Past Part I Qualifying Exams

For the benefit of our current first-year students, we make available to them Part I Qualifying Exams from previous years that they can use to practice.

2022 Qualifying Exam (PDF)

2021 qualifying exam (pdf), 2019 qualifying exam (pdf), 2018 qualifying exam (pdf), 2017 qualifying exam (pdf), 2016 qualifying exam (pdf), 2015 qualifying exam (pdf), 2014 qualifying exam (pdf), 2013 qualifying exam (pdf), 2012 qualifying exam (pdf).

biology phd qualifying exam

Preliminary Qualifying Exam (PQE)

Overview In the spring of the second year, BPH students take a preliminary qualifying examination (PQE). The purpose of the PQE is to assess the student’s preparation and ability to embark on original scientific investigation. The primary goal of the PQE is to evaluate the student’s ability to identify and articulate a clear hypothesis for the thesis topic based upon familiarity with relevant literature, to propose critical experiments designed to prove or to disprove the hypothesis, and to interpret experimental outcomes in a manner that indicates awareness of the limitations of the methods used.  It is not expected that preliminary data will be presented to support the hypothesis. The exam includes a written proposal and oral defense of that proposal on a topic related to the dissertation research.

Preparing for the PQE: Student Timeline

  • Complete the  BPH Preliminary Qualifying Exam Course Form , listing the coursework taken to fulfill program requirements. The BPH Program must approve of satisfactory progress before the student proceeds in the PQE process.
  • The PQE committee will consist of three BPH program faculty * with relevant expertise for each student’s area of research, chosen by the student in consultation with the advisor and Faculty Director. Students may also name faculty with appointments in BPH-affiliated departments, who themselves might not be BPH members. The PQE committee chair , who will act to moderate and document the proceedings and outcomes of the exam, in addition to serving as an examiner, will be assigned from the ranks of the PQE Steering Committee , which is comprised of experienced examiners with collective expertise that cuts across the scientific spectrum covered within the program.  The research/dissertation advisor is not part of the student’s PQE committee. The student must complete the PQE Committee Form and have it approved by the BPH Faculty Director. *NOTE:   For students in dissertation labs outside of BPH (HILS-affiliated labs), one member of the student’s PQE committee can be from the HILS-affiliated lab’s department.
  • The student is required to send the PQE Committee Form and the PQE Course Form to the BPH Office as soon as they are complete along with the date, time and location of the exam. NOTE: It is critical for students to work with the BPH Office in scheduling PQEs so as to not conflict with other BPH academic endeavors such as Dissertation Defenses.
  • Topic and content : Students are expected to choose a topic for their exam that is ordinarily related to the topic of the student’s dissertation. While it is fully expected that the advisor would help guide the student toward their current topic of dissertation research and provided technical advice, the advisor and PQE committee are not allowed to assist the student in developing the scope and aims of the proposal. However, students are encouraged to get feedback and critical comment from their peers in the laboratory and program.
  • Preparation Period and Guidelines : During the preparation of the proposal, students may consult with faculty and other students. Consultation on general issues (clarification, technical advice, etc.) is appropriate, but solicitation regarding ideas for specific aims or experimental design is inappropriate. Faculty members, including dissertation advisors, should not read written drafts of the proposal in order to provide extensive help. Further, students should not seek feedback from the members of their exam committee.

THE WRITTEN PROPOSAL The written component is submitted to the PQE committee at least 10 calendar days before the oral exam. A copy of the proposal should also be provided to the BPH program office and the dissertation advisor. The proposal should be single spaced, following the form of an NIH post-doctoral fellowship application on the topic chosen (Ariel, 11 pt. font, 6-page maximum , excluding specific aims page and references). The proposal should include the following sections:

  • Specific Aims – Listing the objectives of the specific research proposed (e.g., to test a stated hypothesis, create a novel design, solve a specific problem, challenge an existing paradigm or clinical practice, address a critical barrier to progress in the field, or develop new technology). One page or less is recommended.
  • Background and Significance – Briefly sketch the background leading to the proposal, critically evaluate existing knowledge, and specifically identify the gaps that the project is intended to fill. State concisely the importance and health relevance of the research described in this application by relating the specific aims to the broad, long-term objectives. If the aims of the application are achieved, state how scientific knowledge will be advanced. Describe the effect of these studies on the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services or preventative interventions.  Summarize your preliminary work, and work of others, that support the proposed research. Two pages are recommended.
  • Research Design and Methods – Describe the research design conceptual framework, procedures, and analyses to be used to accomplish the specific aims of the project. Briefly summarize how the data will be collected, analyzed, and interpreted. Describe any novel approaches, tools, technologies, or methods you may develop, and advantages over existing methodologies. Describe any novel concepts, approaches, tools, or technologies for the proposed studies. Discuss the potential challenges, difficulties, caveats, and limitations of the proposed procedures and alternative approaches to achieve the aims. Highlight anticipated outcomes, alternative interpretations, and potential pitfalls. Four pages are recommended.
  • References : (author, title, journal, inclusive pages, year)

THE ORAL EXAM The oral portion of the exam is built around a defense of the written proposal. At the outset of the exam, the student leaves the room for the PQE committee to discuss the merits of the written proposal and identify key areas they want to test the student on.  Additionally, the Dissertation Advisor will be asked to attend the PQE exam at the very beginning to review the student’s preparation for the exam with the committee, but will not be present during the oral examination.

Once the student is asked back into the room, the exam starts with a short presentation by the student ( no more than 10 slides ) of the background, specific aims, rationale, preliminary data, and proposed approach. The examiners, having read the proposal in detail, then ask questions that are both directly relate to and tangential to the proposal. Students must defend and explain the hypothesis, methods, and anticipated results, while also recognizing alternative approaches and interpretations. The committee will invariably test the student’s understanding of the core principles that underlie the scientific problem and their origins. Students may be asked to draw models or experimental flowcharts on the board for clarity. The exam is usually completed in about 2 hours, at which time the committee deliberates an outcome with the student out of the room. The PQE Chair will serve not only as an examiner, but will also oversee the administering of the exam and arbitrate problems. The Chair will also see that the PQE Report Form is completed and on file in the BPH Program Office at the completion of the exam.

PQE OUTCOMES

The PQE committee evaluates the individual sections and overall content of the written proposal , with an emphasis on the rationale and feasibility of the aims and whether the aims are interdependent or not. Often, deficiencies in the written proposal are satisfactorily addressed in the oral exam. However, a critique of the proposal will be provided and students may be asked to rewrite specific sections or, on occasion, the entire proposal.

For the oral exam , the committee will deliberate on the student’s preparedness as it relates to:

1) Broad background knowledge of the chosen field and related literature; 2) The ability to deconstruct and think critically about the research project and field (i.e., what are the established first principles and how were they established and what assumptions have been made, but not proven, that impact the proposed study?); 3) The application of specific methods, including strengths, limitations, alternatives, and statistical considerations; 4) The capacity to interpret specific outcomes and define an appropriate course of subsequent experiments; 5) Presentation skills and clarity.

Specific comments on these areas of competency and others will be provided on the PQE Report Form .

Based on the performance of the student, the committee will make constructive recommendations or require specific actions related either to the written proposal or for improving in specific competency areas recognized from the oral exam.

The Potential Outcomes of the PQE are:

1) PASS – a constructive critique and list of recommendations for improvement is provided.

2) CONDITIONAL – This is a qualified pass. In addition to recommendations, a specific list of required changes to the written proposal or actions needed to improve competencies (e.g., through coursework, online modules, article reading, working with a tutor or faculty member on a specific area of deficiency, etc.) will be given and discussed with the student, along with a timeline for completion. For example, a student might be asked to write an additional one or two-page report on a specific area of importance to their project that they displayed insufficient knowledge of, which would be done after further reading of the literature and/or additional coursework. The satisfactory completion of these required actions within the set timeline will be overseen by the PQE chair, laboratory mentor, and Faculty Director.

3) RETAKE – If it is felt that both the written proposal and oral exam are inadequate, with substantial deficiencies being recognized in multiple areas, then the student will be asked to retake the exam. The PQE Report will delineate these deficiencies and make clear recommendations to the student on what needs to be improved. A decision to require a retake of the PQE must be signed off on by the Faculty Director and PQE steering committee after reviewing the case.

A meeting is then held with the PQE chair, Faculty Director, Advisor/PI and student to discuss the case and the specific improvements needed. Resources available to the student and a strategy to employ them for improvements in scientific understanding and reasoning, critical thinking, proposal writing, or presentation will be provided to the student. The student must retake the exam, including submission of a revised written proposal, within six months. Unless aspects of the previous exam were deemed potentially unfair to the student, the same PQE committee will administer the retake , and the Faculty Director or a representative of the PQE steering committee will attend as an observer. In rare circumstances, the student may be counseled to consider leaving the program at this stage.

4) FAIL – The outcome of the retake exam is either pass or fail , and a student can only fail the PQE at the retake stage. Failing the PQE would occur if a combination of the revised proposal and second oral exam are again found to be insufficient and demonstrating a lack of preparedness and qualifications to move forward in the program. If after final considerations by the Faculty Director, PQE steering committee, and mentor, it is concluded that the student is best served by leaving the Program to pursue other interests, the student will be asked to leave the program at the end of the semester.

Upon satisfactory completion of their PQE, BPH students advance to become PhD candidates.

News from the School

Red meat and diabetes

Red meat and diabetes

How for-profit medicine is harming health care

How for-profit medicine is harming health care

A tradition of mentoring

A tradition of mentoring

Promising HIV treatment

Promising HIV treatment

biology phd qualifying exam

UC Davis Graduate Studies

Doctoral qualifying exam.

MANDATORY IN-PERSON PARTICIPATION IN THE QUALIFYING EXAMINATION  In accordance with the Doctoral Qualifying Examinations Policy (Revised March 22, 2024), QE’s must be held fully in-person with the option to include up to one committee member participating remotely, other than the QE chair.

The Doctoral Qualifying Examination (QE)

Qualifying exam topics.

  • Student Eligibility
  • Applying to take the QE
  • Committee Selection
  • Not Pass & the Second Exam

Advancing to Candidacy

  • Forms & Policy Links

The Qualifying Exam Application (via GradSphere)

Purpose of the Qualifying Exam

All UC Davis doctoral students must take a Qualifying Examination (QE) to demonstrate they are prepared to advance to candidacy, undertake independent research, and begin the dissertation.  Doctoral students may have no more than two opportunities to pass the QE.  

The QE evaluates the student’s preparation and potential for doctoral study, including:

Strategies for Success

Review proven QE tips, gathered by students in Professors of the Future, on  Acing Your Qualifying Exam .

  • Academic preparation in the field, and sufficient understanding of the areas related to the dissertation research.
  • Knowledge and understanding of the literature in the field, and the ability to evaluate and integrate those concepts.
  • Knowledge and understanding of relevant research methods and applications.
  • The viability and originality of the research proposal, and the ability to communicate those topics.

Information below is included in the Doctoral Qualifying Examination policy .  The QE must be an oral exam, 2-3 hours in length, and may include a written component covering both breadth and depth of knowledge.  Specific format is determined by the graduate program degree requirements which have been approved by Graduate Council.  Graduate Council specifies that Qualifying Exams must also have the following essential characteristics:

  • Be Interactive
  • The examiners must be able to ask questions, hear the answers, and then follow up with another question or comment in response to the student's initial reply. Committee members, individually and collectively, must be able to engage in a discourse with the candidate on topics relevant to the candidate’s area of competence.
  • Be a Group Activity
  • In addition to the ability to follow up to one's own questions, it is also very important for all examiners to hear all of the questions and all of the student's responses, plus have the ability to interject an alternate follow-up question. The collective wisdom of a group is generally greater than that of the individual. Further having other examiners present serves to moderate the group, to ensure that one examiner does not ask questions that are either trivial or too difficult, and that any one examiner is neither too friendly nor too obstreperous. Thus, to optimize the examination process and evaluation of the candidate, the committee as a whole must collectively: 1) experience the discourse with a candidate, 2) evaluate the candidate’s performance, 3) determine the length and content of the examination, and 4) moderate the demeanor of the candidate and the members of the committee.
  • Be Broadly Structured
  • Based on the candidate’s past academic, research, and scholarly record and the performance on the examination, the candidate must broadly demonstrate sufficient competence in the selected disciplinary area, which must go beyond the limited area of scholarship associated with a dissertation topic. Further, the candidate must demonstrate the capability for integration and utilization of knowledge and skills that are critical for independent and creative research, thereby qualifying them for advancement to the research-intensive phase of doctoral education.

Student QE Eligibility

To be eligible to take the exam, a student must:

  • Be enrolled in the quarter in which the exam will be conducted, or if the exam is held during a break between quarters, the student must have been enrolled in the previous quarter and be enrolled in the subsequent quarter.  
  • Maintain a minimum cumulative GPA of 3.0 in all course work completed.
  • Have completed all degree requirements (including coursework and language examinations), with the possible exception of any requirements being fulfilled during the quarter the QE is to be held.

Applying to take the QE

The exam may not be held until a QE application has been approved by Graduate Studies.  QE applications are due to Graduate Studies at least 30 days prior to the expected exam date.

  • If requesting an external committee member (employed outside the UC) - fill out the Justification for Proposed External Member Participation within the QE application in GradSphere. Upload proposed member CV.
  • Up to one committee (never the QE chair) member may be approved to participate remotely by the program
  • Justification for fully remote requests must be entered in the QE application in GradSphere
  • If you are participating in a Designated Emphasis, and haven't yet submitted an application, complete the DE Application via GradSphere.  
  • After initiation, the QE application is routed to the graduate program advisor (and DE chair if relevant) for approval.
  • External Member Requests are determined by the Associate Dean for Students, and require additional review time.

Reconstituting & Rescheduling the QE

  • Students may change their QE committee membership prior to the exam by submitting a Reconstitution of Committee Membership Request via GradSphere.  The eligibility of the committee will be re-evaluated according to the standards listed below.  
  • Once the QE application has been approved, students and programs do not need to notify Graduate Studies if the exam date is changed - the date listed on the QE Report will be recorded in the student's record.  

The QE Committee

QE committee selection and recommendation vary from program to program, and students should discuss the membership with their Graduate Advisor and major professor.  Graduate Studies evaluates the eligibility of the committee and individual members using the regulations included in the Doctoral Qualifying Examination policy.  The QE Chair and committee members should be selected to avoid any real or perceived conflict of interest.

  • QE Committee Chair Requirements
  • • The Chair of the QE committee must be a member of the student’s graduate program and either a UC Davis Division Academic Senate member or a UC Davis Academic Federation member. • The student’s major professor may be a member of the QE committee, but may not serve as the QE Chair.
  • QE Committee Membership Requirements
  • • The QE committee must include four or five members, as included in the graduate program degree requirements. • A student or program may petition Graduate Studies for one additional member beyond the number required by submitting a brief statement of explanation with the QE application.  Most often additional members are requested for students in a Designated Emphasis. • At least three of the members must be members of the student’s graduate program. • At least three members of the QE committee must be members of the Academic Senate of the University of California. • At most two members of a 5-person committee or one member of a 4-person committee may be from categories that include non-Senate faculty. • At least one committee member who is not a member of the student's graduate program, unless the program has an approved exception.  
  • Students in Designated Emphases
  • • In cases where a student is completing one or more Designated Emphases (DE), at least one committee member must be affiliated with each DE.   • Students must have an approved DE application prior to taking the Qualifying Exam.  
  • Optional External Member - not employed by a University of California
  • • At most one member may be a faculty member from another university outside the UC system or a scholar from outside academia.  

Outcomes of the QE

QE Committees must inform the student of the result of their QE immediately following the exam.  QE Chairs report the results to Graduate Studies by submitting the Qualifying Examination Report via GradSphere . A memo of explanation from the QE Chair must be submitted along with the QE report for any result other than unanimous pass.  More information about the QE results is available on the QE Regulations .

  • The committee unanimously decides the student passed the examination and is prepared to advance to candidacy for the doctoral degree.  No conditions or additional requirements may accompany this decision.
  • The QE Report must specify whether the student is required to retake all or part of the examination, list any additional requirements, and state the expected timeline for completion of requirements before retaking all or part of the exam. The format of the second attempt may include a retake of all or a specific portion of the exam, a rewritten proposal, a paper addressing the areas of deficiency, or an alternate format determined by the QE committee and approved by the Dean of Graduate Studies.  The second QE may include multiple components (e.g. responding to committee questions in writing and then retaking the oral exam), but requirements must be stated in full on the QE Chair memo.  Requirements may not be added or determined necessary after submitting the memo to Graduate Studies. 
  • The committee unanimously determines the student failed the examination due to significant deficiencies, and the student is not currently prepared to continue in the doctoral program.  A unanimous fail on either the first or second exam is a recommendation of the student’s disqualification from the degree objective. 
  • If the QE committee is unable to reach a unanimous decision on pass, retake, or fail, the QE chair will inform the student that the committee is divided, that the majority and minority are making recommendations subject to further review, and that the Administrative Committee of the Graduate Council or its designee will make the final decision with all available input.  In the Split QE memo, the QE Chair must include the number of committee members supporting each decision, and the recommendations from each side.  The QE Chair should not identify the names of committee members supporting each decision when discussing the results with the student or in the Split QE memo

First QE Retake & the Second Exam

Students who receive a Retake in their first QE are permitted one additional opportunity to pass the exam.  The second exam may take a different format depending on which parts of the exam the student needs to retake, and how the committee can best evaluate the clearing of the deficiencies noted in the first exam.  Committees may require students to submit a rewrite of their proposal or written response to committee concerns/questions.  They may require students to retake all or portions of the examination (e.g. the oral portion, but not the written, or the proposal portion, but not the field foundation knowledge portion).  Committees may combine requirements (e.g. a written response and retaking the oral exam). 

The written memo from the QE Chair will clarify the requirements of the second exam in full, how the student should carry these out, and provide a specific timeline for meeting the requirements.  Not Pass memos should indicate one or more contact member(s) if the student has questions about the deficiencies in the first exam or the requirements for the second exam. Graduate Studies will review the QE Retake memo, and may follow-up with QE Chairs for clarification if needed.  Once approved, the Associate Dean for Students will write a letter to the student confirming the second exam requirements.  Letters are sent by the Director of Advising to the student, the Coordinator, the QE Chair, and the program Graduate Chair.

Following the second exam end date included in the Retake memo, the QE Chair will notify the student of the outcome and complete the QE Report in GradSphere (noting that it is a Second QE).  The outcome of the second exam may only be Pass or Fail, and follow the guidelines included in the Outcomes section above.  

After passing the QE and prior to the first day of the following quarter, the student will complete the appropriate Candidacy Application (Plan A, B, or C), identifying their proposed dissertation committee. The Candidacy Application will be submitted to Graduate Studies via GradSphere for review and advancement to candidacy.  

Forms, Policies, & Resources

  • Qualifying Exam Application
  • Remote Committee Member Request
  • External Member Request
  • Qualifying Exam Report
  • Second Qualifying Exam Report

QE Policies & Resources

  • Doctoral Qualifying Examinations (GC2005-02)
  • Service on Advanced Degree Committees (GC1998-01) 
  • UC Davis Qualifying Exam Regulations
  • Acing Your Qualifying Exam
  • The Student Experience
  • Financial Aid
  • Degree Finder
  • Undergraduate Arts & Sciences
  • Departments and Programs
  • Research, Scholarship & Creativity
  • Centers & Institutes
  • Geisel School of Medicine
  • Guarini School of Graduate & Advanced Studies
  • Thayer School of Engineering
  • Tuck School of Business

Campus Life

  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Athletics & Recreation
  • Student Groups & Activities
  • Residential Life
  • [email protected] Contact & Department Info Mail
  • Important Dates
  • Program & Department Contacts
  • Dartmouth's Graduate Community
  • The Upper Valley
  • New Students
  • MCB Intranet
  • Career Development
  • Job Postings
  • Centers & Programs
  • Research Resources & Centers
  • Biochemistry & Cell Biology
  • Biological Sciences
  • Cancer Biology
  • Microbiology and Immunology
  • Molecular and Systems Biology
  • Deadlines & Required Materials
  • General Information

Path to Your Ph.D.

  • News & Events
  • MCB Leadership
  • Biochemistry and Cell Biology
  • Biological Science
  • Cancer Biology
  • Molecular & Systems Biology
  • Alumni Profiles
  • Alumni Q&A

Search form

  • How To Apply

A bike leans against a bench in winter.

MCB Faculty

Learn more about mcb academics.

General requirements for the Ph.D. degree include laboratory research rotations, successful completion of a series of core and elective courses, supervised teaching, participation in journal clubs and student research-in-progress presentations. Advancement to candidacy for the Ph.D. degree requires completion of a qualifying exam. Research culminates in the preparation of a written thesis followed by a public seminar and defense.

Students work with their professor at a computer.

Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences Carey Nadell (left) with grad students Swetha Kasetty (center) and Matthew Bond.

Core Courses

During the Fall, Winter and Spring terms of the first year, MCB students are required to take a three-term core course that gives a broad overview of biochemistry, molecular biology, and cell biology. This course sequence is team taught by faculty members specializing in these areas.

Learn about required courses .

Choosing A Thesis Advisor

Students normally choose a thesis advisor for thesis research at the end of the first year and after they have completed three research rotations. These arrangements are made by mutual agreement of the student, and the thesis advisor, with the approval of the Graduate Committee.

Approved Elective Courses

In addition to the three-term core course, students are required to successfully complete three advanced elective courses selected from a broad list of MCB approved elective courses. Elective coursework is typically completed during the first three years in the graduate program. Students will also complete an approved ethics course as part of the program requirements.

Review approved elective courses .

Qualifying Examination

Each student must pass a qualifying examination to be advanced to candidacy for the Ph.D. The qualifying exam has two components: a dissertation proposal including one aim developed independently by the student and an oral defense. The format of the written exam is similar to a NIH F31 grant application to give the student practical experience in scientific writing.

Teaching Experience

All graduate students in the MCB program are required to gain experience in teaching. To fulfill this requirement, students serve as teaching assistants for one term, usually in the second year of graduate study. The teaching experience is considered an important part of graduate education and includes instruction from faculty on how to organize and present a lecture. Teaching normally involves supervising laboratory and discussion sections as well as grading lab reports and exams.

Research-in-Progress Seminars

Starting in the third year, MCB students present their research to the MCB community once a year. Research-in-progress (RIPs) seminars give students experience presenting to a diverse audience, provides the opportunity for feedback from faculty and fellow students, and keeps the MCB community informed about the work going on in colleagues labs.

Thesis Seminar and Defense

In the second year, students establish a thesis advisory committee. Research progress is monitored by meetings with this committee at least once a year. When the student, thesis advisor, and thesis advisory committee agree that the thesis is near completion, the student begins compiling and writing the thesis. For many students at this stage, thesis research has already resulted in publication in peer reviewed journals. After submission of the thesis and a public presentation, the student defends the thesis before an examination committee. On average, students complete their doctoral training in about six years.

Ph.D. PROGRAM
Ph.D. PROGRAM
Prospective Students
Current Students
Ph.D. Requirements
Ph.D. Requirements
Ph.D. Requirements
  • The Core Course in cell and molecular biology (G6001 - G6002 - G6003). Two semesters of this intensive course (in six to seven half-semester modules) cover genetics, molecular biology, cell biology, developmental biology, structural biochemistry, neurobiology, immunology, and computational biology.
  • Pre-research Seminars (G9301): Faculty describe and discuss their current research.
  • Ethics: discussions on the conduct of science. Starting in 2010-2011, Research Ethics is offered in the Fall semester: BIOETHICS K4450 Research Ethics
  • Students must take the equivalent of two semesters of college-level math (Statistics and/or Calculus) if it was not taken previously. Students who have not fulfilled this requirement prior to enrollment are required to make up those undergraduate courses. Students may take more advanced mathematics, statistics or computer science courses as electives as needed to support their specific research interests.
  • Attendance at the weekly Departmental colloquium (outside speakers) is required. Seminars are usually held Mondays and Wednesdays at noon in Room 700 Fairchild.
  • Two approved graduate seminar courses. No more than one of the two elective courses may have a grade of "B-" and the average must be "B" or higher. Students entering the program with a Masters degree may be exempted from one elective course if they have taken a relevant PhD level course in their Masters program. A description of the course should be given to the Director of Graduate Studies for approval. For a list of elective courses go to pre-approved elective courses . Additional courses may also be allowed subject to approval by the Director of Graduate Studies.
  • Qualifying Exam Part I: Successful completion of the Core Course sequence.(G6001, G6002, G6003).
  • Qualifying Exam Part II: a written research proposal describing an intended thesis project (~10 double-spaced pages) followed by an oral defense before a 2-person faculty committee. This exam may take place during the Spring semester of the second year. It must be completed by the end of the Fall semester of the third year. Qualifying Exam Part II Form
  • Core I class - BIOL G6001, G6002
  • BIOL W4400 Computational Genomics - Choice 1 of 2 to fulfill core requirement for Genomics for advanced computational bio students.
  • Pre-research seminar - BIOL G9301
  • Bioethics (BIET) K4450 Research Ethics (recommended to complete in the second year)
  • 1 st Residence Unit (call #99991)
  • Core II class - Biol G6003 (with G6001, G6002 and Genomics completes Qualifying Exam 1)
  • BIOL W4510 Genomics of Gene Regulation - Choice 2 of 2 to fulfill Core requirement for Genomics for less advanced computational bio students.
  • Elective (1 of 2)
  • 2 nd Residence Unit (call #99991)
  • Statistics or Calculus if needed
  • Rotation 3 (if needed) or Research in permanent lab

Second Year

  • Elective (2 of 2)
  • Teaching (1 of 2)
  • 3 rd Residence Unit (call #99991)
  • BIOL G6300 Writing for the Biological Sciences
  • Elective (if needed)
  • Teaching (2 of 2, must be completed by the end of the third year)
  • 4 th Residence Unit (call #99991)
  • Qualifying Exam 2 - link to form - must be completed by December 31 of the Third Year
  • Apply for MA degree - link to application Students must complete the Masters Degree requirements by the end of the Second Year.
  • Complete Electives (if needed)
  • 5 th Residence Unit (call #99991)
  • 6 th and last Residence Unit (call #99991)
  • Apply for MPhil degree - link to program checklist - link to GSAS application Students must complete the Masters of Philosophy requirements by the end of the Fourth Year.  

Fourth Year

Fall, Spring

  • Student Seminars (Fridays 5 pm, Room 700 Fairchild)
  • Extended Residence Unit
  • Annual Committee Meeting - link to form

Fifth Year & beyond

  • Committee Meeting every 6 months - link to form

Planning for Dissertation Defense 

  • Apply for Dissertation Defense - Intent to Distribute and Defend - link to application
  • Distribute Dissertation to Committee Members
  • Thesis Defense
  • Deposit Thesis

Ph.D. in Biological Sciences requirements

The Graduate School requires at least 30 credits at the 7000 level or higher exclusive of BIO999X (Doctoral Dissertation Research of which 30 credits are required). A full plan of study including any additional courses will be decided on by the advisor and the student and reviewed and approved by the student's dissertation committee.

The Graduate School allows a maximum of 30 credits of BIO 7996 Directed Research. Additionally, all Ph.D. students must take BIO 8995 Graduate Seminar (two credits per semester) for two semesters and BIO 9996 Lab Rotation (two credits per semester) for at least one semester in their first year.

Core course requirements may be waived for a student if the student has demonstrated experience in and mastery of the topic. The graduate officer and graduate committee chair will review requests for waivers. Waivers do not release the student from the minimum Graduate School course requirements.

Present qualifying exam regulations and scheduling will be followed. All first-year students will be advised by the graduate officer and/or the graduate committee chair.

Qualifying exam

Ph.D. students are required to pass qualifying examinations before advancing to candidacy for a Ph.D. The qualifying examinations are administered in two parts. The first part of the qualifying examination is a written test, which is taken by all students. Students may take the written qualifying exam in July of their first year, November of their second year or April of their second year.

The decision of when to take the exam is made jointly by the student and the advisor. The student's complete Dissertation Advisory Committee will administer the written qualifying exam. A list of examination topics will be generated by the Advisory Committee and submitted to the student two months before the scheduled exam.

Each of the four topics will be graded anonymously by two two committee members on a pass/fail basis. Each student must pass a minimum of three topics. If a student does not pass the minimum number of topics, he or she must retake the exam during the next qualifying exam period (July, November, April).

Students who pass the written qualifying examination will take the oral examination within a year of successful completion of the written qualifying exam. Students are expected to complete a written prospectus of their thesis research. This prospectus will be in the form of a grant proposal. The oral examination will include, but not be limited to, a defense of the prospectus.

The examiners will be members of the student's graduate committee. The oral examination will be graded on a pass/fail basis. Students who do not pass the first oral examination must retake the examination within the following semester. Successful completion of the written and oral exams fulfills the qualifying exam requirements for Ph.D. candidacy.

Requirements by division

Also see overall  degree and course requirements .

Molecular biology and biotechnology division

The following sequence is required.

Course # Title Credits Term
BIO 6540 Genetic Analysis

1

Fall
BIO 6510 Molecular Interactions 1 Fall
BIO 6530 Protein Structure & Dynamics 1 Winter
BIO 6520 Gene Expression Manipulation 1 Winter
BIO 6700 Responsible Conduct Research 1 Fall
BIO 7300 Communication of Research 2 Winter

Additionally, students must take at least two of the following lab courses.

Course # Title Credits Term
BIO 7520 Nucleic Acids Lab 2 Fall
BIO 7530 Proteins Lab 2 Winter
BIO 7560 Microscopy & Imaging 2 Winter

Note: With additional credits from the following courses to make up at least 30 credits of 7000 above (or from additional Biological Sciences or non-department courses with graduate officer permission).

Course # Title Credits
BIO 6000 Molecular Cell Biology I 3
BIO 6010 Molecular Cell Biology II 3
BIO 7020 Comprehensive Virology 3
BIO 7040 Signal Transduction Mechanisms 3
BIO 7045 Biometry 4
BIO 7180 Membrane Biology 3
BIO 7240 Molecular Systems Biology 3
BIO 7500 Prokaryotic Gene Expression and Function 3
BIO 7510 Eukaryotic Gene Structure and Function 3
BIO 7610 Infections and Innate Immunity 3

Ecology and evolutionary biology division

Ecology concentration.

At least four of the following courses.

Course # Title Credits
BIO 7045 Biometry 4
BIO 7110 Aquatic Ecology 4
BIO 7440 Terrestrial Ecology 4
BIO 7490 Population and Community Ecology 3
BIO 7540 Ecosystem and Landscape Ecology 3

Evolution concentration

Course # Title Credits
BIO 7045 Biometry 4
BIO 6060 Molecular Evolution 3
BIO 6090 Population Genetics 3
BIO 7150 Genomics 3
BIO 7280 Bioinformatics 3

Additional courses to augment a student's specialty

Course # Title Credits
BIO 5620 Developmental Biology 3
BIO 6000 Molecular Cell Biology I 3
BIO 7090 Molecular Basis of Development 3
BIO 7060 Evolutionary and Developmental Biology 3
BIO 7120 Molecular Basis of Plant Development 3
BIO 7180 Field Investigations in Biological Sciences 3

Cellular, developmental and neurobiology division

At least 12 credits of the following courses.

Course # Title Credits
BIO 5080 Cellular Basis of Animal Behavior 3
BIO 5620 Developmental Biology 3
BIO 6000 Molecular Cell Biology I 3
BIO 6010 Molecular Cell Biology II 3
BIO 6490 Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology 3
BIO 6510 Molecular Interactions 1
BIO 6520 Gene Expressions Manipulation 1
BIO 6530 Protein Structure & Dynamics 1
BIO 6690 Special Topics Neurobiology 3
BIO 7045 Biometry 4
BIO 7090 Molecular Basis of Development 3
BIO 7300 Communication of Research 2
BIO 7520 Nucleic Acids Lab 2
BIO 7530 Proteins Lab 2
BIO 7560 Microscopy and Imaging 2
BIO 7660 Neural Signaling in Health and Disease 3
BIO 7890 Neuroplasticity 3

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Biology

The PhD in Biology is a research degree requiring graduate-level coursework, completion of a dissertation, and two semesters of participation in teaching (usually as a teaching fellow in laboratory or discussion sections of lecture courses led by Biology faculty). For most students, obtaining this degree typically involves five or more years of full-time study.

A summary of Biology PhD student expectations by year can be found here . Full details can be found in the Graduate Program Guide .

The Biology Department guarantees support for five years for all PhD students, contingent on satisfactory performance in the program.

How to Apply    Frequently Asked Questions

Learning Outcomes

1. Demonstrate academic mastery in one of three areas of Biology: Ecology, Behavior & Evolution; Neurobiology; or Cellular & Molecular Biology.

2. Attain research expertise , including grant writing experience, and complete original research that advances a specific field of study within one of three broad subject areas represented in the department: Ecology, Behavior & Evolution; Neurobiology; or Cellular & Molecular Biology.

3. Attain teaching experience and expertise in one of three broad areas of Biology: Ecology, Behavior & Evolution; Neurobiology; or Cellular & Molecular Biology.

4. Attain the skills and qualifications needed for employment in an academic, government, or private sector position related to the life sciences.

Coursework Requirements

Students must complete 64 credits with a minimum grade point average of 3.0; at least 32 of these credits must be accrued from lecture, laboratory, or seminar courses. Students with prior graduate work may be able to transfer course credits.  See the  Graduate School of Arts & Sciences (GRS) Transfer of Credits policy  for more details. 

  • 2 semesters of Progress in Research Seminars (2 credits each):

Cell & Molecular Biology:  BI 583 & BI 584 (CM section)

Ecology, Behavior & Evolution: BI 579 & BI 580

Neurobiology:   BI 583 & BI 584 (NEURO section)

  • 1 semester grant-writing course (2 credits):

Cell & Molecular Biology:  BI 581

Ecology, Behavior & Evolution: BI 671

Neurobiology: BI 581

  • 1 semester pedagogy course (1 credit): All Biology PhD students take  BI 697
  • 1 quantitative course (3–4 credits): from a list of recommended courses .
  • Additional courses vary by specific track below:

Cell & Molecular Biology

1. GRS BI 791/GRS BI 792 Graduate Rotation Credits (2 credits each/4 credits total)

2. GRS BI 753 Advanced Molecular Biology  (4 credits)

3. GRS MB 721 Graduate Biochemistry  (4 credits)

4. GRS BI 735 Advanced Cell Biology  (4 credits)

5. Two electives (8 credits, 500-level and above), see the Graduate Program Guide for recommendations

6. Research credits  (remaining credits)

Ecology, Behavior & Evolution

1. Six electives  (24 credits, 500-level and above), see the Graduate Program Guide for recommendations

2. Research credits  (remaining credits)

Ecology, Behavior & Evolution PhD candidate coursework is highly variable. Students, in consultation with advisors, develop a plan of coursework and research. Students are required to take a minimum of 32 credits of coursework. The remainder of the credits should be research.

Neurobiology

2. GRS BI 755 Cellular and Systems Neuroscience  (4 credits)

3. GRS BI 741 Neural Systems: Functional Circuit Analysis  (4 credits)

4. Four electives  (16 credits, 500-level and above), see the Graduate Program Guide for recommendations

5. Research credits  (remaining credits)

Teaching Requirement

The department requires a minimum of two semesters of teaching as part of the Doctor of Philosophy program. During the first semester of teaching, students are required to enroll in our first-year seminar course, GRS BI 697 A Bridge to Knowledge . The course provides guidance and training on pedagogy and other aspects of graduate school.

Qualifying Examination

The qualifying examination must be completed no later than six semesters after matriculation. In most graduate curricula in the department, this consists of a research proposal—often in the form of a grant application—which the student submits to their committee and subsequently defends in an oral presentation. In the  Cell & Molecular Biology and Ecology, Behavior & Evolution curricula , this is preceded by a comprehensive written examination testing the student’s general background from coursework.

Dissertation & Final Oral Examination

Candidates shall demonstrate their abilities for independent study in a dissertation representing original research or creative scholarship. A prospectus for the dissertation must be completed and approved by the readers, the Director of Graduate Studies, and the Biology Department Chair. Candidates must undergo a final oral examination in which they defend their dissertation as a valuable contribution to knowledge in their field and demonstrate a mastery of their field of specialization in relation to their dissertation. All portions of the dissertation and final oral examination must be completed as outlined in the  GRS General Requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree . The results of the dissertation must be presented at a department colloquium.

Graduation Timeline

Forms and additional information about PhD graduation can be found on the GRS website .

9 – 12 months before proposed graduation date

  • Dissertation Prospectus & approval form due to Graduate Program Specialist for departmental review and submission to GRS

Semester prior to your intended graduation cycle

  • Intent to Graduate Form completed online

About 2 months before dissertation defense

  • Meet with Graduate Program Specialist, Director of Graduate Studies, and Faculty Advisor to review requirements for defense
  • Arrange for Special Service Appointments if committee members are not BU faculty
  • Send first draft of dissertation to readers

Once defense date is confirmed with committee

  • Reserve room(s) for public seminar and defense

At least three weeks prior to dissertation defense

  • Schedule of Final Oral Exam with Abstract Approval due to GRS
  • Properly formatted draft of dissertation submitted as PDF to [email protected]

At least two weeks prior to dissertation defense

  • Send dissertation to all committee members

At least one week prior to dissertation defense

  • Send program information to Graduate Program Specialist

See the Graduate Program Guide for final dates to submit dissertation to ETD

  • Submit final dissertation to ETD (online submission)
  • Complete electronic signature page and forward confirmation to Graduate Program Specialist along with a copy of your submitted dissertation

MS Degree (En Route to PhD)

Option one: A PhD student who has advanced to candidacy (as demonstrated by passing the PhD qualifying exam), and has completed 32 credits of graduate-level coursework (not including research) may apply to the Graduate School for an MS degree in Biology. This must be approved by the Director of Graduate Studies within the Biology Department. The student’s major professor will receive notification of this application process.

Option two: A PhD student who has taken, but has not advanced to candidacy based on the PhD qualifying examination, may still receive an MS degree. This student may receive a Coursework MS degree provided they have completed 32 credits of coursework (not including research credits). Alternatively, this student may receive a Scholarly Paper or Research Thesis MS degree if the written portion of the qualifying examination is adapted to ensure it is of sufficiently high quality for a MS degree, and approved by a majority of the qualifying exam committee and the Director of Graduate Studies.

Interdisciplinary Study Options

Biology PhD students have the option to participate in the Boston University Graduate Program in Urban Biogeoscience and Environmental Health (BU URBAN), the National Science Foundation Research Traineeship Program Understanding the Brain: Neurophotonics (NSF NRT UtB: Neurophotonics), and the Biogeoscience Advanced Graduate Certificate Program . These programs require separate applications in addition to the standard Biology PhD application; those interested in BU URBAN are encouraged pre-apply .

Time Limits

Officially, the PhD must be completed within seven years after the first registration for doctoral study. PhD degrees are conferred in either May, August, or January, as specified on the GRS website . In addition, the PhD candidacy expires after the fifth anniversary of passing the Qualifying Examination. Petitions to extend this deadline are possible at the discretion of the Director of Graduate Studies, the Department Chair, and the Dean of the Graduate School, and can be obtained from the Office of the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.

The Biology Department guarantees support for five years for all PhD students, contingent on satisfactory performance in the program. PhD students are encouraged to apply for fellowships and grants at funding agencies. All domestic students should apply for NSF Graduate Research Fellowships in the Fall semester of their first or second year. 

Travel Grants may be available to assist students in their travel to professional scientific meetings; students presenting papers or posters on their research will receive first consideration.

Common Types of Funding:

Dean’s Fellowships: These are non-service fellowships allocated to first-year PhD students that do not have immediate teaching requirements.

Teaching Fellowships: These provide a stipend plus full tuition and fees for up to four full courses per semester plus a 2-credit teaching course. Teaching responsibilities usually require approximately 20 hours per week. Full or partial awards may be given.

Doctoral Research Fellowships: These awards are given to students who assist individual faculty with specific areas of research. These Research Fellowships provide a stipend and full tuition. The supervising faculty member determines the specific duties of the Research Fellow.

In addition to the above funding sources, several competitive Department awards and fellowships are available to graduate students in the Department of Biology.

Back to Top

Molecular and Cell Biology

Ph.D. Program Information

  • Laboratory Rotations and Presentations

Oral/Qualifying Examination

Research, dissertation and beyond.

The Department offers a Ph.D. program that has a standard completion time of 5.5 to six years. [Note: We do not admit students who wish to take the terminal Master's degree. However, when a student experiences a significant change in career orientation after successful completion of the oral exam, a M.A. degree may be awarded.]

timeline

The Department provides as much flexibility as possible to students as they develop their scientific interests. Individual curricula and research are arranged in consultation with the student's academic Adviser and Thesis Mentor, and formal course work is usually taken during the first two to three semesters at Berkeley. Because the emphasis of the program is largely on training in research, requirements are defined on the basis of individual needs, enabling students to select from the wide range of courses offered by the Department. Other courses of interest to students are offered in the departments of: Chemistry, Plant and Microbial Biology, Integrative Biology, Physics, Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, Bioengineering, Public Health and Biomedical and Environmental Health Sciences. While some students elect to concentrate their coursework in specialized research topics, many students ''choose" to construct programs that will provide them with intensive study in more general areas of molecular and cell biology.

[ Return to Top ]

Lab Rotations and Presentations

Before selecting a thesis adviser, students will complete three 9 week laboratory rotations. Each rotation involves an individual research project selected by the chosen faculty member and student. Laboratory assignments are based on student preference and are arranged so that each student gets his/her first choice for at least one rotation. Credit and grades for the research conducted during the rotations are provided through enrollment in MCB 291A-B with each mentor grading individual rotations and the Head Graduate Adviser reviewing all comments and grades for the final course grade.

FERPs (Faculty Evening Research Presentations) and SMS (Student Micro-Symposia) set the groundwork for new students in the department. During the first 5-6 weeks of the Fall semester, faculty discuss the research taking place in their laboratories, providing a great opportunity to hear about research being done throughout the department. In SMS, each student describes the overall objectives of his/her rotation projects, the experimental approaches used, and the results obtained. SMS is moderated by faculty instructors and is designed to both familiarize students with and instruct them in the skills necessary to present research findings in a clear and incisive manner. SMS takes place during the last week of the Fall and Spring semesters.

First year course work includes: MCB 291A-B (rotations), MCB 293A (FERPs), MCB 293C (Ethical conduct of research), Fundamentals of Molecular and Cell Biology (MCB 200A-200B) and two Advanced Topics courses. All courses must be completed with a grade of B or better. Courses required by the department are marked below with a plus (+). Courses marked with one or two asterisks meet the Advanced Topics requirement; two stars indicate that the course is highly recommended by the Division. All course work must be completed prior to taking the qualifying exam (a.k.a. orals) in the spring semester of the second year. With the approval of the student's academic Adviser, a course offered by another department may be substituted for one of the two Advanced Topics courses. Some Divisions may recommend additional courses as appropriate to their disciplinary areas. Following the successful completion of the qualifying examination, all students must enroll in three semesters of special topics seminars (MCB 290) offered by faculty in areas of current research in the field of molecular and cell biology (typically 6 offerings per semester).

Anticipating future careers which may include teaching, all graduate students participate in undergraduate instruction by serving as Graduate Student Instructors (GSIs) for two semesters. Typically a student teaches during the Fall semester of the second year and the Spring semester of the third year in the doctoral program. These assignments usually include both lecture and laboratory courses and are, in most instances, based upon student preferences. Students who have passed their oral exams (i.e. advanced to candidacy) can also organize seminars for junior- and senior-level undergraduates for additional teaching experience (and credit for one of the three required MCB 290 seminars). A student may also be allowed to serve as a GSI for a third semester if they obtain the approval of their thesis mentor and Dissertation Committee ( see policy ).

During the second year, each student takes an oral/qualifying examination, usually held during the Spring semester. In this exam, the student demonstrates his/her ability to recognize research problems of fundamental importance, to propose appropriate experimental approaches to address these problems, and to display comprehensive knowledge of his/her disciplinary area and related subject areas. The oral examination itself is administered by a committee composed of four faculty approved by the Graduate Division with three faculty from MCB and one from another department on campus.

The qualifying examination will include a written proposal on the thesis work that will be discussed during the oral examination.  The second part of the exam will involve questioning the students on a body of scientific material. The body of scientific material will be defined by 16 journal articles chosen by each division from 4 different areas (i.e. 4 papers in each area).  Each student will be responsible for all 4 areas of the inside division and those from 2 areas of the outside division.  

Though the examination is intended to be challenging, it is unusual for a student not to pass. Passage of the examination is required before a student is advanced to candidacy for the doctoral degree.

The Department is full of opportunities for expanding research in the areas of molecular and cell biology as well as in the expanding and emerging fields of structural biology, genomics, evolution and development, and computational biology. Students may join journal clubs and/or participate in laboratory group meetings of faculty whose work interests them, but in whose laboratories they are not currently conducting research. Many laboratories share research meetings and there are many area meetings between Stanford, UC San Francisco and UC Berkeley.

After advancing to candidacy a student meets each Fall semester with their Thesis Committee to discuss the dissertation project, to review results, and to chart research directions and timelines for the following year up to the completion of the dissertation. In the final year, students complete a dissertation based on original laboratory research.

It is also during the final year that most students present at national conferences and begin their search for a post-doctoral position and funding. The MCB 295 careers course offered in the spring is useful for those looking beyond academia as well as those planning to stay within academia. The campus also has a dedicated biological and physical sciences Ph.D. counselor in the Career Center to help students with the job search including resume writing, interviewing skills, conducting the job search, creating a teaching portfolio and more.

PhD Qualifying Exam: by end of G2 year

[Part of the Policies of the CHD, last updated fall 2021; see also area-specific exam guidelines for Applied Math , Applied Physics , Bioengineering , Computer Science , Electrical Engineering , Environmental Science & Engineering , and Materials Science & Mechanical Engineering ]

The qualifying examination should be taken no later than the end of May of the fourth semester (or the end of the Reading Period if the fourth semester is in the fall).  An extension of this deadline will be granted only if the chair of the qualifying committee makes a specific request to the CHD via the “ Request to Delay the Qualifying Exam " form.  If a student is transferring between advisors and does not have a chair of their qualifying committee, the student can make the extension request to the DGS. A recommendation that the examination be held within a few weeks after that deadline as a matter of mutual convenience, or for good and sufficient reasons during the period June through September following the second year of graduate study, will normally be routinely approved, provided the student has a cumulative average grade better than 3.00 (“B”). Marginal students, or postponement beyond the end of September in the fifth semester, will receive careful scrutiny as to the reasons behind the recommendation.

If a student has not received approval for an extension and does not complete the qualifying examination by the deadline of end of May of the fourth semester (or the end of the Reading Period if the fourth semester is in the fall), SEAS may put the student in unsatisfactory (UNSAT) progress status with GSAS. At that time the CHD will determine whether the student should lose their monthly research funding support, and whether tuition for the following semester is not to be paid, potentially blocking registration for the following semester.

Exam Committee and Scheduling

The qualifying committee is comprised of four committee members: the research advisor, the research advisor’s nominee, the student’s nominee, and the Dean’s Nominee (assigned by the CHD).  The members of the qualifying committee should be Harvard faculty members, but on occasion MIT faculty members or other technical professionals of comparable stature may serve in this capacity with the approval of the CHD.  The qualifying committee so constituted should include at least two SEAS faculty members, at least one of whom should be a senior faculty member (i.e., a full professor).  Usually, the research advisor serves as chair of the qualifying committee; but if the research advisor is not a Harvard faculty member, the research advisor will serve as co-chair with a SEAS faculty member.  Area-specific exam guidelines may specify that the Dean's Nominee is to chair the exam.

[Ed. note: students, be sure to ask your hoped-for advisor's and student's nominees whether they're willing to serve on your qualifying committee before listing them on your Program Plan.]

Approval of the final program plan and the identification of the Dean’s nominee by the CHD will permit the student to schedule the qualifying examination.  Once the student has agreed upon a time for the examination with all members of the qualifying committee, the student is responsible for contacting the Office of Academic Programs ( [email protected] ) at least two weeks in advance in order to prepare the exam paperwork, and, if needed, to schedule a room. 

The Qualifying Exam is a major milestone en route to the PhD and an important opportunity for the student to engage with their faculty committee and receive formal feedback on their progress. As such, SEAS expects the student and committee to meet together in person for the exam. If after attempting to schedule a time for the full committee to meet together in person it appears that no such time can be found, the student should consult with the Office of Academic Programs about alternatives, possibly including that one or more committee members attend remotely. In all cases the student should take the exam in a classroom or seminar room that includes a blackboard or whiteboard that they can use while answering questions, with sufficient videoconferencing for any remote-attending committee member to view it clearly.

Specifics of the Exam

The qualifying examination has the dual purpose of verifying the adequacy of the student's preparation for undertaking research in his/her chosen field, and of assessing his/her ability to synthesize the technical knowledge already acquired.  The purpose of the examination is not to reassess the student's performance in formal courses; however, evaluation of the student's general knowledge in the major field is appropriate.  The basic judgment to be made is whether the student has demonstrated sufficient mastery of the intellectual skills necessary to conduct research so that a confident prediction can be made that an acceptable doctoral dissertation will be forthcoming in timely fashion.  These skills include the ability to pull together scientific ideas, to formulate technical questions, to recognize answers thereto and to make reasonable judgments on how to seek answers to such questions.

The format of the qualifying examination ordinarily is a two-hour oral examination devoted to the presentation and discussion of one or more potential dissertation topics and to more general questions.  The intent is to test the student's comprehension of his/her chosen research field and to probe the limits of the student's technical knowledge in related areas.  Various groups within SEAS have different customs with regard to the detailed nature of the qualifying examination.  For area-specific exam guidelines, see the Graduate Program Degree Requirements page in each academic area. One role of the Dean's nominee is to assure that comparable standards are applied throughout SEAS.  The qualifying committee should agree among themselves as to what is expected of the student, who should reach out to the committee members in advance of the examination regarding the committee’s expectations.

The qualifying committee may pass or fail the student, or may judge the performance to be inconclusive.  Within its discretion, the committee may stipulate further requirements, such as additional course work, a written examination or presentation of a research proposal, as conditions that must be satisfied.  The research committee (see below) will determine whether these conditions have been met, and so report to the CHD.  Failure means that the student may not re-register, thus terminating degree candidacy.  In the case of an inconclusive performance, after consultation with his/her potential research advisor, the student may schedule a second examination, which must be conclusive. The qualifying committee should explain to the student and report to the CHD its reasons for judging the performance to be inadequate and for granting a second examination.

Students who change degree areas

Students who chose to switch degree areas within SEAS after completing their qualifying exam are ordinarily required to take a qualifying exam in the new area (for example, within Engineering Sciences from Bioengineering to Electrical Engineering or between degrees such as from Engineering Sciences to Applied Physics).  The qualifying exam committee for this exam should appropriately reflect the new degree path. Students must first seek approval of the Director of Graduate Studies and the CHD in the area they wish to transfer and must submit a final program plan for the new degree area to be reviewed and approved by the CHD.

In Academic Programs

  • Non-Resident and Part-Time Study
  • CHD Meeting Schedule
  • PhD Overview and Timeline
  • PhD Course Requirements
  • PhD Program Plans
  • Teaching: G2 year
  • Qualifying Exam: by end of G2 year
  • Research Advisors, Committees, and Meetings
  • Dissertation and Final Oral Exam
  • SM and ME Course Requirements
  • SM and ME Program Plans
  • Masters Thesis and Supervisor
  • SM degree en route to the PhD
  • Graduate Student Forms
  • Teaching Fellows
  • External Fellowships List
  • COVID-19 Graduate Program Changes (archived)

Warning icon

PROGRAM IN PLANT BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION

  • Current Students
  • PhD Program

Requirements and Registration

Registration information.

  • You must be registered for at least 3, and no more than 4 units each quarter
  • You must register for summer quarter
  • For your first 8 quarters (including summers), if your coursework does not bring you up to 3 units, then register for enough units of PBC 590 (with your major research advisor) to bring your total units to at least 3. In the summer you will typically register for three units of PBC 590.
  • Starting in your 9 th quarter (years 3+), register for up to 3 units of TGS 500 if you are not taking any courses. If you are taking a course, additionally register for the appropriate units of TGS 500 to bring your total load to 3 units.
  • If you exceed five years to complete your degree and have not secured additional funding, then you will register for TGS 512. This carries a fee of $100, but does not give you access to healthcare subsidies or a U-Pass.

REQUIREMENTS INFORMATION

Doctoral students in Plant Biology and Conservation must meet the following requirements to complete their degree. Read more about general  Graduate School requirements for the PhD.

  • Three core courses (4 units)
  • A) Field and lab methods in plant biology and conservation (PBC 450, 2 units)
  • B) Critical topics in ecology and conservation (PBC 451, 1 unit)
  • C) A course or independent study in Data Science or Statistics . Students can determine what best fits their needs in consultation with their advisor or the Director of Graduate Studies. The following is a non-exhaustive list of examples : Biostatistics (PBC 435); R Data Science (PBC 470); Scientific Programming in Python (Earth 361); Introduction to Programming for Big Data (NICO 401).  
  • Nine elective courses for graduate credit at the 300- or 400- level chosen from PBC and other departmental courses (i.e. Anthropology, Chemistry, Biological Sciences, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Political Science). See the  Graduate School Course Catalog for more information. Electives  should include at least one course in each of the following areas: ecology, evolution, and genetics .
  • Independent Research (PBC 590),  Units of Independent Research (PBC 590), will be taken to fill out your full time registration during your first 8 quarters (including summer). These are typically taken with your major advisor.
  • Zero credit Research Ethics  course for one quarter. Earth 519 or IBIS 423 are recommended.
  • Zero credit Student   Research Seminar  for Fall–Spring quarters starting the second year. Each PhD student in their 2nd year or beyond will give an annual presentation about their independent research as part of this seminar series. This gives students experience and feedback on public speaking and keeps other students and faculty updated on student progress.
  • The Qualifying exam   and PhD Prospectus is necessary to advance to PhD candidacy. These are completed simultaneously and should be completed by the spring of the student’s second year. Students should discuss the timing of their exam with their advisor and work with their committee to schedule the exam. Once the date is scheduled, the PBC program assistant must be notified so the PhD Qualifying Exam form can be submitted online. Read more about the process in the  Graduate Student Handbook.
  • Oral defense of a written   dissertation  under the direction of a faculty member and approved by a dissertation committee. Read more about the process in the  Graduate Student Handbook .
  • Teaching Requirements , Teaching experience is a crucial aspect of graduate student training and is required of all PhD students in Plant Biology and Conservation. Students serve as graduate assistants and will be expected to lead discussion or lab sections and grade homework and exams for at least two quarters (this will most likely take place during the second and third years in the program). Teaching is an essential element of the education and training experience of PhD students at Northwestern. The Graduate School requires that all PhD students serve in some instructional capacity for at least one academic quarter during their graduate education at Northwestern. This teaching requirement is unique to American higher education, and is an integral aspect of professional development. TGS expects students teaching work to be comparable to other students within their program, and strives to ensure teaching demands are as similar as possible across academic programs.

Academic Progress

  • Satisfactory Academic Progress  (SAP) must be maintained by students. A student will not be in good academic standing if he/she has an overall grade average below B (3.0 GPA), has more than three incomplete grades, fails to pass the qualifying exam by the end of his/her third year, or fails to make satisfactory progress with research as determined by the student’s thesis committee. If a student does not maintain SAP, he/she risks academic probation, loss of funding, and removal from the graduate program.

    University of Houston
   
  Aug 20, 2024  
2023-2024 Graduate Catalog    

2023-2024 Graduate Catalog [Not Current Academic Year. Consult with Your Academic Advisor for Your Catalog Year]

|

College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics    > Department of Biology and Biochemistry    > Biology, PhD

The Department of Biology and Biochemistry offers programs of research and study leading to a PhD degree in Biology.

For more information, please see http://www.uh.edu/nsm/biology-biochemistry/graduate .

Admission Requirements

In addition to the College of Natural Science and Mathematics Admission Requirements , applicants should have a Baccalaureate Degree (B.S.) in Biology, Biochemistry, or an equivalent discipline. Evaluation of applicants involves a broad range of criteria including undergraduate preparation, three letters of recommendation, a statement of purpose, and relevant scientific experience. GRE scores are optional. International students should visit http://www.uh.edu/graduate-school/admissions/international-students/ for information on additional requirements.

Degree Requirements

Minimum credit hours required for this degree: 54.0

There are two degree tracks in the Biology PhD program, Cell and Molecular Biology (CMB) Degree Track and Ecology and Evolution Degree Track.

Cell and Molecular Biology (CBM) Degree Track

The Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree will be awarded after students have successfully completed the following requirements. Students may satisfy the degree requirements by completing at least 54 approved credit hours; satisfactorily completing the laboratory rotations and formal graduate-level course requirements including seminars; completing 3-12 letter-graded credit hours of doctoral dissertation courses; and completing and defending a dissertation acceptable to the dissertation committee. All students must be continuously enrolled until the degree requirements are completed.

Course Requirements

15.0 credit hours.

Students are required to complete:

  • BIOL 6120 - Responsible Conduct of Biological Research Credit Hours: 1.0

Students are required to complete at least two of the following four courses:

  • BIOL 6240 - Molecular Genetics 1 Credit Hours: 2.0
  • BIOL 6241 - Molecular Genetics 2 Credit Hours: 2.0
  • BIOL 6230 - Advanced Cell Biology I Credit Hours: 2.0
  • BIOL 6231 - Advanced Cell Biology II Credit Hours: 2.0

Seminar Requirements

  • At least one seminar course per year (in either fall or spring semester). BIOL 6110 Biology Seminar does not apply to this requirement.

PhD students may petition the Department for modification of required courses.

Course Transfers and Substitutions

Transfer or substitution credits for electives are limited to 4 approved credits towards a PhD. A grade of B or better is required for transfer or substitution of course credit. Transferred and substituted courses must be at the graduate level. Courses taken in the context of an earned degree cannot be transferred, only substituted. Transferred and substituted courses must not be older than 10 years by the time of graduation at UH. Moreover, credits cannot be transferred or substituted to replace a core course without the approval of the CMB advising committee and will be limited to one 2-credit module. Students may appeal this process by submitting course information and a written statement justifying the transfer or substitution of specific course credits to the CMB Divisional Leader and the Associate Chair for Graduate Affairs. Course information should include a syllabus that covers course material, and a letter from the course instructor that addresses course content and student performance. A successful appeal will require a 2/3rds majority vote by the primary CMB faculty.

Scholastic Requirement

Graduate students must maintain a minimum grade point average of 3.0 in all course work to be considered in good standing. Students not in good standing cannot receive a graduate degree and can be declared ineligible for support with a graduate assistantship (IA, TA, RA/TE or RA). Graduate students who receive grades of C+ or lower in 12 or more credit hours of course work attempted for graduate credit are ineligible for a PhD in Biology. Credit hours of “U” grades in S/U-graded courses apply toward the above 12-hour total.

Courses Taken Outside the Department

  • Courses that do not promote the student’s academic development in Biology & Biochemistry, or do not contribute directly to the current research program of the student, will not be allowed.
  • Students who wish to take courses outside the Department need the approval of their thesis or dissertation committee.
  • Students may not pursue another degree program concurrently with a PhD in Biology.
  • Students taking approved courses at other institutions need to notify the Graduate coordinator prior to the start of the term in order for the appropriate paperwork to be processed in time by the Registrar’s Office and the Graduate School.

Graduate Student Rotations

The CMB faculty requires that all graduate students enrolled in a PhD program complete at least two rotations in research labs during the first year, and prior to selection of the major professor. Rotation periods are flexible, but must last at least six weeks. At the end of each rotation, students will submit a short report to their rotation advisor, which will include the initial goals, the procedures used and techniques learned, and the results achieved. A written evaluation of each rotation will be completed by the rotation advisor and submitted to the Division Graduate Committee (DGC). Rotation reports and evaluations must be submitted to the DGC before the next rotation can begin. Any exceptions to the rotation policy must be approved by the DGC. Exemption from a second rotation may be granted by petition to the Associate Chair for Graduate Affairs, and will require justification and approval by the student’s advisor. If a student has applied to our Graduate Program with the explicit goal of working with a specific advisor and does not wish to carry out a second rotation, he or she may request an exception, outlining the rationale for declining the second rotation. This request must be accompanied by a letter from the prospective major professor explaining why the decision not to participate in a second research rotation is in the best interest of the student.

First Year Evaluation

At the end of the second term in residence (not counting summers) all students will undergo a first year evaluation administered by the DGC. A positive evaluation must be received for the student to remain in good standing. The evaluation will consider the student’s progress and take into account the following:

  • Courses taken and grades.
  • Seminar class performance.
  • Attendance at departmental seminars.
  • Reports from rotation advisors.
  • Student’s acceptance into a research lab.
  • Other information as required by the DGC.

Committee Meetings

All students must form and meet with their thesis/dissertation committee no later than the third term following admission (not counting summer sessions). For PhD students, the first meeting will focus on the qualifying exam topic. After passing their qualifying exam, PhD students must meet with their committee during their 5th term (not counting summer sessions) to discuss their research plan. In addition, all students must convene a meeting of their committee, at which a majority of the members are present, at least once per calendar year to discuss their progress until graduation.

PhD Qualifying Examination

The Cell and Molecular Biology Division requires graduate students to pass a qualifying exam in their second year. This exam serves to develop and reinforce the skills required for developing experimental programs to test hypotheses and to communicate scientific ideas in a concise manner. Students unable to successfully demonstrate these skills will fail the examination and will not remain as doctoral candidates in the program. The exam has three components: 1) a written thesis proposal, 2) an exam to test general foundational knowledge that is necessary for a successful career in cell and molecular biology research, and 3) an oral defense of the written proposal. The dissertation committee will evaluate the student’s performance. At any point during these three exam components, the committee may decide that the student has an unconditional pass and can move on to the next component; a conditional pass in which the student needs to go back and make improvements before moving on or that the student needs to take extra coursework; or in rare situations, the student has failed without recourse. Details and due dates of the qualifying exam can be found here . Students who do not complete all three qualifying exam components by the end of their second year shall receive an unsatisfactory grade for their research hours for that second term of their second year. The student will continue to receive an unsatisfactory grade for research hours for every following term until they complete the exam or change degree plans to a Masters in Science. A student who accumulates a total of 12 credits of unsatisfactory grades in courses and research hours will be automatically dismissed from the University. Students who are given the option to retake the qualifying exam, but are unable to reschedule or retake in the second term of their second year will be given a grade of incomplete for their research hours. The grade will be changed to an “S” or “U” depending on whether the student retakes or does not retake the exam in the following academic session (summer or spring term). Every effort should be made for the student to retake the exam by the end of their second year in the program. If prolonged absence of a committee member would make it impossible for a student to meet this requirement, that committee member will be replaced.

Preparation of the Dissertation

Each student whose objective is the PhD degree is expected to commence graduate research as soon as possible. It should be recognized that research is an integral component of the degree requirements and that failure to maintain an adequate program of research constitutes unsatisfactory progress toward a degree.

  • Permission to write and defend the dissertation PhD students will need to obtain formal permission to write and defend their dissertation from their dissertation committee. The “Dissertation Committee Permission Form” will need to be signed by all committee members and turned in to the Graduate Coordinator no later than the end of the term prior to the anticipated term of the defense. It is recommended, but not mandatory, that the student have a committee meeting at that time in order for the committee to be aware of the student progress and make final recommendations before the defense. It is expected that the student make progress towards graduation within a year of filing the form.
  • Submission and Defense of the Dissertation Each student must submit and defend the dissertation when it is in final form. Part of the defense will include the presentation of a seminar open to the public. Following this seminar, a formal defense/examination will take place, which is open to any faculty member of the University community. Despite the open nature of the defense, the thesis or dissertation committee has sole responsibility in deciding whether or not the examination is passed. In order for a student to pass the examination, an affirmative vote by the major professor and no more than one negative vote by other committee members must be recorded.

Ecology and Evolution Degree Track

The Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree will be awarded after students have successfully completed the following requirements. Students may satisfy the degree requirements by completing at least 54 approved credit hours; satisfactorily completing the formal graduate-level course requirements including seminars; completing 3-12 hours of letter-graded doctoral dissertation courses; and completing and defending a dissertation acceptable to the dissertation committee. All students must be continuously enrolled full time until the degree requirements are completed.

Major Professor and Dissertation Committee

  • During the first year, each student is required to select, by mutual agreement, a tenured or tenure-track member of the faculty of the Division of Ecology and Evolution as a major professor who, with the dissertation (PhD) committee, will supervise the student’s graduate studies. The student’s choice of faculty advisor must be approved by the graduate committee chair. If a student wishes to work jointly with more than one professor, an understanding as to who is primarily responsible for supervision of the student’s graduate studies should be reached.
  • In consultation with the major professor the student shall select, by mutual agreement, faculty members to serve on their committee. The committee shall be chosen before the end of the second term of residence. Details on the committee composition are given in the section “Academic Policies” below.

13.0 Credit Hours

  • BIOL 6204 - Advanced Ecology & Evolution I Credit Hours: 2.00
  • BIOL 6205 - Advanced Ecology & Evolution II Credit Hours: 2.00

Students are required to complete one of the following:

  • BIOL 6310 - Biostatistics Credit Hours: 3
  • BIOL 6410 - Applied Biostatistics Credit Hours: 4

Students are required to complete at least 4 additional SCH in formal graded BIOL or BCHS lecture courses at the 6000 level, for a total of at least 13 Credit Hours.

  • At least one seminar course per year (typically, BIOL 7167 Population Biology Seminar, in either fall or spring semester).  BIOL 6110 Biology Seminar does not apply to this requirement.
  • For transfer or substitution of course credit, a grade of B or better is required, and courses taken towards a prior degree cannot be transferred; they can only be substituted. All substituted of transferred courses must have been taken within 10 years of the time of graduation at UH
  • Students may initiate the transfer or substitution process by submitting course information and a written statement justifying the transfer or substitution of specific course credits to the E&E Division Policy Leader and the Associate Chair for Graduate Affairs. Course information must include a syllabus that covers course material
  • A successful transfer or substitution will require unanimous support by the Associate Chair for Graduate Affairs, the E&E Division Policy Leader, the E&E members of the Graduate Committee and the student’s thesis/dissertation committee if it has been formed.

During the second long term all students will undergo a first year evaluation administered by faculty in the division (typically, division members of the Graduate Committee). A positive evaluation must be received for the student to remain in good standing. The evaluation will consider the student’s progress and take into account the following:

  • Courses taken and grades
  • Seminar class performance
  • Attendance at departmental seminars
  • Research progress
  • Report from research advisor(s)

Advancement to PhD Candidacy

  • A student advances to candidacy for a PhD degree after completion of a qualifying exam . The qualifying exam will be administered by the student’s dissertation committee, and will consist of three parts: (1) a written exam, (2) a dissertation proposal, and (3) an oral exam. Details and due dates of the qualifying exam can be found here .
  • The qualifying exam must be completed by the end of the fourth term following admission (not counting summer sessions). In exceptional circumstances, a student may petition to take the proposal and/or oral parts of the qualifying exam in the fifth term. A successful petition will require unanimous support by the student’s dissertation committee and the Associate Chair for Graduate Affairs.
  • If the student fails any part of the qualifying exam, the dissertation committee will prescribe a course of action. This may include (a) remedial courses; (b) repetition of the exam; or (c) termination of the student from the PhD program. In the case of the oral exam, such a prescription shall be given verbally immediately after the examination and followed by a written notification within one week. Any retakes must be completed by the end of the subsequent long term. Each exam may be taken no more than twice. Failure after the second try will result in either award of a terminal MS degree or dismissal from the graduate program.
  • A student who fails to attempt the qualifying exam within the fourth term will receive a grade of “U” (unsatisfactory) in 2 credit hours or research. A student who is allowed to take the proposal and/or oral parts of the qualifying exam in the fifth term, but fails to complete the qualifying exam within the fifth term, will receive a grade of “U” in 2 credit hours or research. Any further delay will result in additional “U” grades in 6 research credit hours per long term (or 3 credit hours in the summer). Once a student who has not yet taken his/her qualifying exam has accumulated 12 hours of “U” grades, he/she will be ineligible for a PhD in Biology. 
  • Students who fail to pass part of the qualifying exam in one term and were given the recommendation to retake the exam but were unable to reschedule within the same term will receive a grade of “I” (incomplete) for 2 credit hours or research. The grade will be changed to an “S” or “U” depending on whether the student retakes or does not retake the exam in the following term (not counting summer sessions). Note that the “S” or “U” grades reflect only whether or not the student has taken the exam in the given term. Failure to pass the qualifying exam will not result in a “U” in these research hours.

All students must form and meet with their thesis/dissertation committee no later than the third term following admission (not counting summer sessions). The first meeting will focus on the student’s initial research progress and plans for future research. For PhD students, the first meeting will also include some discussion of which committee members will conduct the written part of the qualifying exam, and the topics that will be covered. For PhD students, the second committee meeting will typically be the oral exam. After the first meeting, all students will meet with their committees (from which no more than one committee member may be absent), at least once per calendar year to discuss their progress towards completion of the degree. At any time the committee may decide that additional meetings should take place. At least one week before every committee meeting, the student will distribute a 2-3 page progress report to each committee member (see exception for qualifying oral exam in section D). After the first meeting, the student will bring a copy of the Committee Status Report from the previous meeting. At the end of each meeting, the chair of the committee will summarize the meeting and make recommendations to the student using a Committee Status Report form. If a committee member is absent from a meeting, the student will meet him/her within two weeks of the meeting.

Final Examinations

PhD students will need to obtain formal permission to write and defend their dissertation from their dissertation committee. The Dissertation Committee Permission Form will need to be signed by all committee members and turned in to the Graduate Coordinator no later than the end of the term prior to the anticipated term of the defense. It is recommended, but not mandatory, that the student have a committee meeting at that time in order for the committee to be aware of the student progress and make final recommendations before the defense. It is expected that the student make progress towards graduation within a year of filing the form.

Each PhD candidate must submit and defend the dissertation when it is in final form. Although any member of the University community may attend the final examination, the committee has sole responsibility in deciding whether or not the examination is passed. In order for a student to pass the examination, an affirmative vote by the major professor and no more than one negative vote by other committee members must be recorded. The examination will emphasize research achievements. In addition, competence in the candidate’s field of research and in the field of ecology and evolution in general will be expected. If the candidate fails to successfully defend his/her dissertation the committee may, 1) outline additional work to be completed and reassessed by the committee or, 2) recommend award of a terminal MS degree. PhD candidates shall have at least one manuscript based on their dissertation submitted for publication before their defense.

Academic Policies

Whether they follow the Cell and Molecular Biology degree track or the Ecology and Evolution degree track, students in the Biology PhD program must specify a dissertation committee and have the names on file in the Office of the Dean at least one term before their graduation. The committee must consist of at least four members, to include three faculty members who have their primary appointment within the department of Biology and Biochemistry and one approved member external to the department. Further details on committee composition can be found here. Additionally, specific requirements for each degree track apply as follows.

Cell and Molecular Biology Degree Track

At least two of the committee members must have their primary appointment in the Cell and Molecular Biology Division of the Department of Biology and Biochemistry. Research faculty may serve on the committee in addition to the core of four committee members who are tenured or tenure-track faculty.

At least three of the committee members (advising or non-advising) must be tenured or tenure-track faculty members with a primary appointment in the Department of Biology and Biochemistry. The three non-advising members must include one member with a primary appointment in the Ecology and Evolution Division of the Department of Biology and Biochemistry and one member from outside the Department of Biology and Biochemistry. At least two of the committee members (advising or non-advising) must have their primary appointment in the Ecology and Evolution Division. Committee decisions can only involve one dissenting vote from a committee member.

University of Houston Academic Policies    

College Academic Policies    

biology phd qualifying exam

  • People Directory

University of Delaware

  • Welcome from the Chair
  • Visitor Information
  • Support the Department
  • Faculty Awards
  • B.A. in Biological Sciences
  • B.S. in Biological Sciences
  • B.S. in Biological Sciences with a Concentration in Cell and Molecular Biology & Genetics
  • B.S. in Biological Sciences with a Concentration in Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • B.A. in Biological Sciences Education
  • Honors Options for Biology Degrees
  • Biology Minor
  • Computational Biology Minor
  • Where Our Grads Are Now
  • Teaching Opportunities
  • Past Recipients - Biological Sciences Academic Excellence Award
  • Past Recipients - Biological Sciences Undergraduate Research Award
  • Past Recipients - Paynter Memorial Award
  • Past Recipients - Richard M. Johnson Memorial Award
  • Past Recipients - Milton H. Stetson Memorial Undergraduate Research Fellowship
  • Past Recipients - Adair B. Gould Memorial Award
  • Past Recipients - Enoch Lee Memorial Award
  • Past Recipients - Jeremie M. Axe, M.D. Summer Scholars Award
  • College and University Resources
  • Graduate Concentration in Molecular Biology and Genetics: M.S. Policy and Curriculum
  • Graduate Concentration in Molecular Biology and Genetics: Ph.D. Policy and Curriculum
  • Graduate Concentration in Cell and Organ Systems: M.S. Policy and Curriculum
  • Graduate Concentration in Cell and Organ Systems: Ph.D. Policy and Curriculum
  • Graduate Concentration in Chemistry-Biology Interface: Ph.D. Policy and Curriculum
  • Dual Degree: Ph.D. in Biological Sciences and Master of Business Administration (MBA)
  • Graduate Concentration in Molecular Biology and Genetics: Comprehensive Exam Guidelines
  • Graduate Concentration in Cell and Organ Systems: Comprehensive Exam Guidelines
  • Degree Time Lines
  • Student Registration Guidelines
  • Ph.D. Qualifying Exam Procedure
  • Department Graduate Program Policy
  • Quick Facts for MS and Ph.D Applicants
  • Professional Science Master's Degree in Biotechnology
  • Graduate Certificate in Biotechnology
  • Joint Ph.D./MBA Program
  • Chemistry-Biology Interface Program
  • Enriched Degree Options
  • Graduate Trainers
  • Former Ph.D./MBA Students: Where are They Now
  • Grants and Fellowships for Graduate Students and Postdocs
  • Graduate Student Professional Development
  • Most Commonly Used Forms
  • Graduation Information
  • Employment Opportunities
  • Publications
  • Graduate Awards
  • Research Programs
  • Equipment Location, Sign-up & Rules
  • University Cores
  • Library Resources
  • Primary Faculty
  • Adjunct and Secondary Faculty
  • Joint Faculty
  • Affiliated Faculty
  • Associate in Arts
  • Emeritus Faculty
  • Postdoctoral Scholars & Research Associates
  • Graduate Students
  • Departmental Staff
  • Laboratory Staff
  • Sept 2022 - Justin Parreno
  • Nov 2022 - Lisha Shao
  • Jan 2021 - Anja Nohe
  • April 2021 - Velia Fowler
  • June 2021 - Alenka Hlousek-Radojcic
  • August 2021 - Aimee Jaramillo-Lambert
  • Jan 2020 - Ramona Neunuebel
  • Feb 2020 - Carlton Cooper
  • Mar 2020 - Stefanie DeVito
  • Apr 2020 - Christopher Trimby
  • May 2020 - Salil Lachke
  • Jun 2020 - Nike Olabisi
  • Sept 2020 - Shuo Wei
  • Oct 2020 - Jessica Tanis
  • Bio Research Day
  • Plate Results
  • In The Media
  • BISC Information Technology
  • Facilities Contact
  • Faculty Programs
  • Initiatives & Academic Assessment
  • Policies, Procedures and Guidelines
  • New Faculty
  • BISC 827 Seminar Evaluation
  • Room Reservations
  • Transfer Course Evaluation Request
  • Undergraduate Research Application
  • Undergraduate Teaching Experience Application

Image Library

Upload new images. The image library for this site will open in a new window.

Document Library

Upload new documents. The document library for this site will open in a new window.

Show Web Part Zones

Show web part zones on the page. Web parts can be added to display dynamic content such as calendars or photo galleries.

Page Layout

Choose between different arrangements of page sections. Page layouts can be changed even after content has been added.

Skip Navigation Links

Toggle Navigation

Open the Navigation Management window, which can be used to view the full current branch of the menu tree, and edit it.

  • Professional Science Master's Degree in Biotechnology

biology phd qualifying exam

Application Process Update

The Department of Biological Sciences is waiving the GRE requirement for our graduate program for students applying for admission in 2022 and 2023. If you are applying without a GRE score, please enter a future GRE exam date into the application when prompted. This does not need to be an actual exam date. Entering a future date will allow your application to be sent on to our review committee where it will receive full consideration. Reporting your scores is entirely optional. If you choose to not submit a GRE score, this will have no bearing on the competitiveness of your application. If you have any questions regarding this pro​cess, please reach out to  Dr. Erica Selva or  Dr. Jessica Tanis​ Graduate Program Co-D​​irectors.

Table of Contents

Graduate program welcome, research facilities, admission requirements, how to apply, financial aid.

  • Professional Development ​

Graduate Student Groups

Degree requirements.

See also: Quick Facts for Graduate Program Applicants

The Department of Biological Sciences offers research-based Master of Science (M.S.) and Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degrees with research foci in the areas of cancer biology, cardiovascular biology, cell, and extracellular matrix biology; cell and organ systems physiology; developmental biology, microbiology; molecular biology and genetics; and musculoskeletal biology. Formalized Graduate Concentrations provide students with curricula and research mentoring that are tailored to the student's career goals. We have also developed an innovative joint Ph.D./MBA program for students interested in combined training in scientific research and business administration.

We have developed both a Professional Science Master’s (PSM) and Graduate Certificate in Biotechnology to serve the needs of both prospective full-time students interested in careers in biotechnology industries and part-time students currently working in scientific industry careers. The PSM in Biotechnology blends rigorous scientific coursework taught by UD science faculty with business coursework offered through the UD Alfred Lerner College of Business capped by a six-month-long internship with one of our industrial partners. Part-time students can complete the internship requirement in their workplace as part of a professional development plan.

Our Department currently has approximately 30 faculty members and at least three additional faculty member is expected to join us in 2020. Several distinguished scientists from other departments at the University of Delaware hold joint appointments in Biological Sciences and further broaden our base of research expertise. Our graduate program also participates in the "Human Health Initiative" , which gives our graduate students additional training opportunities in pediatric research with scientists based at the Nemours Research Foundation, A.I. Dupont Hospital for Children.

At the core of our program is the exciting research carried out by our graduate faculty . Our Department's research efforts are recognized nationally and internationally. An important index of scientific excellence is the level of external funding awarded to a research program: Biological Sciences faculty hold research awards from a variety of federal agencies, and in 2009, over $7,000,000 in external grants were awarded to support Biological Sciences research efforts.

The Department of Biological Sciences offers a unique combination of state-of-the-art research facilities in a safe and very attractive campus . The University of Delaware, which originated as a private academy in 1743, is located in one of the world's most dynamic scientific corridors. Many major research centers in academic, industrial and federal laboratories are within a 90-minute drive in Philadelphia (44 miles), Baltimore (59 miles) and Washington, D.C./Bethesda (100 miles). New York lies only 133 miles from the Newark, DE campus. A large biotechnology community , including DuPont, Hercules, Siemens, and AstraZeneca, also is located in Delaware.

The Department of Biological Sciences occupies Wolf Hall which is located on the main campus and has well-equipped laboratories for research and teaching. Various core facilities including DNA sequencing, microscopy and advanced molecular imaging, whole-animal imaging, and cellular proteomics are available in the department and affiliated institutions including the Delaware Biotechnology Institute , The Nemours Research Foundation at A.I. duPont Hospital for Children and the Center for Translational Cancer Research which is a partnership between the University of Delaware, The Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and A.I. duPont Hospital for Children/Nemours Biomedical Research.

Go to top of page

Graduate admission criteria of the Department include a recommended minimum scholastic index (grade point average on a 4.0 point scale) of 3.0 overall and 3.0 in the sciences. The Graduate Record Examination (GRE) General Test (Verbal, Quantitative, and Writing) is required. Competitive scores are approximately 550 (Verbal) and 650 (Quantitative, Analytical).

Admission to the graduate program in Biological Sciences requires demonstrated academic excellence and the following (or the equivalent): two years of biological sciences; one semester of mathematics, preferably to include calculus and/or statistics; one year of college physics; one year of inorganic (general) chemistry; and one course in organic chemistry. Any deficiency in undergraduate training must be made up (without graduate credit) during the first year of graduate study. Further, nearly all successful applicants have prior, substantive research experience which is well documented in the application.

Applicants who are not U.S. citizens must complete the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) with a score of 600 or higher on the paper-based test, 250 or higher on the computer-based test, or 100 or higher on the TOEFL iBT in accordance with University of Delaware regulations for graduate assistantship eligibility . Applications from non-U.S. citizens who do not have a degree from a U.S. institution will be rejected without further review if these minima are not met. Students who need further training in English prior to attending graduate school may apply for admission through the University of Delaware English Language Institute's Conditional Admission Program .

TOEFL scores are not required of international applicants who have completed a college degree in the U.S. Foreign applicants also are strongly encouraged to complete the Test of Spoken English (TSE) with a score of 45 or higher: international students are given a test very similar to the TSE when they arrive on campus and a passing score is required in order to qualify for financial aid . Previous training or residence in the U.S. does not exempt foreign nationals from these requirements. Requests for a waiver of the language test requirements (for example, for students from English-speaking countries outside of the U.S.) must be approved by the University of Delaware Office of Graduate & Professional Education . Admission to the graduate program in Biological Sciences is competitive. Those who meet the stated minimum requirements are not guaranteed admission, nor are those who fail to meet all those requirements necessarily precluded from admission if they offer other appropriate strengths.

Research-based MS and Ph.D. Programs:

Application must be made electronically to the University's Office of Graduate & Professional Education . It must include three letters of recommendation (sent directly to the University of Delaware Office of Graduate & Professional Education) from persons able to judge the applicant's ability to pursue graduate study. All applications also must include a personal statement that addresses the following questions:

  • What scientific research experience have you had?
  • What are your research interests and long-term professional objectives?
  • What specific attributes of our Department make you feel that it would be a good place for you?
  • Are there any special circumstances related to your academic record that you feel we should know about?

Applications normally are considered only for fall entrance, but applicants who are U.S. citizens or permanent residents may request permission to enroll during the spring or summer semester. Application materials must be completed by October 1 in order to be considered for spring admission. International applicants are considered only for fall admission. Complete applications received by January 15 have optimal consideration for fall admission and financial aid; April 15 is the final Departmental deadline. In exceptional circumstances, late applications from U.S. citizens will be considered until July 1.

Professional Science Masters in Biotechnology and Certificate in Biotechnology

Application must be made electronically to the University's Office of Graduate & Professional Education . It must include three letters of recommendation (sent directly to the University of Delaware Office of Graduate & Professional Education) from persons able to judge the applicant's ability to pursue graduate study. GREs are required of PSM applicants but are not needed for the Certificate program. Applications to the PSM or Certificate in Biotechnology programs also must include a resume or CV outlining work and/or academic experience in the field of biotechnology and a personal statement that addresses the following questions:

  • What scientific research/employment experience have you had? Please be specific about the field of work and job responsibilities
  • What are your long-term professional objectives?
  • What specific attributes of our Department and the PSM in Biotechnology make you feel that this degree is appropriate to help you achieve your professional objectives?

Applications normally are considered only for fall or spring entrance. For optimal consideration for Spring admission, all application materials should be completed by October 1, although applications will be considered until December 1st if there are remaining positions in the program. For optimal consideration for Fall admission, all application materials should be completed by January 15, although applications will be considered until July 1st if there are remaining positions in the program. Foreign nationals are encouraged to apply by the full consideration deadlines to give sufficient time to obtain the necessary visas for graduate study in the USA.

All students admitted into the research-based MS and Ph.D. programs receive generous financial aid packages of over $52,600/year. One component of the financial aid is in the form of graduate assistantships. The stipend level for 2019-2020 graduate assistantships is $26,666 per year for M.S. and pre-candidacy Ph.D. students and $28,000 per year for post-candidacy Ph.D. students. In addition, all graduate assistants in Biological Sciences receive a full-tuition scholarship, health insurance and can enroll in optional dental coverage .

The University also offers other fellowships and scholarships on a competitive basis. Additional fellowships are available through interdepartmental training grants including the NIH-funded Chemistry-Biology Interface Program .

Domestic students admitted into the Professional Science Masters Degree should file FAFSA forms to access the relevant financial aid available for Professional Graduate Study. Foreign applicants are not typically offered financial aid for the PSM program.

The University offers Graduate Student and Family Housing on campus, and a wide range of apartments are available in Newark and the surrounding area.

Professional Development

Students in the Biological Sciences graduate program are encouraged to participate in national and international scientific meetings. Financial support is available from the Department and from the University to offset the cost of travel to scientific meetings.

Graduate students also are encouraged to publish the results of their research projects in prestigious journals, books, etc. The Carson Best Paper Award is given annually to the best scientific paper published by a Ph.D. student currently enrolled in the graduate program.

The Department maintains a Biology Graduate Student Association, and the University supports a variety of graduate student groups .

All students enrolled in the research-based MS or Ph.D. program must select a Graduate Concentration with which to affiliate for the duration of their training. Each fall and spring semester, all MS and Ph.D. graduate students enroll in a graduate research seminar course which provides a mechanism to enhance oral presentation skills.

The research-based Master of Science program requires a minimum of 16 credit hours of courses and successful completion of the preliminary examination. The primary emphasis is on research that culminates in an oral defense of a written thesis. For the Ph.D. degree, a minimum of 16 credit hours of courses, successful completion of the preliminary and qualifying examinations, and the oral defense of a written dissertation are required. Two semesters of experience in the teaching of undergraduates is required of all doctoral candidates.

The preliminary examination, required of MS and Ph.D. students, is administered after completion of two semesters of study and is designed to identify the student's strengths and weaknesses so as to maximize prospects for successful completion of graduate study. The doctoral qualifying examination is an in-depth examination of the student's research specialty and is administered after six semesters of enrollment. It is expected that a significant portion of the dissertation will be suitable for publication.

The research-based M.S. degree curriculum is designed for completion in two years ; the Ph.D. curriculum is designed for completion in five years .

The Professional Science Masters in Biotechnology requires 12 credit hours of core Biology coursework, 9 credit hours of Biotechnology breadth coursework, 15 credits of “PLUS” coursework focused on business practice and ethics and a 6-month long industrial internship.

The Certificate in Biotechnology requires 9 credit hours of core Biology coursework and 6 credit hours of Biotechnology breadth coursework. The coursework leading to the certificate can be rolled into a later PSM in Biotechnology.

For further information or assistance, please contact the Department's Direc​tor of Graduate Programs .

Move this whole section up, swapping places with the section above it.

  • Undergradute
  • ECTS (European Credits Transfer System)
  • Research area
  • Labs & Research Groups
  • Publications
  • Research Videos
  • Faculty Members
  • Instructors
  • Postdoctoral Researchers
  • Research Assistants
  • Associated Researchers
  • Academic Job Applications
  • Prospective Undergraduate Students
  • Prospective Graduate Students

Ph.D. Qualifying Written Exam

Students must pass exams in 4 topics. Topics must be selected such that two of them are from one subject area and two of them could be from the remaining two subject areas or one of each*. Main subjects and the topics are listed below. *One of the topics may be selected from the topics of other PhD programs with the approval of the student's adviser.

Subject areas and topics:

Plant biotechnology:.

  • Plant biotechnology - Selim Çetiner
  • Plant physiology - Levent Öztürk

Molecular Biology

  • Cell biology - Zehra Sayers
  • Immunology - Özgür Kütük
  • Molecular biology and biochemistry - Nur Mustafaoğlu and Hüveyda Başağa
  • Cancer biology - Alex Lyakhovich
  • Neurobiology - Nur Mustafaoğlu
  • Genetics -  Ogün Adebali

Bioinformatics

  • Computational biology - Ogün Adebali and Öznur Taştan
  • Structural biology - Zehra Sayers and Canan Atılgan

Bioengineering:

  • Biosensors - Nur Mustafaoğlu
  • Tissue engineering - Nur Mustafaoğlu

The faculty members of the MBGB program suggest that the following are appropriate study subjects/references for these exams. If a resource is not indicated please consult with a faculty member whos research is similar to the subject in question or the graduate area advisor.

  • Plant biotechnology exam: Textbook: Plant Biotechnology The genetic manipulation of plants Second Edition Adrian Slater, Nigel Scott, and Mark Fowler ISBN: 9780199282616 
  • Chapter 1 Membrane Structure and Membranous Organelles
  • Chapter 3 Membrane Transport
  • Chapter 10 Protein Synthesis, Folding and Degradation
  • Chapter 22 Responses to Abiotic Stress
  • Chapter 23 Mineral Nutrient Acquisition, Transport, and Utilization
  • Chapters 10 - 20
  • Chapters 1-10.

Biochemistry;

  • Amino acids, peptides, and proteins, their structure and function
  • Carbohydrates and lipids and nucleic acids (their structures and functions)
  • Nucleic acids and their functions
  • Membranes and transport
  • Bioenergetics and metabolism (electron transport chain and ox phosphorylation)

Molecular Biology;

  • Genetic materials and structures
  • Central Dogma: DNA Replication Transcription, Translation
  • Mutability and Repair of DNA
  • Regulation of gene expression
  • Principles of methods used in molecular biology

Textbook: Any recent biochemistry or molecular biology textbook and recent articles from literature. Students will be asked to comment on an article from literature in terms of hypothesis, methodology used and suggestions for furthering the research.

  • Principles of Biochemistry Eighth  Edition|©2021 David L. Nelson; Michael M. Cox (or earlier editions but not older than 5th)
  • Chapter 12 Biosignaling
  • 12.8 Regulation of Transcription by Nuclear Hormone Receptors
  • 12.10 Regulation of the Cell Cycle by Protein Kinases
  • 12.11 Oncogenes, Tumor Suppressor Genes, and Programmed Cell Death
  • 25 DNA Metabolism
  • 25.1 Medicine: DNA Repair and Cancer
  • Biology Of The Cell - Bruce Alberts  (at least 4th Ed.)
  • Chapter 23 Cancer

In addition, the following textbooks are highly recommended to read:

  • Introduction to Cancer Biology Robin Hesketh, University of Cambridge Published 2023 2 Ed. or earlier ISBN: 9781316512616
  • The Biology of Cancer Third Edition by Robert A Weinberg ISBN: 978-0-393-88764-8
  • From Neuron to Brain by Author A. Robert Martin, David A. Brown, Mathew E. Diamond, Antonino Cattaneo, Francisco F. De-Miguel, and Foreword by John Nicholls ISBN: 9781605354392
  • Biological sequence analysis. Probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids, edited by R. Durbin, S. Eddy, A. Krogh, and G. Mitchinson. 1998. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Altuna Akalın, Computational Genomics with R, https://compgenomr.github.io/book/stats.html (Not the coding part but the concepts)
  • Branden and Tooze, Introduction to Protein Structure, 2nd edition, Garland Science, 1999.
  • Bahar, Jernigan and Dill, Protein Actions, Taylor & Francis, 2017.
  • Petsko and Ringe, Protein Structure and Function, New Science Press, 2007
  • Biosensors: Essential, Gennady Evtugyn, Springer ISBN 978-3-642-40241-8
  • Handbook of Immunoassay Technologies by Sandeep K. Vashist and John H.T. Loung ISBN 978-0-12-811762-0
  • Principles of Tissue Engineering by Robert Lanza, Robert Langer, Joseph Vacanti eBook ISBN: 9780128214015, Hardcover ISBN: 9780128184226
  • Concepts of Genetics, Global Edition by William S. Klug (Author), Michael R. Cummings (Author), Charlotte A. Spencer (Author), Michael A. Palladino (Author), Darrell Killian (Author) Publisher: Pearson; 12th edition (June 10, 2019) Language: English Paperback: 864 pages ISBN-10: 1292265329 ISBN-13: 978-1292265322

Get the Reddit app

## A subreddit to discuss the intersection of computers and biology. ------ A subreddit dedicated to bioinformatics, computational genomics and systems biology.

PhD Qualifying exam question examples?

I'm a PhD student who is about to go into qualifying exams in the next month. I research farm animal bacterial pathogens, invertebrate infection models, microbiomes, and bacterial WGS. The format will be a set of written questions from each committee member each giving me 1-2 days to answer them. Then an oral presentation of my research followed by the much dreaded oral questioning by the committee.

Can you share examples of quals questions you've had to answer or have given? Also share any success or horror stories while at it!

By continuing, you agree to our User Agreement and acknowledge that you understand the Privacy Policy .

Enter the 6-digit code from your authenticator app

You’ve set up two-factor authentication for this account.

Enter a 6-digit backup code

Create your username and password.

Reddit is anonymous, so your username is what you’ll go by here. Choose wisely—because once you get a name, you can’t change it.

Reset your password

Enter your email address or username and we’ll send you a link to reset your password

Check your inbox

An email with a link to reset your password was sent to the email address associated with your account

Choose a Reddit account to continue

COMMENTS

  1. Ph.D. Qualifying Exam Procedure

    Biol. Chem. 273, 22435-22441. Exam for admission into candidacy for the Ph.D. (Qualifying exam) The exam will be administered by the student's dissertation committee, excluding the student's primary research advisor. If a student has co-advisors with major roles in supervising the student's research, the co-advisors may not serve on the ...

  2. PDF 100 Questions for Bipg Phd Preliminary Exam and Bipg Msbs Qualifying

    The preliminary exam will consist of a set of 20 questions taken from the list below, representing all seven categories (A-G). Each question will be scored on a "pass/fail" basis, with the following results: • Pass all 20 - you pass, and will be taken to lunch by two or more members of the BIPG faculty. • Pass 16-19 (80% or more ...

  3. Preliminary Qualifying Exam (PQE)

    The Goal. The primary goal of the Preliminary Qualifying Examination (PQE) in BBS is to ensure that you are able to assemble an effective research proposal, and then discuss the details of this project with a team of faculty that you select. Research proposal development is a skillset essential for the vast majority of research careers that our ...

  4. Past Part I Qualifying Exams

    Biochemistry, Cell & Developmental Biology Graduate Program. Menu. GDBBS Web Interface ... For the benefit of our current first-year students, we make available to them Part I Qualifying Exams from previous years that they can use to practice. 2022 Qualifying Exam (PDF)

  5. Preliminary Qualifying Exam (PQE)

    The exam includes a written proposal and oral defense of that proposal on a topic related to the dissertation research. Preparing for the PQE: Student Timeline. Complete the BPH Preliminary Qualifying Exam Course Form, listing the coursework taken to fulfill program requirements. The BPH Program must approve of satisfactory progress before the ...

  6. Doctoral Qualifying Exam

    Purpose of the Qualifying Exam. All UC Davis doctoral students must take a Qualifying Examination (QE) to demonstrate they are prepared to advance to candidacy, undertake independent research, and begin the dissertation. Doctoral students may have no more than two opportunities to pass the QE. The QE evaluates the student's preparation and ...

  7. Path to Your Ph.D.

    The qualifying exam has two components: a dissertation proposal including one aim developed independently by the student and an oral defense. The format of the written exam is similar to a NIH F31 grant application to give the student practical experience in scientific writing.

  8. PDF Guidelines for Preliminary Qualifying Examination

    Guidelines for Preliminary Qualifying Examination. Bioinformatics & Integrative Genomics PhD Program (Academic Year 2021-2022) THE GOAL . The primary goal of the Preliminary Qualifying Examination (PQE) is to ensure that you have mastered several topics and skills that are critical for successful completion of your Ph.D. thesis.

  9. Ph.D. Requirements

    Qualifying Exams. Qualifying Exam Part I: Successful completion of the Core Course sequence.(G6001, G6002, G6003). Qualifying Exam Part II: a written research proposal describing an intended thesis project (~10 double-spaced pages) followed by an oral defense before a 2-person faculty committee. This exam may take place during the Spring ...

  10. Ph.D. in Biological Sciences requirements

    Present qualifying exam regulations and scheduling will be followed. All first-year students will be advised by the graduate officer and/or the graduate committee chair. Qualifying exam. Ph.D. students are required to pass qualifying examinations before advancing to candidacy for a Ph.D. The qualifying examinations are administered in two parts.

  11. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Biology

    Option one: A PhD student who has advanced to candidacy (as demonstrated by passing the PhD qualifying exam), and has completed 32 credits of graduate-level coursework (not including research) may apply to the Graduate School for an MS degree in Biology. This must be approved by the Director of Graduate Studies within the Biology Department.

  12. PDF Guidelines for Ph.D. Written Qualifying Exam

    Guidelines for Ph.D. Written Qualifying Exam. The Qualifying Exam in Biological Sciences consists of two parts -- a written portion (Part-I), followed by an oral portion (Part-II, taken only after passing the written portion). The written portion of the Qualifying Exam must be taken by the end of the 5th semester of study.

  13. Rethinking the Doctoral Qualifying Exam

    The doctoral qualifying exam is probably the most stressful part of earning a Ph.D. In addition to the candidate being scrutinized by a panel of field experts with a vague scope of questions, a single poor performance on the exam could result in expulsion from your Ph.D. program, despite how hard you worked toward your Ph.D. already — although a more common outcome entails passing upon ...

  14. Ph.D. Program Information

    Ph.D. Program Information Laboratory Rotations and Presentations Coursework Teaching Oral/Qualifying Examination Research, Dissertation and Beyond The Department offers a Ph.D. program that has a standard completion time of 5.5 to six years. [Note: We do not admit students who wish to take the terminal Master's degree. However, when a student experiences a significant change in career ...

  15. M.S. and Ph.D

    Dual Degree: Ph.D. in Biological Sciences and Master of Business Administration (MBA) Graduate Concentration in Molecular Biology and Genetics: Comprehensive Exam Guidelines. Graduate Concentration in Cell and Organ Systems: Comprehensive Exam Guidelines. Department Graduate Program Policy.

  16. PDF Department PH.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION IN BIOLOGY of Biology

    McGill Biology Ph.D. Qualifying Exam (Version 07-2023 DD) 3 / 5 In the event of a Pass (Satisfactory) If the consensus of the committee is a pass, the committee will then summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the performance in the Report of the Examination Committee and a copy of this report will be given to the candidate.

  17. PhD Qualifying Exam: by end of G2 year

    The qualifying exam committee for this exam should appropriately reflect the new degree path. Students must first seek approval of the Director of Graduate Studies and the CHD in the area they wish to transfer and must submit a final program plan for the new degree area to be reviewed and approved by the CHD.

  18. Requirements and Registration: Program in Plant Biology and

    The Qualifying exam and PhD Prospectus is necessary to advance to PhD candidacy. These are completed simultaneously and should be completed by the spring of the student's second year. ... Teaching Requirements, Teaching experience is a crucial aspect of graduate student training and is required of all PhD students in Plant Biology and ...

  19. Program: Biology, PhD

    A student advances to candidacy for a PhD degree after completion of a qualifying exam. The qualifying exam will be administered by the student's dissertation committee, and will consist of three parts: (1) a written exam, (2) a dissertation proposal, and (3) an oral exam. Details and due dates of the qualifying exam can be found here.

  20. Prospective Students

    The Department of Biological Sciences is waiving the GRE requirement for our graduate program for students applying for admission in 2022 and 2023. If you are applying without a GRE score, please enter a future GRE exam date into the application when prompted. This does not need to be an actual exam date.

  21. Ph.D. Qualifying Written Exam

    The Biology of Cancer Third Edition by Robert A Weinberg ISBN: 978--393-88764-8 . Neurobiology exam: Textbook: From Neuron to Brain by Author A. Robert Martin, David A. Brown, Mathew E. Diamond, Antonino Cattaneo, Francisco F. De-Miguel, and Foreword by John Nicholls ISBN: 9781605354392 . Computational biology exam: Textbook: Biological ...

  22. Qualifying Exam : r/PhD

    As another poster said, it depends on your institution, department, and PhD committee. For me (I'm in a STEM program), I have a qualifying and a comprehensive exams. My qualifying exam was designed by my committee and I had to show my understanding of my project such as background, mechanisms, and theories. The presentation was stressful but I ...

  23. PhD Qualifying exam question examples? : r/bioinformatics

    I'm a PhD student who is about to go into qualifying exams in the next month. I research farm animal bacterial pathogens, invertebrate infection models, microbiomes, and bacterial WGS. The format will be a set of written questions from each committee member each giving me 1-2 days to answer them. Then an oral presentation of my research ...

  24. PDF ECE Ph.D. Qualifying Exam Format and Description

    the student must finalize his/her Ph. D. Qualifying Exam Committee. The student will also be responsible for scheduling the Exam, confirming that all the Ph. D. Qualifying Exam Committee members can attend. • Students must file a Qualifying Exam Proposal Form four weeks before the end of the semester prior to the Ph.D. Qualifying Exam ...