Economics 145 Prof. Yang
In Chapter 1, we covered the basic concepts of research in economics first by reviewing key terms in research and the roles of theory and data in the study of economics. We noted that the study of economics proceeds within the framework of scientific methods and we engaged in a general discussion of scientific method before moving on to a discussion of various terms and concepts within the scientific method. Clearly, learning about the scientific method and the basic concepts of the scientific method is essential to carry out research in economics. However, our discussion was general in nature and, basically, conceptual. While interesting, this kind of learning about the scientific method, and its basic concepts of research in general terms, offers little help in actually starting and successfully completing an economic research project. Thus, given the understanding of basic concepts of research, what we need to learn now are the specifics of to start our research, and to do it.
When students take a research methods course, they usually learn about research procedures in general terms. When they attempt to apply what they have learned in the research methods course to a real research project, they arguably find that they are not adequately prepared to start and complete a meaningful project.
This outcome is at least in part due to our way of teaching students mainly by feeding information without requiring a deeper understanding the subject. This is also partly due to the fact that undergraduate economic education is organized largely by subject-matter packages. Economics undergraduate students typically take intermediate level micro and macro economic theories, several upper division field-specific courses, depending on their interests, as well as one or two quantitative economics courses. More often than not, economics students do not have an opportunity to take a research methods course. Students in upper division field-specific economics courses seldom have the opportunity to conduct any serious and meaningful research, except for the rare occasions to do an honor’s thesis with individualized assistance from faculty members. Consequently, with or without a research methods course, undergraduate students typically do not learn the subject well enough to apply their conceptual knowledge to finding answers in the context of applied and quantitative research. There is a crying need for a practical guide to conducting applied quantitative economic research. Meeting this need is the main motivation to write this book.
The procedures and steps to follow in research are well-known, and I present below a set of standard procedures for conducting applied quantitative economic research. At each step, I will explain you do, you do it, and finally you do it. But merely listing and describing each step at a time is not enough. What I am striving to accomplish is to integrate research problems, theory, and the analysis of data, and to show how and why decisions are being made throughout the research process. To assure comprehension, I will present discussions on research procedures by working with specific examples.
Research is an orderly and systematic procedure, and this procedure may be presented sequentially from the first step of problem definition through the final step of the writing-up of the final report. However, it is also essential to understand that the research process is essentially in the sense that each preceding and succeeding step feeds on each other.
The five major steps in any typical applied and quantitative economic research process are as follows:
1. Statement of Research Problem
2. Survey of Related Literature
3. Theoretical Model: Formulation of Hypothesis
4. Analysis of Data: Testing of Hypothesis
5. Write-up of Research Report
Research Problem John Dewey In starting research one obviously must first decide what problem to investigate. Clearly, therefore, a clear definition and statement of the research problem is the most important part of any research activity. When a research topic is given by your professor or supervisor there is no problem to choosing it. But the responsibility to choose research problem is yours, it becomes more daunting and difficult task. In this case, it will be first something your are interested. It is appropriate to choose a topic within a field which the student is familiar. But even if the student identifies a potential topic he or she is interested in and reasonably familiar with, it is still a difficult task to define and state the problem clearly and adequately. It takes a fair amount of mental struggle to understand the research issue thoroughly; and it takes at least an equal amount of effort to be able to write a succinct problem statement. The importance of a succinct problem statement cannot be too emphasized. Inadequate and incomplete delineation of the research problem results in wasting precious time in gathering materials, and may also result in activities not directly related to the research problem.
A research problem may be disciplinary, subject-matter, or problem-solving oriented and, indeed, combination of the three.
Finally, the requirements of a good research problem include , , and .
B. The research problem has to be specific so that it can be addressed given the constraints of time and budget. Broad and general research problems are neither meaningful nor manageable. If one wishes to study the Pacific Ocean, it is a too broad and wide topic. Research has to focus on a specific aspect of the Pacific Ocean.
C. Finally, the research problem has be "manageable" because it has to be finished within the assigned time and budget constraint.
To define the research problem adequately, however, requires substantial knowledge of the problem itself. One way of obtaining this knowledge is to read background materials. Text-books or, better, a recent review article on the topic are often useful as starting points, since they give a balanced summary of present knowledge, and also provide useful references. But as you study these books and articles by other investigators, you need to evaluate these previous works in light of your own research problem. As you read, you must always ask yourself what you are trying to find out. If you cannot state clearly what it is you want to find out, it is obvious that you are going to waste a lot of time before you settle on the specific research problem.
The problem or problem area to research depends on your interest, experience, and career goals. But once you have a research problem or problem area, a decision must be made to focus on one or two specific aspects of the problem. To accomplish this, one has to be familiar with the area; to actually know quite bit about it, fact. How does one gain enough knowledge to embark on serious research? If you are familiar with the subject matter, it is largely a matter of intuition and insight for you to come up with the specific problem. If not, you have to read background materials to gain this knowledge. Suppose, for instance, that you are interested in studying the reasons for the continual increase over time in health care expenditure in the U.S. Searching through the literature, you will find that Chapter 4, "The Economics of Health Care" in the and two symposia articles on health economics and health care reform in (Summer 1992 and Summer 1994) provide adequate background.
As you gain knowledge on the chosen topic, it is also helpful to decide what specific research problems and issues you are interested in. Specifically, are you interested in establishing a comparison? To find a cause or an effect? With the cause-effect relationship in the health care expenditure in mind, one can choose to study the roles of third-party payment mechanism through insurance, of technology, or of government. How about measuring the magnitude of some interesting and important issue, such as measuring the welfare cost of national health care insurance? There are many more interesting questions and issues to be investigated within the general rubric of health care expenditure in the U.S.
The formulation of the statement of the problem usually requires the following two steps.
1. Overview of the problem
2. Narrowing down to specific aspect(s) of the problem
One good way to start the problem statement is to present the problem in an overview. The reason why researchers usually start with presenting the problem in the context of an overview is to present the problem in perspective. This way, the reader is introduced to terminology, definitions, and the relationship under consideration, as well as the relationship of the topic to related questions and fields.
An example of good overview is quoted below. [See Craig S. Hakkio’s article entitled "Is Purchasing Power Parity a Useful Guide to the Dollar?" in pp. 37-51]
(PPP) is a measure of the dollar’s equilibrium value - the exchange rate toward which the dollar moves over time. Because the value of the dollar is currently below its PPP value, academic and business economists use the concept of purchasing power parity to advocates argue that the dollar is undervalued and therefore likely to rise.
Other economists acknowledge that PPP may help forecast the value of the dollar over the long run but doubt its usefulness as a short-term guide. They often cite the 1970s, when the dollar frequently strayed from its PPP value and sometimes took years to return. They also note that economic and political forces regularly buffet the dollar, keeping its value away from equilibrium. Thus, even though the dollar is currently below its PPP value, these economists maintain there is no guarantee it will rise in value in the near term.
The research problem in Hakkio’s paper is to evaluate the purchasing power parity as a guide to future direction of the US dollar. In his overview of the problem, Hakkio first defines the term "purchasing power parity" and presents two alternative views to the use of PPP as a guide to the future direction of the US dollar. According to one view, namely the purchasing power parity view, the dollar is likely to rise because current value of the dollar is below its PPP value. According to other view, however, there is no guarantee that the dollar value will rise soon, because the PPP view is known to hold only in the long run. What he skillfully accomplished in the two short paragraphs are: 1) to clearly define the problem, 2) to define the key term, and 3) to present two alternative views on the future direction of the dollar.
After having presented an overview of the problem, the researcher usually focuses in one or two specific issues or aspects of the problem. In the case of Hakkio’s paper, however, he moves directly on to the objective statement because there is no further need to narrow it down. His objective statement and a general outline of his paper is presented in the third paragraph of his paper and is quoted below:
"This article argues that PPP is a useful guide to the dollar in the long run
and - to a lesser extent - in the short run. The first section of the article defines
the concept and discusses why most economists believe it is a useful long-run guide. The second section shows the dollar generally moves toward its PPP
the measure says little about whether the dollar will rise in the near term."
Suppose a student proposes to write a research paper with the title "Trade Deficit", "Budget Deficit", "Exchange Rate", or "U.S. Banking". One can tell immediately see that each of these subjects is too broad and general to be a meaningful research topic. How does one go about narrowing down these broad and general topics to a manageable research problem? To learn how to do that, we need to learn to reduce the topic to manageable size by limiting it by time, space, or geographically a certain aspect of the problem.
With the trade deficit as an example, one may limit it to "U.S. Trade Deficit" or, more specifically, to "U.S.-Japan Trade deficit". Similarly, it may limited to a specific time period as "Persistent U.S. Trade Deficit During 1980s". Indeed, it might be a combination of two aspects, like "U.S.-Japan Trade Deficit during the 1980s". Or one might decide to focus on one particular aspect, such as the major determinants of the U.S. trade deficit or the effect of U.S. trade deficits on the exchange value of the U.S. dollar..
With the budget deficit in mind, one might similarly limit it to "U.S. budget Deficits" or to the well known issue of the twin deficits between the "U.S. Budget Deficits and Trade Deficits". Or perhaps one might decide to limit the topic to the impact of a reduction in U.S. budget deficit on the value of the U.S. dollar..
With the U.S. banking in mind, one may ask whether or not U.S. Banking is declining". If the answer is positive, one can further examine why U.S. banking is not declining
To illustrate further, consider health care expenditure in the United States over the past several decades. We see from the data that U.S. health case expenditure has steadily increased and that it has increased faster than other categories of expenditure. One can raise a number of important and meaningful questions with respect to heath care spending vis a vis other categories of expenditures. One can ask: Why are health care expenditures in the U.S. increasing over time? Or why has health care expenditure in the U.S. increased substantially faster than other expenditure categories? With this general question in mind, one may pose a more specific question like: Why has the share of health care expenditure of total U.S. consumer expenditure increased during the 1960-95 period? To answer this question adequately, one has to examine the major determinants of health care expenditure in the U.S. Relating to this question, one might pursue the financing side of health care expenditure. To restrain this rapid growth, many health care reform proposals deal with the question of how to finance health care expenditure.
For the last illustration of narrowing down to specific aspect of the research problem, let us take up the recent surge in gasoline prices in California. One can raise a number of important and useful questions about this topic. First, why did gasoline price increase so dramatically in the first part of 1996 compared with those in the previous five years? Is it due to higher gasoline taxes or is it due to the "rigging" of gasoline price by big oil companies? Would the proposed sale of the navy petroleum reserve announced by President Clinton help lower gasoline prices or is it merely a political ploy? A second question might be: Why, in recent years, are gasoline prices in California substantially higher than in the rest of U.S.? What, if any, is the role of environmental costs in California’s recent gasoline price hike?
When you have finally defined the research problem adequately, the next task is to state the problem clearly. We often say that it is necessary to state the research problem Success depends largely on one’s ability in organization and in technical writing. Since the writing aspect of research activity is not the primary focus of this chapter, one may refer to publications devoted to this aspect. Two good resources which many students find useful are: by John S. Harris and Reed H. Blake (Nelson-Hall) and by William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White. (Macmillan)
Review of Related Literature
Almost all research topics have been studied by other researchers. Nothing under the sun is new, as one verse in the Old Testament says. As you consider some problem or research issue, you can be almost assured that somebody else has studied the problem previously. Therefore, the obvious fact is: The more one knows about what was studied earlier, the better the researcher can approach and solve the problem. What then is the purpose of this review? Obviously, it is to assist you in attacking the problem you choose to study. As you review previous research done in related areas, directly and indirectly, you will be better prepared to handle the problem.
The benefits of a review of related literature are many and a few of them are listed here:
How should one go about preparing "Review of Related Literature". While there is no one way of doing this, following the several steps listed below will be helpful.
Before you begin a review of related literature, you first need to find out what has been done on the topic you are interested in. How does one find out what has been done on a particular topic? There are several ways to do this. An increasingly popular method to do a literature search is to tap into two popular electronic data bases. The first one is the compact disc search This handy and economical search software consists of one compact disc and user manual. It has a complete list of all the articles and working papers listed in the , an official publication of the American Economic Association. To use it, however, requires access to an EconLit compact disc and a personal computer with a compact disc drive. The second electronic source is one of several search procedures available on Internet.
When using electronic search procedures, it is important to type in two or three key words to facilitate your search. If the word chosen for your search is broad and general, these search procedures will give you literately few hundreds citations and sorting through so many is not efficient. Thus, when you search previous studies directly or indirectly related to your chosen topic, type only in two or three few key words directly related to your topic.
After your electronic search procedure has produced the necessary citations, you often need to select only those citations which have a direct bearing on your topic. It is a survey of literature, and only the researcher can make the determination of the degree of relatedness.
If you do not have access to an electronic search, you have to rely on manual search procedures through the library. You can go to library and find current and old issues of the This publication lists articles published by journal and by field. It would be advisable to start from a current issue and see if one can find articles and other publications on the topic. Then go to older issues and do the same by writing down citations of all related works.
Having identified all important previous studies which have a direct or indirect bearing on your topic, the next step of writing the review of related literature is to make a plan of how you want to organize your literature review. Without a plan, the literature survey easily becomes "Smith did this; Jones did that" by merely listing what they have done. In making a literature review plan, good advice is always to be mindful of the research problem itself. Without a clear understanding of the research issue and problem, one cannot make a plan for a good literature survey. Any serious attempt to understand the different aspects of each previous work requires substantial effort before one can see clearly how seemingly unrelated work fit together. Only then one can develop a good plan. In organizing your related literature, it is useful first to identify one or two major, or classic, studies. Then you can see the contributions of other works in relation to what was already done or not done in the major works. There may be situations where, in some cases, it is difficult to classify previous works by "major or minor" categories, because the contributions of each work are similar. In this case, it would be reasonable to review previous works by commenting only on the different aspects or focus of these works. One way or another, understanding the main research problem and the contributions of previous works is essential before one can make a plan for literature survey. Finally, it is always a good idea to see how each prior study is related to the problem you are focusing on. The importance of the literature cannot be emphasized too much.
Remember what you are doing is a review of literature. This means that you are presenting your own discussion of existing literature. Because of this, it is to avoid direct quotation. Paraphrasing or restating in your own words is the way to do it. What you are doing is evaluating prior work to shed light on your study.
"Science is built with facts as a house is built with stones, but a collection of facts is no more science than a heap of stones is a house." -Jules Henri Poincare
"A person "can stare stupidly at phenomena; but in the absence of imagination they will not connect themselves together in any rational way". -C.S. Peirce
After the researcher has chosen a problem and has ascertained what investigations have already been done on it, the next step is to conceptualize the problem.
1. is Conceptual Framework and do we need one?
The conceptual or theoretical framework is the process of conceptualizing the problem by reasoning, recognizing, and synthesizing the problem. It is an abstract process in which the researcher identifies the central versus the peripheral, or the primary versus the secondary components of the problem, and understands how these components fit together.
The economic world is incredibly complex. The economist’s task of explaining the behavior of people, institutions and their interactions is, therefore, a very difficult task. To understand why and how it works, we need, as in all other fields of science, to abstract from reality. Abstraction requires ignoring many details in order to focus on the most important elements in order to understand the functioning of a complex phenomenon. Theorizing is a combined effort of abstracting (from details) and connecting (the essential components), and . As Pierce said, one can stupidly stare at the facts and data. Only with theory, one can begin to attempt to understand it. The process of arriving at a logical structure for organizing and analyzing the problem is, in fact, a deliberate simplification (abstraction) of the factual relationship to explain how those relationships work. So the theory is an of the mechanism behind observed phenomena.
A couple of examples: 1) road map; 2) ocean waves on the surface as facts. Undercurrent and forces below. Focusing on waves make you dizzy with no understanding of why and how’s of pattern of ocean waves. 3) gasoline price and shift in the demand and supply.
Therefore, the first role of conceptualization is to provide a logical structure for organizing and analyzing the problem. The second role of conceptualization is to lead to a hypothesis, which in turn leads to the testing of the hypothesis. Hypotheses are the results of the conceptualization of the problem. One definition: An hypothesis is a tentative assertion that is subject to testing. "As a tentative assertion, it can take the form of a simple proposition of an expected outcome or an assertion of a relationship, or relationships, between or among forces, variables, or events". [Eldridge, p. 136]
:
2) to Star and Develop the Conceptual Framework
How does one get started on the conceptual framework? Source materials for developing the conceptual framework for your research come from existing theories. You will recall that the research process is in the sense that the knowledge obtained in each stage feed on each other from the problem statement, the survey of related literature, and the conceptual framework.
From the review of related literature, one must first existing theory or theories on the problem. Second, when there are competing theories, one has to a particular theory suitable to the problem. Third, and finally, one has to the chosen theory to solve the problem.
To illustrate how to start and develop a conceptual framework, it is best to work with a specific topic. Suppose we are interested in the relationship between transit fares in Sacramento, California and the revenue that the transit system takes in. Specifically, let our question be whether or not a hike in fares, say from a current $1.25 to $1.50, would increase revenue.
In organizing and analyzing our problem to answer that question, we will develop a conceptual framework or, as the economist calls it, build a model. From our knowledge from the micro-economics principles course, we learned that total fare collection (total revenue) is equal to the average fare times the number of rides. In an equational form, this relationship can be stated as:
Equation (1) helps us organize our thinking about the two key variables, namely the fare and number of rides, in the determination of the total revenue. The fare is under the control of and is set by the Sacramento Regional Transit Authority. However, the number rides depends on the fare. The problem is to know how the number of rides will be affected by proposed fare hike by the Transit Authority. Or, more broadly, the question is what determines the number of rides. The economist’s way of answering this question is to view the number of rides as depending on the consumer’s decision to choose between taking transit and alternative transportation modes. The choice of transportation mode is basically an economic decision based on the relative cost and convenience of alternative means of transportation. Once viewed this way, one can see that this is the demand for regional transit.
From the theory of demand, we know that the number of rides, or using the economist’s term, the quantity of transit rides demanded, depends first on fare and the cost of alternative mode of transportation, as well as consumer income. Formally, we can write:
The next step is then to combine the equations (1) and (2) to have the model of total revenue from fare collection. Combining equations (1) and (2) yields:
Total Subway Revenue = fare x quantity of transit ride demanded
We now have a complete theoretical model of transit revenue with the key determining factors. However, one may note that the model specified above is a simplified description of the process involved when compared with real world complexities. It is obvious that important explanatory variables such as parking in downtown, the frequency and quality of service of regional transit and so forth, have been omitted. So the natural question is what is the "right" degree of abstraction. But there is no such thing as one right level of abstraction for all analytical purposes. The proper degree of abstraction obviously depends on the objective of the analysis at hand.
Once the theoretical model is specified, we need to evaluate the model qualitatively. An increase in the fare is expected to do two things. First, an increase in fare, holding constant all factors other than fare, tends to increase revenue. But second, as the theory of demand tells us, an increase in transit fare is expected to reduce the number of transit rides demanded, holding constant other factors, namely taxi cab fare, cost of owning automobile driving, and consumer income. The prediction of a negative relationship between the subway ride demanded and subway fare would make sense intuitively. But to really understand and an increase in the transit fare usually leads to a reduction in the transit rides demanded, one has to go beyond principles of economics and dig into microeconomics at intermediate level. There we will learn that there are income and substitution effects associated with an increase in subway fare, and that the combined income and substitution effects cause transit rides demanded to fall as a result of the increase in its fare. [See for instance, Nicholson’s Chapter 4, 1994]. Since these two effects work in opposite directions, it is not a priori clear whether the increase in fare will lead to an increase in total revenue or not. There are three possibilities: Total revenue may increase, remain the same, or decrease, all depending on the price elasticity of demand of ridership.
What does the theory of demand tells us about expected impact of an increase in cost of two alternative means of transportation? Theory tells us that an increase in taxi fare and cost of automobile driving, given the transit fare, will raise transit rides demanded because transit ride will become relatively cheaper (through the substitution effect). But how about the effect of an increase in consumer income on transit rides demanded? The theory of demand tells us that whether or not an increase in consumer income will raise or reduce transit rides demanded depends on whether consumers perceive transit rides as an inferior good or as a luxury good.
Now we realize that the theory of demand will provide answers only . That is, the number of transit rides demanded will rise or fall, if such and such conditions are satisfied. But theory of demand will not and cannot provide answers, which is necessary to answer our initial question of whether or not a hike in transit fare would increase transit revenue. What the theory does is to conceptualize the problem to provide a logical structure for organizing and analyzing the problem, and it can predict the direction of change of a change in determining factors only . What we need is a quantitative and empirical answer. The next section is devoted to the discussion of the formulation of an empirical model and its estimation with real-world data, as well as testing of hypotheses.
Empirical analysis covers a wide range of activity of measurement, estimation, and verification of phenomena under consideration. Since it covers a broad range of activity, it is difficult to present discussion of general rules to follow in conducting empirical analysis. But it seems reasonable to classify various empirical analysis into two types of empirical analysis: descriptive empirical analysis and cause-effect analysis which involves estimation and the testing of hypothesis. First, we will present discussions of how to conduct a descriptive empirical analysis with an example.
A descriptive empirical analysis is based on data analysis usually consisting of descriptive statistics and other quantitative measures in analyzing a particular issue(s) or question(s). It does not involve the statistical estimation of relationship and the testing of the hypothesis, as is done in the case of analysis of an assumed cause-effect relationship.
A descriptive empirical analysis may also involve and of the extent and degree of a certain phenomenon
To illustrate how to conduct a descriptive empirical analysis, consider a well-known macroeconomic issue of the trade-off between inflation and unemployment. Some background on this issue may be useful. During the 1950s and 1960s, many empirical studies examined inflation and unemployment data for numerous countries and time periods; and in many cases finding a negative relationship between unemployment and inflation. This negative empirical relationship between unemployment and inflation is known as the In the following decades, however, this relationship between unemployment and inflation failed to hold. In the latter part of the 1960s and early 1970s some economists, notably Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps, question the logic of the Phillips curve. They argued on theoretical ground that we should not expect a stable relationship between inflation and unemployment. Rather, a stable negative relationship should exist between inflation and the unemployment rate.
Incorporating the negative relationship between unanticipated inflation and cyclical unemployment, we may write
- = ) where h refers to a positive number that measures the strength of the relationship between unanticipated inflation and cyclical unemployment. The latter is defined as the difference between the actual unemployment rate (u) and the natural rate of unemployment (u ). The above equation states that given the expected inflation rate, unanticipated inflation will be positive when the cyclical unemployment rate is negative, negative when cyclical unemployment is positive, and zero when cyclical unemployment is zero.
With the concept of a trade-off between the unemployment rate and the inflation rate, policy makers try to gauge the amount of slack in the economy in formulating monetary policy. When the economy’s resources are not pushed beyond capacity levels, inflation tends to remain under control. But when the economy’s resources are pushed to or beyond the capacity level, then inflation is expected to surge. In assessing the capacity in the labor markets, the natural rate of unemployment (NRU) is a key concept. The natural rate of unemployment is defined as that rate of unemployment at which there is no tendency for inflation to change.
With the above background in mind, let us now consider how Stuart Weiner at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas examined the relationship between unemployment and inflation in recent papers. First, he defined the concept of the natural rate of unemployment and provided general background information about the relationship between inflation and unemployment, as expected. He then presented two line graphs with data on the U.S. actual unemployment rate and natural unemployment rate for the 1959-1994 period. Since both unemployment rates are measured in percentages on the vertical axis, the vertical difference between them may be considered as the cyclical unemployment rate. In the second graph, Weiner first identified the four episodes of sustained increases in inflation during the period by shaded areas, and then superimposed a line graph of the cyclical unemployment rate.
Using the second graph, he then analyzed whether or not the increases in inflation were accompanied by the actual unemployment rate going below the natural unemployment rate. Examining the graph, he found that "at no times has the actual unemployment rate gone below the natural rate without the economy ultimately experiencing a rise in inflation".
In the discussion of policy implications of his findings, he made several observations. First, he noted that the lead time between a move below the natural rate and the eventual increase in inflation varies. Second, evaluating changes in the demographics and labor market conditions, he made several comments about why he believes that the natural unemployment rate would not be declining from the then currently estimated rate of 6.25%.
Regression analysis of Sacramento Regional transit demand
"Even the best scientific research is useless unless it is communicated to others" Ghebremdhin and Tweeten, 1988, p. 44
1. Introduction
2. Review of Literature
3. Theoretical Model
4. Empirical Analysis
5. Summary and Conclusions
6. Footnotes
7. Tables
8. Appendix
9. References
- Chapter Four: Quantitative Methods (Part 1)
Once you have chosen a topic to investigate, you need to decide which type of method is best to study it. This is one of the most important choices you will make on your research journey. Understanding the value of each of the methods described in this textbook to answer different questions allows you to be able to plan your own studies with more confidence, critique the studies others have done, and provide advice to your colleagues and friends on what type of research they should do to answer questions they have. After briefly reviewing quantitative research assumptions, this chapter is organized in three parts or sections. These parts can also be used as a checklist when working through the steps of your study. Specifically, part 1 focuses on planning a quantitative study (collecting data), part two explains the steps involved in doing a quantitative study, and part three discusses how to make sense of your results (organizing and analyzing data).
- Chapter One: Introduction
- Chapter Two: Understanding the distinctions among research methods
- Chapter Three: Ethical research, writing, and creative work
- Chapter Four: Quantitative Methods (Part 2 - Doing Your Study)
- Chapter Four: Quantitative Methods (Part 3 - Making Sense of Your Study)
- Chapter Five: Qualitative Methods (Part 1)
- Chapter Five: Qualitative Data (Part 2)
- Chapter Six: Critical / Rhetorical Methods (Part 1)
- Chapter Six: Critical / Rhetorical Methods (Part 2)
- Chapter Seven: Presenting Your Results
Quantitative Worldview Assumptions: A Review
In chapter 2, you were introduced to the unique assumptions quantitative research holds about knowledge and how it is created, or what the authors referred to in chapter one as "epistemology." Understanding these assumptions can help you better determine whether you need to use quantitative methods for a particular research study in which you are interested.
Quantitative researchers believe there is an objective reality, which can be measured. "Objective" here means that the researcher is not relying on their own perceptions of an event. S/he is attempting to gather "facts" which may be separate from people's feeling or perceptions about the facts. These facts are often conceptualized as "causes" and "effects." When you ask research questions or pose hypotheses with words in them such as "cause," "effect," "difference between," and "predicts," you are operating under assumptions consistent with quantitative methods. The overall goal of quantitative research is to develop generalizations that enable the researcher to better predict, explain, and understand some phenomenon.
Because of trying to prove cause-effect relationships that can be generalized to the population at large, the research process and related procedures are very important for quantitative methods. Research should be consistently and objectively conducted, without bias or error, in order to be considered to be valid (accurate) and reliable (consistent). Perhaps this emphasis on accurate and standardized methods is because the roots of quantitative research are in the natural and physical sciences, both of which have at their base the need to prove hypotheses and theories in order to better understand the world in which we live. When a person goes to a doctor and is prescribed some medicine to treat an illness, that person is glad such research has been done to know what the effects of taking this medicine is on others' bodies, so s/he can trust the doctor's judgment and take the medicines.
As covered in chapters 1 and 2, the questions you are asking should lead you to a certain research method choice. Students sometimes want to avoid doing quantitative research because of fear of math/statistics, but if their questions call for that type of research, they should forge ahead and use it anyway. If a student really wants to understand what the causes or effects are for a particular phenomenon, they need to do quantitative research. If a student is interested in what sorts of things might predict a person's behavior, they need to do quantitative research. If they want to confirm the finding of another researcher, most likely they will need to do quantitative research. If a student wishes to generalize beyond their participant sample to a larger population, they need to be conducting quantitative research.
So, ultimately, your choice of methods really depends on what your research goal is. What do you really want to find out? Do you want to compare two or more groups, look for relationships between certain variables, predict how someone will act or react, or confirm some findings from another study? If so, you want to use quantitative methods.
A topic such as self-esteem can be studied in many ways. Listed below are some example RQs about self-esteem. Which of the following research questions should be answered with quantitative methods?
- Is there a difference between men's and women's level of self- esteem?
- How do college-aged women describe their ups and downs with self-esteem?
- How has "self-esteem" been constructed in popular self-help books over time?
- Is there a relationship between self-esteem levels and communication apprehension?
What are the advantages of approaching a topic like self-esteem using quantitative methods? What are the disadvantages?
For more information, see the following website: Analyse This!!! Learning to analyse quantitative data
Answers: 1 & 4
Quantitative Methods Part One: Planning Your Study
Planning your study is one of the most important steps in the research process when doing quantitative research. As seen in the diagram below, it involves choosing a topic, writing research questions/hypotheses, and designing your study. Each of these topics will be covered in detail in this section of the chapter.
Topic Choice
Decide on topic.
How do you go about choosing a topic for a research project? One of the best ways to do this is to research something about which you would like to know more. Your communication professors will probably also want you to select something that is related to communication and things you are learning about in other communication classes.
When the authors of this textbook select research topics to study, they choose things that pique their interest for a variety of reasons, sometimes personal and sometimes because they see a need for more research in a particular area. For example, April Chatham-Carpenter studies adoption return trips to China because she has two adopted daughters from China and because there is very little research on this topic for Chinese adoptees and their families; she studied home vs. public schooling because her sister home schools, and at the time she started the study very few researchers had considered the social network implications for home schoolers (cf. http://www.uni.edu/chatham/homeschool.html ).
When you are asked in this class and other classes to select a topic to research, think about topics that you have wondered about, that affect you personally, or that know have gaps in the research. Then start writing down questions you would like to know about this topic. These questions will help you decide whether the goal of your study is to understand something better, explain causes and effects of something, gather the perspectives of others on a topic, or look at how language constructs a certain view of reality.
Review Previous Research
In quantitative research, you do not rely on your conclusions to emerge from the data you collect. Rather, you start out looking for certain things based on what the past research has found. This is consistent with what was called in chapter 2 as a deductive approach (Keyton, 2011), which also leads a quantitative researcher to develop a research question or research problem from reviewing a body of literature, with the previous research framing the study that is being done. So, reviewing previous research done on your topic is an important part of the planning of your study. As seen in chapter 3 and the Appendix, to do an adequate literature review, you need to identify portions of your topic that could have been researched in the past. To do that, you select key terms of concepts related to your topic.
Some people use concept maps to help them identify useful search terms for a literature review. For example, see the following website: Concept Mapping: How to Start Your Term Paper Research .
Narrow Topic to Researchable Area
Once you have selected your topic area and reviewed relevant literature related to your topic, you need to narrow your topic to something that can be researched practically and that will take the research on this topic further. You don't want your research topic to be so broad or large that you are unable to research it. Plus, you want to explain some phenomenon better than has been done before, adding to the literature and theory on a topic. You may want to test out what someone else has found, replicating their study, and therefore building to the body of knowledge already created.
To see how a literature review can be helpful in narrowing your topic, see the following sources. Narrowing or Broadening Your Research Topic and How to Conduct a Literature Review in Social Science
Research Questions & Hypotheses
Write Your Research Questions (RQs) and/or Hypotheses (Hs)
Once you have narrowed your topic based on what you learned from doing your review of literature, you need to formalize your topic area into one or more research questions or hypotheses. If the area you are researching is a relatively new area, and no existing literature or theory can lead you to predict what you might find, then you should write a research question. Take a topic related to social media, for example, which is a relatively new area of study. You might write a research question that asks:
"Is there a difference between how 1st year and 4th year college students use Facebook to communicate with their friends?"
If, however, you are testing out something you think you might find based on the findings of a large amount of previous literature or a well-developed theory, you can write a hypothesis. Researchers often distinguish between null and alternative hypotheses. The alternative hypothesis is what you are trying to test or prove is true, while the null hypothesis assumes that the alternative hypothesis is not true. For example, if the use of Facebook had been studied a great deal, and there were theories that had been developed on the use of it, then you might develop an alternative hypothesis, such as: "First-year students spend more time on using Facebook to communicate with their friends than fourth-year students do." Your null hypothesis, on the other hand, would be: "First-year students do not spend any more time using Facebook to communication with their friends than fourth-year students do." Researchers, however, only state the alternative hypothesis in their studies, and actually call it "hypothesis" rather than "alternative hypothesis."
Process of Writing a Research Question/Hypothesis.
Once you have decided to write a research question (RQ) or hypothesis (H) for your topic, you should go through the following steps to create your RQ or H.
Name the concepts from your overall research topic that you are interested in studying.
RQs and Hs have variables, or concepts that you are interested in studying. Variables can take on different values. For example, in the RQ above, there are at least two variables – year in college and use of Facebook (FB) to communicate. Both of them have a variety of levels within them.
When you look at the concepts you identified, are there any concepts which seem to be related to each other? For example, in our RQ, we are interested in knowing if there is a difference between first-year students and fourth-year students in their use of FB, meaning that we believe there is some connection between our two variables.
- Decide what type of a relationship you would like to study between the variables. Do you think one causes the other? Does a difference in one create a difference in the other? As the value of one changes, does the value of the other change?
Identify which one of these concepts is the independent (or predictor) variable, or the concept that is perceived to be the cause of change in the other variable? Which one is the dependent (criterion) variable, or the one that is affected by changes in the independent variable? In the above example RQ, year in school is the independent variable, and amount of time spent on Facebook communicating with friends is the dependent variable. The amount of time spent on Facebook depends on a person's year in school.
If you're still confused about independent and dependent variables, check out the following site: Independent & Dependent Variables .
Express the relationship between the concepts as a single sentence – in either a hypothesis or a research question.
For example, "is there a difference between international and American students on their perceptions of the basic communication course," where cultural background and perceptions of the course are your two variables. Cultural background would be the independent variable, and perceptions of the course would be your dependent variable. More examples of RQs and Hs are provided in the next section.
APPLICATION: Try the above steps with your topic now. Check with your instructor to see if s/he would like you to send your topic and RQ/H to him/her via e-mail.
Types of Research Questions/Hypotheses
Once you have written your RQ/H, you need to determine what type of research question or hypothesis it is. This will help you later decide what types of statistics you will need to run to answer your question or test your hypothesis. There are three possible types of questions you might ask, and two possible types of hypotheses. The first type of question cannot be written as a hypothesis, but the second and third types can.
Descriptive Question.
The first type of question is a descriptive question. If you have only one variable or concept you are studying, OR if you are not interested in how the variables you are studying are connected or related to each other, then your question is most likely a descriptive question.
This type of question is the closest to looking like a qualitative question, and often starts with a "what" or "how" or "why" or "to what extent" type of wording. What makes it different from a qualitative research question is that the question will be answered using numbers rather than qualitative analysis. Some examples of a descriptive question, using the topic of social media, include the following.
"To what extent are college-aged students using Facebook to communicate with their friends?"
"Why do college-aged students use Facebook to communicate with their friends?"
Notice that neither of these questions has a clear independent or dependent variable, as there is no clear cause or effect being assumed by the question. The question is merely descriptive in nature. It can be answered by summarizing the numbers obtained for each category, such as by providing percentages, averages, or just the raw totals for each type of strategy or organization. This is true also of the following research questions found in a study of online public relations strategies:
"What online public relations strategies are organizations implementing to combat phishing" (Baker, Baker, & Tedesco, 2007, p. 330), and
"Which organizations are doing most and least, according to recommendations from anti- phishing advocacy recommendations, to combat phishing" (Baker, Baker, & Tedesco, 2007, p. 330)
The researchers in this study reported statistics in their results or findings section, making it clearly a quantitative study, but without an independent or dependent variable; therefore, these research questions illustrate the first type of RQ, the descriptive question.
Difference Question/Hypothesis.
The second type of question is a question/hypothesis of difference, and will often have the word "difference" as part of the question. The very first research question in this section, asking if there is a difference between 1st year and 4th year college students' use of Facebook, is an example of this type of question. In this type of question, the independent variable is some type of grouping or categories, such as age. Another example of a question of difference is one April asked in her research on home schooling: "Is there a difference between home vs. public schoolers on the size of their social networks?" In this example, the independent variable is home vs. public schooling (a group being compared), and the dependent variable is size of social networks. Hypotheses can also be difference hypotheses, as the following example on the same topic illustrates: "Public schoolers have a larger social network than home schoolers do."
Relationship/Association Question/Hypothesis.
The third type of question is a relationship/association question or hypothesis, and will often have the word "relate" or "relationship" in it, as the following example does: "There is a relationship between number of television ads for a political candidate and how successful that political candidate is in getting elected." Here the independent (or predictor) variable is number of TV ads, and the dependent (or criterion) variable is the success at getting elected. In this type of question, there is no grouping being compared, but rather the independent variable is continuous (ranges from zero to a certain number) in nature. This type of question can be worded as either a hypothesis or as a research question, as stated earlier.
Test out your knowledge of the above information, by answering the following questions about the RQ/H listed below. (Remember, for a descriptive question there are no clear independent & dependent variables.)
- What is the independent variable (IV)?
- What is the dependent variable (DV)?
- What type of research question/hypothesis is it? (descriptive, difference, relationship/association)
- "Is there a difference on relational satisfaction between those who met their current partner through online dating and those who met their current partner face-to-face?"
- "How do Fortune 500 firms use focus groups to market new products?"
- "There is a relationship between age and amount of time spent online using social media."
Answers: RQ1 is a difference question, with type of dating being the IV and relational satisfaction being the DV. RQ2 is a descriptive question with no IV or DV. RQ3 is a relationship hypothesis with age as the IV and amount of time spent online as the DV.
Design Your Study
The third step in planning your research project, after you have decided on your topic/goal and written your research questions/hypotheses, is to design your study which means to decide how to proceed in gathering data to answer your research question or to test your hypothesis. This step includes six things to do. [NOTE: The terms used in this section will be defined as they are used.]
- Decide type of study design: Experimental, quasi-experimental, non-experimental.
- Decide kind of data to collect: Survey/interview, observation, already existing data.
- Operationalize variables into measurable concepts.
- Determine type of sample: Probability or non-probability.
- Decide how you will collect your data: face-to-face, via e-mail, an online survey, library research, etc.
- Pilot test your methods.
Types of Study Designs
With quantitative research being rooted in the scientific method, traditional research is structured in an experimental fashion. This is especially true in the natural sciences, where they try to prove causes and effects on topics such as successful treatments for cancer. For example, the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics regularly conduct clinical trials to test for the effectiveness of certain treatments for medical conditions ( University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics: Clinical Trials ). They use human participants to conduct such research, regularly recruiting volunteers. However, in communication, true experiments with treatments the researcher controls are less necessary and thus less common. It is important for the researcher to understand which type of study s/he wishes to do, in order to accurately communicate his/her methods to the public when describing the study.
There are three possible types of studies you may choose to do, when embarking on quantitative research: (a) True experiments, (b) quasi-experiments, and (c) non-experiments.
For more information to read on these types of designs, take a look at the following website and related links in it: Types of Designs .
The following flowchart should help you distinguish between the three types of study designs described below.
True Experiments.
The first two types of study designs use difference questions/hypotheses, as the independent variable for true and quasi-experiments is nominal or categorical (based on categories or groupings), as you have groups that are being compared. As seen in the flowchart above, what distinguishes a true experiment from the other two designs is a concept called "random assignment." Random assignment means that the researcher controls to which group the participants are assigned. April's study of home vs. public schooling was NOT a true experiment, because she could not control which participants were home schooled and which ones were public schooled, and instead relied on already existing groups.
An example of a true experiment reported in a communication journal is a study investigating the effects of using interest-based contemporary examples in a lecture on the history of public relations, in which the researchers had the following two hypotheses: "Lectures utilizing interest- based examples should result in more interested participants" and "Lectures utilizing interest- based examples should result in participants with higher scores on subsequent tests of cognitive recall" (Weber, Corrigan, Fornash, & Neupauer, 2003, p. 118). In this study, the 122 college student participants were randomly assigned by the researchers to one of two lecture video viewing groups: a video lecture with traditional examples and a video with contemporary examples. (To see the results of the study, look it up using your school's library databases).
A second example of a true experiment in communication is a study of the effects of viewing either a dramatic narrative television show vs. a nonnarrative television show about the consequences of an unexpected teen pregnancy. The researchers randomly assigned their 367 undergraduate participants to view one of the two types of shows.
Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36 , 26-52.
A third example of a true experiment done in the field of communication can be found in the following study.
Jensen, J. D. (2008). Scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of hedging on scientists' and journalists' credibility. Human Communication Research, 34, 347-369.
In this study, Jakob Jensen had three independent variables. He randomly assigned his 601 participants to 1 of 20 possible conditions, between his three independent variables, which were (a) a hedged vs. not hedged message, (b) the source of the hedging message (research attributed to primary vs. unaffiliated scientists), and (c) specific news story employed (of which he had five randomly selected news stories about cancer research to choose from). Although this study was pretty complex, it does illustrate the true experiment in our field since the participants were randomly assigned to read a particular news story, with certain characteristics.
Quasi-Experiments.
If the researcher is not able to randomly assign participants to one of the treatment groups (or independent variable), but the participants already belong to one of them (e.g., age; home vs. public schooling), then the design is called a quasi-experiment. Here you still have an independent variable with groups, but the participants already belong to a group before the study starts, and the researcher has no control over which group they belong to.
An example of a hypothesis found in a communication study is the following: "Individuals high in trait aggression will enjoy violent content more than nonviolent content, whereas those low in trait aggression will enjoy violent content less than nonviolent content" (Weaver & Wilson, 2009, p. 448). In this study, the researchers could not assign the participants to a high or low trait aggression group since this is a personality characteristic, so this is a quasi-experiment. It does not have any random assignment of participants to the independent variable groups. Read their study, if you would like to, at the following location.
Weaver, A. J., & Wilson, B. J. (2009). The role of graphic and sanitized violence in the enjoyment of television dramas. Human Communication Research, 35 (3), 442-463.
Benoit and Hansen (2004) did not choose to randomly assign participants to groups either, in their study of a national presidential election survey, in which they were looking at differences between debate and non-debate viewers, in terms of several dependent variables, such as which candidate viewers supported. If you are interested in discovering the results of this study, take a look at the following article.
Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2004). Presidential debate watching, issue knowledge, character evaluation, and vote choice. Human Communication Research, 30 (1), 121-144.
Non-Experiments.
The third type of design is the non-experiment. Non-experiments are sometimes called survey designs, because their primary way of collecting data is through surveys. This is not enough to distinguish them from true experiments and quasi-experiments, however, as both of those types of designs may use surveys as well.
What makes a study a non-experiment is that the independent variable is not a grouping or categorical variable. Researchers observe or survey participants in order to describe them as they naturally exist without any experimental intervention. Researchers do not give treatments or observe the effects of a potential natural grouping variable such as age. Descriptive and relationship/association questions are most often used in non-experiments.
Some examples of this type of commonly used design for communication researchers include the following studies.
- Serota, Levine, and Boster (2010) used a national survey of 1,000 adults to determine the prevalence of lying in America (see Human Communication Research, 36 , pp. 2-25).
- Nabi (2009) surveyed 170 young adults on their perceptions of reality television on cosmetic surgery effects, looking at several things: for example, does viewing cosmetic surgery makeover programs relate to body satisfaction (p. 6), finding no significant relationship between those two variables (see Human Communication Research, 35 , pp. 1-27).
- Derlega, Winstead, Mathews, and Braitman (2008) collected stories from 238 college students on reasons why they would disclose or not disclose personal information within close relationships (see Communication Research Reports, 25 , pp. 115-130). They coded the participants' answers into categories so they could count how often specific reasons were mentioned, using a method called content analysis , to answer the following research questions:
RQ1: What are research participants' attributions for the disclosure and nondisclosure of highly personal information?
RQ2: Do attributions reflect concerns about rewards and costs of disclosure or the tension between openness with another and privacy?
RQ3: How often are particular attributions for disclosure/nondisclosure used in various types of relationships? (p. 117)
All of these non-experimental studies have in common no researcher manipulation of an independent variable or even having an independent variable that has natural groups that are being compared.
Identify which design discussed above should be used for each of the following research questions.
- Is there a difference between generations on how much they use MySpace?
- Is there a relationship between age when a person first started using Facebook and the amount of time they currently spend on Facebook daily?
- Is there a difference between potential customers' perceptions of an organization who are shown an organization's Facebook page and those who are not shown an organization's Facebook page?
[HINT: Try to identify the independent and dependent variable in each question above first, before determining what type of design you would use. Also, try to determine what type of question it is – descriptive, difference, or relationship/association.]
Answers: 1. Quasi-experiment 2. Non-experiment 3. True Experiment
Data Collection Methods
Once you decide the type of quantitative research design you will be using, you will need to determine which of the following types of data you will collect: (a) survey data, (b) observational data, and/or (c) already existing data, as in library research.
Using the survey data collection method means you will talk to people or survey them about their behaviors, attitudes, perceptions, and demographic characteristics (e.g., biological sex, socio-economic status, race). This type of data usually consists of a series of questions related to the concepts you want to study (i.e., your independent and dependent variables). Both of April's studies on home schooling and on taking adopted children on a return trip back to China used survey data.
On a survey, you can have both closed-ended and open-ended questions. Closed-ended questions, can be written in a variety of forms. Some of the most common response options include the following.
Likert responses – for example: for the following statement, ______ do you strongly agree agree neutral disagree strongly disagree
Semantic differential – for example: does the following ______ make you Happy ..................................... Sad
Yes-no answers for example: I use social media daily. Yes / No.
One site to check out for possible response options is http://www.360degreefeedback.net/media/ResponseScales.pdf .
Researchers often follow up some of their closed-ended questions with an "other" category, in which they ask their participants to "please specify," their response if none of the ones provided are applicable. They may also ask open-ended questions on "why" a participant chose a particular answer or ask participants for more information about a particular topic. If the researcher wants to use the open-ended question responses as part of his/her quantitative study, the answers are usually coded into categories and counted, in terms of the frequency of a certain answer, using a method called content analysis , which will be discussed when we talk about already-existing artifacts as a source of data.
Surveys can be done face-to-face, by telephone, mail, or online. Each of these methods has its own advantages and disadvantages, primarily in the form of the cost in time and money to do the survey. For example, if you want to survey many people, then online survey tools such as surveygizmo.com and surveymonkey.com are very efficient, but not everyone has access to taking a survey on the computer, so you may not get an adequate sample of the population by doing so. Plus you have to decide how you will recruit people to take your online survey, which can be challenging. There are trade-offs with every method.
For more information on things to consider when selecting your survey method, check out the following website:
Selecting the Survey Method .
There are also many good sources for developing a good survey, such as the following websites. Constructing the Survey Survey Methods Designing Surveys
Observation.
A second type of data collection method is observation . In this data collection method, you make observations of the phenomenon you are studying and then code your observations, so that you can count what you are studying. This type of data collection method is often called interaction analysis, if you collect data by observing people's behavior. For example, if you want to study the phenomenon of mall-walking, you could go to a mall and count characteristics of mall-walkers. A researcher in the area of health communication could study the occurrence of humor in an operating room, for example, by coding and counting the use of humor in such a setting.
One extended research study using observational data collection methods, which is cited often in interpersonal communication classes, is John Gottman's research, which started out in what is now called "The Love Lab." In this lab, researchers observe interactions between couples, including physiological symptoms, using coders who look for certain items found to predict relationship problems and success.
Take a look at the YouTube video about "The Love Lab" at the following site to learn more about the potential of using observation in collecting data for a research study: The "Love" Lab .
Already-Existing Artifacts.
The third method of quantitative data collection is the use of already-existing artifacts . With this method, you choose certain artifacts (e.g., newspaper or magazine articles; television programs; webpages) and code their content, resulting in a count of whatever you are studying. With this data collection method, researchers most often use what is called quantitative content analysis . Basically, the researcher counts frequencies of something that occurs in an artifact of study, such as the frequency of times something is mentioned on a webpage. Content analysis can also be used in qualitative research, where a researcher identifies and creates text-based themes but does not do a count of the occurrences of these themes. Content analysis can also be used to take open-ended questions from a survey method, and identify countable themes within the questions.
Content analysis is a very common method used in media studies, given researchers are interested in studying already-existing media artifacts. There are many good sources to illustrate how to do content analysis such as are seen in the box below.
See the following sources for more information on content analysis. Writing Guide: Content Analysis A Flowchart for the Typical Process of Content Analysis Research What is Content Analysis?
With content analysis and any method that you use to code something into categories, one key concept you need to remember is inter-coder or inter-rater reliability , in which there are multiple coders (at least two) trained to code the observations into categories. This check on coding is important because you need to check to make sure that the way you are coding your observations on the open-ended answers is the same way that others would code a particular item. To establish this kind of inter-coder or inter-rater reliability, researchers prepare codebooks (to train their coders on how to code the materials) and coding forms for their coders to use.
To see some examples of actual codebooks used in research, see the following website: Human Coding--Sample Materials .
There are also online inter-coder reliability calculators some researchers use, such as the following: ReCal: reliability calculation for the masses .
Regardless of which method of data collection you choose, you need to decide even more specifically how you will measure the variables in your study, which leads us to the next planning step in the design of a study.
Operationalization of Variables into Measurable Concepts
When you look at your research question/s and/or hypotheses, you should know already what your independent and dependent variables are. Both of these need to be measured in some way. We call that way of measuring operationalizing a variable. One way to think of it is writing a step by step recipe for how you plan to obtain data on this topic. How you choose to operationalize your variable (or write the recipe) is one all-important decision you have to make, which will make or break your study. In quantitative research, you have to measure your variables in a valid (accurate) and reliable (consistent) manner, which we discuss in this section. You also need to determine the level of measurement you will use for your variables, which will help you later decide what statistical tests you need to run to answer your research question/s or test your hypotheses. We will start with the last topic first.
Level of Measurement
Level of measurement has to do with whether you measure your variables using categories or groupings OR whether you measure your variables using a continuous level of measurement (range of numbers). The level of measurement that is considered to be categorical in nature is called nominal, while the levels of measurement considered to be continuous in nature are ordinal, interval, and ratio. The only ones you really need to know are nominal, ordinal, and interval/ratio.
Nominal variables are categories that do not have meaningful numbers attached to them but are broader categories, such as male and female, home schooled and public schooled, Caucasian and African-American. Ordinal variables do have numbers attached to them, in that the numbers are in a certain order, but there are not equal intervals between the numbers (e.g., such as when you rank a group of 5 items from most to least preferred, where 3 might be highly preferred, and 2 hated). Interval/ratio variables have equal intervals between the numbers (e.g., weight, age).
For more information about these levels of measurement, check out one of the following websites. Levels of Measurement Measurement Scales in Social Science Research What is the difference between ordinal, interval and ratio variables? Why should I care?
Validity and Reliability
When developing a scale/measure or survey, you need to be concerned about validity and reliability. Readers of quantitative research expect to see researchers justify their research measures using these two terms in the methods section of an article or paper.
Validity. Validity is the extent to which your scale/measure or survey adequately reflects the full meaning of the concept you are measuring. Does it measure what you say it measures? For example, if researchers wanted to develop a scale to measure "servant leadership," the researchers would have to determine what dimensions of servant leadership they wanted to measure, and then create items which would be valid or accurate measures of these dimensions. If they included items related to a different type of leadership, those items would not be a valid measure of servant leadership. When doing so, the researchers are trying to prove their measure has internal validity. Researchers may also be interested in external validity, but that has to do with how generalizable their study is to a larger population (a topic related to sampling, which we will consider in the next section), and has less to do with the validity of the instrument itself.
There are several types of validity you may read about, including face validity, content validity, criterion-related validity, and construct validity. To learn more about these types of validity, read the information at the following link: Validity .
To improve the validity of an instrument, researchers need to fully understand the concept they are trying to measure. This means they know the academic literature surrounding that concept well and write several survey questions on each dimension measured, to make sure the full idea of the concept is being measured. For example, Page and Wong (n.d.) identified four dimensions of servant leadership: character, people-orientation, task-orientation, and process-orientation ( A Conceptual Framework for Measuring Servant-Leadership ). All of these dimensions (and any others identified by other researchers) would need multiple survey items developed if a researcher wanted to create a new scale on servant leadership.
Before you create a new survey, it can be useful to see if one already exists with established validity and reliability. Such measures can be found by seeing what other respected studies have used to measure a concept and then doing a library search to find the scale/measure itself (sometimes found in the reference area of a library in books like those listed below).
Reliability . Reliability is the second criterion you will need to address if you choose to develop your own scale or measure. Reliability is concerned with whether a measurement is consistent and reproducible. If you have ever wondered why, when taking a survey, that a question is asked more than once or very similar questions are asked multiple times, it is because the researchers one concerned with proving their study has reliability. Are you, for example, answering all of the similar questions similarly? If so, the measure/scale may have good reliability or consistency over time.
Researchers can use a variety of ways to show their measure/scale is reliable. See the following websites for explanations of some of these ways, which include methods such as the test-retest method, the split-half method, and inter-coder/rater reliability. Types of Reliability Reliability
To understand the relationship between validity and reliability, a nice visual provided below is explained at the following website (Trochim, 2006, para. 2). Reliability & Validity
Self-Quiz/Discussion:
Take a look at one of the surveys found at the following poll reporting sites on a topic which interests you. Critique one of these surveys, using what you have learned about creating surveys so far.
http://www.pewinternet.org/ http://pewresearch.org/ http://www.gallup.com/Home.aspx http://www.kff.org/
One of the things you might have critiqued in the previous self-quiz/discussion may have had less to do with the actual survey itself, but rather with how the researchers got their participants or sample. How participants are recruited is just as important to doing a good study as how valid and reliable a survey is.
Imagine that in the article you chose for the last "self-quiz/discussion" you read the following quote from the Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project: "One in three teens sends more than 100 text messages a day, or 3000 texts a month" (Lenhart, 2010, para.5). How would you know whether you could trust this finding to be true? Would you compare it to what you know about texting from your own and your friends' experiences? Would you want to know what types of questions people were asked to determine this statistic, or whether the survey the statistic is based on is valid and reliable? Would you want to know what type of people were surveyed for the study? As a critical consumer of research, you should ask all of these types of questions, rather than just accepting such a statement as undisputable fact. For example, if only people shopping at an Apple Store were surveyed, the results might be skewed high.
In particular, related to the topic of this section, you should ask about the sampling method the researchers did. Often, the researchers will provide information related to the sample, stating how many participants were surveyed (in this case 800 teens, aged 12-17, who were a nationally representative sample of the population) and how much the "margin of error" is (in this case +/- 3.8%). Why do they state such things? It is because they know the importance of a sample in making the case for their findings being legitimate and credible. Margin of error is how much we are confident that our findings represent the population at large. The larger the margin of error, the less likely it is that the poll or survey is accurate. Margin of error assumes a 95% confidence level that what we found from our study represents the population at large.
For more information on margin of error, see one of the following websites. Answers.com Margin of Error Stats.org Margin of Error Americanresearchgroup.com Margin of Error [this last site is a margin of error calculator, which shows that margin of error is directly tied to the size of your sample, in relationship to the size of the population, two concepts we will talk about in the next few paragraphs]
In particular, this section focused on sampling will talk about the following topics: (a) the difference between a population vs. a sample; (b) concepts of error and bias, or "it's all about significance"; (c) probability vs. non-probability sampling; and (d) sample size issues.
Population vs. Sample
When doing quantitative studies, such as the study of cell phone usage among teens, you are never able to survey the entire population of teenagers, so you survey a portion of the population. If you study every member of a population, then you are conducting a census such as the United States Government does every 10 years. When, however, this is not possible (because you do not have the money the U.S. government has!), you attempt to get as good a sample as possible.
Characteristics of a population are summarized in numerical form, and technically these numbers are called parameters . However, numbers which summarize the characteristics of a sample are called statistics .
Error and Bias
If a sample is not done well, then you may not have confidence in how the study's results can be generalized to the population from which the sample was taken. Your confidence level is often stated as the margin of error of the survey. As noted earlier, a study's margin of error refers to the degree to which a sample differs from the total population you are studying. In the Pew survey, they had a margin of error of +/- 3.8%. So, for example, when the Pew survey said 33% of teens send more than 100 texts a day, the margin of error means they were 95% sure that 29.2% - 36.8% of teens send this many texts a day.
Margin of error is tied to sampling error , which is how much difference there is between your sample's results and what would have been obtained if you had surveyed the whole population. Sample error is linked to a very important concept for quantitative researchers, which is the notion of significance . Here, significance does not refer to whether some finding is morally or practically significant, it refers to whether a finding is statistically significant, meaning the findings are not due to chance but actually represent something that is found in the population. Statistical significance is about how much you, as the researcher, are willing to risk saying you found something important and be wrong.
For the difference between statistical significance and practical significance, see the following YouTube video: Statistical and Practical Significance .
Scientists set certain arbitrary standards based on the probability they could be wrong in reporting their findings. These are called significance levels and are commonly reported in the literature as p <.05 or p <.01 or some other probability (or p ) level.
If an article says a statistical test reported that p < .05 , it simply means that they are most likely correct in what they are saying, but there is a 5% chance they could be wrong and not find the same results in the population. If p < .01, then there would be only a 1% chance they were wrong and would not find the same results in the population. The lower the probability level, the more certain the results.
When researchers are wrong, or make that kind of decision error, it often implies that either (a) their sample was biased and was not representative of the true population in some way, or (b) that something they did in collecting the data biased the results. There are actually two kinds of sampling error talked about in quantitative research: Type I and Type II error. Type 1 error is what happens when you think you found something statistically significant and claim there is a significant difference or relationship, when there really is not in the actual population. So there is something about your sample that made you find something that is not in the actual population. (Type I error is the same as the probability level, or .05, if using the traditional p-level accepted by most researchers.) Type II error happens when you don't find a statistically significant difference or relationship, yet there actually is one in the population at large, so once again, your sample is not representative of the population.
For more information on these two types of error, check out the following websites. Hypothesis Testing: Type I Error, Type II Error Type I and Type II Errors - Making Mistakes in the Justice System
Researchers want to select a sample that is representative of the population in order to reduce the likelihood of having a sample that is biased. There are two types of bias particularly troublesome for researchers, in terms of sampling error. The first type is selection bias , in which each person in the population does not have an equal chance to be chosen for the sample, which happens frequently in communication studies, because we often rely on convenience samples (whoever we can get to complete our surveys). The second type of bias is response bias , in which those who volunteer for a study have different characteristics than those who did not volunteer for the study, another common challenge for communication researchers. Volunteers for a study may very well be different from persons who choose not to volunteer for a study, so that you have a biased sample by relying just on volunteers, which is not representative of the population from which you are trying to sample.
Probability vs. Non-Probability Sampling
One of the best ways to lower your sampling error and reduce the possibility of bias is to do probability or random sampling. This means that every person in the population has an equal chance of being selected to be in your sample. Another way of looking at this is to attempt to get a representative sample, so that the characteristics of your sample closely approximate those of the population. A sample needs to contain essentially the same variations that exist in the population, if possible, especially on the variables or elements that are most important to you (e.g., age, biological sex, race, level of education, socio-economic class).
There are many different ways to draw a probability/random sample from the population. Some of the most common are a simple random sample , where you use a random numbers table or random number generator to select your sample from the population.
There are several examples of random number generators available online. See the following example of an online random number generator: http://www.randomizer.org/ .
A systematic random sample takes every n-th number from the population, depending on how many people you would like to have in your sample. A stratified random sample does random sampling within groups, and a multi-stage or cluster sample is used when there are multiple groups within a large area and a large population, and the researcher does random sampling in stages.
If you are interested in understanding more about these types of probability/random samples, take a look at the following website: Probability Sampling .
However, many times communication researchers use whoever they can find to participate in their study, such as college students in their classes since these people are easily accessible. Many of the studies in interpersonal communication and relationship development, for example, used this type of sample. This is called a convenience sample. In doing so, they are using a non- probability or non-random sample. In these types of samples, each member of the population does not have an equal opportunity to be selected. For example, if you decide to ask your facebook friends to participate in an online survey you created about how college students in the U.S. use cell phones to text, you are using a non-random type of sample. You are unable to randomly sample the whole population in the U.S. of college students who text, so you attempt to find participants more conveniently. Some common non-random or non-probability samples are:
- accidental/convenience samples, such as the facebook example illustrates
- quota samples, in which you do convenience samples within subgroups of the population, such as biological sex, looking for a certain number of participants in each group being compared
- snowball or network sampling, where you ask current participants to send your survey onto their friends.
For more information on non-probability sampling, see the following website: Nonprobability Sampling .
Researchers, such as communication scholars, often use these types of samples because of the nature of their research. Most research designs used in communication are not true experiments, such as would be required in the medical field where they are trying to prove some cause-effect relationship to cure or alleviate symptoms of a disease. Most communication scholars recognize that human behavior in communication situations is much less predictable, so they do not adhere to the strictest possible worldview related to quantitative methods and are less concerned with having to use probability sampling.
They do recognize, however, that with either probability or non-probability sampling, there is still the possibility of bias and error, although much less with probability sampling. That is why all quantitative researchers, regardless of field, will report statistical significance levels if they are interested in generalizing from their sample to the population at large, to let the readers of their work know how confident they are in their results.
Size of Sample
The larger the sample, the more likely the sample is going to be representative of the population. If there is a lot of variability in the population (e.g., lots of different ethnic groups in the population), a researcher will need a larger sample. If you are interested in detecting small possible differences (e.g., in a close political race), you need a larger sample. However, the bigger your population, the less you have to increase the size of your sample in order to have an adequate sample, as is illustrated by an example sample size calculator such as can be found at http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html .
Using the example sample size calculator, see how you might determine how large of a sample you might need in order to study how college students in the U.S. use texting on their cell phones. You would have to first determine approximately how many college students are in the U.S. According to ANEKI, there are a little over 14,000,000 college students in the U.S. ( Countries with the Most University Students ). When inputting that figure into the sample size calculator below (using no commas for the population size), you would need a sample size of approximately 385 students. If the population size was 20,000, you would need a sample of 377 students. If the population was only 2,000, you would need a sample of 323. For a population of 500, you would need a sample of 218.
It is not enough, however, to just have an adequate or large sample. If there is bias in the sampling, you can have a very bad large sample, one that also does not represent the population at large. So, having an unbiased sample is even more important than having a large sample.
So, what do you do, if you cannot reasonably conduct a probability or random sample? You run statistics which report significance levels, and you report the limitations of your sample in the discussion section of your paper/article.
Pilot Testing Methods
Now that we have talked about the different elements of your study design, you should try out your methods by doing a pilot test of some kind. This means that you try out your procedures with someone to try to catch any mistakes in your design before you start collecting data from actual participants in your study. This will save you time and money in the long run, along with unneeded angst over mistakes you made in your design during data collection. There are several ways you might do this.
You might ask an expert who knows about this topic (such as a faculty member) to try out your experiment or survey and provide feedback on what they think of your design. You might ask some participants who are like your potential sample to take your survey or be a part of your pilot test; then you could ask them which parts were confusing or needed revising. You might have potential participants explain to you what they think your questions mean, to see if they are interpreting them like you intended, or if you need to make some questions clearer.
The main thing is that you do not just assume your methods will work or are the best type of methods to use until you try them out with someone. As you write up your study, in your methods section of your paper, you can then talk about what you did to change your study based on the pilot study you did.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval
The last step of your planning takes place when you take the necessary steps to get your study approved by your institution's review board. As you read in chapter 3, this step is important if you are planning on using the data or results from your study beyond just the requirements for your class project. See chapter 3 for more information on the procedures involved in this step.
Conclusion: Study Design Planning
Once you have decided what topic you want to study, you plan your study. Part 1 of this chapter has covered the following steps you need to follow in this planning process:
- decide what type of study you will do (i.e., experimental, quasi-experimental, non- experimental);
- decide on what data collection method you will use (i.e., survey, observation, or already existing data);
- operationalize your variables into measureable concepts;
- determine what type of sample you will use (probability or non-probability);
- pilot test your methods; and
- get IRB approval.
At that point, you are ready to commence collecting your data, which is the topic of the next section in this chapter.
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
CHAPTER 2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Related Papers
Randel D Estacio
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the acceptability of the proposed instructional material, the learning assessment tool in Physics 1 (Mechanics), and to investigate its effect in teaching the subject. The design of this study is a combination of descriptive and experimental designs. A total of thirty three (33) experts and instructors in Physics from selected local colleges and universities in Metro Manila evaluated the proposed instructional material and learning assessment tool. In order to determine the effect of the proposed instructional material and learning assessment tool in Physics 1 (Mechanics) a one group pretest-posttest was employed and a total of 50 freshmen Industrial Engineering students of the Quezon City Polytechnic University (QCPU) served as the experimental group. Lessons in Physics 1 (Mechanics) were presented according to the outcomes based learning approach and the proposed instructional material and learning assessment tool were utilized. An instructional material and learning assessment tool were developed based from the results of validity, reliability, and item analysis of the achievement test in Physics 1 (Mechanics). The acceptability of the proposed instructional material and assessment of learning tool as assessed by the experts and faculty in Physics respondents revealed the following findings: As to Objective. It revealed that the objectives found in the proposed instructional material and learning assessment tool in Physics were highly acceptable as a result by its mean of 4.16. As to Content. The content of the proposed instructional material and learning assessment tool in Physics was highly acceptable having a mean of 4.42 as assessed by the experts and faculty in Physics. As to Usefulness. The study revealed that the usefulness of the proposed instructional material and learning assessment tool in Physics subject was highly acceptable with a mean of 4.45 as assessed by the experts and faculty in the field. As for Clarity. Both expert and faculty agreed that when it comes to clarity, the proposed instructional material and learning assessment tool in Physics were highly acceptable with a mean of 4.43. As to Presentation. The mean response of the expert and faculty in Physics was 4.44 and indicates that the presentation of the lessons in the proposed instructional material and assessment of learning tool was highly acceptable. As to Evaluation. The study found out that the evaluation of the proposed instructional material in a form of concept cartoon was highly accepted by the experts and faculty in Physics as supported by a mean of 4.49. As to Language and Style. Experts and faculty members in the field of Physics assessed the language and style of the proposed instructional-material and assessment of learning tool as very highly acceptable having a mean of 4.46. The study revealed that there is a statistically significant difference in the performance in the post-test of students who were taught with the use of the proposed instructional material and assessment of learning tool as compared to those who did not, p(98)=8.9174, p<.05. When the result of pre-test and post-test of each group was compared, statistically significant difference was found, p(49)=12.9769, p<.05 (control group) and p(49)=22.9071, p<.05 (experimental group). This implies that the proposed instructional material and assessment of learning tool in Physics 1 (Mechanics) greatly affect the performance of students in the class; the result also signifies that students were able to learn the lesson easily if it was presented by means of picture diagrams. The study claims and reaffirms that the findings of other researches that concept cartoon when used as formative assessment can improve the performance and achievement of students in difficult subjects like Physics.
José G. Vargas-hernández
Globalization has become a trigger for international trade due to its role as an integrator of the world economy and social standardization in a technological, cultural and universal knowledge that allows free access to resources with minimal effort context. The study aimed to analyze the Port of Manzanillo from the perspective of theories based on the Industry, the Dynamic Resources and Institutions, all around the Mexican Port System. The study utilized qualitative research method and is based on a literature review of the current status of the port and its global environment.
Prof. Negar Elhamian , Helen Bihag , Dondon Salingay
International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT)
IJERT Journal
https://www.ijert.org/difference-of-pretest-and-post-test-in-philippine-history-of-cas-freshmen-students https://www.ijert.org/research/difference-of-pretest-and-post-test-in-philippine-history-of-cas-freshmen-students-IJERTV5IS040470.pdf This research centers on the difference of pretest and post test in Philippine history of CAS freshmen students. Specifically, it determines the appropriate instructional materials suited to the student's level to maximize learning have to be provided. The study utilized the descriptive method of research. Pretest and Post test were made and it was found out that film viewing in teaching History of the respondents were assessed effective and that the overall mean scores of the students in the pretest and posttest had increased. Results of the study show that the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the mean scores of the respondent was rejected.
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Shaik Farid Abdull Wahab , Tuan Hairulnizam Tuan Kamauzaman , Ida Zaini
nomie valencia
Science Insights
Insights Publisher , E. Agatep
The study assessed the level of internet addiction exists among students of AMA Computer Colleges in Region III, Philippines and identified internet addiction management practices as strategies to address the problem, to lessen if not to eliminate, to prevent or cure level of internet addiction that exists. The descriptive analysis method of research was utilized. A total of one thousand five hundred fifteen student-respondents and one hundred fifty-eight administrator-respondents participated in the study. The researcher found out that there is a severe addiction level described as Often. There is a severe dependence on the internet as reflected in the internet addiction mean test scores of the student-respondents. There is a significant relationship between the level of internet addiction and the perceived level of implementation of the internet addiction management practices. There is a significant relationship between the internet addiction test scores and the perceived level of implementation of the internet addiction management practices. Overall findings conclude that there was a significant very strong negative relationship between the level of internet addiction and in-ternet addiction test scores of student-respondents and the perceived level of implementation of internet addiction management practices of administrator-respondents; hence, the negative relationship indicates that as the intensity of the perceived level of implementation increases, the level of internet addiction and internet addiction test scores among student-respondents decreases. This study is expected to provide a worthy contribution to the institution and to international literature on internet addiction; the result can be used in providing solution, actions and remedies to lessen if not to eliminate addiction in Internet usage.■
Maricel Mendoza Fider
finding answers to my querry about how the learners of today in the secondary best describe
ResearchGate.net
DR. DAVID C . BUENO
The course aims to give an understanding of some topical and contemporary issues in educational administration and how such issues have influenced the educational system. You are required to do and submit literature reviews or syntheses (IMRaD format) on the various current issues, trends or problems affecting the educational system in the Philippines.
Jong Azores
This study is aimed at assessing the data gathered from the survey of 102 musicians about their status and condition in working at the bars and restaurants in the city of Olongapo and the Subic Bay Freeport Zone and at identifying their collective aspirations. Based on its findings, the challenge to develop the adjacent localities of Olongapo City and Subic Bay Freeport Zone as a music tourism destination was identified.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
RELATED PAPERS
Institutional Multidsciplinary Research and Development (IMRaD)
DR. DAVID C . BUENO , Edward San Agustin
Arnolfo Monleon
Polytechnic University of the Philippines Open University
Francisco B Bautista
Jo Dominado
Xenery Madera
Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences
Research and Statistics Center
Laela Montezor
Research Paper
Zoe Vera Acain
IP innovative publication pvt. ltd
IP Innovative Publication Pvt. Ltd.
Historically Digitized
ronaldo pasion
Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology
Zakirul Islam
US-China Education Review A & B
Maine Morales
Lanie Torres
Susan Houge Mackenzie
Ramon Alvarado
caroline tobing , Jimmy Kijai , Francis H , Stenly Pungus , Damrong Satayavaksakul , Evy Indrawati Siregar , yane sinaga , Ika Suhartanti Darmo , Fanny Soewignyo , Mariju Pimentel
Andy N Cubalit , Naely Muchtar , Jittrapat Piankrad , Dararat Khampusaen
YOLI LLORICO
Rainulfo Pagaran
Asian EFL Journal
Romualdo Mabuan
simarjeet kaur
Ritchie Bilasa
Nikolaos Digelidis , Ioannis Syrmpas , Achillios A. Koutelidas
José G. Vargas-hernandez
Nikolaos Digelidis , Ioannis Syrmpas
San Beda College Alabang
Savipra Gorospe, C.Ht., RPm , Renzen Martinez , Chennie Regala
Gilbert Bagsic
Journal of Institutional Research South East Asia
Siti H Stapa , Nor Hasni Mokhtar , Zarina Othman , Azizah Yaacob , Sharifah Zurina
International Journal of Social & Scientific Research
John Mark R . Asio , Ediric D . Gadia
Maribel Malana
Nikolaos Digelidis , D. Pasco
Jeniesel Lopian
International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies
Edward Jimenez , John Mark R . Asio
Joanah Marie Mercado
Rommel Tabula
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2024
Research Terms
Ai generator.
Research terms are specific words or phrases used in academic writing to describe the research process, methodologies, and findings. These include concepts like hypothesis , variables, sample size, literature review, and data analysis. Understanding these terms is crucial for interpreting research studies and effectively communicating ideas. Mastery of research terms enhances clarity in academic discourse, whether in a research project proposal , a qualitative research report , or the description of research methodology.
What are terms in research?
Terms in research refer to the specific words, phrases, and concepts used within a study to define its scope, methodology , and focus. These terms ensure clarity and precision, allowing researchers to communicate ideas and findings effectively. Clear definitions facilitate a shared understanding and maintain the integrity and replicability of research.
Examples of Research Terms
- Hypothesis : A proposed explanation for a phenomenon, to be tested through research.
- Variable : Any factor or element that can be changed and measured in research.
- Literature Review : A comprehensive survey of existing research and publications on a specific topic.
- Methodology : The systematic plan and approach used to conduct research.
- Data Collection : The process of gathering information for analysis in research.
- Sample : A subset of a population selected for observation and analysis.
- Control Group : A group in an experiment that does not receive the treatment, used for comparison.
- Validity : The extent to which a research study measures what it intends to measure.
- Reliability : The consistency of a research study or measuring test.
- Abstract : A brief summary of a research study’s aims, methods, results, and conclusions.
- Population : The entire group of individuals or instances about whom the research is concerned.
- Ethics : Moral principles that govern a researcher’s conduct and the conduct of the research.
- Bias : A systematic error introduced into sampling or testing by selecting or encouraging one outcome over others.
- Pilot Study : A small-scale preliminary study conducted to evaluate feasibility, time, cost, risk, and adverse events.
- Peer Review : A process by which a research study is evaluated by experts in the same field before publication.
- Quantitative Research : Research that relies on numerical data and statistical methods.
- Qualitative Research : Research that relies on non-numerical data, such as interviews, observations, and textual analysis.
- Case Study : An in-depth study of a particular case, individual, group, or event.
- Longitudinal Study : Research that follows subjects over a long period to observe changes and developments.
- Cross-sectional Study : Research that analyzes data from a population at a specific point in time.
- Independent Variable : The variable that is manipulated to observe its effect on the dependent variable.
- Dependent Variable : The variable being tested and measured in an experiment.
- Confounding Variable : An outside influence that affects the dependent and independent variables, causing a spurious association.
- Operational Definition : A clear, precise, and measurable definition of a variable for the purposes of a study.
- Statistical Significance : The likelihood that a result or relationship is caused by something other than mere chance.
- Random Sample : A sample that fairly represents a population because each member has an equal chance of inclusion.
- Correlation : A measure of the relationship between two variables.
- Experimental Group : The group in an experiment that receives the treatment.
- Theoretical Framework : A structure that guides research by providing a clear perspective and basis for the study.
- Meta-analysis : A statistical technique that combines the results of multiple studies to determine overall trends.
Research Terms List
- Sampling Bias
- Control Variable
- Research Design
- Data Analysis
- Primary Data
- Secondary Data
- Theoretical Sampling
- Purposive Sampling
- Snowball Sampling
- Cluster Sampling
- Stratified Sampling
- Questionnaire
- Focus Group
- Field Study
- Experimental Design
- Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- Ethnography
- Grounded Theory
- Content Analysis
- Descriptive Research
- Explanatory Research
- Exploratory Research
- Mixed Methods
- Triangulation
- Hypothesis Testing
- Null Hypothesis
- Alternative Hypothesis
- Research Proposal
5 Common Research Terminologies
- Hypothesis : A testable prediction about the relationship between two or more variables.
- Variable : An element, feature, or factor that can be changed and measured in research.
Confusing Terms in Research
- Reliability : The consistency of a research study or measuring test over time.
- Independent Variable : The variable that is manipulated to observe its effect.
- Dependent Variable : The variable being tested and measured, which is affected by the independent variable.
- Random Assignment : Assigning participants to experimental and control groups by chance to minimize pre-existing differences.
- Descriptive Research : Research that aims to describe characteristics of a population or phenomenon.
- Explanatory Research : Research that seeks to explain the reasons behind a phenomenon or relationship.
Key Research Terms
1. abstract.
- A brief summary of the research paper, outlining the main points, purpose, methods, results, and conclusions.
2. Hypothesis
- A testable statement or prediction about the relationship between two or more variables.
3. Variable
- An element, feature, or factor that can be changed and measured in research. Includes independent, dependent, and control variables.
4. Literature Review
- A comprehensive survey of existing research and publications relevant to the research topic.
5. Methodology
- The systematic plan for conducting research, including the methods, techniques, and procedures used to collect and analyze data.
6. Qualitative Research
- Research that focuses on understanding phenomena through non-numerical data such as interviews, observations, and texts.
7. Quantitative Research
- Research that focuses on quantifying data and analyzing it statistically to draw conclusions.
8. Sampling
- The process of selecting a subset of individuals from a population to represent the whole group in research.
9. Data Collection
- The process of gathering information from various sources to answer research questions.
10. Data Analysis
- The process of examining, cleaning, transforming, and modeling data to discover useful information, draw conclusions, and support decision-making.
Terms Synonymous to Research
- Investigation
- Examination
- Exploration
- Observation
FAQ’s
What is a variable in research.
A variable is any characteristic, number, or quantity that can be measured or quantified in research.
What is the difference between qualitative and quantitative research?
Qualitative research explores concepts and experiences in-depth, while quantitative research involves measuring and analyzing numerical data.
What is a literature review?
A literature review summarizes existing research on a topic, identifying trends, gaps, and key findings.
What is a sample in research?
A sample is a subset of a population selected for study to represent the entire group.
What is a hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a testable prediction or educated guess about the relationship between two or more variables in a study.
What is data collection?
Data collection involves gathering information from various sources to address a research question or hypothesis.
What is an independent variable?
An independent variable is the variable that is manipulated or changed in an experiment to observe its effect.
What is a dependent variable?
A dependent variable is the variable being tested and measured in an experiment, affected by the independent variable.
What is a control group?
A control group is a group in an experiment that does not receive the treatment, used for comparison against the experimental group.
What is a research methodology?
Research methodology is the systematic plan for conducting research, including methods for data collection and analysis.
Text prompt
10 Examples of Public speaking
20 Examples of Gas lighting
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Chapter 2 | Foundational Concepts for Quantitative Research 17 Example: Student 101 is a 5-year-old male who was 117 centimeters tall and weighed 20 kilograms when he visited his doctor September 15, 2018. His most recent vaccination took place on that same date. That sentence reports the case's values for the variables age, gender, height,
INTRODUCTION. A review of literature is a classification and evaluation of what accredited scholars and. researchers have written on a topic, organized according to a guiding concept such as a ...
Chapter 2- Example - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. This chapter describes the research methodology used in the study. A quantitative research design using a correlational technique was employed. The respondents were 296 Grade 10 students from 3 public secondary schools in Nabunturan, Compostela Valley.
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE THREE RESEARCH PARADIGMS Pure quantitative research relies on the collection of quantitative data (i.e., numerical data) and follows the other characteristics of the quantitative research paradigm shown in Table 2.1. Pure qualitative research relies on the collection of qualitative data (i.e., nonnumerical data such as words and pictures) and follows the other ...
This chapter is our introduction to the three major research methodology paradigms. A paradigm is a perspective based on a set of assumptions, concepts, and values that are held and practiced by a community of researchers. For the most of the 20th century the quantitative paradigm was dominant. During the 1980s, the qualitative paradigm came of ...
Chapter 2: Introduction to Quantitative Research. Quantitative Research Is a formal, objective, rigorous, and systematic process for generating numerical information about the world Conducted to describe new situations, events, or concepts, examine relationships among variables, and determine the effectiveness of interventions on a selected health outcomes o Examples: o Describing the spread ...
The materials are included in this chapter help in familiarizing information that is relevant and similar to the present study. This chapter presents literatures and studies related to the present research work that guided the researcher in the formulation of the conceptual and theoretical framework of the study. Review Literature. Local
Chapter 2 Introduction. Chapter 2. Introduction. Maybe you have already gained some experience in doing research, for example in your bachelor studies, or as part of your work. The challenge in conducting academic research at masters level, is that it is multi-faceted. The types of activities are: Writing up and presenting your findings.
The five major steps in any typical applied and quantitative economic research process are as follows: 1. Statement of Research Problem 2. Survey of Related Literature 3. Theoretical Model: Formulation of Hypothesis 4. Analysis of Data: Testing of Hypothesis 5. Write-up of Research Report. 2.1 Statement of Research Problem "A problem well put ...
Chapter 2- Introduction to Quantitative Research - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. This document provides an introduction to quantitative research. It defines key terms, compares problem-solving and research processes, and outlines the steps in quantitative research including descriptive, correlational, quasi-experimental, and experimental designs.
Slide 1. Mainly Chapter 2 of a doctoral dissertation. An exhaustive exposition of the literature sources (especially methods and findings) that a researcher consulted in order to understand and investigate his or her research problem. Built from the annotated bibliography assignment (#4) from the Methods of Inquiry (MOI) course.
This chapter is our introduction to the three research methodology paradigms. A paradigm is a perspective based on a set of assumptions, concepts, and values that are held by a community or researchers. For the most of the 20th century the quantitative paradigm was dominant. During the 1980s, the qualitative paradigm came of age as an ...
Writing chapter 2. This chapter discusses the related literature, related studies, and the relationship between previous studies and the present study. The related literature section reviews articles from various sources that support the research problem's variables and strong points. The related studies section examines published and ...
Chapter 2- Quantitative Research - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. This document summarizes previous studies related to bioplastics from various sources such as fish waste, starches, and plant materials. It notes that existing studies focus on bioplastics from either fish waste or starches individually, but not a combination.
Chapter 2: Introduction to Quantitative Research. What is Quantitative Research? Quantitative research is a formal, objective, rigorous, and systematic process for generating numerical information about the world.
These parts can also be used as a checklist when working through the steps of your study. Specifically, part 1 focuses on planning a quantitative study (collecting data), part two explains the steps involved in doing a quantitative study, and part three discusses how to make sense of your results (organizing and analyzing data). Research Methods.
1 Chapter 2 Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research This chapter is our introduction to the three research methodology paradigms. A paradigm is a perspective based on a set of assumptions, concepts, and values that are held by a community or researchers. For the most of the 20th century the quantitative paradigm was dominant.
Chapter 2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY The methodology describes and explains about the different procedures including research design, respondents of the study, research instrument, validity and reliability of the instrument, data gathering procedure, as well as the statistical treatment and analysis. Research Method The descriptive method was used in ...
Chapter 2 Sample - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. The chapter outlines the methodology used in the study, including the descriptive research design, qualitative and quantitative approaches, random sampling technique, respondents, instrumentation in the form of structured questionnaires, administration and validation of ...
Sa video na ito, tuturuan ko kayo kung paano magsulat ng chapter 2 ng isang research. Chapter 2 of a quantitative research is all about the review of related...
Chapter 1 AND 2 Quantitative Research Paper the impacts of discrimination of grade 12 stem social and mental health in agusan national high school. research. Skip to document. University; ... For example, a derogatory term for a religious group is painted on a student's locker. Other students claim that being denied access to school facilities ...
Quantitative Research: Research that relies on numerical data and statistical methods. Qualitative Research: Research that relies on non-numerical data, such as interviews, observations, and textual analysis. Random Sample vs. Random Assignment. Random Sample: A sample that fairly represents a population because each member has an equal chance ...
Research Paper, Chapter 2 Example 6 pages. This paper is good for learning more about the parts of a research and... View more. Course Professional Elective 2 (BBE EL02) ... The quantitative analysis of the results shows that lecturers conduce to use the OL- synch approach rather than the OL-asynch approach, where the percentage for both online ...
Research Example ,you can see it chapter 1 to 5 republic of the philippines department of education region ii cagayan valley division of cauayan city cauayan. ... descriptive evaluative research used quantitative method to gather information id 19 pandemic, study utilized descriptive from the participants. There are one hundred thirty-two (132 ...