Suggestions or feedback?

MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Machine learning
  • Sustainability
  • Black holes
  • Classes and programs

Departments

  • Aeronautics and Astronautics
  • Brain and Cognitive Sciences
  • Architecture
  • Political Science
  • Mechanical Engineering

Centers, Labs, & Programs

  • Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL)
  • Picower Institute for Learning and Memory
  • Lincoln Laboratory
  • School of Architecture + Planning
  • School of Engineering
  • School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences
  • Sloan School of Management
  • School of Science
  • MIT Schwarzman College of Computing

A comprehensive study of technological change

Press contact :.

Bar graph. On the y-axis: density, from 0.00 to 0.08. On the X-axis: estimated yearly improvement rates, from 0 to 200. There is a large spike of data going past .08 on the y-axis, in between approximately the 0 and 25 marks on the x-axis. A red vertical dotted line exists at the 36.5 mark.

Previous image Next image

The societal impacts of technological change can be seen in many domains, from messenger RNA vaccines and automation to drones and climate change. The pace of that technological change can affect its impact, and how quickly a technology improves in performance can be an indicator of its future importance. For decision-makers like investors, entrepreneurs, and policymakers, predicting which technologies are fast improving (and which are overhyped) can mean the difference between success and failure.

New research from MIT aims to assist in the prediction of technology performance improvement using U.S. patents as a dataset. The study describes 97 percent of the U.S. patent system as a set of 1,757 discrete technology domains, and quantitatively assesses each domain for its improvement potential.

“The rate of improvement can only be empirically estimated when substantial performance measurements are made over long time periods,” says Anuraag Singh SM ’20, lead author of the paper. “In some large technological fields, including software and clinical medicine, such measures have rarely, if ever, been made.”

A previous MIT study provided empirical measures for 30 technological domains, but the patent sets identified for those technologies cover less than 15 percent of the patents in the U.S. patent system. The major purpose of this new study is to provide predictions of the performance improvement rates for the thousands of domains not accessed by empirical measurement. To accomplish this, the researchers developed a method using a new probability-based algorithm, machine learning, natural language processing, and patent network analytics.

Overlap and centrality

A technology domain, as the researchers define it, consists of sets of artifacts fulfilling a specific function using a specific branch of scientific knowledge. To find the patents that best represent a domain, the team built on previous research conducted by co-author Chris Magee, a professor of the practice of engineering systems within the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society (IDSS). Magee and his colleagues found that by looking for patent overlap between the U.S. and international patent-classification systems, they could quickly identify patents that best represent a technology. The researchers ultimately created a correspondence of all patents within the U.S. patent system to a set of 1,757 technology domains.

To estimate performance improvement, Singh employed a method refined by co-authors Magee and Giorgio Triulzi, a researcher with the Sociotechnical Systems Research Center (SSRC) within IDSS and an assistant professor at Universidad de los Andes in Colombia. Their method is based on the average “centrality” of patents in the patent citation network. Centrality refers to multiple criteria for determining the ranking or importance of nodes within a network.

“Our method provides predictions of performance improvement rates for nearly all definable technologies for the first time,” says Singh.

Those rates vary — from a low of 2 percent per year for the “Mechanical skin treatment — Hair removal and wrinkles” domain to a high of 216 percent per year for the “Dynamic information exchange and support systems integrating multiple channels” domain. The researchers found that most technologies improve slowly; more than 80 percent of technologies improve at less than 25 percent per year. Notably, the number of patents in a technological area was not a strong indicator of a higher improvement rate.

“Fast-improving domains are concentrated in a few technological areas,” says Magee. “The domains that show improvement rates greater than the predicted rate for integrated chips — 42 percent, from Moore’s law — are predominantly based upon software and algorithms.”

TechNext Inc.

The researchers built an online interactive system where domains corresponding to technology-related keywords can be found along with their improvement rates. Users can input a keyword describing a technology and the system returns a prediction of improvement for the technological domain, an automated measure of the quality of the match between the keyword and the domain, and patent sets so that the reader can judge the semantic quality of the match.

Moving forward, the researchers have founded a new MIT spinoff called TechNext Inc. to further refine this technology and use it to help leaders make better decisions, from budgets to investment priorities to technology policy. Like any inventors, Magee and his colleagues want to protect their intellectual property rights. To that end, they have applied for a patent for their novel system and its unique methodology.

“Technologies that improve faster win the market,” says Singh. “Our search system enables technology managers, investors, policymakers, and entrepreneurs to quickly look up predictions of improvement rates for specific technologies.”

Adds Magee: “Our goal is to bring greater accuracy, precision, and repeatability to the as-yet fuzzy art of technology forecasting.”

Share this news article on:

Related links.

  • Sociotechnical Systems Research Center
  • Institute for Data, Systems, and Society (IDSS)

Related Topics

  • Technology and society
  • Innovation and Entrepreneurship (I&E)

Related Articles

“Science is a way to connect with people around the world. There are no national boundaries; it's like a more unified network of people working on problems and discussing them,” says Associate Professor Jessika Trancik.

Shaping technology’s future

Ali Jadbabaie is the JR East Professor of Engineering in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the associate director of the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society (IDSS), and the director of one of its parts, the Sociotechnical Systems Research Center. “Our focus is on addressing large societal problems, whether they be power systems and energy systems, or social networks, or...

Tackling society’s big problems with systems theory

Four panel collage of images including a network, wrench, MRI, and bulb

Patents forecast technological change

Previous item Next item

More MIT News

Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson

MIT economists Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson share Nobel Prize

Read full story →

People walk under the trees and columns of Killian court.

MIT releases financials and endowment figures for 2024

High-resolution images of synapses and microtubules

A new method makes high-resolution imaging more accessible

Two nanodiscs, one an early model and one the final model in rainbow colors, hover over a brain neuron. The final model allows for “Membrane Depolarization” and shows an Ion Channel responding to it by allowing molecules inside.

Tiny magnetic discs offer remote brain stimulation without transgenes

Illustration of a head divided into a dark section at the front and a light section at the back, where a bell emits lines representing sound

The way sensory prediction changes under anesthesia tells us how conscious cognition works

Six women, four of whom hold microphones, sit in a row facing an audience sitting in red chairs in a seminar room

Mixing joy and resolve, event celebrates women in science and addresses persistent inequalities

  • More news on MIT News homepage →

Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, USA

  • Map (opens in new window)
  • Events (opens in new window)
  • People (opens in new window)
  • Careers (opens in new window)
  • Accessibility
  • Social Media Hub
  • MIT on Facebook
  • MIT on YouTube
  • MIT on Instagram

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) NANOTECHNOLOGY IMPACT ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

    recent research paper on technology

  2. (PDF) Information Technology Research in the Academy

    recent research paper on technology

  3. (PDF) Review paper on Blue Brain Technology

    recent research paper on technology

  4. 😊 Research paper technology. Research Paper Technology. 2019-02-28

    recent research paper on technology

  5. (PDF) An Overview on Edge Computing Research

    recent research paper on technology

  6. 📚 Research Paper Example on Technology in Education

    recent research paper on technology

VIDEO

  1. Tech Updates: Tesla Subscription, AT&T Ups Fiber Speeds & Massage Robot

  2. How Finely Tuned Is Our Universe?

  3. Premium Paper Technology Based Clutch Assembly

  4. Skeleton-of-Thought: Building a New Template from Scratch

  5. Close Up Images Show Something Weird is Happening on Betelgeuse

  6. Enforcing SBOMs through the Linux kernel with eBPF and IMA