelings, thoughts, and actions. These experiments aren't just for scientists in white coats but can be fun activities we all try to discover more about ourselves and others.

Some of these experiments have become so famous, they’re like the celebrities of the science world! Like the Marshmallow Test, where kids had to wait to eat a yummy marshmallow, or Pavlov's Dogs, where dogs learned to drool just hearing a bell.

Let's look at a few examples of psychology experiments you can do at home.

What Are Some Classic Experiments?

Imagine a time when the mysteries of the mind were being uncovered in groundbreaking ways. During these moments, a few experiments became legendary, capturing the world's attention with their intriguing results.

testing tubes

The Marshmallow Test

One of the most talked-about experiments of the 20th century was the Marshmallow Test , conducted by Walter Mischel in the late 1960s at Stanford University.

The goal was simple but profound: to understand a child's ability to delay gratification and exercise self-control.

Children were placed in a room with a marshmallow and given a choice: eat the marshmallow now or wait 15 minutes and receive two as a reward. Many kids struggled with the wait, some devouring the treat immediately, while others demonstrated remarkable patience.

But the experiment didn’t end there. Years later, Mischel discovered something astonishing. The children who had waited for the second marshmallow were generally more successful in several areas of life, from school achievements to job satisfaction!

While this experiment highlighted the importance of teaching patience and self-control from a young age, it wasn't without its criticisms. Some argued that a child's background, upbringing, or immediate surroundings might play a significant role in their choices.

Moreover, there were concerns about the ethics of judging a child's potential success based on a brief interaction with a marshmallow.

Pavlov's Dogs

Traveling further back in time and over to Russia, another classic experiment took the world by storm. Ivan Pavlov , in the early 1900s, wasn't initially studying learning or behavior. He was exploring the digestive systems of dogs.

But during his research, Pavlov stumbled upon a fascinating discovery. He noticed that by ringing a bell every time he fed his dogs, they eventually began to associate the bell's sound with mealtime. So much so, that merely ringing the bell, even without presenting food, made the dogs drool in anticipation!

This reaction demonstrated the concept of "conditioning" - where behaviors can be learned by linking two unrelated stimuli. Pavlov's work revolutionized the world's understanding of learning and had ripple effects in various areas like animal training and therapy techniques.

Pavlov came up with the term classical conditioning , which is still used today. Other psychologists have developed more nuanced types of conditioning that help us understand how people learn to perform different behaviours.

Classical conditioning is the process by which a neutral stimulus becomes associated with a meaningful stimulus , leading to the same response. In Pavlov's case, the neutral stimulus (bell) became associated with the meaningful stimulus (food), leading the dogs to salivate just by hearing the bell.

Modern thinkers often critique Pavlov's methods from an ethical standpoint. The dogs, crucial to his discovery, may not have been treated with today's standards of care and respect in research.

Both these experiments, while enlightening, also underline the importance of conducting research with empathy and consideration, especially when it involves living beings.

What is Ethical Experimentation?

The tales of Pavlov's bells and Mischel's marshmallows offer us not just insights into the human mind and behavior but also raise a significant question: At what cost do these discoveries come?

Ethical experimentation isn't just a fancy term; it's the backbone of good science. When we talk about ethics, we're referring to the moral principles that guide a researcher's decisions and actions. But why does it matter so much in the realm of psychological experimentation?

An example of an experiment that had major ethical issues is an experiment called the Monster Study . This study was conducted in 1936 and was interested in why children develop a stutter.

The major issue with it is that the psychologists treated some of the children poorly over a period of five months, telling them things like “You must try to stop yourself immediately. Don’t ever speak unless you can do it right.”

You can imagine how that made the children feel!

This study helped create guidelines for ethical treatment in experiments. The guidelines include:

Respect for Individuals: Whether it's a dog in Pavlov's lab or a child in Mischel's study room, every participant—human or animal—deserves respect. They should never be subjected to harm or undue stress. For humans, informed consent (knowing what they're signing up for) is a must. This means that if a child is participating, they, along with their guardians, should understand what the experiment entails and agree to it without being pressured.

Honesty is the Best Policy: Researchers have a responsibility to be truthful. This means not only being honest with participants about the study but also reporting findings truthfully, even if the results aren't what they hoped for. There can be exceptions if an experiment will only succeed if the participants aren't fully aware, but it has to be approved by an ethics committee .

Safety First: No discovery, no matter how groundbreaking, is worth harming a participant. The well-being and mental, emotional, and physical safety of participants is paramount. Experiments should be designed to minimize risks and discomfort.

Considering the Long-Term: Some experiments might have effects that aren't immediately obvious. For example, while a child might seem fine after participating in an experiment, they could feel stressed or anxious later on. Ethical researchers consider and plan for these possibilities, offering support and follow-up if needed.

The Rights of Animals: Just because animals can't voice their rights doesn't mean they don't have any. They should be treated with care, dignity, and respect. This means providing them with appropriate living conditions, not subjecting them to undue harm, and considering alternatives to animal testing when possible.

While the world of psychological experiments offers fascinating insights into behavior and the mind, it's essential to tread with care and compassion. The golden rule? Treat every participant, human or animal, as you'd wish to be treated. After all, the true mark of a groundbreaking experiment isn't just its findings but the ethical integrity with which it's conducted.

So, even if you're experimenting at home, please keep in mind the impact your experiments could have on the people and beings around you!

Let's get into some ideas for experiments.

1) Testing Conformity

Our primary aim with this experiment is to explore the intriguing world of social influences, specifically focusing on how much sway a group has over an individual's decisions. This social influence is called groupthink .

Humans, as social creatures, often find solace in numbers, seeking the approval and acceptance of those around them. But how deep does this need run? Does the desire to "fit in" overpower our trust in our own judgments?

This experiment not only provides insights into these questions but also touches upon the broader themes of peer pressure, societal norms, and individuality. Understanding this could shed light on various real-world situations, from why fashion trends catch on to more critical scenarios like how misinformation can spread.

Method: This idea is inspired by the classic Asch Conformity Experiments . Here's a simple way to try it:

  • Assemble a group of people (about 7-8). Only one person will be the real participant; the others will be in on the experiment.
  • Show the group a picture of three lines of different lengths and another line labeled "Test Line."
  • Ask each person to say out loud which of the three lines matches the length of the "Test Line."
  • Unknown to the real participant, the other members will intentionally choose the wrong line. This is to see if the participant goes along with the group's incorrect choice, even if they can see it's wrong.

Real-World Impacts of Groupthink

Groupthink is more than just a science term; we see it in our daily lives:

Decisions at Work or School: Imagine being in a group where everyone wants to do one thing, even if it's not the best idea. People might not speak up because they're worried about standing out or being the only one with a different opinion.

Wrong Information: Ever heard a rumor that turned out to be untrue? Sometimes, if many people believe and share something, others might believe it too, even if it's not correct. This happens a lot on the internet.

Peer Pressure: Sometimes, friends might all want to do something that's not safe or right. People might join in just because they don't want to feel left out.

Missing Out on New Ideas: When everyone thinks the same way and agrees all the time, cool new ideas might never get heard. It's like always coloring with the same crayon and missing out on all the other bright colors!

2) Testing Color and Mood

colorful room

We all have favorite colors, right? But did you ever wonder if colors can make you feel a certain way? Color psychology is the study of how colors can influence our feelings and actions.

For instance, does blue always calm us down? Does red make us feel excited or even a bit angry? By exploring this, we can learn how colors play a role in our daily lives, from the clothes we wear to the color of our bedroom walls.

  • Find a quiet room and set up different colored lights or large sheets of colored paper: blue, red, yellow, and green.
  • Invite some friends over and let each person spend a few minutes under each colored light or in front of each colored paper.
  • After each color, ask your friends to write down or talk about how they feel. Are they relaxed? Energized? Happy? Sad?

Researchers have always been curious about this. Some studies have shown that colors like blue and green can make people feel calm, while colors like red might make them feel more alert or even hungry!

Real-World Impacts of Color Psychology

Ever noticed how different places use colors?

Hospitals and doctors' clinics often use soft blues and greens. This might be to help patients feel more relaxed and calm.

Many fast food restaurants use bright reds and yellows. These colors might make us feel hungry or want to eat quickly and leave.

Classrooms might use a mix of colors to help students feel both calm and energized.

3) Testing Music and Brainpower

Think about your favorite song. Do you feel smarter or more focused when you listen to it? This experiment seeks to understand the relationship between music and our brain's ability to remember things. Some people believe that certain types of music, like classical tunes, can help us study or work better. Let's find out if it's true!

  • Prepare a list of 10-15 things to remember, like a grocery list or names of places.
  • Invite some friends over. First, let them try to memorize the list in a quiet room.
  • After a short break, play some music (try different types like pop, classical, or even nature sounds) and ask them to memorize the list again.
  • Compare the results. Was there a difference in how much they remembered with and without music?

The " Mozart Effect " is a popular idea. Some studies in the past suggested that listening to Mozart's music might make people smarter, at least for a little while. But other researchers think the effect might not be specific to Mozart; it could be that any music we enjoy boosts our mood and helps our brain work better.

Real-World Impacts of Music and Memory

Think about how we use music:

  • Study Sessions: Many students listen to music while studying, believing it helps them concentrate better.
  • Workout Playlists: Gyms play energetic music to keep people motivated and help them push through tough workouts.
  • Meditation and Relaxation: Calm, soothing sounds are often used to help people relax or meditate.

4) Testing Dreams and Food

Ever had a really wild dream and wondered where it came from? Some say that eating certain foods before bedtime can make our dreams more vivid or even a bit strange.

This experiment is all about diving into the dreamy world of sleep to see if what we eat can really change our nighttime adventures. Can a piece of chocolate or a slice of cheese transport us to a land of wacky dreams? Let's find out!

  • Ask a group of friends to keep a "dream diary" for a week. Every morning, they should write down what they remember about their dreams.
  • For the next week, ask them to eat a small snack before bed, like cheese, chocolate, or even spicy foods.
  • They should continue writing in their "dream diary" every morning.
  • At the end of the two weeks, compare the dream notes. Do the dreams seem different during the snack week?

The link between food and dreams isn't super clear, but some people have shared personal stories. For example, some say that spicy food can lead to bizarre dreams. Scientists aren't completely sure why, but it could be related to how food affects our body temperature or brain activity during sleep.

A cool idea related to this experiment is that of vivid dreams , which are very clear, detailed, and easy to remember dreams. Some people are even able to control their vivid dreams, or say that they feel as real as daily, waking life !

Real-World Impacts of Food and Dreams

Our discoveries might shed light on:

  • Bedtime Routines: Knowing which foods might affect our dreams can help us choose better snacks before bedtime, especially if we want calmer sleep.
  • Understanding Our Brain: Dreams can be mysterious, but studying them can give us clues about how our brains work at night.
  • Cultural Beliefs: Many cultures have myths or stories about foods and dreams. Our findings might add a fun twist to these age-old tales!

5) Testing Mirrors and Self-image

Stand in front of a mirror. How do you feel? Proud? Shy? Curious? Mirrors reflect more than just our appearance; they might influence how we think about ourselves.

This experiment delves into the mystery of self-perception. Do we feel more confident when we see our reflection? Or do we become more self-conscious? Let's take a closer look.

  • Set up two rooms: one with mirrors on all walls and another with no mirrors at all.
  • Invite friends over and ask them to spend some time in each room doing normal activities, like reading or talking.
  • After their time in both rooms, ask them questions like: "Did you think about how you looked more in one room? Did you feel more confident or shy?"
  • Compare the responses to see if the presence of mirrors changes how they feel about themselves.

Studies have shown that when people are in rooms with mirrors, they can become more aware of themselves. Some might stand straighter, fix their hair, or even change how they behave. The mirror acts like an audience, making us more conscious of our actions.

Real-World Impacts of Mirrors and Self-perception

Mirrors aren't just for checking our hair. Ever wonder why clothing stores have so many mirrors? They might help shoppers visualize themselves in new outfits, encouraging them to buy.

Mirrors in gyms can motivate people to work out with correct form and posture. They also help us see progress in real-time!

And sometimes, looking in a mirror can be a reminder to take care of ourselves, both inside and out.

But remember, what we look like isn't as important as how we act in the world or how healthy we are. Some people claim that having too many mirrors around can actually make us more self conscious and distract us from the good parts of ourselves.

Some studies are showing that mirrors can actually increase self-compassion , amongst other things. As any tool, it seems like mirrors can be both good and bad, depending on how we use them!

6) Testing Plants and Talking

potted plants

Have you ever seen someone talking to their plants? It might sound silly, but some people believe that plants can "feel" our vibes and that talking to them might even help them grow better.

In this experiment, we'll explore whether plants can indeed react to our voices and if they might grow taller, faster, or healthier when we chat with them.

  • Get three similar plants, placing each one in a separate room.
  • Talk to the first plant, saying positive things like "You're doing great!" or singing to it.
  • Say negative things to the second plant, like "You're not growing fast enough!"
  • Don't talk to the third plant at all; let it be your "silent" control group .
  • Water all plants equally and make sure they all get the same amount of light.
  • At the end of the month, measure the growth of each plant and note any differences in their health or size.

The idea isn't brand new. Some experiments from the past suggest plants might respond to sounds or vibrations. Some growers play music for their crops, thinking it helps them flourish.

Even if talking to our plants doesn't have an impact on their growth, it can make us feel better! Sometimes, if we are lonely, talking to our plants can help us feel less alone. Remember, they are living too!

Real-World Impacts of Talking to Plants

If plants do react to our voices, gardeners and farmers might adopt new techniques, like playing music in greenhouses or regularly talking to plants.

Taking care of plants and talking to them could become a recommended activity for reducing stress and boosting mood.

And if plants react to sound, it gives us a whole new perspective on how connected all living things might be .

7) Testing Virtual Reality and Senses

Virtual reality (VR) seems like magic, doesn't it? You put on a headset and suddenly, you're in a different world! But how does this "new world" affect our senses? This experiment wants to find out how our brains react to VR compared to the real world. Do we feel, see, or hear things differently? Let's get to the bottom of this digital mystery!

  • You'll need a VR headset and a game or experience that can be replicated in real life (like walking through a forest). If you don't have a headset yourself, there are virtual reality arcades now!
  • Invite friends to first experience the scenario in VR.
  • Afterwards, replicate the experience in the real world, like taking a walk in an actual forest.
  • Ask them questions about both experiences: Did one seem more real than the other? Which sounds were more clear? Which colors were brighter? Did they feel different emotions?

As VR becomes more popular, scientists have been curious about its effects. Some studies show that our brains can sometimes struggle to tell the difference between VR and reality. That's why some people might feel like they're really "falling" in a VR game even though they're standing still.

Real-World Impacts of VR on Our Senses

Schools might use VR to teach lessons, like taking students on a virtual trip to ancient Egypt. Understanding how our senses react in VR can also help game designers create even more exciting and realistic games.

Doctors could use VR to help patients overcome fears or to provide relaxation exercises. This is actually already a method therapists can use for helping patients who have serious phobias. This is called exposure therapy , which basically means slowly exposing someone (or yourself) to the thing you fear, starting from very far away to becoming closer.

For instance, if someone is afraid of snakes. You might show them images of snakes first. Once they are comfortable with the picture, they can know there is one in the next room. Once they are okay with that, they might use a VR headset to see the snake in the same room with them, though of course there is not an actual snake there.

8) Testing Sleep and Learning

We all know that feeling of trying to study or work when we're super tired. Our brains feel foggy, and it's hard to remember stuff. But how exactly does sleep (or lack of it) influence our ability to learn and remember things?

With this experiment, we'll uncover the mysteries of sleep and see how it can be our secret weapon for better learning.

  • Split participants into two groups.
  • Ask both groups to study the same material in the evening.
  • One group goes to bed early, while the other stays up late.
  • The next morning, give both groups a quiz on what they studied.
  • Compare the results to see which group remembered more.

Sleep and its relation to learning have been explored a lot. Scientists believe that during sleep, especially deep sleep, our brains sort and store new information. This is why sometimes, after a good night's rest, we might understand something better or remember more.

Real-World Impacts of Sleep and Learning

Understanding the power of sleep can help:

  • Students: If they know the importance of sleep, students might plan better, mixing study sessions with rest, especially before big exams.
  • Workplaces: Employers might consider more flexible hours, understanding that well-rested employees learn faster and make fewer mistakes.
  • Health: Regularly missing out on sleep can have other bad effects on our health. So, promoting good sleep is about more than just better learning.

9) Testing Social Media and Mood

Have you ever felt different after spending time on social media? Maybe happy after seeing a friend's fun photos, or a bit sad after reading someone's tough news.

Social media is a big part of our lives, but how does it really affect our mood? This experiment aims to shine a light on the emotional roller-coaster of likes, shares, and comments.

  • Ask participants to note down how they're feeling - are they happy, sad, excited, or bored?
  • Have them spend a set amount of time (like 30 minutes) on their favorite social media platforms.
  • After the session, ask them again about their mood. Did it change? Why?
  • Discuss what they saw or read that made them feel that way.

Previous research has shown mixed results. Some studies suggest that seeing positive posts can make us feel good, while others say that too much time on social media can make us feel lonely or left out.

Real-World Impacts of Social Media on Mood

Understanding the emotional impact of social media can help users understand their feelings and take breaks if needed. Knowing is half the battle! Additionally, teachers and parents can guide young users on healthy social media habits, like limiting time or following positive accounts.

And if it's shown that social media does impact mood, social media companies can design friendlier, less stressful user experiences.

But even if the social media companies don't change things, we can still change our social media habits to make ourselves feel better.

10) Testing Handwriting or Typing

Think about the last time you took notes. Did you grab a pen and paper or did you type them out on a computer or tablet?

Both ways are popular, but there's a big question: which method helps us remember and understand better? In this experiment, we'll find out if the classic art of handwriting has an edge over speedy typing.

  • Divide participants into two groups.
  • Present a short lesson or story to both groups.
  • One group will take notes by hand, while the other will type them out.
  • After some time, quiz both groups on the content of the lesson or story.
  • Compare the results to see which note-taking method led to better recall and understanding.

Studies have shown some interesting results. While typing can be faster and allows for more notes, handwriting might boost memory and comprehension because it engages the brain differently, making us process the information as we write.

Importantly, each person might find one or the other works better for them. This could be useful in understanding our learning habits and what instructional style would be best for us.

Real-World Impacts of Handwriting vs. Typing

Knowing the pros and cons of each method can:

  • Boost Study Habits: Students can pick the method that helps them learn best, especially during important study sessions or lectures.
  • Work Efficiency: In jobs where information retention is crucial, understanding the best method can increase efficiency and accuracy.
  • Tech Design: If we find out more about how handwriting benefits us, tech companies might design gadgets that mimic the feel of writing while combining the advantages of digital tools.

11) Testing Money and Happiness

game board with money

We often hear the saying, "Money can't buy happiness," but is that really true? Many dream of winning the lottery or getting a big raise, believing it would solve all problems.

In this experiment, we dig deep to see if there's a real connection between wealth and well-being.

  • Survey a range of participants, from those who earn a little to those who earn a lot, about their overall happiness. You can keep it to your friends and family, but that might not be as accurate as surveying a wider group of people.
  • Ask them to rank things that bring them joy and note if they believe more money would boost their happiness. You could try different methods, one where you include some things that they have to rank, such as gardening, spending time with friends, reading books, learning, etc. Or you could just leave a blank list that they can fill in with their own ideas.
  • Study the data to find patterns or trends about income and happiness.

Some studies have found money can boost happiness, especially when it helps people out of tough financial spots. But after reaching a certain income, extra dollars usually do not add much extra joy.

In fact, psychologists just realized that once people have an income that can comfortably support their needs (and some of their wants), they stop getting happier with more . That number is roughly $75,000, but of course that depends on the cost of living and how many members are in the family.

Real-World Impacts of Money and Happiness

If we can understand the link between money and joy, it might help folks choose jobs they love over jobs that just pay well. And instead of buying things, people might spend on experiences, like trips or classes, that make lasting memories.

Most importantly, we all might spend more time on hobbies, friends, and family, knowing they're big parts of what makes life great.

Some people are hoping that with Artificial Intelligence being able to do a lot of the less well-paying jobs, people might be able to do work they enjoy more, all while making more money and having more time to do the things that make them happy.

12) Testing Temperature and Productivity

Have you ever noticed how a cold classroom or office makes it harder to focus? Or how on hot days, all you want to do is relax? In this experiment, we're going to find out if the temperature around us really does change how well we work.

  • Find a group of participants and a room where you can change the temperature.
  • Set the room to a chilly temperature and give the participants a set of tasks to do.
  • Measure how well and quickly they do these tasks.
  • The next day, make the room comfortably warm and have them do similar tasks.
  • Compare the results to see if the warmer or cooler temperature made them work better.

Some studies have shown that people can work better when they're in a room that feels just right, not too cold or hot. Being too chilly can make fingers slow, and being too warm can make minds wander.

What temperature is "just right"? It won't be the same for everyone, but most people find it's between 70-73 degrees Fahrenheit (21-23 Celsius).

Real-World Implications of Temperature and Productivity

If we can learn more about how temperature affects our work, teachers might set classroom temperatures to help students focus and learn better, offices might adjust temperatures to get the best work out of their teams, and at home, we might find the best temperature for doing homework or chores quickly and well.

Interestingly, temperature also has an impact on our sleep quality. Most people find slightly cooler rooms to be better for good sleep. While the daytime temperature between 70-73F is good for productivity, a nighttime temperature around 65F (18C) is ideal for most people's sleep.

Psychology is like a treasure hunt, where the prize is understanding ourselves better. With every experiment, we learn a little more about why we think, feel, and act the way we do. Some of these experiments might seem simple, like seeing if colors change our mood or if being warm helps us work better. But even the simple questions can have big answers that help us in everyday life.

Remember, while doing experiments is fun, it's also important to always be kind and think about how others feel. We should never make someone uncomfortable just for a test. Instead, let's use these experiments to learn and grow, helping to make the world a brighter, more understanding place for everyone.

Related posts:

  • 150+ Flirty Goodnight Texts For Him (Sweet and Naughty Examples)
  • Dream Interpreter & Dictionary (270+ Meanings)
  • Sleep Stages (Light, Deep, REM)
  • What Part of the Brain Regulates Body Temperature?
  • Why Do We Dream? (6 Theories and Psychological Reasons)

Reference this article:

About The Author

Photo of author

Free Personality Test

Free Personality Quiz

Free Memory Test

Free Memory Test

Free IQ Test

Free IQ Test

PracticalPie.com is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow Us On:

Youtube Facebook Instagram X/Twitter

Psychology Resources

Developmental

Personality

Relationships

Psychologists

Serial Killers

Psychology Tests

Personality Quiz

Memory Test

Depression test

Type A/B Personality Test

© PracticalPsychology. All rights reserved

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

TheHighSchooler

8 Effective Social Psychology Experiments & Activities For High School Students

In school, social interaction plays a crucial role and forms the core of one’s academic life. Have you ever been curious about what others are thinking? Have you ever found yourself wondering about the thoughts and opinions of others? This is something that crosses everyone’s mind. The study of social psychology gives you a peek into some of these interesting stances. 

Social psychology is a field of psychology that investigates how the social environment shapes people’s thoughts, beliefs, and behavior. By studying social psychology, one can gain a deeper understanding of people’s actions and the consequences they have. Furthermore, engaging in practical experiments and activities can make this subject even more fascinating. 

In this post, you will find such engaging specific activities that will offer students valuable hands-on experience in the field of social psychology, allowing them to gain practical knowledge and insights into this fascinating subject matter.

Social psychology experiments and activities for high school students 

Here are a few interesting experiments and activities for high school students to learn about social psychology : 

1. Bystander effect simulation

Group of people surrounding an infured boy

The bystander effect [ 1 ] is a social psychology phenomenon that studies how an individual is unlikely to help in an urgent situation if surrounded by other people. Students can conduct experiments to study this effect in controlled settings. They can choose a social setting and select one person to pretend to need help, such as someone with a false injury struggling to cross the road or gather scattered items. 

The remaining students can observe their behavior while amongst the public.  This experiment aims to display the phenomenon called “diffusion of responsibility”. It will also help one understand the importance of helping people, acts of kindness , and empathetic understanding. Understanding the Bystander effect helps one understand the concept of social initiation, and can further be useful when a real social situation needs their intervention. 

2. Conformity experiment 

Measuring and predicting the length of a rod

People tend to change their beliefs to match what they think is normal, which is called conformity bias. An experiment can be done to test this by asking a group of students to guess the length of a rod from three choices (25 cm, 30 cm, and 40 cm), with 25 cm being the correct answer. 

Some students might be told to give the wrong answer (like 40 cm) and act like they are sure it’s right, giving confident explanations for the same. This creates a situation of peer pressure and social conformity, making the students want to fit in and therefore agree with the group.

Other students might start to do the same thing as well to fit in with their friends. This experiment shows how conformity bias works. It also teaches students about the effects of peer pressure and social conformity, and how acting like others can affect things like confidence.

3. The marshmallow test 

Kids having marshmallows and cookies

The marshmallow test is a study about delaying pleasure, called delayed gratification. This happens when something else gets in the way of enjoying something right away. In an experiment such as this, immediate gratification can be understood as being given something delicious and eating it immediately. High school students can perform this experiment on preschoolers who are between three and five years old. 

The students will randomly select a few children and observe them individually. Each child will be given one marshmallow at a time and will be told that they will be given one more marshmallow if they resist eating this one until the observer returns. This is the process of delayed gratification [ 2 ]

The students would then observe and note the number of kids who attempted and succeeded in doing the same, and see if it agrees with their hypothesis. This test can help the students learn the importance of delayed gratification and how one can apply it to build virtues like discipline and organization.

4. Group polarization experiments 

Discussing

The society contributes tremendously to forming one’s beliefs, prejudices, stereotypes, and notions. This particular experiment focuses on how societal agreements and discussions can strengthen already existing beliefs, lead them to extremities, and increase the rigidity of one’s thoughts. 

These experiments can take place both in classrooms and among peer groups. The first step is for students to express their opinions on a specific societal topic, such as gender norms. Then, the teacher can split the students into pairs, each holding a different viewpoint. 

The pairs will engage in discussions about the topic, sharing their personal opinions and biases. This increases their insight into the topic and open to more agreeable or disagreeable opinions. As the next step, the students will be asked their personal stance on the same topics again after the discussion. 

As per the hypothesis, their opinions will be more diversely spread and will have an increased intensity. This will help them notice any changes in the level of emphasis, aggressiveness, and rigidity of their opinions before and after the discussion. This experiment helps one realize the social effect on the rigidity of one’s thought formation and how social construct plays a role in molding one’s beliefs and values to polarized extremities. 

5. Mirror neurons 

Role play

The brain has a fascinating component called mirror neurons. Just like mirror images,  these are activated by subconsciously copying or adapting to performing any action or feeling a certain emotion, because others are doing so.

This explains why laughter can be contagious, or when your friend feels sad without any apparent reason, you begin feeling down in the dumps too. This indicates how we have the natural ability to empathize and feel others’ emotions only by imagining us being in their shoes, or even by being in the same environment as they are. Conducting experiments and activities, such as imitation, can help us understand the workings of mirror neurons. 

In a classroom or peer group setting, students can choose to perform a skit based on a story they know, but they must play a character they don’t particularly like. For instance, a student who dislikes Draco Malfoy from the Harry Potter series may be assigned to play that character. After the skit, the students can discuss the character traits of the parts they played and the qualities they possess.

In the end, it will be seen that the students have developed a sense of understanding and empathy towards the character that they previously disliked, by being in the same character for some time. Through these exercises, the students can learn how mirror neurons foster empathy, increase understanding, and make it easier to take on different perspectives. 

6. Nonverbal cues and communication

Charades

Societal construct is built in a way that puts so much emphasis on communication skills but ironically conducts it more in nonverbal ways. For high school students, it is not only important for them to be aware of its importance, but to learn it through the perspective of social psychology. This can be manifested as a learning-based class activity similar to the game of dumb charades. 

In this activity, the teacher or a peer will split the students into two teams. Then, one member from each team will be chosen to stand in front of the class and be given a list of emotions to express through facial expressions. Starting with simple emotions like happiness and sadness, they will gradually move on to more complex emotions like anticipation, confusion, grief, and sarcasm. 

The other team members will have to guess the nonverbal cues being portrayed by their teammates and will earn five points for every correct guess. By working together, the class can gain a better understanding of nonverbal communication and its significant impact on even the smallest interactions. This fosters collaborative engagement and teamwork, along with increasing understanding and receptive levels. 

7. Foot-in-the-door experiment

The foot-in-the-door technique is derived from the English idiom that means getting an initial start to something. This technique is studied in social psychology as a strategy used usually in the corporate or marketing sector. This social phenomenon can be observed in the form of organizing an activity like role play . 

The class will be split into pairs, and each pair will act out a marketing scenario. For example, they might choose to sell a skincare product. In the scenario, the salesperson will start by offering a free sample product and explaining its qualities. This small request is more likely to be accepted by the customer as it does not require much attention or effort, or any form of financial demand. 

Then, the salesperson will slowly follow up by convincing the customer to buy the product after trying it and agreeing with the description. In a social situation like this, it builds pressure on the customer to maintain the same agreeable behavior as before, which is why the customer will be more likely to buy the product. This experiment helps the student learn about social conformity and how society plays a role in shaping one’s moral values, categorizing their behavior as acceptable and non-acceptable.

8. Door-in-the-face experiment

Salesperson inviting people to the event

This technique is the exact opposite of foot-in-the-door activity. In the case of a marketing strategy, it is used very smartly. High school students can conduct a social experiment with the permission and supervision of their teacher or faculty member.

The experiment involves inviting someone to a fundraiser organized by their school or institution. The students will start by making an unreasonable request, such as asking a random person to donate a thousand dollars to the charitable initiative of the fundraiser. 

The person is likely to deny the request, but that denial can make the person feel guilty for responding negatively. The students will then follow up with a small request to attend the fundraiser event. This is now possible and easy for the person to agree to, and also calms down the guilt of denying the earlier request by forming an acceptable image of an agreeable person.

This experiment teaches students about the importance of social acceptability in building self-image and confidence. It also lets them get an insight into how society can play a role in both building their values and morals, while at the same time, inducing feelings of unease and guilt. 

Wrapping it up

Already an intriguing subject, social psychology can be made even more fun by incorporating practical experiments and activities. The experiments done in social psychology are for observational and comprehensive purposes. 

They aim to better one’s understanding of social settings and their impact on an individual’s mind, together forming a cohesive psycho-social educational experience. Additionally, students can also engage in psychology games and activities for more clarity on the subject matter. These activities will help you dive deeper into how society operates, and also get to look at it from an observer’s perspective, giving you a clear, unbiased, and non-judgmental view of social occurrences and phenomena. 

  • James M. Hudson, & Amy Bruckman. (2004). The Bystander Effect: A Lens for understanding patterns of participation.  The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 165–195.
  • Mischel Walter; Ebbesen, Ebbe B. (1970). “Attention in delay of gratification”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology . 16 (2): 329–337.

social experiments to try

Sananda Bhattacharya, Chief Editor of TheHighSchooler, is dedicated to enhancing operations and growth. With degrees in Literature and Asian Studies from Presidency University, Kolkata, she leverages her educational and innovative background to shape TheHighSchooler into a pivotal resource hub. Providing valuable insights, practical activities, and guidance on school life, graduation, scholarships, and more, Sananda’s leadership enriches the journey of high school students.

Explore a plethora of invaluable resources and insights tailored for high schoolers at TheHighSchooler, under the guidance of Sananda Bhattacharya’s expertise. You can follow her on Linkedin

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

 alt=

0, text: error()">

0, text: error(), css: errorCssClass">

Reset your password

Enter your email address or username and we’ll send you a link to reset your password

Check your inbox

An email with a link to reset your password was sent to the email address associated with your account

Provide email

Please enter your email to complete registration

Activate to continue

Your account isn't active yet. We've emailed you an activation link. Please check your inbox and click the link to activate your account

0, text: error" style="display: none;">

0, text: success" style="display: none;">

  • Relationships

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here .

  • Partnership
  • Success stories
  • --> --> --> ,
  • -->
--> '; } else { document.getElementById("sessionDropdown").innerHTML = ' '; }
--> -->
-->

   This page contains links to web-based experiments, surveys, and other social psychology studies. If you would like us to add a link to your study, click .

To help reach a wide audience, study links posted here are also publicized via and an (a combined subscriber base of over 294,000 people). All told, SPN has posted links to 3,083 studies and generated a total of 2,150,178 visits to these studies (an average of 39 visits per study for links posted in the past month).

Please note, however, that SPN does not endorse the content or quality of studies that appear below. Any use of SPN pages, feeds, or derivative services indicates acceptance of the .

Table of Contents (click on a category of interest)

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Professional Research
(University of Cincinnati) (Wesleyan University) (Princeton University) (American University) (Durham University, UK) (Saint Mary's University) (Uni. of Southern Queensland) (Queens College of the CUNY) (Alliant International University) (Clark University) (Kwantlen Polytechnic Univ., CA) (Saint Mary's Univ., Canada)

(University of Sunderland, UK) (Princeton University) (Leeds Beckett University, United Kingdom) (Illinois State University) (Mount Saint Mary's University, Los Angeles) (Kennesaw State University) (Boston University)

(Virginia Union University) (Barry University) (Barry University) (Barry University) (Barry University) (KPU, Canada) (Monk Prayogshala) (Cairnmillar Institute) (Kwantlen Polytechnic University) (Towson University) (Manchester Metro. Univ., UK) (Carroll University) (Walden University) (University of Western Ontario) (Rowan University)

(Liverpool Hope University) (Barry University) (University of Twente, Netherlands) (Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Canada) (Penn State Univ.) (Elizabethtown College) (Psychologische Hochschule Berlin) (Queen's University, Canada)

(Wesleyan University) (Manhattan College)

(McGill University, Canada) (Monk Prayogshala) (University of Surrey)

(Vrije Universiteit (Netherlands)) (Manhattan College) (Univ. of Lincoln, UK) (Vanderbilt University) (St Francis College) (Rowan University)

Student Research
(Mercy College) (Saint Mary's University, Canada) (Univ. of Quebec Montreal) (Murdoch University, AU) (University of Chicago) (Charles Sturt U.)

(Washington State Univ.) (Charles Sturt University, AU) (Pace University) (Central Queensland U.) (Charles Sturt University)

(Illinois State Univ.) (Manchester Metropolitan Univ., UK) (Eastern Connecticut State University) (Adelphi University) (St. Francis College) (Adelphi University) (Leeds Beckett U.) (Charles Sturt University) (Univ. of Texas at Austin) (Brunel University) (Adelphi University) (Northumbria University, UK) (Endicott College) (Université du Québec à Montréal) (Adelphi University)

(Charles Sturt Uni) (Goldsmiths, Univ. of London, UK) (Anglia Ruskin U., U.K.) (Maryville University) (Sheffield Hallam University) (Ouachita Baptist University) (Univ. of Portsmouth) (Western Illinois University) (Penn. State University) (Adelphi University)

(Charles Sturt University, AU) (McGill University, Canada) (Brunel University London, UK)

(Charles Sturt University) (Anglia Ruskin University, UK) (Adelphi University) (Pace University) (University of Westminster, UK) (U. Nottingham & De Montfort U.)

(Albertus Magnus College) (University of Lincoln, UK) (Northumbria Univ., UK) (Barry University) (Albertus Magnus College) (Univ. of Bristol, UK) (Northumbria University, UK) (The University of Hawaii at Hilo) (Adelphi University) (Spiru Haret Uni. Brasov, RO) (Royal Holloway, U. of London, UK) (University of California, Santa Cruz) (Dickinson College) (UCLA) (Sheffield Hallam University, UK) (Adelphi University)

Web Experiment Resources
(extensive links grouped by topic) (United Kingdom compendium) (large archive of current and past studies) (compendium maintained by the Inquisitive Mind) (a virtual laboratory of studies) (Yahoo! listing) (has variety of interactive psychology experiments) (studies of online consumer behavior)

(APA report)

(Windows-based research software) (millisecond reaction time software) (for high-precision psychological measures) (freeware for research on ostracism and social exclusion) (tool for designing lab and web experiments) (for research, teaching, and practice) (commercial online survey software) (Mac freeware for psychological experiments) (commercial software for Internet-mediated research) (freeware for web-based studies) (for Macintosh computers) (online course)

(free; NSF-supported) (popular web data collection service; short surveys free) (software for high quality online surveys) (specializing in social science research) (web tool that captures live conversation data) (online psychology experiments made easy) (service for building and analyzing online surveys) (commercial service and software) (online survey software and research management services) (custom-built online surveys for academic research) (web survey application developed by I/O psychologists) (creates and hosts psychology web experiments)

(web-based service for managing participant pools) (web-based software for managing participant pools)

(instant random sampling and assignment) (interactive teaching resources) (software and customized hardware for experiments) (edited volume) (archive of MediaLab applications)

Psychology Headlines

From around the world.

  • People's Moral Values Change with the Seasons, Study Finds
  • U.K. Reports of Antisemitic Incidents Reach Record High
  • U.S. Secretaries of State Urge Musk to Block Election Misinformation
  • Sierra Leone Used to Chain Mental Health Patients; Times Are Changing
  • Report Details Systemic Racism Within London Police Service
  • U.S. Schools Taking Meditation Breaks to Help Students Manage Stress
  • B'tselem's report contains testimony from 55 recently released Palestinian detainees, whose graphic accounts suggest a dramatic worsening of prison conditions since the start of the Gaza war 10 months ago. A U.N. report last week also contained shocking allegations of abuse directed against Palestinian…">Israeli Human Rights Group Alleges Abuse of Palestinian Detainees
  • Worldwide, Scientists Very Concerned About Climate Change, Survey Finds

Source: Psychology News Center

social experiments to try

  • Foundations
  • Write Paper

Search form

  • Experiments
  • Anthropology
  • Self-Esteem
  • Social Anxiety

social experiments to try

  • Psychology >

Social Psychology Experiments

Social psychology experiments can explain how thoughts, feelings and behaviors are influenced by the presence of others.

This article is a part of the guide:

  • Milgram Experiment
  • Bobo Doll Experiment
  • Stanford Prison Experiment
  • Asch Experiment
  • Milgram Experiment Ethics

Browse Full Outline

  • 1 Social Psychology Experiments
  • 2.1 Asch Figure
  • 3 Bobo Doll Experiment
  • 4 Good Samaritan Experiment
  • 5 Stanford Prison Experiment
  • 6.1 Milgram Experiment Ethics
  • 7 Bystander Apathy
  • 8 Sherif’s Robbers Cave
  • 9 Social Judgment Experiment
  • 10 Halo Effect
  • 11 Thought-Rebound
  • 12 Ross’ False Consensus Effect
  • 13 Interpersonal Bargaining
  • 14 Understanding and Belief
  • 15 Hawthorne Effect
  • 16 Self-Deception
  • 17 Confirmation Bias
  • 18 Overjustification Effect
  • 19 Choice Blindness
  • 20.1 Cognitive Dissonance
  • 21.1 Social Group Prejudice
  • 21.2 Intergroup Discrimination
  • 21.3 Selective Group Perception

Typically social psychology studies investigate how someone's behavior influences a groups behavior or internal states, such as attitude or self-concept.

Obedience to Authority

"I was only following orders" Legal defence by a Nazi leader at the Nuremberg trial following World War II

The aftermath of World War 2 made scientists investigate what to made people "follow orders" even though the orders were horrible. The Stanley Milgram Experiment showed that also non-nazi populations would follow orders to harm other persons. It was not a German phenomenon as many thought.

Milgram's Lost Letter Experiment

Classic social psychology experiments are widely used to expose the key elements of aggressive behavior, prejudice and stereotyping. Social group prejudice is manifested in people's unfavorable attitudes towards a particular social group. Stanley Milgram's Lost Letter Experiment further explains this.

Obedience to a Role - Dehumanization

The Abu Ghraib prison-episode was yet another example on the power of predefined roles. The Stanford Prison Experiment by Philip Zimbardo, demonstrated the powerful effect our perception of expectations in roles have.

Solomon Asch wanted to test how much people are influenced by others opinions in the Asch Conformity Experiment .

Observational Role Learning

Behaviorists ruled psychology for a long time. They focused on how individuals learn by trying and failing. Albert Bandura thought that humans are much more than "learning machines". He thought that we learn from role models, initiating the (bandura) social cognitive theory. It all started with the Bobo Doll Experiment .

Helping Behavior - Good Samaritan

Knowing the story of the Good Samaritan makes you wonder what made the Samaritan help the stranger, and why did he not get help from the priest or the Levite? The Good Samaritan Experiment explores causes of not showing helping behavior or altruism.

Cognitive Dissonance Experiment

The Cognitive Dissonance Experiment by Leon Festinger assumes that people hold many different cognitions about their world and tests what happens when the cognitions do not fit. See also the more in depth article about the Cognitive Dissonance Experiment .

Bystander Effect

The Bystander Apathy Experiment was inspirated and motivation to conduct this experiment from the highly publicised murder of Kitty Genovese in the same year.

Groups and Influence On Opinion

Sherif's classic social psychology experiment named Robbers Cave Experiment dealt with in-group relations, out-group relations and intergroup relations.

The Social Judgment Experiment was designed to explore the internal processes of an individual's judgment and intergroup discrimination , how little it takes for people to form into groups, and the degree to which people within a group tend to favour the in-group and discriminate the out-group.

Halo Effect

The Halo Effect was demonstrated by Nisbett and Wilson's experiment. It fits the situation of Hollywood celebrities where people readily assume that since these people are physically attractive, it also follows that they are intelligent, friendly, and display good judgment as well. This also greatly applies to other well-known people such as politicians.

Wegner's Dream Rebound Experiment

According to studies, thoughts suppressed may resurface or manifest themselves in the future in the form of dreams. Psychologist Daniel M. Wegner proves this in his experiment on effects of thought suppression .

False Consensus

Everyone's got their own biases in each and every occasion, even when estimating other people behaviors and the respective causes. One of these is called the false consensus bias. Psychologist Professor Lee Ross conducted studies on setting out to show how false consensus effect operates.

Interpersonal Bargaining

Bargaining is one of the many activities we usually engage in without even realizing it. The Moran Deutsch and Robert Krauss Experiment investigated two central factors in bargaining, namely how we communicate with each other and the use of threats.

Understand and Belief

Daniel Gilbert together with his colleagues put to test both Rene Descartes' and Baruch Spinoza's beliefs on whether belief is automatic or is a separate process that follows understanding. This argument has long been standing for at least 400 years before it was finally settled.

Self-Deception

People lie all the time even to themselves and surprisingly, it does work! This is the finding of the Quattrone and Tversky Experiment that was published in the Journal of Personality and Psychology.

Overjustification Effect

The overjustification effect happens when an external incentive like a reward, decreases a person's intrinsic motivation to perform a particular task. Lepper, Greene and Nisbett confirmed this in their field experiment in a nursery school.

Chameleon Effect

Also called unintentional mirroring, the chameleon effect usually applies to people who are getting along so well, each tend to mimic each other's body posture, hand gestures, speaking accents, among others. This was confirmed by the Chartrand and Bargh experiments.

Confirmation Bias

Confirmation bias is also known as selective collection of evidence. It is considered as an effect of information processing where people behaves to as to make their expectations come true. People tend to favor information that confirms their preconceptions or hypotheses independently of the information's truthness or falsity.

Choice Blindness

Choice blindness refers to ways in which people are blind to their own choices and preferences. Lars Hall and Peter Johansson further explain this phenomenon in their study.

Stereotypes

The Clark Doll Test illustrates the ill effects of stereotyping and racial segregation in America. It illustrated the damage caused by systematic segregation and racism on children's self-perception at the young age of five.

Selective Group Perception

In selective group perception, people tend to actively filter information they think is irrelevant. This effect is demonstrated in Hastorf and Cantril's Case Study: They Saw a Game .

Changing Behaviour When Being Studied

The Hawthorne Effect is the process where human subjects of an experiment change their behavior, simply because they are being studied. This is one of the hardest inbuilt biases to eliminate or factor into the design.

  • Psychology 101
  • Flags and Countries
  • Capitals and Countries

Oskar Blakstad (Oct 10, 2008). Social Psychology Experiments. Retrieved Aug 18, 2024 from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/social-psychology-experiments

You Are Allowed To Copy The Text

The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) .

This means you're free to copy, share and adapt any parts (or all) of the text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this page.

That is it. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page. You can use it freely (with some kind of link), and we're also okay with people reprinting in publications like books, blogs, newsletters, course-material, papers, wikipedia and presentations (with clear attribution).

social experiments to try

Want to stay up to date? Follow us!

Save this course for later.

Don't have time for it all now? No problem, save it as a course and come back to it later.

Footer bottom

  • Privacy Policy

social experiments to try

  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed
  • Like us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter

Alice Boyes Ph.D.

Intelligence

50 ideas for five day self-experiments, get energized by trying new behaviors, five days at a time..

Posted November 9, 2018 | Reviewed by Ekua Hagan

Unsplash

I've long been a fan of time-limited self-experiments, but I've typically done 21 or 30-day experiments. Recently I stumbled across a YouTube series featuring a woman, Lucie Fink, who does five-day self-experiments as part of her job as a video producer at Refinery29. Shorter self-experiments have the advantage of being particularly non-threatening and give you the opportunity to try a wider variety of new behaviors.

I thought I'd give you a list of ideas to kickstart your thinking about experiments you could try. You make the rules, so tweak any of my suggestions to suit you, or come up with your own ideas.

As you read my list, try noting the item number of anything you're at least moderately interested in. Or, print this list and highlight. Where I've given multiple examples, I mean trying a different new thing each day within the category listed. At the end of the post, I'll give tips for planning and implementing your experiments.

Try 5 days of:

  • Reading a chapter of a fiction book each day.
  • Not pushing yourself (for workaholics—try letting yourself cruise. This is one I tried recently).
  • Rediscovering a childhood passion (can be a variation on what you liked as a child).
  • Meditation .
  • Seeing a different friend for lunch or after work.
  • Wearing something different—five days of different clothing styles or five days of different makeup.
  • Foods you've never tried.
  • Something you’ve wanted to try for a year or more, e.g., you've wanted to try the rock climbing wall at your gym but never done it.
  • Playing a game each day, e.g., a card or board game, or sporty. Could include teaching your child a new game, like four square or hopscotch.
  • Using your voice assistant (Google Home, Alexa) in a new way.
  • Recontacting important people you've lost touch with, e.g., sending an email to your college mentor.
  • Work-related social risk-taking , e.g., cold emailing a potential collaborator or getting to know a colleague you rarely talk you.
  • Random acts of kindness (one per day).
  • Doing something different on your way home from work instead of going straight home, e.g., calling into your local library one day, sitting in a coffee shop to read, taking an exercise class on another.
  • Alternatives to driving e.g., ride your bike or walk somewhere, scooter to the corner store, take public transport to work. Doesn't need to be the same thing each day.
  • No plastic bags.
  • No ready-made or restaurant food (you decide the exact rules).
  • Cooking something from scratch (could be making pizza bases one day, cookies the next).
  • Not using the microwave.
  • Making a new recipe from one particular recipe book.
  • Listening to a new podcast.
  • Taking a different lunch to work.
  • Vegan food.
  • Taking a bath instead of a shower.
  • Going to bed early.
  • DIY—trying something yourself that you'd usually pay someone to do.
  • Self-care that gets perpetually pushed to the side, very broadly defined (e.g., buying new pillows when your old ones are so old they're making you sneeze).
  • Decluttering—throwing away 5 or 10 items in your house each day.
  • Creating better organizational systems—one new system per day.
  • Tracking your time use in 10-15 min increments.
  • Finding out something you don't already about someone in your life (having conversations you haven't had before, perhaps about goals , interests, mistakes, politics , childhood).
  • Investing in an important relationship, e.g., calling your mom, talking to your neighbors, or complimenting your spouse.
  • Political or civic activism, e.g., calling your representative's office to give your opinion on an issue, calling your city about a hazard that's never fixed, donating food or a small amount of money.
  • Someone else's productivity method, e.g., Jeff Bezos' 3 good decisions per day.
  • Spending quality time with your children, e.g., reading a book together or playing a game.
  • Reaching out to someone who has impacted you, e.g., emailing the writer of a book you've enjoyed or the creator of a podcast you love, or posting a photo for a food vlogger whose recipe you use and love.
  • Giving a compliment to someone new each day (beyond appearance and other very superficial compliments).
  • No social media .
  • Adding some meaningful art or decoration to your home (for people who tend to under-decorate). For example, displaying a family photo, or putting some of your child's artwork on the wall. It's fine to go a little more commercial with this too if you think it would be meaningful to you, such as buying a nice bottle for your olive oil.
  • Switching up your work routine in some way (try a new switch-up each day, or the same one for all five days).
  • Learning a new skill e.g., a new spreadsheet or other technical skill, or a simple DIY skill.
  • Not overthinking small decisions (see #5 here ).
  • Restorative yoga.
  • Trying something you want to do but that intimidates you (one new thing per day, or a variation on the same thing for all five days).
  • Reducing your expenses (e.g., canceling a subscription you don't use, calling to reduce your cable bill, reprogramming your thermostat a few degrees to save energy).
  • Buying a small item from a thrift/charity store each day.
  • Making only positive/affirming comments.
  • Making something you'd usually buy e.g., your morning coffee.

Implementation tips

  • A reasonable schedule for five-day experiments might be alternating a planning week with an experiment week. You might do a five-week cycle that's: planning week, experiment week, planning week, experiment week, week off. This gives you two experiments every five weeks.
  • Pick experiments with varying themes. You'll notice several themes running through the ideas for experiments. These include food, fun/games, self-care, environment, learning/technology, money, and social/relationships. It's fine to gravitate towards one or two categories, but try to sometimes go outside those and try experiments from other categories.
  • Try alternating more/less intensive experiments. Some experiments won't' really require a planning week, but it's better to be itching to try another experiment than feeling lukewarm or unenthused. Note that some experiments only require one short action per day, whereas others require an all-day shift in mindset (e.g., not overthinking small decisions). During your planning weeks, try to plan every aspect short of actually doing the new behavior. Plan what you'll do for each day of the experiment as well as how, when, and where . This increases your likelihood of following through.
  • There's not an expectation you'll stick to anything you try after the experiment ends. You might, but part of being someone who tries lots of self-experiments is that the more you try, the less room you have in your life for new daily routines. The beauty of behavioral experiments is that it makes it easier to try those behaviors again in the future, as the urge or need strikes you. For example, if you try making pizza dough for the first time as part of an experiment, it might be months or years before you do that again, but nevertheless, trying anything once makes it easier to try again sometime in the future. It's also fine to keep up a habit for a while but then let it slide e.g., if the taking a bath experiment inspires you to keep doing that, but only for a few months. You didn't fail if you do this. People's life and willpower priorities are constantly shifting. Do what works for you, and have fun switching up your routines.

I'm going to write a separate post on the psychological benefits of self-experiments and will link that here once it's posted. Coming soon!

Alice Boyes Ph.D.

Alice Boyes, Ph.D., translates principles from Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and social psychology into tips people can use in their everyday lives.

  • Find a Therapist
  • Find a Treatment Center
  • Find a Psychiatrist
  • Find a Support Group
  • Find Online Therapy
  • United States
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Chicago, IL
  • Houston, TX
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • New York, NY
  • Portland, OR
  • San Diego, CA
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Seattle, WA
  • Washington, DC
  • Asperger's
  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Chronic Pain
  • Eating Disorders
  • Passive Aggression
  • Personality
  • Goal Setting
  • Positive Psychology
  • Stopping Smoking
  • Low Sexual Desire
  • Relationships
  • Child Development
  • Self Tests NEW
  • Therapy Center
  • Diagnosis Dictionary
  • Types of Therapy

July 2024 magazine cover

Sticking up for yourself is no easy task. But there are concrete skills you can use to hone your assertiveness and advocate for yourself.

  • Emotional Intelligence
  • Gaslighting
  • Affective Forecasting
  • Neuroscience

More From Forbes

4 social experiments that will improve your career.

  • Share to Facebook
  • Share to Twitter
  • Share to Linkedin

From a young age, I’ve been fascinated with how people meet and form relationships. While researching and writing The 2 AM Principle , I tested many famous theories and studies about human behavior.

These mini experiments and games provided essential insights for my career. Whether you are an entrepreneur trying to grow your business or someone trying to get ahead in their career, these experiments can help you understand your leadership style, make connections, and build confidence.

1. The Rejection Game

Human beings are overwhelmingly concerned with rejection. The fear of not being accepted stops us from taking many actions for our benefit. Yet, being turned down is never as bad as we think. The Rejection Game helps us realize this and overcome our fear.

It works like this: Go up to complete strangers and ask them for something that would seem worthy of a rejection. The request can be anything that puts you out of your comfort zone, but here are some examples to get started:

  • Ask a random woman or man for their number.
  • At a restaurant, ask a group if you can join them for dinner.
  • Ask a stranger to run a race with you.
  • Ask strangers to do the “Running Man”, “Nae/Nae” or some other dance fad with you.
  • Ask someone at the gym to teach you their workout routine.

Will a percentage of people say no to you? Without a doubt, but it won’t be nearly as many as you think. You will realize how hard it is to get rejected, second you will toughen up and won’t fear rejection as much.

Social experiments can help boost your confidence and career.

2. The Favor Game

The favor game is similar to the rejection game. You ask people to perform favors for you but not for the sake of rejection. Instead, you ask for favors to understand how far strangers or acquaintances will go to support you. It is based on a concept popularized by Ben Franklin. To win over an adversary, Franklin asked for a favor: to borrow a rare book. The two men ended up becoming lifelong friends.

According to the Ben Franklin effect, we like people more when we do them favors because we have invested our time and given them support.

The key is to stack favors from small to large. If you ask people for directions, ask them for the time first. People will go surprisingly far to be helpful. They may lend you their car, help you move, lend you money and so on.

You will discover how much your community is willing to support and be there for you. If you discover that people aren’t willing to do favors for you, then your requests may be too large. Another possibility is that you haven't been a good friend or you’re spending time with the wrong people.

3. The “E” Test

As an indicator of leadership and perspective, Professors Adam Galinsky and Maurice Schweitzer , developed the “E” test. In it, a person is asked to trace the letter “E” on his or her forehead.  Did you write the “E” so that other people could read it? According to Galinsky and Schweitzer, you are focused on others, which suggests that you consider the perspectives of those around you.

If you wrote it so that it can be read from your viewpoint, then you are self-focused, which is common in those in powerful positions. It is suggested that those who are focused on others may not have what it takes to be a ruthless leader, but it isn’t definite.

4. The Cash Register Experiment

In his book Give and Take , Wharton professor Adam Grant proposes that we assume other people are like ourselves. If you want to know how honest you or someone else is, ask a simple question: How much does the average store employee steal from their cash register?

Did you pick a big number or a small number? The higher the number, the less likely a person is to be honest. Once again, this experiment is suggestive but not definitive.

I have found these experiments and games invaluable. These insights have led me to invite a duty-free cashier in the Stockholm Airport to quit her job and travel the world with me after 10 seconds of meeting and befriend Kiefer Sutherland over a battle of Jenga. However, the greatest impact by far was on my confidence and ability to stay calm in any situation.

Jon Levy

  • Editorial Standards
  • Reprints & Permissions

social experiments to try

5 Forgotten (and Ethically Questionable) Experiments on Social Isolation

David Sandwich

David Sandwich

Forgotten Psychology

Human beings may be social animals, but if aliens visited our planet amid the COVID-19 pandemic, they might come to a different conclusion. Around the world, people have been practicing all kinds of safety measures to stop the spread of the novel coronavirus and “flatten the curve.” Unfortunately, this has required many decidedly a social behaviors, like social distancing, isolation, and quarantines. While introverts may be enjoying their time in solitude, there’s no denying that the sharp drop in daily social interactions has taken its toll on our collective mental health.

There are some reasons to be grateful, however. We live in a time of a remarkable technology. While we keep our distance in a physical sense, we have various tools at our fingertips that allow us to stay in touch with family and friends. We have cell phones, social media, FaceTime, Zoom conferencing, and other advanced platforms that closely mimic the rapid exchanges of real, face-to-face conversations. They’re not perfect, and problems like “Zoom fatigue” are on the rise. But technology has greatly minimized the mental health impact of what would otherwise be a period of extreme social isolation.

And, let’s face it. Things could be worse. At least we’re not subjects in a social isolation experiment from the 1950s and ’60s. These experiments began as a way to investigate how social isolation could be used as a brainwashing technique. From there, other scientists took an interest in social isolation as it was believed to have strong implications for theories on perception and the etiology of psychological disorders. Most of these experiments took place before ethical guidelines for human research were in place. Therefore, the procedures were at times unreasonably harsh and often involved the complete isolation of individuals for days or weeks at a time.

While many of these experiments were no doubt dangerous and unethical, some were more innocent and led to valuable insights regarding how social isolation affects our perceptions, behaviors, and mental health. These studies underscore the importance of maintaining social relationships, even when it’s difficult to do so. Here is a curated list of the most intriguing (or downright unethical) studies on the effects of isolation.

1. The Hallucination Experiment at McGill University

Length of isolation: 3 days.

The first studies of social isolation were performed at McGill University in the early 1950s. At the time, there were rumors that China and Korea had developed brainwashing techniques that succeeded in converting American POWs to communists. Dr. Donald Hebb at McGill University wanted to find out whether such a thing were actually possible under the right conditions. So, the eminent professor, along with three other scientists — Drs. Bexton, Heron, and Scott — began looking into how people responded to social isolation coupled with sensory deprivation . However, while rumors of brainwashing overseas served as the impetus for these experiments, the investigators didn’t try to manipulate the beliefs and opinions of their subjects. Instead, they focused broadly on how isolation affected one’s cognitive processes. What the investigators actually found caught everyone by surprise.

For the experiment, each subject spent three days alone in a cubicle. They were paid $20 per day. For sensory deprivation, subjects were blindfolded and wore cardboard arm cuffs that began at the elbows and extended past the fingertips. This latter contraption prevented the subjects from touching anything in the cubicle. A pair of earphones and several running fans were also used to dampen their sense of hearing. As expected, the time in isolation temporarily impaired several cognitive functions. It also made the subjects more irritable and prone to erratic, compulsive movements. But the strangest effect of the isolation was the experiencing of vivid imagery and absurd, dream-like hallucinations.

One subject drew this picture to explain the strange feeling of there being two of him during isolation. He couldn’t decide if he was A or B. All the subjects experienced hallucinations in one form or another. Some subjects reported seeing “wallpaper-like” patterns or geometric shapes. Others experienced more elaborate hallucinations like prehistoric animals or little yellow men. One subject saw a procession of marching squirrels with knapsacks slung over their shoulders. The squirrels were moving “purposefully” across a snowy field. Subjects also reported vague feelings of “otherness” or “strangeness” with respect to their bodies. One subject sensed that two of him existed in the cubicle, and he couldn’t tell which body actually belonged to him. While the experiment yielded several findings of great interest, it was the hallucinations that piqued the attention of the scientific community. Soon, other laboratories began using isolation as a means to study a range of psychological topics.

2. The Princeton University Experiments

Length of isolation: 4 days.

Dr. Hebb’s experiments inspired a team of researchers at Princeton University to further examine the consequences of isolation and sensory deprivation. The experiments were led by Dr. Jack Vernon and focused on what could be done to maximize the number of hallucinations . Unexpectedly, when Dr. Vernon and his team began their work, they had trouble getting their subjects to hallucinate. Only a few subjects experienced hallucinations, and the imagery was too simple. The subjects would see elementary shapes and figures, but no intricate dream-like sequences, as reported in the McGill experiments. So, Dr. Vernon used an even stricter protocol. He had each subject stay in the cubicle for 4 days. The room was pitch black and had “relief bottles” and a chemical toilet so the subject didn’t have to leave the chamber to use the bathroom. The subjects were also forbidden from exploring the room, singing, or talking to themselves. However, even with these Draconian measures in place, the investigators were unable to produce a fair number of hallucinations.

What eventually worked was putting some light in the room and then having participants wear masks instead. The masks weren’t exactly opaque, and so they permitted some perception of light — but not much else. One of the masks worn by the subjects was made of moleskin with two ping-pong balls covering the eyes. Another mask had an illuminated panel that provided a diffuse layer of blue-green light over the subject’s eyes. These changes to the experiment were successful in producing complex hallucinations in more than half of the participants.

The Princeton team discovered some other interesting effects of isolation. For instance, isolation impaired simple motor tasks, like holding a stylus, but enhanced memorization of word lists. Many subjects also experienced feelings of stress, while others faced unusual deficits in their sense of taste. One subject in isolation couldn’t tell the difference between beef bouillon and tomato soup, or ham and bologna. Over time, research on social isolation expanded to other colleges and universities, and scientists began to think seriously about how the research could apply to real-world problems — most notably, space travel.

3. NASA Research for Manned Space Flight

Length of isolation: 5 months.

In the 1950s and ’60s, one of the main concerns about the prospect of space travel was the inevitable prolonged periods of confinement and social isolation. After all, voyaging to a distant planet would require months of being cooped up in a small cabin, and the folks at NASA weren’t sure how this would affect a person’s psyche. So, NASA funded several projects looking into the effects of prolonged isolation. In one of them, Dr. Jack Findley, a psychology professor at the University of Maryland, confined a subject to a tiny 171 sq. ft. chamber for 5 months . The subject was 34-year-old Whilden P. Breen, Jr., a teacher and U.S. army veteran.

While in isolation, Mr. Breen was treated like a lab rat. He had to press buttons to get food, music, cigarettes, and other pleasantries. However, these opportunities would only be available after he completed other tasks, such as physical exercise, health screenings, and “work tasks.” The latter included mundane jobs like looking up words in a dictionary or assembling random electronic devices. Sometimes Dr. Findley would change the rules, and Mr. Breen would have to press a button 500 times before getting a single cigarette. Another game called “Variable Consequence” allowed him to complete work tasks in order to gain a reward that could be very positive (like having a brief conversation with his wife over an intercom) or very negative (like having nothing to eat but banana pellets for 3 days). Mr. Breen was happy to participate in the experiment at the outset. But, after only a few weeks, his patience began to wear thin. He doubted he could make it to 2 months, let alone 5.

One of the things that helped Mr. Breen retain his sanity while in isolation was the opportunity to be creative. He was allowed to take up a hobby and chose oil painting. He painted a variety of different pictures, everything from exotic dancers to nuclear explosions. Each day, Mr. Breen also had the opportunity to perform a verbal task of his choosing, and he used this time to work on a science fiction novel. While these activities helped make the experience more tolerable, the prolonged isolation and regimented schedule eventually got to him. He became antagonistic toward the experimenters and frequently insulted them over the intercom. He also grew suspicious of the experimenters’ motives and thought they were hiding the true purpose of the experiment from him. The mental strain of isolation became so great he couldn’t concentrate on his novel. So, he abandoned it.

In spite of these difficulties, Mr. Breen carried on with the experiment. After 5 months, the study ended, and Mr. Breen returned to his old life. In retrospect, he felt guilty about treating the experimenters poorly and apologized for insulting them. He was also elated to reunite with his wife who upon seeing him said, “He was as handsome as ever.” Dr. Findley regarded the experiment as a success. After all, the programmed environment kept the subject in good health, and his work performance never faltered. However, one recommendation Dr. Findley made that could help future astronauts was the inclusion of more than one person in the environment. As for Mr. Breen, the experiment taught him a lot too. “I’ve decided I like people,” he said.

4. The CIA’s Mind Control Program

Length of isolation: .

As noted above, the scientific study of social isolation began in order to examine its potential as a brainwashing technique. After all, it was believed that isolation was one of the strategies that the Chinese government had been using to brainwash American POWs. In response to such reports, the CIA established its own top secret program aimed at mastering the art of mind control. The project, known as MK-Ultra, lasted from about 1953 to 1973 and involved hundreds of experiments performed at colleges, hospitals, prisons, and secret testing facilities.

There’s a lot we don’t know about MK-Ultra, because when the program was finally terminated, the director of the CIA mandated the destruction of all records. What we do know comes from the limited documents that survived the purge, as well as the testimonies of CIA officials and others during an investigation by the U.S. Senate in 1977 . The investigation revealed the highly unethical and criminal nature of the MK-Ultra experiments. In their quest for complete mind control, researchers recruited prisoners and other vulnerable populations without their consent, and used a variety of cruel and unusual techniques, such as torture, sexual abuse, massive dosing of the hallucinogenic drug LSD, and of course, isolation. At a Kentucky facility, six African-American prisoners were isolated and drugged with LSD for 77 consecutive days. Another victim — a mental patient — was drugged with the hallucinogen for 174 days. Then, in a sub-program called “Operation Third Chance,” investigators tested a series of unconscionable interrogation techniques on American soldiers suspected of espionage. As stated in the published Senate report:

Stressing techniques employed included silent treatment before or after EA 1729 [LSD] administration, sustained conventional interrogation prior to EA 1729 interrogation, deprivation of food, drink, sleep or bodily evacuation, sustained isolation prior to EA 1729 administration, hot-cold switches in approach, duress “pitches”, verbal degradation and bodily discomfort, or dramatized threats to subject’s life or mental health.

Presumably, the MK-Ultra program never reached complete mind control á la The Manchurian Candidate . However, the techniques were effective for interrogation and, to some extent, brainwashing. The real legacy of MK-Ultra will always be one of shame. The program served as a prime example of how blind ambition in science can turn quickly to absolute wickedness.

Length of Isolation: ~13 years

Genie (1970)The case of Genie is a sad one. Genie (born: 1957) was a young girl who was mentally and physically abused by her parents for the first 13 years of her life. During this time, she spent every day alone, hidden in a locked room while confined to either a chair or a toilet. When she was finally rescued by Los Angeles welfare authorities in 1970, she was severely malnourished, had only weak language skills, and like other feral children, showed a lack of socialization.

Genie came under the attention of psychologists who first and foremost wanted to help her, but were also interested in testing several theories of language development. For instance, many researchers believed that children acquired language skills during a specific critical period of development. According to this theory, language acquisition would not be possible once the child surpassed this critical stage. Unfortunately for Genie, this turned out to be true. Even though Genie was able to learn new words under the care of her teachers, she still struggled with grammar and syntax. On the other hand, her capacity for nonverbal communication was intact. She had no problem communicating using gestures, pictures, and sign language.

When Genie turned 18, she moved back with her mom. But, after a few months, Genie’s mom realized she couldn’t provide adequate care, and so Genie was placed in a series of foster homes over the next 20 or so years. There were reports of foster families abusing and harassing her. As a result, her condition deteriorated, and she became depressed. However, as of 2016, Genie is reportedly doing much better. While her exact location hasn’t been disclosed, we do know that she currently lives in a small private institution for adults with intellectual disabilities. Her speech remains severely impaired, but she continues to communicate well using sign language.

The COVID-19 Experiment

Length of isolation: tbd.

While the above studies differed in many ways, they all pointed to a single truth: human contact is vitally important. We require some degree of human interaction to stay happy and healthy. In these strange times, many of us have become unwitting subjects of a very different kind of social experiment, testing the effects of prolonged isolation and social distancing on our collective mental health. And, we’re still awaiting the results. There’s no doubt that such safety measures are needed to flatten the curve and will prevent countless deaths. So, the solution isn’t simply to call off stay-at-home orders and reopen businesses (a dangerous decision many states have already made). Instead we need to find a way to maintain our mental health while in isolation. Although we can’t socialize in person, we can use cell phones and computers to interact with family and friends. If we have a lot of downtime, we can devote more attention to our hobbies or to learning new skills. There are many ways to keep our mental health in check. However, what works for some may not work for others. We each need to find our own way.

Originally published May 6, 2020 on ForgottenPsychology.com

David Sandwich

Written by David Sandwich

Professor, Writer, and World’s Greatest Dad.

Text to speech

  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Therapy Center
  • When To See a Therapist
  • Types of Therapy
  • Best Online Therapy
  • Best Couples Therapy
  • Managing Stress
  • Sleep and Dreaming
  • Understanding Emotions
  • Self-Improvement
  • Healthy Relationships
  • Student Resources
  • Personality Types
  • Sweepstakes
  • Guided Meditations
  • Verywell Mind Insights
  • 2024 Verywell Mind 25
  • Mental Health in the Classroom
  • Editorial Process
  • Meet Our Review Board
  • Crisis Support

How Social Psychologists Conduct Their Research

Surveys, observations, and case studies provide necessary data

Why Study Social Behavior?

Descriptive research, correlational research, experimental research.

Social psychology research methods allow psychologists a window into the causes for human behavior. They rely on a few well-established methods to research  social psychology topics. These methods allow researchers to test hypotheses and theories as they look for relationships among different variables.

Why do people do the things they do? And why do they sometimes behave differently in groups? These questions are of interest not only to social psychologists, but to teachers, public policy-makers, healthcare administrators, or anyone who has ever watched a news story about a world event and wondered, “Why do people act that way?”

Which type of research is best? This depends largely on the subject the researcher is exploring, the resources available, and the theory or hypothesis being investigated.

Why study social behavior? Since so many "common sense" explanations exist for so many human actions, people sometimes fail to see the value in scientifically studying social behavior. However, it is important to remember that folk wisdom can often be surprisingly inaccurate and that the scientific explanations behind a behavior can be quite shocking.

Stanley Milgram's infamous obedience experiments are examples of how the results of an experiment can defy conventional wisdom.

If you asked most people if they would obey an authority figure even if it meant going against their moral code or harming another individual, they would probably emphatically deny that they would ever do such a thing. Yet Milgram's results revealed that all participants hurt another person simply because they were told to do so by an authority figure, with 65% delivering the highest voltage possible.

The scientific method is essential in studying psychological phenomena in an objective, empirical, analytical way. By employing the scientific method, researchers can see cause-and-effect relationships, uncover associations among factors, and generalize the results of their experiments to larger populations.

While common sense might tell us that opposites attract, that birds of a feather flock together, or that absence makes the heart grow fonder, psychologists can put such ideas to the test using various research methods to determine if there is any real truth to such folk wisdom.

The goal of descriptive research is to portray what already exists in a group or population.

One example of this type of research would be an opinion poll to find which political candidate people plan to vote for in an upcoming election. Unlike causal and relational studies, descriptive studies cannot determine if there is a relationship between two variables. They can only describe what exists within a given population.

An example of descriptive research is a survey of people's attitudes toward a particular social issue such as divorce, capital punishment, or gambling laws.

Types of Descriptive Research

Some of the most commonly used forms of descriptive research utilized by social psychologists include the following.

Surveys are probably one of the most frequently used types of descriptive research. Surveys usually rely on self-report inventories in which people fill out questionnaires about their own behaviors or opinions.

The advantage of the survey method is that it allows social psychology researchers to gather a large amount of data relatively quickly, easily, and cheaply.

The Observational Method

The observational method involves watching people and describing their behavior. Sometimes referred to as field observation, this method can involve creating a scenario in a lab and then watching how people respond or performing naturalistic observation in the subject's own environment.

Each type of observation has its own strengths and weaknesses. Researchers might prefer using observational methods in a lab in order to gain greater control over possible extraneous variables, while others might prefer using naturalistic observation in order to obtain greater ecological validity . However, lab observations tend to be more costly and difficult to implement than naturalistic observations.

Case Studies

A case study involves the in-depth observation of a single individual or group. Case studies can allow researchers to gain insight into things that are very rare or even impossible to reproduce in experimental settings.

The case study of Genie , a young girl who was horrifically abused and deprived of learning language during a critical developmental period, is one example of how a case study can allow social scientists to study phenomena that they otherwise could not reproduce in a lab.

Social psychologists use correlational research to look for relationships between variables. For example, social psychologists might carry out a correlational study looking at the relationship between media violence and aggression . They might collect data on how many hours of aggressive or violent television programs children watch each week and then gather data how on aggressively the children act in lab situations or in naturalistic settings.

Conducting surveys, directly observing behaviors, or compiling research from earlier studies are some of the methods used to gather data for correlational research. While this type of study can help determine if two variables have a relationship, it does not allow researchers to determine if one variable causes changes in another variable.

While the researcher in the previous example on media aggression and violence can use the results of their study to determine if there might be a relationship between the two variables, they cannot say definitively that watching television violence causes aggressive behavior.

Experimental research is the key to uncovering causal relationships between variables . In experimental research, the experimenter randomly assigns participants to one of two groups:

  • The control group : The control group receives no treatment and serves as a baseline.
  • The experimental group : Researchers manipulate the levels of some independent variable in the experimental group and then measure the effects.

Because researchers are able to control the independent variables, experimental research can be used to find causal relationships between variables.

So if psychologists wanted to establish a causal relationship between media violence and aggressive behavior, they would want to design an experiment to test this hypothesis. If the hypothesis was that playing violent video games causes players to respond more aggressively in social situations, they would want to randomly assign participants to two groups.

The control group would play a non-violent video game for a predetermined period of time while the experimental group would play a violent game for the same period of time.

Afterward, the participants would be placed in a situation where they would play a game against another opponent. In this game, they could either respond aggressively or non-aggressively. The researchers would then collect data on how often people utilized aggressive responses in this situation and then compare this information with whether these individuals were in the control or experimental group.

By using the scientific method, designing an experiment, collecting data, and analyzing the results, researchers can then determine if there is a causal relationship between media violence and violent behavior.

Why Social Research Methods Are Important

The study of human behavior is as complex as the behaviors themselves, which is why it is so important for social scientists to utilize empirical methods of selecting participants, collecting data, analyzing their findings, and reporting their results.

Haslam N, Loughnan S, Perry G. Meta-milgram: An empirical synthesis of the obedience experiments . Voracek M, ed.  PLoS ONE . 2014;9(4):e93927. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093927

Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience .  The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology . 1963;67(4):371-378. doi:10.1037/h0040525

Curtiss S, Fromkin V, Krashen S, Rigler D, Rigler M. The linguistic development of genie .  Language . 1974;50(3):528.

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Social Mettle

Social Mettle

A List of Quirky Ideas for Social Norm Breaching Experiments

Suppose there is a game in which you are not allowed to say 'yes' or 'no', and have to answer only with another question. Using up the entire range of 'wh-questions', you can think of how entertaining this game can get. Social norm breaching is nothing different than this.

Ideas for Social Norm Breaching Experiments

Suppose there is a game in which you are not allowed to say ‘yes’ or ‘no’, and have to answer only with another question. Using up the entire range of ‘wh-questions’, you can think of how entertaining this game can get. Social norm breaching is nothing different than this.

No Suggestions Implied! While a Superman costume flaunting an underwear is taken well, someone wearing undergarments over normal clothes (that too at a fancy dress party) becomes an act of breach! Unfair, isn’t it!

Eating with your hands while dining at a fancy restaurant, wearing your bathrobe to college one day, sending a reply via email when someone had called you on your cell phone, or talking to a stranger by getting very close to him/her, and such similar deeds are ones that a normal human being would usually avoid doing.

If you have tried any of these, you can be called a researcher who was engaged in studying social norm breaching experiments. Such kind acts of nonsense, which you may call bizarre, are not solely meant for entertainment purposes. This testing of socially accepted rules are mainly a part of the fields of sociology and social psychology. Yes, academics can get very interesting at times!

What are Breaching Experiments in Sociology?

Human expressions collage

Breaching experiments try to study the reactions of people when a social norm is broken or violated.

There are some unwritten rules that all of us follow in our day-to-day conduct. How one would (rather should) behave in a given situation is predefined and based on a lot of assumptions. These experiments try to break these ‘taken for granted’ social norms. Reactions of others to such tricks are also fun to look at. This concept is associated with the ethnomethodology theory of sociology , put forth by Harold Garfinkel.

An unexpected behavior or comment leaves the respondent completely puzzled, making the experiment successful. The approach behind such experiments highlights that, people continue to make a number of such rules everyday, and do not even realize it.

Experiment Ideas

Clearly, a breaching experiment is like asking for trouble. When the action is troublesome, it makes it visible that practices leading to social stability are so much ingrained into our minds. Breaching of norms has to be a deliberate act though; it is not an issue of conflicting opinions leading to disobedience of a given norm. You can try troubling others with the following ideas.

Kid pointing towards the sky

– To a casual question like ‘what’s up?’, you can say ‘the sky’. ‘How’s it going?’ can be replied to in an exhilarating manner, like ‘I didn’t see any ‘it’ going’. When people are not really interested in knowing about you, and they still ask those questions, you may actually stop them and really explain to them some random event going on in your life. (Be very sure about who you want to experiment with this though!)

Group of girl friends laughing at the dining table

– Some tests that college students were asked to take, involved behaving like a stranger or renter in one’s home. Talking only when asked about something, or being very polite, are some things their parents reacted to quite strongly.

Tic-tac-toe board game

– In the tic-tac-toe game, ask a person to play first. When he/she places an ‘X’ in a square, you place an ‘O’ on a line forming the matrix, and not in any square space. That person might get confused, or would exclaim, “Have you gone crazy?” Behaving according to the established practices of following given rules is so important here, even if it is a game. This exemplifies an established social order.

– At a decently crowded public place, get one of your friends to stand opposite you. You act like both of you are talking about something important. Then, act as if the both of you are holding a very thin and delicate cotton string in your fingertips, each one of you holding one end of it. Now, start to move away, very slowly, so that people feel that you are holding something very precious. Shout out words like, ‘easy’, ‘be careful’, or ‘watch out’. You may find a few people actually believing you and ducking while they pass through. Someone might even go around you, so as to not break that string. You would notice, it is very easy to create social norms.

Experiment Examples

Here are some examples of interpersonal conversations, mentioned in ethnomethodology literature as case studies of experimentation given by Garfinkel. These have been sourced from books like ‘Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology’ by John Heritage, and ‘Sociology in Perspective’ by Mark Kirby.

– The subject was telling the experimenter―a member of the subject’s car pool―about having had a flat tire while going to work the previous day.

S : I had a flat tire. E : What do you mean, you had a flat tire? She appeared momentarily stunned. Then she answered in a hostile way: ‘What do you mean? What do you mean? A flat tire is a flat tire. That is what I a meant. Nothing special. What a crazy question!’

– By asking ‘What do you mean?’, as a response to every statement, students were asked to continue the conversation.

S : Hi, Ray. How is your girlfriend feeling? E : What do you mean ‘How is she feeling?’. Do you mean physically or mentally? S : I mean how is she feeling? What’s the matter with you? (He looked peeved.) E : Nothing. Just explain a little clearer as to what you mean. S : Skip it. How are your Med School applications coming? E : What do you mean ‘How are they going?’ S : You know what I mean. E : I really don’t. S : What’s the matter with you? Are you sick?

– On Friday night, my husband and I were watching television. He remarked that he was tired. I asked, ‘How are you tired? Physically, mentally, or just bored?’

S : I don’t know, I guess physically, mainly. E : You mean that your muscles ache, or your bones? S : I guess so. Don’t be so technical. (After more watching) S : All these old movies have the same kind of old iron bedstead in them. E : What do you mean? Do you mean all old movies, or some of them, or just the ones you have seen? S : What’s the matter with you? You know what I mean. E : I wish you would be more specific. S : You know what I mean! Drop dead!

– The victim waived his hand cheerily.

S : How are you? E : How am I in regard to what? My health, my finance, my school work, my peace of mind, my … S : (Red in the face and suddenly out of control.) Look! I was just trying to be polite! Frankly, I don’t give a damn how you are.

The results from these cases proved that the experimenters could successfully break the norms. It was possible because of the fact that, any given conversation (or communication) takes place smoothly, ‘assuming the background knowledge’, which helps two people make sense of what the other means.

Well, if you’ve got the point now, you can be real ‘innovative and original’ with this act of breaching. Oh, but just be sure that you don’t mess with the wrong people at the wrong time.

Like it? Share it!

Get Updates Right to Your Inbox

Further insights.

Simple Tips For Creating An Engaging Online Dating Profile

Privacy Overview

Social Experimentation

Social Experimentation

Since 1970 the United States government has spent over half a billion dollars on social experiments intended to assess the effect of potential tax policies, health insurance plans, housing subsidies, and other programs. Was it worth it? Was anything learned from these experiments that could not have been learned by other, and cheaper, means? Could the experiments have been better designed or analyzed? These are some of the questions addressed by the contributors to this volume, the result of a conference on social experimentation sponsored in 1981 by the National Bureau of Economic Research. The first section of the book looks at four types of experiments and what each accomplished. Frank P. Stafford examines the negative income tax experiments, Dennis J. Aigner considers the experiments with electricity pricing based on time of use, Harvey S. Rosen evaluates housing allowance experiments, and Jeffrey E. Harris reports on health experiments. In the second section, addressing experimental design and analysis, Jerry A. Hausman and David A. Wise highlight the absence of random selection of participants in social experiments, Frederick Mosteller and Milton C. Weinstein look specifically at the design of medical experiments, and Ernst W. Stromsdorfer examines the effects of experiments on policy. Each chapter is followed by the commentary of one or more distinguished economists.

Working Groups

More from nber.

In addition to working papers , the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter , the NBER Digest , the Bulletin on Retirement and Disability , the Bulletin on Health , and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship  — as well as online conference reports , video lectures , and interviews .

2024, 16th Annual Feldstein Lecture, Cecilia E. Rouse," Lessons for Economists from the Pandemic" cover slide

IMAGES

  1. BEST SOCIAL EXPERIMENTS Compilation 2020

    social experiments to try

  2. The Most Epic Social Experiment Of All Time (2 pics)

    social experiments to try

  3. The Social Experiment : Will people try to help strangers in need

    social experiments to try

  4. Social Science Experiments Ideas

    social experiments to try

  5. 17 Social Experiments That Led To Unexpected Results

    social experiments to try

  6. Social experiments to try

    social experiments to try

COMMENTS

  1. 11+ Psychology Experiment Ideas (Goals + Methods)

    Our primary aim with this experiment is to explore the intriguing world of social influences, specifically focusing on how much sway a group has over an individual's decisions. ... Method: This idea is inspired by the classic Asch Conformity Experiments. Here's a simple way to try it: Assemble a group of people (about 7-8). Only one person will ...

  2. Social Experiments and Studies in Psychology

    A social experiment is a type of research performed in psychology to investigate how people respond in certain social situations. In many of these experiments, the experimenters will include confederates who are people who act like regular participants but who are actually acting the part. Such experiments are often used to gain insight into ...

  3. 8 Effective Social Psychology Experiments & Activities For High School

    8. Door-in-the-face experiment. This technique is the exact opposite of foot-in-the-door activity. In the case of a marketing strategy, it is used very smartly. High school students can conduct a social experiment with the permission and supervision of their teacher or faculty member.

  4. 17 Social Experiments That Led To Unexpected Results

    Carlsberg Social Experiment. Idea: In this social experiment by the Danish brewery Carlsberg, the subjects, unsuspecting couples out to watch a movie, walk into a crowded cinema. There are only 2 seats remaining, right in the middle, with each of the rest taken by a rather tough-looking and tattooed male biker.

  5. Social Psychology Experiments: 10 Of The Most Brilliant Studies

    5. The Milgram Social Psychology Experiment. The Milgram experiment, led by the well-known psychologist Stanley Milgram in the 1960s, aimed to test people's obedience to authority. The results of Milgram's social psychology experiment, sometimes known as the Milgram obedience study, continue to be both thought-provoking and controversial.

  6. Great Ideas for Psychology Experiments to Explore

    Try this experiment to see what percentage of people are likely to conform. Enlist confederates to give the wrong response to a math problem and then see if the participants defy or conform to the rest of the group. ... Three of the most classic social psychology experiments are: The Asch Conformity Experiment: This experiment involved seeing ...

  7. Famous Social Psychology Experiments

    At a Glance. Some of the most famous social psychology experiments include Asch's conformity experiments, Bandura's Bobo doll experiments, the Stanford prison experiment, and Milgram's obedience experiments. Some of these studies are quite controversial for various reasons, including how they were conducted, serious ethical concerns, and what ...

  8. 28 social psychology studies from *Experiments With People ...

    The lesson from this as well as many other social psychology experiments is that seemingly trivial situational variables have a greater impact than personality variables, even though people tend to explain behaviors using personality. See The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology (Lee Ross, Richard E. Nisbett, 2011) Chap 9.

  9. 5 Famous & Classic Experiments

    Here, we highlight five powerful experiments in social psychology that have shaped the development of the field. 1. Solomon Asch's Experiments on Conformity. Solomon Asch carried out a series of psychological tests known as the Asch Conformity Experiments in the 1950s to find out how much social pressure from the majority group could persuade ...

  10. Online Social Psychology Studies

    This page contains links to 114 web-based experiments, surveys, and other social psychology studies. If you would like us to add a link to your study, click here. To help reach a wide audience, study links posted here are also publicized via Twitter and an RSS feed (a combined subscriber base of over 294,000 people). All told, SPN has posted ...

  11. Social Psychology Experiments

    The Bystander Apathy Experiment was inspirated and motivation to conduct this experiment from the highly publicised murder of Kitty Genovese in the same year. Groups and Influence On Opinion. Sherif's classic social psychology experiment named Robbers Cave Experiment dealt with in-group relations, out-group relations and intergroup relations.

  12. 50 Ideas for Five Day Self-Experiments

    Try 5 days of: Reading a chapter of a fiction book each day. Not pushing yourself (for workaholics—try letting yourself cruise. This is one I tried recently). Rediscovering a childhood passion ...

  13. Top 10 Social Experiments That Can Improve Your Everyday Life

    9. The Spotlight Effect: This phenomenon highlights our tendency to believe others pay more attention to us than they actually do. Remember that people are often focused on their own lives and ...

  14. 20 safe social experiments you should try before you die

    Part your hair on the opposite side or pick a side if yours runs down the middle. Wear a button ... any button. Carry a sign saying anything or nothing. Eat with the wrong utensil or none at all ...

  15. 4 Social Experiments That Will Improve Your Career

    Social experiments can help boost your confidence and career. 2. The Favor Game. The favor game is similar to the rejection game. You ask people to perform favors for you but not for the sake of ...

  16. Social experiment

    A social experiment is a method of psychological or sociological research that observes people's reactions to certain situations or events. The experiment depends on a particular social approach where the main source of information is the participants' point of view and knowledge. To carry out a social experiment, specialists usually split ...

  17. 5 Forgotten (and Ethically Questionable) Experiments on Social ...

    Human beings may be social animals, but if aliens visited our planet amid the COVID-19 pandemic, they might come to a different conclusion. Around the world, people have been practicing all kinds ...

  18. Introduction to "Social Experimentation"

    2024 Methods Lecture, Susan Athey, "Analysis and Design of Multi-Armed Bandit Experiments and Policy Learning" Lecture; ... Susan, Undral Byambadalai, Vitor Hadad, Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy, Weiwen... 2024, Economics of Social Security Panel, "Earnings Inequality and Payroll Tax Revenues" Lecture; National Bureau of Economic Research. Contact ...

  19. Hey Reddit, what are some social experiments you like to try with

    To exit you have to go through two sets of double doors. On the left door of the first pair of doors, there is a sign that reads "Out of order. Use other door." Then the right door of the second set of doors has an identical notice. I think they are making us take the least efficient route just to see if we will. 4.

  20. Social Psychology Research Methods

    Social psychology research methods allow psychologists a window into the causes for human behavior. They rely on a few well-established methods to research social psychologytopics. These methods allow researchers to test hypotheses and theories as they look for relationships among different variables.

  21. A List of Quirky Ideas for Social Norm Breaching Experiments

    Breaching experiments try to study the reactions of people when a social norm is broken or violated. ... You would notice, it is very easy to create social norms. Experiment Examples. Here are some examples of interpersonal conversations, mentioned in ethnomethodology literature as case studies of experimentation given by Garfinkel. These have ...

  22. Social Experimentation

    Could the experiments have been better designed or analyzed? These are some of the questions addressed by the contributors to this volume, the result of a conference on social experimentation sponsored in 1981 by the National Bureau of Economic Research. The first section of the book looks at four types of experiments and what each accomplished.