critical thinking and reflection in nursing

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Reflective and critical thinking in nursing curriculum

O pensamento crítico-reflexivo nos currículos de enfermagem, el pensamiento reflexivo y crítico en los currículos de enfermería, maría antonia jiménez-gómez, lucila cárdenas-becerril, margarita betzabé velásquez-oyola, marcela carrillo-pineda, leyvi yamile barón-díaz.

• Author information
• Article notes
• Copyright and License information

Corresponding author: María Antonia Jiménez-Gómez, E-mail: [email protected]

Received 2018 Aug 28; Accepted 2019 Mar 25; Collection date 2019.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

to evaluate the teaching of transversal competence of the Reflective and Critical Thinking that is fundamental in the decision-making and solution of nursing problems, in degree programs of public and private institutions in the Andean region.

multi-center, cross-sectional, exploratory-descriptive study, with mixed approach in 5 countries.

76 nursing programs participated in the study. The Reflective and Critical Thinking was found as a subject, subject content and didactic strategies. Of the 562 subjects reviewed, this type of thinking is found in 46% of the humanities area and 42% in the area of research and professional discipline. It is important to train teachers to achieve coherence between the pedagogical model approach, teaching strategies and evaluations.

Conclusion:

nursing programs in the Andean region contemplate the critical thinking as cognitive and personals skills of communication. They also use real situations analysis, supervised practice, simulation labs and specifically learning based in problems to develop the capacity to solve them, decision-making and develop communication skills, including analysis, synthesis and evaluation.

Descriptors: Thinking, Nursing, Education, Curriculum, Nursing Education, Nursing Curriculum

avaliar o ensino da competência transversal do pensamento crítico-reflexivo, fundamental na tomada de decisões e solução de problemas de enfermagem, nos programas de graduação de instituições públicas e privadas da região Andina.

estudo multicêntrico, transversal, exploratório-descritivo, com abordagem mista em cinco países.

Resultados:

76 programas de Enfermagem participaram do estudo. O pensamento crítico-reflexivo foi constatado como disciplina, conteúdo de disciplina e estratégias didáticas. Das 562 disciplinas revisadas, este tipo de pensamento se encontra em 46% da área de humanidades e 42% na área de pesquisa e profissional-disciplinar. Existe a necessidade de capacitar os docentes para obter coerência entre a proposta do modelo pedagógico, as estratégias didáticas e a avaliação.

os programas de enfermagem da região Andina contemplam o pensamento crítico como habilidades cognitivas, de comunicação e pessoais. Da mesma forma, utilizam a análise de situações reais, estágio supervisionado, laboratórios de simulação e, principalmente, a aprendizagem baseada em problemas, com a finalidade de desenvolver a capacidade para solucionar problemas, tomar decisões e desenvolver habilidades comunicativas, incluindo análise, síntese e avaliação.

Descritores: Pensamento, Enfermagem, Educação, Currículo, Educação em Enfermagem, Curriculo en Enfermagem

evaluar la enseñanza de la competencia transversal del Pensamiento Reflexivo y Crítico, fundamental en la toma de decisiones y en la solución de problemas de enfermería, en los programas de grado de instituciones públicas y privadas de la región Andina.

estudio multicéntrico, transversal, exploratorio-descriptivo, con abordaje mixto en 5 países.

76 programas de Enfermería participaron en el estudio. El Pensamiento Reflexivo y Crítico se encontró como asignatura, contenido de asignatura y estrategias didácticas. De las 562 asignaturas que han sido revisadas, este tipo de pensamiento se encuentra en el 46% del área de humanidades y el 42% en el área de investigación y profesional disciplinar. Está la necesidad de capacitar a los docentes para lograr coherencia entre el planteamiento del modelo pedagógico, las estrategias didácticas y la evaluación.

Conclusión:

los programas de enfermería de la región Andina contemplan el pensamiento crítico como habilidades cognitivas, de comunicación y personales. Asimismo, utilizan el análisis de situaciones reales, la práctica supervisada, los laboratorios de simulación y, principalmente, el aprendizaje basado en problemas, con la finalidad de desarrollar la capacidad para solucionar los problemas, tomar decisiones y desarrollar habilidades comunicativas, incluyendo el análisis, la síntesis y la evaluación.

Descriptores: Pensamiento, Enfermería, Educación, Currículo, Educación en Enfermería, Currículo en Enfermería

Introduction

Globalization brought with it changes in all aspects of life: social, political, economic and cultural. Moreover, the nursing profession is evolving, so that it is increasingly moving away from the biomedical model of care, focused on the instrumental, to focus on people’s health care, with primacy of dialogue and agreements between the professional and the person under care. As part of a multiprofessional team, this requires changes in the curricular proposal and, in turn, a qualifying teacher for a new profile of graduate, whereby reflection, self-criticism and professional responsibility are developed ( 1 ) .

Therefore, it is necessary to work intensely to reduce the dichotomies that are present in nursing programs, namely: between theory-practice; training and the reality of professional practice; and the student as a passive part of the teaching-learning process and the professional who is required, active, proactive, creative, analytical, with contextual perspective, flexible, with logical thinking, able to carry out a permanent and continuous search for information, able to contribute with his profession to the solution of health problems.

The General Conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), at its 38th session, held in Paris from 3 to 18 November 2015, “Recommendation about Adult Learning and Education” states in one of its objectives the need to develop people’s capacity to think critically and to act with autonomy and a sense of responsibility ( 2 ) .

Critical thinking (CT) is a process and a learning outcome ( 3 - 4 ) and the clinical judgment is the result of this process. The development of the clinical judgment (clinical reasoning skills) is one of the most important and challenging tasks of being a nurse. Clinical reasoning precedes clinical judgment and the decision-making that is important in professional and personal life.

In order to achieve professionals with reflective and critical thinking (RACT), it is necessary to make deep changes in the educational dynamics, in the teaching and student roles, in the use of pedagogy and didactics to transmit knowledge, the curricular structure, the strategies of teaching-learning. These changes are expected to be centered on the student, who must actively participate in the learning process in order to achieve greater development of his or her capacities for reasoning, self-learning, self-evaluation, self-management and self-regulation. Likewise, it is expected that teachers to be critical and creative, attending to individual ways of learning, encouraging the development of good thinking in the student ( 3 ) .

Literature points out that critical thinking is the “essential foundation for education, since it is the basis for adaptation to the individual, social and professional demands of daily life in the 21st century and beyond” ( 4 ) . The world changes fast and new realities arise, so there is a fundamental need of people to develop capabilities that allow them to respond and adapt themselves to these changes.

Critical thinking is “the process of seeking, obtaining, evaluating, analyzing, synthesizing and conceptualizing information as a guide, to develop self-conscious thinking and the ability to use this information by adding creativity and taking risks” ( 4 ) .

Authors pointed out one of the first definitions of critical thinking: “knowledge, skills and attitudes” ( 5 ) and, since the end of 1980, various strategies for its teaching have been discussed at all school levels ( 4 ) . On the other hand, authors point out the importance of generating opportunities to develop RACT in students. Therefore, some authors emphasize the importance of developing it in all health situations in favor of the patient ( 4 , 6 - 7 ) . The nursing professional developing RACT will know where, when and how to use their knowledge, skills, values and attitudes.

The motivation for nurse training in the Andean region became evident in the 1960s. In particular, Colombia generated the first degree program in 1958, which was approved in 1961. In the same period, Venezuela, Ecuador, and Peru initiated undergraduate programs; in the case of Bolivia, it happened only until 1970 ( 8 ) .

The 1980s were marked by the rise of postgraduate programs, increased development of research and the generation of knowledge. The 1990s saw a boom in graduate, specialization, masters, and doctoral programs, the latter especially in education. However, there were also more options for the qualification of nursing professionals for the teaching role. On the other hand, the Higher Education Quality Assurance System ( Sistema de Aseguramiento de la Calidad de la Educación Superior ) was implemented, as well as the Accreditation of the programs and the own regulations or nursing law emerged in each country of the region.

The first decade of the 21st century brought the development of the highest level of nursing education, the doctorate, and, with it, the generation of nursing knowledge in the region and its progress towards consolidation as a discipline ( 8 ) .

Throughout this journey, there was a permanent motivation for balance and congruence between the graduation profiles and the reality of the job, based on the permanent motivation for the adaptation of the curriculum, the teaching-learning strategies, the evaluation processes, and the teacher qualification to respond to this constantly changing context.

The literature ( 9 - 11 ) shows the need to expand the research in the area of education, to achieve greater development of research and to work in education and nursing policies and practices. On the other hand, the latter shows the need to implement and evaluate pedagogical and didactic strategies that help the student to develop a critical judgment, justified decision making, comprehensive memory and communicative competence ( 11 ) .

For its part, the Ibero-American Network for Research in Nursing Education ( Red Iberoamericana de Investigación en Educación en Enfermería - RIIEE), in 2011, identified as a research priority, “The development of RACT in nursing students”, within the tree of the problems detected in its research line Higher Education and Nursing. For the development of this research purpose, the Network suggested a multicenter macroproject with the theme “Strategies to develop the RACT in nursing students: situation in Latin America”. In fact, the conceptual paradigm refers to “critical theory and constructivism, since RACT is an analytical, cyclical, broad and systematic process, but not rigid; its analysis and interpretation allows to have elements for decision-making, as well as to make informed choices” ( 8 - 12 ) .

The project involves five of the six regions that make up the RIIEE: the Andean region (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela), Brazil, the Southern Cone, Europe, and Mexico and the Caribbean. The investigation is planned in three stages: 1. Diagnose; 2. Planning and implementation of interventions; and 3. Evaluation. The diagnostic stage includes: 1. The state of the art on scientific production in RACT and teaching strategies for its development; 2. Characterization of educational strategies for teaching the RACT collected in nursing literature; 3. To determine the development of the RACT competence in the different nursing curriculum; 4. To identify the educational strategies used by teachers to develop the competence of reflective critical thinking in nursing students; 5. To identify levels of critical thinking in nursing students according to the classification of Paul and Elder (unreflective thinker - master thinker). Objectives 4 and 5 are currently being developed.

The analysis of the “Scientific Production in RACT in Nursing in 1990-2012 in Ibero-America” produced among others the following conclusion: the formation of a critical reader and the investigative process are strategies that help university students to be critical and autonomous and to access more critically to the knowledge of the disciplinary area. For this, teachers are required to make of each moment and situation in the teaching-learning relationship an open forum for reflection, debate, questioning and contrasting of the different perspectives around the area of professional training and society’s problems ( 8 ) .

After reviewing the literature on the web of science by using the descriptors critical thinking and nursing, education and curriculum, it was not possible to find studies that analyzed the presence of RACT in the curriculum of nursing degree programs. However, it is very striking the motivation to analyze the importance of its development and studies that demonstrate its value, as well as the use of different and combined teaching-learning strategies to achieve the formation of RACT in nursing students.

This study was done with the purpose of to evaluate the teaching of transversal competence of the Reflective and Critical Thinking that is fundamental in the decision-making and solution of nursing problems, in degree programs of public and private institutions in the Andean region.

The coordinating group of RIIEE developed the research project from which the research groups of each country and region of the Network were made up, integrated by members of the Network and researchers in education and nursing, who are also teachers in Higher Education Institutions (HEI), and mostly with PhD academic level. The HEI in Nursing (HEIN) were identified through the Ministries of Education, the Associations of Schools and Universities of Nursing of each country and the Latin American Association of Schools and Universities of Nursing ( Asociación Latinoamericana de Escuelas y Facultades de Enfermería - ALADEFE).

The project was benefited from the Declaration of Helsinki (Ethical principles for medical research on human subjects) and the current ethics legislation in each country, was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Antioquia, Colombia, by Act No. CEI-FE 2015-25 on July 31, 2015. The respect for privacy and confidentiality were ensured to each Program Director, with the informed consent signed by each participant. The project was also sent to them and their understanding was guaranteed. In turn, we conceded the right to choose what information they wanted to share. Confidentiality was maintained by institutional coding. Finally, was given a deadline of 15 days to obtain the response of acceptance to participate.

The target population of this research were 187 undergraduate nursing programs in the Andean region: Bolivia (47), Colombia (47), Ecuador (21), Peru (62) and Venezuela (10). We considered only the nursing curriculum of the HEI, recognized by the Associations of Schools and Colleges of Nursing of each country or its counterpart, regardless of whether they were public or private. Resulting in the nursing curriculum of 76 Institutions that correspond to the 40.64% HEIN that teach undergraduate nursing in the Andean region: Bolivia (7), Colombia (38), Ecuador (11), Peru (14), and Venezuela (6). Due to the difficulty in obtaining the information, we checked web pages, contacted HEIN members, made contacts by telephone, in some cases, we made personal visits and, finally, the complete program was requested in PDF format for the complete the instrument of the research group. In addition, the HEIN did not refused to participate, but some institutions did not respond to the invitation. The result of this process: 30 institutions accepted to participate and provided the complete information, and out of 46 partial results were obtained. An HEIN database of the names, telephone numbers and e-mail addresses of the authorities in charge of managing the programs was created in order to follow up on their responses.

After identifying, during 2011 and 2012, the theoretical and conceptual framework of RACT from different authors and different perspectives (education, pedagogy, psychology and nursing), despite the abundance of literature about the subject, we concluded that the concept is very unclear from a nursing point of view ( 13 - 14 ) .

However, it was necessary to establish a concept that was accepted by the research group of the Network, that allowed to determine a starting point or consensus to carry out this work and, without detriment to seek some level of fidelity to the multiple approaches of the scholars of this research object, that was understandable for the group and reflected what was intended to be done in its research phases and stages.

The Network took as a theoretical framework the approaches made by Paul ( 15 ) and Paul; Elder ( 16 ) , the elements of the CT and the attitudes of the Critical Thinker proposed by these authors. With the material analyzed, RIIEE constructed the following concept: “Reflective and critical thinking is a complex, systematic and deliberate process of reasoning, self-directed and action-oriented. It is primary purpose to choose, based on intellectual and affective processes (cognitive, experiential and intuitive), the best response options that favor the solution of nursing problems, in well-defined contexts and in accordance with the ethical postulates of the profession that allow it to act with rationality and professional autonomy” ( 8 ) .

The research process included the conceptual and theoretical analysis of the curriculum, the updating of the context of research development in nursing education in each country of the region, the characterization of the HEIN and, finally, the results of the state of the art on teaching strategies for the development of the RACT 1990-2012, Andean region.

Once the exhaustive bibliographic review was carried out, the instrument was designed based on the concept of Stenhouse ( 17 ) , the curriculum as a macro concept that encompasses the socializing function of the school is at the same time pedagogical ideas, structure of contents in a particular form, precision of them, reflection of educational aspirations more difficult to translate in concrete terms and skills to promote in the students ( 16 ) . In Posner ( 18 ) , who raised the great number of phenomena involved in the curriculum; Gimeno-Sacristán; Pérez-Gómez ( 19 ) , there is five categories in which the definitions of curriculum can be articulated: as an organized knowledge structure, production technology system, instructional plan, set of learning experiences and problems solution.

Based on the aforementioned, the specific instrument for this investigation was constructed with three parts. The first with 10 items, with general information from the HEI or University. Each University is subdivided into Centers that are parted into Colleges and these are divided into programs: name, geographic location, type of institution, accreditation data, mission, vision, objectives, curricular guidelines for degree programs, web page, and data about who completed the instrument. The second, 28 items, for the College, School, Department or Nursing Program (typology to identify HEIN in the region), with the following subsections: general aspects of the nursing program, character within the institution, number of sites where the program is offered, accreditation data (date, resolution, and time of accreditation), program justification, mission, vision and objectives of the program, evaluation process, graduation profile, pedagogical model, number of hours and credits, curricular structure (nursing program subjects that correspond to each area or component). Finally, the general characteristics of the teachers: kind of affiliation with the institution, time worked, and maximum educational level achieved. The third, 9 items, for specific information about each of the subjects: name, component or area to which it belongs, number of hours and credits, type of subject (theoretical, practical and theoretical-practical), contents, teaching-learning methodologies and evaluation process.

The members of the research group carried out an analysis of the validity of the content of the instrument. Afterwards, the pilot test was conducted, starting with its implementation in each of the HEI in which the researchers worked; the results were analyzed and the corresponding adjustments were made in its structure. Subsequently, the adjusted instrument was tested with five members from the region, one from each country, but different from the research group. Because of this test, we decided to design a guide to facilitate the completion of the instrument and ensure objectivity in the collection of information, because of the language differences. It is possible to obtain the final version of the instrument from the authors of the project.

Each participant received the letter of invitation, the project, the informed consent, the instrument to collect the information and the corresponding guide for its completion in hands and by e-mail.

The information obtained was reviewed and, in some cases, it was necessary to request the complementation of some aspects of the instrument. Then we proceeded to codify the HEI or Universities and the HEIN. The information was included in Excel tables designed with the predetermined categories and subcategories, which were later incorporated into the SPSS statistical analysis program, version 19. The information was processed using descriptive statistics, with frequency distributions and average analysis, and analyzed by institution, by country and as an Andean region, according to the categories and subcategories determined, allowing comparisons between countries and conclusions to be drawn as a region.

The analysis of the information was carried out using the deductive-inductive method, considering the objectives of the project and the revised conceptual theoretical framework, with the aim of determining the presence of the RACT, explicit and implicit, in each categories, the coherence of the approaches between University-College-Program, the coherence between the objectives, contents, teaching-learning strategies and the evaluation process in each subject. In this sense, we analyzed the linearity or coherence with respect to what was proposed, developed and evaluated in relation to the RACT and, finally, the contradictions and inconsistencies found in the aforementioned approaches were pointed out. We considered national and international studies about the subject for the analysis and discussion of the results obtained, in addition to the documents mentioned above.

According to the information obtained by the research group, the Andean region has 2,552 HEI; 410 with character of universities and 160 are public, 220 are private and 14 are in special regime. There are 167 universities with nursing programs, 146 affiliated and recognized by the respective Associations of Schools and Colleges of Nursing in each country. The number of accredited nursing programs in the Andean region is 43: Colombia (20), Peru (20) and Bolivia (3). Precisely, of the 20 accredited institutions in Colombia, 11 already have their certifications renewed, which are of 8, 6 and 4 years; 5 and 6 years for Ecuador and 3 years for Peru. Bolivia is just beginning the process and Venezuela has no information about it.

The total population of HEIN by country was Bolivia 47, Colombia 42, Ecuador 21, Peru 62 and Venezuela 10. A total of 76 HEIN answered: Bolivia 7; Colombia 38; Ecuador 11; Peru 14 and Venezuela, 6. These institutions constituted the sample of the study.

Twenty-one of these institutions are certified: in Colombia 20 and in Bolivia 1; 12 did not include this information and 41 were not yet certificated. Of the total number of institutions that provided the information, 47 are public, 26 private and three do not know the information. Administratively, 36 are programs; 22 Colleges; 21 Schools and one Department.

The number of hours and credits of the programs showed considerable heterogeneity: the average number of hours was 5,552.3, corresponding on average to 232.11 credits. Regarding the number of hours per credit, the lowest is in Peru, which has 13 hours per credit, and the highest is in Colombia, with 48 hours corresponding to one credit. There are institutions that do not work with credits, especially in Bolivia; others did not included this information, among them Ecuador and Venezuela.

The main characteristics of the 912 teachers developing nursing programs in the Andean region are: 501 (54.9%) with a Specialist degree; 634 (69.51%) with a Master’s degree and 58 (6.35%) with a PhD; 249 (27.3%) with a postgraduate degree in Education.

From a general perspective, it should be noted that of the five countries in the region only Venezuela and Peru explicitly present the RACT in their Organic Law (OL) or Higher Education Law in terms of integral and permanent formation of reflective critical citizens (LOE, 2009, or Organic Law of Education, in Venezuela) ( 20 ) and (Law 30220, 2014, or University Law, in Peru) ( 21 ) .

The results of RACT’s presence are presented below: Universities or HEI; in Colleges, Programs, Schools and Departments, that is, in HEIN; and in the subjects.

When analyzing the information of the Universities or HEI, we found the RACT as direct mention, indirect mention and evidence of traditional positions was found. Directly, it was found as a training purpose in Bolivia, Colombia and Peru: receptor and analytical constructor, with critical conscience; as methodology to achieve it, in Colombia and Peru: “ promoting reasoning, the CT and creative”; as a result of learning in Ecuador and Venezuela: capable of solving problems, CT promoter.

The indirect mention was found as result in the five countries of the Region, as a strategy in Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela: integral formation, relation practical theory; and as objective in Colombia: future graduates with ethical conscience, autonomy, democratic spirit and highly qualified.

There are still traditional postures: teaching, evaluation as a final product, training in instrumental action, the educational process as providing knowledge.

By going a little deeper into the HEI, we found that 88% (38) consider the RACT: 63% (27) in the mission; 7% (3) in the vision; 51% (22) in the objectives and 30% (13) in the curricular guidelines. Among these, three defining categories were identified. The first, as a training purpose: prepare professionals and leaders with CT and social conscience . The second, as a methodological strategy to achieve its development: to develop and implement pedagogical methods that encourage reasoning, CT and creativity, and that encourage habits of discipline and productive work . And the third, as a result of the formation process that includes the subject: Training of critical, self-managed, creative and proactive men and women; and, moreover, refers to the projection and utility: with the promotion of CT and the generation of knowledge, thanks to the strengthening of critical analysis, anticipation and vision of the future and development of viable alternatives to the problems.

At HEIN, RACT is expressed in the graduation profile, objectives, curricular guidelines and mission. Table 1 shows the data summarized in relation to the number and percentage in which the RACT is presented in the subcategories and with regard to the total. The information recovered allows us to identify that the RACT ranks first with 38.3% in the graduation profile, followed by 35% both in the curricular guidelines and in the objectives; thirdly, is in the mission, 26.7%, and finally, with 11.7% it is in the vision. Bolivia has the highest percentage of presence in its curricular guidelines, followed by Colombia in its graduation profile, objectives, and mission, while Venezuela is in one before the last place with a 28% of presence in its mission and is not present in the profile or in the curricular guidelines. Peru has the last place and presents it only in the objectives of the programs.

Table 1. Number and percentage of RACT * presence in the categories analyzed in Higher Education Institutions, by total sample and subsamples in the countries of the Andean Region, 2017.

RACT = Reflective and Critical Thinking;

%RACT = Percentage of Presence of Reflective and Critical Thinking

In a cross-sectional view of what is proposed by curricular programs, three categories were identified to be highlighted. The first, the development of cognitive and personal skills, expressed as the training of professionals with scientific, technical, critical, analytical and reflective knowledge, as well as communication, oral and written expression skills; and referred to a critical, creative, participative, supportive, innovative and sensitive attitude towards social change.

The second, the way in which its development could be achieved, among which the research stands out: promote and develop research, generating knowledge in the different areas of nursing that contribute to universal science and the solution of health problems; and the use of technologies: learns permanently developing the capacity of abstraction, analysis, synthesis and using information technologies . The third, its finality, related to the ability of individuals, families and community groups to interfere and make decisions in the solution of health problems, to provide comprehensive care with the capacity to solve health problems in changing and emerging environments.

Concerning the pedagogical models expressed in the HEIN, a variety was found in the denomination. First of all, the constructivist approaches are highlighted in eight (8) Institutions, with some connotations as the model social-critical-constructivist and second, the cognitive - humanistic in four (4). Other models or approaches were also identified, among them: dialectic, technological, psychological, the problematic schools, the Active, Reflective, Dialectic, Innovative and Critical . Finally one institution works with the model based on the pillars of education , in which learning to know, learning to do, learning to be and learning to live together, which includes, educating for life, educating for life, educating for work, educating in society and for society ( 22 ) .

The RACT in the subjects of the programs of Nursing in the Andean region

Only 29 of the 76 HEIN participants in the study were able to obtain information on subjects (38.15%), and 22 (75.86%) of these in nursing programs, RACT was present in different elements of the subjects. 562 subjects were reviewed, 159 (29%) of which have no information about teaching strategies or evaluation. Moreover, some programs record the same teaching and assessment strategies for all subjects in the program, 45 (8%).

Table 2 presents the results by subcategory and the total presence of RACT in the different groups of subjects, basic area or foundation subjects (which introduce and contextualize the student in the field of knowledge), Research, Humanities (the study of the behavior, conditions and performance of the human being), disciplinary professional area (gives the basic grammar of the profession and discipline) and those of the flexible area (the student chooses them according to personal interests, allow to the learner to approach, contextualize and study in depth aspects of the profession and discipline, allowing to learn tools and other kinds of knowledge, leading to develop interdisciplinarity, flexibility and diversity).

Table 2. Number and percentage of PRYC † in areas in which nursing degree programs are divided by total sample and sub-samples in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru, 2017.

Sub = Subjects;

RACT = Number of subjects presenting Reflective and Critical Thinking in each area;

% = Percent of subjects that present reflective and critical thinking in each area

The information provided makes it possible to indicate RACT as a subject: Workshop of Critical Thinking and Introduction to CT ; second, as a subject content: CT in Nursing, and, third, RACT is evidenced in teaching-learning strategies.

The highest percentage of subjects in which RACT is evident correspond to the area of humanities, with 46% (55), in which analysis of real situations, group work, concept maps, role playing and seminars are predominant.

In second place, it is in the professional-disciplinary area with 42% (307) subjects with the predominance of the following strategies: supervised clinical practice, clinical case, problem-based learning, simulation laboratories, and the nursing process. The research is in the same place, 42% (41) subjects. The most commonly used strategies are: critical discussions of research reports and articles, project development, workshops, and problem-based learning.

In the last place, subjects from the basic or foundation area 144 (24%). Including discussion workshops, concept maps and case studies.

A great variety of strategies have been identified, among them are: presentation and discussion of clinical case, group work, clinical practice, flipchart, observation guides, debates, discussion about specific topics, resolution of case studies, support of the nursing care plan, investigative reports , workshop development.

What is evaluated: the development of competencies, the acquisition of skills, the development of superior cognitive processes, the professional spirit and the development of processes and independence.

Finally, in some of the subjects, the intentionality of the evaluation of the RACT is explicitly presented: written works about the topics of each seminar in which the proper handling of the bibliography is evidenced, the capacity for criticism, analysis and synthesis, evidence of problem solving, case analysis and Nursing Based in Evidences , didactic relationship analysis and fundamental elements of the RACT, conceptual knowledge, written and oral reflections, group work, practical reflections and group discussions.

It is evident that traditional evaluation techniques still exist: evaluating procedural aspects, dexterity, motivation and initiative in the procedures, memory evaluation, participation in class, oral and written interventions and, finally, the replication of the topics studied in classes.

Therefore, the analyzed programs show interest in including as an important element in their future graduates the development of the RACT. This aspect is vanishing in the development of the subjects. It is evident in the pedagogical strategies, but it is lost until disappearing in most of the evaluative processes.

The analysis results of the plans and programs of the HEI and HEIN allow to conclude that the proposes of the Law of Higher Education to develop the RACT in the students does not guarantee that it is included in the subjects and evaluations.

What is stated in HEI and HEIN allows us to infer that epistemological and theoretical contradictions are present in the Institutions and among them. It makes necessary an epistemological, theoretical and methodological consideration in order to achieve alignment and coherence between the purposes in the curricular guidelines and what is programmed in the curricular plans for the concrete work with the students. This matter goes against comprehensive training, since it is demonstrated that critical and reflective skills contribute to train professionals with greater ability to care for patients ( 23 ) .

It should be noted that it is the University or HEI that determines the philosophical bases that will guide the academic units that compose it, so that they, in turn, incorporate these principles into their academic programs. The results show that there is no linearity between the proposals of the university with respect to its mission, vision, objectives, graduation profile, curricular guidelines, and what is proposed in the nursing degree programs. There is more linearity in Institutions with a longer trajectory and development, private and public ones.

The analysis of the areas in which the subjects are grouped made it possible to identify that the subjects of the humanities area have the highest percentage of presence of the RACT. This result can be explained by the strategies used, but even more by the subjects under study, since it has been demonstrated that the teaching-learning strategies based on the humanities have a significant impact on the development of skills such as clinical reasoning ( 24 ) . The subjects in the professional area use strategies such as case study, supervised clinical practice and other relatively new ones as problem-based learning and simulation laboratories. Strategies that, by involving simulation or potential practical actions, contribute to enhance critical skills and make decisions that lead to the future professional committing fewer errors during the care of patients ( 25 - 26 ) .

By contrast, it is not the same with the subjects of the foundation or basic area in which it is necessary to return to some knowledge aspects that already exists, such as anatomy, physiology, anthropology, psychology, statistics, among many others. For some students these topics are very difficult and involve, on several occasions, an excellent dose of memory. However, the teaching strategies that develop the RACT are not so frequent. It is important doing more research on this point to sustain if it is true.

On the other hand, for the majority of HEIN, training is conceived as qualification and progress achieved by people and as a principle of theories, concepts, methods, models, strategies and courses of pedagogical action that aim to understand and qualify the teaching. In some cases, the transfer of knowledge is approached, but it still underlies the concept of learning as acquisition of knowledge built and finished; the teacher is the one who has the knowledge and the student is who learns what teacher knows.

The curricula of the Andean region include explicit elements that contribute to the development of the RACT, such as reading, writing and reasoning, allowing to the future professional to know how to learn, reason, think creatively, generate and evaluate ideas, make decisions and solve problems ( 24 ) . It includes as proposals the development of social skills, with emphasis on oral and written communication, cognitive skills including problem solving, establish different alternatives, understand the consequences of actions, make decisions and critical thinking ( 16 ) . Also, intend to achieve in the student some characteristics of the critical thinker like to be creative, innovative, proactive, analytical, participatory, entrepreneurial, self-critical, supportive, humanistic, ethical and scientific ( 27 ) .

Regarding the pedagogical models proposed by the HEIN, inconsistencies between the approach of constructivist approach and meaningful learning are evident. The axis is the student and the repetitive approach in the subjects with master class methodology, reading guides and analysis made by teacher, but not by the student. It shows a traditional model centered on the teacher, with an emphasis on memory, comprehension and the application of concepts. Some subjects focus learning on the acquisition of concepts, despite using the integrating project as a teaching-learning strategy, workshops and practice as evaluation. The pretense for the development of the RACT is not in line with the evaluation, with the examination, in the application of contents, since it is centralized in aspects of memory and knowledge, in an asymmetric theory-practice relationship.

Although significant learning is intended and the importance of integrating it into the formation of learning approaches with the intention of promoting critical thinking, added with successful learning experiences ( 28 ) , it is not really concrete how it could be achieved. Strategies such as simple repetition and teaching for the acquisition of concepts show the persistence of the traditional educational models.

This study found there is no a clear structure to operationalize the theories of the proposed pedagogical models, even though there are expressions that point to RACT. Thus, the elements important for its development are presented in the teaching and learning strategies in a more remarkable way.

The curricular guidelines express the intention to transcend technical rationality and behavioral objectives ( 29 ) , from the positivist, rationalist or empirical analyst paradigm, to the humanist and critical curriculum ( 30 ) to the socio-critical paradigm and critical thinking based on hermeneutic processes ( 31 ) . The social and contextual (political, economic and cultural) aspects that influence and determine the health behaviors of the people are still incipient in the curricula ( 32 ) .

According to what has been demonstrated, it is possible to state that there is no predominance of a pedagogical model, but a mixture of several models in the same program with varied influences. The presence of the following models was identified: Traditional Pedagogical, Behavioral, Cognitive, and Social Pedagogical, the latter being very tenuous ( 33 ) .

There are four fundamental elements to forming critical thinkers: first, the question; second, the creation of continuous opportunities to participate in dialogue, debate, research, and critique; third, self-evaluation and hetero-evaluation; and fourth, teachers as models of critical thinkers ( 32 ) . Considering these elements, we can assure that the creation of opportunities is present with more intensity in some curricula, and self-evaluation and hetero-evaluation have begun to be implemented especially in public institutions.

Mentioning the subjects, it is not evident that the thought is motivated by complex kind of questions that encourage exploration, generate evaluation, create concepts and knowledge ( 33 ) .

The literature points out that the Socratic questions stimulate the student to use existing knowledge, since they promote a greater understanding and integration of new knowledge, they foment the habit of thinking critically ( 8 , 34 ) . Other authors suggest, for the reports, questions about the purpose, information, concepts, assumptions, implications, points of view and the questions, as elements that favor analysis, the evaluation of ideas and reasoning ( 24 , 35 ) .

Like other researches, this study found that the most used strategies in the progress of the professional area that promote the development of RACT are the case study ( 24 , 36 ) , problem-based learning ( 24 ) , supervised clinical practice ( 37 ) , the nursing process ( 4 , 38 ) and simulation laboratories ( 34 , 37 - 38 ) . In this article, we only refer to two of these strategies, which were selected because of the great advance of information and communications technologies. The growing need to access this kind of infrastructure as a fundamental part in the training of future professionals and as an example of a single teaching and learning strategy is not sufficient to achieve the RACT, rather, the use of different techniques enhance its development, as we will see below.

We agree with the conclusion of authors who suggest that Problem-Based Learning and simulation labs are active strategies that develop RACT in nursing students ( 37 ) .

The case study, moreover, promotes active learning, helps to solve clinical problems, promotes the development of critical thinking skills ( 34 - 35 ) , in addition, it allows to integrate knowledge, to think as a professional, to analyze individual situations in specific contexts from different angles, to use theoretical concepts in the delimitation of a concrete problem ( 36 ) . It also stimulates collaborative and team work, the work with different points of view. The question-problem is the motivator in the search for alternative solutions, is useful in simple and complex situations, allows to apply theory in practice, promotes the exchange of ideas, teaches students to learn to control their own thinking and promote the exchange of ideas and intellect ( 37 ) . In addition, it helps to incorporate time management and take responsibility. It also facilitates the integration of the four elements of the Nursing metaparadigm: the person receiving the care, health as purpose, the nature of the nursing and the context or environment.

The case study allows the simultaneous implementation of other strategies that further enhance the development of RACT, such as concept maps, the analysis and selection of scientific evidence, the nursing process, nursing history, role-playing, argued discussion and debate.

In contradiction to all the positive aspects of the case study in the development of RACT, the dichotomy between theory and practice in a large number of the curricula reviewed is an obstacle to achieving all the benefits pointed out. Since some teachers are in charge of the development of the theoretical subject in the classroom, others are in charge of their practical part in other spaces that require this care.

Regarding the practice based on simulation models, a study ( 38 ) shows how the promotion of RACT is relevant. In this connection, it highlights the importance of including simulation as a key element in curricula, because it ensures skills in this kind of thinking ( 38 ) and gives students the opportunity to show their ability in decision-making, critical thinking and other skills ( 39 ) . Other authors emphasize its importance when students reflect it on their thinking process and show how it guided their actions ( 34 ) .

There is efficiency of simulation laboratories when accompanied by active strategies, such as the conceptual map before each laboratory session, a visual aid that allows the concepts, objectives, justification, expected results and possible complications to be described in a logical manner if the procedure is not carried out in the appropriate manner ( 34 ) . The same author suggests the use of high-level questions to stimulate reason more than memory. He also suggests assigning an observer, who will ensure analysis and reflection on patient safety, communication, teamwork and leadership, among others ( 34 ) . The reflection of the group around the whole process carried out will be the end of the laboratory ( 15 , 34 ) .

Another study concluded that simulation as a pedagogical method allows students to recognize, interpret and integrate new information with previous knowledge in order to make decisions about the best direction to follow. The authors state that simulation, as an educational method, provides an opportunity to systematically structure learning to help students acquire deep content knowledge and to facilitate the development of thought processes; that simulation experiences stimulate students’ RACT skills and help them become more competent in caring for patients in complex conditions ( 37 ) .

We agree with what has been found in other studies emphasizing that simulation laboratories by themselves do not guarantee the development of RACT skills, but if combined with other strategies and implemented with adequate pedagogy, the results will be much more effective in terms of CT skills ( 34 , 37 - 38 ) .

It is also possible to find correspondence with that was discovered in the State of the Art of scientific production in RACT in the Andean region. The students perceive that “Clinical simulation is a valuable strategy for the acquisition, complementation and integration of the theoretical part with the practical part, because it seeks to make decisions according to the CT” ( 38 ) .

The evaluation of the subjects is cumulative and formative. In some cases, a diagnosis of the level of the student’s participation in the subject is made; it is evaluated in the intermediate and at the end with the objective of promotion to another level. In other cases, a teaching-learning balance is done to verify the fulfillment of the objectives and competences. Self-evaluation and heteroevaluation are increasingly used, implying a process of reflection, analysis and self-criticism.

Precisely, evaluation appears as one of the weakest points when analyzing the presence of RACT in curricula. Therefore, we agree that the “best teaching practice begins by establishing learning outcomes and continues with a focus on helping the student to achieve satisfactory results”. If the proposal is to achieve a higher order thinking, the evaluation will be oriented towards the synthesis, analysis and evaluation of knowledge ( 40 ) .

Overall, the strong approaches to RACT training formulated at HEI, HEIN, as evidenced by some of the teaching and learning strategies presented in the subjects, become much weaker in the evaluation process, with predominance of traditional evaluation models, and in some cases, the intention to evaluate RACT is outlined.

The curricula of Colleges and Schools of Nursing in the Andean region explicitly contemplate reflective and critical thinking in their mission, vision, objectives, graduation profile and didactic strategies, and implicitly as integral formation. However, there is a tension between what is proposed by the HEI and HEIN and what is implemented and evaluated in the subjects. The presence of RACT in the proposed didactic strategies is much more evident, but it is not sufficiently objective or explicit in the evaluation processes.

Despite the great diversity of pedagogical models, there is a clear intention to facilitate the development of RACT. In addition, although a constructivist model is proposed centered on the student, dialogical, active, reflexive, innovative and critical, this model is more centered on the teacher than on the student; on knowledge over a relationship between equals; more on results than on the learning process. Likewise, knowledge is considered as something finished, fixed and the ultimate truth.

In order to be able to teach the RACT to the nursing student it is necessary to include it in the nursing curriculum, teachers who are professionals in the areas of Education and Nursing and with RACT in their training. Teachers should create spaces for the development of RACT, know and implement the different and complementary didactic strategies that facilitate its learning and that analyze the students in relation to the level of RACT achieved.

The authors of this article suggest that the projects currently developed with teachers and students in Ibero-America should be finalized and retaken with the implementation and evaluation of strategies that value the development of RACT.

RACT is considered an indispensable element in personal and professional development, in order to have autonomy, confidence, the ability to make decisions, reach clinical judgment and, the most important, provide individualized, comprehensive and human nursing care. In summary, graduates should be able to work as members of the health team with sufficient clarity of the role and identity they should have, because they have to integrate and experience the four paradigms of the Nursing.

The limitations of the study are

The complexity of the project due to the number of participating countries and the different research groups;

The large number of public and private nursing schools and colleges in the Andean region;

The limitation in accessibility to the complete information of the curricula of each institution;

The minimal presence of information on the official web pages of each institution, school or nursing college;

No response and lack of interest from different schools and nursing colleges, public and private, to participate of this project;

Limited access of current and recent updates of the curricula of nursing colleges to develop this project.

The research group made efforts to reduce these limitations and devised multiple options that were proposed to the institutions, in order to facilitate the provision of information and its complementation when necessary.

Applications for practice

The innovation and contributions expected with this research are based fundamentally on documenting and analyzing of the diverse existing evidences about if RACT is contemplated in the nursing curricula or not, the strategies used by teachers to create and promote it in nursing students and the evaluation processes employed. It provides insights about how RACT’s competence in nursing is addressed in the context of the Andean region and other regions of Ibero-America, its weaknesses and strengths, as well as the improvements that can be made. The final intention of the research is to offer, as a network and collegial body, proposals for teaching, learning and evaluation that will enable the empowerment of new generations of nurses, using RACT as a center of innovation and development.

• 1. Martini JG, Massaroli A, Lazzari DD, Luz JH. Curriculum for undergraduate nursing courses: integrative literature review. [2018 Sep 10];Rev Fundam Care Online. 2017 9(1):265–272. [Internet] Available from: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream /handle/document/53633/ssoar-revpesquisa-2017-1 martini_et_alCurriculum_for_undergraduate_nursing_courses.pdf?sequence=1 . [ Google Scholar ]
• 2. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (UNESCO) Actas de la Conferencia General 38ª reunión: Recomendación sobre el Aprendizaje y la Educación de Adultos, París Francia UNESCO. 2016. [sep 10 2018]. [Internet] Disponible en: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002433/243325S.pdf .
• 3. Achury DM. Estrategias pedagógicas en la formación de profesionales de Enfermería. [23 feb 2018];Invest Enferm: Imagen y Desarrollo. 2011 10(2):97–113. [Internet] Disponible en: http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/imagenydesarrollo/article/view/1604 . [ Google Scholar ]
• 4. Ozkahraman S, Yildirim B. An overview of critical thinking in nursing and education. [Feb 23 2018];Am Int J Contemp Res. 2011 1(2):190–196. [Internet] Available from: http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_1_No_2_September_2011/25.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• 5. Paul SA. Assessment of critical thinking: a Delphi study. [2018 Feb 15];Nurse Educ Today. 2014 34(11):1357–1360. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.03.008. [Internet] Available from: [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 6. Naber J, Wyatt TH. The effect of reflective writing interventions on the critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students. [2018 Feb 28];Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jan;34(1):67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.002. [Internet] Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691713001251?via%3Dihub . [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 7. Wheeler LA, Collins SK. The influence of concept mapping on critical thinking in baccalaureate nursing students. J Prof Nurs. 2003;19(6):339–346. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(03)00134-0. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 8. Cárdenas BL, Jiménez GMA. Enseñanza y aprendizaje del pensamiento reflexivo y crítico en estudiantes de enfermería en Iberoamérica. México: Academia Nacional de Enfermería de México; 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• 9. Orrego S, Castrillón MC, Nájera RM, Salazar MO. Estado del arte de la investigación presentada em los colóquios pan-americanos de investigacion em enfermeria: 1988-1998. http://www.r-e-a-l.org/consuelo/2002
• 10. Do Prado ML, Gelbcke FM. Producción de conocimiento en enfermería en Latino América: El estado del arte; Reunión Internacional de Enfermería, Impacto de la enfermería en la salud: América Latina y el Caribe; Belo Horizonte: 2000. Mecanografiado. [ Google Scholar ]
• 11. Jiménez-Gómez MA. Producción Investigativa en Educación en Enfermería en Colombia. [2018 Feb 23];Invest Educ Enferm. 2010 28(3):319–319. [Internet] Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/iee/v28n3/v28n3a02.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• 12. Facione NC, Facione PA. Assessment design issues for evaluating critical thinking in nursin. Holistic Nurs Pract. 1996;10(3):41–53. doi: 10.1097/00004650-199604000-00008. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 13. Tajvidi M, Ghiyasvandian S, Salsali M. Probing concept of critical thinking in nursing education in Iran: a concept analysis. [2018 Mar 18];Asian Nurs Res. 2014 8(2):158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2014.02.005. [Internet] Available from: https://www.asian-nursingresearch.com/article/S1976-1317(14)00027-9/pdf . [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 14. Chan ZC. Critical thinking and creativity in nursing: Learners’ perspectives. [2018 Mar 18];Nurse Educ Today. 2013 33(5):558–563. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.09.007. [Internet] Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691712002894?via%3Dihub . [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 15. Paul R. Critical and reflective thinking: A philosophical perspective. In: Jones BF, Ido L, editors. Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. USA: North Central Regional; 1990. [ Google Scholar ]
• 16. Paul R, Elder L. La mini-guía para el Pensamiento Crítico. Conceptos y herramientas. Fundación para el Pensamiento Crítico. 2003. [17 mar 2017]. [Internet] Disponible en: https://www.criticalthinking.org/resources/PDF/SP-ConceptsandTools.pdf .
• 17. Stenhouse L. Investigación y desarrollo del currículum. 3ed. Madrid: Morata; 1991. [ Google Scholar ]
• 18. Posner G. Análisis de currículo. 3ed. México: Mc Graw -Hill; 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• 19. Gimeno SJ, Pérez GA. La Enseñanza: su teoría y su práctica. 3ed. España: Ediciones Akal; 1996. [ Google Scholar ]
• 20. Gobierno Bolivariano de Venezuela. Ministerio del poder popular para la comunicación e información Ley orgánica de educación: Nueva Ley Orgánica de Educación, 2009. [18 feb 2017]. [Internet] Disponible en: http://www.minci.gob.ve/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Ley-Org%C3%A1nica-de-Educaci%C3%B3n.pdf .
• 21. Ministerio de Educación del Perú Ley universitaria 30220 de 2014. Tiene por objeto normar la creación, funcionamiento, supervisión y cierre de las universidades. Promueve el mejoramiento continuo de la calidad educativa de las instituciones universitarias como entes fundamentales del desarrollo nacional, de la investigación y de la cultura. [18 jul 2019]. [Internet] Disponible en: http://www.minedu.gob.pe/reforma-universitaria/pdf/ley_universitaria.pdf .
• 22. Delors J. La Educación encierra un Tesoro. Informe a la UNESCO. Santillana: 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• 23. Kabeel AR, Eisa SA. The Correlation of Critical Thinking Disposition and Approaches to Learning among Baccalaureate Nursing Students. [2017 Mar 20];J Educ Practice. 2016 7(32):91–103. [Internet] Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1122541.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• 24. Popil I. Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31(2):204–207. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.002. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 25. Eyikara E, Baykara GZ. The importance of simulation in nursing education. [2018 Feb 23];Wld J Educ Technol: Current Issues. 2017 9(1):2–7. [Internet] Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1141174.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• 26. Hamdan AR, Kwan CHL, Abdul GM, Jhonari SA. Implementation of Problem Based Learning among Nursing Students. [2018 Jun 20];Int EduC Studies. 2014 7(7):136–142. [Internet] Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1070425.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• 27. Bezanilla AMJ, Poblete RM, Fernández ND, Arranz TS, Campo CL. [5 nov 2018];El Pensamiento Crítico desde la Perspectiva de los Docentes Universitarios. 2018 1:89–113. [Internet] Disponible en: http://revistas.uach.cl/index.php/estped/article/view/3600/4473 . [ Google Scholar ]
• 28. Thomas L. From Experience to Meaning: The Critical Skills Program. [2017 Mar 20];Phi Delta Kappan Int. 2009 91(2):93–96. doi: 10.1177/003172170909100224. [Internet] Available from: [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 29. Tanner CA. Reflections on the curriculum revolution. J Nurs Educ. 1990 Sep;29(7):295–299. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19900901-04. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 30. Allen D. The Curriculum Revolution: Radical Re-Visioning of Nursing Education. J Nurs Educ. 1990;29(7):312–316. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19900901-07. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 31. Chinn P, Jacobs M. Theory and nursing. 2ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1987. [ Google Scholar ]
• 32. Philip LB. The Pedagogy of Critical Thinking: Object Design Implications for Improving Students’ Thoughtful Engagement Within E-learning Environment. [2017 Mar 20];US China Educ Rev B. 2011 B3:354–363. [Internet] Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524842.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• 33. Flórez R, Tobón A. Investigación Educativa y Pedagógica. Bogotá: McGraw-Hill; 2001. [ Google Scholar ]
• 34. Medina MJL, Jarauta BB, Inbernon MF. Cuadernos de docencia universitaria. Vol. 17. Barcelona: Ediciones Octaedro; 2010. 42 p. http://www.ub.edu/ice/sites/default/files/docs/qdu/17cuaderno.pdf La enseñanza reflexiva en la educación superior. [ Google Scholar ]
• 35. Dowd SB, Davidhizar R. Using case studies to teach clinical problem-solving. Nurse Educ. 1999;24(5):42–46. doi: 10.1097/00006223-199909000-00017. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 36. Fritz HG, Jay JK. Incremental cases: Real-Life, Real-Time Problem Solving. [2017 Mar 22];College Teach. 2000 48(4):123–128. doi: 10.1080/87567550009595828. [Internet] Available from: [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 37. Carbogim FC, Oliveira LB, Püschel VAA. Critical thinking: concept analysis from the perspective of Rodger’s evolutionary method of concept analysis. [2017 Mar 20];Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2016 24 doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1191.2785. [Internet] Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016005/ [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 38. Botero OMC, López SP. Percepción de los estudiantes de Enfermería de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana sobre la simulación clínica como estrategia de aprendizaje. Bogotá: Facultad de Enfermería Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; 2011. [20 ago 2017]. [Internet] Disponible en: https://repository.javeriana.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10554/9681/tesis19-9.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y . [ Google Scholar ]
• 39. Park M, McMillan M, Conway JF, Cleary S, Murphy L, Griffiths S. Practice-based simulation model: A curriculum innovation to enhance the critical thinking skills of nursing students. [2017 Aug 30];Austr J Adv Nurs. 2013 30(3):41–51. [Internet] Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236002370_Practice-based_simulation_model_A_curriculum_innovation_to_enhance_the_critical_thinking_skills_of_nursing_students . [ Google Scholar ]
• 40. Kantar L. Assessment and instruction to promote higher order thinking in nursing students. [2018 Jun 22];Nurse Educ Today. 2014 34(5):789–794. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.08.013. [Internet] [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• View on publisher site
• PDF (710.4 KB)
• Collections

Similar articles

Cited by other articles, links to ncbi databases.

• Download .nbib .nbib
• Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

Add to Collections

The Value of Critical Thinking in Nursing

• How Nurses Use Critical Thinking
• How to Improve Critical Thinking
• Common Mistakes

Some experts describe a person’s ability to question belief systems, test previously held assumptions, and recognize ambiguity as evidence of critical thinking. Others identify specific skills that demonstrate critical thinking, such as the ability to identify problems and biases, infer and draw conclusions, and determine the relevance of information to a situation.

Nicholas McGowan, BSN, RN, CCRN, has been a critical care nurse for 10 years in neurological trauma nursing and cardiovascular and surgical intensive care. He defines critical thinking as “necessary for problem-solving and decision-making by healthcare providers. It is a process where people use a logical process to gather information and take purposeful action based on their evaluation.”

“This cognitive process is vital for excellent patient outcomes because it requires that nurses make clinical decisions utilizing a variety of different lenses, such as fairness, ethics, and evidence-based practice,” he says.

How Do Nurses Use Critical Thinking?

Successful nurses think beyond their assigned tasks to deliver excellent care for their patients. For example, a nurse might be tasked with changing a wound dressing, delivering medications, and monitoring vital signs during a shift. However, it requires critical thinking skills to understand how a difference in the wound may affect blood pressure and temperature and when those changes may require immediate medical intervention.

Nurses care for many patients during their shifts. Strong critical thinking skills are crucial when juggling various tasks so patient safety and care are not compromised.

Jenna Liphart Rhoads, Ph.D., RN, is a nurse educator with a clinical background in surgical-trauma adult critical care, where critical thinking and action were essential to the safety of her patients. She talks about examples of critical thinking in a healthcare environment, saying:

“Nurses must also critically think to determine which patient to see first, which medications to pass first, and the order in which to organize their day caring for patients. Patient conditions and environments are continually in flux, therefore nurses must constantly be evaluating and re-evaluating information they gather (assess) to keep their patients safe.”

The COVID-19 pandemic created hospital care situations where critical thinking was essential. It was expected of the nurses on the general floor and in intensive care units. Crystal Slaughter is an advanced practice nurse in the intensive care unit (ICU) and a nurse educator. She observed critical thinking throughout the pandemic as she watched intensive care nurses test the boundaries of previously held beliefs and master providing excellent care while preserving resources.

“Nurses are at the patient’s bedside and are often the first ones to detect issues. Then, the nurse needs to gather the appropriate subjective and objective data from the patient in order to frame a concise problem statement or question for the physician or advanced practice provider,” she explains.

Top 5 Ways Nurses Can Improve Critical Thinking Skills

We asked our experts for the top five strategies nurses can use to purposefully improve their critical thinking skills.

Case-Based Approach

Slaughter is a fan of the case-based approach to learning critical thinking skills.

In much the same way a detective would approach a mystery, she mentors her students to ask questions about the situation that help determine the information they have and the information they need. “What is going on? What information am I missing? Can I get that information? What does that information mean for the patient? How quickly do I need to act?”

Consider forming a group and working with a mentor who can guide you through case studies. This provides you with a learner-centered environment in which you can analyze data to reach conclusions and develop communication, analytical, and collaborative skills with your colleagues.

Practice Self-Reflection

Rhoads is an advocate for self-reflection. “Nurses should reflect upon what went well or did not go well in their workday and identify areas of improvement or situations in which they should have reached out for help.” Self-reflection is a form of personal analysis to observe and evaluate situations and how you responded.

This gives you the opportunity to discover mistakes you may have made and to establish new behavior patterns that may help you make better decisions. You likely already do this. For example, after a disagreement or contentious meeting, you may go over the conversation in your head and think about ways you could have responded.

It’s important to go through the decisions you made during your day and determine if you should have gotten more information before acting or if you could have asked better questions.

During self-reflection, you may try thinking about the problem in reverse. This may not give you an immediate answer, but can help you see the situation with fresh eyes and a new perspective. How would the outcome of the day be different if you planned the dressing change in reverse with the assumption you would find a wound infection? How does this information change your plan for the next dressing change?

Develop a Questioning Mind

McGowan has learned that “critical thinking is a self-driven process. It isn’t something that can simply be taught. Rather, it is something that you practice and cultivate with experience. To develop critical thinking skills, you have to be curious and inquisitive.”

To gain critical thinking skills, you must undergo a purposeful process of learning strategies and using them consistently so they become a habit. One of those strategies is developing a questioning mind. Meaningful questions lead to useful answers and are at the core of critical thinking .

However, learning to ask insightful questions is a skill you must develop. Faced with staff and nursing shortages , declining patient conditions, and a rising number of tasks to be completed, it may be difficult to do more than finish the task in front of you. Yet, questions drive active learning and train your brain to see the world differently and take nothing for granted.

It is easier to practice questioning in a non-stressful, quiet environment until it becomes a habit. Then, in the moment when your patient’s care depends on your ability to ask the right questions, you can be ready to rise to the occasion.

Practice Self-Awareness in the Moment

Critical thinking in nursing requires self-awareness and being present in the moment. During a hectic shift, it is easy to lose focus as you struggle to finish every task needed for your patients. Passing medication, changing dressings, and hanging intravenous lines all while trying to assess your patient’s mental and emotional status can affect your focus and how you manage stress as a nurse .

Staying present helps you to be proactive in your thinking and anticipate what might happen, such as bringing extra lubricant for a catheterization or extra gloves for a dressing change.

By staying present, you are also better able to practice active listening. This raises your assessment skills and gives you more information as a basis for your interventions and decisions.

Use a Process

As you are developing critical thinking skills, it can be helpful to use a process. For example:

• Ask questions.
• Gather information.
• Implement a strategy.
• Evaluate the results.
• Consider another point of view.

These are the fundamental steps of the nursing process (assess, diagnose, plan, implement, evaluate). The last step will help you overcome one of the common problems of critical thinking in nursing — personal bias.

Common Critical Thinking Pitfalls in Nursing

Your brain uses a set of processes to make inferences about what’s happening around you. In some cases, your unreliable biases can lead you down the wrong path. McGowan places personal biases at the top of his list of common pitfalls to critical thinking in nursing.

“We all form biases based on our own experiences. However, nurses have to learn to separate their own biases from each patient encounter to avoid making false assumptions that may interfere with their care,” he says. Successful critical thinkers accept they have personal biases and learn to look out for them. Awareness of your biases is the first step to understanding if your personal bias is contributing to the wrong decision.

New nurses may be overwhelmed by the transition from academics to clinical practice, leading to a task-oriented mindset and a common new nurse mistake ; this conflicts with critical thinking skills.

“Consider a patient whose blood pressure is low but who also needs to take a blood pressure medication at a scheduled time. A task-oriented nurse may provide the medication without regard for the patient’s blood pressure because medication administration is a task that must be completed,” Slaughter says. “A nurse employing critical thinking skills would address the low blood pressure, review the patient’s blood pressure history and trends, and potentially call the physician to discuss whether medication should be withheld.”

Fear and pride may also stand in the way of developing critical thinking skills. Your belief system and worldview provide comfort and guidance, but this can impede your judgment when you are faced with an individual whose belief system or cultural practices are not the same as yours. Fear or pride may prevent you from pursuing a line of questioning that would benefit the patient. Nurses with strong critical thinking skills exhibit:

• Learn from their mistakes and the mistakes of other nurses
• Look forward to integrating changes that improve patient care
• Treat each patient interaction as a part of a whole
• Evaluate new events based on past knowledge and adjust decision-making as needed
• Solve problems with their colleagues
• Are self-confident
• Acknowledge biases and seek to ensure these do not impact patient care

An Essential Skill for All Nurses

Critical thinking in nursing protects patient health and contributes to professional development and career advancement. Administrative and clinical nursing leaders are required to have strong critical thinking skills to be successful in their positions.

By using the strategies in this guide during your daily life and in your nursing role, you can intentionally improve your critical thinking abilities and be rewarded with better patient outcomes and potential career advancement.

Frequently Asked Questions About Critical Thinking in Nursing

How are critical thinking skills utilized in nursing practice.

Nursing practice utilizes critical thinking skills to provide the best care for patients. Often, the patient’s cause of pain or health issue is not immediately clear. Nursing professionals need to use their knowledge to determine what might be causing distress, collect vital information, and make quick decisions on how best to handle the situation.

How does nursing school develop critical thinking skills?

Nursing school gives students the knowledge professional nurses use to make important healthcare decisions for their patients. Students learn about diseases, anatomy, and physiology, and how to improve the patient’s overall well-being. Learners also participate in supervised clinical experiences, where they practice using their critical thinking skills to make decisions in professional settings.

Do only nurse managers use critical thinking?

Nurse managers certainly use critical thinking skills in their daily duties. But when working in a health setting, anyone giving care to patients uses their critical thinking skills. Everyone — including licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, and advanced nurse practitioners —needs to flex their critical thinking skills to make potentially life-saving decisions.

Meet Our Contributors

Crystal Slaughter is a core faculty member in Walden University’s RN-to-BSN program. She has worked as an advanced practice registered nurse with an intensivist/pulmonary service to provide care to hospitalized ICU patients and in inpatient palliative care. Slaughter’s clinical interests lie in nursing education and evidence-based practice initiatives to promote improving patient care.

Jenna Liphart Rhoads is a nurse educator and freelance author and editor. She earned a BSN from Saint Francis Medical Center College of Nursing and an MS in nursing education from Northern Illinois University. Rhoads earned a Ph.D. in education with a concentration in nursing education from Capella University where she researched the moderation effects of emotional intelligence on the relationship of stress and GPA in military veteran nursing students. Her clinical background includes surgical-trauma adult critical care, interventional radiology procedures, and conscious sedation in adult and pediatric populations.

Nicholas McGowan is a critical care nurse with 10 years of experience in cardiovascular, surgical intensive care, and neurological trauma nursing. McGowan also has a background in education, leadership, and public speaking. He is an online learner who builds on his foundation of critical care nursing, which he uses directly at the bedside where he still practices. In addition, McGowan hosts an online course at Critical Care Academy where he helps nurses achieve critical care (CCRN) certification.

• Open access
• Published: 16 March 2023

Effectiveness of a critical reflection competency program for clinical nurse educators: a pilot study

• Sujin Shin 1 ,
• Inyoung Lee 2 ,
• Jeonghyun Kim 3 ,
• Eunyoung Oh 4 &
• Eunmin Hong 1  

BMC Nursing volume  22 , Article number:  69 ( 2023 ) Cite this article

16k Accesses

9 Citations

Metrics details

Critical reflection is an effective learning strategy that enhances clinical nurses’ reflective practice and professionalism. Therefore, training programs for nurse educators should be implemented so that critical reflection can be applied to nursing education. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a critical reflection competency program for clinical nurse educators on improving critical thinking disposition, nursing reflection competency, and teaching efficacy.

A pilot study was conducted using a pre- and post-test control-group design. Participants were clinical nurse educators recruited using a convenience sampling method. The program was conducted once a week for 90 min, with a total of four sessions. The effectiveness of the developed program was verified by analyzing pre- and post-test results of 26 participants in the intervention group and 27 participants in the control group, respectively. The chi-square test, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and analysis of covariance with age as a covariate were conducted.

The critical thinking disposition and teaching efficacy of the intervention group improved after the program, and the differences between the control and intervention groups were statistically significant (F = 14.751, p  < 0.001; F = 11.047, p  < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the change in nursing reflection competency between the two groups (F = 2.674, p  = 0.108).

The critical reflection competency program was effective in improving the critical thinking disposition and teaching efficacy of nurse educators. Therefore, it is necessary to implement the developed program for nurse educators to effectively utilize critical reflection in nursing education.

Peer Review reports

The critical thinking of clinical nurses is essential for identifying the needs of patients and providing safe care through prompt and accurate judgment [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Critical thinking can be practiced through critical reflection [ 4 ], a dynamic process in which nurses reflect on their nursing behavior to improve their perspective on a situation and change future nursing practices in a desirable direction [ 5 ]. Through critical reflection, nurses grasp the contextual meaning of a situation and reconstruct their experiences to apply their learning in practice, thereby identifying the meaning of nursing [ 3 ]. In other words, critical reflection can help nurses convert their experiences into practical knowledge [ 6 ]. Thus, critical reflection may be an effective learning strategy linking theory and practice in clinical nursing education [ 7 ].

Studies have reported that critical reflection is effective in improving nurses’ reflective practices and professionalism. Teaching methods that use critical reflection can improve nurses’ knowledge, communication skills, and critical thinking abilities [ 1 , 8 , 9 ]. These methods can be effective in improving clinical judgment and problem-solving abilities by providing new nurses with opportunities to apply their theoretical knowledge in clinical practice [ 10 , 11 ]. In addition, critical reflection has positive effects on the professionalism of new graduate nurses and reduces reality shock during the transition from university to clinical practice [ 12 ]. These advantages have led to the increasing application of critical reflection in training programs for new graduate nurses, including nursing residency programs [ 13 , 14 , 15 ].

In order to facilitate new nurses’ reflective thinking and practice by clinical nurse educators, educators must be trained to strengthen their critical thinking disposition, nursing reflection, and teaching efficacy competency. Educators help new nurses adapt and develop their expertise in clinical settings [ 16 , 17 ]. Moreover, continuing education for nurses to improve their teaching competency relates to the satisfaction of learners and nurse educators, which improves the quality of clinical nursing education [ 18 ]. Therefore, opportunities for nurse educators to develop teaching competency for critical reflection in education should be provided [ 19 ] and educational support for nurse educators to improve critical reflection competency is needed.

However, although there have been studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of the educational interventions concerning critical reflection to new nurses, few studies have been conducted on educational interventions on the critical reflection competencies of clinical nurse educators in charge of educating new nurses. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of a critical reflection competency program for clinical nurse educators on improving critical thinking disposition, nursing reflection competency, and teaching efficacy.

Study design

A pilot study was conducted with a pre- and post-test control group design to investigate the effects of the critical reflection competency program on the critical thinking disposition, nursing reflection competency, and teaching efficacy of nurse educators. The conceptual framework in this study was proposed that the critical reflection competency program will improve critical thinking disposition, nursing reflection, and teaching efficacy of clinical nurse educators [Fig.  1 ].

Conceptual Framework

Participants were clinical nurse educators in hospitals who were recruited using a convenience sampling method. Nurse educators were eligible to participate if they had dedicated nursing education in a clinical setting. They dedicated to nursing education focused on staff development of current nurses, especially the education for new nurses. They also included those who completed all four sessions of the program and participated in the data collection before and after the program. A recruitment document was sent to hospitals to recruit the participants, hospitals were selected with concerning role of clinical nurse educators. Participants were recruited from two hospitals of different sizes and the number of participants differed for each hospital, and they were allocated according to the order of registration.

The sample size required for the analysis was calculated using the G* Power 3.1.9.4. program with an effect size of 0.80, a significance level of 0.05, and a power of 0.80, following the literature [ 20 ]. By applying a self-reflection program for intensive care unit nurses [ 20 ], we calculated the effect size as large. Both the intervention and control groups required 26 participants. Considering a dropout rate of 20%, a total of 63 participants, including 32 in the intervention group and 31 in the control group, were recruited. From the intervention group, six participants who participated in the pre-test and completed all programs, but did not participate in the post-test, were excluded. In the control group, four participants who participated in the pre-test but not in the post-test were excluded. Thus, 26 and 27 participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively, were included in the final analysis [Fig.  2 ]. The pre-test for both groups was conducted in May 2021. Post-tests for the two groups were performed four weeks after the pre-test.

Flowchart of the study

Intervention

The intervention was developed and delivered by the first author, who has more than 15 years of teaching experience in nursing education, including critical reflection. The intervention was conducted between May 2021 and June 2021. Following previous studies that applied critical reflection in medical education [ 21 , 22 ], the intervention was conducted once a week for 90 min, with a total of four sessions. Owing to COVID-19, real-time online sessions were used to minimize contact between participants working in medical institutions. Every week before the sessions, the contents of the session, schedule, and Uniform Resource Locator (URL) were sent to participants via e-mail.

The intervention consisted of the following three steps in four sessions: (1) understanding critical reflection, (2) strategies to use critical reflection, and (3) practical uses of critical reflection [Fig.  3 ]. Synchronous online lectures were conducted in the first and second sessions. The contents of the first session included understanding of critical reflection and the clinical judgment process through critical reflection. Based on the content of the first session, the second outlined educational strategies using critical reflection in nursing education and the direction of critical reflection. In the third and fourth sessions, clinical nurses with experience of critically reflecting on themselves were invited as guest speakers to share their experiences and facilitate online discussions. Online discussions were also conducted in real time, and feedback from guest speakers and the author was immediately provided.

Critical reflection program for clinical nurse educators

Online self-report surveys were conducted before and after the program to assess the program’s effects. In both pre- and post-tests, critical thinking disposition, nursing reflection competency, and teaching efficacy were assessed, as well as information about participants, such as gender, age, experience in nursing education, and the type of institution and the number of beds they affiliated with.

Critical thinking disposition was measured using Yoon’s Critical Thinking Disposition Scale [ 23 ]. This scale comprises 27 items: 5 on “intellectual eagerness/curiosity,” 4 on “prudence,” 4 on “self-confidence,” 3 on “systematicity,” 4 on “intellectual fairness,” 4 on “healthy skepticism,” and 3 on “objectivity.” The items were evaluated on a five-point Likert scale (one point for “strongly disagree” to five points for “strongly agree”); a higher score indicated greater critical thinking disposition. The scale has good reliability as evidenced by a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.84 at the time of the development versus the reliability of the scale in this study was Cronbach’s alpha of 0.78.

Nursing reflection competency was assessed using the Nursing-Reflection Questionnaire, developed by Lee et al. [ 24 ]. This scale comprises four factors with 15 items, including 6 items on “review and analysis nursing behavior,” 5 on “development-oriented deliberative engagement,” 2 on “objective self-awareness,” and 2 on “contemplation of behavioral change.” Each item was evaluated on a five-point Likert scale (one point for “strongly disagree” to five points for “strongly agree”), with a higher score indicating greater nursing reflection competency. The scale has good reliability as evidenced by a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.86 at the time of the development versus the reliability of the scale in this study was Cronbach’s alpha of 0.82.

Teaching efficacy was evaluated using the Teaching Efficacy Scale developed by Park and Suh [ 25 ] to evaluate clinical nursing instructors. This scale consisted of six sub-factors with 42 items, including 12 items on “student instruction,” 9 on “teaching improvement,” 7 on “application of teaching and learning,” 7 on “interpersonal relationship and communication,” 4 on “clinical judgment,” and 3 on “clinical skill instruction.” Each item was evaluated on a five-point Likert scale (one point for “strongly disagree” to five points for “strongly agree”), with a higher score indicating greater teaching efficacy. The scale has good reliability as evidenced by a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.97 at the time of the development versus the reliability of the scale in this study was Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Ewha Womans University (IRB no. ewha-202105-0022-02). The need of written informed consent was exempted by IRB of Ewha Womans University. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. A description of the study, including its purpose, methods, and procedures, was posted on an online pre-test survey. Only those participants who agreed to participate were allowed to complete the questionnaire. The participants were also informed that they could withdraw from the study at any time and that the data of withdrawn participants would not be included in the final analysis. After the survey was completed, a mobile gift voucher was provided to those who agreed to provide their mobile phone number. Data were collected by researchers who did not participate in the program.

Data analysis

The collected data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows (version 28.0). Non-normally distributed data were analyzed using non-parametric tests. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation of participants’ general and institutional characteristics. Chi-square, independent t-, and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to test the homogeneity of the general characteristics and pre-test scores. The Shapiro-Wilk test was conducted to test the normality of the data. To test the difference between the pre- and post-tests for each group, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used. As there was a significant difference in age between the intervention and control groups, an ANCOVA with age as a covariate was conducted for the difference in changes in test scores between the pre- and post-test.

Homogeneity test of general characteristics and dependent variables

All participants were female, with a mean nursing education experience of 27 and 23 months in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The homogeneity test of general and institutional characteristics, such as gender, nursing education experience, affiliated institution types, and the number of beds, were not statistically significant. However, the age differed significantly between the two groups. In the test for homogeneity of the pre-intervention scores, there were no significant differences in critical thinking disposition, nursing reflection competency, or teaching efficacy between the two groups, suggesting homogeneity of the dependent variables between the groups [Table  1 ].

Effects of critical reflection competency program

The effects of the critical reflection competency program are shown in Table  2 .

In the post-intervention phase, scores of critical thinking disposition, nursing reflection competency, and teaching efficacy all improved compared to the pre-intervention phase, and were higher in the experimental group than in the control group. The critical thinking disposition scores before and after the intervention were 3.61 ± 0.26 vs. 3.87 ± 0.04 in the intervention group and 3.76 ± 0.21 vs. 3.77 ± 0.04 in the control group, respectively. The nursing reflection competency scores before and after the intervention were 57.00 ± 3.42 vs. 60.86 ± 0.95 in the intervention group and 59.63 ± 5.24 vs. 59.04 ± 0.89 in the control group. The teaching efficacy scores before and after the intervention were 157.04 ± 10.60 vs. 171.98 ± 2.54 in the intervention group and 161.59 ± 14.77 vs. 160.48 ± 2.46 in the control group.

Age, which was significantly different between the intervention and control groups, was treated as a covariate to conduct the ANCOVA. The changes in critical thinking disposition (F = 14.751, p  < 0.001) and teaching efficacy (F = 11.047, p  < 0.001) scores were significantly different between the two groups. However, there was no significant difference in the change in the nursing reflection competency (F = 2.674, p  = 0.108) score between the two groups.

Reflective practice is crucial to clinical nurses’ professionalism. Reflective practice enables positive learning experiences through deep and meaningful learning, and is essential for integrating theory and practice. It also enables nurses to implement what they have learned into practice, understand their expertise, and develop clinical competencies [ 26 ]. In this respect, it is important for clinical nursing educators to have critical reflection competencies and promote experiential learning among new nurses. In this study, a critical reflection competency program was developed to enhance clinical nurse educators’ critical thinking and teaching competency.

This program was effective in improving critical thinking disposition. In interventions for critical reflection, various aspects, including the introduction of critical reflection and guidelines to promote critical reflection, such as small group discussions and feedback, can be considered [ 27 ]. The program reflected these aspects and helped improve participants’ critical thinking disposition. In the third and fourth sessions, synchronous discussions on sharing experiences of critical reflection were effective. This is consistent with previous studies in which discussions improved reflective competencies [ 21 , 28 ]. Therefore, sharing experiences in the discussion section should be a key element of future educational interventions for critical reflection competency.

Furthermore, the program was effective in improving teaching efficacy. Teaching efficacy is the instructor’s belief in one’s own ability to organize and implement teaching [ 29 ], and is closely related to age, clinical experience, educational experience, professional development, and teaching competency [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Nurses who are more clearly aware of their roles as instructors tend to exhibit higher confidence in their teaching abilities [ 33 , 34 ]. That is, the participants in this study were clearly aware of their roles and developed confidence by sharing their educational experiences about critical reflection.

However, the program did not have a significant effect on nursing reflection competencies. In a previous study [ 10 ], reflective practitioners (RPs) received four weeks of critical reflection training and trained new nurses for six months. During training, new nurses wrote critical reflective journals and RPs provided feedback and shared their experiences. In this study, it seems that the methods and frequency of using critical reflection in nursing education varied for each participant, resulting in insignificant results for nursing reflection competency. It is necessary to provide educational materials or guidelines so that nurse educators can use critical reflection in nursing education.

In this pilot study, the program was found to be effective in improving critical thinking disposition and teaching efficacy. The results show that the program can enhance the critical thinking disposition of nurse educators and help them develop teaching competency by critically reflecting on their educational experiences as instructors [ 35 , 36 ]. Therefore, various educational programs and training systems related to critical reflection are required [ 37 ]. However, many medical institutions find it difficult to provide sufficient educational support to nurses because of limited costs, time, and physical space [ 38 ]. Online real-time lectures and case-based discussions of the developed program can be useful alternatives to overcome barriers to nursing education support. Additionally, more effective educational content and platforms using e-learning can be developed based on the results of this study.

In this study, the critical reflection competency program for clinical nurse educators was developed and conducted. The program was an educational intervention to improve the critical reflection competency of clinical nurse educators in real time online. Several limitations must be considered when interpreting the present findings. The developed program did not affect nursing reflection competencies. Further, the post-test was conducted shortly after program completion. Therefore, there may be limitations to evaluating whether the developed program improves the quality of nursing education. In addition, the participants in this study were allocated regardless of their hospital’s characteristics. Considering variables such as the size of the hospitals, the number of new nurses, and the number of participants per hospital, it is necessary to assign nurse educators the intervention and control groups and to verify the effects of the program. Future studies should consider improving the study design to measure the long-term effects of the program and randomize the participants.

The effects of the program on critical thinking disposition, nursing reflection competency, and teaching efficacy were assessed. The results showed that the program was effective in improving the critical thinking disposition and teaching efficacy of nurse educators. However, there was no significant difference in nursing reflection competency, but it may vary depending on the methods or time of using critical reflection in nursing education. Therefore, it is necessary to provide the critical reflection utilization strategies that can be used by clinical nurse educators in the clinical settings. In addition, further research, such as evaluating the reflective practice of new nurses trained by clinical nurse educators, is needed. This suggests that the critical reflection competency program should be expanded in the future for nurse educators. It is necessary to develop e-learning content and educational platforms to expand the program, and it should be possible to share the experience of critical reflection in various forms. Also, sufficient support for competency improvement of nurse educators is needed to effectively use critical reflection in nursing education. Nursing leaders in hospital and healthcare settings should recognize the importance of using critical reflection in clinical practice and improving the competency of clinical nursing educators who educate new nurses, and make efforts to improve the quality of nursing education through support for these. Lastly, based on the results of this study, we recommend further longitudinal and randomized studies to evaluate additional effects of the program.

Data availability

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Kim YH, Min J, Kim SH, Shin S. Effects of a work-based critical reflection program for novice nurses. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1135-0 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Alfaro-LeFevre R. Critical thinking in nursing: a practical approach. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1995.

Google Scholar  

Do J, Shin S, Lee I, Jung Y, Hong E, Lee MS. Qualitative content analysis on critical reflection of clinical nurses. J Qual Res. 2021;22:86–96. https://doi.org/10.22284/qr.2021.22.86 .

Burrell LA. Integrating critical thinking strategies into nursing curricula. Teach Learn Nurs. 2014;9:53–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2013.12.005 .

Lee M, Jang K. Reflection-related research in korean nursing: a literature review. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2019;25:83–96. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2019.25.2 .

Cox K. Planning bedside teaching. Med J Aust. 1993;158:280–2. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb137586.x .

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Klaeson K, Berglund M, Gustavsson S. The character of nursing students’ critical reflection at the end of their education. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2017;7:55–61. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v7n5p55 .

Pangh B, Jouybari L, Vakili MA, Sanagoo A, Torik A. The effect of reflection on nurse-patient communication skills in emergency medical centers. J Caring Sci. 2019;8:75–81. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2019.011 .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Liu K, Ball AF. Critical reflection and generativity: toward a framework of transformative teacher education for diverse learners. Rev Res Educ. 2019;43:68–105. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18822806 .

Shin S, Kim SH. Experience of novice nurses participating in critical reflection program. J Qual Res. 2019;20:60–7. https://doi.org/10.22284/qr.2018.20.1.60 .

Lee M, Jang K. The significance and application of reflective practice in nursing practice. J Nurs Health Issues. 2018;23:1–8.

Monagle JL, Lasater K, Stoyles S, Dieckmann N. New graduate nurse experiences in clinical judgment: what academic and practice educators need to know. Nurs Educ Pers. 2018;39:201–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000336 .

Bull R, Shearer T, Youl L, Campbell S. Enhancing graduate nurse transition: report of the evaluation of the clinical honors program. J Cont Educ Nurs. 2018;49:348–55. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20180718-05 .

Cadmus E, Salmond SW, Hassler LJ, Black K, Bohnarczyk N. Creating a long-term care new nurse residency model. J Cont Educ Nurs. 2016;47:234–40. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20160419-10 .

Johansson A, Berglund M, Kjellsdotter A. Clinical nursing introduction program for new graduate nurses in Sweden: study protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study. BMJ open. 2021;11:e042385. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042385 .

Salminen L, Minna S, Sanna K, Jouko K, Helena LK. The competence and the cooperation of nurse educators. Nurse Educ Today., 2013;33:1376–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.09.008 .

Zlatanovic T, Havnes A, Mausethagen S. A research review of nurse teachers’ competencies. Vocations Learn. 2017;10:201 − 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9169-0 .

Shinners JS, Franqueiro T. Preceptor skills and characteristics: considerations for preceptor education. J Cont Educ Nurs. 2015;46:233–6. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20150420-04 .

Sheppard-Law S, Curtis S, Bancroft J, Smith W, Fernandez R. Novice clinical nurse educator’s experience of a self-directed learning, education and mentoring program: a qualitative study. Contemp Nurs. 2018;54:208–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2018.1482222 .

Kang HJ, Bang KS. Development and evaluation of a self-reflection program for intensive care unit nurses who have experienced the death of pediatric patients. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2017;47:392-405. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2017.47.3.392 .

Hayton A, Kang I, Wong R, Loo LK. Teaching medical students to reflect more deeply. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27:410-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2015.1077124 .

Spampinato CM, Wittich CM, Beckman TJ, Cha SS, Pawlina W. Safe Harbor”: evaluation of a professionalism case discussion intervention for the gross anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:191–8.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Yoon J. Development of an instrument for the measurement of critical thinking disposition: In nursing[dissertation]. Seoul: Catholic University; 2004.

Lee H. Development and psychometric evaluation of nursing-reflection questionnaire [dissertation]. Seoul: Korea University; 2020.

Park I, Suh YO. Development of teaching efficacy scale to evaluate clinical nursing instructors. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2017;30:18–29. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2018.30.1.18 .

Froneman K, du Plessis E, van Graan AC. Conceptual model for nurse educators to facilitate their presence in large class groups of nursing students through reflective practices: a theory synthesis. BMC Nurs. 2022;21:317. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01095-7 .

Uygur J, Stuart E, De Paor M, Wallace E, Duffy S, O’Shea M, Smith S, Pawlikowska T. A best evidence in medical education systematic review to determine the most effective teaching methods that develop reflection in medical students. BEME Guide No 51 Med Teach. 2019;41:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1505037 .

McEvoy M, Pollack S, Dyche L, Burton W. Near-peer role modeling: can fourth-year medical students, recognized for their humanism, enhance reflection among second-year students in a physical diagnosis course? Med Educ Online. 2016;21:31940. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.31940 .

Poulou M. Personal teaching efficacy and its sources: student teachers’ perceptions. Educ Psychol. 2007;27:191–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601066693 .

Klopfer BC, Piech EM. Characteristics of effective nurse educators. Sigma Theta Tau International: Leadership Connection 2016; 2016.

Dozier AL. An investigation of nursing faculty teacher efficacy in nursing schools in Georgia. ABNF J. 2019;30:50–7.

Kim EK, Shin S. Teaching efficacy of nurses in clinical practice education: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;54:64–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.04.017 .

Wu XV, Chi Y, Selvam UP, Devi MK, Wang W, Chan YS, Wee FC, Zhao S, Sehgal V, Ang NKE. A clinical teaching blended learning program to enhance registered nurse preceptors’ teaching competencies: Pretest and posttest study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e18604. https://doi.org/10.2196/18604 .

Larsen R, Zahner SJ. The impact of web-delivered education on preceptor role self-efficacy and knowledge in public health nurses. Public Health Nurs. 2011;28:349–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00933.x .

Armstrong DK, Asselin ME. Supporting faculty during pedagogical change through reflective teaching practice: an innovative approach. Nurs Educ Pers. 2017;38:354–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000153 .

Raymond C, Profetto-McGrath J, Myrick F, Strean WB. Balancing the seen and unseen: nurse educator as role model for critical thinking. Nurse Educ Prac. 2018;31:41–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.04.010 .

Parrish DR, Crookes K. Designing and implementing reflective practice programs–key principles and considerations. Nurse Educ Prac. 2014;14:265–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.08.002 .

Glogowska M, Young P, Lockyer L, Moule P. How ‘blended’ is blended learning?: students’ perceptions of issues around the integration of online and face-to-face learning in a continuing professional development (CPD) health care context. Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31:887–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.02.003 .

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1F1A1057096).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, 03760, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Sujin Shin & Eunmin Hong

Department of Nursing, Dongnam Health University, 50, Cheoncheon-ro 74beon-gil, Jangan-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Inyoung Lee

College of Nursing, Catholic University of Pusan, 57 Oryundae-ro, Geumjeong-gu, 46252, Busan, Republic of Korea

Jeonghyun Kim

Department of Nursing, Nursing Administration Education Team Leader, Catholic University of Korea Bucheon ST. Mary’s Hospital, 327, Sosa-ro, 14647, Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Eunyoung Oh

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

SS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Project administration. IL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – review & editing. EO: Data curation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. EH: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eunmin Hong .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Ewha Womans University (IRB no. ewha-202105-0022-02). The need of written informed consent was exempted by IRB of Ewha Womans University. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Shin, S., Lee, I., Kim, J. et al. Effectiveness of a critical reflection competency program for clinical nurse educators: a pilot study. BMC Nurs 22 , 69 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01236-6

Download citation

Received : 12 December 2022

Accepted : 07 March 2023

Published : 16 March 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01236-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Education professional
• Nursing education research
• Program evaluation

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

• General enquiries: [email protected]

Critical thinking in nursing clinical practice, education and research: From attitudes to virtue

Affiliations.

• 1 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Consolidated Research Group Quantitative Psychology (2017-SGR-269), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 2 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Consolidated Research Group on Gender, Identity and Diversity (2017-SGR-1091), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 3 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 4 Multidisciplinary Nursing Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
• PMID: 33029860
• DOI: 10.1111/nup.12332

Critical thinking is a complex, dynamic process formed by attitudes and strategic skills, with the aim of achieving a specific goal or objective. The attitudes, including the critical thinking attitudes, constitute an important part of the idea of good care, of the good professional. It could be said that they become a virtue of the nursing profession. In this context, the ethics of virtue is a theoretical framework that becomes essential for analyse the critical thinking concept in nursing care and nursing science. Because the ethics of virtue consider how cultivating virtues are necessary to understand and justify the decisions and guide the actions. Based on selective analysis of the descriptive and empirical literature that addresses conceptual review of critical thinking, we conducted an analysis of this topic in the settings of clinical practice, training and research from the virtue ethical framework. Following JBI critical appraisal checklist for text and opinion papers, we argue the need for critical thinking as an essential element for true excellence in care and that it should be encouraged among professionals. The importance of developing critical thinking skills in education is well substantiated; however, greater efforts are required to implement educational strategies directed at developing critical thinking in students and professionals undergoing training, along with measures that demonstrate their success. Lastly, we show that critical thinking constitutes a fundamental component in the research process, and can improve research competencies in nursing. We conclude that future research and actions must go further in the search for new evidence and open new horizons, to ensure a positive effect on clinical practice, patient health, student education and the growth of nursing science.

Keywords: critical thinking; critical thinking attitudes; nurse education; nursing care; nursing research.

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

• Attitude of Health Personnel*
• Education, Nursing / methods
• Nursing Process
• Nursing Research / methods

Grants and funding

• PREI-19-007-B/School of Nursing. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. University of Barcelona

What is Critical Thinking in Nursing? (With Examples, Importance, & How to Improve)

Successful nursing requires learning several skills used to communicate with patients, families, and healthcare teams. One of the most essential skills nurses must develop is the ability to demonstrate critical thinking. If you are a nurse, perhaps you have asked if there is a way to know how to improve critical thinking in nursing? As you read this article, you will learn what critical thinking in nursing is and why it is important. You will also find 18 simple tips to improve critical thinking in nursing and sample scenarios about how to apply critical thinking in your nursing career.

What is Critical Thinking in Nursing?

4 reasons why critical thinking is so important in nursing, 1. critical thinking skills will help you anticipate and understand changes in your patient’s condition., 2. with strong critical thinking skills, you can make decisions about patient care that is most favorable for the patient and intended outcomes., 3. strong critical thinking skills in nursing can contribute to innovative improvements and professional development., 4. critical thinking skills in nursing contribute to rational decision-making, which improves patient outcomes., what are the 8 important attributes of excellent critical thinking in nursing, 1. the ability to interpret information:, 2. independent thought:, 3. impartiality:, 4. intuition:, 5. problem solving:, 6. flexibility:, 7. perseverance:, 8. integrity:, examples of poor critical thinking vs excellent critical thinking in nursing, 1. scenario: patient/caregiver interactions, poor critical thinking:, excellent critical thinking:, 2. scenario: improving patient care quality, 3. scenario: interdisciplinary collaboration, 4. scenario: precepting nursing students and other nurses, how to improve critical thinking in nursing, 1. demonstrate open-mindedness., 2. practice self-awareness., 3. avoid judgment., 4. eliminate personal biases., 5. do not be afraid to ask questions., 6. find an experienced mentor., 7. join professional nursing organizations., 8. establish a routine of self-reflection., 9. utilize the chain of command., 10. determine the significance of data and decide if it is sufficient for decision-making., 11. volunteer for leadership positions or opportunities., 12. use previous facts and experiences to help develop stronger critical thinking skills in nursing., 13. establish priorities., 14. trust your knowledge and be confident in your abilities., 15. be curious about everything., 16. practice fair-mindedness., 17. learn the value of intellectual humility., 18. never stop learning., 4 consequences of poor critical thinking in nursing, 1. the most significant risk associated with poor critical thinking in nursing is inadequate patient care., 2. failure to recognize changes in patient status:, 3. lack of effective critical thinking in nursing can impact the cost of healthcare., 4. lack of critical thinking skills in nursing can cause a breakdown in communication within the interdisciplinary team., useful resources to improve critical thinking in nursing, youtube videos, my final thoughts, frequently asked questions answered by our expert, 1. will lack of critical thinking impact my nursing career, 2. usually, how long does it take for a nurse to improve their critical thinking skills, 3. do all types of nurses require excellent critical thinking skills, 4. how can i assess my critical thinking skills in nursing.

• Ask relevant questions • Justify opinions • Address and evaluate multiple points of view • Explain assumptions and reasons related to your choice of patient care options

5. Can I Be a Nurse If I Cannot Think Critically?

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Browse Titles

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Apr.

Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses.

Chapter 6 clinical reasoning, decisionmaking, and action: thinking critically and clinically.

Patricia Benner ; Ronda G. Hughes ; Molly Sutphen .

Affiliations

This chapter examines multiple thinking strategies that are needed for high-quality clinical practice. Clinical reasoning and judgment are examined in relation to other modes of thinking used by clinical nurses in providing quality health care to patients that avoids adverse events and patient harm. The clinician’s ability to provide safe, high-quality care can be dependent upon their ability to reason, think, and judge, which can be limited by lack of experience. The expert performance of nurses is dependent upon continual learning and evaluation of performance.

• Critical Thinking

Nursing education has emphasized critical thinking as an essential nursing skill for more than 50 years. 1 The definitions of critical thinking have evolved over the years. There are several key definitions for critical thinking to consider. The American Philosophical Association (APA) defined critical thinking as purposeful, self-regulatory judgment that uses cognitive tools such as interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation of the evidential, conceptual, methodological, criteriological, or contextual considerations on which judgment is based. 2 A more expansive general definition of critical thinking is

. . . in short, self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking. It presupposes assent to rigorous standards of excellence and mindful command of their use. It entails effective communication and problem solving abilities and a commitment to overcome our native egocentrism and sociocentrism. Every clinician must develop rigorous habits of critical thinking, but they cannot escape completely the situatedness and structures of the clinical traditions and practices in which they must make decisions and act quickly in specific clinical situations. 3

There are three key definitions for nursing, which differ slightly. Bittner and Tobin defined critical thinking as being “influenced by knowledge and experience, using strategies such as reflective thinking as a part of learning to identify the issues and opportunities, and holistically synthesize the information in nursing practice” 4 (p. 268). Scheffer and Rubenfeld 5 expanded on the APA definition for nurses through a consensus process, resulting in the following definition:

Critical thinking in nursing is an essential component of professional accountability and quality nursing care. Critical thinkers in nursing exhibit these habits of the mind: confidence, contextual perspective, creativity, flexibility, inquisitiveness, intellectual integrity, intuition, openmindedness, perseverance, and reflection. Critical thinkers in nursing practice the cognitive skills of analyzing, applying standards, discriminating, information seeking, logical reasoning, predicting, and transforming knowledge 6 (Scheffer & Rubenfeld, p. 357).

The National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission (NLNAC) defined critical thinking as:

the deliberate nonlinear process of collecting, interpreting, analyzing, drawing conclusions about, presenting, and evaluating information that is both factually and belief based. This is demonstrated in nursing by clinical judgment, which includes ethical, diagnostic, and therapeutic dimensions and research 7 (p. 8).

These concepts are furthered by the American Association of Colleges of Nurses’ definition of critical thinking in their Essentials of Baccalaureate Nursing :

Critical thinking underlies independent and interdependent decision making. Critical thinking includes questioning, analysis, synthesis, interpretation, inference, inductive and deductive reasoning, intuition, application, and creativity 8 (p. 9).

Course work or ethical experiences should provide the graduate with the knowledge and skills to:

• Use nursing and other appropriate theories and models, and an appropriate ethical framework;
• Apply research-based knowledge from nursing and the sciences as the basis for practice;
• Use clinical judgment and decision-making skills;
• Engage in self-reflective and collegial dialogue about professional practice;
• Evaluate nursing care outcomes through the acquisition of data and the questioning of inconsistencies, allowing for the revision of actions and goals;
• Engage in creative problem solving 8 (p. 10).

Taken together, these definitions of critical thinking set forth the scope and key elements of thought processes involved in providing clinical care. Exactly how critical thinking is defined will influence how it is taught and to what standard of care nurses will be held accountable.

Professional and regulatory bodies in nursing education have required that critical thinking be central to all nursing curricula, but they have not adequately distinguished critical reflection from ethical, clinical, or even creative thinking for decisionmaking or actions required by the clinician. Other essential modes of thought such as clinical reasoning, evaluation of evidence, creative thinking, or the application of well-established standards of practice—all distinct from critical reflection—have been subsumed under the rubric of critical thinking. In the nursing education literature, clinical reasoning and judgment are often conflated with critical thinking. The accrediting bodies and nursing scholars have included decisionmaking and action-oriented, practical, ethical, and clinical reasoning in the rubric of critical reflection and thinking. One might say that this harmless semantic confusion is corrected by actual practices, except that students need to understand the distinctions between critical reflection and clinical reasoning, and they need to learn to discern when each is better suited, just as students need to also engage in applying standards, evidence-based practices, and creative thinking.

The growing body of research, patient acuity, and complexity of care demand higher-order thinking skills. Critical thinking involves the application of knowledge and experience to identify patient problems and to direct clinical judgments and actions that result in positive patient outcomes. These skills can be cultivated by educators who display the virtues of critical thinking, including independence of thought, intellectual curiosity, courage, humility, empathy, integrity, perseverance, and fair-mindedness. 9

The process of critical thinking is stimulated by integrating the essential knowledge, experiences, and clinical reasoning that support professional practice. The emerging paradigm for clinical thinking and cognition is that it is social and dialogical rather than monological and individual. 10–12 Clinicians pool their wisdom and multiple perspectives, yet some clinical knowledge can be demonstrated only in the situation (e.g., how to suction an extremely fragile patient whose oxygen saturations sink too low). Early warnings of problematic situations are made possible by clinicians comparing their observations to that of other providers. Clinicians form practice communities that create styles of practice, including ways of doing things, communication styles and mechanisms, and shared expectations about performance and expertise of team members.

By holding up critical thinking as a large umbrella for different modes of thinking, students can easily misconstrue the logic and purposes of different modes of thinking. Clinicians and scientists alike need multiple thinking strategies, such as critical thinking, clinical judgment, diagnostic reasoning, deliberative rationality, scientific reasoning, dialogue, argument, creative thinking, and so on. In particular, clinicians need forethought and an ongoing grasp of a patient’s health status and care needs trajectory, which requires an assessment of their own clarity and understanding of the situation at hand, critical reflection, critical reasoning, and clinical judgment.

Critical Reflection, Critical Reasoning, and Judgment

Critical reflection requires that the thinker examine the underlying assumptions and radically question or doubt the validity of arguments, assertions, and even facts of the case. Critical reflective skills are essential for clinicians; however, these skills are not sufficient for the clinician who must decide how to act in particular situations and avoid patient injury. For example, in everyday practice, clinicians cannot afford to critically reflect on the well-established tenets of “normal” or “typical” human circulatory systems when trying to figure out a particular patient’s alterations from that typical, well-grounded understanding that has existed since Harvey’s work in 1628. 13 Yet critical reflection can generate new scientifically based ideas. For example, there is a lack of adequate research on the differences between women’s and men’s circulatory systems and the typical pathophysiology related to heart attacks. Available research is based upon multiple, taken-for-granted starting points about the general nature of the circulatory system. As such, critical reflection may not provide what is needed for a clinician to act in a situation. This idea can be considered reasonable since critical reflective thinking is not sufficient for good clinical reasoning and judgment. The clinician’s development of skillful critical reflection depends upon being taught what to pay attention to, and thus gaining a sense of salience that informs the powers of perceptual grasp. The powers of noticing or perceptual grasp depend upon noticing what is salient and the capacity to respond to the situation.

Critical reflection is a crucial professional skill, but it is not the only reasoning skill or logic clinicians require. The ability to think critically uses reflection, induction, deduction, analysis, challenging assumptions, and evaluation of data and information to guide decisionmaking. 9 , 14 , 15 Critical reasoning is a process whereby knowledge and experience are applied in considering multiple possibilities to achieve the desired goals, 16 while considering the patient’s situation. 14 It is a process where both inductive and deductive cognitive skills are used. 17 Sometimes clinical reasoning is presented as a form of evaluating scientific knowledge, sometimes even as a form of scientific reasoning. Critical thinking is inherent in making sound clinical reasoning. 18

An essential point of tension and confusion exists in practice traditions such as nursing and medicine when clinical reasoning and critical reflection become entangled, because the clinician must have some established bases that are not questioned when engaging in clinical decisions and actions, such as standing orders. The clinician must act in the particular situation and time with the best clinical and scientific knowledge available. The clinician cannot afford to indulge in either ritualistic unexamined knowledge or diagnostic or therapeutic nihilism caused by radical doubt, as in critical reflection, because they must find an intelligent and effective way to think and act in particular clinical situations. Critical reflection skills are essential to assist practitioners to rethink outmoded or even wrong-headed approaches to health care, health promotion, and prevention of illness and complications, especially when new evidence is available. Breakdowns in practice, high failure rates in particular therapies, new diseases, new scientific discoveries, and societal changes call for critical reflection about past assumptions and no-longer-tenable beliefs.

Clinical reasoning stands out as a situated, practice-based form of reasoning that requires a background of scientific and technological research-based knowledge about general cases, more so than any particular instance. It also requires practical ability to discern the relevance of the evidence behind general scientific and technical knowledge and how it applies to a particular patient. In dong so, the clinician considers the patient’s particular clinical trajectory, their concerns and preferences, and their particular vulnerabilities (e.g., having multiple comorbidities) and sensitivities to care interventions (e.g., known drug allergies, other conflicting comorbid conditions, incompatible therapies, and past responses to therapies) when forming clinical decisions or conclusions.

Situated in a practice setting, clinical reasoning occurs within social relationships or situations involving patient, family, community, and a team of health care providers. The expert clinician situates themselves within a nexus of relationships, with concerns that are bounded by the situation. Expert clinical reasoning is socially engaged with the relationships and concerns of those who are affected by the caregiving situation, and when certain circumstances are present, the adverse event. Halpern 19 has called excellent clinical ethical reasoning “emotional reasoning” in that the clinicians have emotional access to the patient/family concerns and their understanding of the particular care needs. Expert clinicians also seek an optimal perceptual grasp, one based on understanding and as undistorted as possible, based on an attuned emotional engagement and expert clinical knowledge. 19 , 20

Clergy educators 21 and nursing and medical educators have begun to recognize the wisdom of broadening their narrow vision of rationality beyond simple rational calculation (exemplified by cost-benefit analysis) to reconsider the need for character development—including emotional engagement, perception, habits of thought, and skill acquisition—as essential to the development of expert clinical reasoning, judgment, and action. 10 , 22–24 Practitioners of engineering, law, medicine, and nursing, like the clergy, have to develop a place to stand in their discipline’s tradition of knowledge and science in order to recognize and evaluate salient evidence in the moment. Diagnostic confusion and disciplinary nihilism are both threats to the clinician’s ability to act in particular situations. However, the practice and practitioners will not be self-improving and vital if they cannot engage in critical reflection on what is not of value, what is outmoded, and what does not work. As evidence evolves and expands, so too must clinical thought.

Clinical judgment requires clinical reasoning across time about the particular, and because of the relevance of this immediate historical unfolding, clinical reasoning can be very different from the scientific reasoning used to formulate, conduct, and assess clinical experiments. While scientific reasoning is also socially embedded in a nexus of social relationships and concerns, the goal of detached, critical objectivity used to conduct scientific experiments minimizes the interactive influence of the research on the experiment once it has begun. Scientific research in the natural and clinical sciences typically uses formal criteria to develop “yes” and “no” judgments at prespecified times. The scientist is always situated in past and immediate scientific history, preferring to evaluate static and predetermined points in time (e.g., snapshot reasoning), in contrast to a clinician who must always reason about transitions over time. 25 , 26

Techne and Phronesis

Distinctions between the mere scientific making of things and practice was first explored by Aristotle as distinctions between techne and phronesis. 27 Learning to be a good practitioner requires developing the requisite moral imagination for good practice. If, for example, patients exercise their rights and refuse treatments, practitioners are required to have the moral imagination to understand the probable basis for the patient’s refusal. For example, was the refusal based upon catastrophic thinking, unrealistic fears, misunderstanding, or even clinical depression?

Techne, as defined by Aristotle, encompasses the notion of formation of character and habitus 28 as embodied beings. In Aristotle’s terms, techne refers to the making of things or producing outcomes. 11 Joseph Dunne defines techne as “the activity of producing outcomes,” and it “is governed by a means-ends rationality where the maker or producer governs the thing or outcomes produced or made through gaining mastery over the means of producing the outcomes, to the point of being able to separate means and ends” 11 (p. 54). While some aspects of medical and nursing practice fall into the category of techne, much of nursing and medical practice falls outside means-ends rationality and must be governed by concern for doing good or what is best for the patient in particular circumstances, where being in a relationship and discerning particular human concerns at stake guide action.

Phronesis, in contrast to techne, includes reasoning about the particular, across time, through changes or transitions in the patient’s and/or the clinician’s understanding. As noted by Dunne, phronesis is “characterized at least as much by a perceptiveness with regard to concrete particulars as by a knowledge of universal principles” 11 (p. 273). This type of practical reasoning often takes the form of puzzle solving or the evaluation of immediate past “hot” history of the patient’s situation. Such a particular clinical situation is necessarily particular, even though many commonalities and similarities with other disease syndromes can be recognized through signs and symptoms and laboratory tests. 11 , 29 , 30 Pointing to knowledge embedded in a practice makes no claim for infallibility or “correctness.” Individual practitioners can be mistaken in their judgments because practices such as medicine and nursing are inherently underdetermined. 31

While phronetic knowledge must remain open to correction and improvement, real events, and consequences, it cannot consistently transcend the institutional setting’s capacities and supports for good practice. Phronesis is also dependent on ongoing experiential learning of the practitioner, where knowledge is refined, corrected, or refuted. The Western tradition, with the notable exception of Aristotle, valued knowledge that could be made universal and devalued practical know-how and experiential learning. Descartes codified this preference for formal logic and rational calculation.

Aristotle recognized that when knowledge is underdetermined, changeable, and particular, it cannot be turned into the universal or standardized. It must be perceived, discerned, and judged, all of which require experiential learning. In nursing and medicine, perceptual acuity in physical assessment and clinical judgment (i.e., reasoning across time about changes in the particular patient or the clinician’s understanding of the patient’s condition) fall into the Greek Aristotelian category of phronesis. Dewey 32 sought to rescue knowledge gained by practical activity in the world. He identified three flaws in the understanding of experience in Greek philosophy: (1) empirical knowing is the opposite of experience with science; (2) practice is reduced to techne or the application of rational thought or technique; and (3) action and skilled know-how are considered temporary and capricious as compared to reason, which the Greeks considered as ultimate reality.

In practice, nursing and medicine require both techne and phronesis. The clinician standardizes and routinizes what can be standardized and routinized, as exemplified by standardized blood pressure measurements, diagnoses, and even charting about the patient’s condition and treatment. 27 Procedural and scientific knowledge can often be formalized and standardized (e.g., practice guidelines), or at least made explicit and certain in practice, except for the necessary timing and adjustments made for particular patients. 11 , 22

Rational calculations available to techne—population trends and statistics, algorithms—are created as decision support structures and can improve accuracy when used as a stance of inquiry in making clinical judgments about particular patients. Aggregated evidence from clinical trials and ongoing working knowledge of pathophysiology, biochemistry, and genomics are essential. In addition, the skills of phronesis (clinical judgment that reasons across time, taking into account the transitions of the particular patient/family/community and transitions in the clinician’s understanding of the clinical situation) will be required for nursing, medicine, or any helping profession.

Thinking Critically

Being able to think critically enables nurses to meet the needs of patients within their context and considering their preferences; meet the needs of patients within the context of uncertainty; consider alternatives, resulting in higher-quality care; 33 and think reflectively, rather than simply accepting statements and performing tasks without significant understanding and evaluation. 34 Skillful practitioners can think critically because they have the following cognitive skills: information seeking, discriminating, analyzing, transforming knowledge, predicating, applying standards, and logical reasoning. 5 One’s ability to think critically can be affected by age, length of education (e.g., an associate vs. a baccalaureate decree in nursing), and completion of philosophy or logic subjects. 35–37 The skillful practitioner can think critically because of having the following characteristics: motivation, perseverance, fair-mindedness, and deliberate and careful attention to thinking. 5 , 9

Thinking critically implies that one has a knowledge base from which to reason and the ability to analyze and evaluate evidence. 38 Knowledge can be manifest by the logic and rational implications of decisionmaking. Clinical decisionmaking is particularly influenced by interpersonal relationships with colleagues, 39 patient conditions, availability of resources, 40 knowledge, and experience. 41 Of these, experience has been shown to enhance nurses’ abilities to make quick decisions 42 and fewer decision errors, 43 support the identification of salient cues, and foster the recognition and action on patterns of information. 44 , 45

Clinicians must develop the character and relational skills that enable them to perceive and understand their patient’s needs and concerns. This requires accurate interpretation of patient data that is relevant to the specific patient and situation. In nursing, this formation of moral agency focuses on learning to be responsible in particular ways demanded by the practice, and to pay attention and intelligently discern changes in patients’ concerns and/or clinical condition that require action on the part of the nurse or other health care workers to avert potential compromises to quality care.

Formation of the clinician’s character, skills, and habits are developed in schools and particular practice communities within a larger practice tradition. As Dunne notes,

A practice is not just a surface on which one can display instant virtuosity. It grounds one in a tradition that has been formed through an elaborate development and that exists at any juncture only in the dispositions (slowly and perhaps painfully acquired) of its recognized practitioners. The question may of course be asked whether there are any such practices in the contemporary world, whether the wholesale encroachment of Technique has not obliterated them—and whether this is not the whole point of MacIntyre’s recipe of withdrawal, as well as of the post-modern story of dispossession 11 (p. 378).

Clearly Dunne is engaging in critical reflection about the conditions for developing character, skills, and habits for skillful and ethical comportment of practitioners, as well as to act as moral agents for patients so that they and their families receive safe, effective, and compassionate care.

Professional socialization or professional values, while necessary, do not adequately address character and skill formation that transform the way the practitioner exists in his or her world, what the practitioner is capable of noticing and responding to, based upon well-established patterns of emotional responses, skills, dispositions to act, and the skills to respond, decide, and act. 46 The need for character and skill formation of the clinician is what makes a practice stand out from a mere technical, repetitious manufacturing process. 11 , 30 , 47

In nursing and medicine, many have questioned whether current health care institutions are designed to promote or hinder enlightened, compassionate practice, or whether they have deteriorated into commercial institutional models that focus primarily on efficiency and profit. MacIntyre points out the links between the ongoing development and improvement of practice traditions and the institutions that house them:

Lack of justice, lack of truthfulness, lack of courage, lack of the relevant intellectual virtues—these corrupt traditions, just as they do those institutions and practices which derive their life from the traditions of which they are the contemporary embodiments. To recognize this is of course also to recognize the existence of an additional virtue, one whose importance is perhaps most obvious when it is least present, the virtue of having an adequate sense of the traditions to which one belongs or which confront one. This virtue is not to be confused with any form of conservative antiquarianism; I am not praising those who choose the conventional conservative role of laudator temporis acti. It is rather the case that an adequate sense of tradition manifests itself in a grasp of those future possibilities which the past has made available to the present. Living traditions, just because they continue a not-yet-completed narrative, confront a future whose determinate and determinable character, so far as it possesses any, derives from the past 30 (p. 207).

It would be impossible to capture all the situated and distributed knowledge outside of actual practice situations and particular patients. Simulations are powerful as teaching tools to enable nurses’ ability to think critically because they give students the opportunity to practice in a simplified environment. However, students can be limited in their inability to convey underdetermined situations where much of the information is based on perceptions of many aspects of the patient and changes that have occurred over time. Simulations cannot have the sub-cultures formed in practice settings that set the social mood of trust, distrust, competency, limited resources, or other forms of situated possibilities.

One of the hallmark studies in nursing providing keen insight into understanding the influence of experience was a qualitative study of adult, pediatric, and neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) nurses, where the nurses were clustered into advanced beginner, intermediate, and expert level of practice categories. The advanced beginner (having up to 6 months of work experience) used procedures and protocols to determine which clinical actions were needed. When confronted with a complex patient situation, the advanced beginner felt their practice was unsafe because of a knowledge deficit or because of a knowledge application confusion. The transition from advanced beginners to competent practitioners began when they first had experience with actual clinical situations and could benefit from the knowledge gained from the mistakes of their colleagues. Competent nurses continuously questioned what they saw and heard, feeling an obligation to know more about clinical situations. In doing do, they moved from only using care plans and following the physicians’ orders to analyzing and interpreting patient situations. Beyond that, the proficient nurse acknowledged the changing relevance of clinical situations requiring action beyond what was planned or anticipated. The proficient nurse learned to acknowledge the changing needs of patient care and situation, and could organize interventions “by the situation as it unfolds rather than by preset goals 48 (p. 24). Both competent and proficient nurses (that is, intermediate level of practice) had at least two years of ICU experience. 48 Finally, the expert nurse had a more fully developed grasp of a clinical situation, a sense of confidence in what is known about the situation, and could differentiate the precise clinical problem in little time. 48

Expertise is acquired through professional experience and is indicative of a nurse who has moved beyond mere proficiency. As Gadamer 29 points out, experience involves a turning around of preconceived notions, preunderstandings, and extends or adds nuances to understanding. Dewey 49 notes that experience requires a prepared “creature” and an enriched environment. The opportunity to reflect and narrate one’s experiential learning can clarify, extend, or even refute experiential learning.

Experiential learning requires time and nurturing, but time alone does not ensure experiential learning. Aristotle linked experiential learning to the development of character and moral sensitivities of a person learning a practice. 50 New nurses/new graduates have limited work experience and must experience continuing learning until they have reached an acceptable level of performance. 51 After that, further improvements are not predictable, and years of experience are an inadequate predictor of expertise. 52

The most effective knower and developer of practical knowledge creates an ongoing dialogue and connection between lessons of the day and experiential learning over time. Gadamer, in a late life interview, highlighted the open-endedness and ongoing nature of experiential learning in the following interview response:

Being experienced does not mean that one now knows something once and for all and becomes rigid in this knowledge; rather, one becomes more open to new experiences. A person who is experienced is undogmatic. Experience has the effect of freeing one to be open to new experience … In our experience we bring nothing to a close; we are constantly learning new things from our experience … this I call the interminability of all experience 32 (p. 403).

Practical endeavor, supported by scientific knowledge, requires experiential learning, the development of skilled know-how, and perceptual acuity in order to make the scientific knowledge relevant to the situation. Clinical perceptual and skilled know-how helps the practitioner discern when particular scientific findings might be relevant. 53

Often experience and knowledge, confirmed by experimentation, are treated as oppositions, an either-or choice. However, in practice it is readily acknowledged that experiential knowledge fuels scientific investigation, and scientific investigation fuels further experiential learning. Experiential learning from particular clinical cases can help the clinician recognize future similar cases and fuel new scientific questions and study. For example, less experienced nurses—and it could be argued experienced as well—can use nursing diagnoses practice guidelines as part of their professional advancement. Guidelines are used to reflect their interpretation of patients’ needs, responses, and situation, 54 a process that requires critical thinking and decisionmaking. 55 , 56 Using guidelines also reflects one’s problem identification and problem-solving abilities. 56 Conversely, the ability to proficiently conduct a series of tasks without nursing diagnoses is the hallmark of expertise. 39 , 57

Experience precedes expertise. As expertise develops from experience and gaining knowledge and transitions to the proficiency stage, the nurses’ thinking moves from steps and procedures (i.e., task-oriented care) toward “chunks” or patterns 39 (i.e., patient-specific care). In doing so, the nurse thinks reflectively, rather than merely accepting statements and performing procedures without significant understanding and evaluation. 34 Expert nurses do not rely on rules and logical thought processes in problem-solving and decisionmaking. 39 Instead, they use abstract principles, can see the situation as a complex whole, perceive situations comprehensively, and can be fully involved in the situation. 48 Expert nurses can perform high-level care without conscious awareness of the knowledge they are using, 39 , 58 and they are able to provide that care with flexibility and speed. Through a combination of knowledge and skills gained from a range of theoretical and experiential sources, expert nurses also provide holistic care. 39 Thus, the best care comes from the combination of theoretical, tacit, and experiential knowledge. 59 , 60

Experts are thought to eventually develop the ability to intuitively know what to do and to quickly recognize critical aspects of the situation. 22 Some have proposed that expert nurses provide high-quality patient care, 61 , 62 but that is not consistently documented—particularly in consideration of patient outcomes—and a full understanding between the differential impact of care rendered by an “expert” nurse is not fully understood. In fact, several studies have found that length of professional experience is often unrelated and even negatively related to performance measures and outcomes. 63 , 64

In a review of the literature on expertise in nursing, Ericsson and colleagues 65 found that focusing on challenging, less-frequent situations would reveal individual performance differences on tasks that require speed and flexibility, such as that experienced during a code or an adverse event. Superior performance was associated with extensive training and immediate feedback about outcomes, which can be obtained through continual training, simulation, and processes such as root-cause analysis following an adverse event. Therefore, efforts to improve performance benefited from continual monitoring, planning, and retrospective evaluation. Even then, the nurse’s ability to perform as an expert is dependent upon their ability to use intuition or insights gained through interactions with patients. 39

Intuition and Perception

Intuition is the instant understanding of knowledge without evidence of sensible thought. 66 According to Young, 67 intuition in clinical practice is a process whereby the nurse recognizes something about a patient that is difficult to verbalize. Intuition is characterized by factual knowledge, “immediate possession of knowledge, and knowledge independent of the linear reasoning process” 68 (p. 23). When intuition is used, one filters information initially triggered by the imagination, leading to the integration of all knowledge and information to problem solve. 69 Clinicians use their interactions with patients and intuition, drawing on tacit or experiential knowledge, 70 , 71 to apply the correct knowledge to make the correct decisions to address patient needs. Yet there is a “conflated belief in the nurses’ ability to know what is best for the patient” 72 (p. 251) because the nurses’ and patients’ identification of the patients’ needs can vary. 73

A review of research and rhetoric involving intuition by King and Appleton 62 found that all nurses, including students, used intuition (i.e., gut feelings). They found evidence, predominately in critical care units, that intuition was triggered in response to knowledge and as a trigger for action and/or reflection with a direct bearing on the analytical process involved in patient care. The challenge for nurses was that rigid adherence to checklists, guidelines, and standardized documentation, 62 ignored the benefits of intuition. This view was furthered by Rew and Barrow 68 , 74 in their reviews of the literature, where they found that intuition was imperative to complex decisionmaking, 68 difficult to measure and assess in a quantitative manner, and was not linked to physiologic measures. 74

Intuition is a way of explaining professional expertise. 75 Expert nurses rely on their intuitive judgment that has been developed over time. 39 , 76 Intuition is an informal, nonanalytically based, unstructured, deliberate calculation that facilitates problem solving, 77 a process of arriving at salient conclusions based on relatively small amounts of knowledge and/or information. 78 Experts can have rapid insight into a situation by using intuition to recognize patterns and similarities, achieve commonsense understanding, and sense the salient information combined with deliberative rationality. 10 Intuitive recognition of similarities and commonalities between patients are often the first diagnostic clue or early warning, which must then be followed up with critical evaluation of evidence among the competing conditions. This situation calls for intuitive judgment that can distinguish “expert human judgment from the decisions” made by a novice 79 (p. 23).

Shaw 80 equates intuition with direct perception. Direct perception is dependent upon being able to detect complex patterns and relationships that one has learned through experience are important. Recognizing these patterns and relationships generally occurs rapidly and is complex, making it difficult to articulate or describe. Perceptual skills, like those of the expert nurse, are essential to recognizing current and changing clinical conditions. Perception requires attentiveness and the development of a sense of what is salient. Often in nursing and medicine, means and ends are fused, as is the case for a “good enough” birth experience and a peaceful death.

• Applying Practice Evidence

Research continues to find that using evidence-based guidelines in practice, informed through research evidence, improves patients’ outcomes. 81–83 Research-based guidelines are intended to provide guidance for specific areas of health care delivery. 84 The clinician—both the novice and expert—is expected to use the best available evidence for the most efficacious therapies and interventions in particular instances, to ensure the highest-quality care, especially when deviations from the evidence-based norm may heighten risks to patient safety. Otherwise, if nursing and medicine were exact sciences, or consisted only of techne, then a 1:1 relationship could be established between results of aggregated evidence-based research and the best path for all patients.

Evaluating Evidence

Before research should be used in practice, it must be evaluated. There are many complexities and nuances in evaluating the research evidence for clinical practice. Evaluation of research behind evidence-based medicine requires critical thinking and good clinical judgment. Sometimes the research findings are mixed or even conflicting. As such, the validity, reliability, and generalizability of available research are fundamental to evaluating whether evidence can be applied in practice. To do so, clinicians must select the best scientific evidence relevant to particular patients—a complex process that involves intuition to apply the evidence. Critical thinking is required for evaluating the best available scientific evidence for the treatment and care of a particular patient.

Good clinical judgment is required to select the most relevant research evidence. The best clinical judgment, that is, reasoning across time about the particular patient through changes in the patient’s concerns and condition and/or the clinician’s understanding, are also required. This type of judgment requires clinicians to make careful observations and evaluations of the patient over time, as well as know the patient’s concerns and social circumstances. To evolve to this level of judgment, additional education beyond clinical preparation if often required.

Sources of Evidence

Evidence that can be used in clinical practice has different sources and can be derived from research, patient’s preferences, and work-related experience. 85 , 86 Nurses have been found to obtain evidence from experienced colleagues believed to have clinical expertise and research-based knowledge 87 as well as other sources.

For many years now, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have often been considered the best standard for evaluating clinical practice. Yet, unless the common threats to the validity (e.g., representativeness of the study population) and reliability (e.g., consistency in interventions and responses of study participants) of RCTs are addressed, the meaningfulness and generalizability of the study outcomes are very limited. Relevant patient populations may be excluded, such as women, children, minorities, the elderly, and patients with multiple chronic illnesses. The dropout rate of the trial may confound the results. And it is easier to get positive results published than it is to get negative results published. Thus, RCTs are generalizable (i.e., applicable) only to the population studied—which may not reflect the needs of the patient under the clinicians care. In instances such as these, clinicians need to also consider applied research using prospective or retrospective populations with case control to guide decisionmaking, yet this too requires critical thinking and good clinical judgment.

Another source of available evidence may come from the gold standard of aggregated systematic evaluation of clinical trial outcomes for the therapy and clinical condition in question, be generated by basic and clinical science relevant to the patient’s particular pathophysiology or care need situation, or stem from personal clinical experience. The clinician then takes all of the available evidence and considers the particular patient’s known clinical responses to past therapies, their clinical condition and history, the progression or stages of the patient’s illness and recovery, and available resources.

In clinical practice, the particular is examined in relation to the established generalizations of science. With readily available summaries of scientific evidence (e.g., systematic reviews and practice guidelines) available to nurses and physicians, one might wonder whether deep background understanding is still advantageous. Might it not be expendable, since it is likely to be out of date given the current scientific evidence? But this assumption is a false opposition and false choice because without a deep background understanding, the clinician does not know how to best find and evaluate scientific evidence for the particular case in hand. The clinician’s sense of salience in any given situation depends on past clinical experience and current scientific evidence.

Evidence-Based Practice

The concept of evidence-based practice is dependent upon synthesizing evidence from the variety of sources and applying it appropriately to the care needs of populations and individuals. This implies that evidence-based practice, indicative of expertise in practice, appropriately applies evidence to the specific situations and unique needs of patients. 88 , 89 Unfortunately, even though providing evidence-based care is an essential component of health care quality, it is well known that evidence-based practices are not used consistently.

Conceptually, evidence used in practice advances clinical knowledge, and that knowledge supports independent clinical decisions in the best interest of the patient. 90 , 91 Decisions must prudently consider the factors not necessarily addressed in the guideline, such as the patient’s lifestyle, drug sensitivities and allergies, and comorbidities. Nurses who want to improve the quality and safety of care can do so though improving the consistency of data and information interpretation inherent in evidence-based practice.

Initially, before evidence-based practice can begin, there needs to be an accurate clinical judgment of patient responses and needs. In the course of providing care, with careful consideration of patient safety and quality care, clinicians must give attention to the patient’s condition, their responses to health care interventions, and potential adverse reactions or events that could harm the patient. Nonetheless, there is wide variation in the ability of nurses to accurately interpret patient responses 92 and their risks. 93 Even though variance in interpretation is expected, nurses are obligated to continually improve their skills to ensure that patients receive quality care safely. 94 Patients are vulnerable to the actions and experience of their clinicians, which are inextricably linked to the quality of care patients have access to and subsequently receive.

The judgment of the patient’s condition determines subsequent interventions and patient outcomes. Attaining accurate and consistent interpretations of patient data and information is difficult because each piece can have different meanings, and interpretations are influenced by previous experiences. 95 Nurses use knowledge from clinical experience 96 , 97 and—although infrequently—research. 98–100

Once a problem has been identified, using a process that utilizes critical thinking to recognize the problem, the clinician then searches for and evaluates the research evidence 101 and evaluates potential discrepancies. The process of using evidence in practice involves “a problem-solving approach that incorporates the best available scientific evidence, clinicians’ expertise, and patient’s preferences and values” 102 (p. 28). Yet many nurses do not perceive that they have the education, tools, or resources to use evidence appropriately in practice. 103

Reported barriers to using research in practice have included difficulty in understanding the applicability and the complexity of research findings, failure of researchers to put findings into the clinical context, lack of skills in how to use research in practice, 104 , 105 amount of time required to access information and determine practice implications, 105–107 lack of organizational support to make changes and/or use in practice, 104 , 97 , 105 , 107 and lack of confidence in one’s ability to critically evaluate clinical evidence. 108

When Evidence Is Missing

In many clinical situations, there may be no clear guidelines and few or even no relevant clinical trials to guide decisionmaking. In these cases, the latest basic science about cellular and genomic functioning may be the most relevant science, or by default, guestimation. Consequently, good patient care requires more than a straightforward, unequivocal application of scientific evidence. The clinician must be able to draw on a good understanding of basic sciences, as well as guidelines derived from aggregated data and information from research investigations.

Practical knowledge is shaped by one’s practice discipline and the science and technology relevant to the situation at hand. But scientific, formal, discipline-specific knowledge are not sufficient for good clinical practice, whether the discipline be law, medicine, nursing, teaching, or social work. Practitioners still have to learn how to discern generalizable scientific knowledge, know how to use scientific knowledge in practical situations, discern what scientific evidence/knowledge is relevant, assess how the particular patient’s situation differs from the general scientific understanding, and recognize the complexity of care delivery—a process that is complex, ongoing, and changing, as new evidence can overturn old.

Practice communities like individual practitioners may also be mistaken, as is illustrated by variability in practice styles and practice outcomes across hospitals and regions in the United States. This variability in practice is why practitioners must learn to critically evaluate their practice and continually improve their practice over time. The goal is to create a living self-improving tradition.

Within health care, students, scientists, and practitioners are challenged to learn and use different modes of thinking when they are conflated under one term or rubric, using the best-suited thinking strategies for taking into consideration the purposes and the ends of the reasoning. Learning to be an effective, safe nurse or physician requires not only technical expertise, but also the ability to form helping relationships and engage in practical ethical and clinical reasoning. 50 Good ethical comportment requires that both the clinician and the scientist take into account the notions of good inherent in clinical and scientific practices. The notions of good clinical practice must include the relevant significance and the human concerns involved in decisionmaking in particular situations, centered on clinical grasp and clinical forethought.

The Three Apprenticeships of Professional Education

We have much to learn in comparing the pedagogies of formation across the professions, such as is being done currently by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. The Carnegie Foundation’s broad research program on the educational preparation of the profession focuses on three essential apprenticeships:

To capture the full range of crucial dimensions in professional education, we developed the idea of a three-fold apprenticeship: (1) intellectual training to learn the academic knowledge base and the capacity to think in ways important to the profession; (2) a skill-based apprenticeship of practice; and (3) an apprenticeship to the ethical standards, social roles, and responsibilities of the profession, through which the novice is introduced to the meaning of an integrated practice of all dimensions of the profession, grounded in the profession’s fundamental purposes. 109

This framework has allowed the investigators to describe tensions and shortfalls as well as strengths of widespread teaching practices, especially at articulation points among these dimensions of professional training.

Research has demonstrated that these three apprenticeships are taught best when they are integrated so that the intellectual training includes skilled know-how, clinical judgment, and ethical comportment. In the study of nursing, exemplary classroom and clinical teachers were found who do integrate the three apprenticeships in all of their teaching, as exemplified by the following anonymous student’s comments:

With that as well, I enjoyed the class just because I do have clinical experience in my background and I enjoyed it because it took those practical applications and the knowledge from pathophysiology and pharmacology, and all the other classes, and it tied it into the actual aspects of like what is going to happen at work. For example, I work in the emergency room and question: Why am I doing this procedure for this particular patient? Beforehand, when I was just a tech and I wasn’t going to school, I’d be doing it because I was told to be doing it—or I’d be doing CPR because, you know, the doc said, start CPR. I really enjoy the Care and Illness because now I know the process, the pathophysiological process of why I’m doing it and the clinical reasons of why they’re making the decisions, and the prioritization that goes on behind it. I think that’s the biggest point. Clinical experience is good, but not everybody has it. Yet when these students transition from school and clinicals to their job as a nurse, they will understand what’s going on and why.

The three apprenticeships are equally relevant and intertwined. In the Carnegie National Study of Nursing Education and the companion study on medical education as well as in cross-professional comparisons, teaching that gives an integrated access to professional practice is being examined. Once the three apprenticeships are separated, it is difficult to reintegrate them. The investigators are encouraged by teaching strategies that integrate the latest scientific knowledge and relevant clinical evidence with clinical reasoning about particular patients in unfolding rather than static cases, while keeping the patient and family experience and concerns relevant to clinical concerns and reasoning.

Clinical judgment or phronesis is required to evaluate and integrate techne and scientific evidence.

Within nursing, professional practice is wise and effective usually to the extent that the professional creates relational and communication contexts where clients/patients can be open and trusting. Effectiveness depends upon mutual influence between patient and practitioner, student and learner. This is another way in which clinical knowledge is dialogical and socially distributed. The following articulation of practical reasoning in nursing illustrates the social, dialogical nature of clinical reasoning and addresses the centrality of perception and understanding to good clinical reasoning, judgment and intervention.

Clinical Grasp *

Clinical grasp describes clinical inquiry in action. Clinical grasp begins with perception and includes problem identification and clinical judgment across time about the particular transitions of particular patients. Garrett Chan 20 described the clinician’s attempt at finding an “optimal grasp” or vantage point of understanding. Four aspects of clinical grasp, which are described in the following paragraphs, include (1) making qualitative distinctions, (2) engaging in detective work, (3) recognizing changing relevance, and (4) developing clinical knowledge in specific patient populations.

Making Qualitative Distinctions

Qualitative distinctions refer to those distinctions that can be made only in a particular contextual or historical situation. The context and sequence of events are essential for making qualitative distinctions; therefore, the clinician must pay attention to transitions in the situation and judgment. Many qualitative distinctions can be made only by observing differences through touch, sound, or sight, such as the qualities of a wound, skin turgor, color, capillary refill, or the engagement and energy level of the patient. Another example is assessing whether the patient was more fatigued after ambulating to the bathroom or from lack of sleep. Likewise the quality of the clinician’s touch is distinct as in offering reassurance, putting pressure on a bleeding wound, and so on. 110

Engaging in Detective Work, Modus Operandi Thinking, and Clinical Puzzle Solving

Clinical situations are open ended and underdetermined. Modus operandi thinking keeps track of the particular patient, the way the illness unfolds, the meanings of the patient’s responses as they have occurred in the particular time sequence. Modus operandi thinking requires keeping track of what has been tried and what has or has not worked with the patient. In this kind of reasoning-in-transition, gains and losses of understanding are noticed and adjustments in the problem approach are made.

We found that teachers in a medical surgical unit at the University of Washington deliberately teach their students to engage in “detective work.” Students are given the daily clinical assignment of “sleuthing” for undetected drug incompatibilities, questionable drug dosages, and unnoticed signs and symptoms. For example, one student noted that an unusual dosage of a heart medication was being given to a patient who did not have heart disease. The student first asked her teacher about the unusually high dosage. The teacher, in turn, asked the student whether she had asked the nurse or the patient about the dosage. Upon the student’s questioning, the nurse did not know why the patient was receiving the high dosage and assumed the drug was for heart disease. The patient’s staff nurse had not questioned the order. When the student asked the patient, the student found that the medication was being given for tremors and that the patient and the doctor had titrated the dosage for control of the tremors. This deliberate approach to teaching detective work, or modus operandi thinking, has characteristics of “critical reflection,” but stays situated and engaged, ferreting out the immediate history and unfolding of events.

Recognizing Changing Clinical Relevance

The meanings of signs and symptoms are changed by sequencing and history. The patient’s mental status, color, or pain level may continue to deteriorate or get better. The direction, implication, and consequences for the changes alter the relevance of the particular facts in the situation. The changing relevance entailed in a patient transitioning from primarily curative care to primarily palliative care is a dramatic example, where symptoms literally take on new meanings and require new treatments.

Developing Clinical Knowledge in Specific Patient Populations

Extensive experience with a specific patient population or patients with particular injuries or diseases allows the clinician to develop comparisons, distinctions, and nuanced differences within the population. The comparisons between many specific patients create a matrix of comparisons for clinicians, as well as a tacit, background set of expectations that create population- and patient-specific detective work if a patient does not meet the usual, predictable transitions in recovery. What is in the background and foreground of the clinician’s attention shifts as predictable changes in the patient’s condition occurs, such as is seen in recovering from heart surgery or progressing through the predictable stages of labor and delivery. Over time, the clinician develops a deep background understanding that allows for expert diagnostic and interventions skills.

Clinical Forethought

Clinical forethought is intertwined with clinical grasp, but it is much more deliberate and even routinized than clinical grasp. Clinical forethought is a pervasive habit of thought and action in nursing practice, and also in medicine, as clinicians think about disease and recovery trajectories and the implications of these changes for treatment. Clinical forethought plays a role in clinical grasp because it structures the practical logic of clinicians. At least four habits of thought and action are evident in what we are calling clinical forethought: (1) future think, (2) clinical forethought about specific patient populations, (3) anticipation of risks for particular patients, and (4) seeing the unexpected.

Future think

Future think is the broadest category of this logic of practice. Anticipating likely immediate futures helps the clinician make good plans and decisions about preparing the environment so that responding rapidly to changes in the patient is possible. Without a sense of salience about anticipated signs and symptoms and preparing the environment, essential clinical judgments and timely interventions would be impossible in the typically fast pace of acute and intensive patient care. Future think governs the style and content of the nurse’s attentiveness to the patient. Whether in a fast-paced care environment or a slower-paced rehabilitation setting, thinking and acting with anticipated futures guide clinical thinking and judgment. Future think captures the way judgment is suspended in a predictive net of anticipation and preparing oneself and the environment for a range of potential events.

Clinical forethought about specific diagnoses and injuries

This habit of thought and action is so second nature to the experienced nurse that the new or inexperienced nurse may have difficulty finding out about what seems to other colleagues as “obvious” preparation for particular patients and situations. Clinical forethought involves much local specific knowledge about who is a good resource and how to marshal support services and equipment for particular patients.

Examples of preparing for specific patient populations are pervasive, such as anticipating the need for a pacemaker during surgery and having the equipment assembled ready for use to save essential time. Another example includes forecasting an accident victim’s potential injuries, and recognizing that intubation might be needed.

Anticipation of crises, risks, and vulnerabilities for particular patients

This aspect of clinical forethought is central to knowing the particular patient, family, or community. Nurses situate the patient’s problems almost like a topography of possibilities. This vital clinical knowledge needs to be communicated to other caregivers and across care borders. Clinical teaching could be improved by enriching curricula with narrative examples from actual practice, and by helping students recognize commonly occurring clinical situations in the simulation and clinical setting. For example, if a patient is hemodynamically unstable, then managing life-sustaining physiologic functions will be a main orienting goal. If the patient is agitated and uncomfortable, then attending to comfort needs in relation to hemodynamics will be a priority. Providing comfort measures turns out to be a central background practice for making clinical judgments and contains within it much judgment and experiential learning.

When clinical teaching is too removed from typical contingencies and strong clinical situations in practice, students will lack practice in active thinking-in-action in ambiguous clinical situations. In the following example, an anonymous student recounted her experiences of meeting a patient:

I was used to different equipment and didn’t know how things went, didn’t know their routine, really. You can explain all you want in class, this is how it’s going to be, but when you get there … . Kim was my first instructor and my patient that she assigned me to—I walked into the room and he had every tube imaginable. And so I was a little overwhelmed. It’s not necessarily even that he was that critical … . She asked what tubes here have you seen? Well, I know peripheral lines. You taught me PICC [peripherally inserted central catheter] lines, and we just had that, but I don’t really feel comfortable doing it by myself, without you watching to make sure that I’m flushing it right and how to assess it. He had a chest tube and I had seen chest tubes, but never really knew the depth of what you had to assess and how you make sure that it’s all kosher and whatever. So she went through the chest tube and explained, it’s just bubbling a little bit and that’s okay. The site, check the site. The site looked okay and that she’d say if it wasn’t okay, this is what it might look like … . He had a feeding tube. I had done feeding tubes but that was like a long time ago in my LPN experiences schooling. So I hadn’t really done too much with the feeding stuff either … . He had a [nasogastric] tube, and knew pretty much about that and I think at the time it was clamped. So there were no issues with the suction or whatever. He had a Foley catheter. He had a feeding tube, a chest tube. I can’t even remember but there were a lot.

As noted earlier, a central characteristic of a practice discipline is that a self-improving practice requires ongoing experiential learning. One way nurse educators can enhance clinical inquiry is by increasing pedagogies of experiential learning. Current pedagogies for experiential learning in nursing include extensive preclinical study, care planning, and shared postclinical debriefings where students share their experiential learning with their classmates. Experiential learning requires open learning climates where students can discuss and examine transitions in understanding, including their false starts, or their misconceptions in actual clinical situations. Nursing educators typically develop open and interactive clinical learning communities, so that students seem committed to helping their classmates learn from their experiences that may have been difficult or even unsafe. One anonymous nurse educator described how students extend their experiential learning to their classmates during a postclinical conference:

So for example, the patient had difficulty breathing and the student wanted to give the meds instead of addressing the difficulty of breathing. Well, while we were sharing information about their patients, what they did that day, I didn’t tell the student to say this, but she said, ‘I just want to tell you what I did today in clinical so you don’t do the same thing, and here’s what happened.’ Everybody’s listening very attentively and they were asking her some questions. But she shared that. She didn’t have to. I didn’t tell her, you must share that in postconference or anything like that, but she just went ahead and shared that, I guess, to reinforce what she had learned that day but also to benefit her fellow students in case that thing comes up with them.

The teacher’s response to this student’s honesty and generosity exemplifies her own approach to developing an open community of learning. Focusing only on performance and on “being correct” prevents learning from breakdown or error and can dampen students’ curiosity and courage to learn experientially.

Seeing the unexpected

One of the keys to becoming an expert practitioner lies in how the person holds past experiential learning and background habitual skills and practices. This is a skill of foregrounding attention accurately and effectively in response to the nature of situational demands. Bourdieu 29 calls the recognition of the situation central to practical reasoning. If nothing is routinized as a habitual response pattern, then practitioners will not function effectively in emergencies. Unexpected occurrences may be overlooked. However, if expectations are held rigidly, then subtle changes from the usual will be missed, and habitual, rote responses will inappropriately rule. The clinician must be flexible in shifting between what is in background and foreground. This is accomplished by staying curious and open. The clinical “certainty” associated with perceptual grasp is distinct from the kind of “certainty” achievable in scientific experiments and through measurements. Recognition of similar or paradigmatic clinical situations is similar to “face recognition” or recognition of “family resemblances.” This concept is subject to faulty memory, false associative memories, and mistaken identities; therefore, such perceptual grasp is the beginning of curiosity and inquiry and not the end. Assessment and validation are required. In rapidly moving clinical situations, perceptual grasp is the starting point for clarification, confirmation, and action. Having the clinician say out loud how he or she is understanding the situation gives an opportunity for confirmation and disconfirmation from other clinicians present. 111 The relationship between foreground and background of attention needs to be fluid, so that missed expectations allow the nurse to see the unexpected. For example, when the background rhythm of a cardiac monitor changes, the nurse notices, and what had been background tacit awareness becomes the foreground of attention. A hallmark of expertise is the ability to notice the unexpected. 20 Background expectations of usual patient trajectories form with experience. Tacit expectations for patient trajectories form that enable the nurse to notice subtle failed expectations and pay attention to early signs of unexpected changes in the patient's condition. Clinical expectations gained from caring for similar patient populations form a tacit clinical forethought that enable the experienced clinician to notice missed expectations. Alterations from implicit or explicit expectations set the stage for experiential learning, depending on the openness of the learner.

Learning to provide safe and quality health care requires technical expertise, the ability to think critically, experience, and clinical judgment. The high-performance expectation of nurses is dependent upon the nurses’ continual learning, professional accountability, independent and interdependent decisionmaking, and creative problem-solving abilities.

This section of the paper was condensed and paraphrased from Benner, Hooper-Kyriakidis, and Stannard. 23 Patricia Hooper-Kyriakidis wrote the section on clinical grasp, and Patricia Benner wrote the section on clinical forethought.

• Cite this Page Benner P, Hughes RG, Sutphen M. Clinical Reasoning, Decisionmaking, and Action: Thinking Critically and Clinically. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Apr. Chapter 6.
• PDF version of this page (147K)

In this Page

• Clinical Grasp

Other titles in this collection

• Advances in Patient Safety

Related information

• PMC PubMed Central citations
• PubMed Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

• Nurses' reasoning process during care planning taking pressure ulcer prevention as an example. A think-aloud study. [Int J Nurs Stud. 2007] Nurses' reasoning process during care planning taking pressure ulcer prevention as an example. A think-aloud study. Funkesson KH, Anbäcken EM, Ek AC. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep; 44(7):1109-19. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
• Registered nurses' clinical reasoning skills and reasoning process: A think-aloud study. [Nurse Educ Today. 2016] Registered nurses' clinical reasoning skills and reasoning process: A think-aloud study. Lee J, Lee YJ, Bae J, Seo M. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Nov; 46:75-80. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
• Combining the arts: an applied critical thinking approach in the skills laboratory. [Nursingconnections. 2000] Combining the arts: an applied critical thinking approach in the skills laboratory. Peterson MJ, Bechtel GA. Nursingconnections. 2000 Summer; 13(2):43-9.
• Review About critical thinking. [Dynamics. 2004] Review About critical thinking. Hynes P, Bennett J. Dynamics. 2004 Fall; 15(3):26-9.
• Review The 'five rights' of clinical reasoning: an educational model to enhance nursing students' ability to identify and manage clinically 'at risk' patients. [Nurse Educ Today. 2010] Review The 'five rights' of clinical reasoning: an educational model to enhance nursing students' ability to identify and manage clinically 'at risk' patients. Levett-Jones T, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, Jeong SY, Noble D, Norton CA, Roche J, Hickey N. Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Aug; 30(6):515-20. Epub 2009 Nov 30.

Recent Activity

• Clinical Reasoning, Decisionmaking, and Action: Thinking Critically and Clinical... Clinical Reasoning, Decisionmaking, and Action: Thinking Critically and Clinically - Patient Safety and Quality

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Connect with NLM

National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894

Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure

Help Accessibility Careers